Leviticus (19-20)

•January 15, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Leviticus 19

And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Speak unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, and say unto them: ‘Ye shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy. — ye shall be holy; separated from all the forementioned defilements, and entirely consecrated to God, and obedient to all his laws and statutes.

Ye shall fear every man his mother and his father, and keep My Sabbaths: I am the Lord your God. — and keep my Sabbaths; this is expressed in the plural number, because there were various Sabbaths: the seventh day Sabbath, and the seventh year Sabbath, and the jubilee, which was once in seven times seven years; the seventh day Sabbath is chiefly meant;

Turn ye not unto idols, nor make to yourselves molten gods: I am the Lord your God. — turn ye not unto idols; as the Lord is their God, and there is no other God besides Him, the Israelites must never turn their affections nor address prayers or enquiries to idols.

“‘And if ye offer a sacrifice of peace offerings unto the Lord, ye shall offer it at your own will. — at your own will; or, according to your own pleasure, a voluntary freewill offering, of their own accord, and not by force, what you think fit; for though this sacrifice, was appreciated, it was left to their choice to determine the particulars.

It shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow; and if aught remain until the third day, it shall be burned in the fire. — it shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow; the meaning is, that if it could be, it was best to eat it all up the same day it was offered, but if not, the remainder was to be eaten on the morrow, but by no means to be kept any longer;

And if it be eaten at all on the third day, it is abominable; it shall not be accepted. — it is abominable; it is as any common thing, as if it was no sacrifice; yea, as if it was corrupt and putrefied flesh;

Therefore every one who eateth it shall bear his iniquity, because he hath profaned the hallowed thing of the Lord; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people. — therefore everyone that eateth it shall bear his iniquity; be chargeable with sin, be pronounced guilty, and endure the punishment, which is cutting off;

“‘And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest. — thou shall not wholly reap the corner of the field; but a part was to be left for the poor.

10 And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather every grape of thy vineyard. Thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I am the Lord your God. — left for the poor; is the poor Israelite; “the stranger” is properly the foreigner, or a proselyte who could possess no land of his own in the land of Israel.

11 “‘Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another. — neither deal falsely; in any respect defrauding and over reaching in trade and commerce, particularly not being faithful to a trust committed to them;

12 And ye shall not swear by My name falsely; neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord. — ye shall not swear by my name falsely: this is here added, to show how one sin draws on another, and that when men will lie for their own advantage, they will easily be induced to perjury.

13 “‘Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbor, neither rob him. The wages of him that is hired shall not remain with thee all night until the morning. — MSG “Don’t exploit your friend or rob him. “Don’t hold back the wages of a hired hand overnight.

14 Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord. — do no hurt to any, because they are unable to avenge themselves. We ought to take heed of doing any thing which may occasion our weak brother to fall;

14 Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord. — thou shalt not curse the deaf; to revile one who cannot hear, and is therefore unable to vindicate himself, is both inexpressibly mean and wicked.

15 “‘Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment. Thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty, but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbor.

— ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment; this is said with respect to judges and witnesses; that the one should not bear false witness in a court of judicature to the perversion of justice, and the other should not pronounce an unrighteous sentence, justifying the wicked and condemning the righteous;

16 “‘Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people; neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbor: I am the Lord. — thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer, or thou shalt not go about slandering; either by bearing a false testimony, whereby his blood is in danger of being shed when innocent; or by being silent, and not hearing a testimony for him, whereby the shedding of his innocent blood might have been prevented;

17 “‘Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart. Thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbor, and not let sin come upon him. — you shall not hate your brother in your heart, nor shall you rebuke your brother in any way, lest you bear sin because of him.

18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself: I am the Lord. — but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself; sincerely and heartily, as a man loves himself, doing all the good to him as a man does to himself, or would have done to himself;

19 “‘Ye shall keep My statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle breed with a diverse kind. Thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed; neither shall a garment mingled with linen and wool come upon thee. — thou shall not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind; or “cause them to gender” for cattle do not usually of themselves gender with a diverse kind, unless directed and solicited to it, as a male of one kind with a female of another;

— for instance, an horse with a she ass, or an he ass with a mare, and even creatures that were like one another, yet of different kinds, were not to mix together; as a wolf and a dog, a hound and a fox, goats and roebucks, goats and sheep, a horse and a mule, a mule and an ass, an ass and a wild ass; for though they are like one another, they are of different kinds;

20 “‘And whosoever lieth carnally with a woman who is a bondmaid, betrothed to a husband, and not at all redeemed nor freedom given her, she shall be scourged. They shall not be put to death, because she was not free. — betrothed to an husband; rather, who has been betrothed to a man. The reference appears to be to a bondwoman who has been betrothed to a fellow-servant by her master;

— she shall be scourged; and not he, as the Targum of Jonathan says;

21 And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation: even a ram for a trespass offering. — he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord; to the priest of the Lord, to offer it for him; he, and not she, as the Targum of Jonathan has it;

22 And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he hath done, and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him.

23 “‘And when ye shall come into the land and shall have planted all manner of trees for food, then ye shall count the fruit thereof as uncircumcised. Three years shall it be as uncircumcised unto you. It shall not be eaten of. — as uncircumcised, that is, as unclean, not to be eaten, but cast away, and counted abominable, as the foreskins are;

— three years shall it be; the cutting off of the fruit is to be repeated every year during three successive years. As the produce of the earliest year when let to grow upon the trees is both stunted and tasteless,

24 But in the fourth year all the fruit thereof shall be holy with which to praise the Lord. — but in the fourth year all the fruit thereof shall be holy; separated and devoted to the service of God, to be given to the priest;

25 And in the fifth year shall ye eat of the fruit thereof, that it may yield unto you the increase thereof: I am the Lord your God. — and in the fifth year; it was only in the fifth year that the owner was permitted to eat the fruits without redeeming them.

26 “‘Ye shall not eat any thing with the blood; neither shall ye use enchantment, nor observe omens. — any thing with the blood; any flesh out of which the blood is not first poured.

27 Ye shall not round off the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard. — round the corners of your heads; that is, they are not to shave off the hair around the temples and behind the ears, so as to leave the head bald;

— neither shall thou mar the corners of thy beard; by shaving them entirely; 

28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the Lord. — ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead; by tattooing, imprinting figures of flowers, leaves, stars; either with their nails, tearing their cheeks and other parts, or with any instrument: knife, razor; it was the custom of the Amorites, when anyone died, to cut their flesh;

29 “‘Do not prostitute thy daughter to cause her to be a whore, lest the land fall to whoredom and the land become full of wickedness. — lest the land fall to whoredom, and the land become full of wickedness: of the wickedness of whoredom;

30 Ye shall keep My Sabbaths and reverence My sanctuary: I am the Lord. — ye shall keep my sabbaths; by attending to the worship and service of God on Sabbath days, they and their children would be preserved from the idolatry of the Gentiles, and all the filthy practices attending it;

31 “‘Regard not those who have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards to be defiled by them: I am the Lord your God.

— those who have familiar spirits; it implied that those who practised this craft were supposed to be attended by an invisible spirit who was subject to their call to supply them with supernatural information; or practising as witchcrafts; 

— neither seek after wizards or soothsayers; such as pretend to a great deal of knowledge, as the word signifies; such as are called cunning men; the expression “wizard,” which in old English denotes “wise man,” “sage,” is almost the exact equivalent of the word in the original.

32 “‘Thou shalt rise up before the hoary head and honor the face of the old man, and fear thy God: I am the Lord. — rise up before the hoary head; but though no regard is to be paid to these soothsayers and cunning men, the greatest reverence is to be shown to the aged, for “with the old is wisdom, and in length of days understanding.”

33 “‘And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. — ye shall not vex him; having once been admitted into the community, the Israelites were forbidden to upbraid him with his nationality or throw at him the fact that he was originally a heathen.

34 But the stranger who dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself, for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.

— shalt love him as thyself; he is not simply to be treated with consideration and courtesy because he is a foreigner, and enjoy the rights and receive the justice due to every human being, but he is to be put on a perfect equality with the ordinary Israelite.

35 “‘Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in measuring length, weight, or number. —n meteyard, in weight, or in measure; the first of these signifies the measure of land, of fields and so likewise of anything that is measured, not only by the rod or line, but by the yard or ell, as cloth and other things.

36 Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin shall ye have: I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt. — just balances, just weights; that is, they were to be the same for buying as for selling.

37 Therefore shall ye observe all My statutes and all My judgments, and do them: I am the Lord.’” — terefore; because my blessings and deliverances are not indulgences to sin, but greater obligations to all duties to God.

Leviticus 20

And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel: ‘Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers who sojourn in Israel, who giveth any of his seed unto Molech, he shall surely be put to death. The people of the land shall stone him with stones. — Molech, literally, “the King,” called also Moloch, Milcom, and Malcham, was known in later times as “the abomination of the Ammonites” 1 Kings 11:5.

— the nature of the rite and of the impious custom called passing children through the fire to Molech is probably true; the practices appear to have been essentially connected with magical arts, probably also with unlawful lusts, and with some particular form of profane swearing.

And I will set My face against that man and will cut him off from among his people, because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile My sanctuary and to profane My holy name. — and to profane my holy name: by sacrificing to an idol, when sacrifice should be offered to God; and such a sacrifice as would cause the name of God, and his holy laws, and true religion, to be blasphemed and evil, spoken of among the Gentiles.

And if the people of the land do in any way hide their eyes from the man when he giveth of his seed unto Molech and kill him not, — and if the people of the land; if the community itself, whose duty it is to execute the sentence, either from culpable indifference or criminal sympathy with the sin, connive at it;

then I will set My face against that man and against his family and will cut him off, and all who go a whoring after him to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people. — then I will set my face against that man; that man that sees him do the fact, and winks at it, or the judge that connives at him, and will not condemn him, as well as the man that has committed the iniquity;

“‘And the soul that turneth after such as have familiar spirits and after wizards to go a whoring after them, I will even set My face against that soul and will cut him off from among his people. — such as have familiar spirits; to seek knowledge, or counsel, or help from them; the same punishment will be visited upon the man who consults necromancers; Jonathan says “and will destroy him by a plague from among his people.”

“‘Sanctify yourselves therefore and be ye holy, for I am the Lord your God. — sanctify yourselves therefore; by abstaining from such impious and idolatrous practices, as well as by observing the holy commandments of the Lord; otherwise internal sanctification is not the work of man, but of the Lord himself;

“‘And ye shall keep My statutes and do them: I am the Lord who sanctify you. — and ye shall keep my statutes, and do them; not only those respecting the above things, but all others, which would be a means of preserving them from sin, and of promoting holiness in their lives and conversations;

— I am the Lord which sanctify you: who had separated and distinguished them from all other people on earth, and who had given them holy laws, as the means of holiness; and who only could and did sanctify internally, by his spirit, such or them as were sanctified in heart, as well as outwardly.

“‘For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death. He hath cursed his father or his mother: his blood shall be upon him. — for everyone that curseth his father or his mother; here begins the account of the penalties annexed to the several laws in the preceding chapter; and that respecting the fear and honour of parents being the first,

10 “‘And the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbor’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

— this death was inflicted for six crimes; (1) upon him who had commerce with another man’s wife; (2) who smote his father or mother; (3) who stole an Israelite; (4) who being an elder rebelled against the decree of the senate (Deuteronomy 17:12); (5) who played the false prophet; and (6) who prophesied in the name of another god.

11 And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness. Both of them shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them. — it should be noted that having sex with a stepmother or daughter-in-law are put, by the punishment inflicted upon them, on the same level with adultery and unnatural crimes (verses 10, 13, 15, 16);

12 And if a man lie with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death. They have wrought confusion: their blood shall be upon them. — confusion; by perverting the order which God hath appointed, and making the same offspring both his own child and his grand-child.

13 “‘If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them. — if a man lie also with mankind, as he lieth with a woman; is guilty of the sin of sodomy, this is a breach of the law and worthy of death; be slain by stoning, as the above Targum says;

14 “‘And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness. They shall be burned with fire, both he and they, that there be no wickedness among you. — it is wickedness; abominable wickedness, shocking and detestable; there are other things, which also are wicked and not to be done, but this is extremely wicked, wickedness to a high degree;

15 “‘And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death; and ye shall slay the beast. — if a man lie with a beast; a sin quite unnatural, exceeding shocking and detestable, forbid Leviticus 18:23,

16 And if a woman approach unto any beast and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman and the beast. They shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them. — thou shall kill the woman and the beast: the woman by stoning, and the beast with clubs, as the Targum of Jonathan; and this for the same reasons as before, as well as to prevent monstrous births;

17 “‘And if a man shall take his sister, his father’s daughter or his mother’s daughter, and see her nakedness and she see his nakedness, it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people. He hath uncovered his sister’s nakedness: he shall bear his iniquity.

— if a man shall take his sister, his father’s daughter, or his mother’s daughter; take her to be his wife, or commit lewdness with her, it is not lawful to marry her, or lie with her;

18 “‘And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness and shall uncover her nakedness, he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood; and both of them shall be cut off from among their people. — a woman having her sickness; her monthly periods, which make her weak and languid, which is forbidden;

19 And thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother’s sister nor of thy father’s sister, for he uncovereth his near kin: they shall bear their iniquity. — for he uncovereth his near kin; as an aunt is to a man, and so an uncle to a woman, and both equally criminal;

20 And if a man shall lie with his uncle’s wife, he hath uncovered his uncle’s nakedness. They shall bear their sin: they shall die childless. — they shall die childless; either the offspring should not be regarded as lawfully theirs, nor be entitled to any hereditary privileges, or they should have no blessing in their children.

21 And if a man shall take his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing. He hath uncovered his brother’s nakedness: they shall be childless. — and if a man shall take his brother’s wife; to his wife, whether in his life, as the Targum of Jonathan adds, or whether after his death;

— unless when there is no issue, then he was obliged to it by another law, Deuteronomy 25:5; which is now ceased, and the law in Leviticus 18:16; here referred to, stands clear of all exceptions;

22 “‘Ye shall therefore keep all My statutes and all My judgments, and do them, that the land whither I bring you to dwell therein spew you not out. — that the land . . . spue you not out; as the stomach does its food when it is loathsome and nauseous to it, and it cannot bear it; Leviticus 18:25.

23 And ye shall not walk in the manners of the nation which I cast out before you; for they committed all these things, and therefore I abhorred them. — for there were seven nations cast out for them; and notorious for their wickedness: hence we often meet with this phrase, “the way of the Amorites” they would be ejected and abhorred by him, as the Targums of Jonathan says;

24 But I have said unto you, “Ye shall inherit their land, and I will give it unto you to possess it, a land that floweth with milk and honey.” I am the Lord your God, who have separated you from other people. — but I have said unto you; that is, promised to your fathers Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and also to you, that he would expel the Canaanites, and give the land to the Israelites as an inheritance;

— I am the Lord your God; had chosen them above all people, to be a special and peculiar people to him; had distinguished them by his favours, and had given them particular laws and ordinances, to observe and walk according to them, different from all other nations, which it became them carefully to regard.

25 Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean; and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean. — have separated you from other people; your selection from the rest of the nations was for the all-important end of preserving the knowledge and worship of the true God amid the universal apostasy;

26 And ye shall be holy unto Me; for I the Lord am holy and have severed you from other people, that ye should be Mine. — and ye shall be holy unto me; separated from all unclean persons and things, and devoted to his service, and obedient to all his commands, and so live holy lives and conversations, according to his will, and to his honour and glory;

— for I the Lord am holy; and therefore they, his people, should be like him, and imitate him, and observe those things which are agreeable to his holy nature and will, and yield a cheerful obedience to his holy precepts;

— and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine; which is a very forcible argument, a strong motive, and which laid them under great obligation to obedience and holiness.

27 “‘A man also or woman who hath a familiar spirit, or who is a wizard, shall surely be put to death. They shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.’” — “but” a man also or woman; that is, because the Israelites are God’s holy ones, therefore every man or woman who pretends to disclose future events by means of necromancy, thus usurping the functions of God, is to be stoned to death.

China’s New Defense Minister

•January 14, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Chinese Naval Officers Supplanting Army within PLA

With military establishment in turmoil, Xi turns to the navy to assure loyalty

Asia Sentinel by Andy Wong Ming Jun • January 8, 2024

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s elevation of an admiral to the position of defense minister for the first time under Communist Party (CCP) rule, and several major reshuffles that rerouted senior naval flag-rank officers into China’s Rocket Forces, is a significant signal – if any was needed after 70 of the forces were arrested earlier – that all is not well within the Chinese military establishment.

Dong Jun, China’s new Defense Minister

Most significantly, the promotion of two People’s Liberation Army-Navy flag-rank officers to take up significant leadership roles such as Defense Minister and Commander, Rocket Forces, plus an ex-submariner promoted to become the new naval chief, hints at a potential sea change in the balance of interservice power more befitting the country’s newfound self-imagery as a blue-water power, or more tellingly at deeper issues with political loyalty from the land army to Xi.

Admiral Dong Jun’s elevation is widely seen as unprecedented, given the party’s enduring adherence to traditional Soviet/communist dogma of valuing the land army bit of the military as both the most important defenders of national survival and also the strongest bastion of political/ideological reliability.

Of China’s 14 defense ministers since 1949, all but three hail from the PLA Ground Force. While the 12th (Wei Fenghe) and 13th (Li Shangfu) were the first to break this tradition by hailing from the rocket force and the Strategic Support Force responsible for the PLA’s non-kinetic/electronic warfare branch, all of them nonetheless still came from the land domain of military service.

The land army had to be of the strongest political loyalty. In the case of both the former Soviet Union and modern-day China under the CCP, both countries’ political leaderships heavily politicized their national militaries with the land army the largest of the services.

To this day, political commissars ensure the PLA’s continuing loyalty as the CCP’s armed wing and guarantor of sole political survival as a more ideologically reliable hard power alternative. In Mao’s words, “The Party controls The Gun.”

Also, both the Russian and Chinese communists shared the same ideological distrust of their navies. This is due to two key reasons: a lack of modern naval historical tradition in the case of the Chinese prior to the CCP gaining power in 1949, and a history of starting revolutions in the case of the Russians.

Navies have also proved to be the hardest to effectively politicize, due to their self-image of relatively high professionalism enjoying a degree of operational autonomy away from central political command on land that is difficult if not impossible to achieve for army or air force officers.

It is also why despite its title, command and control of the PLA does not reside with whoever is Defense Minister but with whomever is Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC): one of Xi’s three main hats. The defense minister role is largely to give China an equivalent military leadership title to match those of foreign countries such as the US so as to facilitate diplomatic and professional interactions.

Of eye-opening intrigue is the fact that President Xi has not also concurrently promoted Admiral Dong to a seat on the CMC, which remains vacant following his predecessor Li Shangfu’s October removal.

Combined with Xi’s successful removal of term limits for the Chinese presidency, increasingly strident propagation of his brand of Chinese socialist ideology, and his rolling purges within the PLA and wider Chinese politics under the guise of “anti-corruption,” all signs indicate Dong’s appointment leaves him as the least powerful military figurehead in CCP history.

Dong’s symbolic appointment as defense minister, however, still holds significant signaling value.

According to a potted profile written by Dr Andrew S Erickson and Captain (Ret) Christopher Sharman at the US Naval War College’s China Maritime Studies Institute, Dong’s career, spanning 44 years as a surface warfare officer culminating as naval chief, combined with his experience in operational assignments to key maritime-oriented theater commands facing Taiwan and the South China Sea make him an ideal candidate to demonstrate Xi’s focus on asserting Chinese maritime territorial claims in the East and South China Seas.

Dong’s experience in melding together joint service operations also put him in good stead with Xi, who has sought to modernize the PLA by copying the US military in terms of theater commands combining all military forces. This “flattened” command structure with individual joint-service theater commanders is ultimately controlled directly by Xi through the CMC.

This unprecedented elevation of an admiral to China’s second-highest military office also hints at how, after years of intensifying purges, the prestige, integrity, and political reliability of the PLA’s land army component has fallen significantly enough to allow the navy, historically the most junior and least-prioritized of the services, to gain enough clout to supplant. Nor is this just a one-off.

In another eye-catching move, General Wang Houbin, the new rocket force commander appointed last July, is also a former vice-admiral and deputy commander. Even Wang’s new chief political commissar at the rocket force, General Xu Xisheng, has exposure to maritime operations.

He was previously the chief political commissar of the Southern Theater Command Air Force as well as the deputy political commissar of the entire Southern Theater, which focuses on maintaining and advancing Chinese maritime interests in the South China Sea, as well as supporting its neighboring Eastern Theater Command for any major amphibious invasion of Taiwan.

The rising tide for the navy in the pecking order is indicative of the party’s pivot away from defining military priorities as focusing on continental defense towards becoming a true-blue water maritime power. This is further consolidated with the appointment of ex-submariner Hu Zhongming who succeeds General Dong as the new navy chief, which hints at submarines and undersea warfare as the next area of focus after the previous focus on aircraft carriers and surface vessels.

There is no doubt this will come as a fresh worry for US navy leaders, who have previously said the only clear area of asymmetrical advantage still held by the US against China is in undersea and submarine warfare.

Perhaps even more tellingly, it reflects the fallen star of the PLA ground force and its land-based Rocket Force, which is increasingly out of favor with a leader demanding personal loyalty. At last count nine senior military officers have been caught up in Xi’s latest wave of anti-corruption purges, which have primarily ensnared individuals hailing from the ground forces-linked rocket force and general weapons procurement, with more speculated to come.

Some military observers have expressed cautious hope that this weakening of the rocket force, with its tactical and strategic land and antiship missiles critical to any potential PLA offensive strategy against Taiwan and the US in the Western Pacific, will put pause to any contemplations of war by Xi and the CCP to reclaim Taiwan in the near future.

China sanctions US defense companies

•January 13, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China sanctions US defense companies: namely BAE Systems Land and Armament, Alliant Techsystems Operation, AeroVironment, ViaSat, and Data Link Solutions. Perhaps no more rare earth, gallium and germanium.

The measures are in response to Washington’s weapons sales to Taipei, Beijing says

RT News • January 2024

China has sanctioned five American defense industry companies in response to “gravely wrong actions taken by the US,” the Foreign Ministry has announced. The move is said to be a countermeasure to Washington’s decision to proceed with new arms sales to Taiwan, as well as unilaterally sanctioning Chinese businesses.

This comes after Washington approved a $300 million weapons sale to Taipei last month, ahead of Taiwan’s presidential and parliamentary elections on January 13, in which US-friendly Vice President Lai Ching-te of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party is the front-runner, according to recent polls.

Earlier in 2023, the administration of US President Joe Biden authorized a direct military transfer of $80 million to Taiwan under a program typically used for sovereign states, Reuters reported.

In a statement released on Sunday, the Foreign Ministry said the US sanctions imposed on Chinese companies and individuals “under various false pretexts” harm “China’s sovereignty and security interests, undermine the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.”

“China strongly deplores and firmly opposes this and has made solemn démarches to the US,” according to the statement.

The American companies affected by the new sanctions are BAE Systems Land and Armament, Alliant Techsystems Operation, AeroVironment, ViaSat, and Data Link Solutions, according to the ministry, which added that the measures include freezing the companies’ assets and prohibiting Chinese organizations and individuals from working with them.

Beijing urged the US to abide by the one-China principle and refrain from supplying arms to Taipei. It added that there will be a “strong and resolute response” if Washington continues with “illegal unilateral sanctions.”

Though Taiwan has long been self-governing, China considers the island part of its territory and reserves the right to seek reunification by force if Taipei formally declares independence. The US has officially recognized China’s sovereignty over Taiwan. However, in 2022, Biden said that Washington would defend Taipei in the event of an “unprecedented attack” by Beijing.

Chinese President Xi Jinping told Biden in November 2023 that Taiwan is the biggest and “most potentially dangerous” issue in bilateral relations, according to Reuters.

Obadiah

•January 13, 2024 • Leave a Comment

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and till He has performed the thoughts of His heart; in the latter days you will understand it perfectly” Jeremiah 23:20.

In the latter days our knowledge would increase, and that would include the knowledge of the children of Esau, who they are, where they live and the prophecy, “thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother,” Genesis 27:40-41 Jonathan

The book of Obadiah is about the Prophecy of Esau, also known as Edom (Hebrew for red), Mount Seir (Esau’s residence), Teman; children to the South of the children of Israel. Sometimes they are known as the Idumaean, children of Edom who live in Idumea, south of Jerusalem.

The Hebrew term, Sepharad, is synonymous with Edom (Esau), Negev, the South, the Southland, or Spain (Ispamiah); that is, the children of Esau in today’s world are the Spanish people and the Latin Americans.

When Esau was born, he was born red, all over like a hairy garment. Jewish sources further say that he was already fully formed like a grown-up man. He was fully completed: had hair across his body, hair of the head, beard, teeth and even molars.

España in Principally Red: “And the first came out red, all over like a hairy garment; and they called his name Esau” Genesis 25:25

The long feud between the brother tribes of the children of Israel and the descendants of Esau which began at the birth of the twin ancestors, and continued with varied fortunes down to the extinction of both as distinct nationalities, forms the subject of Obadiah’s vision.

The title of this Book in the Hebrew copies is usually “Sepher Obadiah” which means the Prophecy of the Prophet Obadiah. This book is the shortest of the OT with 21 verses only. We do not know anything of the book’s author, except its name, Obadiah (meaning servant of Yehovah).

Many would place Obadiah into the time of king Jehoram of Judah (848 – 841 BC) under whose reign the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah (II Chronicles 21:8-10). In this case Obadiah would have been the first writing prophet in the history of Israel.

Other observers, however, think that Obadiah lived and ministered at the time of Jerusalem’s destruction in 586 BC or even later as he obviously must have known this event.

This short prophetical book is about the nation of Edom; whose hatred for Israel will eventually lead to their destruction, a destruction that may not has a return; but as could be understood by following this study, its fate is still in suspense. The Lord was asked to remember in Psalms 137 against the Edomites who had asked that Jerusalem be razed to its foundations:

7 Remember, O Lord, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem’s fall, who said, “Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof!”
8 O daughter of Babylon who art to be destroyed, happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us.
9 Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. Psalms 137:7-9

To call for the razing of the Temple of God “Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof!” is a serious crime against the God of the Most High; the Most High dwelled there and these Edomites cheered the Babylonians to burn it down? Madness! Just Madness!!!

Prophecies against Ammon and the Ammonites (Genesis 19:38; it is stated they descendants of Lot) have no promise of restoration “that the Ammonites may not be remembered among the nations” for the Lord have spoken it (Ezekiel 21:32, 25:10).

But for Edomites, and they shall know My vengeance: “And I will lay My vengeance upon Edom by the hand of My people Israel, and they shall do in Edom according to Mine anger and according to My fury; and they shall know My vengeance, saith the Lord God,’ Ezekiel 25:14; indicating they’ll survive? Or, perhaps, their fate is still in the balance?

Historically, the children of Esau dwelt to the South of the children of Israel; in the mountains of Seir, South of the Dead Sea down to the Gulf of Akaba. When the Israelites were on their journey from Egypt to Canaan the Edomites would not let them pass through their territory (Numbers 20:14-21).

Edom rejoiced over Jerusalem’s destruction in 586 BC (Psalms 137:7). When the Romans conquered Judea the Idumeans (Edomites) family of Herod reached the royal dignity. Since Jerusalem’s destruction in 70 AD the Edomites “disappeared” from history. But where did they go? This Study will attempt this Question.

These are the names of Esau’s sons: Eliphaz (7) the son of Adah the wife of Esau, Reuel (4) the son of Basemath the wife of Esau (Genesis 36:10); and Jeush, Jaalam and Korah from Abolibamah (Genesis 36:18); so Esau had five sons and numerous grandsons.

One strong indication points to where they are today: in ancient times they live South to the children of Israel and would most probably today; that they are now in Spain, Portugal, Italy (Rashi’s comment on Genesis 36:43); and across the Atlantic: Mexico and the Latin Americas.

Esau selling his Birthright to Jacob for a bowl of red lentil soup

Obadiah

A parallel Prophecy in Ezekiel Chapter 35

— a prophesy against Mount Seir
— a prophesy against all Edom

1 The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom: We have heard a word from the Lord, and an ambassador is sent among the nations: “Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle”

— the Edomites thought their land was unconquerable because of the defence system that they had built throughout their rocky mountains. Obadiah warns them that no matter how high up the mountains they go or how strong they make their defences, nothing will save them from the coming destruction;

Rashi: The vision of Obadiah: Why is Obadiah different that he was chosen to prophesy concerning Edom and did not prophesy any other prophecy? Our Sages of blessed memory stated: Obadiah was an Edomite proselyte. Said the Holy One, blessed be He: From them and in them will I bring upon them. Let Obadiah, who dwelt between two wicked people, Ahab and Jezebel, and did not learn from their deeds, come and impose retribution upon Esau, who dwelt between two righteous people, Isaac and Rebecca, and did not learn from their deeds.

2 “Behold, I have made thee small among the nations; thou art greatly despised. — thou art greatly despised; a parallel in Jeremiah 49:15 “For lo, I will make thee small among the heathen and despised among men,” as the term beaners (Latinx or Latinos?) could allude to.

Rashi: Behold I have made you small: In contrast with what his father called him, his big son, and his mother called him her big son, the Holy One, blessed be He, says: In My eyes, he is small. And our Sages expounded: small for they have neither script nor language;

The Targum (translated by Lenihan): Behold, I will make you weak among the nations. You are highly contemptible.

A Targum version of Obadiah as translated by Lenihan exists online here. The Targum Jonathan hosted by Sefaria is here. The Targum is an indispensable source of understanding the Bible. Started by Ezra for those returning Jews from Babylon and for these returnees they could only understand the Sacred Text in Aramaic; hence the Targum is as if Ezra is speaking to us from the verses quoted.

3 The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high, that saith in his heart, ‘Who shall bring me down to the ground?’

The Targum: The wickedness of your heart has led you astray. For you are like an eagle that dwells in the teeth of the rock, whose dwelling-place is in the heights, who says in his heart, “Who will bring me down to earth?”

one Report by McKinsey (published in December 9, 202), says Latinos are projected to make up 22.4 percent of the US labor force by 2030 and more than 30 percent by 2060 (Latinos population projected to be 111.2 million by ’60);

McKinsey: of the 60 millions Latinos in US, they often live in ‘deserts’ where adequate housing, groceries are hard to find. “Nearly 9 in 10 of the Latino residents in such communities lived in five states: California, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Texas.”

For more, see (1) Another 100 Million MIGRANTS!; (2) Prophesied Battle over Migrants at the Border

4 Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, from thence will I bring thee down,” saith the Lord.

— Esau was the firstborn, set to exalt thyself as an eagle and favored by his father Isaac for the birthrights, but Jacob coveted it and stole it from under him, and he was brought down like a pigeon. Also, like Herod the Great, an Idumean, he was a great eagle with his famed cruelty over the Jews as king over Judea; shall come up and fly as the eagle but he, too, would be brought down;

Christopher Columbus, an Italian explorer; when he set foot in the Americas on October 12, 1492, claimed the newly discovered land in the first of four expeditions for King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain

— but the most significant fulfillment of this prophecy of an eagle is that, under the reign of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain, Christopher Columbus, an Italian explorer, set foot in the Americas on October 12, 1492, claimed the land for the kingdom of Spain.

5 “If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night (how thou art cut off!), would they not have stolen till they had enough? If the grape-gatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes? — if thieves come upon you by day and robbers by night? would they not have taken till they had enough?

— would (the vintagers) not leave over some gleaning grapes? But these will not leave you anything, for they will search and reveal and seek out your hidden things.

The Targum: If thieves came upon you, if plunderers of the night – How then would you sleep until they had stolen their fill! And if robbers, as grape-cutters, came upon you – Would they not leave gleanings?

6 How the things of Esau are searched out! How his hidden things are sought out! — how are the hidden things of Esau searched out! Or how are the posterity of Esau sought out!

The Targum: How then has Esau been ransacked! His hidden things have been revealed.

The Spanish Armada, defeated by Queen Elizabeth I and her Royal Navy, 1588, when the British emerged to become the top dog and ruled the waves

7 All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border; the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee and prevailed against thee. They that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee; there is no understanding in him.

Rashi: Until the border… escorted you: Those who promised to aid you, came with you and escorted you to the border of your land, to the boundary, whence they came upon you in war, and with this they enticed you and succeeded.

— they prevailed against you: to entice you to leave, and they deserted you.

— your food they lay as a wound under you: Even your food your brother Jacob made for you as a wound, for he gave you bread and a pottage of lentils, and thereby you despised the birthright.

8 Shall I not in that day,” saith the Lord, “even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?

Americans moving westward after they bought Louisiana Purchase from France (Dec 20, 1803, but three weeks before, was under Spain)

9 And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.

Rashi: And your mighty men shall be dismayed: They shall be dismayed and frightened to flee to the land of Israel [Malbim: to the land of Edom]. And Jonathan rendered: And your mighty men shall be dismayed, dwellers of the southland.

— in order that every man be cut off: i.e, every mighty man. [from Targum Jonathan]

— from the mountain of Esau by slaughter: By the great slaughter that will come upon them.

The Targum: And your warriors who dwell in the south shall be smashed, in order to destroy any man with the mark of the City of Esau, through slaughter.

10 “For thy violence against thy brother Jacob, shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.

— “Because of the violence done to your brother Jacob, shame shall cover you, and you shall be cut off forever; and there shall be no survivor for the house of Esau, for the LORD has spoken.”

Rashi: Because of the violence of your brother Jacob: Because of the violence you inflicted upon Jacob.

11 In the day that thou stoodest on the other side—in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates and cast lots upon Jerusalem” even thou wast as one of them.

Rashi: On the day you stood from afar: that you did not come to aid him.

— you, too, are like one of them, by siding with the Babylonians in Psalm 137:7, “Remember, O Lord, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem’s fall, who said, “Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof!” I account it for you as though you were one of their attackers, “Raze it, raze it.”

The Targum: On the day you stood aside, on the day the nations plundered his possessions and strangers entered his forts and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even you were like one of them.

12 But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress.

Rashi: And you should not have looked on the day of your brother: You should not have looked and stood from afar.

— on the day of his being delivered: Heb. נָכְרוֹ. On the day of his being delivered into the hands of the heathens. And so does Scripture state concerning Saul: (I Sam. 23:7) “ נִכַּר אֹתו ֹאֱלֹהִים בְּיָדְי”, “He has delivered him into my hand.”

Dwellers of the Southland – Anachronous map of the Spanish Empire (RED Territories until the Spanish American wars of independence (1808–1833))

13 Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of My people in the day of their calamity; yea, thou shouldest not have looked on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance in the day of their calamity.

The Targum: And that you entered the gates of my nation on the day of their destruction, and that even you watched his affliction of the day of his destruction, and that you laid your hand on his possessions on the day of his destruction.

14 Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that remained in the day of distress.

Rashi: And you should not have stood by the gap: Heb. הַפֶּרֶק. The place through which the escapees emerge to escape, and in French they call it “trou.”

— And you should not have stood by the gap: From here [we learn] that one may not interrupt between one paragraph and another in reading the “Shma.” [Haggadah of Rabbi Akiva]

15 “For the day of the Lord is near upon all the nations. As thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. — upon all the nations (Goyim); which sometimes include the Israelites: such as in Genesis 35:11 “a company of nations (Goyim H1471)” shall be of thee.

Spain and Mexico losing their territories after Napoleon, broke but wanting France to fight the Russians and British, was forced to sell Louisiana to the American in 1803, but ended defeated by the Russians in 1812 and by the British at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815

16 For as ye have drunk upon My holy mountain, so shall all the nations drink continually; yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been.

Rashi: For, as you drank on My Holy Mount: Just as you rejoiced concerning the destruction of My Holy Mount. [from Jonathan]

— and be stunned: Heb. יְלָעוּ. As the Targum renders: וְיִסְתַּלְעֲמוּן, an expression of confusion, amazement, and benumbing the mind; etourdissant in French – stunning.

17 “But upon Mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions.

The Targum: And in Mount Zion there will be deliverance, and they will be holy. And the House of Jacob shall inherit the possessions of the nations who had inherited from them.

Reuben, firstborn but drunk, climbed up onto his father’s bed, hence lost his birthright, defeated at the Battle of Waterloo and Napoleon exiled to the island of St Helena

18 And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble; and they shall kindle them and devour them. And there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau, for the Lord hath spoken it.”

— this is a prophecy: “the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame” the Spanish Empire were put to numerous defeats; first by the British, and second, by the Americans;

— and the house of Esau for stubble; as stubble, that is, left over after a harvest, or as weak as straw; and they of Jacob shall dominate them and kill them with a flame going through them and there will hardly any survivor left for the house of Esau, for the Lord has decreed it so.

Rashi: for the Lord has spoken: Now where did He speak? (Num. 24:19) “Out of Jacob shall come a ruler, and he shall destroy him that remains in the city.” [from Mechilta Bo 12:16, Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer ch.37]

— Oh, wait; is “there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau,” meaning an end of any survival for the house of Esau, which seems contrary to Ezekiel 25:14 “and they shall know my vengeance”? Or, perhaps according to Rashi above, verse 10, only those “that remains in the city” won’t survive?

As thou didst rejoice at the inheritance of the house of Israel because it was desolate, so will I do unto thee. Thou shalt be desolate, O Mount Seir, and all Edom, even all of it; and they shall know that I am the Lord.’” Ezekiel 35:15

— even though all Edom were made desolate, they survive at the end: “and they shall know that I am the Lord.” If they don’t survive, then they would have a similar ending like the fate of the Ammonites; that they “may not be remembered among the nations” see Ezekiel 25:10.

19 And they of the south shall possess the mount of Esau, and they of the plain the Philistines. And they shall possess the fields of Ephraim and the fields of Samaria, and Benjamin shall possess Gilead. — and they, this in the context that they of Mount Seir in the Southland have been given as a possession to the children of Esau,  Deuteronomy 2:5,8;

— an Idumean, like Herod the Great, did conquered and ruled the plain the Philistines, the land of Ephraim, Samaria and Gilead; but they only occupied those land temporary;

Rashi: And [the inhabitants of] the southland shall inherit: Israel, who were dwelling in the south of Eretz Israel, shall inherit the mountain of Esau, which is at the southern boundary; and the people of the plain shall inherit the land of the Philistines and Mt. Ephraim and Mt. Shomeron;

— but a better interpretation is that “they of the south” that is, the children of Esau who live there, will one day, process the fields of Ephraim and the fields of Samaria; and Benjamin with [the inhabitants of] Gilead;

20 And the captives of this host of the children of Israel shall possess that of the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath; and the captives of Jerusalem who are in Sepharad (בִּסְפָרַ֑ד Hebrew 5614) shall possess the cities of the south (Negev הַנֶּֽגֶב 5045)

— and the captives of Jerusalem who are in Sepharad shall possess the cities of the south; many versions of the Scriptures translate the captives of Jerusalem who are in Sepharad (bis·p̄ā·raḏ) as the South or Negev; so Q. Who live in the place call Sepharad? Who lives in the place South of Judea known as Negev? Answer: the captives of Jerusalem; that is, the Jews;

— the Edomites were to possess the cities of the Negev (South); but they, the captives from Jerusalem, the Jews, came to live with the Edomites in Sepharad in the South; in ancient times, the children of Esau were living at the South of Judea and Samaria; today the Spanish live South of the United kingdom and the north-west Europeans; the Spanish migrated to the New World after 1492 and today the Spanish-speaking Mexicans and others live South of the United States and Canada;

— further evidence are provided by the Targum Jonathan which identifies a Sepharad as Spain (Ispamiah);

Rashi agrees by quoting the Targum: Sepharad shall inherit the cities of the Southland as Spain; the Targum identified Sepharad with Spain (Ispamiah), hence, Spanish Jews are called Sephardim;

— and the exile of Jerusalem which is in Sepharad: who are of the people of Judah who were exiled to Sepharad – they, the Edomites, shall inherit the cities of the southland, which are in the Southern part of Eretz Israel.

The Targum is an indispensable source of understanding the Bible. Started by Ezra for those returning Jews from Babylon and for these returnees they could only understand the Sacred Text in Aramaic; hence the Targum is as if Ezra is speaking to them in ancient times and to us today from the Sacred Text.

Peshitta (by Lamsa): The first exiles, that is, of the children of Israel, shall possess the land from Canaan as far as Zarephath; and the exiles of Jerusalem who are in Spain shall possess the cities of the south.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges: Sepharad is the name of a place; the modern Jews understand it of Spain, and accordingly, “at the present day the Spanish Jews, who form the chief of the two great sections into which the Jewish nation is divided, are called by the Jews themselves the Sephardim, German Jews being known as the Ashkenazim.”

Geneva Study Bible: by Zarephath, France; and by Sepharad, Spain;

Wikipedia: Sepharad (/sɛfəræd/or səˈfɛərəd/ Hebrew: סְפָרַד Sp̄āraḏ; also Sefarad, Sephared, Sfard) is the Hebrew name for Spain. A place called Sepharad, probably referring to Sardis in Lydia (‘Sfard’ in Lydian), in the Book of Obadiah (Obadiah 1:20, 6th century BC) of the Hebrew Bible. The name was later applied to the Iberian Peninsula, consisting of both modern-time Western Europe’s Spain and Portugal.

The Spanish Empire at its height: 16th-17th Centuries ~ 13.7 million sq kms.
“Meddle not with them; for I will not give you of their land, no, not so much as a foot breadth, because I have given Mount Seir unto Esau for a possession,” God says of the land of Esau to the childen of Jacob, Deuteronomy 2:5

— but the most important pointer is this: that Esau were living South of Judea and Samaria or Sepharad; today the Spanish live south of the United kingdom and the north-west Europeans; the Spanish migrated to the New World after 1492 and today the Spanish-speaking Mexicans and others live south of the United States and Canada;

— thus in summary:

The Hebrew term, Sepharad, is synonymous with Edom (Esau), Negev, the South, the Southland, or Spain (Ispamiah); that is, the children of Esau in today’s world are the Spanish people and the Latin Americans.

In the latter days our knowledge would increase, and this would include the knowledge of the children of Esau, and the fulfilment of this prophecy: “but it will be that when his sons become evil, and fall from keeping the commandments of the law, thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck…. and then will I kill Jakob my brother,” Genesis 27:40-41 Jonathan

21 And saviors shall come up on Mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the Lord’S.

Rashi: shall ascend: Princes of Israel as saviors on Mount Zion.

— to judge the mountain of Esau: to exact retribution from the mountain of Esau for what they did to Israel.

— to judge: Heb. לִשְׁפֹּט. joustiser in O.F.

— the mountain of Esau: Jonathan renders: the great city of Esau.

— and the Lord shall have the kingdom: This teaches us that His kingdom will not be complete until He exacts retribution from Amalek.

Final decision seems to be still in suspense, yet to be decided, if this is the correct understanding, until the saints would come to Mount Zion to judge the house of Esau?

However Chabad and Rashi consider a chief of Esau as the Progenitor of Rome, saying, “Esau’s offspring were split into various groups, each one led by a chieftain. One of these groups was named Magdiel, which is identified as Rome.” Rome, they implied, is synonymous with the Roman Empire in history, but today, is Italy for this purpose.

Chief Magdiel identified as Rome or the Roman Empire in Jewish writing

Another theory is that the Ottoman Turks (or today’s Turkey) are the sons of Teman. Perhaps, from Chief Teman, they could be another branch of the numerous sons or grandson of Esau.

If so who and where are the other chieftains? Who are today’s Chief Timna, Chief Alvah, Chief Jetheth; Chief Oholibamah, Chief Elah, Chief Pinon, Chief Kenaz, (Chief Teman, identified as the Ottoman Empire above) Chief Mibzar, (Chief Magdiel, identified as Rome or the Roman empire above) and Chief Iram? Genesis 36:40-43.

Christopher Columbus was an Italian hired by the Spanish Monarchs to venture west and founded the New World. Could Columbus had rounded all the other Chieftians together and collectively they are known as Ispamiah? Or a more familiar term, the Latin Americans?

(Note that Chief Amalek appears in Genesis 36:16 but absent from Genesis 36:40-43)

Finally, consider this PROPHECY

“And upon thy sword shalt thou depend, entering at every place: yet thou shalt be supple and credulous, and be in subjection to thy brother [Jacob]; — that is, under the hegemony and yoke of the Monroe Doctrine since December 2, 1823;

but it will be that when his sons [the endtime children of Israel, led especially by Ephraim, the United States] become evil [such as leading in a global woke rot amongst other evils], and fall from keeping the commandments of the law [a culture of telling lies, swearing false oaths, domestic killings and breaking od God’s Sabbaths], thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother,” Genesis 27:41-42 Jonathan

To be supple and credulous mean the ability of bending, be able of moving easily and be flexible; like a contortionist at a circus sideshow. Yet if you describe someone as credulous, you have a low opinion of them because they are too gullible, too ready to believe what people tell them and are easily deceived, such as quack doctors charming money out of the pockets of credulous health-hungry citizens.

But the posterity of Esau now lays in wait: and when the posterity of his brother Jacob sinned, become evil, and fall from God’s protection by not keeping the commandments of the law, then the posterity of Esau will take the Sword and kill the posterity of Jacob.

For more on Esau: Ezekiel 20:45-21:1-5; Ezekiel 35

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

Are there any other possible observations?

Israel’s far-right to expel Gaza’s Palestinians

•January 12, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Israel’s far-right bellowing to expel Gaza’s Palestinians. For further insight, see The War in Gaza isn’t about Hamas, it’s Demographics

Ultranationalist Ben Gvir calling for Palestinian resettlement in the West, a proposal the US sees as ‘inflammatory and irresponsible’

The Conversation by Leonie Fleischmann • January 6, 2024 // AsiaTimes

After more than 90 days of war in Gaza, in which at least 22,000 Palestinians are reported to have been killed, Israeli officials have shifted their attention to what happens once the fighting has ceased.

There has been considerable controversy over proposals from far-right members of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.

Israeli ultranationalist politician Itamar Ben Gvir

The pair, who Netanyahu needed to include in his coalition to form a government last year, have advocated for Palestinians in Gaza to be resettled in countries around the world, making space for Israeli civilians to reoccupy the area.

Israel’s allies, who have thus far supported its war aims, have been quick to condemn the proposal. The United States released a press statement on January 2 rejecting the plan as “inflammatory and irresponsible.”

Washington confirmed its support for Gaza as Palestinian land. The statement further claimed that Netanyahu had reassured the US that the proposal does not reflect government policy.

But while Smotrich and Ben Gvir represent the most extreme factions of Israel’s ruling coalition and were frozen out of the war cabinet, it would be unwise to dismiss their comments as merely another incident of incitement against Palestinians.

The pair have the power to bring down the ruling coalition and Netanyahu if their demands are not heeded. And they have considerable support within the settler movement, which has been influential in the policy and practice of settlement building throughout Israel’s history.

And it is also important to note that proposals to relocate Palestinians from the Gaza Strip were initially proposed by Israeli lawmakers considered to be more moderate.

‘West should welcome Gaza refugees’

In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on November 13, 2023, two Israeli lawmakers – former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon and center-left politician Ram Ben-Barak, formerly deputy director of Mossad, wrote that countries around the world should accept some of Gaza’s population who “have expressed a desire to relocate.”

They criticized the international community for not fulfilling “their moral imperative” to “help civilians caught in the crisis.”

Intelligence minister, Gila Gamliel – who represents Likud, the mainstream conservative nationalist party led by Netanyahu – reiterated this proposal in an article in the Jerusalem Post on November 19, 2023. She referred to Gaza as “a breeding ground for extremism” and called for the “voluntary resettlement” of Palestinians outside the Gaza Strip.

Both these proposals suggested humanitarian concerns for Palestinians alongside security concerns for Israelis. But others who also support the plan do so out of strong religious ideology.

The aftermath of an attack by Israeli settlers on a Palestinian town near Nablus on the West Bank, where an estimated 700,000 Israelis live

Return of the settlers?

As documented by political geographer David Newman, the Israeli settler movement mainly comprises religious Zionists who believe the greater land of Israel was promised to the Jewish people by God. In light of this, many believe that settling the land is an opportunity to fulfill God’s promise.

Following the 1967 and 1974 wars, they rejected those who believed returning land to the Arab countries would secure peace. Instead, they advocated for the establishment of Israeli settlements to ensure the land was never relinquished.

They have had significant influence on Israeli policy and practice and now find themselves represented in the corridors of power by Smotrich and Ben Gvir.

The movement was dealt a severe blow following the decision by former prime minister Ariel Sharon’s disengagement plan in 2005. Sharon evicted about 8,000 Israeli settlers from 21 settlements in the Gaza Strip.

Settlers have been quick to respond to the current conflict, seeing it as an opportunity to fulfill the religious promise. At the end of December last year, the leader of the Nachala Israeli settlement movement, Daniella Weiss, appeared on mainstream television calling for Palestinians to be cleared from Gaza.

This was so that Israeli settlers “can see the sea … There will be no homes, there will be no Arabs – it’s just an elegant way of saying, I want to see the sea.” She declared that Gaza City had always been “one of the cities of Israel. We’re just going back. There was a historical mistake and now we are fixing it.”

What these positions fail to fundamentally understand is the deep connection Palestinians have to the land and their steadfastness in remaining there.

Deep divisions

Weiss’s position – and the aspirations of the settler movement – appear to have been dealt a setback by Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, who has presented his plans for Gaza after the destruction of Hamas.

On January 5, he said: “Gaza residents are Palestinian, therefore Palestinian bodies will be in charge, with the condition that there will be no hostile actions or threats against the State of Israel.” Gallant further proposed that there should be no Israeli civil presence in Gaza.

An account in the Times of Israel said that the cabinet meeting at which Gallant outlined his proposal ended in acrimony, exposing the deep divisions in Netanyahu’s government.

Gallant’s proposal comes days before US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is due to visit to discuss “transitioning to the next phase” of the war. The proposal has been presented to the US administration, although it does not yet form official policy.

As attention turns towards the end of the hostilities, Netanyahu will have a difficult juggling act in placating the different factions of his coalition and the Israeli public, as well as satisfying demands from the US.

What is missing from the discussions thus far is the voice of the Palestinians – which must be put at the center of any future solutions.

For more, see The War in Gaza isn’t about Hamas, it’s Demographics

Leviticus (17-18)

•January 11, 2024 • Leave a Comment
“And if you pollute it, the land will vomit you up just as it vomited up the nations that preceded you”

Leviticus 17

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Speak unto Aaron and unto his sons and unto all the children of Israel, and say unto them: ‘This is the thing which the Lord hath commanded, saying: — this is the thing which the Lord hath commanded; ordered to be observed as his will and pleasure by everyone of them: saying; namely, what follows.

Whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel who killeth an ox or lamb or goat in the camp, or who killeth it out of the camp, — that killeth; not for common use, for such beasts might be killed by any person or in any place; but for sacrifice, as the sense is limited, Leviticus 17:5;

and bringeth it not unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation to offer an offering unto the Lord before the tabernacle of the Lord, blood shall be imputed unto that man: he hath shed blood. And that man shall be cut off from among his people,

— he shall be cut off by death, either by the hand of God, in case men do not know it or neglect to punish it, or by men, if the fact was public and evident;

to the end that the children of Israel may bring their sacrifices which they offer in the open field, even that they may bring them unto the Lord unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, unto the priest, and offer them for peace offerings unto the Lord.

— whoever of the house of Israel slaughtered an ox, sheep, or goat, either within or outside the camp, without bringing the animal to the tabernacle, to offer a sacrifice therefrom to the Lord, “blood was to be reckoned to him;”

And the priest shall sprinkle the blood upon the altar of the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and burn the fat for a sweet savor unto the Lord. — and burn the fat for a sweet savour to the Lord; the fat includes the inwards, the kidneys, the flanks and caul of the liver; Leviticus 3:3.

And they shall no more offer their sacrifices unto devils, after whom they have gone a whoring. This shall be a statute for ever unto them throughout their generations.’ — and they shall no more offer their sacrifices unto devils; the word, sēirim here translated “devils,” literally indicates hairy or shaggy goats, and then goat-like deities, or demons.

“And thou shalt say unto them: ‘Whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers who sojourn among you, who offereth a burnt offering or sacrifice,

and bringeth it not unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation to offer it unto the Lord, even that man shall be cut off from among his people.

— even that man shall be cut off from his people; from being one of them, and having communion with them, and sharing in their privileges; or by death, either by the hand of the civil magistrate, or rather by the hand of God;

10 “‘And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers who sojourn among you, who eateth any manner of blood, I will even set My face against that soul who eateth blood and will cut him off from among his people.

— owing to its great importance, the law is enacted here separately, where it naturally follows the order that the blood of all animals sacrificed in the sanctuary is to be offered to the Lord upon the altar.

11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. — and I have given it unto you to make an atonement for your souls: that being the life of the creature, was given for theirs to preserve them alive, and secure them from death their sins deserved;

12 Therefore I said unto the children of Israel, “No soul of you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood.” — neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood; any proselyte of righteousness; this may not have been observed before.

13 And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel or of the strangers who sojourn among you, who hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten, he shall even pour out the blood thereof and cover it with dust. — he shall even pour out the blood; and cover it with dust; upon the earth, from which all animals came forth at their creation;

14 For it is the life of all flesh: the blood of it is for the life thereof. Therefore I said unto the children of Israel, “Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh, for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof. Whosoever eateth it shall be cut off.” — whosoever eateth it shall be cut off; by death, whether he be an Israelite or a proselyte of righteousness;

15 And every soul that eateth that which died of itself or that which was torn by beasts, whether it be one of your own country or a stranger, he shall both wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening; then shall he be clean. — that which died of itself; the law enacted here is a natural sequel to the one immediately preceding, since it is still based upon the sacredness of blood;

— then shall he be clean; when he has washed his garments, and bathed himself, and the evening is come, and then shall be admitted to society as before:

16 But if he wash them not nor bathe his flesh, then he shall bear his iniquity.’” — then he shall bear his iniquity; his guilt shall remain on him, and he shall suffer the punishment the law exposes him to, either by the hand of God, or the civil magistrate, which is due to persons that enter into the sanctuary in their uncleanness, or eat of holy things.

Leviticus 18

And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Speak unto the children of Israel and say unto them: ‘I am the Lord your God. — I am the Lord your God; the Lord, Yehovah, is their recognised and sole sovereign, the children of Israel are therefore bound to obey His precepts, and not be led astray by the customs or statutes which prevailed among the people whose country they are to possess.

According to the doings of the land of Egypt wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do; and according to the doings of the land of Canaan whither I bring you, shall ye not do; neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.

— after the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do; where they had dwelt many years, and were just come out from thence, and where they had learned many of their evil practices; not only their idolatrous ones referred to in the preceding chapter;

Ye shall do My judgments and keep Mine ordinances to walk therein; I am the Lord your God. — ye shall do my judgments; the expression “my judgments and mine ordinances” is here used emphatically, in opposition to “their ordinances,” and has here the force of Mine only;

Ye shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord. — he shall live in them; not only happily here, but also eternally hereafter;

“‘None of you shall approach any who is near of kin to him to uncover their nakedness: I am the Lord. — to illicit incestuous relation is illegal;

The nakedness of thy father or the nakedness of thy mother shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. — by uncovering a father’s nakedness is not meant anything similar to what befell Noah, which Ham beheld with pleasure, and the other two sons of Noah studiously and with reverence to their father covered;

— she is thy mother, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness; that is, not lie with her, nor marry her, because she is his mother that bore him, of whom he was born, and therefore ought not to become his wife, or be taken into his bed; such a marriage must be incestuous and shocking;

The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness. — a man’s father’s wife is for ever prohibited, whether she be simply betrothed or married to his father, whether she be divorced or not, whether she be a widow or not; all connection with her on the part of the father’s son is forbidden;

— this, therefore, includes the sin of Reuben with Bilhah, his father’s concubine (Genesis 35:22), and of Absalom with the wives of his father (II Samuel 16:20-23; I Kings 2:17); which was not incestuous marriage but adultery, since their husbands were alive and the wives were not divorced from them;

The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.

— the nakedness of thy sister; to lie with one in so near a relation is exceeding criminal, and for which the law curses a man, Deuteronomy 27:22; and to marry her is not lawful; for though it was necessary for the propagation of mankind that a man should marry his sister, for who else could Cain and Abel marry?

— yet afterwards, when there was an increase of mankind, and there were people enough remote from each other, it became unlawful for persons in such near ties of consanguinity to marry with each other; 

10 The nakedness of thy son’s daughter or of thy daughter’s daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover; for theirs is thine own nakedness. — for theirs is thine own nakedness; which sprung from his, being the descendants either of his son or daughter; the Targum of Jonathan says,” for they are as thy own nakedness,” his own flesh and blood.

11 The nakedness of thy father’s wife’s daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. — thy father’s wife’s daughter; if this clause stood alone it would denote the daughter of a man’s stepmother by another or previous husband;

12 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s sister: she is thy father’s near kinswoman. — thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s sister; his aunt by his father’s side;

13 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother’s sister, for she is thy mother’s near kinswoman. — thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother’s sister; which is the same relation as before, an aunt by the mother’s side; wherefore, if such a marriage was unlawful, this must also, and for the same reason;

14 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s brother. Thou shalt not approach his wife: she is thine aunt.

— thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s brother; which some understand this of committing sodomy with him, on which account he was doubly guilty, partly because of lying with a male, and partly because of uncovering the nakedness of his father’s brother;

15 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter-in-law: she is thy son’s wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. — she is that son’s wife; and so one flesh with him, and who is of the same flesh and blood with his father, and therefore the nearness of the relation forbids such incestuous copulation or marriage;

16 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother’s wife: it is thy brother’s nakedness. — the Targum of Jonathan adds; by way of explanation, “in the life of thy brother, or after his death, if he has children,” but then that law was but an exception from this general rule, and so did not make it void in other respects, but bound it the more strongly; and besides, it was a special and peculiar law to them;

17 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter to uncover her nakedness: for they are her near kinswomen; it is wickedness.

— a woman and her daughter; that is, if a man marries a widow who has a daughter by a former husband, or if he forms an alliance with a woman who has a daughter out of wedlock, he is forbidden to marry also the daughter.

18 Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister to vex her, to uncover her nakedness beside the other in her life time. — to vex her; that is, by marrying also the younger sister, the first, who is already the wife, would be roused to jealousy, and the natural love of sisters would thus be converted into enmity, thus precluding the occurrence of a case like that of Jacob with Leah and Rachel.

19 “‘Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness. — to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness; in her monthly courses; and the time of her separation from her husband on that account was seven days;

20 Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbor’s wife, to defile thyself with her. — thy neighbour’s wife; for committing adultery, which is here branded as a defilement, whether with a betrothed or married woman, both guilty parties incurred the penalty of death by stoning.

21 And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord. — pass through the fire to Molech; literally, to let it pass to Molech, that is, to put the child into the hands of the figure of Molech, when it fell into the fire which was kindled in the hollow statue of this idol.

22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination. — as with womankind; this was the sin of Sodom (Genesis 19:5), whence it derived its name, and in spite of the penalty of death enacted by the Law against those who were found guilty of it;

23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith, neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion. — any beast; the necessity for the prohibition of this shocking crime, for which the Mosaic law enacts the penalty of death;

24 “‘Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things, for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you, — defile not ye yourselves in any of these things; in incestuous copulations and marriages, in adultery, sodomy and bestiality;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Defile not yourselves by any one of all these; for by all these have the peoples defiled themselves whom I am about to drive away from before you. Leviticus 18:24 Targum

Defile not yourselves by any one of all these; for by all these have the peoples defiled themselves whom I am about to drive away from before you.

— for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you; that is, the seven nations of the land of Canaan: the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites and the Jebusites. Genesis 15:19-21

25 and the land is defiled. Therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.

— therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it; and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants: the Canaanites collectively, as enormous and incorrigible sinners, were to be exterminated; and this extermination was manifestly a judicial punishment inflicted by a ruler whose laws had been grossly and perseveringly outraged;

— and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants; as a stomach loaded with corrupt and bad food it has taken in, nauseates it, and cannot bear and retain it, but casts it up; so the land of Canaan is represented as loathing its inhabitants, and as a indignation against them, and as not being able to bear them, but entirely willing to be rid of them and throw them out of their places in it, never to be admitted again, being as nauseous and as useless as the cast of a man’s stomach;

26 Ye shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations, neither any of your own nation nor any stranger who sojourneth among you — ye shall therefore keep my statutes; as the perpetration of the above named abominations entailed such disastrous consequences both to the land and to its inhabitants,

And if you pollute it, the land will vomit you up just as it vomited up the nations that preceded you

27 (for all these abominations have the men of the land done, who were before you, and the land is defiled), — the repetition as those in Leviticus 18:24-25, is of the same sentiments in diiferent words, as is frequently the case in the Scriptures, is designed to impart emphasis. The parentheses are unnecessary.

28 that the land spew not you out also when ye defile it, as it spewed out the nations that were before you. — that the land spue not you out also; better, Lest the land vomit you out; that is, as it spewed out the nations that were before you;

— the judgement is expulsion; hence the Targum Jonathan says

For these abominable things have been done by the men of the land who have been before you, so that the land hath been polluted:

lest, when you pollute the land, it cast you forth, as it will have delivered itself of the people that were before you. Leviticus 18:27-28 Targum

— same thing, the judgement is expulsion; and here from the MSG

“Don’t pollute yourself in any of these ways. This is how the nations became polluted, the ones that I am going to drive out of the land before you. Even the land itself became polluted and I punished it for its iniquities—the land vomited up its inhabitants.

You must keep my decrees and laws—natives and foreigners both. You must not do any of these abhorrent things. The people who lived in this land before you arrived did all these things and polluted the land.

And if you pollute it, the land will vomit you up just as it vomited up the nations that preceded you. Leviticus 18:24-28 MSG

And below a parallel Scripture from Jeremiah:

“Therefore behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that it shall no more be said, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’

but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.’ And I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Jeremiah 16:14-15

29 For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls who commit them shall be cut off from among their people. — the souls that commit them shall be cut off; this strong denunciatory language is applied to all the crimes specified in this chapter without distinction: from incest as truly as to Sodomy to bestiality, and to other cases of affinity;

30 Therefore shall ye keep Mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the Lord your God.’”

— and that ye defile not yourselves therein; for though the land is so often said to be defiled, yet, properly speaking, and chiefly, it was the inhabitants that were defiled by their abominable customs;

— and so should the Israelites do so also, should they observe the same, and thereby become abominable in the sight of God, and incur his same displeasure, and be liable to his vengeance:

— from MSG

“Those who do any of these abhorrent things will be cut off from their people. Keep to what I tell you; don’t engage in any of the abhorrent acts that were practiced before you came.

Don’t pollute yourselves with them. I am God, your God.” Leviticus 18:29-30 MSG

Jacob prefers Ephraim over Manasseh

•January 10, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The Scripture tells us that Joseph’s sons were blessed by Jacob, who was inspired by God in his choice of words. They were to carry his name, Israel, to be blessed and “as the fishes of the sea in multiplying are multiplied in the sea, so may the children of Joseph be multiplied abundantly in the midst of the earth” (Genesis 48:16 Jonathan).

This means that the children of Joseph would be like fish which are fruitful and multiply, and which are not affected by the evil eye, since they live calmly and are unseen by their enemies.

Jacob blessed the two sons of Joseph by placing his right hand on the head of the younger sibling, and his left hand on the older. When Joseph saw that Jacob’s right hand was on Ephraim’s head, he tried to move it, thinking Jacob couldn’t see which son was which. Joseph assumed that the greater blessing would go to the older son.

“I know it, my son, I know it. He also shall become a people, and he also shall be great; but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he.”

But this was God’s intent; Ephraim, the younger son, was blessed by God with the blessing of the right hand, the greater blessing – the blessing of the firstborn. His offspring were to become a “multitude” of nations.

Joseph protested, and the story of Jacob’s words continues in Genesis 48:19, “I know, my son, I know that he is the firstborn.” Jacob repeated the expression to imply that he knew many things of which Joseph was unaware, and if he chose to give the primary blessing to Ephraim, it was for good and sufficient reason.

Ephraim’s pre-eminence was not the result of Jacob’s blessing. It was not Jacob’s blessing because Ephraim’s upbringing was the source of his future greatness, for he was accustomed to studying the Torah with Jacob (Rashi Genesis 48:1), while Manasseh, the firstborn was picked up by Joseph to be his assistant in governing Egypt.

Let’s study a critical verse in Deuteronomy 33:17

His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns. With them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth; and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.” Deuteronomy 33:17

Who symbolises the Bullock and who is the Unicorn?

If Great Britain were truly Ephraim, then why does their Royal Standard bear the clear representation of the Unicorn – the symbol or sign of the tribe of Manasseh? The Unicorn of Great Britain identifies the British as primarily of the tribe of Manasseh. And if the unicorn is the symbol of Manasseh and the United States is “Manasseh” – why doesn’t the United States have this symbol in their national emblems and symbols?

The beginning of the story of America is the saga of the search for freedom to worship God without having to conform to the authority of a religious tyranny emanating from Europe. Today, as a whole, America remains a religious nation.

Among advanced industrialized countries, the United States is easily the most religious. Some 60 percent of its citizens say religion is very important to their lives, about six times the percentage of the French. But the divine looms even larger in most Americans’ hearts than those figures suggest. Some 90 percent say they believe in God – 94 percent if you add those who revere a ‘universal spirit’ – while less than 1 percent call themselves atheists or agnostics.

The United States was originally founded largely by Puritans, called Pilgrims, a break-away group of devout Christians who were known as Separatists, because they separated from the Church of England to follow the precepts of the Bible. Because of intense persecution, they sailed for the New World to establish a country where they could worship God in peace.

If anyone visits Washington, DC, he or she would be able to see Bible verses etched in stone all over Federal buildings and monuments. Up the steps to the Supreme Court building, near the top of the building, lies a row of the world’s great lawgivers, each one facing the one in the middle – Moses holding the Ten Commandments. Continuing inside the courtroom, the wall right above where the chief justice sits, there displays the Ten Commandments.

The Puritans of New England – sought to practice their own Christian faith and to found a Christian state. They established Congregationalism and supported it with taxes and compelled their chief magistrates to govern “according to the rule of the Word of God.”

During the 1740s, the colonies were swept by a powerful religious revival called “The First Great Awakening.” It emphasized individual religious experience and conversion.

With a renewed and over zealous fevour, they viewed their emigration from England as a virtual re-enactment of the Exodus from Egypt: England was Egypt, the English king was Pharaoh, the Atlantic Ocean their Red Sea, America was the Land of Israel, and the Indians were the ancient Canaanites.

“We are the New Israelites,” they thought, entering into a new covenant with God in a new Promised Land; with a notion of cultural and racial superiority, the new Settlers started eradicating the native population like it was when they were entering into the land of Canaan.

Names of cities, towns and settlements likewise derived from Hebraic sources. This widespread use of biblical names, however, was not confined to the naming of offspring, cities and towns – names of many biblical heights were eventually bestowed upon the great mountains of America.

Mount Carmel and Mount Horeb, home of the Prophets, were popular names, as was Mount Nebo, the final resting place of Moses. Names like Mount Ephraim, Mount Gilead, Mount Hermon, Mount Moriah, Mount Pisgah, were all popular as well. Some mountains in the New World were even called Mount Sinai, Mount Zion and Mount Olive.

An Antelope, with Horns of a Unicorn

Many of the people who settled British North America in the seventeenth century came for religious reasons, for the opportunity to worship God in ways that were unacceptable in Europe.  As the New Israelites, their passion for their faith was transmitted to their descendants who created the American nation in 1776.

The Puritans wholeheartedly believed that it was their special mission to establish in America a society precisely modeled on the precepts of Sacred Scriptures. They firmly believed that the Hebrew prophets were speaking to them as directly as they had spoken to the the new Israelites; and thus they also carried out ethnic cleansings like it was upon entering the land of Canaan.

Thus the history of the Israelites as related in the Bible served, according to the ministers of the day, as a mirror in which the Puritans could see their own activities reflected. Still considering themselves as Christian Protestants, the Puritans related to the Israelites and their Jewish belief for their fundamental ‘grounding.’

The Second Great Awakening, around 1845, saw revivalist Christianity and evangelicalism spread hand in hand with Jacksonian democracy, bolstering the American creed of liberty, individualism and equality.

It was a Protestant religious revival spreading religion through emotional preaching which sparked a number of reform movements. Revivals were a key part of the movement and attracted hundreds of converts to new Protestant denominations. The Methodist Church used circuit riders to reach people in frontier locations.

The outpouring of religious fervor and revival began in Kentucky and Tennessee in the 1790s and early 1800s among the Presbyterians, Methodists, and Baptists; and new religious movements such as the Latter Day Saint and Adventist movements; and later, the Jehovah witnesses.

Prophet Joseph Smith, holding the golden plates before the angel Moroni

And here is the story of Prophet Joseph Smith (1805-1844), who inspired a fabricated treasure-digging scheme promoted by the Prophet Joseph Smith Jr that empowered the Latter Day Saint movement:

Joseph Smith began his vision with angel Moroni giving him the Golden Plates in a buried stone box at the Hill Cumorah in upstate New York situated a few miles from Smith’s boyhood home on a farm.

When Smith arrived, “the hill opened, and they walked into a cave, in which there was a large and spacious room.” The account continues by saying they found “more plates than probably many wagon loads; and were piled up in the corners and along the walls.”

But Smith was forbidden by the angel to show the plates to anyone until they had been translated from their original “reformed Egyptian” language.

Jesus the Son and God the Father came to visit Joseph Smith, an honour and privilege even Moses or Elijah couldn’t achieve

In his home, Smith dictated the text of the plates while his wife or a scribe wrote down the words which would later become the Book of Mormon. Smith translated the plates, not by looking directly at them, but by looking through a transparent seer stone in the bottom of his hat.

Smith published the first edition of the translation in March 1830 as the Book of Mormon, with an initial print run of 5,000 copies; and hence starting the Movement more riveting and entertaining than a Tom Clancy novel.

Overlapping the life of Joseph Smith, a Prophetess Ellen G White (1827-1915) were to appear to energize the Adventist movement:

Ellen G White, seeing rays of lights from the Throne of the Most High

Soon after Baptist preacher William Miller (1782-1849) failed miserably in his prophecy that the Second Coming would occur at Atonement Ocober 22, 1843 and then again on Ocober 22, 1844. Among the founders of the Adventist movement was Ellen G White, whose extensive writings are still held in high regard that they are on higher ground than the Bible by the church.

In one of her fabricated visions, Ellen G White, wrote of rays of lights from the throne or in one of her dreams, of “her revelation” that her writings ahead of Moses and the Prophets, ahead of God’s Word in actual fact; wine isn’t wine as we normally think of drinking wine to make one merry during festivals.

And in an extremely case, Noah, a righteous man, was found to be drunk with wine, but it was simply grape juice, says Sister White, so let’s check on her writing what she wrote about the eating of meat:

From the light God has given me, the prevalence of cancer and tumors is largely due to gross living on dead flesh.

I sincerely and prayerfully hope that, as a physician, you will not forever be blind on this subject, for blindness is mingled with a want of moral courage to deny our appetite, to lift the cross, which means, to take up the very duties which cut across the natural passions.

Feeding on flesh, the juices and fluids of what you eat pass into the circulation of your blood, and, as we are composed of what we eat, we become animalized; thus a feverish condition is created, because the animals are diseased, and by partaking of their flesh, we plant the seeds of disease in our own tissue and blood.

Then when exposed to the changes in a malarious atmosphere, these are more sensibly felt; also when we are exposed to prevailing epidemics and contagious diseases the system is not in condition to resist the disease. TSDF 68.11

I have the subject presented to me in different aspects. The mortality caused by meat-eating is not discerned; if it were, we would hear no more arguments and excuses in favor of the indulgence of the appetite for dead flesh. We have plenty of good things to satisfy hunger without bringing CORPSES upon our table to compose our bill of fare. TSDF 68.12

But during Passover, the Israelites were asked to eat lamb. False prophets and false prophetesses abound, Ellen Super White seemed to have more understanding of our human body than the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Besides, the sons of Aaron serving as priests in His Temple, would be most defiled because they have to eat the numerous offerings, not CORPSES as false prophetess White alleged, considered as most holy; Leviticus 2:3,10, 6:29. Such a subtle attack on the priesthood; hence giving rise to a Thyatira dublicity!

In ancient Israel, when prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel spoke, their words and prophecies are complementary, although they spoke in different ways, but in this latter day’s so-called prophets or prophetess teachings, their themes kill each other.

That is, Joseph Smith’s teaching is incompatible with Ellen G White’s. And besides, Ellen G White’s numerous visions, as well as her voluminous writings, are as authentic as the treasure-digging scheme promoted by Prophet Joseph Smith Jr!

Not only that, their themes, teachings and prophecies are also incompatible to any of the Old Testament Prophets.

For example, Ezekiel wrote about the Passover, among many other sacrifices, reinstated in the Millennium:

“‘In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the Passover, a feast of seven days. Unleavened bread shall be eaten” Ezekiel 45:21 — this is understood to mean the Passover, “a feast of a full week,” the exact duration of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which began with the eating of the Paschal lamb;

— in actual fact, Passover and the Feast of Tabernacles, and numerous sacrifices are to be offered during the Millennium Ezekiel 40 to 48.

Today, this spiritual malaise about Ephraim has been prophesied long ago of their false teachings or human idols: “for I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria: they prophesied in Baal and caused My people Israel to err” Jeremiah 23:13; further, the God they seemingly worshipped looks down from heaven and says:

And to be followed by God’s judgement:

Leviticus (15-16)

•January 9, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Leviticus 15

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses and to Aaron, saying,

“Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, ‘When any man hath a running issue out of his flesh, because of his issue he is unclean.

— clearer from the MSG

God spoke to Moses and Aaron: “Speak to the People of Israel. Tell them, When a man has a discharge from his genitals, the discharge is unclean. Whether it comes from a seepage or an obstruction he is unclean. He is unclean all the days his body has a seepage or an obstruction. Leviticus 15:1-3

And this shall be his uncleanness in his issue: whether his flesh run with his issue or his flesh be stopped from running with his issue, it is his uncleanness.

Every bed whereon he lieth who hath the issue is unclean, and every thing whereon he sitteth shall be unclean. — every thing; Heb. vessel, by which the Hebrews understand all sorts of household stuff.

And whosoever toucheth his bed shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

— every bed, whereon he lieth; so severely did the canonical law deal with these cases that any defilement communicated to the bed, and hence also to his seat and saddle, by the patient in five different ways: by standing, sitting, lying, hanging, or leaning on it;

— and be unclean until the even; be unfit for conversation with other men till the even, though both his body and clothes are washed.

And he that sitteth on any thing whereon he sat who hath the issue shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening. — and he that sitteth on any thing whereon he sat that hath the issue; shall be unclean, even though he does not touch it.

And he that toucheth the flesh of him that hath the issue shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and is unclean until the evening.

And if he that hath the issue spit upon him that is clean, then he shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening. — and if he that hath the issue spit upon him that is clean; not purposely, which is not usual for a man to do, and whenever it is done, nothing is more affronting; but accidentally;

— whatever is brought up by coughing, as phlegm, or flows from the nose, or is pressed out of it;

And what saddle soever he rideth upon who hath the issue shall be unclean. — and what saddle soever he sitteth upon that hath the issue; when he rides upon any beast, horse, ass, or camel, whatever is put upon the creature, and he sits upon it, the saddle, and whatever appertains to it, the housing and girdle;

10 And whosoever toucheth any thing that was under him shall be unclean until the evening; and he that beareth any of those things shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening. — and whosoever toucheth anything that was under him shall be unclean until the even; either when lying along, or sitting, or riding;

11 And whomsoever he toucheth who hath the issue and hath not rinsed his hands in water, he shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

12 And the vessel of earth that he toucheth who hath the issue shall be broken, and every vessel of wood shall be rinsed in water. — and the vessel of earth . . . shall be broken; for the reason why vessels of a porous clay must be destroyed when contaminated by defilement;

13 “‘And when he that hath an issue is cleansed of his issue, then he shall number to himself seven days for his cleansing, and wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in running water, and shall be clean. — man’s “ritual” impurity;

— from the Chabad Bible for this verse:

When the man with the discharge is cleansed of his discharge, he shall count seven days for himself for his purification, and then immerse his garments and immerse his flesh in spring water, and he shall be clean.

14 And on the eighth day he shall take for himself two turtledoves or two young pigeons, and come before the Lord unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and give them unto the priest.

— from the MSG

“When a person with a discharge is cleansed from it, he is to count off seven days for his cleansing, wash his clothes, and bathe in running water. Then he is clean. On the eighth day he is to take two doves or two pigeons and come before God at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting and give them to the priest.

