Migrants attack Border Patrol agents

•November 6, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Illegal migrants wave Venezuelan flag after crossing US southern border, attack Border Patrol agents

Yahoo News by Adam Shaw, Bill Melugin ~ November 2, 2022

A massive group of illegal migrants Monday crossed into the US waving a large Venezuelan flag and, according to Customs and Border Protection (CBP), attacked Border Patrol agents before being pushed back into the river as agents used crowd-control measures.

Illegal migrants, after crossing US southern border, wave Venezuelan flag

The incident, partially caught on video, saw a group of Venezuelan migrants crossing illegally into El Paso, Texas, as they waved the enormous flag. Agents can be seen pushing migrants back into the river while firing pepper balls near them to control the crowd.

In a statement, CBP said a group of Venezuelans had attempted to illegally enter the US while protesting along the Rio Grande’s international boundary.

The agency said one of the protesters assaulted an agent with a flagpole while another threw a rock at agents, injuring one in the process. That in turn led Border Patrol to initiate crowd-control measures.

“These measures included the use of the authorized less-lethal force pepperball launching system,” the statement said. “The crowd then dispersed and returned to Mexico.”

The agency said that its Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) will review the incident.

The chaotic incident comes as the migrant crisis, which has roiled the southern border since early 2021, continues to see streams of large groups of migrants cross into the US illegally. On Tuesday morning, a group of 300 mostly single adults crossed illegally into Normandy, Texas.

Illegal migrants wave Venezuelan flag after crossing US southern border

In just the Del Rio Sector alone, Border Patrol reports more than 50 large groups of more than 100 migrants since the beginning of October.

Republicans have laid the blame for the crisis at the feet of the Biden administration, saying that its policies of rolling back Trump-era border security and enforcement have only served to draw more migrants to the southern border – with many of them being released into the US.

Republican governors have caused outrage from Democratic states by bussing and even flying them to liberal “sanctuary” jurisdictions like New York City, Washington, DC, Chicago, and Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts. The governors say it has been done to relieve overwhelmed border communities and to bring the crisis home to those areas that describe themselves as welcoming to illegal immigrants.

The Biden administration has taken an approach that has sought to target “root causes” of the crisis, like poverty and violence in Central America. It has also emphasized the importance of cooperation with Western Hemisphere countries and recently announced a new cooperative operation with Mexico that sees more resources and checkpoints set up.

Controversially, it has also expanded Title 42 expulsions to include Venezuelan nationals, who were previously predominantly being released into the US. Now, they are being sent back to Mexico, which is bussing them deeper into the Mexican interior and giving migrants 15 days to get a visa or leave the country.

There were more than 227,000 migrant encounters in September, taking the total number for fiscal year 2022 to more than 2.3 million – a new record high. The administration says it has seen a decrease in the number of Venezuelan crossings in the immediate weeks after the new enforcement operation was put into place.

Meanwhile, Texas authorities have been involved in a number of car chases involving smugglers and illegal immigrants. In Kinney County, the local sheriff’s department pulled over a speeding vehicle with paper plates, finding eight illegal migrants being smuggled inside.

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

“And they shall come against thee with chariots, wagons, and wheels, and with an assembly of people, who shall set against thee buckler and shield and helmet round about; and I will set judgement before them, and they shall judge thee according to their judgements.

“And I will set My jealousy against thee, and they shall deal furiously with thee. They shall take away thy nose and thine ears, and thy remnant shall fall by the sword. They shall take thy sons and thy daughters, and thy residue shall be devoured by the fire” Ezekiel 23:24-25

Kyiv Without Power & Water

•November 5, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Much Of Ukrainian Capital Without Power & Water After New Russian Airstrikes; which must be a response to Ukraine’s “massive” drone attack on the Black Sea Fleet in the Crimean port city of Sevastopol days earlier, damaging three warships.

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ November 1, 2022

Much of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv is without electricity or water, after the latest round of major Russian airstrikes on Monday. The Russian military announced ‘successful’ strikes on multiple of the country’s vital infrastructure facilities. 

“The Russian Armed Forces continued to launch strikes with high-precision long-range air and sea-based weapons against Ukrainian military and energy facilities,” the Defense Ministry said. “The goals of the strikes were successful. All assigned objects were hit.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal confirmed direct hits on 18 sites – most of which were connected to the nation’s energy supply. These ramped up attacks have created a growing sense of panic with temperatures plunging and winter approaching.

Back to the Stone Age, much of Kyiv Without Power and Water

“Missiles and drones hit 10 regions, where 18 sites were damaged, most of them energy-related,” Shmyhal stated on Telegram. “Hundreds of settlements in seven regions of Ukraine were cut off.” Facilities in Cherkasy and Kirovohrad also came under attack. Ukraine’s military said it intercepted projectiles over the Lviv region, which spared this western part of the country from damage.

The Washington Post noted there are “power outages continuing in the Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv regions,” and others. The Post listed some of the below regions impacted by large-scale power outages and water supply disruptions

  • Kyiv region: Russian strikesdamaged buildings, and rescuers are searching for victims, the regional police said. Attacks left 80 percent of the capital without water and are likely to cause sustained power outages, Mayor Vitali Klitschko said.
  • Kharkiv: Two strikes hit critical infrastructure facilities in the eastern city, causing problems with the water supply and affecting the public transit network, the mayor said.
  • Zaporizhzhia region: An infrastructure facility was struck by rockets, the local governor said, prompting warnings from officials in the southern region that energy supplies there could also be affected.
  • Cherkasy region: Some of the region lost power after air attacks on infrastructure facilities, the military administrator said.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba condemned the attacks as more war crimes: “Another batch of Russian missiles hits Ukraine’s critical infrastructure. Instead of fighting on the battlefield, Russia fights civilians,” he tweeted.

Ukrainian firefighters attend to the site of a missile strike in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, on October 6

Additionally Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko announced on Telegram that these fresh strikes left 80% of residents in the capital without water and some 350,000 homes with no electricity

“Just in case, we ask you to stock up on water from the nearest pumps and points of sale,” he advised. The mayor’s office vowed that water supply to the effected parts of the city would be restored in three to four hours, with emergency utility crews working urgently on it.

Rescue teams in the capital are reportedly searching for possible casualties under the rubble of buildings destroyed or damaged from the new salvo of Russian strikes; however, at this point casualty numbers are unclear. 

“And they shall come against thee with chariots, wagons, and wheels, and with an assembly of people, who shall set against thee buckler and shield and helmet round about; and I will set judgement before them, and they shall judge thee according to their judgements.

“And I will set My jealousy against thee, and they shall deal furiously with thee. They shall take away thy nose and thine ears, and thy remnant shall fall by the sword. They shall take thy sons and thy daughters, and thy residue shall be devoured by the fire.” Ezekiel 23:24-25

“Let’s Get Out of NATO!”

•November 4, 2022 • Leave a Comment

“Let’s get out of NATO!”.. HUGE protests all over Europe

“Let’s Get Out Of NATO”: Discontent Soars Across Europe As Russian Sanctions Backfire

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ October 31, 2022

Western sanctions against Russia have been considered a powerful foreign policy tool by the US and the EU to paralyze Moscow back to the ‘stone age.’ Though sanctions against Moscow have entirely backfired, sparking the worst cost-of-living crisis for Europeans in a generation.

In early September, we first noticed a wave of discontent sweeping across Europe as tens of thousands of people took to the city streets to protest soaring electricity bills and the worst inflation in decades. Some countries delivered relief packages to citizens to tame the anger, while other countries did not have the financial capacity to hand out checks.

Tens of thousands of people have marched across metro areas in France, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Germany — many of them are fed up with sanctions on Russia that have sparked economic ruins for many households and businesses — but also very surprising, support for NATO’s involvement in Ukraine is waning.

There has been increasing awareness and dissent among Europeans about their countries’ leaders prioritizing NATO’s ambitions in Ukraine over their own citizens. The prioritization has been in the form of sanctions against Moscow, sparking energy hyperinflation and supplying weapons to Ukraine, which has made Moscow displeased with any country that does so. Some Europeans are now demanding NATO negotiate with Moscow to end the war so that economic turmoil can abate. 

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

Ezekiel (Ch 21-22)

•November 3, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Earlier, we have established that although Ezekiel has his face set toward Jerusalem, this prophecy is meant for the house of Israel at the endtime “for many years to come” (Ezekiel 12:27). Here, he is re-emphasizing the “Sword.”

In fact, the word “Sword” being repeated over and over again, occurs fourteen times in this chapter alone, doubled and thriced for its significance. And remember, this prophecy is meant for the house of Israel which is primarily the United States of America, the United Kingdom and France and secondarily their European allies. . .

For a more detailed Study of Ezekiel 20:45 to 21:5 about this serious subject, see A Sword from the South! click here

Not many, but some are now seeing such land lost as being occupied!

Ezekiel 21

1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — here is an explanation of the riddle of the last chapter. It is declared that the word of the Lord was a “prophesy against the land of Israel” and the whole land, that all might know it was his decree against a wicked and rebellious people. 

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel; — “against the land of Israel” ~ the sword glitters to the terror of those against whom it is drawn; that is, this message for the house of Israel is meant for the United States and its European allies.

— many believe Russia and China are the main threat of the United States; but no, American threat comes from the South! And for Western Europe, the threat comes from the south of Europe; that is, North and Central Africa, and perhaps even the Indian sub-continent;

— some interprete “set thy face toward Jerusalem” to mean a prophecy against Judah by the then Nebuchadnezzar; but this is working backward, since the kingdom of Judah had already fallen, and Ezekiel himself were among its captives by the river Chebar (Ezekiel 1:1), and, second, this Ezekiel warning were never given to the houe of Judah during that fall by Babylon; and, thirdly, this warning message was mainly to the northern house of Israel at the endtime;

For more about the South, a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked. — and will draw forth my Sword out of his sheath; a similar situation occurred earlier to ancient Judah when the Chaldean army rushed out of Babylon into Judea and made the inhabitants captives;

— but the Chaldean was from the North toward the South (Ezekiel 1:4), but this is different and something new; this is from the South toward the North (Ezekiel 20:47, 21:4!) Poor thing, among the wicked the righteous will also be “cut off” ~ there is no place of safety that many among the endtime pretentious are hoping for.

4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the south to the north, — his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North; oh, okay, this might give us a clue what “set your face toward the South” and “kindle a fire in thee. . . from the South” are meant at the end of the preceding chapter.

— this Sword will come from the South! This is serious! It’s not just unwanted immigrants, these are warriors, conquering warriors set to slaughter!! For those in Europe, they might come from the whole of Africa; and for the United States, they might come from the whole South, all the Latinos of South America! And “against all flesh;”

— (and flaming flame in chapter 20:47) but in this chapter a subtle change: “My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North.” ~ that is, all flesh will die! Okay I might be taken away and over the top, but then again, why so much emphasis of the Sword in this chapter?

— Jonathan renders: Spain (Rashi quoting the Targum: Sepharad shall inherit the cities of the Southland as Spain); the Targums identified Sepharad (Obadiah 1:20) with Spain, hence, Spanish Jews are called Sephardim; Zarephath and the exile of Jerusalem which is in Sepharad shall inherit the cities of the southland.

— Wikipedia: Sepharad (/sɛfəræd/or səˈfɛərəd/ Hebrew: סְפָרַד Sp̄āraḏ; also Sefarad, Sephared, Sfard) is the Hebrew name for Spain. A place called Sepharad, probably referring to Sardis in Lydia (‘Sfard’ in Lydian), in the Book of Obadiah (Obadiah 1:20, 6th century BC) of the Hebrew Bible. The name was later applied to Spain. From the Chabad Bible: “Zarephath . . . which is in Sepharad shall inherit the cities of the southland.”

5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’ — more about the Sword! it shall not return any more; that is, into its sheath, until it has done all its work; meaning that the invading army should not return to their own land until they had executed the whole will of God upon the endtime house of Israel; this is the fire that should not be quenched.

— one Report by McKinsey says of the 60 millions Latinos in US that had migrated from the South; they often live in ‘deserts’ where adequate housing, groceries are hard to find. “Nearly 9 in 10 of the Latino residents in such communities lived in five states: California, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Texas.”

McKinsey: Latinos are projected to make up 22.4 percent of the US labor force by 2030 and more than 30 percent by 2060 (Latinos population to 111.2 million by ’60); is this analysis wrong? Am I mistaken? Feel free to present your opinion; thanks.

6 Sigh therefore, thou son of man, with the breaking of thy loins [‘hearts’ in other versions], and with bitterness sigh before their eyes. — sigh, therefore, thou son of man, with the breaking of thy loins; as if thy loins were broke, and go as if they were, and sigh as thou goest;

— or as a woman in travail, having her hands upon her loins as ready to break, and in the utmost distress; or heave, and groan, and sigh, till the girdle of the loins is broke, and by these motions and gesture show the miserable state of this people, and how much thou art affected with it.

7 And it shall be, when they say unto thee, ‘Why sighest thou?’ that thou shalt answer, ‘For the tidings, because it cometh; and every heart shall melt, and all hands shall be feeble, and every spirit shall faint, and all knees shall be weak as water.’ Behold, it cometh, and shall be brought to pass, saith the Lord God.”

— ‘why sighest thou?’ . . . because it cometh” ~ the report of an invading army from the South, with a Sword approaching and besieging their land, the land of Israel, which Ezekiel had heard from the Lord;

— and the thing itself was just at hand, and would certainly be so bad; that was the issues that affected Ezekiel, and caused so much sorrow and sighing.

8 Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

9 “Son of man, prophesy and say, ‘Thus saith the Lord. Say: “‘A sword, a sword is sharpened and also furbished! — a Sword, a Sword, it is sharpened, and also furbished; it is sharpened that it may make a slaughter;

— it is furbished that it may be as lightning: the rod for the house of Israel; primarily the United States of America, the United Kingdom and France; and secondarily their European allies. And it is given to be furbished, that it may be handled: the Sword, it is sharpened, yea, it is furbished, to give it into the hand of the slayer from the South.

10 It is sharpened to make a sore slaughter; it is furbished that it may glitter. Should we then make mirth? It contemneth the rod of My son, as every tree.

11 “‘And he hath given it to be furbished, that it may be handled; this sword is sharpened, and it is furbished to give it into the hand of the slayer. — the Targum says, “he gave their vengeance to be delivered into the hand of the king of Babylon,” ~ and three times elsewhere God describes Nebuchadnezzar as “my servant.”

12 Cry and howl, son of man! For it shall be upon My people; it shall be upon all the princes of Israel. Terrors by reason of the sword shall be upon My people; smite therefore upon thy thigh.

— cry and wail, son of man; for it is upon my people; primarily the United States of America, the United Kingdom and France and secondarily their European allies, it is upon all the princes of Israel; that is, the royal families and nobles of Britain, Spain, Denmark, Belgium, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden: they are delivered over to the Sword with my people;

— smite therefore upon thy thigh; as one grieved in spirit, in great distress and anguish, or the sense of a terrible and irreparable evil happening, as experienced by Jeremiah:

Surely after I was turned, I repented; and after I was instructed, I smote upon my thigh. I was ashamed, yea, even confounded, because I bore the reproach of my youth.’ Jeremiah 31:19.

13 Because it is a trial, and what if the sword contemn even the rod? It shall be no more, saith the Lord God.’ — and what if the sword contemn even the rod? ~ here God foretels, that if the house of Israel should despise, or not accept the correction or punishment brought upon them by the trial, the house of Israel would be entirely broken, and be no more. This is serious stuff!

14 “Thou therefore, son of man, prophesy, and smite thine hands together; and let the sword be doubled the third time, the sword of the slain. It is the sword of the great men that are slain, which entereth into their secret chambers. — and smite thine hands together; the meaning of the clapping of the hands, smiting the hands together is an indication of violent grief; normally accompanied by the loud crying and wailing.

— “Let the sword be doubled the third time…” this shows the tremendous size and power of the Sword coming against the house of Israel; all hope of escape would certainly be gone.

— which entereth into their privy chambers; that is, their most protected palaces, underground bunkers and forts; where they should endeavour to hide themselves from it, but in vain, like Saddam Hussein, none shall escape; their privy hideouts and palaces could not secrete nor secure them.

15 I have set the point of the sword against all their gates, that their heart may faint and their ruins be multiplied. Ah! It is made bright; it is sharpened for the slaughter. — Gill: I have set the point of the sword against all their gates…. the word rendered “point” is nowhere else used, and is differently translated: by some the “fear” of the Sword; by others the “cry” of the Sword, or of those that are slain with it, as the Targum paraphrases it, “those that slay with the sword.”

— their ruins be multiplied; literally, their stumbling blocks be multiplied. The thought is that in the coming desolation trouble shall be on every side and in their perplexity occasions for ill-advised action shall arise all around.

16 Go thee one way or other, either on the right hand or on the left, whithersoever thy face is set. — Gather thyself up, O sword, to the right or to the left. Another rendering is: “Turn thee backwards! get thee to the right! Set thee forwards! Get thee to the left!”

17 I will also smite Mine hands together, and I will cause My fury to rest. I, the Lord, have said it.” — God will also smite his hands together in token of encouragement. He will animate and encourage the slayers to go on. God even said he needs to express His fury so he could find rest; the Targum says, “and even I will bring vengeance upon vengeance.”

18 The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying,

19 “Also, thou son of man, appoint thee two ways that the sword of the king of Babylon may come; both shall come forth out of one land. And choose thou a place; choose it at the head of the way to the city. — by the spirit of prophecy Ezekiel foresaw Nebuchadnezzar’s march from Babylon, and Ezekiel was asked to choose the two ways, by one or other of which the invading army must march from Babylon to Judea and Jerusalem;

— from MSG

God’s Message came to me: “Son of man, lay out two roads for the sword of the king of Babylon to take. Start them from the same place. Place a signpost at the beginning of each road. Post one sign to mark the road of the sword to Rabbah of the Ammonites. Post the other to mark the road to Judah and Fort Jerusalem. The Message Bible

20 Appoint a way, that the sword may come to Rabbah of the Ammonites and to Judah in Jerusalem, the fortified. — normally the Babylonians came from the North, but through Rabbah of the Ammonites would be from the East.

21 For the king of Babylon stood at the parting of the way, at the head of the two ways, to use divination: he made his arrows bright, he consulted with images, he looked at the liver. — he looked in the liver; it was the practice of the ancients to make an inspection of the entrails (especially the liver) of animals offered in sacrifice, to judge the success or failure of an undertaking.

22 At his right hand was the divination for Jerusalem: to appoint captains, to open the mouth in the slaughter, to lift up the voice with shouting, to appoint battering rams against the gates, to cast a siege mound, and to build a fort.

— from MSG

The king of Babylon stands at the fork in the road and he decides by divination which of the two roads to take. He draws straws, he throws god-dice, he examines a goat liver. He opens his right hand: The omen says, ‘Head for Jerusalem!’ So he’s on his way with battering rams, roused to kill, sounding the battle cry, pounding down city gates, building siege works. The Message Bible

23 And it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight, to them that have sworn oaths; but he will call to remembrance the iniquity, that they may be taken. — and it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight; that is, the Jews shall laugh at this divination as a vain thing;

— the Voice “Everyone in Jerusalem will believe the omen to be false because they had pledged loyalty to Babylon. But his actions will remind the doubters of their guilt, and they will be taken prisoners.”

24 “Therefore thus saith the Lord God: ‘Because ye have made your iniquity to be remembered, in that your transgressions are discovered, so that in all your doings your sins do appear; because, I say, that ye have come to remembrance, ye shall be taken with the hand. — ye shall be taken with the hand; as easily as a bird is, when in the snare. The Targum says, “ye shall be delivered into the hand of the king of Babylon.”

25 And thou, profane, wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come when iniquity shall have an end, — the details given in the above few verses were about ancient Judah and its invasion, but Ezekiel’s message is for the endtime;

— “wicked prince of Israel” ~ singular, that is, this wicked prince of Israel stands out above the general wickedness of all the other princes; so who will he be, we need to wait and see;

— such details are written in coded language and only God knows what all these messages are to play out; so we may have to observe how world events eventuates in the next couple of years; which means these comments will need to be updated every now and then. Be patient, we’ll get there.

26 thus saith the Lord God: “‘Remove the diadem and take off the crown; this shall not be the same. Exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high; — thus saith the Lord God, remove the diadem, and take off the crown; that is, from Zedekiah; and as these are the regalia and ensigns of royal dignity, taking them off signifies the deposition of someone as a king;

— “exalt him that is low” is to exalt the Zarah line from the Pharez line. For more details, see “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J.H. Allen

27 I will overturn, overturn, overturn it. And it shall be no more, until He come whose right it is; and I will give it to Him.’

— Jerusalem to Ireland, to Scotland and then finally to England; thus three overturns, until he come whose right it is; the right of the crown and final king of Israel as scepter holder; also the Messiah, being descended from a royalty of kings of the house of Judah, and of the seed of David.

28 “And thou, son of man, prophesy and say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God concerning the Ammonites and concerning their reproach; even say thou: “‘The sword, the sword is drawn; for the slaughter it is furbished to consume because of the glittering”

29 while they [the Ammonites] see vanity unto thee, while they divine a lie unto thee, to bring thee upon the necks of them that are slain, of the wicked whose day is come when their iniquity shall have an end. — the Ammonites also had false prophets among them;

— according to the Book of Nehemiah, Tobiah was an Ammonite official who attempted to hinder Nehemiah ‘s efforts to rebuild Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile, influenced and corrupted the Jewish high priest, Eliashib, and took over the storerooms of the Temple for his own use.

30 Shall I cause it to return into his sheath? I will judge thee in the place where thou wast created, in the land of thy nativity. — they should not be carried out of their own land, but would be destroyed in their own land.

31 And I will pour out Mine indignation upon thee; I will blow against thee in the fire of My wrath, and deliver thee into the hand of brutish men, and skillful to destroy. — the false prophets of the Ammonites made false prophecies of victory; they would never recover their power, but in time would be wholly forgotten.

32 Thou shalt be for fuel to the fire; thy blood shall be in the midst of the land. Thou shalt be no more remembered; for I the Lord have spoken it.’” — thy blood shall be in the midst of the land; such large numbers shall be slain everywhere, that the land shall flow with the blood of them; who shall lie unburied, and rot, and putrefy upon the ground:

— and thou shalt be remembered no more. This prophecy against Ammon and the Ammonites has no promise of restoration; and although they were not to be carried away captive as Judah, they were to perish in his own land; for the Lord have spoken it (more below).

~~~~

This prophecy against Ammon has no promise of restoration. Why? We might speculate why the Ammonites were singled out here for this special oracle; but it might have pertained to the share they had in the murder of Gedaliah, by the hand of Ishmael and the Ammonites gave these killers refuge;

Second, in historic time, when Nebuchadnezzar took his route to Jerusalem, and destroyed the city, returned to Babylon, he went about without making any attempt upon the Ammonites; which so flushed the Ammonites that they insulted the Jews and laughed at their destruction, as if their God whom they served could not save them;

And thirdly, Tobiah was an Ammonite, perhaps a governor, who along with Sanballat the Horonite and Geshem the Arabian, attempted to hinder Nehemiah’s efforts to rebuild Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile, and he influenced the Jewish high priest Eliashib, and took over the storerooms of the Temple for his own use.

And finally, the Ammonites are modern Jordan (or are they; or that a new group of people, the Jordanians, had replaced the ancient Ammonites) sitting on land allocated to three of the tribes of Israel, and they maybe taking their ancestral Promised land back, land that could even stretch to the Euphrates River.

Ezekiel 22

In Chapter 10, God’s four judgements — SWORD, war. FAMINE, occasioned by drought. PESTILENCE, epidemic diseases which sweep off a great part of the inhabitants of a land. And in this chapter it is BLOOD! Which is used 8 times.

1 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — as the Targum says, the word of prophecy from the Lord; that is, another prophecy:

2 “Now, thou son of man, wilt thou judge, wilt thou judge the bloody city? Yea, thou shalt show her all her abominations. — the bloody city?… or, “city of blood” or “cities of blood” so called on account of murders perpetrated in her as in the United States with so much gun violence today.

3 Then say thou, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: The city sheddeth blood in the midst of it, that her time may come, and maketh idols against herself to defile herself. — and maketh idols against herself, to defile herself; being guilty, not only of murder, but of idolatry; she was an idol maker and an idol worshipper; and which was against herself, as well as against God;

4 Thou art become guilty in thy blood that thou hast shed, and hast defiled thyself in thine idols which thou hast made; and thou hast caused thy days to draw near, and art come even unto thy years. Therefore have I made thee a reproach unto the nations and a mocking to all countries.

— “I have made thee a reproach among the nations …” ~ this is a prophecy of what will soon happen, as indicated in the future tense used in the next verse, “Those that are near, and those that are far from thee, shall mock thee.”

5 Those that are near and those that are far from thee shall mock thee, who art infamous and much vexed. — the “much vexed” refers to the internal confusion, commotions and social disorders which characterised the decaying state of the nation.

6 “‘Behold, the princes of Israel, every one was in thee to their power to shed blood. — behold, the princes of Israel; those that belonged to the royal family, the rich and nobles of the land, governors, city chiefs, members of Parliament of Congress of a nation.

7 In thee have they made light of father and mother. In the midst of thee have they dealt by oppression with the stranger. In thee have they vexed the fatherless and the widow. — father and mother; filial respect was one of the most frequently enjoined precepts of the law (see Leviticus 19:32Leviticus 20:9);

— in thee have they vexed the fatherless and the widow; that were weak and helpless, and had none to protect them, father and husband being dead; when, according to their first rank and station as princes, they ought to have been the defenders of them; but, instead of that, distressed, afflicted, and grieved them.

8 Thou hast despised Mine holy things and hast profaned My Sabbaths. — thou hast despised mine holy thing; the holy place, the temple, and the worship of it;

— holy persons, the priests that officiated there; holy sacrifices offered up by them; the holy word of God read and explained; and all holy ordinances there administered. These words are directed to Jerusalem, the holy city, and to the inhabitants of it, who ought to have been holy men;

— and hast profaned my sabbaths; by doing their own work, and neglecting the service of God; and which was an inlet, as it usually is, to all manner of sin.

9 In thee are men that carry tales to shed blood, and in thee they eat upon the mountains. In the midst of thee they commit lewdness [indecency or obscenity]. — men that carry tales; informers and trepanners, or persons that, corrupted with money, give in false witness against the innocent; and the princes of Israel (v6 above) had hands in it; spreading lies about WMD that Saddam Hussein had and going to war with Iraq;

— in the midst of thee they commit lewdness; a general word for all manner of uncleanness, as adultery, fornication, incest, etc.

10 In thee have they uncovered their fathers’ nakedness. In thee have they humbled her that was set apart for pollution. — the worst of heathens, there have been and are some that incestuously defile their fathers’ bed.

11 And one hath committed abomination with his neighbor’s wife, and another hath lewdly defiled his daughter-in-law, and another in thee hath humbled his sister, his father’s daughter. — horrible, shameless doings! the father-in-law committing incest with the wife’s daughter, and brothers defile their own sisters; all this against the light of nature, the law of civilized nations, and the law of God. 

12 In thee have they taken gifts to shed blood. Thou hast taken usury and increase, and thou hast greedily gained from thy neighbors by extortion, and hast forgotten Me, saith the Lord God.

— innocent blood, as the Targum says; judges upon the bench, whose office it is to take the part of the innocent, and clear him from unjust charges; and protect him from the violence of wicked and unreasonable men; that lay things to his charge, which, if true, would require blood;

— and yet men in such offices took bribes to bring in the innocent guilty, and pass sentence of death on him; which is a most shocking iniquity indeed: to take bribes in pecuniary matters is very wicked; but to do it in cases which affect life is most dreadfully cruel:

— or if it is to be understood of such persons who take bribes to bear false witness against a man, to the taking away of his life, it is a very heinous and detestable sin; for, as for a set of jurymen bribed to bring in a wrong verdict, which would be equally a most enormous crime.

13 “‘Behold, therefore I have smitten Mine hand at thy dishonest gain which thou hast made and at thy blood which hath been in the midst of thee. — behold, therefore, I have smitten mine hand at thy dishonest gain which thou hast made; as one amazed at it; or as filled with indignation against it; or as grieved and distressed at it; or else as rejoicing at the punishment going to be inflicted on them for it;

— so the Septuagint renders it, “I will bring my hand upon them;” and the Targum, “behold, I will bring my vengeance upon thee for the sins of mammon.”

14 Can thine heart endure or can thine hands be strong in the days that I shall deal with thee? I, the Lord, have spoken it, and will do it. — can thine hands be strong, to hold the sword, and manage against the warlike Nebuchadnezzar and his army?

— the Targum says, “I have decreed by my word, and I will establish it.”

15 And I will scatter thee among the nations and disperse thee in the countries, and will consume thy filthiness out of thee. — to be scattered and dispersed the house of Israel throughout various provinces of other nations, as chaff is by the winds.

16 And thou shalt take thine inheritance in thyself in the sight of the nations, and thou shalt know that I am the Lord.’” — take thine inheritance in thyself; formerly thou wast my inheritance; but now, full of guilt, thou art no longer my, but thine own inheritance to thyself; “in the sight of the heathen,”

— from MSG

“‘Now look! I’ve clapped my hands, calling everyone’s attention to your rapacious greed and your bloody brutalities. Can you stick with it? Will you be able to keep at this once I start dealing with you? “‘I, God, have spoken. I’ll put an end to this. I’ll throw you to the four winds. I’ll scatter you all over the world. I’ll put a full stop to your filthy living. You will be defiled, spattered with your own mud in the eyes of the nations. And you’ll recognize that I am God.’” The Message Bible

17 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — as the Targum says, the word of prophecy from the Lord;

18 “Son of man, the house of Israel has to Me become dross [something regarded as worthless; rubbish]. All they are brass and tin and iron and lead in the midst of the furnace; they are even the dross of silver.

— from MSG

God’s Message came to me: “Son of man, the people of Israel are slag to me, the useless byproduct of refined copper, tin, iron, and lead left at the smelter—a worthless slag heap. So tell them, ‘God, the Master, has spoken: Because you’ve all become worthless slag, you’re on notice: I’ll assemble you in Jerusalem. As men gather silver, copper, iron, lead, and tin into a furnace and blow fire on it to melt it down, so in my wrath I’ll gather you and melt you down. I’ll blow on you with the fire of my wrath to melt you down in the furnace. As silver is melted down, you’ll be melted down. That should get through to you. Then you’ll recognize that I, God, have let my wrath loose on you.’” The Message Bible

19 Therefore thus saith the Lord God: ‘Because ye have all become dross, behold, therefore I will gather you into the midst of Jerusalem. — indeed judgement appeared in 70 AD; “all become dross” in the hands of the Romans, but it was actually God gathering them for judgement.

20 As they gather silver and brass and iron and lead and tin into the midst of the furnace, to blow the fire upon it to melt it, so will I gather you in Mine anger and in My fury, and I will leave you there and melt you. — several metals of the baser sort are here mentioned, by a gradation from the better to the worse; tin being not so good as brass, and iron of less value than either, and “I will leave you there and melt you”

— (a) the Essenses, who formulated their own calendar, but God is a jealous Being; and they melted away;

— (b) the Sadducees (who observed a Passover and Pentecost similar to the Samaritan’s) where both defiled the tenets from the Sanhedrin and were wiped out by the Sword and by Fire!

21 Yea, I will gather you and blow upon you in the fire of My wrath, and ye shall be melted in the midst thereof. — and I will leave you there, and melt you; that is, I will leave you to the sword, famine, and pestilence, to be destroyed by them;

— or with fire at the burning of the city: or, “I will rest” as the refiner does; having put his metal into the furnace, and blown the fire, sits still till all is melted.

22 As silver is melted in the midst of the furnace, so shall ye be melted in the midst thereof; and ye shall know that I, the Lord, have poured out My fury upon you.’”

— today more than 98.5 percent of Christians are honoring the SUN by observing SUNday. They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east,” Ezekiel 8:16 (more at the end).

23 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, —

24 “Son of man, say unto her: ‘Thou art the land that is not cleansed nor rained upon in the day of indignation.’

25 There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey. They have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious things; they have made her many widows in the midst thereof.

26 Her priests have violated My law and have profaned Mine holy things. They have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shown difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from My Sabbaths, and I am profaned among them. — and Judah’s 70 years in captivity was because of a neglect of the land Sabbath!

19 And they burned the house of God, and broke down the wall of Jerusalem, and burned all the palaces thereof with fire and destroyed all the goodly vessels thereof.
20 And those who had escaped from the sword carried he away to Babylon where they were servants to him and his sons until the reign of the kingdom of Persia,
21 to fulfill the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed her Sabbaths; for as long as she lay desolate she kept Sabbath, to fulfill threescore and ten years. II Chronicles 36:19-21

27 Her princes in the midst thereof are like wolves ravening the prey, to shed blood and to destroy souls, to get dishonest gain. — the princes in the midst of Israel; those that belonged to the royal family, the rich and nobles of the land, governors, city chiefs, members of Parliament of Congress of a nation.

28 And her prophets have daubed them with untempered mortar, seeing vanity and divining lies unto them, saying, ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ when the Lord hath not spoken. — saying, thus saith the Lord God, when the Lord hath not spoken; herein mimicking the true prophets, who came in the name of the Lord,

— and usually prefaced their prophecies with a thus saith the Lord; and so did these false prophets, when the Lord said nothing to them, and gave them no commission to speak in his name, or say the things they did.

29 The people of the land have used oppression and exercised robbery, and have vexed the poor and needy; yea, they have oppressed the stranger wrongfully.

— from MSG

Your politicians are like wolves prowling and killing and rapaciously taking whatever they want. Your preachers cover up for the politicians by pretending to have received visions and special revelations. They say, “This is what God says . . .” when God hasn’t said so much as one word. Extortion is rife, robbery is epidemic, the poor and needy are abused, outsiders are kicked around at will, with no access to justice.’ The Message Bible

30 And I sought for a man among them that should make up the hedge and stand in the gap before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it; but I found none. — but I found none; no reformer of them, no repairer of the breach, nor restorer of paths, to dwell in; no intercessor for them, as Abraham for Sodom, Moses for Israel; or any, like Aaron, that stood between the living and the dead to stay the plague.

31 Therefore have I poured out Mine indignation upon them; I have consumed them with the fire of My wrath. Their own way have I recompensed upon their heads, saith the Lord God.” — I have consumed them with the fire of my wrath; by the sword, famine, pestilence, and captivity.

For a more detailed Study (chapter 20:45 to chapter 21:5) about this subject A Sword from the South! click here

~~~~

Today more than 98.5 percent of Christians are honoring the SUN by observing SUNday. They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east,” Ezekiel 8:16.

Others, following the SUN-worshipping Samaritans, the Church of God Communities are showing their contempt for God by having their “wavesheaf offering” and Pentecost on a SUNday. Always on SUNdays. And these are supposedly in God’s sanctuary, but God says He is a jealous God, so these pretentious Christians could be spewed out of His mouth! No? Regardless, there are those being described in Revelation 3:17 — wretched, miserable, poor, blind and naked. “As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: or else I will spew thee out of My mouth (v16,19).”

Despite the above, there’ll be a remnant that are spared: “Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and who cry because of all the abominations that are done in the midst thereof,” Ezekiel 9:4. These remnants “who sigh and who cry” will be marked with a letter ת in ink on the forehead.

Washington’s Plan to Break Up Russia

•November 2, 2022 • 1 Comment

Washington’s Plan to Break Up Russia

Q: if the United States has a plan to break up Russia, what and how is her plan to break up China?!!

Washington’s Plan to Break Up Russia into seven new nations

Unz Review by Mike Whitney ~ October 27, 2022

“The Western goal is to weaken, divide and ultimately destroy our nation. They are openly stating that, since they managed to break up the Soviet Union in 1991, now it’s time to split Russia into many separate regions that will be at each other’s throats.” Russian President Vladimir Putin

“Cheney ‘wanted to see the dismantlement not only of the Soviet Union and the Russian empire but of Russia itself, so it could never again be a threat to the rest of the world.’...The West must complete the project that began in 1991 …. Until Moscow’s empire is toppled, though, the region—and the world—will not be safe…” (“Decolonize Russia” The Atlantic)

Washington’s animus towards Russia has a long history dating back to 1918 when Woodrow Wilson deployed over 7,000 troops to Siberia as part of an Allied effort to roll back the gains of the Bolshevik Revolution. The activities of the American Expeditionary Force, which remained in the country for 18 months, have long vanished from history books in the US, but Russians still point to the incident as yet another example of America’s relentless intervention in the affairs of its neighbors.

The fact is, Washington elites have always meddled in Russia’s business despite Moscow’s strong objections. In fact, a great number western elites not only think that Russia should be split-up into smaller geographical units, but that the Russian people should welcome such an outcome. 

Western leaders in the Anglosphere are so consumed by hubris and their own blinkered sense of entitlement, they honestly believe that ordinary Russians would like to see their country splintered into bite-sized statelets that remain open to the voracious exploitation of the western oil giants, mining corporations and, of course, the Pentagon. Here’s how Washington’s geopolitical mastermind Zbigniew Brzezinski summed it up an article in Foreign Affairs:

“Given (Russia’s) size and diversity, a decentralized political system and free-market economics would be most likely to unleash the creative potential of the Russian people and Russia’s vast natural resources. A loosely confederated Russia — composed of a European Russia, a Siberian Republic, and a Far Eastern Republic — would also find it easier to cultivate closer economic relations with its neighbors. Each of the confederated entitles would be able to tap its local creative potential, stifled for centuries by Moscow’s heavy bureaucratic hand. In turn, a decentralized Russia would be less susceptible to imperial mobilization.” (Zbigniew Brzezinski, “A Geostrategy for Eurasia” Foreign Affairs, 1997)

The “loosely confederated Russia” that Brzezinski imagines, would be a toothless, dependent nation that could not defend its own borders or sovereignty. It would not be able to prevent more powerful countries from invading, occupying and establishing military bases on its soil. Nor would it be able to unify its disparate people beneath a single banner or pursue a positive “unified” vision for the future of the country. 

A confederal Russia –fragmented into a myriad of smaller parts– would allow the US to maintain its dominant role in the region without threat of challenge or interference. And that appears to be Brzezinski’s real goal as he pointed out in this passage in his magnum opus The Grand Chessboard. Here’s what he said:

“For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia…and America’s global primacy is directly dependent on how long and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is sustained.” (“THE GRAND CHESSBOARD – American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives” Zbigniew Brzezinski, page 30, Basic Books, 1997)

Brzezinski sums up US imperial ambitions succinctly. Washington plans to establish its primacy in the world’s most prosperous and populous region, Eurasia. And–in order to do so– Russia must be decimated and partitioned, its leaders must be toppled and replaced, and its vast resources must be transferred to the iron grip of global transnationals who will use them to perpetuate the flow of wealth from east to west. In other words, Moscow must accept its humble role in the new order as America’s de-facto Gas and Mining Company.

Washington has never really veered from its aim of obliterating the Russian state, in fact, the recently released National Security Strategy (NSS) along with a congressional report titled “Renewed Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress”, confirm much of what we have said here, that the US plans to crush any emerging opposition to its expansion into Central Asia in order to become the dominant player in that region. Here’s an excerpt from the congressional report:

The US goal of preventing the emergence of regional hegemons in Eurasia, though long-standing, is not written in stone—it is a policy choice reflecting two judgments: (1) that given the amount of people, resources, and economic activity in Eurasia, a regional hegemon in Eurasia would represent a concentration of power large enough to be able to threaten vital US interests; and (2) that Eurasia is not dependably self-regulating in terms of preventing the emergence of regional hegemons, meaning that the countries of Eurasia cannot be counted on to be able to prevent, though their own actions, the emergence of regional hegemons, and may need assistance from one or more countries outside Eurasia to be able to do this dependably.” (“Renewed Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress” US Congress)

How different is this new iteration of official US foreign policy than the so-called Wolfowitz Doctrine that was delivered prior to the War in Iraq. Here it is:

“Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.”

As you can see, there has been no meaningful change in the policy since Wolfowitz articulated his doctrine nearly 2 decades ago. The US foreign policy establishment still resolutely asserts Washington’s right to dominate Central Asia and to regard any competitor in the region as national security threat. 

This is further underscored by the fact that both Russia and China have been identified in the latest National Security Strategy as “strategic competitors” which is a deep-state euphemism for mortal enemies. Check out this excerpt from an article titled “Partitioning Russia After World War III?”:

The end goal of the US and NATO is to divide and pacify the world’s biggest country, the Russian Federation, and to even establish a blanket of perpetual disorder (somalization) over its vast territory or, at a minimum, over a portion of Russia and the post-Soviet space…

The ultimate goal of the US is to prevent any alternatives from emerging in Europe and Eurasia to Euro-Atlantic integration. This is why the destruction of Russia is one of its strategic objectives….

Redrawing Eurasia: Washington’s Maps of a Divided Russia

With the division of the Russian Federation, (the) article claims that any bipolar rivalry between Moscow and Washington would end after World War III. In a stark contradiction, it claims that only when Russia is destroyed will there be a genuine multipolar world, but also implies that the US will be the most dominant global power even though Washington and the European Union will be weakened from the anticipated major war with the Russians.” (“Partitioning Russia after World War 3”, Global Research)

Q: if Washington has a plan to break up Russia, now we can understand why she also wants to break up China!

Washington’s relations with Russia have always been contentious but that has more to do with Washington’s geostrategic ambitions than any disruptive behavior on Moscow’s part. Russia’s only crime is that happens to occupy real estate in a part of the world the US wants to control by any means necessary. 

When Hillary Clinton first announced US plans to “pivot to Asia” most people thought it sounded like a reasonable scheme for shifting resources from the Middle East to Asia in order to increase US participation in the world’s fastest growing market. They didn’t realize at the time, that policymakers intended to goad Russia into a bloody ground-war in Ukraine to “weaken” Russia so that Washington could spread its military bases across the Eurasian landmass unopposed. 

Nor did anyone foresee the lengths to which Washington would go to provoke, isolate and demonize Russia for the express purpose of removing its political leaders and splitting the country into multiple statlets. Here’s Hillary making the case back in 2011:

“Harnessing Asia’s growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests… Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade, and access to cutting-edge technology…..American firms (need) to tap into the vast and growing consumer base of Asia…

The region already generates more than half of global output and nearly half of global trade…. we are looking for opportunities to do even more business in Asia…and our investment opportunities in Asia’s dynamic markets.” (“America’s Pacific Century”, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton”, Foreign Policy Magazine, 2011)

A careful reading of Clinton’s speech along with a review of the Wolfowitz Doctrine will help even the most obtuse reader to draw some obvious conclusions about the current conflict in Ukraine which has almost nothing to do with so-called “Russian aggression” but everything to do with Washington’s plan to project power across Asia, control Russia’s massive oil and gas reserves, encircle China with military bases, and establish American domination at the epicenter of this century’s most prosperous market. Here’s Putin again:

“In order to free itself from the latest web of challenges, they need to dismantle Russia as well as other states that choose a sovereign path of development, at all costs, to be able to further plunder other nations’ wealth and use it to patch their own holes. If this does not happen, I cannot rule out that they will try to trigger a collapse of the entire system, and blame everything on that, or, God forbid, decide to use the old formula of economic growth through war.”

US foreign policy experts are shameless in their promotion of theories that threaten to trigger a direct military confrontation with Russia that could result in a nuclear exchange.

In a recent “webinar for congressmen and women hosted on June 23 under the title “Decolonizing Russia.” The webinar, staffed by CIA operatives and right-wing nationalists from Ukraine and the Caucasus, effectively argued that Russia was a colonial empire that had to be broken up with the support of Washington.” (WSWS) The author explores the reasons why some experts want to brand Russia as “imperialist”? An article at the WSWS explains why:

...the claim that Russia is “imperialist” serves a vital political function: It provides a political cover for the imperialist aggression against Russia and the war aims of the imperialist powers…. It is this strategy which the pro-NATO pseudo-left covers up for with its clamor about “Russian imperialism.” The fostering of nationalist, regionalist and ethnic tensions has been a key component of imperialist war policy for decades…..

Through a combination of NATO expansion, coups on its borders and military interventions in countries allied with Russia and China, the imperialist powers have systematically and relentlessly encircled Russia…

Indeed, if one reviews the history of the wars waged by US imperialism over the past thirty years, the unfolding war for the carve-up of Russia and China appears like a brutal inevitability. Despite their reintegration into the world capitalist system, the imperialist powers have been barred by the ruling oligarchic regimes from directly plundering the vast resources of these countries. Vying for these resources between themselves, and driven by irresolvable domestic crises, they are now determined to change this.

… the draft resolution describes the basic aims of the US war against Russia as follows: “the removal of the present regime in Russia, its replacement by an American-controlled puppet, and the breakup of Russia itself—in what is referred to as “decolonizing Russia”—into a dozen or more impotent statelets whose valuable resources will be owned and exploited by US and European finance capital.” This passage is central for understanding both the unfolding conflict and the politics of the pro-NATO pseudo-left and their insistence that Russia is an “imperialist country.” (“The historical and political principles of the socialist opposition to imperialist war and the Putin regime“, Clara Weiss, World Socialist Web Site)

As you can see, elite members of the foreign policy establishment are doggedly searching for new and more convincing justifications for a confrontation with Russia the ultimate purpose of which is to fragment the country paving the way for Washington’s strategic rebalancing or “pivot.” 20 years ago, during the Bush administration, politicians were not nearly as circumspect in their views about Russia.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, for example, made no attempt to conceal his utter contempt for Russia and was surprisingly candid about the policy he supported. Check out this excerpt from an article by Ben Norton:

Former US Vice President Dick Cheney, a lead architect of the Iraq War, not only wanted to dismantle the Soviet Union; he also wanted to break up Russia itself, to prevent it from rising again as a significant political power…. Former US Defense Secretary Robert Gates wrote that, “When the Soviet Union was collapsing in late 1991, Dick wanted to see the dismantlement not only of the Soviet Union and the Russian empire but of Russia itself, so it could never again be a threat.”…

The fact that a figure at the helm of the US government not-so-secretly sought the permanent dissolution of Russia as a country, and straightforwardly communicated this to colleagues like Robert Gates, partially explains the aggressive posturing Washington has taken toward the Russian Federation since the overthrow of the USSR.

The reality is that the US empire will simply never allow Russia to challenge its unilateral domination of Eurasia, despite the fact that the government in Moscow restored capitalism. This is why it is not surprising that Washington has utterly ignored Russia’s security concerns, breaking its promise not to expand NATO “once inch eastward” after German reunification, surrounding Moscow with militarized adversaries hell bent on destabilizing it.

Russian security services have published evidence that the United States supported Chechen separatists in their wars on the central Russian government. British academic John Laughland stressed in a 2004 article in The Guardian, titled “The Chechens’ American friends,” that several Chechen secessionist leaders were living in the West, and were even given grant money by the US government. Laughland noted that the most important US-based pro-Chechen secessionist group, the deceptively named American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC), listed as its members “a rollcall of the most prominent neoconservatives who so enthusiastically support the ‘war on terror’”:

They include Richard Perle, the notorious Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra fame; Kenneth Adelman, the former US ambassador to the UN who egged on the invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be “a cakewalk”; Midge Decter, biographer of Donald Rumsfeld and a director of the rightwing Heritage Foundation; Frank Gaffney of the militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US Committee on Nato; Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute, a former admirer of Italian fascism and now a leading proponent of regime change in Iran; and R James Woolsey, the former CIA director who is one of the leading cheerleaders behind George Bush’s plans to re-model the Muslim world along pro-US lines.

The fact that far-right Salafi-jihadists made up a significant percentage of the Chechen insurgency didn’t bother these anti-Muslim neocons – just as Islamophobic “War on Terror” veterans had no problem supporting extremist head-chopping Takfiri Islamists in the subsequent US wars on Syria and Libya….

…. Victoria Nuland, the third-most powerful official in the Joe Biden administration’s State Department, served as Vice President Cheney’s principal deputy foreign policy adviser from 2003 to 2005. (She also helped to sponsor the violent coup in Ukraine in 2014 that toppled the democratically-elected government.) Like her mentor Cheney, Nuland is a hard-line neoconservative. The fact that he is a Republican and she works primarily in Democratic administrations is irrelevant; this hawkish foreign-policy consensus is completely bipartisan.

Nuland (a former member of the bipartisan board of directors of the NED) is also married to Robert Kagan, a patron saint of neoconservatism, and co-founder of the Project for the New American Century – the cozy home of the neocons in Washington, where he worked alongside Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and other top Bush administration officials. Kagan was a longtime Republican, but in 2016 he joined the Democrats and openly campaigned for Hillary Clinton for president.” (“Ex VP Dick Cheney confirmed US goal is to break up Russia, not just USSR”, Ben Norton, Multipolarista)

US foreign policy is now exclusively in the hands of a small group of neocon extremists who reject diplomacy outright and who genuinely believe that America’s strategic interests can only be achieved through a military conflict with Russia. That said, we can say with some degree of certainty, that things are going to get alot worse before they get better.

Q: if the United States has a plan to break up Russia, what and how is her plan to break up China?!! Despite rising tensions with Russia over the Ukraine crisis, America’s generals have again pegged Beijing as their number one concern.

Xi and the rise of Li

•November 1, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Misreading Xi and the rise of Li

Li Qiang’s appointment shows China is on a private-led high-tech path and not at all reverting to Maoism

AsiaTimes by Uwe Parpart ~ October 24, 2022

The professional China commentariat and its echo chamber in the Western media were blindsided by the appointment of Shanghai party head Li Qiang as the country’s premier, the number two position to Xi Jinping.

Li Qiang, born 23 July 1959 (age 63)

Li is a tech-savvy supporter of high-tech entrepreneurship who believes that China’s future lies in the digital economy. Xi, the Western press insisted with near unanimity, had reverted to Maoism.

Precisely the opposite of what the commentariat expected seems to have happened and the Western press is scrambling to explain the anomaly. Here’s a sampling of Western press comment:

“Xi Jinping promotes loyal Shanghai chief” (Reuters)

“Xi Jinping promotes loyal Shanghai chief to upper echelons of power” (Financial Times)

“A loyal aide in Shanghai takes a leading role in Beijing” (New York Times)

“Xi loyalist likely to be China’s next premier” (Barron’s)

“Promotion of Shanghai chief puts loyalty over everything” (Bloomberg)

Bloomberg tried to explain why it failed to foresee Li’s rise saying, “When Li’s initial lighter-touch approach to China’s strict Covid Zero strategy was breached by the more transmissible omicron variant earlier this year, [his] ascent was cast into doubt.”

That loyalty was a factor in Li’s appointment is obvious. Political leaders, Chinese or Western, do not normally appoint deputies who are known for disloyalty.

The “loyalty” explanation is no explanation at all. A better explanation is that the Anglo-American political establishment has misread Xi from beginning to end.

Li’s appointment should be a wake-up call. The ubiquitous ideological blinders and preconceptions in the foreign policy establishment are the cause of a chronic misreading of China, leading to concomitant political reactions with dangerous implications and consequences.

Li Qiang is now China’s No 2, an appointment that shows Xi’s dedication to a high-tech-led future for China

In fact, Li’s appointment as premier-designate was foreseeable as well as foreseen. Asia Times wrote as much on October 21, forecasting that Xi would opt for retiring four out of the seven Politburo Standing Committee members, including not only Premier Li Keqiang, but also the widely touted premiership candidate Wang Yang, and would not miss the opportunity to install a new, younger and different cast of leaders.

Li is the Shanghai party chief. Few if any previous Shanghai leaders have failed to advance to the Standing Committee, Xi included. That his advance to the number two position nonetheless came as a surprise to most Western analysts merely proves how much so many have misread Xi in particular and Chinese governance in general.

Li studied business administration and holds an MBA degree from Hong Kong Polytechnic University, a top-tier Asian business and technology school funded by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing. He has supported technological entrepreneurship as the leading edge of China’s development.

Among other things, Li was one of Jack Ma’s most visible supporters in the China Communist Party leadership. He brought Elon Musk’s Tesla to Shanghai. His appointment affirms the leadership’s support for private-led high-tech industry.

Accelerated technological innovation and STEM talent development were keywords in Xi’s work report. What Western analysts (and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken) picked out instead was the reiteration of China’s longstanding policy with respect to Taiwan.

Li was chosen for his track record of economic and financial innovation in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone, for bringing in major foreign investment (up by 32% in 2021 despite Covid) and for the policy papers on economic development he wrote for Xi as his assistant in Zhejiang.

So, then, what should be made of Xi’s alleged neo-Maoist, leftist and anti-capitalist emphasis on “common prosperity?”

Throughout his career, Xi has shown himself to be a master of the most characteristic maneuver in Chinese imperial governance: Feint in one direction in order to disarm prospective opponents, while preparing to move in another.

The elements in the Party who opposed Xi in 2012 remain his antagonists, the supporters of a Fortress China that shares the poverty rather than creates the wealth. His first move in power after 2012 was to crush the group around Bo Xilai centered in Chongqing and part of China’s northeastern rust bowl, and to unleash China’s private sector.

During the past two years, Xi adopted the rhetoric of income redistribution under the watchword “common prosperity,” and cracked down on China’s consumer Internet sector. In classic Chinese style, he adopted the rhetoric of the Communist Party elements he most opposed, only to move decisively in the opposite direction.

Ideologically blinded Western analysts and officials consistently miss the point. China’s state is the least ideological, most ruthlessly pragmatic entity in the world. To the extent its leaders succeed, they do so by achieving prosperity and security by whatever means necessary to meet their objectives.

Li Qiang is now China’s No 2, an appointment that shows Xi’s dedication to a high-tech-led future for China

Xi knows that China’s state-owned industry is too sclerotic and corrupt to lead the transition to a digital economy and that the Chinese state needs private entrepreneurs to take the lead. But he also knows that entrenched political interests linked to the state sector will not just grumble at the sudden ascendance of entrepreneurs but also make determined political moves.

“[Li] has a much closer relationship with Xi compared to [Premier] Li Keqiang. … Xi is likely going to give him much more room and power to manage the economy,” Deng Yuwen, a former deputy editor of the Study Times, the official newspaper of the Central Party School, told the South China Morning Post.

To stay in power, Xi or any other Chinese leader must placate the old guard and defuse popular envy of the newly rich while allowing entrepreneurs to lead economic transformation.

But Xi’s core agenda, repeated in the work report, is to make China a moderately prosperous economy by 2035. To do so, China needs and he must achieve a gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate of between 4% and 5% per annum.

Li has demonstrated that he has the energy and executive capability to get things done. A Brookings Institution study reports that in 2018-19 he mobilized Shanghai’s capabilities and workforce in tandem with Elon Musk to build a Tesla factory capable of making 500,000 electric cars annually.

Amazingly, It took only ten months for this joint venture to advance from construction to full operation.

The sweeping change in China’s leadership denotes an inflection point. Deng Xiaoping’s 1979 reforms eventually moved nearly 700 million Chinese from countryside to city, replacing the rural economy of traditional China with a smokestack economy dominated by state-owned enterprises.

China’s state sector, in turn, became a political power base in its own right. Xi concluded that he needed a new broom to sweep aside the obstacles to a digitized industrial economy. With Li’s appointment as his de facto deputy, Xi’s well on his way.

Ezekiel (Ch 19-20)

•October 31, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The house of Israel verses the house of Judah

Although Isaiah 8:14 refers to “both houses of Israel” or the “two houses of Israel” it implies the single house of Jacob, the full twelve tribes.

But Jacob was given a new name, Israel, in which the full house of Israel as in Ezekiel 20:40, the twelve tribes are all included. And after King Solomon, the single house of Jacob or now call Israel was broken into two, the kingdom of Israel and the kingdom of Judah.

Hence, the names of the two houses are separated, namely the 10-tribes “house of Israel” and the 2-tribes “house of Judah.” Further, the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 is redefined as “the house of Jacob” in Isaiah 8:17.

State it in another way in more details, the word “Israel” has five (or even six) possible meanings:

(1) Israel in place of Jacob, since the angel gave Jacob a new name, Israel;

(2) Jacob said, “and let my name be named on them” Genesis 48:16; that is, the name “Israel” is to be installed to the children of Joseph: Ephraim and Manasseh;

(3) the children of Israel, or all the house of Israel as in Ezekiel 20:40 in the sense of all the progeny of Jacob, all twelve tribes; sometimes expressed as the “whole house of Israel;”

(4) the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 or “both houses of Israel” would mean the ‘first’ house of Israel as the house of 10-tribes Israel; and the ‘second’ house of Israel as the 2-tribes house of Judah;

(5) the ‘second’ house of Israel as the 2-tribes house of Judah; this happened during Rehoboam reign when the kingdom was broken into the house of Israel (north) and the house of Judah (south); in this context, the house of Israel could be the 2-tribes Israel as in Ezekiel 8:6,11,12 and Matthew 15:24;

(6) Israel, the modern state of Israel, established in 1917 by the Balfour declaration and gained independence in 1948.

In understanding prophecies, the second and third meanings are mostly in use; the fourth very rarely. Still, it may seem confusing, but one should be able to separate the two by sounding out the context.

For understanding who the modern tribes of Judah and Joseph are, the best book to have expounded this subject is “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J.H. Allen (1847-1930). ~~ chap8&14end;19,33&36beg ~~

Chapter 19 starts with a riddle of a lioness with her two whelps among other young lions. So what does each of them represent? The riddle seems to be a prophecy over the complexities of the house of Israel and the royal house of Judah spread out over the next two and a half thousands years. The scepter, which belongs to the royal house of Judah, are mentioned only twice in the book of Ezekiel, both in this chapter. And earlier, we have established that this Ezekiel prophecy was for a time far into the future (Ezekiel 12:27). In fact it’s for the endtime, our time, and so here it is.

Coffman commented that this chapter is a dirge (a lament for the dead, especially one forming part of a funeral rite) written by Ezekiel as a prophetic funeral for the earthly end of the House of David. As Cooke stated it:

“Ezekiel could write fine poetry when he chose; and on this occasion the impulse came from a mixed emotion, his pride in the royal house of Judah, and his pity for the misfortunes of the young princes.”

Correction; not the royal house of Judah as Cooke says, but “for the princes of Israel” as the first verse below shows.

Ezekiel 19

The best book to have expounded this riddle is “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J.H. Allen (1847-1930).

In summary, this riddle is a continuation of chapter 17 concerning a mysterious prophecy regarding both the house of Judah and the house of Israel. Here in this chapter it shows how the planting and rebuilding of David’s throne had survived beyond captivity into the land of Israel and beyond.

1“Moreover take thou up a lamentation for the princes of Israel, — so this chapter is a lamentation; notice it started at the beginning with a lamentation and at the end it says: “This is a lamentation and shall be a lamentation,” for the princes of Israel; but who are the princes of Israel?

— from Ezekiel 11:1 these are not those who administer his temple, but further out; that is, rulers and governor; cities chiefs; mayors and their rich and influential: “princes” of a city; and the likes of Bill Gates, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch; but most important, the Rothschilds, who spaned many generations centered in the City of London.

— but princes of Israel in this chapter are from the royal house of Judah but sprung off into the land of Israel and beyond; kings and princes who were entrusted with power and authority to exercise the laws of the nation; and who should have been wise counsellors of the people, but to God, these are the men who give wicked counsel and Ezekiel was asked to mourn for them!

2 and say: “‘What is thy mother? A lioness: she lay down among lions; she nourished her whelps among young lions. — this indicates an original royal family that had spread her wings over many nations.

3 And she brought up one of her whelps; it became a young lion, and it learned to catch the prey; it devoured men.

A Lioness and her Cubs

4 The nations also heard of him; he was taken in their pit, and they brought him with chains unto the land of Egypt. — this young lion could well be Joseph, who was sold as a slave into Egypt, later his sons, headed by Ephraim, the younger yet the ‘firstborn’ of Joseph, were to led the house of Israel.

5 Now when she saw that she had waited, and her hope was lost, then she took another of her whelps, and made him a young lion. — the house of Israel, headed by Ephraim, went into captivity, the lioness waited but her hope was lost as this young lion never came back; so the mother’s hope now lies with another whelp; the house of Judah.

6 And he went up and down among the lions; he became a young lion, and learned to catch the prey and devoured men. — the house of Judah grew and became a nation.

7 And he knew their desolate palaces, and he laid waste their cities; and the land was desolate and the fullness thereof by the noise of his roaring. — the subject ‘he’ is now her enemies, Judah’s enemies.

8 Then the nations set against him on every side from the provinces, and spread their net over him; he was taken in their pit. — first the Assyrians came to lay a siege against the house of Judah but they were repelled off. A while later the Chaldeans came and managed to conquer this young nation.

9 And they put him under guard in chains (put him in a cage as some versions say), and brought him to the king of Babylon. They brought him into prison, that his voice should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel. — this young lion, “brought to the king of Babylon,” is clearly established to be house of Judah, the scepter holder, but its royal family had vanished;

— no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel; but yes, upon only a smaller hill of Israel: Ireland.

10 “‘Thy mother is like a vine in thy blood, planted by the waters; she was fruitful and full of branches by reason of many waters. — thy mother is like a vine in thy blood; having royal blood, this lioness is the royal family that had established herself over many nations.

11 And she had strong rods for the scepters of them that bore rule; and her stature was exalted among the thick branches, and she appeared in her height with the multitude of her branches. — a rod or scepter is an emblem of authority; with numerous offspring and prosperity this royal family would split and spread into numerous other royal families that ruled over many nations in throughout Europe, both East and West.

12 But she was plucked up in fury; she was cast down to the ground, and the east wind dried up her fruit. Her strong rods were broken and withered; the fire consumed them. — many of the royal families were overcame “cast down” by revolutions: – France (1830), Portugal (1910), Russia (1917), Germany (1918), Hungary (1918), Italy (1946), Romania (1947), Greece (1974); – they withered and fire consumed them; their monarchies died one way or another, these nations all became republics.

13 And now she is planted in the wilderness, in a dry and thirsty ground. — a few royal families remains, planted on dry and thirsty ground; powerless and without authority; instead or rule they only reign; that is, in name only: Britain, Spain, Denmark, Belgium, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden.

14 And fire has gone out from a rod of her branches, which hath devoured her fruit, so that she hath no strong rod to be a scepter to rule.’ This is a lamentation, and shall be for a lamentation.” — and fire is gone out of a rod of her; this speaks of the destruction of the royal family; she hath no strong rod; few of the royal blood of Judah or only weak ones will be left. And from that time onward, perhaps, no new royals would ever sat upon the throne of Israel;

— those that remains would end up in captivity too as fire would consume them. This chapter starts with lamentation and ends with lamentation; that is, dark days also lay ahead for their children as fire is ready to devour them as it devours her fruit. As the catastrophe shall be so complete, there will be a lot of mourning as lamentation will be compounded by further lamentation.

Ezekiel 20

This chapter is a continuation of lamentation for the princes and people of the house of Israel, on account of what had already befallen them, and what was yet to come.

Among God’s concerns, hallowing or polluting the Sabbaths being the main issue, mentioned six times (verses 12,13,16,20,21,24) in this chapter alone, more than in any other chapters.

These are those that are left after one third died of famine and pestilence, another third of the sword, and these are those left over or those that survive in captivity.

More on (1) Ephraim / The United States; (2) Ephraim and Manasseh

1 And it came to pass in the seventh year, in the fifth month, the tenth day of the month, that certain of the elders of Israel came to inquire of the Lord, and sat before me. — these were either some of the elders that were carried captive, who came to inquire how long they should continue in exile; or what methods they should use to free themselves from it;

— and sat before me; it is usually after some great calamities would these elders humble themselves and come to seek the Lord, by which time (verse 3 below) Ezekiel is forbidden to tell them that he would not be inquired of by them. During peace time these same people are usually contented to ignore God.

2 Then came the word of the Lord unto me, saying,

3 “Son of man, speak unto the elders of Israel and say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Have ye come to inquire of Me? As I live, saith the Lord God, I will not be inquired of by you.’ — as I live, saith the Lord God, I will not be inquired of by you; knowing their wickedness and hypocrisy, which were detestable to him, and therefore would not hear what they had to say, nor give them any answer, or direct them what they should do.

4 Wilt thou judge them, son of man, wilt thou judge them? Cause them to know the abominations of their fathers; — cause them to know the abominations of their fathers: God reminded them of the sins which were abominable in themselves and unto God, by which they would be led to see the abominable evils which they also had been guilty of, in which they had imitated their fathers.

5 and say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: On the day when I chose Israel, and lifted up Mine hand unto the seed of the house of Jacob, and made Myself known unto them in the land of Egypt, when I lifted up Mine hand unto them, saying, “I am the Lord your God.” — here begins the account of their fathers; of God’s unmerited goodness to them since their deliverance from Egypt, and of their sins and how it fared with them.

6 on the day that I lifted up Mine hand unto them to bring them forth out of the land of Egypt into a land that I had espied for them, flowing with milk and honey, which is the glory of all lands, — which is the glory of all lands; that is, either which fertility, signified by milk and honey, is the glory of all lands, being so fruitful, is more glorious or desirable than any other country; it greatly surpassing all others in its situation, soil, and climate.

— the Targum says, “which is the praise of all provinces:” that is, was praised and commended by the inhabitants of all other provinces for the plenty in it; which must needs be very great, to support so large a number of inhabitants in it, and yet its compass but small.

7 then said I unto them: “Cast away every man of ye the abominations of his eyes, and defile not yourselves with the idols of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.” — evidence from this verse shows the Israelites were still deeply indulged in things Egypt’s; the golden calf being the principle idol.

8 But they rebelled against Me and would not hearken unto Me. They did not every man cast away the abominations of their eyes, neither did they forsake the idols of Egypt. “‘Then I said, “I will pour out My fury upon them, to accomplish My anger against them in the midst of the land of Egypt.”

9 But I wrought for My name’s sake, that it should not be polluted before the nations among whom they were, in whose sight I made Myself known unto them in bringing them forth out of the land of Egypt.

— “I wrought for my name’s sake…” this is a reference to the fact that God on several occasions did not judge Israel according to what they certainly deserved; but, that in order to prevent the nations from questioning God’s ability to protect his people, simply went on and blessed them in spite of their sins. Two examples of this are found in Exodus 32:12 and in Numbers 14:16.

10 Therefore I caused them to go forth out of the land of Egypt and brought them into the wilderness.

11 And I gave them My statutes and showed them My judgements, which if a man do, he shall even live in them. — God’s statutes and Judgements are dedicated to his servants to implement, starting with the Great Assembly, later the Sanhedrin. Today this Sanhedrin has been re-established here, inheriting and embedded with the following mandates:

Deuteronomy 16:18 “Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes; and they shall judge the people with just judgement.

19 Thou shalt not distort judgement; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a bribe; for a bribe doth blind the eyes of the wise and pervert the words of the righteous.

Deuteronomy 17:11 According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee and according to the judgement which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do. Thou shalt not decline from the sentence which they shall show thee to the right hand nor to the left.

12 And the man who will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest who standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die; and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.

13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously.

And what happened in 70 AD in Jerusalem and Judea when God exercised His judgement?

History recorded only two sects that escaped this inferno:

(1) The Nazarenes as the early Christians were known in Acts 24:5. Many died as martyrs but according to Eusebius, some received divine warning and escaped to a northern town called Pella, west of the Jordan River.

(2) Pharisees of the House of Hillel escaped to Yavne. These were headed by a rabbi, Johanan ben Zakkai, the head of the Sanhedrin; he was smuggled out of besieged Jerusalem in a coffin. Later, his followers re-emerged as Rabbinic Jews who established the Hillel Calendar, which was revealed by Hillel II in about AD 359 concerning the rules of the Calendar.

12 Moreover also I gave them My Sabbaths to be a sign between Me and them, that they might know that I am the Lord who sanctify them.

13 But the house of Israel rebelled against Me in the wilderness. They walked not in My statutes and they despised My judgments, which if a man do, he shall even live in them; and My Sabbaths they greatly polluted. “‘Then I said I would pour out My fury upon them in the wilderness to consume them.

History recorded two prominent sects that died during this AD 70 inferno:

(a) The Sadducees and Boethusians, following the heretic Samaritan way of observing Passover, kept it on the night of the fourteenth; they perished in the inferno;

(b) The Essenes, after they had repudiated the calendar that was sanctioned by the Sanhedrin, then went about presumptuously making one of their own. They all perished in God’s FURY by either the flaming Sword or the consuming Fire.

14 But I wrought for My name’s sake, that it should not be polluted before the nations, in whose sight I brought them out. — “I wrought for my name’s sake…” ~ this is repeated from verse 9 for emphasis.

15 Yet also I lifted up My hand unto them in the wilderness, that I would not bring them into the land which I had given them, flowing with milk and honey, which is the glory of all lands,

16 because they despised My judgements and walked not in My statutes, but polluted My Sabbaths; for their heart went after their idols. — today more than 98.5 percent of pretending Christians are worshipping God by honoring the SUN by observing SUNday. They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east,” Ezekiel 8:16.

17 Nevertheless Mine eye spared them from destroying them, neither did I make an end of them in the wilderness.

18 “‘But I said unto their children in the wilderness: “Walk ye not in the statutes of your fathers, neither observe their judgements, nor defile yourselves with their idols.

19 I am the Lord your God: Walk in My statutes, and keep My judgements, and do them;

20 and hallow My Sabbaths, and they shall be a sign between Me and you, that ye may know that I am the Lord your God.” — others, following the SUN-worshipping Samaritans, the Church of God Communities are showing their contempt by having their “wavesheaf offering” and Pentecost on a SUNday; always on SUNdays;

— and the Sabbaths are God’s sign, “that ye may know that I am the Lord your God,” ~ unfortunately these pretenters could be spewed out of His mouth! No? Regardless, there are those being described in Revelation 3:17 ~ wretched, miserable, poor, blind and naked. “As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: or else I will spew thee out of My mouth (v16,19).”

21 Notwithstanding, the children rebelled against Me. They walked not in My statutes, neither kept My judgements to do them, which if a man do, he shall even live in them; they polluted My Sabbaths. “‘Then I said I would pour out My fury upon them to accomplish My anger against them in the wilderness. — again, God’s FURY would be poured out for polluting His Sabbaths!

22 Nevertheless I withdrew Mine hand and wrought for My name’s sake, that it should not be polluted in the sight of the nations, in whose sight I brought them forth. — “I withdrew Mine hand and wrought for my name’s sake” ~ again, this is repeated from verse 9 and 14 with some variations for emphasis.

23 I lifted up Mine hand unto them also in the wilderness, that I would scatter them among the nations and disperse them through the countries,

24 because they had not executed My judgements, but had despised My statutes and had polluted My Sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers’ idols. — beware! repeats of offending His Sabbaths for emphasis.

25 Therefore I gave them also statutes that were not good and judgements whereby they should not live;

26 and I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all who openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the Lord.’

27 “Therefore, son of man, speak unto the house of Israel and say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Yet in this your fathers have blasphemed Me, in that they have committed a trespass against Me.

28 For when I had brought them into the land for which I lifted up Mine hand to give it to them, then they saw every high hill and all the thick trees, and they offered there their sacrifices, and there they presented the provocation of their offering. There also they made their sweet savor, and poured out there their drink offerings.

29 Then I said unto them: What is the high place whereunto ye go?’” (And the name thereof is called Bamah unto this day.)

30 “Therefore say unto the house of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? And commit ye whoredom after their abominations?

31 For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day. And shall I be inquired of by you, O house of Israel? As I live, saith the Lord God, I will not be inquired of by you.

32 “‘And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all: in that ye say, “We will be as the nations, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone.”

33 “‘As I live, saith the Lord God, surely with a mighty hand and with a stretched out arm and with fury poured out, will I rule over you.

34 And I will bring you out from the people, and will gather you out of the countries wherein ye are scattered, with a mighty hand and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out;

35 and I will bring you into the wilderness of the people, and there will I plead with you face to face. — “I will bring you into the wilderness of the peoples…” ~ this new wilderness was not a geographical wilderness like the wilderness of Egypt, but a wilderness, “of strange peoples, unusual social customs, etc,”

— it was the wilderness of their captivity in an unknown civilization, the Assyrian; and the vast majority of Israel would not pass that test of being an Israelite, any more than their fathers had passed it in the former wilderness, Egypt;

— most of them, enamored with the wealth and splendor of modern “civilization” would never leave for a return to Palestine, even when free to do so. Such persons were described as, “Separated by the refining process, and not allowed to participate in the restoration.”

36 As I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, saith the Lord God.

37 And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant;

38 and I will purge out from among you the rebels and them that transgress against Me. I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel; and ye shall know that I am the Lord. — lots of purgings to undergo before the house of Israel “shall know that I am the Lord.” At this moment they are all pretenders!!!

39 “‘As for you, O house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God: Go ye, serve ye every one his idols, and hereafter also, if ye will not hearken unto Me; but pollute ye My holy name no more with your gifts, and with your idols.

— “go ye, serve every one his idols…” this is the same kind of commandment that God gave to Judas Iscariot, when he said, “What thou doest, do quickly.” God never restrains anyone from evil who has already made up his mind to do more evil: “We lied, We cheated, We stole… It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment.” That would appear to be the condition of those elders who sat in front of Ezekiel.

40 For in Mine holy mountain, in the mountain of the height of Israel, saith the Lord God, there shall all the house of Israel, all of them in the land, serve Me. There will I accept them, and there will I require your offerings and the firstfruits of your oblations, with all your holy things. — “all the house of Israel” shall serve God; all of them in the land, serve Me;

— “all hostilities and separation between Israel and Judah shall cease;” this is in great contrast we have today:

“Manasseh, Ephraim; and Ephraim, Manasseh; and they together shall be against Judah. For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still” Isaiah 9:21

— the vast majority of today’s professing Christianity (99.99 percent) in the house of Ephraim and Manasseh make one fundamental error against his brother Judah in studying The Oracles of God.

41 I will accept you with your sweet savor when I bring you out from the people and gather you out of the countries wherein ye have been scattered; and I will be sanctified in you before the nations.

— and I will be sanctified in you before the nations; the outside world will take notice of the power and eminence of God, in the conversion and restoration of house of Israel, and praise and glorify him on account of His doing; and when He will be visibly feared, served, and worshipped, in the midst of Israel.

42 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall bring you into the land of Israel, into the country for which I lifted up Mine hand to give it to your fathers.

43 And there shall ye remember your ways and all your doings wherein ye have been defiled; and ye shall loathe yourselves in your own sight for all your evils that ye have committed.

44 And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I have wrought with you for My name’s sake, not according to your wicked ways, nor according to your corrupt doings, O ye house of Israel, saith the Lord God.’”

45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the south, and drop thy word toward the south, and prophesy against the forest of the southland. — prophesy against the forest of the southland; this prophecy “against” indicates something with a bad outcome, which could be literal or could be symbolic, or even both;

— but remember again that this prophecy meant is for the house of Israel and is “of the times that are far off (Ezekiel 12:27); far into the future, this time, our time.

47 And say to the forest of the south: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the south to the north shall be burned therein.

— this “kindle a fire” could be literal: the southern United States and southern Europe could be “kindled with fire” and much of the farmland could be in drought and be burnt up and eventually led to famine;

— but it could also be symbolic, where the south of United States (Mexico and much of the Latin Americas) and the south of Europe (North and Central Africa, and perhaps the Indian sub-continent) could be burnt with famine and civil unrest that led to huge unwanted migration to the north.

— and it shall devour every green and dry tree; all sorts of persons should be consumed, high and low, rich and poor, good and bad; and if good men should suffer, comparable to green trees, which fire will not so easily burn, not being fit fuel for it; then much more bad men, who were by far the most numerous, comparable to dry trees, and so fit fuel for the flames, and easily consumed thereby;

— and this flaming flame will spread from the south to the north: “and all faces from the south to the north shall be burned.”

48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’” — by this “all flesh shall see that I” the God of heaven will be manifested to all the rest of the nations.

49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’” — parables, riddles and enigmas; sobering thoughts, isn’t it? If there are alternative ideas, please feel free to share, thanks.

For a more detailed Study about this A Sword from the South! click here

Weapons to appear on European streets!

•October 31, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Weapons sent to Ukraine appearing on black market – Putin; CBS also reported that some 70% of weapons supplied to Ukraine never make it to the front lines as they have to pass through a network of “power lords, oligarchs and political players.”

Some weapons meant for Ukraine are already in the hands of Finnish criminals, say investigators; Yahoo News

RT ~ October 26, 2022 // Washington Post ~ November 1, 2022

The Russian president has warned that portable air defense systems and high-precision armaments may fall into the wrong hands; seen as having a heightened risk of diversion, including Stinger surface-to-air missiles and Javelin antitank missiles, amid what they describe as Ukraine’s “super hot conflict.”

Western weapons flowing into Ukraine have begun to make their way onto black markets, Russian President Vladimir Putin said during a meeting with the heads of security and special services of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries on Wednesday.

Weapons intended for Ukraine could end up in the streets
Weapons intended for Ukraine would end up in the streets

The Russian leader called on the participants of the meeting to bolster cooperation in anti-terrorism efforts and noted that there were “serious challenges” posed by the emerging black arms markets in Ukraine.

Putin claimed that “cross-border criminal groups” were actively involved in smuggling weapons to other regions and that it wasn’t just small firearms. “There is a persistent risk of criminals getting hold of more powerful weapons, including portable air defense systems and precision weapons.”

The president’s statement comes after Russia’s permanent representative to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, warned last month that corrupt Ukrainian officials had established channels to deliver Western-supplied weapons onto the global black market.

70 percents of weapons intended for Ukraine would end up years later in the streets

Meanwhile, the West’s top military officials have admitted that it is nearly impossible to effectively track where the billions of dollars worth of arms delivered to Ukraine actually end up. Pentagon Inspector General Sean O’Donnell told Bloomberg in August that there was almost no fidelity as the Ukrainians still used paper “hand receipts” to trace supplied weapons.

CBS News also reported that some 70% of weapons supplied to Ukraine never make it to the front lines as they have to pass through a network of “power lords, oligarchs and political players.”

“There is really no information as to where they’re going at all,” Donatella Rovera, a senior crisis adviser with Amnesty international told the outlet, adding that it was “really worrying” that the countries supplying these weapons do not find it necessary to put in place robust oversight mechanisms.

CBS was later pressured, however, to pull the documentary and amend the story after the channel was accused of spreading “Russian propaganda.” Ukrainian presidential adviser Mikhail Podoliak has insisted there is “no proof” that weapons entering the country were unaccounted for.

Ukraine has insisted that an uninterrupted flow of Western weapons is the key to the country’s survival on the battlefield. Russia, meanwhile, has warned on multiple occasions that pumping Kiev with weapons will only prolong the conflict.

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

China in world’s ‘best’ universities

•October 30, 2022 • Leave a Comment

China outnumbers the US for the first time in this ranking of the world’s ‘best’ universities

Market Watch by Zoe Han ~ October 25, 2022

Artificial intelligence is among the few fields that both the US and China regard as a strategic national priority

Some 338 Chinese universities made the US News & World Report’s ‘Best Global Universities Rankings,’ compared to 280 American universities

China has surpassed the US on a major ranking of the world’s best universities.

Among the 2,000 schools from more than 90 countries ranked by US News & World Report, 338 Chinese universities made the list, compared to 280 American universities. It’s the first time China outnumbered the US.

Results were reported in the media outlet’s “Best Global Universities Rankings” released Tuesday. The US and China were followed by Japan (105 universities), the United Kingdom (92), and India (81).

The media outlet began its ranking in 2014 as more universities began competing for students, as well as faculty and research investments. The rankings are based on a range of parameters, including research reputation, publications, conferences and citations. Student outcomes and individual programs are not included.

Although China surpassed the US by 58 spots, the majority of US universities appear in the top half of the rankings, including 8 of the top 10, the report noted.

Fewer Chinese students have attended college in the US since the coronavirus pandemic. From January to September 2022, 52,034 Chinese nationals received F-1 visas, down from 95,518 for the same period in 2019, according to the US State Department data. The F-1 visa is used by international students to gain a degree or an academic certificate in the US.

While public-health concerns and travel restrictions related to the pandemic partly led to the dramatic fall in numbers over the past two years, increasing tensions between the two countries have also pushed Chinese students to gradually look for alternatives, both in China and non-US options.

International student enrollment at US colleges and universities peaked in the 2015-2016 academic year and has been falling since then, the Institute of International Education said, citing visa concerns, competition from other countries with better access to work visas, and stronger social and political ties between China and other nations.

Ezekiel (Ch 17-18)

•October 29, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Chapter 17 starts with a riddle of two eagles and a vine and some mysteries along the historical footpaths in the complexities of the house of Judah and the house of Israel. The best book to have expounded this riddle is “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J.H. Allen (1847-1930).

In summary, this riddle is a mysterious prophecy as a form of a riddle to both Judah and Israel, which shows how the planting and rebuilding of David’s throne had survived beyond the captivity.

“And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, put forth a riddle, and speak a parable unto the house of Israel; and say,

Thus says the Lord God; A great eagle… came unto Lebanon, and took the highest branch of the cedar: he cropped off the top of his young twigs, and carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants.

He took also of the seed of the land, and planted it in a fruitful field; he placed it by great waters, and set it as a willow tree. And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low stature… and shot forth sprigs” (Ezekiel 17:1-6).

An Amazing Commission—and a Breach Healed!

The great eagle at the beginning of the riddle was the king of Babylon, who took Zedekiah captive. Verse 11 describes the destruction of Zedekiah’s Pharez lineage. The execution of his sons is the cropping off of the cedar’s young twigs. The “vine of low stature… [shooting] forth sprigs” reflects Judah’s freedom to movement while in captivity in Babylon.

The second great eagle (v7) refers to Jeremiah who took the princess from Babylon to Egypt, and later, beyond the seas to the British Isles.

This part of the prophecy pertained to the first eagle of Ezekiel’s riddle—the rooting up and tearing down of the existing throne in Judah. But within this same prophecy, the planting and building up is also addressed, which is the work of the second eagle performed by prophet Jeremiah.

Verses 22-23 go on to describe what was Jeremiah’s commission to re-establish David’s throne in another location. God says that He will take of the highest branch—the seed of King Zedekiah—and set it or plant it.

The “tender young twig” of verse 22 could be none other than one of the king’s daughters that Jeremiah took with him to plant in the British Isles. Thus, the “high mountain and eminent” depicts the nations of Israel as God knew they were destined to become, once the birthright promise was realized.

God states that it will eventually be known that it was He who brought down the high tree and exalted the low tree (v24). In light of this, notice a parallel Scripture in Isaiah:

“And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall again take root downward, and bear fruit upward” (Isaiah 37:31).

Jeremiah presented this young Hebrew princess—Tea Tephi—to the Zarah line ruling in the British Isles! Her marriage and children would continue the scepter and the dynasty promised David—and heal the breach.

Ezekiel 17

1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the word of prophecy from the Lord, as the Targum renders it.

2 “Son of man, put forth a riddle, and speak a parable unto the house of Israel, — again, this “house of Israel” is emphasised; that in this chapter, the prophecy concerns chiefly the United Kingdom.

3 and say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: A great eagle with great wings, longwinged, full of feathers which had diverse colors, came unto Lebanon and took the highest branch of the cedar.

— a great eagle; which is Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, as it is explained, Ezekiel 17:12; who is compared to an eagle for his power and authority, that being the king of birds, and for his swiftness and voracity in conquering and subduing kingdoms; see Jeremiah 48:40.

4 He cropped off the top of its young twigs and carried it into a land of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants. — young twigs mentioned, and tender ones, which are meant the princess of the land,.

5 He took also of the seed of the land and planted it in a fruitful field. He placed it by great waters and set it as a willow tree. — the seed of the land; Zedekiah, brother of Jehoiachin, and all their children.

6 And it [the seed] grew and became a spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned toward him and the roots thereof were under him. So it became a vine, and brought forth branches and shot forth sprigs. — this indicates that children were born unto them that were in captivity, but that they grew and flourished toward him; Nebuchadnezzar, to whom the people of the Jews were tributary.

7 “‘There was also another great eagle with great wings and many feathers; and behold, this vine did bend her roots toward him and shot forth her branches toward him, that he might water it by the furrows of her planting. — there was also another great eagle, with great wings and many feathers:

— many (John Gill, Adam Clarke, though JH Allen is indecisive or ambiguous) identify this second eagle as the Pharaoh of Egypt, but it seems more like whoever took Jeremiah and the king’s daughters to the British Isles fit this character of a great eagle with great wings;

— it remains a mystery but whoever took Jeremiah and the king’s daughters in its ship or ships, would most probably be the second eagle that flew over the great seas to transplant the tender twigs there.

Nebuchadnezzar, a great eagle with great wings

8 It was planted in a good soil by great waters, that it might bring forth branches and that it might bear fruit, that it might be a goodly vine.’ — following the trail of Tea Tephi, this would led to Ireland?

9 Say thou, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Shall it prosper? Shall he not pull up the roots thereof and cut off the fruit thereof, that it wither? It shall wither in all the leaves of her spring, even without great power or many people to pluck it up by the roots thereof. — Shall it prosper? Could it be that gratuitous treason should prosper?

— the Voice

Now I, the Eternal Lord, ask, will that vine continue to flourish? Won’t the eagle pull it out of the lush, fertile soil by its roots, strip it of its fruit, and leave it to wither? It won’t take much strength or many people to pull it up by the roots.

10 Yea, behold, being planted, shall it prosper? Shall it not utterly wither when the east wind toucheth it? It shall wither in the furrows where it grew.’” — shall it prosper? it shall not; their own strength, with the help of the king of Egypt, will not be able to protect them from the rage of the king of Babylon.

11 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, —

12 “Say now to the rebellious house: ‘Know ye not what these things mean?’ Tell them: ‘Behold, the king of Babylon is come to Jerusalem, and hath taken the king thereof and the princes thereof, and led them with him to Babylon;

— and hath taken the king thereof, and the princes (but princess left out here) thereof, and led them with him to Babylon; the king of Judea, and the princes of it; Jeconiah and his nobles, who had been carried captive into Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar; for Ezekiel was among these captives.

13 and hath taken of the king’s seed and made a covenant with him, and hath taken an oath from him. He hath also taken the mighty of the land, — and hath taken of the king’s seed, one of the royal family, signified by the seed of the land.

14 that the kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand. — that the king’s seed will take roots and grow, continuing a bloodline, which is a kingdom.

15 But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and many people. Shall he prosper? Shall he escape that doeth such things? Or shall he break the covenant and be delivered? — but he rebelled against him; Zedekiah and his court rebelled against the king of Babylon, broke the covenant he entered into, and violated his oath.

16 As I live, saith the Lord God, surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king, whose oath he despised and whose covenant he broke, even with him in the midst of Babylon he shall die.

— surely in the place where the king dwelleth in Babylon, where Nebuchadnezzar dwelt, that made Zedekiah king of Judah; which is mentioned, to point out the ingratitude of Zedekiah toward the king of Babylon, but instead, send envoys to Egypt, asking for horses and an army to help him (verse 15).

17 Neither shall Pharaoh with his mighty army and great company help him in the war, by casting up siege mounds and building forts to cut off many persons. — by casting up mounts, and building forts; that is, when Nebuchadnezzar should besiege Jerusalem, and raise mounts, and build fortifications, in order to take the city, and destroy its inhabitants; as he did, Jeremiah 52:4.

18 Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand and hath done all these things, he shall not escape. — he shall not escape; divine vengeance, just and proper punishment for his sins.

19 Therefore thus saith the Lord God: As I live, surely Mine oath that he hath despised and My covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head. — even it will I recompense upon his own head; he shall personally bear the punishment due to such crimes;

— the Targum says, “I will revenge his way upon his head,” this refers to the putting out of his eyes.

20 And I will spread My net upon him, and he shall be taken in My snare, and I will bring him to Babylon and will plead with him there for his trespass that he hath trespassed against Me. — and I will spread my net upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare; see Ezekiel 12:13; where the same expressions are used, and of the same person.

21 And all his fugitives with all his troops shall fall by the sword, and they that remain shall be scattered toward all winds; and ye shall know that I, the Lord, have spoken it. — shall fall by the sword; the enemy shall overtake, and cut in pieces; the few that do escape shall be scattered abroad among strangers, who will show them very little kindness.

22 “‘Thus saith the Lord God: I will also take of the highest branch of the high cedar, and will set it; I will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one, and will plant it upon a high mountain and eminent (of a person famous and respected).

— I (through the second eagle) will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one (the feminine gender); and by the “top” and “young twigs” of the highest branch of the cedar, or of the chief tribe in Israel, are meant the royal house and family of David, and the chief of the tribe of Judah; and by the “tender one” is designed the tender gender, the daughters;

— and the Targum says, “I will bring one of the kingdom of the house of David, which is like to a high cedar, and I will raise him up an infant from his children’s children.” But Jeremiah verifies these children were the King’s daughters:

Then Ishmael carried away captive all the residue of the people who were in Mizpah, even the king’s daughters and all the people that remained in Mizpah, whom Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard had committed to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam; and Ishmael the son of Nethaniah carried them away captive, and departed to go over to the Ammonites. Jeremiah 41:10

23 In the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it; and it shall bring forth boughs and bear fruit and be a goodly cedar, and under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell.

— in the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it; in the highest part of the land of Israel, which during that time those at “the height of Israel” could well be in the British Isles (Israel in the isles of the sea, Isaiah 24:15), led by Ephraim. (Ephraim followeth after the east wind, Hosea 12:1)

24 And all the trees of the field shall know that I, the Lord, have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish. I, the Lord, have spoken and have done it.’” — all the trees of the field shall know; as the cedar represents the kingdom of Israel, so the other trees represent all other earthly powers who shall ultimately acknowledge the work of the Lord.

Ezekiel 18

Earlier, we have established that this prophecy that Ezekiel delivered was for many years to come (Ezekiel 12:27), and the message is primarily and principally for the United States of America and secondarily for its European allies. Here the prophecy on the house of Israel continues. . .

1 The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying, — the word of prophecy from the Lord, as the Targum renders it. So Ezra expounds it as a prophecy and a reference to our time.

2 “What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying: ‘The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge’? — saying, the fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge? that is, as the Targum explains it, “the fathers have sinned, and the children are smitten,” or punished, as the ten tribes for the sins of Jeroboam.

3 As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel. — as surely as I live, I, the Eternal Lord, declare you will not quote this proverb in Israel anymore.

4 Behold, all souls are Mine. As the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is Mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die. — all souls are mine; therefore I can deal with all, being My own creation, as I please, Jeremiah 18:6;

— the soul that sinneth, it shall die; the soul that continues in sin, without repentance towards God, shall be separated from the presence of God, and endure his wrath to all eternity.

5 But if a man be just and do that which is lawful and right, — and do that which is lawful and right; or “judgement” and “justice” ~ true judgement and justice.

6 and hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath defiled his neighbor’s wife, neither hath come near to a menstruous woman, — neither hath been guilty of adultery; or by marrying one divorced, not having committed fornication; which divorces were common among the people, and marrying such so divorced.

7 and hath not oppressed any, but hath restored to the debtor his pledge, hath despoiled none by violence, hath given his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a garment;

8 he that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase, that hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity, hath executed true judgement between man and man,

— hath executed true judgement; whether in office as a judge; or as an arbitrator chosen to decide matters in controversy between one and another, and that does everything just and right between man and man.

9 hath walked in My statutes and hath kept My judgements to deal truly; he is just: he shall surely live, saith the Lord God. — God’s statutes and Judgements are dedicated to his servants to implement, starting with the Great Assembly, later the Sanhedrin. Today this Sanhedrin has been re-established here, inheriting and embedded with the following mandates:

Deuteronomy 16:18 “Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes; and they shall judge the people with just judgement.

19 Thou shalt not distort judgement; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a bribe; for a bribe doth blind the eyes of the wise and pervert the words of the righteous.

Deuteronomy 17:11 According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do. Thou shalt not decline from the sentence which they shall show thee to the right hand nor to the left.

12 And the man who will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest who standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die; and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.

13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously.

And what happened in AD 70 in Jerusalem and Judea when God exercised His judgement?

(a) The Sadducees and Boethusians, following the heretic Samaritan way of observing Passover, kept it too early on the night of the fourteenth; they perished in the inferno;

(b) The Essenes, after they had repudiated the calendar that was sanctioned by the Sanhedrin, then went about presumptuously making one of their own. They all perished by either the flaming Sword or the consuming Fire.

I create darkness; I create evil; I, the LORD, do all these things (Isaiah 45:7).

10 “If he beget a son who is a robber, a shedder of blood, and who doeth the like to any one of these things, — a robber; one implies robbery with violence, perhaps, as in that of a housebreaker.

11 and who doeth not any of those duties, but even hath eaten upon the mountains and defiled his neighbor’s wife,

12 hath oppressed the poor and needy, hath despoiled by violence, hath not restored the pledge and hath lifted up his eyes to the idols, hath committed abomination,

13 hath given forth upon usury and hath taken increase — shall he then live? He shall not live, a decisive answer to the former question; he hath done all these abominations: he shall surely die. His blood shall be upon him.

14 “Now, lo, if he beget a son who seeth all his father’s sins which he hath done, and considereth and doeth not the like, — another case: a son who walks not in the steps of an unrighteous father, but in the ways of God; for example, Josiah, the pious son of guilty Amon; Hezekiah, of Ahaz.

15 who hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbor’s wife,

16 neither hath oppressed any, hath not withheld the pledge, neither hath despoiled by violence, but hath given his bread to the hungry and hath covered the naked with a garment;

17 who hath taken off his hand from the poor, who hath not received usury nor increase, hath executed My judgements, hath walked in My statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity of his father: he shall surely live.

18 As for his father, because he cruelly oppressed, despoiled his brother by violence, and did that which is not good among his people, lo, even he shall die in his iniquity.

19 “Yet say ye, ‘Why? Doth not the son bear the iniquity of the father?’ When the son hath done that which is lawful and right, and hath kept all My statutes and hath done them, he shall surely live.

20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

— or as the Targum paraphrases it, “the son shall not be punished for the sins of the father, nor shall the father be punished for the sins of the son.”

— but sometimes, one goes through great sufferings though no fault of his or her own, to develop righteous character, like Job and many others did; these will be rewarded enormously at the end.

21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed and keep all My statutes and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live: he shall not die.

22 All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him. In his righteousness that he hath done he shall live. — that is, if the wicked will turn from all his sins.

23 “Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die, saith the Lord God, and not that he should return from his ways and live?

24 But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die.

— but if the righteous man turn from his righteousness, and doeth wickedness, should he live? All the righteousness that he hath done shall not be remembered: for his unfaithfulness that he hath committed, and for his sin that he hath sinned, for these he shall die.

25 “Yet ye say, ‘The way of the Lord is not equal.’ Hear now, O house of Israel: Is not My way equal? Are not your ways unequal?

— from MSG

“Do I hear you saying, ‘That’s not fair! God’s not fair!’? “Listen, Israel. I’m not fair? You’re the ones who aren’t fair! If a good person turns away from his good life and takes up sinning, he’ll die for it. He’ll die for his own sin. Likewise, if a bad person turns away from his bad life and starts living a good life, a fair life, he will save his life. Because he faces up to all the wrongs he’s committed and puts them behind him, he will live, really live. He won’t die. The Message Bible

26 When a righteous man turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity and dieth in it, for his iniquity that he hath done shall he die.

27 Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive. — he shall save his soul from famine, pestilence, the sword, or captivity; he shall be preserved, and not be involved in calamities and distress.

28 Because he considereth and turneth away from all his transgressions that he hath committed, he shall surely live: he shall not die. — in God’s judgement of AD 70, both the Nazarenes and the Hillel branch of Pharisees survived . . . (see more below)

29 Yet saith the house of Israel, ‘The way of the Lord is not equal.’ O house of Israel, are not My ways equal? Are not your ways unequal? — yet the house of Israel complains; the way of the Lord is not equal.

30 “Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the Lord God. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions, so iniquity shall not be your ruin. — you complain of the injustice of my ways; so if I judge you according to your ways? 

31 Cast away from you all your transgressions whereby ye have transgressed, and make yourselves a new heart and a new spirit. For why will ye die, O house of Israel? — this chapter emphasizes on numerous times the house of Israel, rather than the house of Judah;

— earlier we have established that Ezekiel’s messages were actually meant for those living far into the future, in our time, the message to the modern house of Israel, the chief of whom is Ephraim, the United States of America.

32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord God. Therefore turn yourselves, and live ye.

~~~

But which sects managed to escape from the Romans during the AD 66 to 70 siege of Jerusalem? History recorded only two sects that escaped this inferno:

(1) The Christians, known as Nazarenes in Acts 24:5. Many died as martyrs but according to Eusebius, some received divine warning and escaped to a northern town called Pella, west of the Jordan River.

(2) Pharisees of the House of Hillel escaped to Yavne. These were headed by a rabbi, Johanan ben Zakkai, the head of the Sanhedrin; he was smuggled out of besieged Jerusalem in a coffin. Later, his followers re-emerged as Rabbinic Jews who established the Hillel Calendar, which was revealed by Hillel II in about AD 359 concerning the rules of the Calendar.

‘Dirty Bomb’ In Ukraine?

•October 28, 2022 • Leave a Comment

IAEA Invited To Investigate Russian Claims Of ‘Dirty Bomb’ Inside Ukraine

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ October 25, 2022 // CNN ~ October 23, 2022

Following Russia’s initial major weekend accusation that Ukraine is plotting a ‘dirty bomb’ false flag incident, the Kremlin has announced it has “readied all forces and capabilities to fulfill tasks in conditions of radioactive contamination.”

“Blood and fire and columns (pillars) of smoke” Joel 2:30

This is according to a briefing given Monday by the head of Russia’s nuclear, chemical, and biological forces. Western allies of Ukraine have responded by slamming the “false allegations” over the dirty bomb narrative, instead alleging Russia will itself stage a mass detonation and use it as a pretext for escalation of its invasion.

It remains that up till this point, with the conflict reaching the eight month mark, President Putin has yet to issue a formal war declaration. Kiev has claimed Russia is readying a narrative that would justify full invasion of its forces and complete national mobilization.

Ukraine on Monday is requesting that the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, urgently dispatch a team to Kiev in order to conduct inspections to counter Russia’s claims of a Ukrainian “provocation” in the works.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba issued a public statement referencing a phone call with IAEA chief Rafael Grossi: “I officially invited IAEA to urgently send experts to peaceful facilities in Ukraine, which Russia deceitfully claims to be developing a dirty bomb. He agreed. Unlike Russia, Ukraine has always been and remains transparent. We have nothing to hide,” Kuleba said.

Russia very specifically alleged that its intelligence shows Britain is helping the Ukrainians with the ‘dirty bomb’ plot, but Western officials say they didn’t present evidence.

“And I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth—blood and fire and columns (pillars) of smoke” Joel 2:30

“A third part of thee shall die with the pestilence, and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee; and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds, and I will draw out a sword after them” Ezekiel 5:11-12

Ezekiel (Ch 15-16)

•October 27, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Earlier, we have established that this prophecy that Ezekiel delivered was not to be fulfilled during his time, but that its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27), into our time and the message is primarily for the United States of America and secondarily its European allies.

Remember, the Targum, whose origin was in the Aramaic language, could be traced to Ezra speaking to the returning exiles who couldn’t understand Hebrew, but was expounded to them in a language they could understand.

Ezekiel 15

1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the word of prophecy from the Lord, as the Targum renders it. So if Ezra sees it as a prophecy, it is a reference to the future; into the endtime, our time.

2 “Son of man, what is the vine tree more than any tree, or than a branch which is among the trees of the forest? — the house of Israel is often compared to a vine, so why is the vine tree more valuable than any tree; it’s certain that the vine is esteemed only on account of its fruit.

3 Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? Or will men take a peg from it to hang any vessel thereon? — shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? Is there one good piece of timber in the whole vine fit for building a house, or ship, as there is in the oak, elm, or other wild forest trees?

— will the carpenter and joiner, the house or ship builder, employ it to build houses, make beams, rafters, floors, build ships with, make masts of, or any vessel or utensil for the use of man?

4 Behold, it is cast into the fire for fuel; the fire devoureth both the ends of it, and the middle of it is burned. Is it meet for any work? — behold, the vine or the wood is cast into the fire for fuel, that is; a vine tree when cut down, or a branch when cut off, it is good for nothing else;

— and that is generally put to use; it is suggested would be the end of the house of Israel; who were become by their sins like a wild vine, and were fit fuel for the fire of his wrath;

— the fire devoureth both ends of it; the branch cast into it, and so is quickly consumed. In Isaiah 9:12 “the Syrians before, and the Philistines behind, and they devour Israel with open mouth.”

5 Behold, when it was whole, it was meet for no work. How much less shall it be meet yet for any work when the fire hath devoured it and it is burned? — if the wood is cast into the fire, the wood is useless for any purpose; but what if it have been cast into the fire, and half burned, what of it then?

— MSG “Hardly. When it was whole it wasn’t good for anything. Half-burned is no improvement. What’s it good for?

6 Therefore thus saith the Lord God: As the vine tree among the trees of the forest which I have given to the fire for fuel, so will I give the inhabitants of Jerusalem. — so this was fulfilled to Jerusalem in 70 AD, where “I have given to the fire for fuel;” to be burnt, as other trees of the forest are, and along with them; again in 132-135 AD; and could reoccur during the endtime for the house of Israel.

7 And I will set My face against them: they shall go out from one fire, and another fire shall devour them. And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I set My face against them. — the house of Israel will be surrounded at all sides, fires everywhere, no place to run to;

— they shall go from one calamity to another; those that escaped the famine and pestilence will fall by the sword; and those that escaped famine, sword and pestilence, would be carried into captivity;

— the Targum says, “I will execute my vengeance on them, because of the words of the law, which were given out of the midst of fire; they have transgressed, and people who are strong as fire shall consume them.”

— or another saying: “Out of the frying pan into the flame.”

8 And I will make the land desolate, because they have committed a trespass, saith the Lord God.” — a clue for time of desolation perhaps. The house of Judah had evidently failed to observe the land’s one-year-in-seven Sabbath which was set at 70 years, so the period of iniquity was for a deficit of 490 years.

— for in II Chronicles 36:21 it says, “The land enjoyed its sabbath rests; all the time of its desolation it rested, until the seventy years were completed in fulfillment of the word of the LORD spoken by Jeremiah.” This is a reference to Jeremiah 25:11;

— so, as to better understand Ezekiel 4, could the iniquity of the house of Israel set at 190 years (Septuagint) while that of the house of Judah set for 40 years all due to the abmination for not keeping the land sabbath?

Ezekiel 16

1 Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the Targum renders it, the word of prophecy from the Lord. So if Ezra sees it as a prophecy, it is a reference to the future; into the endtime, our time.

2 “Son of man, cause Jerusalem to know her abominations — cause Jerusalem to know; men, even shepherds, often are so blind as not to perceive their guilt which is patent to all. “Jerusalem” represents the whole kingdom of Judah.

3 and say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God unto Jerusalem: Thy birth and thy nativity are of the land of Canaan; thy father was an Amorite and thy mother a Hittite.

— thy father was an Amorite, and thy mother an Hittite; Abraham and Sarah, who were, properly speaking, the one the father, the other the mother, both were Chaldeans; and neither Amorites nor Hittites; but because they dwelt among them, are so called; and since before their conversion they were idolaters, as those were;

— besides, the Jews who descended from Judah, and from whom they have their name, very probably sprung from ancestors who might be Amorites and Hittites: since Judah married the daughter of a Canaanite, and such an one seems to be Tamar, he took for his son Er, and by whom he himself had two sons, Pharez and Zarah.

4 And as for thy nativity, on the day thou wast born thy navel was not cut, neither wast thou washed in water to soothe thee. Thou wast not salted at all, nor swaddled at all. — thy navel was not cut; alluding to what is done to a newborn infant, when the midwife immediately takes care to cut the navel string, by which the child adheres to its mother, and takes in its breath and nourishment in the womb;

— the Targum refers it, “neither wast thou washed in water to supple thee: which also is done, to an infant as soon as born, to cleanse it from the menstruous blood, to make the flesh sleek, and smooth, and amiable; which is done in hot water:

— thou wast not salted at all; which was done, either by sprinkling salt upon it, or using salt and water as a detersive of uncleanness, to prevent putrefaction, to dry up the humours, and harden the flesh, and consolidate the parts;

— or from the MSG (the Message)

“‘On the day you were born your umbilical cord was not cut, you weren’t bathed and cleaned up, you weren’t rubbed with salt, you weren’t wrapped in a baby blanket. No one cared a fig for you. No one did one thing to care for you tenderly in these ways. You were thrown out into a vacant lot and left there, dirty and unwashed—a newborn nobody wanted.

5 No eye pitied thee to do any of these unto thee, to have compassion upon thee; but thou wast cast out in the open field, to the loathing of thy person on the day that thou wast born. — but thou wast cast out in the open field; alluding to infants exposed by their unnatural parents, or unkind nurses, and left in an open field, or any desert place to perish for want, unless some kind providence appears for them;

— this open field may be the land of Egypt, where Jacob and his posterity were, being driven out of Canaan by a famine; and where, after the death of Joseph, they were exposed to the hardships and cruelties of the Egyptians;

— and this loathing of thee on the day that thou wast born, the Targum paraphrases it, “and he (Pharaoh) decreed a full decree to cast your male children into the river, to destroy you when you were in Egypt.”

6 “‘And when I passed by thee and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, “Live”; yea, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, “Live.” — the Israelites were trodden under foot by the Egyptians, when they made them to serve with rigour, in mortar and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field;

— the Targum paraphrases it, “for it was manifest before me that you were afflicted in your bondage” as they sighed and cried because of their bondage, the Lord looked upon them with an eye of pity and compassion, and delivered them;

— these could be a reminder of the house of Israel happening again, this time for 190 years (Septuagint) instead of the 210 years in Egypt.

7 I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxed great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments. Thy breasts are fashioned and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare. — and thine hair is grown; an euphemism, expressive of puberty, which in females was at twelve years of age, and coming of age.

8 “‘Now when I passed by thee and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread My skirt over thee and covered thy nakedness. Yea, I swore unto thee and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest Mine. — God espoused Israel and took her under his protection as a husband doth his wife.

9 Then washed I thee with water; yea, I thoroughly washed away thy blood from thee, and I anointed thee with oil. — these verses describe the purifications and preparations for marriage to one of high rank.

10 I clothed thee also with embroidered work and shod thee with badgers’ skin, and I girded thee about with fine linen, and I covered thee with silk. — and I clothed you with various garments, the desirable things of your enemies;

— Wikipedia: The production of silk originated in China in the Neolithic period, although it would eventually reach other places of the world (Yangshao culture, 4th millennium BC). Silk production remained confined to China until the Silk Road opened at some point during the latter part of the 1st millennium BC, though China maintained its virtual monopoly over silk production for another thousand years.

11 I decked thee also with ornaments, and I put bracelets upon thy hands and a chain on thy neck. — such as the marriage gifts to Rebekah.

12 And I put a jewel on thy forehead, and earrings in thine ears, and a beautiful crown upon thine head. — a jewel on thy forehead; literally, a nose-ring on thy nostril, the custom of the time sanctioning this mode of ornament.

13 Thus wast thou decked with gold and silver, and thy raiment was of fine linen and silk and embroidered work. Thou didst eat fine flour and honey and oil; and thou wast exceeding beautiful, and thou didst prosper into a kingdom. — and thou wast exceeding beautiful, and thou didst prosper into a kingdom;

— the Targum says, ”and ye became rich, and were greatly strengthened, and prospered, and ruled over all kingdoms.”

14 And thy renown went forth among the nations for thy beauty; for it was perfect through My comeliness, which I had put upon thee, saith the Lord God.

15 “‘But thou didst trust in thine own beauty, and played the harlot because of thy renown, and poured out thy fornications on every one that passed by: his it was. — but thou didst trust in thine own beauty; as the early American pilgrims did upon the new land bestowed on them;

— in their outward prosperity and grandeur; in their riches, wealth, and wisdom; and in the extent of their dominions, as manifest destiny dictates;

— and in such men as America’s Founding Fathers; including George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, James Monroe and Benjamin Franklin; together with several other key players of their time, structured the democratic government of the United States and left a legacy that has shaped the world. are apt to put their trust and confidence, and to be elated with, and grow proud and haughty, as a woman because of her beauty.

America’s Founding Fathers – George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, James Monroe and Benjamin Franklin

— and playedst the harlot because of thy renown; now playing the the role of a harlot among the nations round about them, for their wisdom, riches, and power; which was a snare unto them, as a woman’s beauty is to her; and they were admired and courted, and complimented by their neighbours, and so drawn into idolatrous practices, as women into fornication and adultery by the admirers of them;

— idolatry, which is here meant, is frequently signified by playing the harlot, or by fornication and adultery: or “thou playedst the harlot in thy name” alluding to the custom of harlots, notorious infamous ones, who used to set their names over the apartments, to direct men unto them; and so it may denote how famous and notorious the Israelites were for their idolatries, and how impudent in them;

— Rashi interprets this of the calf of the wilderness, and other idolatries which the tribe of Dan committed there; but it rather respects the idolatries committed from the times of Solomon to the captivity, which were many, and often repeated; and though sometimes a stop was put to them by pious princes, yet broke out again: so trusting in a man’s own righteousness, or in any outward thing, is idolatry; and also false worship and superstitious observances.

16 And of thy garments thou didst take, and decked thy high places with divers colors and played the harlot thereupon. The like things shall not come, neither shall it be so. — this declares how the idolaters put their chief delight in those things which please the eyes and outward senses.

17 Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of My gold and of My silver, which I had given thee, and madest for thyself images of men and didst commit whoredom with them, — a beautiful woman, now taking the image of a man, as described by John Gill:

— Gill: some were in the shape of women, others in the shape of men; here only male images are mentioned, because the idolatrous Israelites are represented by an adulterous woman committing adultery, with men; and these were made by themselves, of their jewels of gold and silver; or of their golden and silver vessels, which they had to eat and drink out of; these, they melted down and made idols of them in the form of men;

— just as the molten calf was made of the earrings of the women, Exodus 32:3; to which some refer this passage: and as it was a piece of egregious folly in themselves to part with their jewels and plate for such purposes, and of great ingratitude to God, their benefactor, so of the grossest stupidity and ignorance to worship images so made; which was equally as stupid, or more so, than if a woman should embrace the image of a man, instead of a man himself, as it follows.

— and didst commit whoredom with them: the images: that is, idolatry, which is spiritual adultery.

18 and tookest thy embroidered garments and covered them; and thou hast set Mine oil and Mine incense before them. — the land being a land of oil olive; or which was to light the lamps in the temple with; or was used in sacrifice to the Lord; and the incense, which was offered unto him on the altar of incense; these were set upon the altars of idols.

19 My meat also which I gave thee; fine flour and oil and honey, wherewith I fed thee; thou hast even set it before them for a sweet savor; and thus it was, saith the Lord God; — meat, fine flour, oil and honey; much of these luxuries are well intended for the early years of United States of America.

20 Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto Me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this thy whoredoms a small matter, — hast sacrificed the children unto the idols; this is a terrible development of idolatries; that is all the daily distractions away from God of our new generation of western societies.

21 that thou hast slain My children and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them? — to qualify as a nation of priests (Exodus 19:6), they need to pass through the fire by way of purification and dedication; else they would fill the Temple with so much filths.

22 And in all thine abominations and thy whoredoms thou hast not remembered the days of thy youth, when thou wast naked and bare and wast polluted in thy blood. — this what God will do dealings with the house of Jacob; with their ingratitude; forgetting the miserable condition they were in Egypt, and their trials and protection through the surrounding nations.

23 “‘And it came to pass after all thy wickedness (Woe, woe unto thee! saith the Lord God), — woe, woe unto thee; this parenthetical exclamation has an awful effect coming like a lightning flash of judgement the show the indignation of the Lord amidst the black clouds of Israel’s guilt.

24 that thou hast also built unto thee a brothel house, and hast made thee a high place in every street. — such arched rooms in a a brothel used in connection with the worship of idols for licentious purposes.

25 Thou hast built thy high place at every head of the way, and hast made thy beauty to be abhorred, and hast opened thy feet to every one that passed by, and multiplied thy whoredoms. — thy beauty to be abhorred; that is, spiritual fornication; she had yielded so much that, like a worn-out prostitute, her tempters became weary of her.

26 Thou hast also committed fornication with the Egyptians thy neighbors, great of flesh, and hast increased thy whoredoms to provoke Me to anger. — even with the golden calf of the wilderness, the Israelites turned with avidity to the worship of Egypt;

— and during the subsequent ages, and remained ever ready to develop herself, as in the calves of Jeroboam (1Kings 12:28-30), and then claiming Bethel and Dan as centers of worship instead of Jerusalem.

27 Behold, therefore I have stretched out My hand over thee, and have diminished thine ordinary food, and delivered thee unto the will of them that hate thee, the daughters of the Philistines, who are ashamed of thy lewd way. — the daughters of the Philistines: idolaters, but they are more honest than the Israelites; they were constant to their own god, and did not, as the Israelites, lewdly go a whoring with every idol they saw.

28 Thou hast played the whore also with the Assyrians, because thou wast unsatiable; yea, thou hast played the harlot with them and yet couldest not be satisfied. — playing whore with the Assyrians; and yet couldn”t be satisfied;

— with their idols, and the worship of them, but sought out for new gods, and new modes of worship; like a lewd woman, who having prostituted herself to one, and to another, yet remains insatiable, and seeks out for other lovers.

29 Thou hast moreover multiplied thy fornication in the land of Canaan unto Chaldea, and yet thou wast not satisfied herewith. — thou hast multiplied thy idolatries in Canaan by sending unto Chaldea to borrow from thence the Chaldean rites, to add to the abominations already practised in Canaan, before the carrying away of Jehoiachin to Chaldea.

30 “‘How weak is thine heart, saith the Lord God, seeing thou doest all these things, the work of an imperious whorish woman, — having a weak heart; unstable, like water that melts away. Neither hast strength of judgement to discern the truth and purity of religion, nor hast strength of resolution to hold fast to it.

31 in that thou buildest thine eminent place at the head of every way and makest thine high place in every street, and hast not been as a harlot in that thou scornest hire,

— from MSG

“‘What a sick soul! Doing all this stuff—the champion whore! You built your bold brothels at every major intersection, opened up your whorehouses in every neighborhood, but you were different from regular whores in that you wouldn’t accept a fee.

32 but as a wife that committeth adultery, that taketh strangers instead of her husband! — that takes other men into her bed instead of her husband, not for the sake of gain, but lust;

— and this is the case of modern Ephraim, who are a wicked people and an idolatrous generation; who took strange gods to worship instead of the true God, who had been a husband to them.

33 Gifts are given to all whores, but thou givest thy gifts to all thy lovers, and hirest them, that they may come unto thee on every side for thy whoredom. — they give gifts to all whores; they gave the Egyptians, Assyrians and other allies, money, to gain their friendship, and procure alliances with them.

34 And it is the contrary in thee from other women in thy whoredoms, whereas none followeth thee to commit whoredoms; and in that thou givest a reward and no reward is given unto thee, therefore thou art contrary.

— whereas none followeth thee to commit whoredoms; the house of Jacob, the Israelites followed the examples, customs, and practices of the Gentiles, in worshipping of their idols; but the Gentiles did not follow the Jews, they kept to their own gods, and did not worship the God of Israel;

35 “‘Therefore, O harlot, hear the word of the Lord! — the sentence to be pronounced; O harlot, hear the word of the Lord; adjudging to be slain with the sword, to be stoned and burned; the crime for which is to be read in the name of the harlot.

36 Thus saith the Lord God: Because thy filthiness was poured out and thy nakedness uncovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers, and with all the idols of thy abominations, and by the blood of thy children which thou didst give unto them,

— thy filthiness; literally, thy brass, that is, money, which, with which she hired and bribed her lovers as said in the previous verses, Israel had lavished upon the surrounding nations.

37 behold, therefore I will gather all thy lovers with whom thou hast taken pleasure, and all them that thou hast loved, with all them that thou hast hated. I will even gather them round about against thee and will uncover thy nakedness unto them, that they may see all thy nakedness.

— to gather all your lovers, with “all them that thou hast hated” and American allies (Germany, Italy, Turkey, S Arabia, UAE, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, S Korea, the Philippines and even Japan) will take their own interests first, team up with enemies of the United States (Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Iran, N Korea, Russia and China) and ALL will turn against America;

— nar, it is not these countries’ doings, but it is God’s judgement that will cause these groupings to be against the United States, and it is again God’s will through his spirits that will trap the United States in a snare (And I will spread my net upon him, and he shall be taken in my [not China’s nor Russia’s] snare, Ezekiel 17:20; and he will be like a pig caught in a cage squealing away to no avail) then uncover her nakedness.

— then and only then, perhaps, the world will finally uncover all the experiments Professor Ralph Baric and other associates have ventured at Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It is God himself that will lay a net to trap the United States; he is the Overseeing GrandMaster; not China, not Russia, these are only pawns on a chessboard.

38 And I will judge thee, as women that break wedlock and shed blood are judged; and I will give thee blood in fury and jealousy. — and I will judge thee as women that break wedlock; the marriage covenant, defile the marriage bed, and were adulteresses, who by the law of Moses should be punished with death.

39 And I will also give thee into their hand, and they shall throw down thine eminent place and shall break down thy high places. They shall strip thee also of thy clothes and shall take thy fair jewels, and leave thee naked and bare. — they shall strip thee also of thy clothes; thy fairjewels, alluding a lot to prostitutes, their maintainers in the end stripping them of all they had given them;

— thy idol temples, shall break down thy high places; lots of palaces, museums, on display of these treasures, now; but shall leave thee naked and bare;

— lots of stolen arts “take thy fair jewels” the vessels of thy glory; the vessels of the sanctuary of gold and silver of other countries, and their own household furniture, with all their riches (from the Opium War booties, the Old Summer Palace looting, etc) and substance from other countries, will be laid naked and have to be returned.

Looting of the Old Summer Palace by Anglo-French forces in 1860

40 They shall also bring up a company against thee, and they shall stone thee with stones and thrust thee through with their swords. — a company; an assembled army; you had your assemblies for your idol worship, and God will have also an assembly, but it shall be of the “Chaldeans” Habakkuk 1:6, and others, to destroy you for your idolatry;

— and thrust thee through with their swords; such as attempted to escape out of the city, or fell into the hands of the enemy when it was taken, were slain with the sword.

41 And they shall burn thine houses with fire, and execute judgements upon thee in the sight of many women; and I will cause thee to cease from playing the harlot, and thou also shalt give no hire any more.

— and they shall burn thine houses with fire; as the houses in Jerusalem were by Nebuchadnezzar’s army, even the temple, the house of the Lord, and the king’s house, and the houses of great men, even all the houses in the city; shall be burned with fire.

42 So will I make My fury toward thee to rest, and My jealousy shall depart from thee, and I will be quiet and will be no more angry. — after his judgement executed, God will be quiet, and will be no more angry: the effects of his anger cease, and he at peace with Israel, and they with him.

43 Because thou hast not remembered the days of thy youth, but hast made Me fret in all these things, behold, therefore I also will recompense thy way upon thine head, saith the Lord God; and thou shalt not commit this lewdness above all thine abominations.

— from the Voice

“Because you failed to remember the days of your youth but instead you infuriated Me with countless perverted love affairs, I will pay you back for every ounce of indecency you instigated. I, the Eternal Lord, proclaim this. Did you not add vulgar acts to your streak of shocking sins?” The Voice

44 “‘Behold, every one that useth proverbs shall use this proverb against thee, saying, “As is the mother, so is her daughter.” — saying, as is the mother, so is her daughter; an ancient and common proverb, used to express a likeness and agreement between persons their nature and disposition, in their behaviour, conduct, and conversation.

— so the Targum says: “as are the works of the mother, so those of the daughter.” That is, once practised by the Amorites and Hittites, they are now continued by the Israelites.

45 Thou art thy mother’s daughter, who loatheth her husband and her children, and thou art the sister of thy sisters, who loathed their husbands and their children. Your mother was a Hittite and your father an Amorite.

— the Targum says, “was not your mother Sarah among the Hittites? [but] she did not do according to their works; and though your father Abraham was among the Amorites, [yet] he walked not in their counsels.”

46 And thine elder sister is Samaria, she and her daughters, who dwell at thy left hand; and thy younger sister, who dwelleth at thy right hand, is Sodom and her daughters. — the temple looked to the east; Samaria was on its left, and Sodom on its right hand;

— Samaria, she and her daughters; the initial inhabitants maybe be Israelites, but starting with Jeroboam, they adopted idolatories, worshipping their calves at Dan and Bethel. The fanciful Samaritans came later, but they added more idolatories as Sun-worshippers.

— today more than 98.5 percent of Christians are honoring the SUN by observing SUNday. They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east,” Ezekiel 8:16. At even (erev) on the Fourteenth, onset to begin their passover, the Samaritans face the west as the SUN is setting. How awesome the sight is, exclaims Fred Coulter, for such a surreal ceremony to take place.

— others, following the SUN-worshipping Samaritans, the Church of God Communities are showing their contempt by having their “wavesheaf offering” and Pentecost on a SUNday; always on SUNdays. And these are supposedly in God’s sanctuary, but God says He is a jealous God, so these pretenters could be spewed out of His mouth! No? Regardless, there are those being described in Revelation 3:17 ~ wretched, miserable, poor, blind and naked. “As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: or else I will spew thee out of My mouth (v16,19).”

— Sodom and her daughters; witness the proliferation of LGBTQIA (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (questioning), intersex, asexual (agender)); are prevalent in western societies. Thou “madest for thyself images of men,” Ezekiel 16:17). Women been changed into men, and men into women, all images of what they did in Sodom.

— Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that count darkness as light, and light as darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Isaiah 5:20

47 Yet hast thou not walked after their ways, nor done according to their abominations, but, as if that were a very little thing, thou wast corrupted more than they in all thy ways. — as if that were a very little thing; these Samaritan Sun-worshipping, were considered as little thing; same as the proliferation of LGBTQIA; no big deal! And they all look upon any criticism with contempt!

— “Not only did you imitate the ways and follow the shocking actions of your sisters, but soon you became even more corrupt than they ever were” The Voice translation; the Targum says, “if thou hadst walked in their ways, and done according to their abominations, thy sin would have been small.”

48 As I live, saith the Lord God, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters. — as I live, saith the Lord God; this is an oath, which the Lord God swore;

— who, because he couldn’t swear by any greater, he swore by himself; and this he did to confirm, that the sins of modern house of Israel were greater than those of Samaria and Sodom; which might not be easily believed, but it is as true as he is the living God.

49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom: pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy; — pride; which was the sin of the devils, and the cause of their ruin; the sin of our first parents, by which they fell, and destroyed themselves, and their posterity;

50 and they were haughty and committed abomination before Me. Therefore I took them away as I saw good. — and they were haughty; Sodom and her daughters, the inhabitants of that place, and the cities adjacent; they lifted up themselves above God and man;

51 Neither hath Samaria committed half of thy sins; but thou hast multiplied thine abominations more than they, and hast justified thy sisters in all thine abominations which thou hast done. — but thou hast multiplied thine abominations more than they; than Samaria and her daughters, or the ten tribes; or more guilty than Sodom and Samaria;

52 Thou also, who hast judged thy sisters, bear thine own shame for thy sins that thou hast committed more abominable than they: they are more righteous than thou. Yea, be thou confounded also and bear thy shame, in that thou hast justified thy sisters.

— hast judged thy sisters; had approved the judgements upon Samaria and Sodom; as it is always easy for man to approve judgements upon the sins of others; but now this must be brought home to herself for her own greater sins.

53 “‘When I shall bring back their captives, the captives of Sodom and her daughters and the captives of Samaria and her daughters, then will I bring back the captivity of thy captives in the midst of them,

— from the Voice

However, I am going to restore the fortunes of your sisters—Sodom and her daughters, Samaria and her daughters—and I’ll restore your fortunes too.

54 that thou mayest bear thine own shame and mayest be confounded in all that thou hast done, in that thou art a comfort unto them. — bear thine own shame; by being put on a level with those whom thou has much despised.

55 When thy sisters, Sodom and her daughters, shall return to their former estate and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then thou and thy daughters shall return to your former estate.

56 For thy sister Sodom was not mentioned by thy mouth in the day of thy pride, — you didn’t mention your sister Sodom when you were feeling proud of yourself.

57 before thy wickedness was uncovered, as at the time of thy reproach of the daughters of Syria and all who are round about her, the daughters of the Philistines, who despise thee round about. — but that was before your evil was exposed! Now you are looked down upon by everyone! The daughters of Syria and all of her neighbors and the daughters of Philistia despise you!

58 Thou hast borne thy lewdness and thine abominations, saith the Lord. — thou hast borne your own abominations, openly and publicly; your iniquities were written as it were upon your foreheads, and to be seen of all; your punishment was due unto yourselves.

59 “‘For thus saith the Lord God: I will even deal with thee as thou hast done, who hast despised the oath in breaking the covenant. — you will get what you deserve from Me because you have despised My oath and broken our covenant.

60 Nevertheless I will remember My covenant with thee in the days of thy youth, and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant. — the covenant to be established shall be an everlasting covenant.

61 Then thou shalt remember thy ways and be ashamed when thou shalt receive thy sisters, thine elder and thy younger; and I will give them unto thee for daughters, but not by thy covenant. — then thou shalt remember thy ways, and be ashamed; it brings persons to a sense of their sins, and to an ingenuous acknowledgment of them, with shame and blushing;

— I will give them unto thee for daughters; all the heathen nations, not merely Sodom and Samaria, are meant by “thy sisters, elder and younger.”

62 And I will establish My covenant with thee; and thou shalt know that I am the Lord, — thou “shall know that I am the Lord” expressed numerous times, implying that neither those teaching in the synagogues nor those in their numerous churches know God today!

63 that thou mayest remember and be confounded and never open thy mouth any more because of thy shame, when I am pacified toward thee for all that thou hast done, saith the Lord God.’”

— from MSG

“‘God, says, I’ll do to you just as you have already done, you who have treated my oath with contempt and broken the covenant. All the same, I’ll remember the covenant I made with you when you were young and I’ll make a new covenant with you that will last forever. You’ll remember your sorry past and be properly contrite when you receive back your sisters, both the older and the younger. I’ll give them to you as daughters, but not as participants in your covenant. I’ll firmly establish my covenant with you and you’ll know that I am God. You’ll remember your past life and face the shame of it, but when I make atonement for you, make everything right after all you’ve done, it will leave you speechless.’” The Message Bible

In conjunction with this chapter, a great youtube to watch here (Brian Berletic vs Daniel Dumbrill)

“I HAVE SEEN A HORRIBLE THING IN THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL” HOSEA 6:10

F-35 Jets Crashes

•October 26, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Crashes of US-Made F-35 Jets: All You Need to Know

Sputnik ~ October 22, 2022 // The EurAsian News ~ October 26, 2022

‘Heartbreaking’ Record of Accidents: US Air Force Launches F-35 Crash Recovery Training For The Very First Time.

Last week, an F-35A fifth-generation fighter jet crashed in the US state of Utah at Hill Air Force Base near Salt Lake City. While the incident was tragic and unprecedented, F-35 crashes are not uncommon for the US and allied Air Forces.

In recent years, the US has been promoting its F-35 aircraft as “the most advanced multirole fighter jet of the 21st century,” looking for potential importers across the globe.

However, not everything seems to be going smoothly in the exploitation of US-made F-35 aircraft, with technical failures and crashes being reported on a regular basis in different countries where these jets were purchased.

Check out Sputnik’s infographic to learn more about the incidents involving US F-35 fighter jets.

TRTWorld South Korean Lawmaker Says F-35s Grounded 172 Times Over 18 Months.

Citing the country’s air force data, a South Korean representative said that over an 18-month period, the F-35 was grounded 172 times, with an additional 62 cases in which the jets flew, but weren’t able to carry out their mission. 

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

Ezekiel (Ch 13-14)

•October 25, 2022 • Leave a Comment

We have established that this Ezekiel’s prophecy that he delivered was meant for many years to come; its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27), into our time and the message is primarily for the United States of America and secondarily its European allies.

The phrase ye or they “shall know that I am the Lord” expressed 4 times in chapter 13 alone (v9,14,21,23) and once in chapter 14 (v8; and 57 times in all in the book of Ezekiel). In other chapters the phase could sometimes be applied to Gentile nations, but for chapter 13 and 14, they apply to both the house of Judah and the house of Israel;

Second, this phase ye or they “shall know that I am the Lord” implies that neither those teaching in the synagogues nor those in their numerous churches know God today!!!

Ezekiel 13

1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the Targum renders it, the word of prophecy from the Lord. If Ezra sees it as a prophecy, it is a reference to our time.

2 “Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel who prophesy, and say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts: ‘Hear ye the word of the Lord! — Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel; who called themselves so; though they are rightly call the false prophets; and are like foxes among the ruins;

— that prophesy; that is, smooth things to the people; promising a speedy return from captivity; or that Jerusalem should not be taken by the Chaldeans, and the inhabitants of it, and of the land, be carried captive.

3 Thus saith the Lord God: Woe unto the foolish prophets, who follow their own spirit and have seen nothing! — false prophecies came into their own spirits and was agreeable to their fancies and carnal imaginations, pretending to be the spirit of prophecy.

The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath My word, let him speak My word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat?” saith the Lord. Jeremiah 23:28

— any dream is the chaff; it is of no value; it is as wood, hay and stubble. Only God’s Word is the wheat – in parallel with gold, silver, and precious stones.

4 O Israel, thy prophets are like the foxes in the deserts. — these false prophets, as the Targum says; they are comparable to foxes, for their craftiness and cunning, and lying in wait to deceive, as these seduced the Lord’s people;

— like the foxes; hungry and ravening, crafty and guileful, and living off their wits.

5 Ye have not gone up into the gaps [or breaches], neither made up the hedge [or a “fence” a fortification] for the house of Israel to stand in the battle on the day of the Lord. — ye, the princes or to the prophet of the house of Israel, have not gone up into the gaps [or breaches as the Targum says];

— the allusion is to breaches made in the walls of a city when besieged; at which time those within gather together in great numbers to meet the enemy, and prevent his entrance by the breaches;

— these words are either spoken to the princes of Israel, governors or the civil magistrates, or to the prophets, who seeing the sins of the people, like a mighty torrent, opening a breach for the wrath and judgements of God to pour in upon them, should have put up their prayers, and made intercession to God for them; neither of which they did, and therefore are blamed here.

6 They have seen vanity and lying divination, saying, “The Lord saith,” but the Lord hath not sent them; and they have made others to hope that they would confirm the word. — in many of the churches in the house of Israel, they have seen vanity, and lying divination;

— the visions of going to heavens, for example, the false prophets pretend to see were nothing but the fruit of their own fancies and imaginations, and had nothing real in them; and what they divined or foretold should be were all lies, and never came to pass, and never would.

7 Have ye not seen a vain vision and have ye not spoken a lying divination, wherein ye say, “The Lord saith it,” albeit I have not spoken? — a lying divination; delivered out a known lie, saying they had it from the Lord, when they had it not; or a prophecy that will deceive, and be without effect, and in the issue prove a falsehood;

— prophesy against the prophets of Israel who prophesy; these false prophets and teachers preach in the name of the Lord, where the Lord has not sent them;

8 “‘Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Because ye have spoken vanity and seen lies, therefore, behold, I am against you, saith the Lord God. — the whole verse speaks the dreadful anger of God against those false prophets; it is unspeakable wrath, and we are left to guess at it by the manner of speech here used;

— expressing a threat, as in Ezekiel 21:3 “and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.” 

9 And Mine hand shall be upon the prophets who see vanity and who divine lies; they shall not be in the assembly of My people, neither shall they be written in the writing of the house of Israel, neither shall they enter into the land of Israel; and ye shall know that I am the Lord God.

— Gill: they shall not be in the assembly of my people, shall have no place in the church of God, nor fellowship with the saints; they shall not join with them in religious worship here;

— Fred R. Coulter, Frank W. Nelte and John W. Ritenbaugh are all liars; will the above verse applies to them, “who see vanity and who divine lies” that being lying and deceitful “they shall not be in the assembly of My people?”

— Matthew Poole’s Commentary: Mine hand; my power striking them; so that it shall be evident they fall under Divine revenge, as Pelatiah, Ezekiel 11:13, and Hananiah, Jeremiah 28:15,16; and Shemaiah, Jeremiah 29:31; or Ahab, son of Kolaiah (and even Zedekiah), Jeremiah 29:21;

— the phrase ye or they “shall know that I am the Lord” implying that those teaching in their numerous churches now don’t know God today!!!

— and it should appear that their names were never written in the Lamb’s book of life; or that they ever were among the number of God’s elect; so the Targum says, “and in the writing of eternal life, which is written for the righteous of the house of Israel, they shall not be written;”

The secret of the Lord is with them that fear Him, and He will show them His covenant. Psalm 25:14

10 “‘Because, even because they have seduced My people, saying, “Peace,” and there was no peace, and one built up a wall, and lo, others daubed it with untempered mortar, — “Because, even because” the repetition heightens the emphasis.

11 say unto those who daub it with untempered mortar that it shall fall. There shall be an overflowing shower, and ye, O great hailstones, shall fall, and a stormy wind shall rend it. — great hailstones; hail is unusual in Palestine, but its destructive effects were well known; this is another way of saying building a house upon the sands, loose sands;

— a stormy wind; a whirlwind, to shake the tumbling stones, which without much shaking would ere long drop down; but, to hasten the downfall, soaking showers, storms of hail and violent winds, shall meet; so shall your crazy state, O deceived shepherds, come down to ruin;

— the vast majority which would be no less than 99.99 percent of today’s professing Christianity make this fundamental error. This porous foundation differs greatly from the original Nazarenes where they understood what the Oracles as given to the Jews (Romans 3:1-4) would mean. Unless trained in Judaism, they wouldn’t be able to read the Sacred Text, which only had consonants written. This means our modern version of Christianity is primarily built on sands, loose sands. For a more in-depth study here.

12 Lo, when the wall has fallen, shall it not be said unto you, “Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it?” — daubing or untempered morter or whited plaster; that is, only good for appearance;

— from MSG:

“The fact is that they’ve lied to my people. They’ve said, ‘No problem; everything’s just fine,’ when things are not at all fine. When people build a wall, they’re right behind them slapping on whitewash. Tell those who are slapping on the whitewash, ‘When a torrent of rain comes and the hailstones crash down and the hurricane sweeps in and the wall collapses, what’s the good of the whitewash that you slapped on so liberally, making it look so good?’ The Message Bible

13 Therefore thus saith the Lord God: I will even rend it with a stormy wind in My fury; and there shall be an overflowing shower in Mine anger and great hailstones in My fury to consume it. — the whole is paraphrased by the Targum thus, “and I will bring a mighty king with the force of tempests; and a destroying people as a prevailing rain in my fury shall come; and kings, who were powerful as hailstones, in wrath to consume.”

14 So will I break down the wall that ye have daubed with untempered mortar and bring it down to the ground, so that the foundation thereof shall be uncovered, and it shall fall and ye shall be consumed in the midst thereof; and ye shall know that I am the Lord. — God will even rend it with a stormy wind in his fury; stormy winds sometimes rend rocks asunder;

— so says the Targum, “and I will destroy the city in which ye have prophesied false prophecies; and I will cause it to fall to the ground, and its foundations shall be discovered.”

15 Thus will I accomplish My wrath upon the wall and upon them that have daubed it with untempered mortar, and will say unto you: “The wall is no more, neither they that daubed it, — my wrath upon the wall; will pour out all his indignation, and inflict just punishment upon the city and its inhabitants.

16 to wit, the prophets of Israel who prophesy concerning Jerusalem, and who see visions of peace for her and there is no peace, saith the Lord God.”’ — it says “concerning Jerusalem” but it’s more likely refering to the chief city of the modern house of Israel, New York, where the “.the prophets of Israel” who “see visions of peace” where there is no peace.

One already passed, more along the way . . .

17 “Likewise, thou son of man, set thy face against the daughters of thy people who prophesy out of their own heart; and prophesy thou against them — set thy face against the false prophetesses, (one among the chiefs was the late Ellen G White, 1827-1915, founder of the Seven-day Adventist Church) who prophesied out of their own illusion.

18 and say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Woe to the women who sew pillows to all armholes and make kerchiefs upon the head of those of every stature to hunt souls! Will ye hunt the souls of My people, and will ye save the souls alive who come unto you?

— from MSG

“And the women prophets—son of man, take your stand against the women prophets who make up stuff out of their own minds. Oppose them. Say ‘Doom’ to the women who sew magic bracelets and head scarves to suit every taste, devices to trap souls. Say, ‘Will you kill the souls of my people, use living souls to make yourselves rich and popular? You have profaned me among my people just to get ahead yourselves, used me to make yourselves look good—killing souls who should never have died and coddling souls who shouldn’t live. You’ve lied to people who love listening to lies.’ The Message Bible

19 And will ye pollute Me among My people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, to slay the souls who should not die and to save the souls alive that should not live, by your lying to My people who hear your lies?

— and will ye pollute me among my people; defile the name of the Lord by abusing it to cover their wicked designs and practices; that what they said came from him, though he spoke not by them; and that it was his will they declared, when it was their own, and what came out of their own hearts and heads:

— so the Targum says, “will ye pollute my will among my people” to profane his name among the Gentiles was a great sin, but to pollute it among his own people was greater; attempting to draw them aside from his fear and worship, and that for gain, for small gain too.

20 “‘Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I am against your pillows, wherewith ye there hunt the souls to make them fly; and I will tear them from your arms and will let the souls go, even the souls whom ye hunt to make them fly. — I am against your pillows; that is, against your lying ceremonial tricks by which ye cheat the people.

21 Your kerchiefs also will I tear and deliver My people out of your hand, and they shall be no more in your hand to be hunted; and ye shall know that I am the Lord.

— from the MSG

“Therefore God says, ‘I am against all the devices and techniques you use to hunt down souls. I’ll rip them out of your hands. I’ll free the souls you’re trying to catch. I’ll rip your magic bracelets and scarves to shreds and deliver my people from your influence so they’ll no longer be victimized by you. That’s how you’ll come to realize that I am God.

22 Because with lies ye have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad, and strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way by promising him life, — Ephraim is a chronic liar; compulsive lying constantly and continuously; chief of whom is Mike Pompeo freely admitting lying within the CIA : We lied, We cheated, We stole

A parallel scripture fits Mike Pompeo to the t:

Ephraim compasseth me about with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit; Hosea 11:12

23 therefore ye shall see no more vanity nor divine divinations; for I will deliver My people out of your hand, and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’” — ye shall see no more vanity, events shall confute their lies, involving themselves in destruction.

— and ye “shall know that I am the Lord” which implies that those teaching in their numerous churches with their faithful pretenders don’t know God today!

Ezekiel 14

Although Isaiah 8:14 refers to “both houses of Israel” or the “two houses of Israel” it implies the single house of Jacob, the full twelve tribes. But Jacob was given a new name, Israel, in which the twelve tribes are named. So the single house of Jacob or now call Israel was broken into two, the kingdom of Israel and the kingdom of Judah.

Hence, the names of the two houses are separated, namely the 10-tribes “house of Israel” and the 2-tribes “house of Judah.” Further, the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 is redefined as “the house of Jacob” in Isaiah 8:17 (more at the end).

This chapter emphasizes Israel, the 10-tribes house of Israel rather than the house of Judah. Earlier we have established that Ezekiel’s messages were actually meant for those living far into the future, in our time, the message to the modern house of Israel, the chief of whom is Ephraim, the United States of America. So this prophecy continues . . .

1 Then came certain of the elders of Israel unto me and sat before me. — not the elders of Judah (where they came in chapter 8), but the elders of Israel sat before me; if these were “the elders of Israel,” than these elders could paradoxically have returned from Assyria (where they were held captives) and inquired from Ezekiel their own fate, the fate for the northern house of Israel;

— surely the elders were not asking about their current fate, for they were already in captivity some 135 years earlier; they would be interested about their fate for their posterity at the endtime, for example, would they ever return, if so, when, to the Promised land?

2 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the word of prophecy from the Lord as the Targum renders it. So if Ezra sees it as a prophecy, it is a reference to the future; our time; hence, this a prophecy for the elders of Israel, indicating this scene is prophetic in significance for those of the house of Israel at the endtime;

3 “Son of man, these men have set up their idols in their heart and put the stumbling block of their iniquity before their face. Should I be inquired of at all by them? — have set up their idols in their heart; resolved idolaters, their heart was totally addicted to their idolatrous worship and ceremonies; so these idols are called “the stumbling block of their iniquity.”

4 Therefore speak unto them and say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Every man of the house of Israel that setteth up his idols in his heart and putteth the stumbling block of his iniquity before his face, and cometh to the prophet, I the Lord will answer him that cometh according to the multitude of his idols,

— they multiplied idols, this their sin, God will multiply their sorrows; they first run into darkness of idolatry, God will leave them to the darkness of misery. He will give answer, but in just judgement, with severe reproof, menace and authority;

— more specifically, their main stubling blocks are SUNday worshipping; Mithraism Dec 25th idoltary; Easterism and those rabbit and eggs; and Halloweenism with frightening masks and costumes;

5 that I may take the house of Israel in their own heart, because they are all estranged from Me through their idols.’ — because they are all estranged from me through their idols; the house of Israel, to have a form and shell of godliness, but to deny its substance, is the essence of hypocrisy;

6 “Therefore say unto the house of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Repent, and turn yourselves from your idols, and turn away your faces from all your abominations. — here, and closeby verses, numerous reference that the warnings are to the modern house of Israel, and turn away their faces from all their abominations.

7 For every one of the house of Israel, or of the stranger that sojourneth in Israel, who separateth himself from Me and setteth up his idols in his heart, and putteth the stumbling block of his iniquity before his face, and cometh to a prophet to inquire of him concerning Me, I the Lord will answer him by Myself.

— such men, be he an Israelite or a Gentile, come to a prophet to inquire of God, God declares that He will answer, not by the prophet through whom the enquiry is made, God the Lord will answer him directly; not by the prophet to whom he comes, but by himself:

— or, “in my word” as the Targum says; yet not by words, but by blows; not in mercy, but in wrath; and in such manner, that it shall appear to come from the Lord, and to be according to truth and justice, it may seem too late . . .

8 And I will set My face against that man and will make him a sign and a proverb, and I will cut him off from the midst of My people; and ye shall know that I am the Lord. — and God himself will set his face against that man;

— and God will “cut him off” from the midst of his people; by a sudden death, notwithstanding all his daring endeavour in coming to seek the will of the Lord from his prophet; inquiring of God, yet guilty of gross idolatry; and only only after facing judgement then shall he know who the Lord is;

— the Targum renders it, “my fury” or “wrath” and indeed that is what is meant; when God sets his face against a man, he pours out his wrath, or inflicts punishment on him;

— even if he’s set his mind “to inquire of him (Ezekiel, or another prophet) concerning Me,” (verse 7 above); a sort of vexing the holy spirits, that is, there is a time that’s just too late.

9 And if the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived [enticed] that prophet, and I will stretch out My hand upon him and will destroy him from the midst of My people Israel. — Rashi: have enticed: I opened a doorway for him to do whatever he wishes. And from here we can learn that if one wishes to defile himself, they open a door for him;

— Fred R. Coulter, Frank W. Nelte and John W. Ritenbaugh are all enticed to be deceivers; will the above verse applies to them, whom “the Lord have deceived [enticed] that prophet” that being lying and deceitful and “I will stretch out My hand upon him and will destroy him from the midst of My people Israel?”

10 And they shall bear the punishment of their iniquity. The punishment of the prophet shall be even as the punishment of him that seeketh unto him,

— the punishment of the (deceived or false) prophet shall be even as the punishment of him that seekest unto him; they being both alike culpable, each pursuing the desires of their own evil hearts; the one seeking for smooth things to be spoken to him; the other speaking them, in order to gratify him;

— the Targum says, “according to the sin of him that comes to learn and learns not; according to the sin of the false prophet shall it be.”

11 that the house of Israel may go no more astray from Me, neither be polluted any more with all their transgressions, but that they may be My people and I may be their God, saith the Lord God.’”

— and this, from MSG

“‘If a prophet is deceived and tells these idolaters the lies they want to hear, I, God, get blamed for those lies. He won’t get by with it. I’ll grab him by the scruff of the neck and get him out of there. They’ll be equally guilty, the prophet and the one who goes to the prophet, so that the house of Israel will never again wander off my paths and make themselves filthy in their rebellions, but will rather be my people, just as I am their God.’”

12 The word of the Lord came again to me, saying, — the Targum renders it, the word of prophecy from the Lord. if it is a prophecy, it is a reference to the future; into the endtime, our time.

13 “Son of man, when the land sinneth against Me by trespassing grievously, then will I stretch out Mine hand upon it, and will break the staff of the bread thereof, and will send famine upon it, and will cut off man and beast from it.

14 Though these three men, Noah, Daniel, and Job were in it, they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the Lord God. — though Noah, Daniel and Job; the intercession even of the holiest of men shall not avert God’s judgements; but that they could only deliver their own souls.

15 If I cause noisome beasts to pass through the land, and they spoil it so that it be desolate, that no man may pass through because of the beasts, — the land might be infested with lions, tigers, foxes, wolves, bears and bisons, alligators and other wild beasts.

16 though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord God, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters. They only shall be delivered, but the land shall be desolate. — they: Noah, Daniel and Job; shall deliver neither sons nor daughters; meaning not adult children, but only little ones, infant sons and daughters; such as had not been guilty; but the land shall be desolate.

17 Or if I bring a sword upon that land and say, ‘Sword, go through the land,’ so that I cut off man and beast from it, — ‘Sword, go through the land,’ this could be a foretaste or an introduction to what would be coming from Ezekiel 20:45 to 21:5; where more details would be given;

 — the Targum says, “and I say that they that kill with the sword pass through the land:” so that I cut off man and beast from it; by the sword; the one being destroyed as an enemy, the other for food;

— the argument is cumulative; the first puts the case of the land sinning so as to fall under the judgement of a famine (Eze 14:13); then (Eze 14:15) “noisome beasts” (Leviticus 26:22); then “the sword” then worst of all “pestilence.”

18 though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord God, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters, but they only shall be delivered themselves. — if Noah, Daniel and Job could not deliver the land when deserving only one judgement, “how much more” when all four judgements combined are to visit the land; when for all these sins, the three righteous men could not deliver it.

19 Or if I send a pestilence into that land and pour out My fury upon it in blood to cut off from it man and beast, — and pour out my fury upon it in blood; or, “by blood” by corrupting the blood which is done when a man is seized with the pestilence;

— the Targum renders it, “with slaughter” by slaying a great number of persons by that disease as a token of fury and wrath, because of their transgressions. It may be rendered, “because of blood” and so express the cause and reason of the judgement, the shedding of innocent blood.

20 though Noah, Daniel, and Job were in it, as I live, saith the Lord God, they shall deliver neither son nor daughter. They shall but deliver their own souls by their righteousness. — though Noah, Daniel and Job, were in it; again repeated as in Ezekiel 14:14; and referred to in Ezekiel 14:16; for emphasis.

21 “For thus saith the Lord God: How much more when I send My four sore judgements upon Jerusalem

— the sword and the famine and the noisome beast and the pestilence — to cut off from it man and beast? — GOD’s four judgements — SWORD, war. FAMINE, occasioned by drought. PESTILENCE, epidemic diseases which sweep off a great part of the inhabitants of a land. The NOISOME BEAST, the multiplication of wild beasts in consequence of the general destruction of the inhabitants.

22 Yet, behold, therein shall be left a remnant that shall be brought forth, both sons and daughters. Behold, they shall come forth unto you, and ye shall see their way and their doings; and ye shall be comforted concerning the evil that I have brought upon Jerusalem, even concerning all that I have brought upon it.

— yet, behold, in it shall be left a remnant that shall escape and be brought forth; they would bear testimonies to the world of their sins; of why they were punished for all that they had done.

23 And they shall comfort you, when ye see their ways and their doings; and ye shall know that I have not done without cause all that I have done in it, saith the Lord God.”

— and ye shall know that I have not done without cause all that I have done in it, saith the Lord God; that there was just reason for it; that he was sufficiently provoked to do it; and that it was necessary it should be done, for his own honour, and the good of others.

~~chap8&14end;19,33&36beg~~

The house of Israel verses the house of Judah

Although Isaiah 8:14 refers to “both houses of Israel” or the “two houses of Israel” it implies the single house of Jacob, the full twelve tribes.

But Jacob was given a new name, Israel, in which the full house of Israel, as in Ezekiel 20:40, the twelve tribes are all included. And after King Solomon, the single house of Jacob or now call Israel was broken into two, the kingdom of Israel and the kingdom of Judah.

Hence, the names of the two houses are separated, namely the 10-tribes “house of Israel” and the 2-tribes “house of Judah.” Further, the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 is redefined as “the house of Jacob” in Isaiah 8:17.

State it in another way in more details, the word “Israel” has five (or even six) possible meanings:

(1) Israel in place of Jacob, since the angel gave Jacob a new name, Israel;

(2) Jacob said, “and let my name be named on them” Genesis 48:16; that is, the name “Israel” is to be installed to the children of Joseph: Ephraim and Manasseh;

(3) the children of Israel, or all the house of Israel as in Ezekiel 20:40 in the sense of all the progeny of Jacob, all twelve tribes; sometimes expressed as the “whole house of Israel;”

(4) the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 or “both houses of Israel” would mean the ‘first’ house of Israel as the house of 10-tribes Israel; and the ‘second’ house of Israel as the 2-tribes house of Judah;

(5) the ‘second’ house of Israel as the 2-tribes house of Judah; this happened during Rehoboam reign when the kingdom was broken into the house of Israel (north) and the house of Judah (south); in this context, the house of Israel could be the 2-tribes Israel as in Ezekiel 8:6,11,12 and Matthew 15:24;

(6) Israel, the modern state of Israel, established in 1917 by the Balfour declaration and gained independence in 1948.

In understanding prophecies, the second and third meanings are mostly in use; the fourth very rarely. Still, it may seem confusing, but one should be able to separate the two by sounding out the context.

For understanding who the modern tribes of Judah and Joseph are, the best book to have expounded this subject is “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J.H. Allen (1847-1930).

Biden’s Tech-War Goes Nuclear

•October 24, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The Unz Review by Mike Whitney ~ October 17, 2022

Another view US chip ban most punitive move yet against China by AsiaTimes ~ October 25, 2022

The Biden administration intensified its war on China last week when it detonated a thermonuclear bomb at the heart of Beijing’s booming technology industry. In an effort to block China’s access to crucial semiconductor technology, Team Biden announced onerous new export rules aimed at a “comprehensive supply cut-off” of essential semiconductor technology which– according to one analyst– led to an “immediate operations paralysis.”

Biden’s Tech-War Goes Nuclear’s a “comprehensive supply cut-off” semiconductor tech

They claimed the new sanctions regime will likely inflict significant damage on China’s thriving technology industry while causing considerable harm to US partners who were not consulted on the matter.

Does anyone in Washington think about these things before they set the wheels in motion? The Biden administration is so obsessed with containing China, it is willing to send US standards-of-living off a cliff while bringing the world even closer to nuclear annihilation.

Here’s an analysis by David Goldman’s “China chip ban a US exercise in extreme self-harm” from an article at the Asia Times:

The US measures won’t affect China’s sensors, satellite surveillance, military guidance and other strategic systems because the vast majority of military applications use older chips that China can produce at home…..The new US restrictions won’t stop China’s 2,000 surface-to-ship and surface-to-surface missiles from targeting US aircraft carriers in the Western Pacific, or US air bases in Guam and Okinawa, and they won’t prevent China’s more than 1,000 interceptors from aiming long-range air-to-air missiles at US planes…

It will also elicit an all-out Chinese effort to replace American chip-making and design technology. CapEx and R&D will shrink drastically in the US semiconductor industry while China allocates a massive budget to the sector.

On a five- or ten-year horizon, America’s technological edge in semiconductor design and fabrication is likely to vanish. As capital budgets collapse in the Western semiconductor industry, the damage to the US and other Western economies is likely to be greater than the harm inflicted on China...an all-out US ban on chip sales to China would eliminate 37% of the revenue of US semiconductor companies, lead to … the loss of 15,000 to 40,000 highly skilled direct jobs in the US semiconductor industry.”..

At worst, the damage to China’s economy is likely to be temporary… But the impact of the incipient depression in the Western semiconductor industry may well do permanent harm. (“China chip ban a US exercise in extreme self-harm”Asia Times)

The problem, of course, is that the China hawks now control the levers of power in Washington which means that the attacks on China will intensify, decoupling will accelerate, and a massively-destabilizing international crisis will soon follow.

And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.

And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest; but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart and failing of eyes and sorrow of mind.

And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have no assurance of thy life. Deuteronomy 28:64-66

Ezekiel (Ch 11-12)

•October 23, 2022 • Leave a Comment

As Ezekiel continues his visions of God in Jerusalem, and remember, Ezekiel’s prophetic message wasn’t for the house of Judah but to the house of Israel; hence we must try to read the prophetic meaning behind all those historical setting.

Its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27), into our time and the message is primarily and principally for the United States of America, and secondarily her Western allies.

The prophecies in these chapters have a bitter/sweet and/or sweet/bitter themes:

And I went unto the angel and said unto him, “Give me the little book.” And he said unto me, “Take it and eat it up, and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.”

And I took the little book out of the angel’s hand and ate it up, and it was in my mouth sweet as honey; and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter. Revelation 10:9-10

More on (1) Ephraim / The United States; (2) Ephraim and Manasseh

Ezekiel 11

— ye or they “shall know that I am the Lord” expressed 3 times in this chapter alone (v10, 12) and in all, 51 times in the book of Ezekiel. In other chapters the phase could apply to some Gentile nations, but for this chapter it, again, applies solely to the house of Israel.

1 Moreover the Spirit lifted me up and brought me unto the east gate of the Lord’S house, which looketh eastward; and behold, at the door of the gate five and twenty men, among whom I saw Jaazaniah the son of Azzur, and Pelatiah the son of Benaiah, princes of the people.

— and behold at the door of the gate five and twenty men as we may guess they were the same as in Ezekiel 8:16 “their backs to the Temple of the Lord” and “their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the sun;”

— now these twenty-five were between the porch and the altar; and performing services and worshipping there; including the priests at the door of the eastern gate, sitting as a court of judicature, and were civil magistrates;

— there is evident of a small difference in the locality, the priests standing between the porch and the altar, whereas the men here stood at the outer side of the temple; these are not those who administer his temple, but further out; that is, rulers and governor; cities chiefs; mayors and their rich and influential: “princes” of a city; and the likes of Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch.

— princes of the people; men who were entrusted with power and authority to exercise the laws of the nation; and who should have been wise counsellors of the people, but to God, these are the men that give wicked counsel!!!

— among whom I saw Pelatiah; named here for that dreadful, sudden death (v13), whereby he became a warning to others; perhaps he started this mocking, “This city is the cauldron, and we be the flesh.”

2 Then said He unto me: “Son of man, these are the men who devise mischief and give wicked counsel in this city,

— these are men that devise mischief, who formed schemes for the holding out of the siege, and for the security of the city, and of themselves in it, which was all folly and vanity:

— and give wicked counsel in this city; either in ecclesiastical affairs, to forsake the worship of God, and cleave to the idols of the nations; or in civil things.

3 who say, ‘It is not near; let us build houses: this city is the cauldron, and we are the flesh.’ — it is not near; that is, the threatened invasion; this mean the Chiefs of the city are advising the people to ignore Ezekiel’s warnings;

— in fact, these infidels are mocking and sneering at Ezekiel, saying: “We will run all risks, we will abide in the city. Though it be the cauldron, and we the flesh, yet we will share its fate: if it perish, we will perish with it.”

— parallel Scripture to add further meaning; this city is the cauldron, and we be the flesh; referring to, and laughing at the prophets, namely Jeremiah, who had said of them, comparing them to a boiling pot, Jeremiah 1:13 “And the word of the LORD came unto me the second time, saying, What seest thou? And I (Jeremiah) said, I see a seething pot; and the face thereof is toward the north.”

— ‘It is not near; or it’s as in Ezekiel 12:27, “of the times that are far off,” where their elders dismissed that Ezekiel’s vision were meant for many years yet to come: “of the times that are far off.”

4 Therefore prophesy against them, prophesy, O son of man.” — prophesy a judgement upon their kings, princes, rulers, royal officers and military commanders of the nations;

5 And the spirit of the Lord fell upon me, and said unto me, “Speak! Thus saith the Lord: Thus have ye said, O house of Israel; for I know the things that come into your mind, every one of them. — the spirit of the Lord; the Targum interprets it of the spirit of prophecy; and if prophecy then it is for the future; and in this case it is the Lord prophesing against the house of modern Israel.

Blood crimes in the United States

6 Ye have multiplied your slain in this city, and ye have filled the streets thereof with the slain. — “multiplied your slain“ capital crimes increasing, blood upon blood, murder upon murder, shedding of innocent blood, gun violence everywhere in the United States today.

7 Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Your slain whom ye have laid in the midst of it, they are the flesh, and this city is the cauldron; but I will bring you forth out of the midst of it. — but I will bring you forth out of the midst of it: where they promised themselves safety; ye shall not be permitted to do so, but God will ensure they shall be carried away as captives.

8 Ye have feared the sword; and I will bring a sword upon you, saith the Lord God. — “ye have multiplied your slain in this city, and ye have filled the streets thereof with the slain;” these crimes, to God, are serious stuff! Hence numerous repeats of a returning “sword” and reminders; repeats “I will bring a sword” and reminders. “Whatever crimes you inflict on others, these will be inflicted back on you.”

— the Targum says, “ye have been afraid of them (meaning the Chaldeans) that kill with the sword” but not afraid of the Lord.

9 And I will bring you out of the midst thereof, and deliver you into the hands of strangers and will execute judgements among you. — indeed the Sword appeared in 70 AD; this time by the hands of the Romans, but it was actually God executing His judgement on:

— (a) the Essenses (who formulated their own calendar, but God is a jealous Being); and;

— (b) the Sadducees (who observed a Passover and Pentecost similar to the Samaritan’s) where both defiled the tenets from the Sanhedrin and were wiped out by the Sword!

10 Ye shall fall by the sword; I will judge you in the border of Israel; and ye shall know that I am the Lord. — and ye shall know that I am the Lord” ~ this implies the house of Israel, even their numerous churches, doesn’t know God today!!!

11 This city shall not be your cauldron, neither shall ye be the flesh in the midst thereof; but I will judge you in the border of Israel. — neither shall ye be the flesh in the midst of it; or the Targum renders it “but ye shall be in the midst of it, as flesh that is boiled in the midst of a pot,”

— again, this is repeated, that the Lord is prophesing against the house of modern Israel.

12 And ye shall know that I am the Lord; for ye have not walked in My statutes, neither executed My judgements, but have done according to the manner of the nations who are round about you.” — and ye shall know that I am the Lord” ~ this implies the house of Israel, even their numerous churches doesn’t know God’s statutes and judgement!

13 And it came to pass when I prophesied, that Pelatiah the son of Benaiah died. Then fell I down upon my face, and cried with a loud voice and said, “Ah, Lord God! Wilt Thou make a full end of the remnant of Israel?” — this Pelatiah was one of the “princes of the people” and probably the ringleader of the scorners mentioned in Ezekiel 11:1-2 as “those that devise mischief and give wicked counsel”

— a parallel incident involved prophet Jeremiah against Hananiah the false prophet; where Jeremiah prophesy against Hananiah to trust in a lie, that he would die, and he died the same year, the seventh month; (Jeremiah 23,15, 17);

— multitudes would die, especially the wicked; and conditions would be so bad that those few who survived would ask, “Would God make a full end to the remnant of Israel?”

— the answer is “no.” Nebuchadnezzar left a few Jews back in their land, but they had a pay taxes and tributes to their new Babylonian governors.

— but in II King 25, an assassination of Gedaliah in 423 BCE ocurred: and to commemorate this event it is now one of the four fasts taking place each year on 3 Tishrei.

— wilt thou make a full end of the remnant; is Pelatiah’s destruction to be the token of the destruction of all, even of the remnant? The people regarded Pelatiah as a mainstay of the city. His name (derived from a Hebrew root, “a remnant,” or else “God delivers”) suggested hope. Is that hope, asks Ezekiel, to be disappointed?

22 And as for the people who remained in the land of Judah, whom Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon had left, even over them he made Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, ruler.

23 And when all the captains of the armies, they and their men, heard that the king of Babylon had made Gedaliah governor, there came to Gedaliah at Mizpah even Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and Johanan the son of Careah, and Seraiah the son of Tanhumeth the Netophathite, and Jaazaniah the son of a Maachathite, they and their men.

24 And Gedaliah swore to them and to their men, and said unto them, “Fear not to be the servants of the Chaldeans. Dwell in the land and serve the king of Babylon, and it shall be well with you.”

25 But it came to pass in the seventh month that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, the son of Elishama, of the seed royal, came and ten men with him, and smote Gedaliah so that he died, and the Jews and the Chaldeans who were with him at Mizpah.

26 And all the people, both small and great, and the captains of the armies, arose and came to Egypt; for they were afraid of the Chaldeans.

14 Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the Targum calls it, “the word of prophecy from the Lord.” It’s a prophecy, thus reference to the future.

15 “Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, ‘Get you far from the Lord; unto us is this land given as a possession.’

— all the house of Israel wholly . . . ‘unto us is this land given as a possession.’ Does this mean that the “whole house of Israel” are coming back to claim the land of Israel that were originally given? If so it would include the whole of West Bank, all of Golan Heights and a large chunk of Jordan onward to the land of Iraq.

— perhaps this organization, BNEY YOSEF NORTH AMERICA https://bneyyosefna.com would take a lead.

16 Therefore say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Although I have cast them far off among the nations, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come.’

— it may be rendered, “the sanctuary of a few” especially those that were truly God-fearing. The Targum says, “I have given them synagogues, second to my sanctuary, and they are as few in the provinces where they are carried captive.”

17 Therefore say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: I will even gather you from the people and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel.’ — returning back the Promise Land, perhaps this house of Joseph, https://bneyyosefna.com could take a lead.

18 And they shall come thither, and they shall take away all the detestable things thereof and all the abominations thereof from thence. — there would be a lot of cleaning to do, their idols and all things detestable since the birth of their nations;

— all these abominations should be wholly rooted out; historically this had its accomplishment under Zerubbabel, Ezra, Haggai, and so there should be another revival.

— but who, if any, would clean the detestable filths and abominations of the latter-day house of Israel?

<<< there seems a great gap in time in between from their detestable filthy and abominable stage above to one where the house of Israel would be ready to accept God’s new spirits, statues and judgments below; from Ezekiel 2 to Ezekiel 37 >>>

19 And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them a heart of flesh,

20 that they may walk in My statutes and keep Mine ordinances, and do them. And they shall be My people, and I will be their God.

21 But as for them whose heart walketh after the heart of their detestable things and their abominations, I will recompense their way upon their own heads, saith the Lord God.”

22 Then the cherubims lifted up their wings, and the wheels beside them, and the glory of the God of Israel was over them.

23 And the glory of the Lord went up from the midst of the city and stood upon the mountain which is on the east side of the city. — the glory of the Lord went up from the midst of the city — this vision demonstrates that God did not abandon this people all at once; he departed by little and little.

24 Afterwards the Spirit took me up, and brought me in a vision by the Spirit of God into Chaldea to those of the captivity. So the vision that I had seen went up from me. — from Jerusalem, Ezekiel was brought back to the land of the Chaldea, back with fellow captives by the River Chebar;

— but all this was done in vision; under the influence of the Spirit of God, as if he was carried to Jerusalem, and there saw and heard all he did, and then was brought back again to Chaldea.

25 Then I spoke unto those of the captivity all the things that the Lord had shown me.

~~~

This vision of Shekinah departing (verse 23 above) demonstrates that God did not abandon this people all at once; he departed by little and little. First, he left the temple. Second, he stopped a little at the gate of the city.

Third, he departed entirely from the city and went to the Mount of Olives, which lay on the east side of the city. Having tarried there for some time to see if they would repent and turn to him.

Fourth, he departed from earth to heaven. Now, the vision being concluded, Ezekiel is taken away by the Spirit back to Chaldea, and there announces to fellow captive Israelites what God had shown him in the preceding visions, and the good that he had spoken concerning them; but they did not seem to believe him, which the prophet reprimands severely.

Ezekiel 12

Ezekiel 12 explains why a few are going to be left to survive, that they may declare all their abominations among the nations. And that the vision that Ezekiel seeth is for many days to come, “and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.”

The prophecies in these chapters have a bitter/sweet and/or sweet/bitter theme.

1 The word of the Lord also came unto me, saying, — the Targum calls it, “the word of prophecy from the Lord.” So Ezra expounds it as a prophecy and a reference to our time.

2 “Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, who have eyes to see and see not; they have ears to hear and hear not, for they are a rebellious house. — this is true even for those dwelling in the Sanctuary, in the house of God; they have ears but couldn’t hear, eyes to see but couldn’t see; they don’t even know what the Oracles of God are; not to say about a willingness and the spirits to keep them.

3 Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee supplies for departure, and remove by day in their sight; and thou shalt remove from thy place to another place in their sight. It may be they will consider, though they are a rebellious house. — prepare thee stuff for removing; the same expression are translated in Jeremiah 46:19, “Furnish thyself to go into captivity.” The action seems to be that of one who must abandon his home and comfort.

4 Then shalt thou bring forth thy goods by day in their sight, as supplies for removing; and thou shalt go forth at evening in their sight, as they that go forth into captivity. — and you shall bring forth your baggage by day in their sight, as provisions and supplies for going into exile; and you shall go forth yourself at evening in their sight, as those who usually go forth into exile;

5 Dig thou through the wall in their sight, and carry out through it. — dig, as Zedekiah was to escape like one digging through a wall, furtively to effect an escape (Eze 12:12).

6 In their sight shalt thou bear it upon thy shoulders and carry it forth in the dark [עֲלָטָה H5939 thick darkness]. Thou shalt cover thy face, that thou see not the ground; for I have set thee for a sign unto the house of Israel.” — in the dark [עֲלָטָה H5939 thick darkness]; so the soon exiles-to-be should make their exit stealthily and restrain from looking around, be hurriedly should be their fight;

— perhaps the MSG might be easier to understand for the few verse around here:

God’s Message came to me: “Son of man, you’re living with a bunch of rebellious people. They have eyes but don’t see a thing, they have ears but don’t hear a thing. They’re rebels all. So, son of man, pack up your exile duffel bags. Leave in broad daylight with everyone watching and go off, as if into exile. Maybe then they’ll understand what’s going on, rebels though they are. You’ll take up your baggage while they watch, a bundle of the bare necessities of someone going into exile, and toward evening leave, just like a person going off into exile. As they watch, dig through the wall of the house and carry your bundle through it. In full sight of the people, put the bundle on your shoulder and walk out into the night. Cover your face so you won’t have to look at what you’ll never see again. I’m using you as a sign for the family of Israel.” The Message Bible

7 And I did so as I was commanded: I brought forth my goods by day, as supplies for captivity, and in the evening I dug through the wall with mine hand. I brought them forth in the dark [darkness], and I bore them upon my shoulder in their sight. — and in the evening (the early part of the night: 6 to midnight) Ezekiel digged through the city wall with his hands; not with an iron instrument; and being in haste, and also that it might be done without noise;

8 And in the morning came the word of the Lord unto me, saying, — in the morning came the word of the Lord unto me, saying; that is, in the morning after he had done all the above commanded him; explaining the meaning of them, and showing to whom they belonged.

9 “Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the rebellious house, said unto thee, ‘What doest thou?’ — again, this “house of Israel” is repeated, that the Lord is prophesing against the modern house of Israel; chiefly the United States, the United Kingdom and France.

10 Say thou unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: This burden concerneth the prince in Jerusalem and all the house of Israel that are among them.’ — thus saith the Lord God: this to add weight and authority to God’s word;

—this burden or warning of a coming calamity most probably concern the future captivity of the house of Judah for 40 years and for the modern house of Israel for the final 190 years (see study on Ezekiel chapter 4).

11 Say, ‘I am your sign: as I have done, so shall it be done unto them. They shall remove and go into captivity.’ — your sign; the change of pronoun is intentional. Ezekiel’s action was to be a sign not only to Zedekiah and the people of Jerusalem, but also to those would be in captivity of the modern house of Israel and for the house of Judah (see study on Ezekiel chapter 4).

12 And the prince who is among them shall bear upon his shoulder in the dark [darkness], and shall go forth; they shall dig through the wall to carry out through it. He shall cover his face, that he see not the ground with his eyes. — the Targum says, “he shall cover his face because he hath sinned:” rendering it as if he, refering to Zedekiah, shall not see with his eyes, and he shall not see the land again.

13 My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in My snare; and I will bring him to Babylon to the land of the Chaldeans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall die there. — and he shall be taken in my snare; as a bird is taken in the snare of the fowler; or a wild beast by the hunter;

— in Jeremiah 52:11, Jeremiah makes it plain by recording that Zedekiah’s eyes were put out in Riblah, before he was carried to Babylon, where he would die there;

14 And I will scatter toward every wind all who are about him to help him, and all his troops; and I will draw out the sword after them. — God will scatter toward every wind; the people of Judah were not carried captive to Babylon only, but many of them were scattered wherever they could find refuge;

— they shall be scattered among the nations; and, finally, the remnant left in the land by Nebuchadnezzar, after the murder of his governor Gedaliah, escaped into Egypt.

15 And they shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall scatter them among the nations and disperse them in the countries. — ye or they “shall know that I am the Lord” expressed 3 times in this chapter alone (v15, 16, 20) and in all, 51 times in the book of Ezekiel. In other chapters the phase could apply to some Gentile nations, but for chapter 12, it applies to both the house of Judah and the house of Israel;

— this implies that neither those teaching in the synagogues nor those in their numerous churches know God today!!! Strange, isn’t it?!

16 But I will leave a few men of them from the sword, from the famine and from the pestilence, that they may declare all their abominations among the nations whither they come; and they shall know that I am the Lord.” — “that they may declare all their abominations among the nations;” this explains why a few are left to survive;

— if they have hidden in some secret hideouts, they won’t be able to “declare all their abominations among the nations” whither they come; who, observing their calamities, and distresses, could deserve and a need to know, and hear those who are well-versed to explain their sins, abominations and judgement to the nations.

17 Moreover the word of the Lord came to me, saying,

18 “Son of man, eat thy bread with quaking, and drink thy water with trembling and with sorrow; — those remnants who survive would explain to the nations that they have been guilty of great enormities;

— so that their punishment was a visible and standing declaration and warning to the nations of their abominable sins; which they, of the house of Israel, had been guilty of; and not to repeat them in their own nations.

19 and say unto the people of the land, ‘Thus saith the Lord God of the inhabitants of Jerusalem and of the land of Israel: They shall eat their bread with sorrow, and drink their water with dismay, that her land may be desolate of all that is therein, because of the violence of all them that dwell therein. — unto the people; the common sort of people, distinguished from rulers, of the land of Chaldea, in which the Jews were captives;

— her land will be desolated: men, cities, towns, houses, vineyards, fields, fruits and cattle are all in ruin. Those who could see, only sorrow and dismay.

20 And the cities that are inhabited shall be laid waste, and the land shall be desolate; and ye shall know that I am the Lord.’” — again, this implies that neither those teaching in the synagogues nor those in their numerous churches know God today!

21 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

22 “Son of man, what is that proverb that ye have in the land of Israel, saying, ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision faileth’? — this is another way for the hardhearted (also stiffnecked) in the “land of Israel” to dismiss Ezekiel’s warning, “every visions faileth!”

23 Tell them therefore, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: I will make this proverb to cease, and they shall no more use it as a proverb in Israel.’ But say unto them, ‘The days are at hand, and the effect of every vision. — but say unto them, the days are at hand, and the effect of every vision; the time is hastening on and will quickly come when every prophecy shall be fulfilled.

24 For there shall be no more any vain vision nor flattering divination within the house of Israel. — the emphasis here is of the modern house of Israel: chiefly the United States, the United Kingdom and France.

25 For I am the Lord: I will speak, and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; it shall be no more put off. For in your days, O rebellious house, will I say the word and will perform it, saith the Lord God.’” — and the word that I shall speak shall come to pass; the word of prophecy delivered out in his nature by the true prophets never fails, but is always accomplished; 

26 Again the word of the Lord came to me, saying,

27 “Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, ‘The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off.’ — see, this warning vision that Ezekiel saw concerning Israel’s ruin and the prophecy which he delivered, the house of Israel say, were not for their time to be fulfilled; dismissing that that they were only meant for many years yet to come: “of the times that are far off.”