The priest then offers one as an Absolution-Offering and one as a Whole-Burnt-Offering and makes atonement for him in the presence of God because of his discharge. Leviticus 15:13-15

15 And the priest shall offer them, the one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for him before the Lord for his issue.

16 “‘And if any man’s seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water and be unclean until the evening.

17 And every garment and every skin whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water and be unclean until the evening.

— from MSG

“When a man has an emission of semen, he must bathe his entire body in water; he remains unclean until evening. Every piece of clothing and everything made of leather which gets semen on it must be washed with water; it remains unclean until evening. When a man sleeps with a woman and has an emission of semen, both are to wash in water; they remain unclean until evening. Leviticus 15:16-18

18 The woman also with whom a man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water and be unclean until the evening.

19 “‘And if a woman have an issue and her issue from her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days; and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the evening.

20 And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean; every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean.

21 And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

22 And whosoever toucheth any thing that she sat upon shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

— from MSG

“When a woman has a discharge of blood, the impurity of her menstrual period lasts seven days. Anyone who touches her is unclean until evening. Everything on which she lies or sits during her period is unclean. Anyone who touches her bed or anything on which she sits must wash his clothes and bathe in water; he remains unclean until evening. Leviticus 15:19-23

23 And if it be on her bed or on any thing whereon she sitteth, when he toucheth it, he shall be unclean until the evening.

24 And if any man lie with her at all and her monthly discharge be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean.

25 “‘And if a woman have an issue of her blood many days out of the time of her separation, or if it run beyond the time of her separation, all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation; she shall be unclean.

26 Every bed whereon she lieth all the days of her issue shall be unto her as the bed of her separation; and whatsoever she sitteth upon shall be unclean, as the uncleanness of her separation.

— from MSG

“If a woman has a discharge of blood for many days, but not at the time of her monthly period, or has a discharge that continues beyond the time of her period, she is unclean the same as during the time of her period.

Every bed on which she lies during the time of the discharge and everything on which she sits becomes unclean the same as in her monthly period. Anyone who touches these things becomes unclean and must wash his clothes and bathe in water; he remains unclean until evening. Leviticus 15:25-27

27 And whosoever toucheth those things shall be unclean, and shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the evening.

28 But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean.

29 And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtledoves or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

30 And the priest shall offer one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the Lord for the issue of her uncleanness.

— from MSG

“When she is cleansed from her discharge, she is to count off seven days; then she is clean. On the eighth day she is to take two doves or two pigeons and bring them to the priest at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting.

The priest will offer one for an Absolution-Offering and the other for a Whole-Burnt-Offering. The priest will make atonement for her in the presence of God because of the discharge that made her unclean. Leviticus 15:28-30

31 “‘Thus shall ye separate the children of Israel from their uncleanness, that they die not in their uncleanness when they defile My tabernacle that is among them.’”

32 This is the law of him that hath an issue, and of him whose seed goeth from him and is defiled therewith,

33 and of her that is sick with her monthly discharge, and of him that hath an issue, of the man and of the woman, and of him that lieth with her that is unclean.

— from MSG

“These are the procedures to follow for a man with a discharge or an emission of semen that makes him unclean, and for a woman in her menstrual period—any man or woman with a discharge and also for a man who sleeps with a woman who is unclean.”

Leviticus 16

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses after the death of the two sons of Aaron, when they offered before the Lord, and died;

— after the death of the two sons of Aaron; that is, after Nadab and Abihu, his two eldest sons, had died, in consequence of having presumptuously entered the sanctuary in a profane manner, and playing with strange fire; they died by a flaming fire; or lightning?

and the Lord said unto Moses, “Speak unto Aaron thy brother, that he come not at all times into the Holy Place within the veil before the mercy seat which is upon the ark, that he die not; for I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat.

— that he come not at all times; Moses is therefore to warn his brother Aaron, the high priest, that if he wishes to escape a similar fate, he is not to presume to enter the Holy of Holies except on one day of the year, the Day of Atonement;

— as Aaron here stands for all those who in future are to succeed him in the pontificate, so Moses, who teaches him his duty, stands for his successors who are hereafter to impart instruction to the high priests on these most solemn occasions;

— he was to go into the holy of holies four times on the Day of Atoneme; first to offer incense, a second time to sprinkle the blood of the bullock, a third time to sprinkle the blood of the goat, and a fourth time to fetch out the censer; and if he entered a fifth time, he was worthy of death; yet Moses might at any time, and consult the Lord upon the mercy seat, Exodus 25:22;

— during the second Temple the instruction and preparation of the high priest for his functions devolved upon the Sanhedrin, who prescribed most minute rules for his guidance. Seven days before the Day of Atonement he was separated from his wife, and lodged in a chamber in the Temple, lest he should contract defilement, which might unfit him for the performance of his pontifical duties;

— the elders or the representatives of the Sanhedrin read and expounded to him the ordinances contained in this chapter; which he had to practise in their [presence, so as to make sure that he could rightly perform all the ceremonies. This continued during the whole night previous to the Day of Atonement, where he was to be kept awake, so as to prevent any pollution arising from a dream or accident by night.

Thus shall Aaron come into the Holy Place: with a young bullock for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering. — thus shall Aaron come; preparatory to his entering on this solemn service the high-priest was to offer two sacrifices in behalf of himself and his family.

He shall put on the holy linen coat, and he shall have the linen breeches upon his flesh and shall be girded with a linen girdle, and with the linen miter shall he be attired. These are holy garments. Therefore shall he wash his flesh in water, and so put them on.

— and he shall wash; he had to bathe his body every time when he changed his vestments, which were no less than five times on this day, and washes his hands and feet ten times on that day, and all are done in the holy place.

And he shall take from the congregation of the children of Israel two kids of the goats for a sin offering and one ram for a burnt offering. — and make atonement for himself and his house; for his own personal sins and for his family’s sins, those of his wife and children; and it may be extended to all the priests of the house of Aaron;

And Aaron shall offer his bullock of the sin offering which is for himself, and make an atonement for himself and for his house.

Two goats: one for the Lord, the other for Azazel

On the Day of Atonement

And he shall take the two goats and present them before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. — both goats were presented for the Day of Atonement before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation; it is commanded that they should be alike in colour, height, and price,

— which may represent the two natures in Christ; his divine nature, as the Son of God, in which he is impassable, and lives for ever, which may be signified by the goat in which he suffered and died at the hand of the high-priest;

— and the second goat, and may be fitly represented by the goat that was alive, when it too was offered to the Lord, but let go; and in his human nature, as the Son of Man, in which he also suffered in the wilderness called Azazel, and died;

And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats — one lot for the Lord and the other lot for Azazel. — after the lot had been chosen, the two goats were distinguished from each other by having a piece of scarlet cloth tied, the first round its neck, the second round its horn. One lot for the Lord, and the other lot for Azazel, which is a wilderness about 12 miles from Jerusalem;

And Aaron shall bring the goat upon which the Lord’S lot fell, and offer him for a sin offering.

10 But the goat on which the lot fell to be for Azazel shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him and to let him go into the wilderness to Azazel. — Jonathan says “by sending him to die in a place rough and hard in the rocky desert which is Beth-hadurey.”

— both goats were presented before the Lord; thus it doesn’t go well that the goat destined for Azazel should represent a demon, or Azazel, to be the same as the evil angel in the Book of Enoch 8:1; 10:10; 13:1; while others as Satan; but Satan or any of his evil demons have never play that role of atoning for the sins of Israel.

11 “And Aaron shall bring the bullock of the sin offering which is for himself, and shall make an atonement for himself and for his house, and shall kill the bullock of the sin offering which is for himself.

— and shall make atonement for himself and for his house: by a confession of sins, as the second confession; and in the same words as before; then he put a tongue-shaped piece of scarlet wool upon the head of the goat to be sent away, and came beside his bullock;

12 And he shall take a censer full of burning coals of fire from off the altar before the Lord, and his hands full of sweet incense beaten small, and bring it inside the veil. — inside the veil, that is, into the holy of holies before the Lord Leviticus 16:2.

13 And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, that the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat that is upon the testimony, that he die not. — that he die not for so gross an error committed in the highest acts of worship, and that by a high priest, whose knowledge and function was a great aggravation to his sin.

14 And he shall take of the blood of the bullock and sprinkle it with his finger upon the mercy seat eastward; and before the mercy seat shall he sprinkle of the blood with his finger seven times. — and sprinkle it with his finger upon the mercy seat, eastward; with his right finger; and the blood sprinkled with it did not fall upon the mercy seat;

15 Then shall he kill the goat of the sin offering that is for the people, and bring his blood within the veil, and do with that blood as he did with the blood of the bullock, and sprinkle it upon the mercy seat and before the mercy seat. — having completed the atonement in the holy of holies on behalf of the priests, the high priest had now to do the same thing on behalf of the people.

16 And he shall make an atonement for the Holy Place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel and because of their transgressions in all their sins; and so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation that remaineth among them in the midst of their uncleanness.

— next he cleansed the tent of meeting, or the court of the sanctuary, where the Israelites were usually admitted; that is, the high priest sprinkled the court and the altar of burnt offering which was in it eight times with the mingled blood of the bullock and goat.

17 And there shall be no man in the tabernacle of the congregation when he goeth in to make an atonement in the Holy Place until he come out, and has made an atonement for himself and for his household and for all the congregation of Israel.

— and there shall be no man; whilst the high priest was performing this process of cleansing, no one, whether priest or Israelite, was permitted to be present;

18 And he shall go out unto the altar that is before the Lord and make an atonement for it, and shall take of the blood of the bullock and of the blood of the goat, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about.

— the order of the ceremony required that atonement should first be made for the most holy place with the mercy-seat, then for the holy place with the golden altar, and then for the altar in the court;

— the horns of the brazen altar were touched with the blood, as they were in the ordinary sin-offerings.

19 And he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times, and cleanse it and hallow it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel. — and he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times; this was done with his right finger, or forefinger, and seven times, to denote the perfect cleansing of the altar with it.

20 “And when he hath made an end of reconciling the Holy Place and the tabernacle of the congregation and the altar, he shall bring the live goat. — he shall bring the live goat; having already been presented before the Lord (Lev 16:10), it was now brought forward to the high priest;

21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness.

— the high priest, who, placing his hands upon its head, and “having confessed over it all the iniquities of the people of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins,” transferred them by this act to the goat as their substitute.

22 And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited; and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness.

— it was then delivered into the hands of a person, who was appointed to lead him away into a distant, solitary, and desert place, “Azazel,” where he was led to a high rocky twelve miles from Jerusalem, and there, being thrust over the precipice, he was killed.

23 “And Aaron shall come into the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall put off the linen garments which he put on when he went into the Holy Place and shall leave them there;

— and shall put off the linen garments which he put on when he went into the holy place; the holy of holies, that is, after he had brought it (the censer) out, then he clothed himself with the golden garments for the daily evening sacrifice;

— and this was the order of the services (on the day of atonement); the daily morning sacrifice (was performed) in the golden garments; the service of the bullock and of the goat, and the incense of the censer, in the white garments; and his ram, and the ram of the people, and some of the additions, in the golden garments;

24 and he shall wash his flesh with water in the Holy Place and put on his garments, and come forth and offer his burnt offering and the burnt offering of the people, and make an atonement for himself and for the people. — he shall wash in the holy place; that is, in the court of the tabernacle, where stood the altar of burnt-offering, and the sacred laver.

25 And the fat of the sin offering shall he burn upon the altar.

26 And he that let go the goat for Azazel shall wash his clothes and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward come into the camp. — Jonathan: “And he who led away the goat to Azazel shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in forty seahs of water, and afterward he may enter the camp.”

27 And the bullock for the sin offering and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the Holy Place, shall one carry forth outside the camp; and they shall burn in the fire their skins and their flesh and their dung. — shall one carry forth; shall be carried forth; during the second Temple four men carried the carcases upon two poles to the place set aside outside Jerusalem for burning.

28 And he that burneth them shall wash his clothes and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward he shall come into the camp. — because they had been defiled by the animals laden with sin.

29 “And this shall be a statute for ever unto you: that in the seventh month on the tenth day of the month, ye shall afflict your souls and do no work at all, whether it be one of your own country or a stranger who sojourneth among you;

— seventh month, on the tenth day; the month of Tisri, as being the seventh in the Sacred year; on the first day was celebrated the Feast of Trumpets, the tenth day was the Day of Atonement, and on the fourteenth day the Feast of tabernacles commenced;

— a stranger that sojourneth among you; rather, the foreigner who dwelleth among you; meaning is, one of foreign blood, who dwelt with the Israelites, and had become familiarly known to his neighbors: the Kenites (Judges 4:11, etc.); the Gibeonites Joshua 9; and a considerable portion of the “mixed multitude” (compare Exodus 12:38, Exodus 12:48);

30 for on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you to cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the Lord.

31 It shall be a sabbath of rest unto you and ye shall afflict your souls, by a statute for ever. — it shall be a Sabbath of rest unto you; literally, a resting day of solemn resting, a Sabbath of Sabbaths, ithat is, a day of complete and perfect rest.

32 And the priest, whom he shall anoint and whom he shall consecrate to minister in the priest’s office in his father’s stead, shall make the atonement, and shall put on the linen clothes, even the holy garments;

— and shall put on the linen clothes, even the holy garments: that is, on the Day of Atonement; in which clothes all the service peculiar to that day, as it was done by Aaron, so it was to be done by all his successors;

33 and he shall make an atonement for the Holy Sanctuary, and he shall make an atonement for the tabernacle of the congregation and for the altar, and he shall make an atonement for the priests and for all the people of the congregation.

34 And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you: to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year.” And he did as the Lord commanded Moses. — these several atonements, for his family, and for all the priests, were separate and distinct, and did not hinder one another, or interfere with one another.

China’s Small Modular Reactor

•January 8, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China’s Small Nuclear Reactor Completes Core Module Assembly. Q. Could such a Reactor powered an aircraft carrier?

SASAC News • August 11, 2023 // China.org.cn

HAIKOU — Assembly of the core module of the world’s first commercial small modular reactor (SMR), Linglong One, was completed on Thursday, according to its developer, the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC).

 Linglong One includes the likes of pressure vessels and steam generators

This marks the peak of the installation process of Linglong One, representing a historic step in the miniaturization of global nuclear energy and confirming that China is at the forefront globally in terms of modular SMR construction.

Located in south China’s island province of Hainan, Linglong One is a multi-purpose small modular pressurized water reactor self-developed by the CNNC.

The core module is the key component of Linglong One, and was independently designed and purchased by the Nuclear Power Institute of China under the CNNC. It includes the likes of pressure vessels and steam generators.

The welding and assembly, which integrate the nuclear power plant’s metaphorical “lungs” and “heart,” is the most challenging aspect of the project. It’s a striking example of the “factory prefabrication, modular manufacturing” approach to the nuclear power equipment construction.

Linglong One to generate up to 1 billion kilowatt hours of electricity per year, sufficient to meet the needs of 526,000 households in Hainan

When commissioned, Linglong One is projected to generate up to 1 billion kilowatt hours of electricity per year, sufficient to meet the needs of 526,000 households in Hainan. This will help cut carbon dioxide emissions by 880,000 metric tons per year, equivalent to planting 7.5 million trees annually.

The stable and reliable clean energy provided by Linglong One will not only aid China in reaching peak carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality, but also foster global nuclear energy development through the demonstration of advanced reactor technology. It will further contribute to the construction of a “clean energy island” in Hainan.

Q. Could such a reactor powered China’s next aircraft carriers? Or, that the Fujian carrier already has such Reactor?

For more, see

China’s first Thorium Reactor

Nature Index: China Surpassed US in Research

Leviticus (13-14)

•January 7, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Leviticus 13

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses and Aaron, saying,

“When a man shall have in the skin of his flesh a rising, a scab, or bright spot, and it be in the skin of his flesh like the plague of leprosy, then he shall be brought unto Aaron the priest or unto one of his sons the priests.

— the plague of leprosy was a disease as well as an uncleanness; Miriam’s leprosy, and king Uzziah’s, were punishments of particular sins;

— as cleansing, a pollution as well as a disease; it belonged to the priest to cleanse him, and therefore to search and discover whether he was defiled and needed cleansing.

And the priest shall look on the plague in the skin of the flesh; and when the hair in the plague has turned white and the plague in appearance be deeper than the skin of his flesh, it is a plague of leprosy; and the priest shall look on him and pronounce him unclean.

— when the hair in the plague is turned white; this is the first symptom, and the most noticeable as the commencement of the disease; the hair around the spot loses its colour and becomes thin and weak, the separate hairs being hardly stronger or individually thicker than down;

— the second symptom is when the plague in sight be deeper than the skin of his flesh; that is, below the upper skin, or cuticle, and in the real cutis. These two symptoms distinguish real leprosy from other affections which at first bear a similar appearance.

If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh and in appearance be not deeper than the skin and the hair thereof be not turned white, then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days.

— then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague; the individual thus suspected was to be separated from the rest of the community for seven days, during which time it would be seen whether it actually developed itself into this disorder.

And the priest shall look on him the seventh day; and behold, if the plague in its appearance is stayed and the plague spread not in the skin, then the priest shall shut him up seven days more.

— if the plague in his sight be at a stay; better, if the plagued spot remain the same in its colour, that is, if the suspicious spot which caused the individual to be shut up had not altered its complexion;

— then the priest shall shut him up seven days more; such abundant care was taken, lest after all it should prove a leprosy.

And the priest shall look on him again the seventh day; and behold, if the plague be somewhat dark and the plague spread not in the skin, the priest shall pronounce him clean. It is but a scab, and he shall wash his clothes and be clean.

— and if, on further examination upon the seventh day, he found that the mole had become paler, had lost its brilliant whiteness, and had not spread, he was to declare him clean, for it was a scurf, i.e., a mere skin eruption, and not true leprosy.

But if the scab spread much abroad in the skin, after he hath been seen by the priest for his cleansing, he shall be seen by the priest again.

And if the priest see that, behold, the scab spreadeth in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is leprosy. — it is a leprosy: it is a clear and plain case that it was one, and no doubt is to be made of it, it is a spreading leprosy;

“When the plague of leprosy is in a man, then he shall be brought unto the priest. — then he shall be brought unto the priest; by his friends and neighbours, if he is not willing to come of himself;

10 And the priest shall see him; and behold, if the rising be white in the skin and it has turned the hair white and there be living raw flesh in the rising,

11 it is an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh; and the priest shall pronounce him unclean and shall not shut him up, for he is unclean.

— and the priest shall pronounce him unclean, and shall not shut him up; there being no doubt at all of it being a leprosy, and of his uncleanness, and therefore no need to shut him up for further examination, but to turn him out of the camp till his purification was over; —

12 And if leprosy break out abroad in the skin and the leprosy cover all the skin of him that hath the plague from his head even to his foot, wheresoever the priest looketh,

— and the leprosy cover all the skin of him that hath the plague, from his head even to his foot; such an one as the leper was that came to Christ for healing, said to be full of leprosy, Luke 5:12; 

13 then the priest shall consider; and behold, if the leprosy have covered all his flesh, he shall pronounce him clean that hath the plague. It has all turned white; he is clean.

14 But when raw flesh appeareth in him, he shall be unclean.

15 And the priest shall see the raw flesh and pronounce him to be unclean, for the raw flesh is unclean; it is leprosy.

16 Or if the raw flesh turn again and be changed unto white, he shall come unto the priest,

17 and the priest shall see him; and behold, if the plague be turned into white, then the priest shall pronounce him clean that hath the plague; he is clean.

18 “The flesh also in which, even in the skin thereof, was a boil and it is healed,

19 and in the place of the boil there be a white rising or a bright spot, white and somewhat reddish, and it be shown to the priest,

20 and if, when the priest seeth it, behold, it is in appearance lower than the skin and the hair thereof is turned white, the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is a plague of leprosy broken out of the boil.

21 But if the priest look on it, and behold, there are no white hairs therein and if it is not lower than the skin, but is somewhat dark, then the priest shall shut him up seven days.

22 And if it spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is a plague.

23 But if the bright spot stay in his place and spread not, it is a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

24 “Or if there be any flesh in the skin whereof there is a hot burning, and the living flesh that burneth have a white bright spot, somewhat reddish or white,

25 then the priest shall look upon it; and behold, if the hair in the bright spot is turned white and it is in appearance deeper than the skin, it is a leprosy broken out of the burning. Therefore the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is the plague of leprosy.

26 But if the priest look on it, and behold, there is no white hair in the bright spot and it is no lower than the other skin, but is somewhat dark, then the priest shall shut him up seven days.

27 And the priest shall look upon him the seventh day; and if it is spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is the plague of leprosy.

28 And if the bright spot stay in his place and spread not in the skin, but it is somewhat dark, it is a rising from the burning; and the priest shall pronounce him clean, for it is an inflammation from the burning.

29 “If a man or woman have a plague upon the head or the beard, — the treatment is similar to that in the preceding cases, but two periods of confinement are prescribed, and the hair is to be shaven after the first seven days.

30 then the priest shall see the plague; and behold, if it be in appearance deeper than the skin and there is in it a yellow thin hair, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is a dry scall, even a leprosy upon the head or beard.

— even a leprosy upon the head or beard; as the head is the seat of knowledge, and the beard a sign of manhood, and of a man’s being arrived to years of discretion; when wisdom and prudence are expected in him; this sort of leprosy may be an emblem of errors in judgment;

— of false doctrines and heresies imbibed by persons, which eat as doth a canker, and are in themselves damnable, and bring ruin and destruction on teachers and hearers, unless recovered from them by the true teachings of God.

31 And if the priest look on the plague of the scall, and behold, it is not in appearance deeper than the skin and there is no black hair in it, then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague of the scall seven days.

32 And on the seventh day the priest shall look on the plague; and behold, if the scall spread not and there is in it no yellow hair and the scall is not in appearance deeper than the skin,

33 he shall be shaved, but the scall shall he not shave; and the priest shall shut up him that hath the scall seven days more.

34 And on the seventh day the priest shall look on the scall; and behold, if the scall is not spread in the skin nor is in appearance deeper than the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him clean; and he shall wash his clothes and be clean.

35 But if the scall spread much in the skin after his cleansing,

36 then the priest shall look on him; and behold, if the scall is spread in the skin, the priest shall not seek for yellow hair; he is unclean.

37 But if the scall is in appearance stayed and there is black hair grown up therein, the scall is healed; he is clean, and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

38 “If a man also or a woman have in the skin of their flesh bright spots, even white bright spots,

39 then the priest shall look; and behold, if the bright spots in the skin of their flesh be darkish white, it is a freckled spot that groweth in the skin; he is clean.

— he is clean; from leprosy; this is observed, lest a person that is freckled should be mistaken for a leprous person; as every man that has some spots, failings, and infirmities, is not to be reckoned as unclean.

40 “And the man whose hair has fallen off his head, he is bald, yet is he clean. — he is bald; yet is he clean; the baldness mentioned in the first part of the verse in general terms is now more minutely specified as consisting of two kinds of baldness.

41 And he that hath his hair fallen off from the part of his head toward his face, his forehead is bald, yet is he clean.

42 And if there be in the bald head or bald forehead a white reddish sore, it is leprosy sprung up in his bald head or his bald forehead.

43 Then the priest shall look upon it; and behold, if the rising of the sore is reddish white in his bald head or in his bald forehead, as the leprosy appeareth in the skin of the flesh,

44 he is a leprous man; he is unclean. The priest shall pronounce him utterly unclean; his plague is on his head.

45 “And the leper in whom the plague is, his clothes shall be rent and his head bare, and he shall put a covering upon his upper lip and shall cry, ‘Unclean, unclean.’

— and shall cry, Unclean; as leprosy was most defiling, and as the very entrance of a leper into a house rendered everything in it unclean, the person thus afflicted had to warn off the passers by, lest they should approach him, and by contact with him become defiled.

46 All the days wherein the plague shall be in him he shall be defiled; he is unclean. He shall dwell alone; outside the camp shall his habitation be. — he shall dwell alone; in consequence of his extreme defilement, the leper had to live in seclusion outside the camp or city.

47 “The garment also that the plague of leprosy is in, whether it be a woolen garment or a linen garment,

48 whether it be in the warp or woof, of linen or of wool, whether in a skin or in any thing made of skin,

49 and if the plague is greenish or reddish in the garment or in the skin, either in the warp or in the woof or in any thing of skin, it is a plague of leprosy and shall be shown unto the priest.

50 And the priest shall look upon the plague and shut up it that hath the plague seven days.

51 And he shall look on the plague on the seventh day; if the plague is spread in the garment, either in the warp or in the woof, or in a skin or in any work that is made of skin, the plague is a consuming leprosy; it is unclean.

52 He shall therefore burn that garment, whether warp or woof, in wool or in linen, or any thing of skin wherein the plague is, for it is a consuming leprosy; it shall be burned in the fire.

53 “And if the priest shall look, and behold, the plague is not spread in the garment, either in the warp or in the woof, or in any thing of skin,

54 then the priest shall command that they wash the thing wherein the plague is, and he shall shut it up seven days more.

55 And the priest shall look on the plague after it is washed; and behold, if the plague has not changed his color and the plague is not spread, it is unclean; thou shalt burn it in the fire. It has eaten inward, whether it be bare within or without.

56 And if the priest look, and behold, the plague is somewhat dark after the washing of it, then he shall rend it out of the garment, or out of the skin, or out of the warp, or out of the woof.

57 And if it appear still in the garment, either in the warp or in the woof or in any thing of skin, it is a spreading plague; thou shalt burn that wherein the plague is with fire.

58 And the garment, either warp or woof or whatsoever thing of skin it is which thou shalt wash, if the plague is departed from them, then it shall be washed the second time and shall be clean.”

59 This is the law of the plague of leprosy in a garment of wool or linen, either in the warp or woof, or any thing of skins, to pronounce it clean or to pronounce it unclean.

Leviticus 14

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“This shall be the law of the leper in the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought unto the priest. — this shall be the law of the leper; that is, the manner in which an Israelite cured of his leprosy shall be purified and restored to the communion of the sanctuary on the day when he is pronounced clean.

And the priest shall go forth out of the camp, and the priest shall look; and behold, if the plague of leprosy be healed in the leper,

then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed two birds alive and clean, and cedar wood, and scarlet, and hyssop. — two birds; literally, “sparrows,” but any sort of birds, 

— and the cedar wood, and scarlet, and hyssop; a stick of cedar; are also to be burnt with the red heifer for the ashes for the water of separation (Numbers 19:6), and they appear to have been commonly employed in purifications;

And the priest shall command that one of the birds be killed in an earthen vessel over running water.

As for the living bird, he shall take it, and the cedar wood, and the scarlet, and the hyssop, and shall dip them and the living bird in the blood of the bird that was killed over the running water.

And he shall sprinkle upon him that is to be cleansed from the leprosy seven times, and shall pronounce him clean and shall let the living bird loose into the open field.

And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his clothes, and shave off all his hair, and wash himself in water, that he may be clean; and after that he shall come into the camp, and shall tarry abroad out of his tent seven days. — and shall tarry abroad out of his tent; but though permitted to return to the camp, yet he had to live the first week out of his own house.

But it shall be on the seventh day that he shall shave all his hair off his head and his beard and his eyebrows, even all his hair he shall shave off, and he shall wash his clothes; also he shall wash his flesh in water, and he shall be clean.

10 “And on the eighth day he shall take two helambs without blemish and one ewe lamb of the first year without blemish, and threetenths part of fine flour for a meat offering mingled with oil, and one log of oil.

11 And the priest who maketh him clean shall present the man that is to be made clean, and those things, before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

12 And the priest shall take one helamb and offer him for a trespass offering, and the log of oil, and wave them for a wave offering before the Lord.

13 And he shall slay the lamb in the place where he shall kill the sin offering and the burnt offering, in the holy place; for as the sin offering is the priest’s, so is the trespass offering; it is most holy.

14 And the priest shall take some of the blood of the trespass offering, and the priest shall put it upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed and upon the thumb of his right hand and upon the great toe of his right foot.

15 And the priest shall take some of the log of oil and pour it into the palm of his own left hand.

16 And the priest shall dip his right finger in the oil that is in his left hand and shall sprinkle of the oil with his finger seven times before the Lord;

17 and of the rest of the oil that is in his hand shall the priest put upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand and upon the great toe of his right foot, upon the blood of the trespass offering.

18 And the remnant of the oil that is in the priest’s hand he shall pour upon the head of him that is to be cleansed; and the priest shall make an atonement for him before the Lord.

19 And the priest shall offer the sin offering, and make an atonement for him that is to be cleansed from his uncleanness; and afterward he shall kill the burnt offering.

20 And the priest shall offer the burnt offering and the meat offering upon the altar; and the priest shall make an atonement for him, and he shall be clean.

21 “And if he be poor and cannot get so much, then he shall take one lamb for a trespass offering to be waved to make an atonement for him, and onetenth part of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering, and a log of oil,

— if he be poor, and cannot get so much; then he shall take one lamb—a kind and considerate provision for an extension of the privilege to lepers of the poorer class.

22 and two turtledoves or two young pigeons, such as he is able to get; and the one shall be a sin offering and the other a burnt offering.

— and two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, such as he is able to get; as good as he can get for his money, or his money he is possessed of will purchase; so that the poor man had as many offerings for his atonement and cleansing as the rich, and his expiation and purgation were as complete as theirs.

23 And he shall bring them on the eighth day for his cleansing unto the priest unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, before the Lord.

24 And the priest shall take the lamb of the trespass offering and the log of oil, and the priest shall wave them for a wave offering before the Lord.

25 And he shall kill the lamb of the trespass offering, and the priest shall take some of the blood of the trespass offering and put it upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand and upon the great toe of his right foot;

26 and the priest shall pour of the oil into the palm of his own left hand.

27 And the priest shall sprinkle with his right finger some of the oil that is in his left hand seven times before the Lord;

28 and the priest shall put of the oil that is in his hand upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand and upon the great toe of his right foot, upon the place of the blood of the trespass offering.

29 And the rest of the oil that is in the priest’s hand he shall put upon the head of him that is to be cleansed, to make an atonement for him before the Lord.

30 And he shall offer one of the turtledoves or of the young pigeons, such as he can get—

31 even such as he is able to get — the one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering, with the meat offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for him that is to be cleansed before the Lord.

32 This is the law for him in whom is the plague of leprosy, whose hand is not able to get that which pertaineth to his cleansing.”

33 And the Lord spoke unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying,

34 “When ye have come into the land of Canaan, which I give to you for a possession, and I put the plague of leprosy in a house of the land of your possession,

— when ye be come into the land of Canaan; which as yet they were not come to, being in the wilderness, and so the following law concerning the leprosy in houses could not yet take place, they now dwelling in tents, and not in houses;

35 and he that owneth the house shall come and tell the priest, saying, ‘It seemeth to me there is, as it were, a plague in the house,’ — leprosy in a house; this law was prospective, not to come into operation till the settlement of the Israelites in Canaan.

36 then the priest shall command that they empty the house before the priest go into it to see the plague, that all that is in the house be not made unclean; and afterward the priest shall go in to see the house.

37 And he shall look on the plague, and behold, if the plague be in the walls of the house with hollow streaks, greenish or reddish, which in appearance are lower than the wall,

38 then the priest shall go out of the house to the door of the house and shut up the house seven days.

39 And the priest shall come again the seventh day and shall look; and behold, if the plague is spread in the walls of the house,

40 then the priest shall command that they take away the stones in which the plague is, and they shall cast them into an unclean place outside the city.

41 And he shall cause the house to be scraped within round about, and they shall pour out the dust that they scrape off outside the city into an unclean place.

42 And they shall take other stones and put them in the place of those stones, and he shall take other mortar and shall plaster the house.

43 “And if the plague come again and break out in the house, after he hath taken away the stones and after he hath scraped the house and after it is plastered,

44 then the priest shall come and look; and behold, if the plague is spread in the house, it is a consuming leprosy in the house; it is unclean.

45 And he shall break down the house — the stones of it and the timber thereof and all the mortar of the house; and he shall carry them forth out of the city into an unclean place.

— and he shall break down the house; order it to be pulled down, and demolished entirely, that is, the priest shall give such orders; but this was to be done by the owner of the house, and that he was to do it himself, and have no associate with him in it;

46 Moreover he that goeth into the house all the while that it is shut up shall be unclean until the evening.

47 And he that lieth in the house shall wash his clothes, and he that eateth in the house shall wash his clothes.

48 “And if the priest shall come in and look upon it, and behold, the plague hath not spread in the house after the house was plastered, then the priest shall pronounce the house clean, because the plague is healed.

49 And he shall take to cleanse the house two birds, and cedar wood, and scarlet, and hyssop.

50 And he shall kill one of the birds in an earthen vessel over running water;

51 and he shall take the cedar wood and the hyssop and the scarlet and the living bird, and dip them in the blood of the slain bird and in the running water, and sprinkle the house seven times.

52 And he shall cleanse the house with the blood of the bird and with the running water and with the living bird, and with the cedar wood and with the hyssop and with the scarlet;

53 but he shall let go the living bird out of the city into the open fields, and make an atonement for the house; and it shall be clean.”

54 This is the law for all manner of plague of leprosy and scall,

55 and for the leprosy of a garment and of a house,

56 and for a rising and for a scab and for a bright spot,

57 to teach when it is unclean and when it is clean. This is the law of leprosy. — this is the law of leprosy; respecting every sort of it, and which is very remarkably enlarged upon; that is, to give directions for the time when they would have to do with the clean and unclean.

UK records 2000% surge in anti-Semitic incidents

•January 6, 2024 • Leave a Comment

UK records 2000% surge in anti-Semitic incidents – media

The surge in hate crimes around the world was reported following the outbreak of Israel-Hamas war, which will definitely result in more Aliyah!

RT News • December 23, 2023

Data obtained from UK police forces has reflected a surge in anti-Semitic and Islamophobic hate crimes in some parts of Britain since Hamas’ October 7 attack and Israel’s subsequent retaliation, according to The Independent.

A Freedom of Information request by the UK newspaper revealed that British Transport Police, whose operational remit includes more than 3,000 stations across the country, recorded 87 anti-Semitic offenses in the four weeks after Hamas’ cross-border assault, the publication said on Friday. There were eight such hate crimes noted from the same period a year prior, a rise of 987%.

Similarly, the figures showed that Islamophobic hate crimes rose to 22 offenses during the same period, up from just two in the same month in 2022, an increase of 1000%.

The Home Office told the paper that “we expect the police to fully investigate all hate crimes and work with the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) to make sure the cowards who commit these abhorrent crimes feel the full force of the law.”

The surge in hate crimes in the Uk will definitely result in more Aliyah!

In October, a group representing British Jews said that an initial surge of anti-Semitism in some parts of the UK was “unprecedentedly high” even when compared to “previous conflicts involving Israel.”

Campaigners against the abuse of Muslims in the UK said that the data was “deeply worrying,” according to The Independent on Friday. “We should never allow such hatred and intolerance to take root in our communities,” Iman Atta of the Tell Mama group said.

“Please look out for each other, whether Muslim or Jewish. We must stand together against intolerance, hate, and racism,” Atta added.

Greater Manchester Police, meanwhile, noted a 400% rise in anti-Semitic incidents from the year before in the month after October 7. Islamophobic crimes, though, dropped, the newspaper said. Police in Merseyside and West Yorkshire also saw similar rises.

Authorities in Thames Valley recorded the most precipitous increase, the data seen by The Independent showed, with a 2000% increase in anti-Semitic incidents. Islamophobia rose by 42% in the same area.

The surge in hate crimes around the world will definitely result in more Aliyah!

A spokesman for the Board of Deputies of British Jews told The Independent that the rise of anti-Semitic incidents across the UK had “caused enormous anxiety for Jewish people, particularly children and Jewish students or indeed anyone easily identified as Jewish by their dress.”

The spokesman added, “We call on police to take strong action against anyone found to be perpetrating hate crimes.”

Israeli officials have said that 1,139 people, mostly civilians, died in Hamas’ attack on October 7, while it is believed that the Palestinian militant group seized at least 236 hostages.

The death toll in Gaza has surpassed 20,000, health officials in the besieged enclave have said.

For more, see

“I am thy shield!” (Genesis 15)

The Case for “Greater Israel!”

China’s Rare Earth Strategy

•January 5, 2024 • Leave a Comment

What goes around comes around. Now China’s New Rare Earth Sanction Policy Shakes Global Tech Industry

OilPrice by Kurt Cobb • December 27, 2023

  • The ban includes technology for making rare earth magnets used in various industries.
  • China, controlling 90% of the refined rare earth metal market, seeks to maintain its processing monopoly.
  • The US has made efforts to incentivize domestic mining of critical minerals, but challenges remain due to China’s market dominance.

China just expanded its already tight restrictions on export of technology related to refining rare earth minerals. The most recent restrictions involve technology for making rare earth magnets which are used in electric motors and generators. These minerals are also used extensively in the automotive industry and in consumer electronics such as cellphones.

I have previously written that the clean energy economy is a metals energy economy, and rare earths constitute a substantial and key part of that metals energy economy.

Export of rare earth extraction and separation technology had already been banned by China. The most recent and previous restrictions are part of a broader trade war between the United States and China over exchange of technology. 

In late 2022 the United States banned exports of advanced microchips. China responded with a ban on the export germanium and gallium, two metals crucial to the manufacture of advanced chips. The United States imports half of its germanium needs and all of the gallium it uses.

What exactly are the Chinese hoping to achieve? The answer becomes pretty clear when you realize that China supplies 90 percent of the volume of refined rare earth metals to the world. The country produces 60 percent of the ore. That means the rest of the world is sending three-quarters of its ore to China for processing, and the Chinese would like to continue to enjoy its near monopoly on processing.

That puts China in a commanding position to decide who will get these metals and even whether the rest of the world gets any at all. China unexpectedly and dramatically reduced its rare earth exports in 2010, driving prices skyward.

The obvious response to such uncertainty would be to encourage the mining of rare earths outside of China. The current US administration rolled out a modest program to incentivize US-based mining of critical minerals such as lithium, nickel, graphite, cobalt and manganese.

Many rare earths are already on what is known as the List of Critical Minerals and thus eligible for incentives to encourage domestic production. A small amount of funding has been allocated for this purpose.

A private attempt to revive a closed rare earth mine, the largest in the United States, resulted in a colossal financial loss for the investors when rare earth prices plummeted after China resumed its previous level of exports following the reduction in 2010. This shows how China can easily sabotage any attempts to challenge its dominance of the rare earth market.

Given the close relationship between China’s government and its rare earth industry, the only reasonable way to break the Chinese stranglehold on the rare earth market would be for governments to guarantee the price of rare earths mined by domestic companies. That runs so counter to the neoliberal free market ethic of the past 40 years that I don’t see it becoming a reality.

In a world where the consensus regarding the free exchange of goods is breaking down and geopolitical interests are coming to the fore, China seems to care far less about living up to free trade rules than protecting its perceived national interests. If other major trading countries and blocks start moving in the same direction, the easy availability of cheap goods and resources produced in faraway locales may become increasingly problematic.

For more, see:

Rare Earth Reserves: Top 8 Countries

Rare Earth Production: Top 5 Countries

“Then will I slay my brother Jacob” (Genesis 27)

•January 4, 2024 • Leave a Comment

“And upon thy sword shalt thou depend, entering at every place: yet thou shalt be supple and credulous, and be in subjection to thy brother [Jacob]; but it will be that when his sons [the modern children of Israel] become evil, and fall from keeping the commandments of the law, thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother,” Genesis 27:41-42 Jonathan

Esau sold his birthright for a bowl of soup

Genesis 27

1 And it came to pass that when Isaac was old, and his eyes were dim so that he could not see, he called Esau his eldest son and said unto him, “My son.” And he said unto him, “Behold, here am I.” 

— it came to pass; the importance of this chapter is manifest. Just as in Abraham’s life the decision had to be made which of the two sons, Ishmael and Isaac, was to be the heir of the promise, so, here again, there is the same Divine election: but while Abraham obeyed, though with heavy heart (Genesis 21:11), Isaac even struggled against God’s will;

— in this case, however, the sons are more closely allied, being twins, born of the same mother, but the younger following so closely upon the very heels of the elder as to seem, even at his birth, as if in eager pursuit.

— Esau violated the family law laid down by Abraham, Jacob conformed to it. By marrying Canaanitish women, Esau forfeited by his own act the birthright which previously he had sold; for his children, being illegitimate;

And he said, “Behold now, I am old; I know not the day of my death. — when Isaac was old, and his eyes were dim; he was in his hundred thirty-seventh year; but he lived to be 180 (Genesis 35:28).

Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field and take me some venison. — take me some venison; in this Isaac designed, as receiving a fresh instance of his son’s filial duty and affection to him, before he bestowed the designed favour upon him. 

And make me savory meat, such as I love, and bring it to me, that I may eat, that my soul may bless thee before I die.” — that my soul may bless thee; we gather from the solemn blessing given to his sons by Jacob (Genesis 49) that this was a prophetic act, by which the patriarchs, under the influence of God’s spirit, and in expectation of death, decided to which son should belong the birthright;

— that my soul may bless thee before I die; having eaten a comfortable meal, and being refreshed with it, but that having had proof of his son’s duty and affection to him, he might confer the blessing on him heartily: this blessing was not an ordinary and common one, but what parents used to bestow upon their children at the time of their death, or a little before it;

— and good men oftentimes did this under a spirit of prophecy, declaring what would be the case and circumstances of their children in time to come; and particularly the principal part of the blessing of Isaac, which Abraham had entailed upon him by divine direction, and he thought to have entailed on Esau his firstborn; especially of the possession and inheritance of the land of Canaan; between the two great rivers, (Genesis 15);

And Rebekah heard when Isaac spoke to Esau his son. And Esau went to the field to hunt for venison, and to bring it. — but Rebekah, who heard what he said, sought to frustrate this intention, and to secure the blessing for her favourite son, Jacob. 

And Rebekah spoke unto Jacob her son, saying, “Behold, I heard thy father speak unto Esau thy brother, saying, — if Rebekah, when she heard Isaac promise the blessing to Esau, had gone to him, and with humility and seriousness put him in remembrance of that which God had said concerning their sons;

— if she had further showed him how Esau had forfeited the blessing, both by selling his birthright, and by marrying of strange wives; it is probable Isaac would have been prevailed with to confer the blessing upon Jacob, and needed not thus to have been cheated into it;

And Isaac entreated (beseech; ask earnestly) the Lord for his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord was entreated by him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.

And the children struggled together within her; and she said, “If it be so, why am I thus?” And she went to inquire of the Lord.

And the Lord said unto her, “Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy body; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people, and the elder shall serve the younger.” Genesis 25:21-23

The Targun of Jonathan says:

And Izhak went to the mountain of worship, the place where his father had bound him. And Izhak in his prayer turned the attention of the Holy One, blessed be He! from that which He had decreed concerning him who had been childless. And he was enlarged, and Rivekah his wife was with child.

And the children pressed in her womb as men doing battle. And she said, If this is the anguish of a mother, what then are children to me? And she went into the school of Shem Rabba to supplicate mercy before the Lord.

And the Lord said to her, Two peoples are in thy womb, and two kingdoms from thy womb shall be separated; and one kingdom shall be stronger than the other, and the elder shall serve the younger, if the children of the younger will keep the commandments of the Law. Genesis 25:21-23

— and the elder shall serve the younger; that is only true if the children of the younger, that is, of the children of Israel, would keep all the laws, statutes and ordinances of God;

‘Bring me venison, and make me savory meat, that I may eat and bless thee before the Lord before my death.’ — before the Lord; solemnly, as in God’s presence, in his name, and by his authority, and with his leave and favour, which I shall heartily pray for thee. So he signifies that this was more than an ordinary blessing which he now intended to give him.

Now therefore, my son, obey my voice according to that which I command thee. — Rebekah knew that the blessing was intended for Jacob, and expected he would have it. But she wronged Isaac by putting a cheat on him; she wronged Jacob by tempting him to wickedness.

Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats, and I will make them savory meat for thy father, such as he loveth; 

— two good kids of the goats; though two may seem to be too much to be dressed for Isaac only; it may be observed, that Rebekah intended only to take out some of the choicest and most tender and delicate parts of them, and which would best suit her purpose, and which she would make most like to venison;

— I will make them savoury meat, out of their most tender and delicate parts; wherewith it was not difficult to deceive Isaac, partly because of the likeness of the flesh, especially being altered by convenient sauce; and partly because the same old age which had dimmed Isaac’s sight had also dulled his other senses;

10 and thou shalt bring it to thy father, that he may eat and that he may bless thee before his death.” —that he may eat, and that he may bless thee before his death; to whom she knew by the divine oracle the blessing belonged, Genesis 25:23;

11 And Jacob said to Rebekah his mother, “Behold, Esau my brother is a hairy man, and I am a smooth man. — Jacob said, Esau my brother is a hairy man; it is remarkable that his scruples were founded, not on the evil of the act, but on the risk and consequences of deception.

12 My father perhaps will feel me, and I shall seem to him as a deceiver; and I shall bring a curse upon myself and not a blessing.” — I shall bring a curse upon me, which is due to every one that deceiveth the blind, Deu 27:18, especially his father, and especially in a religious concern;

13 And his mother said unto him, “Upon me be thy curse, my son; only obey my voice, and go, fetch me them.” — upon me be thy curse; that is, I will warrant the success; or, if the issue turn out ill, I shall bear the blame and the punishment;

14 And he went, and fetched and brought them to his mother; and his mother made savory meat, such as his father loved. — being satisfied with what his mother had said, he went to the field where the flock was, and took out of it two young kids, and brought them to his mother; and thus far he did right to obey her commands;

15 And Rebekah took goodly raiment of her eldest son Esau, which were with her in the house, and put them upon Jacob her younger son; — goodly raiment; it has been supposed that the elder son held a sort of priestly office in the household, and as Isaac’s sight was growing dim, that Esau ministered for him at sacrifices.

16 and she put the skins of the kids of the goats upon his hands and upon the smooth of his neck. — Upon the two exposed parts of his body, which were most likely to be discovered. As for his face, it is more than probable from his age, which was the same with Esau’s;

17 And she gave the savory meat and the bread, which she had prepared, into the hand of her son Jacob. — and she gave the savoury (salty and spicy instead of being sweet) meat; seasoned and dressed in such a manner as might be taken for venison;

18 And he came unto his father, and said, “My father.” And he said, “Here am I. Who art thou, my son?” — who art thou, my son? for, from the voice and the quick dispatch made, he suspected it was not his son Esau.

19 And Jacob said unto his father, “I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done according as thou badest me. Arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that thy soul may bless me.” 

— that thy soul may bless me; as this was the thing in view, so speaking of it as soon as he came in, and which he desired might be done after his father had eat and drank, might serve to take off the suspicion of his being another person;

— the disguise, though wanting in one thing, which had nearly upset the whole plot, succeeded in misleading Isaac; and while giving his paternal embrace, the old man was roused into a state of high satisfaction and delight.

20 And Isaac said unto his son, “How is it that thou hast found it so quickly, my son?” And he said, “Because the Lord thy God brought it to me.” — because the Lord thy God brought it to me; Jacob does keep up his acting well, for it was in accordance with Isaac’s protraying to see anything providential in Esau’s success in hunting. This may have helped to arouse Isaac’s suspicions, who immediately proceeds to examine him;

— but it was another falsehood; for it was not the Lord, but his mother brought it to him: and this seems to be the most marvellous of all, that so good a man should dare to bring the name of the Lord God into this affair;

21 And Isaac said unto Jacob, “Come near, I pray thee, that I may feel thee, my son, whether thou be my very son Esau or not.” — whether thou be my very son Esau, or not; which he still was somewhat doubtful.

22 And Jacob went near unto Isaac his father; and he felt him and said, “The voice is Jacob’s voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau.” — but the hands are the hands of Esau; are like them, being hairy as they; or, as the Targums Jonathan says, “the feeling of the hands is as the feeling of the hands of Esau;”

23 And he discerned him not, because his hands were hairy, as his brother Esau’s hands; so he blessed him. — and he discerned him not; as he could not see, he could make no judgment by that sense; and, though he had his hearing;

— and thought the voice was like Jacob’s, he might imagine there might be an alteration in Esau’s voice, coming in haste and weary from the fields; yet, as there could not be any deception in his feeling, he thought it safest to trust to that, as it follows;

24 And he said, “Art thou my very son Esau?” And he said, “I am.” — and he said, I am; in a further excuse from lying, that Jacob does not say, “I am Esau”, only “I”, but it will not do, since it is an answer to Isaac’s question, with a design to deceive him; and he intended by it that he should understand him as he did, that he was really Esau.

25 And he said, “Bring it near to me, and I will eat of my son’s venison, that my soul may bless thee.” And he brought it near to him, and he ate; and he brought him wine, and he drank. — and he brought him wine, and he drank; and so was comfortably refreshed, and in a good temper and disposition of mind to confer the blessing.

26 And his father Isaac said unto him, “Come near now, and kiss me, my son.” — come near now, and kiss me, my son; this was the solemn preparation for the giving of the blessing.

— Isaac’s suspicions had now quite passed away’he had eaten and drunk, and the time had now come for the decision which son was to inherit the promise.

27 And he came near, and kissed him; and he smelled the smell of his raiment, and blessed him and said, “See, the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which the Lord hath blessed. — and he came near, and kissed him; Jacob came near and kissed Isaac his father;

— and Isaac smelled the smell of his raiment; which being not like the smell of a sheep coat, but of a field, might give him more full satisfaction that it was truly Esau: and he blessed Jacob; with his patriarchal and prophetic blessing,

28 Therefore God give thee of the dew of heaven, and the fatness of the earth, and plenty of corn and wine. — the dew of heaven; in Middle-Eastern countries, where there is so little rain, the dew is the most important prerequisite for the growth of the fruits of the earth, and is often mentioned therefore as a source of blessing;

29 Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee; be lord over thy brethren, and let thy mother’s sons bow down to thee. Cursed be every one that curseth thee, and blessed be he that blesseth thee!” 

— let people serve thee; Heb. peoples (‘am·mîm,); up to this point the blessing had been general, but now Isaac bestows the birthright, carrying with it widespread dominion, precedence over all other members of the family, and special blessedness. The phrases “thy brethren” and “thy mother’s sons” include all nations sprung from Abraham, and all possible offshoots from Isaac’s other descendants.

30 And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarcely gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting. 

— and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father; which no doubt he made haste to do, as soon as he had got the blessing; partly to avoid his brother, whom he might expect to come in every moment, and partly to relate to his mother the success he had met with;

31 And he also had made savory meat, and brought it unto his father and said unto his father, “Let my father arise and eat of his son’s venison, that thy soul may bless me.” — he also made; Esau returned just as Jacob was leaving Isaac’s presence. There would still be some considerable delay before the captured game was made into savoury meat;

32 And Isaac his father said unto him, “Who art thou?” And he said, “I am thy son, thy firstborn, Esau.” — and Isaac his father said unto him, who art thou? Hearing another voice more like Esau’s than what he had heard before surprised him, and therefore in haste puts this question;

— and he said, I am thy son, thy firstborn Esau; all which was true in a sense; he was his son, and he was Esau, and he was his firstborn by nature, but not by right, for he had sold his birthright.

33 And Isaac trembled exceedingly and said, “Who? Where is he that hath taken venison and brought it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? Yea, and he shall be blessed.” — Isaac trembled very exceedingly; this was not from mere vexation at having been so deceived, and made to give the blessing contrary to his wishes;

— what Isaac felt was that he had been resisting God. In spite of the prophecy given to the mother, and Esau’s own irreligious character and heathen marriages, he had determined to bestow on him the birthright by an act of his own will; and he had failed; he has no word of blame for Rebekah and Jacob, but confirms to him the possession of the birthright, and declares, “Yea, he shall be blessed.”

34 And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, “Bless me, even me also, O my father!” — and said unto his father, bless me, even me also, O my father; thou art my father, and I am a child of thine as well as Jacob, show paternal affection to me; give me also a child’s blessing, one at least equal to what thou hast given Jacob, if not a greater, as being the firstborn.

35 And he said, “Thy brother came with subtlety, and hath taken away thy blessing.” — and he said, thy brother came with subtilty; the Targum Jonathan interprets it, “with subtilty” taking it in a good sense, “subtilty is the quality of being subtle, or having a high degree of finesse or skill” or with wisdom, and rather commending it, as if it was wisely and prudently managed;

36 And he said, “Is not he rightly named Jacob [that is, A supplanter]? For he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright, and behold, now he hath taken away my blessing.” And he said, “Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me?” 

— and he said, is not he rightly named Jacob? as he was by his parents, and those that were at his birth, because he took his brother by the heel as he came out of his mother’s womb; for Jacob signifies “heeler”, a supplanter, and was given him to keep up the memory of what he had done, to which Esau here refers;

— for he hath supplanted me these two times; to supplant another is to put his foot under the heel of another, in order to trip him up, to which Esau alludes; but uses the word in a figurative sense, for circumventing him, and dealing fraudulently and deceitfully with him, though he is not able to support his charge; for if he dealt fraudulently with any, it was with his father, and not with him, and the two times he refers to prove it not;

— he took away my birthright; which is not true, he did not take it away from him either by force or fraud, Esau sold it to him for a mess of pottage, Genesis 25:29; 

— and behold, now he hath taken away my blessing; this is not true, he had not taken it away; it was given him by his father; and though he had used some artful methods to get it, Genesis 27:15, he had neither supplanted Esau, but if anyone, his father; nor had he done any injustice to Esau, since as he had bought from him the birthright, the blessing annexed to it went along with it, and of right belonged to Jacob;

 — and he said, hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? is the whole fund of blessings exhausted? are all bestowed upon Jacob? is there not one left for me? he hoped there was, and that as good a one as he had bestowed on his brother, and entreats he might have it.

37 And Isaac answered and said unto Esau, “Behold, I have made him thy lord, and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; and with corn and wine have I sustained him. And what shall I do now unto thee, my son?” — behold, I have made him thy lord; the lord of his posterity, who would be subdued and become tributary to his seed;

— and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; the Edomites, who sprung from his brother Esau, who, according to this prophetic blessing, became servants to David, who was a son of Jacob’s;

— and with corn and wine have I sustained him; promised him a fruitful country, the land of Canaan, abounding with all good things, particularly with corn and wine, which are put for all the rest;

— and what shall I do now unto thee, my son? what is there remains? what can be bestowed upon thee? there is nothing left; dominion over others, even over all nations, yea, over thyself and thy posterity, and plenty of all good things, are given already to Jacob; what is there to be done for thee, or thou canst expect?

38 And Esau said unto his father, “Hast thou but one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, O my father!” And Esau lifted up his voice and wept. — and Esau said unto his father, hast thou but one blessing, my father? he seems to speak diminutively of what had been given to Jacob, calling it one blessing:

— whereas there were many, of different sorts, temporal and spiritual; but it may be Esau had not so clear and comprehensive a view of what was contained in Jacob’s blessing; or at least was willing to think and hope that there was not so much given, but there might be some behind for him, and that his father had a greater stock than to be drained of all at once;

— bless me, even me also, O my father: with another blessing, with one equal to what has been given my brother:

— and Esau lift up his voice, and wept; in order to move the affections of his father, and to prevail upon him to reverse the blessing he had bestowed on Jacob, and give it to him; but he could not bring his father to repentance, to change his mind, and revoke the blessing, and give it him, with all his crying and tears;

39 And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, “Behold, thy dwelling shall be away from the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above. — and Isaac his father answered and said unto him; being willing to bestow what he could upon him, without lessening or breaking in upon the grant made to Jacob;

— behold, thy dwelling shall be away from the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above: this agrees with the blessing of Jacob, and if so, Jacob hasn’t took the birthright; and would have no occasion of complaint or grief; or to have hated his brother and sought his life; to which may be added, that the land of Edom, which Esau and his posterity inhabited, was a very desert country;

— but from the Septuagint:

“And Isaac his father answered and said to him, See, away from the fatness of the earth shall your dwelling be, and away from the dew of the sky on high” (Genesis 27:39 Septuagint NETS)

— and from MSG (the Message)

Isaac said to him, You’ll live far from Earth’s bounty, remote from Heaven’s dew. You’ll live by your sword, hand-to-mouth, and you’ll serve your brother. But when you can’t take it any more you’ll break loose and run free. (Genesis 27:39 MSG)

— but it was deemed from the beginning that the birthright would be dew and fatness from heaven; hence many translations, following the Septuagint, have Esau’s loss of the birthright as “Your dwelling shall be away from the fatness of the earth and away from the dew of heaven from above;” and no mention made of corn and wine; the land of Edom not being so fat and fruitful as the land bestowed upon Jacob’s;

— though Esau was not personally subject to his brother, his posterity would be tributary to the Israelites: “Behold, I have made him thy lord.”

40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.” — and by thy sword (or by your dagger; Septuagint NETS) shalt thou live; by what he could get by it; his land being so poor that he could not live upon it, but must be obliged to such methods for a livelihood; or his country being surrounded with enemies, his posterity would be obliged to defend themselves by the sword, and other weapons of war;

— and shalt serve thy brother; which is the sense and language of the oracle, Genesis 25:23; and which Isaac perhaps now remembered, and had a clear understanding of it, and delivers out his prophetic blessing agreeably to it;

— and it shall come to pass, when thou shalt have the dominion; not over the Israelites, the posterity of Jacob, which the Edomites, Esau’s posterity, never had; but when they should get a greater degree of strength, power, authority, and dominion in the world;

— that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck; the Edomites should revolt from the posterity of Jacob, and shake off the yoke of bondage and subjection they had been long under; thus in this prophecy, Esau is bidding for his time;

41 And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, “The days of mourning for my father are at hand. Then will I slay my brother Jacob.” — the days of mourning for my father are at hand; Esau evidently expected that his father’s death was near, and such also was Isaac’s own expectation (Genesis 27:2); but he recovered, and lived forty-four years after this;

— perhaps on this account another translation has been suggested, namely, “Days of mourning for my father are at hand: then I will slay Jacob.”

— and the Targum Jonathan says of Esau’s delayed intent of killing his brother Jacob; in fact it is a prophecy for the house for Esau against the house of Jacob:

“And upon thy sword shalt thou depend, entering at every place: yet thou shalt be supple and credulous, and be in subjection to thy brother [Jacob]; but it will be that when his sons [the modern children of Israel] become evil, and fall from keeping the commandments of the law, thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother, and will be found the killer and the heir” Genesis 27:41 Jonathan

— a bit more on what this phase means “and will be found the killer and the heir”:

Esau says to himself that he will not make the same mistake as Cain. Cain killed his brother Abel, thinking that that would make him the sole heir. But then, Adam had another child, so Cain still had to share the inheritance.

Hence Esau said that he would not do that. Instead, he would delay the killing of Jacob until the death of Isaac, so that when Jacob is killed, Esau will become the sole heir.

So, Esau hopes he would be both be the killer and the only heir.

42 And these words of Esau her elder son were told to Rebekah; and she sent and called Jacob her younger son, and said unto him, “Behold, thy brother Esau doth comfort himself concerning thee, purposing to kill thee. 

— and said unto him, behold, thy brother Esau, as touching thee, doth comfort himself, purposing to kill thee; he has determined on it, and has laid a scheme for it, and comforts himself and so be the heir of the promise, and get the blessing; and even that thy death will be a comfort to him under the loss of his blessing, though he gets nothing by it, so sweet is revenge unto him.

43 Now therefore my son, obey my voice; and arise, flee thou to Laban my brother in Haran, — these words of Esau were told Rebekah; poor woman! she now early begins to reap the bitter fruits of her fraudulent device;

— she is obliged to part with her son, for whom she planned it, never, probably, seeing him again; and he felt the retributive justice of heaven fall upon him heavily in his own future family; but she had taken full responsibility upon herself, in fulfilment of her promise in Genesis 27:13, “upon me be thy curse, my son, only obey my voice.”

44 and tarry with him a few days until thy brother’s fury turn away; — and tarry with Laban my brother, and remaining there “some days,” as she mildly puts it, until his brother’s wrath was subdued.

45 until thy brother’s anger turn away from thee, and he forget that which thou hast done to him. Then I will send and fetch thee from thence. Why should I be deprived also of you both in one day?” — why should I be deprived also of you both in one day? who might either in the quarrel kill one another; or however, as one would be murdered, so the other, the murderer, must die by the hand of the law;

— Why should I be deprived of you both? — Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary says this refers to the law of Goelism, by which the nearest of kin would be obliged to avenge the death of Jacob upon his brother.

46 And Rebekah said to Isaac, “I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth. If Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these who are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?” — if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth; as his brother has done, and after his example, as the best are too apt to be led by bad examples;

— such as these which are of the daughters of the land: like those Esau had married, of the same tribe, or other tribes of the Canaanites, for Esau had married two “Hittite” wives (Genesis 26:34-35), which were in religion and manners like them.

200 Years since Monroe is 200 too many

•January 3, 2024 • Leave a Comment

200 Years of the Monroe Doctrine is 200 too many

And this is what the Targum Jonathan says of Isaac’s prayer for Esau:

“And upon thy sword shalt thou depend, entering at every place: yet thou shalt be supple and credulous, and be in subjection to thy brother [Jacob]; but it will be that when his sons [the modern children of Israel] become evil, and fall from keeping the commandments of the law, thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother” Genesis 27:41-42

Pearls and Irritations by John Raby • December 28, 2023

If the United States is serious about liberty and justice for all, respect for international law, and a rules based order that treats everyone fairly and even-handedly, it’s time to ditch the doctrine and its corollaries.

When those of us of a certain age were in school, we learned that the Monroe Doctrine committed the United States to protect the independence of Latin American nations, which had just freed themselves from Spanish and Portuguese rule.

While it granted European nations the right to keep whatever colonies they still had in the Western Hemisphere, it declared that any attempt on Europe’s part to expand those colonies would be considered an unfriendly act against the United States. It looked like a brave and noble act, and a step forward for the US on the world stage.

As the doctrine approaches its 200th anniversary December 2, we know it ain’t necessarily so.

At first, the US couldn’t enforce it because its navy was too small to keep European powers out. However, the British navy was quite willing to do the job now that Latin markets were open to British trade.

In that vein, British Foreign Secretary Lord George Canning suggested the US and Britain issue a joint statement in defense of Latin independence. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams rejected the idea, arguing that it would make the US “a cock-boat in the wake of the British man-of-war.”

Marine General Smedley Butler, who took part in several such actions, confessed that he had become a bag man for US corporations, and concluded that “war is a racket.”

Instead, Adams drafted his own statement, which became the Monroe Doctrine, since president James Monroe approved the draft and could take credit for it. And so, the US got the glory while the British did the work, which they were content to do for the sake of their own economic advantage.

There was more tricky business involved. The US wouldn’t recognize Haitian independence from France until 1862, since Haiti rose from a brutal slave revolt. Nor did it have any quarrel with France’s demand that Haiti repay it for the loss of its slaves, an insistence which plunged Haiti deeply into debt and made it what it still is—the poorest, least stable nation in the Western Hemisphere. It was a nasty thing to do, since the Haitian revolution made the Louisiana Purchase possible.

Ever since then, there has been more and more tricky business. When Texas detached itself from Mexico in 1836, the US immediately recognized it, along with its territorial claims out to the Rio Grande, which then included parts of New Mexico and Colorado. Mexico disputed those claims.

Matters got worse when Texas became a US state in 1845, the evident objective all along, and there was still the question of disputed territory. When President James K Polk sent troops to Corpus Christi, which was just inside the disputed area, the Mexicans saw it as an invasion. War with Mexico followed, and in 1848, Mexico surrendered half its territory in return for a $15,000,000 payment.

During the mid-1850s, a Tennessee soldier of fortune named William Walker set off a series of coups in Central America, whereby he attempted to unite it into one slaveholding country and offer it to the US, either for annexation or as a client state. In 1853 and 1854, he had already tried to do something similar in northwestern Mexico.

Though President Franklin Pierce recognized his short-lived regime in Nicaragua, the United States had too many problems at home to follow through with the idea. By 1860, both the offer and the daring Mr. Walker’s own life were finished.

Nonetheless, the US did covet Cuba, and considered buying the island from Spain in the 1850s and 1870s. Spain wasn’t interested, but by the 1890s, the Cuban revolution was well enough along for the United States to see an opportunity and take it.

When the battleship Maine blew up in Havana harbor, the US blamed Spain and the Spanish-American War followed. And so we helped Cuba oust Spain, but with a catch. In 1902, the US insisted on fastening the Platt Amendment to the Cuban constitution, which gave the US the right to supervise Cuban foreign policy. In effect, the island was a US protectorate until Fidel Castro took over in 1959.

Now let’s backtrack a bit. In 1895, there was a border dispute between Venezuela and British Guyana. By that point, US Secretary of State Richard Olney felt confident enough to issue a corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which declared that the US had the right to mediate all such disputes, which the US did in this instance, without objection from either side.

In 1901, Britain and America reached a further understanding in the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty. Britain recognized America’s predominance in the Western Hemisphere, while America did the same for Britain in the East. And so the English-speaking nations went halfsies on the entire planet.

By the early 1900s, the United States was getting used to rearranging Latin America to its liking. When Colombia insisted on more money from the United States than the US was willing to pay to dig the Panama Canal, President Theodore Roosevelt purchased a Panamanian revolt which let him have his way.

He openly boasted, “I took Panama!” He was right, since he created the country. In 1989, when Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega became inconvenient to US interests there, the US removed him. The operation featured the bombardment of Panama City.

In 1905, Roosevelt added a corollary of his own to the Monroe Doctrine, announcing that whenever the United States thought a Latin American nation was unable to protect foreign lives or property, or pay debts to foreign lenders, the US had the right to intervene and put its affairs in order.

During the first half of the 1900s, military interventions and occupations followed in Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, and Mexico. Marine General Smedley Butler, who took part in several such actions, confessed that he had become a bag man for US corporations, and concluded that “war is a racket.”

The interventions continued during the Cold War. In 1954, after Guatemala’s democratically elected government nationalized United Fruit Company’s idle holdings there, intending to turn them over to small farmers, the CIA moved in and installed a dictatorship, in part because Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and CIA boss Allen Dulles were major stockholders in United Fruit and were annoyed.

Then there was the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in 1961, followed by economic sanctions which continue to this day. In 1964, when the Dominican Republic’s democratically elected government decided to pursue a friendlier policy toward Cuba than the Johnson administration liked, the Marines moved in and set up a dictatorship there. The next year, the US backed a military coup in Brazil.

The 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s saw no essential change, with ethnic massacres, interventions, overthrows, and assassinations in Guatemala, Grenada, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Colombia, and the previously mentioned one in Panama. Quite often, Latin troops and officers trained in the US took part.

Nor did our government bat an eye when a Salvadoran death squad murdered archbishop Oscar Romero, who had protested against what the death squads were doing across that suffering country. In 1999, as part of the US drug war, President Bill Clinton initiated Plan Colombia, which included aerial bombardment in that country.

The most glaring example was against Chile’s democratically elected president, Salvador Allende. By 1973, Allende had nationalized International Telephone and Telegraph’s holdings in Chile. ITT head Harold Geneen was furious about what he thought was inadequate compensation.

He complained to Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who had been working to destabilize the Allende government, and who were ready to arrange Allende’s overthrow and murder. A 17-year dictatorship under the more agreeable Augusto Pinochet followed, and Geneen cleaned up when he got back his business in Chile.

Economic sanctions against Cuba and Venezuela have continued in this century. And in 2009, the US shrugged its shoulders when a military coup overthrew the democratically elected Zelaya government in Honduras. The unlucky President Manuel Zelaya had supported Indigenous objections to US investments there that were doing environmental damage.

In that same country, the fate of Berta Cáceres was worse. She had successfully blocked the building of a dam that would have flooded her Indigenous homeland and fouled its waters. Her murder in 2011 was the price she paid for that success. No condolences or protests came from our government.

Readers of this column quite likely know about all these things and more. After all, there is extensive literature and broadcast reporting on the subject. The essential point of this modest offering is a simple one.

If the United States is serious about liberty and justice for all, respect for international law, and a rules based order that treats everyone fairly and even-handedly, it’s time to ditch the Monroe Doctrine and its corollaries. Adios, Olney. Adios, Roosevelt. Adios, Adams. Adios, Monroe.

Most Dangerous Combination: China and Russia

•January 2, 2024 • Leave a Comment

World’s Most Dangerous Combination: China and Russia

Gatestone Institute by Gordon G Chang • December 25, 2023

  • China and Russia are more than just working together. They are forming the core of a new axis. Around this core are proxies and proxies of proxies, such as Iran, North Korea, Algeria, and a host of terrorist groups.
  • The Chinese and Russian leaders are forming this grouping because they believe the United States, the final guarantor of the international system that frustrates them both, must be taken down. Xi, by, among other things, declaring a “people’s war” on America, has made it clear that the US must be destroyed and Americans exterminated. Putin is less ambitious, only wanting the US out of his way as he recreates the Russian Empire at its greatest extent.
  • “Washington has little leverage over Russia. There are no carrots to offer to Putin, and the sticks haven’t worked.” — Rebekah Koffler, author of Putin’s Playbook and former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst, to Gatestone, December 2023.
  • In other words, China and Russia are preparing to go to war together. As no country threatens either of them, they are undoubtedly thinking of perpetrating more acts of aggression.

Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy knows how to end the greatest threat to American national security. That threat would be the combination of the world’s two most dangerous states: China and Russia.

“I would freeze the current lines of control,” the candidate told Fox News’s Jesse Watters during his prime time show, referring to the battlefields in Ukraine. “I would further make a hard commitment that NATO will not admit Ukraine to NATO. That’s enough to get Putin to do the deal.”

“But I would require something even greater in return, Jesse,” Ramaswamy said. “Russia has to exit its military alliance with China.”

Putin will take the deal, the charismatic candidate assured Watters: “He’s gonna say, ‘Ok’ because I’m going to say, ‘We’ll reopen our economic relations with Russia and further, we’ll end the Ukraine war and also make sure NATO never admits Ukraine.’ “

The interview occurred in late August, but these themes are often heard, in America and elsewhere. Is Ramaswamy on the right track?

World’s Most Dangerous Combination: China and Russia

In theory, it should be possible to separate Moscow from Beijing. After all, China and Russia have for centuries been competitors, adversaries, and even enemies. Take something as fundamental as their common border. After border skirmishes, they finally settled the boundary only in 2008, when Moscow formally transferred various parcels to China.

Vladimir Putin knows, however, that no border is ever finally fixed, and Chinese migrants are pouring into the sparsely populated Russian Far East. There, many of them hope to “retake” lands ceded by the Qing dynasty to Moscow in the 1850s and 1860s in what Chinese officials now call “unequal treaties.” Beijing has made no formal claim to Vladivostok and surrounding areas, but it has been continually pushing the idea nonetheless.

In short, China poses the greatest threat to Russia, at least over the long term.

The Ramaswamy proposal, however, ignores the reality that as long as Putin and Xi Jinping rule, there is no realistic possibility of breaking up the two states. Both dictators view the world in similar terms; believe that their short-term interests coincide; and identify the same adversary, the United States of America. As Xi said on December 20 as he welcomed Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin to Beijing, “Maintaining and developing China-Russia relations well is a strategic choice made by both sides based on the fundamental interests of the two peoples.”

The two regimes, Xi’s words reveal, have been on the same page for some time. They declared their closeness with the 5,300-word joint statement issued after Putin met Xi in Beijing on February 4 of last year, just 20 days before Russia’s attack on Ukraine. That is when they declared their “no-limits” partnership.

China and Russia are more than just working together. They are forming the core of a new axis. Around this core are proxies and proxies of proxies, such as Iran, North Korea, Algeria, and a host of terrorist groups.

The Chinese and Russian leaders are forming this grouping because they believe the United States, the final guarantor of the international system that frustrates them both, must be taken down. Xi, by, among other things, declaring a “people’s war” on America, has made it clear that the US must be destroyed and Americans exterminated. Putin is less ambitious, only wanting the US out of his way as he recreates the Russian Empire at its greatest extent.

Moreover, Xi and Putin believe that the United States is in terminal decline. “Change is coming that hasn’t happened in 100 years,” the Chinese dictator said on March 22 to the Russian dictator in Moscow while bidding farewell after their 40th in-person meeting. “And we are driving this change together.”

Even if Xi and Putin were not so confident there are reasons for the Russian leader to reject the overtures of a President Ramaswamy. “Washington has little leverage over Russia,” Rebekah Koffler, the author of Putin’s Playbook and former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst, told Gatestone. “There are no carrots to offer to Putin, and the sticks haven’t worked.”

Yes, the Biden administration could drop sanctions and abandon Ukraine, but even those actions, which would be deeply injurious to the US and the international system, would not be enough to break Putin’s bond with Beijing. “Russia does not trust the US and Europe,” Koffler says. “Russia believes the West will continue to try to weaken it economically and militarily. Moscow believes that regardless of who occupies the White House, a Democrat or a Republican, the US will pursue an anti-Russia policy.”

Democrats and Republicans should pursue “anti-Russia” policies: Russia has refused to abide by the rules and norms of the international system. Russia is not only an aggressor state, but it is also engaging in barbaric acts in Ukraine, some of which constitute “genocide” as defined in Article II of the 1948 Genocide Convention.

Ramaswamy says “we have wrongfully cut off Russia from the West.” It is true that Americans and Western actions, as Koffler remarked, “hit the key revenue drivers of the Russian economy,” but how could any nation allow Putin to, among other things, use its banks and financial system while his soldiers were torturing, raping, and killing Ukrainian women and children; committing acts of mass murder in town after town; and abducting hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian children to Russia in an apparent attempt to eliminate Ukrainian identity?

To finance acts of aggression and barbarism in the face of sanctions, Putin has found support from China. By November, China-Russia trade hit $218.2 billion in 2023, exceeding their announced target of $200 billion by the end of 2024. Trade during the first 11 months of 2023 was double the volume in 2018 of $108.3 billion, which itself represented an increase of 24.5% over 2017. Putin will not break this established and fast-growing trade relationship for mere promises from a West he neither likes nor trusts.

China does not, as Ramaswamy tells us, have a “military alliance” with Russia—China has no formal alliances except the one with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea—but the Chinese and Russian militaries are nonetheless close.

The two forces are worrying the commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral John Aquilino. This month in Tokyo, he publicly stated that he was “very concerned” about their joint exercises: “I view it as far beyond the marriage of convenience at this point in time.”

In other words, China and Russia are preparing to go to war together. As no country threatens either of them, they are undoubtedly thinking of perpetrating more acts of aggression.

Would Putin join Xi if China were to invade some neighbor? That is not clear, but it is highly likely that the Russian leader will help China. “Russia could conduct shows of force to stretch US and allied surveillance,” Rebecca Grant of defense consultant IRIS Independent Research told Gatestone. “Posturing military moves by Russia could also make US leadership balk.” She points out there could be, for instance, Russian bomber flights or even nuclear weapons exercises.

Russia could also help China by trying to grab even more of the Kuril Islands chain from Japan or moving against a NATO member, such as one of the three Baltic republics, engulfing the Eurasian landmass in conflict, from one end to the other.

The War in Gaza isn’t about Hamas, it’s Demographics

•January 1, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The War in Gaza: It’s Not About Hamas. It’s About Demographics

Q. Could one unexpected day the Jews bring out the Ark of the Covenant and cause both the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to collapse?

Global Research by Mike Whitney • December 18, 2023 // The Unz Review

We’ve been told repeatedly that the goal of Israel’s operation in Gaza is to “defeat Hamas.” But is that true? We don’t think it is. We don’t think that any reasonable person would attempt to eradicate a militant organization by laying to waste vast swaths of the country while killing tens of thousands of innocent people.

That is not how one garners support for one’s cause nor is it an effective strategy for defeating the enemy. Instead, it is a policy that is guaranteed to horrify allies and critics alike greatly undermining the operation’s chances of success.

And that’s why we don’t believe that Israel’s attack on Gaza has anything to do with Hamas. We think it’s a smokescreen that’s being used to divert attention from the real objectives of the campaign.

And, what might those “real objectives” be?

The real objectives relate to an issue that is never discussed in the media, but is the primary factor driving events. Demographics.

As we all know, Israel’s long-term plan is to incorporate Gaza and the West Bank into Greater Israel. They want to control all the land from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great River Euphrates” (Genesis 15)

The problem is, however, that if they annex the occupied territories without disposing of the people, then the Palestinian population will equal or exceed that of the Jews which would lead to the demise of the Jewish state. That is the basic problem in a nutshell. Check out this article that helps to explain what’s going on:

Demography is a matter of national security in Israel and a key indicator for Israeli-Palestinian relations and their outlook: demographic trends in Israel are rapidly shifting and this will impact prospects for violence and conflict resolution.

As of late 2022, over seven million Israelis lived in Israel and the West Bank, and seven million Palestinians lived in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Israel and East Jerusalem, a somehow integrated region referred to as “Greater Israel” by Jewish right-wing activists …

A demographic bomb is already ticking. Israeli Jews experience an existential fear to be outgrown by the Palestinian population,and this is further instrumentalized by right-wing nationalist political entrepreneurs. Demography lies at the core of the territorial dispute between Jews and Arabs, as the two nations are waging a major war on numbers, aimed at weaponizing fertility rates to turn them into a predictive assumption of victory.

As the current Israeli right-wing government is laying the ground for the de facto annexation of the West Bank’s Area C, demography has been one of the tools employed to reassure the Jewish public opinion that Judea and Samaria could still be integrated into Israel, while keeping a Jewish demographic majority.

However, demography remains a struggle for survival and an uphill battle for Israel. This is especially true if Israel were to progress with the Palestinian Area C annexation. Israel: A Demographic Ticking Bomb in Today’s One-State Reality,” Aspenia

As an American, diversity might not seem like such a big deal. But to many Israelis, it’s pure strychnine. Zionists, in particular, see growth in the Arab population as a “demographic time-bomb” that threatens the future of the Jewish state. And that’s what the Gaza fracas is really all about; getting rid of the people but keeping the land. In fact, the last 75 years of conflict can be reduced to just 8 words, “They want the land, but not the people.” Here’s more from the Times of Israel:

Jewish people make up less than 47 percent of all those living west of the Jordan River, an Israeli demographer warned Tuesday, claiming that most of the Israeli population is unaware of the democratic peril the country is sliding into by possibly becoming a ruling minority in the area.

Arnon Soffer, a professor of geography at Haifa University, told Army Radio Tuesday that in addition to the Jewish and Arab populations, he reached his figures by taking into consideration the hundreds of thousands of non-Jewish people residing in Israel who are not citizens.

According to Soffer, there are 7.45 million Jews and others along with 7.53 million Arab Israelis and Palestinians living in what he termed the Land of Israel, meaning Israel plus the West Bank and Gaza Strip. When the number of non-Israeli nationals is taken into consideration, it leaves the Jewish proportion at between 46% and 47% of the total, he claimed.

According to Israel’s official Central Bureau of Statistics, at the end of 2021, 9.449 million people live in Israel (including Israelis in West Bank settlements). Of those, 6.982 million (74 percent) are Jewish, 1.99 million (21%) are Arab and 472,000 (5%) are neither…. The Palestinian Bureau of Statistics puts the West Bank Palestinian population at a little over 3 million, and the Gaza population at just over 2 million.

Soffer explained to Army Radio that although the birthrate has been higher among the Jewish population in recent years, so too is the death rate, meaning the Arab population, which is far younger on average than the Jewish population, is growing faster. Jews now a 47% minority in Israel and the territories, demographer says, the Times of Israel.

Imagine, for a minute, that you posted a number of articles on your social media sites that said you thought there were too many blacks or Asians in America. How long do you think it would take before you were either shadow-banned, censored or buried under an avalanche of death threats?

But when we look at the contents of the article above, we see that a major newspaper in Israel breezily publishes an article which states in stark terms that the country faces “democratic peril” because there are too many Arabs in the areas earmarked for future annexation. How is that not racism?

Following numerous Nakba and Naksa, Progression towards a Greater Israel

But this is how the issue is discussed in Israel. Demographics are considered a national security issue, an existential issue, and an issue that will decide the future of the Jewish State. Is it any wonder why the reaction has been so extreme? Is it any wonder why people refer to the fact that there is a large population of Palestinians in Palestine as the “Arab problem”? And, of course, once the indigenous population is regarded as a “problem,” then it is incumbent on the political leaders to conjure-up a solution.

So, what exactly is the solution to the Arab problem?

Why fewer Arabs, of course. Which is why the idea of expelling the Palestinians has a long pedigree in Zionist thinking dating back a full five decades before the establishment of the Jewish state. As it happens, the Arabs were always a problem even when the Jews represented less than 10 percent of the population. Go figure? Check out this comment by the ideological father of political Zionism himself, Theodor Herzl, who wrote the following:

“We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country… expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.”

Shockingly, Herzl wrote those words in 1895, 50 years before Israel declared its statehood. And many of the Zionist leaders who followed him shared that same world view, like Israel’s first prime minister David Ben-Gurion who said:

“You are no doubt aware of the [Jewish National Fund’s] activity in this respect. Now a transfer of a completely different scope will have to be carried out. In many parts of the country new settlement will not be possible without transferring the Arab fellahin.” He concluded: “Jewish power [in Palestine], which grows steadily, will also increase our possibilities to carry out this transfer on a large scale.” (1948)

And here’s Ben-Gurion again in 1938: “I support compulsory transfer. I don’t see anything immoral in it.”

See how far back this line of reasoning goes? The Zionists were tweaking their ethnic cleansing plans long before Israel had even become a state. And for good reason. They knew that the numbers did not support the prospects for an enduring Jewish State. The only way to square the circle was through compulsory resettlement, otherwise known as “transfer.”

And while that policy might have been repugnant to a great many Jews, a far larger number undoubtedly believed it was a cruel necessity. The preservation of the Jewish State became the highest value permitting behavior that would otherwise be disparaged as unacceptable and immoral. Here’s how Ben Shapiro summed it up in an essay titled “Transfer is Not a Dirty Word”:

The time for half measures has passed…. Some have rightly suggested that Israel be allowed to decapitate the terrorist leadership of the Palestinian Authority. But this, too, is only a half measure. The ideology of the Palestinian population is indistinguishable from that of the terrorist leadership.…

Here is the bottom line: If you believe that the Jewish state has a right to exist, then you must allow Israel to transfer the Palestinians and the Israeli-Arabs from Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Israel proper. It’s an ugly solution, but it is the only solution. And it is far less ugly than the prospect of bloody conflict ad infinitum….

The Jews don’t realize that expelling a hostile population is a commonly used and generally effective way of preventing violent entanglements. There are no gas chambers here. It’s not genocide; it’s transfer….

It’s time to stop being squeamish. Jews are not Nazis. Transfer is not genocide. And anything else isn’t a solution. Transfer is Not a Dirty Word, Narkive

The importance of the Shapiro piece can’t be overstated. First, he explicitly links the future viability of the Jewish state to the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. Second, he acknowledges that transfer is “an ugly solution,” but supports the policy as a necessary evil. And, third, he justifies the implementation of the mass expulsion by putting the entire Palestinian population into the same category as the terrorists. (“The ideology of the Palestinian population is indistinguishable from that of the terrorist leadership.”)

So, in essence, Shapiro is making our case for us. He is candidly admitting that the only policy that will preserve the Jewish state is ethnic cleansing. And judging by developments on the ground, we must assume the Netanyahu government arrived at the same conclusion. The people of Gaza are being bombed, starved and terrorized all with the explicit aim of herding them in the direction of the southern border where they will be forced at gunpoint to flee their historic homeland.

Bottom line: The strategic objectives of the Israeli operation in Gaza are entirely different than the stated goal of defeating Hamas.

All of the land west of the Jordan River is now being cleared of its native occupants so it can be incorporated into Greater Israel while maintaining a sizable Jewish majority.

The demonizing of the Palestinian people –which casts the victims of this onslaught as the perpetrators– is intended to conceal the underlying policy that is based on racial discrimination. There is no doubt that if the Arabs in Gaza were of Jewish descent, they would be spared the genocide they face today.

Lindsey Graham calls for bombing Iran

•December 31, 2023 • Leave a Comment

What goes around comes around. Now Lindsey Graham wants the IRGC headquarters “blown off the map”

RT News • December 28, 2023 // ZeroHedge

The US should bomb Iranian oil fields and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps HQ in retaliation for Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping, Senator Lindsey Graham said on Thursday.

“Without Iran, there are no Houthis,” Lindsey Graham said, blow them “off the map.”

In a Fox News interview, the South Carolina Republican argued that Tehran was behind both the attacks on US bases in Iraq and Syria and the harassment of Israeli-linked cargo ships in the Red Sea.

“I have been saying for six months now: Hit Iran,” Graham said. “They have oil fields out in the open, they have the Revolutionary Guard headquarters you can see from space. Blow it off the map.”

According to Graham, the Houthis in Yemen are “completely backed” by Tehran. “Without Iran, there are no Houthis,” he said.

The group that stylizes itself as the government of Yemen has openly sided with the Palestinians in the Israel-Gaza conflict and began targeting merchant ships owned by or headed for Israel in late October. Major shipping companies have rerouted their vessels around Africa in response, driving up prices.

Various groups calling themselves the “Islamic Resistance” have also launched drones and rockets at US troops in Iraq and Syria. Washington refuses to withdraw its forces from the region, even though they have long outlived Baghdad’s welcome and never had the blessing of Damascus.

Although the US launched airstrikes against three targets in Iraq on Monday, Graham accused Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin of showing “weakness” and “failing our troops in the field” by not retaliating more forcefully.

“I asked him a couple of months ago: Is there a red line? Would you tell our enemies publicly that if you kill an American, we are coming after you?” the senator told Fox News. “If you really want to protect American soldiers, make it real to the ayatollah, you attack a soldier through a proxy, we’re coming after you.”

Graham has a long history of promoting the use of force abroad, often in tandem with former Arizona Senator John McCain, who infamously sang “Bomb Iran” during his 2007 presidential campaign. He carried the torch after McCain died in 2018. Graham is a retired colonel in the US Air Force but spent his entire military career in the Judge Advocate General corps as a lawyer and then a judge.

Leviticus (11-12)

•December 31, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Leviticus 11

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses and to Aaron, saying unto them, — spoke unto Moses and Aaron; this charge is given to them jointly; to one as chief governor, and to the other as high-priest; the priest was to direct the people about the things forbidden or allowed, and the magistrate was to see the direction followed.

“Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘These are the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that are on the earth. — in accordance with the division of the animal kingdom are into four principal classes: (1) the land animals, (2) the water animals, (3) the birds of the air, and (4) the swarming animals.

The foot of the ox, sheep and goat, the hoof is wholly divided below and above

Whatsoever parteth the hoof and is cloven-footed and cheweth the cud among the beasts, that shall ye eat. — whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is cloven-footed, and cheweth the cud; ruminating animals by the peculiar structure of their stomachs digest their food more fully than others.

Nevertheless these shall ye not eat, of those that chew the cud or of those that divide the hoof: the camel, because he cheweth the cud but divideth not the hoof, he is unclean unto you; 

and the coney, because he cheweth the cud but divideth not the hoof, he is unclean unto you; — the coney; that is the old name for the rabbits;

and the hare, because he cheweth the cud but divideth not the hoof, he is unclean unto you; 

and the swine, though he divide the hoof and is cloven-footed, yet he cheweth not the cud, he is unclean to you. — and the swine; this animal is remarkable for filthiness, and for feeding on all manner of ordure, even carrion if it falls in its way;

Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcass shall ye not touch; they are unclean to you. 

“‘These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat. — any fish, either from salt water or fresh, might be eaten if it had both scales and fins. but no other creature that lives in the waters;

10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you. 

— shellfish of all kinds, whether mollusks or crustaceans, and cetaceous animals were therefore prohibited, as well as fish which appear to have no scales, like the eel; probably because they were considered unwholesome;

11 They shall be even an abomination unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall hold their carcasses in abomination. 

— an abomination unto you, for food; this clause is added to show that they were neither abominable in their own nature, nor for the food of other nations; as Noah was asked to eat anything that moves, “Every moving thing that liveth shall be food for you;” Genesis 9:3; and Noah was an righteous man;

12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you. — whatsoever hath no fins nor scales; frogs, eels, shellfish of all descriptions, were included as unclean; but locusts are clean and should be consumed;

13 “‘And these are they which ye shall hold in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the osprey, — all such fowls and birds as are rapacious, and live upon prey, as the eagle, and its several kinds, hawks, kites, vultures, ravens, and more, are forbidden;

14 and the vulture, and the kite after his kind, 

15 every raven after his kind, 

16 and the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckoo, and the hawk after his kind, 

17 and the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl, 

18 and the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle, — and the swan; other translations as “white owl” or “barn owls” or “water hen,”

The swan as bustard in the Targum Jonathan
pedican

19 and the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat. 

20 “‘All fowls that creep, going upon all fours, shall be an abomination unto you. — all the fowls that creep, better, all creeping things which have wings; the swarming animals or insects, especially of the reptile or insect kind, which constitute the fourth class of the Hebrew division of the animal kingdom;

21 Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all fours, which have legs above their feet with which to leap upon the earth; — yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet;

22 even these of them ye may eat: the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind. — and the bald locust, the beetle, or rather, the hopping locust.

23 But all other flying creeping things which have four feet shall be an abomination unto you. 

24 “‘And by these ye shall be unclean. Whosoever toucheth the carcass of them shall be unclean until the evening, — shall be unclean until the even; for coming in contact with the dead body of the animals contracts defilement for the rest of the day, and till the beginning of a new day, which took place after sunset;

25 and whosoever beareth aught of the carcass of them shall wash his clothes and be unclean until the evening. — and whosoever beareth; but he who removed the carcase out of the camp or city, or from one place to another, not only contracted defilement for the rest of the day, but had to wash the clothes which he had on;

26 The carcasses of every beast which divideth the hoof, and is not cloven-footed nor cheweth the cud, are unclean unto you; every one who toucheth them shall be unclean. — they were prohibited from touching their dead bodies, but not their bodies when alive: for they used camels, horses, asses, and others, for necessary service;

27 And whatsoever goeth upon his paws, among all manner of beasts that go on all fours, those are unclean unto you; whoso toucheth their carcass shall be unclean until the evening.

28 And he that beareth the carcass of them shall wash his clothes and be unclean until the evening; they are unclean unto you. 

the weasel

29 “‘These also shall be unclean unto you among the creeping things that creep upon the earth: the weasel, and the mouse, and the tortoise after his kind, 

30 and the ferret, and the chameleon, and the lizard, and the snail, and the mole. 

31 These are unclean to you among all that creep; whosoever doth touch them when they are dead shall be unclean until the evening. 

32 And upon whatsoever any of them when they are dead doth fall, it shall be unclean. Whether it be any vessel of wood or raiment or skin or sack, whatsoever vessel it be wherein any work is done, it must be put into water, and it shall be unclean until the evening; so it shall be cleansed. 

33 And every earthen vessel whereinto any of them falleth, whatsoever is in it shall be unclean, and ye shall break it. 

34 Of all meat which may be eaten, that on which such water cometh shall be unclean; and all drink that may be drunk in every such vessel shall be unclean. 

35 And every thing whereupon any part of their carcass falleth shall be unclean. Whether it be an oven or ranges for pots, they shall be broken down; for they are unclean and shall be unclean unto you. 

36 Nevertheless a fountain or pit, wherein there is plenty of water, shall be clean; but that which toucheth their carcass shall be unclean. 

37 And if any part of their carcass fall upon any sowing seed which is to be sown, it shall be clean. 

38 But if any water be put upon the seed and any part of their carcass fall thereon, it shall be unclean unto you. 

39 “‘And if any beast of which ye may eat die, he that toucheth the carcass thereof shall be unclean until the evening. — and if any beast; that is, a clean animal, but which has not been properly slaughtered, having died from any disease or accident; the carcase, in this case, is to be regarded as the dead body of an unclean animal;

40 And he that eateth of the carcass of it shall wash his clothes and be unclean until the evening. He also that beareth the carcass of it shall wash his clothes and be unclean until the evening. 

41 “‘And every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth shall be an abomination; it shall not be eaten.

42 Whatsoever goeth upon the belly, and whatsoever goeth upon all fours, or whatsoever hath more feet among all creeping things that creep upon the earth, them ye shall not eat, for they are an abomination.

43 Ye shall not make yourselves abominable with any creeping thing that creepeth, neither shall ye make yourselves unclean with them, that ye should be defiled thereby.

44 For I am the Lord your God. Ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy, for I am holy; neither shall ye defile yourselves with any manner of creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 

— ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy, for I am holy; that is, separate themselves from all other people, and be distinct from them, by using a different diet from theirs, as their Lord and God was different from all others;

— neither shall ye defile yourselves with any manner of creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; which is repeated to keep them at the utmost distance from these things, and to fill them with an aversion to them, that they might be careful to avoid them.

45 For I am the Lord who bringeth you up out of the land of Egypt, to be your God. Ye shall therefore be holy, for I am holy. 

— ye shall therefore be holy, for I am holy; separate from all others as he was, living holy lives and conversations, agreeably to his will made known to them, in imitation or him who had chosen and called them to be his people; for, since holiness is his nature, it becomes them who are his house and family, his subjects and people.

46 “‘This is the law of the beasts, and of the fowl, and of every living creature that moveth in the waters, and of every creature that creepeth upon the earth, — this is the law of the beasts: clean and unclean, what were to be eaten, and what not.

47 to make a difference between the unclean and the clean, and between the beast that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten.’” — make a difference between the unclean and the clean—that is, between animals used and not used for food. 

Leviticus 12

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘If a woman have conceived seed and borne a manchild, then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean. 

— she shall be unclean seven days; though the issue of blood which succeeds child-birth generally only lasts three or four days, yet the period of uncleanness is extended to seven days to include exceptional cases.

And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised. — and in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised; or the foreskin of his flesh, that is, of the man child born according to the law.

And she shall then continue in the blood of her purifying three and thirty days. She shall touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary until the days of her purifying are fulfilled. — the Levitical law ascribed impurity exclusively to the mother, but in no degree to the child; why?

But if she bear a maidchild, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her separation; and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying threescore and six days. 

— threescore and six days; the time in both particulars is double to that of the male, the former; the law, as some think, being adapted to an opinion that women are sooner purified after the birth of males than of females;

— perhaps, that a male infant circumcised on the eighth day, by the profusion of its own blood, bears part of the purgation; wherefore the mother, for the birth of a female, must suffer twice the time of separation; the separation is finished within two weeks, but the purgation continues sixty six days;

“‘And when the days of her purifying are fulfilled, for a son or for a daughter, she shall bring a lamb of the first year for a burnt offering, and a young pigeon or a turtledove for a sin offering, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation unto the priest, 

— but in cases of great poverty a pigeon might be substituted for the lamb (Leviticus 12:8, cf. Leviticus 5:7, Leviticus 5:11);

— for a burnt offering; in gratitude, and by way of thanksgiving for the love she had received in childbearing;

who shall offer it before the Lord and make an atonement for her; and she shall be cleansed from the issue of her blood. This is the law for her that hath borne a male or a female. — and make an atonement for her; for whatsoever sin in connection with or that attended childbearing; 

And if she be not able to bring a lamb, then she shall bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons, the one for the burnt offering and the other for a sin offering, and the priest shall make an atonement for her, and she shall be clean.’”

 — then she shall bring two turtles, or two young pigeons; which was a kind and merciful provision for the poorer sort;

— and the priest shall make an atonement for her, and she shall be clean; equally the same as if she had brought a lamb, instead of young pigeons, or turtledoves.

Will the US Become Hispanic by 2060?

•December 30, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Will The United States Become A Hispanic Country By 2060?

“The fact is that they’ve lied to my people. They’ve said, ‘No problem; everything’s just fine,’ when things are not at all fine.” Ezekiel 13:10 (MSG)

The demographics of the United States have changed a lot over the past few decades, and with the noticeable growth of the Hispanic and Latino American population both through immigration and higher birthrates could the United States be slowly becoming a Hispanic country?

Will The United States Become A Hispanic Country By 2060?

Is America’s future hispanic? States like Texas and California already see latinos constitute a plurality of the population, and these populations will almost certainly become majorities by 2050, with some figures suggesting the United States could become majority hispanic, while more reasonable estimates suggest hispanic-americans will comprise as much as 35 percent of the total population.

What could this mean for the future of American politics? How will Hispanic-American voting patterns effect elections in America, the political power of the Republican and Democratic parties?

In analyzing and explaining this we also need to consider that while Hispanic and Latino populations are often lumped together, there is a good amount of diversity among the Hispanic demographic, with many White, Mestizo, and Black Hispanics.

We must also consider the declining birthrates seen within the domestic population of the United States, and how higher fertility rates among Hispanic-Americans will effect America’s demographics.

Will the United States become a Hispanic country by 2060?

US-led Forces to Patrol the Red Sea

•December 28, 2023 • Leave a Comment

There’s a growing list of major shipping and container companies which have paralyzed transit through the Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea as Israel confronts attack from Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, Iraq, Yemen and Iran:

Italian-Swiss giant Mediterranean Shipping Company
France’s CMA CGM
Germany’s Hapag-Lloyd
Belgium’s Euronav
oil giant BP
Denmark’s A.P Moller-Maersk
Taiwan shipping firm Evergreen
Norway-based Frontline

Houthi pirates, armed with drones and helicopter, in action on cargo ships!

This resulted in a US-led force, including the UK, Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain to fight the Houthis in the Red Sea.

Reuters • December 19, 2023 // Sputnik International

CAIRO/GAZA/JERUSALEM (Reuters) -Several countries have agreed to jointly carry out patrols in the southern Red Sea and Gulf of Aden to try to safeguard commercial shipping against attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels, US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said.

Yemen’s Houthis seized the ship in the Red Sea off the coast of Yemen and threatening to seize all vessels owned by Israeli companies

The Iran-aligned group says the aim of its missile and drone attacks is to support the Palestinians as Israel and Hamas wage war in the Gaza Strip. On Monday, Mohammed al-Bukhaiti, a member of the Houthi politburo, told Al Jazeera that his group will be able to confront any coalition formed by the United States that could deploy to the Red Sea.

Austin, who is on a trip to Bahrain, home to the US Navy’s headquarters in the Middle East, said participating countries led by the United States include the United Kingdom, Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.

Multi-national Forces from the US, UK, Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain arms up to fight the Houthis

“This is an international challenge that demands collective action. Therefore today I am announcing the establishment of Operation Prosperity Guardian, an important new multinational security initiative,” Austin said in a statement early on Tuesday.

Several other countries have also agreed to be involved in the operation but prefer not to be publicly named, a defense official said on the condition of anonymity to discuss additional details of the new mission that have not been publicly announced.

The mission will be coordinated by the already existing Combined Task Force 153, which was set up in April 2022 to improve maritime security in the Red Sea, Bab el-Mandeb and the Gulf of Aden. There have been 39 member nations in CTF 153, but officials were working to determine which of them would participate in this latest effort.

In a letter to council members obtained Monday by The Associated Press, US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said Houthi attacks targeting commercial vessels legally transiting the international waterways continue to threaten “navigational rights and freedoms, international maritime security, and international commerce.”

The 15 council members discussed the Houthi threat behind closed doors Monday but took no immediate action.

The Houthis said earlier Monday they had attacked two “Israeli-linked” vessels in the Red Sea in solidarity with Gaza, as more companies halt transit through the troubled but vital waterway.

In a statement, the Houthis said they had carried out a “military operation against two ships linked to the Zionist entity” using naval drones. They vowed to “continue to prevent all ships heading to Israeli ports… from navigating in the Arab and Red Seas” until more food and medicine is allowed into Gaza.

US warships currently operating in the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf

Three US warships — the USS Carney, the USS Stethem and the USS Mason, all Navy destroyers — have been moving through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait daily to help deter and respond to attacks from the Houthis.

Gaza, Hamas and the continuing Zionist project

•December 27, 2023 • Leave a Comment

If we are going to understand the present Israeli – Arab conflict, we have to examine its roots.

The burden which Habakkuk the prophet saw. O Lord, how long shall I cry, and Thou wilt not hear? Even cry out unto Thee of violence, and Thou wilt not save?

Why dost Thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? For despoiling and violence are before me, and there are those that raise up strife and contention. Habakkuk 1:1-3

Pearls and Irritations by John Menadue • December 19, 2023

Hamas is the excuse for the Israeli attack on Gaza. It is not the reason.

The real Israeli objective in Gaza is to drive out the population and destroy infrastructure as part of a long term plan to expel Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere.

This settler colonisation has been ongoing since 1948, starting with the Nakba. In Australia we are very familiar with settler colonisation – driving out the original inhabitants.

“I am thy shield! Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15)

In 1948 Palestinians owned 94% of all land; now Israelis own 82%. These figures tell the real story.

October 7 did not occur in a vacuum. It was the result of decades long Israeli occupation, never ending violence and oppression. The pressure cooker exploded!

The US and Australian parrott on about a two state solution but we do nothing to advance it. We use it as a fig leaf to hide our support for US policies in support of Israel.

Recognizing Palestine would be a first step in a political settlement. But the Israeli government rejects it. Netanyahu boasts that he has thwarted a Palestinian State.

Instead Israel pursues occupation of more and more land, ethnic cleansing and apartheid.

Even if the military defeat of Hamas was possible it would not end Palestinian resistance. It would continue in another and stronger form.

Hamas is certainly not winning in our Washington manipulated media. But it is winning overwhelmingly in the Arab street.

Netanyahu repeatedly tells us about how Hamas is a great threat to Israel. But in recent years he has been channelling financial support to Hamas.

In 2016, Netanyahu began allowing the Qataris to send money to Gaza. Netanyahu said that money was humanitarian aid. His motive for this secret funding however has been to build Hamas as the rival to Fatah and President Abbas. Netanyahu is now hoist with his own petard. And Palestinians are paying the price with high tech Israeli killing.

A recent poll by the Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) of persons in Gaza and the West Bank should be essential reading. It reports on Hamas and other key issues;

• Support for Hamas has more than tripled in the West Bank compared to three months ago. In the Gaza Strip, support for Hamas increased but not significantly. Despite the increase in its popularity, the majority in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip does not support Hamas. It is worth noting that support for Hamas usually rises temporarily during or immediately after a war and then returns to the previous level several months after the end of the war.

• Support for President Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah party drops significantly. The same is true for the trust in the PA as a whole, as demand for its dissolution rises to nearly 60%, the highest percentage ever recorded in PSR polls. Demand for Abbas’s resignation is rising to around 90 percent, and even higher in the West Bank. Despite the decline in support for Fatah and Abbas, the most popular Palestinian figure remains Marwan Barghouti, a Fatah leader (in jail). Barghouti is still able to beat Hamas’ candidate Ismail Haniyeh or any other.

• Support for armed struggle rises ten percentage points compared to three months ago, with more than 60% saying it is the best means of ending the Israeli occupation; in the West Bank, the percentage rises further to close to 70%. Moreover, a majority in the West Bank believes that the formation of armed groups in communities subject to settler attacks is the most effective means of combating settler terrorism against towns and villages in the West Bank.

• Despite the above-mentioned reference to the lack of confidence in the seriousness of US and European talk about reviving the two-state solution and despite the increase in support for armed struggle, support for the two-state solution has not dropped in this poll. To the contrary, support for this solution has increased slightly in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. This increase seems to come especially from those who believe that the US and European talk about the two-state solution is indeed serious.

Asked about their degree of ‘satisfaction’ of various actors in the Gaza genocide the US was placed last.

so significant is this encrypted message that it is repeated

West has ‘backstabbed’ Ukraine

•December 26, 2023 • Leave a Comment

West has ‘backstabbed’ Ukraine – Lukashenko. “All your lovers have forgotten you!“

RT News • December 15, 2023

The promise of weapons to fight Russia “for as long as it takes” was false, the Belarusian president has claimed

Promises of support given by the US and its allies to nations that used to be parts of the USSR are empty, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said on Thursday, citing Ukraine as an example of trust being betrayed.

The promise of weapons to fight Russia “for as long as it takes” was false

Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky was promised arms and money to fight Russia, with Western leaders stating it would last “for as long as it takes” to prevail. The aid is now dwindling, proving that Kiev was misled by the West, Lukashenko noted, and leaving Ukraine “standing with its legs split off the road.”

He claimed he had warned Zelensky: “some turmoil will happen, or something else – and they (the US) will forget about you. And here you go.” The Belarusian leader was referring to the Middle East crisis and the dispute over domestic policies in the US derailing White House attempts to appropriate continued funding for Kiev in Congress. He added that Ukraine’s president is now “walking around hat in hand, poor man.”

“They backstabbed him, just like in Afghanistan,” Lukashenko said, predicting that Ukrainians “will be clinging to plane landing gear and falling” the way some Afghans did in 2020, when the US was pulling its troops out amid the takeover of Kabul by Taliban fighters.

The remarks were directed at the security chiefs and heads of intelligence agencies of members of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a post-Soviet intragovernmental organization, who had gathered in the Belarusian capital for a meeting. The host was making a case for regional integration, arguing that historical, cultural and economic reasons dictate the need for cooperation.

The West seeks to undermine this unity, and those who are tempted by its promises will get burned, Lukashenko argued. He was specifically addressing Armenia, which has been considering the US and the EU as potential security providers in the wake of the latest crisis in Nagorno-Karabakh. The part of Azerbaijan existed for decades as a self-proclaimed entity called ‘Artsakh’ which was tacitly allied with Yerevan, but in September, Baku reclaimed full control over the territory.

Lukashenko urged Armenia not to hastily cut ties with its fellow members of the CIS, because rifts like that are hard to mend.

“Do not split away under any circumstances, don’t leave, because [the West] will fail you. And a dispossessed nation that gets into a hard spot, a dead-end, has but one way out. It’s given a rifle and told to go to war,” he said.

Armenia was represented in Minsk by Kristinne Grigoryan, its former human rights ombudsman who was appointed the head of the newly-created foreign intelligence service in October.

Fore more, see US has funds for only one more Ukraine aid package

US Bases in Finland Will Make It Less Safe

•December 25, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US Bases in Finland Will Make Nordic Nation Less Safe: Here’s Why

Sputnik International • December 16, 2023

Finland will provide the United States with access to 15 military bases under a defense pact reached following Helsinki’s move to join NATO. Far from strengthening Finland’s security, allowing US troops to set up shop on Finnish soil could make the country and region less safe. A leading Russian security analyst explains why.

The Finnish-US Defense Cooperation Agreement, expected to be formally signed on December 18 by Finland’s cabinet, and approved by parliament after that, has been justified by Defense Minister Antti Hakkanen on the grounds that the United States should help “protect” Finland.

“Finland’s close defense cooperation with the United States dates back to the early 1990s, and the DCA would not be possible without this long history of cooperation,” Hakkanen said.

“The signature of the DCA is not the end point, but a new step towards even closer cooperation between the defense administrations of Finland and the United States. The agreement reflects the United States’ commitment to Finland’s security and it creates the conditions for cooperation in times of crisis. Finland is not alone in defending itself, but does so as a NATO ally and together with the United States,” he added.

If approved, the pact will grant US forces access to military bases and facilities across the Nordic nation, from its Baltic Sea coastlines to remote areas of the country’s interior to a major training base in Finnish Lapland crossing the Arctic Circle.

New NATO member, Finland to Give US Access to 15 Military Bases

The US would be allowed to preposition defense equipment, supplies and materiel across the country, deploy vehicles, warships and aircraft and take measures to ensure their “protection, safety, and security,” with Helsinki also waiving “its primary right to exercise criminal jurisdiction” over American troops, a waiver other countries hosting large quantities of US servicemen have come to regret.

The Kremlin has expressed alarm over the basing agreement. “It will certainly lead [to increased tensions],” presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Friday.

“We can only express regret in this regard, because we really once had excellent relations with Finland. No one threatened anyone, there were no problems or claims against one another, no one infringed on one another’s interests, there was mutual respect, and so on. Therefore, of course, now that Finland has become a member of NATO, and when NATO’s military infrastructure is going to be entering Finland, this will pose a threat to us, clearly,” Peskov said.

Finland, which shares a nearly 1,300 km long border with Russia, applied to join the US-led NATO bloc in 2022, after the Donbass crisis escalated into a full-blown NATO-Russia proxy war in Ukraine. The country completed its entry in April, bringing an end to decades of neutrality that Finland had enjoyed since the close of WWII.

Russia has so far demonstrated a sense of “restraint” in connection with Finland’s accession to NATO and the buildup of American military power in Europe, says Institute of World Economy and International relations security analyst and researcher Dmitry Stefanovich.

Nevertheless, Moscow has been forced to react to growing threats to its northern flank. “We have all heard about the creation of two new military districts, about a new division and about the strengthening of military aviation. The most important thing is that as a result of all of these processes, the architecture of mutual deterrence is changing both in the non-nuclear and nuclear dimensions,” Stefanovich told Sputnik.

“At the same time, these processes are not very fast. If the political will is there, the trends can be changed somewhat,” the observer stressed.

“That is, we can once again realize that mutual deterrence is fraught with the constant underestimation or overestimation of threats, requires a huge infusion of resources into the military sphere that could be useful in other places, and most importantly, creates conditions for escalation, including unintentional escalation, simply by virtue of very powerful armed forces saturated with various weapons being mobilized and standing opposite one another.”

In such conditions, any flashpoint could quickly turn into large-scale fighting that could prove difficult to stop, Stefanovich said.

“The alternative is the restoration, strengthening and development of security confidence-building measures in the military sphere and the normalization of work, including through the OSCE. And in the end, a transition to something vaguely reminiscent of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe,” the researcher suggested. “In any case, some kind of regional agreements are quite possible,” as are channels of communication on a military-to-military level.

Otherwise, the basing agreement will threaten to escalate already sky-high tensions between Russia, NATO and the US, this time along a new front which did not exist even during the Cold War.

China wants Vietnam’s rare earths

•December 24, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China wants role in US-Vietnam rare earths plan. For more, see Rare Earth Production: Top 5 Countries

AsiaTimes by Jeff Pao • December 16, 2023

Following the conclusion of President Xi Jinping’s Hanoi trip earlier this week, China has claimed itself to be Vietnam’s best choice for trade and diplomatic partnerships in the Asia Pacific region.

According to the US Geological Survey, Vietnam’s rare earth reserves stand at 22 million metric tons; second, compared with China’s 44 million metric tons

Perhaps, but the proof will be in the pudding. Will Vietnam directly export its rare earths, as the US hopes, or send them for processing in China? Chinese pundits want to know. They also want to know whether Hanoi will lease a military port to Washington.

On Wednesday, China and Vietnam signed 36 agreements, covering the Belt and Road Initiative, development cooperation, digital economy, green development, transportation, inspection and quarantine, defense and law enforcement and maritime cooperation. But Vietnamese media said Beijing and Hanoi have failed to reach agreements on nine other issues, including metals and rare earths mining. 

During his own trip to Hanoi in September, US President Joe Biden signed deals with Vietnam on semiconductors and rare earths. He encouraged US investment in rare earth exploration in Vietnam – which is ranked third in the world in its rare earths potential – to counter China’s world domination of the minerals.

Rare Earths

Some Chinese pundits said China will boost trade and investments with Vietnam as long as Hanoi continues to maintain a good relationship with Beijing. They said if Vietnam is going to use US investment to explore its rare earth reserves, it should consider shipping the deposits to China for refining. 

According to the US Geological Survey, Vietnam’s rare earth reserves stand at 22 million metric tons, compared with China’s 44 million metric tons. 

Rare earth deposits in Vietnam have remained largely untapped, due to the low prices that are effectively set by China, which was the largest rare-earths supplier in the world last year.

This week, Beijing said it is ready to offer grants to Vietnam to build the railway between Kunming and the Vietnamese port city of Haiphong. The railway will pass through Vietnam’s rare-earths heartland. 

“If Vietnam asks China to build a railway in its territory, it’s natural for both sides to form a rare earth partnership,” a Shanxi-based columnist says in an article published on Friday. “It will be embarrassing if China is building the railway while the US is extracting the minerals in Vietnam.”

He says the proposed construction of a Sino-Vietnam cross-border railway will make it more difficult for Vietnam and the US to form a rare earth partnership. He says, even if the US starts mining, it will have to send the minerals to China for refining. 

“The US offered to help Vietnam develop its mining industry in a bid to obtain its rare minerals, but such a move will only increase the cooperation between Vietnam and China,” Huang Xuan, a Heilongjiang-based writer, says in an article, adding that China is good at refining rare earths.

Often times fighting like cats and dogs in the past, now lips and teeth

‘The Outsiders’

The same writer praises Vietnam for maintaining a friendly relationship with China, for example, by importing Chinese raw materials and intermediate products, refusing to condemn Russia in the Ukraine war and supporting Palestine. She says Vietnam and China agree that maintaining stability in the South China Sea fulfills both countries’ interests.

Xi Jinping told Vietnamese President Vo Van Thuong on Wednesday that both China and Vietnam should be “alert to and oppose any attempts to mess up Asia Pacific.”

The Chinese Foreign Ministry had in the past said that the US and NATO were the “outsiders” who tried to mess up Asia Pacific. It had criticized the US and Philippines for strengthening their military ties after Philippine President Bongbong Marcos took office in June 2020.

“We have to admit that the encirclement deployed by the US in the South China Sea is taking shape and posing security risks and threats to China,” a writer using the pen name “Zhenjiang” says in an article published on Friday. 

“Fortunately, China has also strengthened its military power in the region over the past few decades,” he says. “If the US wants to gather its allies to cause trouble at China’s doorstep, it needs to take into consideration the naval and air power of the People’s Liberation Army.”

He says the US definitely wants to rebuild a navy base in Vietnam’s Cam Ranh Bay, an American military port during the Cold War period. He says, if this is the case, the PLA will deploy J-20 fighter jets and launch Dongfeng-21D anti-ship ballistic missiles to punish the trouble-makers.

‘Historic Significance,’ ‘new milestone’

But, getting back to the fancy words: The Chinese Foreign Ministry said Friday that Xi’s visit to Vietnam on December 12-13 is of great historic significance and marks a new milestone in the two countries’ bilateral relations.

The ministry would say that, of course, especially with a view back to Biden’s meeting with Vietnamese Communist Party General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong in Hanoi on September 10. Those two had agreed to elevate the US-Vietnam relationship to “Comprehensive Strategic Partnership” for the purposes of “peace, cooperation and sustainable development.”

Mao Ning, a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said the Vietnamese side firmly supports and will actively participate in the Belt and Road Initiative, the Global Development Initiative, the Global Security Initiative and the Global Civilization Initiative proposed by Xi.

“The Vietnamese side emphasized that China is the only country that can contribute to all the priorities of Vietnamese diplomacy and growing relations with China is the top priority and strategic choice made by Vietnam, which will not be disturbed or sabotaged by any external forces,” Mao said. “This sets a solid political foundation for building a China-Vietnam community with a shared future.”

Xi’s trip to Vietnam is aimed at telling the mainland Chinese people and the West that Beijing has still had a strong influence on its neighboring countries, Huong Le Thu, deputy director of the Asia Program at the International Crisis Group, told the United Daily News in an interview.

“Vietnamese leaders have so far managed its relations with the US and China quite well,” she said. “They understand the challenges and opportunities created during the competition between great powers, and how to make use of Vietnam’s strategic position.”

She said the question is how long Hanoi can sustain the situation. She said Vietnamese leaders need to deal with the US and China carefully as both had fought with Vietnam in the past. 

For more, see Rare Earth Production: Top 5 Countries

Rising China’s Naval Prowess

•December 23, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Rising Tides: China’s Naval Prowess Soars With Fourth Type 075 Assault Ship Launch

Sputnik International • December 16, 2023

China’s fourth Type 075 universal amphibious assault ship was launched at the Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard in Shanghai on December 14, 2023.

The launch ceremony marked the completion of the main construction, as the assault ship was moved out of the dry dock and placed on the outfitting quay for remaining work.

The new ship has not yet been officially christened, and there is no information on its completion date. Chinese authorities tend to keep details of achievements in military equipment secret until official announcements are made.

To date, the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) operates three assault ships of this class. The lead ship, the Hainan, is part of the South Sea Fleet. The first and second series ships, the Guangxi and Anhui, are in service with the East Sea Fleet.

Previous reports suggested that China would limit the series to three Type 075 all-purpose assault ships, but the addition of the fourth vessel suggests the possibility of additional units in the future.

The amphibious helicopter assault ships were developed entirely by Chinese designers. In terms of size, the assault ships are comparable to American counterparts such as the Tarawa, Wasp and America classes.

According to available information from Chinese sources, the length of Type 075 ships ranges from 235 to 250 meters with a total displacement of 36,000 tons. By comparison, American helicopter assault ships of the same class are 254 to 257 meters in length and have a total displacement of 40,000 to 46,000 tons.

The commissioning of the new ship, which will increase the PLAN’s combat power, comes amid renewed escalation of tensions in the South China Sea over maritime disputes between Vietnam and China. The US has accused both countries of violating the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), but singled out China as the major threat to other regional players.

In an effort to counter so-called “Chinese influence” the US has engaged Vietnam through trade and military deals, including a visit by a US aircraft carrier. That prompted Beijing, in turn, to accuse Washington of stoking tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea.

All recent US actions, including saling drone ships near Chinese waters and increasing military spending, are just another facet of the Pentagon’s “Pacific Deterrence Initiative” which aims to continue encircling China with US military bases and offensive weapons platforms.

With the US showing “extraordinary interest” in the South China Sea by deploying warships close to Chinese borders and stoking tensions between China and other regional players by asserting the importance of “keeping the region open to global trade,” Beijing is naturally forced to increase military spending and further improve its naval defense capabilities.

Why are US politicians afraid of GARLIC?

•December 22, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Why are US politicians afraid of Chinese GARLIC?

Fear is Washington’s go-to tool for the centralisation of power, so it gets evoked at every opportunity

RT News by Timur Fomenko December 15, 2023

Florida Senator Rick Scott was recently ridiculed online after saying that Chinese imports of garlic to the US are a “national security threat.” It may sound funny, but it is in fact common for American politicians to make such claims about any and all things coming from China – no matter how ridiculous.

There have been numerous examples, including a balloon, fridges, coffee machines, cranes, electric cars, subway cars, students, Confucius Institutes, Huawei, and TikTok. The list goes on and on. Rather than being something bizarre, it is in fact the norm for American senators amongst others to do this. In one way or another, everything from China is linked back in a malign way to a Communist Party conspiracy and there is no room for normality.

To understand why this is, one must recognise that American politics operates fundamentally on the medium of fear. The US is a massive federalist democracy with over 300 million people, living across very diverse regions and with polarised worldviews. The constitution entrenches this structure.

Once upon a time, the states held more power and autonomy than they have today. However, the civil war and its consequences produced a political trajectory which leaned towards the centralisation of executive power by various means.

This trend continued into the 20th century and the significant influences upon it were World Wars I and II, as well as the Great Depression. When facing such challenges, how do you keep your country together?

Not only by legal centralisation, as per the expansion of federal authority brought about in Roosevelt’s New Deal, but also through the evocation of fear to maintain unity and conformity in a nation which has always been, and especially today, bitterly divided.

Thus, starting with World War II and the expansion of radio and television technology, the US began to intensify its propaganda apparatus to be able to solidify support for its foreign policies.

Therefore, from the Cold War onwards, the weaponisation of fear became the primary American tool to legitimise its foreign policy objectives and enforce unity even amidst contentious debates at home.

The first notable expression of this was the McCarthyist era and the Red Scare. American officials learnt to weaponise, exaggerate and use irrational fear to enforce loyalty to the state by creating wild conspiracy theories of infiltration and subversion.

They also used this to close down the political debate and stifle dissent, with the degree of paranoia weaponised to prevent criticism, often by accusing the critic of being compromised by the adversary or inauthentic in some way.

The weaponisation of fear in this sense is deployed to manufacture consent for aggressive policies and scare the public into supporting them. For example, the most famous modern instance of fear weaponisation was the bogus claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction to justify the invasion of Iraq.

The current US foreign policy priority is Beijing, and Washington subsequently returns to using anti-Communist paranoia to discredit anything Chinese that arrives in America. Washington’s grievances with Beijing are economic and trade related, and as a result American politicians use the language of “national security threats” to evoke fear over various Chinese products they dislike.

Usually this is done by linking the product in question to spying in some absurdist way, though in the case of garlic, Senator Scott at least chose a more plausible avenue of attack, speaking about trade rules enforcement and “a severe public health concern” stemming from China’s allegedly unsanitary “growth practices.”

Whatever the specific accusation, the end goal of such fearmongering is to forcibly exclude the target product from the American market and then to convince allies to do the same. This is most notable in the treatment of Huawei’s participation in Western 5G networks.

Huawei was accused, without any substantial evidence, of being a security risk and spying on behalf of China. Per the American way, the accusation is repeated again and again, and then the establishment media serve a function of parroting that claim uncritically by conveying it as unbiased “concerns” without touching upon the true motive. It turns public opinion against the target and secures the desired foreign policy outcomes.

Calling garlic, of all things, a “national security threat” has been deservedly laughed at, therefore revealing the limitations of such hysteria-inducing tactics. Scott’s obvious real motive was to push for eliminating Chinese agricultural goods to protect American producers.

To some extent, successive presidential administrations have been doing the same, though their usual angle was “forced labour” as they attempted to weaponise human rights against goods like tomatoes or cotton from Xinjiang.

However, the sheer nonsense of Scott’s comments only serve to show how paranoia in US politics is deliberately opportunistic and rarely ever based on facts. The US sees fear as a very powerful weapon and tool of persuasion to push conformity and unity in an otherwise bitterly divided political order with a constitutionally limited central authority. And it works.

Balloon, TikTok, now Garlic, then maybe TOILET PAPER!

Leviticus (9-10)

•December 21, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Leviticus 9

1 And it came to pass on the eighth day that Moses called Aaron and his sons and the elders of Israel, — the consecration was to last seven days, during which time the persons to be consecrated were not to go away from the door of the tabernacle, and now is the eighth day.

and he said unto Aaron, “Take thee a young calf for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering, without blemish, and offer them before the Lord. 

— and Moses said unto Aaron; take thee a young calf for a sin offering; the directions in these sacred things were still given by Moses, the circumstances being extraordinary;

— and offer them before the Lord; on the altar of burnt offering, which stood in the court of the tabernacle;

And unto the children of Israel thou shalt speak, saying, ‘Take ye a kid of the goats for a sin offering, and a calf and a lamb, both of the first year, without blemish, for a burnt offering, 

— and unto the children of Israel thou shalt speak; that is, Aaron, who was now constituted high priest, was to give the orders about the sacrifices;

also a bullock and a ram for peace offerings to sacrifice before the Lord, and a meat offering mingled with oil; for today the Lord will appear unto you.’” 

— for to-day the Lord will appear unto you; that is, prepare and sanctify yourselves with these sacrifices, for the Lord is to manifest himself in an especial manner to signify his approval of the inauguration of Aaron and his family to the priesthood.

And they brought that which Moses commanded before the tabernacle of the congregation, and all the congregation drew near and stood before the Lord. 

— and all the congregation; that is, the elders who represented the people, whom Moses summoned (see Leviticus 9:1), and as many of the people as could find room assembled before the sanctuary in the court-yard to witness the newly-installed priests officiating for the first time.

And Moses said, “This is the thing which the Lord commanded that ye should do, and the glory of the Lord shall appear unto you.” 

— and the glory of the Lord shall appear unto you; the fire that should go out from him, and consume the sacrifice, which would be a demonstration of his presence with them, and of his acceptance of the sacrifice.

And Moses said unto Aaron, “Go unto the altar, and offer thy sin offering and thy burnt offering, and make an atonement for thyself and for the people; and offer the offering of the people and make an atonement for them, as the Lord commanded.” 

— and Moses said unto Aaron; though he was now the duly-installed high priest, yet he did not approach the altar till he was solemnly called upon by Moses to do it.

Aaron therefore went unto the altar and slew the calf of the sin offering, which was for himself. — and slew the calf; as the sacrificer Aaron, like every ordinary offerer, slaughtered the calf himself;

And the sons of Aaron brought the blood unto him, and he dipped his finger in the blood and put it upon the horns of the altar, and poured out the blood at the bottom of the altar; 

— and poured out the blood at the bottom of the altar; what remained after he had put what was proper on the horns of it.

10 but the fat, and the kidneys and the caul above the liver of the sin offering, he burned upon the altar, as the Lord commanded Moses.

11 And the flesh and the hide he burned with fire outside the camp. — and the flesh and the hide he burnt with fire outside the camp; with common fire, for the fire from the Lord came only upon the altar;

12 And he slew the burnt offering; and Aaron’s sons presented unto him the blood, which he sprinkled round about upon the altar. — and Aaron’s sons presented unto him the blood: which they had received into a basin, when it was slain.

13 And they presented the burnt offering unto him, with the pieces thereof and the head; and he burned them upon the altar. 

14 And he washed the inwards and the legs, and burned them upon the burnt offering on the altar.

15 And he brought the people’s offering, and took the goat, which was the sin offering for the people, and slew it and offered it for sin, as the first.

16 And he brought the burnt offering and offered it according to the ordinance.

17 And he brought the meat offering, and took a handful thereof and burned it upon the altar beside the burnt sacrifice of the morning.

18 He slew also the bullock and the ram for a sacrifice of peace offerings, which was for the people; and Aaron’s sons presented unto him the blood, which he sprinkled upon the altar round about, 

19 and the fat of the bullock and of the ram, the rump, and that which covereth the inwards, and the kidneys, and the caul above the liver. 

20 And they put the fat upon the breasts, and he burned the fat upon the altar.

21 And the breasts and the right shoulder Aaron waved for a wave offering before the Lord, as Moses commanded.

22 And Aaron lifted up his hand toward the people and blessed them, and came down from offering the sin offering and the burnt offering and peace offerings.

23 And Moses and Aaron went into the tabernacle of the congregation, and came out and blessed the people; and the glory of the Lord appeared unto all the people.

24 And there came a fire out from before the Lord and consumed upon the altar the burnt offering and the fat, which when all the people saw, they shouted and fell on their faces. 

— there came a fire out from the Lord; a flame emanating from that resplendent light that filled the holy place flashed upon the brazen altar and kindled the sacrifices;

— this miraculous fire; for the descent of which the people had probably been prepared, was a sign, not only of the acceptance of the offerings and of the establishment of Aaron’s authority, but of God’s actual residence in that chosen dwelling-place;

— which when all the people saw, they shouted, and fell on their faces; Aaron blessing them, and the appearance of the glory of God unto them, no doubt, gave themfear, mixed with joy and pleasure, as the presence of God do to his people.

And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, met their Death

Leviticus 10

1 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took each of them his censer and put fire therein, and put incense thereon and offered strange fire before the Lord, which He commanded them not. — and Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron; his two eldest sons, as seems from Exodus 6:23;

— took either of them his censer; the sin of Nadab and Abihu was of a complicated nature, and involved and consisted of several transgressions:

— (a) they each took his own censer, and not the sacred utensil of the sanctuary; (b) they both offered it together, whereas the incense was only to be offered by one; (c) they presumptuously encroached upon the functions of the high priest; for according to the Law the high priest alone burnt incense in a censer: see Leviticus 16:12-13; Numbers 17:11;

— the ordinary priests only burnt it on the golden altar in the holy place (Exodus 30:7-8), or on the brazen altar as a part of the memorial, (see Leviticus 2:2-3; Leviticus 2:16) The case of Korah and his company was an exception, since it was ordered by Moses for an especial purpose (Numbers 16:6-25); (d) they offered the incense at an unauthorised time, since it was apart from the morning and evening sacrifice;

— and offered strange fire; they filled their vessels with common fire instead of taking it from the holy fire of the altar, which was always to be used in burning incense; (Leviticus 9:24; Leviticus 16:12);

— which he commanded them not; according to a figure of speech frequently used in Hebrew, where the negative form is used for the emphatic affirmative, this phrase is better rendered, “which he had strongly forbidden them.”

And there went out fire from the Lord and devoured them, and they died before the Lord. — they died before the Lord; that is, in the court of the sanctuary (Leviticus 10:1), or from the most holy place, where the Lord dwelt between the cherubim; on the very spot where the sin was committed;

— and devoured them; not reduced them to ashes, for neither their bodies nor their clothes were burnt with this fire; and so the Targum of Jonathan says of these, “without destroying their bodies,” their bodies were not burnt:

Then Moses said unto Aaron, “This is that which the Lord spoke, saying, ‘I will be sanctified in them that come nigh Me, and before all the people I will be glorified.’” And Aaron held his peace. 

— and Aaron held his peace; he was in a stupor, as the Septuagint, quite amazed, thunderstruck, but silently submitted to the righteous judgment which bereft him of his two sons.

And Moses called Mishael and Elzaphan, the sons of Uzziel the uncle of Aaron, and said unto them, “Come near; carry your brethren from before the sanctuary out of the camp.” 

— the first cousins of Aaron Exodus 6:22 are selected by Moses to convey the bodies of Nadab and Abihu out of the camp and bury them, probably because they were the nearest relations who were not priests.

So they went near and carried them in their coats out of the camp, as Moses had said. — the Targum of Jonathan says “and carried them with hooks of iron in their garments, and buried them outside the camp;”

And Moses said unto Aaron and unto Eleazar and unto Ithamar, his sons, “Uncover not your heads, neither rend your clothes, lest ye die, and lest wrath come upon all the people; but let your brethren, the whole house of Israel, bewail the burning which the Lord hath kindled. 

— Aaron and his two surviving sons are forbidden to show the accustomed signs of mourning, or to leave the court of the tabernacle in order to attend the funeral;

— lest ye die, and lest wrath come upon all the people; so very provoking to God would be any signs of mourning in Aaron and his sons, on this account;

— but let your brethren, the whole house of Israel, bewail the burning which the Lord hath kindled: though Aaron and his sons might not mourn on this occasion, the whole body of the people might;

— the whole house of Israel, who are here designedly called “the brethren” of the bereaved, to show the depth of their sympathy, were allowed to mourn over the great calamity which had thus befallen them.

And ye shall not go out from the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die; for the anointing oil of the Lord is upon you.” And they did according to the word of Moses. 

— and ye shall not go out from the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die; that is, they were not to relinquish the service of the sanctuary, on the account of the death of these relations of theirs, and through grief for it;

And the Lord spoke unto Aaron, saying,

“Do not drink wine nor strong drink, thou, nor thy sons with thee, when ye go into the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die. It shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations, 

— do not drink wine or strong drink; this law following upon the affair of Nadab and Abihu has caused some to think, and not without some reason, that they were drunk with wine or strong drink, when they offered strange fire; 

10 that ye may put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean, — and that ye may put difference between holy and unholy; that being sober they might be able to distinguish between the one and the other; which a drunken man, having his mind and senses disturbed, is not capable of;

11 and that ye may teach the children of Israel all the statutes which the Lord hath spoken unto them by the hand of Moses.” — and that ye may teach the children of Israel all the statutes: laws, precepts, ordinances, which was the business of the priests to do;

12 And Moses spoke unto Aaron and unto Eleazar and unto Ithamar, his sons who were left: “Take the meat offering that remaineth of the offerings of the Lord made by fire, and eat it without leaven beside the altar; for it is most holy. — for it is most holy; hence it could only be eaten by the male members of the families of the priests within the court of the sanctuary;

13 And ye shall eat it in the holy place, because it is thy due and thy sons’ due of the sacrifices of the Lord made by fire; for so I am commanded. — because it is thy due, and thy sons’ due, of the offerings of the Lord made by fire;

— and not any others; neither their wives nor daughters, nor any other related to him, or whom he might invite, as in other cases, might eat of it; this none but he and his sons might eat of, and nowhere else but in the sanctuary;

14 And the wave breast and heave shoulder shall ye eat in a clean place, thou, and thy sons, and thy daughters with thee; for they are thy due and thy sons’ due, which are given out of the sacrifices of peace offerings of the children of Israel. — and the wave breast and heave shoulder; that is, of the peace offering which was offered by the nation;

— thou and thy sons, and thy daughters with thee; these were not restrained to him and his sons only, as the meat offerings, and the flesh of the sin offerings were, but were common to the whole family; and how about their wives?

15 The heave shoulder and the wave breast shall they bring with the offerings made by fire of the fat, to wave it for a wave offering before the Lord; and it shall be thine and thy sons’ with thee by a statute for ever, as the Lord hath commanded.” 

— the heave shoulder and the wave breast shall they bring; that is, the offerers who devoted these portions of the peace offering to the Lord, are to bring them to the officiating priests.

16 And Moses diligently sought the goat of the sin offering, and behold, it was burned; and he was angry with Eleazar and Ithamar, the sons of Aaron who were left alive, saying, — and Moses diligently sought the goat; that is, the flesh of the goat of the sin offering which was offered by the nation on the eighth day;

— and, behold, it was burnt, being overwhelmed with grief at the loss of their brothers, Eleazar and Ithamar could not eat, and as none but priests were allowed to partake of the flesh of the sin offering, they burnt it on the altar; they did this all the more readily since the flesh of Aaron’s sin offering was just before burnt outside the camp;

— and he was angry with Eleazar and Ithamar; when their two elder brothers were killed with lightning for doing what was not commanded, which should have made them more observant of the laws of God, to do that which was commanded them: and though they were spared, and survived their brethren;

— yet they transgressed, in burning the sin offering of the people, when they should have eaten it. Moses expressed his anger not to Aaron, but to his sons, which he did for the honour of Aaron, laying the blame not on him, who was overwhelmed with grief, but on his sons;

17 “Why have ye not eaten the sin offering in the holy place, seeing it is most holy, and God hath given it to you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord? 

— ye not eaten of the sin offering in the holy place, seeing it is most holy; the sin offering was one of the most holy things, and therefore to be eaten only in the sanctuary; though this was not the fault they are here charged with that they had eat it, but not in the holy place; for they had not eaten it at all, but burnt it;

— they are reminded of the whole law concerning it, that it was to he eaten by them, that it was to be eaten in the holy place, the reason of which is given; but they had not eaten it but burnt it;

18 Behold, the blood of it was not brought in within the holy place; ye should indeed have eaten it in the holy place, as I commanded.” 

— Moses diligently sought the goat of the sin offering, and, behold, it was burnt; in a sacrifice presented on behalf of the people, it was the duty of the priests, as typically representing them and bearing their sins, to have eaten the flesh after the blood had been sprinkled upon the altar;

— the blood of it was not brought in within the holy place; the reason was because Aaron was not yet admitted into the holy place, whither that blood should have been brought, till he had prepared the way by the sacrifices which were to be offered in the court.

19 And Aaron said unto Moses, “Behold, this day have they offered their sin offering and their burnt offering before the Lord, and such things have befallen me. And if I had eaten the sin offering today, should it have been accepted in the sight of the Lord?” 

— and such things, such calamity, have befallen me; but whilst he, Eleazar, and Ithamar were thus duly performing the sacrificial rites, Nadab and Abihu, his other two sons, transgressed, and were suddenly struck down dead, thus overwhelming the survivors with sorrow, and rendering them unfit to partake of the sacrifices;

— and if I had eaten the sin offering today, should it have been accepted in the sight of the Lord? Aaron being a mourner; the high priest may offer, being a mourner, but not eat; but today, he might eat with rejoicing and thanksgiving as appears from Deuternomy 12:7, 26:14; so should this be accepted?

20 And when Moses heard that, he was content. — and when Moses heard that, he was content; he said no more, he did not proceed in blaming Aaron nor his sons, but was satisfied with the answer received.

Putin exposed China’s leakage to US

•December 20, 2023 • Leave a Comment

In a sign of self-cleansing among Beijing’s top ranks, foreign policy and defense officials are vanishing as Xi roots out perceived enemies. Without rid of ruthless purging and self-cleansing, a country could be subjected to CIA’s strong arm of twistings and other turnarounds.

Second, why did China Suddenly Support a UN Resolution Acknowledging ‘Russian Aggression Against Ukraine’? Why a sudden turnaround? Was China subject to a blackmail? Now for one such turnaround, see a constructed example from the Philippines.

In China’s case, Putin started by exposing Foreign Minister Qin Gang for leaking military secrets to the US. And soon 70 others, mainly from the ‘Rocket Force’ were purged.

Asia Sentinel • December 14, 2023 // Pearls and Irritations

The Chinese government’s investigation of China’s Rocket Force, which includes the country’s long-range nuclear missiles capable of hitting the US, has netted at least 70 people. While corruption is one problem plaguing the rocket force, another motive for this widening investigation is suspicion that generals in the rocket force leaked China’s missile secrets to the US.

When Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Russian President Vladimir Putin in March, Putin disclosed to Xi that former Chinese foreign minister Qin Gang played a role in the leak of China’s missile secrets to the US, Asia Sentinel learned from several sources. Qin was sacked as foreign minister on July 25, Asia Sentinel reported.

He was last seen on June 25, while Lieutenant General Li Yuchao, then commander of China’s rocket force, was arrested around the same time, which strengthened suspicions that Qin was connected to the investigation of the rocket force, as Asia Sentinel reported on July 30.

“So far, we have been able to track down around 70 individuals who have been taken away within the larger frame of the Rocket Force investigation. As of yet, we believe, considering that procurement, and logistics are also involved, it is still too early to inquire about the results of the ongoing crackdown,” an analyst for Cercius Group, a Canadian geopolitical consulting firm, told Asia Sentinel.

The Chinese government takes its investigation of the rocket force very seriously, said the Cercius analyst. The rocket force will be the most needed force in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) should the Chinese government decide to attack Taiwan, he explained.

“Hence, it is of critical importance that the rocket force be reviewed and be ready for combat and the Chinese government needs to assess the political loyalty of the commanding chain to make sure orders are followed in times of crisis. Second, the rocket force is also in charge of stratospheric weaponry development.”

“Furthermore, corruption within the PLA’s procurement and development structure has severely impacted weapon and equipment quality and the viability of existing supply chains: rectifying this issue is of critical importance not only for Xi, but for the PLA at large, as functioning equipment is necessary for combat readiness. However, remedying these matters will no doubt take a long time, further delaying any kind of military action against Taiwan,” the analyst said.

“We are not only talking about embezzling funds or getting kickbacks from military-linked SOEs (state-owned enterprises), but also lowered quality-control standards, resulting in subpar quality weapons and military equipment being purchased and possibly used by the PLA – which includes the Rocket Force,” the analyst added.

Since China’s missile secrets have fallen into Washington’s hands, it will cost trillions of yuan (hundreds of billions of dollars) for the Chinese government to reconfigure its missile system, another analyst said. This huge amount of money could have been spent on improving the Chinese people’s livelihood, said the analyst who declined to be named.

On October 24, Xi personally gave an order to remove Qin as state councilor, a post in the Chinese government equivalent to minister, and dismiss Li Shangfu as defense minister and state councilor, Asia Sentinel reported on October 26. Li has been detained by the authorities, who need to interrogate him on contracts and suppliers in order for the PLA to review its stockpile of missiles and high-tech weaponry prior to engaging in any military action, the Cercius analyst explained.

Was former foreign minister Qin Gang executed?

Two sources told Asia Sentinel that Qin was executed a few months ago, but we have been unable to verify this. In addition to these two sources, a professor believes Qin is either executed or serving a life sentence in prison.

“We may never see old Qin and his lovely girlfriend again. Sad. They will serve at least life in prison,” a professor said.

Fu Xiaotian, a female reporter with Phoenix TV, a Chinese state-owned broadcaster, is believed to have had an affair with Qin in the US. In April, one month after Putin told Xi that Qin was involved in the leak of China’s missile secrets, Fu flew to mainland China in April ostensibly to attend a meeting and was never heard from again, a source said.

Fu’s last post on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform, was on April 11. She had made several Weibo posts that hinted Qin, a married man, had fathered a baby with her. These posts were broadcast in July around the time of Qin’s dismissal as foreign minister, despite the Chinese government’s heavy censorship of Weibo. This has aroused suspicion among some that the posts are a red herring designed to distract people from the main reason for Qin’s downfall.

“The leakage of state secrets seems the most probable reason they are serving life in prison or worse. In China, the punishment for treason is death,” said the professor who declined to be named. Although he has no evidence that Qin was executed, this outcome or life in prison was likely according to his analysis.

Normally, after a senior official is taken down for corruption in China, the Chinese government would announce details of his crimes but to date, the Chinese authorities have made no public announcement of the reasons for Li’s dismissal as defense minister and Qin as foreign minister, the professor pointed out.

“There has been no precedent for a senior official such as Qin or general Li Shangfu disappearing for so long without official explanation. Just via logical elimination, treason via leakage of state secrets to the US seems the only plausible reason left,” the professor said.

It is doubtful that Qin is dead, the Cercius analyst said.

“There is simply no valid reason for the party to sit on this information of Qin’s death for four to five months, while still playing the administrative game of removing him from positions twice during official meetings. And lest we forget, Qin, to this day, is still a member of the Central Committee,” the analyst explained.

The Central Committee consists of the 205 most senior Chinese government officials and is vested with the power to elect top Chinese officials.

“Following this logic, why publicize Li Keqiang’s death so soon? Why not wait as well?” the Cercius analyst argued.

Li Keqiang, a former Chinese prime minister, died of a heart attack after swimming in a pool in Shanghai on October 27, state media reported on the same day. The 68-year-old Li was accorded a funeral and obituary with high honors.

Qin Gang and Li Shangfu taking oaths as Foreign and Defence minister

Qin has been under detention for several months, which is far shorter than some individuals who have been taken down by the Chinese anti-graft agency years ago and still have not been completely processed by China’s judicial system, the Cercius analyst pointed out. “Are we to assume that they have been executed? We do not think so.”

The analyst raised the possibility that rumors of Qin’s execution might be a propaganda ploy by anti-Xi forces within Beijing to undermine the Chinese president.

“Competing factions have been known to mobilize foreign news outlets to spread rumors to push their agenda or undermine someone else’s,” said the analyst.

For more, see the evidence of a constructed turnaround of the Philippines.

NATO wants Asia

•December 19, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Not content with expanding its membership from the original 12 to 31 nations, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation is making a grab for a presence in the Asia Pacific as well.

Pearls and Irritations by Alison Broinowski • December 16, 2023

From 1949, NATO’s commitment to defend any member if attacked (Article 5) applied only to the North American and European mainlands and territories north of the Tropic of Cancer, as well as modern Turkiye and ‘French Algeria’.

Now, those boundaries (Article 6) are being treated as merely semantic, and the designation ‘NATO Partner’ has been amended so that Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand can join an ‘Individual Tailored Partnership Plan.’ It looks like a prep school for joining NATO.

The Philippines and Taiwan, and perhaps India, are awaiting an invitation

Finland became the latest NATO member this year, and Sweden’s membership depends on Turkiye and Hungary joining the consensus. President Erdogan’s price is F16s from the US, while President Orban claims the delay is merely technical.

NATO’s decades-long expansion across Europe led to Russia’s eventual invasion of Ukraine. But NATO, having promised Ukraine eventual membership, still dangles that prize before President Zelensky, delaying it so that Article 5 does not apply to having to defend it.

For years, the neon sign advertising membership of NATO has flicked on and off in Australia and Japan. In July 2022 it lit up again when for the first time, leaders of the ‘AP4’ – Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea – went to the NATO summit in Madrid.

The then Director-General of ASIO, Duncan Lewis, told the ABC that NATO ‘realises that nothing is far distant any more – that its interests are invoked on the other side of the world’. That suggests China is in NATO’s sights as its next enemy. At the meeting, China was identified as ‘a new strategic concept’ for NATO.

In July this year, the AP4 again attended the NATO summit in Vilnius, but France opposed opening a NATO liaison office in Japan, and NATO’S China Strategic Concept was not prominent in discussion. That however hasn’t resolved Korean concerns that a prospective ‘Asian NATO’ will involve joint war operations against China.

The South Korea–NATO agreement already stresses interoperability, technological cooperation, and developing ‘defence and security capabilities.’. South Korean commentator Hae-won Jun complained that the people and their political representatives had not been consulted about what was being planned.

The South Korean National Assembly is obliged to approve or reject all treaties related to security, international organizations and relations, restrictions on sovereignty, the dispatch of armed forces, and the stationing of foreign forces.

South Koreans are particularly sensitive about any provocation of their northern neighbours, or efforts to align Seoul militarily with Tokyo. The conservative, pro-US government in Japan, meanwhile, wants to ‘normalise’ its military forces and its capacity to go to war.

US brings South Korea and Japan together in a landmark Camp David summit

Seeking to build an anti-China coalition, in August 2023 President Biden hosted the Japanese Prime Minister and the South Korean President at Camp David to encourage Japanese-South Korean reconciliation. The meeting produced a commitment to consult in the event of security contingencies. It read like a collective defence treaty.

After the summit however, US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan denied that the trilateral security pledge represented a ‘new NATO for the Pacific.’ He was well aware that any such alliance would not attract non-aligned Southeast Asian nations, and its provocation of China would not be welcomed by those, including the AP4, which seek to maintain important trade relationships with Beijing.

Michael Green, who heads the US Studies Centre in Sydney, concluded that although China’s show of strength requires a regional alliance for the first time in seven decades, there’s no certainty about a full-fledged anti-China alliance. Yet he thought a collective security bloc suddenly looked more plausible, warning ‘Never Say Never to an Asian NATO.’

Both Korea and Japan have recently signed military cooperation agreements with Australia that might mean steps towards joining an Asian NATO. Prime Minister Albanese and Defence Minister Marles have agreed to a long succession of measures, from embedded intelligence, export controls, and technology dominance, to influential investments favouring the US and UK, as Mike Scrafton has pointed out here. (Australians need to know what lies beneath the new era of US-Australia strategic cooperation – Pearls and Irritations. 7 December 2023).

Joe Biden wants Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand in NATO

Aligning Australian and American regulatory frameworks could ‘surrender any sovereignty capability’ according to Bill Greenwalt, the former US Under Secretary for Defense and an expert on America’s defence procurement laws.

Dr Greenwalt told the ABC that in cooperating with the US, Australia will surrender to control by the US bureaucracy. Australia is left only to hope ‘that the US will remove process barriers that will allow the US to essentially steal and control Australian technology faster’.

Meanwhile, New Zealand hesitates over both AUKUS and NATO. A serious proposition for doing away with the nation’s armed forces altogether was raised in a recent book by New Zealanders Joseph Llewellyn and Richard Jackson, Abolishing the Military.

Australians might consider it before we get dragged into a war alongside our new NATO allies against our major trading partner. So should the Australian government. They ought then to transparently explain their plans for our national sovereignty to the Australian people and their elected representatives.

China’s first Thorium Reactor

•December 18, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China has built the world’s first waterless reactor, which generates electricity in the desert and is extremely safe. Construction is due to start near Wuwei in China’s northern Gansu Province next year with full operation expected in 2030. 

iMedia News • December 12, 2023 ~ ABC

Regarding the construction of nuclear power plants, there is a global consensus that it must be close to the water source. Because nuclear power plants generate a lot of heat energy during operation, they need water for cooling.

Therefore, the northwest desert area has never been linked to nuclear power. But the emergence of anhydrous nuclear reactors fueled by liquid thorium instead of uranium has changed this situation.

Construction is due to start near Wuwei in China’s northern Gansu Province in 2025 with full operation expected in 2030

This kind of water-free nuclear reactor is called molten salt reactor (usually abbreviated as MSR). Unlike conventional nuclear power plants driven by solid fuel rods, its coolant and fuel are molten salt mixed. This concept has actually existed since the 1940s.

It was proposed by Alvin Weinberg, the proponent of the pressurized water reactor concept, who was also the first director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in the United States. It is envisaged that the system uses graphite as a moderator to wrap molten salt, stimulate a chain reaction to generate heat, and then produce steam to power the turbine to generate electricity.

Because molten salt can reach more than 1000 degrees under atmospheric pressure and remain liquid, the system can operate at low pressure, which can reduce mechanical stress and improve safety.

And because only when the fuel is wrapped in graphite, the chain reaction can occur. Therefore, when the reactor temperature rises and the liquid expands to a certain level, the fuel will stop because of insufficient density and difficulty in maintaining the chain reaction.

And when the temperature of the liquid is too high, a special plug at the bottom of the reactor will melt, allowing the liquid to fall into the emergency dumping tank.

Even if the fuel leaks out of the circuit in some way, it will quickly cool and solidify because it cannot maintain the high temperature, and capture the radioactive material inside. The low level of thorium also means that there is less risk of nuclear proliferation.

More importantly, a typical molten salt reactor requires only about 1,000 kilograms of salt fuel for every 1 gigawatt of electricity generated each year. A traditional solid fuel nuclear reactor requires about 250 tons of enriched uranium to obtain the same energy, and most of the waste must be stored for more than 100,000 years before it can be safely released back to the earth’s environment.

On the contrary, the radioactive waste produced by molten salt reactors can be safely released after only 300 years of storage. In addition, in theory, molten salt reactors can also use waste from other nuclear reactors as a fuel source.

The waste generated in a normal reactor year can make the molten salt reactor last about 250 years. This makes them a relatively safer alternative to traditional nuclear power. However, due to technical problems, the United States has never been able to build a molten salt reactor nuclear power plant.

At first, in the few years after the concept of molten salt reactor was proposed, the main research direction of the technology in the United States was always focused on aircraft reactor tests, aiming to achieve the high power density of nuclear reactors that can be used as nuclear-powered bomber engines.

However, after studying the suitability of small nuclear power plants and bombers, and the radiation indicators of the onboard personnel of the chain reaction device based on nuclear fission, it was found that humans are not suitable for long-term flight of this type of aircraft.

The abandoned Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA, built in the 60s

Then in the 1960s, the United States built a facility to test the power generation capacity of the technology, and countries such as France, the former Soviet Union, and Japan also launched similar projects.

However, these early projects all failed because they could not solve the problems of pipeline rupture caused by radioactive molten salt corrosion. Since then, all research on molten salt reactors has almost stalled. Until recent years, more and more countries began to restart molten salt reactor projects.

In addition to the United States, Russia and European countries, even Japan, even India and Indonesia have also participated. In 2011, China approved the construction of a Thorium Molten Salt Reactor (TMSR) prototype in Wuwei, a desert city in Gansu Province.

At the same time, teams of researchers from all over the country have also been mobilized to try to solve the technical problems that previously hindered other countries. For example, the development of an alloy that can withstand the radiation of thorium salt at temperatures close to 1,000 degrees Celsius.

According to the official plan, the [Chinese] reactor in the west will be combined with wind and solar power plants to provide a clean and stable power supply for the densely populated eastern region. Moreover, this technology can also provide new energy sources for aircraft carriers and submarines.

Although the project was slightly delayed due to the epidemic last year, the construction of TMSR is still proceeding steadily and is expected to be completed in August, and the equipment trial operation may begin as early as September.

Although the prototype can only generate 2 megawatts of energy, if it succeeds, this will be the first time the theory has been put into practice. Moreover, in the design, future commercial reactors will be able to generate up to 100 megawatts of electricity. Although not as large as uranium reactors, they are still sufficient to provide electricity for a modern residential area with 100,000 households.

A Thorium Molten Salt Reactor (TMSR) in Wuwei, a desert city in Gansu Province

The most important thing is that thorium is widely distributed in the earth’s crust and is usually associated with rare earth metals. The world has proven reserves of several million tons, which is a promising energy material. And with the increasing exploration of thorium ore in various countries, the proven reserves of thorium are also increasing.

China’s thorium resources are even more abundant. According to incomplete statistics, more than 20 provinces and regions have found a considerable amount of thorium resources.

According to data from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2005, the reserves of thorium in the Baiyun Obo mining area in Inner Mongolia are about 220,000 tons, accounting for 77.3% of the 286,000 tons of thorium reserves in the country. Enough to meet China’s energy needs for at least 20,000 years.

In contrast, China’s uranium reserves are the lowest among all nuclear-capable countries. The shortage of uranium will pose a serious threat to China’s energy security, which is not only related to the sustained and stable economic development, but also related to the national economy, people’s livelihood and national security.

Therefore, molten salt reactors not only represent the progress of China’s nuclear energy technology, but also a moat in the field of China’s energy security.

China’s Xi goes full Stalin with purge

•December 17, 2023 • Leave a Comment

In a sign of self-cleansing among Beijing’s top ranks, foreign policy and defense officials are vanishing as Xi roots out perceived enemies. Without rid of ruthless purging and self-cleansing, a country could be subjected to CIA’s strong arm of twistings and other turnarounds.

Second, why did China Suddenly Support a UN Resolution Acknowledging ‘Russian Aggression Against Ukraine’? Why a sudden turnaround? Was China subject to a blackmail? Now for one such turnaround, see a constructed example from the Philippines.

In China’s case, Putin started by exposing Foreign Minister Qin Gang for leaking military secrets to the US. And soon 70 others, mainly from the ‘Rocket Force’ were purged.

POLITICO • December 6, 2023

Something is rotten in the imperial court of Chairman Xi Jinping. 

After a brief stint as a vice foreign minister, Qin was named ambassador to Washington in July 2021 and foreign minister barely 18 months later — a uniquely rapid rise, but soon followed by another rapid purge!

While the world is distracted by war in the Middle East and Ukraine, a Stalin-like purge is sweeping through China’s ultra-secretive political system, with profound implications for the global economy and even the prospects for peace in the region.

The signals emanating from Beijing are unmistakable, even as China’s security services have ramped up repression to totalitarian levels, making it almost impossible to know what is really happening inside the country.

The unexplained disappearance and removal of China’s foreign and defense ministers — both Xi loyalists who were handpicked and elevated mere months before they went missing earlier this year — are just two examples.

Other high-profile victims include the generals in charge of China’s nuclear weapons program and some of the most senior officials overseeing the Chinese financial sector. Several of these former Xi acolytes have apparently died in custody.