28 Therefore say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: There shall none of My words be put off any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord God.’” — but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord God: not one jot of it shall pass away till all be fulfilled; sooner may heaven and earth pass away than that shall; it is forever settled in heaven, and shall be fulfilled on earth; he that has said it is of one mind, and none can turn him; and is able to do whatsoever he pleases.

~~~

Please allow me to elaborate (on verse 27 above): God must had told Ezekiel that the visions were for a time far into the future, and Ezekiel, in turn, repeated God’s message to the house of Israel, which seems unrecorded. Being hardhearted, the house of Israel, or their elders, turned around, brushing off those warnings by saying the visions were only meant for those living in the far future, which is recorded as in verse 27; hence they could continue to practice their abominable things which they were doing.

But more calamities were to fall for the house of Judah a few years later when Nebuchadnezzar took more captives; and a few hundred years later, in 70 AD and 132 AD, this time by the Romans; hence God’s warning messages were meant for the house of Judah since those days; timeless, and another meaning “of the times that are far off.” That is, it was a warning meant for the endtime, our time, and this prophecy is primarily and principally for the United States of America and secondarily its European allies.

OPEC Members Against the US

•October 22, 2022 • Leave a Comment

OPEC Members Line Up To Back Oil Production Cut After US Claims Against Saudi Arabia

ZeroHedge by Tyre Durden ~ October 18, 2022 // Global Upfront ~ October 18, 2022

OPEC+ member states lined up on October 16 to endorse a steep production cut agreed upon this month following accusations from top Biden administration officials against the Saudi government.

OPEC Members Line Up Against the US To Back Oil Production Cut

Iraq, the second-largest producer in OPEC, said the move was based on economic indicators and done unanimously.

“There is complete consensus among OPEC+ countries that the best approach in dealing with the oil market conditions during the current period of uncertainty and lack of clarity is a pre-emptive approach that supports market stability and provides the future the guidance it needs,” Iraq’s state oil agency said in a statement.

Oman and Bahrain also said in separate statements that OPEC+ had been unanimous in deciding on the 2 million barrels per day reduction several weeks ago. Algeria’s energy minister called the Oct. 5 decision “historic,” and he and OPEC Secretary General Haitham Al Ghais, currently visiting Algeria, expressed their full confidence in it, Algeria’s Ennahar TV reported.

Those statements came after White House and Pentagon spokesman John Kirby accused Riyadh of pushing other countries into making the oil production cut during the last OPEC meeting.

“The Saudi foreign ministry can try to spin or deflect, but the facts are simple. The world is rallying behind Ukraine in combating Russian aggression,” Kirby said in a statement last week, claiming that “more than one” member of OPEC+ disagreed with the oil production cut. He didn’t provide examples, however.

But the Saudi kingdom rejected those allegations, saying that those statements “are not based on facts” and that it had made its decision “purely on economic considerations.”

OPEC meeting ends with market expecting deep production cut 

“The government of the kingdom clarified through its continuous consultation with the US administration that all economic analyses indicate that postponing the OPEC+ decision for a month … would have had negative economic consequences,” the Saudi energy ministry stated last week.

And here’s a prophecy from the Scriptures:

“All your lovers have forgotten you; they no longer care for you anymore. I have wounded you as an enemy would. I have punished you as the cruel would, because your guilt is so great, because your sins are so many” Jeremiah 30:14.

“Behold, therefore I will gather all thy lovers with whom thou hast taken pleasure, and all them that thou hast loved, with all them that thou hast hated. I will even gather them round about against thee and will uncover thy nakedness unto them, that they may see all thy nakedness” Ezekiel 16:37

Ezekiel (Ch 9-10)

•October 21, 2022 • Leave a Comment

As Ezekiel continues his visions of God in Jerusalem, the focus of his prophecy is for the children of Israel at the endtime; in these two chapters, it refers to both the house of Israel and the house of Judah.

In chapter 9 it has the core subject about those who preside over God’s Sanctuary in the endtime, the saints. Yet these saints are to be slain: “Slay utterly old and young . . . and begin at my Sanctuary,” Ezekiel 9:6.

But a small remnants are spared; why spared these and not the others?

Ezekiel’s Vision of God for the Endtime rebellious House of Israel

Ezekiel 9

1 He cried also in mine ears with a loud voice, saying, “Cause them that have charge over the city to draw near, even every man with his destroying weapon in his hand.” — he cried also in mine ears with a loud voice; that is, the Shekinah, whom the prophet saw in the temple, and who directed him from place to place, now wanted to show him all the abominations committed there;

— saying, cause them that have the charge over the city to draw near; or, “those appointed over the city,” as the Targum says; that is, the city of Jerusalem; by whom are meant the ministering angels, who had the charge of executing God’s judgements upon the city;

— even every man with his destroying weapon in his hand; weapons of war, as bows and arrows, sword and spear, each of these had a weapon proper for that kind of destruction which he was to effect; and so, some to slay with sword, another with the pestilence, another with famine.

2 And behold, six men came from the way of the higher gate, which lieth toward the north, and every man a slaughter weapon in his hand; and one man among them was clothed with linen, with a writer’s inkhorn by his side. And they went in and stood beside the brazen altar. — in the good old days, these “six men” or six destroyers, or angels of wrath, or they could be the generals of Nebuchadnezzar Jeremiah 39:3;

— but if this “six men” are meant to be prophecy, then who are they? In modern times, could they be Chechens, Syrians, Iraqis, Palestinians, Libyans and Afghans? Or perhaps some other combinations?

— or, as Ezekiel 38:22 renders it, I will strike thee with six plagues; those mentioned, namely, pestilence, blood, overflowing rain, hailstones, fire, brimstone;

— in the Talmud, it was expressed as “wrath, anger, fury, destruction, breach and consumption.”

3 And the glory of the God of Israel had gone up from the cherub, whereupon he was, to the threshold of the house. And He called to the man clothed with linen, who had the writer’s inkhorn by his side; — and the glory of the God of Israel was gone up from the cherub; that is, the glorious God; or the Shekinah, removed from thence, as a token of his being about to depart from the temple, and with its protection removed, the temple would be destroyed in a short time.

— the Targum says, “the glory of the God of Israel departed in the cherub on which he dwelt, in the house of the holy of holies;” the cherubim removed with him, as were his chariot in which he rode.

Shekinah, the Glory of God left the Temple and Jerusalem was soon destroyed

4 and the Lord said unto him, “Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and who cry because of all the abominations that are done in the midst thereof.” — and you shall mark a sign: you shall mark a sign on the foreheads of the righteous men in order to show the destroyers those men whom they should not strike.

— it is a Rabbinical thought that Gabriel had orders to write the letter ת (tav; the last letter of the alphabet) in ink upon the foreheads of the righteous, which signified תחיה, “thou shall live”. And for the wicked the same letter ת were written in blood upon the foreheads, but it signified תמות, “thou shall die”.

— the letter ת in the original paleo Hebrew looks like an x sign.

5 And to the others He said in mine hearing, “Go ye after him through the city and smite. Let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity. — the remnant fell by the sword of the Chaldeans, but God found out some way to secure them; as in the last destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans;

— the Christians were secured in a city on the mountains, called Pella, east of the Jordan; and certain Jews, including some Pharisees of the House of Hillel; they escaped to Yavne along the coast of the Mediterranean sea.

6 Slay utterly old and young, both maids and little children and women; but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at My sanctuary.” Then they began with the elder men who were before the house. — and begin at my sanctuary; the temple, the house of God, and the priests and Levites that dwelt there; and in today’s climate, the synagogues, the churches; the chapels, the assemblies or some other terms;

— the Septuagint version is, “begin at my saints” those who professed themselves to be saints of the Lord, and were separated and devoted to his service; and so the Rabbins say, do not read ממקדשי, “at my sanctuary”; but ממקודשי, “at those that sanctify me” or “my sanctified ones” which they interpret of those that keep the whole law, from “aleph” to “tau.”

7 And He said unto them, “Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain. Go ye forth.” And they went forth and slew in the city.

8 And it came to pass, while they were slaying them and I was left, that I fell upon my face and cried, and said, “Ah Lord God! Wilt Thou destroy all the residue of Israel in Thy pouring out of Thy fury upon Jerusalem?”

— when Ezekiel was delivering his message both the house of Israel and Judah were already in captivity. He was among the captives at the river Chebar, so Ezekiel’s messages were actually meant for those living far into the future, in our time, to the modern house of Israel, the chief of whom is Ephraim, the United States of America — in thy pouring out of thy fury by famine, pestilence and sword.

A Nation Full of Blood Crimes!

9 Then said He unto me, “The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is exceeding great, and the land is full of blood and the city full of perverseness; for they say, ‘The Lord hath forsaken the earth, and the Lord seeth not.’ — the iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is immeasurably great, and the land is full of blood-guiltiness, and the city full of perversion;

— for they say God hath forsaken the land, and he seeth not. Ezekiel 9:10. So also shall my eye not look with pity, and I will not spare; I will give their way upon their head. Ezekiel 9:11. 

10 And as for Me also, Mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity, but I will recompense their ways upon their heads.” — a parallel Scripture, “As you have done [unto others], it shall be done to you; your dealings will return upon your own head” Obadiah 1:15

11 And behold, the man clothed with linen, who had the inkhorn by his side, reported the matter, saying, “I have done as Thou hast commanded me.” — the man clad in linen returns, announcing the execution of God’s commands.

~~~~

More on Ezekiel 9:6 Slay utterly old and young . . . and begin at my sanctuary:

Today many pretentious Christians, especially among the CoG Communities, believe they will go into a place of safety? But this is just day dreaming. It’s far more likely that lightnings and thunderstorms would begin with these professing Christians.

Deuteronomy 16:18 “You shall appoint judges and officers in all your towns that the Lord your God is giving you, according to your tribes, and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment.

Deuteronomy 17:11 According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee, and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do: thou shalt not decline from the sentence which they shall shew thee, to the right hand, nor to the left. 12 And the man who will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest who standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die.

Moses knew he would die soon and his understanding had been conveyed to the judges, the Levites and priests where the true interpretation of the law were taught. So in the book of Deuteronomy Moses spoke and explained unto all Israel “according unto all that the Lord had given him” as to how to keep them, the blessing they would have if they obey, or cursing if they disobey, in a language they could understand. Men may have good intentions, but may do things seen as presumptuously? What is presumptuous or presumptuously?

Below are its synonyms:

arrogant, bumptious, cavalier, chesty, haughty, high-and-mighty, high-handed, high-hat, huffish, huffy, imperious, important, lofty, lordly, masterful, overweening, peremptory, pompous, presuming, pretentious, self-asserting, self-assertive, sniffy, supercilious, superior, uppish, uppity

The Jews were prophesied they would mourn One whom they had rejected: “And they shall look to Me whom they have pierced; then they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only son” (Zechariah 12:10). But these Christians have nothing to mourn? Currently these endtime virgins are described as lukewarm and in need of nothing, but would they not mourn when they realise that they had been blind, wretched and naked, seeing finally that Christ had suffered far more through His torn flesh and shed blood than they had ever realised? No?

Today more than 98.5 percent of Christians are honoring the SUN by observing SUNday. They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east,” Ezekiel 8:16.

Others, following the SUN-worshipping Samaritans, the Church of God Communities are showing their contempt for God by having their “wavesheaf offering” and Pentecost on a SUNday. Always on SUNdays. And these are supposedly in God’s sanctuary, but God says He is a jealous God, so these pretentious Christians could be spewed out of His mouth! No? Regardless, there are those being described in Revelation 3:17 — wretched, miserable, poor, blind and naked. “As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: or else I will spew thee out of My mouth (v16,19).”

Despite the above, there’ll be a remnant that are spared: “Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and who cry because of all the abominations that are done in the midst thereof,” Ezekiel 9:4. These remnants “who sigh and who cry” will be marked with a letter ת in ink on the forehead;

— but the question is, do we qualify to be in this category?

Ezekiel 10

Chapter 10 is a vision, very much like that in the first chapter, but with a different view; the design being to represent the wrath of God against Jerusalem and his departure from the city and temple. A throne much like that in Ezekiel 1:26 is described.

1 Then I looked, and behold, in the firmament that was above the head of the cherubims there appeared over them, as it were, a sapphire stone with the appearance of the likeness of a throne. — description much like in chapter 1.

2 And He spoke unto the man clothed with linen, and said, “Go in between the wheels, even under the cherub, and fill thine hand with coals of fire from between the cherubims, and scatter them over the city.” And he went in in my sight.

— and He spake unto the man clothed with linen; that is, the God of Israel gave orders to the man clothed in linen, who appears in another character, and represents the Chaldean or Roman army; these “coals of fire” were an emblem of the wrath of God against Jerusalem.

3 Now the cherubims stood on the right side of the house when the man went in; and the cloud filled the inner court. — now the cherubim stood on the right side of the house; according to the Targum, it was the south side of the house (the idolatries could be seen from the north); opposite the north; that’s where the gross idolatries were committed.

4 Then the glory of the Lord went up from the cherub and stood over the threshold of the house; and the house was filled with the cloud, and the court was full of the brightness of the Lord’S glory. — this is a token and intimation of the Lord’s leaving of the temple; and a little before the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans.

5 And the sound of the cherubims’ wings was heard even to the outer court, as the voice of the Almighty God when He speaketh. — and the sound of the cherubim’s wings was heard even to the outer court; or outward court; the swift ministry of the apostles, signified by the “cherubim’s wings” went into all the earth, and throughout to the Gentiles;

— the sound of the Kingdom, and redemption by Christ; the sound of this in the swift ministry of the apostles, signified by the “cherubim’s wings” going out into all the earth, especially to the Gentile world.

6 And it came to pass that when He had commanded the man clothed with linen, saying, “Take fire from between the wheels, from between the cherubims,” then he went in and stood beside the wheels. — the cherubims stood as servants waiting; the fire being taken from between the wheels.

7 And one cherub stretched forth his hand from between the cherubims unto the fire that was between the cherubims, and took thereof and put it into the hands of him that was clothed with linen, who took it and went out. — who took it, and went out; took the fire, and went out of the temple, and scattered it upon the city of Jerusalem; so representing the Chaldean, or rather the Roman army, burning it with fire;

— but Ezekiel is a prophetic book, so the most important Question remains for us to ponder during the endtime: who would spread this fire in the house of Israel? A loose army from the Global South? (Ezekiel 20-45 to 21:5)

8 And there appeared in the cherubims the form of a man’s hand under their wings. — one of them put forth his hand, which was seen by Ezekiel, but this was only the “form” of one; which is not to be taken literally, but as seen in the vision of prophecy; and being under their wings indicates secrecy and privacy.

9 And when I looked, behold, the four wheels by the cherubims, one wheel by one cherub and another wheel by another cherub; and the appearance of the wheels was as the color of a beryl stone. — a beryl stone is of sea-green colour; the Targum renders it in general, “a precious stone.”

All four had one likeness, as if a wheel had been in the midst of a wheel

10 And as for their appearance, all four had one likeness, as if a wheel had been in the midst of a wheel. — and as for their appearances, all four had one likeness, see pic above.

11 When they went, they went upon their four sides. They turned not as they went, but to the place whither the head looked they followed it; they turned not as they went. — the wheels were not guided by some external impetus, but by the cherubim themselves.

12 And their whole body, and their backs, and their hands, and their wings, and the wheels, were full of eyes round about — even the wheels that the four had. — and the wheels were full of eyes; that is, the rings or circles of the wheels, as in Ezekiel 1:18; even the four wheels were “full of eyes.”

13 As for the wheels, it was cried unto them in my hearing, “O wheel.” — the word “galgal הַגַּלְגַּ֖ל whirl” could be better rendered “chariot” instead of “wheel;” “chariot” or whirl representing very well the collection of wheels.

14 And every one had four faces: the first face was the face of a cherub, and the second face was the face of a man, and the third the face of a lion, and the fourth the face of an eagle.

— compare to chapter 1 of the description of the cherub, the first face was the face of an OX; the ox, being placed toward the west, now this is a face of a CHERUB, indicating, perhaps, that now the face of an ox and a cherub has a change of significance. If so, what are they? Why the change of the face from that of an OX to that of a CHERUB?

— but the OX is also the symbol of the United States; and though the UK has the Unicorn as its symbol, it has less significance (more below). For more in a deeper analysis, see The Ox without the Unicorn

(Note, on the west side were Benjamin (Norway), Manasseh (United Kingdom and the Commonwealth) and Ephraim (the United States); they all have enomous natural resources, but none of the others)

15 And the cherubims were lifted up. This is the living creature that I saw by the River of Chebar.

16 And when the cherubims went, the wheels went alongside them; and when the cherubims lifted up their wings to mount up from the earth, the same wheels also turned not from beside them.

17 When they stood, these stood, and when they were lifted up, these lifted up themselves also; for the spirit of the living creature was in them. — when they stood, these stood; when the one were inactive, lifeless, and without motion, making no progress in knowledge, experience, and practice, the other were so likewise.

18 Then the glory of the Lord departed from off the threshold of the house and stood over the cherubims. — the departure of Shekinah from the Holy of Holies to the east gate of the Lord’s house, with the motion of the cherubim and wheels along with him.

19 And the cherubims lifted up their wings and mounted up from the earth in my sight. When they went out, the wheels also were beside them, and every one stood at the door of the east gate of the Lord’S house; and the glory of the God of Israel was over above them. — again, the departure of Shekinah from the Holy of Holies with the cherubims lifting up their wings and went along withe wheels toward the east gate.

20 This is the living creature that I saw under the God of Israel by the River of Chebar; and I knew that they were the cherubims.

21 Every one had four faces apiece, and every one four wings, and the likeness of the hands of a man was under their wings. — and everyone four wings: the Septuagint reads eight wings; and the Syriac version “six” so many in all indeed they had.

22 And the likeness of their faces was the same as the faces which I saw by the River of Chebar, their appearances and themselves. They went every one straight forward. — they went everyone straight forward; their motion as well as their form were alike; they kept one even course, looking right on, and their eyes right before them.

~~~

More on the Ox and the Unicorn:

His glory is like the firstling of his ox (bullock), and his horns are like the horns of unicorns. With them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth; and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh,” Deuteronomy 33:17.

In the above verse, the Ox (verse 14 above) and Ephraim are named first, the firstborn of his (Joseph’s) “bullock is his glory”: the reference being to Ephraim; followed by Unicorn and Manasseh.

Although Manasseh was the firstborn, Joseph the father crossed his hands and placed Ephraim as firstborn, hence Ephraim, often known as the thirteenth tribe, represents not just the house of Joseph, but more often the house of the 10-tribes Northern Kingdom.

The Coat of Arms of the United States; thirteen Stars and thirteen Arrows – the thirteenth tribe
A Unicorn in the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom

In Rabbinic teachings: the myriads (ten thousands) slain by Joshua, of the tribe of Ephraim: These are the myriads descended from Ephraim;

— and the thousands of Manasseh: these are the thousands slain by Gideon, who was of the tribe of Manasseh. These are the thousands descended from Manasseh.

In his blessings Jacob ascribes to Ephraim ten thousands, and to Manasseh only thousands; thus foreshowing, that Ephraim the younger was to be the more numerous of the two, as Jacob had before prophesied of them.

For a more detailed analysis, see The Ox without the Unicorn

The Eighth Day – Shemini Atzeret

•October 20, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The festival of Sukkot comes to an end on the seventh day, “Hoshanah Rabba,” or “The Great Salvation,” the greatest day of the feast. Then there is the Eighth Day. The Eighth Day, counting from the first day of Sukkot, is considered a special celebration day of its own. It is to be a Sabbath Day, meaning a day of rest and a day of celebration. It is also a day to assemble together and rejoice before the LORD (Leviticus 23:36, 39).

“‘On the eighth day ye shall have a solemn assembly. Ye shall do no servile work therein; but ye shall offer a burnt offering, a sacrifice made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord: one bullock, one ram, seven lambs of the first year without blemish; (Numbers 29:35-36)

The Eighth Day – Shemini Atzeret, a Plan beyond the Millennium

This Eighth Day is the time when observant Jews leave the “sukkah” (booth or tabernacle) and observe a unique day of transition. The Eighth Day marks the official end of summer and the beginning of fall, with the expectation of the fall and winter rains.

Prayers are recited to request the blessing of rain upon the land. There is generally no rainfall in Israel for seven months, from Passover until the end of Sukkot (from April ’til October). However from the Eighth Day until the coming Passover, the nation of Israel anticipates the rains from heaven and there are daily prayers offered to the God of heaven and earth to bless the Land with rain.

The Eighth Day is also the official end of the Torah reading cycle for the year. To mark this unique day there is a special celebration, which in Hebrew is called “שמחת תורה” – Simchat Torah or “The Joy of the Torah!”

During this festive ceremony of Simchat Torah there is rejoicing with the Torah in a very tangible way. It is customary at the synagogue to march or dance seven circuits around the synagogue as attendees take turns holding and literally dancing with a Torah scroll.

More on the Rainy Season: In Israel most of the rain usually fell from December to February. The first rain of the rainy season—the “early rain”—usually came mid-October through early November. This rain softened the ground and facilitated the germination of seeds and the growth of crops. The latter rain came, before the harvest, from early March to April. This rain contributed to maturation of the crop.

Therefore, rain was enormously important to Israelite life and was considered a gift from God (Deuteronomy 11:14; Jeremiah 5:24; Matthew 5:45). The lack of rain was often seen as an expression of divine disfavor, a result of the sins and rebelliousness of the people (Jeremiah 3:3).

Outpouring of the spirit and rain: In the Scriptures rain became a symbol for the divine outpouring of the spirit; both rain and the spirit were sent by God as a demonstration of his concern for his creation.

We find, first, an eschatological usage of the image of rain. God described the future restoration of his people using the language of rain to illustrate the work of the spirit: “For I will pour water on the thirsty land, and streams on the dry ground; I will pour out my spirit on your offspring, and my blessing on your descendants” (Isaiah 44:3; cf. Ezekiel 39:29; Isaiah 32:15; 44:3).

In Joel, after announcing the coming of the early and latter rains, God added, “I will pour out my spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, your young men will see visions” (Joel 2:28, 29).

Second, the image of the early and latter rains could be applied to at least two different powerful works of the spirit within the church: one related to the experience of Pentecost, and the other to events shortly before the return of Christ.

The eschatological work of the spirit announced by Joel was partially fulfilled during the outpouring of the spirit at Pentecost (Acts 2:18). This could be called, the “early rain.” But that same prophecy referred to “the great and glorious day of the Lord” suggesting that a fuller manifestation of the spirit was to be expected (cf. Acts 2:19, 20).

God’s future work of the spirit would accompany and empower the proclamation of the his message of judgement and salvation to the human race. It is to this event that Revelation 18:1 points. An angel, representing God (Ezekiel 43:2), descended from heaven with great authority, illuminating the earth with his glory, and adding power to the worldwide proclamation of God’s messages by his angels of Revelation 14:6-12.

Such a manifestation of the spirit could be called the “latter rain.” Before the return of Christ, evil powers will perform great wonders and miracles (Revelation 13:13, 14; 1 Tim. 4:1), but God will also express His superior power through the work of the spirit among His people.

So the phrases “early rain” and “latter rain” are agricultural images figuratively applied to the work of the spirit at the beginning of the Christian church and shortly before God’s end-time harvest (Revelation 14:14-20).

In the last day, the great day of the feast; namely, the Eighth Day, when, according to the institution of Moses, (Leviticus 23:36; Numbers 29:35) there was to be a holy convocation, or general and solemn assembly of the people, attended with some extraordinary sacrifices. This day is called the great day of the feast, on account of the high reverance in which the nation of Israel held it.

On the seven preceding days they held that sacrifices were offered, not so much for themselves as for the whole world; in the course of them, seventy bullocks (Numbers 29:13-32 from thirteen to seven), being sacrificed for the seventy nations of the world: but the sacrifices of this Eight Day, just one bullock (v35), they considered as being offered for Israel alone, on whose behalf the significance of the Last Great day was observed.

The biblical compositor of the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 states that seventy nations descended from Noah’s three sons, thereby indicating that the total population of the world came from Noah’s seed. From here is derived the concept of the Gentile world as “the seventy nations.”

“There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days; for the child shall die a hundred years old; but the sinner being a hundred years old shall be accursed.” Isaiah 65:20

The setting of Isaiah 65 is a prophecy about the time when the Kingdom of God will govern the entire world. The book of Revelation complements many of God’s prophecies, including this one. Revelation 20:5 tells us that there will be a resurrection after the first 1,000 years of Christ’s reign. Verses 11-13 add more detail, explaining that God will bring people who were not called to salvation during their initial lifetime back to life again.

This period is known as the Great White Throne judgement, described in Revelation 20:11-15, and is the final judgement prior to the lost being cast into the lake of fire. We know from Revelation 20:7-15 that this judgement will take place after the Millennium and after Satan is thrown into the lake of fire where the beast and the false prophet are (Revelation 19:19-20; 20:7-10).

But Shemini Atzeret is beyond God’s seven thousand year plan, even beyond the Millennium; it is on the Eight Day. In the New Testament, only one reference is implied to this Eighth Day festival:

37 On the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, “If any man thirst, let him come unto Me, and drink.

38 He that believeth in Me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” John 7:37-38

The books that are opened (Revelation 20:12) contain records of everyone’s deeds, whether they are good or evil, because God knows everything that has ever been said, done, or even thought, and He will reward or punish each one accordingly (Psalm 28:4; 62:12; Romans 2:6; Revelation 2:23; 18:6; 22:12).

In this plan of God, many uncertainties exist in these verses. How long is this period? These verses in Revelation do not tell us. Instead, they focus on the purpose for it—to give everyone an opportunity to respond to God’s calling and to live the Christian way of life.

Due to the limited evidence available, the churches could say with certainty that this will be a total of 100 years. There are different alternatives for interpreting this verse, while many maintain the teaching of three resurrections. The first is the resurrection of the sheep, the firstfruit, to reign with Christ after the judgement of the nations (Matthew 25:31-36). This takes place after the tribulation period but prior to the Millennium; its purpose is to determine who will enter the millennial kingdom.

The second is the Great White Throne resurrection to mortal life and they will be given judgement at the end of the Millennium (Revelation 20:11-15). This is the judgement of the billions resurrected and will be judged according to their works and will be given heavenly reward of an everlasting life or sentenced to everlasting punishment in the lake of fire.

The third are for those who utterly rejected God’s offer of salvation while they were alive. In Hebrews 6:4-6: “For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened . . . and have become partakers of the holy spirit, and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to
an open shame.” These will suffer a second death from which there will not be any more resurrection.

Some have said that God intends to show us through Isaiah 65:20, where the phrase “one hundred years” appears twice, that this time frame is 100 years. That may be the case, or it may be a way to emphasize the same principle given in Revelation 20. That is, the people will have the time that they need to respond to God’s calling and live a Godly way of life. “One hundred years” may be a way of making that point, but it could also be a literal prophecy on several fronts.

The following are a few possibilities to interprete this “100 years”:

(1) People born during the Millennium will have a life-span of a hundred years to live in general; these are descendants of those who survive the various tribulations before the return of Christ, the Messiah;

(2) People resurrected after the Millennium, that is, during the Eightth Day, Shemini Atzeret, the eighth Millenium will each be given a hundred years to live. These are those who had lived during the first sixth thousand years but have no chance of the redemptive process. They had never known the Bible, neither had they heard of Christ the Messiah. Some estimate these number as somewhere 130 to 150 billions and that’s a lot!

Ezekiel (Ch 7-8)

•October 19, 2022 • Leave a Comment

As Ezekiel continues his visions from God, his prophecy is for the children of Israel at the endtime.

“Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, ‘The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off’ Ezekiel 12:27

Ezekiel 7

1 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the Targum, whose origin in the Aramaic language could be traced to Ezra; expresses it as “The word of prophecy from the Lord.” If it is a prophecy from Ezra’s perspective, it was meant for the future, into the end time, our time.

Remember, laying side by side along with the Masoretic Text, the Targum is another source of the Bible. Started by Ezra for those returning from Babylon and Persia, these returnees they could only understand in Aramaic; hence the Targum is as if Ezra is speaking to them then and to us today from the Hebrew Text quoted.

2 “Also, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord God unto the land of Israel: “An end! The end is come upon the four corners of the land. — the Targum says, “the punishment of the end, or the punishment determined to come upon the four winds of the earth;” this Targum version recognizes that the house of Israel, the modern-day Israelites, would be all over the face of the earth, spread over the four winds!

— in Ezekiel 6:3 the message was to the “mountains of Israel,”referring to the United States, UK and France. . . . “and to the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys;” — the hills: Ireland, Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, Finland, and Iceland; and the valleys, the low countries: Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg.

— to the rivers; where during the nineteenth century, the British Royal Navy were known to “Rule the Waves;” and the United States having been plowing up and down the five oceans with her Seven Fleets since the British left the scene;

— and now “are all over the face of the earth, spread over the four winds” as the Targum says; which would include Australia, New Zealand, Canada (and perhaps South Africa?) and numerous small colonised islands around the world.

— and in this context, “the land of Israel” and “over the face of the earth” would most probably include the modern state of Israel in Palestine.

3 Now is the end come upon thee, and I will send Mine anger upon thee, and will judge thee according to thy ways, and will recompense upon thee all thine abominations. — and I will judge thee according to thy ways; parallel Scripture: “Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk 2:8

4 And Mine eye shall not spare thee, neither will I have pity; but I will recompense thy ways upon thee, and thine abominations shall be in the midst of thee; and ye shall know that I am the Lord. — the punishments would be so great that “ye shall know who the LORD is,” to whom vengeance belongs; who takes notice of all their sinful actions, and punishes for them;

— the Targum says, “and the punishment of thine abominations shall be in the midst of thee.” Of course he is refering to the house of Israel in this instance.

5 “Thus saith the Lord God: An evil, an only evil, behold, is come! — the Targum says, “evil after evil, lo, it cometh.” That is, one evil after another; when one evil is gone, another comes.

6 An end is come, the end is come! It watcheth for thee; behold, it is come. — the repeatings of “is come” are for emphasis as these words show the eagerness and concern of the prophet’s mind; the speed and haste destruction was making, or is to come; and the great hardheartedness and stupidity of the people, which requires constant repetitions.

7 The morning is come unto thee, O thou that dwellest in the land; the time is come, the day of trouble is near, and not the sounding again of the mountains. — again, the repeatings of “is come” for multiple assurance that it is to come;

— the Targum says, “and there is no fleeing or escaping to the tops of the mountains.”

8 Now will I shortly pour out My fury upon thee, and accomplish Mine anger upon thee; and I will judge thee according to thy ways, and will recompense thee for all thine abominations. — very similar to verve 3 above; “and I will judge thee according to thy ways”; parallel Scripture as above: “Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk 2:8

9 And Mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity. I will recompense thee according to thy ways and thine abominations that are in the midst of thee; and ye shall know that I am the Lord that smiteth.

— the Lord that smiteth; in other places it only said, “ye shall know that I am the LORD,” without saying in what respect; here this is specified “the Lord that smiteth” – they shall know that God is the One who carried out judgement “the Lord that smiteth” and that these calamities are from him.

10 “Behold the day, behold, it is come! The morning is gone forth, the rod hath blossomed, pride hath budded. — the rod hath blossomed, pride hath budded; both these phrases could be understood of Nebuchadnezzar; he was the rod, with which the Lord smote his people, as the Assyrian monarch is called the rod of his anger, Isaiah 10:5,

— the Assyrian monarch was a very proud prince, and had budded and blossomed, and so was king Nebuchadnezzar, whom God had described as “my servant” had been prepared as “the rod” for the chastisement of his people;

— the Targum says, “a ruler hath budded, a wicked one hath appeared.”

11 Violence is risen up into a rod of wickedness; none of them shall remain, nor of their multitude, nor of any of theirs; neither shall there be wailing for them. — neither shall there be wailing for them; the destruction would be so thorough, that there would be but few left to mourn;

— and those that were left would be struck with such a stupor and amazement at the calamity, that they would not be capable of mourning; or with such a dread of the enemy, that there would be no place for lamentation over their dead friends and relations.

12 The time is come, the day draweth near. Let not the buyer rejoice nor the seller mourn, for wrath is upon all the multitude thereof. — for wrath is upon the whole house of modern Israelites, high and low, rich and poor, bond and free, buyer and seller; all those that are in good circumstances, and all those that are in bad ones; so that they were all upon the same level, all in the same case and condition.

13 For the seller shall not return to that which is sold, although they were yet alive; for the vision is touching the whole multitude thereof, which shall not return; neither shall any strengthen himself in the iniquity of his life. — for the seller shall not return to that which is sold; in the year of jubilee, because he shall be in captivity: according to the law in Leviticus 25:13, when a man had sold his possession, he returned to it again in the year of jubilee;

— but in captivity, that could be 190 or 40 years, though there would be jubilees, yet those that had sold their estates, being captives in another land, could not be returned to them.

14 “They have blown the trumpet, even to make all ready; but none goeth to the battle, for My wrath is upon all the multitude thereof. — they have blown the trumpet, as an alarm of war, and see what will be the effect of it, but they shall be dispirited, people are so enfeebled and none come forth for a fight;

— this parallels another verse: “The children of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle” Psalm 78:9.

15 The sword is without, and the pestilence and the famine within. He that is in the field shall die with the sword, and he that is in the city, famine and pestilence shall devour him. — the sword will come from outside their borders; war is throughout the country and pestilence and famine within the borders; together they shall destroy the whole. He who endeavours to flee from the one shall fall by another, except a small remnant.

16 But they that escape of them shall escape, and shall be on the mountains like doves of the valleys, all of them mourning, every one for his iniquity. — so Israel, once dwelling in its peaceful valleys, shall flee from their foe to the mountains, were justly to be made the scene of its flight and shame. The plaintive note of the dove (Isa 59:11) represents the mournful repentance of Israel hereafter (Zec 12:10-12);

— a few shall escape the pestilence, famine, and sword and flee to the mountains, where they will live a very miserable and uncomfortable life; barren and desert places, where they shall find no subsistence, nor have any agreeable company and conversation, but live in solitude and distress.

— like doves, though usually frequenting the valleys, mount up to the mountains when fearing the bird-catcher (Ps 11:1); they gather together in the mountains and hide themselves in the holes of the rocks, on the sides of the valleys, from birds of prey.

17 All hands shall be feeble, and all knees shall be weak as water. — all hands shall be feeble; no strength in them, like jelly, to lay hold on weapons of war to defend themselves, or fight the enemy;

18 They shall also gird themselves with sackcloth, and horror shall cover them; and shame shall be upon all faces, and baldness upon all their heads. — no heart nor courage in them, to go forth and meet their enemy; and even afraid to lift up their voice in mourning, lest they should be heard, being pursued, and be taken.

19 They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed; their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord. They shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels, because it is the stumbling block of their iniquity. — gold and silver as being of no use to preserve them from the sword, famine and pestilence, but instead an hindrance in their flight from the enemy;

— this could also be interpreted as their idols of gold and silver, which shall be as items of contempt, to be cast away. Greed and the love for riches are their iniquity, covetousness, and idolatry, at which they stumbled, and fell into sin, and so into punishment for them.

20 “As for the beauty of his ornament, he set it in majesty; but they made the images of their abominations and of their detestable things therein; therefore have I set it far from them. — the beauty of his ornament should be set in the majesty of his Temple, but man has made it an abominations and an detestable thing; hence God has distanced himself from them.

21 And I will give it into the hands of the strangers for a prey and to the wicked of the earth for a spoil, and they shall pollute it. — and they “the Babylonians” shall pollute it; by entering into their land and spoiling it, by pillaging and burning it.

22 My face will I turn also from them, and they shall pollute My secret place; for the robbers shall enter into it and defile it. — because of their sins, God allows the Chaldeans, the Greeks and the Romans, not only to destroy Jerusalem; but to enter God’s temple, even the holy of hollies: to deface it, plunder it, and burn it to the ground.

23 “Make a chain, for the land is full of bloody crimes, and the city is full of violence. — or “judgement of bloods,” capital crimes, such as are deserving of death, particularly murder, or shedding of innocent blood, gun violence especially in the United States today.

24 Therefore I will bring the worst of the nations, and they shall possess their houses. I will also make the pomp of the strong to cease, and their holy places shall be defiled. — many refugees now coming across the Southern Border: Afghans, Syrians, Iraqis, Palestinians, Mexicans are now in American cities;

— would some of them or their children turn into extremists like the Chechens did an attack in Boston with further plan to travel to Times Square in New York to unleash more mayhem and bombs?

25 Destruction cometh; and they shall seek peace, and there shall be none.

— a parallel Scripture in Ezekiel to add more depth:

“And say to the forest of the South: ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned therein'” Ezekiel 20:47

26 Mischief shall come upon mischief, and rumor shall be upon rumor. Then shall they seek a vision of the prophet, but the law shall perish from the priest and counsel from the ancients. — mischief upon mischief; loss upon loss, one sorrow on the neck of another; vision shall perish from the prophet, the law from the priest, and counselors from the ancients;

— being rejected and be threatened, the prophets wouldn’t be able to continue giving wise counsel; for the law shall perish from them. Other “wise men” and celebrated statesmen could devise foolish schemes; and in trying to avert disasters, they hasten their own ruin.

27 The king shall mourn, and the prince shall be clothed with desolation, and the hands of the people of the land shall be troubled. I will do unto them according to their way, and according to their deserts will I judge them; and they shall know that I am the Lord.” — all those of the Royal houses of Europe, and their princes, all their chief rulers, shall mourn with desolation but they wouldn’t be comforted;

— the Targum says: “In their judgements will I judge them:” the same measure they have meted out to others shall be measured unto them. All these judgements are to make them know the only Lord God of this universe is fair, omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent.

Ezekiel 8

In this chapter Ezekiel was carried in vision to Jerusalem and begins a new scene of prophecy extending to the twelfth chapter in one vision. This, according to Archbishop Usher, was the sixth year of Ezekiel’s captivity.

1 And it came to pass in the sixth year, in the sixth month, on the fifth day of the month, as I sat in mine house and the elders of Judah sat before me, that the hand of the Lord God fell there upon me.

— that the hand of the Lord fell upon me; which the Targum interprets is the spirit of prophecy, which came with power upon him: it indicates the spirit of God was upon him, revealing to him the things that would soon take place;

— the “elders of Judah” could be the elders that were carried captives along with Jehoiachin; but more probably these were those that came from Jerusalem inquiring about the fate of the holy city;

— notice the “elders of Israel” also came, but they appeared later in Ezekiel 14; they, too, are inquiring about their fate;

“A likeness as the appearance of fire: from the appearance of His loins”

2 Then I beheld, and lo, a likeness as the appearance of fire: from the appearance of His loins even downward, fire, and from His loins even upward, as the appearance of brightness, as the color of amber. — there are many variations interchanging between fire and man among all the English versions of the Scriptures; is it the appearance of fire or is it a man?

— the Septuagint renders it, “behold the likeness of a man”; reading איש, “a man”, for אש, “fire.”

— the Targum renders both the one and the other part of the description thus, “and I saw. . . a likeness the look of fire, the look of glory, which the eye cannot see, nor is it possible to look upon it; and beneath the look of fire, and the look of glory, which the eye cannot behold, nor is it possible to contemplate it; and above, as the look of brightness.”

Hence there are many variations interchanging between fire and man among all the English versions of the Bible. Here is one great example, the Message Bible:

In the sixth year, in the sixth month and the fifth day, while I was sitting at home meeting with the leaders of Judah, it happened that the hand of my Master, God, gripped me. When I looked, I was astonished. What I saw looked like a man—from the waist down like fire and from the waist up like highly burnished bronze. He reached out what looked like a hand and grabbed me by the hair.

The Spirit swept me high in the air and carried me in visions of God to Jerusalem, to the entrance of the north gate of the Temple’s inside court where the image of the sex goddess that makes God so angry had been set up. Right before me was the Glory of the God of Israel, exactly like the vision I had seen out on the plain.

3 And He put forth the form of a hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and the Spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north, where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.

— and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem; so it was represented to Ezekiel in a true vision, which was of God, that he was carried from Chaldea to Jerusalem; not that he really was, for he was still in Chaldea when that vision was over.

4 And behold, the glory of the God of Israel was there, according to the vision that I saw in the plain. — is this the Shekinah? Yes, behold, the glory of the God of Israel was there; in the temple, between the cherubim, where the glory of the divine Majesty dwelt;

— the Shekinah is a visible manifestation of God on earth, whose presence is portrayed through a natural occurrence of clouds and fire. Shekinah Glory means “He caused to dwell,” referring to the divine presence of God. So this was the same Shekinah that accompanied the children of Israel in the wilderness during the Exodus.

5 Then said He unto me, “Son of man, lift up thine eyes now the way toward the north.” So I lifted up mine eyes the way toward the north, and beheld northward at the gate of the altar this image of jealousy in the entry.

— Isaiah 14:13 indicates God’s throne is toward the north: “For thou hast said in thine heart, I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the side of the north,” and God is jealous of the numerous idols the house of Israel were ironically practicing in “Jerusalem” and “in His Sanctuary.”

6 He said furthermore unto me, “Son of man, seest thou what they do, even the great abominations that the house of Israel committeth here, that I should depart far off from My sanctuary? But turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations.” — God was setting the stage to reveal greater abominations that the house of Israel had committeth in His Sanctuary? That’s why he withdrew from his sanctuary? 

— this “house of Israel” would most likely be the southern house of Judah (verse 17 below) where his sanctury is placed (Jerusalem); (more at the end)

7 And He brought me to the door of the court; and when I looked, behold, a hole in the wall.

8 Then said He unto me, “Son of man, dig now in the wall”; and when I had dug in the wall, behold, a door. — it was probable that they imitated the Egyptians in this kind of idolatry; for the Egyptians used to worship several kinds of beasts and reptiles;

— according to some accounts, a multitude of chambers were built, which had elegant paintings of all the beasts sacred in Egypt; it is not unlikely they imagined they evaded the law against setting up any image or idolatry to worship, by having them only portrayed or painted on the wall;

9 And He said unto me, “Go in, and behold the wicked abominations that they do here.” — and behold the wicked abominations they do here; the idolatries there committed, wicked in themselves, and abominable to God.

10 So I went in and saw; and behold, every form of creeping things and abominable beasts and all the idols of the house of Israel portrayed upon the wall round about. — every form of creeping things, and abominable beasts;

— these description of the idolatrous rites practised clearly indicates their Egyptian origin; thus even after some 700 to 800 years since Exodus, they were still enslaved in their pagan minds and thoughts.

11 And there stood before them seventy men of the ancients of the house of Israel, and in the midst of them stood Jaazaniah the son of Shaphan, with every man his censer in his hand; and a thick cloud of incense went up. — seventy men of the ancients of the house of Israel;

— the whole Sanhedrin, or the great court of judicature in Jerusalem, which were originally appointed in Moses’ time to be judges and officers over the people, and govern, judge and direct them according the tenets established in Exodus 18:21–22 and Deuteronomy 17:9–12;

— and today, the Sanhedrin has been reestablished and is functioning in Jerusalem.

12 Then said He unto me, “Son of man, hast thou seen what the elders of the house of Israel do in the dark, every man in the chambers of his images? For they say, ‘The Lord seeth us not. The Lord hath forsaken the earth.’” — every man in the chambers of his imagery? the Septuagint renders it, “in his hidden” or “secret chamber”;

— that is, in those chambers which belonged to the priests and Levites, on the walls they had their secret rites or mysteries performed, in imitation of the heathens; who had mysteries of their religion privately observed; to which none were admitted; as those of Osiris among the Egyptians; of Ceres with the Grecians; and of Bona Dea among the Romans.

13 He said also unto me, “Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations that they do.” — more revelations; for modern days, all on records and he says, “I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10.

14 Then He brought me to the door of the gate of the Lord’S house which was toward the north; and behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. — Tammuz, an idol of Chaldeans, is nowhere else mentioned in Scripture, but is identified only here.

15 Then said He unto me, “Hast thou seen this, O son of man? Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these.” — these latter wickednesses may be accounted greater, because they were acted in a more sacred place.

16 And He brought me into the inner court of the Lord’S house, and behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men with their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the sun toward the east.

— the heads of the twenty-four courses of the priesthood, led by the high priest, making up the “twenty five men” were not only worshipping the sun: they were doing so in the very temple of God, with their backs turned against the presence of God!

— the worship of heavenly bodies was against God’s will which Moses had warned the people (Deuteronomy 4:19, 17:3, whose penalty is to be stoned to death, Deuteronomy 17:5 ’till they die). These 25 men corrupted themselves by worshipping the sun; and so the Targum renders it, “and, lo, they corrupted themselves, worshipping facing the east the sun; their backs toward the temple of the Lord” — they turned their backs to the most holy place; which is the utmost contempt for God:

Moses’ warnings in Deuteronomy 17

3 And [if you] hath gone and served other gods and worshiped them, either the sun or moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded, 4 and it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it and inquired diligently, and behold, it be true and the thing certain that such abomination is wrought in Israel, 5 then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman who has committed that wicked thing unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones till they die. Deuteronomy 17:3-5

— also, Days of the Week Names: “Sunday” is the Sun’s day and “Monday” is the Moon’s day. “Tuesday” is Tiw’s day; Tiw is an Anglo-Saxon god of war. “Wednesday” comes from Woden, the Anglo-Saxon king of the gods; in Saxon the name is Wodnesdaeg. “Thursday” is Thursdaeg, Thor’s day; Thor is a Norse god of thunder, lightning and storms. “Friday” is Frigedaeg, Frigga’s day; Frigg is a Norse goddess of home, marriage and fertility. “Saturday” is Saeterndaeg, Saturn’s day; Saturn is an ancient Roman god of fun and feasting;

— Months of the Year Names: January (derived from the Latin Januarius) is to honor their Roman gods Janus; and March, named for Mars, is the Roman mighty god of war; February is derived from the Februa festival or its eponymous februa (“purifications, expiatory offerings”); April relates to what the Romans called the month Aprilis; from a word meaning “to open” and further back from Aphrodite, the Greek name for the goddess of love. May – named for Maia, is the Roman goddess of spring and growth;

— June is a name attributed to Juno, the female mighty wife of Jupiter in Roman mythology. She is also called the “Queen of Heaven” and “Queen of Mighty Ones.” July is to honor Julius Caesar; the Roman Senate named it “Julius” in honor of Roman emperor Julius Caesar. August honor Julius Caesar’s successor, the emperor Augustus; and the months September, October, November, and December are archaic adjectives derived from the ordinal numbers 7 to 10;

— today, more than 98.5 percent of Christians are honoring the SUN by observing SUNday worship. They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east; whose penalty is to be stoned to death – ’till they die.

— also, following the SUN-worshipping Samaritans, most Church of God Communities are showing their contempt for God by having their “wavesheaf offering” and Pentecost on a SUNday; always on a SUNday. And these are supposedly in God’s Sanctuary, but God says He is a jealous God, so these pretentious Christians could be spewed out of His mouth! A death penalty – ’till they die!

17 Then He said unto me, “Hast thou seen this, O son of man? Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here? For they have filled the land with violence and have returned to provoke Me to anger; and lo, they put the branch to their nose. — blood, murders and various form of killings and gun violence in our societies today;

— this “house of Judah” would be the second “house of Israel” in verse 6 above (more at the end).

18 Therefore will I also deal in fury. Mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity; and though they cry in Mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them.” — yet will God not hear them; as they turned their backs on him, God will turn a deaf ear to them, and not regard their cries;

— the Targum says, “they shall pray before me, with a great voice, and I will not receive their prayer.” ~~ chap8&14end;19,33&36beg ~~

The house of Israel verses the house of Judah

Although Isaiah 8:14 refers to “both houses of Israel” or the “two houses of Israel” it implies the single house of Jacob, the full twelve tribes.

But Jacob was given a new name, Israel, in which the full house of Israel as in Ezekiel 20:40, the twelve tribes are all included. And after King Solomon, the single house of Jacob or now call Israel was broken into two, the kingdom of Israel and the kingdom of Judah.

Hence, the names of the two houses are separated, namely the 10-tribes “house of Israel” and the 2-tribes “house of Judah.” Further, the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 is redefined as “the house of Jacob” in Isaiah 8:17.

State it in another way in more details, the word “Israel” has five (or even six) possible meanings:

(1) Israel in place of Jacob, since the angel gave Jacob a new name, Israel;

(2) Jacob said, “and let my name be named on them” Genesis 48:16; that is, the name “Israel” is to be installed to the children of Joseph: Ephraim and Manasseh;

(3) the children of Israel, or all the house of Israel as in Ezekiel 20:40 in the sense of all the progeny of Jacob, all twelve tribes; sometimes expressed as the “whole house of Israel;”

(4) the “two houses of Israel” in Isaiah 8:14 or “both houses of Israel” would mean the ‘first’ house of Israel as the house of 10-tribes Israel; and the ‘second’ house of Israel as the 2-tribes house of Judah;

(5) the ‘second’ house of Israel as the 2-tribes house of Judah; this happened during Rehoboam reign when the kingdom was broken into the house of Israel (north) and the house of Judah (south); in this context, the house of Israel could be the 2-tribes Israel as in Ezekiel 8:6,11,12 and Matthew 15:24;

(6) Israel, the modern state of Israel, established in 1917 by the Balfour declaration and gained independence in 1948.

In understanding prophecies, the second and third meanings are mostly in use; the fourth very rarely. Still, it may seem confusing, but one should be able to separate the two by sounding out the context.

For understanding who the modern tribes of Judah and Joseph are, the best book to have expounded this subject is “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J.H. Allen (1847-1930).

The Butcher of Ukraine

•October 18, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Russia aims to bomb Ukraine back to the Stone Age

AsiaTimes by Stephen Bryen ~ Ootober 12, 2022

Russia’s “nuclear war” in Ukraine has already started, but it is not with “normal” nuclear weapons. Russia’s nuclear strategy is to take down a large part of Ukraine’s critical infrastructure, leaving it a country in ruins or, as some Americans say, bombing it back to the stone age.

Russia aims to bomb Ukraine back to the Stone Age

For Russia, attacking critical infrastructure means hitting the vulnerable parts that can be wiped out with missiles, drones and artillery rockets.

Some read this as Russia’s response to the bombing of the Crimean Kerch bridge, a US$3.5 billion span that connects Russia to Crimea. But that is only partly true. Ukraine, which has admitted responsibility for the Kerch bridge truck bomb, crossed what Russia calls a “red line.” But it is far from the first bit of infrastructure that both sides have attacked.

What is different is that Russia’s massive attack starting on October 10 was not aimed at one discrete target but many and these targets are all around the country. Notably, Russia went after Ukrainian thermal power plants and command centers and was generally successful, forcing Ukraine to impose emergency measures on electricity use and stop power exports.

It is likely that the mastermind of the infrastructure bombing campaign is newly appointed Ukraine Special Operation commander General Sergei Surovikin, who was in charge of the air and land campaign in Syria. His leadership led to a month-long bombing of Aleppo where rebels and civilians held out in the eastern neighborhoods of the city.

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that ye be not troubled, for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there shall be famines and pestilences and earthquakes in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows” Matthew 24:6-8

Ezekiel (Ch 5-6)

•October 17, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Chapter 5 is using Jerusalem as an example of the judgments which God were about to execute on its inhabitants with famine, pestilence, sword and dispersion, and what were the reasons of God’s judgements on that great city; and the nature, rise and end of them.

The secret is out when God revealed it to Ezekiel: “Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, ‘The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off’ (Ezekiel 12:27). Or as the RSV has it: “The vision that he sees is for many days hence, and he prophesies of times far off.”

And this warning is to “all the house of Israel” (verse 4); all thirteen tribes or the house of Jacob.

Ezekiel 5

1 “And thou, son of man, take thee a sharp knife, take thee a barber’s razor and cause it to pass over thine head and upon thy beard. Then take thee balances to weigh and divide the hair. — the Septuagint reads this in conjunction with the former, thus, “take thee a knife” or a “sword, sharper than a barber’s razor” — in another translation: “a sword sharper than a barber’s razor.”

— and cause it to pass upon thine head, and upon thy beard; the “head” was a symbol of the city of Jerusalem, the metropolis of Judea; the “beard” of the cities, towns and villages about it; and the “hair” of both, of the common people; the cutting off the hair was a common mark of mourning (see Job 1:20; Isaiah 22:12; Jeremiah 7:29); and the shaving of them denotes their disgrace and destruction.

2 Thou shalt burn with fire a third part in the midst of the city, when the days of the siege are fulfilled; and thou shalt take a third part and smite about it with a knife, and a third part thou shalt scatter in the wind; and I will draw out a sword after them.

The first third “fire” would also include pestilence and famine: “Our skin was black like an oven because of the terrible famine.” Lementation 5:10; see also Ezekiel 5:12 below.

The Septuagint: 2A fourth part thou shalt burn in the fire in the midst of the city, at the fulfillment of the days of the siege: and thou shalt take a fourth part, and burn it up in the midst of it: and a fourth part thou shalt cut with a sword round about it: and a fourth part thou shalt scatter to the wind; and I will draw out a sword after them.

One already passed, more along the way . . .

The rubble of the World Trade Centre in New York smoulders following a terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 in New York. Russia and China were quick to express solidarity and willingness to work with the US to defeat terrorism.

3 Thou shalt also take thereof a few in number, and bind them in thy skirts. — and bind them in thy skirts; in the pockets of them; signifying both a very small number of them, a small remnant and their preservation. These were to be carried captive to Babylon; lived there and were preserved.

4 Then take of them again, and cast them into the midst of the fire, and burn them in the fire; for thereof shall a fire come forth into all the house of Israel. — and this warning is to “all the house of Israel;” the northern house of Israel (for 190 years?) and the southern house of Judah (for 40 years?)

— and cast them into the midst of the fire, and burn them in the fire. Anciently, this was fulfilled in Gedaliah and the Jews that were with him, over whom the king of Babylon had made him governor, who were slain by Ishmael.

5 “Thus saith the Lord God: This is Jerusalem. I have set it in the midst of the nations and countries that are round about her. — it is the city of Jerusalem that is portrayed upon the tile; and the same is signified by the head of the prophet that was to be shaved; that being not only the chief city of Judea, but of the whole world.

God’s judgement on Jerusalem in 586 BC and in 70 AD

6 And she hath changed My judgements into wickedness more than the nations, and My statutes more than the countries that are round about her; for they have refused My judgements and My statutes. They have not walked in them.

— she hath changed my judgements into wickedness more than the nations; the word “changed” signifies to “rebel against” or to “transgress” and that, she, that is, Jerusalem, has “rebelled” against my judgements and “transgressed” them in a wicked manner, even to a greater degree than the nations of the world. The Targum interprets it changed as we do: — witness LGBTQIA (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (questioning), intersex, asexual (agender));

— woe unto them that call evil good and good evil; that count darkness as light, and light as darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Isaiah 5:20;

— and my statutes more than the countries that are around her. “Judgements” and “statutes” are the same laws and ordinances of worship, being just and righteous, and firm and unalterable; witness God’s judgement on Jerusalem in 70 AD;

— for they have refused my judgements and my statutes; they refused to comply with them, and to yield an obedience to them, and that with loathing, disdain and contempt as the word s signifies — no one seems to understanding the significance of the siege and inferno of Jerusalem from 66 AD to 70 AD;

7 Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Because ye multiplied more than the nations that are round about you, and have not walked in My statutes, neither have kept My judgements, neither have done according to the judgements of the nations that are round about you, — these are more abominable than the heathens; one example is that LGBTQIA is more perversed in Israelitist naions;

— parallel Scripture in Hosea: “I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel; there is the whoredom of Ephraim, Israel is defiled” Hosea 6:10

8 therefore thus saith the Lord God: Behold I, even I, am against thee, and will execute judgements in the midst of thee in the sight of the nations. — God’s judgement in the sight of the nations; as notorious as thy sins, so shall thy punishment be. The heathens shall see my hand in it, and own my justice;

— these are serious stuff; for example, the world will see if Fort Detrick and/or the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill the Source of Covid-19? And before the sight of the nations?

— the history of Fort Detrick; how they received the Unit 731 biolab transplant and how they nurtured those secrets from then on? Also, perhaps, the full extent of “We lied, we cheated, we stole… we had entire training courses” exposed for the world to see?

— without going into details, others could be (1) chemical weapons in various countries across the world, one example: orange agents during Vietnam war; (2) moon landing hoax; (3) 9/11 World Trade Centers killers; (4) Covid-19 origin; (5) the minds and hands behind Nord Stream I and II attacks;

9 And I will do in thee that which I have not done, and the like of which I will not do any more, because of all thine abominations. — “because of all thine abominations;” God shows the reason why He deals with the full house of Israel in greater severity than with the surrounding heathen nations;

— not comparable to any other nation, not even to Sodom and Gomorrah, when they were destroyed by fire from heaven; not in Egypt, when he inflicted his plagues on Pharaoh and his people. More than the Nazi concentration camp? More than the Armenian genocide in 1916? More than the Japanese Unit 731 germ experiment in Harbin? It is going to be very ugly!

10 Therefore the fathers shall eat the sons in the midst of thee, and the sons shall eat their fathers; and I will execute judgements in thee, and the whole remnant of thee will I scatter into all the winds.

— therefore the fathers shall eat the sons in the midst of thee; which was long ago threatened by the Lord, and prophesied of by Moses, Leviticus 26:27; and was fulfilled at several times in the people of Israel, as at the siege of Samaria, II Kings 6:28; at the siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, Lamentations 4:10;

— and at the siege of the same city by Titus Vespasian, as Josephus relates; for though these instances only show that mothers ate their children, yet no doubt the fathers took part with them; and if mothers, who are naturally more tender, could do this, it is much more reasonable to suppose that fathers did the same;

— the whole remnant of thee will I scatter: this was verified when they were fetched away who were left at the departure of the besiegers, and when the very small remnant fled into Egypt with Johanan; but this will be repeated in the future.

11 “Therefore as I live, saith the Lord God, surely because thou hast defiled My sanctuary with all thy detestable things and with all thine abominations, therefore will I also diminish thee; neither shall Mine eye spare, neither will I have any pity.

— as I live, the most solemn of oaths, pledging the self-existence of God: the calamities of the Babylonian were surpassed by the Roman siege, and these again were but a foreshadowing of still more terrible destruction at the last day.

12 A third part of thee shall die with the pestilence, and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee; and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds, and I will draw out a sword after them.

— a third part of them shall die with the pestilence and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee; and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; signified by the third part of the hair, smitten with a knife; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds; the greatest part of which were carried into captivity.

13 Thus shall Mine anger be accomplished, and I will cause My fury to rest upon them, and I will be comforted; and they shall know that I, the Lord, have spoken it in My zeal when I have accomplished My fury upon them. — and they shall know that I the Lord have spoken it in My zeal; that is, they shall find by experience that what the Lord had spoken by His prophets, and had threatened to bring upon them, was said in earnest, and arose from a jealousy for His own glory; this will be a clear case, and out of question.

14 “Moreover I will make thee a waste and a reproach among the nations that are round about thee, in the sight of all that pass by. — moreover God will make thee a reproach among the nations that are round about thee, in the sight of all that pass by.

15 So it shall be a reproach and a taunt, an instruction and an astonishment unto the nations that are round about thee, when I shall execute judgements upon thee in anger and in fury and in furious rebukes. I, the Lord, have spoken it. — I the Lord have spoken it; the Targum says, “I the Lord have decreed in my word.”

16 When I shall send upon them the evil arrows of famine which shall be for their destruction, and which I will send to destroy you, and I will increase the famine upon you, and will break your staff of bread,

17 so will I send upon you famine and evil beasts, and they shall bereave thee; and pestilence and blood shall pass through thee, and I will bring the sword upon thee. I, the Lord, have spoken it.” — evil beasts, literally lions, wolves, alligators, bears and bisons, etc;

— God the Almighty have spoken it: who is able to perform it, and did, both at the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC and by Titus in AD 70; and perhaps a series of bigger ones in the future?

Ezekiel 6

— ye or they “shall know that I am the Lord” expressed 3 times in this chapter alone (v7, 13, 14) and in all, 51 times in the book of Ezekiel. In other chapters the phase could apply to some Gentile nations, but for this chapter it applies solely to the house of Israel.

1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, — the message in this chapter is more to the house of Israel, and less to the house of Judah.

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward the mountains of Israel, and prophesy against them — Son of man, set thy face towards the mountains of Israel; or cities of Israel, the future inhabitants of them; not the ancient ten tribes, for they had been carried captive long before this time, even in the times of Hezekiah;

— but far more likely, into the far future (Ezekiel 12:27), unless it can be thought that this prophecy was designed to show the reason of their Assyrian captivity, which wasn’t.

3 and say: ‘Ye mountains of Israel, hear the word of the Lord God. Thus saith the Lord God to the mountains and to the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys: Behold I, even I, will bring a sword upon you, and I will destroy your high places. — this message to the “mountains of Israel;” these mountains refer to the United States, UK and France. . . .

— and to the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys; the hills: Ireland, Switzerland and the Scandinavian: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, Finland and Iceland; and the valleys, the low countries: Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg;

— and to the rivers (or ravines), where during the nineteenth century, the British Navy were known to “Rule the Waves;” their colonies, their new territories; and the United States having been plowing up and down the five oceans with her Seven Fleets since the British Navy left the scene;

— behold I, even I, will bring a sword upon you; the Targum paraphrases it, “them that kill with the sword;” meaning your enemies will destroy your high places;

4 And your altars shall be desolate, and your images shall be broken; and I will cast down your slain men before your idols. — your temples and altars, built on high places, and devoted to idolatrous worship, threatening them with utter destruction.

5 And I will lay the dead carcasses of the children of Israel before their idols; and I will scatter your bones round about your altars. — and God will lay the dead carcasses of the children of Israel before their idols, which is repeated for emphasis.

6 In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished.

— in all your dwelling places your cities shall be laid waste; which indicates that the desolation should be widespread, wherever they had cities, towns and villages and places to dwell in;

— the idolatry being universal as is said in Jeremiah 2:28; but where are thy gods that thou hast made thee? Let them arise if they can save thee in the time of thy trouble; for according to the number of thy cities are thy gods, O Judah. Of course, this chapter is for modern Israel, not Judah.

7 And the slain shall fall in the midst of you, and ye shall know that I am the Lord.

— flash forward in a parallel Scripture; and speaking of the house of Jacob today: “I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate, and thou shalt know that I am the LORD” Ezekiel 35:4. This implies the house of Israel, even their numerous churches, doesn’t know God today!!!

8 “‘Yet will I leave a remnant, that ye may have some that shall escape the sword among the nations when ye shall be scattered through the countries. — situations are getting very serious, and ultimately Ezekiel asks: “Ah, Lord God! Wilt Thou make a full end of the remnant of Israel?” Ezekiel 11:13.

9 And they that escape from among you shall remember Me among the nations whither they shall be carried captives, because I am broken with their whorish heart which hath departed from Me, and with their eyes which go a whoring after their idols. And they shall loathe themselves for the evils which they have committed in all their abominations. — they that escape of you shall remember God (or, as the Targum says, learn the fear of me);

— those that escape the sword, the pestilence, and the famine, and shall be led into captivity, shall plainly see that it is God who has done this, and shall humble themselves on account of their abominations, leave their idolatry, and worship God alone;

— and this the house of Judah have experienced from the Babylonian captivity many times, again and again, down to the present day; but the house of Israel will be dealt with in the last days, perhaps the last 190 years according to Ezekiel 4 (Septuagint version).

10 And they shall know that I am the Lord, and that I have not said in vain that I would do this evil unto them. — the emphasis of the words is, “When the slain shall fall in the midst of you, then at last ye shall know that I am the Lord.” Again, this implies in numerous times that the house of Israel doesn’t know God today!!!

11 “‘Thus saith the Lord God: Smite with thine hand and stamp with thy foot, and say: “Alas for all the evil abominations of the house of Israel!” For they shall fall by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence. — smite with thine hand and stamp with thy foot; all expression of anguish and sorrow: the word “alas” or “woe” as in the Targum is an interjection of mourning and lamentation;

— for they shall fall by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence; which are repeated from Ezekiel 5:12; and the persons on whom they should be separately executed are mentioned in Ezekiel 6:12. Again the term “the house of Israel” is used here.

12 He that is far off shall die of the pestilence, and he that is near shall fall by the sword, and he that remaineth and is besieged shall die by the famine; thus will I accomplish My fury upon them. — central theme of falling by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence are repeated for emphasis. And sometimes in different order indicates they are all mixed and mingled together.

13 Then shall ye know that I am the Lord, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, on all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they offered sweet savor to all their idols.

— modern day idolatries are alive and well; in all corners, caves and hideout of the house of Israel, people will be caught in a snare; anything that they love, treasure, prioritize, identify with or look to for need fulfillment outside of God, can be acting as an idol in our heart and life: Wealth, Prosperity, Career Success, Image, Safety & Security.

14 So will I stretch out My hand upon them and make the land desolate, yea, more desolate than the wilderness toward Diblath, in all their habitations; and they shall know that I am the Lord.’”

— again, the ending of this chapter “and they shall know that I am the Lord” implies that the house of Israel doesn’t know God today!!!

— by now we have established that 70 AD is one of God’s judgement on Judah and Jerusalem, but it’s a microcosm for the wider Israelites at the endtime. So what were God’s judgement in 70 AD? And which sects managed to escape fire and death? History recorded only two sects that escaped the inferno of 70 AD:

(1) The Christians, known as Nazarenes in Acts 24:5. They escaped to a northern town called Pella, east of the Jordan River.

(2) Some Pharisees, those of the House of Hillel. They were headed by a Pharisaic rabbi, Johanan ben Zakkai, the head of the Sanhedrin, who was smuggled out of besieged Jerusalem in a coffin. They escaped to Yavne and, later, his followers re-emerged as Rabbinic Jews, who established the Hillel Calendar, which was revealed by Hillel II in about 359 AD concerning the rules of the calendar.

All other sects died and “disappeared” in the 70 AD inferno: (a) All Sadducees, Herodians, Boethusians; (b) Essenes, together with (c) the House of Shammai Pharisees and (d) the Zealots. They all “disappeared” by receiving their sword and fire. Were these sects facing their judgement as warned by Ezekiel?

Pella, East of the Jordan River

If the 70 AD inferno was only a microcosm, how could those who deviate from the God ordained Calendar, who have similar deceptive beliefs as the original Essenes, escape Ezekiel’s and John’s warning during the Last Days? Wouldn’t there be another Sodom and Gomorrah? And wouldn’t they also share its fate? It’s an unpleasant ending, but that’s what the Scriptures indicate.

When Jerusalem went through a fire inferno in 70 AD and all Sadducees disappeared from history. “Disappeared from history” seems like a whitewashed phrase. They were in fact burnt off like the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah. Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? Amos 3:6. Their predictions of death were proven true, that the Sadducees were sharing the same fate with king Zedekiah, described as “the wicked ones … whose reign over Israel will be brought down … his wives, his children, and his infant will go into captivity.”

Like the Samaritans, the Sadducees rejected not only the Oral Torah and the Rabbinic understanding of the Torah, but instead accepted the Samaritan interpretation of their Passover and Pentecost celebration. By doing so, they rejected the Prophets (like Ezekiel) and their Writings. God included His holy city of Jerusalem in this judgement in 70 AD as a microcosm for us to be forewarned, so take heed.

Negotiate or ‘Armageddon’

•October 16, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Excerpt from Jeffrey Sachs as Righteous Rogue Elephant

Unz by Ron Unz ~ October 10, 2022 // CNN: A negotiated peace is the only way to end Russia’s war on Ukraine

There is only one answer to the war in Ukraine: a peace deal.

A negotiated peace is the only way to end Russia’s war on Ukraine

The two-pronged US strategy, to help Ukraine overcome the Russian invasion by imposing tough sanctions and by supplying Ukraine’s military with sophisticated armaments, is likely to fall short. What is needed is a peace deal, which may be within reach. Yet to reach a deal, the United States will have to compromise on NATO, something Washington has so far rejected.

Putin started the war in Ukraine and has said negotiations have reached an impasse, without slamming the door on them. But before the war started, Putin presented the West with a list of demands including, most notably, a halt to NATO enlargement.

The US, pointedly, was not willing to engage on that point. Now would be a good time to revisit that policy. Putin also would have to show a willingness to make concessions for negotiations to succeed.

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

Commander-in-chief with Swastika

•October 15, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Ukrainian army’s commander-in-chief poses with swastika bracelet

RT ~ Octpber 9, 2022

General Valery Zaluzhny, the commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s armed forces, has posted a photo to Twitter which shows him wearing a swastika bracelet.

General Valery Zaluzhny, commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s armed forces, posted a photo to Twitter of himself wearing a swastika bracelet. Although Kiev dismisses accusations of Nazism within its ranks as “Russian propaganda,” its soldiers are often photographed wearing the symbols of the Third Reich.

In a post on Thursday, Zaluzhny declared that Ukraine’s struggle against Russia is on a scale that “the world has not seen since the Second World War.” It was not immediately clear which side of the struggle he was referring to.

Adorning Zaluzhny’s wrist in the photo is a bracelet made up of multiple tiles, at least one of which features a swastika. The photo itself has been circulating online since at least March.

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that ye be not troubled, for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there shall be famines and pestilences and earthquakes in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows” Matthew 24:6-8

Ezekiel (Ch 3-4)

•October 14, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Chapter 3 starts with further account of Ezekiel’s calling and mission; of his preparation and work; of the people to whom he was sent; of what happened to him; of the nature of his office, and what followed upon the renewal of his calling.

And remember, Ezekiel’s prophetic message wasn’t for the house of Judah but to the house of Israel; hence we must try to read the prophetic meaning behind all those historical setting. Its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27), into our time and the message is primarily and principally for the United States of America, and secondarily her Western allies.

More on (1) Ephraim / The United States; (2) Ephraim and Manasseh

Ezekiel 3

1 Moreover He said unto me, “Son of man, eat what thou findest: eat this scroll, and go, speak unto the house of Israel.” — eat this roll; not literally, but figuratively, as John is bid to eat the little book, digest it; let it be thy nourishment; and let it be thy meat and drink to do the will of thy Father who is in heaven;

— Revelation 10:9; that is, read it, meditate upon the things contained therein; and digest them, that he might be able to impart them, and make them known to others: it is explained in Ezekiel 3:10; by hearing and receiving the words of the prophecy; and so the Targum, “receive what is written in this roll.”

Ezekiel began to see Visions of God, “Son of man, eat this scroll.”

2 So I opened my mouth, and He caused me to eat that scroll.

3 And He said unto me, “Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this scroll that I give thee.” Then did I eat it, and it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness. — it was joyous for Ezekiel to receive the Divine message, to be thus let into the secrets of the Divine counsel. It’s liked the Parable of the King inviting one special friend for the Eight Day to end the Feast; for just one special guest.

— Gill: And he said unto me, son of man, cause thy belly to eat…. or “devour” and consume; that is, concoct and digest; do not cast it out of thy mouth, as soon as thou hast tasted of it; but let it go down into the stomach, and there digest it; and from thence into the belly, that so, upon the whole, virtue may be received, and nourishment come by it:

— and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee; eat to satiety;

— so the Targum says, “son of man, thou shalt satiate thy soul, and fill thy belly, if thou receivest what is written in this roll, which I give thee:”

Remember, the Targum, whose origin was in the Aramaic language, could be traced to Ezra speaking to the returning exiles who couldn’t understand Hebrew, but was expounded to them in a language they could understand.

4 And He said unto me, “Son of man, go, get thee unto the house of Israel, and speak with My words unto them. — and he said unto me, son of man, go…. after he had eaten the roll; for then was he qualified to prophesy: not to the house of Judah but to the house of Israel;

— parallel Scriptures in Ezekiel 36:1, “the mountain of Israel” this prophecy is infering the desolations of the United States, UK and France; “and to the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys (v4)” these are the hills: Ireland, Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, Finland and Iceland; and the valleys, the low countries: Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg;

5 For thou art not sent to a people of strange speech and of a hard language, but to the house of Israel — but to the house of Israel; who were a people of the same speech and language with the prophet (Protestants of Western Europe: principally the United States, UK and France);

— all spoke and understood the Hebrew language; nor were the things he delivered such as they were altogether strangers to being the same, for substance, which Moses, and the other prophets, had ever taught.

6 not to many people of strange speech and of a hard language, whose words thou canst not understand. Surely, had I sent thee to them, they would have hearkened unto thee. — surely, I had NOT sent thee to “a people of strange speech and of a hard language,” they would have hearkened unto thee; which shows an aggravation of the obstinacy and disobedience of the people of Israel;

— that had the Gentiles been favoured with the same means of instruction they were they would have been obedient. That is, Gentiles, people with a strange speech and of a hard language, “they would have hearkened unto thee” would have repented and would have done better!!!

7 But the house of Israel will not hearken unto thee, for they will not hearken unto Me; for all the house of Israel are impudent and hardhearted. — they are not willing; they have no desire, no inclination, to hear and hearken; but the reverse: stiffnecked as in Exodus 32:9; and indeed the reason why they did not hearken to him was not because they rejected Ezekiel and his words, but because they rejected the Lord and his reproofs (admonitions).

8 Behold, I have made thy face strong against their faces, and thy forehead strong against their foreheads. — Ezekiel should behave with an undaunted spirit, and with great intrepidity, amidst all opposition made to him.

9 As an adamant, harder than flint, have I made thy forehead. Fear them not, neither be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house.” — adamant is the diamond, as it is translated (Jeremiah 17:1, the sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron and with the point of a diamond). The people were as hard as flint, but as the diamond cuts flint, so Ezekiel’s words should be made by the Divine power to cut through all their resistance.

10 Moreover He said unto me, “Son of man, all My words that I shall speak unto thee receive in thine heart, and hear with thine ears. — God shows what is meant by the eating of the book, that is, to internalise them in heart and mind.

11 And go, get thee to those of the captivity, unto the children of thy people, and speak unto them and tell them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God,’ whether they will hear or whether they will forbear.”

— “Go, get thee unto thy people…” note that God did not say here, “unto my people,” but “unto thy people.” The apostasy of Israel was so complete that God no longer recognized them as his people, thus fulfilling the prophecy of Hosea, “I hated them: because of the wickedness of their doings I will drive them out of my house; I will love them no more” (Hosea 9:15); “and they shall be wanderers among the nations” (v17).

12 Then the Spirit took me up, and I heard behind me a voice of a great rushing, saying, “Blessed be the glory of the Lord from His place.” — a voice of a great rushing; this was the same noise made by the wings of the living creatures that formed the chariot of God. See Ezekiel chapters 1 and 10.

13 I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that touched one another, and the noise of the wheels opposite them, and a noise of a great rushing.

14 So the Spirit lifted me up and took me away, and I went in bitterness, in the heat of my spirit; but the hand of the Lord was strong upon me.

— then the spirit took me up; it could be the wind, or an angel, often expressed as the spirit of God; who lifted up Ezekiel from the ground, from the place where he was, among the captives by the river Chebar, and had seen the glorious vision described in the first chapter; and had had his call and mission, as expressed in the second chapter; and was carried by him to another company of captives, who were at another place by the same river, as appears by comparing Ezekiel 1:1 with Ezekiel 3:15.

15 Then I came to those of the captivity at Telabib, who dwelt by the River of Chebar; and I sat where they sat, and remained there astonished among them seven days. — seven days at Telabib, a change of place and company, but still by the same “river of Chebar,”

— at the sad condition his people were in; and above all at the dreadful things he had to deliver to them. The Targum renders it, “silent” through grief and trouble, a great time for reflection.

16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days that the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

17 “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore hear the word out of My mouth, and give them warning from Me. — Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel, thus if he warned the wicked, he would not be chargeable with their ruin;

— a watchman of a town or city, or of the whole country, and in an ecclesiastical sense. So the Targum renders it by מליף, “a teacher” whose business it was to instruct the people in divine issues, to warn them of their evil ways, and of the danger they exposed them to; such as from their prophets of old; and lies in watching over the souls of men,

— as shepherds over their flocks, that they go into the right pastures, and not astray and so preserves them from beasts of prey; and as watchmen of cities, to give the time of night and notice of approaching danger; to the discharge of which office are necessary quick sight, diligence in looking out, sobriety and vigilance, courage, constancy and faithfulness: and they are “sons of men” that are put into this office.

18 When I say unto the wicked, ‘Thou shalt surely die,’ and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way to save his life, the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand. — thou shalt surely die;

— that is, if he turn not from his wickedness, and thou givest him not warning, as above, he shalt die in his iniquity, which he should not have committed; but his blood will God require at their hand; God will visit their soul for the loss of his;

19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

— repeated in Ezekiel 33:1-6,

1 Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, 2 “Son of man, speak to the children of thy people and say unto them: ‘When I bring the sword upon a land, if the people of the land take a man from their borders and set him as their watchman, and 3 if when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet and warn the people, 4 then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet and taketh not warning, if the sword come and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head. 5 He heard the sound of the trumpet and took not warning: his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul. 6 But if the watchman see the sword come and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned, if the sword come and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand’ Ezekiel 33:1-6

20 Again, when a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die. Because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

— better translated as “Again, when a righteous man turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity, and God place an obstacle before him, he will die; but since you have not warned him, he will die in his sin, and the righteous deeds which he has done will not be remembered; but you will be responsible for his blood.”

21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul.”

<< there seems to be some missing events to fill the gap. Ezekiel must have delivered his warning message, least he would die as a watcher, but he didn’t die, signifying he must have delivered the warning but that the people didn’t like the message. On his return, he was made dumb by God who asked him to stay at home until the fulfillment of his warning: the destruction of Jerusalem: Ezekiel 24:26-27. This is historical but the real message is for the endtime and is to the house of Israel >>

22 And the hand of the Lord was there upon me; and He said unto me, “Arise, go forth into the plain, and I will there talk with thee.” — considerable time must had passsed for this new event to come to pass.

23 Then I arose and went forth into the plain, and behold, the glory of the Lord stood there, as the glory which I saw by the River of Chebar; and I fell on my face.

24 Then the Spirit entered into me and set me upon my feet, and spoke with me and said unto me, “Go, shut thyself within thine house. — instead of sending him to a public assembly, God orders him to confine himself to his own lodgings: “Go, shut thyself within thy house.”

25 But thou, O son of man, behold, they shall put bands upon thee and shall bind thee with them, and thou shalt not go out among them. — put bands upon thee; signifying the bonds and chains of their future captivity who were yet at Jerusalem; shall bind thee with them:

— this may indicate the severity with which the conqueror would treat them, he would bind their bonds fast, close, and this will be pain and grief to the bounden.

26 And I will make thy tongue cleave to the roof of thy mouth, that thou shalt be dumb and shalt not be to them a reprover [someone who finds fault or imputes blame], for they are a rebellious house. — that thou shall be dumb which is to be understood not just literally, as if he was really struck dumb,

— and that such silence should be charged upon him by the Lord, that he should be as if his tongue cleaved to the roof of his mouth, as if he was a dumb man: and so the Septuagint version renders it, “I will bind thy tongue.”

27 But when I speak with thee, I will open thy mouth, and thou shalt say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ He that heareth, let him hear; and he that forbeareth, let him forbear; for they are a rebellious house. — God will make thy tongue cleave to the roof of thy mouth; but he will give thee the message to deliver to them when the time is ripe;

— they are so rebellious, it is useless to give them further warning. But then again, God set the time, when to be silent and when to speak when the time is right.

Ezekiel 4

1 “Thou also, son of man, take thee a tile and lay it before thee, and portray upon it the city, even Jerusalem; — take a tile and lay it before thee; Ezekiel received God’s command to depict Jerusalem as a tile or a clay tablet;

— he often foreshowed impending judgements by significant emblems, which usually strike more powerfully than words; and to take one of those earthen vessels and break it in the sight of the elders of the Jews, (chap 19) that they might thereby be sensibly taught the greatness of God’s power, and their own frailty.

2 and lay siege against it, and build a fort against it, and cast a mound against it. Set the camp also against it, and set battering rams against it round about. — lay siege against it; it seemed at this time that Jerusalem would soon become the subject of another siege.

— but if Jerusalem had already fallen then this mentioning of siege could be a futurist event, perhaps in the year 70 AD, and, lastly, the event of this siege could be a microcosm for the endtime, for a wider audience, for the house of Israel in the next verse, and its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27).

3 Moreover take thou unto thee an iron plate and set it for a wall of iron between thee and the city; and set thy face against it, and it shall be besieged, and thou shalt lay siege against it. This shall be a sign to the house of Israel. —

4 “Also lie thou upon thy left side, and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it: according to the number of the [hundred and fifty] days that thou shalt lie upon it, thou shalt bear their iniquity. — the Septuagint has another phase: “according to the number of the hundred and fifty days,” which is not in the Masoretic text.

5 For I have laid upon thee the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days, three hundred and ninety days; so shalt thou bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. — nobody attempts to place what this 390 years mean, except:

— Rashi: three hundred and ninety days: We learned in Seder Olam (ch. 26): This teaches us that Israel sinned for three hundred and ninety years from the time they entered the Land until the ten tribes were exiled therefrom.

— well, if Rashi’s premise is true, that the 390 years were since the house of Israel entered the Promised Land from the other side of the Jordan to the time of their exile, then using the same principle, Judah’s 40 years of iniquity would have started the same time but ended around the time Joshua ended his reign when he died an an age of 110, or shortly after? It just doesn’t add up and doesn’t make sense!

— and by the way, the Septuagint version of this verse says it is 190 years instead of 390 years in verse five; so is this easier to understand? Maybe! Perhaps and perhaps only, the downfall of the house of Israel would start first and last for 150 years before the house of Judah joins them for the last 40 years for the final total 190 years as spelt out in the Septuagint? What do you think?

6 And when thou hast accomplished them, lie again on thy right side, and thou shalt bear the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days: I have appointed thee each day for a year. — this takes for its starting-point the evident allusion of Ezekiel to Numbers 14:14, “After the number of the days in which ye searched the land, even forty days, each day for a year shall ye bear your iniquities;” 

Rashi: the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days: This teaches us that the house of Judah sinned, from the time that the ten tribes were exiled until Jerusalem was destroyed, forty years; but these figures and reasoning don’t sound right; why start only after the northern 10 tribes had gone into captivity; and the time gap was about 135 to 150 years, not 40?

— reading from verse 4 to verse 6 in the Septuagint, it seems the 190 days are made up of 150 days for Israel and consecutively and other 40 days for both Israel and Judah.

Septuagint version: 4 And thou shalt lie upon thy left side, and lay the iniquities of the house of Israel upon it, according to the number of the hundred and fifty days which thou shalt lie upon it: and thou shalt bear their iniquities. 5 For I have appointed thee their iniquities for a number of days, for a hundred and ninety days: so thou shalt bear the iniquities of the house of Israel. 6 And thou shalt accomplish this, and shalt lie on thy right side, and shalt bear the iniquities of the house of Juda forty days: I have appointed thee a day for a year.

7 Therefore thou shalt set thy face toward the siege of Jerusalem; and thine arm shall be uncovered, and thou shalt prophesy against it. — therefore thou shalt set thy face toward the siege at Jerusalem; all the while he was lying either on the left side or the right, his face was to be directed to the siege of Jerusalem, indicating this is prophetic “thou shalt prophesy” pointing to the year 70 AD.

8 And behold, I will lay bands upon thee, and thou shalt not turn thee from one side to another until thou hast ended the days of thy siege.

9 “Take thou also unto thee wheat and barley and beans, and lentils and millet and fitches, and put them in one vessel, and make thee bread thereof according to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon thy side; three hundred and ninety days shalt thou eat thereof.

— Gill: Take thou also unto thee wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentiles, and millet, and fitches…. the first of these was commonly used to make bread of; in case of want and poverty, barley was used; but, for the rest, they were for cattle, and never used for the food of men but in a time of great scarcity; wherefore this was designed to denote the famine that should attend the siege of Jerusalem.

— Gill: no mention is made of the forty days, perhaps they are understood, a part being put for the whole; or they were included in the three hundred and ninety days. The Septuagint and Arabic versions read only a hundred and ninety days.

10 And thy meat which thou shalt eat shall be by weight, twenty shekels a day. From time to time shalt thou eat it.

11 Thou shalt drink also water by measure, a sixth part of a hin. From time to time shalt thou drink. — this is famine, same as the great scarcity during the siege of Jerusalem from 66 to 70 AD.

12 And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man in their sight.” — in the severity of famines, the captives, to languish in hunger and distress, though not compelled to make bricks from straw but only asked to bake their food with shits! Yak! Is this a better deal than the time during their Egyptian captivity?

13 And the Lord said, “Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the nations, whither I will drive them.” — the above “thus shall” indicates it is futuristic from God’s and Ezekiel’s perspectives as the house of Israel shall spend 190 years in captivity, so the mystery of 390/190/150/40 years remains in the future. Any other possibilities? None that I know off.

14 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! Behold, my soul hath not been polluted; for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.” — then said I, ah, Lord God!… the interjection “ah” is expressive of sighing and groaning.

Gill: neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth; corrupt or, putrefied, or whatsoever was unclean by law, as swine’s flesh, or any other. The argument is that since he had never eaten of anything forbidden by the law of God, he could by no means think of eating that which was abhorrent to nature; as bread baked with men’s dung was.

15 Then He said unto me, “Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.” — cow’s dung, obviously an improvement over man’s excretion, which Ezekiel seemed to have bargained for, like Abraham did in his days.

16 Moreover He said unto me, “Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem; and they shall eat bread by weight and with care, and they shall drink water by measure and with astonishment,

17 that they may lack bread and water, and be stunned one with another, and be consumed away for their iniquity.

~~~~

Below is the Septuagint (and Arabic versions too; John Gill says so) and putting all together, a possible explanation to the mystery of the 390/190/150/40 years:

4 And thou shalt lie upon thy left side, and lay the iniquities of the house of Israel upon it, according to the number of the hundred and fifty days which thou shalt lie upon it: and thou shalt bear their iniquities. — start with the ten tribes house of Israel and last for 150 years

5 For I have appointed thee their iniquities for a number of days, for a hundred and ninety days: so thou shalt bear the iniquities of the house of Israel. — start with the 10 tribes but end with the full house of Israel; all 12 tribes: end of the 190 years

6 And thou shalt accomplish this, and shalt lie on thy right side, and shalt bear the iniquities of the house of Juda forty days: I have appointed thee a day for a year. Ezekiel 4:4-6 Septuagint. — after the start of the 10 tribes house of Israel and last for 150 years, the house of Judah; 3 tribes join in for 40 years

9 Take thou also to thee wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentils, and millet, and bread-corn; and thou shalt cast them into one earthen vessel, and shalt make them into loaves for thyself; and thou shalt eat them a hundred and ninety days, according to the number of the days which thou sleepest on thy side. Ezekiel 4:9 Septuagint.

From the start with 10 tribes and end with full house of Israel: 190 years; why the difference? Perhaps Judah had undergo numerous pogroms and cleanings whereas Ephraim has none since the day when went captivity and into apparent oblivion

We’re now in the Hebrew year 5783 and we’ll need another 216 years to usher the Divine Plan into the 7th Millennium as we believe. Of course, this is on the assumption that God’s oracles have been accurately kept since the day Adam was created as the Jewish custodians claim.

If we add 216 years to the Gregorian calendar year 2022 we’ll come to 2238 when the 7th Millennium starts. Working backward 190 years will bring us to the Gregorian year 2048. So could the year 2048 be the start of the house of Israel’s “iniquity?” — “thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them;” in captivity to start the 190 years?

No, perhaps not: the 190 years may end with the appearance of “My servant David,” in the “valley full of dry bones” scenario (Ezekiel 37) where the full house of Israel would dwell securely rather than in captivity. Indications are that this period is a hundred year period involving “Gog and all his multitude” to the beginning of the Millennium (Ezekiel 40); (or it may be only seven years).

If so, the start of the 190 years would be pushed back another hundred years, which would be the Gregorian year 2048; which seems having a higher possibility than the figures (of 390/40 years) offered by the Masoretic Text.

On reflection the children of Israel were in Egypt for about 210 years, so cheers; this captivity of 190 years is 20 years shorter. These analyses may run away with imaginations, but the incorporation of prophecies always has elements of uncertainties and so these predictions could be prone to errors.

Okay, one Question that comes to mind is, “Why the iniquity for Israel is much longer than Judah?” Perhaps the answer could be broken into two parts: (1) the house of Judah, the Jews, have undergone pogroms numerous times over the last two and a half millenium whereas the house of Israel have remained largely unscatched since their only captivity was by the Assyrians;

And a related second reason: (2) the house of Judah has already been restored to the Land of Promise; whereas the house of Israel are still largely intact and dwelling “among the nations” (Lamentations 1:1, Ezekiel 12:15). It would take decades for conditions to build up for the whole house of Israel to want to return back to their homeland to team up with the house of Judah for the fulfilment of the prophecy of the joining of the two sticks in Ezekiel 37.

And finally, these analyses are not written in stone and so any thoughts to the contrary are most welcome. Are there any other possibilities or factors that have been left out but could or should be considered? Thanks for reading.

~~~

More on (1) Ephraim / The United States; (2) Ephraim and Manasseh

Bolton Calls For Putin Assassination

•October 13, 2022 • Leave a Comment

John Bolton Calls For Putin Assassination, Regime Change

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ October 10, 2022

Former White House national security adviser John Bolton is now taking to the networks to call for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s assassination. “I think we should make it clear publicly so that not just Putin but that all the top Russian leadership… that if Putin authorizes the use of a nuclear weapon he’s signing his own suicide note,” the well-known neocon hawk said to CBS in a Friday appearance.

As you have done [unto others], it shall be done to you

Describing that Putin is head of command and control for all Russian – including nuclear – forces, Bolton continued by stating what he says should be official US policy: “He’s a legitimate military target… he needs to know that he’s on our target list at this point.” Bolton essentially called for the US to assassinate the Russian leader if the opportunity ever arises.

Bolton went on the discuss an op-ed he penned days prior in the online military journal 1945 wherein effecting regime change in Russia was the focus.

“There is no long-term prospect for peace and security in Europe without regime change in Russia. Russians are already discussing it, quietly, for obvious reasons. For the United States and others pretending that the issue is not before will do far more harm than good,” Bolton spelled out in that op-ed. 

“To avoid the war simply grinding along indefinitely, we must alter today’s calculus. Carefully assisting Russian dissidents to pursue regime change might just be the answer, he continued. “Russia is, obviously, a nuclear power, but that is no more an argument against seeking regime change than against assisting Ukrainian self-defense.”

The ultra-provocative call for regime change from so visible a former government official as Bolton is sure to catch the attention of Moscow, also at a moment tensions are at boiling point with Illegitimate President Biden’s nuclear “Armageddon” remarks which also surprised and angered the Kremlin.

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10

“For the day of the Lord is near upon all the nations. As you have done [unto others], it shall be done to you; your dealings will return upon your own head” Obadiah 1:15

Ezekiel (Ch 1-2)

•October 12, 2022 • Leave a Comment

This book Ezekiel is placed after Jeremiah; since Ezekiel was among the captives in Chaldea when his visions occurred; whereas Jeremiah began to prophesy long before that captivity. The name of this prophet signifies, as it is commonly interpreted, “the strength of God” or “strengthened by God.”

And since Ezekiel was regarded as a major prophets, the events recorded have significant meanings, that although those events were historical, they have implications for our time; the end time.

And Ezekiel’s main message wasn’t for the house of Judah but to the house of Israel, whose captivity occurred some 135 years before Judah’s captivity. Hence we must try to read the prophetic meaning behind all those historical setting.

Yet nobody seems to understand the various symbols and riddles in this book of Ezekiel to put all the puzzles into a cohesive and coherent picture. The Jews couldn’t understand what or how the house of Israel could have any relevance since the days they went into exile; Christians taught themselves that they have already replaced the Israelites and God’s graceful promises of eternity are now theirs!

The secret is out when God revealed it to Ezekiel: “Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, ‘The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off’ (Ezekiel 12:27). Or as the RSV has it: “The vision that he sees is for many days hence, and he prophesies of times far off.”

That’s right, its timing was a great distance into the future into our time and the message is primarily and principally for Ephraim, the head of the northern tribes, the United States of America and, secondarily, its European allies.

Before we go further you may like to know who Ephraim and Manasseh are.

Ezekiel was among the captives by the River of Chebar when the heavens opened and he saw the visions of God

Ezekiel 1

1 Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, on the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the River of Chebar, that the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God.

— the Targum, whose origin in the Aramaic language could be traced to Ezra, paraphrases the words thus, “and it was in the thirtieth year after Hilkiah the high priest found the book of the law, in the house of the sanctuary, in the court under the porch, in the middle of the night, after the moon was down, in the days of Josiah son of Amon king of Judah” (from John Gill’s exposition).

— Ezekiel was among the captives by the river Chebar in Chaldea; some thought it was the river Euphrates, others a distributary. Ezekiel was among the captives and this was around the year 587/586 BC, resulting in the exile of the inhabitants of Jerusalem to Babylon. The northern Kingdom Israel was taken earlier around 721 BC (ie about 135 years earlier), hence the significance is that Ezekiel’s visions are prophetic.

— “and I saw visions of God.” And so at the end: “And I saw, and behold, a storm wind, etc.” — a similar case like John in Revelation when he was in visions.

— in his introduction to Ezekiel. John Gill wrote that there were already synagogues in Babylon; he states: “the account R. Benjamin Tudelensis is that there is a synagogue of the Prophet Ezekiel by the river Euphrates; and over against the synagogue sixty towers; and between every tower a synagogue. In the court of the synagogue is a library;” ~ this means there were numerous synagogues while the Jews were in captivity in Babylon.

2 On the fifth day of the month (which was the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s captivity),

3 the word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, in the land of the Chaldeans by the River Chebar; and the hand of the Lord was there upon him. — Ezekiel was a priest; in the Jerusalem Targum, the Prophet Ezekiel is called the son of Jeremiah the prophet (Gill).

4 And I looked, and behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire infolding itself; and a brightness was about it, and out of the midst thereof as the color of amber, out of the midst of the fire. — “A whirlwind came out of the north;” Nebuchadnezzar, whose land, Babylonia, lay north of Judea. Chaldea was denominated by Jeremiah prophecy;

— from the north, see also Jeremiah 1:14-15Jeremiah 4:6Jeremiah 6:1; it was from that direction that the Assyrian and the Chaldæan conquerors were accustomed to descend upon the Holy Land.

5 Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. And this was their appearance: they had the likeness of a man. — out of the midst of that same whirlwind from the north (v4) came “the likeness of four living creatures.”

6 And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings. — as in Ezekiel 10:21, each cherub has four wings, or two elsewhere (Exodus 25:20; in the Temple overshadowing the mercy-seat, or in the garden of Eden keeping the way of the tree of life, always indicate the immediate presence of God). But in Isaiah 6:2, each seraphim has six wings;

— in the Targum, whose origin in the Aramaic language of understanding the Scriptures could be traced to Ezra; multiplies the faces in a strange monstrous manner, paraphrasing the words thus, “each had four faces, and there were four faces to everyone “of them”, and every creature had sixteen faces; the number of the faces of the four creatures was sixty and four.”

— Rabbi Rashi (1040-1105 France): and each one had four faces: “Each one” means that the human countenance had four faces, as did that of the lion, the eagle, and the ox, totaling sixteen [faces] to one living being. It was thus for each living being, and four wings for each of the faces, totaling sixty-four wings for each living being. This is [why] Jonathan paraphrased: two hundred fifty-six wings.

Ezekiel’s vision of four living creatures, each has four faces!

7 And their feet were straight feet, and the soles of their feet were like the sole of a calf’s foot; and they sparkled like the color of burnished brass.

8 And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four sides; and all four had their faces and their wings.

9 Their wings were joined one to another. They turned not when they went; they went every one straight forward.

10 As for the likeness of their faces, all four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion on the right side, and all four had the face of an ox on the left side; all four also had the face of an eagle.

Around the camp: NORTH: DAN (Asher, Naphtali); EAST: JUDAH (Issachar, Zebulon); SOUTH: REUBEN (Gad, Simon): WEST: EPHRAIM (Benjamin, Manasseh). Numbers 2:3, 2:10, 2:18, and 2:25

North: DAN (Eagle); East: JUDAH (Lion); South: REUBEN (Man): East: EPHRAIM (Ox)

11 Thus were their faces. And their wings were stretched upward; two wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their bodies.

12 And they went every one straight forward; whither the spirit was to go, they went, and they turned not when they went.

13 As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was like burning coals of fire and like the appearance of lamps; it went up and down among the living creatures, and the fire was bright, and out of the fire went forth lightning.

14 And the living creatures ran and returned, like the appearance of a flash of lightning. — not only was the appearance of the cherubim thus glittering, but also their speed as they “ran and returned” was liked that of lightning.

15 Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold, a wheel was upon the earth by each of the living creatures with his four faces.

16 The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the color of beryl, and all four had the same likeness; and their appearance and their work was, as it were, a wheel in the middle of a wheel.

17 When they went, they went upon their four sides; and they turned not when they went.

18 As for their rims, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rims were full of eyes round about the four.

19 And when the living creatures went, the wheels went beside them; and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up.

20 Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went; thither was their spirit to go: and the wheels were lifted up opposite them, for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

21 When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up opposite them, for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

22 And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living creatures was as the color of the terrible crystal, stretched forth over their heads above.

23 And under the firmament were their wings straight, the one toward the other; every one had two which covered on this side, and every one had two which covered on that side of their bodies.

24 And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings like the noise of great waters, as the voice of the Almighty, the voice of speech as the noise of a host. When they stood, they let down their wings; — “as the voice of the Almighty;” like distant thunder, with hailstones and coals of fire, sometimes lightning flashes; for this is termed the voice of God, Psalms 18:13; Exodus 9:23; Exodus 9:28-29; Exodus 20:18.

25 and there was a voice from the firmament that was over their heads when they stood and had let down their wings.

26 And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, with the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness in appearance of a man above upon it.


27 And I saw as the color of amber, with the appearance of fire round about within it. From the appearance of His loins even upward and from the appearance of His loins even downward, I saw, as it were, the appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.

28 As the appearance of the rainbow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of One who spoke.

— this was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of God: of the divine Shekinah; His omnipotence and omniscience; the same BEING that dwelled in the Temple in Jerusalem, now manifested Himself to Prophet Ezekiel showing him events that are set to come far into the future.

Ezekiel 2

1 And He said unto me, “Son of man, stand upon thy feet, and I will speak unto thee.” — the Most High said unto Ezekiel; “Son of man” emphasizes Ezekiel’s insignificance or mere humanity; it’s applied to Daniel only once (Daniel 8:17), while to Ezekiel it is used over ninety times; both were prophets of captivity.

2 And the spirit entered into me when He spoke unto me, and set me upon my feet, so that I heard Him who spoke unto me. — this is the spirit of God that entered Ezekiel and spoke to him.

3 And He said unto me, “Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation (goyim) that hath rebelled against Me. They and their fathers have transgressed against Me, even unto this very day;

— “I send thee to the children of Israel;” this targeted nation (goyim in Hebrew) couldn’t be Judah, which was already in captivity, and not Israel, the northern Kingdom either, since it was exiled by the Assyrians some 135 years earlier. So the message has to be meant for the endtime, to the endtime house of Israel, “a rebellious nation (goyim plural; that is, nations) that hath rebelled against Me.”

— connecting Scripture: “Son of man, behold, they of the house of Israel say, ‘The vision that he seeth is for many days to come, and he prophesieth of the times that are far off’ Ezekiel 12 :27

4 for they are impudent children and stiffhearted. I send thee unto them; and thou shalt say unto them, ‘Thus saith the Lord God.’ — “for they are impudent children and stiffhearted: hard-hearted; elsewhere stiffnecked: impudent—literally, “hard-faced” (Eze 3:7,9);

— And the Lord said unto Moses, “I have seen this people, and behold, it is a stiffnecked people,” Exodus 32:9; showing no respect; obstinate, stubborn, with hearts that were like an adamant stone, and harder than the nether millstone; impenitent, obdurate, and inflexible.

5 And they, whether they will hear or whether they will forbear (for they are a rebellious house), yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them.

— John Gill: “yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them,” so that they were left without excuse, which was the purpose of the prophet being sent unto them; although there was little or no hope of reclaiming them; but, however, by such a step taken, they could not say that they had no prophet sent to reprove them for their sins, and warn them of their danger; had they, they would have listened to him, and so have escaped the evils that would come upon them.

6 “And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee and thou dost dwell among scorpions. Be not afraid of their words nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house.

— be not afraid of their words; as before; with which they are like briers, thorns and scorpions, being very grievous, defamatory and mischievous: the Targum paraphrases it, “thou dwellest in the midst of a people whose works are like to scorpions.”

Ezekiel’s message to Ephraim, “a people whose words and looks are like scorpions.”

7 And thou shalt speak My words unto them, whether they will hear or whether they will forbear, for they are most rebellious. — “And they, whether they will hear or whether they will forbear (for they are a rebellious house), yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them,” Ezekiel 2:5

8 But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee. Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house. Open thy mouth, and eat what I give thee.” — this means Ezekiel was to hear it and internalize the message, then the people to whom such messages of God may come should also hear it read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest it, and be warned of this message.

9 And when I looked, behold, a hand was sent unto me; and lo, a scroll of a book was therein. — behold a hand was sent unto me; a hand stretched out toward me.

10 And He spread it before me; and it was written within and without, and there were written therein lamentations and mourning and woe. — “it was written within and without;” contrary to the state of rolls in general, which are written on the inside only, but this was also written on the outside, perhaps indicating a message of unusual urgency.

— the Targum says, “it was written before and behind, what was from the beginning, and what shall be in the end.”

— Gill: it was usual only to write on the inside; but when they had a great deal to write, then they wrote on the back also; so that this roll being written denotes the largeness and abundance of the prophecies contained in this book; some in respect to the Jews and the house of Israel, and others the nations of the world.

— in the Talmud, “lamentations” are interpreted as punishments of the righteous in this world; “mourning” are gift of reward to the righteous, over which they will sing in the world to come; and “woe” are of the punishments of the wicked in the world to come. The Targum says, “if the house of Israel transgress the law, the people shall rule over them; but, if they keep the law, lamentation, and mourning, and sorrow, shall cease from them.”

~~~~

More on (1) Ephraim / The United States; (2) Ephraim and Manasseh

Why the Kerch Bridge?

•October 11, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Why is the Kerch Bridge important attacked? Is this bridge explosion ‘the beginning’?

DW whodunnit? ~ October 9, 2022

deadly blast sparked a fire on Saturday and caused massive damage to the Kerch Bridge that links Russia to Crimea. Now reports of Ukraine cities bombed in apparent revenge strikes

Blast was ‘certainly’ a Ukrainian attack. Is this ‘the beginning’?

Russian officials said the fire was caused by a truck explosion and did not immediately assign blame. Analysts have suggested that it could have been the result of a Ukrainian attack. The Russian Transport Ministry said limited road traffic resumed on one lane of the bridge later on Saturday.

Ukrainian officials have not directly claimed responsibility for the blast but have regularly made allusions to their desire to destroy the bridge and have made social media posts celebrating the explosion.

Kyiv has vowed to retake Crimea, which Russia illegally annexed in 2014.

Moscow built the Kerch Bridge to link the newly annexed Crimean Peninsula to the Russian region of Krasnodar Krai in the northern Caucasus.

The bridge cost $3.6 billion (€3.25 billion) at the time. With a length of 19 kilometers (12 miles), the ambitious project, designed to help shore up Crimea’s infrastructure and strengthen its connection to Russia, is the longest bridge in Europe.

Kyiv accused Russia of damaging the environment and obstructing the passage of larger ships in constructing the bridge, which crosses the Kerch Strait that connects the Sea of Azov to the Black Sea.

The bridge represents a major source of supplies for Russian forces in Ukraine’s occupied Kherson region. Moscow illegally annexed the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia at the end of September, through which it aims to connect Crimea to the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, where pro-Russian separatists have waged an insurgency against Kyiv since 2014.

Blast was ‘almost certainly’ a Ukrainian attack

Kings College fellow Mike Martin told DW on Saturday that the fire on the Kerch Bridge was “almost certainly” the result of a Ukrainian attack.

The Kings College War Department fellow said that crippling the bridge has both strategic and symbolic significance for Ukraine.

Only two rail links connect Russia to Crimea and the Kherson region, he said. He added that Russian forces heavily rely on rail links for supplies.

A blast destroyed parts of a bridge for the Russian supply lines

“One is on the bridge that we’ve just seen destroyed,” Martin said, referring to freight lines on the Kerch Bridge. “So the Ukrainians are clearly isolating the Russian forces from their suppliers.

“This bridge has Putin’s name all over it,” Martin said, adding that the blast came at a time Russia’s military and president face criticism at home over battlefield losses.

“What we’ve seen over the last three or four months is that the Ukrainians have consistently outthought the Russians and they’ve outfought them as well,” Martin argued.

Ukrainian officials taunt Moscow over blast

Damaging the Kerch Bridge holds significant symbolic value for Kyiv, which has pledged to retake the Crimean Peninsula from Russia, along with all other Ukrainian territory currently occupied by Russian forces.

The head of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, Oleksiy Danilov, posted a video on Twitter showing the burning Kherson Bridge juxtaposed with Marilyn Monroe singing “Happy birthday, Mr President.” The blast occurred a day after Putin’s 70th birthday.

Ukraine’s postal service said it would print a special stamp to commemorate the explosion.

Following the blast, Ukrainian presidential advisor Mykhailo Podolyak tweeted that this was “just the beginning.”

Blast was certainly a Ukrainian ‘terrorist’ attack. Is this ‘the beginning’?

“Everything illegal must be destroyed, everything that is stolen must be returned to Ukraine, everything occupied by Russia must be expelled,” Podolyak said.

Later on Saturday, Podolyak wrote a tweet suggesting that the bridge was damaged due to sabotage from within Russia. “Isn’t it obvious who made an explosion? Truck arrived from [the Russian Federation],” he said.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Ukrainian officials’ reaction to the damage to the bridge “testifies to [Kyiv’s] terrorist nature.”

In response was a series of “Shock’n Awe” across cities in Ukraine

Now reports of Ukraine cities bombed in apparent revenge strikes

A man flees as cars burn after a missile hits central Kyiv this morning

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that ye be not troubled, for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there shall be famines and pestilences and earthquakes in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows” Matthew 24:6-8

Zelensky ‘Running Out of Props’

•October 10, 2022 • Leave a Comment

New Push to Get Ukraine Into NATO Shows Zelensky ‘Running Out of Props’

Sputnik International ~ October 6, 2022

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s latest desperate attempt to convince Western politicians that Kiev can now join NATO is a sign that he is running out of props, analysts told Sputnik.

Zelensky ‘Running Out of Props’

On Friday, Zelensky said that Ukraine was applying to join NATO in an expedited manner after the DPR, the LPR, the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions decided to join Russia.

“He is running out of props… so he is grasping at whatever mirage might save him,” University of Pittsburgh Professor of International Affairs Michael Brenner said on Monday. “Thus, the idea of joining NATO.”

The fantasy that his Western masters would allow Ukraine to join NATO revealed the imaginary nature of the world Zelensky lived in, Brenner observed.

“Of course, it never will happen because it would mean all-out war with Russia. Even the lunatics in Washington are not that suicidal,” he said.

Zelensky is a TV producer and actor, Brenner added, who improbably finds himself the star player in a real life drama of historic importance.

“He is at once script writer, director and central character. The worlds of fiction and actuality have merged in his mind – Stanislavsky method acting to the extreme,” Brenner told Sputnik. “At the same time, he knows that to keep the show on the road, he has to follow instructions from Washington, which is the uber director.”

So, he must do anything that keeps the war going – not for Ukraine but for an American strategic victory – in other words, to bleed the Russian and weaken them, he said.

The Americans felt no loyalty or special ties to Zelensky, whatever he believed to the contrary, Brenner stressed.

“As long as Zelensky serves this purpose, they will keep him as their champion – when he becomes a liability, they will drop him, like [1960s South Vietnam President Ngo Dinh] Diem in Vietnam,” he said.

Retired veteran Pentagon analyst Chuck Spinney commented that the NATO membership fantasy was an absurd aspiration even for Zelensky and that it revealed his fading grip on reality.

“It is beyond stupid. Which raises a question of why do it now? Has someone given him a green light or is Zelensky going off the rails?” Spinney told Sputnik. “My impression is that he is becoming more erratic. His quasi-Hitlerite stance of fighting to the last man to save territory may be an indicator of instability.”

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that ye be not troubled, for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there shall be famines and pestilences and earthquakes in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows” Matthew 24:6-8

The World’s Greatest Hoax?

•October 9, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Moon Landing – The World’s Greatest Hoax? | Free Documentary History

Encyclopedia Britannica: Apollo, Moon-landing project conducted by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the 1960s and ’70s.

Weird! Why the flag waves when there is no atmosphere?

The Apollo program was announced in May 1961, but the choice among competing techniques for achieving a Moon landing and return was not resolved until considerable further study.

All of the total 6 manned moon landings to date were a part of NASA’s Apollo program. Running from 1961 to 1972, the objective of the program was to gather as much data as possible from close orbits and manned landings, and in all, 24 American astronauts made the trip from Earth to the Moon between 1968 and 1972.

During these 6 trips by 24 American astronauts some moon materials; 382 kilograms (842 pounds) of lunar rocks, core samples, pebbles, sand and dust from the lunar surface were collected from six different exploration sites on the Moon and brought back to the earth for study.

Today, one can have experience with Moon Rocks for educational purposes, and specimens have been loaned to thousands of schools (to educational institutions such as K – 12 schools, colleges, and universities), museums, and outreach organizers; yet none discover any new metal nor minerals.

Some 44 years later, China’s Chang’e 5 is bringing the first fresh samples (just 3.82 lbs or 1.73 kilo of lunar material) of moon rocks, they discovered that helium-3 are abundant on the moon; an element is considered a stable source of fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.

A Chinese flag is displayed next to the Chang’e-5’s return capsule containing about 2kg of lunar samples, after it landed in Inner Mongolia on December 17, 2020

China plans to launch Chang’e 6 to collect samples from the lunar south pole in 2024, which will provide further new samples; which is been promoted as a potential fuel in future nuclear fusion power plants.

While extremely rare on earth, helium-3 is more abundant on the moon; with its surface believed to contain as much as 1.1 million metric tons of helium-3. This mineral has its isotope delivered into the unprotected lunar surface by the solar wind, a constant stream of material flowing off the sun and across the solar system.

Your hear that? “[H]elium-3 is more abundant on the moon . . . its isotope delivered into the unprotected lunar surface” yet the numerous scientists analyzing the 382 kilos that the 24 American astronauts brought back over 6 trips made no mention of such discoveries?

China’s discovery of a sixth new mineral – a crystal named Changesite-(Y) – brought back from the Chang’E 5 lunar mission; so what are the previous five discoveries?!

Also, Chinese scientists have discovered a new mineral on the moon, making China the only nation after the supposedly United States and Russia to have gone to the moon and back. The mineral, called Changesite-(Y), was found in rock and dust samples retrieved from the moon by China’s Chang’e-5 mission, the nation’s first mission to return a lunar sample, which launched in 2020.

Changesite-(Y) is reported supposely to the sixth new mineral discovery on the moon; and if so what minerals are the previous five discovered? Such a question draws a blank. Isn’t this funny?

“Ephraim surrounds me with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit” Hosea 11:12

“Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, whose glorious beauty is a fading flower, which is on the head of the fat valleys of them that are overcome with wine!” Isaiah 28:1

The Rare Earths geopolitical risks

•October 8, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The scramble for rare earths carries big geopolitical risks

Financial Times ~ September 28, 2022

The war in Ukraine has demonstrated just how inadvisable over-dependence on a single supplier can be. Russia’s dominance in the European gas market turned into a geopolitical nightmare in the space of a few weeks. Just imagine if a single country provided you with 90 per cent of your needs for essential commodities. Now imagine how you’d feel if that country was China. Actually, we don’t need to use our imagination because that is exactly the reality for Europe’s galloping consumption of rare earth metals.

Deng Xiaoping: “The Middle East has oil. China has rare earth metals.”

Just imagine if a single country provided you with 90 per cent of your needs for essential commodities. Now imagine how you’d feel if that country is China. Actually, we don’t need to use our imagination because that is exactly the reality for Europe’s galloping consumption of rare earth metals.

About five years ago, the west started to wake up to this awkward situation and decided to do something about it. But, as the EU, UK and US scramble to diversify the supply chains of rare earths and other critical raw materials, they are discovering that it’s not so easy. Left to its own devices, the market will never wean itself off Chinese production. Governments must intervene.

It’s hard to overestimate the importance of China’s mastery of critical raw materials. There is no green transition, no internet, no nano medical research, no advanced weaponry, basically virtually no technical solutions to our planetary problems, without them. The father of China’s economic revolution, Deng Xiaoping, understood their importance, noting: “The Middle East has oil. China has rare earth metals.”

Rare earth metals are not, in fact, rare. Most countries in the world have significant, if not always accessible, reserves of them. But extracting them involves overcoming two challenges. To mine just tiny quantities of the 17 rare earth metals requires removing many tonnes of aggregate and rock. Without stringent controls, this operation is highly polluting.

Then comes the separation of the metals followed by their preparation for use in high powered magnets, laser technology or the anti-counterfeiting device in euro banknotes. This is pricey and China can offer you the finished product for 30 per cent less than anyone else. Hence the market’s lack of interest in factoring in geopolitical considerations.

Rare Earth Elements Project | Science History Institute

It wasn’t always like this. China’s dominance was a product of successive US administrations’ decision from the late 1980s onwards to turn China into the heartland of US manufacturing. One of the industries America shifted across the Pacific was rare earth mining and processing. Until this point, the US enjoyed a monopoly on both thanks to the rich seams in an area of the Mojave desert called Mountain Pass.

In 2017, the EU formed the European Raw Materials Alliance in order to start diversifying. At the time, China supplied it with a staggering 98 per cent of its rare earth requirements. Five years later, China still provides 90 per cent of rare earths globally — so progress of sorts, but at a snail’s pace.

Nonetheless, the EU has struck up two strategic partnerships since forming the alliance. One is with Canada. The problem is that the second deal was with Ukraine, which has other issues to deal with right now. SecDev, a Canadian company that provides strategic advice, has investigated Ukraine’s mineral assets. Its co-founder, Rob Muggah, explains that “Ukraine has deposits of 117 of the 120 most widely used minerals and metals. At least 40 of them are needed for the green transition. It is a resource superpower.”

SecDev discovered, Muggah adds, “that about 2,000 of those deposits were under Russian control. And what that meant in terms of a headline was that about 20 per cent of all of Ukraine’s resource wealth was in Russian hands.”

Russia, too, is part of the scramble for rare earths. Olivia Lazard from the Carnegie Endowment has found evidence that Ukraine was a target for the Russian military not solely as a symbol of imperial decline, but also because of the significant strategic economic interests involved.

There are British, European, North American and Australian companies now investing systematically in mining and processing. But so far this is a drop in the ocean. Guillaume Pitron, author of The Rare Metals War, says that in the next three decades, “the world will consume more metals and minerals than all the metals and minerals we have consumed for the last 70,000 years.”

Arresting the climate emergency is not just a question of ditching fossil fuels. It requires constructing an entirely new system of energy production and consumption, which itself contains huge risks to the environment if not done correctly. But the greatest risk is that the very resources which offer a faint promise for our survival will turn the world once more into a cauldron of geopolitical competition.

“Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, whose glorious beauty is a fading flower, which is on the head of the fat valleys of them that are overcome with wine!” Isaiah 28:1

Talk of ‘Civil War’ Flaring Online

•October 7, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Talk of ‘Civil War,’ Ignited by Mar-a-Lago Search, Is Flaring Online

Yahoo News by Ken Bensinger and Sheera Frenkel ~ October 5, 2022 // DNYUZ ~ October 5, 2022 

Soon after the FBI searched Donald Trump’s home in Florida for classified documents, online researchers zeroed in on a worrying trend.

Ignited by Mar-a-Lago Search, talk of ‘Civil War’ Is Flaring Online

Posts on Twitter that mentioned “civil war” had soared nearly 3,000% in just a few hours as Trump’s supporters blasted the action as a provocation. Similar spikes followed, including on Facebook, Reddit, Telegram, Parler, Gab and Truth Social, Trump’s social media platform. Mentions of the phrase more than doubled on radio programs and podcasts, as measured by Critical Mention, a media-tracking firm.

Posts mentioning “civil war” jumped again a few weeks later, after President Joe Biden branded Trump and “MAGA Republicans” a threat to “the very foundations of our republic” in a speech on democracy in Philadelphia.

Now experts are bracing for renewed discussions of civil war, as the Nov. 8 midterm elections approach and political talk grows more urgent and heated.

More than a century and a half after the actual Civil War, the deadliest war in US history, “civil war” references have become increasingly commonplace on the right. While in many cases the term is used only loosely — shorthand for the nation’s intensifying partisan divisions — observers note that the phrase, for some, is far more than a metaphor.

“The question is what does ‘civil war’ look like and what does it mean,” said Elizabeth Neumann, assistant secretary for counterterrorism at the Homeland Security Department under Trump. “I did not anticipate, nor did anyone else as far as I know, how rapidly the violence would escalate.”

Neumann now works for Moonshot, a private security company that tracks extremism online. Moonshot found a 51% increase in “civil war” references on the most active pages on 4Chan, the fringe online message board, in the week after Biden’s Sept. 1 speech.

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that ye be not troubled, for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there shall be famines and pestilences and earthquakes in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows” Matthew 24:6-8

US-trained Chinese scientists: Stay or leave?

•October 7, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Op-Ed: The quandary of US-trained Chinese scientists: Stay or leave?

Los Angeles Times by Christopher S Tang ~ October 3, 2022

Would you train your workers and then squeeze them out by creating a hostile environment? Would you drive out these workers so they can go work for a competitor? The answer is obviously no. Yet this is what’s happening now in the US, with a rising number of US-trained Chinese scientists leaving this country.

Even flow of Chinese students to the MIT campus in Cambridge, Mass. is declining

In 2021 alone, 1,400 US-trained scientists have left their corporate positions or relinquished tenured positions at top-tier American universities such as Harvard, MIT and Princeton. This trend has grown since former President Trump promoted anti-China rhetoric during his term. To make things worse, many of these Chinese scientists are returning to China to compete against the United States.

At the same time, the flow of Chinese students to the US is declining. During the first six months in 2022, the US issued 31,055 academic visas to Chinese nationals, down from 64,261 for the same period in 2019. Chinese students make up 16% of all US students in STEM fields, and a significant percentage of STEM workers in the US are of Chinese descent, which means this problem could affect STEM fields for years into the future.

The departure of US-trained Chinese scientists and the reduced numbers of Chinese students could hinder the plan to revitalize domestic semiconductor manufacturing and electric vehicle manufacturing. These trends will also weaken the ability of the US to compete with China in science and technology, especially when China is already leading in several key scientific metrics such as the number of patents and the number of papers published.

Why would these US-trained Chinese scientists give up their secure and prestigious positions in this country? Why do Chinese students seek their higher education elsewhere?

First, mistrust and the hunt for spies among Chinese Americans have long been present in US history. And the distrust of China has soared since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trump stoked suspicion and fear about China, and President Biden received bipartisan support to view China as a “strategic competitor.”

Under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice launched a program called the China Initiative in 2018 that was intended to counter theft of US secrets and technology. Many scientists of Chinese descent have been falsely accused of spying for China, and many of them have been interrogated by FBI agents.

For example, Gang Chen, a professor at MIT, had federal charges against him dismissed after undergoing a lengthy espionage investigation. These cases have had a profound effect on Asian American academics, especially those of Chinese descent. Even though the China Initiative program ended this year after intense public outcry, fear and the perception of the US being a hostile environment continues.

Second, putting political risk aside, many Asian Americans, despite having a strong presence in corporate America, are virtually absent in the executive suites and feel least included at the workplace. In fact, Asian American workers are the least likely group to be promoted to management — even less likely than Black and Latino workers.

Asian American professionals and scientists, including Chinese Americans, are often portrayed as well-educated, hardworking, successful. Yet they remain underrepresented in leadership roles and are regularly left out of discussions about discrimination in the workplace. In fact, Asians are often excluded in diversity and inclusion plans entirely.

This climate makes many Chinese scientists and professionals feel pessimistic about their prospects in the United States. They may, however, be more optimistic about China when Chinese universities and companies are offering them senior positions with attractive benefits.

Finally, many people of Chinese descent feel they have been made scapegoats for the spread of the coronavirus. This negative sentiment has triggered a staggering increase of hate crimes against Asians — by 339% in 2021. The murder of Shaoxiong Zheng, a Chinese student, near the University of Chicago’s campus in broad daylight in 2021 sent a shock wave through Chinese students in the United States. Heightened safety concerns over hate crimes against Asians have nudged more Chinese scholars to leave and discouraged Chinese students from coming to the US.

The dynamic causing Chinese scientists to leave now, in some ways, recalls the dreadful case of Qian Xuesen, the MIT-trained rocket scientist and co-founder of Caltech’s Jet Propulsion Lab. He was accused of being a communist sympathizer, and placed under house arrest for five years before being deported to China in 1955. There was no evidence that he was a spy. Upon returning to China, Qian helped China to develop its first nuclear weapon. Former Navy Secretary Dan Kimball later lamented that the treatment of Qian was “the stupidest thing this country ever did.”

Regardless of current tensions between the US and China, the long-term public interest surely lies with promoting policies that would help retain the best US-trained scientists in this country.

“I will be unto Ephraim as a moth,” Hosea 5:12

Clarke – I will consume them little by little, as a moth frets a garment.

Gill – which eats garments, penetrates into them, feeds on them privately, secretly, without any noise, and gradually and slowly consumes them; but at last utterly, that they are of no use and profit:

N Korea’s missile flew over Japan

•October 6, 2022 • Leave a Comment

North Korea shoots missile over Japan in ‘barbaric’ act; S Korea and the United States responded a live-fire drill with ballistic missile malfunctioned and crashed into the ground, panicking confused residents of a coastal city of Gangneung, where some feared it was a North Korean attack, already uneasy earlier over increasingly provocative weapons tests by rival North Korea.

Japanese authorities urged residents in the northern Hokkaido and Aomori regions to take cover. The missile is believed to have landed in the Pacific Ocean, with Tokyo and Seoul strongly condemning the launch.

DW ~ October 4, 2022 // Yahoo News ~ October 5, 2022

North Korea launched a suspected medium-range ballistic missile over Japan on Tuesday, authorities in Tokyo and Seoul said.

North Korea’s missile test launched over Japan 

Although the launch was likely just a test, officials in the Japanese regions of Hokkaido and Aomori urged residents to take cover early on Tuesday morning.

“North Korea appears to have launched a missile,” the Japanese government said in a rare activation of its J-Alert system. “Please evacuate into buildings or underground.”

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk-yeol condemned Pyongyang’s “reckless provocations” while Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida called the missile launch “barbaric.” No damage or injuries were reported.

Later on Tuesday, the South Korean Ministry of Unification said Pyongyang was unresponsive on the inter-Korea hotline used for negotiations between the two countries.

Missile launch ‘threatened security of Japan’

The missile flew over Japan and landed in the Pacific Ocean some 3,000 kilometers (1900 miles) away from the archipelago, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno said (Coming close to Guam, which is 3425 kilometers away).

Japanese and South Korean authorities said the missile traveled around 4,500 kilometers in total, and reached a speed of Mach 17.

“North Korea’s series of actions, including its repeated ballistic missile launches, threatens the peace and security of Japan, the region, and the international community, and poses a serious challenge to the entire international community, including Japan,” Matsuno added.

In August, the United States and South Korea kicked off large-scale joint military drills. North Korea views these exercises as an invasion rehearsal, however Seoul and Washington maintain they are defensive in nature.

Ankit Panda, an Asia-Pacific security expert with the US-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that firing over Japan allows North Korean scientists to test missiles under more realistic conditions.

“Compared to the usual highly lofted trajectory, this allows them to expose a long-range reentry vehicle to thermal loads and atmospheric reentry stresses that are more representative of the conditions they’d endure in real-world use,” he said.

A South Korean missile was misfired during a joint military drill between the US and South Korea forces; it crashed onto the ground, panicking residents of a coastal city

“Politically, it’s complicated: the missile largely flies outside of the atmosphere when it’s over Japan, but it’s obviously distressing to the Japanese public to receive warnings of a possible incoming North Korean missile.” 

“Ephraim shall be desolate in the day of rebuke; among the tribes of Israel have I made known that which shall surely be” Hosea 5:9

“And I will cast you out of My sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim” Jeremiah 7:15

“Dangerous Allies!”

•October 6, 2022 • Leave a Comment

“Dangerous Allies!” by Malcolm Fraser

Australia [read Europe] has always been reliant on ‘great and powerful friends’ for its sense of national security and for direction on its foreign policy—first on the British Empire and now on the United States. [Europe] has actively pursued a policy of strategic dependence, believing that making a grand bargain with a powerful ally was the best policy to ensure its security and prosperity.

Dangerous Allies examines [Europe]’s history of strategic dependence and questions the continuation of this position. It argues that international circumstances, in the world and in the Western Pacific especially, now make such a policy highly questionable. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the United States has also changed dramatically, making it less relevant to [Europe] and a less appropriate ally on which [Europe] should rely.

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ October 3, 2022

Blinken Calls Sabotage Attacks On Nord Stream Pipelines A “Tremendous Opportunity”

Just when speculation and an avalanche of theories have inundated the web on an array of international outlets, the Biden administration has bluntly (and apparently lacking self-awareness) boasted that the pipeline bombings present an “opportunity”.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a Friday joint press briefing with Canada’s top diplomat that the damage and disruption to the pipelines are being seen in Washington as a “tremendous opportunity” to greatly reduce European energy imports on Russia.

Who did it?

In addressing the ‘mystery’ sabotage incidents, Blinken began, “I think first it’s important to make clear that these pipelines – that is, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 – were not pumping gas into Europe at this time.  Nord Stream 2 never became operational, as is well known.  Nord Stream 1 has been shut down for weeks because of Russia’s weaponization of energy.”

A mere few sentences later, he followed by saying “ultimately this is also a tremendous opportunity. It’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove the dependence on Russian energy and thus to take away from Vladimir Putin the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing his imperial designs.”

He at the same time touted that the Untied States has now become “the leading supplier of LNG [liquefied natural gas] to Europe,” stressing too that the Biden administration is helping to enable European leaders to “decrease demand” and “speed up the transition to renewables.”

35 The Lord shall smite thee in the knees and in the legs with a sore boil that cannot be healed, from the sole of thy foot unto the top of thy head.

36 “The Lord shall bring thee and thy king whom thou shalt set over thee unto a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, and there shalt thou serve other gods, wood and stone.

37 And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee. Deuteronomy 28:35-37

For more about a dangerous allies or just one major ally, see The Crisis in Ukraine Is Not About Ukraine. It’s About Germany!

The Crisis in Ukraine Is Not About Ukraine!

•October 5, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The Crisis in Ukraine Is Not About Ukraine; it’s About Germany!

Unz Review by Mike Whitney ~ Mike has the foresight to see this scenario in February 11, 2022; two weeks before the war started in February 24, 2022

“The primordial interest of the United States, over which for centuries we have fought wars– the First, the Second and Cold Wars– has been the relationship between Germany and Russia, because united there, they’re the only force that could threaten us. And to make sure that that doesn’t happen.” George Friedman, STRATFOR CEO at The Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs

The Ukrainian crisis has nothing to do with Ukraine. It’s about Germany and, in particular, a pipeline that connects Germany to Russia called Nord Stream 2. Washington sees the pipeline as a threat to its primacy in Europe and has tried to sabotage the project at every turn.

The Crisis in Ukraine Is Not About Ukraine; it’s About Germany!

Even so, Nord Stream has pushed ahead and is now fully-operational and ready-to-go. Once German regulators provide the final certification, the gas deliveries will begin. German homeowners and businesses will have a reliable source of clean and inexpensive energy while Russia will see a significant boost to their gas revenues. It’s a win-win situation for both parties.

The US Foreign Policy establishment is not happy about these developments. They don’t want Germany to become more dependent on Russian gas because commerce builds trust and trust leads to the expansion of trade. As relations grow warmer, more trade barriers are lifted, regulations are eased, travel and tourism increase, and a new security architecture evolves. 

In a world where Germany and Russia are friends and trading partners, there is no need for US military bases, no need for expensive US-made weapons and missile systems, and no need for NATO. There’s also no need to transact energy deals in US Dollars or to stockpile US Treasuries to balance accounts. Transactions between business partners can be conducted in their own currencies which is bound to precipitate a sharp decline in the value of the dollar and a dramatic shift in economic power. This is why the Biden administration opposes Nord Stream. It’s not just a pipeline, it’s a window into the future; a future in which Europe and Asia are drawn closer together into a massive free trade zone that increases their mutual power and prosperity while leaving the US on the outside looking in. 

Warmer relations between Germany and Russia signal an end to the “unipolar” world order the US has overseen for the last 75 years. A German-Russo alliance threatens to hasten the decline of the Superpower that is presently inching closer to the abyss. This is why Washington is determined to do everything it can to sabotage Nord Stream and keep Germany within its orbit. It’s a matter of survival.

That’s where Ukraine comes into the picture. Ukraine is Washington’s ‘weapon of choice’ for torpedoing Nord Stream and putting a wedge between Germany and Russia. The strategy is taken from page one of the US Foreign Policy Handbook under the rubric: Divide and Rule. 

Washington needs to create the perception that Russia poses a security threat to Europe. That’s the goal. They need to show that Putin is a bloodthirsty aggressor with a hair-trigger temper who cannot be trusted. To that end, the media has been given the assignment of reiterating over and over again, “Russia is planning to invade Ukraine.”

What’s left unsaid is that Russia has not invaded any country since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and that the US has invaded or toppled regimes in more than 50 countries in the same period of time, and that the US maintains over 800 military bases in countries around the world. None of this is reported by the media, instead the focus is on “evil Putin” who has amassed an estimated 100,000 troops along the Ukrainian border threatening to plunge all of Europe into another bloody war.

The Crisis in Ukraine Is Not About Ukraine; it’s About Germany!

All of the hysterical war propaganda is created with the intention of manufacturing a crisis that can be used to isolate, demonize and, ultimately, splinter Russia into smaller units. The real target, however, is not Russia, but Germany. Check out this excerpt from an article by Michael Hudson at The Unz Review:

“The only way left for U.S. diplomats to block European purchases is to goad Russia into a military response and then claim that avenging this response outweighs any purely national economic interest. As hawkish Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland, explained in a State Department press briefing on January 27: “If Russia invades Ukraine one way or another Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” (“America’s Real Adversaries Are Its European and Other Allies”, The Unz Review)

There it is in black and white. The Biden team wants to “goad Russia into a military response” in order to sabotage NordStream. That implies there will be some kind of provocation designed to induce Putin to send his troops across the border to defend the ethnic Russians in the eastern part of the country.

If Putin takes the bait, the response would be swift and harsh. The media will excoriate the action as a threat to all of Europe while leaders around the world will denounce Putin as the “new Hitler.” This is Washington’s strategy in a nutshell, and the whole production is being orchestrated with one goal in mind; to make it politically impossible for the German Chancellor Olaf Scholz to wave NordStream through the final approval process.

Given what we know about Washington’s opposition to Nord Stream, readers may wonder why earlier in the year the Biden administration lobbied Congress NOT to impose more sanctions on the project. The answer to that question is simple: Domestic politics. Germany is currently decommissioning its nuclear power plants and needs natural gas to make up for the energy shortfall. Also, the threat of economic sanctions is a “turn-off” for Germans who see them as a sign of foreign meddling. “Why is the United States interfering in our energy decisions,” asks the average German. “Washington should mind its own business and stay out of ours.” This is precisely the response one would expect from any reasonable person.

Then, there’s this from Al Jazeera:

“Germans in the majority support the project, it is only parts of the elite and media who are against the pipeline

“The more the US talks about sanctioning or criticizes the project, the more it becomes popular in German society,” said Stefan Meister, a Russia and eastern Europe expert at the German Council on Foreign Relations.” (“Nord Stream 2: Why Russia’s pipeline to Europe divides the West”, AlJazeera)

So, public opinion is solidly behind Nord Stream which helps to explain why Washington settled on a new approach. Sanctions are not going to work, so Uncle Sam has flipped to Plan B: Create a big enough external threat that Germany will be forced to block the opening of the pipeline.

Frankly, the strategy smacks of desperation, but you have to be impressed by Washington’s perseverance. They might be down by 5 runs in the bottom of the 9th, but they haven’t thrown in the towel just yet. They’re going to give it one last shot and see if they can make some headway.

On Monday, President Biden held his first joint-press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz at the White House. The ballyhoo surrounding the event was simply unprecedented. Everything was orchestrated to manufacture a “crisis atmosphere” that Biden used to pressure the chancellor in the direction of US policy.

Earlier in the week, White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki repeatedly said that a “Russian invasion was imminent.” Her comments were followed by State Department flak Nick Price opining that the Intel agencies had provided him with details of an alleged Russian-backed “false flag” operation they expected to take place in the near future in east Ukraine.

Price’s warning was followed on Sunday morning by national security advisor Jake Sullivan claiming that a Russian invasion could happen at any time maybe “even tomorrow.” This was just days after Bloomberg News agency had published its sensational and utterly-false headline that “Russia Invades Ukraine”.

Can you see the pattern here? Can you see how these baseless claims were all used to apply pressure to the unsuspecting German chancellor who seemed oblivious to the campaign that was aimed at him?

As one might expect, the final blow was delivered by the American president himself. During the press conference Biden stated emphatically that,

“If Russia invades … there will no longer [be] a Nord Stream 2.. We will bring an end to it.”

So, now Washington sets policy for Germany???

What insufferable arrogance!

The German chancellor was taken aback by Biden’s comments which clearly were not part of the original script. Even so, Scholz never agreed to cancel Nord Stream and refused to even mention the pipeline by name. If Biden thought he could sandbag the leader of the world’s third biggest economy by cornering him in a public forum, he guessed wrong. Germany remains committed to launching Nord Stream regardless of potential flare-ups in far-flung Ukraine.

For more, see America Defeats Germany for the Third Time in a Century

But that could change at any time. After all, who knows what incitements Washington might be planning in the near future? Who knows how many lives they are prepared to sacrifice in order to put a wedge between Germany and Russia? Who knows what risks Biden is willing to take to slow America’s decline and prevent a new “polycentric” world order from emerging? Anything could happen in the weeks ahead. Anything.

For now, Germany is in the catbird seat. It’s up to Scholz to decide how the matter will be settled. Will he implement the policy that best serves the interests of the German people or will he cave in to Biden’s relentless arm twisting? Will he chart a new course that strengthens new alliances in the bustling Eurasian corridor or will he throw his support behind Washington’s crazed geopolitical ambitions? Will he accept Germany’s pivotal role in a new world order— in which many emerging centers of power share equally in global governance and where the leadership remains unflinchingly committed to multilateralism, peaceful development and security for all– or will he try to prop up the tattered post-War system that has clearly outlived its shelf-life?

One thing is certain; whatever Germany decides is bound to affect us all.

Ukraine or Germany; Taiwan or South China Sea, they are all major side distractions, the main threat for the United States comes from the Global South!

US envoy ‘will not be admitted’

•October 4, 2022 • Leave a Comment

US envoy ‘will not be admitted’ to Nicaragua, vice president says

Aljazeera ~ September 30, 2022

Nicaragua will not allow the new United States ambassador to enter the country due to his “interfering” attitude, Vice President Rosario Murillo has reiterated, amid months of escalating tensions between the two nations.

US envoy ‘will not be admitted’ to Nicaragua, vice president says

The US envoy, Hugo Rodriguez, “will not under any circumstances be admitted into our Nicaragua”, said Murillo, who is also the wife of President Daniel Ortega.

“Let that be clear to the imperialists,” she said on Friday, reading a statement from the foreign office on state media, as reported by the AFP news agency.

The US Senate confirmed Rodriguez’s nomination to the ambassador post on Thursday, despite Nicaragua saying in July that it would reject it.

The diplomatic fight comes as the Biden administration has imposed a slew of sanctions, including US visa restrictions, on Nicaraguan state officials and their relatives over a crackdown on opposition politicians and human rights activists in the Central American nation.

Rodriguez, a former senior adviser in the US Department of State’s Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, told a US Senate hearing that he would “support using all economic and diplomatic tools to bring about a change in direction in Nicaragua.”

He also described Nicaragua as a “pariah state in the region” and branded Ortega’s government a “dictatorship.”

“Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, whose glorious beauty is a fading flower, which is on the head of the fat valleys of them that are overcome with wine!” Isaiah 28:1

“The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, shall be trodden under feet” Isaiah 28:3

Migrants to ‘pick crops!’

•October 3, 2022 • Leave a Comment

US farmers need migrants to ‘pick crops’ – Pelosi

RT ~ October 1, 2022

America is experiencing a shortage of workers, the House speaker explained

Farmers in the US state of Florida need migrants to “pick the crops” due to a labor shortage in America, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed on Friday.

Speaking at a press conference, the California Democrat was asked to comment on security at the US’ southern border with Mexico.

“We have a shortage of workers in our country. In Florida, some of the farmers and the growers are saying ‘why are you shipping these immigrants up North? We need them to pick the crops down here.'”

Pelosi admitted that the Biden administration has “a responsibility to secure our border,” adding that “we also have a responsibility to recognize the importance of newcomers to our nation.” She believes this could be remedied by “comprehensive immigration reform.”

She went on to point out that the US is experiencing a workforce shortage. “You see even in Florida some of the farmers and the growers saying, ‘Why are you shipping these immigrants up north?  We need them to pick the crops down here,” Pelosi noted.

“Ephraim is oppressed and broken in judgment, because he willingly walked after man’s commandment” Hosea 5:11

“Ephraim also is like a silly dove without heart; they call to Egypt, they go to Assyria” Hosea 7:11

‘Our citizens forever!’

•October 2, 2022 • Leave a Comment

‘Our citizens forever’: Putin annexes four Russian-speaking Ukrainian regions

RT ~ September 30, 2022

By recognizing the free will of the residents of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye, Russia has embraced the people who share its history and culture and repaired some of the injustices created by the Soviet Union and its destruction, President Vladimir Putin said in Moscow on Friday.

President Putin: “The ongoing collapse of Western hegemony is irreversible. And I repeat: things will never be the same.”

Ukraine intended for Russian speakers within its borders the same fate the “colonial” West wants to inflict upon the entire world in its desire for hegemony, he added.

The West clearly did not expect such insubordination. They simply got used to acting according to a template, to grab whatever they please, by blackmail, bribery, intimidation, and convinced themselves that these methods would work forever, as if they had fossilised in the past.

But people cannot be fed with printed dollars and euros. You can’t feed them with those pieces of paper, and the virtual, inflated capitalisation of western social media companies can’t heat their homes. Everything I am saying is important. And what I just said is no less so: you can’t feed anyone with paper – you need food; and you can’t heat anyone’s home with these inflated capitalisations – you need energy.

Crowds attend a concert marking the annexation of Russian-speaking territories

The world has entered a period of a fundamental, revolutionary transformation. New centres of power are emerging. They represent the majority – the majority! – of the international community. They are ready not only to declare their interests but also to protect them. They see in multipolarity an opportunity to strengthen their sovereignty, which means gaining genuine freedom, historical prospects, and the right to their own independent, creative and distinctive forms of development, to a harmonious process.

Today, we are fighting for a just and free path, first of all for ourselves, for Russia, in order to leave dictate and despotism in the past. I am convinced that countries and peoples understand that a policy based on the exceptionalism of whoever it may be and the suppression of other cultures and peoples is inherently criminal, and that we must close this shameful chapter. The ongoing collapse of Western hegemony is irreversible. And I repeat: things will never be the same.

“The children of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle” Psalm 78:9

“Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? Shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?” Amos 3:6

‘Obsolete’ Pompeo Paid $150,000

•October 1, 2022 • Leave a Comment

‘Obsolete’ Pompeo seeks ‘cash, political gains’ in 2nd Taiwan island trip

Global Times by Fan Anqi ~ September 27, 2022

Former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo has paid his second trip to China’s Taiwan region, turning the island into a “cash machine” while trying to accumulate “political capital” by blatantly trumpeting the island as “an independent country,” although experts said Pompeo is just seen as an obsolete politician with a bad reputation, even in the US.

Pompeo was paid $150,000 to say Taiwan “doesn’t need to declare independence because it already is an independent country.”

Responding to Pompeo’s Taiwan tour, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said Pompeo’s calculations will not materialize, describing him as “a former politician of diminished credibility who staged these stunts for personal political gains.”

Pompeo arrived in Kaohsiung in the southern part of the island late Monday under the invitation of the “Global Taiwan Business Forum,” where he delivered a speech on the island’s “economic development and role in the global economy,” according to local media reports. 

At the event, Pompeo falsely and provocatively claimed that Taiwan “doesn’t need to declare independence because it already is an independent country,” stressing the island authorities’ “firm relationship” with the US, local media reported.

Supporting “Taiwan independence” has long been a way to “score points” for politicians in the US, and Pompeo is taking every chance to do so, creating gimmicks that can later be used as “political capital” to gain support and meet his future ambitious plans, Xin Qiang, director of the Taiwan studies center with Fudan University, told the Global Times on Tuesday. 

Pompeo told media in July that he was prepared to run for the White House in 2024.

Another more practical purpose of Pompeo’s trip is to make money, analysts said. 

The Global Times learned that he will allegedly take “commission fees” from a number of companies, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (TSMC), and I-MEI Foods Co Ltd. 

In his previous visit to the island in March, Pompeo was paid $150,000 for a speech under the terms of an agreement signed by the “Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office” in the US and US-based company Premiere Speakers Bureau, according to media reports.

“In fact, the ‘commission fees’ are nothing compared with the much greater deals promoted by US interest groups behind Pompeo. For example, military-industrial interest groups may have private deals with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in power, in turn pushing for larger deals with Taiwan such as arms purchases,” Xin said.

While some observers noted that choosing this time to visit the island reflects Pompeo’s considerations for the US mid-term elections, Xin said it will not make much of a difference, as in both Democrats and Republicans eyes, Pompeo is “really just an over-the-hill expired politician with a bad reputation.”

The Global Taiwan Business Forum is organized by pro-secessionist media Liberty Times, which invited more than 300 businesspeople to the Kaohsiung Marriott Hotel, including Taiwan’s deputy regional leader Lai Ching-te.

The invitation to the former US senior official to visit Taiwan island was extended by a civil organization, which reflects that DPP authorities want to desensitize the visit after US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip. They are wearing a “white glove” by appearing as a civil group while taking stealth benefits for their own political gains, analysts said.

Pompeo’s visit to Taiwan will to some extent help the DPP gain support during the upcoming local elections, as the trip can shift focus from a series of political scandals of the DPP and help the DPP take advantage of Pompeo’s words to show their “achievements” in improving ties with the US, experts said.

US Forces Looting Syrian Oil

•September 30, 2022 • Leave a Comment

US Forces Smuggle 79 More Tankers Filled to the Brim With Looted Syrian Oil

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

Sputnik ~ September 26, 2022 // SANA (Syrian Arab News Agency) ~ 25 September 2022

Damascus has spent years accusing Washington and its Syrian Democratic Forces militia allies of siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of oil and food out of US-occupied northeastern Syria, and preventing the country from rebuilding from a devastating, decade-long foreign-sponsored conflict.

A 79-vehicle convoy of tankers carrying looted crude from oil fields in Jazira, northeastern Syria has been smuggled out of the country via the illegal al-Mahmoudiya crossing into northern Iraq, the Syrian Arab News Agency has reported, citing sources in the al-Yaarubiyah countryside in al-Hasakah province.

The reported smuggling activities are the latest since Tuesday, when sources told SANA that 60 more oil tankers had made their way into Iraq carrying looted Syrian crude.

Two days before that, the news agency reported that an additional 83 trucks, including ‘scores’ of tankers, had crossed into Iraq via the al-Mahmoudiya and al-Walid crossings. Syrian authorities classify the border checkpoints as “illegal” because they remain outside the jurisdiction of the internationally recognized government in Damascus.

The US has at least 900 troops stationed in Syria, according to the Pentagon. The Biden administration’s formal justification for keeping boots on the ground in the war-torn country is to prevent the resurgence of Daesh (ISIS)* – the terrorist group which controlled wide swathes of northeastern Syria and northwestern Iraq between 2014 and 2017.

Syrian officials say Washington’s continued presence in the country is aimed at preventing Damascus from regaining control over oil, natural gas and food resources in its northeastern regions – which once allowed Syria to enjoy modest self-sufficiency in energy and foodstuffs.

Washington and its allies have also imposed crushing sanctions on the country, and threatened nations that do business with Damascus with secondary restrictions. These sanctions have further limited Syria’s access to resources needed to rebuild from the devastating foreign-backed conflict which began in 2011, and have prevented the country from importing medicines and medical equipment.

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee, because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein,” Habakkuk 2:8

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

US Blew Up Nord Stream 1 & 2

•September 29, 2022 • Leave a Comment

US Blew Up Russian Gas Pipelines Nord Stream 1 & 2, Says Former Polish Defense Minister

ZeroHedge~ September 28, 2022 // RT “Thank you USA” ~ September 27, 2022

former Polish Defense Minister, Radek Sikorski, has attributed to the United States the sabotage of two pipelines, Nord Stream 1 and 2, which carry natural gas from Russia to Germany. “Thank you, USA,” Sikorski wrote on Twitter (now deleted). Sikorski was Minister of National Defense from 2005 – 2007 and served as Deputy Minister of National Defense and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, previously. He is currently an elected member of the European parliament.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said an attack on Nord Stream was “in no one’s interest,” but that it also represented a “significant opportunity” for Western Europe to abandon Russian natural gas in favor of alternative energy supplies, presumably such as US LNG, and “accelerate the transition to renewables” in order to fight climate change.

Here’s a map of the four leaks on the Nord Stream pipeline system

But it’s not out of the realm of the possible that the US is indeed behind the attack. President Joe Biden promised on February 7 to prevent Nord Stream 2 from becoming operational if Russia invaded Ukraine.

“If Russia invades,” said Biden, “then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”

Reporter: “But how will you do that, exactly, since…the project is in Germany’s control?”

Biden: “I promise you, we will be able to do that.”

ABC News: Pres. Biden: “If Russia invades…then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”

Here is another testimony a month earlier in January from Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland

As the United States has made good what they promised, so would the Lord God “As you have done, it shall be done to you

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10

“For the day of the Lord is near upon all the nations. As you have done, it shall be done to you; your dealings will return upon your own head” Obadiah 1:15

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

For more, see The barbarians are not at the gates, not anymore. They are inside their golden Citadel.

The EurAsian Times: Nord Stream Attack: Sabotage For Sure, But Fingers Are Pointing Towards Russia’s ‘Biggest Critic’ In Europe ~ October 11, 2022

Xi Jinping overthrown?

•September 28, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Xi Jinping overthrown? Why the wildest rumours about China are so easy to spread

Western audiences are prone to believing the most outlandish things they hear about China, even with zero substantiation

RT by Timur Fomenko ~ September 28, 2022

Over the past weekend, unsubstantiated rumours have gone viral on Twitter, claiming that China’s leader Xi Jinping had been overthrown in a military coup and placed under house arrest. As evidence, a video was posted, purporting to show military vehicles in China.

To nobody’s surprise, there was no truth in the story at all. It was fake news. But this didn’t stop the story trending, going round the world and having many people believe it.

Some mainstream media outlets, and especially media in India, also reported on the story.

The rumour was sourced to several accounts linked to the Falun Gong Movement, an anti-communist, Chinese conservative religious group, which since being banned in China itself in the 1990s, has become known for its sporadic misinformation regarding the country.

This completely false story regarding a coup in China is not the first which such dedicated misinformation machines have pulled off, and it certainly won’t be the last. In fact, it is commonplace for all kinds of misconceptions and false information regarding the country to go viral. Typically, they involve video clips taken out of context.

Why so? Because Westerners will believe just about anything they are told regarding China. As a country which is perceived as an incomprehensible and feared “other”, China is a frequent subject of Western paranoia, prejudice, stereotypes and mystery.

The $144 Billion Art Robbery

•September 28, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The 144 Billion Dollar Art Robbery Opium War Theft, Sacking Of the Yuanmingyuan, the Summer Palace

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

“For the day of the Lord is near upon all the nations. As you have done, it shall be done to you; your dealings will return upon your own head” Obadiah 1:15

···
The British High Commissioner to China, Lord Elgin, ordering the destruction of the Summer Palace in Beijing (Peking), which was then carried out by French and British troops following the Second Opium War on 6th October 1860

by Peter Combs

Welcome.
The 144 Billion Dollar Art Robbery Opium War Theft, Sacking Of the Yuanmingyuan The Summer Palace

“As you have done, it shall be done to you; your dealings will return upon your own head”

In 1860 Britain along with France raided, looted, and burned possibly the finest collection of Chinese art ever assembled. All done after addicting millions of Chinese to Opium, all of it illegally smuggled into the country for nearly 100 years.

One of the great crimes of the last 200 years.

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee, because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein,” Habakkuk 2:8

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10
“Ephraim shall be desolate in the day of rebuke; among the tribes of Israel have I made known that which shall surely be” Hosea 5:9

Ezekiel Masoretic Timeline – 390/40

•September 27, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Ezekiel Timeline – 390/40 Years according to the Masoretic Text.

God says in Isaiah 46 “Remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is none other; I am God, and there is none like Me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure,’” Isaiah 46:9-10.

God works out the end from the beginning and our endeavour is to understand how are the numbers work out. God gives some clues and hints here and there and the most puzzling of this Ezekiel Timeline 390/40 Years which is found in Ezekiel 4 according to the Masoretic Text.

Ezekiel Masoretic Timeline – 390/40

I’ve always been wondering if there are any thoughts to the contrary? And so my constant updates.

The figures given by the Septuagint (of 150/190/40 years) are slightly different and is evaluated here.

Ezekiel 4

1 “Thou also, son of man, take thee a tile and lay it before thee, and portray upon it the city, even Jerusalem;

2 and lay siege against it, and build a fort against it, and cast a mound against it. Set the camp also against it, and set battering rams against it round about.

3 Moreover take thou unto thee an iron plate, and set it for a wall of iron between thee and the city; and set thy face against it, and it shall be besieged, and thou shalt lay siege against it. This shall be a sign to the house of Israel.

4 “Also lie thou upon thy left side, and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it: according to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon it, thou shalt bear their iniquity.

5 For I have laid upon thee the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days, three hundred and ninety days; so shalt thou bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. — start with the full house of Israel and last for 390 years

6 And when thou hast accomplished them, lie again on thy right side, and thou shalt bear the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days: I have appointed thee each day for a year. — after the start of full house of Israel and last for 350 years, the house of Judah join in and, together, proceed on for another 40 to sum up to 390 years

7 Therefore thou shalt set thy face toward the siege of Jerusalem; and thine arm shall be uncovered, and thou shalt prophesy against it.

8 And behold, I will lay bands upon thee, and thou shalt not turn thee from one side to another until thou hast ended the days of thy siege.

9 “Take thou also unto thee wheat and barley and beans, and lentils and millet and fitches, and put them in one vessel, and make thee bread thereof according to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon thy side; three hundred and ninety days shalt thou eat thereof.

— from the start with 10 tribes and ends with the full house of Israel: 390 years: why the difference? Perhaps Judah had undergo numerous pogroms and cleanings whereas the ten-tribes of Israel has none since the day when went captivity and into apparent oblivion

A clue for this Ezekiel Timeline – 390/40 Years could be found in a parallel exile. the house of Judah had evidently failed to observe the land’s one-year-in-seven Sabbath for 490 years, so the term of the Babylonian captivity was set at 70 years to make up the deficit.

For in II Chronicles 36:21 it says, “The land enjoyed its sabbath rests; all the time of its desolation it rested, until the seventy years were completed in fulfillment of the word of the LORD spoken by Jeremiah.” This is a reference to Jeremiah 25:11.

So if the house of Israel is to be penalised for 390 years (a day for a year) and where this length of captivity is a redemption for the years Israel didn’t keep the land Sabbath, it would be for a periof of 390 X 7 = 2730 years.

Given that, by most western reckoning, the house of Israel was exiled in 721 BC and after 2730 years it will bring the time to 2009 AD.

The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 was regarded as the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression of 1929. Predatory lending targeting low-income homebuyers, excessive risk-taking by global financial institutions, and the bursting of the United States housing bubble culminated in a “perfect storm.”

The International Monetary Fund estimated that large US and European banks lost more than $1 trillion on toxic assets and from bad loans from January 2007 to September 2009, resulting in several bank failures and the US unemployment rate peaked at 11% in October 2009.

The stage was set for the gradual decline of the United States amd much of the West. But, eating away like a moth, China has by then accumulated more than a few decades of silent but rapid growth.

China’s ongoing rise has clearly carry enormous implications for both the country itself and was discarding away the industrial prowess of the house of Israel, especially in the face of China’s ability to devote resources to science and innovation, financing overseas infrastructure projects or military spending with new warships and carriers beyond China’s coastal waters.

But in much of the United States, many companies had moved overseas, leaving their industrial land and factories behind.

All these declining scenarios could be categorised by their Biblical intensities: from light to intense . . .

a. light

“Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, whose glorious beauty is a fading flower, which is on the head of the fat valleys of them that are overcome with wine!” Isaiah 28:1

“I will be unto Ephraim as a moth,” Hosea 5:12

Clarke – I will consume them little by little, as a moth frets a garment.
Gill – which eats garments, penetrates into them, feeds on them privately, secretly, without any noise, and gradually and slowly consumes them; but at last utterly, that they are of no use and profit:

b. more serious

“A third part of thee shall die with the pestilence, and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee; and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds, and I will draw out a sword after them.” Ezekiel 5:11-12

“And I will cast you out of My sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim” Jeremiah 7:15

c. very intense

“Ephraim shall be desolate in the day of rebuke; among the tribes of Israel have I made known that which shall surely be” Hosea 5:9

“The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, shall be trodden under feet” Isaiah 28:3

For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah; I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him. Hosea 5:14

Calvin: “I will not,” he says, “be any longer like a moth and a worm; I shall come like a lion to you, with an open mouth to devour you . . .

Trapp: For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion I, that is, my Assyrian, the rod of my wrath, will be as a lion, or leopard, a creature swift and fierce above measure.

Gill: For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah…. being provoked by their above conduct and behavior in seeking to others, and not to him, for help, he threatens to punish them in a more public and severe manner; not be to them only as a moth and rottenness, but as a lion, and as a young lion, creatures strong and fierce, that destroy and devour all that come into their hands, and from whom there is no deliverance: thus the Lord was both to Israel and Judah, by means of the Assyrians and Babylonians; the former are compared to a lion, that devoured Israel; and the latter to a young lion, that broke the bones of Judah.

We’re now in the Hebrew year 5782 and we’ll need another 217 years to usher the Divine Plan into the 7th Millennium as we believe. Of course, this is on the assumption that God’s oracles have been accurately kept since the day Adam was created as the Orthodox custodians claim.

If we add 217 years to the Gregorian calendar year 2022 we’ll come to 2239 when the 7th Millennium starts. Working backward Israel was voided (390 X 7 =) 2730 years plus the last 390 years where the house would gradually slide into decline. So could the year 2009 be the start of the house of Israel’s “iniquity?” — “thus shall the children of Israel start eating their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them;” Ezekiel 4:13 in captivity to start the last 230 years?

~~~~

Translation and Comments from ChatGPT & Copilot versions

Ezekiel 4 (Targum of Jonathan)

1 “And you, son of man, take for yourself a stone and place it before you, and inscribe upon it the city of Jerusalem.”

This passage appears to be a directive to symbolically represent the city of Jerusalem by inscribing its image or name onto a stone. It reflects a prophetic or symbolic action, often seen in biblical and prophetic literature, where physical objects are used to represent larger concepts or forthcoming events. (ChatGPT)

1 “And you, son of man, take a brick and lay it before you, and engrave on it a city, even Jerusalem.”

In this passage, God instructs the prophet Ezekiel to perform a symbolic act representing the siege of Jerusalem. Ezekiel’s actions serve as a visual prophecy to the people of Israel, illustrating the impending judgment and destruction of the city due to their disobedience. (Copilot)

2 “And draw upon it a siege, build upon it fortifications, set up upon it an army, and place battering rams all around it.”

This passage describes the symbolic act of depicting a siege against the city of Jerusalem. It involves drawing or constructing the elements of a military siege, such as fortifications, armies, and battering rams, surrounding the city. This is likely a prophetic action meant to represent an impending siege or judgment against Jerusalem, using the stone from the previous verse as a model or symbol. (ChatGPT)

2 “And lay siege against it, build a siege wall against it, and raise a mound against it; set camps also against it, and plant battering rams against it all around.”

In this passage, Ezekiel is instructed to create a detailed model of the siege of Jerusalem. This symbolic act is meant to visually represent the coming destruction and the severity of the siege that Jerusalem will face due to the people’s disobedience. (Copilot)

3 “And you, take for yourself an iron pan and set it as an iron wall between you and the city, and set your face against it. It will be besieged, and you shall lay siege against it. This will be a sign to the house of Israel. And you, lie on your left side and place the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it. The number of days that you lie on it, you shall bear their iniquity.”

This passage describes a symbolic act where a prophet is instructed to use an iron pan as a barrier, representing a wall between himself and a city, signifying the city being under siege. The act of lying on the left side represents bearing the sins of the house of Israel, with the duration of this act symbolizing the period of their iniquity. This is a form of prophetic demonstration meant to convey a message to the people of Israel. (ChatGPT)

3 “And you, take an iron plate and set it up as an iron wall between you and the city; set your face toward it, and it shall be besieged, and you shall lay siege against it. This will be a sign to the house of Israel.”

In this passage, the iron plate represents a barrier between Ezekiel (symbolizing God) and Jerusalem, indicating the severity and inevitability of the coming siege. Ezekiel’s actions serve as a powerful visual prophecy to the people of Israel, emphasizing the consequences of their disobedience. (Copilot)

4 “And I have appointed to you a day for each year of their iniquity—three hundred and ninety days—so you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.”

This passage continues the symbolic act described earlier, where the prophet is instructed to lie on his side as a representation of bearing the sins of Israel. Each day of lying on his side symbolizes a year of Israel’s iniquity, with the total number being 390 days, corresponding to 390 years of their sins. This act is a powerful prophetic demonstration of the consequences of the people’s sins and the duration of their punishment. (ChatGPT)

4 “And you, lie on your left side, and place the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it. For the number of days that you lie on it, you shall bear their iniquity.”

In this passage, Ezekiel is commanded to lie on his left side for a specific number of days to symbolize bearing the sins of the house of Israel. This act serves as a powerful visual representation of the burden of Israel’s sins and the consequences they will face. (Copilot)

5 “And I have appointed for you one (against) two, in their sins, to account for the days: three hundred and ninety days, and you shall bear the sins of the house of Israel.”

This passage likely refers to a symbolic act in which the prophet is instructed to bear the burden of Israel’s sins for a specific period—390 days. The phrase “one against two” could be interpreted as a ratio or comparison, possibly indicating that the punishment or burden is doubled in some way. The 390 days represent the period during which the prophet will symbolically carry the weight of Israel’s transgressions. This type of prophetic action is often found in biblical texts, where a prophet enacts a symbolic gesture to convey a divine message to the people. (ChatGPT)

5 “For I have assigned you a number of days corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.”

This verse continues the symbolic act that Ezekiel is instructed to perform, representing the years of Israel’s sin that he must bear. (Copilot)

6 “And when you have completed these, you shall lie down on your right side a second time, and you shall bear the sins of the house of Judah for forty days. A day for each year, I have appointed it to you.”

In this passage, the prophet is instructed to perform another symbolic act after completing the first one. This time, he is to lie on his right side for forty days, each day representing a year, to bear the sins of the house of Judah. The use of symbolic actions like these in prophetic literature serves to convey the gravity of the situation and the extent of the people’s sins. The forty days symbolize the period of Judah’s guilt, just as the 390 days earlier symbolized Israel’s sins. This form of prophecy is meant to make the message vivid and memorable for those who witness or hear about it. (ChatGPT)

6 “When you have completed these, you shall lie down a second time, but on your right side, and bear the iniquity of the house of Judah. I have assigned you forty days, a day for each year.”

This verse continues the symbolic acts that Ezekiel is instructed to perform, representing the punishment for the sins of Judah. He is to lie on his right side for forty days, symbolizing the years of Judah’s sin. (Copilot)

7 “And you shall set your face against Jerusalem, and your arm shall be uncovered, and you shall prophesy against it.”

This passage instructs the prophet to direct his focus and attention toward Jerusalem, symbolically showing determination or hostility by setting his face against the city. The uncovering of the arm is a gesture that often signifies readiness for action or battle, indicating that the prophecy will be one of impending judgment or confrontation. The command to “prophesy against it” suggests that the message will be a warning or declaration of the consequences that Jerusalem will face due to its actions. This vivid imagery serves to emphasize the seriousness of the prophecy and the impending judgment on the city. (ChatGPT)

7 “And you shall set your face toward the siege of Jerusalem, with your arm bared, and prophesy against it.”

This verse continues the symbolic acts that Ezekiel is instructed to perform, representing the coming siege of Jerusalem. Ezekiel’s actions are meant to convey the seriousness of the impending judgment. (Copilot)

8 “And behold, I will place cords upon you, and you shall not turn from one side to the other until you have completed the days of your siege.”

In this passage, the prophet is being told that he will be restrained, symbolically bound with cords, so that he cannot move from one side to the other. This restriction is meant to keep him in a specific position as he carries out the symbolic act of lying on one side for a set period, representing the siege and suffering of Jerusalem. The “days of your siege” refers to the period during which the prophet is to enact this symbolic gesture, emphasizing the inevitability and duration of the judgment that is to come upon the city. The imagery of being bound reinforces the idea of being unable to escape the consequences of the actions that have led to this prophecy. (ChatGPT)

8 “And behold, I will put cords upon you, so that you cannot turn from one side to the other, till you have completed the days of your siege.”

This verse continues the symbolic acts that Ezekiel is instructed to perform, representing the binding and the inability to escape the coming judgment. (Copilot)

9 “And you, take for yourself wheat, barley, beans, lentils, millet, and spelt; and put them in one vessel and make bread of them for yourself. During the number of days that you lie on your side, three hundred and ninety days, you shall eat it.”

In this passage, the prophet is instructed to gather various grains and legumes, mix them together, and use them to make bread. This bread will be his food during the 390 days that he lies on his side, symbolizing the duration of Israel’s punishment. The specific ingredients and the act of making bread from them likely symbolize the hardship and scarcity that will accompany the period of judgment. This instruction is part of a broader symbolic act meant to convey the seriousness of the message and the reality of the consequences that the people will face. (ChatGPT)

9 “And you, take wheat and barley, beans and lentils, millet and spelt; put them in a single vessel, and make bread of them. You shall eat it according to the number of the days that you lie on your side, three hundred and ninety days you shall eat it.”

This verse is part of the instructions given to Ezekiel to symbolize the hardships that the people of Jerusalem will face during the siege. The mixture of grains and legumes represents the scarcity and variety of food that will be available. (Copilot)