Another ominous sign is the untimely death of Li Keqiang, China’s recently retired prime minister — No. 2 in the Communist hierarchy — who supposedly died of a heart attack in a swimming pool in Shanghai in late October, despite enjoying some of the world’s best medical care. Following his death, Xi ordered public mourning for his former rival be heavily curtailed. 

In the minds of many in China, “heart attack in a swimming pool” has the same connotation that “falling out of a window” does for Russian apparatchiks who anger or offend Vladimir Putin.

Since his reign began in 2012, Xi Jinping’s endless purges have removed millions of officials — from top-ranked Communist Party “tigers” down to lowly bureaucratic “flies,” to use Xi’s evocative terminology.

What’s different today is that the officials being neutralized are not members of hostile political factions but loyalists from the inner ring of Xi’s own clique, leading to serious questions over the regime’s stability.

With such a febrile atmosphere in the celestial capital of Beijing, there are fears that an isolated and paranoid Chairman Xi could miscalculate, provoke armed conflict with one of its weaker neighbors or even launch a full-scale invasion of democratic Taiwan in order to distract from his domestic troubles.

Enemies everywhere, so says POLITICO Europe, but self-cleansing in CHINA

Enemies everywhere

The political earthquakes rippling out from the old imperial leadership compound of Zhongnanhai are exacerbating the already dire state of the Chinese economy.

“We see a China domestically that is challenged; an aging society, demography, a severe housing crisis, slowing down growth, unexpected unemployment because the young generation leaving university does not find adequate jobs in the private sector anymore,”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who heads to Beijing this week with her European Council counterpart Charles Michel for the first face-to-face EU-China meeting in nearly five years, told POLITICO last week, “So quite some challenges domestically.”

Chinese financiers and businesspeople (quietly) complain they are required to spend countless hours studying “Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era” — a painfully turgid governing mantra that boils down to ideology-free totalitarian rule and the return of a personality cult to China. 

In recent weeks, the country’s leading investment bank banned negative macroeconomic or market commentary, as well as any behavior that could suggest its bankers lead “hedonistic lifestyles.”

Not long after he ascended to chairmanship of the Communist Party in 2012, Xi began purging his real and perceived enemies in an “anti-corruption” campaign that never really ended.

Hundreds of senior officers in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), as well as thousands of top Party officials, have been arrested, disappeared or “suicided” (driven to commit suicide or killed in circumstances made to look like suicide).

The beneficiaries of this perennial purge have been provincial bureaucrats who worked with Xi earlier in his career and whose main qualification is unquestioning loyalty to the “people’s leader.”

Small town boys

These former small-town officials now make up the majority of the Standing Committee of the Politburo, which wields ultimate power in China.

One such loyal figure was Qin Gang, a former spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry whose career went stratospheric after he became China’s chief protocol officer, overseeing most of Chairman Xi’s interactions with foreign dignitaries between 2014 and 2018. 

After a brief stint as a vice foreign minister, Qin was named ambassador to Washington in July 2021 and foreign minister barely 18 months later — a uniquely rapid rise that Chinese officialdom attributed to his proximity and personal favor with the “core leader.”

On June 25 this year, barely six months after becoming minister, Qin held meetings in Beijing with the foreign ministers of Sri Lanka and Vietnam, as well as Deputy Russian Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko.

Then he vanished. 

According to several people with access to high-level Chinese officials, Rudenko’s real mission in Beijing was to inform Xi that his foreign minister and several top officers in the PLA had been compromised by western intelligence agencies.

Following his disappearance, lurid tales emerged of Qin’s affair with a reporter for Chinese broadcaster Phoenix TV called Fu Xiaotian, with whom he allegedly fathered a son who is a US citizen. The stories circulated widely online with the apparent consent of Chinese cyber censors.

Fu attended Cambridge University, a traditional recruiting ground for Britain’s intelligence agencies, and first met Qin more than a decade ago when he was posted to the Chinese Embassy in London. 

In 2016, Churchill College, Fu’s alma mater at Cambridge, named a garden after her in gratitude for her “very rare … series of generous gifts,” reportedly adding up to at least £250,000, an enormous sum for most journalists.

Fu Xiaotian Garden at Churchill College, Fu’s alma mater at Cambridge

Before the foreign minister disappeared, Fu all but named Qin as the father of her child on social media. 

Then, in April, she flew back to Beijing on what appears to have been a government-chartered private jet and has not been heard from since.

China’s propaganda system is strongly hinting that the affair and illegitimate American child are the reasons for Qin’s purge. 

Rocket men

According to several people with access to top officials, the real reason for his abrupt disappearance was Qin’s involvement in a much more serious scandal, involving the defense minister and the generals who commanded China’s “rocket force,” which oversees the country’s nuclear weapons program.

At almost the same time Qin went missing, the top commander of the rocket force, Li Yuchao, along with his deputy Liu Guangbin and former deputy Zhang Zhenzhong, all also disappeared.

Several other senior serving and former officers from the force were likewise detained and at least one former deputy commander died of unspecified illness, according to state media reports.

The missing commanders were eventually formally fired and replaced by officers from the navy and airforce, a very rare development since top commanders of the rocket force have almost always been promoted from within the service.

Li Shangfu, the man Xi picked as China’s defense minister, now purged

Not long after the rocket force purge was officially acknowledged, Li Shangfu, the man Xi picked as China’s defense minister in March this year, also vanished. His formal dismissal was announced in late October.

Further adding to the intrigue was a terse state media report on the day before Qin was formally removed as foreign minister in July. It said Wang Shaojun, commander since 2015 of the Central Guard unit that protects China’s top leaders and oversees Chairman Xi’s personal bodyguard, had died three months earlier due to “ineffective medical treatment.” 

China’s nuclear weapons program has massively expanded in recent years and, according to people with access to top Chinese officials, Russian Deputy Minister Rudenko’s message to Xi included allegations that Qin and relatives of top rocket force officers had helped pass Chinese nuclear secrets to Western intelligence agencies.

Two of these people claim that Qin died, either from suicide or torture, in late July in the military hospital in Beijing that treats China’s top leaders.

Hostile forces

Given the opacity of the Chinese system, it is impossible to confirm these accounts definitively and the Chinese government does not comment on the inner workings of the Communist Party. 

Senior Western intelligence officials declined to comment or discuss the matter when asked about the purges in China. 

But the sensational nature of the claims themselves make clear the feverish paranoia permeating Beijing.

Whether by accident or design, that mood was exacerbated over the summer when Director of the US Central Intelligence Agency Bill Burns said the CIA had “made progress” rebuilding its network within China and had a “strong human intelligence capability” in the country.

Director of the US CIA Bill Burns revealed that the CIA had “made progress” rebuilding its network within China, Washington Post, July 20, 2023

That paranoia extends into all parts of the bureaucracy and economy and seems to have tarnished anyone seen as too Westernized or too close to “hostile Western forces.”

One senior Chinese finance official who speaks fluent English and is a regular fixture on the international conference circuit told POLITICO by email that he could no longer attend an upcoming event outside China and was unable to speak on the phone.

He joins dozens of senior finance officials who have been removed in recent months, often after being accused of corruption.

An associate of this official said he was currently being investigated for being “too close to America” and “possibly a spy.”

This seems to be the inevitable fate of anyone who engages too eagerly with foreigners and should serve as a warning to those who still believe China is open for business with the West.

For more, see the evidence of a constructed turnaround of the Philippines.

Leviticus (7-8)

•December 17, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Leviticus 7

1 “‘Likewise this is the law of the trespass offering (it is most holy): — it is most holy; wholly devoted for sacred use, either to the Lord, or to his priests; there were some things call light holy things, and others most holy in the highest degree, of this sort was the trespass offering.

In the place where they kill the burnt offering shall they kill the trespass offering; and the blood thereof shall he sprinkle round about upon the altar. 

— and the blood thereof shall he sprinkle round about upon the altar; on the upper part of it. There was a scarlet thread that was drawn around the altar in the middle, the blood of some of the sacrifices was sprinkled below it; and some above it, as was the blood of the trespass offering.

And he shall offer from it all the fat thereof: the rump, and the fat that covereth the inwards, — the fat portions only were to be burned upon the altar, viz., the same as in the sin and peace-offerings; but the flesh was to be eaten by the priests, as in the sin-offering.

and the two kidneys and the fat that is on them which is by the flanks, and the caul that is above the liver, with the kidneys; it shall he take away. — with the kidneys, it shall he take away; all the fat before mentioned, together with the kidneys, were to be taken away from the ram of the trespass offering, and burnt;

And the priest shall burn them upon the altar for an offering made by fire unto the Lord: it is a trespass offering. — and the priest shall burn; these fat pieces he shall burn, as in the case of the sin offering and peace offering.

Every male among the priests shall eat thereof. It shall be eaten in the holy place; it is most holy. — every male among the priests shall eat thereof; of the flesh of it, after the fat was taken off and burnt, the rest belonged to the priests and their sons, and to them only, leaving their wives and daughters bewildered;

As the sin offering is, so is the trespass offering; there is one law for them: the priest who maketh atonement therewith shall have it. — the priest that maketh atonement therewith shall have it; who by offering it made atonement for the trespass of the person that brings it;

And the priest who offereth any man’s burnt offering, even the priest shall have to himself the skin of the burnt offering which he hath offered. — the priest shall have to himself the skin; as the skin was the only part not consumed by the fire, in the case of the burnt offering, it fell to the share of the officiating priest.

And all the meat offering that is baked in the oven, and all that is dressed in the frying pan and in the pan, shall be the priest’s who offereth it. — shall be the priest’s; with the exception of the memorial part, which was burnt upon the altar;

10 And every meat offering mingled with oil, or dry, shall all the sons of Aaron have, one as much as another. — shall all the sons of Aaron have; that is, whether with or without oil, the remainder of this kind of raw offering is to be equally shared by all the priests.

11 “‘And this is the law of the sacrifice of peace offerings which he shall offer unto the Lord: — the Peace-Offering may be brought for three reasons: a. for thanksgiving (Leviticus 7:12), to commemorate deliverance from sickness or danger; b. iIn fulfilment of a vow (Leviticus 7:16); c. as a freewill offering (Leviticus 7:16) when the heart is moved by the remembrance of God’s kindness and mercies.

12 If he offer it for a thanksgiving, then he shall offer with the sacrifice of thanksgiving unleavened cakes mingled with oil, and unleavened wafers anointed with oil, and cakes mingled with oil of fine flour, fried. 

13 Besides the cakes, he shall offer for his offering leavened bread with the sacrifice of thanksgiving of his peace offerings.

14 And of it he shall offer one out of the whole oblation for a heave offering unto the Lord, and it shall be the priest’s who sprinkleth the blood of the peace offerings. — and it shall be the priest’s that sprinkleth the blood of the peace offerings; that is, that part of the cakes and bread, which is offered as an heave offering to the Lord, was the portion of the priests;

15 And the flesh of the sacrifice of his peace offerings for thanksgiving shall be eaten the same day that it is offered; he shall not leave any of it until the morning. — shall be eaten the same day that it is offered; partly by him that brought them; and what about his family? Wives and daughters?

16 But if the sacrifice of his offering be a vow or a voluntary offering, it shall be eaten the same day that he offereth his sacrifice; and on the morrow also the remainder of it shall be eaten. — and on the morrow also the remainder of it shall be eaten; some of it, if thought fit, might be kept till the day after the sacrifice, but no longer.

17 But the remainder of the flesh of the sacrifice on the third day shall be burned with fire. — shall be burnt with fire; that it might neither corrupt, nor be put to superstitious uses, nor be of any profit in any respect;

18 And if any of the flesh of the sacrifice of his peace offerings is eaten at all on the third day, it shall not be accepted, neither shall it be imputed unto him that offereth it; it shall be an abomination, and the soul that eateth of it shall bear his iniquity. 

— it shall be an abomination; to God, the flesh being kept so long, through a sordid and stubborn disposition: and the soul that eateth of it shall bear his iniquity; it shall not be forgiven him; he shall bear the punishment of it.

19 “‘And the flesh that toucheth any unclean thing shall not be eaten; it shall be burned with fire; and as for the flesh, all who are clean shall eat thereof. — and the flesh that toucheth any unclean thing shall not be eaten; that is, the flesh of the peace offerings;

20 But the soul that eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings that pertain unto the Lord, having his uncleanness upon him, even that soul shall be cut off from his people. — even that soul shall be cut off from his people; be disfranchised as an Israelite, be debarred the privileges of the sanctuary, or be cut off by death before the usual time and term of man’s life;

21 Moreover the soul that shall touch any unclean thing, as the uncleanness of man or any unclean beast or any abominable unclean thing, and eat of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings which pertain unto the Lord, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.’”

22 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

23 “Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘Ye shall eat no manner of fat, of ox or of sheep or of goat. —of ox, or of sheep, or of goats: creatures used in sacrifice; though this is not to be restrained to such of them, and the fat of them that were sacrificed, whose fat was claimed by the Lord as his, and was burnt on his altar;

24 And the fat of the beast that dieth of itself and the fat of that which is torn by beasts may be used in any other use, but ye shall in no wise eat of it. — and the fat of the beast that dieth of itself; of any disease, and is not regularly killed: and the fat of that which is torn with beasts;

25 For whosoever eateth the fat of the beast of which men offer an offering made by fire unto the Lord, even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people. — even the soul that eateth it shall be cut off from his people; if he did it presumptuously he incurred the penalty of excision;

26 Moreover ye shall eat no manner of blood in any of your dwellings, whether it be of fowl or of beast.

27 Whatsoever soul it be that eateth any manner of blood, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.’”

28 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

29 “Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘He that offereth the sacrifice of his peace offerings unto the Lord shall bring his oblation unto the Lord from the sacrifice of his peace offerings.

30 His own hands shall bring the offerings of the Lord made by fire; the fat with the breast it shall he bring, that the breast may be waved as a wave offering before the Lord. — his own hands shall bring; this act the owner himself was to perform, and it was not to be deputed to any one else.

31 And the priest shall burn the fat upon the altar, but the breast shall be Aaron’s and his sons’. — but the breast shall be Aaron’s and his sons; which being waved before the Lord for a wave offering, was the Lord’s, and so was given to his priests to eat of, for the service done by them;

32 And the right shoulder shall ye give unto the priest for a heave offering of the sacrifices of your peace offerings. — and the right shoulder shall ye give unto the priest for an heave offering; whether of an ox or a cow, a lamb or a goat.

33 He among the sons of Aaron who offereth the blood of the peace offerings and the fat, shall have the right shoulder for his part. — shall have the right shoulder for his part; that the right shoulder was given to him that sprinkled the blood, and the breast to all the priests;

34 For the wave breast and the heave shoulder have I taken from the children of Israel from the sacrifices of their peace offerings, and have given them unto Aaron the priest and unto his sons by a statute for ever, from among the children of Israel.’”

35 This is the portion of the anointing of Aaron and of the anointing of his sons out of the offerings to the Lord made by fire, on the day when he presented them to minister unto the Lord in the priest’s office, — this is the portion of the anointing of Aaron; of his being anointed to the priestly office.

36 which the Lord commanded to be given them by the children of Israel on the day that He anointed them, by a statute for ever throughout their generations. — in the day that he anointed them; or from the day they were anointed of Moses, by the direction of the Lord;

37 This is the law of the burnt offering, of the meat offering, and of the sin offering, and of the trespass offering, and of the consecrations, and of the sacrifice of the peace offerings, 

38 which the Lord commanded Moses on Mount Sinai on the day that He commanded the children of Israel to offer their oblations unto the Lord in the Wilderness of Sinai.

Leviticus 8

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Take Aaron and his sons with him, and the garments, and the anointing oil, and a bullock for the sin offering, and two rams, and a basket of unleavened bread; 

and gather thou all the congregation together unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.”

And Moses did as the Lord commanded him, and the assembly was gathered together unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

And Moses said unto the congregation: “This is the thing which the Lord commanded to be done.”

And Moses brought Aaron and his sons, and washed them with water. — and washed them with water; to show that they should be clean that bear the vessels of the Lord, and offer the sacrifices of the people;

And he put upon him the coat, and girded him with the girdle, and clothed him with the robe, and put the ephod upon him, and he girded him with the woven girdle of the ephod, and bound it unto him therewith.

And he put the breastplate upon him. Also he put in the breastplate the Urim and the Thummim. — also he put in the breastplate the Urim and Thummim: that is, Moses did it, as all the rest;

And he put the miter upon his head. Also upon the miter, even upon the front thereof, did he put the golden plate, the holy crown, as the Lord commanded Moses.

10 And Moses took the anointing oil and anointed the tabernacle and all that was therein, and sanctified them. — and sanctified them; that is, by this action Moses separated them from the laity, and dedicated them to the service of God, so that they were not to come in contact with any defilement.

11 And he sprinkled thereof upon the altar seven times, and anointed the altar and all his vessels, both the laver and his foot, to sanctify them.

12 And he poured of the anointing oil upon Aaron’s head and anointed him, to sanctify him.

13 And Moses brought Aaron’s sons and put coats upon them, and girded them with girdles, and put headdresses upon them, as the Lord commanded Moses. — and Moses brought Aaron’s sons; having consecrated the father as high priest, Moses now invests Aaron’s four sons, Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, with the visible signs of the priestly office by robing them in the sacerdotal garments.

14 And he brought the bullock for the sin offering; and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin offering. — and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin offering; their right hands, according to the Targum of Jonathan;

15 And he slew it; and Moses took the blood, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about with his finger and purified the altar, and poured the blood at the bottom of the altar and sanctified it, to make reconciliation upon it. — and he slew it; in ordinary cases the offerer himself slaughtered the victim but in the case Moses performed this act.

16 And he took all the fat that was upon the inwards, and the caul above the liver, and the two kidneys, and their fat, and Moses burned it upon the altar. — and Moses took all the acts here;

17 But the bullock and his hide, his flesh, and his dung he burned with fire outside the camp, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

18 And he brought the ram for the burnt offering; and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the ram. — and Moses acting like the officiating priest;

19 And he killed it; and Moses sprinkled the blood upon the altar round about.

20 And he cut the ram into pieces; and Moses burned the head and the pieces and the fat. — and Moses burnt the head, and the pieces, and the fat; even all of it, as the following verse shows.

21 And he washed the inwards and the legs in water; and Moses burned the whole ram upon the altar. It was a burnt sacrifice for a sweet savor, and an offering made by fire unto the Lord, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

22 And he brought the other ram, the ram of consecration; and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the ram. — and he brought the other ram; that is, the second of the two rams mentioned in Leviticus 8:2.

23 And he slew it; and Moses took of the blood of it and put it upon the tip of Aaron’s right ear and upon the thumb of his right hand and upon the great toe of his right foot. 

24 And he brought Aaron’s sons, and Moses put of the blood upon the tip of their right ear and upon the thumbs of their right hands and upon the great toes of their right feet; and Moses sprinkled the blood upon the altar round about. 

25 And he took the fat, and the rump, and all the fat that was upon the inwards, and the caul above the liver, and the two kidneys and their fat, and the right shoulder; 

26 and out of the basket of unleavened bread that was before the Lord he took one unleavened cake and a cake of oiled bread and one wafer, and put them on the fat and upon the right shoulder. 

27 And he put all upon Aaron’s hands and upon his sons’ hands, and waved them for a wave offering before the Lord. 

28 And Moses took them from their hands and burned them on the altar upon the burnt offering. They were consecrations for a sweet savor; it is an offering made by fire unto the Lord. — they were consecrated for a sweet savour; acceptable to the Lord, and so the priests, Aaron and his sons likewise, on whose account they were made.

29 And Moses took the breast and waved it for a wave offering before the Lord; for of the ram of consecration, it was Moses’ part, as the Lord commanded Moses. — for the ram of consecration it was Moses’s part; the breast of it was also his;

30 And Moses took of the anointing oil and of the blood which was upon the altar, and sprinkled it upon Aaron and upon his garments, and upon his sons and upon his sons’ garments with him, and sanctified Aaron and his garments, and his sons and his sons’ garments with him. — and Moses was acting like the officiating priest; —

31 And Moses said unto Aaron and to his sons, “Boil the flesh at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and there eat it with the bread that is in the basket of consecrations, as I commanded, saying, ‘Aaron and his sons shall eat it.’ — ‘Aaron and his sons shall eat it’ because this is holy: no layman or non-priest could partake of the meal;

32 And that which remaineth of the flesh and of the bread shall ye burn with fire. — ye, that is, Aaron and his sons;

33 And ye shall not go out of the door of the tabernacle of the congregation for seven days, until the days of your consecration are at an end; for seven days shall He consecrate you. — and ye shall not go out of the door of the tabernacle; that is, Aaron and his sons are not to go out of the court, as the consecration was not performed within but at the entrance of the tent of meeting.

34 As He hath done this day, so the Lord hath commanded to do, to make an atonement for you. — to make an atonement for you, of the day of atonement; and say, that the high priest was obliged to be separate (from his own house and family) seven days; 

35 Therefore shall ye abide at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation day and night seven days, and keep the charge of the Lord, that ye die not; for so I am commanded.” — during the seven days of their consecration; and the penalty being death in case of failure, was to make them more careful and cautious of transgressing; and which was the more necessary;

— for so I am commanded; that is, to declare unto them, that if they did not punctually observe the above orders, they must expect to die.

36 So Aaron and his sons did all things which the Lord commanded by the hand of Moses. — after all these preliminaries, they had still to undergo a week’s probation in the court of the tabernacle before they obtained permission to enter into the interior of the sacred building for their official duties.

US CHIPS Act hurting its Asian Allies

•December 16, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US CHIPS Act hurting its Asian partners

CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act aim to contain China but are also undermining Japan, South Korea and Taiwan’s growth and innovation

AsiaTimes by Samuel Hardwick • December 12, 2023

Though geared mainly at domestic outcomes, the rise of industrial policy in the United States is affecting global supply chains, especially in Asia. 

In trying to hollow out China, Joe Biden’s CHIPS Act is hurting its Asian Allies

To the extent that they boost investment in the green transition, these policies are globally valuable. Yet they also contain discriminatory measures that harm Asian economies and, arguably, the United States itself. 

One searing assessment comes from South Korea’s Hankyoreh newspaper:

“The US is morphing from a guardian of free trade into a disrupter … despite being the leader of today’s international trade order, [it] is perfectly willing to dispense with those principles when they no longer seem to serve its national interest.” 

These comments refer to two controversial laws: the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the CHIPS and Science Act. The IRA offers upwards of US$360 billion in incentives, primarily tax credits, focused on electrification and green industries. These include extensive local content provisions. 

For example, to obtain a $7,500 electric vehicle (EV) credit, the EV and most of its battery components must be assembled in North America. Critical minerals in the battery must also be largely sourced or refined domestically or from FTA partners.  

While the policies aim to draw economic activity and supply chains away from China, they have mixed impacts on other Asia Pacific economies, such as Australia, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. 

Australia, a critical mineral mining powerhouse and US FTA partner, is well-positioned to take advantage of the package, especially in minerals with battery and EV applications. But the picture is more complex for globally integrated Australian firms. 

Worldwide minerals production and processing often involves China and other nations without US FTAs, excluding them from IRA subsidies. Large capital requirements and long lead times to develop new mines and processing plants also limit the US policies’ influence. 

Japan and South Korea occupy a different place in the EV value chain. Both are major players in anode and cathode materials, behind only China. All three countries are net exporters of batteries and EVs. When the IRA was announced, Japan lacked a qualifying trade agreement with the United States. 

This raised concerns about the law’s impact on Japanese EV component supply. In response, the United States negotiated a critical minerals agreement with Japan, enabling Japanese firms to benefit from the IRA. 

Japan also instigated its own legislation and policy for green transformation, which includes government financial support for decarbonization largely via green hydrogen initiatives. 

Given the scheme’s requirement that final assembly take place in North America, EV tax credits also caused tensions with South Korea. The Biden administration partly allayed concerns by outlining a second track of credits for leased vehicles, which omits requirements on country of origin.

This second track will partially offset some of the IRA’s trade-diverting effects.  

For globally integrated South Korean EV and battery firms, which source raw materials from countries without qualifying agreements with the United States, uncertainty remains. Like some global Australian firms, the extent to which these manufacturers will be eligible for IRA benefits — and the long-term effects on the country’s minerals, battery and EV industries — remains unclear. 

For Taiwan, the CHIPS Act, a division of the much larger CHIPS and Science Act, is perhaps more relevant than the IRA. The CHIPS Act allocates $52.7 billion to boost US semiconductor manufacturing. Most of this expenditure is for fabrication facilities, with $11 billion for chip research and development (R&D). 

There are limits to how much semiconductor, battery or EV production can be shifted to the United States from East Asia, due to divergent costs of labor, land, regulatory compliance and construction. Construction costs for US manufacturing plants alone are estimated to be “four to five times greater” than in Taiwan. 

CHIPS Act subsidies are still smaller than reported Taiwanese, South Korean and Chinese support programs. Even IRA-scale financial incentives are insufficient to reorient supply chains in which China, or any country, has overwhelming advantages. Subsidies shift decisions at the margins, but some facilities will remain too expensive or the lead times too long to set up domestically. 

There is also emerging evidence of skilled labor shortages in key US states associated with semiconductor manufacturing, which might have impacts on adjacent sectors, labor costs and the ability to deliver on CHIPS Act and IRA policy goals. 

Many aspects of these US efforts have merit, not least the significant investment in R&D and infrastructure to address the climate crisis. The trouble with policies like the IRA and CHIPS Act is the cost and risk that come with preferences for domestic tradeable goods over cheaper or superior foreign equivalents.  

For the United States, these preferences are not optimal for achieving the core objectives of bolstering national security and fighting climate change, especially over the longer term. Achieving these objectives will become even costlier if other countries launch similar provisions.

For the rest of the world, the US policies are another step away from its leadership of a functional multilateral trading system. While this system could be indispensable in building a greener global economy, in a more inward-looking world, the most effective technology and know-how for reducing emissions will take longer to spread. 

There are better ways to achieve US goals. But with a potential second Trump presidency looming, are these politically realistic? The value of US industrial policies depends on how we view their flaws – as strategic blunders or unfortunate but necessary compromises. 

West’s ‘500-year dominance’ ending – Lavrov

•December 15, 2023 • Leave a Comment

West’s ‘500-year dominance’ ending – Lavrov

RT News • December 11, 2023

The formation of a multipolar world is the objective course of history, the Russian foreign minister said

The 500-year-long dominance of the West is coming to an end, being replaced by “a new polycentric world,” Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, said Sunday in a video address to the Doha Forum.

The minister expressed regret that certain “circumstances” prevented him from coming to the Qatari capital in person and hearing the discussions at the annual high-profile event.

“But I assume that you were discussing the multipolar world, which is emerging after 500 years of domination of what we call the ‘collective West,’” Lavrov said.

This hegemony of the US and its allies had been “based on a diverse history, including ruthless exploitation of peoples and territories of other countries,” he said.

According to the minister, the West suggested that it could use the model of globalization, which it had been building for centuries, to maintain its dominance. 

“However, other countries, using exactly the principles and instruments of the Western globalization, managed to beat the West on its own turf, building the economies on the basis of national sovereignty, on the basis of balance of interests with other countries.”

New centers of economic growth and political influence have been emerging, “changing the balance of power in the world, and not to the West’s liking,” he said.

“In order to suppress this kind of development,” the US and its allies have in recent years “sacrificed” globalization in favor of the so-called ‘rules-based world order,’ Lavrov continued.

“The rules were never published, were never even announced by anyone to anyone, and they are being applied depending on what exactly the West needs at a particular moment of modern history,” he added.

The FM said that such an approach is most seen “in various conflicts, which the West ignites all over the world,” including the one in Ukraine. “Everything goes to keep the hegemony. Intervention in domestic affairs, sanctions against all the principles of competition, regime change, and of course direct military interventions, like we have seen in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere.”

“Is there a single place where the US intervened with military force, where life has become better? I think you know the answer,” Lavrov told the forum participants.

According to the diplomat, new formats like BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, ASEAN, African Union, and others will become “the bricks of the new polycentric world.”

READ MORE: Middle East royal calls for end to Western ‘dominance’

It should be recognized, including by those in the West, that “the objective course of history… is the evolution of a multipolar world,” Lavrov insisted.

Leviticus (5-6)

•December 15, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Note the Five types of Offerings in Leviticus:

Leviticus 1:2 “Speak unto the children of Israel and say unto them: ‘If any man of you bring an offering unto the Lord

Leviticus 1:3 ‘If his offering be a burnt sacrifice
Leviticus 2:1 ‘And when any will offer a meat offering
Leviticus 3:1 ‘And if his oblation be a sacrifice of peace offering
Leviticus 4:3 ‘If the priest … a young bullock … for a sin offering
Leviticus 5:6 ‘And he shall bring his trespass offering

Compare to the Five types of Offerings during the Millennium in Ezekiel:

Ezekiel 46:12 ‘Now when the prince prepares a voluntary burnt offering, or peace offerings unto the Lord
Ezekiel 44:29 ‘They shall eat the meat offering and the sin offering and the trespass offering

Leviticus 5

1 “‘And if a soul sin and hear the voice of swearing, and is a witness, whether he hath seen or known of it, if he does not utter it, then he shall bear his iniquity. — swearing; the case appears to be that of one who has been put upon his oath as a witness by a magistrate, and fails to utter all he has seen and heard;

Or if a soul touch any unclean thing, whether it be a carcass of an unclean beast, or a carcass of unclean cattle, or the carcass of unclean creeping things, and if it be hidden from him, he also shall be unclean and guilty. — of unclean cattle; cattle are normally clean; became unclean perhaps by being worshipped as an idols by any of the heathens;

Or if he touch the uncleanness of man, whatsoever uncleanness it be, that a man shall be defiled thereby, and it be hid from him, when he knoweth of it, then he shall be guilty. — if he touch the uncleanness of man; the dead body of a man, or the bone of a dead body, or a grave, or any profluvious person:

Or if a soul swear, pronouncing with his lips to do evil or to do good, whatsoever it be that a man shall pronounce with an oath, and it be hid from him, when he knoweth of it, then he shall be guilty in one of these.

— if a soul swear; a rash oath, without duly considering the nature and consequences of the oath, perhaps inconsiderately binding himself to do anything wrong, or neglecting to perform a vow to do something good. In all such cases a person might have transgressed one of the commandments unwittingly, and have been afterwards brought to a sense of his delinquency.

And it shall be, when he shall be guilty in one of these things, that he shall confess that he hath sinned in that thing; — it shall be, when he shall be guilty; that he shall confess that he hath sinned in that thing; make a voluntary acknowledgment of his sin from his own conscience, and before it come to the knowledge of the world. 

and he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord for his sin which he hath sinned, a female from the flock, a lamb or a kid of the goats for a sin offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for him concerning his sin.

— he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord for his sins which he hath sinned; a trespass offering differed from a sin offering in the following respects: that it was appointed for persons who had either done evil unwittingly, or were in doubt as to their own criminality;

— MSG

3 “Or if you touch human uncleanness, any sort of ritually contaminating uncleanness, and you’re not aware of it at the time, but later you realize it and you’re guilty;

4 “Or if you impulsively swear to do something, whether good or bad—some rash oath that just pops out—and you aren’t aware of what you’ve done at the time, but later you come to realize it and you’re guilty in any of these cases;

5-6 “When you are guilty, immediately confess the sin that you’ve committed and bring as your penalty to God for the sin you have committed a female lamb or goat from the flock for an Absolution-Offering.

“In this way, the priest will make atonement for your sin.

“‘And if he is not able to bring a lamb, then he shall bring for his trespass, which he hath committed, two turtledoves or two young pigeons unto the Lord: one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering.

— one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering; one of the turtle doves or pigeons, whichsoever were brought, was offered up as a sin offering, and the other that remained was offered up as a burnt offering;

— so that the poor man had two sorts of offerings out of what he brought, when the rich had but one; and may indicate the completeness of his sacrifice, and the full atonement made by it.

And he shall bring them unto the priest, who shall offer that which is for the sin offering first, and wring off his head from his neck, but shall not divide it asunder.

And he shall sprinkle of the blood of the sin offering upon the side of the altar, and the rest of the blood shall be wrung out at the bottom of the altar: it is a sin offering.

— and he shall sprinkle; here again there is a striking difference between the ritual in the sacrifice and that in the case of the sin offering described in the previous chapters; the blood is simply to be thrown on the walls of the altar, whilst in the ordinary sin offering, the priest had not only to dip his finger seven times in the blood of the sacrifice, but had to put it on the horns of the altar;

10 And he shall offer the second for a burnt offering according to the ordinance; and the priest shall make an atonement for him for his sin which he hath sinned, and it shall be forgiven him. — a trespass offering differed from a sin offering in that it was appointed for persons who had either done evil unwittingly, or were in doubt as to their own criminality;

11 “‘But if he is not able to bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons, then he that sinned shall bring for his offering a tenth part of an ephah of fine flour for a sin offering. He shall put no oil upon it, neither shall he put any frankincense thereon, for it is a sin offering.

— the trespass offering appointed in such cases was a female lamb or kid; if unable to make such an offering, he might bring a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons; the one to be offered for a sin offering, the other for a burnt offering; or if even that was beyond his ability, the law would be satisfied with the tenth part of an ephah of fine flour without oil or frankincense.

12 Then shall he bring it to the priest and the priest shall take his handful of it, even a memorial thereof, and burn it on the altar according to the offerings made by fire unto the Lord: it is a sin offering.

13 And the priest shall make an atonement for him for his sin that he hath sinned in one of these, and it shall be forgiven him; and the remnant shall be the priest’s as a meat offering.’”

14 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

15 “If a soul commit a trespass and sin through ignorance in the holy things of the Lord, then he shall bring for his trespass unto the Lord a ram without blemish out of the flocks, with thy valuation in shekels of silver according to the shekel of the sanctuary, for a trespass offering. — and sin through ignorance; if at the time of its committal he did not know that it was a transgression;

16 And he shall make amends for the harm that he hath done in the holy thing, and shall add a fifth part thereto and give it unto the priest; and the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering, and it shall be forgiven him.

— and shall add the fifth part thereto; besides paying the principal, the fifth part of the value of the holy property thus restored is to be added to the original amount; for example, if he has had profited to the value of four shekels, now he should pay five shekels; for the fifth of the shekels they add the fifth part to the four shekels;

17 “And if a soul sin, and commit any of these things which are forbidden to be done by the commandments of the Lord, though he knew it not, yet is he guilty and shall bear his iniquity. — yet he is guilty, and shall bear the iniquity; be chargeable with guilt, and is liable to punishment, and must make an atonement and satisfaction for it;

18 And he shall bring a ram without blemish out of the flock, according to thy valuation for a trespass offering unto the priest; and the priest shall make an atonement for him concerning his ignorance wherein he erred and knew it not, and it shall be forgiven him.

— in the case of the trespass-offering, the animal sacrificed was usually a ram, this fact alone clearly distinguishes the trespass-offerings from the sin-offerings, for which all kinds of sacrifices were offered from an ox to a pigeon;

19 It is a trespass offering; he hath certainly trespassed against the Lord.” — it is a trespass offering; that is, though the prescribed fifth part is here dispensed with, it is still a trespass offering, for his conscience tells him that he has trespassed against the Lord.

Leviticus 6

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“If a soul sin and commit a trespass against the Lord by lying unto his neighbor about that which was delivered to him to keep, or in dealings, or in a thing taken away by violence, or hath deceived his neighbor,

— or in a thing taken away by violence: without the will and knowledge of the owner; privately and secretly, but being suspected, is challenged with it, and denying it, is made to swear, which he does falsely;

or has found that which was lost and lieth concerning it, and sweareth falsely — in any of all these that a man doeth, sinning therein, — in any of all these that a man doeth, sinning therein; by unfaithfulness in a trust, cheating, defrauding, lying, and false swearing.

then it shall be, because he hath sinned and is guilty, that he shall restore that which he took violently away, or the thing which he hath deceitfully gotten, or that which was delivered him to keep, or the lost thing which he found, — or the thing which he hath deceitfully gotten; by outwitting him, by extortion, by false accusation, or detention of wages;

or all that about which he hath sworn falsely. He shall even restore the principal thereof, and shall add a fifth part more thereto, and give it unto him to whom it appertaineth, on the day of his trespassoffering.

And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, a ram without blemish out of the flock, according to thy valuation, for a trespass offering, unto the priest. — he shall even restore it in the principal; whatsoever he has embezzled, or cheated another of, or detained from the right owner, the whole of that was to be restored: and shall add the fifth part more thereto; to the principal;

And the priest shall make an atonement for him before the Lord; and it shall be forgiven him for any thing of all that he hath done in trespassing therein.” — and the priest shall make an atonement for him before the Lord; by offering the ram he brought, by which a typical, for atonement to be presented before the Lord;

And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Command Aaron and his sons, saying, ‘This is the law of the burnt offering: It is the burnt offering because of the burning upon the altar all night unto the morning, and the fire of the altar shall be burning in it. — command Aaron and his sons; having instructed the people concerning the sacrifices to be brought by them, Moses now proceeds, at God’s command, to direct the priests respecting several parts of their official services;

— better, “This, the burnt-offering, shall be upon the fire on the altar all night unto the morning,” the meaning is, the evening burnt-offering was to be so managed and laid on piece after piece, so that the fire might be constantly maintained by it; that the morning burnt-offerings were to be kept burning all the day from morning to night also;

10 And the priest shall put on his linen garment, and his linen breeches shall he put upon his flesh, and take up the ashes which the fire hath consumed with the burnt offering on the altar; and he shall put them beside the altar.

— he shall put them beside the altar; during the second Temple, a priest was appointed by lot to take off from the altar every morning at least a shovelful of ashes and carry it outside the camp, and when the ashes accumulated they were entirely removed to the same place.

11 And he shall take off his garments and put on other garments, and carry forth the ashes outside the camp unto a clean place.

— and he shall put off his garments; that is, the priest shall change the sacred robes in which he ministered at the altar; for other garments, though less holy, were not common, since the removing of the ashes was still a sacerdotal function.

12 And the fire upon the altar shall be burning in it; it shall not be put out. And the priest shall burn wood on it every morning and lay the burnt offering in order upon it; and he shall burn thereon the fat of the peace offerings. — the wood for the burnt-offering of the morning is kindled from the fire which has been kept in all night.

13 The fire shall ever be burning upon the altar; it shall never go out. — the fire shall ever be burning; this fire, which first came down from heaven (Leviticus 9:24), was to be continually fed with fuel especially provided by the congregation, and with the daily burnt offerings.

14 “‘And this is the law of the meat offering: The sons of Aaron shall offer it before the Lord, before the altar. — the sons of Aaron shall offer it; though in the chapter before us it literally means Aaron’s sons, the phrase is intended to comprise his lineal descendants who succeeded to the priestly office.

15 And he shall take from it his handful of the flour of the meat offering, and of the oil thereof and all the frankincense which is upon the meat offering, and shall burn it upon the altar for a sweet savor, even the memorial of it unto the Lord.

16 And the remainder thereof shall Aaron and his sons eat. With unleavened bread shall it be eaten in the holy place; in the court of the tabernacle of the congregation they shall eat it. — the males only might eat these, because they were most holy things; whereas the daughters of Aaron might eat other holy things, Numbers 18:11.

17 It shall not be baked with leaven. I have given it unto them for their portion of My offerings made by fire; it is most holy, as is the sin offering and as the trespass offering.

— be regarded as “most holy” and the way in which it was prepared was: on any meat offerings being presented, the priest carried them to the altar, and taking a handful from each of them as an oblation, he salted and burnt it on the altar; the residue became the property of the priests;

18 All the males among the children of Aaron shall eat of it. It shall be a statute for ever in your generations concerning the offerings of the Lord made by fire. Every one who toucheth them shall be holy.’” — every one that toucheth them shall be holy; that is; the meaning is that any one who touches the sacrifices of the first order of holiness must be a descendant of Aaron and a male;

19 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

20 “This is the offering of Aaron and of his sons, which they shall offer unto the Lord in the day when he is anointed: a tenth part of an ephah of fine flour for a perpetual meat offering, half of it in the morning and half thereof at night.

— in the day when he is anointed; that is, when he is anointed or when his anointing ceremony is completed, and he entered upon the duties of his office;

21 In a pan it shall be made with oil; and when it is baked thou shalt bring it in, and the baked pieces of the meat offering shalt thou offer for a sweet savor unto the Lord. —

as a new law, with a special formula, and is inserted here in its proper place in the sacrificial instructions given for the priests, as it would have been altogether out of place among the general laws for the laity.

22 And the priest from among his sons, who is anointed in his stead, shall offer it. It is a statute for ever unto the Lord; it shall be wholly burned.

— and the priest of his sons; that is, any one of his descendants who succeeds to the high priesthood is to do the same in all times to come, since it is a statute to last as long as the priesthood continues;

— it shall be wholly burnt; unlike the ordinary meat offerings brought by the laity, which, with the exception of a handful, was the perquisite of the officiating priest (Leviticus 2:2-3), the high priest could not eat of this because he presented it himself, since it would be unseemly both to offer it to God and at the same time eat it himself; nor was an ordinary priest allowed to eat it, because he was subordinate in rank to the officiating high priest.

23 For every meat offering for the priest shall be wholly burned; it shall not be eaten.” — it shall not be eaten; no part of it shall be eaten by the priest, as it was when the offering was for the people;

24 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

25 “Speak unto Aaron and to his sons, saying, ‘This is the law of the sin offering: In the place where the burnt offering is killed shall the sin offering be killed before the Lord; it is most holy. — it is most holy; sacred to the Lord, offered up to him, and accepted by him, and typical of the most pure and holy sacrifice and an offering for sin, in the room and stead of his people.

26 The priest who offereth it for sin shall eat it; in the holy place shall it be eaten, in the court of the tabernacle of the congregation. — the priest that offereth it for sin shall eat it; thereby signifying that he bore the sin of the person that brought the offering, and made atonement for it;

27 Whatsoever shall touch the flesh thereof shall be holy; and when there is sprinkled of the blood thereof upon any garment, thou shalt wash that whereon it was sprinkled in the holy place.

— whatsoever shall touch the flesh thereof shall be holy; none but holy persons, such as were devoted to holy services, even the priests and their sons, might touch and eat of the flesh of the sin offering;

28 But the earthen vessel wherein it is boiled shall be broken; and if it is boiled in a brazen pot, it shall be both scoured and rinsed in water.

— all that did so were sacred persons; and even what were the earthen vessel used in preparing and eating it, dishes and knives, were to be put to no other use, not to any common service, or for anything but holy things;

29 All the males among the priests shall eat thereof; it is most holy. — all the males among the priests; ot only did the officiating priest, whose perquisite the flesh of the sin offering became, and his male children, partake of it, and he could invite any other priests and their sons to the meal; but leaving their daughters a bit bewildered.

30 And no sin offering, from which any of the blood is brought into the tabernacle of the congregation for reconcilement thereby in the holy place, shall be eaten: it shall be burned in the fire. — it shall be burnt in the fire; none was to be eaten.

US F-16 Crashes near China

•December 14, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US F-16 Crashes In Yellow Sea after some mysterious “In-Flight Emergency” following another mysterious F-35 crash in South Carolina in September, 2023.

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • December 11, 2023 // Yahoo News

A US General Dynamics F-16 fighter jet crashed in the Yellow Sea near South Korea’s southwestern coast on Monday, as reported by officials from the US Air Force.

The pilot managed to eject safely and was unharmed. This incident has stoked concerns about the safety of US military aircraft, especially in light of last month’s Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey crash that killed eight US airmen. 

US F-16 Crashes In Yellow Sea after an unknown “In-Flight Emergency”

Kunsan Air Base, located in Gunsan, South Korea, released a statement that said the F-16 pilot is “awake and in stable condition.” He was rescued by the Republic of Korea Maritime Forces. [About 45 F-16 aircraft are stationed at the base. It is one of two major Air Force installations operated by the United States Forces Korea, the other being Osan Air Base]

USAF officials said the F-16 experienced “an in-flight emergency over the Yellow Sea” early Monday morning at approximately 8:43 am local time. 

“We are grateful for the safe recovery of our Airman by our ROK Allies and that the pilot is in good condition,” said Col Matthew C Gaetke, 8th FW commander. 

Would the US retire their well-armed F-16 along with all their V-22 Osprey?

The US military base at Gunsan airport is about 180km (110m) south of Seoul and has approximately 2,800 air force members, army soldiers and other officials at the installation.

It comes as North Korea on Monday criticised South Korea and the US for “walking on the path of confrontation and war” by staging joint military drills, according to Pyongyang’s official Rodong Sinmun newspaper.

It called the joint drills “futile” provocative acts that will only hasten the South Korea’s destruction and slammed Seoul for “recklessly” running amok to stage a war in the peninsula.

Last month’s crash of the Osprey off Yakushima, a southwestern Japanese island, which resulted in the death of eight airmen, remains fresh in everyone’s minds. 

Following that, the Pentagon issued an order to ground all V-22 tiltrotor aircraft late last week. This decision was made after a preliminary investigation into the crash found a potential mechanical problem.

South American Gangs Target Mansions In Detroit

•December 13, 2023 • Leave a Comment

South American Gangs Target Dozens of up-market Mansions In Detroit

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • December 10, 2023 // The Patriot Light

Violent crime is quickly spreading to suburbia. A new report shows gangs from South America have targeted mansions in wealthy neighborhoods across the Detroit metro area. This comes as the Biden administration’s disastrous open border policies have flooded the country with millions of illegal migrants, as well as progressive cities fail to enforce ‘common sense’ law and order. 

Are more of these South Americans breakins to come?

WXYZ Detroit reported at least 30 to 40 homes in upscale neighborhoods across Detroit have been targeted by “highly functional and well-trained” gangs from South America this fall.

Thieves are using high-tech “jammers” to disable WiFi home security systems. They’re primarily after cash, jewelry, and expensive handbags. 

Last week, Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard said thieves are part of “transnational gangs” operating across the country and are targeting multi-million dollar homes. 

In recent months, we have shared an emerging theme of thieves across the country targeting wealthy households:

This disturbing trend comes as illegal migrant encounters by the Customs and Border Protection on the southern border hit a record high.

South American Gangs Target Dozens of up-market Mansions in Detroit

President Biden’s disastrous open southern border has flooded the country with 9 million illegals since he took office. Also, Democrat lawmakers, some of whom are Soros-backed, fail to enforce common sense law and order, transforming some metros into lawless, crime-ridden hellholes. 

Democrats are turning this nation into a third-world-like state – and now criminals, emboldened by failed progressive policies, have the rich in their crosshairs in suburbia. 

The only advice for law-abiding Americans who want to defend their families and homes in suburbia, where the average police could be upwards of ten minutes or more, is to get proper firearms training from a professional. 

Leviticus (3-4)

•December 13, 2023 • Leave a Comment
~~ Peace and Burnt Offerings ~~

Leviticus 3

1 “‘And if his oblation be a sacrifice of peace offering, if he offer it of the herd, whether it be a male or female, he shall offer it without blemish before the Lord. — a sacrifice of peace offering; the peace offering consisted of two kinds, the peace offering from the herd (Leviticus 3:1-5), and the peace offering from the flock (Leviticus 3:6-15);

— as in the case of the burnt offering (Leviticus 1:3), the ox is mentioned first, because it is most costly and more important; whether it be a male; whilst in the case of the burnt offering (Leviticus 1:3; Leviticus 1:10) only the male was allowed, there is no distinction of sex here, nor is there any limitation of age. All that was required was that it should be without any defect;

— they were called peace-offering, because in them God and his people did, as it were, feast together to ireflect prosperity and happiness generally, in token of friendship. The peace-offerings were offered by way of supplication; and “thank-offering” is sometimes used as another class of peace-offering.

And he shall lay his hand upon the head of his offering, and kill it at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation; and Aaron’s sons the priests shall sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about. — not on the north side of the altar, where the burnt-offering was killed, as also the sin-offering, and the trespass-offering, but in the very entrance of the court where the brazen altar stood;

— and Aaron’s sons the priests shall sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about; in like manner as the blood of the burnt offering was;

And he shall offer from the sacrifice of the peace offering an offering made by fire unto the Lord: the fat that covereth the inwards and all the fat that is upon the inwards,

and the two kidneys and the fat that is on them which is by the flanks, and the caul above the liver, with the kidneys — it shall he take away. 

And Aaron’s sons shall burn it on the altar upon the burnt sacrifice, which is upon the wood that is on the fire: it is an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord. 

— and Aaron’s sons; after the offerer has killed the victim, taken out the choice parts and offered them to the officiating priest, the latter shall burn it, that is, the whole collection of the fat pieces described in Leviticus 3:3-4, upon the ashes of the continual burnt offering, which was the daily offering of the lamb.

“‘And if his offering for a sacrifice of peace offering unto the Lord be of the flock, male or female, he shall offer it without blemish. — of the flock; that is, of sheep or goats; they might be either male or female, provided only that they were without any defect; to give to God means to give the best.

If he offer a lamb for his offering, then shall he offer it before the Lord. — if he offer a lamb for his offering; which was of the flock, it must be of the first year; this is a principle that whereever this word is used in the law, it signifies one of the first year;

And he shall lay his hand upon the head of his offering and kill it before the tabernacle of the congregation; and Aaron’s sons shall sprinkle the blood thereof round about upon the altar. — and he, the man that brought the offering, shall lay his hand upon the head of the lamb;

And he shall offer from the sacrifice of the peace offering an offering made by fire unto the Lord; the fat thereof and the whole rump, it shall he take off hard by the backbone: and the fat that covereth the inwards and all the fat that is upon the inwards,

10 and the two kidneys and the fat that is upon them which is by the flanks, and the caul above the liver, with the kidneys — it shall he take away. — as in verse 4 above, livers and kidneys are always taken away; but why?

11 And the priest shall burn it upon the altar: it is the food of the offering made by fire unto the Lord. 

12 “‘And if his offering be a goat, then he shall offer it before the Lord. — and if his offering be a goat; the directions about the goat as a peace offering are the same as those about an ox.

13 And he shall lay his hand upon the head of it and kill it before the tabernacle of the congregation; and the sons of Aaron shall sprinkle the blood thereof upon the altar round about. 

14 And he shall offer thereof his offering, even an offering made by fire unto the Lord: the fat that covereth the inwards and all the fat that is upon the inwards, 

15 and the two kidneys and the fat that is upon them which is by the flanks, and the caul above the liver, with the kidneys — it shall he take away. — as in verse 4 and 10 above, livers and kidneys are always taken away; but why? Maybe they were considered as delicacies, and God wants them to be returned so that the families of the offerers could enjoy in the celebration?

16 And the priest shall burn them upon the altar: it is the food of the offering made by fire for a sweet savor; all the fat is the Lord’S. 

17 It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood.’” — that is, the law not to eat the fat or blood of sheep or goats, is to be binding upon the Israelites throughout all their future generations, and is applicable to any place wherever they may dwell.—

‘If a soul shall sin through ignorance against any of the commandments

Leviticus 4

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘If a soul shall sin through ignorance against any of the commandments of the Lord concerning things which ought not to be done, and shall do against any of them, — if a soul sin through ignorance; the next kind of sacrifices appointed were for the expiation of particular sins, and are therefore called sin-offerings; the first sort of these were for sins of ignorance.

— and shall do against any of them; it must be something done, and not merely said: hence the Jews say, that as the neglect of circumcision, and of the Passover, does not come under this exemption, because they ought to know;

— but what about if a man eats the fat that is above the kidneys, thinking it is the fat that is above the heart; or that lies with a woman forbidden by the law, thinking her to be his wife; or that commits idolatry, by bowing to the idol, thinking that the law only forbids sacrifice, incense, and libation, but not bowing; or that profanes the Sabbath, thinking it is still before evening on Friday.

if the priest who is anointed shall sin, bringing the sin upon the people, then let him bring for his sin which he hath sinned a young bullock without blemish unto the Lord for a sin offering. — even the chief priest could be a frail being, and often does, like the rest of the people; or to which he was liable as they; or “to make the people guilty” as it could be read; “so that the people sin” or “making the people to sin;”

And he shall bring the bullock unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord, and shall lay his hand upon the bullock’s head and kill the bullock before the Lord. — and the priest shall bring the bullock; that is, the high priest himself; it is evident that God never had any infallible priest in his service upon the earth;

And the priest who is anointed shall take of the bullock’s blood and bring it to the tabernacle of the congregation; — and bring it to the tabernacle of the congregation; out of the court where the bullock was slain, into the holy place, where were the veil that divided between the holy of holies, and the altar of sweet incense;

and the priest shall dip his finger in the blood and sprinkle of the blood seven times before the Lord, before the veil of the sanctuary. — the treatment of the blood was special in this sin-offerings; the high priest himself sprinkled the blood seven times within the tabernacle and smeared it on the horns of the altar of incense;

— seven times; a number of completeness; and prescribed here, either to show that his sins needed more than ordinary purgation, and more exercise of his efforts and repentance; before the veil; the inner veil dividing between the holy place and the holy of holies;

— whereas the other ‘inferior’ sin-offerings, it was smeared on the horns of the altar of burnt-offering outside the tabernacle; Leviticus 4:25, Leviticus 4:30, Leviticus 4:34; and no mention of sprinkling of the blood seven times;

And the priest shall put some of the blood upon the horns of the altar of sweet incense before the Lord, which is in the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall pour all the blood of the bullock at the bottom of the altar of the burnt offering, which is at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. — and the priest shall put; that is, the high priest. —

And he shall take off from it all the fat of the bullock for the sin offering: the fat that covereth the inwards and all the fat that is upon the inwards, 

and the two kidneys and the fat that is upon them which is by the flanks, and the caul above the liver, with the kidneys — it shall he take away,

10 as it was taken off from the bullock of the sacrifice of peace offerings; and the priest shall burn them upon the altar of the burnt offering. — the priest was to lift off “all the fat” from the sacrifice, that is, the same fat portions as in the peace-offering, and burn it upon the altar of burnt-offering.

11 And the skin of the bullock and all his flesh, with his head, and with his legs, and his inwards, and his dung” — The skin of the bullock, and all the flesh, together with the head and the shank and the entrails (Leviticus 1:9) and the dung;

— in fact the whole bullock, was to be carried out by him (the sacrificing priest) to a clean place before the camp, to which the ashes of the sacrifices were carried from the ash-heap (Leviticus 1:16), and there burnt on the wood with fire.

12 even the whole bullock shall he carry forth outside the camp unto a clean place, where the ashes are poured out, and burn him on the wood with fire; where the ashes are poured out shall he be burned. — — outside the camp; during the Second Temple this third place is outside Jerusalem, called the place of ashes;

13 “‘And if the whole congregation of Israel sin through ignorance, and the thing be hid from the eyes of the assembly, and they have done something against any of the commandments of the Lord concerning things which should not be done, and are guilty,

14 when the sin which they have sinned is known, then the congregation shall offer a young bullock for the sin, and bring him before the tabernacle of the congregation.

15 And the elders of the congregation shall lay their hands upon the head of the bullock before the Lord; and the bullock shall be killed before the Lord. — the elders of the congregation represent the whole congregation;

16 And the priest who is anointed shall bring of the bullock’s blood to the tabernacle of the congregation; 

17 and the priest shall dip his finger in some of the blood and sprinkle it seven times before the Lord, even before the veil. — the treatment of the blood is again special in this sin-offerings; the high priest shall sprinkle the blood seven times within the tabernacle before the veil and smear it on the horns of the altar of incense;

18 And he shall put some of the blood upon the horns of the altar which is before the Lord, that is in the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall pour out all the blood at the bottom of the altar of the burnt offering, which is at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. 

19 And he shall take all his fat from him and burn it upon the altar.

20 And he shall do with the bullock as he did with the bullock for a sin offering; so shall he do with this. And the priest shall make an atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven them.

21 And he shall carry forth the bullock outside the camp and burn him as he burned the first bullock: it is a sin offering for the congregation. — and the priest that is anointed shall bring of the bullock’s blood; that is, the high priest, as the Targums of Jonathan explain it:

— again, outside the camp; during the Second Temple this place is outside Jerusalem, called the place of ashes;

22 “‘When a ruler hath sinned, and done something through ignorance against any of the commandments of the Lord his God concerning things which should not be done, and is guilty, — when a ruler hath sinned, that is, the king, judge, or subordinate, was the party concerned in this sin;

23 or if his sin wherein he hath sinned come to his knowledge, he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a male without blemish. — he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a male without blemish; his offering was to be a “kid of the goats”

24 And he shall lay his hand upon the head of the goat, and kill it in the place where they kill the burnt offering before the Lord: it is a sin offering.

25 And the priest shall take of the blood of the sin offering with his finger, and put it upon the horns of the altar of burnt offering, and shall pour out his blood at the bottom of the altar of burnt offering. — the priest shall sprinkle the blood; but no mention of seven times;

26 And he shall burn all his fat upon the altar, as the fat of the sacrifice of peace offerings; and the priest shall make an atonement for him concerning his sin, and it shall be forgiven him.

27 “‘And if any one of the common people sin through ignorance while he doeth something against any of the commandments of the Lord concerning things which ought not to be done, and be guilty,

28 or if his sin which he hath sinned come to his knowledge, then he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a female without blemish, for his sin which he hath sinned.

29 And he shall lay his hand upon the head of the sin offering, and slay the sin offering in the place of the burnt offering. 

30 And the priest shall take of the blood thereof with his finger, and put it upon the horns of the altar of burnt offering, and shall pour out all the blood thereof at the bottom of the altar. — the priest shall put the blood upon the horns of the altar; but no mention of any sprinking of blood;

31 And he shall take away all the fat thereof, as the fat is taken away from off the sacrifice of peace offerings, and the priest shall burn it upon the altar for a sweet savor unto the Lord; and the priest shall make an atonement for him, and it shall be forgiven him. 

32 “‘And if he bring a lamb for a sin offering, he shall bring it a female without blemish. — and if he bring a lamb; those who were unable to bring a goat might offer a female sheep as the less valuable animal, provided it was without blemish;

33 And he shall lay his hand upon the head of the sin offering, and slay it for a sin offering in the place where they kill the burnt offering.

34 And the priest shall take of the blood of the sin offering with his finger, and put it upon the horns of the altar of burnt offering, and shall pour out all the blood thereof at the bottom of the altar. 

35 And he shall take away all the fat thereof, as the fat of the lamb is taken away from the sacrifice of the peace offerings, and the priest shall burn them upon the altar, according to the offerings made by fire unto the Lord; and the priest shall make an atonement for his sin that he hath committed, and it shall be forgiven him.

The Navy: Dead In The Water?

•December 12, 2023 • Leave a Comment

The US military is grounding all 400 of its ‘widow-maker’ Osprey V-22

RealClearWire by Brent Ramsey December 7, 2023 // ZeroHedge

“Mission:  The United States is a maritime nation, and the US Navy protects America at sea. Alongside our allies and partners, we defend freedom, preserve economic prosperity, and keep the seas open and free. Our nation is engaged in long-term competition. To defend American interests around the globe, the US Navy must remain prepared to execute our timeless role, as directed by Congress and the President.”   The preceding statement is from the US Navy’s website.

Dark clouds hang over whereever the US Navy and Air Force are operating

There are many indicators that the Navy is at increasing risk of mission failure.

  1. Missing recruiting goals by thousands for two years in a row, missing its goal for FY 2023 by over 7000 new recruits. The impact of missing recruiting goals is cumulative. Its impact does not subside if in subsequent years deficits are not made up. Lack of manpower adds to the strain of a Navy struggling to meet its national priorities overseas. Failing to recruit enough people to man the Navy is a result of many factors. Since the Afghanistan debacle, the public’s faith in the military has plummeted to new lows. With relatively low unemployment, the competition for young people is high. American youth are less fit, less capable of serving in the military than at any time in our history. Fewer young people want to serve as the political left teaches them to hate our country, academia promotes socialism, and race hustlers malign our country for its supposed racism and white supremacy. Divisive ideologies like Critical Race Theory and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion are now promoted vigorously up and down the chain of command in the Navy. These ideologies alienate the youth of what for generations was the most fertile recruiting grounds, white, southern, Christian Americans. This demographic is now increasingly averse to serving in our new politically correct Navy of DEI, Pride month, correct pronouns, drag queens, and transgender people. If the Navy cannot recruit now for the existing numbers of ships we have, we have no hope whatsoever of filling out the ranks of a Navy with much higher numbers of ships.
  2. Recently, due to the international wars simultaneously in Ukraine and Israel, and high tension in the Taiwan strait/South China Sea, the US Navy had an almost unprecedented 8 Carriers at sea at the same time. The only three not at sea were unavailable due to long-term maintenance. Normally, the Navy might have three or four carriers at sea at one time. Navy ships and crews continually operating wear out rapidly. Typical deployments last 6 months. The USS Ford has been deployed for 7 months and SECDEF just extended its deployment in the eastern Med for the second time. The longer the deployment the more worn out the crew and the higher rates of equipment failures become. As deployments go on for longer and longer, the size of the crew shrinks due to illness, pregnancy, injury, and suicides. Typically ships returning to home port after a lengthy deployment are missing a substantial number of the deploying crew. This puts much more stress and strain on the remaining crewmen. The international situation with multiple wars demanding our attention simultaneously is eroding our Navy’s readiness at a high rate. When the ships and their crews wear out, there will be no alternative but to return them to port for re-fit and rest for the crews regardless of whatever pressing mission the ship is on. That the Navy does not have enough ships is now obvious to even the most casual observer when multiple hot spots in distant seas occur. When the proverbial stuff hits the fan, the very first question everyone, including the President asks is, “Where is the nearest carrier?”
  3. The Navy’s high suicide rate over a lengthy period demonstrates the leadership’s tragically being unable to ameliorate the problem. The higher the OP tempo, the longer the deployments, the more arduous the maintenance periods are, the more inadequate berthing arrangements are for ships in long term overhaul, aggravate already high stress environments and seemingly make things unbearable for too many of our sailors. The Navy seems content to muddle along with scores of sailors killing themselves year after year and the heart-rending loss of life continuing as an unsolved problem. We Navy folk like to call ourselves warriors and most of us fit the description of selflessly putting ourselves in harm’s way for the benefit of others, for the benefit of our nation. But what does it say about our culture to have so many warriors who end their own lives because somehow our organization does not recognize their despair until it is too late, and they have taken the irreversible step and ended their own life? Considering how extremely selective the Navy is at screening those who volunteer to serve, why do such high numbers of exceptional citizens, with all that the Navy has to offer, choose to end their own lives? Are our leaders so overwhelmed by the work the Navy has them do that they cannot be close enough to their sailors to recognize those who are in extremis in time to help them?
  4. Notable institutional leadership failures in multiple major program areas and multiple high profile operational failures are now far too common. Examples include well documented cases such as the LCS and Zumwalt ship classes, the USS Ford class’s cost overruns, lateness, and multiple of its ship systems not being fully operational (EMALS, ammo elevators, arresting gear, etc.) even years after being in commission. An egregious example of a mammoth leadership failure was the loss of the USS Bonhomme Richard, a multi-billion-dollar capital ship that due to negligence was allowed to burn at the side of a pier, a $3B loss with no replacement. A total of 45 Navy leaders were disciplined due to this one incident. The grounding of the USS Connecticut with this vital attack submarine being out of commission for years for repairs. The USS Gettysburg has been out of commission for over 8 years undergoing modernization. Four of the seven cruisers selected for modernization will instead be de-commissioned after the Navy has spent billions on upgrades. The collisions of the USS McCain and USS Fitzgerald with commercial shipping were failures of leadership that led to the deaths of 17 sailors.
  5. In the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act the Congress established the size of the Navy to be 355 battle force ships. According to the United States Naval Institute as of 6 November 2023 there are currently 291 battle force ships in the Navy. The predictions from the Congressional Research Service are that the size of the Navy will stay relatively the same for the rest of this decade before it slowly starts to increase in size in the 2030’s. In 2022, then CNO Gilday announced that the requirement is actually much higher, in excess of 500 battle force ships. Multiple other experts’ analyses confirm those higher numbers. The PRC’s PLAN is already at 350 combatants and building at a rate at least four times that of the US.
  6. In the FY 2023 NDAA there was a provision to establish a Commission to study the Navy and its requirements. The report of the Commission is due to the Congress by July 1, 2024. As of this writing, the commission has not even been formed. The Secretary of the Navy and the CNO should be urgently pressing Congress to get this Commission up and running. Furthermore, the Navy should be proactive in suggesting Navy advocates serve on the Commission or serve on the staff of the Commission. It is vital for the defense of the nation to have the definitive knowledge of what the Navy’s true requirements are in 2023 in the face of multiplying threats all over the world.

Conclusion:  All of these factors outlined above make it clear that our Navy is in extremis. There are not enough ships to do the mission nor enough manpower to man the ships optimally. Deployments are too long, and our people and ships are wearing out.

Recruiting is stagnant. Too few ships, not enough people, not enough shipbuilding, or repair capacity have us on the brink of mission failure. To put the size of the Navy in perspective, when this officer went aboard ship in 1970 to conduct anti-submarine patrols looking for Soviet ballistic missile submarines, the Navy had 792 battle force ships in commission. We now have 291. Then we had a cold war against one adversary, the old Soviet Union.

Today we have adversaries all over the world and are trying to perform the mission quoted above with a tiny fraction of the ships we had decades ago. As a maritime nation with treaty allies all over the world coupled with our dependence upon the sea for 90% of the commerce that keeps our economy running, it is a travesty that such neglect of the Navy has occurred. Who is at fault for this neglect?

Congress is ultimately at fault as it holds the power of the purse. However, it is incumbent upon senior Navy leaders to make the case for the right size Navy. The CNO and every other Navy flag who testifies before Congress should be sounding the alarm about the imminent failure of the Navy to perform its mission now in “peacetime” with multiple hots spots in Europe, the Middle East, and in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, and even more importantly in the next actual fighting war.

Someone long since should have laid his stars on the table to make the point to politicians that we need more ships and more manpower for the survival of our nation. Our way of life and our very lives are at stake if we do not rebuild our Navy to an adequate size to perform its vital worldwide mission.

The US military is grounding all 400 of its ‘widow-maker’ Osprey V-22

Leviticus (1-2)

•December 11, 2023 • Leave a Comment

The Targum Jonathan provides a good preamble to the book of Leviticus:

And it was when Mosheh had completed to erect the tabernacle that Mosheh reasoned and judged in his heart, and said:

“To Mount Sinai, whose excellency is the excellence only of an hour and its holiness the holiness but of three days, I could not ascend till the time that the word was spoken to me; but the excellence of this the tabernacle of ordinance is an eternal excellency, and its holiness an everlasting holiness; therefore is it right that I should not enter within it until the time that I am spoken with from before the Lord.”

“If his offering a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male without blemish”

Leviticus 1

1 And the Lord called unto Moses, and spoke unto him out of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying,

— when the Lord first communicated to Moses that He was about to deliver the Israelites from Egypt, “He called unto him” from the burning bush (Exodus 3:4). When the Lord was about to give to Moses the Ten Commandments for the people of Israel, “He called unto him” from the top of Sinai (Exodus 19:3; Exodus 19:20);

— and now when the Lord is about to give to His chosen people, through His servant Moses, the laws by which their Divine worship is to be regulated, “He called unto him” from the tent of meeting (Leviticus 1:1).

“Speak unto the children of Israel and say unto them: ‘If any man of you bring an offering unto the Lord, ye shall bring your offering of the cattle, even of the herd and of the flock.

— the act of offering was to be voluntary on the part of the worshipper, but the mode of doing it was in every point defined by the Law; and any member of the congregation might bring his voluntary offering if he could afford.

“‘If his offering be a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male without blemish. He shall offer it of his own voluntary will at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord. — without blemish; or perfect, having no part wanting, nor any part superfluous, nor any spot upon it

And he shall put his hand upon the head of the burnt offering, and it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him. — and he, the offer of the offering, shall put his hand upon the head of the burnt offering to make atonement for him; this phrase belongs more especially to the sin-offerings and the trespass-offerings;

— the high priest, Aaron, would be more concerned with other duties: another daily ‘burnt offering’ stands first in Leviticus for several reasons; it was offered twice daily, besides on other occasions;

And he shall kill the bullock before the Lord; and the priests, Aaron’s sons, shall bring the blood and sprinkle the blood round about upon the altar that is by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

— and he shall kill the bullock; the sacrificer himself, the offerer, not by the priest, slaughtered the animal on the north side of the altar, by cutting its throat, while a priest or an assistant held a bowl under the neck to receive the blood;

— in later times, however, the offering was generally performed by Levites; sprinkle the blood; this was to be done by the priests, by Aaron’s sons initially. 

And he shall flay the burnt offering and cut it into his pieces.

And the sons of Aaron the priest shall put fire upon the altar, and lay the wood in order upon the fire.

And the priests, Aaron’s sons, shall lay the parts, the head, and the fat in order upon the wood that is on the fire which is upon the altar;

but his inwards and his legs shall he wash in water. And the priest shall burn all on the altar to be a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord. — a sweet savour, or a soothing odour; the word ‘savour’ in old English is applied to the smell as well as the taste of a thing.

10 “‘And if his offering be of the flocks, namely, of the sheep or of the goats, for a burnt sacrifice, he shall bring a male without blemish. — those who could not offer a bullock, were to bring a sheep or a goat; and those who were not able to do that, were accepted of God, if they brought a turtle-dove, or a pigeon.

If they are poor they could bring a turtle-dove or a pigeon, or a pair

11 And he shall kill it on the side of the altar northward before the Lord; and the priests, Aaron’s sons, shall sprinkle his blood round about upon the altar.

12 And he shall cut it into his pieces, with his head and his fat; and the priest shall lay them in order on the wood that is on the fire which is upon the altar,

13 but he shall wash the inwards and the legs with water. And the priest shall bring it all and burn it upon the altar: it is a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord.

14 “‘And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the Lord be of fowls, then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves or of young pigeons. — those who could not offer a bullock or a sheep or a goat; they are to bring turtle-doves or pigeons; a single pigeon or turtle-dove formed a sacrifice, but they are often offered in pairs; and there are no rule in respect to sex;

15 And the priest shall bring it unto the altar, and wring off his head, and burn it on the altar; and the blood thereof shall be wrung out at the side of the altar.

16 And he shall pluck away his crop with his feathers, and cast it beside the altar on the east part, by the place of the ashes.

17 And he shall cleave it with the wings thereof, but shall not divide it asunder. And the priest shall burn it upon the altar, upon the wood that is upon the fire: it is a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord.

Leviticus 2

1 “‘And when any will offer a meat offering unto the Lord, his offering shall be of fine flour; and he shall pour oil upon it and put frankincense thereon. — the old use of the word “meat” in the sense of “food,” in contrast to “flesh,” creates some confusion of thought;

— to make a sweet odour in the court of the tabernacle, on a part of it; which otherwise would have been bad odour, by reason of the blood that was sprinkled and the flesh that was burned there daily;

— second; and put frankincense thereon; various spices: stacte, onycha and galbanum; these sweet spices with pure frankincense; are holy to the Lord, and to be used for him only; Exodus 30:34;

And he shall bring it to Aaron’s sons the priests; and he shall take from it his handful of the flour thereof and of the oil thereof, with all the frankincense thereof; and the priest shall burn the memorial of it upon the altar to be an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord.

— and he, the offer of the food offering, shall bring it to Aaron’s sons the priests; the high priest, Aaron, would be more concerned with other duties: involves in daily ‘burnt offering’ which was offered twice everyday;

— a sweet savour, or a soothing odour; the word ‘savour’ in old English is applied to the smell as well as the taste of the food.

Incense: stacte, onycha, galbanum; these spices with pure frankincense

And the remnant of the meat offering shall be Aaron’s and his sons’: it is a thing most holy of the offerings to the Lord made by fire. — a offering most holy; offerings consisted of two classes, the (just) holy and the most holy;

— the wave offerings (Leviticus 23:20; Numbers 6:20), the firstborn of sacrificed animals, the firstlings of oil, wine, and corn, (Numbers 18:17); and the paschal sacrifices, belonged to the holy, and might be eaten entirely or partially in any place within the holy city by the officiating priests and their families.

— the incense offering, the shew-bread (Exodus 30:26-29; Leviticus 24:9), the sin and trespass offerings (Leviticus 6:25-29; Leviticus 7:1; Leviticus 7:6; Leviticus 14:13), and the meat offerings here described, belonged to the most holy. They could be eaten in the court of the sanctuary only by the priests, (Leviticus 10:12-14).

“‘And if thou bring an oblation of a meat offering baked in the oven, it shall be unleavened cakes of fine flour mingled with oil, or unleavened wafers anointed with oil.

And if thy oblation be a meat offering baked in a pan, it shall be of fine flour, unleavened, mingled with oil.

Thou shalt part it in pieces and pour oil thereon: it is a meat offering.

And if thy oblation be a meat offering baked in the frying pan, it shall be made of fine flour with oil.

And thou shalt bring the meat offering that is made of these things unto the Lord; and when it is presented unto the priest, he shall bring it unto the altar.

And the priest shall take from the meat offering a memorial thereof and shall burn it upon the altar: it is an offering made by fire, of a sweet savor unto the Lord.

10 And that which is left of the meat offering shall be Aaron’s and his sons’: it is a thing most holy of the offerings of the Lord made by fire. — the term meat was and is properly given to any kind of provision, and the greater part of this offering was to be eaten for food, not burned; they of the most holy.

11 “‘No meat offering which ye shall bring unto the Lord shall be made with leaven; for ye shall burn no leaven nor any honey in any offering of the Lord made by fire. — leaven, in this instance, is the emblem of pride, malice, and hypocrisy, and honey of sensual pleasure.

12 As for the oblation of the firstfruits, ye shall offer them unto the Lord, but they shall not be burned on the altar for a sweet savor.

13 And every oblation of thy meat offering shalt thou season with salt; neither shalt thou allow the salt of the covenant of thy God to be lacking from thy meat offering. With all thine offerings thou shalt offer salt. — with all thine offerings thou shalt offer salt; every animal offering was to be accompanied by salt;

— salt was used in meat offerings, and in all others, because it was a symbol of the perpetuity of the covenant, which from thence is called a covenant of salt forever, Numbers 18:19 namely, the covenant of the priesthood, to which these sacrifices belonged;

— hence the Targum of Jonathan says, “because the twenty and four gifts of the priests are appointed with a covenant of salt; therefore salt shalt thou offer with all thy oblations.”

14 And if thou offer a meat offering of thy firstfruits unto the Lord, thou shalt offer for the meat offering of thy firstfruits green ears of corn dried by the fire, even corn beaten out of full ears.

15 And thou shalt put oil upon it and lay frankincense thereon: it is a meat offering.

16 And the priest shall burn the memorial of it, part of the beaten corn thereof and part of the oil thereof, with all the frankincense thereof: it is an offering made by fire unto the Lord.

— every independent meat-offering was to be prepared without leaven, and a portion given to the Lord as fire-food, for a savour of satisfaction upon the altar; and the rest was to be scrupulously kept away from being used by the offerer, as a most holy thing, and to be eaten at the holy place by the priests only;

— it is unfortunate that while the law was given the children of Israel were travelling throught the desert for the next thirty-nine years or so, with their main food, the manna, and only offerings of animal sacrifices could be offered; they could not practice the first-fruit offerings; but the law was provided here when the crossed the Jordan and became settled cultivators.

Sharp Decline in Maths Skill in OECD

•December 10, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Teenage math and reading skills show ‘unprecedented drop’ – study

PISA 2018: The Top Rated Countries

RT World News • December 6, 2023 // World Population Review

The sharp decline in arithmetic scores is particularly significant in five European countries, OECD research has found

A study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) of the academic performance of teenagers from 81 countries has found that their performance in reading and math has plummeted. It also shows that students from European countries have the lowest math scores, while Asian participants have the highest.  

Nearly 700,000 15-year-olds were tested in math, reading, and science as part of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 to assess learning before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 

According to the OECD on Tuesday, the results of the study, which was focused on math, show an “unprecedented drop” in academic performance, with average scores down 10 points in reading and nearly 15 points in math compared to 2018. Science scores “did not change significantly,” the document said. 

The research found the sharp decline in math achievement to be “three times larger” than any previous change and was most significant in Germany, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Poland. Participants from Singapore, China, Japan, and South Korea outperformed the others. In reading, Ireland, Estonia, Japan, and South Korea performed strongly. 

The study also shows the impact of digital devices on students’ academic performance – moderate use of gadgets in school is associated with better grades. However, this depends on whether technology is used to support learning rather than distract from it.

The downward trend in reading, math, and science scores was evident before 2018, suggesting that only part of the decline in achievement can be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, the OECD said.

The international PISA survey in these three disciplines is conducted every three years among 15-year-old students. Originally scheduled for 2021, the study was postponed due to the pandemic. All participating countries are OECD partners. 

Mysterious aircraft crashes in year 2023

•December 9, 2023 • Leave a Comment

At least 30 American troops have died in a spate of mysterious US military helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft crashes this year. Now the US military has grounded its entire fleet of Osprey aircraft and Japan has also grounded its fleet of 14 Ospreys after the crash.