~~~~~

~~~ This Translation and Comments are from ChatGPT on another day ~~~

Ezekiel 4 (Jonathan)

1 “וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם סַב לָךְ אַבְנָא וְתִתֵּן יָתָהּ קָדָמָךְ וּתְצוֹר עֲלָהּ קַרְתָּא יַת יְרוּשְׁלֵם:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation:

  • וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם (V’atah bar adam): “And you, son of man”
  • סַב לָךְ אַבְנָא (Sav lach avnah): “Take a brick”
  • וְתִתֵּן יָתָהּ קָדָמָךְ (V’titen yatah kadamach): “and place it before you”
  • וּתְצוֹר עֲלָהּ קַרְתָּא (U’ttzor alah kartah): “and build upon it a city”
  • יַת יְרוּשְׁלֵם (Yat Yerushalayim): “namely Jerusalem”

Putting it together:

“And you, son of man, take a brick and place it before you and build upon it a city, namely Jerusalem.”

In this passage, the prophet is instructed to use a brick as a symbol and build a representation of the city of Jerusalem. This symbolic act serves to illustrate the upcoming events and judgments related to Jerusalem.

2 “וְתִתֵּן עֲלָהּ צְיָר וְתִבְנֵי עֲלָהּ מִלְיָתָא וְתִשְׁרֵי עֲלָהּ מַשִׁרְיָן וּמַנֵי עֲלָהּ אֶפְדוֹרְוָן סְחוֹר סְחוֹר:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation:

  • וְתִתֵּן עֲלָהּ צְיָר (V’titen alah tziyar): “And place upon it a drawing”
  • וְתִבְנֵי עֲלָהּ מִלְיָתָא (V’tivnei alah mil’yatah): “and build upon it a mound”
  • וְתִשְׁרֵי עֲלָהּ מַשִׁרְיָן (V’tishrei alah mashiryah): “and place upon it a siege ramp”
  • וּמַנֵי עֲלָהּ אֶפְדוֹרְוָן סְחוֹר סְחוֹר (U’manei alah ef’dorvan skhor skhor): “and place upon it engines of war, siege engines”

Putting it together:

“And place upon it a drawing and build upon it a mound, and place upon it a siege ramp and set up siege engines upon it.”

This passage continues the instructions for the symbolic act. The prophet is to depict a siege scenario by adding detailed elements like a drawing, a mound, a siege ramp, and war engines to illustrate the concept of a siege and the impending judgment.

3 “וְאַתְּ סַב לָךְ מַסְרֵית בַּרְזֵל וְתִתֵּן יָתָהּ כּוֹתֶל בַּרְזֶל בֵּינָךְ וּבֵין קַרְתָּא וְתַתְקֵן יַת אַפָךְ לָהּ וּתְהֵי בְצַיְרָא וּתְצוּר עֲלָהּ אָת הִיא לְבֵית יִשְׂרָאֵל:”

Here is a breakdown and translation:

  • וְאַתְּ סַב לָךְ מַסְרֵית בַּרְזֵל (V’at sav lakh mas’reit barzel): “And you shall take for yourself an iron plate”
  • וְתִתֵּן יָתָהּ כּוֹתֶל בַּרְזֶל (V’titen yat’ah kotel barzel): “and set it as an iron wall”
  • בֵּינָךְ וּבֵין קַרְתָּא (Beinakh u’vein kartah): “between you and the city”
  • וְתַתְקֵן יַת אַפָךְ לָהּ (V’tatken yat afakh lah): “and set your face toward it”
  • וּתְהֵי בְצַיְרָא וּתְצוּר עֲלָהּ (U’tehei b’tzayra u’ttzur alah): “and be in siege against it and lay siege to it”
  • אָת הִיא לְבֵית יִשְׂרָאֵל (At hi l’veit Yisrael): “This is a sign for the house of Israel”

Putting it all together:

“And you shall take an iron plate for yourself and set it as an iron wall between you and the city, and set your face toward it, and be in siege against it and lay siege to it. This is a sign for the house of Israel.”

This passage is an instruction to act out a symbolic gesture involving an iron plate as a sign for the house of Israel, representing a siege or blockade. The prophet is to set the plate as a barrier between themselves and the city, demonstrating the impending judgment and separation.

4 “וְאַתְּ שְׁכוּב עַל סִטְרָךְ דִסְמָלָא וּתְשַׁוֵי יַת חוֹבֵי בֵית יִשְׂרָאֵל עֲלוֹהִי מִנְיַן יוֹמַיָא דְתִשְׁכּוֹב עֲלוֹהִי תְּקַבֵּל יַת חוֹבֵיהוֹן:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וְאַתְּ שְׁכוּב עַל סִטְרָךְ דִסְמָלָא (V’at sh’khuv al sitrekh d’s’mala): “And you shall lie on your left side”
  • וּתְשַׁוֵי יַת חוֹבֵי בֵית יִשְׂרָאֵל (U’tshavei yat chovey Beit Yisrael): “and you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel”
  • עֲלוֹהִי מִנְיַן יוֹמַיָא (Alohei minyan yomayya): “for the number of days”
  • דְתִשְׁכּוֹב עֲלוֹהִי (D’tishkhov alohi): “that you lie on it”
  • תְּקַבֵּל יַת חוֹבֵיהוֹן (T’kabel yat choveihon): “you shall bear their iniquity”

Putting it together:

“And you shall lie on your left side and bear the iniquity of the house of Israel for the number of days that you lie on it, and you shall bear their iniquity.”

This passage instructs the prophet to lie on their left side for a specific number of days to bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. The act symbolizes the burden of Israel’s sins, which the prophet will bear during this period.

5 “וַאֲנָא יְהָבִית לָךְ עַל חַד תְּרֵין בְּחוֹבֵיהוֹן לְמִנְיַן יוֹמַיָא תְּלַת מְאָה וְתִשְׁעִין יוֹמִין וּתְקַבֵּיל חוֹבֵי בֵית יִשְׂרָאֵל:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וַאֲנָא יְהָבִית לָךְ (Va’ana yehevit lakh): “And I will give you”
  • עַל חַד תְּרֵין בְּחוֹבֵיהוֹן (Al chad t’rein b’choveihon): “for one or two [years] of their iniquity” (this phrase suggests that the prophet will bear the iniquity of one or two years of their sins).
  • לְמִנְיַן יוֹמַיָא (L’minyan yomayya): “according to the number of days”
  • תְּלַת מְאָה וְתִשְׁעִין יוֹמִין (T’lat me’ah v’tish’in yomim): “three hundred and ninety days” (representing the years of iniquity)
  • וּתְקַבֵּיל חוֹבֵי בֵית יִשְׂרָאֵל (U’tkabel chovei Beit Yisrael): “and you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.”

Putting it together:

“And I will give you [the task of bearing] for one or two years of their iniquity according to the number of days, three hundred and ninety days, and you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.”

This passage instructs the prophet to bear the iniquity of the house of Israel for a symbolic period of three hundred and ninety days, representing their years of sin or disobedience.

6 “וְתַשְׁלִים יַת אִלֵין וְתִשְׁכּוֹב עַל סִטְרָךְ דִיְמִינָא תִּנְיָנוּת וּתְקַבֵּיל יַת חוֹבֵי בֵית יְהוּדָה אַרְבְּעִין יוֹמִין יוֹמָא לְשַׁתָּא יוֹמָא לְשַׁתָּא יְהַבְתִּינוּן לָךְ:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וְתַשְׁלִים יַת אִלֵין (V’tashlim yat ilen): “And you shall complete these” (referring to something that needs to be fulfilled or completed).
  • וְתִשְׁכּוֹב עַל סִטְרָךְ דִיְמִינָא (V’tishkhov al sitrakh diymina): “And you shall lie on your right side” (a symbolic act of prophesying or demonstrating a message).
  • תִּנְיָנוּת (T’ninyut): “For the second time” (or “for a second period”).
  • וּתְקַבֵּל יַת חוֹבֵי בֵית יְהוּדָה (U’tkabel yat khovei Beit Yehudah): “And you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Judah” (accepting responsibility or punishment for their sins).
  • אַרְבְּעִין יוֹמִין יוֹמָא לְשַׁתָּא (Arba’im yomim yomah l’shatah): “Forty days, a day for each year” (symbolically representing the number of years of sin or punishment).
  • יוֹמָא לְשַׁתָּא יְהַבְתִּינוּן לָךְ (Yomah l’shatah yehav’tinun lakh): “A day for each year, I have given to you” (emphasizing the duration of the prophetic act or punishment).

Putting it all together:

“And you shall complete these (prophecies) and lie on your right side for a second period, and you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Judah for forty days, a day for each year, as I have given to you.”

This passage instructs the prophet to symbolically act out the judgment or punishment for the sins of the house of Judah by lying on their right side for forty days, representing forty years of iniquity.

7 “וְלִצְיָר יְרוּשְׁלֵם תְּתַקֵין אַפָּךְ וְדַרְעָךְ תַּתְקֵיף וְתִתְנַבֵּי עֲלָהּ:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וְלִצְיָר יְרוּשְׁלֵם (V’litsiyar Yerushalayim): “And to depict (or represent) Jerusalem.”
  • תְּתַקֵין אַפָּךְ (T’takin apakh): “You shall set your face” (meaning to focus or direct your attention).
  • וְדַרְעָךְ תַּתְקֵיף (V’dara’akh tatkeif): “And your arm you shall make strong” (meaning to prepare for action or to show strength).
  • וְתִתְנַבֵּי עֲלָהּ (V’titnabe aleha): “And you shall prophesy against it.”

Putting it together:

“And you shall set your face to depict Jerusalem, and you shall make your arm strong, and you shall prophesy against it.”

This passage instructs the prophet to focus on Jerusalem, prepare for action, and deliver a prophecy against it. The emphasis is on determination and strength in delivering the message of warning or judgment.

8 “וְהָא גְזָרֵית פִּתְגָמֵי עֲלָךְ כֶּאֱסוּר גְדִילָן וְלָא תִתְהַפֵּיךְ מִסִטְרָךְ לְסִטְרָךְ עַד אַשְׁלְמוּתָךְ יוֹמֵי צַיְרָךְ:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וְהָא גְזָרֵית פִּתְגָמֵי עֲלָךְ (V’ha gazreit pitgamei alakh): “And behold, I have laid decrees upon you.”
  • כֶאֱסוּר גְדִילָן (Ke’esur g’dilan): “As a binding of cords” (meaning as a restriction or binding similar to being tied up with ropes).
  • וְלָא תִתְהַפֵּיךְ מִסִטְרָךְ לְסִטְרָךְ (V’lo tithapeikh misitrakh l’sitrakh): “And you shall not turn from one side to the other.”
  • עַד אַשְׁלְמוּתָךְ יוֹמֵי צַיְרָךְ (Ad ashlemutakh yomei tsirakh): “Until you complete the days of your distress (or affliction).”

Putting it together:

“And behold, I have laid decrees upon you as a binding of cords, and you shall not turn from one side to the other until you complete the days of your affliction.”

This passage reflects a command that restricts the prophet’s movement as part of a symbolic act during a period of suffering or judgment, emphasizing the seriousness and inevitability of the prophetic message being delivered.

9 “וְאַתְּ סַב לָךְ חִטִין וּסְעוֹרִין וּפוֹלָא וּטְלוֹפְחִין וְדוֹחָן וְכוּנְתִּין וְתִתֵּן יַתְהוֹן לָךְ לְמֵיכַל מִנְיַן יוֹמַיָא דְאַתְּ שְׁכִיב עַל סִטְרָךְ תְּלַת מְאָה וְתִשְׁעִין יוֹמִין תֵּיכְלִינֵיהּ:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וְאַתְּ סַב לָךְ (Ve’at sab lakh): “And you, take for yourself.”
  • חִטִין (Chitin): “Wheat.”
  • וּסְעוֹרִין (U’se’orin): “Barley.”
  • וּפוֹלָא (U’fol): “Beans.”
  • וּטְלוֹפְחִין (U’tlofachin): “Lentils.”
  • וְדוֹחָן (V’dochan): “Millet.”
  • וְכוּנְתִּין (V’kuntin): “Spelt.”
  • וְתִתֵּן יַתְהוֹן לָךְ (V’titen yat’hon lakh): “And you shall place them for yourself.”
  • לְמֵיכַל (L’meichal): “To eat.”
  • מִנְיַן יוֹמַיָא דְאַתְּ שְׁכִיב עַל סִטְרָךְ (Minyan yoma’ya d’at shkhiv al sitrakh): “The number of days that you lie on your side.”
  • תְּלַת מְאָה וְתִשְׁעִין יוֹמִין (Telat me’a v’tish’in yomin): “Three hundred and ninety days.”
  • תֵּיכְלִינֵיהּ (Teichlinieh): “You shall eat it.”

Putting it together:

“And you, take for yourself wheat, barley, beans, lentils, millet, and spelt, and place them for yourself to eat during the number of days that you lie on your side—three hundred and ninety days you shall eat it.”

This passage appears to be an instruction given to a prophet (likely Ezekiel) to prepare a specific mixture of grains and legumes for sustenance during a period of symbolic action (lying on his side for 390 days) as part of a prophetic act. This act represents a period of judgment or punishment.

10 וּמֵיכְלָךְ דְתֵיכְלִינֵיהּ בְמַתְקַל עַסְרִין פִּילֵס לְיוֹם מֵעִדַן עַד עִדָן תֵּיכְלִינֵיהּ:

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וּמֵיכְלָךְ דְתֵיכְלִינֵיהּ (U’meichlach de’teichlinieh): “And the food that you shall eat.”
  • בְמַתְקַל עַסְרִין פִּילֵס לְיוֹם (Be’matkal asrin pilas le’yom): “By weight, twenty shekels per day.”
  • מֵעִדַן עַד עִדָן (Me’idan ad idan): “From time to time” or “from period to period.”
  • תֵּיכְלִינֵיהּ (Teichlinieh): “You shall eat it.”

Putting it together:

“And the food that you shall eat, by weight, twenty shekels per day, from time to time, you shall eat it.”

This phrase likely refers to a period of scarcity or rationing where food is consumed in measured quantities. The mention of “twenty shekels per day” indicates a specific allowance or portion that must be adhered to, and the phrase “from time to time” suggests this rationing will occur consistently over a period of time. The passage highlights a controlled and perhaps difficult period of sustenance.

11 וּמַיָא בִּמְכִילָא תִשְׁתֵּי חַד מִן שַׁתָּא בְּהִינָא מֵעִדַן עַד עִדַן תִּשְׁתֵּי:

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וּמַיָא (U’maya): “And water.”
  • בִּמְכִילָא תִשְׁתֵּי (Bi’mechila tishtei): “You shall drink by measure.”
  • חַד מִן שַׁתָּא (Chad min shata): “One-sixth of a hin” (a hin is an ancient measurement of liquid).
  • בְּהִינָא (Be’hina): “By the hin” or “as a hin.”
  • מֵעִדַן עַד עִדַן (Me’idan ad idan): “From time to time” or “from period to period.”
  • תִּשְׁתֵּי (Tishtei): “You shall drink.”

Putting it together:

“And water you shall drink by measure, one-sixth of a hin, from time to time, you shall drink.”

This passage describes a period of water rationing where the amount of water allowed per person is limited to one-sixth of a hin, and this rationing is consistent and ongoing. The passage emphasizes the scarcity and controlled consumption of water during this period.

12 וַחֲרָרָא דִלְחַם שְׂעוֹרִין תֵּיכְלִינָהּ וְהִיא עַל גְלֵי מַפְקַת אֱנָשָׁא תַּחְרְרִינָה לְעֵינֵיהוֹן:

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וַחֲרָרָא (Va’charara): “And a cake” or “a round flatbread.”
  • דִלְחַם שְׂעוֹרִין (Di’lechem se’orim): “of barley bread.”
  • תֵּיכְלִינָהּ (Teichlina): “You shall eat it.”
  • וְהִיא (Ve’hi): “And it.”
  • עַל גְלֵי (Al gelei): “On (human) dung” or “excrement.”
  • מַפְקַת אֱנָשָׁא (Mafkat enasha): “that comes out of a man.”
  • תַּחְרְרִינָה (Tachrerina): “You shall bake it.”
  • לְעֵינֵיהוֹן (Le’eineihon): “In their sight” or “before their eyes.”

Putting it together:

“And a cake of barley bread you shall eat, and it, on human dung, you shall bake it before their eyes.”

This passage is a stark and symbolic description of the dire conditions and humiliation that would be experienced, where even the bread—usually a basic sustenance—is baked using human waste as fuel, signifying extreme degradation and suffering, and this act is performed publicly to be seen by others.

13 “וַאֲמַר יְיָ כְּדֵין יֵיכְלוּן בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל יַת מֵיכַלְהוֹן מְסָאַב בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא דְאַגְלִינוּן לְתַמָן:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וַאֲמַר יְיָ (Va’amar Adonai): “And the Lord said.”
  • כְּדֵין (Kedein): “Thus” or “So.”
  • יֵיכְלוּן (Yeichlun): “They shall eat.”
  • בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל (Bnei Yisrael): “The children of Israel” or “The people of Israel.”
  • יַת מֵיכַלְהוֹן (Yat meichalhon): “Their food.”
  • מְסָאַב (Mesa’av): “Defiled” or “unclean.”
  • בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא (Beinei ammaya): “Among the nations” or “In the midst of the nations.”
  • דְאַגְלִינוּן לְתַמָן (De’aglinun le’taman): “To which I will drive them” or “Where I have exiled them.”

Putting it together:

“And the Lord said, ‘Thus shall the people of Israel eat their defiled food among the nations where I will drive them.'”

This passage conveys a prophecy of the conditions that the people of Israel will face in exile, where they will be forced to eat food that is considered unclean, symbolizing their suffering and the loss of their purity and sanctity in a foreign land.

14 “וַאֲמָרֵית קַבֵּיל בָּעוּתִי יְיָ אֱלֹהִים הָא נַפְשִׁי לָא מְסָאֲבָא וּנְבֵילָא וּתְבִירָא לָא אֲכָלֵית מִזְעוּרֵי וְעַד כְּעַן וְלָא אֲכָלֵית בְּסַר מְרָחָק:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation:

  • וַאֲמָרֵית קַבֵּיל בָּעוּתִי (Va’amart, kabbel ba’uti): “And you said, accept my petition”
  • יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (YHVH Elohim): “YHVH God”
  • הָא נַפְשִׁי לָא מְסָאֲבָא (Ha nafshi la’ mesavah): “Behold, my soul is not tired”
  • וּנְבֵילָא וּתְבִירָא (U’nevilah u’tevirah): “and broken and shattered”
  • לָא אֲכָלֵית מִזְעוּרֵי (La’ akhalit mizaruri): “has not consumed me from minor distress”
  • וְעַד כְּעַן וְלָא אֲכָלֵית בְּסַר מְרָחָק (V’ad ke’anan, ve’la akhalit b’sar merachak): “and until now I have not consumed the distant flesh”

Putting it together:

“And you said, accept my petition, YHVH God. Behold, my soul is not weary, and broken and shattered. It has not consumed me from minor distress, and until now, I have not consumed the distant flesh.”

In this passage, the speaker is expressing that despite their suffering and the distress they have endured, their soul remains unweary. They are asking God to accept their petition, noting that their distress has not completely overwhelmed them, and they have not consumed or been consumed by distant sorrows or hardships.

15 “וַאֲמַר לִי חֲזֵי דִיהָבֵית לָךְ יַת גְלֵי תוֹרַיָא חֲלַף גְלֵי אֱנָשָׁא וְתַעֲבֵיד יַת מֵיכְלָךְ עֲלֵיהוֹן:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וַאֲמַר לִי (Va’amar li): “And he said to me.”
  • חֲזֵי (Chazi): “See” or “Behold.”
  • דִיהָבֵית לָךְ (Dihaveit lach): “That I have given you.”
  • יַת גְלֵי תוֹרַיָא (Yat glei toraya): “Cow dung” (literally “dung of oxen”).
  • חֲלַף גְלֵי אֱנָשָׁא (Chalaf glei enasha): “Instead of human dung.”
  • וְתַעֲבֵיד יַת מֵיכְלָךְ עֲלֵיהוֹן (Ve’ta’aveid yat meichlach aleihon): “And you shall prepare your food over them.”

Putting it together:

“And He said to me, ‘Behold, I have given you cow dung instead of human dung, and you shall prepare your food over it.'”

This passage reflects a specific instruction from God to use cow dung as fuel for cooking, as opposed to the more detestable option of using human excrement. It is likely a symbolic act representing the harsh and humiliating conditions faced during exile, yet with some measure of mercy in the substitution of cow dung.

16 “וַאֲמַר לִי בַּר אָדָם הָא אֲנָא תָבֵר סְעִיד מֵיכְלָא בִּירוּשְׁלֵם וְיֵכְלוּן לַחְמָא בְּמַתְקַל וּבְיִצְפָּא וּמַיָא בְּצָדוּ וּבְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ יִשְׁתּוּן:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • וַאֲמַר לִי (Va’amar li): “And He said to me.”
  • בַּר אָדָם (Bar Adam): “Son of man.”
  • הָא אֲנָא תָבֵר (Ha ana taver): “Behold, I am about to break.”
  • סְעִיד מֵיכְלָא (Seid meichla): “The staff of bread” (a symbol for food supply).
  • בִּירוּשְׁלֵם (BiYerushalem): “In Jerusalem.”
  • וְיֵכְלוּן לַחְמָא בְּמַתְקַל (Veyechelun lachma b’matkal): “And they shall eat bread by weight” (measured or rationed).
  • וּבְיִצְפָּא (U’beyitzpa): “And with anxiety.”
  • וּמַיָא בְּצָדוּ (Umaya b’tzadu): “And water by measure” (rationed water).
  • וּבְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ יִשְׁתּוּן (U’b’isht’mamu yishtun): “And in dismay they shall drink.”

Putting it together:

“And He said to me, ‘Son of man, behold, I am about to break the staff of bread in Jerusalem, and they shall eat bread by weight and with anxiety, and they shall drink water by measure and in dismay.'”

This passage conveys a prophecy of severe famine and distress in Jerusalem, where food and water will be scarce, leading to anxiety and dismay among the people. The “breaking of the staff of bread” symbolizes the removal or destruction of sustenance and stability.

17 “בְּדִיל דְיַחְסַר לְהוֹן מֵיכַל וּמִשְׁתִּי וְיִצְדוֹן גְבַר וַאֲחוּהִי וְיִתְמְסוּן בְּחוֹבֵיהוֹן:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation of the text:

  • בְּדִיל (B’dil): “Because” or “in order that.”
  • יַחְסַר לְהוֹן (Yachsar le’hon): “They will lack” or “they will be deprived of.”
  • מֵיכַל וּמִשְׁתִּי (Meichal u’mishti): “Food and drink.”
  • וְיִצְדוֹן גְבַר וַאֲחוּהִי (Veyitzdon gevar va’achuh): “And a man and his brother will be at odds” (or “will contend with each other”).
  • וְיִתְמְסוּן בְּחוֹבֵיהוֹן (Veyitm’sun b’choveyhon): “And they will waste away in their iniquities” or “and they will be consumed by their sins.”

Putting it together:

“Because they will lack food and drink, and a man and his brother will contend with each other, and they will waste away in their iniquities.”

This passage continues the theme of distress and judgment, describing a situation where scarcity leads to conflict and strife among people, and ultimately, they are destroyed or consumed by their sins.

Ezekiel 5 (against all the house of Israel)

1 “וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם סַב לָךְ חַרְבָּא חֲרִיפָא מַסְפַּר גַלְבַיָא תִּסַב לָךְ וְתַעְבֵּד עַל רֵישֵׁךְ וְעַל דִקְנָךְ וְתִסֵב לָךְ מוֹזְנָיָן דְמַתְקַל וְתַפְלְגִינוּן:”

Here’s a breakdown and translation:

  • וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם (Ve’atah bar adam): “And you, son of man”
  • סַב לָךְ חַרְבָּא חֲרִיפָא (Sab lakh charva charifa): “Take for yourself a sharp sword”
  • מַסְפַּר גַלְבַיָא (Maspar galvaya): “a measure of the sharpness”
  • תִּסַב לָךְ (Tisav lakh): “You shall put it”
  • וְתַעְבֵּד עַל רֵישֵׁךְ וְעַל דִקְנָךְ (Ve’ta’aved al reishkha ve’al diknakha): “and work upon your head and upon your beard”
  • וְתִסֵב לָךְ מוֹזְנָיָן (Ve’tisav lakh moznayan): “and put upon yourself the scales”
  • דְמַתְקַל וְתַפְלְגִינוּן (D’matkhal ve’taflginun): “that weigh and balance”

Putting it together:

“And you, son of man, take for yourself a sharp sword, a measure of sharpness. Put it upon yourself and work upon your head and your beard, and place upon yourself the scales that weigh and balance.”

This passage seems to instruct the individual to take a sharp sword and use it in a precise manner, involving specific actions related to their head and beard. It suggests the use of scales for weighing and balancing, implying a careful and measured approach to their tasks.

2 “תִּלְתָּא בְּנוּרָא תַדְלֵיק בְּגוֹ קַרְתָּא כְּמִשְׁלַם יְמֵי צַיְרָא וְתִסַב יַת תִּלְתָּא תִּקְטֵיל בְּחַרְבָּא סָחֲרָנָהָא וְתִלְתָּא יִתְבַּדְרוּן וּדְקַטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא אֱגָרֵי בַּתְרֵיהוֹן”

Here’s a breakdown and translation:

  • תִּלְתָּא בְּנוּרָא (Tilta b’nura): “Three in the fire”
  • תַדְלֵיק בְּגוֹ קַרְתָּא (Tadlik b’go kartha): “Shall light within the city”
  • כְּמִשְׁלַם יְמֵי צַיְרָא (K’mishlam y’mei tsayar): “As the end of the days of distress”
  • וְתִסַב יַת תִּלְתָּא (Ve’tisav yat tilta): “And you shall put upon the three”
  • תִּקְטֵיל בְּחַרְבָּא סָחֲרָנָהָא (Tiqtil b’charva s’charana): “Shall be slain by the sword of vengeance”
  • וְתִלְתָּא יִתְבַּדְרוּן (Ve’tilta yit’badrun): “And the three shall be purified”
  • וּדְקַטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא אֱגָרֵי בַּתְרֵיהוֹן (U’d’katlin b’charva egaray b’trehon): “And they shall be slain by the sword; punishment shall follow them”

Putting it all together:

“Three in the fire shall light within the city, as the end of the days of distress. And you shall put upon the three, and they shall be slain by the sword of vengeance. The three shall be purified, and they shall be slain by the sword; punishment shall follow them.”

This passage seems to describe a vision of judgment or purification, where three entities are involved in a process of destruction and purification, culminating in a final act of vengeance and punishment.

3 וְתִסֵב מִתַּמָן זְעֵיר בְּמִנְיַן וּתְצוּר יַתְהוֹן בִכְנָפָךְ:

“And you shall turn from there a small number in count and shall protect them under your wings.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וְתִסֵב מִתַּמָן (Ve’tisav mit’taman): “And you shall turn from there”
  • זְעֵיר בְּמִנְיַן (Zaeir b’minyan): “A small number in count”
  • וּתְצוּר יַתְהוֹן (U’t’tsur yat’hon): “And shall protect them”
  • בִכְנָפָךְ (B’knafak): “Under your wings”

Putting it all together:

“And you shall turn from there a small number in count and shall protect them under your wings.”

This passage implies a transition or movement of a small group from a particular place and ensuring their safety or protection, symbolically described as sheltering them under one’s wings.

4 וּמִנְהוֹן עוֹד תִּסַב וְתַרְמֵי יַתְהוֹן לְגוֹ נוּרָא וְתוֹקִיד יַתְהוֹן בְּנוּרָא בְּכֵן תִּפּוֹק אֶשְׁתָּא עַל כָּל בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל:

“And from them, you shall turn again and cast them into the fire, and you shall kindle them in the fire; thus shall fire go out upon all the house of Israel.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וּמִנְהוֹן עוֹד תִּסַב (U’minhon od tisav): “And from them, you shall turn again”
  • וְתַרְמֵי יַתְהוֹן (V’tarmei yat’hon): “And cast them”
  • לְגוֹ נוּרָא (L’go nurah): “Into the fire”
  • וְתוֹקִיד יַתְהוֹן (V’tokid yat’hon): “And you shall kindle them”
  • בְּנוּרָא (B’nurah): “In the fire”
  • בְּכֵן תִּפּוֹק אֶשְׁתָּא (B’khen tipok esh’ta): “Thus shall fire go out”
  • עַל כָּל בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל (Al kol beit Yisrael): “Upon all the house of Israel”

So, the complete translation is:

“And from them, you shall turn again and cast them into the fire, and you shall kindle them in the fire; thus shall fire go out upon all the house of Israel.”

This passage seems to refer to a prophetic or symbolic act of purging or purification, involving casting a group into the fire and kindling them, resulting in a significant impact on the entire house of Israel.

5 כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים דָא יְרוּשְׁלֵם בְּגוֹ עַמְמַיָא שַׁוִיתָהָא וּסְחוֹר סְחוֹר לָהּ מְדִינָתָא:

The phrase translates to:

“As the Lord God has said, this is Jerusalem: among the nations, she has become a reproach and a burden, and her cities are desolate.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (Kidnan amar Adonai Elohim): “As the Lord God has said”
  • דָא יְרוּשְׁלֵם (Da Yerushalayim): “This is Jerusalem”
  • בְּגוֹ עַמְמַיָא (B’go ammayya): “Among the nations”
  • שַׁוִיתָהָא (Shavitah): “She has become a reproach”
  • וּסְחוֹר סְחוֹר (U’shochor shochor): “And a burden”
  • לָהּ מְדִינָתָא (Lah medinat): “And her cities are desolate”

The passage describes Jerusalem’s diminished status and the reproach it has become among the nations. It reflects a state of ruin and burden, signifying a time of great distress or judgment.

6 וְאַשְׁנִיאַת יַת דִינִי לִמְחַבְּבֵיהוֹן מִן עַמְמַיָא וְיַת קְיָמִי מִן מְדִינָתָא דִי בְּסֶחֱרָנָהָא אֲרֵי בְּדִינַי קָצוּ וּקְיָמַי לָא הֲלִיכוּ בְהוֹן:

The phrase translates to:

“And I will make my judgment known to those who love it, from among the nations, and my presence from among the desolate states; for in the day of judgment, they will be cut off, and my presence will not go with them.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וְאַשְׁנִיאַת יַת דִינִי (V’ashniyat yat dini): “And I will make my judgment known”
  • לִמְחַבְּבֵיהוֹן (L’mchabb’vehon): “To those who love it”
  • מִן עַמְמַיָא (Min ammayya): “From among the nations”
  • וְיַת קְיָמִי (V’yat qiyami): “And my presence”
  • מִן מְדִינָתָא (Min medinatah): “From among the desolate states”
  • דִי בְּסֶחֱרָנָהָא (Di b’shecharanah): “For in the day of judgment”
  • אֲרֵי בְּדִינַי קָצוּ (Ari b’dinai katsu): “They will be cut off”
  • וּקְיָמַי לָא הֲלִיכוּ בְהוֹן (U’qiyamai lo halikhu b’hem): “And my presence will not go with them”

This passage speaks of divine judgment and the separation of those who love God’s laws from those who do not. It emphasizes that in times of judgment, those who are faithful will be preserved, while others will be cut off from divine presence.

7 בְּכֵן כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים חֲלַף דְחַבְתּוּן מִן עַמְמַיָא דִי בְסַחֲרָנֵיכוֹן בִּקְיָמַי לָא הֲלֵכְתּוּן וְיַת דִינַי לָא עֲבַדְתּוּן וּכְנִימוּסֵי עַמְמַיָא דִי בְסַחְרָנֵיכוֹן לָא עֲבַדְתּוּן:

The translation of the text is:

“Therefore, as God said, ‘You have departed from among the nations that in your commerce did not walk in my ways, and you did not perform my judgments, and the customs of the nations in your commerce were not practiced by you.'”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • בְּכֵן (B’khen): “Therefore”
  • כִּדְנַן (Kidan): “As said”
  • אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (Amar YHVH Elohim): “Said the Lord God”
  • חֲלַף דְחַבְתּוּן (Chalaf d’chav’tun): “You have departed”
  • מִן עַמְמַיָא (Min ammayya): “From among the nations”
  • דִי בְּסַחֲרָנֵיכוֹן (Di b’sacharanaykhon): “That in your commerce”
  • בִּקְיָמַי לָא הֲלֵכְתּוּן (B’kiyamai lo halekhtun): “Did not walk in my ways”
  • וְיַת דִינַי (V’yat dinai): “And you did not perform my judgments”
  • לָא עֲבַדְתּוּן (Lo avad’tun): “You did not do”
  • וּכְנִימוּסֵי (U’khnimusei): “And the customs of”
  • עַמְמַיָא (Ammayya): “The nations”
  • דִי בְּסַחְרָנֵיכוֹן (Di b’sacharanaykhon): “In your commerce”
  • לָא עֲבַדְתּוּן (Lo avad’tun): “Were not practiced by you”

This passage criticizes the failure to adhere to divine commandments and justice, contrasting it with the improper customs of other nations that were not adopted.

8 בְּכֵן כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים הָא אֲנָא שָׁלַח רוּגְזִי עֲלָךְ אַף אֲנָא וְאַעֲבֵּיד בְּגַוִיךְ פּוּרְעֲנוּת דִינִין לְעֵינֵי עַמְמַיָא:

The translation of the text is:

“Therefore, as said the Lord God: ‘Behold, I will send my wrath upon you, and I will execute vengeance upon you in your midst, as a punishment in the presence of the nations.'”

Here’s a breakdown of the key phrases:

  • בְּכֵן (B’khen): “Therefore”
  • כִּדְנַן (Kidan): “As said”
  • אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (Amar YHVH Elohim): “Said the Lord God”
  • הָא אֲנָא (Ha ana): “Behold, I”
  • שָׁלַח רוּגְזִי (Shalach rugzi): “Will send my wrath”
  • עֲלָךְ (Alech): “Upon you”
  • אַף אֲנָא (Af ana): “And I will”
  • וְאַעֲבֵּיד (V’avad): “Execute”
  • בְּגַוִיךְ (B’gavayikh): “In your midst”
  • פּוּרְעֲנוּת דִינִין (Pur’anut dinin): “Punishment of judgments”
  • לְעֵינֵי (L’einei): “In the presence of”
  • עַמְמַיָא (Ammayya): “The nations”

This passage indicates a divine response involving wrath and vengeance, which will be executed visibly to serve as a lesson or warning to other nations.

9 וְאַעְבֵּיד בִּיךְ יַת דְלָא עֲבַדֵית וְיַת דְלָא אַעְבֵּיד דִכְוָתֵיהּ עוֹד חֲלַף כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ:

The translation of the text is:

“And I will execute upon you the things that you did not do, and the things that you did not carry out according to its measure, beyond all your abominations.”

Here’s a breakdown of the key phrases:

  • וְאַעְבֵּיד בִּיךְ (V’avad bikh): “And I will execute upon you”
  • יַת דְלָא עֲבַדֵית (Yat d’la avadit): “The things that you did not do”
  • וְיַת דְלָא אַעְבֵּיד (V’yat d’la a’avid): “And the things that you did not carry out”
  • דִכְוָתֵיהּ (D’k’vatah): “According to its measure”
  • עוֹד (Od): “Beyond”
  • חֲלַף (Chalaf): “All”
  • כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ (Kol to’avatayikh): “Your abominations”

This passage indicates that the divine judgment will encompass not only what was neglected or improperly executed but will also exceed the extent of all the abominations committed.

10 בְּכֵן אֲבָהָן יֵיכְלוּן בְּסַר בְּנֵיהוֹן בְּגַוִיךְ וּבְנַיָא יֵיכְלוּן בְּסַר אֲבָהָתְהוֹן וְאַעְבֵּיד בִּיךְ פּוּרְעֲנוּת דִינִין וַאֲבַדַר יַת כָּל שְׁאָר עַמִיךְ לְכָל רוּחַ:

The translation of the text is:

“Therefore, the fathers will bear the consequences in their bodies, and the sons will bear the consequences of their fathers’ deeds. And I will execute upon you punishments and destroy all the rest of your people to every wind.”

Here’s a breakdown of the key phrases:

  • בְּכֵן (B’khen): “Therefore”
  • אֲבָהָן (Avahan): “The fathers”
  • יֵיכְלוּן בְּסַר בְּנֵיהוֹן (Ye’khe’lun b’sar b’neihem): “Will bear the consequences in their bodies”
  • בְּגַוִיךְ (B’gawikh): “In your body”
  • וּבְנַיָא (U’v’naya): “And the sons”
  • יֵיכְלוּן בְּסַר אֲבָהָתְהוֹן (Ye’khe’lun b’sar avahotayhem): “Will bear the consequences in the bodies of their fathers”
  • וְאַעְבֵּיד בִּיךְ (V’avad bikh): “And I will execute upon you”
  • פּוּרְעֲנוּת דִינִין (Pur’anut dinin): “Punishments”
  • וַאֲבַדַר (V’avadar): “And I will destroy”
  • יַת כָּל שְׁאָר עַמִיךְ (Yat kol she’ar amik): “All the rest of your people”
  • לְכָל רוּחַ (L’khol ru’ach): “To every wind” (meaning “everywhere”)

This passage describes a judgment where the consequences of the sins are distributed across both generations, with severe punishment and destruction extending to all parts of the community.

11 בְּכֵן קַיָים אֲנָא אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים אִם לָא חֲלַף דְמָקְדְשֵׁי סָאֵבְתְּ בְּכָל שִׁקוּצָיִךְ וּבְכָל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ וְאַף אֲנָא אֶקְטוֹף תְּקוֹף דַרְעִיךְ וְלָא יָחוּס מֵימְרִי וְאַף אֲנָא לָא אֲרַחֵם:

The translation of the text is:

“Therefore, I declare, says the Lord God, if you do not remove your sanctuaries from all your abominations and all your detestable practices, I will also remove the strength of your arm, and no one will have compassion, and I will not show mercy.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • בְּכֵן (B’khen): “Therefore”
  • קַיָים (Kayyam): “I declare” or “I establish”
  • אֲנָא (Ana): “I” or “I am”
  • אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (Amar Adonai Elohim): “Says the Lord God”
  • אִם לָא (Im la): “If not”
  • חֲלַף (H’laf): “Remove”
  • דְמָקְדְשֵׁי (D’mak’deshei): “Your sanctuaries”
  • סָאֵבְתְּ (Sa’evt): “From all”
  • בְּכָל שִׁקוּצָיִךְ (B’khol shikutsayikh): “Your abominations”
  • וּבְכָל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ (U’b’khol to’avatayikh): “And all your detestable practices”
  • וְאַף אֲנָא (V’af ana): “And I also”
  • אֶקְטוֹף (Ek’tof): “Will remove”
  • תְּקוֹף (T’kof): “The strength”
  • דַרְעִיךְ (Dara’ikh): “Of your arm” (symbolically, strength or power)
  • וְלָא יָחוּס (V’la yachus): “And no one will have compassion”
  • מֵימְרִי (Mey’meri): “From the words” (can mean the promises or declarations)
  • וְאַף אֲנָא לָא אֲרַחֵם (V’af ana la arachem): “And I will not show mercy”

This passage emphasizes a severe judgment if the abominations and detestable practices are not removed. The strength and compassion will be withdrawn, and there will be no mercy.

12 תִּלְתִּיךְ בְּמוֹתָא יְמוּתוּן וּבְכַפְנָא יִשְׁתֵּיצוּן בְּגַוִיךְ וְתִלְתָּא בְּחַרְבָּא יִתְקַטְלוּן סַחֲרָנַיִךְ וְתִלְתָּא לְכָל רוּחַ אֲבַדַר וּדְקָטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא אֱגָרֵי בַּתְרֵיהוֹן:

The translation of the text is:

“One-third will die by death, and one-third will remain in your midst, bound, and one-third will fall by the sword; your merchants will be killed. And one-third will be scattered to every wind, and they will be pursued with the sword.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • תִּלְתִּיךְ בְּמוֹתָא (Til’tikh b’motah): “One-third will die by death”
  • יְמוּתוּן (Y’mutu): “They will die”
  • וּבְכַפְנָא (U’b’khafna): “And one-third”
  • יִשְׁתֵּיצוּן בְּגַוִיךְ (Yish’teitsun b’ga’vikh): “Will remain in your midst, bound”
  • וְתִלְתָּא בְּחַרְבָּא (V’til’ta b’kharba): “And one-third by the sword”
  • יִתְקַטְלוּן (Yit’katlun): “Will be killed”
  • סַחֲרָנַיִךְ (S’kharanayikh): “Your merchants”
  • וְתִלְתָּא לְכָל רוּחַ (V’til’ta l’khol ru’ach): “And one-third to every wind”
  • אֲבַדַר (Avadar): “Will be scattered” or “destroyed”
  • וּדְקָטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא (U’d’khatlin b’kharba): “And they will be pursued with the sword”
  • אֱגָרֵי בַּתְרֵיהוֹן (Egaray b’treihon): “Pursued with the sword”

This passage describes a grim fate where a third of the people will die, a third will be left bound, and a third will be killed by the sword or scattered and pursued.

13 וְיָחוּל רוּגְזִי וַאֲנִיחַ חֵימְתִי בְהוֹן וַאֲסִיף וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ גְזַרֵית בְּמֵימְרִי וַאֲקַיֵים כַּד יָחוּל רוּגְזִי בְּהוֹן:

The translation of this passage is:

“And I will endure my fury and set my anger upon them, and I will gather them together, and they will know that I, Yehovah, have decreed this by my word, and I will fulfill as I have endured my fury upon them.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וְיָחוּל רוּגְזִי (V’yachul ru’gz’i): “And I will endure my fury”
  • וַאֲנִיחַ חֵימְתִי בְהוֹן (V’ani’ach cheimt’i b’hem): “And set my anger upon them”
  • וַאֲסִיף (V’asi’f): “And I will gather them”
  • וְיֵדְעוּן (V’ye’du’n): “And they will know”
  • אֲרֵי (A’rei): “That”
  • אֲנָא (Ana): “I”
  • יְיָ (Yah): “Yehovah”
  • גְזַרֵית (G’zareit): “Have decreed”
  • בְּמֵימְרִי (B’meimri): “By my word”
  • וַאֲקַיֵים (V’a’kayim): “And I will fulfill”
  • כַּד (Kad): “As”
  • יָחוּל רוּגְזִי (Yachul ru’gz’i): “I have endured my fury”
  • בְּהוֹן (B’hem): “Upon them”

This passage emphasizes the divine promise to enforce judgment and demonstrate the authority of Yahweh through actions and decrees.

14 וְאֶתְּנִנָךְ לְחַרְבָּא וּלְחִסוּדִין בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא דִי בְסַחְרָנָךְ לְעֵינֵי כָּל דְעָדֵי:

The translation of this passage is:

“And I will deliver you into the sword and to destruction among the nations that you have dealt with, in the eyes of all who see.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וְאֶתְּנִנָךְ לְחַרְבָּא (V’etenin’cha l’charev’a): “And I will deliver you into the sword”
  • וּלְחִסוּדִין (U’l’chisud’in): “And to destruction”
  • בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא (B’nei am’maya): “Among the nations”
  • דִי בְסַחְרָנָךְ (Di b’s’char’nach): “That you have dealt with”
  • לְעֵינֵי כָּל דְעָדֵי (L’einei kol d’a’dei): “In the eyes of all who see”

This passage indicates that the speaker will hand over the subject to judgment and ruin among the nations with which they have been involved, and this will be witnessed by everyone.

15 וּתְהֵין לְחִסוּדִין וּלְאִתְרַבְרְבָא עֲלָךְ צָדוּ וְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ לְעַמְמַיָא דִבְסָחֳרָנִיךְ כַּד אַעְבֵיד בִּיךְ פּוּרְעֲנוּת דִינִין בִּרְגַז וּבְחֵמָה וּבִתְקוֹף רְגַז אֲנָא יְיָ גְזַרֵית בְּמֵימְרִי:

The translation of this passage is:

“And you will be for destruction and for reproach, and they will be struck and amazed at you, among the nations with whom you have dealt, as I will carry out retribution upon you in wrath and in anger, and in the force of wrath. I, Yehovah, have decreed in My word.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וּתְהֵין לְחִסוּדִין (U’the’ein l’chisud’in): “And you will be for destruction”
  • וּלְאִתְרַבְרְבָא (U’l’it’ra’b’ra’ba): “And for reproach”
  • עֲלָךְ צָדוּ (A’lech tzadu): “And they will be struck”
  • וְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ (V’ishtemamu): “And be amazed”
  • לְעַמְמַיָא (L’eim’maya): “Among the nations”
  • דִבְסָחֳרָנִיךְ (Di b’sachor’nich): “With whom you have dealt”
  • כַּד אַעְבֵיד בִּיךְ פּוּרְעֲנוּת דִינִין (Kad a’vid b’ich pur’an’ut dinin): “As I will carry out retribution upon you”
  • בִּרְגַז וּבְחֵמָה (B’rigaz u’b’chem’a): “In wrath and in anger”
  • וּבִתְקוֹף רְגַז (U’b’tokof rigaz): “And in the force of wrath”
  • אֲנָא יְיָ גְזַרֵית בְּמֵימְרִי (Ana Yehovah g’zerit b’meimri): “I, Yehovah, have decreed in My word”

This passage indicates that the speaker will make the subject a target of destruction and reproach, causing amazement and shock among the nations they have interacted with. The retribution will be severe, carried out in wrath and anger, according to the divine decree.

16 בְּגָרָיוּתִי יַת מְחַת כַּפְנָא מַכְתָּשִׁין בִּישִׁין דִמְתַקְנִין לְחַבָּלָא דַאֲשַׁלַח יַתְהוֹן לְחַבָּלוּתְכוֹן וְכַפְנָא אוֹסִיף עֲלֵיכוֹן וְאִתְבַּר לְכוֹן סְעַד מֵיכְלָא:

The passage translates as:

“In My anger, I will strike with a hammer of crushing and severe blows, which are prepared for the purpose of destruction. I will send them to their destruction, and the hammer will be added upon them. I will break their support and their strength.”

Here’s a breakdown of the passage:

  • בְּגָרָיוּתִי (B’garayot’i): “In My anger”
  • יַת מְחַת (Yat me’chat): “I will strike”
  • כַּפְנָא (Kafna): “With a hammer”
  • מַכְתָּשִׁין (Mik’tashin): “Of crushing” or “crushing blows”
  • בִּישִׁין (B’ishin): “Severe”
  • דִמְתַקְנִין (D’mitak’nin): “Which are prepared”
  • לְחַבָּלָא (L’khab’ala): “For the purpose of destruction”
  • דַאֲשַׁלַח (D’ashal’ach): “That I will send”
  • יַתְהוֹן (Yatheon): “Them” (referring to those being punished)
  • לְחַבָּלוּתְכוֹן (L’khabbalutekhon): “To their destruction”
  • וְכַפְנָא (V’kafna): “And the hammer”
  • אוֹסִיף (Osif): “Will be added”
  • עֲלֵיכוֹן (A’leikhon): “Upon them”
  • וְאִתְבַּר (V’it’bar): “And I will break”
  • לְכוֹן (L’khon): “Their”
  • סְעַד (Se’ad): “Support”
  • מֵיכְלָא (Mekhla): “Strength”

This passage conveys a strong message of divine retribution and destruction, with the imagery of a hammer used to crush and break, illustrating the severity of the punishment and the complete dismantling of the support and strength of those being judged.

17 וַאֲשַׁלַח עֲלֵיכוֹן כַּפְנָא וְחַיְתָא בִישְׁתָּא וְיִתְכְּלוּנַיִךְ וּמוֹתָא וּקְטָלָא יַעְדוּן בִּיךְ וּדְקָטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא אַיְתֵי עֲלָךְ אֲנָא יְיָ גְזָרֵית בְּמֵימְרִי:

The passage translates as:

“And I will send upon you a hammer and a fierce beast, and they will consume you, and death and killing will be your destiny. They will be struck by the sword, and I, the Lord, have decreed it with My words.”

Here’s a breakdown of the passage:

  • וַאֲשַׁלַח (V’ashalach): “And I will send”
  • עֲלֵיכוֹן (A’leikhon): “Upon you”
  • כַּפְנָא (Kafna): “A hammer”
  • וְחַיְתָא (V’khayta): “And a beast” or “a fierce animal”
  • בִישְׁתָּא (B’ish’ta): “Fierce” or “terrible”
  • וְיִתְכְּלוּנַיִךְ (V’yit’khlunayikh): “And they will consume you”
  • וּמוֹתָא (U’mot’a): “And death”
  • וּקְטָלָא (U’k’tala): “And killing”
  • יַעְדוּן (Ya’udun): “Will be your destiny” or “will be destined”
  • בִּיךְ (Bikh): “For you”
  • וּדְקָטְלִין (V’d’kat’lin): “And they will be struck”
  • בְּחַרְבָּא (B’kharba): “By the sword”
  • אַיְתֵי (A’yte): “In places”
  • עֲלָךְ (A’lekh): “Upon you”
  • אֲנָא יְיָ (Ana Adonai): “I, the Lord”
  • גְזָרֵית (G’zayrit): “Have decreed”
  • בְּמֵימְרִי (B’meimri): “With My words”

This passage describes a severe punishment, where a divine hammer and a fierce beast are sent as instruments of destruction. It emphasizes the certainty of the divine decree and the impending violence and death that will befall the subject of this decree.

Ezekiel 6 (against the mountains of Israel)

1 וַהֲוָה פִּתְגַם נְבוּאָה מִן קֳדָם יְיָ עִמִי לְמֵימָר:

The phrase “וַהֲוָה פִּתְגַם נְבוּאָה מִן קֳדָם יְיָ עִמִי לְמֵימָר” translates to:

“And this was the prophecy spoken before the Lord with my words.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וַהֲוָה (V’hava): “And this was”
  • פִּתְגַם (Pitgam): “The saying” or “the prophecy”
  • נְבוּאָה (N’vu’ah): “Prophecy”
  • מִן (Min): “From” or “spoken before”
  • קֳדָם (Kodam): “Before”
  • יְיָ (Adonai): “The Lord”
  • עִמִי (Imi): “With me” or “spoken with my words”
  • לְמֵימָר (L’meimar): “To say” or “to speak”

This phrase indicates that the following words are a direct prophecy or declaration made before the Lord, and it emphasizes the authority and authenticity of the message being conveyed.

2 בַּר אָדָם קַבֵּל נְבוּאָה עַל טוּרֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאִתְנַבֵּי עֲלֵיהוֹן:

The phrase “בַּר אָדָם קַבֵּל נְבוּאָה עַל טוּרֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאִתְנַבֵּי עֲלֵיהוֹן” translates to:

“A man receives prophecy concerning the tribes of Israel and prophesies about them.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • בַּר אָדָם (Bar Adam): “A man” or “a person”
  • קַבֵּל (Kabel): “Receives” or “accepts”
  • נְבוּאָה (N’vu’ah): “Prophecy”
  • עַל (Al): “Concerning” or “about”
  • טוּרֵי (Turay): “Tribes” or “ranks”
  • יִשְׂרָאֵל (Yisrael): “Israel”
  • וְאִתְנַבֵּי (V’itnabe): “And prophesies”
  • עֲלֵיהוֹן (Aleihon): “About them” or “concerning them”

This phrase signifies that someone, often a prophet or an individual of spiritual significance, is receiving and delivering a prophecy specifically related to the tribes of Israel.

3 וְתֵימַר טוּרֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל קַבִּילוּ פִתְגָמָא דַייָ אֱלֹהִים כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים לְטוּרַיָא וּלְרָמָתָא וּלְפַצִידַיָא וּלְחֵילַיָא הָא אֲנָא מַיְתֵי עֲלֵיכוֹן דְקַטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא וְאוֹבִיד בָּמָתֵיכוֹן:

The phrase “וְתֵימַר טוּרֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל קַבִּילוּ פִתְגָמָא דַייָ אֱלֹהִים כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים לְטוּרַיָא וּלְרָמָתָא וּלְפַצִידַיָא וּלְחֵילַיָא הָא אֲנָא מַיְתֵי עֲלֵיכוֹן דְקַטְלִין בְּחַרְבָּא וְאוֹבִיד בָּמָתֵיכוֹן” can be translated as:

“And the tribes of Israel received the decree of the Lord God as follows: Thus says the Lord God to the tribes, to the heights, to the fortresses, and to the strongholds: Behold, I will bring upon you the sword and destroy your high places.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְתֵימַר (V’teimar): “And it is said” or “and it is proclaimed”
  • טוּרֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל (Turay Yisrael): “The tribes of Israel”
  • קַבִּילוּ (Kabilu): “Received” or “accepted”
  • פִתְגָמָא (P’tigama): “The decree” or “the word”
  • דַייָ אֱלֹהִים (Dai Elohim): “Of the Lord God”
  • כִּדְנַן אֲמַר (Kidnan Amar): “As said” or “as proclaimed”
  • יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (YHVH Elohim): “The Lord God”
  • לְטוּרַיָא (L’turayya): “To the tribes”
  • וּלְרָמָתָא (U’l’ramaata): “And to the heights” or “and to the elevated places”
  • וּלְפַצִידַיָא (U’l’fatsidaya): “And to the fortresses” or “and to the strongholds”
  • וּלְחֵילַיָא (U’l’cheilaiya): “And to the strongholds” or “and to the mighty”
  • הָא (Ha): “Behold”
  • אֲנָא (Ana): “I”
  • מַיְתֵי (Maytei): “Will bring” or “will bring about”
  • עֲלֵיכוֹן (Alei’chon): “Upon you”
  • דְקַטְלִין (D’katlin): “The sword” or “killing”
  • בְּחַרְבָּא (B’charba): “With the sword”
  • וְאוֹבִיד (V’ovid): “And destroy”
  • בָּמָתֵיכוֹן (Bamatekho): “Your high places” or “your high places”

This passage expresses a prophecy or decree from God concerning the tribes of Israel, stating that they will face destruction and devastation.

4 וְיִצְדוּן אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן וְיִתְבְּרוּן חֲנִיסְנְסֵיכוֹן וְאַרְמִי קְטִילֵיכוֹן קֳדָם פִּגוּר טַעֲוַתְכוֹן:

The phrase “וְיִצְדוּן אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן וְיִתְבְּרוּן חֲנִיסְנְסֵיכוֹן וְאַרְמִי קְטִילֵיכוֹן קֳדָם פִּגוּר טַעֲוַתְכוֹן” can be translated as:

“And your enemies will gather together and your fortifications will be breached, and your strongholds will be destroyed before the sight of your desires.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְיִצְדוּן (V’yitsdun): “And they will gather” or “and they will come together”
  • אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן (Egorayikhon): “Your enemies” (literally, “those who gather” or “those who surround”)
  • וְיִתְבְּרוּן (V’yitb’run): “And they will be breached” or “and they will be broken”
  • חֲנִיסְנְסֵיכוֹן (Ch’niss’neikhon): “Your fortifications” or “your strongholds”
  • וְאַרְמִי (V’ar’mi): “And your strongholds” or “and your fortresses”
  • קְטִילֵיכוֹן (K’tileik’on): “Will be destroyed” or “will be killed”
  • קֳדָם (Kodam): “Before” or “in front of”
  • פִּגוּר (Pigur): “The sight” or “the face”
  • טַעֲוַתְכוֹן (Ta’avat’k’on): “Of your desires” or “of your pleasures”

This passage conveys a prophecy where the enemies of the people will come together, their fortifications will be breached, and their strongholds will be destroyed. This will happen before their very eyes, in the face of their own desires or pleasures.

5 וְאֶתֵּן יַת פִּגְרֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל קֳדָם פִּגּוּר טַעֲוַתְהוֹן וַאֲבַדֵר יַת גַרְמֵיכוֹן סִחְרָנוּת אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן:

The phrase “וְאֶתֵּן יַת פִּגְרֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל קֳדָם פִּגּוּר טַעֲוַתְהוֹן וַאֲבַדֵר יַת גַרְמֵיכוֹן סִחְרָנוּת אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן” can be translated as:

“And I will place the corpses of the children of Israel before the sight of their desires, and I will destroy their remnants and their merchandise of their enemies.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְאֶתֵּן (V’et’en): “And I will place” or “and I will set”
  • יַת פִּגְרֵי (Yat pig’rei): “The corpses” or “the dead bodies”
  • בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל (B’nei Yisra’el): “The children of Israel”
  • קֳדָם (Kodam): “Before” or “in front of”
  • פִּגּוּר (Pigur): “The sight” or “the face”
  • טַעֲוַתְהוֹן (Ta’avat’he’on): “Of their desires” or “of their pleasures”
  • וַאֲבַדֵר (V’avad’er): “And I will destroy” or “and I will cause to perish”
  • יַת גַרְמֵיכוֹן (Yat gar’meikhon): “Their remnants” or “their remains”
  • סִחְרָנוּת (S’khar’nut): “The merchandise” or “the trade”
  • אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן (Egorayikhon): “Of their enemies” or “of those who surround them”

In this passage, there is a prophecy about placing the corpses of the children of Israel before the sight of their own desires and then destroying their remains and the goods associated with their enemies. This implies a severe judgment and destruction directed at the remnants of Israel and their adversaries’ possessions.

6 בְּכֵל מוֹתְבָנֵיכוֹן קִרְוַיָא יֶחֱרְבָן וּבְמָתָא יִצְדְיָן בְּדִיל דְיֶחֱרְבוּן וְיִצְדוּן אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן וְיִתְבְּרָן וְיִבְטְלָן טַעֲוַתְכוֹן וְיִתְקַטְפוּן חֲנִסְנְסֵיכוֹן וְיִתְמְחוּן עוֹבָדֵיכוֹן:

The phrase “בְּכֵל מוֹתְבָנֵיכוֹן קִרְוַיָא יֶחֱרְבָן וּבְמָתָא יִצְדְיָן בְּדִיל דְיֶחֱרְבוּן וְיִצְדוּן אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן וְיִתְבְּרָן וְיִבְטְלָן טַעֲוַתְכוֹן וְיִתְקַטְפוּן חֲנִסְנְסֵיכוֹן וְיִתְמְחוּן עוֹבָדֵיכוֹן” can be translated as:

“In all your habitations, the cities will be desolated, and in the land, they will be destroyed. This is because they will be desolated and their enemies will be gathered against them, and their desires will be eliminated. Their possessions will be seized and their servants will be exterminated.”

Here’s a breakdown of the passage:

  • בְּכֵל מוֹתְבָנֵיכוֹן (B’khel mot’vanekhon): “In all your habitations”
  • קִרְוַיָא (Kiruya): “The cities”
  • יֶחֱרְבָן (Y’kher’van): “Will be desolated” or “will be destroyed”
  • וּבְמָתָא (U’v’mata): “And in the land”
  • יִצְדְיָן (Yits’dyan): “They will be destroyed” or “they will be ruined”
  • בְּדִיל (B’dil): “Because” or “since”
  • דְיֶחֱרְבוּן (D’ykher’vun): “They will be desolated” or “they will be ruined”
  • וְיִצְדוּן (V’yits’dun): “And they will be gathered”
  • אֱגוֹרֵיכוֹן (Egorayikhon): “Their enemies” or “those who surround them”
  • וְיִתְבְּרָן (V’yit’bran): “And their desires will be eliminated”
  • וְיִבְטְלָן (V’yiv’tlan): “And will be abolished”
  • טַעֲוַתְכוֹן (Ta’avat’khon): “Their desires” or “their pleasures”
  • וְיִתְקַטְפוּן (V’yit’kaf’tun): “And they will be seized”
  • חֲנִסְנְסֵיכוֹן (Khanis’n’saykhon): “Their possessions”
  • וְיִתְמְחוּן (V’yitm’khun): “And they will be exterminated”
  • עוֹבָדֵיכוֹן (Ovadeikhon): “Their servants”

This passage describes a prophecy where cities and lands will be desolated and ruined, possessions will be seized, desires will be eliminated, and servants will be exterminated.

7 וְיִתְרְמוּן קְטִילִין בֵּינֵיכוֹן וְתֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ:

The phrase “וְיִתְרְמוּן קְטִילִין בֵּינֵיכוֹן וְתֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ” can be translated as:

“And there will be many killings among you, and you will know that I am the Lord.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְיִתְרְמוּן (V’yit’r’mun): “And there will be” or “and they will be”
  • קְטִילִין (K’tilin): “Killings” or “slaughters”
  • בֵּינֵיכוֹן (Beynayikhon): “Among you” or “between you”
  • וְתֵדְעוּן (V’ted’un): “And you will know”
  • אֲרֵי (Arei): “That” or “because”
  • אֲנָא (Ana): “I”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord” or “God”

The phrase implies that amidst a situation of many killings or slaughters, people will come to understand and recognize the authority or presence of the Lord.

8 וְאַשְׁאַר בְּמֶהֱוֵי לְכוֹן מְשֵׁזְבֵי חַרְבָּא בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא בְּאִתְבַּדָרוּתֵיכוֹן בִּמְדִינָתָא:

The phrase “וְאַשְׁאַר בְּמֶהֱוֵי לְכוֹן מְשֵׁזְבֵי חַרְבָּא בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא בְּאִתְבַּדָרוּתֵיכוֹן בִּמְדִינָתָא” can be translated as:

“And I will leave you as ruins, with swords among the nations, due to your abandonment in the land.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְאַשְׁאַר (V’ash’ar): “And I will leave” or “And I will make” (in the sense of leaving behind)
  • בְּמֶהֱוֵי (B’meh’avi): “As” or “in a state of”
  • לְכוֹן (L’khon): “For you” or “to you”
  • מְשֵׁזְבֵי (M’shezvei): “Ruins” or “desolations”
  • חַרְבָּא (Charba): “Sword” or “swords”
  • בֵּינֵי (Beynei): “Among” or “between”
  • עַמְמַיָא (Am’maya): “The nations”
  • בְּאִתְבַּדָרוּתֵיכוֹן (B’it’badu’taykhon): “Due to your abandonment” or “due to your forsaking”
  • בִּמְדִינָתָא (B’medinata): “In the land” or “in the country”

In context, this phrase suggests a dire consequence of abandonment or forsaking, where the people will be left in ruin, suffering under the threat of swords among other nations due to their abandonment of the land.

9 וְיִדְכְּרוּן מְשֵׁיזְבֵיכוֹן דְחַלְתִּי בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא דְאִשְׁתְּבִיאוּ לְתַמָן דִתְבַרֵית יַת לִבְּהוֹן טִפְּשָׁא דִסְטָא מִבָּתַר פּוּלְחָנִי וְיַת חֵיזוּ עֵינֵיהוֹן דִטְעָא בָּתַר טַעֲוַתְהוֹן וְיִדַנְקוּן וִיהוֹן חָזַן עַל בִּישְׁתָּא דַעֲבַדוּ לְכָל תּוֹעֲבַתְהוֹן:

The phrase “וְיִדְכְּרוּן מְשֵׁיזְבֵיכוֹן דְחַלְתִּי בֵּינֵי עַמְמַיָא דְאִשְׁתְּבִיאוּ לְתַמָן דִתְבַרֵית יַת לִבְּהוֹן טִפְּשָׁא דִסְטָא מִבָּתַר פּוּלְחָנִי וְיַת חֵיזוּ עֵינֵיהוֹן דִטְעָא בָּתַר טַעֲוַתְהוֹן וְיִדַנְקוּן וִיהוֹן חָזַן עַל בִּישְׁתָּא דַעֲבַדוּ לְכָל תּוֹעֲבַתְהוֹן” can be translated as:

“And they will remember their desolation among the nations where they brought themselves, due to their foolishness and the vanity of their service. Their eyes will be opened to their error, and they will be cleansed and see the evil they have done in all their abominations.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְיִדְכְּרוּן (V’yid’kru): “And they will remember”
  • מְשֵׁיזְבֵיכוֹן (M’sheizve’ikhon): “Their desolation” or “their ruin”
  • דְחַלְתִּי (D’khalti): “Of desolation” or “of ruin”
  • בֵּינֵי (Beynei): “Among” or “between”
  • עַמְמַיָא (Am’maya): “The nations”
  • דְאִשְׁתְּבִיאוּ (D’ish’tevi’u): “Where they brought themselves” or “where they went”
  • לְתַמָן (L’taman): “To there” or “to that place”
  • דִתְבַרֵית (D’tav’reit): “Due to their foolishness” or “because of their foolishness”
  • יַת לִבְּהוֹן (Yat lib’bohon): “Their heart” or “their understanding”
  • טִפְּשָׁא (Tip’sha): “Foolishness” or “stupidity”
  • דִסְטָא (D’sta): “Of vanity” or “of uselessness”
  • מִבָּתַר (Mi’bat’ar): “After” or “beyond”
  • פּוּלְחָנִי (Pul’chani): “Their service” or “their worship”
  • וְיַת חֵיזוּ (V’yat chizu): “And their vision” or “and their sight”
  • עֵינֵיהוֹן (Einei’hon): “Their eyes”
  • דִטְעָא (D’ta’a): “Of error” or “of mistake”
  • בָּתַר (Batar): “After” or “following”
  • טַעֲוַתְהוֹן (Ta’avat’hon): “Their desire” or “their error”
  • וְיִדַנְקוּן (V’yid’nkun): “And they will be cleansed” or “and they will be purged”
  • וִיהוֹן (V’yihon): “And they will see” or “and they will be”
  • חָזַן (Chazan): “Vision” or “will see”
  • עַל בִּישְׁתָּא (Al bish’ta): “The evil” or “the bad”
  • דַעֲבַדוּ (D’avad’u): “That they have done” or “that they did”
  • לְכָל (L’khol): “To all”
  • תּוֹעֲבַתְהוֹן (To’avat’hon): “Their abominations” or “their detestable acts”

In context, this passage describes a time of reckoning where people will realize the extent of their mistakes and wrongdoings, leading them to reflect on and cleanse their previous actions and errors.

10 וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ לָא לְמַגָן גְזֵרֵית בְּמֵימְרִי לְמֶעְבַּד לְהוֹן בִּישְׁתָּא הָדָא:

The phrase “וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ לָא לְמַגָן גְזֵרֵית בְּמֵימְרִי לְמֶעְבַּד לְהוֹן בִּישְׁתָּא הָדָא” can be translated as:

“And they will know that I, the Lord, do not protect my decree to allow them to act wickedly.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • וְיֵדְעוּן (V’yed’un): “And they will know”
  • אֲרֵי (Arei): “That” or “because”
  • אֲנָא (Ana): “I” or “I am”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord” (often translated as “Yehovah” or “the Lord”)
  • לָא (La): “Do not” or “will not”
  • לְמַגָן (L’magan): “Protect” or “defend”
  • גְזֵרֵית (G’zerit): “My decree” or “my judgment”
  • בְּמֵימְרִי (B’meimri): “In my word” or “in my declaration”
  • לְמֶעְבַּד (L’me’abad): “To allow” or “to let”
  • לְהוֹן (L’ hon): “Them” or “to them”
  • בִּישְׁתָּא (Bish’ta): “Wickedness” or “evil”
  • הָדָא (Hada): “This” or “that”

In context, this passage emphasizes that God does not permit or tolerate wicked behavior despite any decrees or declarations. It underscores a divine standard of justice where wrongdoing is not condoned.

11 כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים טְפַּח בִּידָךְ וּרְפוֹס בְּרַגְלָךְ וַאֲמַר וַי עַל כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָא בִּישְׁתָא בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל דִי בְּחַרְבָּא בְּכַפְנָא וּבְמוֹתָא יִתְרְמוּן:

The phrase “כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים טְפַּח בִּידָךְ וּרְפוֹס בְּרַגְלָךְ וַאֲמַר וַי עַל כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָא בִּישְׁתָא בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל דִי בְּחַרְבָּא בְּכַפְנָא וּבְמוֹתָא יִתְרְמוּן” can be translated as:

“As the Lord God has said, ‘Strike with your hand and trample with your feet,’ and He has said ‘Woe’ to all the abominations of wickedness in the house of Israel that will be punished with sword, with violence, and with death.”

Here’s a breakdown of the phrase:

  • כִּדְנַן (Kidnan): “As” or “according to”
  • אֲמַר (Amar): “Said”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord”
  • אֱלֹהִים (Elohim): “God”
  • טְפַּח (T’pach): “Strike” or “hit”
  • בִּידָךְ (B’yadcha): “With your hand”
  • וּרְפוֹס (U’refosh): “And trample” or “and step”
  • בְּרַגְלָךְ (B’raglecha): “With your feet”
  • וַאֲמַר (Va’amar): “And He said”
  • וַי (Vay): “Woe” or “Alas”
  • עַל (Al): “To” or “upon”
  • כָּל (Kol): “All”
  • תּוֹעֲבָתָא (To’avat): “Abominations” or “wickedness”
  • בִּישְׁתָא (Bish’ta): “Wickedness” or “evil”
  • בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל (Beit Yisrael): “House of Israel”
  • דִי (Di): “That”
  • בְּחַרְבָּא (B’charev): “With sword”
  • בְּכַפְנָא (B’kafna): “With violence” or “with punishment”
  • וּבְמוֹתָא (U’b’motah): “And with death”
  • יִתְרְמוּן (Yitremun): “They will be punished” or “they will be afflicted”

In this context, the phrase is a powerful proclamation from God about the severe consequences that await the abominations and wickedness within the house of Israel. It signifies the divine judgment and the severe punishment that will be meted out.

12 דְרָחִיק בְּמוֹתָא יְמוּת וּדְקָרִיב בְּחַרְבָּא יִתְקְטֵיל וּדְיִשְׁתְּאַר וּדְיֵעוֹל לִכְרַכֵּי צַיְרָא בְּכַפְנָא יְמוּת וְיָחוּל רוּגְזִי בְּהוֹן:

The phrase “דְרָחִיק בְּמוֹתָא יְמוּת וּדְקָרִיב בְּחַרְבָּא יִתְקְטֵיל וּדְיִשְׁתְּאַר וּדְיֵעוֹל לִכְרַכֵּי צַיְרָא בְּכַפְנָא יְמוּת וְיָחוּל רוּגְזִי בְּהוֹן” translates to:

“Those who are distant will die by death, and those who are near will be killed by the sword. Those who remain and those who enter the regions of the wicked will die by violence, and my wrath will be poured out upon them.”

Here is the breakdown:

  • דְרָחִיק (D’rachik): “Those who are distant”
  • בְּמוֹתָא (B’motah): “By death”
  • יְמוּת (Y’mut): “Will die”
  • וּדְקָרִיב (U’d’kariv): “And those who are near” or “and those who come near”
  • בְּחַרְבָּא (B’charev): “By the sword”
  • יִתְקְטֵיל (Yitkatel): “Will be killed” or “will be slain”
  • וּדְיִשְׁתְּאַר (U’d’yish’tar): “And those who remain” or “and those who are left”
  • וּדְיֵעוֹל (U’d’ye’ul): “And those who enter” or “and those who go to”
  • לִכְרַכֵּי (L’khrakei): “The regions of” or “the circles of”
  • צַיְרָא (Tza’ira): “Wicked” or “evil”
  • בְּכַפְנָא (B’kafna): “By violence” or “by punishment”
  • יְמוּת (Y’mut): “Will die”
  • וְיָחוּל (V’yachul): “And will endure” or “and will experience”
  • רוּגְזִי (Rugzi): “My wrath”
  • בְּהוֹן (B’he’on): “Upon them”

This proclamation describes the severe and diverse punishments that will be inflicted based on proximity and actions, highlighting a comprehensive divine judgment where both distant and near individuals will face different forms of punishment.

13 וְתִדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ בְּמֶהֱוֵי קְטִילֵיהוֹן בְּגוֹ פִּגוּר טַעֲוַתְהוֹן סַחֲרָנוּת אִגוֹרֵיהוֹן עַל כָּל רָמָא מְנַטְלָא בְּכָל רֵישֵׁי טוּרַיָא תְּחוֹת כָּל אִילָן עַבּוּף וּתְחוֹת כָּל בּוּטְמָא מְעַפְיָא אֲתַר דִיהַבוּ תַמָן קוּרְבָּנִין לְפוּלְחַן לְכָל טַעֲוַתְהוֹן:

The phrase “וְתִדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ בְּמֶהֱוֵי קְטִילֵיהוֹן בְּגוֹ פִּגוּר טַעֲוַתְהוֹן סַחֲרָנוּת אִגוֹרֵיהוֹן עַל כָּל רָמָא מְנַטְלָא בְּכָל רֵישֵׁי טוּרַיָא תְּחוֹת כָּל אִילָן עַבּוּף וּתְחוֹת כָּל בּוּטְמָא מְעַפְיָא אֲתַר דִיהַבוּ תַמָן קוּרְבָּנִין לְפוּלְחַן לְכָל טַעֲוַתְהוֹן” translates to:

“And you will know that I, the Lord, will kill them in the midst of their depravity, their wickedness, and their idolatry. They will be punished on every high place, under every lofty tree, and under every thick oak where they offered their sacrifices for their idol worship and all their abominations.”

Here’s the breakdown:

  • וְתִדְעוּן (V’tid’un): “And you will know”
  • אֲרֵי אֲנָא (Arei anah): “That I”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord”
  • בְּמֶהֱוֵי (B’mehvei): “Will kill” or “will destroy”
  • קְטִילֵיהוֹן (K’tileihon): “Them” (those who are to be punished)
  • בְּגוֹ (B’go): “In the midst of”
  • פִּגוּר (Pigur): “Their depravity” or “their corruption”
  • טַעֲוַתְהוֹן (Ta’avat’hon): “Their abominations” or “their wickedness”
  • סַחֲרָנוּת (S’charanut): “Their idolatry” or “their worship”
  • אִגוֹרֵיהוֹן (Igor’eihon): “Their places of worship” or “their high places”
  • עַל כָּל רָמָא (Al kol rama): “On every high place”
  • מְנַטְלָא (M’nat’la): “Where they have lifted up” or “where they have raised”
  • בְּכָל רֵישֵׁי (B’chol reishai): “Under every lofty”
  • טוּרַיָא (Turayya): “Tree” or “oak”
  • תְּחוֹת (T’khot): “Under”
  • כָּל אִילָן (Kol ilan): “Every tree”
  • עַבּוּף (Avuf): “Thick” or “lofty”
  • וּתְחוֹת (U’t’khot): “And under”
  • כָּל בּוּטְמָא (Kol butma): “Every thick oak” or “every high place”
  • מְעַפְיָא (M’afiya): “Where they offered” or “where they performed”
  • אֲתַר (Ater): “The place” or “the location”
  • דִיהַבוּ (Dihavu): “Where they have offered”
  • תַמָן (Taman): “There”
  • קוּרְבָּנִין (Kurbannin): “Sacrifices”
  • לְפוּלְחַן (L’pulhan): “For their idol worship”
  • לְכָל טַעֲוַתְהוֹן (L’chol ta’avat’hon): “For all their abominations”

This proclamation outlines the extent of divine retribution, emphasizing that punishment will be meted out in places of idolatry and high places where sacrifices and abominations were committed.

14 וְאָרִים יַת מְחַת גְבוּרְתִּי עֲלֵיהוֹן וְאֶתֵּן יַת אַרְעָא לְצָדוּ וְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ מִמִדְבַּר דִבְלָת בְּכָל מוֹתְבָנֵיהוֹן וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ:

The phrase “וְאָרִים יַת מְחַת גְבוּרְתִּי עֲלֵיהוֹן וְאֶתֵּן יַת אַרְעָא לְצָדוּ וְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ מִמִדְבַּר דִבְלָת בְּכָל מוֹתְבָנֵיהוֹן וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ” translates to:

“And I will raise up the might of my strength against them, and I will give the land to desolation. They will be destroyed from the wilderness of the desert in all their places of settlement, and they will know that I am the Lord.”

Here’s the breakdown:

  • וְאָרִים (V’ariym): “And I will raise up” or “and I will uplift”
  • יַת מְחַת (Yat m’khat): “The might” or “the terror”
  • גְבוּרְתִּי (G’vurti): “Of my strength” or “my power”
  • עֲלֵיהוֹן (Aleihem): “Against them”
  • וְאֶתֵּן (V’et’en): “And I will give” or “and I will put”
  • יַת אַרְעָא (Yat ar’a): “The land”
  • לְצָדוּ (L’tzadu): “To desolation” or “to waste”
  • וְאִשְׁתְּמָמוּ (V’ishtemammu): “And they will be destroyed” or “and they will be devastated”
  • מִמִדְבַּר (Mi-midbar): “From the wilderness”
  • דִבְלָת (D’vlat): “Of the desert” or “of the wasteland”
  • בְּכָל (B’chol): “In all”
  • מוֹתְבָנֵיהוֹן (Mot’vaneihon): “Their places of settlement” or “their dwellings”
  • וְיֵדְעוּן (V’yed’un): “And they will know”
  • אֲרֵי (Arei): “That”
  • אֲנָא (Ana): “I”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord”

This message conveys that divine intervention will bring about destruction and desolation upon the people, causing them to realize and acknowledge the power of the Lord.

Ezekiel 7 (against the land of Israel)

1 וַהֲוָה פִּתְגָם נְבוּאָה מִן קֳדָם יְיָ עִמִי לְמֵימָר:

The phrase “וַהֲוָה פִּתְגָם נְבוּאָה מִן קֳדָם יְיָ עִמִי לְמֵימָר” translates to:

“And this is a prophetic saying from before the Lord with me to declare.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וַהֲוָה (V’havah): “And this is” or “and it is”
  • פִּתְגָם (Pitgam): “A saying” or “a proclamation”
  • נְבוּאָה (Nevu’ah): “Prophecy” or “prophetic”
  • מִן (Min): “From”
  • קֳדָם (Kodam): “Before” or “in front of”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord”
  • עִמִי (Immi): “With me”
  • לְמֵימָר (L’meimar): “To declare” or “to proclaim”

The phrase indicates that the message or prophecy being conveyed is directly from the Lord and is intended to be declared or proclaimed.

2 וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים לְאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל קִצָא מְטָא מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת קִצָא לְמֵיתֵי עַל אַרְבַּע רוּחֵי אַרְעָא:

The phrase “וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים לְאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל קִצָא מְטָא מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת קִצָא לְמֵיתֵי עַל אַרְבַּע רוּחֵי אַרְעָא” translates to:

“And you, son of man, as the Lord God has said to the land of Israel: The end has come, the end has come upon the four corners of the land.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וְאַתְּ בַּר אָדָם (V’atah bar adam): “And you, son of man”
  • כִּדְנַן (Kidnan): “As” or “just as”
  • אֲמַר (Amar): “Said”
  • יְיָ (YHVH): “The Lord”
  • אֱלֹהִים (Elohim): “God”
  • לְאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל (L’ara d’Yisrael): “To the land of Israel”
  • קִצָא (Kitsah): “End” or “termination”
  • מְטָא (M’ta): “Has come”
  • מְטַת (M’tat): “Upon”
  • פּוּרְעֲנוּת (Pur’anut): “Punishment” or “retribution”
  • קִצָא (Kitsah): “End”
  • לְמֵיתֵי (L’meti): “To come” or “to befall”
  • עַל (Al): “Upon” or “on”
  • אַרְבַּע רוּחֵי אַרְעָא (Arba ruchei ara): “The four corners of the land”

The phrase conveys a prophetic message declaring that the end or final judgment is imminent for the land of Israel, affecting all corners of the land.

3 כְּעַן מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת קִצָא לְמֵיתֵי עֲלָךְ וְאֶשְׁלַח רוּגְזִי בִּיךְ וְאִתְפְּרַע מִנִיךְ כְּאוֹרְחָתַיִךְ וְאֶתֵּן עֲלָךְ יַת כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ:

The phrase “כְּעַן מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת קִצָא לְמֵיתֵי עֲלָךְ וְאֶשְׁלַח רוּגְזִי בִּיךְ וְאִתְפְּרַע מִנִיךְ כְּאוֹרְחָתַיִךְ וְאֶתֵּן עֲלָךְ יַת כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ” can be translated as follows:

“Now, the end of retribution has come to befall you, and I will send my fury against you. I will execute judgment upon you according to your ways and will give you the recompense for all your abominations.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • כְּעַן (K’aan): “Now”
  • מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת (M’tat pur’anut): “The end of retribution” or “the termination of punishment”
  • קִצָא (Kitsah): “Has come”
  • לְמֵיתֵי (L’meti): “To befall” or “to come upon”
  • עֲלָךְ (Alaikh): “Upon you”
  • וְאֶשְׁלַח (V’eshlach): “And I will send”
  • רוּגְזִי (Rugzi): “My fury” or “my anger”
  • בִּיךְ (Bich): “Against you”
  • וְאִתְפְּרַע (V’it’per’a): “And I will execute judgment”
  • מִנִיךְ (Minikh): “From you” or “upon you”
  • כְּאוֹרְחָתַיִךְ (K’orchateikh): “According to your ways”
  • וְאֶתֵּן (V’et’en): “And I will give”
  • עֲלָךְ (Alaikh): “Upon you”
  • יַת כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ (Yat kol to’avatayikh): “All your abominations” or “all your detestable practices”

This statement indicates that divine retribution is imminent, with judgment being meted out based on the individual’s actions and the severity of their transgressions.

4 וְלָא יְחוּס מֵימְרִי עֲלָךְ וְלָא אֶרְחַם אֲרֵי חוֹב אוֹרְחָתָיִךְ עֲלָךְ אֶתֵּן וּפוּרְעֲנוּת תּוֹעֲבָתַיִךְ בְּגַוִיךְ יֶהֶוְיָן וְתֵידְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ:

The phrase “וְלָא יְחוּס מֵימְרִי עֲלָךְ וְלָא אֶרְחַם אֲרֵי חוֹב אוֹרְחָתָיִךְ עֲלָךְ אֶתֵּן וּפוּרְעֲנוּת תּוֹעֲבָתַיִךְ בְּגַוִיךְ יֶהֶוְיָן וְתֵידְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ” can be translated as follows:

“And I will not spare my word against you, nor will I have mercy. For I will repay according to your ways, and I will give retribution for your abominations within you. You will know that I am the Lord.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וְלָא יְחוּס מֵימְרִי עֲלָךְ (V’la y’chus meimri alakh): “And I will not spare my word against you”
  • וְלָא אֶרְחַם (V’la erham): “Nor will I have mercy”
  • אֲרֵי (Arei): “For” or “because”
  • חוֹב (Chov): “According to” or “the debt of”
  • אוֹרְחָתָיִךְ (Orchateikh): “Your ways”
  • עֲלָךְ אֶתֵּן (Alaikh et’en): “Upon you, I will give”
  • וּפוּרְעֲנוּת (U’pur’anut): “Retribution”
  • תּוֹעֲבָתַיִךְ (To’avatayikh): “Your abominations”
  • בְּגַוִיךְ (B’gavikh): “Within you”
  • יֶהֶוְיָן (Y’hevyan): “It will be”
  • וְתֵידְעוּן (V’teid’un): “And you will know”
  • אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ (Arei ana Adonai): “That I am the Lord”

This statement conveys a strong message of judgment and retribution, indicating that divine mercy will not be extended, and justice will be meted out strictly according to one’s actions and deeds. The speaker emphasizes that this is a definitive pronouncement from God, reinforcing the certainty of the judgment to come.

5 כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים בִּישְׁתָא בָּתַר בִּישְׁתָא הָא אַתְיָא:

The phrase “כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים בִּישְׁתָא בָּתַר בִּישְׁתָא הָא אַתְיָא” translates to:

“As the Lord God has said: ‘Evil will follow evil; this is what is coming.'”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים (Kidnan amar Adonai Elohim): “As the Lord God has said”
  • בִּישְׁתָא בָּתַר בִּישְׁתָא (Bish’ta batar bish’ta): “Evil will follow evil” or “Evil will come after evil”
  • הָא אַתְיָא (Ha at’yah): “This is what is coming” or “This is what will happen”

This statement indicates a declaration of impending consequences where one form of evil will follow or lead to further evil, emphasizing a cycle or pattern of judgment.

6 קִצָא מְטָא מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת קִיצָא לְמֵיתֵי עֲלַךְ הָא אַתְיָא:

The phrase “קִצָא מְטָא מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת קִיצָא לְמֵיתֵי עֲלַךְ הָא אַתְיָא” translates to:

“The end of the measure of punishment is coming upon you; this is what will happen.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • קִצָא מְטָא (Kitz’a mata): “The end of the measure”
  • מְטַת פּוּרְעֲנוּת (Mitat puranut): “Of punishment” or “Of retribution”
  • קִיצָא לְמֵיתֵי עֲלַךְ (Kitz’a l’meitei alach): “Is coming upon you” or “Is about to befall you”
  • הָא אַתְיָא (Ha at’yah): “This is what will happen” or “This is what is coming”

This phrase indicates that the period or extent of punishment is reaching its conclusion and will soon be realized or experienced.

7 אִתְגְלִיאַת מַלְכוּתָא עֲלָךְ יָתֵיב אַרְעָא מְטָא עִדַן תְּבִירַת קָרֵיב יוֹם אִתְרְגוּשָׁא וְלֵית לְאִשְׁתֵּיזָבָא בִּמְצָדֵי טוּרַיָא:

The phrase “אִתְגְלִיאַת מַלְכוּתָא עֲלָךְ יָתֵיב אַרְעָא מְטָא עִדַן תְּבִירַת קָרֵיב יוֹם אִתְרְגוּשָׁא וְלֵית לְאִשְׁתֵּיזָבָא בִּמְצָדֵי טוּרַיָא” translates to:

“The revelation of the kingship is upon you; the land will remain until now, and the time of destruction is near. There is no place to escape in the fortresses of the towers.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • אִתְגְלִיאַת מַלְכוּתָא (It’gali’at malkhuta): “The revelation of the kingship” or “The unveiling of sovereignty”
  • עֲלָךְ (Alach): “Upon you”
  • יָתֵיב אַרְעָא (Yateiv ar’a): “The land will remain” or “The land will stay”
  • מְטָא עִדַן (Mata iddan): “Until now” or “Until the present”
  • תְּבִירַת קָרֵיב יוֹם (Tevirat kariv yom): “The time of destruction is near” or “The day of destruction is close”
  • אִתְרְגוּשָׁא (It’rgusha): “The time of tumult” or “The period of upheaval”
  • וְלֵית לְאִשְׁתֵּיזָבָא (V’leit l’ishtizava): “There is no place to escape”
  • בִּמְצָדֵי טוּרַיָא (B’metsadei turayya): “In the fortresses of the towers” or “In the strongholds of the towers”

This phrase suggests that the divine sovereignty is manifesting, and the land will endure until the time of imminent destruction. It also implies that there will be no refuge from this calamity, even in fortified places.

8 כְּעַן מִקָרֵיב אֶשְׁפּוֹךְ חֵימְתִי עֲלָךְ וְיֵחוֹל רוּגְזִי בִּיךְ וְאִתְפְּרַע מִנִיךְ כְּאוֹרְחָתָיִךְ וְאֶתֵּן עֲלָךְ יַת כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ:

The phrase “כְּעַן מִקָרֵיב אֶשְׁפּוֹךְ חֵימְתִי עֲלָךְ וְיֵחוֹל רוּגְזִי בִּיךְ וְאִתְפְּרַע מִנִיךְ כְּאוֹרְחָתָיִךְ וְאֶתֵּן עֲלָךְ יַת כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ” can be translated as:

“Now I will pour out my fury upon you, and my anger will be kindled against you. I will take retribution from you according to your deeds and will deliver upon you all your abominations.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • כְּעַן (Ke’aan): “Now” or “At this time”
  • מִקָרֵיב (Mikarev): “I will pour out” or “I will bring near”
  • אֶשְׁפּוֹךְ חֵימְתִי (Eshp’och cheimti): “My fury” or “My wrath”
  • עֲלָךְ (Alech): “Upon you”
  • וְיֵחוֹל רוּגְזִי בִּיךְ (Ve’yechol rugzi be’cha): “And my anger will be kindled against you”
  • וְאִתְפְּרַע מִנִיךְ (Ve’it’pareh mi’necha): “I will take retribution from you” or “I will exact punishment from you”
  • כְּאוֹרְחָתָיִךְ (Ke’orchatayich): “According to your deeds” or “According to your ways”
  • וְאֶתֵּן עֲלָךְ (Ve’eten alech): “And I will deliver upon you”
  • יַת כָּל תּוֹעֲבָתָיִךְ (Yat kol to’avatayich): “All your abominations” or “All your abominations”

In summary, this phrase is a declaration of impending punishment and divine retribution for the wrongdoings and abominations of the individual or group being addressed. It reflects a strong and uncompromising stance on justice and the consequences of moral failings.

9 וְלָא תְחוֹס מֵימְרִי וְלָא אֶרְחִים כְּחוֹבֵי אוֹרְחָתַיִךְ עֲלָךְ אֶתֵּן וּפוּרְעֲנוּת תּוֹעֲבָתַיִךְ בְּגַוִיךְ יֶהֱוְיָן וְתִדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ אַיְתֵיתִי עֲלֵיכוֹן מְחָא:

The phrase “וְלָא תְחוֹס מֵימְרִי וְלָא אֶרְחִים כְּחוֹבֵי אוֹרְחָתַיִךְ עֲלָךְ אֶתֵּן וּפוּרְעֲנוּת תּוֹעֲבָתַיִךְ בְּגַוִיךְ יֶהֱוְיָן וְתִדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ אַיְתֵיתִי עֲלֵיכוֹן מְחָא” translates to:

“And I will not spare my words, nor will I be lenient. According to the severity of your ways, I will bring upon you punishment and retribution for your abominations. You will know that I, the Lord, have decreed this against you with fierce anger.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וְלָא תְחוֹס מֵימְרִי (V’lo tachus meimri): “And I will not spare my words” or “And I will not withhold my words”
  • וְלָא אֶרְחִים (V’lo erchim): “Nor will I be lenient” or “And I will not be merciful”
  • כְּחוֹבֵי אוֹרְחָתַיִךְ (K’cho’bei orchateich): “According to the severity of your ways” or “According to the harshness of your conduct”
  • עֲלָךְ (Alech): “Upon you”
  • אֶתֵּן (Et’en): “I will bring” or “I will give”
  • וּפוּרְעֲנוּת תּוֹעֲבָתַיִךְ (U’pur’anut to’avatayich): “And retribution for your abominations”
  • בְּגַוִיךְ (B’gavich): “In your midst” or “Within you”
  • יֶהֱוְיָן (Yeh’yevan): “Will be” or “Will happen”
  • וְתִדְעוּן (V’tid’un): “And you will know”
  • אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ (Arei ana Adonai): “That I, the Lord”
  • אַיְתֵיתִי עֲלֵיכוֹן מְחָא (Ayetiti aleichem mecha): “Have decreed this against you with fierce anger”

This phrase emphasizes that the divine punishment will be severe and without leniency, reflecting the seriousness of the recipient’s actions and the intense anger of the speaker.

10 הָא יוֹם פּוּרְעֲנוּתָא מְטָא הָא אַתְיָא אִתְגְלִיאַת מַלְכוּתָא צְמַח שׁוּלְטָנָא הוֹפַע רַשִׁיעָא:

The phrase “הָא יוֹם פּוּרְעֲנוּתָא מְטָא הָא אַתְיָא אִתְגְלִיאַת מַלְכוּתָא צְמַח שׁוּלְטָנָא הוֹפַע רַשִׁיעָא” can be translated to:

“This day, retribution has arrived, for this is the day when the kingdom’s rule is manifest, and the wicked are revealed.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • הָא יוֹם פּוּרְעֲנוּתָא (Ha yom pur’anuta): “This day of retribution” or “This day of punishment”
  • מְטָא (Mita): “Has arrived” or “Has come”
  • הָא אַתְיָא (Ha at’ya): “For this is the day” or “This is the coming”
  • אִתְגְלִיאַת מַלְכוּתָא (Itg’li’at malkhuta): “The manifestation of the kingdom” or “The revealing of the sovereignty”
  • צְמַח שׁוּלְטָנָא (Tz’mach shultan): “The growth of rule” or “The rise of dominion”
  • הוֹפַע רַשִׁיעָא (Hofa’a rish’ya): “The revealing of the wicked” or “The exposure of the evil”

In summary, this phrase indicates that the day of retribution has come, bringing with it the manifestation of divine sovereignty and the exposure of wickedness. It suggests a time of significant judgment and the revelation of both divine authority and moral corruption.

11 חֲטוֹפִין קָמוּ לְמִסְעַר רַשִׁיעִין לָא מִנְהוֹן וְלָא מְאִתְרְגוּשְׁתְּהוֹן וְלָא מִבְּנֵיהוֹן וְלָא מִבְּנֵי בְּנֵיהוֹן:

The phrase “חֲטוֹפִין קָמוּ לְמִסְעַר רַשִׁיעִין לָא מִנְהוֹן וְלָא מְאִתְרְגוּשְׁתְּהוֹן וְלָא מִבְּנֵיהוֹן וְלָא מִבְּנֵי בְּנֵיהוֹן” translates to:

“The sinners have risen for judgment. They do not escape, neither by their own merit, nor by their repentance, nor by their children, nor by the children of their children.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • חֲטוֹפִין (Chatofin): “Sinners” or “wrongdoers”
  • קָמוּ (Kamu): “Have risen” or “stand”
  • לְמִסְעַר (Le’mis’ar): “For judgment”
  • רַשִׁיעִין (Rashiin): “Sinners” or “evildoers”
  • לָא מִנְהוֹן (Lo min’hon): “Do not escape” or “are not spared”
  • וְלָא מְאִתְרְגוּשְׁתְּהוֹן (Ve’lo me’it’rog’sh’thon): “Nor by their repentance” or “nor by their remorse”
  • וְלָא מִבְּנֵיהוֹן (Ve’lo mi’benayhon): “Nor by their children”
  • וְלָא מִבְּנֵי בְּנֵיהוֹן (Ve’lo mi’benay b’neihon): “Nor by the children of their children”

In essence, this passage conveys that the sinners cannot escape judgment through their own actions, repentance, or through the intercession of their descendants. The message emphasizes that the consequences of their actions are inescapable and will not be mitigated by any external means.

12 מְטָא עִדָן תּוּשְׁלְמַת חוֹבִין קָרִיב יוֹם פּוּרְעֲנוּת חֶטְאִין זָבְנָא לָא יֶחֱדֵי וּמְזוֹבְנָא לָא יִדְוֵי אֲרֵי רְגַז מִן קֳדָמַי עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן:

The phrase “מְטָא עִדָן תּוּשְׁלְמַת חוֹבִין קָרִיב יוֹם פּוּרְעֲנוּת חֶטְאִין זָבְנָא לָא יֶחֱדֵי וּמְזוֹבְנָא לָא יִדְוֵי אֲרֵי רְגַז מִן קֳדָמַי עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן” can be translated as:

“At this time, the payment of debts is due. The day of punishment for sins is near. The sinners will not escape, and the payment will not be deferred, for anger is coming from before me against all their repentance.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • מְטָא עִדָן (Mita idan): “At this time” or “at the appointed time”
  • תוּשְׁלְמַת חוֹבִין (Tush’lem’at chovin): “The payment of debts” or “the settlement of debts”
  • קָרִיב יוֹם (Kariv yom): “The day is near”
  • פּוּרְעֲנוּת (Puri’anut): “Punishment” or “retribution”
  • חֶטְאִין (Cheta’in): “Sins” or “transgressions”
  • זָבְנָא (Zav’na): “Will not escape” or “will not be spared”
  • לָא יֶחֱדֵי (Lo yech’dei): “Will not be deferred” or “will not be postponed”
  • וּמְזוֹבְנָא (U’mezov’na): “And the payment” or “and the recompense”
  • לָא יִדְוֵי (Lo yid’vei): “Will not be delayed” or “will not be deferred”
  • אֲרֵי (Arei): “For” or “because”
  • רְגַז מִן קֳדָמַי (Regaz min kodami): “Anger from before me” or “my anger”
  • עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן (Al kol it’rog’sha’thon): “Against all their repentance” or “against all their remorse”

In summary, the passage emphasizes that the time for retribution and judgment is imminent. The payment for sins cannot be postponed, and no amount of repentance will prevent the impending punishment.

13 אֲרֵי מְזוֹבְנָא לִזְבִינָא לָא יְתוּב וְעַד דְאִינוּן חַיָן יִרְדִינוּן בִּגְוִיָתְהוֹן אֲרֵי נְבִיַיָא מִתְנַבָּן עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן לְמֵיתַב בִּתְיוּבְתָּא וְלָא תָיְבִין גְבַר בְּחוֹבֵי נַפְשֵׁיהּ מִתְרְעָן וְעַד דְאִינוּן קַיָמִין בִּתְיוּבְתָּא לָא מִתַּקְפִין:

The passage “אֲרֵי מְזוֹבְנָא לִזְבִינָא לָא יְתוּב וְעַד דְאִינוּן חַיָן יִרְדִינוּן בִּגְוִיָתְהוֹן אֲרֵי נְבִיַיָא מִתְנַבָּן עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן לְמֵיתַב בִּתְיוּבְתָּא וְלָא תָיְבִין גְבַר בְּחוֹבֵי נַפְשֵׁיהּ מִתְרְעָן וְעַד דְאִינוּן קַיָמִין בִּתְיוּבְתָּא לָא מִתַּקְפִין” can be translated and understood as:

“Because the payment (or recompense) cannot be deferred, and until they (the sinners) are alive, they will be punished in their bodies. Prophets have been prophesying about all their repentance, and no man will understand the value of his soul. As long as they persist in their repentance, they will not be spared.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • אֲרֵי (Arei): “Because” or “for”
  • מְזוֹבְנָא לִזְבִינָא (Mezov’na liz’bina): “The payment” or “the recompense” (referring to debts or sins) “cannot be deferred” or “cannot be delayed”
  • לָא יְתוּב (Lo yetuv): “Will not be postponed” or “will not be alleviated”
  • וְעַד דְאִינוּן חַיָן (Ve’ad d’inun chayyan): “Until they (the sinners) are alive”
  • יִרְדִינוּן בִּגְוִיָתְהוֹן (Yirdinu’n b’giv’yat’hon): “They will be punished in their bodies”
  • אֲרֵי נְבִיַיָא (Arei nevi’aya): “Because the prophets”
  • מִתְנַבָּן (Mit’nab’n): “Have been prophesying”
  • עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן (Al kol it’rog’shat’hon): “About all their repentance” or “concerning all their acts of repentance”
  • לְמֵיתַב בִּתְיוּבְתָּא (L’meitav b’tiyuv’ta): “To be of benefit” or “to improve their situation”
  • וְלָא תָיְבִין (Ve’lo tayvin): “And no man will understand”
  • גְבַר בְּחוֹבֵי נַפְשֵׁיהוֹן (Gever b’cho’vei naf’shei): “The value of his soul”
  • מִתְרְעָן (Mit’ra’an): “Will understand” or “will grasp”
  • וְעַד דְאִינוּן (Ve’ad d’inun): “And as long as they”
  • קַיָמִין בִּתְיוּבְתָּא (K’aimin b’tiyuv’ta): “Persist in their repentance”
  • לָא מִתַּקְפִין (Lo mit’kafin): “Will not be spared” or “will not be forgiven”

In summary, this passage suggests that the payment for sins cannot be deferred, and as long as people remain alive, they will be punished for their actions. Despite the prophets’ warnings and the efforts of repentance, individuals will not escape their punishment if they persist in their wrongdoings.

14 נַפְקִין בְּאַצְוָחַת קַרְנָא מִתַקְנִין בְּמָנֵי זְיָנָא וְלֵית דְאָזִיל לִקְרָבָא אֲרֵי רְגַז מִן קֳדָמַי עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן:

The passage “נַפְקִין בְּאַצְוָחַת קַרְנָא מִתַקְנִין בְּמָנֵי זְיָנָא וְלֵית דְאָזִיל לִקְרָבָא אֲרֵי רְגַז מִן קֳדָמַי עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן” can be translated and interpreted as follows:

“They (the sinners) will be punished severely, like being struck with the horn of a wild animal. They will be repaired through various means of punishment, and no one will be able to seek reconciliation because of the rage from before me for all their deeds.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • נַפְקִין בְּאַצְוָחַת קַרְנָא (Nafqin b’atz’chat karn’a): “They (the sinners) will be punished severely” or “will be struck with the horn” (referring metaphorically to severe punishment)
  • מִתַקְנִין בְּמָנֵי זְיָנָא (Mit’k’nin b’manei z’yan’a): “Will be repaired through various means” or “corrected through various methods”
  • וְלֵית דְאָזִיל לִקְרָבָא (Ve’leith d’azil li’krava): “And no one will be able to seek reconciliation” or “And no one will be able to come close” (to seek forgiveness)
  • אֲרֵי רְגַז מִן קֳדָמַי (Arei rgaz min kodamai): “Because of the rage from before me” (referring to divine anger)
  • עַל כָּל אִתְרְגוּשַׁתְהוֹן (Al kol it’rog’shat’hon): “For all their deeds” or “concerning all their actions”

In summary, the passage conveys that the punishment for sinners will be harsh and comprehensive, with no possibility of reconciliation due to the divine wrath for their actions.

15 חַרְבָּא מִלְבָרָא וּמוֹתָא וְכַפְנָא מִלְגָיו דִבְחַקְלָא בְּחַרְבָּא יִתְקְטֵיל וְדִי בְקַרְתָּא כַּפְנָא וּמוֹתָא יְשֵׁיצִינֵיהּ:

The passage “חַרְבָּא מִלְבָרָא וּמוֹתָא וְכַפְנָא מִלְגָיו דִבְחַקְלָא בְּחַרְבָּא יִתְקְטֵיל וְדִי בְקַרְתָּא כַּפְנָא וּמוֹתָא יְשֵׁיצִינֵיהּ” can be translated and understood as follows:

“The sword (will be) from outside, and death and famine (will come) from within. Those who are smitten by the sword will be killed, and those who are afflicted by famine and death will be sustained.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • חַרְבָּא מִלְבָרָא (Charba mil’bara): “The sword from outside” — This suggests external violence or attack.
  • וּמוֹתָא וְכַפְנָא מִלְגָיו (U’mot’a v’chapna mil’gav): “And death and famine from within” — This refers to internal suffering or scarcity.
  • דִבְחַקְלָא בְּחַרְבָּא יִתְקְטֵיל (D’v’chakla b’charba yit’katil): “Those who are smitten by the sword will be killed” — Indicates that those struck by external violence will die.
  • וְדִי בְקַרְתָּא כַּפְנָא וּמוֹתָא יְשֵׁיצִינֵיהּ (U’di b’kart’a chapna u’mot’a y’sheitzin): “And those afflicted by famine and death will be sustained” — Suggests that those suffering from internal conditions will be kept alive, possibly referring to a form of prolonged suffering.

In summary, the passage conveys a distinction between two types of suffering: external violence (sword) leading to death, and internal suffering (famine and death) leading to a prolonged or sustained state of hardship.

16 וּמְשֵׁיזְבַיָא יִשְׁתֵּיזְבוּן מִנְהוֹן וִיהוֹן עַל טוּרַיָא כְּיוֹנֵי חֵילַיָא כּוּלְהוֹן מְנַהֲמִין גְבַר בְּחוּבֵי נַפְשֵׁיהּ:

The passage “וּמְשֵׁיזְבַיָא יִשְׁתֵּיזְבוּן מִנְהוֹן וִיהוֹן עַל טוּרַיָא כְּיוֹנֵי חֵילַיָא כּוּלְהוֹן מְנַהֲמִין גְבַר בְּחוּבֵי נַפְשֵׁיהוֹן” can be translated and interpreted as follows:

“And the ones who are wounded will be healed from them, and they will be upon the borders like the soldiers of the army. All of them will comfort the person with the wounds of his soul.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וּמְשֵׁיזְבַיָא (u’meshizbaya): “And the ones who are wounded” — Referring to those who have been hurt or afflicted.
  • יִשְׁתֵּיזְבוּן מִנְהוֹן (yish’tizbu minhon): “Will be healed from them” — Indicates that they will recover or be healed from their wounds.
  • וִיהוֹן עַל טוּרַיָא (v’yehon al turaya): “And they will be upon the borders” — Suggests that they will be positioned at the edges or boundaries.
  • כְּיוֹנֵי חֵילַיָא (k’yonei cheilaya): “Like the soldiers of the army” — Implies they will be in a state similar to that of soldiers.
  • כּוּלְהוֹן מְנַהֲמִין גְבַר בְּחוּבֵי נַפְשֵׁיהוֹן (kulhon menah’min g’var b’chubay nafshayon): “All of them will comfort the person with the wounds of his soul” — Means that all these individuals will provide comfort to someone suffering emotionally or spiritually.

In summary, this passage suggests that those who are wounded will be healed, positioned like soldiers on the borders, and will offer comfort to those suffering from emotional or spiritual wounds.

17 כָּל יְדַיָא יִתְרַשְׁלָן וְכָל רְכִיבַיָא יִתְאַשְׁדָן מַיָא:

The passage “כָּל יְדַיָא יִתְרַשְׁלָן וְכָל רְכִיבַיָא יִתְאַשְׁדָן מַיָא” can be translated and interpreted as follows:

“All the hands will become desolate, and all the riders will be drowned in water.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • כָּל יְדַיָא (kol yadaya): “All the hands” — Refers to all those who are involved in some action or work.
  • יִתְרַשְׁלָן (yitrashlan): “Will become desolate” — Implies that they will be abandoned or left in a state of desolation.
  • וְכָל רְכִיבַיָא (v’kol rekhivaya): “And all the riders” — Refers to those who ride or travel.
  • יִתְאַשְׁדָן מַיָא (yit’ashdan maya): “Will be drowned in water” — Indicates that they will be overwhelmed or submerged in water.

In summary, this passage suggests that all those involved in actions or work will be left desolate, and those who are traveling or moving will be overwhelmed by water. This imagery conveys a sense of destruction or overwhelming force affecting all participants and travelers.

18 וְיֵסְרוּן סַקִין וְתַחְפֵי יַתְהוֹן אִתְכְּנָעוּתָא וְעַל כָּל אַפֵּיהוֹן בַּהֲתָא וּבְכָל רֵישֵׁיהוֹן מְרַט:

The passage “וְיֵסְרוּן סַקִין וְתַחְפֵי יַתְהוֹן אִתְכְּנָעוּתָא וְעַל כָּל אַפֵּיהוֹן בַּהֲתָא וּבְכָל רֵישֵׁיהוֹן מְרַט” can be translated and interpreted as follows:

“And they will be bound by knives and their coverings will be in humility, and upon all their faces will be a lamentation, and in all their places will be torn.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וְיֵסְרוּן סַקִין (v’yesron s’kin): “And they will be bound by knives” — This suggests being bound or restrained by weapons or a severe situation.
  • וְתַחְפֵי יַתְהוֹן (v’takhfei yathon): “And their coverings” — Refers to what is used to cover or protect them.
  • אִתְכְּנָעוּתָא (it’khnuta): “Will be in humility” — Indicates a state of submission or degradation.
  • וְעַל כָּל אַפֵּיהוֹן בַּהֲתָא (v’al kol apeihon bahata): “And upon all their faces will be a lamentation” — Suggests that their faces will be marked by mourning or sorrow.
  • וּבְכָל רֵישֵׁיהוֹן מְרַט (u’v’kol reishayhon mirat): “And in all their places will be torn” — Indicates destruction or damage in all their places.

In summary, this passage describes a state of severe suffering and destruction, where people are bound by weapons, their coverings are in a state of humility or degradation, and their faces and places are marked by lamentation and tearing. It conveys a powerful image of desolation and mourning.

19 כַּסְפֵּהוֹן בְּשׁוּקִין יִרְמוֹן וּדְהַבְהוֹן לְבוּסְרָן יְהֵי כַּסְפֵּיהוֹן וּדְהַבְהוֹן לָא יִכּוּל לְשֵׁיזָבוּתְהוֹן בְּיוֹם רוּגְזָא דַייָ נַפְשֵׁיהוֹן לָא יִסְבְּעוּן וּמֵעֵיהוֹן לָא יִמְלוּן אֲרֵי לְתַקְלַת חוֹבִין יְהֵי:

The passage “כַּסְפֵּהוֹן בְּשׁוּקִין יִרְמוֹן וּדְהַבְהוֹן לְבוּסְרָן יְהֵי כַּסְפֵּיהוֹן וּדְהַבְהוֹן לָא יִכּוּל לְשֵׁיזָבוּתְהוֹן בְּיוֹם רוּגְזָא דַייָ נַפְשֵׁיהוֹן לָא יִסְבְּעוּן וּמֵעֵיהוֹן לָא יִמְלוּן אֲרֵי לְתַקְלַת חוֹבִין יְהֵי” translates to:

“Their money in the markets will be lost, and their gold and silver will become worthless. Their money and gold will not be able to rescue them on the day of wrath. Their souls will not endure, and their substance will not be sufficient, for the settlement of their debts will be required.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • כַּסְפֵּהוֹן בְּשׁוּקִין יִרְמוֹן (kaspehon b’shukin yirmon): “Their money in the markets will be lost” — Indicates that their financial assets or money will be wasted or become worthless.
  • וּדְהַבְהוֹן לְבוּסְרָן (u’dehavhon l’busran): “And their gold and silver will become worthless” — Their precious metals will lose value.
  • יְהֵי כַּסְפֵּיהוֹן וּדְהַבְהוֹן לָא יִכּוּל לְשֵׁיזָבוּתְהוֹן (yehei kaspeihon u’dehavhon la yikul l’sheizavutahon): “Their money and gold will not be able to rescue them” — These assets will not help them in their time of need.
  • בְּיוֹם רוּגְזָא דַייָ (b’yom rugza daiya): “On the day of wrath” — Refers to a day of severe judgment or punishment.
  • נַפְשֵׁיהוֹן לָא יִסְבְּעוּן (nafshayon la yisbu’un): “Their souls will not endure” — Their souls will not be able to bear the situation.
  • וּמֵעֵיהוֹן לָא יִמְלוּן (u’me’eihem la yimlu’n): “And their substance will not be sufficient” — Their resources or wealth will be inadequate.
  • אֲרֵי לְתַקְלַת חוֹבִין יְהֵי (arei l’taklat chovin yehei): “For the settlement of their debts will be required” — They will need to settle their debts, but their wealth will not be enough to do so.

In essence, this passage emphasizes that material wealth, including money and precious metals, will be ineffective in protecting or saving individuals during a time of severe judgment. Their financial resources will be inadequate to meet their needs or settle their debts in the face of impending wrath.

20 וְחֶדְוַת תִּקוּנֵיהּ לִיקַר יְהַבְתֵּיהּ וְאִינוּן צַלְמֵי תוֹעֲבַתְהוֹן שִׁקוּצֵיהוֹן עֲבַדוּ בֵיהּ עַל כֵּן יְהַבְתֵּיהּ לְהוֹן לְבוּסְרָן:

The passage “וְחֶדְוַת תִּקוּנֵיהּ לִיקַר יְהַבְתֵּיהּ וְאִינוּן צַלְמֵי תוֹעֲבַתְהוֹן שִׁקוּצֵיהוֹן עֲבַדוּ בֵיהּ עַל כֵּן יְהַבְתֵּיהּ לְהוֹן לְבוּסְרָן” translates to:

“And the joy of their restoration will turn into horror for them. Their images of abominations, their detestable deeds, were committed by them; therefore, their restoration will be given to them as a burden.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • וְחֶדְוַת תִּקוּנֵיהּ לִיקַר יְהַבְתֵּיהּ (v’chedvat tikunei’hu likar yehavteih): “And the joy of their restoration will turn into horror for them” — The happiness they expected from their restoration will become a source of fear or distress.
  • וְאִינוּן צַלְמֵי תוֹעֲבַתְהוֹן (v’innun tzalmey to’avathehon): “And their images of abominations” — Refers to their detestable practices or idolatry.
  • שִׁקוּצֵיהוֹן עֲבַדוּ בֵיהּ (shikutsayhon avadu beh): “Their detestable deeds were committed by them” — They engaged in actions that were abominable or defiling.
  • עַל כֵּן יְהַבְתֵּיהּ לְהוֹן לְבוּסְרָן (al ken yehavteih lehon le’busran): “Therefore, their restoration will be given to them as a burden” — The process of their restoration will become a burden or a source of suffering.

In essence, this passage expresses that the anticipated joy of restoration or redemption will instead bring about horror and suffering for those who engaged in abominable practices. Their detestable actions will result in their restoration being a heavy burden rather than a blessing.

21 וְאֶמְסְרִנֵיהּ בְּיַד רַשִׁיעִין לְמִבַז וּלְחַיָבֵי אַרְעָא לַעֲדִי וְיַחֲלוּנֵיהּ:

The passage “וְאֶמְסְרִנֵיהּ בְּיַד רַשִׁיעִין לְמִבַז וּלְחַיָבֵי אַרְעָא לַעֲדִי וְיַחֲלוּנֵיהּ” translates to:

“And I will deliver it into the hands of the wicked to be plundered, and to those liable for the land, for them to distress it.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וְאֶמְסְרִנֵיהּ בְּיַד רַשִׁיעִין (v’emsreneh b’yad rash’iyyin): “And I will deliver it into the hands of the wicked” — Refers to handing over something (likely property or resources) to those who are considered wicked or corrupt.
  • לְמִבַז (l’mibaz): “To be plundered” — Indicates that the item or property will be taken and used by force or greedily.
  • וּלְחַיָבֵי אַרְעָא (u’l’chayavei ar’a): “And to those liable for the land” — Refers to those who are responsible or accountable for the land or territory.
  • לַעֲדִי וְיַחֲלוּנֵיהּ (l’adi v’yachaluneyh): “For them to distress it” — Implies causing hardship, damage, or trouble to the land or resources.

In essence, this passage conveys that the subject (property or resources) will be handed over to wicked people who will plunder it, and to those responsible for the land, who will cause distress or trouble to it.

22 וַאֲסַלֵיק שְׁכִינְתִּי מִנְהוֹן עַל דְאָחִילוּ יַת אַרְעָא בֵּית שְׁכִינְתִּי וְיַעֲלוּן בָּהּ רַשִׁיעִין וְיַחֲלוּנָהּ:

The passage “וַאֲסַלֵיק שְׁכִינְתִּי מִנְהוֹן עַל דְאָחִילוּ יַת אַרְעָא בֵּית שְׁכִינְתִּי וְיַעֲלוּן בָּהּ רַשִׁיעִין וְיַחֲלוּנָהּ” translates to:

“And I will remove My Presence from them because they have defiled the land, My dwelling place, and the wicked will ascend upon it and distress it.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וַאֲסַלֵיק שְׁכִינְתִּי מִנְהוֹן (v’asilik shekhin’ti minhon): “And I will remove My Presence from them” — Indicates the departure or withdrawal of divine presence or protection from the people.
  • עַל דְאָחִילוּ יַת אַרְעָא (al d’achilu yat ar’a): “Because they have defiled the land” — Refers to the land being made impure or corrupted by the actions of the people.
  • בֵּית שְׁכִינְתִּי (beit shekhin’ti): “My dwelling place” — Refers to the divine presence’s traditional dwelling or place of residence.
  • וְיַעֲלוּן בָּהּ רַשִׁיעִין (v’ya’alu’n bah rash’iyyin): “And the wicked will ascend upon it” — Suggests that wicked individuals will come and take over or dominate it.
  • וְיַחֲלוּנָהּ (v’yachalunah): “And distress it” — Implies that these individuals will cause harm, trouble, or suffering to the land or its inhabitants.

In summary, this passage conveys that due to the defilement of the land and divine dwelling by the actions of the people, the divine presence will be withdrawn, leading to the land being taken over and troubled by wicked individuals.

23 עֲבֵיד שִׁלְשְׁלָן אֲרֵי אַרְעָא אִתְמְלִיאַת חַיָבֵי קְטוֹל וְקַרְתָּא אִתְמְלִיאַת חֲטוֹפִין:

The passage “עֲבֵיד שִׁלְשְׁלָן אֲרֵי אַרְעָא אִתְמְלִיאַת חַיָבֵי קְטוֹל וְקַרְתָּא אִתְמְלִיאַת חֲטוֹפִין” translates to:

“I will bring about a downfall for the land; its inhabitants will be filled with destruction, and the city will be filled with plunderers.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • עֲבֵיד שִׁלְשְׁלָן (aveid shil’shlan): “I will bring about a downfall” — Refers to causing a significant decline or destruction.
  • אֲרֵי אַרְעָא (arei ar’a): “For the land” — Indicates that the action is directed towards the land or country.
  • אִתְמְלִיאַת חַיָבֵי קְטוֹל (it’me’li’at chayavei ketol): “Its inhabitants will be filled with destruction” — Suggests that the people living in the land will experience severe devastation or death.
  • וְקַרְתָּא אִתְמְלִיאַת חֲטוֹפִין (v’karta it’me’li’at chatofin): “And the city will be filled with plunderers” — Implies that the city will be overrun by those who come to loot or plunder.

In summary, the passage describes a divine or foreseen judgment where the land will face significant ruin and its inhabitants will suffer severe destruction. Additionally, the city will be overtaken by plunderers.

24 וְאַיְתֵי מַבְאִשֵׁי עַמְמַיָא וְיַחְסְנוּן יַת בָּתֵּיהוֹן וַאֲבַטֵיל רְבוּת רַשִׁיעִין וְיִתָּחֲלוּן מִקְדָשֵׁיהוֹן:

The passage “וְאַיְתֵי מַבְאִשֵׁי עַמְמַיָא וְיַחְסְנוּן יַת בָּתֵּיהוֹן וַאֲבַטֵיל רְבוּת רַשִׁיעִין וְיִתָּחֲלוּן מִקְדָשֵׁיהוֹן” can be translated as:

“And I will bring about the downfall of the people’s oppressors, and they will destroy their houses. I will annul the multitude of the wicked, and they will be forsaken by their sanctuaries.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • וְאַיְתֵי מַבְאִשֵׁי עַמְמַיָא (v’aytei mav’ishay am’mayya): “And I will bring about the downfall of the people’s oppressors” — Refers to bringing ruin to those who oppress or harm the people.
  • וְיַחְסְנוּן יַת בָּתֵּיהוֹן (v’yach’sinun yat batei’hem): “And they will destroy their houses” — Indicates that these oppressors will face destruction, including their own homes.
  • וַאֲבַטֵיל רְבוּת רַשִׁיעִין (v’avatel revut rash’iyyin): “I will annul the multitude of the wicked” — Means that the large number of wicked people will be nullified or eradicated.
  • וְיִתָּחֲלוּן מִקְדָשֵׁיהוֹן (v’yit’ach’lun mikdash’ayhem): “And they will be forsaken by their sanctuaries” — Suggests that the wicked will be abandoned by their holy or sacred places.

In summary, the passage foretells the downfall of those who oppress the people, the destruction of their homes, the elimination of wicked people, and the abandonment of their sacred places.

25 אִתְקְפָדַת מְטַת וְיִבְעוֹן שְׁלָמָא וְלֵית:

The passage “אִתְקְפָדַת מְטַת וְיִבְעוֹן שְׁלָמָא וְלֵית” can be translated as:

“The dominion will be taken away, and peace will be lost, and there will be none.”

Here’s a breakdown of the translation:

  • אִתְקְפָדַת מְטַת (it’kepadat m’tat): “The dominion will be taken away” — Indicates that control or authority will be removed or overthrown.
  • וְיִבְעוֹן שְׁלָמָא (v’yiv’on sh’lama): “And peace will be lost” — Suggests that tranquility or peace will disappear.
  • וְלֵית (v’leih): “And there will be none” — Means that there will be a lack of something, in this case, it implies there will be no peace or stability.

In summary, this passage reflects a situation where authority or control is lost, peace is absent, and overall, there will be a void or lack of stability.

26 תְּבַר עַל תְּבַר יֵיתִי וּכְסוֹרְתָּא עַל בְּסוֹרְתָּא תְּהֵי וְיִבְעוּן אוּלְפַן מִסָפֵר וְאוֹרָאָה תִּפְסוֹק מִכָּהֵן וּמְלַךְ מְחַכִּים:

The passage “תְּבַר עַל תְּבַר יֵיתִי וּכְסוֹרְתָּא עַל בְּסוֹרְתָּא תְּהֵי וְיִבְעוּן אוּלְפַן מִסָפֵר וְאוֹרָאָה תִּפְסוֹק מִכָּהֵן וּמְלַךְ מְחַכִּים” can be translated as:

“Destruction upon destruction will come, and covering upon covering will be; and learning will cease, and guidance will stop from now on, and a wise king will be awaited.”

Here’s a breakdown:

  • תְּבַר עַל תְּבַר (t’var al t’var): “Destruction upon destruction” — Suggests successive or continuous destruction.
  • יֵיתִי וּכְסוֹרְתָּא עַל בְּסוֹרְתָּא (yeiti u’khesorta al b’sorta): “Will come, and covering upon covering” — Indicates that calamities will come, and they will be compounded or layered.
  • תְּהֵי וְיִבְעוּן אוּלְפַן (tehei v’yiv’un ulpan): “Will be, and learning will cease” — Implies that there will be a halt in education or learning.
  • מִסָפֵר וְאוֹרָאָה תִּפְסוֹק מִכָּהֵן (misaper v’orah tif’sok mikahan): “From now on, and guidance will stop” — Guidance or illumination will end from this point forward.
  • וּמְלַךְ מְחַכִּים (u’melekh m’khakim): “And a wise king will be awaited” — Indicates that a wise ruler is anticipated.

In summary, the passage describes a period of continuous destruction and confusion, where education and guidance will cease, and there will be a longing for a wise leader to restore order and wisdom.

27 מַלְכָּא יִתְאַבַּל וְרַבָּא יִלְבַּשׁ צָדוּ וִידֵי עַמָא דְאַרְעָא יִתְבַּהֲלָן מֵאָרְחֵיהוֹן אַעְבֵיד עִמְהוֹן וּבְנִימוּסֵיהוֹן אִתְפְּרַע מִנְהוֹן וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ:

The passage “מַלְכָּא יִתְאַבַּל וְרַבָּא יִלְבַּשׁ צָדוּ וִידֵי עַמָא דְאַרְעָא יִתְבַּהֲלָן מֵאָרְחֵיהוֹן אַעְבֵיד עִמְהוֹן וּבְנִימוּסֵיהוֹן אִתְפְּרַע מִנְהוֹן וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ” can be translated as:

“The king will mourn and the great ones will wear sackcloth, and the people of the land will be distressed by their hosts. They will act with them and their manners will be upset, and they will know that I, the Lord, have done this.”

Here’s a breakdown of the passage:

  • מַלְכָּא יִתְאַבַּל (malkha yit’abbel): “The king will mourn” — Suggests that the king will be in mourning or deep distress.
  • וְרַבָּא יִלְבַּשׁ צָדוּ (v’rabba yilbash tsadu): “And the great ones will wear sackcloth” — The prominent figures will show signs of mourning by wearing sackcloth.
  • וִידֵי עַמָא דְאַרְעָא יִתְבַּהֲלָן (v’yedei amma d’ar’a yit’bhalan): “And the people of the land will be distressed” — The populace will experience turmoil or distress.
  • מֵאָרְחֵיהוֹן אַעְבֵיד עִמְהוֹן (me’archayhon a’evad imhon): “By their hosts, they will act with them” — This might imply that the distress is related to the way they interact with or are treated by their hosts or leaders.
  • וּבְנִימוּסֵיהוֹן אִתְפְּרַע מִנְהוֹן (u’b’nimusayhon it’per’a minhon): “And their manners will be upset” — Their usual conduct or behavior will be disturbed.
  • וְיֵדְעוּן אֲרֵי אֲנָא יְיָ (v’yed’un arei an’a YHVH): “And they will know that I, the Lord” — They will come to understand that this situation is due to divine intervention.

In essence, the passage describes a period of mourning and upheaval among both leaders and the general populace, indicating that these events are a result of divine will.

Ezekiel 8 (against the elders of Judah)

Another 100 Million MIGRANTS!

•September 26, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The WEF (World Economic Forum) plan to REMAKE Mexico, US and Canada’s borders EXPOSED! | Redacted with Clayton Morris

Lara Logan is an international award investigative journalist, one who has described Dr Fauci as Josef Mengele, the notorious Nazi doctor known as the “Angel of Death.”

Does the United Nations have a plan to flood the United States with immigrants to erase borders and create a North American super power? It sure feels like it and that is what journalist Lara Logan says is happening, according to her high level source.

Could another 100 Million MIGRANTS from the Global South flood the United States?

Could Lara Logan have the source of a Global agenda to flood the United States with another 100 Million migrants? Such a potential flashpoint could be realised and exploded from the land of the South, or the “forest of the South?” And from the Global South a fire could spread rapidly to the North?

Areas claimed by the Spanish and Portuguese empires in 1790

Wikipedia says Latin America has a Population of 656,098,097 (2021 estimates), so another 100 million is just a small portion! (~15%)

Ezekiel 20:45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the South, and drop thy word toward the South, and prophesy against the forest of the Southland.

47 And say to the forest of the South: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned (repeating here “all faces from the South to the North shall be burned” for emphasis) therein.

48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’”

49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’”

Ezekiel 21:1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel;

3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My Sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.

4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North,

5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My Sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’

Mexican 400-strong children’s choir stand on the US border singing

What did the British loot in Beijing?

•September 25, 2022 • Leave a Comment

What did the British and French loot from the Old Summer Palace in Beijing?

In October 1860, Anglo-French forces are estimated to have looted 1.5 million priceless treasures from the Old Summer Palace, Yuanmingyuan, in Beijing, after which, to inflict a lasting pain, they then burnt the heavenly complex to the ground.

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

The Old Summer Palace, destroyed by British and French forces in 1860, lay in ruin

This act has been described as the greatest act of cultural vandalism in modern history – and is likely one of the largest mass-scale thefts too.

In this documentary we will explore why and how the Old Summer Palace was sacked, and will inspect some of the items that were looted.

To bring the history to life, we will utilise old photographs, drawings and maps, and will inspect up close some of the looted objects.

What did the British loot from the Old Summer Palace in Beijing?