Business Insider • December 5, 2023 // Yahoo

  • A US Air Force Osprey crashed off the coast of Japan on November 29, killing all eight Airmen aboard.
  • It’s the latest in a string of helicopter and tiltrotor crashes this year. 
  • Seven crashes have left 30 American soldiers dead and injured over 40 more.

It’s been a deadly year for US military helicopters and tiltrotor aircraft. Seven crashes around the world have so far killed at least 30 American service members and injured over 40 more.

None of these incidents occurred during combat or were the result of enemy fire; almost all took place during some sort of training mission. Two branches of the military grounded flights in response to crashes and the resulting loss of life.

Dark clouds hang over where the US Navy and Air Force are operating

Here’s a timeline of these crashes and what we know about their causes:

February 15: UH-60 Blackhawk crashed in Alabama

A Tennessee National Guard helicopter crashed during a training flight near Huntsville, killing the two pilots. According to a statement from the Tennessee Department of Military, the aircraft was approaching a local airport when it “rapidly descended and impacted the ground.”

March 29: HH-60 Black Hawks collide in Kentucky

Two US Army helicopters crashed into each other during a training “accident” near Fort Campbell, the 101st Airborne Division said, killing all nine soldiers who were on board. The aircraft were conducing a routine mission and were operating in “multi-ship formation” using night-vision goggles. They crashed into an open field across from a residential area.

April 27: AH-64 Apaches collide in Alaska

Two helicopters returning from a training mission crashed into each other near Healy, killing three soldiers and injuring a fourth, the 11th Airborne Division said. After this incident, the US Army temporarily grounded all aircraft except those participating in “critical missions.”

June 11: MH-47 Chinook crashed in Syria

A US military helicopter with a faulty rotor crashed as it was landing at a staging base in the northeast, injuring 22 soldiers. A Pentagon spokesperson said at the time that the incident was under investigation, but all troops involved — including some who had to be evacuated to facilities outside the US Central Command’s area of responsibility in the Middle East — were in stable condition.

August 27: MV-22B Osprey crashed in Australia

A US Marine Corps Osprey crashed on Melville Island during a training exercise, killing three soldiers and injuring another 20. Marine Rotational Force — Darwin said at the time that the cause was under investigation. This incident marked the second in a string of three “aviation mishaps” during August and September that eventually led the Marines to pause all flights for several days.

November 10: MH-60 Blackhawk crashed in the eastern Mediterranean Sea

Five US Army Special Operations aviation soldiers were killed after their helicopter experienced an “in-flight emergency” during aerial refueling training and crashed into the water, the Pentagon said. It added that there were “no indications” the crash was the result of hostile actions, amid soaring regional tensions as a result of the Israel-Hamas war.

November 29: CV-22B Osprey crashed off the coast of Japan

A US Air Force Osprey was involved in an unknown “aircraft mishap” during a routine training mission off the coast of Yakushima Island, killing all eight crew members aboard. Air Force Special Operations Command said on December 5 that a search and recovery mission was still underway to locate the remains of two Airmen.

The US military is grounding all 400 of its ‘widow-maker’ Osprey V-22

Exodus (39-40)

•December 9, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

~~~~

Exodus 39

1 And of the blue and purple and scarlet they made clothes of service to do service in the holy place, and made the holy garments for Aaron, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

And he made the ephod of gold, blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen. 

And they beat the gold into thin plates, and cut it into wires to work it in the blue and in the purple and in the scarlet and in the fine linen, with skillful work. 

They made shoulder pieces for it to couple it together; by the two edges was it coupled together. 

And the embroidered girdle of his ephod that was upon it was of the same, according to the work thereof: of gold, blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

And they wrought onyx stones enclosed in clasps of gold, graven as signets are graven, with the names of the children of Israel. — the names of the twelve tribes of Israel are not specified here; question remains whether Joseph has two portions? If so who gives way; Dan or Levi?

And he put them on the shoulders of the ephod, that they should be stones for a memorial to the children of Israel, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

And he made the breastplate of skillful work, like the work of the ephod: of gold, blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen. 

It was foursquare. They made the breastplate double: a span was the length thereof and a span the breadth thereof, being doubled. 

10 And they set in it four rows of stones: the first row was a sardius, a topaz and a carbuncle; this was the first row; — the Targum Jonathan adds the names of three tribes, Reuben, Shimeon, and Levi and Targum Jerusalem says the same in chapter 28:17 Reuben, Shemeon, Levi;

11 and the second row, an emerald, a sapphire, and a diamond; — there are some differences of opinions from here: the Targum Jonathan adds the names of the three tribes, Jehudah, Dan, and Naphtali; whereas Targum Jerusalem says Jehudah, Issakar, and Zebulon;

12 and the third row, a ligure, an agate, and an amethyst; — the Targum Jonathan adds the names of the three tribes, Gad, Asher, and Issakar; but Targum Jerusalem says Dan, Naphtali, and Gad;

13 and the fourth row, a beryl, an onyx, and a jasper. They were enclosed in clasps of gold in their enclosings. — the Targum Jonathan adds the names of the three tribes, Zebulon, Joseph, and Benjamin; but Targum Jerusalem says Asher, Joseph, and Benjamin;

The tribe of Dan disappears when Joseph is allocated two portions

14 And the stones were according to the names of the children of Israel — twelve, according to their names like the engravings of a signet, every one with his name according to the twelve tribes. 

15 And they made upon the breastplate chains at the ends of wreathed work of pure gold. — no mention is made of the Urim and Thummim, perhaps they are incorporated inside or behind the ephod;

The Urim and Thummim, perhaps they are incorporated inside the ephod

16 And they made two clasps of gold and two gold rings, and put the two rings on the two ends of the breastplate. 

17 And they put the two wreathed chains of gold in the two rings on the ends of the breastplate; 

18 and the two ends of the two wreathed chains they fastened in the two clasps, and put them on the shoulder pieces of the ephod at the front. 

19 And they made two rings of gold and put them on the two ends of the breastplate, upon the border of it which was on the side of the ephod inward; 

20 and they made two other golden rings and put them on the two sides of the ephod underneath, toward the front of it over against the other coupling thereof, above the embroidered girdle of the ephod. 

21 And they bound the breastplate by his rings unto the rings of the ephod with a lace of blue, that it might be above the embroidered girdle of the ephod, and that the breastplate might not be loosed from the ephod, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

22 And he made the robe of the ephod of woven work, all of blue. 

23 And there was a hole in the midst of the robe, as the hole of a jacket of mail, with a band round about the hole, that it should not rend. 

24 And they made upon the hems of the robe pomegranates of blue and purple and scarlet, and twined linen. 

25 And they made bells of pure gold, and put the bells between the pomegranates upon the hem of the robe, round about between the pomegranates: 

26 a bell and a pomegranate, a bell and a pomegranate, round about the hem of the robe to minister in, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

27 And they made coats of fine linen of woven work for Aaron and for his sons, 

28 and a miter of fine linen and goodly bonnets of fine linen, and linen breeches of finetwined linen, 

29 and a girdle of finetwined linen, and blue and purple and scarlet needlework, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

30 And they made the plate of the holy crown of pure gold, and wrote upon it a writing, like the engravings of a signet: Holiness to the Lord.

31 And they tied unto it a lace of blue to fasten it on high upon the miter, as the Lord commanded Moses.

32 Thus was all the work of the tabernacle of the tent of the congregation finished, and the children of Israel did according to all that the Lord commanded Moses; so did they.

33 And they brought the tabernacle unto Moses: the tent and all his furniture, his clasps, his boards, his bars and his pillars and his sockets; 

34 and the covering of rams’ skins dyed red, and the covering of badgers’ skins, and the veil of the covering; 

35 the ark of the Testimony and the staves thereof, and the mercy seat; 

36 the table and all the vessels thereof, and the showbread; 

37 the pure candlestick with the lamps thereof, even with the lamps to be set in order, and all the vessels thereof, and the oil for light; 

38 and the golden altar, and the anointing oil, and the sweet incense, and the hanging for the tabernacle door; 

39 the brazen altar and his grate of brass, his staves and all his vessels, the laver and his foot; 

Joseph is allocated two placements but the Levi were the Lord’s

40 the hangings of the court, his pillars and his sockets, and the hanging for the court gate, his cords and his pegs, and all the vessels of the service of the tabernacle for the tent of the congregation; 

41 the clothes of service to do service in the holy place, and the holy garments for Aaron the priest and his sons’ garments to minister in the priest’s office. 

42 According to all that the Lord commanded Moses, so the children of Israel made all the work. 

43 And Moses looked upon all the work, and behold, they had done it as the Lord had commanded; even so had they done it. And Moses blessed them. 

Exodus 40

~~~~

~~~~

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“On the first day of the first month shalt thou set up the tabernacle of the tent of the congregation. — the new year was now approaching, and as it was approaching, its first day on the month of Nisan was naturally chosen as most fit for the inauguration of the new structure.

And thou shalt put therein the ark of the Testimony, and cover the ark with the veil. 

And thou shalt bring in the table and set in order the things that are to be set in order upon it; and thou shalt bring in the candlestick and light the lamps thereof. 

And thou shalt set the altar of gold for the incense before the ark of the Testimony, and put up the hanging of the door to the tabernacle. 

And thou shalt set the altar of the burnt offering before the door of the tabernacle of the tent of the congregation. 

And thou shalt set the laver between the tent of the congregation and the altar, and shalt put water therein. 

And thou shalt set up the court round about, and hang up the hanging at the court gate. 

And thou shalt take the anointing oil, and anoint the tabernacle and all that is therein, and shalt hallow it and all the vessels thereof; and it shall be holy. 

10 And thou shalt anoint the altar of the burnt offering and all his vessels, and sanctify the altar; and it shall be an altar most holy. 

11 And thou shalt anoint the laver and his foot, and sanctify it. 

12 And thou shalt bring Aaron and his sons unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and wash them with water. 

13 And thou shalt put upon Aaron the holy garments, and anoint him and sanctify him, that he may minister unto Me in the priest’s office.

14 And thou shalt bring his sons and clothe them with coats; 

15 and thou shalt anoint them, as thou didst anoint their father, that they may minister unto Me in the priest’s office. For their anointing shall surely be an everlasting priesthood throughout their generations.” 

16 Thus did Moses: according to all that the Lord commanded him, so did he. 

17 And it came to pass in the first month in the second year, on the first day of the month, that the tabernacle was reared up. 

18 And Moses reared up the tabernacle, and fastened his sockets and set up the boards thereof, and put in the bars thereof and reared up his pillars. 

19 And he spread abroad the tent over the tabernacle, and put the covering of the tent above upon it, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

20 And he took and put the testimony into the ark, and set the staves on the ark, and put the mercy seat above upon the ark. 

21 And he brought the ark into the tabernacle, and set up the veil of the covering and covered the ark of the Testimony, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

22 And he put the table in the tent of the congregation upon the side of the tabernacle northward, outside the veil. 

23 And he set the bread in order upon it before the Lord, as the Lord had commanded Moses. 

24 And he put the candlestick in the tent of the congregation opposite the table, on the side of the tabernacle southward.

25 And he lighted the lamps before the Lord, as the Lord commanded Moses.

26 And he put the golden altar in the tent of the congregation before the veil;

27 and he burned sweet incense thereon, as the Lord commanded Moses.

28 And he set up the hanging at the door of the tabernacle. 

29 And he put the altar of burnt offering by the door of the tabernacle of the tent of the congregation, and offered upon it the burnt offering and the meat offering, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

30 And he set the laver between the tent of the congregation and the altar, and put water there for washing. 

31 And Moses and Aaron and his sons washed their hands and their feet thereat. 

32 When they went into the tent of the congregation and when they came near unto the altar, they washed, as the Lord commanded Moses. 

33 And he reared up the court round about the tabernacle and the altar, and set up the hanging of the court gate. So Moses finished the work. 

34 Then a cloud covered the tent of the congregation, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle. 

35 And Moses was not able to enter into the tent of the congregation because the cloud abode thereon, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle. 

36 And when the cloud was taken up from over the tabernacle, the children of Israel went onward in all their journeys; 

37 but if the cloud were not taken up, then they journeyed not until the day that it was taken up. 

38 For the cloud of the Lord was upon the tabernacle by day and fire was on it by night, in the sight of all the house of Israel throughout all their journeys. 

— throughout the book of Exodus the term, “Urim and Thummim” is not used; the earliest encounter is in Leviticus 8:8: “And he [Moses] put the breastplate upon him [Aaron]. Also he [Moses] put in the breastplate the Urim and the Thummim.” Hence the Urim and the Thummim are incorporated inside the ephod with the breastplate of twelve previous stones.

Why being a friend of the US is ‘fatal’?

•December 8, 2023 • Leave a Comment

“To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal”
― Henry Kissinger

“To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal”

News analysis: Why being a friend of the United States is ‘fatal’?

See also Fate of Qin Gang, China’s former Foreign Minister Politico Europe

CGTN • October 23, 2023

US President Joe Biden has pledged an “unprecedented” package of aid to support its “ironclad” ally in Middle East – Israel, which is entangled in a fresh round of conflict with its old foe Palestine. Besides, the White House also vowed to back Ukraine “as long as it takes” in its fight against Russia.

The funding for Israel and Ukraine that the US government has asked for, amounted to almost $106 billion. Will this be a credible commitment or just another empty promise?

“It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal,” former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once remarked. And the US has proven him right. Time and again, the US has showed that it is not a reliable ally in global affairs.

Sitting across the pond, making huge profits

Economist Pierre de Gaulle, grandson of former French President Charles de Gaulle, told the French newspaper Le Parisien that the US provoked a conflict in Ukraine to “turn Europe into a vassal” and has managed to use the Ukraine crisis to “destabilize Europe.”

In terms of energy, security, economy, refugees, etc, Europe is paying a heavy price in the crisis while the US is enjoying the most benefits and still fanning the flames to prolong and expand the Ukraine crisis.

“This is while the United States, sitting across the pond, watching on and observing, is making huge profits,” Modern Diplomacy magazine commented on its website when describing the Ukraine crisis.

For instance, American energy companies are making a fortune during the crisis, as The Wall Street Journal bluntly stated, “A big winner from the energy crisis in Europe: the US economy.”

The EU imported around 94.73 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in 2022, compared to 57.27 million tonnes in 2021. The US represented 41 percent of the supply in all of 2022 and remained to be the EU’s top LNG supplier, surpassing Russia for the first time, according to a report by the research firm Kpler. In the first half of this year, the EU remained the primary buyer of US LNG, which constitutes more than half of the EU LNG import market.

Unfortunately, the price to move away from Russian energy is not cheap for the European side. The natural gas price frenzy in Europe shows no signs of easing. For instance, in France last year, energy prices alone increased by 23.1 percent yearly, followed by 6.8 percent for food and 3 percent for manufactured goods and services.

Europe’s interests have never been America’s concern. In 2021, the US hastily withdrew from Kabul, Afghanistan, leaving its European allies stunned and unprepared. The US also forged the AUKUS with the UK and Australia, blatantly breaking the Australia-France submarine deal.

Coercive diplomacy

The US applied coercive diplomacy with East Asian allies with no mercy.

In 1986, in response to the rise of Japan’s semiconductor industry, the US forced Japan to sign the “US-Japan Semiconductor Agreement,” initiated a “Section 301 Investigation” against Japan, and imposed trade sanctions on a variety of Japanese products such as semiconductors and computers, which undermined the competitiveness and potential of Japan’s semiconductor industry, seeing its market share fall from 50 percent of the global market to about 10 percent in 2019.

“To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal”

In recent years, the US has been wielding the tariff stick against Japan because of its dissatisfaction with Japan’s longstanding trade surplus with the US. In March 2018, the US imposed tariffs of up to 25 percent and 10 percent on imported steel and aluminum products under the Trade Expansion Act, temporarily “exempting” the Five Eyes countries, including the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, but charging Japan the same.

The US’ ally South Korea is chewing on the same thing. The US passed the Inflation Reduction Act last year, eliminating federal tax credits for electric vehicles made outside North America, meaning companies including South Korea’s Hyundai and its affiliate Kia Corp will no longer be eligible for such subsidies.

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol hoped talks with his US counterpart Joe Biden would resolve Seoul’s concerns over the Act during his visit to New York in September 2022. However, Yoon was only granted a 48-second spontaneous chat with Biden.

Since 1991, South Korea has shared the upkeep cost for US soldiers, including costs for South Korean civilians hired by the US Forces Korea (USFK), construction of military installations and logistics support.

Under the 10th Special Measures Agreement (SMA), South Korea paid 1.04 trillion won (about $890 million) for the stationing of US troops. When the 10th SMA was about to expire at the end of 2019, the US reportedly threatened to pull troops if South Korean didn’t pay $5 billion to the US for a new deal.

No wonder former European Council President Donald Tusk once commented on the US’ move, “with friends like that, who needs enemies?”

Exodus (37-38)

•December 7, 2023 • Leave a Comment

“To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal”
― Henry Kissinger

Q. Could one unexpected day the Jews bring out the Ark of the Covenant and cause both the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to collapse?

Exodus 37

1 And Bezaleel made the ark of shittim wood. Two cubits and a half was the length of it, and a cubit and a half the breadth of it, and a cubit and a half the height of it. 

And he overlaid it with pure gold within and without, and made a crown of gold for it round about. 

And he cast for it four rings of gold to be set in the four corners of it: even two rings upon the one side of it, and two rings upon the other side of it. 

And he made staves of shittim wood and overlaid them with gold. 

And he put the staves into the rings on the sides of the ark, to bear the ark. 

And he made the mercy seat of pure gold. Two cubits and a half was the length thereof, and one cubit and a half the breadth thereof. 

And he made two cherubims of gold. Beaten out of one piece made he them on the two ends of the mercy seat: 

Two cherubims of pure gold over the Mercy Seat also of pure gold

one cherub on the end on this side, and another cherub on the other end on that side; out of the mercy seat made he the cherubims on the two ends thereof. 

And the cherubims spread out their wings on high, and covered over the mercy seat with their wings with their faces one toward another; even toward the mercy seat were the faces of the cherubims. 

10 And he made the table of shittim wood. Two cubits was the length thereof, and a cubit the breadth thereof, and a cubit and a half the height thereof. 

11 And he overlaid it with pure gold, and made thereunto a crown of gold round about. 

12 Also he made thereunto a border of a handbreadth round about, and made a crown of gold for the border thereof round about. 

13 And he cast for it four rings of gold, and put the rings upon the four corners that were in the four feet thereof. 

14 Over against the border were the rings, the places for the staves to bear the table. 

15 And he made the staves of shittim wood to bear the table, and overlaid them with gold. 

16 And he made the vessels which were upon the table — his dishes and his spoons and his bowls and his covers for covering — of pure gold. 

Seven candlestick of pure gold, each with a bowl, buds and flowers

17 And he made the candlestick of pure gold; of beaten work made he the candlestick. His shaft, and his branch, his bowls, his buds and his flowers were of the same. 

18 And six branches came out of the sides thereof: three branches of the candlestick out of the one side thereof, and three branches of the candlestick out of the other side thereof. 

19 Three bowls were made after the fashion of almonds on one branch, with a bud and a flower, and three bowls were made like almonds on another branch, with a bud and a flower — so throughout the six branches going out of the candlestick. 

20 And on the candlestick were four bowls made like almonds, with his buds and his flowers, 

21 and a bud under two branches of the same, and a bud under two branches of the same, and a bud under two branches of the same, according to the six branches going out of it. 

22 Their buds and their branches were of the same; all of it was one beaten work of pure gold. 

Seven golden branches of candlesticks each with buds and flowers

23 And he made his seven lamps and his snuffers and his snuff dishes of pure gold. 

24 Of a talent of pure gold made he it, and all the vessels thereof. 

25 And he made the incense altar of shittim wood. The length of it was a cubit and the breadth of it a cubit; it was foursquare, and two cubits was the height of it. The horns thereof were of the same. 

26 And he overlaid it with pure gold, both the top of it and the sides thereof round about, and the horns of it; also he made for it a crown of gold round about. 

27 And he made two rings of gold for it under the crown thereof, by the two corners of it, upon the two sides thereof, to be places for the staves to bear it. 

28 And he made the staves of shittim wood and overlaid them with gold. 

29 And he made the holy anointing oil and the pure incense of sweet spices, according to the work of the perfumer. 

Exodus 38

~~~~

1 And he made the altar of burnt offering of shittim wood; five cubits was the length thereof and five cubits the breadth thereof; it was foursquare, and three cubits the height thereof. 

And he made the horns thereof on the four corners of it; the horns thereof were of the same, and he overlaid it with brass. 

And he made all the vessels of the altar: the pots and the shovels and the basins, and the fleshhooks and the firepans; all the vessels thereof made he of brass. 

And he made for the altar a brazen grate of network, under the rim thereof beneath, unto the midst of it. 

And he cast four rings for the four ends of the grate of brass, to be places for the staves. 

And he made the staves of shittim wood and overlaid them with brass. 

And he put the staves into the rings on the sides of the altar to bear it; he made the altar hollow with boards. 

And he made the laver of brass and the foot of it from brass, from the looking glasses of the women assembling, who assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. 

And he made the court: on the south side southward the hangings of the court were of finetwined linen, a hundred cubits. 

10 Their pillars were twenty and their brazen sockets twenty; the hooks of the pillars and their fillets were of silver.

11 And for the north side the hangings were a hundred cubits. Their pillars were twenty and their sockets of brass twenty, the hooks of the pillars and their fillets, of silver. 

12 And for the west side were hangings of fifty cubits, their pillars ten and their sockets ten, the hooks of the pillars and their fillets, of silver. 

13 And for the east side eastward, fifty cubits. 

14 The hangings of the one side of the gate were fifteen cubits, their pillars three and their sockets three. 

15 And for the other side of the court gate, on this side and that side, were hangings of fifteen cubits, their pillars three and their sockets three. 

16 All the hangings of the court round about were of finetwined linen. 

17 And the sockets for the pillars were of brass, the hooks of the pillars and their fillets, of silver; and the overlaying of their capitals, of silver, and all the pillars of the court were filleted with silver.

18 And the hanging for the gate of the court was needlework: of blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen; and twenty cubits was the length, and the height in the breadth was five cubits, corresponding to the hangings of the court.

19 And their pillars were four and their sockets of brass four; their hooks, of silver, and the overlaying of their capitals and their fillets, of silver. 

20 And all the pegs of the tabernacle and of the court round about were of brass. 

21 This is the account of the tabernacle, even of the tabernacle of testimony, as it was counted according to the commandment of Moses for the service of the Levites, by the hand of Ithamar, son of Aaron the priest. 

22 And Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah, made all that the Lord commanded Moses. 

23 And with him was Aholiab, son of Ahisamach, of the tribe of Dan, an engraver and a skillful workman, and an embroiderer in blue and in purple and in scarlet, and fine linen. 

24 All the gold that was used for the work in all the work of the holy place, even the gold of the offering, was twenty and nine talents, and seven hundred and thirty shekels, according to the shekel of the sanctuary. 

25 And the silver of those who were numbered in the congregation was a hundred talents, and a thousand seven hundred and threescore and fifteen shekels, according to the shekel of the sanctuary: 

26 a bekah for every man, that is, half a shekel, according to the shekel of the sanctuary, for every one who went to be numbered from twenty years old and upward, for six hundred thousand and three thousand and five hundred and fifty men. 

27 And of the hundred talents of silver were cast the sockets of the sanctuary and the sockets of the veil: a hundred sockets from the hundred talents, a talent for a socket. 

28 And of the thousand seven hundred seventy and five shekels he made hooks for the pillars, and overlaid their capitals and filleted them. 

29 And the brass from the offering was seventy talents, and two thousand and four hundred shekels. 

30 And therewith he made the sockets for the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and the brazen altar and the brazen grate for it, and all the vessels of the altar, 

31 and the sockets of the court round about, and the sockets of the court gate, and all the pegs of the tabernacle, and all the pegs of the court round about. 

Would 2024 be the Last US Election?

•December 6, 2023 • Leave a Comment

If Donald Trump is re-elected, would he become a dictator?

Liz Cheney says ‘there’s no question’ Trump would refuse to leave office if elected again. A vote for Donald Trump “may mean the last election that you ever get to vote in.”

Today by Scott Strump • December 5, 2023 // Sputnik International

Former congresswoman Liz Cheney believes Donald Trump would refuse to leave office after a second presidential term if he is reelected and that a vote for him “may mean the last election that you ever get to vote in.”

Cheney, a lifelong Republican who broke with the party after leading the House of Representatives committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, spoke with Savannah Guthrie on TODAY on Dec. 4 about the threat she sees from a second Trump presidential term.

She writes in her new book, “Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning,” that the 2024 election will be about whether or not we will still have a democracy.

“It certainly is,” she said. “And Donald Trump has told us exactly what he will do. He will not abide by the rulings of the courts. He will certainly appoint people to office whether or not they can be confirmed by the Senate.

“He has talked about using the military in terms that really are fundamentally un-American. … So it’s a very dangerous moment, and it’s a moment for people to understand that that cannot be the path that we go down as a country.”

The daughter of former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney believes Trump would install himself as a permanent president and refuse to leave office after the mandated two-term limit if he is reelected.

“There’s no question,” she said. “Absolutely. He’s already done it once. … He’s already attempted to seize power, and he was stopped, thankfully, and for the good of the nation and the republic. But he said he will do it again. He’s expressed no remorse for what he did.”

A potential election between Trump and President Joe Biden could come down to a small sliver of undecided voters in swing states. Cheney was asked about voters who may think a vote for Trump won’t have any long-lasting effects on democracy.

“I think that’s a real problem, and I think that the challenge is to make sure that those people understand and recognize that a Trump vote is not acceptable,” she said. “I hope that there are options and alternatives that reflect the important challenges that we’re facing, and that reflect leadership to meet those challenges, but that choice can never be Donald Trump because a vote for Donald Trump may mean the last election that you ever get to vote in.

“And again, I don’t say that lightly, and I think it’s heartbreaking that that’s where we are, but people have to recognize that a vote for Donald Trump is a vote against the Constitution.”

Cheney, 57, called the possibility of Trump becoming a dictator “a very, very real threat and concern.”

Even as someone who has dedicated her life to Republican politics, Cheney said she “will never vote for Donald Trump” and “will do whatever it takes to make sure that Donald Trump is defeated in 2024.”

And she continued, “and he’s so dangerous. If you have a president who is unwilling to abide by the rulings of the courts, who’s unwilling to uphold the Constitution, then there are no guardrails who can stop him.”

Recent polls show former US President Donald Trump besting his White House successor in five out of six battleground states, making a second Trump presidency a real legitimate possibility.

Exodus (35-36)

•December 5, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

Q. Could one unexpected day the Jews bring out the Ark of the Covenant and cause both the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to collapse?

Exodus 35

And Moses gathered all the congregation of the children of Israel together and said unto them, “These are the words which the Lord hath commanded, that ye should do them: — the narrative of what relates to the construction of the sanctuary is now resumed from Exodus 31:18.

Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be for you a holy day, a Sabbath of rest to the Lord. Whosoever doeth work therein shall be put to death. — six days shall work be done; work for the tabernacle, but on the seventh day they must not strike a stroke, no, not at the tabernacle work; the honour of the sabbath was above that of the sanctuary;

— shall be put to death; the Targum of Jonathan adds, by the casting of stones, stoning outside the camp being the punishment of sabbath breakers, Numbers 15:35.

Ye shall kindle no fire throughout your habitations upon the Sabbath day.” — ye shall kindle no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day; this law seems the need to be emphasized, again and again; continuing; it is said to be throughout their generations as elsewhere, where the law of the sabbath is repeated;

God raise up Bezaleel and Aholiab for the crafting of his vessels and edifices

And Moses spoke unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, saying, “This is the thing which the Lord commanded, saying, 

‘Take ye from among you an offering unto the Lord. Whosoever is of a willing heart, let him bring it, an offering of the Lord: gold and silver and brass; — let him bring it, an offering of the Lord; or an offering to him, otherwise not; if brought stubborn and grudgingly it would not be acceptable, for God loves a willing and cheerful giver: gold, silver, and brass;

and blue and purple and scarlet, and fine linen and goats’ hair; 

and rams’ skins dyed red, and badgers’ skins, and shittim wood; 

and oil for the light, and spices for anointing oil and for the sweet incense; 

and onyx stones, and stones to be set for the ephod and for the breastplate. 

10 “‘And every wisehearted among you shall come and make all that the Lord hath commanded: 

11 the tabernacle, his tent and his covering, his clasps, and his boards, his bars, his pillars and his sockets; 

12 the ark and the staves thereof, with the mercy seat and the veil of the covering; 

13 the table and his staves and all his vessels, and the showbread; 

14 the candlestick also for the light, and his furniture and his lamps with the oil for the light; 

15 and the incense altar and his staves, and the anointing oil, and the sweet incense, and the hanging for the door at the entrance of the tabernacle; 

16 the altar of burnt offering with his brazen grate, his staves and all his vessels, the laver and his foot; 

17 the hangings of the court, his pillars and their sockets, and the hanging for the door of the court; 

18 the pegs of the tabernacle, and the pegs of the court and their cords; 

19 the clothes of service to do service in the holy place, the holy garments for Aaron the priest and the garments of his sons to minister in the priest’s office.’” 

Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be for you a holy day, a Sabbath of rest to the Lord

20 And all the congregation of the children of Israel departed from the presence of Moses. 

21 And they came every one whose heart stirred him up, and every one whom his spirit made willing, and they brought the Lord’S offering to the work of the tabernacle of the congregation, and for all his service and for the holy garments. 

22 And they came, both men and women, as many as were willinghearted, and brought bracelets and earrings, and rings and tablets, all jewels of gold; and every man who offered, offered an offering of gold unto the Lord. 

23 And every man with whom was found blue and purple and scarlet, and fine linen and goats’ hair, and red skins of rams and badgers’ skins, brought them. 

24 Every one who offered an offering of silver and brass brought the Lord’S offering; and every man with whom was found shittim wood for any work of the service brought it.

25 And all the women who were wisehearted spun with their hands and brought that which they had spun, both of blue and of purple, and of scarlet and of fine linen. 

26 And all the women whose heart stirred them up in wisdom spun goats’ hair.

27 And the rulers brought onyx stones, and stones to be set for the ephod and for the breastplate, 

28 and spices, and oil for the light and for the anointing oil, and for the sweet incense. 

29 The children of Israel brought a willing offering unto the Lord, every man and woman whose heart made them willing to bring for all manner of work, which the Lord had commanded to be made by the hand of Moses.

30 And Moses said unto the children of Israel, “See, the Lord hath called by name Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur of the tribe of Judah. — both Bezalee and Aholiab; Aholiab, though subordinate to Bezaleel, was the director of his own department, that of weaving and embroidery (Exodus 38:23), and had to instruct in it as Bezaleel had in his.

31 And He hath filled him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom, in understanding and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship, — God hath filled Bezaleel with his Spirit, in wisdom, in understanding;

32 and to devise skillful works, to work in gold and in silver and in brass, 

33 and in the cutting of stones to set them, and in carving of wood to make any manner of skillful work. 

34 And He hath put in his heart that he may teach, both he and Aholiab, the son of Ahisamach of the tribe of Dan. — and he hath put in his heart that he may teach; instruct others in the things be had knowledge of; the Lord not only gave him gifts of wisdom, understanding, and knowledge, to devise and contrive curious works;

35 Them hath He filled with wisdom of heart, to work all manner of work of the engraver and of the skilled workman, and of the embroiderer in blue and in purple, in scarlet and in fine linen, and of the weaver —even of those who do any work and of those who devise skillful work.” 

Exodus 36

Then Bezaleel and Aholiab, and every wisehearted man in whom the Lord put wisdom and understanding to know how to work all manner of work for the service of the sanctuary, wrought according to all that the Lord had commanded. 

And Moses called Bezaleel and Aholiab, and every wisehearted man in whose heart the Lord had put wisdom, even every one whose heart stirred him up, to come unto the work to do it. 

And they received from Moses all the offering which the children of Israel had brought for the work of the service of the sanctuary, to make it thereby. And they brought yet unto him freewill offerings every morning. 

Whosoever doeth work on the Sabbath therein shall be put to death

And all the wise men who wrought all the work of the sanctuary came every man from his work which they made, 

and they spoke unto Moses, saying, “The people bring much more than enough for the service of the work which the Lord commanded to make.” 

And Moses gave a commandment, and they caused it to be proclaimed throughout the camp, saying, “Let neither man nor woman make any more work for the offering of the sanctuary.” So the people were restrained from bringing, 

for the supply they had was sufficient for all the work to make it, and too much. 

And every wisehearted man among them who wrought the work of the tabernacle made ten curtains of finetwined linen, and blue and purple and scarlet; with cherubims of skillful work made he them. 

The length of one curtain was twenty and eight cubits, and the breadth of one curtain four cubits; the curtains were all of one size. 

10 And he coupled the five curtains one unto another, and the other five curtains he coupled one unto another. 

11 And he made loops of blue on the edge of one curtain from the selvage in the coupling. Likewise he made in the outermost side of another curtain, in the coupling of the second. 

12 Fifty loops made he in one curtain, and fifty loops made he in the edge of the curtain which was in the coupling of the second; the loops held one curtain to another. 

13 And he made fifty clasps of gold, and coupled the curtains one unto another with the clasps. So it became one tabernacle. 

14 And he made curtains of goats’ hair for the tent over the tabernacle; eleven curtains he made them. 

15 The length of one curtain was thirty cubits, and four cubits was the breadth of one curtain; the eleven curtains were of one size. 

16 And he coupled five curtains by themselves and six curtains by themselves. 

17 And he made fifty loops upon the outermost edge of the curtain in the coupling, and fifty loops made he upon the edge of the curtain which coupleth the second. 

18 And he made fifty clasps of brass to couple the tent together, that it might be one. 

19 And he made a covering for the tent of rams’ skins dyed red, and a covering of badgers’ skins above that. 

20 And he made boards for the tabernacle of shittim wood, standing upright. 

21 The length of a board was ten cubits, and the breadth of a board one cubit and a half. 

22 One board had two tenons equally distant one from another. Thus did he make for all the boards of the tabernacle.

23 And he made boards for the tabernacle, twenty boards for the south side southward. 

24 And forty sockets of silver he made under the twenty boards: two sockets under one board for his two tenons, and two sockets under another board for his two tenons. 

25 And for the other side of the tabernacle, which is toward the north corner, he made twenty boards 

26 and their forty sockets of silver: two sockets under one board, and two sockets under another board. 

27 And for the sides of the tabernacle westward he made six boards. 

28 And two boards made he for the corners of the tabernacle in the two sides. — —

29 And they were coupled beneath and coupled together at the head thereof to one ring; thus he did to both of them in both the corners. 

30 And there were eight boards, and their sockets were sixteen sockets of silver, under every board two sockets. 

31 And he made bars of shittim wood: five for the boards of the one side of the tabernacle, 

32 and five bars for the boards of the other side of the tabernacle, and five bars for the boards of the tabernacle for the sides westward. 

33 And he made the middle bar to extend through the boards from the one end to the other. 

34 And he overlaid the boards with gold, and made their rings of gold to be places for the bars, and overlaid the bars with gold. 

35 And he made a veil of blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen; with cherubims he made it of skillful work. 

36 And he made thereunto four pillars of shittim wood and overlaid them with gold. Their hooks were of gold, and he cast for them four sockets of silver. 

37 And he made a hanging for the tabernacle door of blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen, of needlework, 

38 and the five pillars of it with their hooks. And he overlaid their capitals and their fillets with gold, but their five sockets were of brass. 

US Osprey crashes in Okinawa

•December 4, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US military aircraft suffers fatal crash in Okinawa, some 2 miles off Yakushima island.

RT News • November 29, 2023 // Politico

Authorities on the Island of Okinawa want the US’ V-22 Osprey fleet grounded after the incident

And they shall fall one upon another as if it were before a sword when none pursueth

At least one remains (24-year-old Staff Sgt Jacob M Galliher of Pittsfield, Massachusetts) have been recovered and seven others their status ‘unknown’ after a V-22 Osprey aircraft operated by the US military crashed off Yakushima Island in southwestern Japan on Wednesday. The crash is the latest in a series of accidents involving the tilt-rotor aircraft.

The vertical-take-off plane, which was assigned to the Yokota Air Base in Tokyo, disappeared from radar while en route to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa on Wednesday afternoon, according to the Japanese Defense Ministry.

The Japanese Coast Guard said that it received a distress call moments before the Osprey crashed into the sea, several hundred kilometers north of Okinawa. One of the eight people aboard the aircraft was found dead at the scene, the coast guard said, while a group of local fishermen told Reuters that three others were found nearby in unknown condition.

A wreck found near the Osprey that crashed into the sea off Yakushima Island

Okinawa Governor Denny Tamaki told reporters that he would seek the suspension of all US Osprey flights in Japan “until the cause of the accident is identified.” Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, a close partner of Washington, said that he would not push for a grounding until the crash is investigated.

In service since 2007, the V-22 Osprey can take off like a helicopter, before tilting its twin rotors forward and flying like a conventional turboprop plane. The US and Japanese militaries are the world’s only operators of the aircraft.

The crash is the second such incident in Japan involving an Osprey. A crash landing onto an Okinawa reef in 2016 enraged locals, who were already furious over two cases of rape and murder by US troops earlier that year.

Of the US’ 54,000 troops in Japan, the majority are stationed on Okinawa. Locals stage annual protests against their presence, with this year’s demonstrations drawing large crowds amid Japan’s ongoing remilitarization and growing tensions between the US and China.

Dark clouds hang over where the US Navy and Air Force were operating

Aside from the two crashes in Japan, the US has lost 11 Ospreys to crashes and malfunctions since 2007. Three US Marines were killed and 20 injured when the Osprey they were traveling on crashed during a training exercise in Australia in August, while five Marines died when their Osprey crashed near Glamis, California last June.

An undisclosed number of Ospreys were grounded in February over a clutch issue that was blamed for at least four incidents since 2017.

Pentagon says “We’re broke!”

•December 3, 2023 • Leave a Comment

‘We’re taking it out of hide’: Pentagon says it has no money for Middle East buildup

Politico • November 28, 2023 // RT News

The Defense Department has ordered an additional aircraft carrier strike group, air defenses, fighter jets and hundreds of troops to the Middle East since the surprise terrorist attacks on Israel on Oct 7, in an effort to prevent the conflict from spiraling into a regional war.

The US Navy’s USS Gerald R Ford supercarrier plying in the Mediterranean

The problem: Congressional dysfunction means the Pentagon has no money to pay for the buildup.

The military, like the rest of the federal government, is operating under a temporary funding measure that freezes spending at the previous year’s levels. And because the Middle East troop movements weren’t planned, the Pentagon has had to pull money from existing operations and maintenance accounts, DOD spokesperson Chris Sherwood said.

President Joe Biden signed the stopgap measure this month to keep the government open until lawmakers can agree on a full-year spending bill.

Because DOD had to hunt for funds, that means less money for training, exercises and deployments the military had already planned for the year. Some contractual payments could be delayed, Sherwood said.

“Current events have revised some of the operational assumptions used to develop the FY 2024 President’s Budget request. Specifically, neither the base budget request nor the FY 2024 supplemental request included funding for US operations related to Israel,” he said.

“We’re taking it out of hide,” Sherwood added.

The buildup in the Middle East — which has included extending the deployment of the Gerald R Ford Carrier Strike Group operating off the coast of Israel — has therefore forced the military departments and US Central Command to reassess the requirements for current and future operations based on the developing conflict, he said.

The Dwight D Eisenhower alongside the Gerald R Ford in the Mediterranean

As of Tuesday afternoon, DOD said it was still working on releasing an estimate of the total cost of the US support for Israel.

Top Pentagon officials warn year after year about the harm that temporary funding measures have on military readiness. Operating under a stopgap measure prevents the department from starting any new programs or paying for anything above the previous year’s levels.

That burden is now weighing heavier than usual on DOD, as the Pentagon supports two wars at once: in Ukraine and in Israel.

“We’ve gotten used to getting by, CR to CR, but it’s with significant consequence,” Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks said during a Nov 21 event in Washington, using the abbreviation for continuing resolution. “That has a cost. You can’t buy back the time. You just can’t.”

Hicks estimated the impact of keeping the Pentagon under the stopgap effectively means the department takes a $35 billion cut.

“We have a responsibility to build trust with Congress — to get done what we want to get done,” Hicks said. “But the truth of the matter is, trust is a two-way street, and we are really being challenged to trust that our partners in Congress can get done what they need to do for us to achieve those ends.”

Once the continuing resolution runs out Feb 2, it’s up to lawmakers to pass a full-year spending bill. But if the bickering drags on through April, the Pentagon and other federal agencies will face a 1 percent across-the-board spending cut.

Exodus (33-34)

•December 2, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15

Exodus 33

1 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Depart and go up hence, thou and the people whom thou hast brought up out of the land of Egypt, unto the land which I swore unto Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, saying, ‘Unto thy seed will I give it.’ 

— the land which I swore unto Abraham, Isaac and to Jacob; saying, unto thy seed will I give it: meaning the land between the two great rivers, which as he had promised with an oath to their fathers to give it to them, he would faithfully observe it, though they were unworthy of such a favour.

And I will send an angel before thee; and I will drive out the Canaanite, the Amorite, and the Hittite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite” — and I will drive out the Canaanite, the Amorite, and the Hittite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite; who were now the inhabitants of the land, and these he promises drive out, to make way for their possession of it;

— and that “by his hand” as the Targum of Jonathan interprets it, by the hand of the angel. Only six nations are mentioned, though there were seven; the Girgashite is omitted, but added in the Septuagint version.

unto a land flowing with milk and honey. For I will not go up in the midst of thee, for thou art a stiffnecked people, lest I consume thee on the way.” — unto a land flowing with milk and honey; abounding with all the necessaries and good things of life;

— for I will not go up in the midst of thee; lest I consume thee, for “God is a consuming fire” Exodus 32:10; Leviticus 10:2; Hebrews 12:29;

And when the people heard these evil tidings they mourned, and no man put on his ornaments. — when the people heard these evil tidings, they mourned; it was something that these sinful people felt the tidings to be “evil” to shrink from the presence of God;

— his near presence, by day and by night, constantly (Exodus 13:22), and they dreaded a change, which they felt must involve a loss, and one the extent of which they could not measure; “an angel” they thought, is a poor consolation when we are craving for God himself!

For the Lord had said unto Moses, “Say unto the children of Israel, ‘Ye are a stiffnecked people. I will come up into the midst of thee in a moment and consume thee. Therefore now put off thy ornaments from thee, that I may know what to do unto thee.’” — I will come up; that is, If I were to go up for one moment in the midst of thee, I should consume thee;

— therefore now put off thy ornaments from thee; put them aside altogether; show thy penitence by giving up their use; denies them the tokens of his presence they had been blessed with; token of their sorrow the Lord required of his offending people; and mourn for their sin.

— that I may know what to do unto thee; that I may either inflict my judgments, or suspend them, as thou art penitent or impenitent.

And the children of Israel stripped themselves of their ornaments by Mount Horeb. — and the children of Israel stripped themselves of their ornaments; that is, left off their ornaments, ceased to wear them altogether.

And Moses took the tabernacle and pitched it outside the camp, afar off from the camp, and called it the tabernacle of the congregation. And it came to pass that every one who sought the Lord went out unto the tabernacle of the congregation, which was outside the camp. 

— perhaps this tabernacle was a model of the tabernacle that had already been erected, this, a hasty draft from the pattern showed him in the mount, designed for direction to the workmen, and used in the mean time as a tabernacle of meeting between God and Moses about public affairs;

— or, did Moses, with the help of a few hundreds of the Levites among the thousands available, moved the sanctuary and pitched it outside the camp, afar off from the camp; to signify to them that they were unworthy of close proximity;

— the Targum of Jonathan says “the tabernacle he took away from thence” seems like this tabernacle was the original taken away; and pitched outside the camp;

— the King James and Geneva Study Bible versions say “without the camp” such old English usage is misleading; hence better to use the 21st Century King James Version or KJ21.

And it came to pass, when Moses went out unto the tabernacle, that all the people rose up and stood every man at his tent door, and looked after Moses until he had gone into the tabernacle. — when Moses went out; all the people rose up; probably Moses “went out” at set times each day;

— and the people watched for his going, and “rose up,” as a mark of respect and reverence. They felt that he went to the tent mainly to pray for them;

— the Targum of Jonathan says adversely about the people being wicked: “that all the wicked people arose, and stood, every man at the door of his tent, and looked with the evil eye after Mosheh, when he entered the tabernacle.”

And it came to pass, as Moses entered into the tabernacle, the pillar of cloud descended and stood at the door of the tabernacle, and the Lord talked with Moses. — and as Moses entered into the tabernacle, the cloudy pillar descended; that is, from the top of Mount Sinai in which the Lord was;

— and all the people rose up and worshipped, everyman in his tent door; it was awesome sight, so they bowed, not to Moses, for he was gone into the tabernacle out of sight, but a deep fear and adorating bow to the Lord in the pillar of cloud.

“Thou canst not see My face, for there shall no man see Me and live.” 

11 And the Lord spoke unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he returned again into the camp; but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle.

— face to face, or, mouth to mouth, as Numbers 12:8; not that God hath face or mouth, or that Moses could behold it, which is denied, Exodus 33:20; but the sense is, he spake with him freely and familiarly, plainly, cordially, openly, not by an angel in a dream or vision, as he did to other prophets;

— but his servant Joshua departed not out of the tabernacle; probably Joshua abode there to assist and direct those who resorted thither to seek God in Moses’s absence; and Joshua seems to be appointed for this work rather than Aaron, or any other of the elders, because they had one way or other been guilty of the idolatry; and he was the general of the army at the battle with Amalek;

12 And Moses said unto the Lord, “See, Thou sayest unto me, ‘Bring up this people,’ and Thou hast not let me know whom Thou wilt send with me. Yet Thou hast said, ‘I know thee by name, and thou hast also found grace in My sight.’ 

— I know thee by name; God had shown this knowledge when He called on Moses out of the burning bush (Exodus 3:4), and again, probably, when he “called unto him out of the midst of the cloud” (Exodus 24:16); it implies a very high degree of Divine favour. God “knows by name” only those whom he greatly regards.

13 Now therefore, I pray Thee, if I have found grace in Thy sight, show me now Thy way, that I may know Thee, that I may find grace in Thy sight; and consider that this nation is Thy people.” — shew me now thy way: either the way which he himself would take, the way of his providence in bringing the children of Israel into the land of Canaan;

14 And He said, “My presence shall go with thee, and I will give thee rest.” — my presence shall go with thee; or before thee, both with Moses and before the people; meaning the Angel of his presence he had before promised;

15 And he said unto Him, “If Thy presence go not with me, carry us not up hence. — that is, Let us rather die in the wilderness with thy presence and favour, than go into Canaan without God’s presence;

16 For wherein shall it be known here that I and Thy people have found grace in Thy sight? Is it not in that Thou goest with us? So shall we be separated, I and Thy people, from all the people who are upon the face of the earth.” — and if thou wilt lead the people up to Canaan, consider that we are thine own people, to whom thou must acknowledge thyself as our God.

17 And the Lord said unto Moses, “I will do this thing also that thou hast spoken; for thou hast found grace in My sight, and I know thee by name.” — and I know thee by name; he owns the truth of the thing, on which Moses had formed his plan, and what can be a greater blessing than to partake of the special plan of God, and to be personally known to him;

18 And he said, “I beseech Thee, show me Thy glory.” — Moses repeats, in a more definite form, his request above in verse 13 “show me now Thy way.” He asks to be allowed to see Gods’s glory; but is told in reply that he cannot see this in its fulness;

19 And He said, “I will make all My goodness pass before thee; and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee, and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy.” 

20 And He said, “Thou canst not see My face, for there shall no man see Me and live.” — thou canst not see my face; the full display of his glory, that light inaccessible, before which the angels stand, but which would be insufferable to mortal eyes; this no man can see and live.

21 And the Lord said, “Behold, there is a place by Me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock.

22 And it shall come to pass, while My glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a cleft of the rock, and will cover thee with My hand while I pass by; 

23 and I will take away Mine hand, and thou shalt see My back parts, but My face shall not be seen.” 

MSG

God said, “Look, here is a place right beside me. Put yourself on this rock. When my Glory passes by, I’ll put you in the cleft of the rock and cover you with my hand until I’ve passed by. Then I’ll take my hand away and you’ll see my back. But you won’t see my face.”

Exodus 34

1 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Hew thee two tablets of stone like unto the first, and I will write upon these tablets the words that were in the first tablets which thou brokest. — hew thee two tables; something is always lost by sin, even when it is forgiven. The first tables were “the work of God” (Exodus 32:16). the second were hewn by the hand of Moses.

And be ready in the morning, and come up in the morning unto Mount Sinai, and present thyself there to Me on the top of the mount. — and present thyself there to me on the top of the mount; where the pillar of cloud stood, and near it Moses was to stand and wait to hear what would be said unto him, and to see what would be made to pass before him.

And no man shall come up with thee, neither let any man be seen throughout all the mount; neither let the flocks nor herds feed before that mount.” — neither let the flocks nor herds feed before that mount; or over against it, or rather “near” it; Moses was to be alone, and no one was to be seen in any part of the mount.

And he hewed two tablets of stone like unto the first; and Moses rose up early in the morning and went up unto Mount Sinai, as the Lord had commanded him, and took in his hand the two tablets of stone. —and Moses rose up early in the morning: and went up unto Mount Sinai, as the Lord had commanded him; which was the third time of his going there, and every time he continued forty days and forty nights;

And the Lord descended in the cloud and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of the Lord. — and the Lord descended in the cloud; the same with the cloudy pillar, which had gone up from the door of the tabernacle, and was on high in the air over the mount, and on which the Lord now descended in it;

And the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, “The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, — the Lord, the Lord God proclaims, “The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious. . . ”

keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children unto the third and to the fourth generation.” 

MSG

So Moses cut two tablets of stone just like the originals. He got up early in the morning and climbed Mount Sinai as God had commanded him, carrying the two tablets of stone. God descended in the cloud and took up his position there beside him and called out the name, God. God passed in front of him and called out,

“God, God, a God of mercy and grace, endlessly patient—so much love, so deeply true—loyal in love for a thousand generations, forgiving iniquity, rebellion, and sin. Still, he doesn’t ignore sin. He holds sons and grandsons responsible for a father’s sins to the third and even fourth generation.”

Targum of Jonathan

And he hewed two tables of stone like the former: and Mosheh arose in the morning and ascended Mount Sinai, as the Lord had instructed him, and took in his hand the two tables of stone. And the Lord made His Shekinah to pass by before his face, and proclaimed,

The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and nigh in mercies, abounding to exercise compassion and truth; keeping mercy and bounty for thousands of generations, absolving and remitting guilt, passing by rebellions, and covering sins; pardoning them who convert unto the law, but holding not guiltless in the great day of judgment those who will not convert; visiting the sins of fathers upon rebellious children upon the third and upon the fourth generation.

And Moses made haste, and bowed his head toward the earth and worshiped. — Moses made haste, and bowed his head; as the Divine glory passed before him, Moses bowed his head in adoration, worshipping God, and not daring to look until the glory had gone by.

And he said, “If now I have found grace in Thy sight, O Lord, let my Lord, I pray Thee, go among us, for it is a stiffnecked people; and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us for Thine inheritance.” — O Lord, let my Lord, I pray thee, go amongst us;

— as the Lord had signified as if he would not go among them, but leave them to the conduct of a an angel; and Moses had before prayed that his presence or face might go with them;

10 And He said, “Behold, I make a covenant. Before all thy people I will do marvels such as have not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation; and all the people among whom thou art shall see the work of the Lord, for it is a fearsome thing that I will do with thee. 

— for it is a terrible thing that I will do with thee; restrains this to Moses and interprets this of the wonderful shining of the skin of his face, when he came down from the mount, which made the children of Israel afraid to come nigh him;

11 Observe thou that which I command thee this day. Behold, I drive out before thee the Amorite and the Canaanite, and the Hittite and the Perizzite, and the Hivite and the Jebusite. 

— the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite; six nations are only mentioned, though there were seven, the Girgashites being omitted, because either they left the land before; or because they were subjugated by the others; but they are retained in the Septuagint version.

12 Take heed to thyself, lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither thou goest, lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee. — lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee; be the means of drawing them into the same sinful practices with themselves, especially into idolatrous ones, and so of bringing ruin and destruction on them.

13 But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their Asherah poles. — and cut down their groves; which were clusters of trees, where they had their temples and their idols, and did service to them, and where, besides idolatry, many impurities were committed.

14 For thou shalt worship no other god; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God, — whose name is Jealous; who hath made himself known by, and glories in that name; the jealous God, who cannot endure any competitor or corrival; whereas the false and puny gods of the heathens were contented with multitudes of partners.

15 lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee and thou eat of his sacrifice, — and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice; invite to eat of what remained, that was offered to the idol: hence it appears, that having feasts at sacrifices, and eating things offered to idols in a festival way, are very ancient practices;

16 and thou take their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods. — and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods; by the means of tempting and drawing them into idolatrous practices, as the wives of Solomon were a snare to him.

17 “Thou shalt make thee no molten gods. — thou shalt make thee no molten gods; it is just possible that the Israelites when they worshipped the golden calf may have conceived that they were not breaking the second commandment, which forbade the adoration of any “graven image.” An express law was therefore made against “molten images.”

18 “The Feast of Unleavened Bread shalt thou keep. Seven days thou shalt eat unleavened bread, as I commanded thee, in the time of the month of Abib; for in the month of Abib thou camest out from Egypt. — the feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep; which was instituted at the time of their coming out of Egypt, and on that account, and then observed, Exodus 12:15 and afterwards repeated, and the month expressed in which they were to keep it;

19 “All that openeth the womb is Mine, and every firstling among thy cattle, whether ox or sheep, that is male. — all that openeth “the womb” is mine, and every firstling among thy cattle, whether ox or sheep, that is male, shall be sanctified, and set apart for his use;

20 But the firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb; and if thou redeem him not, then shalt thou break his neck. All the firstborn of thy sons thou shalt redeem. And none shall appear before Me empty. — and none shall appear before me empty; at the grand festivals, the Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles;

21 “Six days thou shalt work, but on the seventh day thou shalt rest; in plowing time and in harvest thou shalt rest. — in earing and in harvest thou shall rest; that is, in the time of ploughing, and in the time of reaping and gathering in the harvest;

22 And thou shalt observe the Feast of Weeks of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the Feast of Ingathering at the year’s end. — the feast of weeks; called in Exodus 23:16, “the feast of harvest,” and in the New Testament “the day of Pentecost”

23 Thrice in the year shall all your menchildren appear before the Lord God, the God of Israel. — the God of Israel; who had chosen them to be his special people, had redeemed them out of Egypt, and done great things for them since; had made a covenant with them.

24 For I will cast out the nations before thee and enlarge thy borders; neither shall any man desire thy land when thou shalt go up to appear before the Lord thy God thrice in the year. — neither shall any man desire thy land; I will not only tie their hands, that they shall make no invasion upon you, but I will take off their thoughts and affections from such an enterprise, which it was very easy for God to effect many ways.

25 “Thou shalt not offer the blood of My sacrifice with leaven, neither shall the sacrifice of the Feast of the Passover be left until the morning. — thou shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven; that is, not to kill the passover while there was any leaven in their houses; so the Targum of Jonathan says “You shall not sacrifice the victim of My passover before you have done away with leaven;”

26 The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring unto the house of the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not boil a kid in his mother’s milk.” — the first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring; this, and another law in this verse, concerning not seething a kid in his mother’s milk, are repeated from Exodus 23:19.

27 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Write thou these words, for according to the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel.” — write for thee these words, that is, put them in writing for thine own use and the use of thy people.

God wrote the two tablets of testimony in Paleo-Hebrew, not square script Hebrew

29 And it came to pass, when Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the two tablets of testimony in Moses’ hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses knew not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with Him. 

— the skin of his face shone, while he talked with him: the Targum of Jonathan is, “Mosheh knew not that the visage (form) of his face shone with the splendour which had come upon him from the brightness of the glory of the Lord’s Shekinah in the time of His speaking with him.”

30 And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone, and they were afraid to come nigh him. — behold, the skin of Moses’ face shone; darted out rays of light and glory all around him, Aaron and the people were afraid to go near Moses when they saw the brightness of his face.

— they were afraid, their fear arose from a sense of guilt; the beaming radiance of his countenance made him appear to their awe-struck consciences of a flaming sword from heaven.

31 And Moses called unto them, and Aaron and all the rulers of the congregation returned unto him; and Moses talked with them. — and Moses talked with them; after he had put a vail on his face, of which there is an account in the following verses;

— he talked with them friendly, and told them all that had happened to him in the mount; what a glorious sight he had been indulged with; what a proclamation of the grace and goodness of God had been made to him; and what laws and ordinances God had enjoined him and their observance.

Later the two tablets of testimony were placed in the Ark of the Covenant

32 And afterward all the children of Israel came nigh, and he gave them in commandments all that the Lord had spoken with him on Mount Sinai. 

— and afterward all the children of Israel came near; that is, after Aaron and the rulers had had a conversation with Moses, then the whole body of the people by turns were admitted to come before him, and hear the laws of God from him;

33 And until Moses had done speaking with them, he put a veil on his face. — and till Moses had finished speaking with them, he had a veil over his face.

34 But when Moses went in before the Lord to speak with Him, he took the veil off until he came out. And he came out, and spoke unto the children of Israel that which he was commanded. 

— and he came out, and spake unto the children of Israel that which he was commanded; out of the tabernacle with the law and commands now given, for these he had already declared;

— but after times, and all such times when he went in to the Lord to inquire of him his mind and will concerning certain things, in which the people wanted information, when, upon his return, he acquainted them with whatsoever the Lord ordered to be done.

35 And the children of Israel saw the face of Moses, that the skin of Moses’ face shone; and Moses put the veil upon his face again, until he went in to speak with Him. 

— and Moses put the veil upon his face again, until he went in to speak with him; this he did from time to time, when he came out from the Lord he put on his veil, and when he went in again, he takes it off.

MSG

When Moses finished speaking with them, he put a veil over his face, but when he went into the presence of God to speak with him, he removed the veil until he came out.

When he came out and told the Israelites what he had been commanded, they would see Moses’ face, its skin glowing, and then he would again put the veil on his face until he went back in to speak with God.

The “Leading 200 Science Cities” list

•December 1, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Chinese cities soar in science ranking while US and European rivals drop

South China Morning Post • November 24, 2023

Beijing is once again world’s top city for high-quality research output according to annual Nature Index, while Shanghai comes in third place

The other 18 Chinese metro areas among the top 50 jump up the list, with up-and-comer Hefei beating out London and Los Angeles

Chinese cities are rapidly growing in high-quality scientific research while American and European rivals are dropping, according to a global ranking of top science cities by Nature Index released on Wednesday.

The “Leading 200 Science Cities” list – maintained by the academic journal Nature – tracks research output by measuring contributions to academic articles published in 82 of the world’s most influential natural science journals from 2015 to 2022.

A total of 32 cities in mainland China made the 2023 list, and almost all of them climbed up the rankings compared to their positions on last year’s list, with only one exception: Taiyuan, an inland city located in central China.

Five out of the top 10 cities on the 2023 list are in mainland China, and Beijing once again ranks as the top science city in the world.

The top five cities – Beijing, New York, Shanghai, Boston, and the San Francisco Bay Area – remained unchanged.

But there were some notable shifts among the rest of the top-ranked cities. The other 18 mainland Chinese cities that made the top 50 jumped to a higher ranking compared to last year, while most major cities outside China, including Tokyo, Paris and London, fell. The only exception was Seoul, which rose two spots.

The Nature Index measures two different scores – “count” and “share.” A city receives a count value of one for each article with at least one author affiliated with an institution in that city. The sum of these values is the city’s count score.

For the share score, each article is assigned a value of one, which is split equally among all authors. For instance, for an article with 10 authors, each author receives a share value of 0.1. Each city’s share score is calculated by adding up the share values of the authors in that city.

According to both indicators, Beijing overwhelmingly outperformed runner-up New York. The Chinese capital’s share score was 3,734.62 and its count score was 7,841 in the most recent ranking, whereas the figures for New York were 1,924.53 and 4,693 respectively.

A growing number of Chinese cities showed strong upwards momentum compared to the previous year, edging out other international research hubs.

For instance, the eastern city of Nanjing moved from eighth to sixth place, surpassing both Baltimore-Washington and the Tokyo metropolitan area. The southern metropolis of Guangzhou climbed from 10th to eighth place, displacing Paris, which fell from the ninth to the 11th spot.

The city of Hefei in southeast China surpassed both Los Angeles and London in its share score – the number that ultimately determines the Nature Index rankings – rising by three places to 13th place on this year’s list.

When Nature first launched the global science city ranking in 2018, just 10 Chinese cities ranked among the top 50. Six years later, that number has already doubled.

“Beijing and other Asian cities are rapidly rising in the field of science, technology and innovation,” said Zeng Rong, vice-president of Tsinghua University in Beijing, in an interview with state news agency Xinhua on Wednesday. “There is a greater need for them to play an important role in international cooperation in the field.”

Major Chinese cities have increasingly poured money into science and technology, which they consider to be one of the crucial driving forces behind urban development.

For example, Hefei’s financial investment in science and technology increased from 4 per cent of the city’s general public expenditure to 14.2 per cent in the decade from 2012 to 2022.

The number of national hi-tech enterprises in the city grew from 615 to 4,578 over the same period.

“We are the city that is most willing to invest in technology,” Hefei officials were quoted as saying by local media last year.

According to the latest official data, Hefei is now home to 12 large scientific facilities, and four national key laboratories have been approved this year, which will bring the city’s total to six.

Hefei is also home to the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), where scientists like Pan Jianwei are leading China’s research and development in quantum technology. The university’s laboratories have led to the establishment of several hi-tech firms in the city.

In another Nature Index ranking released in June, USTC ranked fourth among institutions globally, just behind Stanford University, in terms of high-quality scientific research output.

RankCity/Metro areaCountry
1Beijing China
2New York United States
3Shanghai China
4Boston United States
5San Francisco Bay United States
6Baltimore-Washington United States
7Tokyo Japan
8Nanjing China
9Paris France
10Guangzhou China
11Wuhan China
12Los Angeles United States
13London United Kingdom
14Seoul South Korea
15Chicago United States
16Hefei China
17Zürich  Switzerland
18Singapore Singapore
19Hangzhou China
20Tianjin China
21San Diego United States
22Cambridge United Kingdom
23Hong Kong China
24Munich Germany
25Philadelphia United States
26Oxford United Kingdom
27Berlin Germany
28Shenzhen China
29Xi’an China
30Chengdu China
31Houston United States
32Seattle United States
33Melbourne Australia
34Changsha China
35Changchun China
36Jinan China
37Atlanta United States
38Ann Arbor United States
39Toronto Canada
40Sydney Australia
41Daejeon South Korea
42Lausanne  Switzerland
43Kyoto Japan
44Ithaca United States
45Barcelona Spain
46Copenhagen Denmark
47Moscow Russia
48Suzhou China
49Dalian China
50Fuzhou China
51Chongqing China
52Madrid Spain
53Osaka Japan
54Stockholm Sweden
55Montreal Canada
56Dallas–Fort Worth United States
57Tsukuba Japan
58Vienna Austria
59Taipei Taiwan
60St Louis United States
61Boulder United States
62Austin United States
63Xiamen China
64Pittsburgh United States
65Heidelberg Germany
66Urbana United States
67Lanzhou China
68Qingdao China
69Nagoya Japan
70Brisbane Australia
71Vancouver Canada
72Dresden Germany
73Amsterdam Netherlands
74Minneapolis–Saint Paul United States
75Madison United States
76Göttingen Germany
77Durham United States
78State College United States
79Hamburg Germany
80Milan Italy
81Rehovot Israel
82Santa Barbara United States
83Edinburgh United Kingdom
84Chapel Hill United States
85Harbin China
86Geneva  Switzerland
87Grenoble France
88Bengaluru India
89Leuven Belgium
90Münster Germany
91Manchester United Kingdom
92Davis United States
93Rome Italy
94Irvine United States
95Bristol United Kingdom
96Zhengzhou China
97Utrecht Netherlands
98College Station United States
99Jerusalem Israel
100Tel Aviv Israel
From Wikipedia: The top 100 cities and metropolitan areas with the highest share of articles published in scientific journals in 2021 according to the Nature Index 2022

2022 Statistics: China 24; US 28; Germany 7; UK 6; Japan 5; Switzerland 3; Australia 3; Canada 3; Israel 3; Netherland 2; France 2; Spain 2; Italy 2; South Korea 2; Belgium 1; Sweden 1; Denmark 1; Austria 1; Singapore 1; Taiwan 1; Russia 1; India 1

China’s Fujian carrier flexes tech race

•November 30, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China’s Fujian carrier flexes next-gen launch tech

China’s latest aircraft carrier is testing an advanced electromagnetic launch system, marking a great leap forward for its naval power projection

AsiaTimes by Gabriel Honrada • November 28, 2023 // The EurAsian Times

China’s Type 003 Fujian aircraft carrier has commenced testing its state-of-the-art electromagnetic catapults for launching jet fighters, marking a new era in Chinese naval power.

The Chinese carrier displaces over 80,000 tons, measures approximately 316 meters in length and can carry 70 aircraft including J-15 fighters and Z-9C anti-submarine helicopters.

The Chinese aircraft carrier Fujian, in a new era of Chinese naval power

This month, Naval News reported that China’s Type 003 Fujian aircraft carrier has started testing its electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS), a significant upgrade from traditional steam catapults which use steam piped from the ship’s turbines to launch aircraft.

Electromagnetic catapults can launch heavier aircraft, meaning more types can be launched from a carrier while each fighter aircraft can carry more fuel and weapons. It is also said to be gentler on the jet airframes, reducing maintenance downtime.

Naval News shows footage from social media with the carrier conducting dead load launch tests, a standard procedure for carriers equipped with catapults. The source mentions this testing phase involves launching test vehicles from the carrier’s catapults to validate their functionality.

It notes that the Fujian was observed moving away from its berth, sparking speculation about an imminent sea trial linked to the catapult testing. However, Naval News says the timeframe for further testing remains uncertain but a sea trial may happen shortly.

The Naval News report notes that the Fujian represents a significant advancement for the People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) as the first Chinese carrier equipped with EMALS and featuring several technological firsts.

The US Navy’s USS Gerald R Ford supercarrier is now plying in the Mediterranean

It says the Fujian’s development, construction and testing phases are being closely monitored with frequent updates shared through overflight and satellite imagery on social media.

Naval News compares the Fujian with the US Navy’s USS Gerald R Ford (CVN-78), which is also equipped with EMALS. Despite the similarities, however, the Chinese system differs technically from the American EMALS.

The report says that the USS Gerald R Ford’s testing timelines and challenges might only provide a broad reference for Fujian’s progress as the Chinese carrier faces unique challenges.

The USS Gerald R Ford experienced multiple delays before entering service linked to constant redesigns and rebuilds from incorporating multiple advanced technologies on a carrier for the first time, such as the EMALS, Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) and Advanced Weapon Elevator (AWE).

The Fujian, the first PLA-N carrier of its size and capabilities, began construction some time before 2018 and was launched in June 2022. It is expected to undergo extensive trials and testing, potentially leading to commissioning in 2025.

China’s carrier fleet is set for rapid expansion. In a June 2023 article for Aviation Week Network, Bradley Perrett notes that the Fujian’s successful sea trials would pave the way for a fourth Chinese nuclear-powered carrier and up to six carriers by 2040. Perrett also predicts that China’s shipborne fighter numbers will quadruple over the coming decade.

Perrett says Fujian took around six years to construct while the Shandong was completed in just 4.5 years, although it was not put into operation until 1.6 years later.

The Fujian is technically more advanced than the other Chinese carriers

He mentions China could have five carriers by 2030 if it starts building fourth and fifth ships soon, possibly by next year. Perrett notes that one of the upcoming carriers could be made by Dalian Shipbuilding, the shipyard in northeast China that constructed the Liaoning and Shandong. He suggests Shanghai Jiangnan, Fujian’s builder, could build the other simultaneously.

China’s first carrier, Liaoning, is based in Qingdao, East China’s Shandong Province, near the East China Sea, Yellow Sea, and Bohai Sea. The second carrier, Shandong, is based in Sanya, South China’s Hainan Province, near the South China Sea. The homeport of Fujian is not yet known.

China is also reportedly exploring the acquisition of more nuclear-powered carriers, a development that would eliminate the requirement for frequent refueling, enhancing the carrier’s operational endurance and autonomy.

Exodus (31-32)

•November 30, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

Q. Could one unexpected day the Jews bring out the Ark of the Covenant and cause both the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to collapse?

Exodus 31

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

“See, I have called by name Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah. — I have called by name. God “calls by name” only those whom he appoints to some high office, as Moses (Exodus 3:4; Exodus 33:12), Cyrus (Isaiah 45:3, 4), and here Bezaleel and Aholiab;

God raise up Bezaleel and Aholiab for the crafting of his vessels and edifices

And I have filled him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom and in understanding and in knowledge and in all manner of workmanship, — I have filled him with the spirit of God; wisdom, understanding and knowledge; and in all manner of artistic workmanship;

to devise skillful works: to work in gold and in silver and in brass, — to be skillful goldsmiths or brasiers;

and in cutting of stones to set them, and in carving of timber, to work in all manner of workmanship. — to be a first-class artisan, competent to take charge of both the plain and ornamental work, which the building of any sacred edifice required;

And I, behold, I have given with him Aholiab, the son of Ahisamach, of the tribe of Dan; and in the hearts of all who are wisehearted I have put wisdom, that they may make all that I have commanded thee: — Aholiab, of the tribe of Dan; to be a partner with Bezaleel, as Moses and Aaron, Joshua and Zerubbabel,

the tabernacle of the congregation, and the ark of the Testimony and the mercy seat that is thereupon, and all the furniture of the tabernacle,

and the table and his furniture, and the pure candlestick with all his furniture, and the altar of incense,

and the altar of burnt offering with all his furniture, and the laver and his foot,

10 and the clothes of service, and the holy garments for Aaron the priest and the garments of his sons to minister in the priest’s office,

11 and the anointing oil and sweet incense for the holy place. According to all that I have commanded thee shall they do.”

13 “Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘Verily My Sabbaths ye shall keep; for it is a sign between Me and you throughout your generations, that ye may know that I am the Lord who doth sanctify you. — it is a sign between me and you; throughout your generations; a token of the covenant between them, of his being their God and they his people in a peculiar sense;

— one which no other nations of the world observe; of his sanctifying and separating them from all other people; for this was not a sign between him and other nations, but between him and the people of Israel only; and was to be observed throughout their ages;

14 Ye shall keep the Sabbath therefore, for it is holy unto you. Every one who defileth it shall surely be put to death; for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people. — for it is holy unto you; a day that was set apart of God for holy exercises, and by doing any servile work upon it, or not observing it in a religious way, shall surely be put to death;

— every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death; this is a serious enactment, and must be regarded in conjunction with the dignity attached to Sabbath observance by its having become the special covenant sign between God and His people;

15 Six days may work be done, but on the seventh is the Sabbath of rest, holy to the Lord. Whosoever doeth any work on the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.

— but in the seventh is the sabbath of rest; from worldly labour, and was typical of spiritual rest here, and holy to the Lord; separated from other days, and entirely devoted to the worship and service of God, and to be kept holy to the Lord in all holy and religious exercises, as hearing and studying the word, and praying;

16 Therefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations for a perpetual covenant. — for a perpetual covenant, or by a perpetual covenant, or it is a perpetual covenant, that is, not to be obsolete but a perpetual agreement.

17 It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel for ever; for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He rested and was refreshed.’” — t is a sign, repeated for emphasis as a sign of the covenant between God and Israel;

18 And He gave unto Moses, when He had made an end of communing with him upon Mount Sinai, two tablets of testimony, tablets of stone, written with the finger of God. — written with the finger of God, that is, by God himself, and not by an angel; but with the power or Spirit of God;

The two tablets of testimony, tablets of stone, written with the finger of God

Exodus 32

1 And when the people saw that Moses delayed to come down out of the mount, the people gathered themselves together unto Aaron and said unto him, “Arise, make us gods which shall go before us; for as for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we know not what has become of him.”

— how ridiculous the assertion that “the people” did not know what had become of Moses! They knew that he was up there with God. The elders, Aaron, Joshua and Hur, would have told them that; the fire on the mount would have burned in on all minds the confirmation. They were just rebellious!

And Aaron said unto them, “Break off the golden earrings which are in the ears of your wives, of your sons and of your daughters, and bring them unto me.” — Aaron’s compliance just a reflection of his cowardice; he knew as well as what he should have said, but, like many another man in influential position, when beset by popular cries, he was frightened, and yielded when he should have ‘set his face like a flint.’

And all the people broke off the golden earrings which were in their ears, and brought them unto Aaron. — all the people brake off the golden earrings; Aaron had miscalculated the strength of the people’s fanaticism; ot the slightest resistance was offered to his requirement. “All the people,” with one accord, surrendered their earrings ready for idol worship.

And he received them from their hand, and fashioned it with an engraving tool after he had made it a molten calf; and they said, “These are thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt!” — a molten calf; it has been usual to regard the selection of the “calf” form for the image as due to Egyptian influences;

— a sacred bull, called Apis, was worshipped at Memphis, and another, called Mnevis, at Heliopolis, both being regarded as actual incarnate deities.

And when Aaron saw it, he built an altar before it; and Aaron made proclamation and said, “Tomorrow is a feast to the Lord.” — and when Aaron saw the molten calf, he made proclamation, “tomorrow is a feast to the Lord;”

— the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem paraphrase it, “and Aaron saw Hur slain before him,” for reproving them of their idolatry, that is, Aaron, fearing they would also take away his life if he opposed them, he quickly grant his approval of idol worship;

And they rose up early on the morrow, and offered burnt offerings, and brought peace offerings; and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to play. — they rose up early; to show their zeal these idolaters began early in the morning, and offered burnt-offerings; and to play; to dance and sing, as was done by the Egyptians in the worship of their Apis or Ox;

And the Lord said unto Moses, “Go, get thee down; for thy people which thou broughtest out of the land of Egypt have corrupted themselves. — the Lord said unto Moses, Go, get thee down; Moses was, of course, wholly ignorant of all that had occurred in the camp. The thick cloud which covered the top of Sinai had prevented his seeing what occurred in the plain below;

— for thy people which thou broughtest out of the land of Egypt have corrupted themselves; their works, their ways and their manners; their minds, the imaginations of their hearts, were first corrupted, and this led on to a corruption of actions, and defiled themselves yet more and more, and made themselves abominable in the sight of God;

They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them. They have made themselves a molten calf and have worshiped it, and have sacrificed thereunto and said, ‘These are thy gods, O Israel, which have brought thee up out of the land of Egypt!’”

— they have turned aside quickly, quickly after the law was given them, and they had promised to obey it; quickly after God had done such great things for them, and declared his kind intentions to do greater.

And the Lord said unto Moses, “I have seen this people, and behold, it is a stiffnecked people. — it is a stiff-necked people; it is generally explained as “obstinate,” but rather means “perverse,” the metaphor being taken from the horse that stiffens his neck against the pull of the rein, and will not be guided by the rider.

10 Now therefore let Me alone, that My wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them; and I will make of thee a great nation.” — now, therefore, let me alone, the Targum of Jonathan says, “and now leave off thy prayer, and do not cry for them before me;” as the Prophet Jeremiah was often bid not to pray for this people in his time, which was a token of God’s great displeasure with them;

— full text from Targum of Jonathan

And now, cease from thy prayer, and cry not for them before Me; for I will let My anger burn like strong fire against them, and consume them, and I will make thee a great people.

11 And Moses besought the Lord his God and said, “Lord, why doth Thy wrath wax hot against Thy people, whom Thou hast brought forth out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? — and Moses besought the Lord his God; if God would not be called the God of Israel, yet he hoped he might address him as his own God.

12 Why should the Egyptians speak and say, ‘For mischief did He bring them out, to slay them in the mountains and to consume them from the face of the earth’? Turn from Thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against Thy people.

— turn from thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against thy people; not that there is any turning or any change of his mind, or any such passions and affections in him as expressed here; but this is said after the manner of men concerning him, when he alters the course of his dealings with men according to his unalterable will.

13 Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, Thy servants to whom Thou sworest by Thine own self and saidst unto them, ‘I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have spoken of will I give unto your seed, and they shall inherit it for ever.’” — to whom thou swarest by thine own self; which he did, because he could swear by no greater; and for the confirmation of his covenant and promise, Genesis 22:16.

14 And the Lord repented of the evil which He thought to do unto His people. — and the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people; he did not do what he threatened to do, but a change of mind and did what Moses desired he would;

15 And Moses turned and went down from the mount, and the two tablets of the testimony were in his hand. The tablets were written on both their sides; on the one side and on the other were they written. — Moses carries them in both hands, being of stone; Targum of Jonathan says “and the two tables of the testimony were in his hands,”

16 And the tablets were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tablets. — and the tables were the work of God; not of angels or men; the stones were made and formed by God into the shape they were; and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tables; 

17 And when Joshua heard the noise of the people as they shouted, he said unto Moses, “There is a noise of war in the camp.” — Joshua had waited upon the middle of the mount for Moses, and so knew neither what the people had done, nor heard what God had said to Moses;

— and when Joshua heard the noise of the people, as they shouted; dancing about the calf: when Moses went up into the mount, Joshua went with him, and tarried in a middle part of the mount all the forty days until he returned;

18 And Moses said, “It is not the voice of them that shout for mastery, neither is it the voice of them that cry for being overcome; but the noise of them that sing do I hear.” — but the noise of them that sing do I hear; as at a merry entertainment; Moses, who knew what the children of Israel had done, and what they were about, could better judge of the nature of the sound he heard than Joshua could, who knew nothing of what was transacting;

19 And it came to pass, as soon as he came nigh unto the camp, that he saw the calf and the dancing; and Moses’ anger waxed hot, and he cast the tablets out of his hands and broke them beneath the mount. — and he cast the tables out of his hands, and brake them beneath the mount of Sinai; at the foot of it:

— he brought the tables, told them what they were, and writing them with his own fingers, engraving them himself on such tables of stone; and then broke them to pieces, to denote that they had broken these laws, and deserved to be broke in pieces and destroyed themselves; and this he did before their eyes;

20 And he took the calf which they had made and burned it in the fire and ground it to powder, and strewed it upon the water and made the children of Israel drink of it. — ground it to powder; melted it either into one great mass, or rather into divers little fragments, which afterwards by a the or other instruments he, by the help of many others, might soon grind to powder, or dust of gold.

21 And Moses said unto Aaron, “What did this people unto thee, that thou hast brought so great a sin upon them?” — and Moses said unto Aaron; having destroyed the calf, and thereby expressed his abhorrence of their idolatry, he examines the cause and reason of it; and begins with Aaron, though his own brother, with whom he had committed the government of the people during his absence; —

22 And Aaron said, “Let not the anger of my lord wax hot. Thou knowest the people, that they are set on mischief. — and Aaron said, Let not the anger of my lord wax hot; Aaron cuts a poor figure, making a shuffling excuse and betraying more dread of the anger of Moses than of the Lord.

23 For they said unto me, ‘Make us gods which shall go before us; for as for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we know not what has become of him.’ — we wot not what is become of him; their words because they carried in them some reflection on Moses for staying so long in the mount;

— and as if that contributed much to this affair, and which put the people on forming such a scheme, they concluding he must be dead by then, as the Targum of Jonathan says, be consumed in the mountain, by the flaming fire from before the Lord.

24 And I said unto them, ‘Whosoever hath any gold, let them break it off.’ So they gave it to me. Then I cast it into the fire, and there came out this calf.” — and there came out this calf; he speaks of it as if the gold became in the form of a calf without any design, or without using any methods to put it in this form; as if done by the work of magic;

— the Targum of Jonathan says,

And I said to them, Whoever hath gold, let him deliver and give it to me; and I cast it into the fire, and Satana entered into it, and there came out of it the similitude of this calf!

25 And when Moses saw that the people were naked (for Aaron had made them naked unto their shame among their enemies), — Moses saw that the people were naked; the obvious meaning of the word פרע, parua (unrestrained) used here; it is the sense they were stripped of their ornament and armour, besides their jewels; and gotten out of control;

26 then Moses stood in the gate of the camp and said, “Who is on the Lord’S side? Let him come unto me.” And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him. — the tribe of Levi, Moses’ own tribe, now distinguished itself by immediately returning to its allegiance and obeying the call to fight on the side of Moses;

27 And he said unto them, “Thus saith the Lord God of Israel: ‘Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbor.’”

— and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp; not into the tents, where good men might be bemoaning their sins, but throughout the streets, where many were loitering, they showed no sign of any remorse by these idolaters;

— and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour; who were idolaters; none were to be spared on account of relation, friendship or acquaintance.

28 And the children of Levi did according to the word of Moses, and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men. — about 3000 men fell by their sword on that day; and if Levi stood the test, how did Aaron escape his penalty?

— the Levites were to slay those of this wickedness; yet escaped being executed but those who openly stood forth; those who persisted in shouting and dancing, after night were dying, even into the morning; these sinners feel secure and jovial in their sin.

29 For Moses had said, “Consecrate yourselves today to the Lord, even every man upon his son and upon his brother, that He may bestow upon you a blessing this day.” — consecrate yourselves; that is, offer a sacrifice, “and make atonement for yourselves before the Lord,” as the Targum of Jonathan says;

30 And it came to pass on the morrow that Moses said unto the people, “Ye have sinned a great sin. And now I will go up unto the Lord. Perhaps I shall make an atonement for your sin.” — and I will go up unto the Lord: on the top of Mount Sinai: and I shall make atonement for your sin; not by any sacrifice offered, but to intercede on their behalf for God to forgive their sin;

God wrote them with his fingers in Paleo-Hebrew, not square script Hebrew

31 And Moses returned unto the Lord and said, “Oh, this people have sinned a great sin, and have made themselves gods of gold. — Moses said unto the people, Ye have sinned a great sin; he had labored to show the people the heinous nature of their sin, and to bring them to repentance.

32 Yet now, if Thou wilt forgive their sin — and if not, blot me, I pray Thee, out of Thy book which Thou hast written!” — as a true mediator of his people, Moses was ready to stake his own life for the deliverance of the nation, and not just to live before God himself.

33 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Whosoever hath sinned against Me, him will I blot out of My book. — whosoever hath sinned against me, him will I blot out: Ezekiel 18:4; “the soul that sinneth, it shall die.”

34 Therefore now go, lead the people unto the place of which I have spoken unto thee; behold, Mine angel shall go before thee. Nevertheless in the day when I visit I will visit their sin upon them.”

— my angel shall go before thee; the promise is, as nearly as possible, a repetition of the original one, “Behold, I send an angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared” Exodus 23:20;

35 And the Lord plagued the people, because they made the calf which Aaron made. — the Lord plagued the people, because they made the calf; no immediate judgements were inflicted, but this early lapse into idolatry was always mentioned as an aggravation of their subsequent apostasies;

— the Lord plagued the people; I will visit their sin upon them; when I shall punish them for their other sins, which I foresee they will commit; and I will remember and punish this also.

“Who are the children of Esau?” (Genesis 36)

•November 29, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Who is Edom — that name Edom perpetuated the remembrance of the foolish bargain Esau made when he sold his birthright for that red pottage.

~~~~

However the book of Obadiah identifies the posterity of Esau today as Spain.

Genesis 36

1 Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom. — it seem not only that Esau had lost his birthrights, but his name as well;

— now Edom is used in place of the name Esau, which he received at his birth, because the former became the national designation of his descendants; the Edomites; others are Idumeans, Hasmonean; and from his famed grandson, Amalek, the Amalekites;

— these are the generations of Esau; who has the honour of having an account of his posterity recorded, for the sake of his progenitors, Abraham and Isaac, and because the Edomites, his descendants, were neighbours to Israel, and their genealogy would be of use to cast light on the following relations of what passed between them at latter years.

Esau took his wives from the daughters of Canaan: Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite; and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah, the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite;

— the names of Esau’s three wives differ from those given in the previous accounts (Genesis 26:34: Judith and Basemath both are Hittites; and Genesis 28:9: Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael), and in one instance the father’s name as well;

— perhaps Esau might have five wives:

(1) Adah, the daughter of Elon the Hittite;
(2) Aholibamah, the daughter of Anah, the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite;
(3) Basemath, the daughter of Ishmael, and sister of Nebaioth;
(4) Judith, the daughter of Beeri the Hittite;
(5) Mahalath, the daughter of Ishmael, and sister of Nebaioth;

— unlike Jacob, who went back and took wives from his kinsmen, Esau took wives from the local ‘natives’ which displeased both his parents, Isaac and Rebecca. Esau’s descendents are a mixtures of Canaanites, Hittites, Hivites, known to be among the posterity of Ham; and Ishmaelites, a mix with the Egyptians;

— further, according to the Midrash and Aggadah, Esau’s first two wives, Adah and Judith, are described as adulterous and idolatrous.

and Basemath, Ishmael’s daughter, sister of Nebajoth. — Basemath was listed as a Hittite in Genesis 26:34;

And Adah bore to Esau, Eliphaz; and Basemath bore Reuel;

and Aholibamah bore Jeush and Jaalam and Korah. These are the sons of Esau, who were born unto him in the land of Canaan. — these are the sons of Esau, who were born unto him in the land of Canaan; perhaps his fourth and fifth wives, their sons were born after they left Canaan.

Rashi: Oholibamah bore…and Korah: This Korah was illegitimate. He was the son of Eliphaz, who had been intimate with his father’s wife, Oholibamah, the wife of Esau. This is evidenced by the fact that he [Korah] is [also] listed among the chieftains of Eliphaz at the end of this chapter. — [from Gen. Rabbah 82:12]

And Esau took his wives, and his sons and his daughters, and all the persons of his house, and his cattle and all his beasts, and all his substance which he had gotten in the land of Canaan, and went into the country from the face of his brother Jacob.

— Esau sought a home further south in Seir, because he knew that Jacob, as the heir, would enter upon the family possessions, so without waiting till Jacob returned, he actually took possession further south;

— “because of Jacob” perhaps for fear of him, as the Targum of Jonathan, which paraphrases the words, “for there fell upon him a fear of Jakob his brother;” because he knew, by the blessing of his father, and the oracle of God, and his concurring providence in all things, that the land of Canaan belonged to Jacob,

Rashi:

and the land of their sojournings could not: provide [sufficient] pasture for their animals. The Midrash Aggadah (Gen. Rabbah 82:13), however, explains “because of his brother Jacob,” [as follows:] Because of the note of obligation of the decree: “that your seed will be strangers” (Gen. 15: 13), which was put upon the descendants of Isaac.

He (Esau) said, “I will get out of here. I have neither a share in the gift-for the land has been given to him-nor in the payment of the debt.” [He left] also on account of the shame that [he felt because] he had sold his birthright. — [from Gen. Rabbah 82:13]

For their riches were more than that they might dwell together, and the land wherein they were strangers could not bear them because of their cattle. — the land wherein they were strangers; the large growth of their wealth made the separation of Esau and Jacob as inevitable;

Thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir. Esau is Edom. — Mount Seir; the land of Idumea extends from the southern extremity of the Dead Sea to the Gulf of Elath, and consists of a chain of mountains running parallel to the Akaba, or continuation of the deep depression through which the Jordan flows till it loses itself in the Dead Sea.

— Esau is Edom, so called from the red pottage he had of Jacob, which is repeated to fix the odium of that transaction upon him, as well as for the sake of what follows, showing the reason why his posterity were called Edomites.

And these are the generations of Esau, the father of the Edomites in Mount Seir.

10 These are the names of Esau’s sons: Eliphaz the son of Adah the wife of Esau, Reuel the son of Basemath the wife of Esau.

11 And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.

12 And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz, Esau’s son, and she bore to Eliphaz, Amalek: these were the sons of Adah, Esau’s wife. — among the sons of Eliphaz we find Amalek, whose mother was Timna, the concubine of Eliphaz; the ancestor of the Amalekites, who attacked the Israelites at Horeb as they came out of Egypt under Moses (Exodus 17:8);

— more about Timna, the mother of Amalek, from Rashi:

And Timna was a concubine: [This passage is here] to proclaim the greatness of Abraham-how much [people] longed to attach themselves to his descendants. This Timna was a daughter of chieftains, as it is said: “and the sister of Lotan was Timna” (below verse 22).

Lotan was one of the chieftains of the inhabitants of Seir, from the Horites, who had dwelt there before. She said, “I may not be worthy of marrying you, but if only I could be [your] concubine” (Gen. Rabbah 82:14). In (I) Chronicles (1:36) [the Chronicler] enumerates her among the children of Eliphaz [here she is counted as the daughter of Seir the Horite, and the concubine of Eliphaz].

This teaches [us] that he (Eliphaz) was intimate with the wife of Seir, and Timna emerged from between them (Seir’s wife and Eliphaz), and when she grew up, she became his (Eliphaz’s) concubine. That is the meaning of “and the sister of Lotan was Timna.” [Scripture] did not count her with the sons of Seir, because she was his (Lotan’s) sister through his mother but not through his father. — [from Tanchuma Vayeshev 1]

13 And these are the sons of Reuel: Nahath and Zerah, Shammah and Mizzah: these were the sons of Basemath, Esau’s wife.

14 And these were the sons of Aholibamah, the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon, Esau’s wife; and she bore to Esau: Jeush and Jaalam and Korah.

15 These were chiefs of the sons of Esau. The sons of Eliphaz the firstborn son of Esau: Chief Teman, Chief Omar, Chief Zepho, Chief Kenaz, — Eliphaz, as he was Esau’s first-born, so he had more than a double portion, his six sons being made dukes;

— another term for Chief is Duke; or like the sheiks or emirs of the modern East; or like the Nasi or Prince among the Israelite; that is, these men given the titles Chiefs meant that they had rose to a position of prominance to distinguish themselves from their peers;

16 Chief Korah, Chief Gatam, and Chief Amalek: these are the chiefs who came of Eliphaz in the land of Edom; these were the sons of Adah. — Amalek rose from the position of a grandson and separated himself from the rest of the Edomites by being given the title of a Chief.

17 And these are the sons of Reuel, Esau’s son: Chief Nahath, Chief Zerah, Chief Shammah, Chief Mizzah: these are the chiefs who came of Reuel in the land of Edom; these are the sons of Basemath, Esau’s wife.

18 And these are the sons of Aholibamah, Esau’s wife: Chief Jeush, Chief Jaalam, Chief Korah: these were the chiefs who came of Aholibamah the daughter of Anah, Esau’s wife.

— these would make fourteen Dukes or Chiefs, whereas it appears from the closing verses of the chapter that there were only eleven:

  • Verses 15 to 18: 1. Chief Teman, 2. Chief Omar, 3. Chief Zepho, 4. Chief Kenaz, 5. Chief Korah, 6. Chief Gatam, 7. Chief Amalek, 8. Chief Nahath, 9. Chief Zerah, 10. Chief Shammah, 11. Chief Mizzah, 12. Chief Jeush, 13. Chief Jaalam, 14. Chief Korah
  • Verses 29 to 30: 1. Chief Lotan, 2. Chief Shobal, 3. Chief Zibeon, 4. Chief Anah, 5. Chief Dishon, 6. Chief Ezer, 7. Chief Dishan
  • Verses 40 to 43: 1. Chief Timnah, 2. Chief Alvah, 3. Chief Jetheth, 4. Chief Aholibamah, 5. Chief Elah, 6. Chief Pinon, 7. Chief Kenaz, 8. Chief Teman, 9. Chief Mibzar, 10. Chief Magdiel, 11. Chief Iram

19 These are the sons of Esau, who is Edom, and these are their chiefs.

20 These are the sons of Seir the Horite, who inhabited the land: Lotan and Shobal, and Zibeon and Anah, — Mount Seir is called the land of their possession. Canaan was at this time only the land of promise. Seir was in the possession of the Edomites;

— “Seir the Horite,” the Horites Genesis 14:6, were cave-dweller, and probably got the name from the cave hewn out of the solid rock in which he was accustomed to dwell; Sela being a city of such excavated dwellings;

Rashi:

the inhabitants of the land: They were its inhabitants before Esau came there. Our Rabbis explain [that they were called, “inhabitants of the land”] (Shab. 85a) because they were skilled in making the land habitable.

[They would say,] “The length of this [measuring] stick is [good] for [planting] olives; the length of this [measuring] stick is [good] for [planting] grapevines,” for they would taste [the soil] and know what was suitable to plant in it.

21 and Dishon and Ezer and Dishan: these are the chiefs of the Horites, the children of Seir in the land of Edom.

22 And the children of Lotan were Hori and Hemam; and Lotan’s sister was Timna.

23 And the children of Shobal were these: Alvan and Manahath and Ebal, Shepho and Onam.

24 And these are the children of Zibeon: both Ajah and Anah; this was that Anah that found the mules in the wilderness as he fed the asses of Zibeon his father.

Rashi:

who found the mules in the wilderness: Heb. הַיֵמִם, mules. He mated a donkey with a mare (female horse), and it gave birth to a mule. He (Anah) was illegitimate, and he brought illegitimate offspring into the world (Gen. Rabbah 82:15).

Why were they called יֵמִם (signifying “dreaded beings”)? Because their dread (אֵימָתָן) was cast upon people; Rabbi Hanina said, “In all my days no one has ever recovered from a wound from a white female mule.” (But we see that [those bitten by white female mules] do live.

Do not read: “who has lived (וְהָיָה) ,” but “that was healed (וְחָיתָה) ,” because [such a] wound will never heal. — [from an old Rashi manuscript]) It was unnecessary to list the genealogy of the Horites except to mention Timna, and thereby inform us of the greatness of Abraham, as I explained above (verse 12). [from Chullin 7b]

25 And the children of Anah were these: Dishon, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah.

26 And these are the children of Dishon: Hemdan and Eshban, and Ithran and Cheran.

27 The children of Ezer are these: Bilhan and Zaavan and Akan.

28 The children of Dishan are these: Uz and Aran.

29 These are the chiefs who came of the Horites: Chief Lotan, Chief Shobal, Chief Zibeon, Chief Anah,

30 Chief Dishon, Chief Ezer, Chief Dishan: these are the chiefs who came of the Horites, among their chiefs in the land of Seir.

31 And these are the kings who reigned in the land of Edom, before there reigned any king over the children of Israel.

Rashi:

And these are the kings, etc.: They were eight, and, corresponding to them, Jacob set up [eight kings] and nullified the kingdom of Esau during their time. They are the following (kings): Saul, Ish-bosheth, David, Solomon, Rehoboam, Abijah, Asa, and Jehoshaphat.

During the days of his (Jehoshaphat’s) son Joram, however, it is written: “In his days, Edom revolted from under the power of Judah, and they appointed a king over themselves” (II Kings 8:20), [whereas] during Saul’s days it is written: “There was no king in Edom; a governor was king” (I Kings 22:48). [from Gen. Rabbah 83:2]

32 And Bela the son of Beor reigned in Edom; and the name of his city was Dinhabah.

33 And Bela died, and Jobab the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his stead.

34 And Jobab died, and Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead.

35 And Husham died, and Hadad the son of Bedad (who smote Midian in the field of Moab) reigned in his stead; and the name of his city was Avith.

Rashi: who defeated Moab in the field of Midian: For Midian came against Moab to wage war, and the king of Edom went to aid Moab. From here we learn that Midian and Moab were quarreling with one another, and in the days of Balaam they made peace, [in order] to band together against Israel. — [from Tanchuma Balak 3]

36 And Hadad died, and Samlah of Masrekah reigned in his stead.

37 And Samlah died, and Saul of Rehoboth by the river reigned in his stead.

38 And Saul died, and Baalhanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.

39 And Baalhanan the son of Achbor died, and Hadar reigned in his stead; and the name of his city was Pau; and his wife’s name was Mehetabel, the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Mezahab.

40 And these are the names of the chiefs who came of Esau, according to their families, after their places, by their names: Chief Timnah, Chief Alvah, Chief Jetheth,

Rashi: And these are the names of the chieftains of Esau: who were called by the names of their provinces after Hadar died and their kingdom had ceased. The first ones mentioned above (verses 15-19) are the names of their generations, and so it is delineated in (I Chronicles 1: 51): And Hadar [sic] died, and the chiefs of Edom were Chief Timna, etc.”

41 Chief Aholibamah, Chief Elah, Chief Pinon,

42 Chief Kenaz, Chief Teman, Chief Mibzar,

43 Chief Magdiel, Chief Iram: these are the chiefs of Edom, according to their habitations in the land of their possession; he is Esau, the father of the Edomites.

Rashi: Magdiel: This is Rome. — [From Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 38]

In summary, Esau took wives from the local ‘natives’ which displeased both his parents. Hence Esau’s descendents are a mixtures of Canaanites, Hittites, Hivites, known to be among the posterity of Ham; and Ishmaelites, a mix with the Egyptians. Often, many of their childen are spiritually illegitimate!

Spain at its Peak, including large parts of the Americas; scattered parts of Italy

Centuries later, the Spanish are also known to have taken wives from the natives, starting with Mexico and have mixed marriages all over South America.

Europe’s anti-semitism Rising

•November 28, 2023 • Leave a Comment

With antisemitism rising as the Israel-Hamas war rages, Europe’s Jews worry; and many will be taking Aliyah to the State of Israel. The next few years may see Israel increasing its population by 3 to 4 millions.

Yahoo News • November 26, 2023 // The Times of Israel // CNN

GENEVA (AP) — As he sits in Geneva, Michel Dreifuss does not feel all that far away from the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct 7 and Israel’s subsequent bombardment of Gaza. The ripples are rolling through Europe and upending assumptions both global and intimate — including those about his personal safety as a Jew.

Thousands gather for a march against antisemitism in Paris, France, on Nov 12, 2023. Antisemitism is spiking across Europe after Hamas’ Oct 7 massacre and Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, worrying Jews from London to Geneva and Berlin.

“Yesterday I bought a tear-gas spray canister at a military-equipment surplus store,” the 64-year-old retired tech sector worker said recently at a rally to mark a month since the Hamas killings. The choice, he says, is a “precaution,” driven by a surge of antisemitism in Europe.

Last month’s slayings of about 1,200 people in Israel by armed Palestinian militants represented the biggest killing of Jews since the Holocaust. The fallout from it, and from Israel’s intense military response that health officials in Hamas-controlled Gaza say has killed at least 13,300 Palestinians, has extended to Europe. In doing so, it has shaken a continent all too familiar with deadly anti-Jewish hatred for centuries.

Aliyah flight brings back recruits to Israeli army, among others

The past century is of particular note, of course. Concern about rising antisemitism in Europe is fueled in part by what happened to Jews before and during World War II, and that makes it particularly fearsome for those who may be only one or two generations removed from people who were the victims of riots against Jews and Nazi brutality.

What most chills many Jews interviewed is what they see as the lack of empathy for the Israelis killed during the early morning massacre and for the relatives of the hostages — about 30 of whom are children — suspended in an agonizing limbo.

“What really upsets me,” said Holocaust survivor Herbert Traube said at a Paris event commemorating the 85th anniversary of Kristallnacht, the 1938 government-backed pogroms against Jews in Germany and Austria, “is to see that there isn’t a massive popular reaction against this.”

“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15)

ACTS OF ANTISEMITISM — AND HOW THAT’S DEFINED

Antisemitism is broadly defined as hatred of Jews. But a debate has been raging for years over what actions and words should be labeled antisemitic.

Criticism of Israel’s policies and antisemitism have long been conflated by Israeli leaders such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and by some watchdog groups. Critics say that blurring helps undermine opposition to the country’s policies and amps up perceptions that any utterance or incident against Israeli policy is antisemitic.

Some language — whether for or against Israel or the Palestinians – “makes it sound like a football match,” says Susan Neiman of the Einstein Forum in Potsdam, Germany. “We are perpetuating the idea that you’ve got to be on one side or the other instead of being on the side of human rights and justice,” she said.

Others argue that antisemites often use criticism of Israel as a placeholder for expressing their views.

The list of examples of anti-Jewish sentiment since the Oct 7 attacks is long and documented by governments and watchdog groups across Europe.

—Little more than a month after the attack in Israel, the French Interior Ministry said 1,247 antisemitic incidents had been reported since Oct 7, nearly three times the total for all of 2022.

—Denmark’s main Jewish association said cases were up 24 times from the average of the last nine months.

—The Community Security Trust, which tracks antisemitic incidents in Britain, reported more than 1,000 such events — the most ever recorded for a 28-day period.

That all comes despite widespread denunciations of anti-Jewish hatred — and support for Israel — from leaders in Europe since the attack.

Some of Europe’s Jews say they see it on the streets and the news. Jewish schoolchildren face bullying on their way to class, or — in one instance — have been asked to explain Israel’s actions, according to Britain’s Community Security Trust. There’s been talk of blending in better: covering skullcaps in public and perhaps hiding mezuzahs, the traditional symbol on doorposts of Jewish homes.

In Russia, a riot broke out at an airport in which there were some antisemitic chants and posters from a crowd of men looking for passengers who had arrived from Israel. A Berlin synagogue was firebombed. An assailant stabbed a Jewish woman twice in the stomach at her home in Lyon, France, according to her lawyer.

In Prague’s Little Quarter last month, staffers at the well-known Hippopotamus bar refused to serve beer to several tourists from Israel and their Czech guides, and some patrons served up insults. Police had to step in. In Berlin, Jews are still reeling from an attempted firebombing of a synagogue last month.

“Some of us are in a state of panic,” said Anna Segal, 37, the manager of the Kahal Adass Jisroel in Berlin, a community of 450 members.

COMING TO GRIPS WITH A FEELING OF DREAD

Some community members are changing how they live, Segal said. Students no longer wear uniforms. Kindergarten classes don’t leave the building for field trips or the playground next door. Some members no longer call taxis, or they hesitate to order deliveries to their homes. Hebrew-speaking in public is fading. Some wonder if they should move to Israel.

“I hear more and more from people from the Jewish community who say they feel safer and more comfortable in Israel now than in Germany, despite the war and all the rockets,” Segal said. “Because they don’t have to hide there.”

And in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, some protesters are shouting, “ from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” Some say that’s a call for Palestinian freedom and is not anti-Jewish but anti-Israel; the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea includes not only Israel, but also the West Bank and east Jerusalem, where Palestinians have lived under Israeli occupation since 1967. Many Jews, though, say the chant is inherently anti-Jewish and calls for the destruction of Israel.

Faced with fears that antisemitism will spread, communities are taking action. A hotline has been set up in France to help provide psychological support for Jews. The Community Security Trust, which aims to protect the Jewish community and foster good relations with others, has joined with the British government to distribute primers on how to address antisemitism in primary and secondary schools.

Peggy Hicks, a director at the UN human rights office, says the actions of governments and political movements are fair game for criticism but warned against discrimination, which the Geneva-based office has long battled. In the chaos of the past weeks, she sees reason to hope.

The Star of David waving between Two Great Rivers

“I’ve been amazed in the course of my working in human rights about the amount of compassion and the resilience of of human beings,” Hicks said. “People who have lost children and come together on both sides of a conflict, who have shared a loss — but from opposing sides — and who have found a way to get past the fact that they should actually be enemies.”

She added: “I don’t think everybody has the ability to show that kind of courage. But the fact that it exists, I think, gives us all something to aspire to.”

Exodus (29-30)

•November 28, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

Q. Could on one unexpected day the Jews bring out the Ark of the Covenant and cause both the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to collapse?

Exodus 29

~~~~

This chapter deals with Aaron and his son, the purification and anointing

1 “And this is the thing that thou shalt do unto them to hallow them, to minister unto Me in the priest’s office: Take one young bullock and two rams without blemish, — this is the thing that thou shalt do unto the priests; that is, Aaron and his sons; their consecration had been commanded in the preceding chapter;

and unleavened bread and cakes unleavened tempered with oil, and wafers unleavened anointed with oil — of wheat flour shalt thou make them — unleavened bread; unleavened bread, as used to be eaten at the time of the Passover, seems to have been required as purer than leavened, since fermentation was viewed as a species of corruption.

and thou shalt put them into one basket and bring them in the basket, with the bullock and the two rams. — in the basket, with the bullock and the two rams; along with the bread, cakes, and wafers; ãnd to be brought to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, to the altar, in order to be slain and sacrificed.

And Aaron and his sons thou shalt bring unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and shalt wash them with water. — and shalt wash Aaron and his sons; water is so natural a symbol of purity, and ablution so apt a representative of the purging from sin; also to signify that they must be clean who bear the vessels and work of the Lord;

And thou shalt take the garments, and put upon Aaron the coat and the robe of the ephod and the ephod and the breastplate, and gird him with the embroidered girdle of the ephod. — and the robe of the ephod: which was all of blue, and had pomegranates and golden bells at the hem of it; this was put over the broidered coat;

— and the breastplate; with the Urim and Thummim in it, or the twelve precious stones on which were engraven the names of the twelve tribes of Israel, which hung down over the breast by wreathen chains of gold, from the shoulder pieces of the ephod;

And thou shalt put the miter upon his head and put the holy crown upon the miter. — and Moses shall put the holy crown upon the mitre; the holy crown was a plate of gold or a diadem which had these words, “holiness to the Lord” engraven on it;

— and says the Targum of Jonathan, “And thou shalt set the mitre on his head, and put the diadem upon which is engraven the Name of Holiness upon the mitre;” the mitre was on top of Aaron’s head, and upon his forehead;

Then shalt thou take the anointing oil, and pour it upon his head and anoint him. — and Moses shall pour the oil upon Aaron’s head, between his eyebrows; and anoint him;

— the Investiture of Aaron’s sons; they do not seem to have been anointed, as Aaron was, by having the holy oil poured upon their heads, but only by having some of it sprinkled upon their garments.

And thou shalt gird them with girdles, Aaron and his sons, and put the bonnets on them. And the priest’s office shall be theirs for a perpetual statute; and thou shalt consecrate Aaron and his sons. — and thou shall consecrate Aaron and his sons; or “fill the hand of them” that is, with sacrifices to offer for themselves and others;

10 “And thou shalt cause a bullock to be brought before the tabernacle of the congregation, and Aaron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head of the bullock. — “to be brought before the tabernacle” means outside the tabernacle; and thus the altar was a much larger one;

— and Aaron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head of the bullock; not Aaron first alone, and then his sons, but all together, not one after another;

11 And thou shalt kill the bullock before the Lord by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. — and thou shalt kill the bullock before the Lord; that is, Moses being ordered to do it, who now officiated as a priest; Aaron and his sons not yet completely invested with that office, or thoroughly consecrated to it, yet;

12 And thou shalt take of the blood of the bullock, and put it upon the horns of the altar with thy finger, and pour all the blood alongside the bottom of the altar. — that some of the victim’s blood should be smeared upon the altar’s horns; and the remainder should be poured at its base;

13 And thou shalt take all the fat that covereth the inwards, and the caul that is above the liver, and the two kidneys and the fat that is upon them, and burn them upon the altar.

14 But the flesh of the bullock and his skin and his dung shalt thou burn with fire outside the camp. It is a sin offering. — shalt thou burn with fire outside the camp; so the Messiah, the antitype, suffered outside the gates of Jerusalem a most painful and shameful death;

15 “Thou shalt also take one ram, and Aaron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head of the ram. — and Aaron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head of the ram; confessing their sins, acknowledging their guilt, and by this act transferring the same to the ram, which was to be a burnt offering, and was typical of the imputation of sin to the Messiah, or the Son of God, the Christ;

16 And thou shalt slay the ram, and thou shalt take his blood and sprinkle it round about upon the altar. — and thou shall take his blood, and sprinkle it round about upon the altar; the blood being received into a basin, it was not to be put upon the altar with the finger, as the blood of the bullock, but was to be sprinkled probably with a bunch of hyssop, round about upon the altar;

— this may signify that his blood has its virtue and efficacy from that, to make atonement for the sins of men, and to cleanse men from their sins.

17 And thou shalt cut the ram in pieces, and wash the inwards of him and his legs, and put them on top of his pieces and on top of his head; — and put them unto his pieces, and unto his head; lay them together, so that they might be entirely consumed at once;

18 and thou shalt burn the whole ram upon the altar. It is a burnt offering unto the Lord: it is a sweet savor, an offering made by fire unto the Lord. — for a smell of sweet savour, or a sweet smelling savour; an offering pleasing to God;

19 “And thou shalt take the other ram, and Aaron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head of the ram. —and Aaron and his sons shall put their hands on the head of the ram, as they were to do, and did, upon the head of the other;

20 Then shalt thou kill the ram, and take of his blood and put it upon the tip of the right ear of Aaron, and upon the tip of the right ear of his sons, and upon the thumb of their right hand, and upon the great toe of their right foot, and sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about.

— and put it upon the tip of the right ear of Aaron, and upon the tip of the right ear of his sons; upon the great toe of their right foot, it sanctified their whole walk in life, their “going out,” and their “coming in;” and sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about; as was done with the blood of the other ram;

21 And thou shalt take of the blood that is upon the altar and of the anointing oil, and sprinkle it upon Aaron and upon his garments, and upon his sons and upon the garments of his sons with him; and he shall be hallowed, and his garments, and his sons and his sons’ garments with him.

22 “Also thou shalt take of the ram the fat, and the rump, and the fat that covereth the inwards, and the caul above the liver, and the two kidneys and the fat that is upon them, and the right shoulder (for it is a ram of consecration),

23 and one loaf of bread and one cake of oiled bread, and one wafer out of the basket of the unleavened bread that is before the Lord.

24 And thou shalt put all in the hands of Aaron and in the hands of his sons, and shalt wave them for a wave offering before the Lord. — and shalt wave them for a wave offering before the Lord: which was waved or shook to and fro, from east to west, and from north to south, to or before him, whose are the four winds of the world;

— this was done by Moses and Aaron; “both were employed in waving, both the owners and the priest, how? the priest put his hand under the hand of the owner and waved, and in this Aaron and his sons were the owners and Moses the priest.”

25 And thou shalt receive them from their hands, and burn them upon the altar for a burnt offering, for a sweet savor before the Lord. It is an offering made by fire unto the Lord. — for a sweet savour before the Lord; that it might be pleasing and acceptable to him;

26 “And thou shalt take the breast of the ram of Aaron’s consecration, and wave it for a wave offering before the Lord; and it shall be thy part.

27 And thou shalt sanctify the breast of the wave offering and the shoulder of the heave offering, which is waved and which is heaved up, of the ram of the consecration, even of that which is for Aaron and of that which is for his sons.

28 And it shall be Aaron’s and his sons’ by a statute for ever from the children of Israel, for it is a heave offering; and it shall be a heave offering from the children of Israel from the sacrifice of their peace offerings, even their heave offering unto the Lord.

29 “And the holy garments of Aaron shall be his sons’ after him, to be anointed therein and to be consecrated in them. — and the holy garments of Aaron shall be his son’s after him; the son that succeeded him in the priesthood; for the priesthood continued in Aaron’s family by succession, the eldest son being high priest;

30 And that son who is priest in his stead shall put them on seven days, when he cometh into the tabernacle of the congregation to minister in the holy place. — shall put them on seven days; the next successor was to wear the garments seven days running;

31 “And thou shalt take the ram of the consecration and boil his flesh in the holy place. — in the courtyard at the door of the tabernacle, where it was both boiled and eaten;

32 And Aaron and his sons shall eat the flesh of the ram, and the bread that is in the basket by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

33 And they shall eat those things with which the atonement was made, to consecrate and to sanctify them; but a stranger shall not eat thereof, because they are holy. —but a stranger shall not eat thereof, because they are holy;

— meaning not just one of another nation, but of another family, though an Israelite; the Targum of Jonathan renders it, a profane or common person, a layman, one that was not a priest; who, though he was of the seed of Israel, yet not being of the seed of Aaron, as he might not eat of the above things, because they were devoted to holy uses;

34 And if aught of the flesh of the consecrations or of the bread remain unto the morning, then thou shalt burn the remainder with fire. It shall not be eaten, because it is holy. — it was not to be given to a stranger, nor to be cast to dogs;

35 “And thus shalt thou do unto Aaron and to his sons, according to all things which I have commanded thee. Seven days shalt thou consecrate them. — to make it the more solemn and efficacious, the entire sacrifice and ceremony are to be repeated every day for seven days;

36 And thou shalt offer every day a bullock for a sin offering for atonement; and thou shalt cleanse the altar when thou hast made an atonement for it, and thou shalt anoint it to sanctify it. — and thou shall offer every day a bullock for a sin offering for atonement; that is, every day of the seven days of consecration;

37 Seven days thou shalt make an atonement for the altar and sanctify it; and it shall be an altar most holy. Whatsoever toucheth the altar shall be holy. — whatsoever toucheth the altar shall be holy; that is, must be holy; nothing which is not holy must touch it;

— that such should be holy who were of the sons of Aaron, but of the rest of the people it was not lawful for them to draw nigh; the Targum of Jonathan adds “lest they be burned with the fiery flame which cometh from the holy place.”

38 “Now this is that which thou shalt offer upon the altar: two lambs of the first year, day by day continually. — two lambs day by day continually; which is the daily sacrifice;

39 The one lamb thou shalt offer in the morning, and the other lamb thou shalt offer at evening. — a lamb offered upon the altar every morning, and the other every evening “between the two evenings” hā·‘ar·bā·yim.

40 And with the one lamb a tenth part of flour mingled with a fourth part of a hin of beaten oil, and a fourth part of a hin of wine for a drink offering.

41 And the other lamb thou shalt offer at evening, and shalt do thereto according to the meat offering of the morning and according to the drink offering thereof, for a sweet savor, an offering made by fire unto the Lord.

42 “This shall be a continual burnt offering throughout your generations at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord, where I will meet you to speak there unto thee. — this shall be a continual burnt offering throughout your generations; to be offered up morning and evening in every age; at “the tabernacle of meeting, where I will meet you.”

43 And there I will meet with the children of Israel, and [the tabernacle] shall be sanctified by My glory. — and there will I meet with the children of Israel; not only with Moses or with Aaron, and his sons, but with the people themselves, by granting them his gracious presence in public ordinances; “and (Israel) shall be sanctified through My glory.”

— “the tabernacle” is added, since they are not in the original; but it makes more sense to substitute the space with Israel, that is, the people that are sanctified by his glory;

44 And I will sanctify the tabernacle of the congregation and the altar. I will sanctify also both Aaron and his sons to minister to Me in the priest’s office. — the tabernacle and the altar were sanctified, or set apart for holy uses, as well as cleansed and expiated by sacrifices;

— I will sanctify also both Aaron and his sons, to minister to me in the priest’s office;

45 And I will dwell among the children of Israel and will be their God. — I will dwell among the children of Israel; it is the fulfilment of this promise by the presence of the Shekinah within the Tabernacle; will watch over them as a nation, by a peculiar providence;

46 And they shall know that I am the Lord their God, who brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, that I may dwell among them. I am the Lord their God. — I am the Lord their God; of which he had given full proof and evidence by what he had done for them, and would yet give more; and to have the Lord our God with the greatest protection and happiness that can be enjoyed.

Exodus 30

The tabernacle, and subsequently the Temple, were arranged in three compartments: the outermost court, which was accessible to all Israelites; the second, which could only be trodden by the priests alone; and the third, where the Shekinah dwelt in solitude, broken only once a year by the foot of the High Priest.

1 “And thou shalt make an altar to burn incense upon; of shittim wood shalt thou make it. — an altar to burn incense; not an altar to burn sacrifices: cows bulls, lambs and others; here it is called the incense of spices or perfumes;

A cubit shall be the length thereof and a cubit the breadth thereof. Foursquare shall it be, and two cubits shall be the height thereof. The horns thereof shall be part of the same. — the main altar outside for sacrifices is much larger, five cubits square and three cubit in height;

And thou shalt overlay it with pure gold, the top thereof and the sides thereof round about, and the horns thereof; and thou shalt make unto it a crown of gold round about. — the top thereof, and the sides thereof, and the horns thereof: all and each of them were covered with gold; this altar had a top;

And two golden rings shalt thou make for it under the crown of it, by the two corners thereof; upon the two sides of it shalt thou make it; and they shall be for places for the staves to bear it.

And thou shalt make the staves of shittim wood and overlay them with gold. — and thou shalt make the staves of shittim wood; that is, of the same wood the altar itself was made;

And thou shalt put it before the veil that is by the ark of the Testimony, before the mercy seat that is over the Testimony, where I will meet with thee. — this altar to burn incense is to be placed in the sanctuary just before the veil; between the candlestick and the table of shewbread, outside the Holy of Holies;

And Aaron shall burn thereon sweet incense every morning. When he dresseth the lamps, he shall burn incense upon it. — Aaron was to burn sweet incense upon this altar every morning and every evening;

And when Aaron lighteth the lamps at evening, he shall burn incense upon it, a perpetual incense before the Lord throughout your generations. — a perpetual incense before the Lord throughout your generations; no “strange incense” was to be offered upon it;

Ye shall offer no strange incense thereon, nor burnt sacrifice, nor meat offering; neither shall ye pour drink offering thereon. — burnt sacrifice and meat offering are offered in another larger altar outside the sancturay;

10 And Aaron shall make an atonement upon the horns of it once in a year with the blood of the sin offering of atonements. Once in the year shall he make atonement upon it throughout your generations. It is most holy unto the Lord.” — this atonement made on the Day of Atonement; once in the year; the tenth day of the seventh month;

11 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

12 “When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel according to their number, then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul unto the Lord when thou numberest them, that there be no plague among them when thou numberest them.

— that there be no plague among them; if a man did not feel his need of “ransom,” and gladly pay the small sum at which the ransom was fixed, he would show himself so proud and presumptuous that he might well provoke a Divine “plague,” or punishment;

13 This they shall give, every one that passeth among them that are numbered: half a shekel according to the shekel of the sanctuary (a shekel is twenty gerahs); a half shekel shall be the offering to the Lord. — king David offended in not demanding payment of this tribute or atonement-tax when he numbered the people.

14 Every one who passeth among them that are numbered, from twenty years old and above, shall give an offering unto the Lord.

15 The rich shall not give more and the poor shall not give less than half a shekel, when they give an offering unto the Lord to make an atonement for your souls.

16 And thou shalt take the atonement money of the children of Israel, and shalt appoint it for the service of the tabernacle of the congregation, that it may be a memorial unto the children of Israel before the Lord, to make an atonement for your souls.”

MSG

God spoke to Moses: “When you take a head count of the Israelites to keep track of them, all must pay an atonement-tax to God for their life at the time of being registered so that nothing bad will happen because of the registration.

“Everyone who gets counted is to give a half-shekel (using the standard Sanctuary shekel of a fifth of an ounce to the shekel)—a half-shekel offering to God. Everyone counted, age twenty and up, is to make the offering to God.

“The rich are not to pay more nor the poor less than the half-shekel offering to God, the atonement-tax for your lives. Take the atonement-tax money from the Israelites and put it to the maintenance of the Tent of Meeting. It will be a memorial fund for the Israelites in honor of God, making atonement for your lives.”

17 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

18 “Thou shalt also make a laver of brass, with his foot also of brass, for washing; and thou shalt put it between the tabernacle of the congregation and the altar, and thou shalt put water therein. — a round, cauldron-shaped vessel for use by the officiating priests to wash before their entrance on their ministry; and denotes in general the necessity of purity; 

A laver of brass for washing between the tabernacle and the altar

19 For Aaron and his sons shall wash their hands and their feet thereat.

20 When they go into the tabernacle of the congregation, they shall wash with water, that they die not. Or when they come near to the altar to minister, to burn offering made by fire unto the Lord,

21 so they shall wash their hands and their feet, that they die not. And it shall be a statute for ever to them, even to him and to his seed throughout their generations.”

22 Moreover the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying,

23 “Take thou also unto thee principal spices: of pure myrrh five hundred shekels, and of sweet cinnamon half as much (even two hundred and fifty shekels), and of sweet calamus two hundred and fifty shekels, — details and directions are here given for making the holy anointing oil, and the incense to be used in the service of the tabernacle.

24 and of cassia five hundred shekels, according to the shekel of the sanctuary, and of olive oil a hin.

25 And thou shalt make from it an oil of holy ointment, an ointment compound according to the art of the perfumer; it shall be a holy anointing oil.

26 And thou shalt anoint the tabernacle of the congregation therewith, and the ark of the Testimony,

27 and the table and all his vessels, and the candlestick and his vessels, and the altar of incense,

28 and the altar of burnt offering with all his vessels, and the laver and his foot;

29 and thou shalt sanctify them, that they may be most holy. Whatsoever toucheth them shall be holy. — the Targum of Jonathan interprets it of persons that approach these holy places, and things so anointed, shall be sanctified, while others would be consumed, paraphrasing the words thus;

“and consecrate them, and they shall be most holy. Every one of the priests who approacheth to them shall be sanctified; but of the rest of the tribes, (whoever toucheth them) shall be consumed by the fiery flame from before the Lord.”

Whosoever shall make like to smell thereof, shall be put death

30 And thou shalt anoint Aaron and his sons and consecrate them, that they may minister unto Me in the priest’s office.

31 And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘This shall be a holy anointing oil unto Me throughout your generations.

32 Upon man’s flesh shall it not be poured, neither shall ye make any other like it, according to the composition of it. It is holy, and it shall be holy unto you.

33 Whosoever compoundeth any like it, or whosoever putteth any of it upon a stranger, shall even be cut off from his people.’”

— the word stranger is commonly used to imply the Gentiles, or such as were not an Israelite; but sometimes it indicates those that are not of the priestly line, and is shown here; as the Targum of Jonathan says: one that is not of the seed of Aaron;

34 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Take unto thee sweet spices: stacte and onycha and galbanum; these sweet spices with pure frankincense, of each shall there be a like weight. — various spices: stacte, onycha and galbanum; these sweet spices with pure frankincense; are holy to the Lord;

35 And thou shalt make it a perfume, a confection according to the art of the perfumer, tempered together, pure and holy.

36 And thou shalt beat some of it very small, and put it before the testimony in the tabernacle of the congregation where I will meet with thee; it shall be unto you most holy.

— thou shalt . . . put it before the testimony; some pieces of the incense were to be continually before the ark of the covenant, that is, upon the altar of incense; it was to be put there in order to be burnt, and to be smelled to.

37 And as for the perfume which thou shalt make, ye shall not make it for yourselves according to the composition thereof; it shall be unto thee holy for the Lord. — ye shall not make to yourselves according to the composition thereof; that is, for your own use, for the scenting of your rooms, or to snuff up, or smell to;

38 Whosoever shall make like unto that, to smell thereto, shall even be cut off from his people.” — the recipe for the incense as well as for the oil in the tabernacle “it shall be unto thee holy for the Lord;” that is, are sort off copyrighted by the Most High; anyone who duplicate this recipe and use it for themselves would be put to death.

China’s new Subs and Sonars Challenge

•November 27, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China’s New Subs and Sonars Challenge Supremacy of US Silent Hunter Fleets

Sputnik International • November 22, 2023

The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) surpassed the US Navy in total number of warships in late 2021. Technologically too, China has made major strides, including in the area of submarine construction and detection. These advances have sparked concerns from observers that America’s powerful fleets could be left dead in the water in a crisis.

The PLAN’s military and technological prowess against the US Navy in the field of submarine construction and anti-submarine warfare is progressing apace, and the “era of total US submarine dominance” over the People’s Republic of China is reaching its end.

That’s the conclusion reached by one of America’s top cited business newspapers in a piece focused on the Asian nation’s scientific and industrial advances for naval warfare. China, the paper pointed out, is gradually “narrowing” the gap between itself and the United States in the highly complex fields of submarine technology and undersea detection.

These developments not only threaten the Pentagon’s regional strategy of hemming China into its home ports, but could challenge US naval supremacy globally over the long term.

Earlier this year, for instance, research by the US Naval War College’s China Maritime Studies Institute pointed to Chinese advances in efficient nuclear reactors, quiet-running pump-jet propulsion systems and internal quieting devices, the latter based on “imitative innovation” of Russian technology, predicting that the PLAN’s latest nuclear-powered subs will be much harder to track than before.

Additionally, analyses of satellite photos of the Huludao Shipyard in Liaoning, northeastern China taken last year showed the construction of sections of submarine hulls larger than anything US analysts have ever seen in a Chinese sub, along with what seemed to be plans to increase production capacity.

US media citing leaked US Navy intelligence already sounded the alarm about China’s impressive shipbuilding capacity this past fall, which at 23.2 million tons per year, compared with 100,000 tons per year in the US, gives the People’s Republic the ability to build warships at a rate some 200 times greater than the US in a pinch.

On top of that, the PLAN’s rapid construction of a vast network of underwater sensors in the South China Sea and other areas along the Chinese coast known as the “Underwater Great Wall”, to look out for sub, surface warship and aerial activity, means that the Pentagon will find it more difficult to place its warships, subs and aircraft in areas around the Asian nation. The Underwater Great Wall’s construction is reportedly nearing its completion, and includes a vast network of passive and active sonar sensors, plus remote controlled underwater and surface drones which can look out for enemy activity.

China is reportedly also “getting better” at finding silent-running US attack and cruise missile subs sneaking around near its home waters, combining buoy and drone-based monitoring with the use of patrol aircraft and helicopters, for example.

In addition are the PLAN’s growing number of exercises with Russia, which, it can be assumed not only increases the Chinese Navy’s ability to coordinate with its northern neighbor in the event of an emergency, but allows it to learn from the Russian Navy’s half century-plus year experience as a major global naval power rivaled only to the US.

Australian divers shiver over Chinese sonar pulses

•November 26, 2023 • Leave a Comment

HMAS Toowoomba naval divers forced to exit water over Chinese warship sonar pulses

What are your thoughts on the recent incident where a Chinese navy destroyer used active sonar to harass a disabled Australian frigate conducting underwater repairs in international waters?

For more about the issue in Australian perspective, see ABC News • November 18, 2023

Another view presented in Quora by Aya Shawan

Not long ago, Western media were promoting “the Chinese Air Force intercepted a Canadian aircraft.” But they don’t tell you that this interception took place in the northern part of the Taiwan Strait, only dozens of kilometers away from the coast of China.

Now, the Western media is once again propagating that “the Chinese Navy is unprofessional towards Australian warships.” Okay, let’s look at the truth of the matter again.

The “exclusive economic zones” of China and Japan overlap on a large scale, and the overlapping area is closer to China’s territorial waters.

First, Australia claimed that “the warship is located within Japan’s exclusive economic zone.” It seems to tell us that they are near Japanese territorial waters. But is this true?

Let’s take a look at how big Japan’s “exclusive economic zone” is. As we all know, Japan’s “exclusive economic zone” was set unilaterally by Japan. It has a large number of overlapping areas with mainland China, Taiwan, South Korea, and North Korea, and is not recognized at all in East Asia.

Therefore, the fact that the Australian warship is “located within Japan’s exclusive economic zone” does not mean that it is “close to Japan.” On the contrary, it is likely to be close to China’s territorial waters, has entered China’s exclusive economic zone or even approached China’s territorial waters. This is also the reason for this type of incident. normal. The Chinese almost never go far from their shores on such missions.

Secondly, the news that the Chinese Navy’s use of “sonar” caused “slight injuries” to divers is not credible at all. According to news reports, the warship that intercepted the Australian Navy was the Chinese Navy No. 139 Ningbo Ship. This is a modern-class destroyer with a full load displacement of 8,500 tons and an old Soviet warship.

According to public information, the sonar equipped on this destroyer is the MGK-335 hull-acoustic hull sonar. This is an active high-power sonar designed for deep-sea nuclear submarines, with a peak operating power of hundreds of kilowatts.

The shock waves it emits can hit the submarine’s hull several kilometers away and detect the echoes. There is no point in turning on sonar for surface ship monitoring.

Because this type of sonar is powerful enough to cause injury to large marine life such as dolphins and whales, it is generally not turned on. When the warships of both sides are approaching, if the Chinese Navy really turns on this sonar, then the diver will not suffer just a “slight injury,” it will shatter people’s internal organs.

Therefore, the real situation may be that the diver suffered minor injuries due to other reasons in the process of rushing to shore. After all, the Australian Toowoomba is just a 3,600-ton frigate. When facing an 8,500-ton Chinese warship, a hasty retreat is a normal reaction.

There are a few more noteworthy keywords

1. Sanctions tasks of the United Nations

This statement is the same as that of the Canadian military aircraft, which also claimed to be carrying out “UN sanctions supervision against North Korea.” But they flew to the northern part of the Taiwan Strait.

China has publicly stated many times that the United Nations has never authorized such a mission. As one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, China’s statement is credible, and other countries have not raised any objections.

Therefore, the Australian warship’s so-called “implementation of United Nations sanctions and supervision of North Korea” is just a farce written and directed by several countries led by the United States.

The incident took place so far away from Australia. What was the Australian Navy thinking when it sent a warship to the coast of a superpower to show off? If the opponent was the United States or Russia, they would have been sunk long ago.

2. The fishing net entangled the propeller

It shows that the Australian warship has entered the fishing area instead of the normal route. This will cause disruption to both Chinese and Japanese fishermen. Whether it is Japan’s exclusive economic zone or China’s exclusive economic zone, it is undeniable that it is more than 1,000 kilometers away from Australia. That is China’s doorstep, not Australia’s.

3. Unprofessional

The Chinese Navy’s approach to foreign warships approaching China’s territorial waters has always been to “identify, warn and drive away.” This is their “professionalism.” There was no warning of weapons and no active collision, indicating that the Chinese navy was restrained. It makes no sense for the Australians to use the excuse “sonar harms divers” to divert attention.

Who are the Amalekites?

•November 26, 2023 • Leave a Comment

The Israelites fought the Amalekites numerous times; so who are the Amalekites?

(1i) Exodus 17 • on the Plain of Rephidim (ii) Deuteronomy 25; (2) I Samuel 15 • during the reign of King Saul (3) I Samuel 30 • during the reign of King David (4) Esther 3 • Haman and Mordecai (5) Ezekiel 38 • Gog and Magog

~~~~

Jewish Women’s Archive by Tamar Kadari

Timna, concubine of Eliphaz: Midrash and Aggadah

In Brief

After being denied conversion by the men of Abraham’s household, Timna becomes the concubine of Eliphaz. The Rabbis portray this action as proof of her genuine desire to convert, and Israel is punished for the Patriarch’s actions. Another midrash uses Timna to clarify an issue of lineage, ultimately showing that Esau’s descendants were born of adultery.

Timna was the sister of Lotan, one of Esau’s chiefs, and therefore the daughter of royalty. The Rabbis relate that she sought to convert and join Abraham’s household. She went to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but since they would not accept her, she went and became the concubine of Eliphaz. She declared: “Better for me to be a handmaiden to this nation [Israel], and not a noblewoman of that nation [the chiefs of Esau]” (Midrash  Tannaim on Deut., 32:47).

The Rabbis assert that Timna’s willingness to exchange her status of noblewoman for that of concubine attests to her pure intent to convert. The Patriarchs did not understand her true aim; instead of rejecting her, they should have drawn her to the bosom of Judaism. They were accordingly punished, for her union with Eliphaz produced Amalek, who would cause Israel to suffer (BT Sanhedrin 99b).

According to another tradition (TanhumaVayeshev 1), the description of Eliphaz’s “marriage” to Timna teaches of corruption and degeneration among the descendants of Seir. This midrash is based on the inconsistency concerning Timna’s lineage between Gen. 36:20–22, in which she is presented as the sister of Lotan (the son of Seir), and I Chron. 1:36, that mentions her as the daughter of Eliphaz.

The Rabbis reconcile this discrepancy by explaining that Timna was indeed Eliphaz’s daughter, as a result of his adulterous relations with Seir’s wife; to compound his sin, Eliphaz took his own daughter as his concubine. The Torah  charts the lineage of Esau’s descendants at length, in order to show that this lineage was founded in adultery.

(1) Exodus 17

When the Israelites had just came out of Egypt

Then came Amalek and fought with Israel in Rephidim. — then came Amalek, a grandson of Esau; the Amalekites had not been previously (except in the anticipatory flashforwarding in Genesis 14:7) mentioned as a tribe or nation;

— their hatred could be the old grudge of the children of Esau returning against the children of Israel; because of the affair of the birthright and blessing which Jacob stole from Esau, who were now on their march for the land of Canaan, claiming their birthright land which came to children of Esau thereby;

And Moses said unto Joshua, “Choose us out men, and go out, fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in mine hand.” — Joshua; he was a prince of the tribe of Ephraim; chosen as a leader to fight the Amalekites;

10 So Joshua did as Moses had said to him, and fought with Amalek; and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill.

— Hur; according to Josephus (Ant. Jud., iii. 2, § 4) Hur was the husband of Miriam, and so the brother-in-law of Moses and Aaron. He was a descendant of Judah through Pharez and Hezron;

— to the top of the hill; to the top of Mount Sinai or Horeb, not so much to see the battle fought, as to be seen by Joshua and his warriors;

11 And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed; and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. — Moses was getting old and was tired; his strongest arm will fail with being long held out; but it is God only whose hand is stretched out still;

12 But Moses’ hands were heavy; and they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat thereon. And Aaron and Hur held up his hands, the one on the one side and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun.

— both the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem paraphrase the words, “when Moses lift up his hands in prayer, the house of Israel prevailed, but when he restrained his hands from prayer, the house of Amalek prevailed.”

13 And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. — Amalek being distinguished from “his people” has established a strong sense that Amalek was the title of their king, or chief of the army (hence Chief Amalek in Genesis 36:16), and that it was a common title to the kings of that nation of the Amalekites, as Pharaoh was to the kings of Egypt, or Caesar to Rome;

— that’s a significant truth; a truth during Moses time during the Exodus; more probable, later, is that the name Agag had evolved into a title for their king in place of Amalek; as stated by Balaam, employed by the king of the Moabites, to pronounce a ‘curse:’ 

“He (the children of Israel) shall pour the water out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters; and his king shall be higher than Agag (hence, used in this way, it is more likely that Agag is the title of a king rather than the name of one king; and Agag was named as the king of the Amalekites in Samuel’s experience: 1 Samuel 15:8), and his kingdom (of Israel) shall be exalted” Numbers 24:7.

14 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Write this for a memorial in a book, and recount it in the ears of Joshua; for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.” — I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek; the extermination of Amalek, here prophesied, was partly accomplished in part by Saul (1 Samuel 15:8) and David (1 Samuel 30:17);

— Moses must write what had been done, what Amalek had done against Israel; write their bitter hatred; write their cruel attempts; let them never be forgotten, nor what God had done for Israel in saving them from Amalek.

15 And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Jehovahnissi [that is, The Lord my banner]; — Moses built an altar; primarily, no doubt, to sacrifice thank-offerings upon it, as an acknowledgment of the Divine help in giving Israel the victory.

16 for he said, “Because the Lord hath sworn that the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.” — the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation; until they are utterly destroyed; and so in fact he had, and thus it was;

— the Targum of Jonathan is, “he by his word will make war against those that are of the house of Amalek, and destroy them to three generations, from the generation of this world, from the generation of the Messiah, and from the generation of the world to come.”

(ii) Deuteronomy 25

17 “Remember what Amalek did unto thee on the way, when ye had come forth out of Egypt,

18 how he met thee on the way and smote the hindmost of thee, even all who were feeble behind thee, when thou wast faint and weary; and he feared not God.

19 Therefore it shall be, when the Lord thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it.

~~~~

(2) I Samuel 15

During the reign of King Saul

1 Samuel also said unto Saul, “The Lord sent me to anoint thee to be king over His people, over Israel. Now therefore hearken thou unto the voice of the words of the Lord.

Thus saith the Lord of hosts: ‘I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he lay in wait for him on the way when he came up from Egypt.

Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.’”

And Saul gathered the people together and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen and ten thousand men of Judah.

And Saul came to a city of Amalek, and lay in wait in the valley.

And Saul said unto the Kenites, “Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them; for ye showed kindness to all the children of Israel when they came up out of Egypt.” So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites.

And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, which is over against Egypt.

And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword.

But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep and of the oxen, and of the fatlings and the lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them; but every thing that was vile and refuse, that they destroyed utterly.

10 Then came the word of the Lord unto Samuel, saying,

11 “I repent that I have set up Saul to be king, for he has turned back from following Me and hath not performed My commandments.” And it grieved Samuel, and he cried unto the Lord all night.

12 And when Samuel rose early to meet Saul in the morning, it was told Samuel, saying, “Saul came to Carmel, and behold, he set him up a place, and has gone about and passed on and gone down to Gilgal.”

13 And Samuel came to Saul; and Saul said unto him, “Blessed be thou of the Lord. I have performed the commandment of the Lord.”

14 And Samuel said, “What meaneth then this bleating of the sheep in mine ears and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?”

15 And Saul said, “They have brought them from the Amalekites; for the people spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen to sacrifice unto the Lord thy God, and the rest we have utterly destroyed.”

16 Then Samuel said unto Saul, “Stay, and I will tell thee what the Lord hath said to me this night.” And he said unto him, “Say on.”

17 And Samuel said, “When thou wast little in thine own sight, wast thou not made the head of the tribes of Israel, and the Lord anointed thee king over Israel?

18 And the Lord sent thee on a journey and said, ‘Go, and utterly destroy the sinners, the Amalekites, and fight against them until they be consumed.’

19 Why then didst thou not obey the voice of the Lord, but didst leap upon the spoil and didst evil in the sight of the Lord?”

20 And Saul said unto Samuel, “Yea, I have obeyed the voice of the Lord and have gone the way which the Lord sent me, and have brought Agag the king of Amalek, and have utterly destroyed the Amalekites.

21 But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen, the chief of the things which should have been utterly destroyed, to sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in Gilgal.”

22 And Samuel said, “Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

23 For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, He hath also rejected thee from being king.”

24 And Saul said unto Samuel, “I have sinned; for I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord and thy words, because I feared the people and obeyed their voice.

25 Now therefore, I pray thee, pardon my sin, and return with me, that I may worship the Lord.”

26 And Samuel said unto Saul, “I will not return with thee; for thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, and the Lord hath rejected thee from being king over Israel.”

27 And as Samuel turned about to go away, he laid hold upon the skirt of his mantle, and it rent.

28 And Samuel said unto him, “The Lord hath rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day, and hath given it to a neighbor of thine, who is better than thou.

29 And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent; for He is not a man, that He should repent.”

30 Then he said, “I have sinned; yet honor me now, I pray thee, before the elders of my people and before Israel, and return with me, that I may worship the Lord thy God.”

31 So Samuel turned back after Saul, and Saul worshiped the Lord.

32 Then said Samuel, “Bring ye hither to me Agag, the king of the Amalekites.” And Agag came unto him charily; and Agag said, “Surely the bitterness of death is past.”

33 And Samuel said, “As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women.” And Samuel hewed Agag in pieces before the Lord in Gilgal.

34 Then Samuel went to Ramah; and Saul went up to his house to Gibeah of Saul.

35 And Samuel came no more to see Saul until the day of his death. Nevertheless Samuel mourned for Saul; and the Lord repented that He had made Saul king over Israel.

(3) I Samuel 30

During the reign of King David

1 And it came to pass, when David and his men had come to Ziklag on the third day, that the Amalekites had invaded the South and Ziklag, and smitten Ziklag and burned it with fire,

and had taken the women captive, who were therein. They slew not any, either great or small, but carried them away and went on their way.

So David and his men came to the city, and behold, it was burned with fire; and their wives and their sons and their daughters were taken captive.

Then David and the people who were with him lifted up their voice and wept, until they had no more power to weep.

And David’s two wives were taken captive: Ahinoam the Jezreelitess, and Abigail the wife of Nabal the Carmelite.

And David was greatly distressed, for the people spoke of stoning him because the soul of all the people was grieved, every man for his sons and for his daughters; but David encouraged himself in the Lord his God.

And David said to Abiathar the priest, Ahimelech’s son, “I pray thee, bring me hither the ephod.” And Abiathar brought thither the ephod to David.

And David inquired of the Lord, saying, “Shall I pursue after this troop? Shall I overtake them?” And He answered him, “Pursue, for thou shalt surely overtake them and without fail recover all.”

So David went, he and the six hundred men who were with him, and came to the Brook Besor, where those who were left behind stayed.

10 But David pursued, he and four hundred men; for two hundred remained behind, who were so faint that they could not go over the Brook Besor.

11 And they found an Egyptian in the field, and brought him to David and gave him bread, and he ate; and they made him drink water.

12 And they gave him a piece of a cake of figs and two clusters of raisins; and when he had eaten his spirit came again to him, for he had eaten no bread nor drunk any water three days and three nights.

13 And David said unto him, “To whom belongest thou, and from whence art thou?” And he said, “I am a young man of Egypt, servant to an Amalekite; and my master left me, because three days ago I fell sick.

14 We made an invasion upon the south of the Cherethites, and upon the border which belongeth to Judah and upon the south of Caleb; and we burned Ziklag with fire.”

16 And when he had brought him down, behold, they were spread abroad upon all the earth, eating and drinking and dancing, because of all the great spoil that they had taken out of the land of the Philistines and out of the land of Judah.

17 And David smote them from the twilight even unto the evening of the next day; and there escaped not a man of them, save four hundred young men who rode upon camels and fled.

18 And David recovered all that the Amalekites had carried away, and David rescued his two wives.

19 And there was nothing lacking to them, neither small nor great, neither sons nor daughters, neither spoil nor any thing that they had taken from them; David recovered all.

20 And David took all the flocks and the herds which they drove before those other cattle, and said, “This is David’s spoil.”

21 And David came to the two hundred men who were so faint that they could not follow David, whom they had made also to remain at the Brook Besor; and they went forth to meet David and to meet the people who were with him. And when David came near to the people, he saluted them.

22 Then answered all the wicked men and men of Belial of those who went with David, and said, “Because they went not with us, we will not give them aught of the spoil that we have recovered, save to every man his wife and his children, that they may lead them away and depart.”

23 Then said David, “Ye shall not do so, my brethren, with that which the Lord hath given us, who hath preserved us and delivered the company that came against us into our hand.

24 For who will hearken unto you in this matter? But as his part is who goeth down to the battle, so shall his part be who tarrieth by the supplies: they shall divide alike.”

25 And it was so from that day forward, that he made it a statute and an ordinance for Israel unto this day.

26 And when David came to Ziklag, he sent a portion of the spoil unto the elders of Judah, even to his friends, saying, “Behold, a present for you of the spoil of the enemies of the Lord”—

27 to those who were in Bethel, and to those who were in South Ramoth, and to those who were in Jattir;

28 and to those who were in Aroer, and to those who were in Siphmoth, and to those who were in Eshtemoa,

29 and to those who were in Rachal, and to those who were in the cities of the Jerahmeelites, and to those who were in the cities of the Kenites;

30 and to those who were in Hormah, and to those who were in Chorashan, and to those who were in Athach;

31 and to those who were in Hebron, and to all the places where David himself and his men were wont to haunt.

(4) Esther 3 • Haman and Mordecai

1 After these things did King Ahasuerus promote Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, and advanced him and set his seat above all the princes who were with him. — Haman was a direct descendant of Agag in the sixteenth generation and consequently an Amalekite (Targ. Sheni; Josephus, “Ant.” xi. 6, § 5).

And all the king’s servants who were in the king’s gate bowed and reverenced Haman, for the king had so commanded concerning him. But Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence.

Then the king’s servants, who were in the king’s gate, said unto Mordecai, “Why transgressest thou the king’s commandment?”

Now it came to pass, when they spoke daily unto him and he hearkened not unto them, that they told Haman to see whether Mordecai’s matters would stand; for he had told them that he was a Jew.

And when Haman saw that Mordecai bowed not nor did him reverence, then was Haman full of wrath.

<< Esther 3 to Esther 7 >>

“The adversary and enemy is this wicked Haman.”

Esther 7

Then King Ahasuerus answered and said unto Esther the queen, “Who is he, and where is he, who dared presume in his heart to do so?”

And Esther said, “The adversary and enemy is this wicked Haman.” Then Haman was afraid before the king and the queen.

And the king, arising from the banquet of wine in his wrath, went into the palace garden; and Haman stood up to make request for his life to Esther the queen, for he saw that there was evil determined against him by the king.

Then the king returned from the palace garden into the place of the banquet of wine, and Haman had fallen upon the bed whereon Esther was. Then said the king, “Will he force the queen also before me in the house?” As the word went out of the king’s mouth, they covered Haman’s face.

Haman and his ten sons were hanged upon the gallows, Esther 9:14

And Harbonah, one of the chamberlains, said before the king, “Behold also the gallows fifty cubits high which Haman had made for Mordecai, who had spoken good for the king, standeth in the house of Haman.” Then the king said, “Hang him thereon!”

10 So they hanged Haman on the gallows that he had prepared for Mordecai. Then was the king’s wrath pacified.

(5) Ezekiel 38 • Gog and Magog

Ezekiel 38:2 “Son of man, set thy face against Gog, in the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him — Gog1463 גוג (Agag 90אגג) of the land of Magog, is an abbreviated expression for “Gog from the land of Magog;”

— Magog, Meshech and Tubal, these are the sons of Japheth; Gomer, and his son, Togarmah, are mentioned later in verse 6; omitting the Japhetic tribes of Madai, Javan and Tiras; Genesis 10:2), and led by their chief, Gog, Russia; and Gog is acting as their Chief; their Prince;

~~~~

The sons of Japheth: Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. 3And the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz and Riphath and Togarmah 4And the sons of Javan: Elishah and Tarshish, Kittim and Dodanim. Genesis 10:2-4

— in Revelation 20:8, after the thousand years are over, “Gog and Magog” might be a term adopted by John either as mystical names or symbolic names of rebellious nations against the eminence of those ruling from Jerusalem; or rebelling “against the mountains of Israel” with Jerusalem as its Capital;

— second, could the term chief or title “Gog” be translated as Agag or as the Amalekitish kings instead? The name Gog occurs only in connection with Magog, except in 1 Chronicles 5:4.

In Numbers 24:7 it was translated as “Gog” in the Septuagint in place of Agag. Thus it strengthens the view that “Agag” was a dynastic name of the kings of Amalek, a grandson of Esau; just as Pharaoh was used as a dynastic name for the ancient Egyptians; Caesar for Rome and of more modern times, the Czar of Russia;

There shall come a man out of his seed, and he shall rule over many nations; and the kingdom of Gog shall be exalted, and his kingdom shall be increased. Numbers 24:7 (Septuagint) “Agag” in the Masoretic; throughout history there is no concept of any “kingdom of Gog” but a “kingdom of Agag” could easily be conceptualized as the kingdom of the Amalekites.

— a third opinion says the countries of Gog and Magog, which they call Gug and Mungug; from hence came the Turks, even from Tartary; Josephus (Antiqu.l.1.c.6.sect.1) says that the posterity of Magog are called Scythians, and these inhabited Tartary; so some commentaries make Gog to be the general of the Ishmaelites or Edomites or Turks. This land of Magog is the same with Cathaia or Scythia, that part of Tartary from whence the Turks came; Joel Richardson is of this opinion.

Exodus (27-28)

•November 25, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

Q. Could on one unexpected day the Jews bring out the Ark of the Covenant and cause both the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to collapse?

Exodus 27

~~~~

1 “And thou shalt make an altar of shittim wood, five cubits long and five cubits broad; the altar shall be foursquare, and the height thereof shall be three cubits. — ñot of gold but of brass; the height thereof shall be three cubits; a proper height for a man to minister at;

And thou shalt make the horns of it upon the four corners thereof. His horns shall be of the same, and thou shalt overlay it with brass. — his horns shall be of the same; these horns were projections pointing upward in the form either of a small obelisk, or of the horn of an ox; they were projections at the four top comers, probably not unlike the horns of bulls, whence their name; the length of the horns is not specified;

And thou shalt make his pans to receive his ashes, and his shovels and his basins and his fleshhooks and his firepans. All the vessels thereof thou shalt make of brass. — and his basins: to receive the blood of the sacrifice, and out of which it was sprinkled, as the word signifies, and may be rendered sprinkling basin;

— and his fire pans; which were a kind of censers in which coals of fire were taken off from the altar of burnt offering, and carried to the altar of incense, all the vessels thereof thou shalt make of brass; as being fittest for the use of this altar.

And thou shalt make for it a grate, a network of brass; and upon the network shalt thou make four brazen rings at the four corners thereof.

And thou shalt put it under the rim of the altar beneath, that the network may be even to the middle of the altar.

And thou shalt make staves for the altar, staves of shittim wood, and overlay them with brass.

And the staves shall be put into the rings, and the staves shall be upon the two sides of the altar to bear it.

Hollow with boards shalt thou make it. As it was shown thee on the mount, so shall they make it.

“And thou shalt make the court of the tabernacle: For the south side southward there shall be hangings for the court of fine twined linen of a hundred cubits long for one side.

10 And the twenty pillars thereof and their twenty sockets shall be of brass; the hooks of the pillars and their fillets shall be of silver.

11 And likewise for the north side, in length there shall be hangings of a hundred cubits long, and his twenty pillars with their twenty sockets of brass, and the hooks of the pillars and their fillets of silver.

12 And for the breadth of the court on the west side shall be hangings of fifty cubits, their pillars ten and their sockets ten.

13 And the breadth of the court on the east side eastward shall be fifty cubits.

14 The hangings on one side of the gate shall be fifteen cubits, their pillars three and their sockets three.

15 And on the other side shall be hangings of fifteen cubits, their pillars three and their sockets three.

16 And for the gate of the court shall be a hanging of twenty cubits of blue and purple and scarlet, and fine twined linen wrought with needlework; and their pillars shall be four and their sockets four.

17 All the pillars round about the court shall be filleted with silver; their hooks shall be of silver and their sockets of brass.

18 The length of the court shall be a hundred cubits, and the breadth fifty everywhere, and the height five cubits of fine twined linen, and their sockets of brass.

19 All the vessels of the tabernacle for all the service thereof, and all the pins thereof, and all the pins of the court, shall be of brass.

20 “And thou shalt command the children of Israel that they bring thee pure oil of beaten olives for the light to cause the lamp to burn always.

21 In the tabernacle of the congregation outside the veil, which is before the Testimony, Aaron and his sons shall tend it from evening (‘ereḇ) to morning before the Lord (יְהוָ֑ה). It shall be a statute for ever unto their generations on behalf of the children of Israel.