~~~

The Yuanmingyuan, or Old Summer Palace, in Beijing was once known as the “Garden of All Gardens” as it brought oriental gardens and Eastern and Western architecture together.

French and British troops burned it to the ground in 1860 during the Second Opium War, but thanks to modern technology, we can now explore it in its original glory. Check out this video and have a look at the wisdom and aesthetics of the old Chinese architecture.

Explore the original glory of China’s Old Summer Palace with CGTN

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel,” Hosea 6:10

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee, because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein,” Habakkuk 2:8

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

Nuclear war is possible

•September 24, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Nuclear war is possible – US commander

“And I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth—blood and fire and columns (pillars) of smoke” Joel 2:30

RT ~ September 22, 2022

For the first time since the Cold War, conflict with a nuclear-armed peer is “no longer theoretical,” Admiral Charles Richard said

Is World War III Inevitable?

Navy Admiral Charles Richard, commander of US Strategic Command, declared on Wednesday that for the first time since the end of the Cold War, the US faces the possibility of nuclear war with a peer-level opponent.

Speaking at an Air Force-organized conference in Maryland, Richard claimed that the US would have to prepare to escalate quickly against possible opponents, and to protect its homeland.

“All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating…direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer,” he said, according to a Pentagon summary of his comments. “We have not had to do that in over 30 years.”

“Russia and China can escalate to any level of violence that they choose in any domain with any instrument of power worldwide,” he continued. “We just haven’t faced competitors and opponents like that in a long time.”

In the eyes of Moscow, the US is currently locked in a proxy conflict with Russia in Ukraine, and has steadily escalated its commitment of weapons, intelligence and financial assistance to Kiev since Russian troops entered Ukraine in February. 

Russia’s current nuclear doctrine allows for the use of nuclear weapons in the event of a first nuclear strike on its territory or infrastructure, or if the existence of the Russian state is threatened by either nuclear or conventional weapons. American doctrine allows for a nuclear first strike in “extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the United States or its allies and partners.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin reiterated this position on Wednesday, declaring that the Kremlin would “without a doubt use all available means to protect Russia and our people,” should Russian territory be threatened. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also warned that the US was “teetering on the brink” of becoming a direct party in the Ukraine conflict, with Washington risking “a direct collision between nuclear powers.” 

Similar warnings have come from within the US too, most notably from former President Donald Trump, who declared on Wednesday that the conflict, which he said “should have never happened,” could “end up being World War III.”

A DEVASTATING message for ALL

•September 24, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Putin has a DEVASTATING message for Germany and the EU | Redacted with Clayton Morris

The Express ‘Dust off the nuclear plans’ Horror warning to UK as Putin threatens armageddon ~ August 23, 2022

Germany’s economy continues to collapse due to its NATO conflict with Russia. Was this the plan all along? Newly leaked documents seem to suggest that the West wanted to drag Germany into an economic and military conflict with Russia all along in order to weaken the rest of Europe.

This from leaked Rand documents produced for the White House, the CIA, the NSA and the Democratic National Party. Um…WHAT!? You can read the full report thanks to journalist John Mark Dugan.

He published the report here: Rand Research Report ~ January 25, 2022 (Confidential)

From a commentator in Germany:

I live in Germany, and I have to agree with you. Our government seems to have other priorities than its people. Rent and energy costs are exploding, people are getting rid of insurances they can’t pay for, big companies are going bankrupt. Trucks soon won’t be able to transport goods any more, because of gas prices. That will have a devestating effect on goods and services in general. Public pools, wellness hotels and saunas might have to close etc. It feels like we are in a war even though we aren’t really. The only politician speaking out about the stupidity of our government is supposed to be banned from her party and from office in general. Same reasoning as during the pandemic. This is all totally unnecessary and will result in a huge catastrophe if it isn’t stopped instantly. I don’t understand why our government is doing this to us. Our foreign minister even said she is loyal to the Ukranians no matter what her German voters think. Imagine that???!!!???

And from the Scriptures

“Therefore as I live, saith the Lord God, surely because thou hast defiled My sanctuary with all thy detestable things and with all thine abominations, therefore will I also diminish thee; neither shall Mine eye spare, neither will I have any pity.

“A third part of thee shall die with the pestilence, and with famine shall they be consumed in the midst of thee; and a third part shall fall by the sword round about thee; and I will scatter a third part into all the winds, and I will draw out a sword after them.” Ezekiel 5:11-12

Migrant Arrests Top 2 Million!

•September 23, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Migrant Arrests Top 2 Million For The First Time Ever After Kamala Declares ‘Border Secure’

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ September 20, 2022

Just one week after VP Kamala Harris declared that the southern US border is “secure,” the number of illegal migrants arrested topped 2 million in just 11 months – an all-time record.

According to the latest figures from US Customs and Border Protection, 203,598 migrants were detained in August, putting the total number of illegals arrested at 2.3 million for the 2022 fiscal year which ends Sept. 30.

And those are just the ones who were caught.

The historic migration wave this year has been driven by soaring numbers of border-crossers from outside Mexico and Central America, the two largest traditional sources of illegal entries. Migrants from Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba accounted for more than one-third of those taken into custody along the southern border last month, according to Customs and Border Protection, a 175 percent increase over August 2021. -WaPo

“Failing communist regimes in Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba are driving a new wave of migration across the Western Hemisphere, including the recent increase in encounters at the southwest U.S. border,” said CBP Commissioner Chris Magnus, in a politically charged statement. “Those fleeing repressive regimes pose significant challenges for processing and removal.”

If only some type of barrier, or ‘wall’ could be erected to stop massive illegal inflows of migrants?

~~~

DHS Intel Report Indicates Venezuela Emptying Prisons, Sending Violent Criminals To US Border

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ September 20, 2022

Since President Biden assumed office nearly two years ago, his ‘open border’ policies have allowed 4.9 million illegal aliens, or about the entire population of Ireland, to cross into the US. 

America is facing a historic crisis at its southern border. White House officials could care less and have welcomed illegals (though not welcomed in white liberal elite towns, such as Martha’s Vineyard). 

US Border Czar, Vice President Kamala Harris, has yet to visit the border while Democrats downplay the invasion of illegals. 

The endless flow of illegal aliens has concerned the Department of Homeland Security detailed in an intelligence report received by the Border Patrol (obtained by Breitbart), which specifies the Venezuelan government, under the leadership of Nicolas Maduro, is releasing violent criminals from jail and embedding them within migrant caravans headed to the US-Mexico border. 

Here’s more from Breitbart’s story, citing the intelligence report:

The intelligence report warns agents the freed prisoners have been seen within migrant caravans traveling from Tapachula, Mexico toward the U.S.-Mexico border as recently as July. The source, not authorized to speak to the media, told Breitbart Texas the move is reminiscent of a similar action taken by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro during the Mariel boat lift in the 1980s.

The report does not state whether the released prison inmates were traveling as a cohesive group but does state it was commonly shared knowledge among migrants traveling to the United States within a caravan in July that many of the Venezuelan migrants in the group were convicts and included hardened criminals.

The report does not specify that the release of the convicts — understanding they would head to the United States — could be a purposeful geopolitical move specifically intended to impact US national security. Another information gap cited in the report acknowledges the unknown role the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN), Venezuela’s equivalent to the CIA, may have played in the deliberate releases.

The source says the task of identifying Venezuelans who have criminal records in their home country is nearly impossible. Of the thousands of Venezuelan migrants surrendering along the U.S.-Mexico border daily, most, according to the source, are being released into the United States. Without effective diplomatic relations with Venezuela, the source says access to criminal databases in that country simply does not exist.

The source says it is unknown how many have already been released into the interior of the United States to pursue asylum.

Most of these migrants come from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Venezuela, but growing numbers now come from all over the world. Many of these illegals cross the border with little skills and almost no personal wealth to better the US but act as a massive burden. 

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

Martha’s Vineyard in Chaos

•September 22, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Martha’s Vineyard in chaos after DeSantis ships migrants to liberal enclave

New York Post by Olivia Land and Bruce Golding ~ September 15, 2022

Le Monde Migrants flown to posh Martha’s Vineyard file suit against Florida governor ~ September 21, 2022

The class action suit, filed in Massachusetts by immigrant rights group Alianza Americas and three unnamed Venezuelans representing the whole group, said the migrants had been lured from Texas shelters on to a chartered flight with false promises of jobs and assistance, as well as $10 McDonalds gift vouchers.

Earlier, the posh liberal enclave of Martha’s Vineyard has been thrown into chaos by the arrival of two planeloads of migrants sent there by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, according to local reports.

Roughly 50 migrants were flown to the famed Massachusetts island — constituting what the local tourism board called a “humanitarian crisis’’ Thursday.

Immigrants gather with their belongings outside St Andrews Episcopal Church on September 14, 2022, in Edgartown, Massachusetts, on Martha’s Vineyard

“This is an ongoing situation,’’ wrote a county emergency-management rep in a statement, noting that local authorities “are actively collaborating to develop a coordinated regional response.

“We have reached out to our State and Federal partners for additional and long term support and assistance.’’

Some local pols learned  about the new arrivals during a Wednesday night meeting of the West Tisbury Select Board — with Town Administrator Jennifer Rand saying she’d been receiving “furious texts” from residents, the MV Times reported.

“I’m a little unclear about the situation, as is everybody, because everybody is scrambling a bit,” Rand said.

Rand said the migrants were headed to the St. Andrews Church in Edgartown and might be given short-term housing at the Martha’s Vineyard Agricultural Society’s “Ag Hall.”

But that won’t work for long because it doesn’t have beds or showers, she said, adding that feeding the migrants could be difficult, too, because the Martha’s Vineyard Red Cross was “not participating” in the official response.

Martha’s Vineyard has long been a favored vacation spot for left-leaning celebrities and Democratic pols including former President Barack Obama, who owns an $11.75 million estate where he celebrated his 60th birthday with a blow-out party last year.

But former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News that “I doubt they’ll embrace” the migrants on Martha’s Vineyard.

“You know, these are all sanctuary cities until they’re in their sanctuary,” he said Wednesday night on “Jesse Watters Primetime.”

Online responses to the reports about the migrant arrivals included outrage from readers, including one who said, “Any blame lays at the feet of President Biden.

“Thousands of people pour into the country daily and the federal government refuses to set any policy whatsoever other than the door is wide open,” wrote Fred from Edgartown.

Tucker Carlson: This will destroy the US over time

Could Tucker Carlson be right this time? That such potential flashpoint be realised and explodes from the land of the South, or the “forest of the South?” And from the South a fire could spread to the North?

Ezekiel 20:45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the South, and drop thy word toward the South, and prophesy against the forest of the Southland.

47 And say to the forest of the South: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned (repeating here “all faces from the South to the North shall be burned” for emphasis) therein.

48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’”

49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’”

Ezekiel 21:1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel;

3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My Sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.

4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North,

5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My Sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’

HIMARS is the Game-changer!

•September 21, 2022 • Leave a Comment

‘The Russians have nothing equivalent’: How HIMARS help Ukraine

Aljazeera by John Psaropoulos ~ July 26, 2022

HIMARS: The Rocket Weapon Creating Chaos For Russia In Ukraine ~ September 3, 2022

The M142 HIMARS, the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems supplied to Ukraine by the United States, have become a symbol of Russian vulnerability.

In the occupied southern Kherson oblast, posters appeared in July featuring a picture of a HIMARS system and words threatening retribution on the Russians for “looting, killing, rape, destruction.”

Now, the Eastern European countries most worried about a future Russian attack are arming themselves.

Poland and the Baltic States have drawn the lesson that they are among the most effective weapons in stopping the Russian advance in Ukraine, and are ordering hundreds of launch systems at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Polish defence minister Mariusz Blaszczak announced on May 26 that he had requested 500 HIMARS launchers plus ammunition – an enormous number which he said would involve extensive co-production.

Estonia would buy six launchers and ammunition worth $500m, the US Department of State said on July 15. Latvia made public its request for $300m in launchers and rockets a week later. And Lithuania is expected to follow suit.

“The agreement to unblock Odesa would have been impossible without HIMARS. It’s now very clear that the war will end earlier if we arm Ukraine faster,” Lithuanian foreign minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said on July 22, referring to Russia’s agreement to allow Ukrainian grain shipments through the Black Sea.

“The Baltics will become a single theatre of war for Russia,” said Estonian defence minister Kusti Salm, explaining the regional coordination on defence procurements.

Latvia and Estonia have talked about acquiring the latest, 300km ATACMs (Army Tactical Missiles) for their launchers. From the Estonian border, these would easily be able to strike St Petersburg.

HIMARS, a Game-Changer: a Weapon the Russian has no equivalent

From Latvia, they would be able to hit halfway to Moscow, impeding any invasion force long before it reached the border.

From the Polish and Lithuanian borders, they could strike almost anywhere on the territory of Belarus, Moscow’s only regional ally, whose territory was used as a marshalling ground to attack Kiyv.

“We will force our enemy to hike the price of aggression. If they know we can destroy certain kinds of targets, they will have to start looking for alternative solutions. However, those are notably more expensive.

Attacking Estonia, Baltic countries and NATO will become a lot more complicated and expensive for the enemy,” said Salm.

The United States’s armed forces are to bring an even more advanced HIMARS-launched rocket, the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), with a 500km (310-mile) range, into the field next year. Should that be supplied to regional allies, they would be able to hit in the vicinity of Moscow.

~~~~

China’s Version of HIMARS Could Be ‘Game Changer’ if Beijing Attacks Taiwan

Newsweek by Zoe Strozewski ~ May 8, 2022

Along-range Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) that has been described as China’s version of the HIMARS could be a “game changer” in a potential direct conflict with Taiwan, according to one expert.

Lyle Goldstein, the director of Asia Engagement at the Defense Priorities think tank, shared pictures from the Chinese television channel CCTV-7 on Twitter Friday that he said showed the MLRS being fired in the Taiwan Strait on August 4.

A Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) being described as China’s version of the HIMARS

“They might not look as impressive as the missiles shot over Taiwan, but these systems could be the game changer,” he wrote, referencing China’s ongoing military drills around Taiwan in response to U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s controversial visit to the island this week. “This is economical firepower and implies thousands of strikes per day, ranging the whole island.”

When asked whether he agreed that the Chinese MLRS could be its version of HIMARS, Goldstein told Newsweek that he did, saying that he believes the systems are very similar, but it can depend on the accuracy of each.

“And part of the reason it’s so accurate is, I think, the intelligence,” Goldstein said. “In other words, all of the thinking that goes into where they want to put it has been excellent.”

He added that he believes Chinese weapons would also be supported by a “huge intelligence system” and see success similar to what HIMARS have seen. China’s MLRS would probably have “comparable accuracy” to U.S. HIMARS as well, Goldstein added, noting that versions of the Weishi systems are guided.

A Royal Gift or a ‘Stolen’ Gem?

•September 20, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The World’s Largest 500 carat Clear-Cut Diamond Is Mounted on the Queen’s Scepter. Now South Africa Wants It Back.

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

Yahoo News by Rachel Cormack ~ September 17, 2022 // CNN ~ September 16, 2022

The death of Queen Elizabeth II last week has raised questions regarding the ownership of the world’s largest known clear-cut diamond.

A royal gift or a ‘stolen’ diamond? The Cullinan I weight: 530.2 carats.
The stolen diamond has an estimated worth of over $400 million now!

A royal gift or a ‘stolen’ diamond?

The Great Star of Africa, otherwise known as Cullinan I, is currently mounted on the late sovereign’s royal scepter but originally hails from South Africa. The 530-carat diamond was presented to King Edward VII in 1907, two years after it was discovered in a private mine in Cullinan. Many South Africans view Britain’s acquisition of the jewel as illegitimate and are calling for the British royal family to return it to the country, as reported by CNN.

“The Cullinan Diamond must be returned to South Africa with immediate effect,” activist Thanduxolo Sabelo told local media. “The minerals of our country and other countries continue to benefit Britain at the expense of our people.”

A miner with the Cullinan Diamond shortly after it was “discovered.”

According to the Royal Collection Trust, the original gem was the size of a human heart and weighed around 3,106 carats. It was sent to Asscher of Amsterdam in 1908 and cut into nine large stones and 96 smaller pieces. According to the Royal Asscher, the largest of the stones was purchased by South Africa’s Transvaal government while it was under British rule and presented to King Edward VII as a birthday gift. It was subsequently set in the king’s scepter. The second largest cut stone, known as the Smaller Star of Africa, was mounted in the Imperial Crown.

Britain stole $45 trillion from India

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee, because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein,” Habakkuk 2:8

Prelude To World War III?

•September 19, 2022 • Leave a Comment

“Prologue To Third World War”: Kremlin Reacts To Security Guarantees For Ukraine

“And I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth—blood and fire and columns (pillars) of smoke” Joel 2:30

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden ~ September 14, 2022 // RT ~ September 13, 2022

UPDATE: Putin Announces Mobilization: West To “Destroy” Russia ~ September 21, 2022

Ukraine wants a ‘NATO-esque’ bloc which can be called upon to immediately defend borders with Russia, which was proposed by a working group established by President Volodymyr Zelensky. Crucially it would include the United States and other NATO allies providing Ukraine with “security guarantees.”  Kiev officials stressed in unveiling the plan Tuesday that it’s not meant as a replacement for NATO, but as a legally binding alliance to be in place while Ukraine eventually pursues full NATO membership, as Newsweek describes of the proposal

The Kyiv Security Compact (KSC)—proposed by Andriy Yermak, the head of Zelensky’s office, and former NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen—would also establish a “multi-decade” plan of investment, military training, and intelligence sharing to bolster Ukraine’s defensive capabilities as the country pursues full NATO membership.

The Kremlin’s reaction has been swift and fierce, with Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev warning that it is “really a prologue to the Third World War” if it gets enacted. He described that nuclear holocaust would be the end result.

Russia’s Dmitry Medvedev, “The land will be on fire and the concrete will melt.”

According to a translation of Medvedev’s reaction in state media, which had been posted in a statement to Telegram, he blamed “dull idiots” from “stupid think tanks” for concocting such a “hysterical appeal.” Medvedev wrote:

“And then the Western nations will not be able to sit in their clean homes, laughing at how they carefully weaken Russia by proxy. Everything will be on fire around them. Their people will harvest their grief in full. The land will be on fire and the concrete will melt.

“Yet still the narrow-minded politicians and their stupid think tanks, thoughtfully twirling a glass of wine in their hands, talk about how they can deal with us without entering into a direct war. Dull idiots with a classical education.”

He said that already the conflict in Ukraine is sliding into unknown, unpredictable territory of escalation due to the West’s “unrestrained pumping of the Kiev regime with the most dangerous types of weapons.” 

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

“The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again” Isaiah 24:20

In another troubling spot: During a ‘60 Minutes’ CBS News interview aired Sunday night, Biden was asked if the US would “defend the island” in a potential conflict between Beijing and Taiwan, including through the use of military force. “Yes, if in fact there was an unprecedented attack,” Biden replied.

The mysterious Gang of Eight? 

•September 18, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Is the US preparing for a nuclear strike from Russia?

Redacted with Clayton Morris ~ September 15, 2022

Higher ups in the US government are meeting about something but we’re not sure what. Meanwhile, allies of President Putin are dropping like flies under mysterious circumstances and US weapons makers are chummier than ever with Ukraine.

Putin is hiding something BIG and the West knows it | Redacted with Clayton Morris

Is World WAR III brewing on the Horizon?

Why are the mysterious Gang of Eight meeting in secret?

Why are the Gang of Eight House of Intelligence Committee meeting in secret?

What is the Gang of Eight anyway?

From Wikipedia

The Gang of Eight is a colloquial term for a set of eight leaders within the United States Congress who are briefed on classified intelligence matters by the executive branch. Specifically, the Gang of Eight includes the leaders of each of the two parties from both the Senate and House of Representatives, and the chairs and ranking minority members of both the Senate Committee and House Committee for intelligence as set forth by 50 U.S.C. § 3093(c)(2).

‘Gang of Eight’ 9 years ago

Under normal conditions, the President of the United States is required by Title 50 U.S.C. § 3091(a)(1) to “ensure that the congressional intelligence committees are kept fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States, including any significant anticipated intelligence activity as required by [the] title.” However, under “extraordinary circumstances”, when the President thinks “it is essential to limit access” to information about a covert action, 50 U.S.C. § 3093(c)(2) allows the President to limit reporting.

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6

“The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again” Isaiah 24:20

US No Longer be a Superpower

•September 17, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Poll: Half of Americans Think US Will No Longer be a Global Superpower Within Ten Years

Information Liberation by Chris Menahan ~ bSeptember 13, 2022

Half of Americans Think US Will No Longer be a Global Superpower by 2032

A new YouGov/Economist poll asking Americans about the likelihood of various “dire political scenarios” found that half the country think that within ten years the US will no longer be a global superpower and there will be a “total economic collapse.”

From YouGov:

Among 15 potential future scenarios involving instability or political violence, the one that most Americans consider likely in the next decade is that the US ceases to be a global superpower (50% say this), followed by a total collapse of the US economy (47%). Each of the 15 dire scenarios is considered somewhat or very likely in the next decade by at least 20% of Americans.

[…] 37% of Americans say [a civil war] is at least somewhat likely to occur.

Many in the US believe Russia was and some still believe it is the main threat of their kingdom. Others, like John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, give incredible speeches around the world saying China is the main enemy. And Mearsheimer emphasizes the United States are protected by fish to the left and fish to the right, but he foolishly negate to address America’s broken border in the South; and that the Scriptures say that House of Israel’s main “enemy” comes from the South:

And let’s have a look at some Scriptures:

Ezekiel 20:45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the South, and drop thy word toward the South, and prophesy against the forest of the Southland.

47 And say to the forest of the South: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, (repeat here for emphasis “I will kindle a fire in thee”) and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned therein.

48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’”

49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’”

Ezekiel 21:1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel;

3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My Sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.

4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North,

5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My Sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’

The Scriptures above are shrouded in cryptic languages and so the Qs are: how would such scenarios be played out? The current Russia/Ukraine and China/Taiwan arises are just two major distractions, but more importantly, who are these enemies the Prophet Ezekiel identifies coming from the SOUTH, and how would God says He will kindle a fire and “all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee?”

For the Scriptures had said:

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee,” Habakkuk 2:8

The Gyanvapi Mosque Flashpoint

•September 16, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Gyanvapi masjid: India dispute could become another religious flashpoint

Yahoo News by Shilpa Jamkhandikar / Reuters ~ September 12, 2022

MUMBAI (Reuters) – An Indian court has allowed a civil suit to proceed that challenges the title of a centuries-old mosque in Uttar Pradesh, Gyanvapi mosque, and the land surrounding it.

Gyanvapi masjid: India’s Hindu/Muslim dispute could become a major flashpoint

On Monday, the Varanasi district and sessions court dismissed the challenge by the mosque’s management after five Hindu women filed petitions last year seeking the right to worship on the outer wall of the mosque complex.

The women claimed in their petitions that the mosque premises was once a Hindu temple which was demolished by Mughal emperor Aurangazeb and subsequently a mosque was built on the land.

The dismissal of the challenge by the mosque committee implies that the civil suits will be heard in detail and an examination of evidence will follow.

The mosque is located next to the Kashi Vishwanath temple in the city of Varanasi, regarded as a holy city by Hindus, and is also the constituency from where the country’s Hindu nationalist prime minister was elected.

In May, a portion of the mosque, a water tank where Muslims perform the wuzu or ritual of ablution before offering prayers, was ordered to be sealed off.

Contesting the claims of the Hindu side, the Muslims alleged that the mosque was built on Waqf (mosque) premises.

In July, the Supreme Court said that before intervening in the matter, it would wait for the Varanasi district court’s decision on the mosque committee’s challenge to the civil suits.

The mosque has emerged as the latest Hindu-Muslim flashpoint in which Hindu hardliners claim some mosques have been built over demolished Hindu temples in the country.

Ahead of the Varanasi court’s order on Monday, security was tightened and prohibitory orders were imposed around the mosque area to prevent any unrest.

Varanasi is one of the world’s oldest living Hindu cities

“Alert has been sounded in all sensitive areas ahead of the court’s verdict in the Gyanvapi matter. Patrolling is going on to ensure peace. Religious heads have issued statements asking for peace to be maintained,” Prashant Kumar, additional director general of police (law and order) was quoted as saying by The Hindustan Times.

The Gyanvapi mosque dispute has raised concerns that there will be a repeat of the decades-long Ayodhya legal dispute.

In 1992, a Hindu temple was built at a site of a 16th century mosque demolished by Hindu crowds, triggering religious riots in which about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, were killed across the country.

In 2019, in a major win for the Narendra Modi administration, the Supreme Court allowed the federal government to construct a Hindu temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya where the Babri Masjid, an historic mosque, was demolished in 1992.

The Babri flashpoint in 1992 when a Hindu mob destroyed a mosque at the site

Is Taj Mahal Sitting on a Hindu Temple?

Could such a potential flashpoint be realised and explodes from the “forest of the South?” And from the South it could spread to the North?

Ezekiel 20:45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the South, and drop thy word toward the South, and prophesy against the forest of the Southland.

47 And say to the forest of the South: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned (repeating here “all faces from the South to the North shall be burned” for emphasis) therein.

48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’”

49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’”

Ezekiel 21:1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel;

3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My Sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.

4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North,

5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My Sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’

The Eight-Nation Alliance of 1900

•September 15, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The Eight-Nation Alliance was a multinational military coalition that invaded northern China in 1900 with the stated aim of relieving the foreign legations in Beijing, then besieged by the popular Boxer militia, who were determined to remove foreign imperialism in China. In the process the Alliance fought and defeated the Qing and Boxers and then looted much of China’s palaces and other treasures.

Now with the Queen’s death, it has been reported that the Windsor family or the British Royalty has amassed a total of $25 trillion in their estates. How much of these were robed or stolen when Britannia rules the waves? (for more, see King Luxury)

India had documented that Britain had robbed or stolen $45 trillion during her almost 200 years of rule from 1765 to 1938. Economist Utsa Patnaik: Between 1765 and 1938, the drain amounted to £9.2 trillion (equal to $45 trillion), but China has yet to evaluate a similar project to put a looted sum for all stolen. But it doesn’t matter, the Sovereign of Heaven sees all these and says:

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

From Wikipedia

The Eight-Nation Alliance of 1900 Against China

The Eight-Nation Alliance was a multinational military coalition that invaded northern China in 1900 with the stated aim of relieving the foreign legations in Beijing, then besieged by the popular Boxer militia, who were determined to remove foreign imperialism in China. The Allied forces consisted of about 45,000 troops from the eight nations of Germany, Japan, Russia, Britain, France, the United States, Italy, and Austria-Hungary. Neither the Chinese nor the foreign allies issued a formal declaration of war.

No treaty or formal agreement bound the Alliance together. Some western historians define the first phase of hostilities, starting in August 1900, as “more or less a civil war,” though the Battle of the Taku Forts in June pushed the Qing government to support the Boxers. With the success of the invasion, the later stages developed into a punitive expedition, which pillaged Beijing and North China for more than a year. The fighting ended in 1901 with the signing of the Boxer Protocol.

Gun blazing, Eight-nations soldiers displayed their prowess during the Boxer Rebellion

Background

The Boxers, a peasant movement, had attacked and killed foreign missionaries, nationals and Chinese Christians across northern China in 1899 and 1900. The Qing government and the Imperial Army supported the Boxers and, under the Manchu general Ronglu, besieged foreign diplomats and civilians taking refuge in the Legation Quarter in Beijing.

The diplomatic compound was under siege by the Wuwei Rear Division of the Chinese Army and some Boxers (Yihetuan), for 55 days, from 20 June to 14 August 1900. A total of 473 foreign civilians, 409 soldiers from eight countries, and about 3,000 Chinese Christians took refuge in the Legation Quarter.

Under the command of the British minister to China, Claude Maxwell MacDonald, the legation staff and security personnel defended the compound with small arms and one old muzzle-loaded cannon discovered and unearthed by Chinese Christians, who turned it over to the Allies. It was nicknamed the International Gun because the barrel was British, the carriage Italian, the shells Russian and the crew American.

Also under siege in Beijing was the North Cathedral, the Beitang of the Catholic Church. The Beitang was defended by 43 French and Italian soldiers, 33 foreign Catholic priests and nuns, and about 3,200 Chinese Catholics. The defenders suffered heavy casualties from lack of food and Chinese mines that exploded in tunnels dug beneath the compound.

On 14 August 1900, the allies marched to Beijing from Tianjin to relieve the Legation Quarter siege.

Depicting Ceremony in the Forbidden Palace, Peking, after the signing of the Treaty

Military Engagement, Punitive Expeditions and Looting

The allied troops invaded and occupied Beijing on 14 August 1900. They defeated the Qing Imperial Army’s Wuwei Corps in several engagements and quickly brought an end to the siege and also the Boxer Rebellion. Empress Dowager Cixi, the Emperor and high government officials fled the Imperial Palace for Xi’an and sent Li Hongzhang for peace talks with the Alliance.

As Allied troops moved from Beijing into the North China countryside, they executed unknown numbers of people accused or suspected of being or resembling Boxer rebels, which became the subject of an early short film. A US Marine wrote that he witnessed German and Russian troops raping and then bayoneting women. While the Allies were in Beijing, they looted the palaces, yamens, and government buildings inflicting incalculable loss of cultural relics, books on literature and history (including the famous Yongle Dadian) and damage to cultural heritage (including the Forbidden City, the Summer Palace, Xishan and the Old Summer Palace).

More than 3,000 gold-plated bronze Buddhas, 1,400 artistic products and 4,300 bronzes in Songzhu Temple (嵩祝寺) were looted. The gold plating on the copper tanks in front of the Forbidden City palaces was scraped off by the Alliance, leaving scratch marks that can be seen even now. The Yongle Dadian that was compiled by 2,100 scholars during the Ming Yongle period (1403–1408), with a total of 22,870 volumes, was partially destroyed in the Second Opium War in 1860. Later, it was collected in the Imperial Palace on Nanchizi Street. It was found and destroyed completely by the Alliance in 1900. Part of the Yongle Dadian was used for the construction of fortifications.

The Siku Quanshu was compiled by 360 scholars during the Qing Qianlong period. It collected 3,461 ancient books, totaling 79,309 volumes. The whole book consisted of seven sets. One set was destroyed in 1860 during the Arrow War. Another 10,000 plus volumes were destroyed in 1900 by the Eight-Nation Alliance. The Hanlin Academy houses a collection of precious books, orphans, books of the Song dynasty, literature and history materials, and precious paintings. The Eight-Nation Alliance looted the collections. Some of these looted books remain in the custody of museums in London and Paris.

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

Member nations

1. Austria-Hungary

Austria-Hungary had a single cruiser, SMS Zenta, on station at the beginning of the rebellion, based at the Russian concession of Port Arthur. Detachments of sailors from the Zenta were the only Austro-Hungarian forces to see action. Some were involved in defending the legations under siege, and another detachment was involved in the rescue attempts.

In June, the Austro-Hungarians helped hold the Tianjin railway against Boxer forces and fired upon several armed junks on the Hai River near Tong-Tcheou in Peking. They took part in the seizure of the Taku Forts commanding the approaches to Tianjin, and the boarding and capture of four Chinese destroyers by Capt. Roger Keyes of HMS Fame.

The Austro-Hungarian Navy sent the cruisers SMS Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia, SMS Kaiserin Elisabeth, SMS Aspern and a company of marines to China. Arriving in September they were too late since most of the fighting had ended and the legations had been relieved. The cruisers and the Zenta were involved in the shelling and capture of several Chinese forts. The Austro-Hungarians suffered minimal casualties during the rebellion.

After the Boxer Uprising, a cruiser was maintained permanently on the Chinese coast and a detachment of marines was deployed at the Austro-Hungarian embassy in Peking (now Beijing). Lieutenant Georg Ludwig von Trapp, made famous in the 1959 musical The Sound of Music, was decorated for bravery aboard SMS Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia during the rebellion.

2. United Kingdom

At the outset of the Boxer Rebellion, Britain was engaged in the Second Boer War in South Africa. Consequently, with the army tied down by the war, the British had to rely on the China Squadron and troops largely from India. The Royal Navy’s China Squadron, stationed off Tientsin, consisted of the battleships Barfleur and Centurion, the cruisers Alacrity, Algerine, Aurora, Endymion, and Orlando, and the destroyers Whiting and Fame.

British forces were the third-largest contingent in the alliance and consisted of the following units: Naval Brigade, 12th Battery Royal Field Artillery, Hong Kong & Singapore Artillery, 2nd Battalion Royal Welsh Fusiliers, 1st Bengal Lancers, 7th Rajput Infantry, 24th Punjab Infantry, 1st Sikh Infantry, Hong Kong Regiment, 1st Chinese Regiment, Royal Engineers, and other support personnel.

Australian colonies

The Australian colonies did not become a unified federation until 1901. As such, several of the colonies, independently of each other, sent contingents of naval and army personnel to support the British contingent. For example, South Australia sent its entire navy: the gunboat HMCS Protector. Australia was not an official member of the eight-nation alliance and its forces arrived too late to see significant action.

India

Britain provided 10,000 troops, many of whom were Indian troops, made out of units of Baluchis, Sikhs, Gurkhas, Rajputs and Punjabis.

Indian troops under Britiah Command during the Boxer Rebellion

3. Germany

Germany had gained a presence in China after the Juye Incident in which two German missionaries had been murdered in November 1897. The concession in Kiaochow with the port of Tsingtao was used as a naval base for the East Asia Squadron and a trading port. The German concession was governed and garrisoned by the Imperial German Navy. At the outbreak of the Boxer Rebellion in June 1900, the garrison of the concession was composed of the III Seebataillon, with 1,126 men, a marine/naval artillery battery, about 800 men of a Kommando Detachment and sailors from the East Asian Squadron.

With the increasing threat of the Boxers, a small armed group from the III Seebatallion was sent to Peking and Tientsin to protect German interests there while the majority of the remaining forces stayed behind to prevent attacks against Tsingtao. The siege of the foreign legations in Peking soon convinced Germany and the other European powers that more forces were needed to be sent to China to reinforce the allied forces. The first troops dispatched from Germany were the Marine-Expeditionskorps which consisted of the I and II Seebatallions.

They were soon followed by the Ostasiatisches Expeditionskorps (East Asian Expeditionary Corps), which was a force of about 15,000 of mostly volunteers from the regular Army under the command of Gen Alfred Count von Waldersee. It comprised initially four and later six two-battalion infantry regiments and a Jäger company, single regiments of cavalry and field artillery and various support and logistics units. On arrival in China, it incorporated the Marine-Expeditionskorps that had preceded it to China by a few weeks.

Most of the German forces arrived too late to take part in any of the major actions. The first elements of the Corps arrived at Taku on September 21, after the legations had been relieved. As a result, most of the Corps was mainly employed for garrison duties. They fought a number of smaller engagements against pockets of remaining Boxers. The Corps was later disbanded and recalled to Germany in early 1901.

4. France

Three battalions of marines, the II/9th, and the I and II/11th RIMa which were stationed in French Indochina were sent to China. They joined the 1st brigade of Marines commanded by general Henri-Nicolas Frey. In July 1900, the 2nd and 3rd battalions of infantry embarked from Toulon but did not reach China until September. In October, following losses and rotations of duty, the first three battalions sent were included in the 16th regiment of marines by order of general Régis Voyron, commander in chief of the French Expeditionary Corps in China. On 1 January 1901, the 16th RIMa was renamed the 16th regiment of colonial infantry. At the end of the campaign, it moved to a new base in Tianjin, with its headquarters in the former buildings of the Chinese admiralty.

5. Italy

In 1898, the Italians had demanded San Mun Bay as a concession, but the Chinese refused. The Italian Navy then dispatched a squadron to San Mun Bay, but no further action was taken. The squadron remained there, and in the summer of 1900, when the Boxer Rebellion broke out, detachments from Italian cruisers were sent to Peking. Italian forces were initially made up of sailors from warships. Some of them helped the French defend the Pei Tang Catholic Cathedral, and another defended the European Legations in Peking during the famous fifty-five-day siege. Italian sailors also took part in the attacks on the Dagu forts and in capturing Tientsin.

However, a larger contingent was later dispatched from Italy, including 83 officers, 1,882 troops, and 178 horses. The contingent included a battalion of Bersaglieri, which was formed from one company each from the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, and 11th Bersaglieri Regiments. In addition, the 24th Line Regiment, volunteers from the Alpini, a battery of machine guns, and some engineers were also sent to China. A battery of field guns was also supplied by the Italian Navy.

The total force of 1,965 officers and men, which composed the Italian expeditionary force against the Boxers, was officially referred to as the Italian Royal Troops in China. In August 1900, when the larger force reached the capital, the Italians had seven cruisers and 2,543 men in the country. They were involved in numerous operations along the coast and in the interior of northern China.

The larger part of the approximately 2,000 Italian soldiers and officers who fought in the campaign against the Boxers were recalled from Peking after the end of the conflict. Italy obtained a 151-acre concession area in Tianjin and the right to occupy the Shanhaiguan fort. A small naval squadron and a naval garrison were maintained in China to protect Italian interests there.

6. Japan

Japan provided the largest contingent of troops; 20,840, as well as 18 warships. Of the total number, 20,300 were Imperial Japanese Army troops of the 5th Infantry Division under Lieutenant General Yamaguchi Motoomi; the remainder were 540 naval rikusentai (Marines) from the Imperial Japanese Navy.

At the beginning of the Boxer Rebellion, the Japanese had only 215 troops in northern China stationed at Tientsin, nearly all of whom were naval rikusentai from the Kasagi and the Atago, under the command of Captain Shimamura Hayao. The Japanese were able to contribute 52 men to the Seymour Expedition. On June 12, the advance of the Seymour Expedition was halted some 30 miles from the capital, by mixed Boxer and Chinese regular army forces. The vastly-outnumbered allies withdrew to the vicinity of Tianjin and had suffered more than 300 casualties.

The army general staff in Tokyo had become aware of the worsening conditions in China and had drafted ambitious contingency plans, but the government, in the wake of the Triple Intervention five years earlier, refused to deploy a large contingent of troops unless it was requested by the western powers.However, three days later a provisional force of 1,300 troops, commanded by Major General Fukushima Yasumasa, was deployed to northern China. Fukushima was chosen because of his ability to speak fluent English, which enabled him to communicate with the British commander. The force landed near Tianjin on July 5.

On June 17, naval Rikusentai from the Kasagi and Atago had joined British, Russian and German sailors to seize the Dagu forts, near Tianjin. The British, in light of the precarious situation, were compelled to ask Japan for additional reinforcements since the Japanese had the only readily available forces in the region. Britain at the time was heavily engaged in the Boer War and so much of the British Army was tied down in South Africa. In addition, deploying large numbers of troops from its garrisons in India would take too much time and weaken internal security there.

Japanese marines who served under the British commander Edward Hobart Seymour

Overriding personal doubts, Foreign Minister Aoki Shūzō calculated that the advantages of participating in an allied coalition were too attractive to ignore. Prime Minister Yamagata likewise concurred, but others in the cabinet demanded that guarantees from the British in return for the risks and costs of the major deployment of Japanese troops. On July 6, the 5th Infantry Division was alerted for possible deployment to China, but no timetable was set for its deployment. Two days later, on July 8, with more ground troops urgently needed to lift the siege of the foreign legations at Peking, the British ambassador offered the Japanese government one million pound sterling in exchange for Japanese participation.

Shortly afterward, advance units of the 5th Division departed for China, bringing Japanese strength to 3,800 members of the 17,000-strong allied force. The commander of the 5th Division, Lt. General Yamaguchi Motoomi had taken operational control from Fukushima. Japanese troops were involved in the storming of Tianjin on July 14, and the allies later consolidated and awaited the remainder of the 5th Division and other coalition reinforcements. The siege of legations was lifted on August 14; the Japanese force of 13,000 was the largest single contingent, making up about 40 percent of the approximately 33,000-strong allied expeditionary force.

Japanese troops involved in the fighting had acquitted themselves well although a British military observer felt that their aggressiveness, densely-packed formations, and overwillingness to attack cost them excessive and disproportionate casualties. For example, during the Tianjin fighting, the Japanese suffered more than half of the allied casualties, 400 out of 730, but made up less than one quarter (3,800) of the force of 17,000. Similarly at Beijing, the Japanese accounted for almost two thirds of the losses, 280 of 453, but constituted slightly less than half of the assault force.

7. Russia

Russia supplied the second largest force, after Japan, with 12,400 troops consisting mainly of garrisons from Port Arthur and Vladivostok. On 30 November 1900, Admiral Yevgeni Ivanovich Alekseyev compelled the Chinese military governor of Shenyang, Zeng Qi, to sign an agreement that effectively ended Chinese sovereignty over Manchuria and placed it under Russian control.

Russian troops during the Boxer Rebellion: reward ~ Manchuria

8. United States

In the United States, the suppression of the Boxer Rebellion was known as the China Relief Expedition. The United States was able to play a major role in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion largely because of the presence of American forces deployed in the Philippines since the US annexation after the Spanish–American War in 1898. Of the foreigners under siege in Beijing, there were 56 American Sailors and Marines from the USS Oregon and USS Newark.

The main American formations deployed to relieve the siege were the 9th Infantry and 14th Infantry regiments, elements of the 6th Cavalry regiment, the 5th Artillery regiment, and a Marine battalion, all under the command of Adna Chaffee. Future President Herbert Hoover and First Lady Mrs. Lou Henry Hoover were living in the foreign compound during the siege when Mr. Hoover was working for the Chinese Engineering and Mining Company. Mr. Hoover helped erect barricades and formed a protective force of the able bodied men. Mrs. Hoover helped set up a hospital, nursed the wounded, set up a dairy, took part in the night watch, took tea to sentries and carried a Mauser .38 semi-automatic pistol.

US Marines during Boxer Rebellion 1900 | Boxer rebellion, Marine corps

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee, because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein,” Habakkuk 2:8

Britain stole $45 trillion from India

A Sword from the South!

A Study of Deuteronomy 6:4

•September 14, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Who was the LORD speaking to in Deuternonmy 6:4 when the LORD says “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one LORD.” Rabbinic Jews see this as one God, One Yehovah.

The Rabbinic view stipulates that the Messiah, when He comes, will be a Man, a human born to ordinary human beings. His existence is derived from Deuteronomy 18:18 and as a man will rule on this earth, but never die.

The presentation here is the correct view. Alternate views, which offer little sense, could be found in Rabbi Tovia Singer and Jews for Judiasm.

“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one LORD” Deuteronomy 6:4

The first words of the Talmud concern the hours when this form should be recited in daily morning or evening prayer, “Hear, O Israel: Yehovah our God is one Yehovah”

The above verse is styled by our Lord (Mark 12:29) as “the first and great commandment” in the Law and form the beginning of what is termed the “Shema.”

The Jews wrote it on their phylacteries (or slips of parchment bound on their foreheads and left arms) and thought themselves not only obliged to repeat it twice every day, but very happy in being so obliged; having this saying among them, “Blessed are we who, every morning and evening, say, Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord!”

The word “one” in Hebrew is ’e·ḥāḏ, אֶחָֽד which is also similarily used in Genesis 2:24 “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother and shall cleave unto his wife and they shall be one flesh.” Yes, two beings but in one flesh.

And it is also used in and Genesis 3:22 “And the LORD God said Behold the man is become as one of us to know good and evil and now lest he put forth his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat and live for ever.”

But Christian view is that He is the Son of God who pre-existed even before being born into this world. So when the world was created in Genesis, God says “Let us make man in our image . . .” (Genesis 1:26) in the plural, that is as a singular compound, like One family, One branch of grapes.

And this view is shared King David, who wrote of the LORD speaking to his Son, “Sit Thou at My right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool.” It ended up with “The LORD said to my Lord…” in verse 4 indicating that this is God the Father speaking from His throne to His Son, who also bears a name Yehovah. The word used for God is “Elohim” which with a sulfix “im” is in a plural noun.

Of course the doctrinity of the Trinity is false! The spirit of God is not a God just like the angels of God are also not God, nor is the throne of God a God. (For more, see What Is the Holy Spirit? and A Study of Matthew 28:19)

A Study Index of Ezekiel

•September 13, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Nobody seems to understand the various symbols and riddles in this book of Ezekiel to put all the puzzles into a cohesive and coherent picture. The Jews couldn’t understand what or how the house of Israel could have any relevance since the days they went into exile; Christians taught themselves that they have already replaced the Israelites and God’s graceful promises of eternity are now theirs!

So none got it right. In the Study, we’ll find that Ezekiel’s prophecy was meant not to be fulfilled during his time; its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27), into our time and the message is primarily for the United States and secondarily its European allies.

A Study Index of Ezekiel

Table of Contents

Chapter 1

— Ezekiel among captives by the river Chebar in Chaldea
— each cherub has four wings
— and each one had four faces
— the face of a man, of a lion, of an ox, and of an eagle

~ Chapter 2

— “Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel”
— Who are the children of the house of Israel?
— the Spirit of God spoke unto Ezekiel

A Study of Chapters 1 and 2 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 3

— Ezekiel to speak unto the “house of Israel”
— caused me to eat that scroll, what does this mean?
— Ezekiel made a watchman to the “house of Israel”

~ Chapter 4

— iniquity of the house of Israel: 390 days
— iniquity of the house of Judah: 40 days
— Septuagint: 190/150/40 days

A Study of Chapters 3 and 4 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 5

— a third burns with fire, pestilence and famine
— a third smitten by a sword
— and a third scatters into the wind, a sword follows

~ Chapter 6

— a prophecy against “the mountains of Israel”
— a remnant will remember “all their abominations”

A Study of Chapters 5 and 6 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 7

— a wrath upon the multitude of the house of Israel
— all hands shall be feeble, all knees weak as water
— a trumpet is blown but “none goeth to battle”

~ Chapter 8

— their faces toward the east; worshipping the sun
— their backs against the Temple of the Lord

A Study of Chapters 7 and 8 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 9

— “six men” prophesied to destroy the house of Israel
— a mark on the foreheads of those who sigh and cry

~ Chapter 10

— back to another of Ezekiel’s visions, the wheels
— more about the cherubim, their wings
— the Ox and the Unicorn

A Study of Chapters 9 and 10 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 11

— twenty-five men at the Temple’s door
— the cauldron and the flesh
— “a full end of the remnant of Israel?”

~ Chapter 12

— a remnants will declare all their abominations
— “and every vision faileth”
— visions are “of the times that are far off”

A Study of Chapters 11 and 12 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 13

— a prophesy against the prophets of Israel
— who prophesied false prophecies

~ Chapter 14

— a prophesy against the elders of Israel
— but it seems too late
— even Noah, Daniel and Job couldn’t avert His wrath

A Study of Chapters 13 and 14 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 15

— the house of Israel will be surrounded at all sides
— from one fire to another
— “Out of the cauldron into the flame”

~ Chapter 16

— God will gather all thy lovers whom thou hast pleasure
— and gather thy loved ones with those thou hated
— together they’ll regather against thee
— and uncover thee and see all thy nakedness

A Study of Chapters 15 and 16 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 17

— a riddle of two eagles and a vine
— a riddle of the “tender young twig”
— of bringing down the high tree and exalting the low tree

~ Chapter 18

— if they “hath walked in My statutes and kept My judgements”
— “I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth”

A Study of Chapters 17 and 18 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 19

— a riddle of a lioness with her two whelps
— of strong rods broken and withered; and fire consumed them
— of some rods planted in the wilderness

~ Chapter 20

— certain of the elders of Israel come to inquire of the Lord
— “I wrought for my name’s sake”
— a riddle or prophesy against the forest of the South

A Study of Chapters 19 and 20 HERE~ —— ~

Chapter 21

— the hinting of the forest of the South
— “I am against thee; will draw My Sword out of its sheath”
— “and will cut off the righteous and the wicked”
— “I will overturn, overturn, overturn it”

~ Chapter 22

— “Thou hast despised Mine holy Sabbaths”
— your streets are full of blood
— by the sword, famine, pestilence and captivity

A Study of Chapters 21 and 22 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 23

— the whoredom of Oholah: Samaria, the ten tribes
— the whoredom of Oholibah: Judah and Jerusalem
— they have profaned My Sabbaths

~ Chapter 24

— take the choice of the flock and burn the bones
— a riddle of blood set upon the top of a rock
— Ezekiel’s wife died; he was forbidden to mourn

A Study of Chapters 23 and 24 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 25

— prophecy against the Ammonites
— “clap thine hands and stamp your feet”

~ Chapter 26

— a prophecy against Tyre
— “and thou shalt be no more”

A Study of Chapters 25 and 26 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 27

— a lamentation for Tyre
— “the merchants of the peoples hiss at thee”

~ Chapter 28

— a prophecy against the “prince” of Tyre
— a prophecy against the “king” of Tyre

A Study of Chapters 27 and 28 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 29

— a prophecy against the Pharaoh of Egypt
— “I will give the land of Egypt unto Nebuchadnezzar”

~ Chapter 30

— the time of the nations: “the time of the Gentile?”
— the sword shall come upon Egypt, and her multitude

A Study of Chapters 29 and 30 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 31

— a prophecy against the Pharaoh of Egypt
— a prophecy against Pharaoh and all his multitude

~ Chapter 32

— a lamentation for Pharaoh and a company of many people
— Gypsies: its Heb name derived from Egyptian city of Zoan
— English and French writings testify Romani were Egyptiens

A Study of Chapters 31 and 32 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 33

— the duty of a watchman
— “then shall they know that a prophet
— hath been among them”

~ Chapter 34

— a prophesy against the shepherds of Israel
— the shepherds of Israel that feed themselves!
— both civil and ecclesiastical

A Study of Chapters 33 and 34 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 35

— a prophesy against Mount Seir
— a prophesy against all Edom

~ Chapter 36

— a prophesy against the mountains of Israel
— against “the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys”
— “they profaned My holy name,” whither they have gone

A Study of Chapters 35 and 36 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 37

— “Son of man, can these bones live?”
— “these bones are the whole house of Israel”
— “They shall walk in My judgements and observe My statutes”

~ Chapter 38

— a prophesy against Gog and Magog and all his army
— pestilence and blood; rain, hailstones, fire and brimstone

A Study of Chapters 37 and 38 HERE ~ —— ~

Chapter 39

— more prophesy against Gog and all his multitudes
— “and all the nations shall see My judgement”
— a reconciliation between Israel and all nations

~ Chapter 40

— a start for the peace and tranquility of the Millennium
— there was a man; appearance of brass, a cherub?
— a reef to measure the Temple
— burnt offering and animal sacrifices brought

A Study of Chapters 39 and 40 HERE ~ —— ~

~ Chapter 41

— the Millennium starts with the building of the Temple
— the posts, the walls and doors given precise measurements
— “This is the Most Holy Place”
— side chambers and windows given precise measurements

~ Chapter 42

— the outer court given precise measurements
— the holy chambers where the priests shall approach the Lord
— there shall be burnt offering, meat offering and sin offering
— the precincts of the Temple and its courts

A Study of Chapters 41 and 42 HERE ~ —— ~

~ Chapter 43

— the Shekinah of God come from the way of the east
— His voice was like a noise of many waters
— all the ordinances thereof and all the laws thereof;
— and write it in their sight, that they keep and do them

~ Chapter 44

— “This gate shall be shut. . .
— except for the Prince, who shall sit and eat before the Lord
— ye have not kept charge of Mine holy things
— all the ordinances to be observed during the Millennium

A Study of Chapters 43 and 44 HERE ~ —— ~

~ Chapter 45

— the tribes shall resort upon all the solemn festivals
— a portion for the Prince on both sides of the holy portion
— execute judgment and judge righteously
— Passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread eaten

~ Chapter 46

— the Sabbath and the new moon shall be observed
— the Prince shall oversee the sacrificial services performed
— the people shall come before the Lord at the solemn feasts
— repeating of morning sacrifice but silence to the evening

A Study of Chapters 45 and 46 HERE ~ —— ~

~ Chapter 47

— the waters flow beneath the south side of the altar
— Jerusalem has 12 gates, three on each sides of the city
— there shall be a very great multitude of fish
— on that side of the rivers, shall grow all trees for food

~ Chapter 48

— Dan ~ Ireland, Denmark; Asher ~ Belgium; Naphtali ~ Sweden 
— Manasseh ~ UK; Ephraim ~ US; Reuben ~ France;
— Judah and Levi ~ Israel; Benjamin ~ Norway 
— Issachar ~ Sweden, Finland; Zebulun ~ Holland; Gad ~ Switzerland

A Study of Chapters 47 and 48 HERE ~ —— ~

Rising Risk of Civil Unrests

•September 12, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Risk of civil unrest rising globally – study

More than 100 nations worldwide have been affected, a UK-based global strategic consulting firm says

RT ~ September 2, 2022 // Insider ~ September 2, 2022

Countries worldwide are experiencing an “unprecedented” rise in the potential for civil unrest, according to a fresh study by Verisk Maplecroft, a UK-based global strategic consulting firm.

Over 100 nations experienced an “increase in risk” of civil unrest in the last quarter, the company said in its Civil Unrest Index (CUI) published on Thursday. The index is derived from a set of various surveys assessing different factors, such as inflation and government mechanisms to overcome or quell conflicts, as well as the overall impact of unrest.

Out of 198 nations worldwide, only 42 saw the risk of civil unrest decreasing in the surveyed period, while 101 of them saw it increasing. The situation in the rest remained unchanged compared to the previous quarter. The company linked the rising civil unrest risk with “the impacts of inflation on the price of staple foods and energy.”

“The impact is evident across the globe, with popular discontent over rising living costs emerging on the streets of developed and emerging markets alike, stretching from the EU, Sri Lanka and Peru to Kenya, Ecuador and Iran,” it said in a press release.

Europe “stands out” in the ranking negatively, having experienced a rise in the risk of civil unrest “in large part due to the fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,” the company said. The situation on the continent is expected to get worse in the next six months and “Bosnia and Herzegovina, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, and Ukraine are all among the states with the biggest projected increases in risk,” it added.

The registered uptick in civil unrest risk is the largest since the CUI was first released by the company back in 2016.

Risk of civil unrest surging in more than half of the world’s countries

“With more than 80% of countries around the world seeing inflation above 6%, socioeconomic risks are reaching critical levels. Almost half of all the countries on the CUI are now categorized as high- or extreme-risk, and a large number of states are expected to experience a further deterioration over the next six months,” Verisk Maplecroft noted.

The global trend is unlikely to change anytime soon, the company warned. “Only a significant reduction in global food and energy prices can arrest the negative global trend in civil unrest risk. Recession fears are mounting and inflation is expected to be worse in 2023 than in 2022,” it explained.

And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have no assurance of thy life.

In the morning thou shalt say, ‘Would God it were evening!’ and at evening thou shalt say, ‘Would God it were morning!’ for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. Deuteronomy 28: 66-67

Ezekiel (Ch 47-48)

•September 11, 2022 • Leave a Comment

During the Millennium the most important feature is that there will be an elaborate system of animal sacrifices and other material offerings, along with the faithful observance of New Moons and the Sabbaths, both weekly and annual. So why are we not practising them during this current time?

The other feature is that the portion thus given to each tribe would be less than, on the average, just two-thirds that were assigned by Joshua. And given the Great Sea is the Mediterranean Sea, and the east sea is the Dead Sea or even the Sea of Galilee, then the new Promised Land allocated is rather small and restricted. Perhaps an area ideally holding no more that 10 million people!

This could be partly because these are onlt small remnants that came out of the Great Tribulation, after the Time of the Gentiles (perhaps this is the Sword from the South of Ezekiel 20-21; after Ezekiel 4 – 190/40 Years of captivity), after the Time of Jacob’s Troubles, and after the Day of the Lord. The end result may be perhaps only one percent of the house of Jacob would survive to go through to dwell in the new Promised land.

Ezekiel 47

1 Afterward he brought me again unto the door of the house, and behold, waters issued out from under the threshold of the house eastward; for the forefront of the house stood toward the east, and the waters came down from under from the right side of the house, at the south side of the altar. — the waters of Shiloah Psalm 46:4Isaiah 8:6 flowed from the rocks which is believed beneath the Temple-mount. Is this Shiloah stream coming from Gihon which is about 600 meters south of Temple Mount?

Then he brought me out of the way of the gate northward, and led me about the way outside unto the outer gate by the way that looketh eastward; and, behold, there ran out waters on the right side. — the way of the gate northward: the east gate being shut, the prophet in this vision is led to the north gate, out of which he goeth into the next court, and so through them all, till he comes to the north gate of the outmost court.

And when the man who had the line in his hand went forth eastward, he measured a thousand cubits, and he brought me through the waters; the waters were to the ankles. — a thousand cubits, about one-third of a mile or one-half a kilometer;

— the waters flow eastward, that is, towards the Kedron, and thence towards the Jordan, and so into the Dead Sea.

Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through the waters; the waters were to the knees. Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through; the waters were to the loins.

Jerusalem would have 12 gates, three on each of the four sides of the city 

Afterward he measured a thousand, and it was a river that I could not pass over; for the waters had risen, waters to swim in, a river that could not be passed over. — afterward he measured a thousand; a fourth time a thousand cubits, or about a mile and a half;

— the waters flow eastward, that is, from the Kedron onwards into the Dead Sea; the main point in the picture is the rapid augmentation from a petty stream, getting deeper and deeper into a mighty river;

And he said unto me, “Son of man, hast thou seen this?” Then he brought me and caused me to return to the brink of the river. — the metaphor; if we search into the things of God, we find some things plain and easy to be understood, as the waters that were but to the ankles; others more difficult, which require a deeper search, as the waters to the knees, or the loins; and some quite beyond our reach, which we cannot penetrate;

Now when I had returned, behold, at the bank of the river were very many trees on the one side and on the other. — in his first appearance he observed no trees, and no mention is made of any, but it seems he found them on this return: though they do not really so soon grow, they might be visionally there; as he measured the waters; sees this wonderful sight; an emblem of true Saints, believers and regenerate persons, who are trees of righteousness, planted by the river with his divine spirits.

Then said he unto me, “These waters issue out toward the east country and go down into the desert and go into the sea, which being brought forth into the sea, the waters shall be healed. — these waters signify the healing effect of God, which went forth from Jerusalem, and spread into the countries about; also the gifts and powers of the holy spirits which accompanied it, by virtue of which is spread far and produced healing and blessed effects.

And it shall come to pass that every thing that liveth, which moveth, whithersoever the rivers shall come, shall live. And there shall be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters shall come thither; for they shall be healed, and every thing shall live whither the river cometh. — the rivers, according to the pointing of the Hebrew text this is “the two rivers” as is expressed in the margin;

— this peculiar form has occasioned some perplexity, especially because in the vision of Zechariah (Zechariah 14:8) the waters are represented as divided, half of them flowing to the Dead Sea and half of them to the Mediterranean.

— and there shall be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters shall come thither; that is, a multitude of fish in the Dead sea, where none lived before, and owing to those waters coming thither: it signifies the great number of living Saints, true believers, who shall appear wherever the truth is truly, purely, and powerfully preached; of these see more in the next verse.

10 And it shall come to pass that the fishers shall stand upon it from Engedi even unto Eneglaim; they shall be a place to spread forth nets. Their fish shall be according to their kinds, as the fish of the Great Sea, exceeding many. — from Engedi even unto Eneglaim; two places, which lay, the latter one at the entrance of the Dead sea, and the former at the end of it; 

— for their fish shall be according to their kind, as the fish of the Great Sea, exceeding many: that is, there shall be fish of all sorts, small and great, and in large numbers, as in the Mediterranean.

“And they shall dwell in their own land.”

11 But the miry places thereof and the marshes thereof shall not be healed; they shall be given to salt. — shall not be healed; these design the reprobate part of the world, obstinate and perverse sinners, that abandon themselves to their filthy lusts, and sensual pleasures; that wallow like swine in the mire and dirt of sin; are wholly immersed in the things of this world.

12 And by the river upon the bank thereof, on this side and on that side, shall grow all trees for food, whose leaf shall not fade, neither shall the fruit thereof be consumed. It shall bring forth new fruit according to his months, because their waters issued out of the sanctuary; and the fruit thereof shall be for food and the leaf thereof for medicine.”

— shall grow all trees for food; such as bear fruit, that may be eaten, and is good for food: by these “trees” are meant truly gracious souls, converted persons, real Saints, true believers in the Messiah Yeshua, the Christ;

13 Thus saith the Lord God: “This shall be the border whereby ye shall inherit the land according to the twelve tribes of Israel. Joseph shall have two portions. — according to the twelve tribes of Israel; in the ideal land of the restoration, not today’s Judah and Benjamin only, but all the twelve tribes are to have their portions;

— yet Levi is otherwise provided for in the “oblation,” and therefore Joseph, in accordance with Genesis 48:5; Genesis 48:22, and with the whole history of the nation, is to have two portions: Manasseh and Ephraim, for all Israel (all twelve tribes) is to return and dwell as one people of God under King David in its own land.

— this is further confirmed in Jeremiah 23:7 “Therefore, behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that they shall no more say, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’ 8 but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up and who led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them.’ And they shall dwell in their own land.

— in the Lord’s eye, the land they are dwelling now, in western Europe, North America and Australasia, are not their land; Period!

14 And ye shall inherit it, one as well as another, concerning which I lifted up Mine hand to give it unto your fathers; and this land shall fall unto you for inheritance.

15 “And this shall be the border of the land: toward the north side, from the Great Sea, the way of Hethlon, as men go to Zedad, — this shall be the border toward the north; the northern border of the land was to begin from the west point, on which side lay the Mediterranean sea, and to go on northward toward Hethlon, a place between Tyre and Damascus, and so forward to Zedad, mentioned Numbers 34:8, Hamath, and other places here mentioned in these verses.

16 Hamath, Berothah, Sibraim, which is between the border of Damascus and the border of Hamath, Hazarhatticon, which is by the coast of Hauran.

17 And the border from the sea shall be Hazarenon, the border of Damascus, and the north northward, and the border of Hamath. And this is the north side.

“And they shall dwell in their own land.”

18 “And the east side ye shall measure from Hauran, and from Damascus, and from Gilead, and from the land of Israel by the Jordan, from the border unto the east sea. And this is the east side. — if the east sea is the Dead Sea or even the Sea of Galilee, then the land allocated is rather small and restricted. Probably this is the beginning of the Millennium and not many of the twelve tribes could have survived to make the trip?

19 “And the south side southward, from Tamar even to the Waters of Strife in Kadesh, the river to the Great Sea. And this is the south side southward. — Tamar has been identified with Kurnub, a ruined village some twenty-five miles south-west of the southern end of the Dead Sea; no mention that it would extend unto the river of Egypt (Nile).

20 “The west side also shall be the Great Sea from the border till a man come opposite Hamath. This is the west side. — the Great Sea is known as the Mediterranean Sea and the land given is small and restricted, not even to the Red Sea.

21 “So shall ye divide this land unto you according to the tribes of Israel. — the division of the territory given into twelve parts or tribes of Israel, to which all, but what are allotted to the Prince, priests, Levites and the city.

22 And it shall come to pass that ye shall divide it by lot for an inheritance unto you and to the strangers that sojourn among you, who shall beget children among you. And they shall be unto you as born in the country among the children of Israel; they shall have inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel.

— the land so bounded shall be divided by lot among the families of each tribe; and strangers sojourning in Israel shall inherit just as those born in the land. The stranger shall have his inheritance by lots as well among the members of the tribe in which he sojourns, which they never had such privilege before.

23 And it shall come to pass that in what tribe the stranger sojourneth, there shall ye give him his inheritance, saith the Lord God. — no stranger or proselyte or Gentile that joins himself to the people of God shall be excluded out of the tribe’s inheritance, among whom he hath sojourned and begotten children.

Ezekiel 48

1 “Now these are the names of the tribes: From the north end to the coast of the way of Hethlon, as one goeth to Hamath, Hazarenan, the border of Damascus northward to the coast of Hamath; for these are his sides east and west: a portion for Dan. — the territory falling to each tribe was much smaller than of old, partly because of the large space occupied by the “oblation” (fully one-fifth of the whole);

— and partly because these are those that came out of the Great Tribulation, after the Time of the Gentiles (perhaps this is the Sword from the South of Ezekiel 20-21; after Ezekiel 4 – 390/40 Years), after the Time of Jacob’s Troubles, after the Day of the Lord; the portion thus given to each tribe would be rather less than two-thirds that assigned, on the average, by Joshua; perhaps only one percent would survive and go through to see the new Promised land.

For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah; I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him. Hosea 5:14

And by the border of Dan, from the east side unto the west side: a portion for Asher. — the original portion of Dan was at the west of Benjamin, but a part of the tribe having conquered Laish, and settled at the extreme north, now Dan is alloted the most northern of the tribes;

— Dan ~ Ireland and Denmark

And by the border of Asher, from the east side even unto the west side: a portion for Naphtali. — Asher, Naphtali, Manasseh, and Ephraim are so far approximated to their old places as to be north of the sanctuary, Jerusalem and the Temple.

— Asher ~ Belgium

And by the border of Naphtali, from the east side unto the west side: a portion for Manasseh. — “Zebulun and Issachar” are removed from the north to the south to make room for the second half of “Manasseh” brought over from the east of Jordan.

— Naphtali ~ Sweden 

And by the border of Manasseh, from the east side unto the west side: a portion for Ephraim.

— Manasseh ~ Great Britain

And by the border of Ephraim, from the east side even unto the west side: a portion for Reuben. — “Reuben,” brought over from the east, is placed between “Ephraim and Judah.”

— Ephraim ~ United States

And by the border of Reuben, from the east side unto the west side: a portion for Judah. — Reuben; doomed formerly for incest and instability “not to excel” (Genesis 49:4). So no distinguished prophet, priest, or king had come from him;

— Reuben ~ France

“And by the border of Judah, from the east side unto the west side, shall be the offering which ye shall offer of five and twenty thousand reeds in breadth, and in length as one of the other parts, from the east side unto the west side; and the sanctuary shall be in the midst of it. — Jerusalem would be allocated to Judah, but bordering Benjamin as would be different from the time of Joshua;

— and within the house of Judah, the priests and the Levites who would dwell among Judah in Jerusalem;

— Judah ~ Modern state of Israel

The oblation that ye shall offer unto the Lord shall be of five and twenty thousand in length, and of ten thousand in breadth.