Exodus 28

~~~~

1 “And take thou unto thee Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him, from among the children of Israel, that he may minister unto Me in the priest’s office, even Aaron, with Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, Aaron’s sons.

And thou shalt make holy garments for Aaron thy brother, for glory and for beauty.

And thou shalt speak unto all who are wisehearted, whom I have filled with the spirit of wisdom, that they may make Aaron’s garments to consecrate him, that he may minister unto Me in the priest’s office.

“And take thou unto thee Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him,” Exodus 28:1

And these are the garments which they shall make: a breastplate and an ephod, and a robe and an embroidered coat, a miter and a girdle; and they shall make holy garments for Aaron thy brother and his sons, that he may minister unto Me in the priest’s office.

“And they shall take gold and blue and purple and scarlet, and fine linen;

and they shall make the ephod of gold, of blue and of purple, of scarlet and fine twined linen, with skillful work.

It shall have the two shoulder pieces thereof joined at the two edges thereof, and so it shall be joined together.

And the embroidered girdle of the ephod which is upon it shall be of the same, according to the work thereof: even of gold, of blue and purple and scarlet and fine twined linen.

And thou shalt take two onyx stones, and engrave on them the names of the children of Israel:

10 six of their names on one stone, and the other six names of the rest on the other stone, according to their birth.

11 With the work of an engraver in stone, like the engravings of a signet, shalt thou engrave the two stones with the names of the children of Israel. Thou shalt make them to be set in clasps of gold.

12 And thou shalt put the two stones upon the shoulders of theephod for stones of memorial unto the children of Israel; and Aaron shall bear their names before the Lord upon his two shoulders for a memorial.

13 And thou shalt make clasps of gold,

14 and two chains of pure gold at the ends; of wreathed work shalt thou make them, and fasten the wreathed chains to the clasps.

15 “And thou shalt make the breastplate of judgment with skillful work; according to the work of the ephod thou shalt make it: of gold, of blue and of purple, and of scarlet and of finetwined linen shalt thou make it.

16 Foursquare it shall be, and doubled: a span shall be the length thereof and a span shall be the breadth thereof.

17 And thou shalt set in it settings of stones, even four rows of stones: the first row shall be a sardius, a topaz, and a carbuncle; this shall be the first row.

18 And the second row shall be an emerald, a sapphire, and a diamond;

19 and the third row a ligure, an agate, and an amethyst;

20 and the fourth row a beryl and an onyx and a jasper. They shall be set in gold in their enclosings.

21 And the stones shall be with the names of the children of Israel, twelve according to their names, like the engravings of a signet; every one with his name shall they be according to the twelve tribes.

22 And thou shalt make upon the breastplate chains at the ends, of wreathed work of pure gold.

23 And thou shalt make upon the breastplate two rings of gold, and shalt put the two rings on the two ends of the breastplate.

24 And thou shalt put the two wreathed chains of gold in the two rings which are on the ends of the breastplate.

25 And the other two ends of the two wreathed chains thou shalt fasten in the two clasps, and put them on the shoulder pieces of the ephod at the front of it.

26 And thou shalt make two rings of gold, and thou shalt put them upon the two ends of the breastplate in the border thereof, which is on the inner side of the ephod.

27 And two other rings of gold thou shalt make, and shalt put them on the two sides of the ephod underneath, toward the forepart thereof, over against the other coupling thereof, above the embroidered girdle of the ephod.

28 And they shall bind the breastplate by the rings thereof unto the rings of the ephod with a lace of blue, that it may be above the embroidered girdle of the ephod, and that the breastplate be not loosed from the ephod.

29 And Aaron shall bear the names of the children of Israel on the breastplate of judgment upon his heart when he goeth in unto the holy place, for a memorial before the Lord continually.

31 “And thou shalt make the robe of the ephod all of blue;

32 and there shall be a hole in the top of it, in the middle thereof. It shall have a binding of woven work round about the hole of it, as it were the hole of a jacket of mail, that it be not rent.

33 And beneath upon the hem of it thou shalt make pomegranates of blue and of purple and of scarlet round about the hem thereof, and bells of gold between them round about:

34 a golden bell and a pomegranate, a golden bell and a pomegranate, upon the hem of the robe round about.

35 And it shall be upon Aaron when he ministers; and his sound shall be heard when he goeth in unto the holy place before the Lord and when he cometh out, that he die not.

36 “And thou shalt make a plate of pure gold and engrave upon it, like the engravings of a signet: Holiness to the Lord.

37 And thou shalt put it on a blue lace, that it may be upon the miter; upon the forefront of the miter it shall be. — a mitre is a type of a headgear, a turban, almost like an imperial crown.

38 And it shall be upon Aaron’s forehead, that Aaron may bear the iniquity of the holy things which the children of Israel shall hallow in all their holy gifts. And it shall be always upon his forehead, that they may be accepted before the Lord.

39 “And thou shalt embroider the coat of fine linen, and thou shalt make the miter of fine linen, and thou shalt make the girdle of needlework.

40 “And for Aaron’s sons thou shalt make coats, and thou shalt make for them girdles, and bonnets shalt thou make for them, for glory and for beauty.

41 And thou shalt put them upon Aaron thy brother and his sons with him; and shalt anoint them and consecrate them and sanctify them, that they may minister unto Me in the priest’s office.

42 And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness; from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach.

43 And they shall be upon Aaron and upon his sons when they come in unto the tabernacle of the congregation, or when they come near unto the altar to minister in the holy place, that they bear not iniquity and die. It shall be a statute for ever unto him and his seed after him.

Is Iran Complicit In Ship Hijacking?

•November 24, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US Says Iran is Complicit In Ship Hijacking By Yemeni Rebels, Mulls Houthi Terror Designation

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • November 22, 2023

The Biden White House is threatening to slap an official terror designation on Yemen’s Houthi militia after it seized an Israel-linked cargo vessel in the Red Sea (details below).

On Tuesday, as 25 international crew are still being held hostage after Houthi militants boarded the vessel by helicopter Sunday, National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters that “in light of … the piracy of a ship in international waters, we have begun a review of potential terrorist designations and we’ll be considering other options together with our allies and partners as well.”

Importantly, Kirby also directly alleged that Iran was complicit. The Houthis have expressly said that the seizure was in retaliation for Israel’s onslaught on Gaza, which has killed some 13,000 Palestinians – mostly civilians. Per a White House press briefing:

The Houthis earlier this month declared war on Israel, and have sent several drones and missiles toward southern Israel at this point. At least two of these projectiles have been intercepted by warships stationed in the Red Sea.

* * *

Yemen’s Houthi rebels have released dramatic video of their Sunday hijacking of the Galaxy Leader, a vehicle-transport ship whose owner is a subsidiary of a company owned by an Israeli billionaire.

The ship is still in their control, with 25 crew members of various nationalities held hostage and the vessel now in the Yemeni port of Hodeidah.

The Red Sea incident received surprisingly little initial coverage by major media, considering it marked the opening of a new, maritime front in the multilateral regional conflict that erupted on Oct 7, when Palestinian Hamas militants invaded southern Lebanon, killing more than a thousand Israeli civilians and soldiers.   

The Iran-aligned Houthis, who’ve been battling Yemen’s Saudi-backed government since 2014, had already launched multiple drone and missile attacks on Israel in solidarity with Hamas and the people of Gaza. In announcing their seizure of the Galaxy Leader, the group said, “All ships belonging to the Israeli enemy or that deal with it will become legitimate targets.” 

“The detention of the Israeli ship is a practical step that proves the seriousness of the Yemeni armed forces in waging the sea battle, regardless of its costs and costs,” said Houthi chief negotiator Mohammed Abdul-Salam in a separate online statement. “This is the beginning.” About a fifth of the world’s oil must traverse the narrow strait between Yemen and Djibouti.

The professionally-produced, nearly four-minute Houthi video appears to have been shot from multiple cameras in the air and on the sea, including one mounted on the tail of a helicopter used to airlift the attackers onto the ship and others worn by the militants in action. 

It first shows a helicopter pursuing the 600-foot ship as it plows through the sea. Houthis then dismount the chopper atop the ship’s deck, fire AK-47 rifles and make their way to the ship’s bridge, where crew members surrender to them. In the final shot, the ship moving through the water, surrounded by several small watercraft. 

Maritime security company Ambrey tells the Times of Israel that the helicopter air assault tactic mirrors similar seizures perpetrated by Iran. The Houthis have declared themselves part of an “axis of resistance” against the Zionist state. 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office characterized the hijacking as “an Iranian attack.” Iran distanced itself from the incident. “We have repeatedly announced that the resistance groups in the region represent their countries and make decisions and act based on the interests of their countries,” said the foreign ministry’s Nasser Kanani.

It appears there are no Israeli citizens on the ship, which was headed from Turkey to India. The crew includes Ukrainians, Bulgarians, Filipinos, Mexicans and a Romanian, The Timesreports. The seized ship is operated by a Japanese company, Nippon Yusen. Japan’s foreign minister says his diplomats are in direct contact with the Houthis, while also “urging Saudi Arabia, Oman, Iran, and other countries concerned to strongly urge the Houthis for the early release of the vessel and crew members.”

Exodus (25-26)

•November 23, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

From the top of Mount Sinai, the Lord spoke unto Moses

Exodus 25

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, — when on the mount, and in the midst of the cloud with him;

“Speak unto the children of Israel, that they bring Me an offering. From every man who giveth it willingly with his heart ye shall take My offering. — of every man that giveth it willingly, with his heart, ye shall take my offering; or take what was offered to him, be it more or less, and of whatsoever person, high and low, rich and poor, so be it it is freely given from the heart;

And this is the offering which ye shall take from them: gold and silver and brass; — gold, and silver, and brass; the supply of these metals possessed by the Israelites at this time probably included what they had inherited from their forefathers, what they had obtained from the Egyptians, and what may have been found amongst the spoils of the Amalekites;

and blue and purple and scarlet, and fine linen and goats’ hair; — these are to be made into yarn, and wove, and was much used in the garments of the priests, in the curtains of the tabernacle, and in the vail between the holy and the most holy place;

and rams’ skins dyed red, and badgers’ skins, and shittim wood; — and rams’ skins died red; of these were made a covering for the tent or tabernacle; other materials enough to furnish planks for the construction of the ark;

oil for the light, spices for anointing oil and for sweet incense; — oil for the light; such is needed that the “sanctuary,” which is to be built, will be lighted; that anointing oil will be needed, and that spices will be a necessary ingredient in such oil;

onyx stones, and stones to be set in the ephod and in the breastplate. — and stones to be set in the ephod, and in the breastplate; two onyx stones were set in the ephod, one of the garments of the high priest, and an onyx stone, with eleven other precious stones, were set in the breastplate of the high priest:

— these stones were doubtless among the jewels set in gold and silver the Israelites had of the Egyptians, and brought with them out of Egypt.

And let them make Me a sanctuary, that I may dwell among them. — and let them make me a sanctuary; an holy place to dwell in, and so called from his dwelling in it;

— that I may dwell among them; the purpose of the sanctuary is here definitely declared by the Lord Himself. It was to be the constant witness of His presence among His people.

According to all that I show thee, after the pattern of the tabernacle and the pattern of all the instruments thereof, even so shall ye make it. — the sanctuary is to be constructed in accordance with a model shown to Moses in the mount, which he must conform to in all points.

10 “And they shall make an ark of shittim wood: two cubits and a half shall be the length thereof, and a cubit and a half the breadth thereof, and a cubit and a half the height thereof. — the ark of the covenant was the central point of the sanctuary; it was designed to contain the testimony; others are the table of shew-bread, and the seven-branched candlestick, or lamp-stand;

11 And thou shalt overlay it with pure gold; within and without shalt thou overlay it, and shalt make upon it a crown of gold round about. — within and without shalt thou overlay it; so that nothing of the wood could be seen;

12 And thou shalt cast four rings of gold for it, and put them in the four corners thereof; and two rings shall be on the one side of it, and two rings on the other side of it. — four rings of gold; though the ark was not to be carried in procession, like some pagan arks, yet it would have to be carried when the Israelites resumed their journeyings.

13 And thou shalt make staves of shittim wood and overlay them with gold.

14 And thou shalt put the staves into the rings by the sides of the ark, that the ark may be borne with them. — that the ark might be borne with them; which staves overlaid with gold, and put into golden rings;

15 The staves shall be in the rings of the ark; they shall not be taken from it. — the staves were to remain always in the rings, whether the ark was in motion or at rest; that there might never at any time be a necessity for touching the ark itself, or even the rings. He who touched the ark risked his life;

16 And thou shalt put into the ark the testimony which I shall give thee. — the stone tables of the Ten Commandments are called the Testimony, or the tables of the Testimony;

17 “And thou shalt make a mercy seat of pure gold: two cubits and a half shall be the length thereof, and a cubit and a half the breadth thereof. — a mercy seat of pure gold, to serve as a lid, covering it exactly.

18 And thou shalt make two cherubims of gold; of beaten work shalt thou make them at the two ends of the mercy seat. — the cherubim were fixed to the mercy-seat, and of a piece with it, and spread their wings over it; they stretched out their wings, and their faces were turned towards the mercy seat;

19 And make one cherub on the one end, and the other cherub on the other end; even of the mercy seat shall ye make the cherubims on the two ends thereof. — they were made not only of the same kind of metal with that, but out of the same mass or lump of gold, a lid of gold being made commensurate to the ark, what remained above that measure, at the ends of it, were beaten and formed into two cherubim.

20 And the cherubims shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering the mercy seat with their wings, and their faces shall look one to another. Toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubims be. — the two wings of both cherubs were to be elevated and advanced so as to overshadow the mercy seat, and, as it were, protect it.

21 And thou shalt put the mercy seat above upon the ark; and in the ark thou shalt put the testimony that I shall give thee. — and thou shalt put the mercy seat above upon the ark; over it, as a covering for it: this situation of the mercy seat above the ark; 

22 And there I will meet with thee, and I will commune with thee from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubims which are upon the ark of the Testimony, of all things which I will give thee in commandment unto the children of Israel. — and I will commune with thee from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim; hence the Lord is frequently described as “dwelling between the cherubim;”

— the theocracy was to be a government by God in reality. There was to be constant “communing” between God and the earthly ruler of the nation, and therefore a place of communing.

23 “Thou shalt also make a table of shittim wood: two cubits shall be the length thereof, and a cubit the breadth thereof, and a cubit and a half the height thereof. — a table was to be made of wood, overlaid with gold, to stand in the outer tabernacle, to be always furnished with the shew-bread.

24 And thou shalt overlay it with pure gold, and make thereto a crown of gold round about. — a crown of gold round about; that is, on both sides and at both ends; and a border, or edging of gold, something to prevent what was placed on the table from readily falling off.

25 And thou shalt make unto it a border of a handbreadth round about, and thou shalt make a golden crown for the border thereof round about. — and thou shalt make a golden crown to the border thereof round about; this was not the same spoke of in the former verse;

— but another; that was above, and upon the table, this below and under it; or rather that was, as it may be better expressed, a lip, rim, or border, that went round within the table; and this crown, surrounded that on the edge of it.

26 And thou shalt make for it four rings of gold, and put the rings in the four corners that are on the four feet thereof. — and put the rings in the four corners that are on the four feet thereof; as there were four feet at the four corners of the table, to each foot a ring was fastened; the use of these follows.

27 Over against the border shall the rings be for places for the staves to bear the table. — shall the rings be for placing of the staves to bear the table; into these rings staves were to be put, to carry the table from place to place, as while in the wilderness, and before the tabernacle had a fixed settled place for it.

28 And thou shalt make the staves of shittim wood and overlay them with gold, that the table may be borne with them. — and thou shall make the staves of shittim wood, and overlay them with gold; in like manner as the staves for the ark, and which were made of the same wood;

29 And thou shalt make the dishes thereof and spoons thereof and covers thereof and bowls thereof for pouring; of pure gold shalt thou make them. — all the above said vessels were to be made of pure gold;

30 And thou shalt set upon the table showbread before Me always. — the Hebrew expression translated “showbread” is literally, “bread of face,” or “bread of presence”—bread, that is, which was set forth always before the presence of God;

31 “And thou shalt make a candlestick of pure gold; of beaten work shall the candlestick be made: his shaft and his branches, his bowls, his buds, and his flowers shall be of the same. — a lampstand rather than a candlestick; its purpose was to support seven oil-lamps. Its height appears to have been about three feet, and its width two feet. 

32 And six branches shall come out of the sides of it: three branches of the candlestick out of the one side, and three branches of the candlestick out of the other side. — from the sides of the candlestick, that is, of the upright stem in the middle, there were to be six branches, three on either side;

— added to one in the middle, there would be seven candlesticks; representing the seven true Churches of God of Revelation 2 and 3; they are “true” Churches despite their weaknesses and limitations;

33 Three bowls made like unto almonds with a bud and a flower on one branch, and three bowls made like almonds on the other branch with a bud and a flower — so for the six branches that come out of the candlestick. — there were three bowls or cups in the form of almond nuts to each branch, which were probably to hold oil for the lamps;

34 And on the candlestick shall be four bowls made like unto almonds, with their buds and their flowers. — and in the candlestick shall be four bowls; that is, in the trunk or body of it; the branches had but three apiece, made like unto almonds, with their knops and their flowers; as the bowls on the branches had with them;

35 And there shall be a bud under two branches of the same, and a bud under two branches of the same, and a bud under two branches of the same, according to the six branches that proceed out of the candlestick.

— and there shall be a knop under two branches of the same; that is, from the middle of the knop, which probably was like a pomegranate; this clause is repeated twice in this verse, signifying there should be a knop under each of the three branches on one side, and three on the other side;

— the buds signify a living significance, each growing from something small into something big; such is a parallel with the mustard seed, the Kingdom of God, which will grow into an enormous Kingdom.

He told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. 

Though it is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches” Matthew 13:31-21

36 Their buds and their branches shall be of the same. All of it shall be one beaten work of pure gold. — their knops and their branches shall be of the same; of the same metal, gold; that is, of the same highest quality of substance or essence, like gold is;

37 And thou shalt make the seven lamps thereof; and they shall light the lamps thereof, that they may give light over the face of it. — the candlestick represents the light of God’s word; his seven Churches, as light to the world,

38 And the tongs thereof and the snuff dishes thereof shall be of pure gold; — tongs, trays and snuffers thereof shall be of pure gold; but snuff-dishes; these were shallow vessels used to receive the burnt fragments of wick removed by the tongs.

39 of a talent of pure gold shall he make it, with all these vessels. — the signification of the seven-armed candlestick is apparent from its purpose, viz., to carry seven lamps, which were trimmed and filled with oil every morning, and lighted every evening, and were to burn throughout the night.

40 And look that thou make them after their pattern, which was shown thee on the mount. — the symbolical character of the candlestick is clearly indicated in the Scriptures. The prophet Zechariah (Zechariah 4:1-14) sees a golden candlestick with seven lamps and two olive-trees, one on either side, from which the oil-vessel is supplied;

— and the angel who is talking with him informs him that the olive-trees are the two representatives of the kingdom and priesthood, the divinely appointed organs through which the Spirit of God was communicated to the covenant nation;

— and in Revelation 1:20, the seven churches, that is, the Church, which would proceed to represent the Kingdom of God, are shown to the holy seer in the form of seven candlesticks standing before the throne of God.

~~~~

Exodus 26

~~~~

1 “Moreover thou shalt make the tabernacle with ten curtains of fine twined linen, and blue and purple and scarlet. With cherubims of the work of a skilled embroiderer shalt thou make them. — with ten curtains of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet; the ground of these curtains was fine linen, twined or doubled;

The length of one curtain shall be eight and twenty cubits, and the breadth of one curtain four cubits; and every one of the curtains shall have one measure. — and everyone of the curtains shall have one measure; be of equal length and breadth, that is, the same with all the other curtains.

The five curtains shall be coupled together one to another, and other five curtains shall be coupled one to another. — the five curtains shall be coupled together one to another, so as to form two grand divisions, each eleven yards wide.

And thou shalt make loops of blue upon the edge of the one curtain from the selvage in the coupling, and likewise shalt thou do on the uttermost edge of another curtain, in the coupling of the second. — at the coupling; that is, at the selvedge, nearest to the place where the two curtains were to be coupled together.

Fifty loops shalt thou make in the one curtain, and fifty loops shalt thou make on the edge of the curtain that is in the coupling of the second, that the loops may take hold one to another.

And thou shalt make fifty clasps of gold, and couple the curtains together with the clasps; and it shall be one tabernacle.

“And thou shalt make curtains of goats’ hair to be a covering upon the tabernacle; eleven curtains shalt thou make. — curtains of goats’ hair; the flower or down of goats, the softer and finer part of their hair,

The length of one curtain shall be thirty cubits, and the breadth of one curtain four cubits; and the eleven curtains shall be all the same measure.

And thou shalt couple five curtains by themselves and six curtains by themselves, and shalt double the sixth curtain at the forefront of the tabernacle. — the Tent over the Dwelling, consisting of eleven curtains of cloth made of goats’ hair, each 30 cubits long, and 4 cubits wide, fastened together so as to form a single large curtain, 30 cubits broad, and 44 cubits long.

10 And thou shalt make fifty loops on the edge of the one curtain that is outmost in the coupling, and fifty loops on the edge of the curtain which coupleth the second.

11 “And thou shalt make fifty clasps of brass, and put the clasps into the loops, and couple the tent together, that it may be one.

12 And the remnant that remaineth of the curtains of the tent, the half curtain that remaineth, shall hang over the backside of the tabernacle.

13 And a cubit on the one side and a cubit on the other side, of that which remaineth of the length of the curtains of the tent, shall hang over the sides of the tabernacle on this side and on that side to cover it.

14 And thou shalt make a covering for the tent of rams’ skins dyed red, and a covering above of badgers’ skins. — and a covering above of badgers’ skins; this was a fourth covering of the tabernacle; the first was of linen curtains, the second of goats’ hair, the third of rams’ skins, and the fourth of badgers’ skins, which seems to have been thicker and courser, since shoes were made of them;

15 “And thou shalt make boards for the tabernacle of shittim wood standing upright.

16 Ten cubits shall be the length of a board, and a cubit and a half shall be the breadth of one board.

17 Two tenons shall there be in one board, set in order to join one to another. Thus shalt thou make for all the boards of the tabernacle.

18 And thou shalt make the boards for the tabernacle, twenty boards for the south side southward.

19 And thou shalt make forty sockets of silver under the twenty boards: two sockets under one board for his two tenons, and two sockets under another board for his two tenons.

20 And for the second side of the tabernacle on the north side, there shall be twenty boards

21 and their forty sockets of silver: two sockets under one board and two sockets under another board.

22 And for the sides of the tabernacle westward, thou shalt make six boards.

23 And two boards shalt thou make for the corners of the tabernacle at the two sides.

24 And they shall be coupled together beneath, and they shall be coupled together above the head of it into one ring. Thus shall it be for them both; they shall be for the two corners.

25 And there shall be eight boards with their sockets of silver, sixteen sockets: two sockets under one board, and two sockets under another board.

26 “And thou shalt make bars of shittim wood: five for the boards of the one side of the tabernacle,

27 and five bars for the boards of the other side of the tabernacle, and five bars for the boards of the side of the tabernacle, for the two sides westward.

28 And the middle bar in the midst of the boards shall reach from end to end.

29 And thou shalt overlay the boards with gold, and make their rings of gold for places for the bars; and thou shalt overlay the bars with gold.

30 And thou shalt raise up the tabernacle according to the fashion thereof which was shown thee on the mount.

31 “And thou shalt make a veil of blue and purple and scarlet, and finetwined linen of skillful work; with cherubims shall it be made.

32 And thou shalt hang it upon four pillars of shittim wood overlaid with gold; their hooks shall be of gold, upon the four sockets of silver.

33 And thou shalt hang up the veil under the clasps, that thou mayest bring in thither within the veil the ark of the Testimony; and the veil shall divide unto you between the holy place and the Most Holy.

34 And thou shalt put the mercy seat upon the ark of the Testimony in the Most Holy Place.

35 And thou shalt set the table outside the veil, and the candlestick opposite the table on the side of the tabernacle toward the south; and thou shalt put the table on the north side.

36 “And thou shalt make a hanging for the door of the tent of blue and purple and scarlet and finetwined linen, wrought with needlework.

37 And thou shalt make for the hanging five pillars of shittim wood, and overlay them with gold, and their hooks shall be of gold; and thou shalt cast five sockets of brass for them.

US Navy jet overshoots Runway

•November 22, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US Navy jet overshoots runway into water off Hawaii

CNN by Brad Lendon and Taylor Romine • November 21, 2023 // USA Today

CNN — A US Navy reconnaissance jet with nine crew members aboard crashed into water off the Hawaiian island of Oahu on Monday after overshooting the runway at a US Marine Corps base there, military officials said.

There were no casualties aboard the P-8A Poseidon aircraft, a twin-engine multimission patrol and reconnaissance jet with the airframe of a Boeing 737 passenger plane, according to Marine Corps spokesperson 1st Lt. Hailey Harms.

Harms said the conditions of the nine personnel aboard were being assessed.

Pictures showed the aircraft upright with its wings slightly above the waterline in Kaneohe Bay off Marine Corps Base Hawaii on the main island of Oahu, north of the capital of Honolulu.

Visibility was down to around a mile at the time of the incident, with wind gusts up to 21 miles per hour and mist, according to the National Weather Service.

The P-8A Poseidon is a workhorse of US Navy operations.

It can carry both torpedoes and cruise missiles, while conducting antisubmarine and antisurface warfare and intelligence gathering missions.

A statement from the US Navy’s Third Fleet said the jet, based in Whidbey Island, Washington, was “on a detachment in support of maritime homeland defense.”

Earlier this year, a P-8A operating over the South China Sea with a CNN crew aboard was intercepted by a Chinese fighter jet in an encounter that saw the Chinese plane come within 500 feet of it.

P-8 aircraft are also flown by the Australian, New Zealand, British, Norwegian and Indian militaries, according to Boeing.

Exodus (23-24)

•November 21, 2023 • Leave a Comment

The cases mentioned in previous chapters and below, give rules of justice for the Israelites then, and the British developed their common law from there, and is still in use for deciding similar matters in many of the Commonwealth of Nations.

We are taught by these laws, that we must be very careful to do no wrong, either directly or indirectly. If we have done wrong, we must be very willing to make it good, and be desirous that nobody may lose by our wrong doing.

Exodus 23

1 “Thou shalt not raise a false report. Put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. — thou shalt not raise a false report, a false accusation; of a neighbour, or of any man whatever, either secretly by private slanders, whispers, backbiting or tale bearing;

— and here with some parallels from Proverbs:

16 These six things doth the Lord hate, yea, seven are an abomination unto Him:
17 a proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
19 a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren. Proverbs 6:16–19

Thou shalt not follow the multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause, following many, to divert judgment. — sometimes we cannot avoid hearing a false report, slanders, whispers, backbiting or tale bearing, but we must not hear it with pleasure, nor easily give credit to it;

— a judge is not to be influenced by names or numbers in giving his judgement, but to judge according to the truth of the matter, as they appear to him; that is, in judging a cause, thou shalt not simply go with the majority, if it bents on injustice, but form your own opinion and adhere to it.

Neither shalt thou countenance a poor man in his cause. — neither shalt thou countenance; Hebrew, honour or favour; a poor man in his cause; thus we are properly cautioned against an opposite error which we may be also in danger of falling into, that of respecting the poor man’s cause, out of pity and compassion, when the cause of the other man is more just;

“If thou meet thine enemy’s ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again. — thou shalt surely bring it back to him; so far shalt thou be from revenging his injuries, that thou shalt render good to him, whereby if thou dost not reconcile him, thou wilt at least procure peace to thyself, and an honour to yourself.

If thou see the ass of him that hateth thee lying under his burden, and wouldest forbear to help him, thou shalt surely help with him. — verses 4 & 5 version from MSG:

“If you find your enemy’s ox or donkey loose, take it back to him. If you see the donkey of someone who hates you lying helpless under its load, don’t walk off and leave it. Help it up.

“Thou shalt not divert the judgment from thy poor in his cause. — a judge should beware, lest through motives of compassion, or an affectation of popularity, he be biassed in favour of the poor; or, on the other hand, he must not despise a man because he is poor and without friends;

Keep thee far from a false matter, and the innocent and righteous slay thou not; for I will not justify the wicked. — keep thee far from a false matter; hold aloof, that is, from anything like a false accusation;

— neither bring one, nor countenance one, else those mayest cause the death of an innocent and righteous man, and bring down on thyself the vengeance of him, who will not justify the wicked.

And thou shalt take no bribe, for the bribe blindeth the wise and perverteth the words of the righteous. — a bribe perverts the words of the righteous; either the sentences of judges, as a gift perverts their judgment, and they give a wrong decree.

“Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger; for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. — this verse is a repetition of Exodus 22:21, but the precept is there addressed to the people at large, while it is here addressed to the judges in reference to their official duties.

10 “And six years thou shalt sow thy land and shalt gather in the fruits thereof, — six years . . . the seventh year; the land Sabbatical year which is commanded here was an institution wholly unknown to any nation but the Hebrews.

11 but the seventh year thou shalt let it rest and lie still, that the poor of thy people may eat; and what they leave the beasts of the field shall eat. In like manner thou shalt deal with thy vineyard and with thy olive trees. — that the poor of thy people may eat: that which grows up of itself;

— in like manner thou shall deal with thy vineyard, and with thy oliveyard; that is, these were not to be pruned, nor the grapes and olives gathered;

— the 70 years the Kingdom of Judea went into captivity in Babylon is due to their 490 years negligence of keeping the land Sabbath according to II Chronicles 36:19-21:

And I will scatter you among the nations, and will draw out a sword after you; and your land shall be desolate and your cities waste.

“‘Then shall the land enjoy her sabbaths, as long as it lieth desolate and ye are in your enemies’ land; even then shall the land rest and enjoy her sabbaths” Leviticus 26:33-34

12 “Six days thou shalt do thy work, and on the seventh day thou shalt rest, that thine ox and thine ass may rest, and the son of thy handmaid and the stranger may be refreshed. — the law of the weekly Sabbath is here repeated in conjunction with that of the Sabbatical year, to mark the intimate connection between the two, which were parts of one and the same system;

13 And in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect; and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth. — and in all things that I have said unto you, be circumspect; or be careful to keep them punctually and constantly;

— and make no mention of the name of other gods; neither call upon them, nor swear by them, nor make vows to them; but view them with the utmost detestation and abhorrence;

14 “Three times thou shalt keep a feast unto Me in the year. — this is the first mention of the three yearly Festivals: the feast of Unleavened bread, in its connection with the Paschal Lamb, is spoken of in Exodus 12 to Exodus 13: but the two others are first named here.

15 Thou shalt keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread (thou shalt eat unleavened bread seven days, as I commanded thee, at the time appointed in the month of Abib, for in it thou camest out from Egypt; and none shall appear before Me empty), — the Feast of Unleavened Bread, or the Passover, see Exodus 12:1-20, Exodus 12:43-50; Exodus 13:3-16; Exodus 34:18-20; Leviticus 23:4-14;

— the Feast of Unleavened Bread, or sometimes call the Passover, is a composite Feast of seven days, not two separate feasts; the killing of the Passover is on the fourteenth of Abib, but the eating, with unleavened bread, is on the fifteenth;

— for more, see What time is ben ha arbayim?

16 and the Feast of Harvest, the firstfruits of thy labors which thou hast sown in the field, and the Feast of Ingathering, which is at the end of the year when thou hast gathered in thy labors out of the field.— “the feast of harvest,” fiftieth day after the day after Passover, or Pentecost; and the Feast of Ingathering, or Feast of Booths, or Tabernacles; and none shall appear before me empty;

17 Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the Lord God. — three times in the year all thy males, but do not prohibit the inclusion of women and boys, shall appear before the Lord; later it was revealed by God’s prophets to be in the city of Jerusalem;

18 “Thou shalt not offer the blood of My sacrifice with leavened bread; neither shall the fat of My sacrifice remain until the morning. — the fat of my sacrifice; the fat of my feast; the fat of the Paschal lambs was burnt on the altar with incense the same evening; thus the whole lamb was consumed before the morning.

19 “The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring into the house of the Lord thy God. “Thou shalt not boil a kid in his mother’s milk. — the Targum of Jonathan says, “you are not permitted to dress or to eat of flesh and milk mingled together.”

20 “Behold, I send an angel before thee to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. — an angel is to guide Israel on its journey to Canaan or Judea and Samaria: his instructions must be received with the same respect and fear as those of God Himself; for Yehovah will Himself be speaking in him.

21 Have regard for him, and obey his voice. Provoke him not, for he will not pardon your transgressions, for My name is in him. — beware of him and obey his voice; hearken to what he says, and readily obey as he orders: provoke him not; by unbelief, by murmurings and complaint; observe his directions and instructions, laws and commands;

— for My name is in him; God as Elohim (Exodus 21:6) and His Name Yehovah are in the Scriptures almost convertible terms. He said His Name could even been in a man, like Moses representing God to Pharaoh (Exodus 7:1), or as judges to Israel (Exodus 21:6);

— also, the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father; the nature and perfections of God are in the Word and Son of God, and so his name Yehovah, which is peculiar to him; Christ is also Yehovah our saviour and redeemer;

22 But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice and do all that I speak, then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries. — and do all that I speak; by him; or whatsoever he had spoke, or was about to speak; for as yet all the laws and statutes were not delivered;

— then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries; which they should either meet with in their passage through the wilderness of Sinai, or when they came into the land of Canaan; or even the land between the Nile and the Euphrates (Genesis 15);

“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15

23 For Mine angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites and the Hittites, and the Perizzites and the Canaanites, the Hivites and the Jebusites; and I will cut them off. — and I will cut them off; and I, not the Israelites, will cut them off; but these words are conditional, on the basis that they keep the laws and statutes of God, “if they followed Him and hearkened to His voice.”

24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do according to their works; but thou shalt utterly overthrow them and quite break down their images. — thou shalt not bow down nor serve them, that is, give them neither outward worship with thy body, nor inward with thy mind, nor follow their numerous worship of idols.

25 And ye shall serve the Lord your God, and He shall bless thy bread and thy water; and I will take sickness away from the midst of thee. — take sickness away; half the sicknesses from which men suffer are directly caused by sin, and would disappear if men led godly, righteous, and sober lives. Others, as plague and pestilence, are scourges sent by God to punish those who have offended Him.

26 None shall cast their young nor be barren in thy land; the number of thy days I will fulfill. — there shall nothing cast their young, nor be barren; abortions, untimely births, and barrenness, when they exceeded a certain average, were always reckoned among signs of God’s displeasure;

— the number of thy days I will fulfil; which was fixed for each of them; bless them in the land with bountiful provision, health, fruitfulness, and length of life; in the days of Moses, and even today, was threescore years and ten, or fourscore;

27 “I will send My fear before thee and will destroy all the people to whom thou shalt come, and I will make all thine enemies turn their backs unto thee. — I will send my fear before thee; and they that fear will soon flee: I, not the children of Israel, will strike a terror into the inhabitants of Canaan, which shall facilitate their conquest;

28 And I will send hornets before thee which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite from before thee. — I will send hornets before thee; these words are to be taken literally, for hornets, which are a sort of wasps, whose stings are very penetrating and venomous;

— or may be interpreted either figuratively, and so may signify the same as fear before which should fall on the Canaanites upon hearing the Israelites were coming;

— which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite, from before thee; which three are mentioned instead of the rest, probably they were more infested and distressed with the hornets, and drove out of their land before the children of Israel arrival.

29 I will not drive them out from before thee in one year, lest the land become desolate and the beast of the field multiply against thee. — lest the land should become desolate, there being an insufficient population to keep down the weeds and maintain the tillage;

30 Little by little I will drive them out from before thee, until thou be increased and inherit the land. — until thou be increased, and inherit the land; for as their enemies were driven out gradually, by little and little,

— so the Iseaelites multiplied gradually, until at length they became a sufficient number to fill all the cities and towns in all the nations of Canaan, and take an entire possession of it, as their inheritance given unto them by God.

Progress of claiming the Land, between the two great rivers, promised to Abraham

31 And I will set thy bounds from the Red Sea even unto the Sea of the Philistines, and from the desert unto the river; for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and thou shalt drive them out before thee. — and thou shalt drive them out before thee; someitimes at once, “driven out” rather than exterminated, sometimes slowly by degrees, as often observed.

32 Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods. — thou shalt make no covenant with them; that is, no peace treaty; as to take them to be their allies and friends; but they were always to consider them as their enemies, no arrangement by which one part of the land shall be thine and another theirs;

— the Egypt–Israel peace treaty and the Oslo Accords are thus a violation of the above, but could only appeal to men;

33 They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against Me; for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee.” — they shall not dwell in thy land; they will surely be a snare unto thee: idolatry would be the cause of their ruin and destruction.

Exodus 24

1 And He said unto Moses, “Come up unto the Lord, thou and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel, and worship ye afar off. — seventy of the elders; these are not the “judges” of Exodus 18:21-26, who were not yet appointed; but were heads of tribes and families who had exercised authority over the Israelites in Egypt;

And Moses alone shall come near the Lord; but they shall not come nigh, neither shall the people go up with him.” — neither shall the people go up with him to any part of the mount;

And Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord and all the judgments; and all the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words which the Lord hath said will we do.” — all the words which the Lord hath said will we do: this they readily and hastily promise, because they were not aware of their own weakness, and because they did not understand the comprehensiveness and rigidity of God’s law.

And Moses wrote all the words of the Lord, and rose up early in the morning and built an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars according to the twelve tribes of Israel. — and Moses wrote the words of the Lord; that there might be no mistake; as God dictated them on the mount;

— the words Moses wrote were in Paleo-Hebrew alphabet; not modern Hebrew; and Moses wrote them without vowels, without spaces, and without any punctuations. To explore more on this subject, see What are the Oracles of God? Part I, Part II;

And he sent young men of the children of Israel, who offered burnt offerings and sacrificed peace offerings of oxen unto the Lord. — and he sent young men of the children Israel; to the altar under the hill, they were the firstborn of the children of Israel; and so the Targum of Jonathan says;

And Moses took half of the blood and put it in basins, and half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. — and Moses took half of the blood, and put it in basins; this he put into basins, and set by, in order to sprinkle on the people;

— and half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar; to atone for the people: as the Targum of Onkelos adds, “to atone on behalf of the people.”

And he took the Book of the Covenant and read in the audience of the people; and they said, “All that the Lord hath said will we do, and be obedient.” — the book of the covenant; that is, the book which he had written overnight, the collection of laws and promises made;

And Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people, and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant which the Lord hath made with you concerning all these words.” — and sprinkled it on the people; not on the whole body of the people, who could not be brought nigh enough, and were too numerous to be all sprinkled with it;

— either this was sprinkled on the young men that offered the sacrifices in the name of all the people; or on the seventy elders, as the heads of the Israelites.

Then went up Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel; — then went up Moses and Aaron with his two oldest sons, Nadab and Abihu; after the above things were done, the words of the Lord were told the people, and the book of the covenant read unto them, to which they agreed, sacrifices were offered, and the blood of them sprinkled on the altar, and on the people;

10 and they saw the God of Israel. And there was under His feet as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were the body of heaven in his clearness. — they saw the God of Israel; certainly in human form, as Isaiah saw Him, otherwise they would have fell dead;

11 And upon the nobles of the children of Israel He laid not His hand. Also they saw God, and ate and drank. — the nobles; the seventy elders, and other persons, already mentioned;

— He laid not his hand; God did not smite them with death, or pestilence, or even blindness. It was thought to be impossible to see God and live: (Genesis 32:30Judges 6:22, 23).

12 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Come up to Me onto the mount, and be there; and I will give thee tablets of stone, and a law and commandments which I have written, that thou mayest teach them.” — come up to me into the mount, and be there; for as yet Moses was not got up to the top of the mount, only up some part of it with the elders, though at some distance from the people: but now he is bid to come up higher;

13 And Moses rose up with his minister Joshua, and Moses went up onto the mount of God. — Moses rose up, and his minister Joshua; the close connection of Joshua with Moses is here, for the first time, indicated; his employment as a general against Amalek (Exodus 17:9-13).

14 And he said unto the elders, “Tarry ye here for us until we come again unto you; and behold, Aaron and Hur are with you. If any man have any matters to arbitrate, let him come unto them.” — Moses said unto the elders; he understood that his stay in the mount was about to be a prolonged one;

15 And Moses went up onto the mount, and a cloud covered the mount. — and Moses went up into the mount; to the top of it, and as it seems alone, leaving Joshua behind in a lower part of the mountain;

16 And the glory of the Lord abode upon Mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it six days; and the seventh day He called unto Moses out of the midst of the cloud. — and the glory of the Lord abode upon Mount Sinai; the divine Shekinah or Majesty, some visible token of it, an exceeding great brightness and splendour for six days;

— and on the seventh day he called unto Moses out of the midst of the cloud; in which the glory of God was, and which seems to favour the first sense of the preceding clause, that it was the glory of God the cloud covered.

17 And the sight of the glory of the Lord was like devouring fire on the top of the mount in the eyes of the children of Israel. — the sight of the glory of the Lord; to the Israelites in the plain below, the appearance on the top of the Mount was “like devouring fire.” A light like that of a conflagration rested on the top of the Mount all the time that Moses was away.

18 And Moses went into the midst of the cloud, and got himself up onto the mount; and Moses was on the mount forty days and forty nights. — forty days and forty nights, the whole time without eating and drinking (Deuteronomy 9:9). The number forty was certainly significant, since it was not only repeated on the occasion of his second protracted stay upon Mount Sinai.

Myanmar to spiral off?

•November 20, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Myanmar’s military junta in death spiral decline; and could spiral off into different states. Other countries in the region that could spiral off includes Pakistan and even India, sparking potential mass migration to the Global North.

AsiaTimes • November 17, 2023 // The Conversation

Strategic reversals, territorial losses and economic collapse mean coup-installed military regime’s days are likely numbered.

Myint Swe, the acting president of Myanmar’s military government, has warned that the country “will be split into various parts” after his armed forces suffered huge territorial losses to resistance fighters recently. His response was to call on Myanmar’s people to support his military forces, a call that is likely, based on previous experience, to fall mainly on deaf ears.

More than a million people have been displaced since Myanmar’s military coup in 2021, plunging the country into conflict and economic ruin

Far from sharing the military government’s fears of shrinking territorial control, it’s likely that most among Myanmar’s 55 million people will celebrate the army’s territorial losses. Junta misreads like this are not new – after they seized power in February 2021, the coup leaders indicated surprise when the coup met with widespread outrage and sustained public protest and resistance.

To quell opposition, military bosses have adopted a strategy of arbitrary arrest and extreme violence. The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners estimates 19,675 people are currently jailed – a figure that increases almost daily. Peaceful protests are met with army snipers and shoot-to-kill orders.

Myanmar’s military routinely responds to armed resistance by collectively punishing nearby civilian populations. This has included devastating airstrikes on civilian targets and scorched-earth “clearance operation” campaigns that have killed thousands of people and displaced more than 700,000 more. Rather than cowing the populace, junta violence continues to spur nationwide resistance.

Since September 2021, the National Unity Government (NUG), a shadow government in exile, has authorized a “defensive war” against the state military, pushing for the creation of militias targeting the junta and its economic base. NUG militias have increasingly coordinated with Myanmar’s dozens of ethnic armed groups, many of which have already been fighting the Tatmadaw (the junta’s military) for decades.

Now, every time government troops leave their barracks they face potential attack, causing them to increasingly lean on air power, but further limiting their ability to maintain effective control on the ground. Economic and territorial losses have steadily accumulated.

This is important because the Tatmadaw’s legitimacy depends on its ability to hold the country together. The controversial 2008 military-drafted constitution refers to “non-disintegration” of Myanmar a dozen times, including as a duty of the defense forces. This was a key justification for the 1962 military coup that ushered in five decades of military rule.

During the immediate post-independence period (1948-1962), Myanmar’s civilian government struggled to maintain territorial control, at times controlling little more than major urban centers. The situation is similar now, except that today it is the Tatmadaw that is unable to maintain control beyond urban centers and military barracks. This will hit junta morale badly and inspire further resistance.

The junta’s recent reversal in Shan State, its most significant territorial loss, came at the hands of three ethnic-based armed groups, the Arakan Army, the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, and the Ta’ang National Liberation Army. These three groups now coordinate their activities as the Brotherhood Alliance.

They inflicted heavy losses on junta forces in early November, overrunning dozens of military posts and killing the commander of the 99th Light Infantry Division, a unit known internationally for its genocidal campaign against the Rohingya community.

The Brotherhood Alliance also captured the main overland route from Mandalay to China, a key economic corridor.

China’s Role

Brotherhood Alliance members are themselves territorially ambitious but rely on China for arms so it is unlikely an operation in China’s hinterland could have occurred without China’s acquiescence.

Allowing this operation to go ahead is a strong statement by a Chinese government frustrated with the junta’s inaction on online scam centers in Shan state where thousands of trafficked Chinese and other foreigners have been forced to work in slave-like conditions.

China’s strategic ambiguity is unsurprising. China was far from enthusiastic about the 2021 coup. China’s ambassador to Myanmar, Chen Hai, told journalists at the time a coup was, “absolutely not what China wants to see.”

While traditionally a key international ally of the junta, China’s leadership had a very close relationship with Myanmar’s ousted de facto leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, and maintains close ties with many of Myanmar’s ethnic armed groups.

Now, strategic reversals, nationwide territorial losses and economic decline mean momentum has strongly shifted away from Myanmar’s junta. China’s leadership may have read the situation better than most, recognizing the junta may now be in a death spiral.

Others have been less shrewd. Russia has displaced China as the junta’s biggest arms supplier, accounting for US$406 million of Myanmar’s arms imports since the coup and crucially providing aviation fuel in exchange for funds, access to Bay of Bengal port facilities, and regional relevance.

Coup leader Min Aung Hlaing recently welcomed Russia’s navy for joint maneuvers, describing Vladimir Putin in glowing terms as a “leader of the world who is creating stability on the international arena.”

For Putin, this may soon be embarrassingly unwelcome praise. By linking itself so closely with a declining junta, Russia guarantees its Myanmar influence and regional relevance will not outlast military rule.

Instability in a region that could spiral off, inevitably sparking potential mass uncontrollable migration to the Global North

Post-junta Planning

The NUG idealizes a post-junta Myanmar unified under its leadership with Suu Kyi returned to power. But for many ethnic armed groups – who will feel they, rather than the NUG, inflicted the strongest blows on the junta and now control significant territory – that is not likely their preferred outcome.

They will seek guarantees about key demands around federalism and minority rights that were not satisfactorily addressed when Suu Kyi was last in power.

The junta appears on a clear path to defeat, but this will not be immediate. Meanwhile, the state’s military forces commonly respond to reversals with shocking violence, so bringing junta rule to a speedy end must be prioritized.

Myanmar’s population and neighboring states will also not want the country, post-junta, to descend into the same sort of fractured instability as in the immediate post-independence period.

Myanmar’s neighbors, ASEAN, and Western powers who have talked tough on human rights in Myanmar, including the US, UK and EU, must now take steps to ensure the post-junta future plays out peacefully with all resistance groups included in decisions about Myanmar’s future.

The transitional period after the removal of the military will require a commitment from international actors to ensure the stability of the country, perhaps like the Cambodian UNTAC process in the 1990s.

Rather than being again caught on the hop by events in Myanmar, ASEAN and the UN should begin preparations to manage the transition to a post-junta Myanmar that now appears increasingly likely.

“In latter days you will understand it fully,” that is, it means as a whole, we wouldn’t fully understand these prophecies until we’re living in the latter days; after God had executed his judgement in anger and performed the thoughts of his heart!

Exodus (21-22)

•November 19, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15

Exodus 21

1 “Now these are the judgements which thou shalt set before them: — now these are the judgements; the judicial laws and legal precedents, respecting the state of the people of Israel, so called because they are founded on justice and equity, and are according to the judgement precedents before;

If thou buy a Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve; and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. — if thou buy an Hebrew servant; every Israelite was free-born; but slavery (through poverty, debt, or crime) was permitted under certain restrictions.

If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself; if he was married, then his wife shall go out with him. — if he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself; that is, if he came into his servitude on his free will;

— if he were married, then his wife shall go with him; that is, if he had a wife, a daughter of Israel, as the Targum of Jonathan says; “but if (he be) the husband of a wife, a daughter of Israel, his wife shall go out with him.”

If his master has given him a wife, and she has borne him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out by himself.

— if his master have given him a wife; if, however, the Hebrew slave, being previously unmarried, had been allowed by his master to take to wife one of his female slaves, then, when the husband claimed his freedom, both she and her children remained in his master’s stronghold.

And if the servant shall plainly say, ‘I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,’ — if a man has no rights, he is thankful for small mercies, and responds with warm feeling to those who treat him kindly.

then his master shall bring him unto the judges (Elohim). He shall also bring him to the door or unto the doorpost, and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl, and he shall serve him for ever. — his master shall bring him unto the judges (Elohimin in the original Hebrew); a formal act, a divine act, santifies by God as if they are God’s envoy, hence these judges are acting as Elohim; “for my name is in him” Exodus 23:21

“And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. — if a man sell his daughter; Hebrew girls might be redeemed for a reasonable sum. But in the event of her parents or friends being unable to pay the redemption money, her owner was not at liberty to sell her elsewhere.

If she please not her master who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed. To sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her. — then shall he let her be redeemed, either by herself or friends, or any other person that will redeem her, but not selling her to a foreigner.

And if he has betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters. — he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters; as if she was his daughter, and give her a dowry: or the son shall treat her after the manner the daughters of Israel are treated when married;

10 If he take for himself another wife, her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage shall he not diminish. — her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish; neither deny it her in whole, nor lessen it in part, but give her her full due of each.

11 And if he does not do these three unto her, then shall she go out free, without money. — then shall she go out free without money; be dismissed from her servitude, and not obliged to pay anything for her freedom;

12 “He that smiteth a man so that he die shall be surely put to death. — shall surely be put to death; by the order of the civil magistrate, and by the hand of such as shall be appointed by him; for this is the law of God;

13 And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand, then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee. — his life is taken away by him, though not purposely and maliciously; a distinction being drawn between accidental and intentional killing, then I will appoint thee a place, an asylum, whither he shall flee;

14 But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbor to slay him with guile, thou shalt take him from Mine altar, that he may die. — if a man come presumptuously; rather, if a man come maliciously, or with premeditation; the Targum says then he may be slain by the sword by the priests;

15 “And he that smiteth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death. — so sacred and inviolable is that reverence which children owe to their parents, that, by the law of God, it was death not only to strike them, but even to curse or outrageously revile them, Exodus 21:17;

16 “And he that stealeth a man and selleth him, or if he shall be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.

17 “And he that curseth his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. — and he that curseth his father, or his mother; though he does not smite them with his hand, yet if he smites them with his tongue, or speaks evil of them, shall surely be put to death; or be killed by casting stones, as the Targum of Jonathan, or with stoning;

18 “And if men strive together and one smite another with a stone or with his fist, and he die not but keepeth to his bed, — the law imposed a fine, which was to be fixed at such an amount as would at once compensate the sufferer for the loss of his time, and defray the cost of his cure in his sick bed.

19 if he rise again and walk abroad upon his staff, then shall he that smote him be acquitted; he shall only pay for the loss of his time, and shall cause him to be thoroughly healed.

20 “And if a man smite his servant or his maid with a rod, and he die under his hand, he shall be surely punished. — and if a man smite his servant or his maid with a rod; a Canaanitish servant or maid, as the Targum of Jonathan says;

21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished; for he is his money. — for he is his money; that is, his possession bought with his money; 

22 “If men strive and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no misfortune follow, he shall be surely punished according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. — the husband may impose a fine, and if it be unreasonable, the judges shall have a power to moderate it.

23 And if any misfortune follow, then thou shalt give life for life, — the Targum of Jonathan, “but if there is death in her, then ye shall judge or condemn the life of the murderer for the life of the woman;’

— God intends it to be “life for life” especially against a woman with child; but men feel it too excessive hence soften it to a pecuniary or monetary compensation to be paid;

24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, — in civil cases, it was given to regulate the procedure of the public magistrate in determining the amount of compensation in every case of injury, but did not encourage feelings of private revenge;

— but the Son of God says something radically different later, “Ye have heard that it hath been said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say unto you that ye resist not evil, but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. Matthew 38-39;

25 burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. — the Targum of Jonathan says, the price of the pain of burning for burning, and indeed, in everyone of these cases, the law could not be well literally executed;

26 “And if a man smite the eye of his servant or the eye of his maid, that it perish, he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake. — this law was made to deter masters from using their servants with cruelty, since they would loose their own profit and advantage.

27 And if he smite out his manservant’s tooth or his maidservant’s tooth, he shall let him go free for his tooth’s sake. — all other principal members of the body, which they reckon to be twenty four, are included, as the fingers, toes and so on;

28 “If an ox gore a man or a woman, so that they die, then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be acquitted. — injuries to the person might arise either from man or from animals; protection from both was needed;

— an ox killed by stoning would not be bled in the usual way, and would be “unclean” for food; the flesh should not even be disposed of to the Gentiles, but had to be buried.

29 But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in times past, and it hath been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in so that he hath killed a man or a woman, the ox shall be stoned and his owner also shall be put to death.

30 If there be laid on him a sum of money, then he shall give for the ransom of his life whatsoever is laid upon him.

MSG (28-32)

“If an ox gores a man or a woman to death, the ox must be stoned. The meat cannot be eaten but the owner of the ox is in the clear.

But if the ox has a history of goring and the owner knew it and did nothing to guard against it, then if the ox kills a man or a woman, the ox is to be stoned and the owner given the death penalty.

If a ransom is agreed upon instead of death, he must pay it in full as a redemption for his life. If a son or daughter is gored, the same judgment holds. If it is a slave or a handmaid the ox gores, thirty shekels of silver is to be paid to the owner and the ox stoned.

31 Whether he hath gored a son or hath gored a daughter, according to this judgment shall it be done unto him.

32 If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant, he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned.

33 “And if a man shall open a pit, or if a man shall dig a pit and not cover it, and an ox or an ass fall therein,

— the MSG (33-34)

“If someone uncovers a cistern or digs a pit and leaves it open and an ox or donkey falls into it, the owner of the pit must pay whatever the animal is worth to its owner but can keep the dead animal.

the owner of the pit shall make it good and give money unto the owner of them, and the dead beast shall be his.

35 And if one man’s ox hurt another’s, so that he die, then they shall sell the live ox and divide the money from it, and the dead ox also they shall divide.

36 Or if it be known that the ox used to push in times past and his owner hath not kept him in, he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead shall be his own.

— the MSG (35-36)

“If someone’s ox injures a neighbor’s ox and the ox dies, they must sell the live ox and split the price; they must also split the dead animal. But if the ox had a history of goring and the owner knew it and did nothing to guard against it, the owner must pay an ox for an ox but can keep the dead animal.”

The cases mentioned above give rules of justice then, and the British developed their common law from there, and is still in use for deciding similar matters in many of the Commonwealth of Nations.

We are taught by these laws, that we must be very careful to do no wrong, either directly or indirectly. If we have done wrong, we must be very willing to make it good, and be desirous that nobody may lose by any wrong doing.

Exodus 22

1 “If a man shall steal an ox or a sheep, and kill it or sell it, he shall restore five oxen for an ox and four sheep for a sheep. — five oxen . . . four sheep; the principle of the variation is not clear; perhaps the theft of an ox was regarded as involving more audacity, and so more guilt in the thief.

“If a thief be found breaking in and be smitten so that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. — if a thief, in breaking into a dwelling in the night, was slain, the person who slew him did not incur the guilt of blood;

If the sun be risen upon him, there shall be blood shed for him, for he should make full restitution. If he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft. — if the sun be risen upon him. If the entry is attempted after daybreak. In this case it is charitably assumed that the thief does not contemplate murder;

— a robber breaking into a house at midnight might, in self-defense, be slain with impunity; but if he was slain after sunrise, it would be considered murder, for it was not thought likely an assault would then be made upon the lives of the occupants. In every case where a thief could not make restitution, he was sold as a slave for the usual term.

If the theft be certainly found in his hand alive, whether it be ox or ass or sheep, he shall restore double. — if the theft be certainly found in his hand alive; or “in finding be found” be plainly and evidently found upon him, before witnesses; so that there is no doubt of the theft; 

— he shall restore double; two oxen for an ox, two asses for an ass, and two sheep for a sheep; the thief being convicted in his own conscience of his evil, makes confession, or, however, the creatures are found with alive, and so more useful being restored;

“If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast and shall feed in another man’s field, of the best of his own field and of the best of his own vineyard shall he make restitution.

“If fire break out and catch in thorns, so that the stacks of corn or the standing corn or the field be consumed therewith, he that kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.

“If a man shall deliver unto his neighbor money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen out of the man’s house, if the thief be found, let him pay double.

If the thief be not found, then the master of the house shall be brought unto the judges to see whether he has put his hand unto his neighbor’s goods.

“For all manner of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing which another challengeth to be his, the cause of both parties shall come before the judges; and whom the judges shall condemn, he shall pay double unto his neighbor.

10 “If a man deliver unto his neighbor an ass, or an ox, or a sheep, or any beast to keep, and it die or be hurt or driven away, no man seeing it,

11 then shall an oath of the Lord be between them both that he hath not put his hand unto his neighbor’s goods; and the owner of it shall accept thereof, and he shall not make it good.

12 And if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.

13 If it be torn in pieces, then let him bring it for witness, and he shall not make good that which was torn.

14 “And if a man borrow aught from his neighbor, and it become hurt or die, the owner thereof being not with it, he shall surely make it good.

15 But if the owner thereof be with it, he shall not make it good; if it be a hired thing, it came for his hire.

16 “And if a man entice a maid who is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife.

The cases mentioned above give rules of justice then, and the British developed their common law from there, and is still in use for deciding similar matters in many of the Commonwealth of Nations.

We are taught by these laws, that we must be very careful to do no wrong, either directly or indirectly. If we have done wrong, we must be very willing to make it good, and be desirous that nobody may lose by any wrong doing.

17 If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins. — if her father refused to give her to him, he was to weigh (pay) money equivalent to the dowry of maidens, that is, to pay the father just as much for the disgrace brought upon him by the seduction of his daughter, as maidens would receive for a dowry upon their marriage.

18 “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. — the fact that witchcraft is often nothing but jugglery to deceive the people, and only those witches were to be put to death who would not give up their witchcraft assisted by evil spirits when it was forbidden. —

19 “Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death. — according to the Targum of Jonathan, the death of such a person was by stoning, for it says, he “shall be stoned to death.”

20 “He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the Lord only, he shall be utterly destroyed. — according to the Targum of Jonathan, the death of such a person “shall be slain with the sword;”

21 “Thou shalt neither vex a stranger nor oppress him, for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. — thou shall not vex a stranger; one that is not born in Israel, but comes into another country to sojourn;

— nor oppress him; by taking his goods, by refusing to assist him with advice when asked, to trade with him, or to give him lodging, and furnish him with the necessaries of life.

22 Ye shall not afflict any widow or fatherless child. — law against oppressing widows and orphans. With the stranger are naturally placed the widow and orphan; like him, weak and defenceless; like him, special objects of God’s care.

23 If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto Me, I will surely hear their cry; — I will surely hear their cry; the Targum of Jonathan says, “I will hear the voice of their prayer, and will avenge them.”

24 and My wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless. — and I will kill you with the sword; with the sword, says the Targum of Jonathan;

— it designs one of God’s sore judgments, the sword; the meaning is, that when such evils should become frequent among them, God would suffer a neighbouring nation to break in upon them in an hostile way, and put them to the sword;

25 “If thou lend money to any of My people who are poor among thee, thou shalt not be to him as a usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury. — interest not to be taken on money lent to the poor; especially to fellow Israelites;

— on the other hand, the lending of money upon interest to foreigners was distinctly allowed (Deuteronomy 23:20), and no limit placed upon the amount of interest that might be taken.

26 If thou at all take thy neighbor’s raiment in pledge, thou shalt deliver it unto him by the time the sun goeth down, — if he gave his upper garment as a pledge, he was to give it him back towards sunset, because it was his only covering; as the poorer classes use them as garment for warmth;

27 for that is his only covering. It is his raiment for his skin. Wherein shall he sleep? And it shall come to pass, when he crieth unto Me, that I will hear, for I am gracious.

— for I am gracious; or equitable; and therefore everything cruel and uncompassionate is abominable to him, and he will take care in his providence that the injured person shall be redressed and the injurer punished.

28 “Thou shalt not revile the judges, nor curse the ruler of thy people. — Thou shalt not revile, speak evil, show disrespect, to the judges and magistrates, for they are also acting as ‘ělôhı̂ym, or as gods;

29 “Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits and of thy liquors. The firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto Me. — like the firstfruits of the soil, the firstborn of men and animals are also to be given to God; who spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for all of us as well.

30 Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen and with thy sheep: seven days it shall be with his dam; on the eighth day thou shalt give it to Me.

— the main object of forbidding sacrifice before the eighth day would appear to have being in regard for the health and comfort of the mother, which needed the relief obtained by suckling of its offspring;

31 “And ye shall be holy men unto Me; neither shall ye eat any flesh that is torn by beasts in the field: ye shall cast it to the dogs.

— neither shall ye eat any flesh that is torn of beasts; partly, because the blood was not taken out of it; partly, because the clean beast was ceremonially defiled by the touch of the unclean.

Exodus (19-20)

•November 18, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15

Exodus 19

In the third month after the children of Israel had gone forth out of the land of Egypt, the same day came they into the Wilderness of Sinai. — the Targum of Jonathan says “In the third month of the Exodus of the sons of Israel from the land of Mizraim, on that day, the first of the month, came they to the desert;”

For they had departed from Rephidim, and had come to the desert of Sinai and had pitched camp in the wilderness; and there Israel camped before the mount. — for they were departed from Rephidim; after they had fought with Amalek, and came to the western part of the mount to Horeb, where the rock was smitten for them; and they were come from that now, and encamped at Sinai;

And Moses went up unto God, and the Lord called unto him out of the mountain, saying, “Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel: — and Moses went up unto God; who was in the pillar of cloud upon the top of the mount; this was on the second day, according to the Targum of Jonathan: “the Lord called unto him out of the mountain;”

‘Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you unto Myself. — the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem paraphrase the words, “and I bore you on clouds, as on eagles’ wings;” which covered and protected and sustained them, as the eagles’ wings do its young;

Now therefore, if ye will obey My voice indeed and keep My covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto Me above all people; for all the earth is Mine.

— above all people: for all the earth is mine; while claiming a peculiar right in Israel, God does not mean to separate Himself from the other nations, to cease to care for them, or give them up to their own devices;

— He is always “the Most High over all the earth” (Psalm 83:18), “a light to lighten the Gentiles,” one who “judges the people righteously, and governs all the nations upon earth” (Psalm 67:4). Israel’s prerogative does not rob them of their birthright. He maybe the favoured son; but they, too, “are, all of them, children of the Most High” (Psalm 82:6).

And ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.” — “if ye will obey My voice indeed and keep My covenant” ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation;

— and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests; instead of being in a state of servitude and bondage, as they had been in Egypt; and an holy nation” being separated from all others, and devoted to the worship and service of the true God.

And Moses came and called for the elders of the people, and laid before their faces all these words which the Lord commanded him. — Moses called for the elders, they formed the usual channel of communication between Moses and the people, reporting his words to them, and theirs to him.

And all the people answered together and said, “All that the Lord hath spoken we will do.” And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord. — all that the Lord hath spoken we will do; obey his voice in all things he directs unto, or keep the covenant he should make with them, and observe whatever was required on their parts;

And the Lord said unto Moses, “Lo, I come unto thee in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with thee, and believe thee for ever.” And Moses told the words of the people unto the Lord. — and the Lord said unto Moses; and the Targum of Jonathan added, on the third day;

10 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Go unto the people and sanctify them today and tomorrow, and let them wash their clothes — and let them wash their clothes; which to be understood both of their garments and their bodies also; teaching them by these outward things the necessity of internal purity and holiness, to appear before God;

11 and be ready against the third day; for the third day the Lord will come down in the sight of all the people upon Mount Sinai. — and be ready against the third day; not the third day of the month, but the third day from hence, this being the fourth, and the morrow the fifth, and the third day, the day following that, the sixth;

— for the third day the Lord will come down in the sight of all the people upon Mount Sinai; which must be understood, consistent with his omnipresence, and is only expressive of some visible display of his power, and of some sensible token of his presence to the people;

12 And thou shalt set bounds unto the people round about, saying, ‘Take heed to yourselves, that ye go not up into the mount or touch the border of it. Whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death. — whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death; which severe law was made to deter them from any attempt to go up the mountain, since it was death even to touch it;

13 There shall not a hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned or shot through; whether it be beast or man, it shall not live.’ When the trumpet soundeth long, they shall come up to the mount.”

— the Targum of Jonathan seems to understand it, as if punishment would be immediately inflicted upon such a person, not by the hands of men, but by the hand of God; for it says, such an one shall be stoned with hailstones, and fiery darts shall be spread upon him; or, as the Jerusalem Targum, shall be shot at him.

14 And Moses went down from the mount unto the people, and sanctified the people; and they washed their clothes. — and Moses went down from the mount unto the people; the same day that he went up, the fourth day of the month:

— touch it; rather “touch him,” the person who had touched the mount was not to be touched, since the contact would be pollution.

15 And he said unto the people, “Be ready against the third day. Come not at your wives.” — come not at your wives; it was the general sentiment of antiquity that a ceremonial uncleanness attached even to the chastest sexual connection.

16 And it came to pass on the third day in the morning, that there were thunders and lightnings and a thick cloud upon the mount, and the voice of the trumpet exceeding loud, so that all the people who were in the camp trembled.

— there were thunders, and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the mount; so that all the people that was in the camp trembled, at the sound of it being so loud and terrible, it pierced their ears and hearts;

17 And Moses brought forth the people out of the camp to meet with God, and they stood at the nether part of the mount. — out of the camp; an open space outside the camp before the mountain into which Moses led the representatives of the people, their officials so bringing them as near to God as was permitted.

18 And Mount Sinai was altogether in smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire; and the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mount quaked greatly. — the whole mount quaked greatly, as in Psalm 68:8, “The earth shook, the heavens also dropped at the presence of God: even Sinai itself was moved at the presence of God.”

— because the Lord descended upon it in fire; in flaming fire, as the Targum says, which set the mountain on fire, and caused this prodigious smoke; for if he, who is a consuming fire, but toucheth the hills and mountains, they smoke, Psalm 104:32;

the Targum:

And all the mount of Sinai was in flame; for the heavens had overspread it, and He was revealed over it in flaming fire, and the smoke went up as the smoke of a furnace, and all the mountain quaked greatly.

19 And when the voice of the trumpet sounded long and waxed louder and louder, Moses spoke, and God answered him by a voice.

— Moses spake; what he said is not here recorded; it is highly probable, as has been observed by some, that he uttered those words related of him in Hebrews 12:21 “I exceedingly fear and quake”: such an impression did this loud and strong voice of the trumpet make upon him:

— and God answered him by a voice; a still and gentle one, in order to encourage and comfort him; and so the Targum of Jonathan paraphrases it, “with a gracious and majestic voice, and pleasant and gracious words.”

20 And the Lord came down upon Mount Sinai, on the top of the mount; and the Lord called Moses up to the top of the mount, and Moses went up. — and the Lord called Moses up to the top of the mount; who either was at the bottom of it with the people, or in a higher ascent of it between God and them;

21 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Go down. Charge the people, lest they break through to gaze unto the Lord, and many of them perish. — charge the people, lest they break through unto the Lord to gaze; to see if they could observe any similitude or likeness of God,

— that they might make an image like unto it; to prevent which, the Lord, knowing the vanity and curiosity of their minds, ordered Moses to give them a strict charge not to transgress the bounds set them, or whatever was placed for bounds;

22 And let the priests also, who come near to the Lord, sanctify themselves, lest the Lord break forth upon them.” — and let the priests also, which come near unto the Lord; either the firstborn, as the Jews generally interpret it, or the sons of Aaron, who should be, and were potentially, though not official actually priests;

23 And Moses said unto the Lord, “The people cannot come up to Mount Sinai; for Thou charged us, saying, ‘Set bounds about the mount and sanctify it.’” — for thou chargedst us, saying, set bounds about the mount, and sanctify it; and accordingly bounds have been set,

— that the people may not go up it, and the place has been declared sacred, that so none will presume to do it, according to the solemn charge that has been given;

24 And the Lord said unto him, “Away! Get thee down, and thou shalt come up, thou and Aaron with thee; but let not the priests and the people break through to come up unto the Lord, lest He break forth upon them.”

— but let not the priests and the people break through to come up unto the Lord, lest he break forth upon them; it required the immediate presence of Moses below, and immediate care was to be taken by him;

— lest the priests and people, led by a vain curiosity, should attempt to ascend the mount, and come to where God was, to see if they could observe any likeness of him; which would so provoke him, that in just retaliation, as they had broke through the bounds set, he would break forth on them by inflicting sudden death upon them.

25 So Moses went down unto the people and spoke unto them. — and spake unto them: charging them to keep their distance, and not presume to pass the line he had drawn, or the fence he had made.

Exodus 20

1 And God spoke all these words, saying: — ‘I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt.’ God speaks to the nation as a whole, establishing a special relation between Himself and them, which is founded on His redeeming act, and is reciprocal, requiring that they should be His people, as He is their God;

Today’s Golden Calf: the 2024 Paris Olympics has gone full Woke dystopian with transgend*r mockery of the Last Supper, the Golden Calf idol, and even the Pale Horse from the Book of Revelation

“I am the Lord thy God, who have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. — which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt: where they had been afflicted many years, and reduced to great distress, but were brought forth with an high hand;

— out of the house of bondage: where they had been servants and slaves, but now were made free, and were become a body politic, a kingdom of themselves, under their Lord, King, Lawgiver.

“Thou shalt have no other gods before Me. — there shall not be to thee another god, or other gods, to wit, idols, which others have, esteem, and worship as gods;

“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. — anything that is in heaven; as of God, Deu 4:15 Isaiah 44:9,20, angels, sun, moon, or stars, which the heathens worshipped, Deu 4:19 17:3.

— or in the earth; as of men, and beasts; or in the water; as of fishes, such as Dagon was; or serpents, crocodiles, and such other Egyptian deities; although Moses only speaks of idols, there is no doubt that by implication he condemns all the forms of false worship, which men have invented for themselves.

Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me, — unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; as all idolaters must be thought to do;

— “the third and fourth generation” of them that hate me, the term is a strong one, and denotes those who persistently and defiantly oppose themselves to God, because sometimes parents lived to see these, and so with their eyes beheld the punishment inflicted upon their posterity for their sins;

and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me and keep My commandments. — showing mercy unto thousands; rather, to the thousandth generation, as is distinctly expressed in Deuteronomy 7:9.

“Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain. — the Lord will not hold him guiltless; punishment will assuredly overtake the perjured man, if not in this life, then in another.

“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. — it is taken for granted, that the sabbath was instituted before. God’s blessing and sanctifying a seventh day is derivedn right from the beginning, (Genesis 2:3) so that this was not the enacting of a new law, but the reviving of an old law.

Six days shalt thou labor and do all thy work; — that all should be done on the six days that could possibly be done, and nothing left to be done on the seventh;

10 but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God. In it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates. — resting from every work is the basis of the observance of the Sabbath; it shall be a day of holy rest from things worldly, and of devotion to things heavenly;

11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it. — the Lord blessed the sabbath day, that is, made it a day of blessing; as of conferring his blessings and favours upon those that religiously observe it.

12 “Honor thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. — that thy days may be long, that their, that is, thy parents, may prolong thy days, or the days of thy parents’ life;

13 “Thou shalt not kill. — from the peculiar duties owed by children to their parents, the Divine legislator went on to lay down those general duties which men owe to their fellow-men.

14 “Thou shalt not commit adultery. — thou shalt not commit adultery; this commandment forbids all acts of uncleanness, with all those desires which produce those acts and war against all kinds of filthiness, as bestiality, sodomy, whoredom, fornication.

15 “Thou shalt not steal. — either by deceit or violence, or without his knowledge and consent, take away another man’s goods;

16 “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. — this forbids; speaking falsely in any matter, laying false charges, lying, equivocating, and any way devising and designing to deceive our neighbour.

17 “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor’s.” — thou shalt not covet; the foregoing commands implicitly forbid all desire of doing that which will be an injury to our neighbour;

18 And all the people saw the thunderings and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet and the mountain smoking; and when the people saw it, they removed and stood afar off. — and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off; their minds were not only terrified and distressed, and their bodies shook with fear;

— but they could not stand their ground, but were obliged to retreat, who but just before were curious to draw near, and gaze and see what they could; the Targum says, and the people stood twelve miles off;

19 And they said unto Moses, “Speak thou with us and we will hear; but let not God speak with us, lest we die.” — let not God speak with us, lest we die; the phenomena of thunder and lightning had been one of the plagues so fatal to Egypt, and as they heard God speaking to them now, they were apprehensive of instant death also.

20 And Moses said unto the people, “Fear not; for God has come to test you, and that His fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not.”

— fear not; that is, think not that this thunder and fire are designed to consume you; but that his dreadful manifestation of his majesty and justice, may be now and ever before your eyes, and in your memories, as an effectual preservative from straying away from him.

21 And the people stood afar off, and Moses drew near unto the thick darkness where God was. — the Targum says in verse 18 above, the distance was twelve miles off;

— and Moses drew near to the thick darkness where God was; the thick cloud, and so Moses passed through the darkness, and the cloud, to the thick darkness where יְהוָה Yehovah was;

22 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Thus thou shalt say unto the children of Israel: ‘Ye have seen that I have talked with you from heaven. — ye have seen that I have talked with you from heaven; descending on Mount Sinai in a cloud and fire, and talked with them out of the cloud and fire, and delivered to them with an audible voice the above ten commands;

23 Ye shall not make with Me gods of silver, neither shall ye make unto you gods of gold. — to make Gods of silver and gods of gold are specially forbidden, because it was idolatry of the same kind; the golden calf or any molten images is no isolated phenomenon;

— Jeroboam set up molten images at Dan and Bethel for the northern Ten Tribes but there were no uprising! “Dead fish goes with the flow!”

24 An altar of earth thou shalt make unto Me, and shalt sacrifice thereon thy burnt offerings and thy peace offerings, thy sheep and thine oxen. In all places where I record My name I will come unto thee, and I will bless thee. — in all places where I record my name; or where my name is recorded; or, “cause it to be mentioned” that is, where I am worshipped in sincerity; I will come unto thee, and will bless thee;

Note the Five types of Offerings summarised in Leviticus:

Leviticus 1:2 “Speak unto the children of Israel and say unto them: ‘If any man of you bring an offering unto the Lord

Leviticus 1:3 ‘If his offering be a burnt sacrifice
Leviticus 2:1 ‘And when any will offer a meat offering
Leviticus 3:1 ‘And if his oblation be a sacrifice of peace offering
Leviticus 4:3 ‘If the priest … a young bullock … for a sin offering
Leviticus 5:6 ‘And he shall bring his trespass offering

Compare to the Five types of Offerings during the Millennium in Ezekiel:

Ezekiel 46:12 ‘Now when the prince prepares a voluntary burnt offering, or peace offerings unto the Lord
Ezekiel 44:29 ‘They shall eat the meat offering and the sin offering and the trespass offering

25 And if thou wilt make Me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone; for if thou lift up thy tool upon it, thou hast polluted it. — thou hast polluted it; and so made it unfit for use: how this should be done hereby is not easy to understand; no good reason seems easy to human understanding but probably the will and pleasure of God (Gill);

— the real object was that altars should not be elaborately carved with objects that might superinduce idolatry: Pulpit Commentary;

— the Targum of Jonathan

And you, the priests, who stand to minister before Me, shall not ascend to My altar by steps, but by (sloping) bridges; that thy shame may not be seen thereupon.

26 Neither shalt thou go up by steps unto Mine altar, that thy nakedness be not uncovered thereon.’ — Neither shalt thou go up by steps unto mine altar; but afterward God appointed an altar ten cubits high. One can speculate they went not up to that by steps, but by a sloping ascent.

MSG

God said to Moses, “Give this Message to the People of Israel: ‘You’ve experienced firsthand how I spoke with you from Heaven. Don’t make gods of silver and gods of gold and then set them alongside me. Make me an earthen Altar. Sacrifice your Whole-Burnt-Offerings, your Peace-Offerings, your sheep, and your cattle on it.

Every place where I cause my name to be honored in your worship, I’ll be there myself and bless you. If you use stones to make my Altar, don’t use dressed stones. If you use a chisel on the stones you’ll profane the Altar. Don’t use steps to climb to my Altar because that will expose your nakedness.’”

Five US Servicemen Crashed

•November 17, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Five US Service Members Killed in Military Aircraft Crash in Mediterranean under a mysterious dark omen

Sputnik International • November 13, 2023 // ZeroHedge

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – All five service members, who were onboard a US Air Force aircraft that crashed into the Mediterranean, were killed, the US European Command (USEUCOM) said on Sunday.

Dark clouds hang over where the US Navy and Air Force were operating

On Saturday, USEUCOM said that the US military aircraft crashed in the eastern Mediterranean on November 10, while conducting training operations.

“During a routine air refueling mission as part of military training, a US military aircraft carrying five service members suffered a mishap and crashed into the Mediterranean Sea. All five of the service members onboard the aircraft were killed,” USEUCOM said in a statement.

“However, we can definitively say that the aircraft sortie was purely related to training, and there are no indications of hostile activity,” USEUCOM said, adding, “Out of respect for the families affected, we will not release further information on the personnel involved at this time.”

Location of the mysterious crash landing of the aircraft where five were killed as military search and rescue planes have been circling the skies

It wasn’t immediately clear what military service the aircraft belonged to. The Air Force has sent additional squadrons to the region and the USS Gerald R Ford aircraft carrier, which has an array of aircraft on board, has also been operating in the eastern Mediterranean.

President Joe Biden said in a statement Saturday, “Jill and I are praying for the families and friends who have lost a precious loved one – a piece of their soul. Our entire nation shares their grief.”

And the Lord replies:

Exodus (17-18)

•November 16, 2023 • Leave a Comment
“I am thy shield!” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15

Exodus 17

1 And all the congregation of the children of Israel journeyed from the Wilderness of Sin after their journeys, according to the commandment of the Lord, and pitched camp in Rephidim; and there was no water for the people to drink. — being a sandy desert place there was no water for the people to drink.

Therefore the people chided Moses and said, “Give us water that we may drink.” And Moses said unto them, “Why chide ye me? Why do ye tempt the Lord?” — and Moses said unto them, why chide ye with me? as if it was I that brought you hither,

— whereas it is the Lord that goes before you in the pillar of cloud and fire, and as if I kept water from you, or could give it you at pleasure; how unreasonable, as well as how ungenerous is it in you to chide with me on this account;

And the people thirsted there for water; and the people murmured against Moses and said, “Why is this that thou hast brought us up out of Egypt to kill us and our children and our cattle with thirst?” — to kill us and our children and our cattle with thirst: which is intolerable to any, and especially to children and cattle, which require frequent drinking;

And Moses cried unto the Lord, saying, “What shall I do unto this people? They are almost ready to stone me!” — they be almost ready to stone me; this is the first which we hear of stoning as a punishment.

And the Lord said unto Moses, “Go on before the people, and take with thee of the elders of Israel; and thy rod with which thou smotest the river, take in thine hand and go. — go on before the people, lead them on nearer to Mount Sinai or Horeb, within sight of which they now were; “and see if they will stone thee.”

Behold, I will stand before thee there upon the rock in Horeb; and thou shalt smite the rock and there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink.” And Moses did so in the sight of the elders of Israel. — I will stand before thee there, in my cloudy pillar, which shall stand over that place.

And he called the name of the place Massah [that is, Temptation], and Meribah [that is, Chiding], because of the chiding of the children of Israel, and because they tempted the Lord, saying, “Is the Lord among us or not?”

— Is the Lord among us or not? to protect and provide for us according to his word; will he be as good as his word, or will he not? Words which implied that to them it was very doubtful.

Then came Amalek and fought with Israel in Rephidim. — then came Amalek, a grandson of Esau; the Amalekites had not been previously (except in the anticipatory flashforwarding in Genesis 14:7) mentioned as a tribe or nation;

— their hatred could be the old grudge of the children of Esau returning against the children of Israel; because of the affair of the birthright and blessing which Jacob stole from Esau, who were now on their march for the land of Canaan, claiming their birthright land which came to children of Esau thereby;

“I am thy shield,” the Lord said, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [Nile] of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15)

And Moses said unto Joshua, “Choose us out men, and go out, fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in mine hand.” — Joshua; he was a prince of the tribe of Ephraim; chosen as a leader to fight the Amalekites;

10 So Joshua did as Moses had said to him, and fought with Amalek; and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill.

— Hur; according to Josephus (Ant. Jud., iii. 2, § 4) Hur was the husband of Miriam, and so the brother-in-law of Moses and Aaron. He was a descendant of Judah through Pharez and Hezron;

— to the top of the hill; to the top of Mount Sinai or Horeb, not so much to see the battle fought, as to be seen by Joshua and his warriors;

11 And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed; and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. — Moses was getting old and was tired; his strongest arm will fail with being long held out; but it is God only whose hand is stretched out still;

12 But Moses’ hands were heavy; and they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat thereon. And Aaron and Hur held up his hands, the one on the one side and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun.

— both the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem paraphrase the words, “when Moses lift up his hands in prayer, the house of Israel prevailed, but when he restrained his hands from prayer, the house of Amalek prevailed.”

13 And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. — Amalek being distinguished from “his people” has established a strong sense that Amalek was the title of their king, or chief of the army (hence Chief Amalek in Genesis 36:16), and that it became the title to the kings of that nation of the Amalekites, as Pharaoh was to the kings of Egypt, or Caesar to Rome;

— that’s a significant truth; a truth during Moses time during the Exodus; more probable, later, is that the name Agag had evolved into a title for their king in place of Amalek; as stated by Balaam, employed by the king of the Moabites, to pronounce a ‘curse:’ 

“He (the children of Israel) shall pour the water out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters; and his king shall be higher than Agag (hence, used in this way, it is more likely that Agag is the title of a king rather than the name of one king; and Agag was named as the king of the Amalekites in Samuel’s experience: 1 Samuel 15:8), and his kingdom (of Israel) shall be exalted” Numbers 24:7.

14 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Write this for a memorial in a book, and recount it in the ears of Joshua; for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.” — I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek; the extermination of Amalek, here prophesied, was partly accomplished in part by Saul (1 Samuel 15:8) and David (1 Samuel 30:17);

— Moses must write what had been done, what Amalek had done against Israel; write their bitter hatred; write their cruel attempts; let them never be forgotten, nor what God had done for Israel in saving them from Amalek.

15 And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Jehovahnissi [that is, The Lord my banner]; — Moses built an altar; primarily, no doubt, to sacrifice thank-offerings upon it, as an acknowledgment of the Divine help in giving Israel the victory.

16 for he said, “Because the Lord hath sworn that the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.” — the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation; until they are utterly destroyed; and so in fact he had, and thus it was;

— the Targum of Jonathan is, “he by his word will make war against those that are of the house of Amalek, and destroy them to three generations, from the generation of this world, from the generation of the Messiah, and from the generation of the world to come.”

Exodus 18

1 When Jethro, the priest of Midian, Moses’ father-in-law, heard of all that God had done for Moses and for Israel His people, and that the Lord had brought Israel out of Egypt,

— as both the Amalekites and Midianites were descended from Abraham, and stood in blood-relationship to Israel, the different attitudes which they assumed towards the Israelites foreshadowed and typified the twofold attitude which the heathen world would assume towards the kingdom of God.

then Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, took Zipporah, Moses’ wife, after Moses had sent her back — after he had sent her back: upon his call and mission to Egypt, he took his wife and children with him; but upon an affair which occurred in the inn by the way, he sent them back again to his father-in-law, where they had remained ever since;

and her two sons (of whom the name of the one was Gershom [that is, A stranger there], for he said, “I have been an alien in a strange land”; — for he said, I have been an alien in a strange land; meaning, not the land of Egypt, where he was born, and had lived forty years; but in the land of Midian, where he was when this son of his was born;

and the name of the other was Eliezer [that is, My God is a help], “For the God of my father,” said he, “was my help and delivered me from the sword of Pharaoh”);

and Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, came with his sons and his wife unto Moses into the wilderness, where he encamped at the mount of God. — is there a possibility that Caleb as a young man met an aging Moses “in the land of Midian?”

— Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenizzite Numbers 32:12; these were chiefs of the sons of Esau: Eliphaz, Teman, Omar, Zepho, Kenaz; and could the Kenizzites be the sons of Kenaz? Genesis 36:15

And he said unto Moses, “I, thy father-in-law Jethro, have come unto thee and thy wife and her two sons with her.” — the Targum of Jonathan adds, “I, thy father-in-law Jethro, have come to thee to be a proselyte;”

And Moses went out to meet his father-in-law, and did obeisance and kissed him; and they asked each other of their welfare, and they came into the tent.

And Moses told his father-in-law all that the Lord had done unto Pharaoh and to the Egyptians for Israel’s sake, and all the travail that had come upon them by the way, and how the Lord delivered them. — and how the Lord delivered them; out of all this travail and trouble, and out of the hands of all their enemies, Egyptians and Amalekites.

And Jethro rejoiced for all the goodness which the Lord had done to Israel, whom He had delivered out of the hand of the Egyptians. — being a proselyte, Jethro, a Midianite, a descendant of Abraham by Keturah, rejoiced for all the goodness which the Lord had done to Israel;

10 And Jethro said, “Blessed be the Lord, who hath delivered you out of the hand of the Egyptians and out of the hand of Pharaoh, who hath delivered the people from under the hand of the Egyptians.

11 Now I know that the Lord is greater than all gods; for in the thing wherein they dealt proudly, He was above them.”

12 And Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, took a burnt offering and sacrifices for God; and Aaron came, and all the elders of Israel, to eat bread with Moses’ father-in-law before God. — Jethro took a burnt offering and sacrifices for God; Jethro had brought sacrifices with him, and now offered them in token of his thankfulness for God’s mercies towards himself and towards his kinsman;

— Jethro was a priest in Midian, and a worshipper of the true God, and the priesthood was not yet settled to be Aaron and his sons in Israel; and they did eat bread before God, indicating such an offering and feast was accepted by God;

13 And it came to pass on the morrow that Moses sat to judge the people, and the people stood by Moses from the morning unto the evening (hā·‘ā·reḇ). — it may be probable that numerous cases of difficulty arose out of the division of the spoil of the Amalekites;

14 And when Moses’ father-in-law saw all that he did for the people, he said, “What is this thing that thou doest for the people? Why sittest thou thyself alone, and all the people stand by thee from morning unto evening?” — why sittest thou thyself alone? the emphatic word is “alone.” Why dost thou not, Jethro means, to palm out some of the duty upon others?

15 And Moses said unto his father-in-law, “Because the people come unto me to inquire of God. — because the people come unto me to inquire of God; in doubtful cases, what was his will, and to desire Moses to inform them; which in later times was done by the Sanhedrin and Urim and Thummim; hence giving birth and growth of the Oral Law.

16 When they have a matter, they come unto me, and I judge between one and another, and I make them know the statutes of God and His laws.” — if the laws and statutes of God had yet been given on Mount Sinai, the people would be ignorant of them, and so needed not such daily judgement and instruction from Moses.

17 And Moses’ father-in-law said unto him, “The thing that thou doest is not good. — Moses was occupied from morning till evening in judging the people; hence it was not good for his health;

18 Thou wilt surely wear away, both thou and this people who are with thee. For this thing is too heavy for thee. Thou art not able to perform it thyself alone. — for this thing is too heavy for thee: it was too great a burden upon his shoulders, what his strength was not equal to;

19 Hearken now unto my voice! I will give thee counsel, and God shall be with thee: Be thou for the people to Godward, that thou mayest bring the causes unto God. — may Go be with thee; may he give thee wisdom to direct the right course.

20 And thou shalt teach them ordinances and laws, and shalt show them the way wherein they must walk and the work that they must do. — thou shalt teach them ordinances and laws; or “statutes and laws.”

21 Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God — men of truth, hating covetousness — and place such over them to be rulers of thousands and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties and rulers of tens. — the word “rulers” sometimes rendered “princes” is general, including all ranks of officials placed in command;

— men of truth; true men, sincere, upright, and faithful men, that love truth and hate lies and falsehood; hating covetousness; in themselves and others, filthy lucre, dishonest gain, mammon of unrighteousness, and so not to be bribed and corrupted, and execute wrong judgment for the sake of money.

22 And let them judge the people at all seasons; and it shall be that every great matter they shall bring unto thee, but every small matter they shall judge. So shall it be easier for thyself, and they shall bear the burden with thee.

— the people at all times; in their districts, whenever a matter of difference between man and man arises, and the case is brought before them, let them judge impartially between them, and determine what is right and wrong, and execute judgment and justice truly; which would take off a great deal of business from the hands of Moses;

— and it be that every great matter they shall bring to thee; any affair of great importance, and difficult of determination, and about which the judges may have some doubt in their minds, and they are not clear as to the decision of it; this, they the judges, not the people, were to bring to Moses.

Today’s Golden Calf: the 2024 Paris Olympics has gone full Woke dystopian with transgend*r mockery of the Last Supper, the Golden Calf idol, and even the Pale Horse from the Book of Revelation

23 If thou shalt do this thing and God command thee so, then thou shalt be able to endure, and all this people shall also go to their place in peace.” — then thou shall be able to endure; to continue in his office and post, and hold on for decades to come, God granting him life and health; whereas otherwise, his time would be wasted in ruin;

24 So Moses hearkened to the voice of his father-in-law, and did all that he had said. — so Moses hearkened to the voice of Jethro; considered what he said, weighed it well in his mind, and judged it good advice, and determined to put them into action;

25 And Moses chose able men out of all Israel and made them heads over the people: rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens. — and made them heads over the people; rulers, governors, judges, and officials;

— according to the Targum of Jonathan, the rabbans or rulers of thousands were six hundred, rulers of hundreds 6000, rulers of fifties 12,000, and the rulers of tens 60,000;

26 And they judged the people at all seasons. The hard causes they brought unto Moses, but every small matter they judged themselves. — only those causes which seemed “hard” to the “rulers of thousands” were brought before Moses for decision.

27 And Moses let his father-in-law depart, and he went his way into his own land. — and Moses went his way into his own land; the land of Midian: the Targum of Jonathan, “he went to proselyte all the children of his own country.”

Americans Loosing their Patriotism

•November 15, 2023 • Leave a Comment

More Americans Don’t Want to Fight For Their Country Anymore

Newsweek • November 10, 2023 // Yahoo News

A majority of American adults would not be willing to serve in the military were the US to enter into a major war, recent polling has found, while public confidence in the armed forces appears to be waning.

The figures come as all branches of the armed forces have in recent years struggled to meet their recruitment targets, suggesting a growing apathy towards a career of military service. In 2023, the Army and Air Force fell short of their respective goals by around 10,000 recruits, while the Navy was under by 6,000. Since 1987, the number of active-duty personnel has fallen by 39 percent.

Americans Loosing their Patriotism; most unwilling to serve

Experts say that such shortfalls are worrisome in an increasingly volatile global picture with American leadership unsure when it will next have to bring its full military force to bear.

“We have strike groups, aircraft carriers with a Marine Expeditionary Unit outside Israel now,” Justin Henderson, a former transport operator for the US Marines turned military recruiter, told Newsweek. “We’re funding two wars, but we’re actually boots on the ground, drones above Gaza. So we’re already involved in there—and we’re not sure what’s happening in Taiwan. So this is a very tumultuous time for us, because we don’t know what’s going to happen.”

“How much it matters depends on what kind of people you’re talking about and which bit you’re not getting,” Tom Shugart, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security and a former Navy attack submarine commander, told Newsweek.

Obese Soldiers in the Army’s Future Soldier Prepatory Course’s fitness training 

While infantry recruits could be trained in a matter of weeks, the same was not true for other roles. “Let’s say the Navy misses recruiting targets for an extended period and wasn’t able to bring on the people that it needs to manage submarines and fly its airplanes…if you end up in a major conflict, it’s going to take time to train those people,” he said.

Experts say, though, that there is a complex mix of factors contributing to the military’s recruitment issues, including adapting its messaging to a younger target generation more engrossed in modern technology and stories of supposed “woke” marketing hurting recruitment, as well as an economic outlook that is proving a challenging environment for those efforts.

“We are actively making efforts to ensure the military remains a viable and productive career choice for a majority of people,” Commander Nicole Schwegman, a Department of Defense (DOD) spokesperson, told Newsweek when asked to comment.

A Generational Shift

A poll by the research institute Echelon Insights of 1,029 likely voters, conducted between October 23-26, found that 72 percent of those asked would not be willing to volunteer to serve in the armed forces were America to enter a major conflict, compared with 21 percent who would. The remainder were unsure. The poll was conducted after Hamas led an unprecedented militant attack on Israel on October 7.

Shugart said that the results needed context, however.

“I’m very skeptical of that being accurate because I think the ‘why’ you’re in a war can dramatically change the answer to that question,” he said. “I was in the military before 9/11; a lot of society didn’t really think about the military very much [before then].”

The military is struggling to attract Gen Z recruits; 72 percent of those asked would not want to serve in the armed forces. Five of Eleven aircraft carriers on active Duty

“If you look at our history, we need to be convinced to get into [a] war,” David Eustice, CEO of Military Recruiting Experts, told Newsweek. While Americans needed a reason to support the war in Vietnam, he said, the war in Afghanistan “was immediate and had wide support because something happened to our country.”

“If we are convinced that it’s something that we need to do Americans generally will do it; less people joining is another matter and it’s very complex,” he added.

At the start of October, a survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted by J.L. Partners for the Daily Mail found that while an overall majority of Americans said they would die fighting for their country were the US invaded, when broken down by age this sentiment was lowest among those who were 18-29 years old.

Meanwhile, a Gallup poll in June found confidence in the military declined for a sixth consecutive year, to 60 percent.

Eustice, who served 26 years in the Minnesota National Guard, noted that young adults were the military’s prime target for new recruits—currently Generation Z, or those born after 1997—and argued that growing up in the internet age had made them used to “immediate gratification.”

“There’s so many choices out there; we’re an a la carte society,” he said. “You can have it if you want to have it, you can have it delivered to you. Almost anything is a swipe or click away.” In a world where a college degree can be earned from a bedroom, Eustice suggested, the rigor of training could appear unappealing.

Obesity has been considered an epidemic in the United States since 1976

Having observed his young children watching videos on the internet of feats of physical activity, Henderson said they were “getting that dopamine hit” of seeing someone accomplish something physically taxing, “but their body didn’t go through it. And that’s where the disconnect really comes in.”

The current generation is also less likely to interact with members of the military, the recruiters said. Eustice noted that while his father, who served in Korea, saw seven of his 10 children serve in the military, that sort of family was very uncommon nowadays.

The military is also facing a high level of unfitness to serve among the general population: as of 2020, it assessed that 77 percent of those aged 17-24 were unqualified due to medical reasons, drug use or criminal records.

But there are signs that the military is adapting to Generation Z. Henderson spoke of a gaming truck designed by the Air Force so young adults could simulate flying drones. “The military is now trying to speak their language,” he said.

Exodus (15-16)

•November 14, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Exodus 15

1 Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto the Lord, and spoke, saying, “I will sing unto the Lord, for He hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath He thrown into the sea.

— then sang Moses and the children of Israel; the scene of this thanksgiving song is supposed to have been at the landing place on the eastern shore of the Red Sea, at Ayoun Musa, “the fountains of Moses.”

The Lord is my strength and song, and He has become my salvation; He is my God, and I will prepare Him a habitation; my father’s God, and I will exalt Him.

The Lord is a man of war; the Lord is His name. — God’s name is the four-letter Hebrew word יהוה‎ YHVH Yehovah (not Yahweh, since it is only used among the Samaritan communities; and not Jehovah since the letter J wasn’t around but only after the sixteenth century; (more on this at the end);

Pharaoh’s chariots and his host hath He cast into the sea; his chosen captains also are drowned in the Red Sea.

The depths have covered them; they sank into the bottom as a stone. — they sunk into the bottom as a stone; into the bottom of the sea, as a stone thrown into anybody of water sinks and rises not up again;

Thy right hand, O Lord, has become glorious in power; Thy right hand, O Lord, hath dashed in pieces the enemy. — thy right hand, O Lord, hath dashed in pieces the enemy; in a literal sense, Pharaoh and his host, the avowed enemies of Israel;

And in the greatness of Thine excellency Thou hast overthrown them that rose up against Thee; Thou sentest forth Thy wrath, which consumed them as stubble.

And with the blast of Thy nostrils the waters were gathered together, the floods stood upright as a heap, and the depths were congealed in the heart of the sea. — the blast of God’s nostrils corresponds to the east wind, which drove the waters back;

The enemy said, ‘I will pursue, I will overtake, I will divide the spoil; my lust shall be satisfied upon them. I will draw my sword; my hand shall destroy them.’

10 Thou didst blow with Thy wind, the sea covered them; they sank as lead in the mighty waters. — they sunk as lead in the mighty waters; which is a very heavy metal, and, being cast into the water, sinks to the bottom at once, as did the Egyptians in the Red sea;

11 “Who is like unto Thee, O Lord, among the gods? Who is like Thee, glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders?

12 Thou stretchedst out Thy right hand; the earth swallowed them. — the earth swallowed them; the sea, which actually “swallowed them,” is a part of the earth.

13 Thou in Thy mercy hast led forth the people whom Thou hast redeemed; Thou hast guided them in Thy strength unto Thy holy habitation.

14 “The people shall hear and be afraid; sorrow shall take hold on the inhabitants of Palestina. — the peoples: all the various tribes of the desert of Palestine—the Amalekites, Edomites, Philistines, Moabites, Amorites—

15 Then the chiefs of Edom shall be amazed; the mighty men of Moab, trembling shall take hold upon them; all the inhabitants of Canaan shall melt away.

— all the inhabitants of Canaan shall melt away; as their hearts did, through fear, when they heard what God did for Israel against the Egyptians and the Amorites, and understood that they were upon the march to their land to dispossess them;

— the Edomites of Mount Seir and the Moabites gave Israel a free passage through their borders (Deuteronomy 2:4-8, 18, 29), being afraid to oppose them

16 Fear and dread shall fall upon them. By the greatness of Thine arm they shall be as still as a stone, till Thy people pass overya·‘ă·ḇōr5674, O Lord, till the people pass overya·‘ă·ḇōr5674, whom Thou hast purchased. — till thy people pass over (ya·‘ă·ḇōr5674); that is, cross the frontier of the Canaanites, and enter their country.

17 Thou shalt bring them in and plant them in the mountain of Thine inheritance, in the place, O Lord, which Thou hast made for Thee to dwell in, in the sanctuary, O Lord, which Thy hands have established. —in the mountain of thine inheritance; some suppose Mount Moriah to be especially intended;

— but it is better to understand Canaan generally, which is a country consisting almost entirely of mountains, with only two plains of any extent—those of Sharon and Esdraelon.

18 The Lord shall reign for ever and ever.” — the Lord shall reign; this concludes the whole song, by which Moses not only expresses his own faith and that of the people in God’s everlasting kingdom;

19 For the horse of Pharaoh went in with his chariots and with his horsemen into the sea, and the Lord brought again the waters of the sea upon them; but the children of Israel went on dry land in the midst of the sea.

— but the children of Israel went on dry land in the midst of the sea; which was a very wonderful thing, and was a just and sufficient reason for singing the above song to the Lord;

20 And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances. — her name Miriam is the same as Mary; Miriam is called a prophetess, Numbers 12:2 because she and Aaron had evidently received divine communications.

21 And Miriam answered them: “Sing ye to the Lord, for He hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath He thrown into the sea!”

22 So Moses brought Israel from the Red Sea, and they went out into the Wilderness of Shur; and they went three days in the wilderness, and found no water. — and they went three days in the wilderness, and found no water; which must be very distressing to such a vast number of people and cattle, in a hot, sandy, desert;

23 And when they came to Marah, they could not drink of the waters of Marah, for they were bitter. Therefore the name of it was called Marah [that is, Bitterness].

24 And the people murmured against Moses, saying, “What shall we drink?”

25 And he cried unto the Lord; and the Lord showed him a tree, which when he had cast into the waters, the waters were made sweet. There He made for them a statute and an ordinance, and there He put them to the proof,

— the waters were made sweet, not so much by any virtue in that tree, as by the power of God, who used this rather as a sign to the Israelites, than as an instrument to himself in this work.

26 and said, “If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the Lord thy God, and wilt do that which is right in His sight, and wilt give ear to His commandments and keep all His statutes, I will put none of these diseases upon thee which I have brought upon the Egyptians; for I am the Lord that healeth thee.”

— for I am the Lord that healeth thee; both in body and soul; in body, by preserving from diseases, and by curing them when afflicted with them; and in soul, by pardoning their iniquities, which, in Scripture, is sometimes signified by healing.

27 And they came to Elim, where were twelve wells of water and threescore and ten palm trees; and they encamped there by the waters.

— they came to Elim. Elim was undoubtedly some spot in the comparatively fertile tract which lies south of the “wilderness of Shur,” intervening between it and the “wilderness of Sin.”

Exodus 16

And they took their journey from Elim, and all the congregation of the children of Israel came unto the Wilderness of Sin, which is between Elim and Sinai, on the fifteenth day of the second month after their departing out of the land of Egypt.

— they took their journey from Elim; the stay at Elim was probably for some days. “Sin” was reached on the fifteenth day of the second month, exactly one month after the departure from Egypt;

And the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness.

— murmured against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness; in the wilderness of Sin, where they were, and where no corn was to be had to make bread of; and their murmuring was not only against Moses, as before when they wanted water, but against Aaron also, who were jointly concerned in bringing them out of Egypt.

And the children of Israel said unto them, “Would to God we had died by the hand of the Lord in the land of Egypt, when we sat by the fleshpots and when we ate bread to the full! For ye have brought us forth into this wilderness to kill this whole assembly with hunger.”

— to kill this whole assembly with hunger; it is difficult to imagine that there could have been as yet any real danger of starvation. The sheep, the cattle, may have suffered in the passage through the wilderness of Shur, but the bulk of them would survive;

— would to God we had died; they so undervalue their deliverance, that they wish they had died in Egypt; nay, and died by the hand of the Lord too; that is, by some of the plagues which cut off the Egyptians;

Then said the Lord unto Moses, “Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day, that I may put them to the proof, whether they will walk in My law, or no.

— that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law or no; by this single instance of their obedience to his will in going out every morning to gather their bread;

— that should be rained for them, he proposed to try and prove their obedience to his law in all other respects; what regard would be had to it when it should be given, and what might be expected from them, and likewise whether they would depend upon his providence in this case also.

And it shall come to pass that on the sixth day they shall prepare that which they bring in, and it shall be twice as much as they gather daily.” — on the sixth day; that is, the sixth day after the first giving of the manna;

— and it shall be twice as much as they gather daily: on that day should be rained double what fell on other days, and so twice as much should be gathered up; 

And Moses and Aaron said unto all the children of Israel, “At evening (ḇā·‘e·reḇ), then ye shall know that the Lord hath brought you out from the land of Egypt;

— at even (ḇā·‘e·reḇ), then ye shall know that the Lord hath brought you out from the land of Egypt: that they were brought out they knew, but they make this to be an act and deed of Moses and Aaron;

and in the morning, then ye shall see the glory of the Lord, for He heareth your murmurings against the Lord. And what are we, that ye murmur against us?” — and in the morning, then ye shall see the glory of the Lord; as displayed by raining bread around their tents;

And Moses said, “This shall be when the Lord shall give you in the evening flesh to eat and in the morning bread to the full, for the Lord heareth your murmurings which ye murmur against Him. And what are we? Your murmurings are not against us, but against the Lord.”

— Moses said, “You will know this when the Lord gives you meat to eat in the evening and bread in the morning to satisfy you;

And Moses spoke unto Aaron, “Say unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, ‘Come near before the Lord, for He hath heard your murmurings.’” — and Moses spake unto Aaron, who was his prophet and spokesman to the people: say unto all the congregation of the children of Israel;

10 And it came to pass, as Aaron spoke unto the whole congregation of the children of Israel, that they looked toward the wilderness, and behold, the glory of the Lord appeared in the cloud.

— and, behold, the glory of the Lord appeared in the cloud; which went before them; there was a more than common brightness in it, an effulgence and beam of light and glory shining in it.

11 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, — and the Lord spake unto Moses, out of the bright and glorious cloud: saying;

12 “I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel. Speak unto them, saying, ‘At evening ye shall eat flesh, and in the morning ye shall be filled with bread; and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God.’”

— at evening (bên hā·‘ar·bā·yim “between the two evenings,” which is from noon to sunset); ye shall know that I am the Lord your God;

— this gave proof of his power as the Lord, and his particular favour to them as their God; when God plagued the Egyptians, it was to make them know that he is the Lord; when he provided for the Israelites, it was to make them know that he was their God.

13 And it came to pass that at evening (ḇā·‘e·reḇ) the quails came up and covered the camp, and in the morning the dew lay round about the host.

— there are other meanings or applications for ḇā·‘e·reḇ but only one is revelant here, and that is, from noon to sunset; it was the time frame, the same time as bên hā·‘ar·bā·yim in the previous verse; yes in this case they mean the same or having the same time overlap;

some misguided would like to think that the Scriptures define what ḇā·‘e·reḇ and bên hā·‘ar·bā·yim are; but the Scripture is certainly not a dictionary; meanings of words could only be supplied by oral knowledge; for more, see the Oracles of God; which is further inferred here; but his misguided people reject these truths;

14 And when the dew that lay had gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoarfrost on the ground. — when the dew that lay was gone up; the moisture which lay upon the herbage soon evaporated, drawn up by the sun; and then the miracle revealed itself.

15 And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another, “What is this?” For they knew not what it was. And Moses said unto them, “This is the bread which the Lord hath given you to eat.

16 This is the thing which the Lord hath commanded: ‘Gather of it every man according to his eating, an omer for every man, according to the number of your persons. Take ye every man for those who are in his tents.’” — each man was to gather according to his immediate need and that of his family. No one was to seek to accumulate a store.

17 And the children of Israel did so and gathered, some more, some less. — every one was to gather according to the necessities of his family;

18 And when they measured it with an omer, he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; they gathered every man according to his eating. — when they did mete it with an omer;

— on returning to their tents, with the manna which they had collected, the Israelites proceeded to measure it with their own, or a neighbour’s, omer measure, when the wonderful result appeared, that, whatever the quantity actually gathered by any one, the result of the measurement showed, exactly as many omers as there were persons in the family.

19 And Moses said, “Let no man leave any of it until the morning.” — had nothing over; whatever quantity each person had gathered, when he measured it in his tent, he found that he had just as many omers as he needed for the consumption of his family.

20 Notwithstanding, they hearkened not unto Moses; but some of them left part of it until the morning, and it bred worms and stank. And Moses was wroth with them. — it bred worms; so that we must view the result spoken of as a punishment for disobedience;

21 And they gathered it every morning, every man according to his eating; and when the sun waxed hot, it melted. —it melted; this refers to the manna which was not gathered.

22 And it came to pass that on the sixth day they gathered twice as much bread, two omers for one man; and all the rulers of the congregation came and told Moses. — lying in a great quantity, they gathered as much as they could, or just two omers for one man;

23 And he said unto them, “This is that which the Lord hath said: ‘Tomorrow is the rest of the holy Sabbath unto the Lord. Bake that which ye will bake today, and boil what ye will boil; and that which remaineth over lay up for yourselves to be kept until the morning.’”

— introducing an explanation of something unexpected, that is, the Sabbath; to inculcate the preparation and observance of the Sabbath.

24 And they laid it up until the morning, as Moses bade; and it did not stink, neither was there any worm therein. — there was an interposition of divine Providence in the keeping of it to such a Day;

25 And Moses said, “Eat that today, for today is a Sabbath unto the Lord. Today ye shall not find it in the field. — a Sabbath unto the Lord, to be wholly consecrated to his service, and therefore not to be employed in servile works.

26 Six days ye shall gather it, but on the seventh day, which is the Sabbath, in it there shall be none.” — the practical observance of the Sabbath was formally instituted before the giving of other laws.

27 And it came to pass that there went out some of the people on the seventh day to gather, and they found none. — went out some of the people; this was an act of willful disobedience.

28 And the Lord said unto Moses, “How long refuse ye to keep My commandments and My laws? — how long refuse ye to keep my commandments? the people had already broken one of the positive precepts with respect to the manna (Exodus 16:20); now they broke another;

29 See, for the Lord hath given you the Sabbath; therefore He giveth you on the sixth day the bread for two days. Abide ye every man in his place. Let no man go out of his place on the seventh day.”

30 So the people rested on the seventh day.

31 And the house of Israel called the name thereof manna; and it was like coriander seed, white; and the taste of it was like wafers made with honey.

32 And Moses said, “This is the thing which the Lord commandeth: ‘Fill an omer with it to be kept for your generations, that they may see the bread wherewith I have fed you in the wilderness when I brought you forth from the land of Egypt.’”

— fill an omer of manna to be kept for your generations; the mere fact of such a multitude being fed for forty years in the wilderness;

33 And Moses said unto Aaron, “Take a pot, and put an omer full of manna therein, and lay it up before the Lord to be kept for your generations.” — in a place where the Lord would hereafter fix the symbol of his presence, the ark, cherubim and mercy seat;

— lay it up before the Lord; the “pot of manna” was laid up before the Lord with the “tables of the covenant,” and “Aaron’s rod that budded;” Hebrews 9:4;

34 As the Lord commanded Moses, so Aaron laid it up before the testimony, to be kept. — before the testimony; the testimony is not the Ark of the Covenant, but the Covenant itself, or the two tables of stone engraved by the finger of God;

35 And the children of Israel ate manna forty years, until they came to a land inhabited. They ate manna until they came unto the borders of the land of Canaan. — forty years; for thirty-nine years and nine months

— besides manna they had numerous flocks and herds, for milk, cheese and of course could be slaughtered for a constant supply of flesh.

36 Now an omer is a tenth part of an ephah.