10 And for them, even for the priests, shall be this holy oblation: toward the north five and twenty thousand in length, and toward the west ten thousand in breadth, and toward the east ten thousand in breadth, and toward the south five and twenty thousand in length. And the sanctuary of the Lord shall be in the midst thereof.

11 It shall be for the priests who are sanctified of the sons of Zadok, who have kept My charge, who went not astray when the children of Israel went astray, as the Levites went astray. — the original Zadok was the High Priest of Israel during the reigns of David and Solomon (II Samuel 8:16–18);

12 And this oblation of the land that is offered shall be unto them a thing most holy by the border of the Levites.

13 And opposite the border of the priests, the Levites shall have five and twenty thousand in length, and ten thousand in breadth; all the length shall be five and twenty thousand, and the breadth ten thousand.

14 And they shall not sell any of it, neither exchange nor alienate the firstfruits of the land; for it is holy unto the Lord.

15 “And the five thousand that are left in the breadth opposite the five and twenty thousand, shall be a profane place for the city, for dwelling and for suburbs; and the city shall be in the midst thereof.

— the five thousand that are left; the two strips of territory for the Levites and the priests, each 10,000 reeds wide, being deducted from the whole width of the oblation, leaves a strip of 5,000 wide and 25,000 long which is here apportioned to the city and its suburbs;

— it is called “profane” comparatively, because it was not so holy in contrast to the Temple and the sanctuary deemed as the “holy” possession of the Levites (Ezekiel 48:14), and the “most holy” of the priests (Ezekiel 48:12), though it was still a part of the oblation.

16 And these shall be the measurements thereof: the north side four thousand and five hundred, and the south side four thousand and five hundred, and on the east side four thousand and five hundred, and the west side four thousand and five hundred. — the measures; the city itself is to be an exact square of 4,500 reeds, and according to Ezekiel 48:17, was to have “suburbs,” or rather an open space on all sides of 250 reeds;

— the whole was, therefore, 5,000 reeds—a little less than ten miles—square, the exact width of the space that was left of the oblation, and leaving 10,000 reeds on each side of it.

17 And the suburbs of the city shall be toward the north two hundred and fifty, and toward the south two hundred and fifty, and toward the east two hundred and fifty, and toward the west two hundred and fifty.

18 And the residue in length over against the oblation of the holy portion shall be ten thousand eastward and ten thousand westward; and it shall be over against the oblation of the holy portion, and the increase thereof shall be for food unto them that serve the city.

— shall be for food; this piece of land, only four times the size of the city itself, would seem a very insufficient provision for raising all the food unto them that serve the city; for the city officers, so that they may live nearby, whose life is spent for the city.

19 And those who serve the city shall serve it out of all the tribes of Israel. — out of all the tribes of Israel; the city itself is no longer to belong to any particular tribe, as of old, but is to be situated on the common oblation and its labourers are to be taken alike from all the tribes; still there is a portion for the tribe of Levites.

20 All the oblation shall be five and twenty thousand by five and twenty thousand. Ye shall offer the holy oblation foursquare, with the possession of the city. — the verse means that the holy oblation when the possession of the city is included forms a square of 25,000 by 25,000; tghat is, 10 miles square, which isn’t very big.

21 “And the residue shall be for the prince, on the one side and on the other of the holy oblation, and of the possession of the city, over against the five and twenty thousand of the oblation toward the east border, and westward over against the five and twenty thousand toward the west border, over against the portions: for the prince. And it shall be the holy oblation, and the sanctuary of the house shall be in the midst thereof.

— the Land beyond the east toward the Mediterranean and beyond the west of the city toward the Dead Sea, will be allocated to the Prince, who remains a Mystery; Who is the Prince?

The Land allotted to the Prince remains a Mystery; Who is the Prince?

22 Moreover from the possession of the Levites and from the possession of the city which is in the midst of that which is the prince’s, between the border of Judah and the border of Benjamin, shall be for the prince. — “Benjamin” comes immediately south of the city, and “Gad” is brought over from the east to the extreme south.

23 “As for the rest of the tribes, from the east side unto the west side, Benjamin shall have a portion.

— Benjamin ~ Norway 

24 And by the border of Benjamin, from the east side unto the west side, Simeon shall have a portion.

— Simeon prophesied to be scattered.

25 And by the border of Simeon, from the east side unto the west side, Issachar a portion.

— Issachar ~ Sweden and Finland.

26 And by the border of Issachar, from the east side unto the west side, Zebulun a portion.

— Zebulun ~ the Netherlands (Holland).

27 And by the border of Zebulun, from the east side unto the west side, Gad a portion.

— Gad ~ Switzerland

28 And by the border of Gad at the south side southward, the border shall be even from Tamar unto the Waters of Strife in Kadesh, and to the river toward the Great Sea.

29 This is the land which ye shall divide by lot unto the tribes of Israel for inheritance, and these are their portions,” saith the Lord God.

30 “And these are the exits out of the city: On the north side, four thousand and five hundred measures,

Jerusalem would have 12 gates, three on each of the four sides of the city 

31 and the gates of the city shall be after the names of the tribes of Israel, three gates northward: one gate of Reuben, one gate of Judah, one gate of Levi.

32 And at the east side, four thousand and five hundred, and three gates: and one gate of Joseph, one gate of Benjamin, one gate of Dan.

33 And at the south side, four thousand and five hundred measures, and three gates: one gate of Simeon, one gate of Issachar, one gate of Zebulun.

34 At the west side, four thousand and five hundred, with their three gates: one gate of Gad, one gate of Asher, one gate of Naphtali.

35 It was round about eighteen thousand measures. “And the name of the city from that day shall be: The LORD Is There.”

~ THE END ~

What’s Missing in the UN Report?

•September 10, 2022 • Leave a Comment

What’s Missing from the UN Human Rights Report?

Xinjiang, a province that is often characterized as genocide


Jerry’s Take on China
~ September 7, 2022

Jerry Grey

After an in-depth review of this, considering all the outside interests I’ve discussed what’s missing and found it to be perhaps even more important than what’s included – judge for yourself ~Jerry

“Ephraim compasseth me about with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit” Hosea 11:12

“For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah; I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him” Hosea 5:14
Calvin: “I will not,” God says, “be any longer like a moth and a worm; I shall come like a lion to you, with an open mouth to devour you . . .
Trapp: For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion. I, that is, my Assyrian, the rod of my wrath, will be as a lion, or leopard, a creature swift and fierce above measure.

“US Created COVID-19”

•September 9, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Breaking! NY Times: “US Created COVID-19”

The Unz Review by Kevin Barrett ~ September 4, 2022

Breaking! NY Times: “US Created COVID-19”

One hour ago as I write this, The New York Times published a big front-page story that begins:

The United States secretly manufactured biological weapons in Ukraine. It trained birds to carry pathogens into Russia. It created Covid-19.

My first reaction: Yowza! Man bites dog! NYT tells truth! MSM is stealing our stuff! I’d better invite this NYT journalist, Steven Lee Myers, as a guest commentator on False Flag Weekly News!

Then I read the second paragraph:

Of the many falsehoods that the Kremlin has spread since the war in Ukraine began more than six months ago, some of the most outlandish and yet enduring have been those accusing the United States of operating clandestine biological research programs to wreak havoc around the globe.

So the first paragraph had been an innoculation, and the second paragraph the desired immune response.

Regime propagandists have been using this “immunization” technique intensively for at least a decade. After 9/11 and the widespread loss of faith in the official story, a cottage industry sprung up in academia, heavily funded by grant money, looking at ways to “cure conspiracy theories.” (The seminal contribution to the emerging field was Cass Sunstein’s “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.”) A consenus emerged that since conspiracy theories were a viral disease, the authorities should “innoculate” those who had not yet been exposed, while “locking down” the “carriers” (conspiracy theorists) off in the far corners of the internet where they wouldn’t “infect” the normies.

So how do you “innoculate” someone against conspiracy theories? Simple: You state the conspiracy theory (i.e. you inject the subject with a small dose of the toxic, contagious idea) and then “debunk” it (building an “immune response” in the subject). That’s what the above-cited New York Times story tries to accomplish in its first two paragraphs.

Breaking! NY Times: “US Created COVID-19”

Note that the Times’ debunking atttempt doesn’t actually engage in factual debate. It doesn’t have to. Most people are dominated by emotional, impressionistic thinking. So smearing the theory that COVID came from a US bioweapons lab as an “outrageous falsehood” and “Kremlin propaganda” suffices to innoculate the average NYT reader.

One thing the NYT innoculation attempt, I mean, news story, fails to mention, is the fact that the Chair of The Lancet’s COVID Origins Commission, Jeffrey Sachs, has made it clear that he thinks COVID did originate in a US bioweapons lab. As Ron Unz has noted, that’s a bit like Philip Zelikow, Chair of the 9/11 Commission, saying 9/11 was an inside job. If such a thing happened The New York Times probably wouldn’t mention that, either.

Jeffrey Sachs is a consumate insider. He’s the last person on earth anyone would call a Russian stooge. Sachs was actually a prime villain in the 1990s looting of Russia, as explained in Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine. Maybe he’s telling the truth now because he wants to be remembered for doing something admirable rather than reprehensible.

Why did The New York Times, the leading propaganda organ of the Deep State, find it necessary to run a big front-page innoculation against COVID origin “conspiracy theories”? I would like to think it’s because I just published “What America Needs Right Now Is a COVID Origins Truth Movement”—and then highlighted it during this week’s False Flag Weekly News broadcast. Or because my video with Ron Unz COVID-19 Bio-Attack Smoking Gun! just broke 400,000 views on Rumble (the equivalent of millions of YouTube views).

“Ephraim compasseth me about with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit” Hosea 11:12

“For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah; I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him” Hosea 5:14

Calvin: “I will not,” God says, “be any longer like a moth and a worm; I shall come like a lion to you, with an open mouth to devour you . . .
Trapp: For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion. I, that is, my Assyrian, the rod of my wrath, will be as a lion, or leopard, a creature swift and fierce above measure.

China’s Human Rights

•September 8, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Human rights in mainland China are periodically reviewed by the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC), on which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and various foreign governments and human rights organizations have often disagreed.

CCP and PRC authorities, their supporters, and other proponents claim that existing policies and enforcement measures are sufficient to guard against human rights abuses.

However other countries and their authorities (such as the United States Department of State, Global Affairs Canada, etc.), international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) including Human Rights in China and Amnesty International, and citizens, lawyers, and dissidents inside the country, state that the authorities in mainland China regularly sanction or organize such abuses.

Below are various opinions.

Independent analysis:

Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris

Jerry’s Take on China

Against Indian broadcasts

ANI
NDTV

European Broadcasts

BBC

Ezekiel (Ch 45-46)

•September 7, 2022 • Leave a Comment

During the Millennium we have an elaborate system of animal sacrifices and other material offerings, along with the faithful observance of New Moons and the Sabbaths, both weekly and annual. And if the Churches teach that these ordinances are for ritual or sacrificial laws, then why are these brought back during the Millenniun? Surely false teachers abound in the land of Israel today, their shepherd and watchmen are blind and misguided!

Ezekiel 45

1 “‘Moreover, when ye shall divide by lot the land for inheritance, ye shall offer an oblation unto the Lord, a holy portion of the land. The length shall be the length of five and twenty thousand reeds, and the breadth shall be ten thousand; this shall be holy in all the borders thereof round about.

— when ye shall divide by lot the land for inheritance; the land was first divided by lot under Joshua, a particular share of which was to be God’s portion, as an acknowledgment of his sovereign dominion:

— the length shall be five and twenty thousand reeds; the Hebrew does not express either reeds or cubits: our translation supplies the word reeds, so this length is uncertain and debatable.

Of this there shall be for the sanctuary five hundred in length with five hundred in breadth, square round about, and fifty cubits round about for the open places thereof. — five hundred in length, and five hundred in breadth, square round about: that is, five hundred reeds square, and this denotes the largeness, perfection and stability of the Millennium Kingdom.

And of this measure shalt thou measure the length of five and twenty thousand and the breadth of ten thousand; and in it shall be the sanctuary and the Most Holy Place. — this verse is a repetition of the latter part of Ezekiel 45:1; hence the uncertainties remain.

The holy portion of the land shall be for the priests, the ministers of the sanctuary, who shall come near to minister unto the Lord; and it shall be a place for their houses and a holy place for the sanctuary. — for the priests; sons of Zadok, who minister to the Lord, and others with them, who, though degraded from the priestly honour, yet lived upon priestly provision;

— a place for their houses; in which twenty-three of twenty-four courses of priests may dwell conveniently, while the twenty-fourth minister serve at the temple, as by order they did.

And the five and twenty thousand of length and the ten thousand of breadth shall also the Levites, the ministers of the house, have for themselves as a possession for twenty chambers. — for a possession for twenty chambers; adjoining the priests’ portion of the oblation, another equal portion is assigned to the Levites.

“‘And ye shall appoint as the possession of the city five thousand broad, and five and twenty thousand long, opposite the oblation of the holy portion; it shall be for the whole house of Israel. — this must run parallel in length with the holy portion, though but half its breadth, by which means these three portions made an exact square;

— it shall be for the whole house of Israel; the capital city, to which all the tribes shall resort upon the solemn festivals, and shall have twelve gates, according to the number of the tribes of Israel, Ezekiel 48:31.

“‘And a portion shall be for the Prince on the one side and on the other side of the oblation of the holy portion and of the possession of the city, before the oblation of the holy portion, and before the possession of the city, from the west side westward and from the east side eastward; and the length shall be over against one of the portions, from the west border unto the east border.

— and a portion shall be for the prince; meaning the Prince (nā·śî), it could be the Prince Messiah, see Ezekiel 44:3.

In the land shall be his possession in Israel; and My princes shall no more oppress My people, and the rest of the land shall they give to the house of Israel according to their tribes. — my princes; one possibility is that the language my is indicative of possession, as in Ezekiel 45:9, “princes of Israe;”

— another possibility is that this Prince (or princes) is yet to be identified, so the mystery remains

“‘Thus saith the Lord God: Let it suffice you, O princes of Israel. Remove violence and spoil, and execute judgement and justice. Take away your exactions from My people, saith the Lord God. — again “princes” in the plural, could these be the progeny of the Prince? If so, then the Prince wouldn’t be the Messiah? So the Mystery remains;

— execute judgment; judge righteously, and look at the sentences executed, (1) exile into Babylon, (2) Jerusalem in inferno in AD70; Why were they sent into exile in the first place? and relief of the oppressed; those that cried out for forgiveness and forgiveness.

10 “‘Ye shall have just balances, and a just ephah, and a just bath. — and a just ephah, and a just bath; and not make the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit, as some did, Amos 8:5.

11 The ephah and the bath shall be of one measure, that the bath may contain a tenth part of a homer, and the ephah a tenth part of a homer; the measure thereof shall be according to the homer.

12 And the shekel shall be twenty gerahs; twenty shekels, five and twenty shekels, fifteen shekels shall be your maneh. — the standard weights were lost when the Chaldeans destroyed the Temple and the people exiled, here God will revive the same measurements as used before.

13 “‘This is the oblation that ye shall offer: a sixth part of an ephah of a homer of wheat, and ye shall give a sixth part of an ephah of a homer of barley. — the oblation; Ezekiel 45:13-16 provide for a regular tax to be paid to the Prince, in order that he may be able to furnish the required offerings at the sanctuary;

— this, like the oblation of land (Ezekiel 45:1), is described as a “heave offering,” and was the sixtieth part of the grain, the hundredth of the oil, and the two-hundredth of the flock, all being from the year’s increase.

14 Concerning the ordinance of oil, the bath of oil, ye shall offer a tenth part of a bath out of the cor, which is a homer of ten baths; for ten baths are a homer.

15 And one lamb out of the flock of two hundred, out of the fat pastures of Israel, for a meat offering and for a burnt offering and for peace offerings, to make reconciliation for them, saith the Lord God. — for a meat offering, and for a burnt offering, and for peace offerings; not that the lamb was given for all these; but the wheat and the oil for the meat offering, and the lamb for the burnt offering and peace offerings. 

16 All the people of the land shall give this oblation for the prince in Israel. — for the Prince in Israel; not the high priest, nor the civil magistrate, but the Prince Messiah; or to another yet-to-be identified Prince?

17 And it shall be the prince’s part to give burnt offerings and meat offerings and drink offerings, in the feasts and in the new moons and in the Sabbaths, in all solemnities of the house of Israel. He shall prepare the sin offering and the meat offering and the burnt offering and the peace offerings to make reconciliation for the house of Israel. — “He shall prepare the sin offering” but is he going to offer it?

— and it shall be the prince’s part to give burnt offerings; or, “upon the prince shall be the burnt offerings” made; as the Son it is his overseeing duty to provide the various offerings for the Father;

— the Temple is “my Father house.” Jesus, the Messiah, never claim it is his house. “In My Father’s house are many mansions,” John 14:2. “For my house will be called a house of prayer for all nations,” Isaiah 56:7);

— in the feasts, and in the new moons, and in the sabbaths, and in all solemnities of the house of Israel; in the Feasts of the Passover, Tabernacle, and Pentecost, which were all features of the Millennium Kingdom; of his being the Passover sacrificed for us, of his Tabernacling in his Kingdom, and of the effusion of his spirits;

— and the “new moons” and “sabbaths” and “solemn days” are Old Testament phrases reinstating the main Feastures of the Millennium Kingdom; see Isaiah 66:23.

18 “‘Thus saith the Lord God: In the first month, on the first day of the month, thou shalt take a young bullock without blemish and cleanse the sanctuary. — and cleanse the sanctuary; that by this, offered according to the law, the temple might be cleansed.

19 And the priest shall take of the blood of the sin offering, and put it upon the posts of the house and upon the four corners of the ledge of the altar and upon the posts of the gate of the inner court. — and the priest shall take of the blood of the sin offering; an emblem of the blood of Christ, who was made sin for his people, and an offering for their sin; and which blood cleanses from all sin:

— and put it upon the posts of the house; of the house of God, the Temple; upon everyone of the posts of it, which stood at the entrance into it. The Targum is “upon the threshold of the house:” and upon the four corners of the settle of the altar; or four horns of it;

20 And so thou shalt do the seventh day of the month for every one that erreth, and for him that is simple; so shall ye reconcile the house. — and for anyone that sinned, shall you do on seven days in the month: It may be said that this means: And so shall you do any (or all? which doesn’t sound right) of the seven days, and so too he says above (Ezekiel 43:26): “For seven days shall they purge the altar and purify it, and they shall consecrate themselves.”

21 “‘In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the Passover, a feast of seven days. Unleavened bread shall be eaten. — this is Passover, understood to mean “a feast of a full week,” the exact duration of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which began with the eating of the Paschal lamb;

— in actual fact, Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread, a feast of heptads of days, or weeks of days, are a composite Feast and is used interchangably in Deuteronomy 16 as well as throughout the New Testament era! To understand it differently is just being misguided; being deceived and go about deceiving others.

22 And upon that day shall the prince prepare for himself and for all the people of the land a bullock for a sin offering. — shall the Prince prepare for himself, and for all the people of the land, a bullock for a sin offering; here everything again is made new;

23 And seven days of the feast he shall prepare a burnt offering to the Lord, seven bullocks and seven rams without blemish daily the seven days, and a kid of the goats daily for a sin offering. — the sin offering by the Mosaic law (Numbers 28:17; Numbers 28:22) was to be a he-goat for each day; here, a bullock for the first day, and a he-goat for the other days (Ezekiel 45:23);

— prepare “the sin offering” but again, is he going to offer it?

— forty-nine of each kind of the beasts in the space of the seven days, and ninety-eight ephahs and as many hins with them: a greatly and costly service during the Millennium which they could well efford.

24 And he shall prepare a meat offering of an ephah for a bullock, and an ephah for a ram, and a hin of oil for an ephah.

25 In the seventh month, on the fifteenth day of the month, shall he do the like at the feast of the seven days, according to the sin offering, according to the burnt offering, and according to the meat offering, and according to the oil. — the month Tisri, the fifteenth, the Feast of Tabernacles is again described here;

— instead of one ram and seven lambs for the daily burnt offering, there are to be seven bullocks and seven rams, “like as the feast of the seven days,” verse 23.

Ezekiel 46

1 “‘Thus saith the Lord God: The gate of the inner court that looketh toward the east shall be shut the six working days, but on the Sabbath it shall be opened, and on the day of the new moon it shall be opened. — the six working days; or every day that is a working day;

— on the sabbath; on that holy rest the prospect into the Temple and to the altar shall be free and be opened; the priests should open it. The new moon festival is named and all the rest are included: this gate was to be shut only on working days, therefore to be open on all holy days, which were days of holy service to God.

And the prince shall enter by the way of the porch of that gate outside and shall stand by the post of the gate, and the priests shall prepare his burnt offering and his peace offerings, and he shall worship at the threshold of the gate. Then he shall go forth, but the gate shall not be shut until the evening.

— and the Prince, the Messiah (ha·nā·śî); shall enter the sanctuary by the east gate of the outer court, pass through that court to the inner gate, and oversee the “worship at the threshold of the gate” immediately adjoining the inner court;

— while the priests make ready their sacrifices, but he, the Messiah, is not to enter the inner court, or to assume any priestly functions; how could he be a priest in the order of Melchizedek? (Psalm 110:4). Afterwards he is to go forth by the same way (Ezekiel 46:8, and Ezekiel 44:3), and stands “by the post of the gate” which is open until evening, though no one else is to enter thereby;

— or to another yet-to-be identified Prince?

Likewise the people of the land shall worship at the door of this gate before the Lord on the Sabbaths and on the new moons. — the Prince shall enter by the way of the porch of that gate outside; the Messiah shall go through the outer gate of the eastern gate, even the outermost gate of the porch and so pass to the inner gate, where he would oversee the whole sacrificial service performed at the altar;

— on the Sabbaths, both weekly and the annual holy days, and on the new moons; these observance would be strictly carried out. These commandments were poorly observed throughout history, now these are to be observed correctly, with the Messiah overseeing everything is done correctly;

— or by another yet-to-be identified Prince?

And the burnt offering that the prince shall offer unto the Lord on the Sabbath day shall be six lambs without blemish and a ram without blemish. — six lambs . . . and a ram; the burnt offering for the Sabbath, according to the Mosaic law (Numbers 28:9), was two lambs;

— this is greatly increased here, and the “meat offering” for the ram is also made larger, while that for the lambs (Ezekiel 46:5) is left to the Prince’s generosity.

And the meat offering shall be an ephah for a ram, and the meat offering for the lambs as he shall be able to give, and a hin of oil to an ephah.

And on the day of the new moon it shall be a young bullock without blemish and six lambs and a ram; they shall be without blemish. — a young bullock . . . and six lambs, and a ram; the law required for the new moons, for a burnt offering, two bullocks, seven lambs, and a ram (Numbers 28:11), so that this sacrifice is here diminished; it also required a he-goat for a sin offering, of which no mention is here made.

And he shall prepare a meat offering: an ephah for a bullock, and an ephah for a ram, and for the lambs according as his hand shall attain unto, and a hin of oil to an ephah.

And when the prince shall enter, he shall go in by the way of the porch of that gate, and he shall go forth by the way thereof. — while the priests make ready their sacrifices, the Messiah shall continue to oversee their performances;

— or by another yet-to-be identified Prince? If so, who would he then?

“‘But when the people of the land shall come before the Lord at the solemn feasts, he that entereth in by the way of the North Gate to worship shall go out by the way of the South Gate, and he that entereth by the way of the South Gate shall go forth by the way of the north gate; he shall not return by the way of the gate whereby he came in, but shall go forth opposite it.

— he that entereth in by the way of the north gate to worship shall go out by the way of the south gate; and he that entereth in by the way of the south gate shall go forth by the way of the north gate; that so such as were coming in, and going out, might not meet, and stop and hinder one another in going out and coming in:

— no mention is made of entering in by the east gate, which was only for the prince, Ezekiel 44:1, and there was no entering in, or going out, on the west.

10 And the prince in the midst of them, when they go in, shall go in, and when they go forth, shall go forth. — the Prince, the Son, in the midst; not isolated as at other times, but joining the great throng of worshippers; the Prince and people must meet together at the time for offering the morning or evening sacrifice, be ready to present their prayers to the Father

— or another mysterious yet-to-be identified Prince?

11 “‘And at the feasts and at the solemnities, the meat offering shall be an ephah to a bullock and an ephah to a ram, and to the lambs as he is able to give, and a hin of oil to an ephah.

12 Now when the prince shall prepare a voluntary burnt offering, or peace offerings voluntarily unto the Lord, one shall then open him the gate that looketh toward the east; and he shall prepare his burnt offering and his peace offerings as he did on the Sabbath day. Then he shall go forth, and after his going forth one shall shut the gate.

— now when the Prince shall prepare a voluntary offering; the foregoing verses gave directions about the sacrifices the Prince was enjoined to offer upon solemn days; this gives directions concerning his free-will, or voluntary offerings;

— note that it is only a voluntary burnt offering, or peace offerings, but not a sin offering because the Son never sinned; or could another yet-to-be identified Prince sinned?

— upon these occasions the eastern gate was to be opened for the Prince; but then, as soon as the service was over, and he was gone out, the gate was to be shut, indicating he is no ordinary personage.

13 “‘Thou shalt daily prepare a burnt offering unto the Lord of a lamb of the first year without blemish; thou shalt prepare it every morning. — and a yearling lamb without blemish shalt thou prepare as a burnt-offering daily for the Father every morning or, “morning by morning” shalt thou prepare it;

— the Mosaic law required such a lamb both morning and evening (Numbers 28:3-4); here it omits the evening sacrifice, but increases the meat-offering to the sixth of an ephah of meal and the third of a hin of oil, against the tenth of an ephah of meal and the fourth of a hin of oil prescribed by the Mosaic law.

14 And thou shalt prepare a meat offering for it every morning, a sixth part of an ephah and a third part of a hin of oil to temper with the fine flour — a meat offering continually by a perpetual ordinance unto the Lord. — the repeated emphasizing of “every morning” shows that the silence as to the evening sacrifice is not a mere oversight of the matter, but that in the new order of worship the evening sacrifice is to be omitted.

15 Thus shall they prepare the lamb and the meat offering and the oil every morning for a continual burnt offering. — “every morning” or “morning by morning”

— again, no mention is made of the evening sacrifice; while some think is included in the morning burnt offering, others think that the true reason is that Christ has appeared once in the evening of the world, and offered up himself; yea, it was literally in the evening, whereby he offered himself a type of the Passover lamb; hence no evening sacrifice is further needed.

16 “‘Thus saith the Lord God: If the prince give a gift unto any of his sons, the inheritance thereof shall be his sons’; it shall be their possession by inheritance. — if the Prince is the Messiah Jesus, the Son, then this verse has problem, as Jesus was known not to have any children. So what do you think?

— or to another yet-to-be identified Prince? He would be mortal, since he’s going to have sons, and childern, and wife?!!!

17 But if he give a gift of his inheritance to one of his servants, then it shall be his to the year of liberty; afterward it shall return to the prince. But his inheritance shall be his sons’ for them. — whatever lands of the prince are given to servants, by gift, shall at the year of jubilee revert to the sons of the Prince, who shall repossess them, forasmuch as they are lands of inheritance, and of right belong to the heir.

18 Moreover the prince shall not take of the people’s inheritance by oppression to thrust them out of their possession; but he shall give his sons inheritance out of his own possession, that My people be not scattered every man from his possession.’”

— he seems to be mortal, and chances increases for him to be yet-to-be an identified Prince? The mystery remains.

19 After that he brought me through the entry, which was at the side of the gate, into the holy chambers of the priests which looked toward the north; and behold, there was a place on the two sides westward. — “the holy chambers of the priests” is where the priests shall boil the trespass offering, and the sin offering; this was the priests’ kitchen, in which they prepared the sacrifices that were to be eaten;

20 Then said he unto me, “This is the place where the priests shall boil the trespass offering and the sin offering, where they shall bake the meat offering, that they bear them not out into the outer court, to sanctify the people.” — shall boil . . . shall bake; the flesh of all sacrifices except the Passover was by the law required to be boiled, and the unbloody “meat offering,” when not already cooked, was to be baked.

21 Then he brought me forth into the outer court and caused me to pass by the four corners of the court; and behold, in every corner of the court there was a court. — behold, in every corner of the court there was a court; at every corner, where the side walls met in right angles, there was another little court.

22 In the four corners of the court there were courts joined of forty cubits long and thirty broad. These four corners were of one measure. — of forty cubits long, and thirty broad; an oblong quadrangle;

— these four corners were of one measure; the courts that were in these four corners were of the same measure, as to length and breadth;

23 And there was a row of building round about in them, round about the four, and it was made with boiling places under the rows round about. — and it was made with boiling places under the rows round about; under these rows of building, chambers or sheds; or under these stone walls were furnaces, and coppers, and caldrons, set on them, for the boiling of the sacrifices.

24 Then said he unto me, “These are the places of those who boil, where the ministers of the house shall boil the sacrifice of the people.” — the “ministers” are the subordinate officials, the Levites; where the ministers of the house shall boil the sacrifice of the people; these seem to be the Levites, as distinct from the priests before mentioned; though in this prophecy they are both used of the same persons.

$500 Million for Negative China Coverage

•September 6, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Congress Proposes $500 Million for Negative News Coverage of China. It was an increase from an earlier proposed $300 million with an additional $500 million. Desperation shows it’s a sign of a Collapsing Empire.

The effort to counter China’s ‘malign influence’ would fund negative coverage of China’s Belt and Road Initiative—while also beefing up the US’s international lending.

The American Prospect by LEE Harris ~ February 9, 2022 // China Daily ~ February 25, 2022

A tech and manufacturing bill currently moving through Congress allocates $500 million for media outlets to produce journalism for overseas audiences that is critical of China.

America’s state-sponsored 500-million-dollar anti-China Lies and Propaganda

Meant to “combat Chinese disinformation,” the bill would direct funding to the US Agency for Global Media, a US-run foreign media service, as well as local outlets and programs to train foreign journalists.

The America COMPETES Act, just passed by the House, is an industrial policy plan for semiconductor production and supply chain resiliency. It sets aside technology investment funds for everything from high-level research to high school computer science.

If a domestic manufacturing bill seems like the wrong setting for spending on foreign news dispatches, sponsors say it’s a natural fit, since the need to stimulate American production is a matter of competition with Beijing. The sales pitch for reviving global competitiveness has been vivid: The country’s use of forced labor in Xinjiang camps, Nancy Pelosi said last week in a speech on the bill, “hurts American workers who have to compete with slave labor.”

The House version of the legislation, which passed last week, is a companion to the Senate’s more hawkish bill on China competition, USICA, which passed in June of last year. The plan is to merge both bills through a conference committee in the coming weeks.

The bills have titles penned by the Foreign Affairs Committees of each chamber. Both include a section named “Supporting independent media and countering disinformation.”

While both bills stipulate that the US-funded media coverage should be “independent,” that mandate could be at odds with other requirements in the legislation. There is, at the very least, an appearance of conflict. For example, the Senate bill aims to crowd out Chinese investment in developing countries, and also encourages criticism of China’s projects in those markets.

Critics of escalating tensions with Beijing expressed concerns over the push for anti-China coverage, saying it could potentially undermine the credibility of journalists involved in the reporting.

“We welcome support for journalism,” Tobita Chow, the director of Justice Is Global, a group that advocates for a more equitable world economy, told the Prospect. “But if the government is setting out ahead of time in legislation what the conclusion and the point of coverage is going to be, that doesn’t really qualify as genuine journalism.”

USA PROPAGANDA. $500 Million for Negative News Coverage of China

Editorially Independent State-Funded News

The Senate bill aims to produce more anti-China media for regions where it says the Chinese Communist Party and other rivals are ​​promoting “manipulated media markets.” It notes that the sponsored news will be “independent.”

Governments have long funded (relatively) impartial programming, from PBS’s educational shows for children to the titanic British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). But the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which would receive the majority of the media support in this bill package, has a troubled legacy.

A federally funded government agency, USAGM oversees outlets including Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia (RFA), and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB). The outlets have sometimes blurred the line between objective news coverage and pro-American propaganda—a distinction that all but dissolved in the Trump years.

After the OCB came under fire for airing a 2018 segment calling the philanthropist George Soros “a nonbelieving Jew of flexible morals,” it conducted an internal review that offers a candid look at US-run foreign media’s mission.

“A primordial rule of successful political messaging and modern marketing is that to influence people, you must usually first establish empathy with them,” the report explains. “OCB’s broadcasts and postings do that far too little. They seek instead to activate overt opposition and hostility to the entirety of the Cuban Revolution.” Instead, the report recommends a subtler approach that could more effectively sway Cuban public opinion.

The Trump administration put a registered lobbyist for Taiwan in control of Radio Free Asia, drawing criticism from journalists who said the outlet’s credibility was tarnished. And staffers at Voice of America wrote in a letter that orders to broadcast a speech by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were an attempt to “stage a propaganda event.”

Progressive critics said that media funded as part of strategic rivalry with a peer competitor can lose its objectivity, or at least the appearance of objectivity.

US-run broadcast networks have been responsive to changing political currents as recently as last December, when Voice of America expanded coverage in the area and named its network’s first-ever Eastern Europe chief, citing rising tensions with Russia and “the impact of Russia’s and China’s influence throughout the region.”

In light of that history, anti-war activists have been wary of expansions to US-run news networks. While they were careful not to equate reporting by state-funded media in the United States, where robust free-speech laws protect journalists, to heavily censored state media in China, several progressive critics said that media funded as part of strategic rivalry with a peer competitor can lose its objectivity, or at least the appearance of objectivity.

“When the United States funds ‘independent’ media to report critically on China, very serious guardrails must be adhered to so that the US government doesn’t simply appear to be pushing its own form of propaganda and to protect the safety and credibility of reporters who cover China with a critical lens,” one congressional progressive staffer said. “Otherwise, this funding is just an exercise in crude soft-power projection, with many sources at risk of being much more easily dismissed or repressed as pawns of a US geopolitical strategy.”

The staffer added that progressive legislators would push for outlets and journalists receiving US funding or training to disclose that relationship transparently in their reporting.

“The Chinese state’s own attempts to manipulate public opinion overseas tend to backfire,” Jake Werner, a researcher on China at Boston University and co-founder of Justice Is Global, told the Prospect. Although the funding could produce some good journalism, he said, “it would also tend to sow doubt and hostility toward journalists doing critical reporting on China’s activities among key audiences like overseas Chinese.”

Responding to a request for comment, Rohit Mahajan, a spokesperson for Radio Free Asia, referred the Prospect to RFA’s mission statement.

“Radio Free Asia’s journalists do not engage in propaganda,” Mahajan added. “RFA brings fact-based, independent news to millions living in places where authoritarians and elites do everything in their power to silence a free press and free speech.”

Amendment to Limit Production of Propaganda

In the 1970s, following reports that Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty were backed with CIA funds, Arkansas Sen. J. William Fulbright, a pre-eminent critic of American foreign policy, argued that the “radios … [should] take their rightful place in the graveyard of Cold War relics.” While most of Fulbright’s opposition to US-run broadcasting was unsuccessful, he led a reform effort that restricted the distribution of overseas propaganda material to Americans.

Rep. Edward Zorinsky (D-NE) later extended that reform, arguing that refraining from propagandizing the American people “distinguishes us, as a free society, from the Soviet Union where domestic propaganda is a principal government activity.”

That prohibition, which extended to Radio Free Asia and other USAGM networks, was in place until 2012. An amendment in that year’s defense authorization bill repealed the ban on disseminating propaganda to domestic audiences. A spokesperson for the USAGM (then called the Broadcasting Board of Governors) said at the time that repealing the ban would increase transparency and help the agency reach diaspora groups living in America, such as Somali expats in Minnesota.

Now, progressives concerned about the new enthusiasm for producing reporting critical of competitors are hoping to limit the likelihood that new funding produces propaganda. An amendment to the House bill, introduced by Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-TX), would prohibit the use of any funds “for publicity or propaganda purposes not authorized by the Congress.”

“The initial goal was to try to revive that long-standing prohibition on propagandizing people in the United States,” Erik Sperling, the executive director of Just Foreign Policy, told the Prospect. Sperling’s group worked on developing the Escobar amendment.

When reached for comment, Sperling said he was surprised to see that language specifying “United States” had been cut from the amendment after he had last seen it. While his organization had only planned to push for the more modest request not to propagandize Americans, he welcomed a more general mandate not to distribute propaganda overseas.

The amendment passed among two dozen Congressional Progressive Caucus amendments to the House legislation. Since a ban on propaganda could be at odds with more hawkish coverage of China, it remains to be seen how it will be reconciled with the bill’s broader priorities. A progressive staffer said it is intended as a “guardrail.”

China Criticism Aimed at Arenas Where US Seeks to Compete

Funding critical news coverage in a bill package that heightens competition with the subjects of that coverage could call into doubt the objectivity of US-run media.

One example is coverage of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The Senate bill encourages criticism of the BRI, which it is directly seeking to compete with.

China in recent years has erected ports, bridges, and other public works in countries from Pakistan to Peru. The result is an imperial-scale influence campaign, targeted at developing countries and geostrategic choke points, that has been compared to the Marshall Plan, America’s spending to rebuild Western Europe and contain the Soviet Union after World War II.

Since taking office, President Biden has talked about wresting back turf from China with rival investments, particularly in nearby Latin America and the Caribbean. USICA, the Senate bill, would raise US spending through the Inter-American Development Bank, and introduce “conditionality measures” to block partner countries from borrowing simultaneously from China.

One subtitle of USICA creates a “Countering Chinese Influence Fund” totaling $1.5 billion over a five-year period, with more than a third of funds aimed at media outlets.

The push to counter China, the subtitle explains, should “raise awareness of and increase transparency regarding the negative impact of activities related to the Belt and Road Initiative.” It should also urge “support for market-based alternatives in key economic sectors, such as digital economy, energy, and infrastructure.”

The House and Senate Foreign Affairs Committees did not respond to questions from the Prospect, including on how bill sponsors define “disinformation” and “misinformation.” The terms are not defined in either bill.

~~~~

On Life Support: Sign of a Collapsing Empire

BENEFICIARIES

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)

Voice of America

Radio Free Europe

Radio Free Asia (RFA)

WION ~ GRATiTAS; headquartered in New Delhi

India TV; headquartered in Noida, Uttar Pradesh

CNN-News18, operating in conjuction with Firstpost and CNBC-TV18; headquartered in Mumbai

ANI News (Asian News International); headquartered in New Delhi

Hindustan Times; headquartered in New Delhi

Republic TV; headquartered in Mumbai

NDTV; headquartered in New Delhi

Epoch Times

New Tang Dynasty TV, or NTD

Ezekiel (Ch 43-44)

•September 5, 2022 • Leave a Comment

During the Millennium we have an elaborate system of animal sacrifices and other material offerings, along with the faithful observance of New Moons and Sabbaths. And if the Churches teach that these ordinances are for ritual or sacrificial laws, then why are these brought back during the Millenniun? Surely false teachers abound in the land of Israel today, their shepherd and watchmen are blind and misguided!

Ezekiel 43

1 Afterward he brought me to the gate, even the gate that looketh toward the east. — the gate; this was the eastern gate from the precincts to the outer court.

And behold, the glory of the God of Israel came from the way of the east; and His voice was like a noise of many waters, and the earth shined with His glory. — as the Shekinah glory was the peculiar distinction of the old temple, so it was to be in the new in a degree as much more transcendent as the proportions of the new exceeded those of the old;

— the glory of God, the Father, enters the house by the East gate; the sound of his chariot was as the sound of many waters, and his glory lightened the earth; something new in contrast to the Solomon Temple.

The heavens magnify the Glory of God; the Shekinah returning to the Temple in Jerusalem

And it was according to the appearance of the vision which I saw, even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city. And the visions were like the vision that I saw by the River Chebar; and I fell upon my face. — even according to the vision that I saw when I came to destroy the city; the city of Jerusalem; not that the prophet destroyed it, or came to destroy it himself, which was to be done, and was done, by the Chaldeans;

— but to foretell the destruction of it; which prediction of his made it as certain as if it was done. So the Targum says, “when I prophesied to destroy the city.”

And the glory of the Lord came into the house by the way of the gate whose prospect is toward the east. — the glory of the Lord came into the temple by the way of the gate facing east.

So the Spirit took me up and brought me into the inner court; and behold, the glory of the Lord filled the house. — having seen the Shekinah enter by the eastern gate, the prophet, himself a priest, is brought into the into the inner court, and there sees the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle when that was set up in the Temple of Solomon.

And I heard Him speaking unto me out of the house; and the man stood by me. — there can be no question that God, the Father Himself, spoke directly to the prophet.

And He said unto me, “Son of man, the place of My throne and the place of the soles of My feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever, and My holy name, shall the house of Israel no more defile, neither they nor their kings, by their whoredom nor by the carcasses of their kings in their high places. — and my name shall the house of Israel no more defile, or “profane” or cause to be blasphemed by immoralities, or false doctrines; denoting the holiness of life, purity of doctrine and worship.

In their setting of their threshold by My thresholds, and their post by My posts, and the wall between Me and them, they have even defiled My holy name by their abominations that they have committed. Therefore I have consumed them in Mine anger. — a bit of a flashback; for My holy name have been defiled by their abominations; altars for their idols; therefore I have consumed them in Mine anger.

Now let them put away their whoredom and the carcasses of their kings far from Me, and I will dwell in the midst of them for ever. — carcasses of their kings; it is supposed that some of their idolatrous kings were buried within the bounds of Solomon’s Temple;

— nor by the carcasses of their kings in their high places; or and “their high places” that is, by both; by the carcasses of their kings being buried in or near the house of God; so the Targum adds, at their death; or by human carcasses being sacrificed to Molech or Milcom, which signifies their kin;

— it was believed that Manasseh and his son, Amon, were buried in their palace garden, the garden of Uzza near the Temple and there had erected monuments to their idols.

10 “Thou son of man, show the house to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities; and let them measure the pattern. — that they may be ashamed of their iniquities; when they shall blush to see what glory their iniquities had ruined, how great losers they were by their sins: or else thus interpret the meaning of these things;

— and let the children of Israel know what a Temple God would erect if only they had obeyed, that so they may be ashamed of their iniquities, which provoked God to cast them off for a while.

11 And if they be ashamed of all that they have done, show them the form of the house and the fashion thereof, and the goings out thereof and the comings in thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the ordinances thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the laws thereof; and write it in their sight, that they may keep the whole form thereof and all the ordinances thereof, and do them. — the ordinances; rites and orders, rules of governing priests, and their services. These are again repeated in the next words of the verse, which is usual in Scripture, and with this prophet.

— write it in their sight: that it may be remembered, they shall have a draught of it from thy hand, and drawn in their sight, that they may inquire of any particular wherein doubt ariseth.

— that they may keep the whole form thereof: as Moses and Solomon had done, so must the builders of this Temple, frame the whole to the pattern or exemplar set before them;

— again, if the Churches teach that these ordinances are for ritual or sacrificial laws, then why are these brought back during the Millenniun? Surely false teachers abound in the land of Israel today, their shepherd and watchmen are blind and misguided!

“Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see” Isaiah 42:18

“His watchmen are blind; they are all ignorant; they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark, sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber” Isaiah 56:10

12 This is the law of the house: Upon the top of the mountain the whole limit thereof round about shall be most holy. Behold, this is the law of the house. — this is the law of the house; “the house” must not be restricted to the Temple proper, consisting of the holy place and the holy of holies, but extended to the whole free space encompassing the outer court, the quadrangular area of three thousand cubits square;

— upon the top of the mountain, perhaps it is meant the nations of Israel, the whole limit thereof round about shall be most holy. Behold, this is the law of the house applying the them.

13 “And these are the mesurements of the altar in cubits (the cubit is a cubit and a handbreadth): even the bottom shall be a cubit and the breadth a cubit, and the border thereof by the edge thereof round about shall be a span; and this shall be the higher place of the altar. — the altar in Solomon’s Temple was of brass, 20 cubits square, and 10 cubits high (2 Chronicles 4:1), while that in the Tabernacle (of shittim-wood overlaid with brass) had been 5 cubits square, and 3 cubits high (Exodus 27:1);

— that in Herod’s Temple is said to have been 32 cubits square, and 10 cubits high, and was of hewn stone. The dimensions of Ezekiel’s altar seem to have been selected for the symmetry of the numbers in the several parts. In height, although the dimention not given, it exceeded any of the others.

14 And from the bottom upon the ground even to the lower ledge shall be two cubits and the breadth one cubit; and from the lesser ledge even to the greater ledge shall be four cubits and the breadth one cubit.

15 So the altar shall be four cubits; and from the altar and upward shall be four horns. — now from hence and upwards were four horns at the four corners of the altar; which denote the strength of God; and that he is accessible to persons that come from all parts, from the four corners of the earth.

16 And the altar shall be twelve cubits long, twelve broad, square in the four squares thereof. — and the altar shall be twelve cubits long, twelve broad; the length of it, from east to west, was twelve cubits; and the breadth, from north to south, was the same; so that it was a proper foursquare.

Ezekiel 43:17: The upper ledge also is square, fourteen cubits long and fourteen cubits wide. All around the altar is a gutter of one cubit with a rim of half a cubit. The steps of the altar should face east, not south as this picture shows.

17 And the ledge shall be fourteen cubits long and fourteen broad in the four squares thereof; and the border about it shall be half a cubit, and the bottom thereof shall be a cubit about; and his stairs shall look toward the east.” — and his stairs shall look towards the east; steps to the altar were forbidden by the law of Moses, Exodus 20:26 wherefore, as the height of the altar of Solomon, and so of the second temple, required some way and method of ascent to the top of it, to do the business upon it;

— the Jews had what they call “kibbesh” a way made of earth thrown up, which rose gradually, and led to the top of it, and was about two and thirty cubits long, and sixteen broad; but here steps or stairs are expressly mentioned, which show that this refers to times when the Mosaic laws should be re-established. These stairs were placed eastward, so that those that went up them looked toward the west, toward the Temple; and turned their backs to the east, or rising sun, in direct opposition to the worshippers of the sun, whose faces would be toward the east. 

The steps of the altar facing east, as Scriptures say

18 And He said unto me, “Son of man, thus saith the Lord God: These are the ordinances of the altar on the day when they shall make it, to offer burnt offerings thereon and to sprinkle blood thereon. — to sprinkle blood thereon, according to the law of a burnt sacrifice, Leviticus 1:5.

19 And thou shalt give to the priests, the Levites who are of the seed of Zadok, who approach Me to minister unto Me, saith the Lord God, a young bullock for a sin offering. — for a sin offering; the sprinkling of his blood on the horns of the altar is still needed to make an atonement for sins, and to reconcile the person that brought the sacrifice.

20 And thou shalt take of the blood thereof, and put it on the four horns of it and on the four corners of the ledge and upon the border round about; thus shalt thou cleanse and purge it.

21 Thou shalt take the bullock also of the sin offering, and he shall burn it in the appointed place of the house, outside the sanctuary. — this was done outside the gate, outside the camp where the Temple stood.

22 And on the second day thou shalt offer a kid of the goats without blemish for a sin offering; and they shall cleanse the altar, as they cleansed it with the bullock. — and on the second day thou shalt offer a kid of the goats without blemish “for a sin offering” this time it is “a kid of the goats without blemish” as commanded.

23 When thou hast made an end of cleansing it, thou shalt offer a young bullock without blemish and a ram out of the flock without blemish. — there was, on each of the seven days, a burnt-offering of a bullock and a ram, preceded by a “sin-offereng of a bullock” on the first day, and of a “kid of the goats” on the other days.

24 And thou shalt offer them before the Lord, and the priests shall cast salt upon them, and they shall offer them up for a burnt offering unto the Lord. — when thou hast made an end of cleansing it; the altar, by the sacrifices of the bullock and the kid, on the first and second days;

— then, on the third day, thou shalt offer a young bullock without blemish, and a ram out of the flock without blemish; all these sacrifices was to be pure and perfect.

— and they shall offer them up for a burnt offering unto the Lord; throughout the whole seven days of the consecration and cleansing of the altar.

25 Seven days shalt thou prepare every day a goat for a sin offering; they shall also prepare a young bullock and a ram out of the flock, without blemish. — seven days shalt thou prepare every day a goat for a sin offering; by this it appears that the altar was seven days a consecrating and cleansing; and that on each day a goat “for a sin offering” was prepared and offered as before observed.

26 Seven days shall they purge the altar and purify it, and they shall consecrate themselves. — and they shall consecrate themselves: the priests shall consecrate themselves or devote themselves to the service of the Temple.

The Glory of God, the Shekinah entering by the eastern gate of the Temple

27 And when these days are expired, it shall be that upon the eighth day, and so forward, the priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar, and your peace offerings; and I will accept you, saith the Lord God.” — upon the eighth day, which begins a new week and it is probable the first of these seven days for sacrifice might be the Sabbath, and end on our Friday; however, the first week is spent in solemn consecration of altar and priests; all weeks after are to have, day by day, the usual appointed sacrifices;

— “and I will accept you” doesn’t sound like it would be merely a memorial; but a commandment as in Ezekiel 20:40 For in Mine holy mountain, in the mountain of the height of Israel, saith the Lord God, there shall all the house of Israel, all of them in the land, serve Me. There will I accept them, and there will I require your offerings and the firstfruits of your oblations, with all your holy things.

— I will accept you with your sweet savor when I bring you out from the people and gather you out of the countries wherein ye have been scattered; and I will be sanctified in you before the Gentiles, Ezekiel 20:41;

— actually the offerings and sacrifices in the two verses above are flashforwards, after “For in Mine holy mountain, in the mountain of the height of Israel,” beginning of Ezekiel 20:40;

— thus unless proven to the contrary, this read like these sacrifices and offerings will go on throughout each and every week, that is, it will be statutary and a required commandment throughout the Millennium.

Ezekiel 44

1 Then he brought me back the way of the gate of the outer sanctuary which looketh toward the east, and it was shut. — the gate of the outward sanctuary; this is better rendered, the outer gate of the sanctuary;

— the prophet Ezekiel had been in the inner court, or court of the priests, where the altar stood, and is now brought back to the eastern gate of the outer court. He finds it shut, but when he was there before, it was open; for he saw the glory of the Lord enter into the house by the way of it; but now it was shut, 

Then said the Lord unto me, “This gate shall be shut. It shall not be opened and no man shall enter in by it, because the Lord, the God of Israel, hath entered in by it; therefore it shall be shut. — shall not be opened, i.e. shall not ordinarily stand open, but be shut till occasion requires it should sometimes be opened.

— no man; none of the common ordinary sort of people, or none but the prince, God’s agent and the ministering priests. Contrast this with the Temple of old (whether Temple or tabernacle), in which the east gate stood always open; perhaps to express the idea that the glory of God should no more depart from the Temple, but abide in it forever. 

It is for the Prince; the Prince shall sit in it to eat bread before the LORD. He shall enter by the way of the porch of that gate and shall go out by the way of the same.” — the Prince (nā·śî); Christians and Rabbis understood this to refer to the Messiah, and the Prince shall sit to eat bread before the Father.

— a parallel scene is found in Psalm 110:1 The LORD said unto my Lord (the Son, the Messiah), “Sit Thou at My right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool.”

Then he brought me the way of the north gate before the house. And I looked, and behold, the glory of the Lord filled the house of the Lord; and I fell upon my face. — and I looked, and, behold, the glory of the LORD filled the house of the LORD; as he had seen at the eastern gate, Ezekiel 43:2.

And the Lord said unto me, “Son of man, mark well, and behold with thine eyes and hear with thine ears all that I say unto thee concerning all the ordinances of the house of the Lord and all the laws thereof; and mark well the entering in of the house, with every going forth of the sanctuary. — mark well; or, “set thine heart” be attentive, Ezekiel, to what is about to be said, as being of great concern and importance concerning all the ordinances of the house of the LORD, and all the laws thereof.

And thou shalt say to the rebellious, even to the house of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: O ye house of Israel, let it suffice you of all your abominations, — thus saith the Lord God, O ye house of Israel, let it suite you of all your abominations; that is, let the abominations you have committed, will worship and superstition, paying a regard to the false doctrines and commandments of men, be sufficient; stop and proceed no further; relinquish those things which are so abominable in my sight.

in that ye have brought into My sanctuary strangers, uncircumcised in heart and uncircumcised in flesh, to be in My sanctuary to pollute it, even My house, when ye offer My bread, the fat and the blood; and they have broken My covenant because of all your abominations. — strangers; foreigners and heathens, who had their idols in the very courts of the Temple, and there worshipped their idols;

— uncircumcised in heart; the worst of them, profane and impious; uncircumcised in flesh: no uncircumcised one should come into the court of the Temple, but you have brought them into the very sanctuary at the times of worship;

And ye have not kept charge of Mine holy things; but ye have set keepers of My charge in My sanctuary for yourselves. — Tobiah, an Ammonite official (possibly a governor of Ammon, was allowed by the High Priest Eliashib Tobiah to lease the storerooms of the Temple to him, so that a stranger could conduct business in the newly constructed Temple; (more on Tobiah colluding with Eliashib the high priest in the Temple at the end).

“‘Thus saith the Lord God: No stranger, uncircumcised in heart nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into My sanctuary, or any stranger that is among the children of Israel. — these were great sins before the Lord, as Tobiah was a stranger, “uncircumcised in heart and uncircumcised in flesh,” and as storerooms were intended for the Israelites’ grain offerings, incense, temple articles and the tithes of grain, new wine and oil meant for the work of the Temple and the Temple workers themselves.

10 And the Levites that have gone away far from Me when Israel went astray, who went astray away from Me after their idols, they shall even bear their iniquity. — the influence of Tobiah corrupted the Levites and the priesthood, where they went astray and later emerged as the Sadducees administering the Temple service.

11 Yet they shall be ministers in My sanctuary, having charge at the gates of the house and ministering to the house. They shall slay the burnt offering and the sacrifice for the people, and they shall stand before them to minister unto them.

12 Because they ministered unto them before their idols and caused the house of Israel to fall into iniquity, therefore have I lifted up Mine hand against them, saith the Lord God, and they shall bear their iniquity. — “and they shall bear their iniquity” was implemented ib AD 70; so which sects went into their death?

— these sects of the Jews faced their days of vengeance and disappeared in the AD 70 inferno: All Sadducees, Herodians, Boethusians, Essenes, together with the House of Shammai Pharisees and those of its military arm, the Zealots. They all ministered before their idols and faced their days of vengeance and disappeared from history. Were they receiving their judgement?

— but history recorded only two sects that escaped the inferno of AD 70: (1) The Christians, known as Nazarenes in Acts 24:5. They escaped to a northern town called Pella, west of the Jordan River;

— (2) some Pharisees, those of the House of Hillel. They were headed by a Pharisaic rabbi, Johanan ben Zakkai, the head of the Sanhedrin, who escaped to Yavne and, later, his followers re-emerged as Rabbinic Jews, who established the Hillel Calendar, which was revealed by Hillel II in about AD 359 concerning the rules of the calendar.

13 And they shall not come near unto Me to do the office of a priest unto Me, nor to come near to any of My holy things in the Most Holy Place; but they shall bear their shame and their abominations which they have committed. — they shall be dealt with according to their abominations, i.e. their apostacy and idolatry, hence all the Sadducees, Herodians, Boethusians and Essenes faced their judgement and disappeared from history.

14 But I will make them keepers of the charge of the house for all the service thereof and for all that shall be done therein. — but I will make them keepers of the charge of the house; to be watchmen, Levites and priests; to administer the Temple, to open and shut the doors of it; to sweep and keep it clean;

— to administer the Feasts, the Passover; to all these, he must first of all be circumcised; (Exodus 12:43-44).

15 But the priests, the Levites, the sons of Zadok that kept the charge of My sanctuary when the children of Israel went astray from Me, they shall come near to Me to minister unto Me, and they shall stand before Me to offer unto Me the fat and the blood, saith the Lord God. — some Pharisees, those of the House of Hillel;

— they escaped to Yavne and, later, his followers re-emerged as Rabbinic Jews, who established the Hillel Calendar, which was revealed by Hillel II in about AD 359 concerning the rules of the calendar.

16 They shall enter into My sanctuary, and they shall come near to My table to minister unto Me, and they shall keep My charge. — these are the Rabbinic Jews, of the tribe of Levi; and for priests, of the sons of Aaron.

17 And it shall come to pass that when they enter in at the gates of the inner court, they shall be clothed with linen garments; and no wool shall come upon them while they minister in the gates of the inner court and within. — these are from them priests who were of the tribe of Levi, of the sons of Aaron, whom the Lord chose and separated to minister unto him.

18 They shall have linen headdresses upon their heads and shall have linen breeches upon their loins; they shall not gird themselves with any thing that causeth sweat. — these regulations as to the priests’ services; their garments are defined and various rules prescribed in the Law are repeated with some additions in order to denote additional care to avoid uncleanness.

19 And when they go forth into the outer court, even into the outer court to the people, they shall put off their garments wherein they ministered and lay them in the holy chambers, and they shall put on other garments; and they shall not sanctify the people with their garments. — they shall put off their garments; this requirement that the priests shall wear their official dress only when engaged in official duty, putting it on when they entered the inner court, and putting it off when they went out, which is only implied in Exodus and Leviticus, but is here expressly enjoined.

20 Neither shall they shave their heads nor suffer their locks to grow long; they shall only trim the hair of their heads. — their locks to grow long; the law forbade the shaving of the head (Leviticus 21:5), but only condemned letting the hair grow long by implication, providing for it in the exceptional case of the Nazarite vow.

21 Neither shall any priest drink wine when they enter into the inner court. — neither shall any priest drink wine, that is, as in Leviticus 10:9, “lest ye die. It shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations.”

22 Neither shall they take for their wives a widow nor her that is put away; but they shall take maidens of the seed of the house of Israel, or a widow who had a priest before. — in regard both to marriage the Levitical law made a broad distinction between the ordinary priest and the high priest. The former was only forbidden to marry a divorced woman (Leviticus 21:7), but was allowed to marry a widow; the latter could marry only a virgin of Israel.

23 And they shall teach My people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean. — and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean; impure thoughts, doctrines, and manners, and those which are agreeable to the word of God; the sense is, that they shall take pains to instruct persons in the knowledge of divine things, and shall do it truly, faithfully, and sincerely.

24 And in controversy they shall stand in judgment, and they shall judge it according to My judgments; and they shall keep My laws and My statutes in all Mine assemblies, and they shall hallow My Sabbaths. — and in controversy they shall stand in judgement; when any controversy arises among them concerning the law, this shall be carried into a court, and there heard, tried, judged and determined;

— and they shall hallow My Sabbaths, not a pagan Sunday; such times as are appointed for divine worship; these they shall be kept holy. And those who profame the true Sabbaths will be put to death; “for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people,” Exodus 31:14.

25 And they shall come near no dead person to defile themselves; but for father or for mother, or for son or for daughter, for brother or for sister that hath had no husband, they may defile themselves. — they shall come at no dead person to defile themselves; whosoever touched a dead body became legally unclean, (Numbers 19:11,) and thereby was disqualified for attending upon God’s worship in the Temple, Leviticus 22:3.

26 And after he is cleansed, they shall reckon unto him seven days. — seven days; that is, seven days shall be reckoned from the time of his cleansing, before he enters on public service again: according to the old law, seven days were reckoned from the defilement to the purification;

— here seven more are numbered after the purification is made; and therefore, this is a new law or rule, is to be observed during the Millennium.

27 And on the day that he goeth into the sanctuary unto the inner court to minister in the sanctuary, he shall offer his sin offering, saith the Lord God. — and in the day that the high priest goeth into the sanctuary, unto the inner court, to minister in the sanctuary, he shall offer his sin offering, saith the Lord GOD;

— yes, verse 44:27 says the high priest still offers his sin offering.

28 “‘And it shall be unto them for an inheritance. I am their inheritance, and ye shall give them no possession in Israel: I am their possession. — the priests were to be supported by the tithes given to God, and by their portion of the offerings made to Him.

29 They shall eat the meat offering and the sin offering and the trespass offering, and every dedicated thing in Israel shall be theirs.

30 And the first of all the firstfruits of all things and every oblation of all, of every sort of your oblations, shall be the priest’s. Ye shall also give unto the priest the first of your dough, that he may cause the blessing to rest in thine house. — that he may cause the blessing to rest in thine house; that is, that he, the priest or minister of the word, that partakes of the above things, and is comfortably provided for and supported, may pray to the Lord for such who liberally contribute to him;

— that a blessing may come and abide upon them and their families, and prosperity and success may attend them in their worldly business and employments of life;

31 The priests shall not eat of any thing that is dead of itself or torn, whether it be fowl or beast. — same as in Leviticus 22:8; the same law was binding upon all the Israelites, Leviticus 17:15.

~~~~

More on Tobiah colluding with Eliashib the high priest in the Temple – Nehemiah 13:4-9

4 And before this, Eliashib the priest, having the oversight of the chamber of the house of our God, was allied unto Tobiah.

5 And he had prepared for him a great chamber, where previously they laid the meat offerings, the frankincense and the vessels and the tithes of the corn, the new wine and the oil, which were commanded to be given to the Levites and the singers and the gatekeepers, and the offerings of the priests.

6 But in all this time I was not at Jerusalem; for in the two and thirtieth year of Artaxerxes king of Babylon I came unto the king, and after certain days I obtained leave from the king.

7 And I came to Jerusalem and learned of the evil that Eliashib had done for Tobiah in preparing him a chamber in the courts of the house of God.

8 And it grieved me sore; therefore I cast forth all the household stuff of Tobiah out of the chamber.

9 Then I commanded, and they cleansed the chambers; and thither I brought back the vessels of the house of God, with the meat offering and the frankincense.

Britain stole $45 trillion from India

•September 4, 2022 • Leave a Comment

How Britain stole $45 trillion from India; now with the Queen’s death, it has been reported that the Windsor family or the British Royalty has amassed a total of $25 trillion in their estates. How much of these were robed or stolen when Britannia rules the waves? (for more, see King Luxury)

“Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee” Habakkuk

Aljazeera by Jason Hickel ~ December 13, 2018

There is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonisation of India – as horrible as it may have been – was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself. If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain. So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long – the story goes – was a gesture of Britain’s benevolence.

New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik – published by Columbia University Press – deals a crushing blow to this narrative. Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938. 

It’s a staggering sum. For perspective, $45 trillion is 17 times more than the total annual gross domestic product of the United Kingdom today.

How did this come about?

It happened through the trade system. Prior to the colonial period, Britain bought goods like textiles and rice from Indian producers and paid for them in the normal way – mostly with silver – as they did with any other country. But something changed in 1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent and established a monopoly over Indian trade.

Among artifacts looted from India, this priceless Koh-i-Noor diamond was originally plundered in 1849 and set in the Crown of the Queen Mother

Here’s how it worked. The East India Company began collecting taxes in India, and then cleverly used a portion of those revenues (about a third) to fund the purchase of Indian goods for British use. In other words, instead of paying for Indian goods out of their own pocket, British traders acquired them for free, “buying” from peasants and weavers using money that had just been taken from them.

It was a scam – theft on a grand scale. Yet most Indians were unaware of what was going on because the agent who collected the taxes was not the same as the one who showed up to buy their goods. Had it been the same person, they surely would have smelled a rat.

Twitters users from India, Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan are scrambling for the return of the cursed Koh-i-Noor Diamond, an idol with a reputation for bringing misfortune, catastrophe and bloodshed to any man who wears it. Although the Imperial State Crown doesn’t have a precise value, due to its extensive list of priceless gems, jewellery experts estimate the crown to be worth an eye-watering £3 billion to £5 billion.

Some of the stolen goods were consumed in Britain, and the rest were re-exported elsewhere. The re-export system allowed Britain to finance a flow of imports from Europe, including strategic materials like iron, tar and timber, which were essential to Britain’s industrialisation. Indeed, the Industrial Revolution depended in large part on this systematic theft from India.

On top of this, the British were able to sell the stolen goods to other countries for much more than they “bought” them for in the first place, pocketing not only 100 percent of the original value of the goods but also the markup.

After the British Raj took over in 1858, colonisers added a special new twist to the tax-and-buy system. As the East India Company’s monopoly broke down, Indian producers were allowed to export their goods directly to other countries. But Britain made sure that the payments for those goods nonetheless ended up in London. 

How did this work? Basically, anyone who wanted to buy goods from India would do so using special Council Bills – a unique paper currency issued only by the British Crown. And the only way to get those bills was to buy them from London with gold or silver. So traders would pay London in gold to get the bills, and then use the bills to pay Indian producers. When Indians cashed the bills in at the local colonial office, they were “paid” in rupees out of tax revenues – money that had just been collected from them. So, once again, they were not in fact paid at all; they were defrauded.

Meanwhile, London ended up with all of the gold and silver that should have gone directly to the Indians in exchange for their exports.

Shashi Tharoor’s Stirring Speech at Oxford Union Goes Viral: “The Sun never set on the British Empire because even God couldn’t trust the British in the Dark.”

This corrupt system meant that even while India was running an impressive trade surplus with the rest of the world – a surplus that lasted for three decades in the early 20th century – it showed up as a deficit in the national accounts because the real income from India’s exports was appropriated in its entirety by Britain. 

Some point to this fictional “deficit” as evidence that India was a liability to Britain. But exactly the opposite is true. Britain intercepted enormous quantities of income that rightly belonged to Indian producers. India was the goose that laid the golden egg. Meanwhile, the “deficit” meant that India had no option but to borrow from Britain to finance its imports. So the entire Indian population was forced into completely unnecessary debt to their colonial overlords, further cementing British control. 

Britain used the windfall from this fraudulent system to fuel the engines of imperial violence – funding the invasion of China in the 1840s and the suppression of the Indian Rebellion in 1857. And this was on top of what the Crown took directly from Indian taxpayers to pay for its wars. As Patnaik points out, “the cost of all Britain’s wars of conquest outside Indian borders were charged always wholly or mainly to Indian revenues.” 

And that’s not all. Britain used this flow of tribute from India to finance the expansion of capitalism in Europe and regions of European settlement, like Canada and Australia. So not only the industrialisation of Britain but also the industrialisation of much of the Western world was facilitated by extraction from the colonies.

Patnaik identifies four distinct economic periods in colonial India from 1765 to 1938, calculates the extraction for each, and then compounds at a modest rate of interest (about 5 percent, which is lower than the market rate) from the middle of each period to the present. Adding it all up, she finds that the total drain amounts to $44.6 trillion. This figure is conservative, she says, and does not include the debts that Britain imposed on India during the Raj.

These are eye-watering sums. But the true costs of this drain cannot be calculated. If India had been able to invest its own tax revenues and foreign exchange earnings in development – as Japan did – there’s no telling how history might have turned out differently. India could very well have become an economic powerhouse. Centuries of poverty and suffering could have been prevented.

All of this is a sobering antidote to the rosy narrative promoted by certain powerful voices in Britain. The conservative historian Niall Ferguson has claimed that British rule helped “develop” India. While he was prime minister, David Cameron asserted that British rule was a net help to India.

This narrative has found considerable traction in the popular imagination: according to a 2014 YouGov poll, 50 percent of people in Britain believe that colonialism was beneficial to the colonies.

Yet during the entire 200-year history of British rule in India, there was almost no increase in per capita income. In fact, during the last half of the 19th century – the heyday of British intervention – income in India collapsed by half. The average life expectancy of Indians dropped by a fifth from 1870 to 1920. Tens of millions died needlessly of policy-induced famine.

Britain didn’t develop India. Quite the contrary – as Patnaik’s work makes clear – India developed Britain.

Dr Shashi Tharoor – Looking Back at the British Raj in India· by The University of Edinburgh: Speaking of unwanted immigrants in the UK today, “We are here because you were there.”

What does this require of Britain today? An apology? Absolutely. Reparations? Perhaps – although there is not enough money in all of Britain to cover the sums that Patnaik identifies. In the meantime, we can start by setting the story straight. We need to recognise that Britain retained control of India not out of benevolence but for the sake of plunder and that Britain’s industrial rise didn’t emerge sui generis from the steam engine and strong institutions, as our schoolbooks would have it, but depended on violent theft from other lands and other peoples.

~~~~

Many in the United Kingdom believe Russia was and some still believe it is the main threat of their kingdom. Others, like John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, give incredible speeches around the world saying China is the main enemy. And Mearsheimer emphasizes the United States are protected by fish to the left and fish to the right, but he foolishly negate to address America’s broken border in the South; and that the Scriptures say that House of Israel’s main “enemy” comes from the South:

And let’s have a look at some Scriptures:

Ezekiel 20:45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the South, and drop thy word toward the South, and prophesy against the forest of the Southland.

47 And say to the forest of the South: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned therein.

48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’”

49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’”

Ezekiel 21:1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel;

3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My Sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.

4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North,

5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My Sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’

The Scriptures above are shrouded in cryptic languages and so the Qs are: how would such scenarios be played out? The current Russia/Ukraine and China/Taiwan arises are just two major distractions, but more importantly, who are these enemies the Prophet Ezekiel identifies coming from the SOUTH, and how would God says He will kindle a fire and “all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee?”

For the Scriptures had said:

Because thou hast despoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall despoil thee, because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein,” Habakkuk 2:8

Poland to sue for €1.3 trillion

•September 3, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Poland to sue for €1.3 trillion from Germany over WWII in reparations

Euronews ~ September 1, 2022 // RT ~ September 1, 2022

Update: RT Poland passes reparations bill through Parliament ~ September 14, 2022

The Polish government on Thursday estimated the financial cost of World War II losses under Nazi occupation at €1.3 trillion and said it would “ask Germany to negotiate these reparations.”

“It’s a significant sum of 6.2 trillion” zlotys, Deputy Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski, leader of the ruling Law and Justice party, told a conference.

Polish Army Veterans attend a wreath-laying ceremony marking national observances of the anniversary of WWII in Warsaw

“We not only prepared the report but we have also taken the decision as to the further steps,” Kaczynski said during the report’s presentation, announcing that Warsaw intends to officially request reparations from Germany, which he described as a “long and not… easy path.”

The sum was announced at the release of a report on the cost of years of Nazi German occupation. Some 30 historians, economists and other experts have been working on the document since 2017.

The country’s right-wing government says Poland has not been compensated by Germany while Berlin argues compensation was paid to East Bloc nations in the years after the war.

Nazi German occupation of Poland began 83 years ago and lasted until the end of the war in May 1945.

President Andrzej Duda said the war was “one of the most terrible tragedies in our history” at a remembrance event near Gdansk.

“Not only because it took our freedom, not only because it took our state from us, but also because this war meant millions of victims among Poland’s citizens and irreparable losses to our homeland and our nation,” Duda said.

Dietmar Nietan, the German government’s official for German-Polish cooperation, said in a statement that 1 September “remains a day of guilt and shame for Germany that reminds us time and again not to forget the crimes carried out by Germany” that are the “darkest chapter in our history” and still affect bilateral relations.

Reconciliation offered by people in Poland is “the basis on which we can look toward the future together in a united Europe,” Nietan said.

Poland’s government rejects a 1953 declaration by the country’s then-communist leaders, under pressure from the Soviet Union, agreeing not to make any further claims on Germany.

An opposition lawmaker, Grzegorz Schetyna, said the report is just a “game in the internal politics” and insists Poland needs to build good relations with Berlin.

Some six million of Poland’s citizens, including three million Jews, were killed in the war and its industry, infrastructure and culture suffered huge losses.

Ezekiel (Ch 41-42)

•September 2, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The start of the Millennium begins with the building of the Temple. What we have here is a very detailed description of a magnificent physical Temple, somewhat loosely patterned after the Temple of Solomon, only much larger, complete with special living quarters for priests and Levites, and an elaborate system of animal sacrifices and other material offerings, along with the faithful observance of New Moons and Sabbaths, the whole picture rivaling the Book of Leviticus itself.

Ezekiel 41

This is a continuation of the description of the Temple in Chapter 40, where the Outer and Inner Courts, plus other details, were presented and measured:

Afterward he brought me to the temple and measured the posts, six cubits broad on the one side and six cubits broad on the other side, which was the breadth of the tabernacle. — after the prophet had observed the courts, he was brought to the temple; the posts of six cubits broad; each cubit consisting of about one and a half foot, or eighteen inches, or one half-yard.

And the breadth of the door was ten cubits; and the sides of the door were five cubits on the one side and five cubits on the other side; and he measured the length thereof, forty cubits, and the breadth, twenty cubits. — the length thereof, forty cubits; these are exactly the dimensions of the Holy Place in Solomon’s Temple. The measurements are internal, the same as in the Temple of Solomon.  

Then went he inward and measured the post of the door, two cubits; and the door, six cubits; and the breadth of the door, seven cubits. — went he inward; here is a noticeable change in the usual expression; in all other cases the angel had brought the prophet to the places to be measured;

— but as he is here entering the Holy of Holies, into which, under the law, Ezekiel might not enter, because the holy of holies was not to be entered even by a priest like Ezekiel, but only by the high priest once a year; the angel goes in alone.

So he measured the length thereof, twenty cubits; and the breadth, twenty cubits, before the temple. And he said unto me, “This is the Most Holy Place.” — holy of holies; it was an exact square, as was Solomon’s, 1 Kings 6:20.

After that, he measured the wall of the house, six cubits; and the breadth of every side chamber, four cubits, round about the house on every side. — the wall of the house, six cubits, the thickness of the wall is the same with that of the wall of the outer court (Ezekiel 40:5), about ten feet. Great massiveness is characteristic of the Temple, to set forth the firmness and security of the things symbolised.

And the side chambers were three, one over another, and thirty in order; and they entered into the wall which was of the house for the side chambers round about, that they might have support, but they had no support in the wall of the house. — there were three storeys of chambers one above the other, and this was repeated thirty times, giving thirty chambers in each storey, or ninety in all;

— these chambers were exactly like those surrounding Solomon’s Temple, except that they were one cubit narrower, and the description of them is made clearer by a comparison with 1 Kings 6:5-10

And there was an enlarging and a winding about still upward to the side chambers; for the winding about of the house went still upward round about the house. Therefore the breadth of the house was still upward, and so increased from the lowest chamber to the highest by the middle chamber. — there was an increase in the width of each storey of the side chambers by the distance which the wall receded, as is expressly said in 1 Kings 6:6; but whether there was a corresponding recession in the thickness of the outer wall of the chambers is not stated;

— it is also plain that the side chambers surrounded the house; and that the two upper storeys were reached by a winding staircase (w [Ezekiel 40:44-49]).

I saw also the height of the house round about; the foundations of the side chambers were a full reed of six great cubits. — the Temple, as has been already said (Ezekiel 40:49), was entered by a flight of steps leading up to the porch, and the “house round and side chambers” were therefore on a lower level than the Temple.

The thickness of the wall, which was for the side chamber outside, was five cubits; and that which was left was the place of the side chambers that were within. — the thickness of the wall, which was for the side chambers without, was five cubits; this is the outward wall of the chambers, north and south, which was five cubits thick, made of stone.

10 And between the chambers was the wideness of twenty cubits round about the house on every side. — there was a space of twenty cubits between the foundation on which the chambers and the Temple stood and the wall of the court on all three sides on which the chambers extended.

11 And the doors of the side chambers were toward the place that was left, one door toward the north and another door toward the south; and the breadth of the place that was left was five cubits round about. — we may now sum up the measurements of the Temple with its chambers and surrounding space. The wall, 6 cubits; the chambers, 4; their outer wall, 5; the platform beyond, 5; the space beyond this, 20 (6 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 20 = 40);

— this was on each side, and therefore is to be doubled, making 80 cubits; to this add the 20 cubits of the inner width of the Temple, and we have exactly the 100 cubits, the width of the inner court. In the same way the length: here the porch is considered as belonging to the court, and with it the front wall of the Temple, the thickness of which is included in the length of the porch.

— beginning then at the inside of the outer walls, we have the inner length of Temple, 60 cubits; rear wall, 6; chambers, 4; outer wall, 5; platform, 5; space, 20; in all, 100 cubits. thus making an exact square.

12 Now the building fronting the separate place at the end toward the west was seventy cubits broad; and the wall of the building was five cubits thick round about and the length thereof ninety cubits. — this building was to the west of the temple, at which end stood the holy of holies, and this near to that; it was seventy cubits broad; and the length thereof ninety cubits.

13 So he measured the house, a hundred cubits long; and the separate place and the building with the walls thereof, a hundred cubits long; — the house; the whole Temple, oracle, sanctuary, and porch, with the walls;

— the length was ninety cubits, which, adding as before the thickness of the walls, gives 100 cubits in length, from north to south; the whole temple-building was 500 cubits from west to east, and from north to south, 500 cubits.

14 also the breadth of the face of the house and of the separate place toward the east, a hundred cubits. — toward the east; the separate place was measured on its eastern side, for the western was not approachable for the purpose of measurement

— the whole temple-building was 500 cubits from west to east, and from north to south, 500 cubits.

15 And he measured the length of the building opposite the separate place which was behind it, and the galleries thereof on the one side and on the other side, a hundred cubits, with the inner temple and the porches of the court.

16 the doorposts, and the narrow windows, and the galleries round about on their three stories opposite the door, ceiled with wood round about, and from the ground up to the windows (and the windows were covered), — the door posts and the narrow windows; of the inner temple or holy of holies; for this is what is last mentioned; of the door posts of it, see Ezekiel 41:3, in the holy of holies;

— both in Moses’s tabernacle, and Solomon’s temple, were no windows; Yehovah dwelt in thick darkness, 1 Kings 8:12, but in this inner temple, the holy of holies.

17 to the space above the door, even unto the inner house and outside, and by all the wall round about within and without, by measure. — over above the door …”within and without” was “by measure.” This asserts that all the overlaying was done by careful measurement.

18 And it was made with cherubims and palm trees, so that a palm tree was between a cherub and a cherub; and every cherub had two faces, — the cherubim are represented each with two faces, but in Ezekiel 1 and 10, they have each four faces.

19 so that the face of a man was toward the palm tree on the one side, and the face of a young lion toward the palm tree on the other side; it was made through all the house round about. — a man’s face toward the palm on this side, and a lion’s face toward the palm on that side: thus was it made round about the whole house.

20 From the ground unto above the door were cherubims and palm trees made, and on the wall of the temple. — it remains obscure whether it be the “door” of the holiest or that of the holy place to which he refers, or both.

21 The posts of the temple were squared, and also the face of the sanctuary; the appearance of the one as the appearance of the other. — the door-frames of both were square and just alike.

22 The altar of wood was three cubits high and the length thereof two cubits; and the corners thereof and the length thereof and the walls thereof were of wood. And he said unto me, “This is the table that is before the Lord.”

— the altar of burnt offering in Solomon’s temple was of brass (2 Chronicles 4:1), and in the tabernacle of shittim wood (Exodus 27:1); the altar of incense in the tabernacle (Exodus 30:1) and in Solomon’s temple (1 Kings 7:48) was constructed of wood overlaid with gold, but in this temple only of wood.

— the altar had corners, probably somewhat raised, but may or may not look like horns.

23 And the temple and the sanctuary had two doors.

24 And the doors had two leaves apiece, two turning leaves: two leaves for the one door and two leaves for the other door. — each had a double or two-leaved door; the doors of the holy place and the holiest.

— the temple or holy place and the holiest had each a two-leaved door; and each of the leaves was again divided into two leaves.

25 And there were made on them, on the doors of the temple, cherubims and palm trees, as were made upon the walls; and there were thick planks upon the face of the porch outside. — cherubim and palm trees, like as were made on the walls; the doors of both places had the same decorations as the walls of each;

— and there were thick planks upon the face of the porch outdifr; on the outward front of the porch were some thick wainscot boards, which projected as a cover to the entrance into it. 

26 And there were narrow windows and palm trees on the one side and on the other side, on the sides of the porch, and upon the side chambers of the house, and thick planks. — it is to be observed that in these outer parts of the Temple only palm trees were used in the ornamentation, the cherubim being reserved for the Holy Place and the Holy of Holies.

— the description of the Temple proper is now finished, and it is noticeable how very little is said of its interior furniture and arrangements; there is no mention at all of that profuse overlaying with gold so characteristic of Solomon’s Temple; nothing is said of the candlestick, or the table of show-bread; even the ark itself, that climax of Israel’s symbolic worship, is not mentioned. 

Ezekiel 42

1 Then he brought me forth into the outer court, the way toward the north; and he brought me into the chamber that was opposite the separate place and which was before the building toward the north. — then he brought me forth into the outer court; outer with respect to the temple itself, or the outer part of the court, which court was that of the priests.

Along the length of a hundred cubits was the north door, and the breadth was fifty cubits. — he brought me “before” a row of chambers 100 cubits long, east and west. “The door” of which lay on the north side of the chambers. The priests entered from the outer court; the breadth of this block of chambers was fifty cubits, north and south Ezekiel 42:8.

Opposite the twenty cubits which were for the inner court, and opposite the pavement which was for the outer court, was gallery upon gallery in three stories.

And before the chambers was a walk of ten cubits breadth inward, a way of one cubit, and their doors toward the north.

Now the upper chambers were shorter; for the galleries were higher than these — than the lower and than the middlemost of the building.

For they were in three stories, but had not pillars as the pillars of the courts; therefore the upper building was narrowed more than the lowest and the middlemost from the ground.

And the wall that was outside opposite the chambers, toward the outer court on the forepart of the chambers, the length thereof was fifty cubits.

For the length of the chambers that were in the outer court was fifty cubits; and lo, those before the temple were a hundred cubits.

And from under these chambers was the entry on the east side, as one goeth into them from the outer court.

10 The chambers were within the thickness of the wall of the court toward the east, opposite the separate place and opposite the building.

11 And the walk before them was like the appearance of the chambers which were toward the north, as long as they and as broad as they; and all their exits were both according to their fashions, and according to their doors.

12 And according to the doors of the chambers that were toward the south was a door in the head of the walk, the passage directly before the wall toward the east as one entereth into them.

13 Then said he unto me, “The north chambers and the south chambers, which are in front of the separate place, they are holy chambers where the priests who approach unto the Lord shall eat the most holy things. There shall they lay the most holy things, and the meat offering, and the sin offering, and the trespass offering; for the place is holy.

— the north chambers, and the south chambers; namely, those described in the foregoing part of the chapter; they be holy chambers, where the priests shall eat the most holy things;

— the show- bread, the remainder of the meat-offering, sin-offering, and trespass- offering, are expressly called the most holy things, Leviticus 6:14; Leviticus 6:17; Leviticus 24:9; and are distinguished from the holy things, such as the peace- offerings, first-fruits, and tithes, Leviticus 21:22. These were to be eaten within the precincts of the temple, by the direction of the Levitical law. There shall they lay the most holy things;

— these rooms were likewise set apart for laying up the remainder of the sacrifices, till they were eaten by the priests and their families, Leviticus 10:13; Leviticus 22:13;

— if the Churches teach that these activities are for ritual or sacrificial laws, then why are these brought back during the Millenniun? Surely false teachers abound, their shepherd and watchmen are misguided!

“Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see” Isaiah 42:18

“His watchmen are blind; they are all ignorant; they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark, sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber” Isaiah 56:10

14 When the priests enter therein, then shall they not go out of the holy place into the outer court; but there they shall lay their garments wherein they minister, for they are holy; and they shall put on other garments and shall approach those things which are for the people.”

— same thing with garments; but there they shall lay their garments when on duty, for they are holy; these signify the robe of righteousness and garments of purity, that fine linen, clean and white, which is the righteousness of the saints; and fitly represented by the linen garments of the priests, in which they ministered in their office, and were like them holy, pure, and spotless; in these only saints appear before God.

15 Now when he had made an end of measuring the inner house, he brought me forth toward the gate whose prospect is toward the east, and measured it round about.

16 He measured the east side with the measuring reed, five hundred reeds with the measuring reed round about.

17 He measured the north side, five hundred reeds with the measuring reed round about.

18 He measured the south side, five hundred reeds with the measuring reed.

19 He turned about to the west side and measured five hundred reeds with the measuring reed.

20 He measured it on the four sides; it had a wall round about, five hundred reeds long and five hundred broad, to make a separation between the sanctuary and the profane place. — this vast enclosure on all sides was a wall, a massive wall surrounding the outer court; the object of this enclosure was to protect the sanctity of the Temple and its courts, “to make a separation between the sanctuary and the profane place”

— the Precincts; the Temple and its courts were surrounded by an area of exact dimensions 3,000 cubits (1,500 yards) square.

Prof Jeffrey Sachs on Covid Cover-Up

•September 1, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Prof Jeffrey Sachs on the Covid Origins Cover-Up

Unz Review / August 29, 2022

Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University stands as a pillar of America’s academic establishment, and even as far back as three decades ago, the New York Times had already hailed him as one of the world’s most important figures in his field. He currently serves as director of his university’s Center for Sustainable Development, and over the years he has published a multitude of articles and columns on a very wide range of public policy issues.

Given that background, it was hardly surprising that the Lancet, a top medical journal, named him chairman of the Covid Commission, established to investigate all aspects of the massive disease epidemic that has devastated the world since early 2020 and killed well over a million Americans.

“I chaired the commission for the Lancet for 2 years on Covid. I’m pretty convinced it came out of a US lab of biotechnology […] We don’t know for sure but there is enough evidence. [However] it’s not being investigated, not in the US, not anywhere.” Prof. Jeffrey Sachs

Yet over the last few months, Prof. Sachs has broken ranks with America’s ruling political and media elites, and courageously begun to speak his mind on the origins of the outbreak.

In May he co-authored a major paper in the prestigious PNAS journal, pointing to the very strong evidence that the Covid virus had been bioengineered, being the product of a laboratory instead of nature, and he called for an independent investigation into its true source.

The following month, he was even more forthright in his statements at a small think-tank gathering in Spain, and at the beginning of July a short clip of those remarks went super-viral, retweeted out more than 11,000 times and accumulating over than a million views.

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel; there is the whoredom of Ephraim, Israel is defiled” Hosea 6:10

Behold, the eyes of the Lord God are upon the sinful kingdom, and I will destroy it from off the face of the earth, except that I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob,” saith the Lord. Amos 9:8

UK’s Crumbling Navy Power 

•August 31, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Failing to revive a crumbling empire, UK’s newest and largest aircraft carrier, broke down again on the 2nd day of a mission to the US

RT / August 29, 2022 // BBC / August 29, 2022

$3.5bn UK aircraft carrier breaks down again

The stricken HMS Prince of Wales suffered a “mechanical issue,” the Royal Navy says

Six shipyards were involved in the building of HMS Prince of Wales at a cost of £3bn

Britain’s biggest ship and the second of the Royal Navy’s two aircraft carriers, HMS Prince of Wales, has broken down shortly after embarking on a cross-Atlantic aviation trial.

The carrier “remains in the South Coast Exercise Area while conducting investigations into an emerging mechanical issue,” the Royal Navy’s spokesperson said in a statement to the media on Sunday.

The incident occurred just one day after the vessel left Portsmouth for what the Royal Navy described as “a landmark mission to shape the future of stealth jet and drone operations.”

The UK Defence Journal cited a source as saying divers discovered that the ship’s propeller shaft appeared to be damaged.

Built at a cost of £3bn, this isn’t the first time that the 65,000-ton vessel has suffered technical issues since it entered service in 2019. At the end of 2020, it was stranded in Portsmouth after a flooded engine room led to electrical damage.

The carrier, which has a crew of 1,600, spent fewer than 90 days at sea during its first two years of service after suffering multiple leaks, according to The Guardian.

“Britain is lucky this landmark event happened near home. Imagine the embarrassment if this had happened in the South China Sea,” someone tweets.

Indeed, its twin sister carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, had managed to put on a long voyage to provoke China in the South China Sea in July 2021, before loosing one of its F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter in the Mediterranean Sea on her way home.

According to a report, the Prince of Wales is now anchored southeast of the Isle of Wight in England. It states that, unless the problem can be resolved at sea enabling the warship to continue its journey to the US, it might need to go into dry dock at Rosyth in Scotland early, ahead of a planned inspection in 2023.

Therefore the LORD, the God of hosts, the LORD saith thus: “Wailing shall be in all streets, and they shall say in all the highways, ‘Alas! Alas!’ And they shall call the husbandman to mourning, and such as are skillful in lamentation to wailing.

And in all vineyards shall be wailing, for I will pass through thee,” saith the LORD.

Woe unto you that desire the day of the LORD! To what end is it for you? The day of the LORD is darkness, and not light:

as if a man fled from a lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent bit him.

Shall not the day of the LORD be darkness, and not light? Even very dark, and no brightness in it? Amos 5:16-20

Stolen Treasures

•August 30, 2022 • Leave a Comment


Inside one of the most lavish rooms of Buckingham Palace

29 July 2022

George IV’s lifelong passion for art inspired a new wave of oriental fashion from the East in the 18th Century. In this BBC history documentary, Fiona Bruce reveals George IV’s art and furniture collections hidden in the Centre Room of Buckingham Palace.

Colonialism 2.0: How the US and UK take what they want from ‘lesser powers’ RT / 20, August 2022

In the name of sanctions, geopolitical interests or the so-called ‘rules-based order’, colonial powers do what they do best – plunder those they see as weak and insubordinate

There is an old joke which still has resonance. A child asks his parent, “Why are there pyramids in Egypt?” The parent answers, “Because they were too big to take to Britain.” Of course, many a true word is spoken in jest. Indeed, there is an apocryphal story that back in the day when Vladimir Lenin was in exile in London, he would enjoy taking friends to the British Museum and explaining to them how and from what far-flung lands all the antiquities there were stolen.

One might have thought that these days of colonial plunder had ended, but one would be very wrong. Current examples abound. A notable one is, of course, the freezing by the US of $7 billion from the Afghanistan treasury – monies the US continues to hold even as it watches Afghans begin to die from starvation. Apparently, the US believes that, after laying waste to Afghanistan through 20 years of war and, even before that by supporting the mujahideen terrorists, it is entitled to some compensation. This upside-down type of reasoning abounds in the minds of those in the West who simply believe they can take whatever they wish.

US and UK; Plundering the Global South

Similarly, the US is now plundering Syria – another country utterly devastated in no small part by Washington-backed militants in a campaign to overthrow the elected president – of most of its oil, even as Syria suffers from severe energy blackouts. Thus, according to the Syrian Oil Ministry, “US occupation forces and their mercenaries,” referring to the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), “steal up to 66,000 barrels every single day from the fields occupied in the eastern region,” amounting to around 83% of Syria’s daily oil production.

According to the ministry’s data, the Syrian oil sector has incurred losses of “about $105 billion since the beginning of the war until the middle of this year” as a result of the US oil theft campaign.

Additionally, the statement added that alongside the financial losses incurred by the oil sector were “losses of life, including 235 martyrs, 46 injured and 112 kidnapped.”

Pacific nation snubs US

•August 29, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Pacific nation of Solomon Islands snubs US request to dock ship – media

RT Reports / August 26, 2022 // CNN / August 26, 2022

The US Coast Guard vessel was diverted to Papua New Guinea after its call for access to a Solomon Islands’ port was ignored. Solomon Islands doesn’t answer US Coast Guard’s request for port visit.

Changing times: Solomon Islands snubs US request to dock ship

A vessel of the US Coast Guard was prevented from entering the Solomon Islands for a routine refueling stop, because the Pacific nation’s government did not respond to its request for port access, Reuters has reported, citing an American official.  

The USCGC Oliver Henry was out patrolling for illegal fishing in the region when it attempted and failed to gain access to Honiara port for refueling, the news agency wrote on Friday.

The Solomons’ government “did not respond” to the US request for diplomatic clearance, Kristin Kam, public affairs officer for the US Coast Guard in Hawaii, told Reuters. Kam said the US Department of State was “in contact” with Honiara and expects “all future clearances will be provided to US ships.”

The US vessel was instead diverted to Papua New Guinea, another official told the news agency.

Reports on social media suggested that a British navy ship had also been refused port access this week. The HMS Spey was also taking part in monitoring waters for illegal fishing for the Pacific Islands Forum, which holds annual surveillance operations with help from the US, Australia, New Zealand and France.

A Royal Navy spokesperson told Reuters that its ships’ programmes are “under constant review” and it is not unusual for them to change. “For reasons of operational security we do not discuss details,” the spokesperson said, adding that the UK navy “looks forward to visiting the Solomon Islands at a later date”.

Honiara did not answer Reuters’ request for comment. 

The South Pacific islands have become the next US-China contest

The apparent refusal to grant entry to the Western ships comes amid heightened tensions with the US and Australia following the Solomons’ signing of a security pact with China earlier this year.

Beijing has already begun training local troops on the islands, prompting alarm in Australia, where there are fears China will use the agreement to establish a military base there. Australia has since promised to “step up” its military presence in the Pacific, with China responding by accusing Australia of encouraging an “arms race” in the region.

Update / August 30, 2022

Solomon Islands to ban U.S. navy ships from ports – U.S. embassy SYDNEY (Reuters) – The Solomon Islands government has told the United States it will place a moratorium on navy vessels entering its ports, the United States embassy in Canberra said on Tuesday.

“All your lovers have forgotten you; they no longer care for you anymore. I have wounded you as an enemy would. I have punished you as the cruel would, because your guilt is so great, because your sins are so many” Jeremiah 30:14.

All thy friends have forgotten thee; they shall not ask about thee at all, for I have smitten thee with he stroke of an enemy, even severe correction: thy sins have abounded above all thine iniquity. Septuagint Brenton Translation

“Unless ye be circumcised, ye cannot be saved”

•August 28, 2022 • Leave a Comment

“Unless ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved,” Acts 15:1. Not only is this relevant to Abraham and Isaac, and his posterity by Isaac, were to be circumcised, but also Ishmael and the bond-servants.

“And the uncircumcised manchild whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken My covenant,” Genesis 17:14

Genesis 17

10 This is My covenant which ye shall keep between Me and you and thy seed after thee: every manchild among you shall be circumcised. — it is here said to be the covenant which Abraham and his seed must keep, as a copy or counterpart. It is considered a sign and seal, (Romans 4:11);

— an obligation upon Abraham and his seed which was their part of the covenant, not only to the duty of accepting the covenant, and putting away the corruption of the flesh, which were primarily signified by circumcision, but in general to the observation of all God’s commands.

11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant between Me and you. — not only Abraham and Isaac, and his posterity by Isaac, were to be circumcised, but also Ishmael and the bond-servants.

— it is worthy of remark that in circumcision, after Abraham himself, the parent is the voluntary imponent, and the child merely the passive recipient of the sign of the covenant. It shall be a token of the covenant, i.e. a sign, evidence, and assurance, both of the blessing promised by that God who appointed this ordinance, and of man’s obligation to the duties required, which is signified by his acceptance of and submission to this ordinance. 

12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every manchild in your generations, he that is born in the house or bought with money from any stranger who is not of thy seed. — the time of circumcision is the eighth day. Seven is the number of perfection. Seven days are therefore regarded as a type of perfectage and individuality. At this stage, accordingly, the sign of sanctification is made on the child, betokening the consecration of the heart to God, when its rational powers have come into noticeable activity;

— to be “cut off from his people” is to be excluded from any part in the covenant; and for an Israelite, is certainly worse than a Gentile or an alien. 

13 He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must be circumcised; and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. — just as between God and Noah in Genesis 9:12-16 regarding the rainbow: my covenant with you shall be an everlasting covenant.

14 And the uncircumcised manchild whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken My covenant.” — “shall be cut off from his people” Jewish commentators generally consider that this penalty consisted in the offender being left to the direct interposition of God, who would punish him with childlessness and premature death (Talmud: Tract Yebam, 55);

— most Christian commentators suppose that the offender was to be put to death by the civil magistrate; as, for instance, the killing of a a sacrifice anywhere, except at the door of the tabernacle (Leviticus 17:4), and the eating of blood (Leviticus 17:9; Leviticus 17:14), are to be thus similarily dealt with, while blasphemy and murder are to be punished with death (Leviticus 24:16-17).

Joshua 5

1 And it came to pass, when all the kings of the Amorites who were on the side of the Jordan westward and all the kings of the Canaanites who were by the sea heard that the Lord had dried up the waters of the Jordan from before the children of Israel until we had passed over, that their heart melted; neither was there spirit in them any more because of the children of Israel.

At that time the Lord said unto Joshua, “Make thee sharp knives and circumcise again the children of Israel the second time.” — “again the second time” this does not mean that those very persons who had before been circumcised should be circumcised again, but that the rite or custom of circumcising, which had been disused in the wilderness for some years, should be again practised.

And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at the hill of the foreskins [or, Gibeahhaaraloth]. — Joshua circumcised the children of Israel; that is, he caused them to be circumcised, namely, such of them as were uncircumcised.

And this is the cause why Joshua did circumcise: All the people who came out of Egypt who were males, even all the men of war, died in the wilderness by the way after they came out of Egypt. — all the people that came out of Egypt that were males, even all the men of war; meaning such that were twenty years old, and upwards: died in the wilderness in a course of forty years;

— as they journeyed through the wilderness; this is to be understood with an exception of Joshua, Caleb, Eleazar, & etc but then there was a large number who were under twenty years of age, that came out of Egypt, and were still living.

Now all the people who came out were circumcised; but all the people who were born in the wilderness on the way as they came forth out of Egypt, them they had not circumcised. — “all that came out of Egypt were circumcised,” this does not say when and where they were circumcised; but maybe during the horrors of the plagues (before the last plague of firstborn death) in Egypt, the Israelites saw that the first step toward liberty, as Moses would have told them, is the need to be circumcised;

— Exodus 4, Zipporah, wife of Moses, was inspired and took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son, otherwise he might had died of being the firstborn like the Egyptians if he had not been circumcised (Exodus 4);

— Exodus 4:24 “the Lord met him and sought to put him to death,” Rashi: on the way, in an inn and sought to put him to death: [i.e., He sought] Moses, because he had neglected to circumcise his son Eliezer. Because he neglected it, he was [to be] punished with death.

— Rashi: This appears in tractate Nedarim (31b). The angel turned into a sort of serpent and swallowed him [Moses] from his head to his thighs, and then [spit him out and] swallowed him from his feet to his private parts. Zipporah therefore understood that it was because of [the failure to perform] the circumcision [that this occurred]. — [from Ned. 32a, Exodus Rabbah 5:5].

— Targum: But it was on the way, in the place of lodging that the angel of the Lord met him, and sought to kill him, because Gershom his son had not been circumcised, inasmuch as Jethro his father-in-law had not permitted him to circumcise him: but Eliezer had been circumcised, by an agreement between them two. And Zipporah took a stone, and circumcised the foreskin of Gershom her son, and brought the severed part to the feet of the angel, the Destroyer, and said, The husband sought to circumcise, but the father-in-law obstructed him; and now let this blood of the circumcision atone for my husband.

— I Chronicles 23:14 Now concerning Moses the man of God, his sons were named of the tribe of Levi. 15 The sons of Moses were Gershom and Eliezer. (Exodus 2:22 Gershom [that is, A stranger there] was born; presumably the firstborn)

For the children of Israel walked forty years in the wilderness till all the people who were men of war, who came out of Egypt, were consumed because they obeyed not the voice of the Lord. Unto these the Lord swore that He would not show them the land which the Lord swore unto their fathers that He would give us, a land that floweth with milk and honey. — “because they had not hearkened to the voice of the Lord” they broke the coverant: Genesis 17:12 “he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every manchild in your generations.”

— the onus of responsibilities lies chiefly with the parents, especially with their fathers, that sons should be circumcised, (1) that’s why Moses was threatened with death, (2) that’s why those parents of children borned in the wilderness were not allowed into the Promised Land;

— as reaffirmed at Mount Sinai in Leviticus 12:1-3 “And the Lord spoke unto Moses, ‘If a woman have conceived seed and borne a manchild . . . on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.”

And their children, whom He raised up in their stead, them Joshua circumcised; for they were uncircumcised, because they had not circumcised them on the way. — their children; these that Joshua circumcised: God now required this to be done in order to inherit the Promised Land of milk and honey.

And it came to pass, when they had done circumcising all the people, that they abode in their places in the camp till they were whole. — that they abode in their places in the camp till they were whole: till the wound made by circumcision was healed; now as it was on the tenth day they passed over Jordan, and came to Gilgal, where they were circumcised, there were three entire days between that and the fourteenth, when they kept the Passover.

Only Gentiles are exempt:

Acts 15

And certain men who came down from Judea taught the brethren and said, “Unless ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.” — at Antioch some maintain that Gentile converts must be circumcised; a mission to Jerusalem about the question was thus sent.

When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question. — the Council at Jerusalem, occupied for the Christian theocracy a position similar to that of the Sanhedrim, was the centre of authority and remained so till its fall. The apostles and elders were the recognised leaders of the Church;

— most fake Christians errously say this is “the ceremonial law”” or “the laws of Moses” but it was established way earlier during God’s covernant with Abraham in Genesis 17:10 “This is My covenant which ye shall keep between Me and you and thy seed after thee: every manchild among you shall be circumcised.”

And being sent on their way by the church, they passed through Phoenicia and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles; and they caused great joy unto all the brethren. — they passed through Phenice and Samaria; which both lay between Syria and Judea; and in the latter Philip the evangelist had preached earlier with much success, Acts 8:5.

And when they had come to Jerusalem, they were received by the church and by the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.

But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees who believed, saying that it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the Law of Moses. — besides the covernant between God and Abraham, the Pharisaic teaching concerning the necessity of circumcision was based on such passages as Isaiah 56:6, where the covenant mentioned was held to be that of circumcision. And they supported their position by such passages as Isaiah 52:1, where the uncircumcised are excluded from Jerusalem, the holy city.

And the apostles and the elders came together to consider this matter. — and the apostles and elders came together to consider of this matter; as the apostles commonly resided at Jerusalem, the greater part of them may have come together on this occasion; and the elders likewise, men most respectable for their knowledhe and wisdom, having been chosen to the office of elders from among those on whom the holy spirits descended on the day of Pentecost.

And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up and said unto them, “Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the Word of the Gospel and believe. — after much deliberation, Peter, on behalf of the Council concluded that circumcision were not binding upon the Gentiles, to press the precedent of the case of Cornelius and the analogy of the proselytes of thom they had witnessed. 

And God, who knoweth the hearts, bore them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost even as He did unto us, — God had put the uncircumcised on the same level with the circumcised by giving to them the same gifts of the spirit.

and put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. — what was given to the new converts was the same which had been given at the first outpouring of the spirits; and God made no mark of distinction to sever Jews from Gentiles.

10 Now therefore why tempt ye God to put a yoke upon the necks of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? — for forty years the Israelites didn’t circumcise their children, hence they were consumed and not allowed to enter the Promised Land (Joshua 5:6).

11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.” — salvation is a gift granted through “the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ” but to qualify for that gift one has to keep his commandment; “If ye love me, keep my commandments,”John 14:15. “For you have omitted the weightier matters of the law: judgement, mercy and faith. These ought ye to have done and not to leave the others undone,” Matthew 23:23.

12 Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul as they declared what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them. — then all the multitude kept silence, having nothing further to object to what had been advanced; and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, who confirmed Peter’s reasoning, by declaring what miracles God had wrought among the Gentiles.

From the Council in Jerusalem, exemptions from circumcision were given only to the Gentiles, but speaking of the Israelites today, the covenant (Genesis 17:10) between God and Abraham remains, “Unless ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.”

UK GDP shrank by 11%

•August 27, 2022 • Leave a Comment

UK GDP shrank by 11%, its biggest drop in 300 years – data for 2020 shows

RT / August 23, 2022

The British economy shrank by 11% in 2020, its largest drop in 300 years, revised data from the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed on Monday. The previous reading had been a 9.3% decline.

This happened to be the biggest drop since the ONS began keeping records and the UK’s largest GDP slump since 1709, the year of the ‘Great Frost,’ when the country’s economy shrank by 13.4%, according to historical data provided by the Bank of England.

UK GDP shrank by 11%, its biggest drop in 300 years, way before 1894

The downward revision was triggered by new data showing the effect the Covid-19 pandemic had on healthcare and individual retailers.

The health service faced higher costs than we initially estimated, meaning its overall contribution to the economy was lower,” ONS analyst Craig McLaren explained, adding that retailers also faced higher costs, which prompted statisticians to revise their contribution to the economy.

In 2021, the British economy largely returned to its pre-pandemic levels. However, since the start of this year, it has been increasingly battered by rising inflation, and analysts now fear the country could tip into recession by the end of the year.

The ONS is due to publish its updated growth figures for 2021 and the first half of 2022 in September. The agency routinely updates its GDP estimates when it obtains more data.

Therefore the LORD, the God of hosts, the LORD saith thus: “Wailing shall be in all streets, and they shall say in all the highways, ‘Alas! Alas!’ And they shall call the husbandman to mourning, and such as are skillful in lamentation to wailing.
And in all vineyards shall be wailing, for I will pass through thee,” saith the LORD.
Woe unto you that desire the day of the LORD! To what end is it for you? The day of the LORD is darkness, and not light:
as if a man fled from a lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent bit him.
Shall not the day of the LORD be darkness, and not light? Even very dark, and no brightness in it? Amos 5:16-20

South Asia Language Map

•August 26, 2022 • Leave a Comment

States and language map of India

Sitting on border line, my thought and Q for this post is: Could India be included in the Forest of the South in this article A Sword from the South?

Potential Independent States of India
LanguageTotal speakers (millions)
Hindi615
Bengali265
Urdu170
Punjabi126
Marathi95
Telugu93
Tamil81
Gujarati61
Kannada56
Odia38
Malayalam38
Assamese15
Santali7
Meitei (Manipuri)1.7
Sanskrit0.025

English Speakers in India 128,539,090 (as first and second language), from Wikipedia

From Wikipedia: Recently, the Indian government has claimed that in 2013, Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal experienced [ideological] “influence” of “Left Wing Extremism”; while claiming that armed activity by the “Left Wing” extremists was noticed in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal.

Hindu Caste System; Narendra Modi belongs to the “Vaishya” Community
Pakistan Tribal and Language Map
Major Separatist Movements in Pakistan
Separatist Movements of Pakistan

My thought and Q for this post is: Could India be included in the Forest of the South in this article A Sword from the South?

The US to hollow out TSMC from Taiwan

•August 25, 2022 • Leave a Comment

The Register / January 5, 2022

A top US Army War College paper suggests Taiwan should credibly threaten to eradicate its semiconductor industry if threatened by China so that Beijing would no longer be interested in unification.

TSMC is the global leader in advanced 2-nanometre semiconductors

The bright idea comes from two American scholars. Their reasoning goes:

Potential war with the US over Taiwan is no longer a deterrent for China as Beijing believes its military would dominate. Therefore, to make the island unappealing, it needs to be perceived as presenting an “unacceptable economic, political, and strategic costs upon Beijing.” As it currently stands, Taiwan appears to be an enticing technology powerhouse ripe for absorption. However, destroying TSMC, an important supplier for China, would create a desperately unwanted major economic crisis on the mainland and make China chipless while it was also engaged in a war effort.

“If done correctly, such a strategy could discourage a Chinese invasion of Taiwan while simultaneously lessening the chances of an unwanted great-power conflict, especially if combined with good-faith efforts by the United States to make the status quo more tolerable for both China and Taiwan,” wrote the authors.

It’s hard to understate TSMC’s importance to the world. It accounts for more than half of global foundry revenue while in the manufacturing of advanced chips under 10 nanometers it controls about 84% of the global market, according to the European Institute for Asian Studies in Brussels.

Congress has passed a bill that will invest $280 billion over the next five years to boost microchip production and counter China.

With bipartisan support, the CHIPS and Science Act was passed by lawmakers in late July, and President Joe Biden soon signed the bill into law.

Once a leader in semiconductor chip manufacturing, the US has lost ground as other countries like China ramped up production, forcing many American manufacturers to import chips — which are essential to the production of cars, smartphones and medical equipment.

The new funding is intended to help companies bring chip manufacturing back to the US and, as a result, help lower costs and prevent supply chain disruptions.

$52.7 billion for chip manufacturing and research

The package will invest $39 billion over five years to expand domestic semiconductor manufacturing. It will provide companies incentives to build, expand and modernize US facilities and equipment.

The legislation will also create a new 25% tax credit for companies that invest in semiconductor manufacturing equipment or the construction of manufacturing facilities.

Private companies that receive financial assistance will be restricted from expanding certain chip manufacturing in China for 10 years.

This means if TSMC receives any subsidies for its $12 billion plant in Arizona, it wouldn’t be able to expand into China. And there are other crucial factors to consider, too, not least that China is the world’s biggest market for semiconductor sales, at 35% of the global market share, surpassing the US, Europe, Japan, and even Taiwan, which is home to the largest manufacturer of semiconductor chips.

The CHIP law will provide $11 billion over five years to the Department of Commerce to help spur research and development in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, to invest in new technologies and expand workforce training opportunities.

Another $1.5 billion will fund the Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund to help telecommunications companies compete with Chinese telecom giant Huawei and limit the scope of other telecommunications companies with close ties to China.

Millions of dollars will target workforce development to make sure workers are available to support more manufacturing.

$170 billion for scientific research

The legislation calls for a historic investment in scientific research and development that amounts to nearly $170 billion over five years, an $82.5 billion increase in the federal government’s baseline authorization.

About $13 billion will go to education in the science, technology, engineering and math fields — known as STEM — including scholarships and fellowships, with a focus of increasing access to education in these fields in rural areas.

Universities, community colleges and high schools may be eligible for the money in an effort to strengthen America’s workforce so that it can support new chip manufacturing.

The ‘Chip 4’ meeting led by the US, South Korea, and Japan has kept out Taiwan so far. The US also sought deeper cooperation with Japan and South Korea to compete more with China’s science and technology efforts.

After hollowing out TSMC, the island of Taiwan would be irrelevant even if China takes over TSMC there.

Pretending to be relevant, Taiwan responded by saying it has not been informed of ‘Chip 4’ meeting!

Malaysia’s Mahathir speaks out on Taiwan

•August 24, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Malaysia’s Mahathir says US seeking to provoke war in Taiwan

Yahoo News by Eileen Ng / August 19, 2022

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad on Friday accused the US of trying to provoke a war in Taiwan, and in a wide-ranging interview also said he expects Malaysia’s graft-tainted ruling party to hold general elections in the coming months.

Dr Mahathir says US seeking to provoke wars in Taiwan and Ukraine

Mahathir, a two-time prime minister long known as a critic of the West and its geopolitics, warned that the US was antagonizing China through recent visits to Taiwan by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others. China considers the self-ruled island democracy part of its territory and regards such visits as meddling in its affairs.

“China has allowed Taiwan to remain by itself. No problem. They didn’t invade. If they wanted to invade, they could have invaded. They didn’t. But America is provoking (them) so that there can be a war, so that the Chinese will make the mistake of trying to occupy Taiwan,” the 97-year-old Mahathir said.

“Then there is an excuse … for the US to help Taiwan, even fight against China and sell a lot of arms to Taiwan,” he added.

Following Pelosi’s visit, China launched large-scale military drills surrounding the island and fired ballistic missiles into the sea. Beijing also warned Washington not to encourage Taiwan to try to make its de facto independence permanent, a step China says would lead to war.

There was no immediate US response to Mahathir’s comments.

In Malaysia, Mahathir said the ruling United Malays National Organization is likely preparing for snap polls that it will most likely “win big.” He believes that a number of Malay voters have returned to UMNO because they were offered money and other incentives.

“I think they will want to have the general elections this year. If possible, maybe as soon as two or three months from now, because they feel that at this moment the public still looks up at them, and the opposition is broken up, disorganized,” he told the AP.

Elections are not due until September 2023, but some UMNO members, including ex-Prime Minister Najib Razak and party president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, who are both fighting graft charges, have been rallying for an earlier vote.

Mahathir was an UMNO prime minister for 22 years until his retirement in 2003. He was inspired to return to politics by the massive looting of the 1MDB state fund during Najib’s term in office, and rode a wave of public anger to lead the opposition to a historic victory in 2018 polls that ousted Najib’s government.

Mahathir became the world’s oldest head of government at 93, but his reformist alliance collapsed in less than two years due to defections. UMNO returned to power and now leads a new coalition government.

Mahathir has formed a new party, Pejuang, and a Malay alliance to contest 120 Malay-dominated parliamentary seats. He said his mission remained the same: to “clean-up” the country and form a graft-free government.

“I don’t know about being prime minister candidate, but if I am strong enough, if I am healthy enough, if they want me to contest, I will contest,” Mahathir said.

“I will fight, even if it is a losing battle,” he said. “I will fight because I believe in principle. It’s not what happens to me. I believe in principle. I believe that this is a great country which can become a developed country, but under the crooks you will never become.”

Najib has maintained his innocence. With his final appeal against a 12-year prison sentence in the first of several trials ongoing in the country’s top court, he would not be allowed to run in the event of an early election.

Mahathir said he believes Najib hopes to make a political comeback with an UMNO win.

“In the elections, if UMNO wins, he expects an UMNO government to ask for a pardon for him — and when he gets a pardon, (and is) cleared completely, he can then become prime minister,” Mahathir said. “He will do it. Believe me, he will do it.”

On the international front, Mahathir described President Joe Biden as an “ineffective” leader.

“In a way, he’s very anti-Islam, he’s not being fair. He allows Israel to commit all kinds of crime, genocide, and he does nothing. He supports them,” said Mahathir, who has been accused of anti-Semitism for attacking Jews, whom he blames for a humanitarian crisis in Palestinian territories.

He also railed against the European Union over the Russian war on Ukraine.

“What NATO is doing, the EU is doing is to provoke some more and asking the Ukrainians to fight,” Mahathir said. “They promised to accept Ukraine (into NATO) but they didn’t.”

The US shouting down the British!

•August 23, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Sputnik by llya Tsukanov / August 22, 2022

CIA Carried Out ‘Black Ops’ Mission to Get UK to Drop Huawei Gear in 5G Infrastructure, Book “The Secret History of the Five Eyes” Reveals.

Britain banned the Chinese tech giant’s 5G equipment from being installed by mobile network operators in 2020, and ordered operators to remove already fitted Huawei kit by 2027. British Telecom has been asked to complete the switch away from Huawei by January 2023, but has recently asked for more time to prevent service disruptions.

“The Secret History of the Five Eyes” reveals Uncle Sam shouting down the British!

A delegation of US officials dismissed their British counterparts’ report about the safety of Huawei 5G equipment, and literally shouted down their allies from across the pond for several hours straight in a Cabinet Office meeting in May of 2019, author Richard Kerbaj has alleged in an upcoming new book.

A British intelligence official who was at the meeting told the author that US deputy national security advisor Matthew Pottinger “just shouted and was entirely uninterested in the UK’s analysis” on the safety of Huawei’s products.

“The message was, ‘We don’t want you to do this, you have no idea how evil China is’. It was five hours of shouting with a prepared, angry and weirdly non-threatening script,” the official recalled. “We tried to offer a policy discussion but Pottinger didn’t care. We even said that we didn’t contest the analysis of the Chinese threat and explained our technicalities, but the US officials weren’t interested in that. Pottinger was continuously and repeatedly obnoxious.”

Former UK National Cyber Security Center chief Ciaran Martin – who was responsible for the Government Communications Headquarters’ (GCHQ) analysis of the Chinese company’s equipment to look out for any vulnerabilities, was also present at the meeting.

“We were keen to work with the US to counter [China’s] ambitions,” Martin said. “The problem was, on our side, we didn’t think Huawei’s limited involvement in UK 5G was the most important thing in a much wider strategic challenge –whereas the US were only interested in that part of the problem, for reasons we couldn’t fathom.”

More on the Ox and the Unicorn:

Let the blessing come upon the head of Joseph, and upon the top of the head of him that was separated from his brethren. His glory is like the firstling of his ox (bullock), and his horns are like the horns of unicorns. With them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth; and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh,” Deuteronomy 33:16-17.

On closer look, the Ox and the Unicorn as two separate animals is a misconception. First the scene: “the head of Joseph” and upon Joseph’s head is “his glory;” which is like “the firstling of his ox.” Joseph doesn’t have horns but the Ox has. And upon its horns, that is, the horns of the ox, these are “like the horns of unicorns.” These horns arise from the ox and not from the head of Joseph; and such horns look like that from the unicorns!

US intelligence and officials in Washington also bullied other members of the English-speaking Five Eyes Alliance into banning Huawei, with New Zealand and Australia doing so in late 2018, and Canada holding out until May 2022 before folding. In February 2019, then-US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned Britain that its use of Huawei equipment would pose a national security risk to the US. The same month as the testy May 2019 meeting, the Commerce Department placed Huawei and dozens of its affiliates on a trade blacklist.

The CIA also got in on the intimidation campaign, working, according to Kerbaj, on trying to “discredit” the UK’s position with their French, German, Italian and Norwegian colleagues, and expressing superficial concerns over Britain’s “misjudgment” of the matter. British intelligence officials slammed the CIA’s behavior as an open “black ops” mission against an ally.

The US delegation “didn’t really have any compelling technical arguments that undermined the GCHQ case,” Sir Kim Darroch, who was Britain’s ambassador to the US at the time, said.

“I remember GCHQ seeming pretty unimpressed. The encounter exposed that the US case was really political, not technical. So GCHQ stuck to their guns, and, initially, so did the prime minister,” Darroch said.

Boris Johnson, who initially supported Martin’s recommendations on Huawei, banned the Chinese company from operations in the UK in July 2020 after the US presented London with a fait accompli by barring the Chinese firm from using US-made chips in its 5G equipment. The move has caused a multiyear delay in Britain’s 5G rollout, with economists predicting that it will cost more than £2 billion to remove Huawei equipment by the 2027 deadline.

Martin, who resigned as GCHQ CSC chief in late 2020, told Kerbaj that the Huawei 5G spat had made Britain “entirely dependent on Nokia and Ericsson,” and that while the UK “trusts” these companies, “in reality, anyone can have a go at hacking anything.”

“Are we seriously saying that just because they’re not Chinese, they can’t be hacked? By neighboring Russia, for example? Or China?” he asked.

Huawei has consistently denied that any of its equipment has built-in capabilities for use for malevolent purposes by the Chinese government, and has emphasized that it is a private, independent company with no affiliation with Chinese authorities. The company has also expressed willingness to sign a ‘no-spy’ or ‘no-backdoor’ guarantee to assuage any privacy concerns, a commitment its Western competitors have yet to match.

Kerbaj’s book, ‘The Secret History of the Five Eyes’, is set to drop on September 1.

Only One Mystical Animal: The Ox with Horns of a Unicorn, but no Unicorn!

More on the Ox without the Unicorn:

Since Brexit, the UK has followed US policy closer and closer until it is as if the UK is a state and mouthpiece of the United States. Both Australia and New Zealand are treaty allies of the US in the trilateral ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand and the US) Treaty as well as in Five Eyes (FVEY) intelligence alliance, the latter also comprising Canada and the UK.

Additionally, Australia, the US and the UK also announced a trilateral AUKUS arrangement last September. Under AUKUS, the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) would get access to technology to develop advanced nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs). New Zealand, who used to have a fiercely independent foreign policy, now seems to have allowed herself more and more aligned with the group. Spearheaded by the US, these five nations move around together in a pack; its nerve center radiating from Washington DC, not London.

Putin to offer the ‘most modern’ weapons

•August 22, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Putin says he’s ‘ready to offer’ allies, including in Latin America (read especially the Latin America), the ‘most modern’ military weaponry

Yahoo News by Andrew Miller / August 18, 2022 // Fox News by Andrew Miller / August 17, 2022

Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Monday that his country is ready to distribute advanced weaponry across the globe, including in Latin America (read especially the Latin America), which he says is superior to other weapons systems.

Putin most willing to offer the ‘most modern’ weapons to Latin America

“Russia sincerely cherishes the historical strong, friendly, truly trusting ties with the states of Latin America, Asia, and Africa and is ready to offer its partners and allies the most modern types of weapons,” Putin said at the opening of the Army-2022 International Military and Technical Forum outside of Moscow. “From small arms to armored vehicles and artillery, combat aircrafts and unmanned aerial vehicles.”

Putin added that “almost all” of the weapons he is willing to sell across the globe have been used more than once in combat and claimed that the Russian-made products are superior to those made by his foreign rivals.

“Many of them are years, or maybe decades ahead of their foreign counterparts, and in terms of tactical and technical characteristics they are significantly superior to them,” Putin said.

Rebekah Koffler, a former U.S. DIA intelligence officer focused on Russia and the author of “Putin’s Playbook: Russia’s Secret Plan to Defeat America,” told Fox News Digital that Putin’s comments show his desire to push his country’s influence all over the world.

“Putin is reaching out to all corners of the world especially now that Russia is being isolated by Western sanctions,” Koffler said. “He’s trying to invoke his own version of the Monroe Doctrine in his pursuit of influence that the Russians believe we are violating by trying to democratize countries like Ukraine.”

Koffler explained that Russia’s overtures to his Latin American allies such as Venezuela and Cuba have been “intensifying” in recent months and could be part of a plan to potentially establish military bases in the region.

Koffler said that Putin is telling the world that he believes Russia’s “value system is superior” and that by presenting a united front with his dictator-led allies in the Western Hemisphere he is “countering U.S. influence” and attempting to “demonstrate that their regimes are just as legitimate as democratic regimes.”

Putin’s statement also signals that he “needs additional revenue” in light of U.S. sanctions stemming from Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, Koffler explained. He’s also “always interested in supporting fellow authoritarian regimes.”

While Koffler acknowledged that Russian weapons may not be as sophisticated as U.S. weapons in all areas, the country is considered by the Pentagon as a “near peer” competitor in that department and weapons ranging from AK-47s to S-400 surface-to-air missile systems could end up in the hands of groups across the world that present a “threat in the long term” to “kill Americans.”

“It’s not just Latin America, but it’s all over,” Koffler said of Putin’s plans to ship weapons to allies. “It’s China, North Korea, and Iran as well.”

Russia ranks second only to the United States with arms sales of around $15 billion a year, nearly a fifth of the global export market. From 2017-2021, 73% of those sales went to just four countries – India, China, Egypt and Algeria – according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the house of Judah; I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him. Hosea 5:14

And I will turn your feasts into mourning and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning for an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day. Amos 8:9-10

Latter-days Counterfeit Temples

•August 21, 2022 • Leave a Comment

God’s Temple would only be in Jerusalem, but there were counterfeit temples, first built by a rebellious Jeroboam, later by his Latter-days imitators.

Latter-days Counterfeit Temple at Salt Lake City

I King 12

26 And Jeroboam said in his heart, “Now shall the kingdom return to the house of David.

27 If this people go up to do sacrifice in the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, then shall the heart of this people turn again unto their lord, even unto Rehoboam king of Judah, and they shall kill me and go again to Rehoboam king of Judah.”

28 Whereupon the king took counsel and made two calves of gold, and said unto them, “It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem. Behold thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt!”

29 And he set the one in Bethel, and the other put he in Dan.

30 And this thing became a sin, for the people went to worship before the one, even unto Dan.

31 And he made a house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, who were not of the sons of Levi.

32 And Jeroboam ordained a feast in the eighth month, on the fifteenth day of the month, like unto the feast that is in Judah, and he offered upon the altar. So did he in Bethel, sacrificing unto the calves that he had made; and he placed in Bethel the priests of the high places which he had made.

33 So he offered upon the altar which he had made in Bethel the fifteenth day of the eighth month, even in the month which he had devised of his own heart, and ordained a feast unto the children of Israel; and he offered upon the altar and burned incense.

Now the Later Days Ephraimites have temples in Utah and elsewhere

“And this thing became a sin, for the people went to worship before the one, even unto Dan.”
The Conference Center where the church holds its General Conferences twice a year; but God isn’t there in “Bethel” nor “Dan”

Therefore, in vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.’ Mark 7:7

Isaiah 1:13 Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto Me. The new moons and Sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot endure. It is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. — Jeroboam’s new moon and sabbaths were an abomination to God; it was outright malicious and rebellious, hence God couldn’t endure and so send them, the house of Israel, off into captivity; — these assemblies called were the holy convocations on the seventh day Sabbath, at the feasts of Passover, Pentecost, at the blowing of the Trumpets, on the day of Atonement and Tabernacles: Leviticus 23.

Isaiah 1:14 Your new moons and your appointed feasts My soul hateth; they are a trouble unto Me, I am weary of bearing them. — again, this new moon and their appointed feasts are repeated to show how God hates them; — God was and is referring to the house of Israel; their appointed feasts a month late, and at Dan and Bethel, instead of in Jerusalem, where he ordains it to be the holy place; and they maliciously change the day of worship from Sabbaths to Sundays.

The 1919 Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

•August 20, 2022 • Leave a Comment

PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi Pay Tribute to Victims of 1919 Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

Sputnik / April 13, 2022

On 13 April 1919, the British Army under the command of Colonel Reginald Dyer, opened fire on a crowd gathered at Jallianwala Bagh, in Amritsar in the Indian state of Punjab.

The 1919 Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, 379–381 dead, by the British Army

The people had congregated for the Baisakhi festival and to protest peacefully against the arrest of two key freedom fighters — Dr Satya Pal and Dr Saifuddin Kitchlew.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday led the nation in paying tribute to the victims of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, with 379–381 dead, which took place on this day in 1919 while the country was under British rule.

In his message posted on Twitter, Prime Minister Modi talked of those who died in the event, saying that “their unparalleled courage and sacrifice will motivate future generations.”

He also shared the speech he made when the renovated complex of the Jallianwala Bagh Memorial was inaugurated last year.

At the same time, Rahul Gandhi, leader of the country’s main opposition party, Congress, paid tribute to the martyrs and said “the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh showed the world the cruelty of an autocratic regime.”

Shashi Tharoor, who penned a book ‘An Era of Darkness: The British Empire in India’, has accused the British of draining the country of resources.

“The British came to one of the richest countries in the world accounting for 27 percent of global GDP in 1700,” he said, adding that after more than 200 years of exploitation, depredation, and destruction, India was reduced “to a poster child for Third World poverty,” accounting for just above 3 percent of global GDP by the time the country gained independence.

According to Tharoor, 35 million people died under the British Raj from unnecessary famines caused by British policy.

Shashi Tharoor, author of ‘An Era of Darkness’

An estimated three million people died in the Bengal famine of 1943, which Tharoor blamed on WInston Churchill’s policies of “deliberately ordering the diversion of food from starving Indian civilians to well-supplied British soldiers and even to top up European stockpiles, meant for yet-to-be-liberated Greeks and Yugoslavs.”

“Bodies began piling up on the sides of roads and in ponds, rivers and ditches. Vultures got too fat to take flight, and jackals feasted on still-living bodies in broad daylight,” writes Professor Janam Mukherjee in his book, ‘Hunger Bengal: War, Famine, Riots and the End of Empire.’

“And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up; and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him” Jeremiah 50:32.

“In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate, that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished” Ezekiel 6:6.

Canada’s “Race-based Genocide!”

•August 19, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Canada is complicit in a “race-based genocide” against its indigenous people, a government inquiry has found.

BBC / June 24, 2021

An indigenous nation in Canada says it has found 751 unmarked graves at the site of a former residential school in Saskatchewan.

“An estimated 6,000 children died while attending these schools.”

The Cowessess First Nation said the discovery was “the most significantly substantial to date in Canada”.

It comes weeks after the remains of 215 children were found at a similar residential school in British Columbia.

“This is not a mass grave site. These are unmarked graves,” said Cowessess Chief Cadmus Delorme.

The Marieval Indian Residential School was operated by the Roman Catholic Church from 1899 to the 1980s, when the First Nation took over operations, in the area where Cowessess is now located in southeastern Saskatchewan. It is not yet clear if all of the remains are linked to the school.

It was one of more than 130 compulsory boarding schools funded by the Canadian government and run by religious authorities during the 19th and 20th Centuries with the aim of assimilating indigenous youth.

An estimated 6,000 children died while attending these schools, according to former Truth and Reconciliation Commission chair Murray Sinclair. Students were often housed in poorly built, poorly heated, and unsanitary facilities.

Physical and sexual abuse at the hands of school authorities led others to run away.

Last month, the Cowessess began to use ground-penetrating radar to locate unmarked graves at the cemetery of the Marieval Indian Residential School in Saskatchewan. Thursday’s announcement marked the first phase of the search efforts.

Chief Delorme said there may have been markers for the graves at one point but that the Roman Catholic church, which oversaw the cemetery, may have removed them. Cowessess First Nation is “optimistic” that the church will work with them in investigating further, he said.

It has not yet been determined if all the unmarked graves belong to children, Chief Delorme said. Technical teams will now work to provide a verified number and identify the remains, he said.

In a statement, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he was “terribly saddened” by the discovery in Saskatchewan. He said it was “a shameful reminder of the systemic racism, discrimination, and injustice that Indigenous peoples have faced.”

“I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel; there is the whoredom of Ephraim, Israel is defiled” Hosea 6:10

And I will do in thee that which I have not done, and the like of which I will not do any more, because of all thine abominations. Ezekiel 5:9

Is a Coup in Taiwan inevitable?

•August 18, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Is there any possibility of a coup attempt in Taiwan?

Imagine what the top brass of the Taiwanese Military would think: if Taiwan is returned back to mainland China.

Not expecting to win, Taiwan’s fake President says “Beijing will pay a heavy price.”

(a) China’s white paper of 2022 had said if Taiwan is reunited they would send troops to Taiwan to take control of the island. This is assuming China has to take Taiwan by force and Taiwan would loose much autonomy.

(b) but if Taiwan is reunited with China by peaceful mean, Taiwan would be granted much autonomy, as China had said in two previous white papers, in 1993 and 2000, that they “will not send troops or administrative personnel to be based in Taiwan” after achieving reunification on peaceful terms.

Taiwan’s military equipments are antiquated and their top brass know this. Former President Ma Ying-jeou had said the US will not come to Taiwan’s aid in the case of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait.

China’s navy has two aircraft carriers and 530 warships, all in the Western Pacific

China has J-20s and carrier-borne FC-31 stealth fighters but Taiwan hasn’t have any of the US F-35. All Taiwan has are a couple of non-stealth F-16s of the Vietnam War era and not even a single F-18. China’s navy has already two aircraft carriers and another on the way; plus another 530 warships, more than even the US’s 490. Another sixty or so submarines cruise below the surface.

Despite much rhetorics about coming to Taiwan’s help should China invade Taiwan, none of the US’s Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group with their combined 27,000 sailors and marines would risk coming close to any of Taiwan’s shorelines. For there awaits China’s hypersonic DF17, DF21, DF26 and others all keeping watch deep in the heartland of Qinghai, Xinjiang, Tibet, Sichuan and Gansu; and other anti-ship missiles, designated as YJ-12B, allow China to strike surface vessels within 295 nautical miles from their strategic Spratly and Paracel Islands in the hotly contested South China Sea.

“The children of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle” Psalm 78:9

“The US Navy wouldn’t dare come close to Taiwan’s shoreline.”

In a speech on cross-strait relations and Taiwanese national security delivered in August 10, 2020, Ma stated that China’s strategy of striking Taiwan is to “let the first battle be the last,” indicating that the emerging behemoth aims to launch a quick war so that Taiwan does not have time to wait for American military support.

If Taiwan lost out and they will, their top military personel and bull-headed politicians would spend the rest of their lives in prison, unless they manage to flee abroad like President Thiệu of South Vietnam in April 30, 1975 with 15 tons of gold to Taiwan; otherwise hide underground like Saddam of Iraq had done when the American forces overrun over their country in March 29, 2003 before an onslaught.

Certainly the Taiwanese military also know that if they negotiate a settlement they could be assured Taiwan’s military would enjoy great autonomy after becoming a special administrative region of China. The white paper of 2022 says “anything can be negotiated.” That’s why the transition and takeover of the Afghanistan government by the Taliban from the frormer regime were so stealthful, quick and smooth; simply because the fakes know they are fakes and will evenutally be exposed.

Taiwan’s “first battle will be the last” former President Ma predicted a war with China

“The president should prevent war from happening,” Ma said, referring to Taiwan’s fake President Tsai Ing-wen’s frequent comments to foreign media that if Taiwan is attacked by China, Beijing will “pay a heavy price.” She also said that after the nation endures the first wave of attacks, she hopes countries around the world will come to assist it.

But Ma Ying-jeou said he was worried because the Taiwan’s military is aware of China’s strategy. Once war has begun, it will be over in a very short time, he predicted, giving Taiwan no chance to wait for the US military to arrive. Hence Ma predicted Taiwan’s “first battle” with China will also be Taiwan’s “last.”

And since Nancy Pelocy’s trip to Taiwan, their top military brass are having high blood pressure, more so when they could hopefully see missiles flying over their island. Amid such tensions, Taiwan’s defence research expert, Ou Yang Li-hsing, 57, who was in charge of missile production, died in a hotel room “of a heart attack.”

Ou Yang Li-hsing, who was in charge of missile production, died in a hotel room “of a heart attack.”

Soon after Pelosi’s departure, another US congressional delegation arrived in Taiwan, a five-member delegation, led by Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts, to meet President Tsai and attend a banquet hosted by the foreign minister, Joseph Wu, during another provocative visit.

China relaunched more military drills and other simulating blockade around Taiwan, with 30 warplanes and five vessels near the Taiwan Straight. And this goes in a circle as it wouldn’t be long before another batch of provocateurs would land in Taiwan to stir the pot, this time led by either a group of Canadian lawmakers or Lithuanian demagogues and her European compatriots.

Given such a scenario, the pressures and incentives for the top military brass of Taiwan to carry out a coup is extremely irresistable and seducive.

“And I will cast you out of My sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim” Jeremiah 7:15

“The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, shall be trodden under feet” Isaiah 28:3

Hidden Crimes in Okinawa?

•August 17, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Why aren’t Japan and US talking about these crimes in Okinawa?

Interview by Li Jingjing / August 12, 2022

The Ryukyuan with their own distinct culture; some trace of Chinese

Native Okinawan (Luchun) Rob Kajiwara spells out the horrifying atrocities the Japanese government and US government committed to their people and homeland. In order to control China and the whole Asia-Pacific region, the United States put hundreds of military bases across the region and almost erased the population and culture of native people on different islands. This is the excerpt of the interview with Rob Kajiwara, check the full interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L-gY…

Territories covered by the US military bases dominate Okinawa

The Ryukyuan people are indigenous people who live on the Ryukyu Islands, and are ethnically, culturally, and linguistically distinct from Japanese people. During the Sanzan period, Okinawa was divided into the three polities of Hokuzan, Chūzan and Nanzan. In 1429, Chūzan’s chieftain Shō Hashi unified them and founded the autonomous Ryukyu Kingdom (1429–1879), with the capital at Shuri Castle.

The kingdom continued to have tributary relations with the Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty China, a practice that was started by Chūzan in 1372–1374 and lasted until the downfall of the kingdom in the late 19th century. This tributary relationship was greatly beneficial to the kingdom as the kings received political legitimacy, while the country as a whole gained access to economic, cultural and political opportunities in Southeast Asia without any interference by China in the internal political autonomy of Ryukyu.

In 1879, Japan annexed the islands and the kingdom-domain was abolished, established as Okinawa Prefecture, while the last Ryukyu king Shō Tai was forcibly exiled to Tokyo; others to China. Sixteen years later, in 1895, the Japanese empire annexed Taiwan.

41:00 Rob Kajiwara: “Some Luchuans actually lived out the remainder of their lives in exile in China where they continued to hope and pray for the day that China would once again become strong enough to help free Luchu and restore Luchu’s independence.”

Today the Luchuans are crying out for freedom!

“But, behold, I will raise up against you a nation, O house of Israel,” saith the LORD the God of hosts; “and they shall afflict you from the entrance of Hemath unto the river of the wilderness.” Amos 6:14

And I will turn your feasts into mourning and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning for an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day. Amos 8:9-10

For more, see New Military Base Increases Calls For Okinawa’s Independence

Henry Kissinger: US ‘on brink’ of War

•August 16, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Henry Kissinger: US ‘at Edge of War’ With Russia, China

MOSCOW (Sputnik) // RT August 14, 2022 / Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger believes that Washington is teetering on the brink of war with Moscow and Beijing on the matters that the United States co-created.

“We are at the edge of war with Russia and China on issues which we partly created, without any concept of how this is going to end or what it is supposed to lead to,” Kissinger told the Wall Street Journal.

Could the US manage the two adversaries by triangulating between them, as during the Nixon years? He offers no simple prescription. “You can’t just now say we’re going to split them off and turn them against each other. All you can do is not to accelerate the tensions and to create options, and for that you have to have some purpose.”

The veteran foreign policy scholar said that the Unuted States can only avoid accelerating tensions and “create options.”

As for Ukraine, Kissinger thought that in the past it was best fit to act as a buffer between Russia and the West, “something like Finland.” However, Russia’s military operation in Ukraine changed his view, making him believe that “one way or the other, formally or not, Ukraine has to be treated in the aftermath of this as a member of NATO.” The former secretary of state also argued that Russia would retain Crimea and parts of Donbass as a result of a plausible settlement with Kiev.

On the question of Taiwan, Kissinger worries that the US and China are maneuvering toward a crisis, and he counsels steadiness on Washington’s part. “The policy that was carried out by both parties has produced and allowed the progress of Taiwan into an autonomous democratic entity and has preserved peace between China and the US for 50 years,” he says. “One should be very careful, therefore, in measures that seem to change the basic structure.”

During the World Economic Forum in May, Kissinger called for a diplomatic settlement in Ukraine to restore the status quo ante bellum, i.e. the situation as it was before Russia launched its special operation on February 24.

“Henry Kissinger is warning about the dangers of US warmongering not because he has gotten saner, but because the US war machine has gotten crazier.”

Last month, Kissinger, the man who helped reestablish US-China ties in the 1970s, warned President Joe Biden against “endless confrontations” with Beijing.

“Biden and previous administrations have been too much influenced by the domestic aspects of the view of China,” Kissinger told Bloomberg News Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait. “It is, of course, important to prevent Chinese or any other country’s hegemony.”

The 99-year-old diplomat said that geopolitics today requires “Nixonian flexibility” to help ease tensions between Washington and Beijing.

“The children of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle” Psalm 78:9

And I will turn your feasts into mourning and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning for an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day. Amos 8:9-10

For more, see Modern US Warmongering Is Scaring Henry Kissinger by Caitlin Johnstone

Droughts hitting the US and Europe

•August 15, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Much of Europe and the Northern Hemisphere is battling either wildfires, low water levels, harvest warnings, water use restrictions or a mixture of all these. DW and Euronews round up the situation.

DW reports ; Euronews ; BBC / August 12, 2022 // RT EU drought ‘worst in 500 years’ August 23, 2022

Around much of the Northern Hemisphere, from Hungary to Hawaii, from the drying Rhine River to the now-recovering Rio Grande, or from Casablanca to California, summer droughts and high temperatures are having a serious impact on everything from agriculture to the freight industry.

As was the day of Ahad and Jezebel, so is it today

Here’s a rundown of some of the latest drought-related developments from around the world, plus a window to more bespoke coverage in various media.

There was a prophecy by prophet Elijah who prophecised a drought of three and a half years. He warned Ahab that there will be years of catastrophic drought so severe that not even dew will form, because Ahab and his queen stand at the end of a line of kings of Israel who are said to have “done evil in the sight of the Lord.”

1 Kings 17

1 And Elijah the Tishbite, who was of the inhabitants of Gilead, said unto Ahab, “As the Lord God of Israel liveth, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, except according to my word.”

2 And the word of the Lord came unto him, saying,

3 “Get thee hence and turn thee eastward, and hide thyself by the Brook Cherith, that is before the Jordan.

4 And it shall be that thou shalt drink of the brook, and I have commanded the ravens to feed thee there.”

5 So he went and did according unto the word of the Lord; for he went and dwelt by the Brook Cherith, that is before the Jordan.

6 And the ravens brought him bread and flesh in the morning, and bread and flesh in the evening; and he drank from the brook.

Is water the new Gold?

China’s Promise Withdrawn from Taiwan

•August 14, 2022 • Leave a Comment

China has withdrawn its promise not to send troops to Taiwan if it takes control of island

Reuters by Yew Lun Tian / August 10, 2022

China has withdrawn a promise not to send troops or administrators to Taiwan if it takes control of the island, an official document showed on Wednesday, signalling a decision by President Xi Jinping to grant less autonomy than previously offered.

China’s Promise of Autonomy Withdrawn from Taiwan

China’s white paper on its position on self-ruled Taiwan follows days of unprecedented Chinese military exercises near the island, which Beijing claims as its territory, in protest against US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit last week.

China had said in two previous white papers on Taiwan, in 1993 and 2000, that it “will not send troops or administrative personnel to be based in Taiwan” after achieving what Beijing terms “reunification.”

That line, meant to assure Taiwan it would enjoy autonomy after becoming a special administrative region of China, did not appear in the latest white paper.

China’s ruling Communist Party had proposed that Taiwan could return to its rule under a “one country, two systems” model, similar to the formula under which the former British colony of Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997.

That would offer some autonomy to democratically ruled Taiwan to partially preserve its social and political systems.

Taiwan’s government says only the island’s people can decide their future.

A line in the 2000 white paper that said “anything can be negotiated” as long as Taiwan accepts that there is only one China and does not seek independence, is also missing from the latest white paper.

The Taiwan Policy Act of 2022

•August 13, 2022 • Leave a Comment

American policy towards China is one from the one-China policy 0f 1972 to the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 to the Propose “Taiwan Policy Act of 2022.”

Will this Propose “Taiwan Policy Act of 2022” succeed?

The Washingtom Post / August 6, 2022 // Bloomberg / August 3, 2022

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan this week heightened tensions between China and the United States. Behind the recent developments, including Beijing’s show of force in response, is a long history of shifting ties and frictions.

The Propose “Taiwan Policy Act” of 2022, trying to tame the rising Dragon

US Senators Bob Menendez and Lindsey Graham recently introduced the Taiwan Policy Act of 2022, a 107-page bill that Menendez called a “seminal statement of the United States’ absolute commitment” to China’s Taiwan region. The bill’s focus on an unwarranted “defense partnership” and multibillion dollar security assistance capture the latest bipartisan attempt to interfere in China’s internal affairs. Such attempts to empower Taiwan separatist forces have failed in the past, and the Taiwan Policy Act will be no exception.

Washington’s willingness to consistently endorse and support the motivations of Taiwan independence forces should make a fundamental reality clear: characterizing “the security of Taiwan” a “major non-NATO ally,” and the ability for its people to “determine their own future” as “fundamental to United States’ interests and values” is a preposterous assertion. It serves no other interest than hollowing out and obscuring Washington’s adherence to the one-China principle. That trajectory is unsustainable.

Senators Bob Menendez and Lindsey Graham introduced the Taiwan Policy Act of 2022

The act arrives at a time when US officials are keen to advance high-level communication between the two countries in the summer. The Biden administration is lobbying Democratic senators to put the brakes on a bill that would alter US policy toward Taiwan, including by designating it as a major non-NATO ally, according to people familiar with the matter.

The legislation also would provide Taiwan with $4.5 billion in military aid, including potentially long-range missiles capable of striking mainland China. This would make the island the fourth-largest recipient of US security assistance, behind only Kiev, Tel Aviv and Cairo.

The upshot is that the White House sees provoking China further as unwise in the wake of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to the island, which triggered an unprecedented crisis in the Taiwan Strait. A Chinese military official warned the situation could lead to “a real war at any point.” 

White House At Odds With Lawmakers Over Taiwan Policy Act by Connor Freeman

However, the Taiwan Policy Act runs contrary to those realities, presenting a pretexts of Chinese “aggression and influence campaigns” to justify Senator Graham’s fiction of record-setting military and economic “expansion” with the Taiwan region.

“The White House has significant concerns,” said Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut and member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “I have significant concerns.”

Murphy said the Foreign Relations panel is delaying work on the legislation until September and it may be rewritten. The committee had planned to vote on the bill Wednesday. The US has treated Taiwan as a major non-NATO ally since the George W. Bush administration. The bill would formalize that designation.

The Biden administration considers the legislation counterproductive and that it would interfere with the decades-old approach of “strategic ambiguity” about whether the US military would defend Taiwan against Communist forces, according to the people, who asked for anonymity because the discussions are private. The US also adheres to a “One China” policy which deems the question of sovereignty over Taiwan as undetermined.

“I’m not sure this is the moment to throw out 40 years of policy,” Murphy said, while adding that “it makes sense for us to draw closer to Taiwan.”

“The children of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle” Psalm 78:9

And I will turn your feasts into mourning and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning for an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day. Amos 8:9-10

North Korea To Send 100,000 Troops?

•August 11, 2022 • Leave a Comment

North Korea Willing To Send Russia 100,000 Troops For Ukraine War: 

Yahoo News / August 8, 2022 // Zerohedge by Tyler Durden / August 8, 2022

North Korea Willing To Send Russia 100,000 Troops For Ukraine War

During six months of war in Ukraine there have been some instances of Russian satellite states providing “volunteer” forces – with Chechens being a foremost reported group of foreign fighters said to be in Ukraine. But Russian state media recently presented the biggest offer of foreign troops yet, reportedly from an unlikely “pariah” nation also long at odds with the United States.

  • North Korea has offered Russia 100,000 troops to help defeat Ukraine, according to Russian state media.
  • A Russian pundit said North Korean troops could bring useful experience with counter-battery warfare, per reports.
  • North Korea is also reportedly prepared to send workers to help rebuild the Donbas region for Russia.
North Korea expresses a desire to meet its international duty

North Korea has said it is willing to send 100,000 “volunteer” troops to help Vladimir Putin execute the ongoing war in Ukraine, Business Insider has reported, citing Channel One Russia. Russian military pundit Igor Korotchenko made the claim to the state broadcaster, saying further that the DPRK military could provide a “wealth of experience with counter-battery warfare.”

“If North Korea expresses a desire to meet its international duty to fight against Ukrainian fascism, we should let them,” Korotchenko was also quoted in New York Post as saying.

This comes amid unverified Western media claims that Russia has suffered huge and unexpected numbers of casualties, to the point of being “desperate” – and reportedly being forced to provide abbreviated and ineffective training to new recruits.

North Korea’s military is the world’s fourth largest, with nearly 1.3 million active personnel, according to the New York-based Council for Foreign Relations. A further 600,000 serve as reserve soldiers.

Defense experts say it operates with aging equipment and technology, said the CFR.

According to the South Korean newspaper Daily NK, North Korea has also offered up workers to assist Russia in rebuilding a post-war Ukraine.

Citing Russian sources, Daily NK reported that North Korea is planning on sending more than 1,000 workers to the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine if Russia wins the war.

“Considering that the war isn’t over yet, the government is planning to send workers at an appropriate time while monitoring the situation on the ground,” a North Korean source said, per Daily NK.

Monkeypox a health risk

•August 10, 2022 • Leave a Comment

US declares monkeypox a public health emergency

Reuters / August 5, 2022

The United States has declared monkeypox a public health emergency, the health secretary confirmed Thursday.

Cases had crossed 6,600 in the United States a day earlier, almost all of them among men who have sex with men.

Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, told Reuters that the spread of cases outside that group was not high but was being carefully monitored.

“But you’ve always got to take things like that seriously and keep an open mind that you might see more of that. You don’t want to panic people because there’s no need to be overly concerned now, but at the same time that you’re not currently over-concerned you should be currently very observant, and currently very careful, and currently on top of what’s going on and following it very carefully.”

The first US case of monkeypox was confirmed in Massachusetts in May, followed by another case in California five days later.

Declarations of emergencies are already in place in California, Illinois and New York.

The World Health Organization last month dubbed monkeypox a “public health emergency of international concern,” its highest alert level.

First identified in monkeys in 1958, the disease has mild symptoms including fever, aches and skin lesions, and is usually spread through close contact.

The US government had distributed 156,000 monkeypox vaccine doses nationwide through mid-July. It has ordered an additional 2.5 million doses.

Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire, from the Lord out of heaven; and He overthrew those cities, and all the plain and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground. Genesis 19:24-25

Reuters Washington DC lightning strike that killed three on “climate” warning / August 6, 2022

The two men and two women struck by lightning on Thursday while visiting Washington’s Lafayette Square, just north of the White House, were among the unlucky few – struck by a bolt that hit the ground during a violent, afternoon thunderstorm.

Lightning strikes near the White House killing three people and injuring two more

The lightning hit near a tree that stands yards (meters) away from the fence that surrounds the presidential residence and offices across from the square, which is often crowded with visitors, especially in the summer months.

All four victims sustained critical, life-threatening injuries, and were taken to area hospitals. Two of them later died: James Mueller, 76, and Donna Mueller, 75, from Janesville, Wisconsin, the Metropolitan Police Department said.

Later on Friday a third victim, a 29-year-old male, was pronounced dead, the Metropolitan Police Department said. Further details on the victim were being withheld until the next-of-kin were notified.

NJ woman who survived lightning strike details her shocking experience: ‘I was doing the laundry’

FBI director warns of ‘Significant’ Threat

•August 9, 2022 • Leave a Comment

FBI director warns of ‘significant security issue’ during Biden border crisis

New York Post by Steven Nelson / August 4, 2022

The “staggering” number of people illegally crossing the US-Mexico border poses a “significant security issue” that can be exploited by terrorists, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned Thursday.

One Houston (6-7m) added to the US every year: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott 

Wray repeatedly expressed concern about the border crisis at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, despite other members of the Biden administration insisting the border situation is under control.

“I certainly know that it is an eclectic mix of nationalities and the volume is just staggering,” Wray told Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).

Cornyn followed up, “And that’s a public security threat, you agree with me?”

“To me it represents a significant security issue and represents a wide array of criminal threats that flow out of it,”

The number of Border Patrol busts in the 2022 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, has already surpassed 1.6 million, according to official figures.

One Houston (4.49th minute) 6-7m added to the US every year: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott 

The year’s tally is poised to soar past last year’s record of nearly 1.7 million encounters. The figures do not include the number of people able to evade authorities.

Nightly crossing through a gap at the US-Mexico border near Yuma, Arizona

Below is a warning from Ezekiel

Nobody Will Put Out the Fire

Ezekiel 20:45-46 God’s Message came to me: “Son of man, face south. Let the Message roll out against the south. Prophesy against the wilderness forest of the south.

47-48 “Tell the forest of the south, ‘Listen to the Message of God! God, the Master, says, I’ll set a fire in you that will burn up every tree, dead trees and live trees alike. Nobody will put out the fire. The whole country from south to north will be blackened by it. Everyone is going to see that I, God, started the fire and that it’s not going to be put out.’”

49 And I said, “O God, everyone is saying of me, ‘He just makes up stories.’”

A Sword! A Sword!

Ezekiel 21:1-5 God’s Message came to me: “Son of man, now face Jerusalem and let the Message roll out against the Sanctuary. Prophesy against the land of Israel. Say, ‘God’s Message: I’m against you. I’m pulling my sword from its sheath and killing both the wicked and the righteous. Because I’m treating everyone the same, good and bad, everyone from south to north is going to feel my sword! Everyone will know that I mean business.’ Ezekiel 20:45-21:5 (The Message Bible)

A Ukraine Stalemate?

•August 8, 2022 • Leave a Comment

RT by Dmitri Trenin: August 4, 2022

Russia cannot afford to lose in Ukraine, but neither can the US – is there a non-nuclear way out of the deadlock?

An escalation can lead to a bigger and more dangerous conflict. Are Moscow and Washington ready to take the risk?

What is vital for the two countries and the rest of the world is that this fight does not cross the nuclear threshold; BUT WHAT IF, IT DOES?

The threat of the conflict in Ukraine getting out of control is not just an ever-present concern, but a reality.

The authors of the RAND Corporation’s recent paper, ‘Pathways to Russian Escalation Against NATO From the Ukraine War’, warn US policymakers to be careful in their statements and moves. This is particularly when deciding on military postures, deployment patterns, weapons capabilities, and the like, so that the steps taken by them do not provoke the Russian leadership into pre-emptive or retaliatory strikes, including using non-strategic nuclear weapons, or taking the campaign into NATO territory.

This is totally in line with America’s overall approach of doing the maximum to weaken Russia on the battlefield in Ukraine while avoiding being drawn directly into a war against Moscow.  

Seen from here, Washington is clearly escalating its participation in the conflict by constantly testing the limits of Russian tolerance of these moves. It started with the provision to Kiev of Javelin anti-tank systems; it was then amplified to include M777 howitzers and HIMARS MLRS systems; it is now moving in the direction of providing Ukraine with U.S.-made military aircraft and training its pilots to fly them. In addition to the new packages of Western sanctions, Russia is also facing pressure on its geopolitically vulnerable outposts, whether regarding goods transit to and from its Kaliningrad exclave or the status of its forces in Transnistria, a small territory wedged between Ukraine and Moldova. Some refer to the latter as attempts by America’s junior allies in Eastern Europe to open a second front against Russia. 

So far, Russia’s actions and inaction have sometimes appeared surprising, even puzzling to US watchers. Moscow has refrained from strikes against transport links to Poland, cyberattacks against Ukrainian – not to mention U.S. – critical infrastructure, or even destroying bridges across the Dnieper River. As for the most concerning step of all – Russia using tactical nuclear weapons – this scenario is irrelevant in a situation where hostilities are taking place on Ukrainian territory with Russian forces slowly but steadily advancing, and a “threat to the existence of the Russian Federation” – the doctrinal condition for such deployment – is out of the question.

Moscow’s failure to respond immediately to high-profile Ukrainian actions, such as the constant shelling of the center of Donetsk; missile attacks against Russian villages and towns close to their shared border; or even the loss of the Moskva, the flagship of its Black Sea Fleet, hit and sunk by Ukraine with the material assistance of the United States, probably demonstrates the Kremlin’s unwillingness to be provoked by the enemy. President Vladimir Putin probably prefers his revenge to be served cold, and at the time of his choosing. It would be safe to say that nothing from this conflict will be forgotten by either side, but at least the Russians have refused to be distracted from their current central task – defeating the enemy’s forces in Donbass and taking control over Ukraine’s east and south.

So far, U.S.-led assistance to Kiev, whether military, financial or diplomatic, has not had a decisive impact on the battlefield. It has certainly propped up the Zelensky government and compensated for the Ukrainian forces’ losses of military equipment, thus contributing to the slowing down of Russian advances, but has not turned the tide of the war. One may conclude that the Kremlin sees no need, for now, to do things that would breach the resistance of the Biden Administration to domestic U.S. demands for a more rapid escalation of the U.S. involvement in the conflict. Jake Sullivan’s recent comment to the Aspen Strategy Group, demonstrating the reluctance of the White House to provide ATACMS systems to Kiev, suggests that this approach has some value.         

Looking ahead, one should expect more US escalation in any scenario of the evolution of fighting in Ukraine – whether Russia continues to gain ground (and integrate various new territories into the Russian Federation), or Ukraine mounts a counter-offensive (which so far it has failed to do). Russian officials express concern that a Ukrainian provocation presented as Moscow’s use of chemical weapons – which makes no military or any other sense but would certainly be believed in the US as a major egregious act by the Russians – could lead to Washington climbing abruptly up the escalation ladder.

Things may become even more serious, however, if the US or its NATO allies enter Ukraine, or otherwise become directly involved in the conflict; if the material assistance which they provide to Kiev starts making a major difference on the battlefield; or if those weapons are used to strike significant targets on Russia’s territory, such as the Crimean Bridge. There are parallel American concerns about Russia attacking transshipment points on NATO territory, launching significant counter-attacks against the United States or its allies, and using weapons of mass destruction. The last point has already been discussed, and as to the previous two, they could be in response to an adverse turn of events in the theater of operations.

Avoiding a “full-scale war” with Russia is one of the main priorities, Jens Stoltenberg says, BUT WHAT IF IT GOES OUT OF HAND?

Neither Russia nor the US can afford to lose in the conflict now raging in Ukraine. However, the difference between the situations faced by Washington and Moscow is huge. For the American leadership, a failure in Ukraine would be a strategic setback, politically costly both at home and internationally; for the Russian leadership, the outcome of its special military operation is an existential matter. In an asymmetrical conflict like this one, this amounts to an escalation advantage, if not dominance. What is vital for the two countries and the rest of the world is that this fight does not cross the nuclear threshold; BUT WHAT IF, IT DOES?

NATO reveals its goal in Ukraine conflict
Avoiding a “full-scale war” with Russia is one of the main priorities, Jens Stoltenberg says, BUT WHAT IF IT GOES OUT OF HAND?

Mormons and the tribe of EPHRAIM

•August 7, 2022 • 1 Comment

Today, the tribe of Ephraim is greatly praised by the LDS Church.

Excerpts from LDS Learning

The Mormon people regard them-selves as of Israel, and the term “Israel” as applying to themselves is frequently heard in their congregations. They believe themselves to be of Ephraim, and cousins of the Jews, who are of Judah.

The Book of Mormon: Great Britain….The Blessing Given to Manasseh, Not Ephraim?

To a Mormon those not of their faith are regarded as “Gentiles.” Gentiles in Utah often say, in a bantering way, that everybody in Utah outside of the Mormons is a Gentile, even the Jews! But the Mormons themselves would add “Excepting the Jews,” for, as already pointed out. they regard the Jew in the same light that he regards himself as of Israel, but of another “branch” of the faith.

The Mormons hold Heber J. Grant, who is an insurance man by profession as a literal prophet of God, even as Abraham and Moses. Joseph Smith was their first prophet and Brigham Young the second. Others followed until Mr Grant took the office nearly a decade ago.

They assert that they are hated by some sects because of their teachings respecting exclusive divine authority rather than because of polygamy. Polygamy was dropped in the ’90’s, and if anybody in the church attempted it today he would be set upon by church leaders without mercy, as far as immediate excommunication has any terrors. This is because the church undertook to abandon polygamy after the US Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional, and not because of any retraction of faith.

“EPHRAIM SHALL NOT VEX JUDAH”

The Book of Mormon is a history, chiefly, of the descendants of Joseph; and in the mighty nations which have peopled the American continent, the Latter-day Saints see, in part, the fulfillment of the great blessings pronounced upon his head.

Doctrinal Outline Established:

“The great majority of those who have come into the Church are Ephraimites. It is the exception to find one of any other tribe, unless it is of Manasseh.”

Mormons believe their relationship as Ephraimites and the Jews. “With us Mormons who are Ephraimites the time has come when Judah shall not envy Ephraim and Ephraim shall not vex Judah.”

“It is essential in this dispensation that Ephraim stand in his place at the head, exercising the birthright in Israel which was given to him by direct revelation. Therefore, Ephraim must be gathered first to prepare the way, through the gospel and the priesthood, for the rest of the tribes of Israel when the time comes for them to be gathered to Zion.”

The birthright had nothing to do with the priesthood. The Levites had the priesthood in the Old Testament, but they did not have the birthright.

Notice the gathering to Zion … where is Zion again? All of America (North + Central + South) as Joseph Smith taught? “The great majority of those who have come into the Church are Ephraimites. It is the exception to find one of any other tribe, unless it is of Manasseh.”

“It is Ephraim, today, who holds the priesthood. It is with Ephraim that the Lord has made covenant and has revealed the fulness of the everlasting gospel. It is Ephraim who is building temples and performing the ordinances in them for both the living and for the dead. When the “lost tribes” come — and it will be a most wonderful sight and a marvelous thing when they do come to Zion — in fulfilment of the promises made through Isaiah and Jeremiah, they will have to receive the crowning blessings from their brother Ephraim, the “firstborn” in Israel” (Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 3:252–53).” — page 66.

Only Ephraim is building temples? Only Ephraim holds the priesthood in the LDS Church today?

In fulfilment of the promises made through Isaiah and Jeremiah?

No. This is not the context of the Old Testament prophets.

Both Isaiah and Jeremiah wrote concerning Judah and Jerusalem (Isaiah chapter 2, Jeremiah chapters 4-6).

Confusion arises when scripture is taken out of context.

Great Britain was first because Manasseh was first born and Great Britain was a nation first, long before America; but Ephraim was considered as the firstborn in Israel?

Israel, David, and Ephraim were called the firstborn (Ex. 4:22; Jer. 31:9; Ps. 89:27).

In Doctrine and Covenants 133:34, Joseph Smith said that the tribe of Ephraim would receive the richer blessing above all the other tribes of Israel. The meaning of the name Manasseh, which is forgetful or he who forgets.

When you look at the LDS Church’s Bible Dictionary for “Ephraim” at https://www.lds.org/scriptures/bd/ephraim?lang=eng&letter=e

it says, “Ephraim was given the birthright in Israel (1 Chr. 5: 1-2; Jer. 31: 9), and in the last days it has been the tribe of Ephraim’s privilege first to bear the message of the restoration of the gospel to the world and to gather scattered Israel.”

If you read that passage in Chronicles, the birthright went to Ephraim plus Manasseh. Let’s not forget that. There is no scripture saying that Manasseh ever lost this birthright.

The Throne of Britain on The Stone of Scoon 

By the way, the birthright applies to the physical tribes of Israel. This Israelite birthright does not extend to non-Israelites.

“The time will come when, through the operation of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the envy of Judah and Ephraim shall cease (Isa. 11:12-13).

That last part is incorrect.

If you examine Isaiah 11:12-13, you will see that it has also been mentioned by the Book of Mormon.

“The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim” (Isaiah).

2 Nephi 21:13 – “The envy of Ephraim also shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off; Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim.”

When you examine both versions, it says that a time will come when Ephraim will not envy Judah. Judah did not envy Ephraim. It was Ephraim who envied Judah.

Doctrine and Covenants 133:35 says, “And they also of the tribe of Judah, after their pain, shall be sanctified in holiness before the Lord, to dwell in his presence day and night, forever and ever.”

This sounds like Judah has a greater blessing for Ephraim is not said to dwell in God’s presence day and night.

Also, one should carefully read the passage cited by the LDS Church in Doctrine and Covenants 133:26-35. There is no mention of a land inheritance in the United States.

Also, according to how Joseph Smith writes this, this event of Ephraim’s envy of Judah departing occurs in the future … after the Second Coming. See verse 23.

“He shall command the great deep, and it shall be driven back into the north countries, and the islands shall become one land.”

The prophet Isaiah and others give ample reason why Ephraim is not favoured over the other tribes. It was copied into the Book of Mormon.

2 Nephi 17:2 – Syria and Ephraim wage war against Judah.

2 Nephi 17:5 – Ephraim takes evil counsel against Judah.

2 Nephi 17:8 – Ephraim would be broken that it be not a people.

2 Nephi 19:9 – Ephraim has pride.

2 Nephi 19:21 – Manasseh and Ephraim are against Judah.

We all know from the Bible that Jesus was of the line of Judah. This alone should reveal that Judah received the greatest blessing.

Psalm 78:67-68 – “Moreover, he refused the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim. But chose the tribe of Judah, the mount Zion which he loved.”

Jeremiah 7:15 – “And I will cast you out of my sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole house of Ephraim.”

Jeremiah 31:20 – After Ephraim repents, he receives mercy, not blessings above the other tribes.

By far, Hosea shows more than any other prophet about the fallen nature of Ephraim:

Hosea 4:17 – “Ephraim is joined to idols; let him alone.”

Hosea 5:3 – “O Ephraim, thou committest whoredom, and Israel is defiled.”

Hosea 5:9 – “Ephraim shall be desolate in the day of rebuke; among the tribes of Israel have I made known that which shall surely be.”

Hosea 9:3 – .”.. but Ephraim shall return to Egypt, and they shall eat unclean things in Assyria.”

Hosea 12:1 – “Ephraim compasseth me about with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit; but Judah yet ruleth with God and is faithful with the saints.”

Far from Ephraim receiving a greater blessing, Judah has. It has in the past, and it will again in the future.

Jesus the Son and God the Father came to visit Joseph Smith, an honour and privilege even Moses or Elijah couldn’t achieve

You can see from the above that Mormons who believe they are modern-day “Ephraimites” still envy Judah so much so that they believe the physical Zion is the land of America.

As for the Bible, the tribe of Judah received the greater blessing … and some day, the Eprhaimites will cease to envy Judah (just like Isaiah 11:13 said).

According to the Bible, the physical Zion refers to the land of physical Israel.

I leave you with some final thoughts …

“Moreover, he refused the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim. But chose the tribe of Judah, the mount Zion which he loved” (Psalm 78:67-68).

“For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant” (Isaiah 5:7).

For an indepth study, see:

Who are the posterity of biblical Jacob? And on the identities of Ephraim and Manasseh, see (1) The Birthrights (2) Ephraim and Manasseh (3) Ephraim as the Thirteenth Tribe (4) Who is this lying Ephraim? (5) The Ox with horns of a Unicorn

For understanding who the modern tribes of Judah and Joseph are, the best book to have expounded this subject is “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J. H. Allen (1847-1930).

What is The Times of the Gentiles?

•August 6, 2022 • Leave a Comment

In Luke 21:24, Jesus speaks of future events, including the destruction of Jerusalem and His return. He says

“And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem shall be trodden down by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”

A similar phrase is found in Romans 11:25, which says, “A partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.” Does the Bible tell us what the phrase “times of the Gentiles” means?

The context above already has a hint, “that Israel shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away as captives into all nations. And Jerusalem shall be trodden down by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”

Could the Times of the Gentiles coinsides with the times of Jacob’s trouble? It seems possible. The fall by the edge of the sword upon Jerusalem could occur when the house of Judah is again taken into captivity under Ezekiel 4; when Exekiel was made to bear the iniquity of Judah for forty years; where Judah shall bear his iniquity for forty days, for God have appointed them a day for a year.

A narror context is in Jeremiah 30:6-8

6 Ask ye now, and see whether a man doth travail with child? Why do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?

7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it. It is even the time of Jacob’s trouble, but he shall be saved out of it.

8 “‘For it shall come to pass in that day,’ saith the Lord of hosts, ‘that I will break his yoke from off thy neck, and will burst thy bonds, and strangers shall no more be served by him.

Israel incorporates the house of Jacob; it’s also the times of Jacob’s trouble. The house of Judah had already returned to the State of Israel, but the house of Israel hasn’t returned. That’s about to change.

There is a parallel Scripture in Ezekiel 36: “the mountain of Israel” this prophecy is concerning the desolations of the United States, UK and France; “and to the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys” these are the hills: Ireland, Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, Finland and Iceland; and the valleys, the low countries: Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg;

— shoot forth your branches; that is, the trees that grew upon them should; the vines, and the olive trees, planted on hills and mountains; these are their colonies: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa; American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands (US); Anguilla, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Virgin Islands (UK); Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana, Mayotte, Réunion (France).

For an answer, lets go into the Old Testament, where this phase originated.

Ezekiel 30:3 “For the day is near; even the day of the Lord is near, a cloudy day; it shall be the time of the Gentiles” (NKJV, JUB).

The times of the Gentiles could also coincide with the iniquities of the hiouse of Israel for 190 years and the house of Judah for 40 years as given by the Septuagint version of Ezekiel 4:

5 For I have appointed thee their iniquities for a number of days, for a hundred and ninety days: so thou shalt bear the iniquities of the house of Israel. — start with the 10 tribes but end with the full house of Israel; all 12 tribes: end of the 190 years

6 And thou shalt accomplish this, and shalt lie on thy right side, and shalt bear the iniquities of the house of Juda forty days: I have appointed thee a day for a year. Ezekiel 4:4-6 Septuagint. — after the start of the 10 tribes house of Israel and last for 150 years, the house of Judah; 3 tribes join in for 40 years

9 Take thou also to thee wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentils, and millet, and bread-corn; and thou shalt cast them into one earthen vessel, and shalt make them into loaves for thyself; and thou shalt eat them a hundred and ninety days, according to the number of the days which thou sleepest on thy side. Ezekiel 4:4-9 Septuagint. — from the start with 10 tribes and ends with the full house of Israel: 190 years: why the difference? Perhaps Judah had undergo numerous pogroms and cleanings whereas Ephraim has none since the day when went captivity and into apparent oblivion

We’re now in the Hebrew year 5782 and we’ll need another 217 years to usher the Divine Plan into the 7th Millennium as we believe. Of course, this is on the assumption that God’s oracles have been accurately kept since the day Adam was created as the Orthodox custodians claim.

If we add 217 years to the Gregorian calendar year 2022 we’ll come to 2239 when the 7th Millennium starts. Working backward 190 years will bring us to the Gregorian year 2049. So could the year 2049 be the start of the house of Israel’s “iniquity?” — “thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them;” Ezekiel 4:13 in captivity to start the 190 years?

His Name is YEHOVAH

•August 5, 2022 • Leave a Comment

Who is the LORD?

So, let’s pose a question: If God’s personal name is YEHOVAH, why do most Bible translations translate YEHOVAH as “the LORD”?

The answer is straightforward. The most common translation of YEHOVAH is the ‘LORD’ because the translators chose to follow the traditions of man instead of the command of God.

Since the Hebrew Text was without vowels, it appears in the Text as YHVH (H3068 יְהֹוָה); and without vowels soon the pronouncement was lost. How could we know it is Yehovah and not “Yahweh” (YAH-way); others prefer “Yehowah,” “Yahuweh,” or “Yahawah”; still others argue for “Jehovah”?

The vast majority of Jewish and Christian biblical scholars and linguists do not believe “Jehovah” to be the proper pronunciation of YHVH. There was no true J sound in ancient Hebrew. Even the Hebrew letter vav, which is transliterated as the W in YHWH is said to have originally had a pronunciation closer to V than the W of Jehovah.

Thou Shalt Swear By My Name

Yehovah in His wisdom commanded the Israelites to swear via His Name. If they vowed, they were to use His Name. Thus, His Name had to be used for such solemn acts. They weren’t usually forced to vow, but when they did, they had to use His Name:

Deuteronomy 6:13 Thou shalt fear Yehovah thy God and serve Him. And thou shalt swear via His name.

Deuteronomy 10:20 Thou shalt fear Yehovah thy God. Thou shalt serve Him, and thou shalt cleave to Him. And thou shalt swear via His name.

Here are a few further thoughts:

(1) His name YHVH is used around 6519 times (in Strong’s Blue Letter Bible), and should be used, (not Lord, which is a title). Nehemia Gordon, a native Hebrew speaker, had dug this issue deeper and established His name as Yehovah:

a) The Name Yehovah Found 1015 Times in Ancient Hebrew Manuscripts | Hoshana Rabbah BlogHoshana Rabbah Blog b) (261) Nehemia Gordon: How to Pronounce YHWH in Hebrew The Awakening Report – YouTube

(2) The time when the Jew stopped and lost His name was around the time of Rabbi Haninah ben Teradion, (2nd century AD). During the Hadrianic persecutions decrees (following the Bar Kokhba revolt of AD 132-135) were promulgated imposing the most rigorous penalties on the observers of the Jewish law, and especially upon those who occupied themselves with the promulgation of that law. Nevertheless, Hananiah conscientiously followed his chosen profession; he convened public assemblies and taught Torah; and for this, he lost his life as a martyr.

(3) The LORD; one of the 134 changes to Adonai listed by EW Bullinger in Appendix 32 of The Companion Bible; it should be “The LORD (יְהוָ֨ה YHVH, Yehovah)” as in the original Text;

The official list given in the Massorah (§§ 107-15, Ginsburg’s edition) contains the 134.

Genesis 18:3,27,30,32; (Genesis 18:31? The context indicates that this verse should be included)

 19:18; 20:4. Exodus 4:10,13; 5:22; 15:17; 34:9,9. Numbers 14:17.

Joshua 7:8. Judges 6:15; 13:8. 1Kings 3:10,15; 22:6. 2Kings 7:6; 19:23. Isaiah 3:17,18; 4:4; 6:1,8,11; 7:14,20; 8:7; 9:8,17; 10:12; 11:11; 21:6,8,16; 28:2; 29:13; 30:20; 37:24; 38:14,16; 49:14. Ezekiel 18:25,29; 21:13; 33:17,29. Amos 5:16; 7:7,8; 9:1. Zechariah 9:4. Micah 1:2. Malachi 1:12,14.

Psalm 2:4; 16:2; 22:19,30; 30:8; 35:3?(none), 35:17,22; 37:12; 38:9,15,22; 39:7; 40:17; 44:23; 51:15; 54:4; 55:9; 57:9; 59:11; 62:12; 66:18; 68:11,17,19,22,26,32; 73:20; 77:2,7; 78:65; 79:12; 86:3,4,5,8,9,12,15; 89:49,50; 90:1,17; 110:5; 130:2,3,6. Daniel 1:2; 9:3,4,7,9,15,16,17,19,19,19. Lamentations 1:14,15,15; 2:1,2,5,7,18,19,20; 3:31,36,37,58. Ezra 10:3. Nehemiah 1:11; 4:14. Job 28:28.

[There seems to be an error: that there is none in Psalm 35:3 but another change should be added to Genesis 18:31; the total changes remain at 134]

China to conduct military drills around Taiwan

•August 4, 2022 • Leave a Comment

China plans to conduct a series of military drills around Taiwan

RT / August 3, 2022 // Global Times August 3, 2022

The PLA will also conduct a series of live fire military drills from August 4 to 7 in six different areas that encircle the island of Taiwan from all directions, according to the Xinhua News Agency after Pelosi landed at the Taipei airport.

Taiwan’s defense officials have accused Beijing of seeking to “invade” the island’s territorial waters and airspace, after China announced a series of “targeted military operations” in response to US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei.

Military officials in Taipei claimed on Wednesday that several exclusion zones around the island, where China intends to conduct live-fire drills and other military exercises later this week, overlap with “Taiwan’s territorial space.” According to the Guardian, Taipei accused Beijing of violating “UN rules” with what it claimed would amount to a de facto “blockade of Taiwan’s air and sea space”  

Amphibious armored vehicles of the Chinese PLA pictured during military drills

Accusing Beijing of waging “psychological warfare on Taiwan and citizens,” Taipei vowed to “firmly defend its national security” and boost its military preparedness to the highest level, while adhering to the “principle of not asking for a war.”

Pelosi arrived in Taipei late on Tuesday despite repeated warnings from Beijing against attempting to visit territory that it regards as an integral part of China.

Chinese PLA held combat naval drills in South China Sea
The PLA will conduct live fire military drills from August 4-7, 2022, compared to 1996’s
3 US carrier groups namely the aircraft carrier group USS Ronald Reagan & the amphibious assault groups USS Tripoli & USS America are in the vicinity of #Taiwan
The map also shows the locations of the 2 Chinese carriers, Liaoning & Shandong.

Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim, whose glorious beauty is a fading flower, which are on the head of the fat valleys of them that are overcome with wine! Isaiah 28:1

European Refugee Crisis

•August 3, 2022 • Leave a Comment

European Migration Refugee Crisis Explained | Middle East Crisis | International Relations Analysis. Europe is struggling to handle its largest flow of migrants since the aftermath of World War II. Why is the crisis happening now?

Amit Sengupta explains / 1 Jan 2021

European Refugee Crisis

Wall Street Journal / 10 Sept 2015

The war in Ukraine, as well as a potential war in Taiwan have sparked off steams and smokes into the atmosphere and act as a distraction to European and US’s problems. The real problem of the West lies to the South. Their blind shepherd just couldn’t see this because they are blind! And that all her shepherd are dumb dogs, they cannot bark, sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber:

Ezekiel 20:45 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,
46 “Son of man, set thy face toward the South, and drop thy word toward the South, and prophesy against the forest of the Southland.
47 And say to the forest of the South: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the South to the North shall be burned therein.
48 And all flesh shall see that I, the Lord, have kindled it; it shall not be quenched.’”
49 Then said I, “Ah, Lord God! They say of me, ‘Doth he not speak parables?’”
Ezekiel 21:1 And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,
2 “Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel;
3 and say to the land of Israel, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth My Sword out of his sheath and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.
4 Seeing then that I will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall My Sword go forth out of his sheath against all flesh from the South to the North,
5 that all flesh may know that I, the Lord, have drawn forth My Sword out of his sheath. It shall not return any more.’ (Ezekiel 20:45-21:5)

European Migration Crisis

And remember, Ezekiel’s prophetic message wasn’t for the house of Judah but to the house of Israel; hence we must try to read the prophetic meaning behind all those historical setting. Its timing was a great distance into the future (Ezekiel 12:27), into our time and the message is primarily and principally for the United States of America, and secondarily its European allies.