~~~~

More on God’s name, Yehovah.

God’s name is the four-letter Hebrew word יהוה‎ YHVH Yehovah, which are embedded in the Masoretic text over 6000 times, yet when translated into our English language most had been translated as Lord, or LORD, which are titles, but not his name. His name is יהוה‎ Yehovah, or YEHOVAH (but there are no capital letters in Hebrew).

It wasn’t until 1524 that Gian Giorgio Trissino, an Italian Renaissance grammarian, invented the letter J that this new letter started to take a hold in the writings of western Europe. Even in 1611 when the English Bible the King James has our subject of study by the prophet Jeremiah, he was known as Ieremiah. So Jehovah is a very late comer.

The following verses with the LORD erred in translation. His name Yehovah should be used:

I am the LORD; that is My name. And My glory will I not give to another, neither My praise to graven images. Isaiah 42:8

And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered; for in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call. Joel 2:32

“I am sought of them that asked not for Me; I am found of them that sought Me not. I said, ‘Behold Me, behold Me,’ unto a nation that was not called by My name. Isaiah 65:1

When we call our God, the LORD, we err, because his name is not the LORD, which is a title. His name is YEHOVAH! May We all ask for his forgiveness, and may Our merciful God forgive us all.

TRUMP’s Raids, Mass Camps and Deportations

•November 13, 2023 • Leave a Comment

In majority-immigrant city of Hialeah, Trump promises historic raids, prison camps and mass deportation operation to rid the country of what he considers as vermin. “[T]he threat from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous and grave than the threat from within. Our threat is from within.”

Could such a burning ambitious act spark a forest fire?

“And say to the forest of the south: ‘Hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee and every dry tree. The flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the south to the north shall be burned therein.” Ezekiel 20:47

Yahoo News • November 12, 2023 // Sputnik International

Speaking in a city where three-fourths of residents are foreign-born, former President Donald Trump on Wednesday night promised to deport a massive amount of immigrants on the first day in office should he be reelected.

“Our country is being invaded,” Trump said. “This is an invasion.”

“Under Biden the US has become the dumping ground of the world. .. They’re coming in in levels never seen before — never seen before in any country. There’s never been anything like this. Our country is being invaded. This is an invasion,” Trump said at a rally held in opposition to the Republican National Debate happening across town simultaneously.

“On Day One I will terminate every open borders policy of the Biden Administration,” he continued as the crowd’s cheers swelled. “And we will begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”

While the comment was met with thunderous applause, the location for such remarks is also notable: Trump held his rally in Hialeah, a city where 95.8% of residents are Hispanic, and 74.1% are foreign-born, according to US Census data.

“On Day One I will terminate every open borders policy of the Biden Administration.”

To help speed mass deportations, Trump is preparing an enormous expansion of a form of removal that does not require due-process hearings. To help Immigration and Customs Enforcement carry out sweeping raids, he plans to reassign other federal agents and deputize local police officers and National Guard soldiers voluntarily contributed by Republican-run states.

To ease the strain on ICE detention facilities, Trump wants to build huge camps to detain people while their cases are processed and they await deportation flights. And to get around any refusal by Congress to appropriate the necessary funds, Trump would redirect money in the military budget, as he did in his first term to spend more on a border wall than Congress had authorized.

The enthusiasm isn’t entirely surprising in South Florida, where Trump remains highly popular with Hispanic voters. Several residents at the rally told the Herald that their families migrated to the US legally from Cuba, emphasizing that they oppose illegal immigration specifically.

Trump was also met with fanfare from local officials. At one point during the rally, Hialeah Mayor Esteban “Steve” Bovo joined Trump onstage and promised to name a city street after the former president.

”You’ve always kept your promise to the residents of this great nation,” Bovo said of Trump’s chili hot ambition, “and we’re appreciative.”

Hamas refugees to be dumped onto Canada?

•November 12, 2023 • 1 Comment

Why Israel wants to dump Palestinian refugees onto Canada, and if it is too cold or too tranquil for them, they could move southward into the United States.

RT News November 7, 2023

An early plan leaked from the Israeli government suggests Canada as a possible final destination for those displaced by the Gaza war

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

Israel’s Intelligence Ministry has come up with a creative solution for dealing with those displaced by the Gaza conflict, of which there are an estimated 1.4 million and counting: Go west — all the way to Canada [next to the United States].

As Gaza residents were being directed by Israel to clear out and move towards the southern border with Egypt – while the IDF pelted the northern part of the enclave, where most Hamas forces are reportedly concentrated, with missiles – one of the big questions some of us asked was where over 2 million Palestinians would possibly go.

Thanks to a leaked Israeli government document, dated October 13 and published by Israeli news site Sicha Mekomit, there’s now some insight into what at least some Israeli government officials have been floating.

This paper, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office says presents “initial thoughts” that won’t be considered until the war is over, envisions the refugees heading to Egypt first. But, because Egypt has previously refused to absorb Gaza residents, it may ultimately just end up being used as a staging ground for their mass relocation to other countries.

The proposal is for Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates to at least provide financial support for this mass displacement, if not offer to take in some refugees themselves, either in the short or long term.

But the real kicker is that one particular Western country – way over on the other side of the world from the conflict – is singled out for its “lenient” immigration policy, making it a place where Israeli officials figure the displaced Palestinians could feasibly be resettled.

And that country is Canada. Because despite its strict points-based immigration system that selects for potential newcomers based on their skills and education, Canada still clearly has a reputation for being a refugee welcome mat – even though today’s reality is a far cry from this perception.

Not that our big-mouthed Canadian officials have helped. “To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tweeted in January 2017, in reaction to then-US President Donald Trump’s executive order banning refugees from a list of Muslim countries.

But it wasn’t long before Trudeau had to send out members of his own administration to explain to these same migrant communities that his tweets were a bit more obtuse than official policy.

Nor does the image of Canada as a freeloader’s paradise jibe with real life upon arrival in the country. By 2019, Canada had welcomed nearly 60,000 Syrian refugees amid the US-backed regime change war against President Bashar Assad. Images abound of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau handing out winter jackets to arriving families at Toronto’s Pearson airport.

“You’re safe at home now,” Trudeau told them. That was back in 2015. Just four years later, some provinces had ditched all aid for immigration and refugee programs and just 24% of male and 8% of female refugees from Syria had found employment, according to government data.

As a Canadian who still spends considerable time in the country, it’s not uncommon to hear from school teachers about how many Syrian children are struggling to integrate into schools and are displaying considerable behavioral troubles.

For every feel-good success story, there’s also one about Syrians returning back to their home country now that the situation there has stabilized with Assad still in power and the US having moved on from intervening in Russian-allied Syria to doing the same over Ukraine.

If Syrians aren’t faring too great in Canada, and are struggling with the end of the initial generous government assistance, then what hope is there for those from Gaza who have spent their lives under blockade?

“Some 50 per cent of students (aged 5-17 years) do not achieve their full educational potential, meaning that the psychological impact of hostilities has led to a deterioration in learning outcomes, and difficulties in reading and writing,” according to the United Nations.

Even among Canadians born and educated in Canada and gainfully employed, there are those struggling to survive with inflation and the current cost of living. And because of Canada’s ongoing housing crisis, with rent and mortgages out of the reach of much of the working class, 44% of Canadians in a recent survey now feel that there’s too much immigration to the country.

So it goes without saying that Israel never bothered asking Palestinians if they want to be displaced to the other side of the planet from their home, but clearly no one in Israel has asked Canadians how they feel, either, about the possibility of serving as a dumping ground for their ethnic cleansing efforts in Gaza.

Because, if they had, they’d have realized that Canada was already full. So, who gave them that idea? Did they come up with it on their own? Or is someone in Trudeau’s government actually suggesting that it’s a realistic scenario?

There’s been no debate about any such possibility, and until there’s a full discussion about it in Canadian parliament and some official dares to stick his neck out and commit political suicide over the idea, Canadian officials need to tell the Israeli Intelligence Ministry to shove it.

Like its fellow Western allies, Canada’s official position is to support a two-state solution for a Palestinian homeland. Just a few days ago, Trudeau reiterated that “the world and the region needs a peaceful, safe, prosperous, viable Palestinian state alongside a peaceful, prosperous, democratic, safe … Israel.”

This means that Gaza residents ultimately get to stay in Gaza, and don’t get offloaded onto other countries in mass displacement just because some folks in Israel may be in favor of using revenge against Hamas as a convenient pretext to wipe Gaza off the map as an independent entity.

At least 10,000 Palestinians have been killed amid Israel’s pursuit of security in the wake of the Hamas attacks of October 7th, [but there are another 2.3 million more in Gaza].

Neither they – nor Canadians on whom this proposal is offering to unload survivors – should be reduced to being pawns as the proposed plan suggests. Better head back to the drawing board and try coming up with an idea for your own “security” that’s less radical than emptying out an entire state into another.

China’s low-cost drone swarm lead

•November 11, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China speeding into the low-cost drone swarm lead

Jet engine innovation gives China yet another cost-competitive edge over US as both rivals see drone swarms as the future of war

Asia Times November 6, 2023

China has developed a low-cost drone jet engine that could pave the way for the production of cutting-edge, cost-efficient drones, setting a precedent that could redefine global drone warfare strategies.

Future wars will be fought using drone swarms

South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported (SCMP) reported that a new generation of high-speed, long-endurance drones powered by low-cost jet engines has entered military service in China, according to a lead scientist on the project.

SCMP says that the new Chinese drones stand out from other models due to the low cost of their power source and that the innovation could ignite a drone arms race as the US begins its program to ramp up the weapon’s production.

SCMP says that the technological breakthrough will allow the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to source superior-performance jet drone engines at less than a fifth of the international price. The report says that the Chinese Academy of Sciences released a presentation on the project on October 19.

At the event, engineering thermal physicist Zhu Junqiang claimed the PLA has been quick to embrace the new engine, mainly because it consumes nearly a third less fuel than the current two-shaft engines in use and because maintenance costs will be significantly cheaper due to having 70% fewer mechanical components.

In contrast, SCMP notes that a high-speed military drone powered by a jet engine is usually categorized as a high-value asset, but due to high costs they are stockpiled in small numbers in most military arsenals. The Northrop Grumman-made RQ-4 Global Hawk drone, for instance, is powered by an AE3007 turbofan engine supplied by Rolls-Royce at a cool US$4 million per unit.

SCMP says that even the US, which has a bigger military budget than all other global countries combined, can only currently afford 42 Global Hawks, which cost around $130 million each.

Future conflicts will likely become drone wars of attrition, with the Ukraine war illustrating the new-age warfare possibility. In an April 2023 article in the peer-reviewed Defense and Security Analysis journal, Marc DeVore states that the ongoing war has shown the virtues of low costs and expendability in drone warfare.

DeVore says that Russia lost at least 148 reusable drones and Ukraine 40 during the first nine months of the war, pointing out that the reasons for high drone losses are technical, as drone data links are susceptible to jamming. He says the weapons fly at lower and medium altitudes, also making them vulnerable to short-range air defenses.

He notes that both Russia and Ukraine have used drones for missions in densely defended zones, leading to a shift towards lower cost and more disposable platforms. For instance, he notes that Ukraine’s Turkey-made Bayraktar TB-2 and Russian Forpost and Orion are respectively their most sophisticated drones.

Still, he says their vulnerability has limited their effectiveness against jamming and low-altitude air defense assets. As a result, he says both countries have increasingly turned to very low-cost or disposable drones, as the cost of shooting down these one-way attack weapons exceeds their value.

Cognizant of this battlefield lesson, the US has initiated programs to mass-produce drones for a high-tech war of attrition.

In September, Asia Times reported on the US Replicator program, which aims to field massive numbers of AI-driven autonomous drones to counter China’s growing military capabilities. The program aims to rapidly advance the fielding of attritable autonomous platforms in air, land, and sea domains, with an aggressive 18 to 24-month deployment timeline.

China’s FH-97 drone

The Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Unit will oversee the project while working with defense and non-traditional tech companies. Advancements in artificial intelligence, mesh networks and grand networking capabilities will facilitate autonomous, decentralized functioning, offering quicker deployment closer to the tactical edge.

Furthermore, in February 2023, Asia Times reported on the US “Autonomous Multi-Domain Adaptive Swarms-of-Swarms” (AMASS) project to develop autonomous drone swarms capable of being launched from sea, air and land to overwhelm enemy air defenses.

The project aims to develop the capability to launch and command thousands of autonomous drones, working together to destroy an enemy’s defenses, including air defenses, artillery pieces, missile launchers, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) platforms.

The AMASS program is expected to focus specifically on deterring or defeating a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. The program explores using “swarm-of-swarms” to conduct military operations with low-cost drones with diverse sensors and kinetic and non-kinetic effectors in highly contested environments,

Still, the US faces significant challenges in scaling up its low-cost drone production. A CNBC report last month noted that the problem with producing small consumer drones such as quadcopters in the US is that the price goes up since material and labor costs are higher than in China.

CNBC notes that many Western drone companies dropped out of the market in 2016 and 2017 due to being out-competed by China or because of bad business decisions. It also notes that making drones with parts solely sourced from the US is complicated, as the US does not have the factories to produce expendable military drones on such a massive scale. Nor does it have the secure supply chains needed to make sensitive components, the report said.

China has a growing cost-advantage over the US in fielding drone swarms

China, on the other hand, is better-placed to ramp up low-cost drone production. China is currently already the world’s largest exporter of armed military drones; Shenzhen-based DJI commands 70% of the world’s consumer drone market.

Asia Times reported in September on China’s Sunflower-200 loitering munition, which is purportedly modeled after the Iranian Shahed-136, the weapon Russia is using in the ongoing Ukraine war that it has extensively modified to suit the specific battlefield conditions in the area. The drone was shown during the Army-2023 defense exhibition in Moscow.

Despite China having the capability to mass-produce the Sunflower-200 and improved versions for Russia, it has taken a cautious approach to its support for Moscow’s war effort, balancing its interests to ensure an outcome favorable to its interests while avoiding Western sanctions.

While it is unlikely that the Sunflower-200 will soon appear in Russia’s arsenal, China has sent dual-use drones to Russia cognizant they will be used for military purposes.

Exodus (13-14)

•November 11, 2023 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

A parallel Exodus would reoccur during the endtime, which would far exceed that of the original Exodus led by Moses.

Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night, where I will not show you favor.’

“Therefore behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that it shall no more be said, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’

but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.’ And I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Jeremiah 16:13-15.

So severe shall be their bondage that their deliverance from it shall be a far greater Deliverance than that out of Egypt where they spent 210 years in slavery under their Egyptian taskmasters!

For more see,

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

For more about the South, a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

Exodus 13

And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, — God spoke to Moses on the day of the Exodus, at the first station, namely, Succoth;

“Sanctify unto Me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast; it is Mine.” — sanctify unto me all the firstborn; that is, of males, as the Targum of Jonathan adds, for those, and not females, were desinated to be either sacrificed or redeemed;

And Moses said unto the people, “Remember this day in which ye came out from Egypt, out of the house of bondage; for by strength of hand the Lord brought you out from this place. There shall no leavened bread be eaten. — Remember this day; the 15th of Abib in which ye came out of Egypt,

This day came ye out, in the month Abib. — this day came ye out of Egypt, on the fifteenth of Nisan, as the Targum of Jonathan says;

“And it shall be when the Lord shall bring thee into the land of the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Amorites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, which He swore unto thy fathers to give thee, a land flowing with milk and honey, that thou shalt keep this service in this month.

— the full number of the Canaanitish nations was seven, five of which are enumerated here; the other two were the Perizzites and the Girgashites, which seem to have been the least important.

Seven days thou shalt eat unleavened bread, and in the seventh day shall be a feast to the Lord. — and in the seventh day shall be a feast to the Lord; an holy convocation, in which no work was to be done, except what was necessary for preparing food to eat, Exodus 12:16.

Unleavened bread shall be eaten seven days; and there shall no leavened bread be seen with thee, neither shall there be leaven seen with thee in all thy quarters.

— they begin before the passover, with all the diligence and care they can, to put away any leaven, or anything that hath had leaven in it, out of their houses; searching all their cupboards and bins.

And thou shalt show thy son in that day, saying, ‘This is done because of that which the Lord did unto me when I came forth out of Egypt.’

— thou shalt show thy son; when you shall be come into the land of Canaan, you shall instruct your children in the meaning of your killing the lamb, and abstaining from leaven, that so you and they may be excited to gratitude to God for his goodness.

And it shall be as a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial between thine eyes, that the Lord’S law may be in thy mouth; for with a strong hand hath the Lord brought thee out of Egypt.

— the use of phylacteries among them, pieces of parchment inscribed with sentences of their law, which they bound upon their left hand, and placed upon their foreheads between their eyes.

10 Thou shalt therefore keep this ordinance in his season from year to year. — this ordinance the Israelites were to keep למועדהּ, “at its appointed time” (that is, from the 15th to the 21st Abib), – “from days to days,” in this season, spring, from year to year.

11 “And it shall be when the Lord shall bring thee into the land of the Canaanites, as He swore unto thee and to thy fathers, and shall give it to thee, — the land of the Canaanites, under which general name all the other nations are contained, as being all the children of Canaan.

12 that thou shalt set apart unto the Lord all that openeth the womb, and every firstling that cometh from a beast which thou hast; the males shall be the Lord’S.

— the males shall be the Lord’s; which explains what sort of firstborn of man and beast were to be set apart for his use, not females, though the first that opened the womb; but males.

13 And every firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb; and if thou wilt not redeem it, then thou shalt break his neck; and all the firstborn of man among thy children shalt thou redeem. — break its neck; unless redeemed, it could not be retained for use by its owner;

— it was not to be killed by shedding of blood, because in old Israel ‘the slaughter of an animal in the ordinary way implied a sacrifice, which was impossible in the case of an ass;

14 And it shall be when thy son asketh thee in time to come, saying, ‘What is this?’ that thou shalt say unto him, ‘By strength of hand the Lord brought us out from Egypt, from the house of bondage.

— which is added to teach parents in all succeeding ages, that it is their duty to instruct their children in the word and works of God, and in the nature and reasons of every particular kind or part of God’s worship and service.

15 And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly let us go, that the Lord slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man and the firstborn of beast; therefore I sacrifice to the Lord all that openeth the womb, being males; but all the firstborn of my children I redeem.’

— firstborn of man; the price of redemption was fixed at five shekels of the sanctuary: Numbers 3:47;

16 And it shall be as a token upon thine hand, and as frontlets between thine eyes; for by strength of hand the Lord brought us forth out of Egypt.” — it shall be for a token upon thine head, and for frontlets between thine eyes;

— these laws setting apart the firstlings of their beasts, the redemption of the firstbon, will be as easily and as clearly discerned as anything upon a man’s forehead may be seen by another;

17 And it came to pass, when Pharaoh had let the people go, that God led them not through the way of the land of the Philistines, although that was near; for God said, “Lest perhaps the people repent when they see war, and they return to Egypt.”

— when they see war; for the Philistines were viewed as one of the most warlike people of the time; while the Israelites after two centuries of slavery would have been an ill match for the Philistines;

18 But God led the people about, through the way of the wilderness of the Red Sea; and the children of Israel went up by five in a rank out of the land of Egypt.

— through the wilderness of the Red sea; perhaps indicative of the countries of Edom (“red”); including the gulf of Akaba;

19 And Moses took the bones of Joseph with him; for he had strictly sworn the children of Israel, saying, “God will surely visit you, and ye shall carry up my bones away hence with you.” — Moses took the bones of Joseph; Joseph’s body had been embalmed according to the Egyptian fashion;

Rashi thinks that the bones of all the tribes, or of the sons of Jacob, were carried with them, but that does not appear from the text;

20 And they took their journey from Succoth, and encamped in Etham on the edge of the wilderness. — they took their journey from Succoth, and encamped in Etham;

— the exact positions of both Succoth and Etham are uncertain, and can only be conjectured; but they probably lay to the southeast of Tanis, between that city and the Bitter Lakes.

21 And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud to lead them the way, and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light, to go by day and night. — by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; through the Red sea, and the wilderness, at the edge of which they now were, which was untrodden, and trackless;

— and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; whenever they travelled by night, and in those hot countries it maybe refleshing; and this pillar of fire gave them light when the moon wasn’t shining, and showing the direction they ought to go.

22 He took not away the pillar of the cloud by day nor the pillar of fire by night from before the people. — the Lord went before them; by a visible token of His presence, the Shekinah, in a majestic cloud.

Exodus 14

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, — and the Lord spake unto Moses; perhaps out of the pillar of the cloud in which he went before them;

“Speak unto the children of Israel, that they turn and encamp before Pihahiroth, between Migdol and the sea, opposite Baalzephon; before it shall ye encamp by the sea. — at Pi-hahiroth, Pharaoh and his servants repent for letting the people go; pursue and intend to overtake the Israelites;

For Pharaoh will say of the children of Israel, ‘They are entangled in the land, the wilderness hath shut them in.’ — Pharaoh will say they are entangled; presuming that they are hemmed in between the rocks and the sea.

And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, that he shall follow after them; and I will be honored above Pharaoh, and above all his host, that the Egyptians may know that I am the Lord.” And they did so.

— while Pharaoh gratified his malice and revenge, he furthered the bringing to pass God’s counsels concerning him. Though with the greatest reason he had let Israel go, yet now he was angry with himself for it.

And it was told the king of Egypt that the people fled; and the heart of Pharaoh and of his servants was turned against the people, and they said, “Why have we done this, that we have let Israel go from serving us?”

— God makes the envy and rage of men against his people, thus “Pharaoh and of his servants was turned against the people” a torment to themselves.

And he made ready his chariot and took his people with him, — he made ready his chariot; his preparations for an immediate and hot pursuit are here described;

and he took six hundred chosen chariots and all the chariots of Egypt and captains over every one of them. — a difference is made between “the chosen chariots” and “the chariots of Egypt.”

— the first evidently composed the king’s guard, amounting to six hundred chariots, and they are called “chosen,” literally, “third men”; three men being allotted to each chariot, the charioteer and two warriors, hence totally 1800 personel;

— as to “the chariots of Egypt,” the common cars contained only two persons, one for driving and the other for fighting; sometimes only one person was in the chariot, the driver lashed the reins round his body and fought; and of course, foot soldiers;

And the Lord hardened the heart of Pharaoh king of Egypt, and he pursued after the children of Israel; and the children of Israel went out with a high hand. — and the Lord hardened the heart of Pharaoh king of Egypt; as he said he would;

— with an high hand; confidently, boldly, perhaps somewhat proudly, as having brought the Egyptians to entreat them to take their departure.

But the Egyptians pursued after them, all the horses and chariots of Pharaoh, and his horsemen and his army, and overtook them encamping by the sea beside Pihahiroth, before Baalzephon. — and overtook them encamping by the sea, beside Pihahiroth, before Baalzephon; where they had pitched their camp by divine appointment;

10 And when Pharaoh drew nigh, the children of Israel lifted up their eyes, and behold, the Egyptians marched after them; and they were sore afraid; and the children of Israel cried out unto the Lord.

— and they were sore afraid; being an unarmed people, though numerous, and so unable to defend themselves against armed and disciplined troops;

11 And they said unto Moses, “Because there were no graves in Egypt, hast thou taken us away to die in the wilderness? Why hast thou dealt thus with us, to carry us forth out of Egypt?

— because there were no graves in Egypt; spoken in bitter irony, doubtless, but scarcely with any conscious reference to Egypt as “a land of tombs.” They meant simply to say: “Might we not as well have died there as here?”

12 Is not this the word that we told thee in Egypt, saying, ‘Let us alone, that we may serve the Egyptians’? For it had been better for us to serve the Egyptians, than that we should die in the wilderness.”

— let us alone; this is a gross exaggeration, yet not without a semblance of truth: for although the Israelites welcomed the message of Moses at first, they gave way completely at the first serious trial.

13 And Moses said unto the people, “Fear ye not. Stand still, and see the salvation of the Lord, which He will show to you today; for the Egyptians whom ye have seen today, ye shall see them again no more for ever. — fear ye not, stand still; let not your hearts fail, or sink or stagger, through unbelief: but with quiet minds look up to God.

14 The Lord shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace.” — and ye shall hold your peace; be still and quiet, and easy in your minds, and forbear saying or doing anything;

15 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Why criest thou unto Me? Speak unto the children of Israel, that they go forward. — speak unto the children of Israel, that they go forward; a little further until they were come to the sea shore.

16 But lift thou up thy rod, and stretch out thine hand over the sea and divide it; and the children of Israel shall go on dry ground through the midst of the sea. — with his rod, he hearkened to it, and touched the water with it, and so it divided, as it is said it did;

17 And I, behold, I will harden the hearts of the Egyptians, and they shall follow them; and I will get Myself honor above Pharaoh and above all his host, above his chariots and above his horsemen.

— and I will get me honour upon Pharaoh, and upon all his host, upon his chariots, and upon his horsemen: by the utter destruction of them, in just retaliation for the many innocent infants that had been drowned by them in the river Nile.

18 And the Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord when I have gotten Myself honor above Pharaoh, above his chariots, and above his horsemen.”

— when I have gotten me honour upon Pharaoh, upon his chariots, and upon his horsemen; by casting them into the sea, and drowning them there, thereby showing himself to be mightier than he.

19 And the angel of God, who went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face and stood behind them.

— and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them; the Targum adds, “because the Mizraee (Egyptians) threw darts and stones at the Israelites, but the Cloud intercepted them;” whereby the Israelites were protected from receiving any injury from them.

20 And it came between the camp of the Egyptians and the camp of Israel; and it was a cloud and darkness to them, but it gave light by night to these, so that the one came not near the other all the night.

— it was a cloud and darkness to the Egyptians, to whom it brought their former horrible darkness to mind, and did both exceedingly affright them, and altogether hinder them from motion or action, as that also did for three days; but it gave light by night to the Israelites, as the opposition showeth.

21 And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided. — the waters were divided;

— the waters of the Bitter Lakes were for a time separated completely from those of the Red Sea. By gradual elevation and desiccation the channel over which the Israelites passed has probably now become dry land.

22 And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground, and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand and on their left. — some Jewish writers say that the tribe of Judah went in first, and then the other tribes followed;

23 And the Egyptians pursued, and went in after them to the midst of the sea, even all Pharaoh’s horses, his chariots, and his horsemen.

— the Egyptians went in after them into the midst of the sea; they thought, Why might they not venture where Israel did? They were more advantageously provided with chariots and horses, while the Israelites were on foot.

24 And it came to pass that in the morning watch the Lord looked unto the host of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire and of the cloud, and troubled the host of the Egyptians. — the Lord looked through the cloud, and troubled them; with the most terrible and prodigious winds, and rains, and lightnings, and both claps and bolts of thunder;

25 And He took off their chariot wheels, that they drove them heavily, so that the Egyptians said, “Let us flee from the face of Israel, for the Lord fighteth for them against the Egyptians.” — and the Lord took off their chariot wheels;

Rashi renders it “And He removed the wheels of their chariots: With the fire the wheels were burned, and the chariots dragged, and those sitting in them were moved to and fro, and their limbs were wrenched apart.”

26 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Stretch out thine hand over the sea, that the waters may come again upon the Egyptians, upon their chariots, and upon their horsemen.”

— that the waters may come again upon the Egyptians, upon their chariots, and upon their horsemen; the waters which stood upright as a wall, on the right and left, might be no longer kept in such a position, but fall down upon the Egyptians, their chariots and horsemen.

27 And Moses stretched forth his hand over the sea, and the sea returned to his strength when the morning appeared. And the Egyptians fled against it, and the Lord overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea.

— and the Lord overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea; or shook them “off” or “out” out of their chariots, blew them out with the wind;

28 And the waters returned, and covered the chariots and the horsemen and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them. There remained not so much as one of them. — there remained not so much as one of them;

— wherefore it must be a falsehood which is related by some, that Pharaoh himself was preserved, and afterwards reigned in Nineveh, since not one was saved; they all perished;

29 But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea, and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand and on their left. — but the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; the bottom of it becoming so through the strong east wind, which blew all night until they came to the opposite shore;

30 Thus the Lord saved Israel that day out of the hand of the Egyptians, and Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the seashore. — saw their dead bodies floating upon the waters; it is likely, however, that the bodies of some were cast on shore, and became food to the beasts and birds of prey that frequent the wilderness;

31 And Israel saw that great work which the Lord did upon the Egyptians; and the people feared the Lord, and believed the Lord and His servant Moses.

— and the people feared the Lord; had an awe of his power and greatness upon their minds, and a sense of his goodness to them upon their hearts, which influenced their fear of him, and caused them to fear him with a filial and godly fear.

~~~~

A parallel Exodus would reoccur during the endtime, which would far exceed that of the original Exodus led by Moses.

Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night, where I will not show you favor.’

“Therefore behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that it shall no more be said, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’ 

but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.’ And I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Jeremiah 16:13-15; so emphatic is such a scene that it is repeated in Jeremiah 23:6-8.

So severe shall be their bondage that their deliverance from it shall be a far greater Deliverance than that out of Egypt where they spent 210 years in slavery under their Egyptian taskmasters!

For more see,

BYD to build its Electric Cars in Hungary

•November 10, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China’s largest EV manufacturer will expand its production efforts in Hungary. But what about the US? Would BYD build their electric cars in Mexico?

MSN News • November 6, 2023 // Reuters

BYD is expected to soon announce a decision about the location of its first European electric car factory.

Meet The e1 Entry Level Electric Car From BYD

According to German newspaper The Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (FAS), via Reuters), the European plant will be built in Hungary. The information is unofficial, based on “unnamed sources close to BYD” who indicate that “the decision had already been made internally.”

The article also points out that last month, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban met BYD Chairman and President Wang Chuanfu.

Well, there are no official comments yet, but the selection of Hungary would not be surprising, as BYD already has an electric bus factory in the country.

Hungary is in the European Union, which would allow the site to produce and sell cars locally in the entire region, without any issues.

Let’s recall that the European Union opened an anti-subsidy probe into Chinese EVs sold in Europe, which in the future might result in some import tariffs (to support the local automotive industry).

BYD Plug-in Electric Car Export – October 2023

The third element is that Hungary is one of the most favored countries for various Chinese investments. The world’s largest lithium-ion EV battery manufacturer CATL is already building a massive 100-gigawatt-hour factory in the country.

BYD has become the world’s largest plug-in electric car manufacturer and, in the third quarter, basically matched Tesla in terms of all-electric car sales volume (the difference was just 3,456 units).

With a record 300,000+ sales a month in October, and surging exports to over 30,000 units last month (roughly 10 percent of the total volume), the Chinese manufacturer is now looking into overseas markets.

“China is a sleeping giant . . . when she wakes up, it will shake the world” Napoleon.

“China rocks in my opinion” Elon Musk

“Be afraid,” warns David Goldman, “Be very afraid!”

Exodus (11-12)

•November 9, 2023 • Leave a Comment

A parallel Exodus would reoccur during the endtime, which would far exceed that of the original Exodus led by Moses.

Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night, where I will not show you favor.’

“Therefore behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that it shall no more be said, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’

but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.’ And I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Jeremiah 16:13-15.

So severe shall be their bondage that their deliverance from it shall be a far greater Deliverance than that out of Egypt where they spent 210 years in slavery under their Egyptian taskmasters!

For more see,

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

For more about the South, a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

Exodus 11

1 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Yet will I bring one plague more upon Pharaoh and upon Egypt. Afterwards he will let you go hence. When he shall let you go, he shall surely thrust you out hence altogether.

— he shall surely thrust you out hence altogether; absolutely, entirely, without any exception or limitation, them, their wives, their children, their flocks and herds, without any restraint upon them and without any condition of return;

— or fixing any time for it, but the dismission should be general, unlimited, and unconditional; or “in thrusting he shall thrust you out,” with force and vehemence, with urgency and in great haste.

Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow from his neighbor, and every woman from her neighbor, jewels of silver and jewels of gold.” — let every man ask; not borrow, of his neighbour;

— jewels of silver, jewels of gold; to ornament themselves with at the feast they were going to keep: the Samaritan and Septuagint versions add, and clothing or raiment, and such it is certain they did borrow.

And the Lord gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians. Moreover the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt in the sight of Pharaoh’s servants and in the sight of the people.

— therefore they complied with their request, not only out of love to the people, but out of fear to Moses, lest he should punish them severely in case of refusal.

And Moses said, “Thus saith the Lord: ‘About midnight will I go out into the midst of Egypt;

and all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant who is behind the mill, and all the firstborn of beasts.

— and all the firstborn in the land of Eygpt shall die; by the destroying angel; however, it was sudden and immediate death, and which was universal, reaching to all the firstborn that were in the families of the Egyptians in all parts of the kingdom;

And there shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt, such as there was none like it, nor shall be like it any more.

— shall be a great cry throughout all the land; in the case of a death, people set up loud wailings, and imagination may conceive what “a great cry” would be raised when death would invade every family in the kingdom.

But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue, against man or beast, that ye may know how the Lord doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.’ — shall not a dog move his tongue; a proverbial expression, importing all should be peace and quietness among the Israelites;

And all these thy servants shall come down unto me and bow down themselves unto me, saying, ‘Get thee out, and all the people who follow thee!’ And after that I will go out.” And he went out from Pharaoh in a great anger. — in a great anger; in heat of anger, burning with indignation.

And the Lord said unto Moses, “Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you, that My wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt.”

— that my wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt; of the smiting of the firstborn, dividing the waters of the Red sea, and the destruction of Pharaoh and his host in it; but since these words were said before any of the plagues, were inflicted, it may refer to them all.

10 And Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before Pharaoh; and the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so that he would not let the children of Israel go out of his land. — and the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart: one time after another, and yet more and more;

— so that he would not let the children of Israel go out of his land; until the last plague, the slaying of the firstborn, was brought upon him and his people, related in the following chapter.

Exodus 12

The Passover and Timeline of the Exodus

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, saying, — the Lord spoke; according to these Scriptural record, neither Moses nor Aaron introduced any legislative power of their own, either at this time or later;

— the whole system, religious, political, and ecclesiastical, was received by Divine Revelation, commanded by God, hence the term the “law of Moses” is misleading, used by those misguided;

“This month shall be unto you the beginning of months; it shall be the first month of the year to you. — again, the starting of a month or a year is by Divine Revelation; not for mere man to determine for themselves when the month or year to start;

Speak ye unto all the congregation of Israel, saying, ‘On the tenth day of this month they shall take for themselves every man a lamb, according to the house of their fathers, a lamb for a house. — a lamb; the word used (śeh) is a vague one, applied equally to sheep and goats, of any age and of either sex;

— in the tenth day of this month; it was necessary they should now begin to prepare the passover four days before, because otherwise it would have been difficult to get ready so many lambs in Egypt, especially as they were to depart in haste;

— but not necessarily for later generation, thus implied by the Targum Jonathan: but “not for (coming) generations.” Perhaps in later generations, the growth of population would make such a practice unmanagable to confine it in a single day;

— the passover in Egypt, they were commanded to sprinkling with a bunch of hyssop upon the lintel, and upon the two side posts, and was eaten with haste, but the passover in later ages were to be kept during all the seven days so that no leaven (of malice) should be found in their houses.

And if the household be too little for the lamb, let him and his neighbor next unto his house take it according to the number of the souls; every man according to his eating shall make your count for the lamb.

Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year; ye shall take it out from the sheep, or from the goats. — more apecifics of the lamb or from the goats (śeh from verse 3 above) is revealed here: a male of the first year, and without blemish;

And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month, and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening. — evening (`ben ha arbayim); “between the [two] evenings;

— “between the evenings” – the first evening was to begin with the decline of the sun from the zenith, and the second begins with sunset.

Evidence of progressive Revelation on how to keep the Passover:

1. The first Passover was slaughtered by the whole congregation of Israel, but later it was slaughtered by priests and Levites at the sanctuary and still later, only at the Temple.

2. Introduction of the second passover; Numbers 9:9 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, 10 “Speak unto the children of Israel, saying: ‘If any man of you or your posterity shall be unclean by reason of a dead body, or be in a journey afar off, yet he shall keep the Passover unto the Lord.

11 The fourteenth day of the second month at evening they shall keep it, and eat it with unleavened bread and bitter herbs. 12 They shall leave none of it unto the morning, nor break any bones of it. According to all the ordinances of the Passover they shall keep it.

And they shall take of the blood, and strike it on the two side posts and on the upper door post of the houses wherein they shall eat it. —

— regarding keeping of the second Passover by King Hezekiah in II Chronicles 30:

15 Then they killed the Passover lamb on the fourteenth day of the second month; and the priests and the Levites were ashamed, and sanctified themselves and brought in the burnt offerings into the house of the Lord.

16And they stood in their place according to their order, according to the law of Moses the man of God. The priests sprinkled the blood which they received from the hand of the Levites. II Chronicles 30:15-16

— in later years, this killing of the Passover lamb could only be done near the Temple so as to sprinkle the blood of the Lamb at the base of the altar, Exodus 29:12, which was not in the original Exodus.

— again, with King Josiah, another good king, at the Temple, II Chronicles 35:

10 So the service was prepared, and the priests stood in their place and the Levites in their courses, according to the king’s commandment. 11 And they killed the Passover lamb, and the priests sprinkled the blood from their hands, and the Levites flayed them.

12 And they removed the burnt offerings, that they might give according to the divisions of the families of the people to offer unto the Lord, as it is written in the Book of Moses. And so did they with the oxen. 13 And they roasted the Passover lamb with fire according to the ordinance. II Chronicles 35:10-13

And they shall eat the flesh in that night, roasted with fire; and with unleavened bread and with bitter herbs they shall eat it.

The Targum Jonathan translates and explains the eating of the Passover from the Hebrew in Exodus 12 into the vernacular, in a very simple language, and verse 8 is extremely clear: “And you shall eat the flesh on that night, the fifteenth of Nisan . . . without leaven,” Exodus 12

This eating of the Passover is during the night of the fifteenth. If this is the night of the fourteenth, there shouldn’t be any need to take unleavened bread; neither was any unleavened bread available.

Eat not of it raw, nor boiled at all with water, but roasted with fire — his head with his legs and with the viscera thereof.

10 And ye shall let nothing of it remain until the morning (בֹּקֶר bôqer, H1242), and that which remaineth of it until the morning (בֹּקֶר bôqer, H1242) ye shall burn with fire.

Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning H1242 were the first day. Morning is thus a 12-hours period, starting at midnight. This means they were to burn any roasted remains before they left. And they left probably around 1-2 pm, burning any remains before they go.

Targum: Nor shall any be left of it till the morning; but what may remain of it in the morning you shall cover over, and in the daylight of the sixteenth day burn with fire; for you may not burn the residue of a holy oblation on the feast day.

Rashi: and whatever is left over of it until morning-: What is the meaning of “until morning” a second time? [This implies] adding one morning to another morning, for morning starts with sunrise, and this verse is here to make it [the prohibition] earlier, [i.e.,] that it is forbidden to eat it [the leftover flesh] from dawn. This is according to its apparent meaning.

Another midrashic interpretation is that this teaches that it may not be burnt on Yom Tov but on the next day, and this is how it is to be interpreted: and what is left over from it on the first morning you shall wait until the second morning and burn it. — [from Shab. 24b]

11 And thus shall ye eat it: with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste; it is the Lord’S Passover H6453.

“WHAT FOLLY!” some misguided would preach to convey this meaning: “And you shall eat it in trepidation” that is, with dread and apprehension but no readiness for fleeing; if so what would be the point, “with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste?”

12 For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the Lord.

Targum: ninety thousand myriads of destroying angels — a myriad is generally a unit of ten thousand; but usually this expression is taken to mean an innumerable number.

13 And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are; and when I see the blood, I will pass over H6452 you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you when I smite the land of Egypt.

— flashing forward, the blood of the Lamb of God, Christ, in around AD 31, were to save mankind from the penalty of death; when the Angel of Death came to smite the land of ‘Egypt.’

— the lamb was to be without blemish; the Lord Yeshua offered himself for humanity as the Lamb of God without spot. Not a bone of it must be broken. Despite they couldn’t find any fault with him, the chief priests went on to condemn Christ.

14 “‘And this day (this day is when the death plague occurred) shall be unto you for a memorial, and ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever. — this day is still referring to the time the Death Angel passed over the houses, the subject in discussion;

— a memorial, it’s a feast and an ordinance – this should be the same night as the night to be much observed as stated in verse 42, not a separate night as most CoGs, who hail largely from their original home, Samaria, would thinks so! 

Rashi: and you shall celebrate it: The day that is a memorial for you-you shall celebrate it. But we have not yet heard which is the day of memorial. Therefore, Scripture states: “Remember this day, when you went out of Egypt” (Exod. 13: 3), we learn that the day of the Exodus is the day of memorial.

Now on what day did they go out [of Egypt]? Therefore, Scripture states: “On the day after the Passover, they went out” (Num. 33:3). I must therefore say that the fifteenth of Nissan is the day of the festival, because the night of the fifteenth they ate the Passover sacrifice, and in the morning they went out.

15 Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread. Even the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses; for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel.

Rashi: For seven days: Heb. שִׁבְעַתיָמִים, seteyne of days, i.e., a group of seven days. 

Rashi: For seven days you shall eat unleavened cakes-: But elsewhere it says: “For six days you shall eat unleavened cakes” (Deut. 16:8). This teaches [us] regarding the seventh day of Passover, that it is not obligatory to eat matzah, as long as one does not eat chametz. How do we know that [the first] six [days] are also optional [concerning eating matzah]?

This is a principle in [interpreting] the Torah: Anything that was included in a generalization [in the Torah] and was excluded from that generalization [in the Torah] to teach [something] it was not excluded to teach [only] about itself, but it was excluded to teach about the entire generalization.

[In this case it means that] just as [on] the seventh day [eating matzah] is optional, so is it optional in [the first] six [days]. I might think that [on] the first night it is also optional. Therefore, Scripture states: “in the evening, you shall eat unleavened cakes” (Exod. 12:18). The text established it as an obligation. — [from Mechilta]

16 And in the first day there shall be a holy convocation, and in the seventh day there shall be a holy convocation to you. No manner of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat, that only may be done by you.

17 And ye shall observe the Feast of Unleavened Bread, for in this selfsame day have I brought your armies out of the land of Egypt. Therefore shall ye observe this day in your generations by an ordinance for ever.

— the notion that the First Day as a holy day for an assembly during the Exodus were not practiced like practising Jews have today. Perhaps they assembled in haste to flee; more details were added later, like as the issue that there was no wave sheaf offering during the Exodus; that was also added later as in Leviticus 23; which is another evidence of progressive revealing of God’s laws through further revelation.

18 In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at evening (`ereb), ye shall eat unleavened bread until the one and twentieth day of the month at evening (`ereb).

Leviticus 23:5 In the fourteenth day of the first month at even (h6153`ben ha arbayim or between the evenings) is the LORD’S passover. (h6153 ben ha arbayim is also used in Ex 12:6; 16:12; 29:39,41; 30:8; Lev 23:5; Num 9:3,5,11; 28:4,8)

The composite Feast combining the Passover and the Days of Unleavened Bread is already evidenced above.

Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day (h3117 יוֹם yowm), and the darkness he called Night (h3915 לַיִל layil). And the evening (h6153 עֶרֶב`ereb) and the morning (h1242 בֹּקֶר boqer) were the first day (h3117 יוֹם yowm). Evening and Morning are both a 12-hour period.

If we use even (‘ereḇ), as the beginning of a day for Atonement, in Leviticus 23:32, we must keep Atonement for two days on the 9th and 10th – contrary to the scriptures. Also, If we use even (‘ereḇ) as the beginning of the fourteenth for Unleavened Bread in Exodus 12:18, we must keep the Days of Unleavened Bread for 8 days – again, contrary to the scriptures.  

19 Seven days shall there be no leaven found in your houses; for whosoever eateth that which is leavened, even that soul shall be cut off from the congregation of Israel, whether he be a stranger or born in the land.

20 Ye shall eat nothing leavened; in all your habitations shall ye eat unleavened bread.’”

21 Then Moses called for all the elders of Israel and said unto them, “Draw out and take you a lamb according to your families, and kill the Passover H6453. — and to kill the Passover; to eat the Passover; hence Passover is an event, not a day; you couldn’t kill a day, nor eat one;

— you kill the Passover at even (ben ha arbayim) on the fourteenth of Nisan (the time when Christ died); but you eat the Passover at night on the fifteenth;

22 And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the basin, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the basin; and none of you shall go out from the door of his house until the morning.

During the first Passover, they were to stay in their houses, but later on they were not allowed to stay within their gates, which certainly include their houses. It says in Deuteronomy 16:5

“Thou mayest not sacrifice the Passover within any of thy gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee.” This is proof that God makes adjustments in later years to the observance of ordinances from the original instructions given in Egypt.

23 For the Lord will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when He seeth the blood upon the lintel and on the two side posts, the Lord will pass over H6452 the door and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you.

24 And ye shall observe this thing as an ordinance to thee and to thy sons for ever.

25 And it shall come to pass, when ye come to the land which the Lord will give you, according as He hath promised, that ye shall keep this service.

26 And it shall come to pass, when your children shall say unto you, ‘What mean ye by this service?’

27 that ye shall say, ‘It is the sacrifice of the Lord’S Passover H6453, who passed over H6452 the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt when He smote the Egyptians and delivered our houses.’” And the people bowed their heads and worshiped.

The LORD’s “Passover” vs the Death Angel “passed over” the house. Which is the real Passover? So both the fourteenth and fifteenth were to be memorialized for a remembrance for the Children.

28 And the children of Israel went away, and did as the Lord had commanded Moses and Aaron; so did they.

29 And it came to pass, that at midnight the Lord smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sat on his throne, unto the firstborn of the captive who was in the dungeon, and all the firstborn of cattle.

30 And Pharaoh rose up in the night, he and all his servants and all the Egyptians; and there was a great cry in Egypt, for there was not a house where there was not one dead.

31 And he called for Moses and Aaron by night and said, “Rise up, and get you forth from among my people, both ye and the children of Israel! And go, serve the Lord, as ye have said.

32 Also take your flocks and your herds, as ye have said; and be gone, and bless me also.”

33 And the Egyptians were urgent upon the people, that they might send them out of the land in haste; for they said, “We are all dead men.”

Numbers 9:11 The fourteenth day of the second month at evening they shall keep it, and eat it with unleavened bread and bitter herbs.

12 They shall leave none of it unto the morning (בֹּקֶר bôqer, H1242), nor break any bones. According to all the ordinances of the Passover they shall keep it.

The Israelites could have left around 1-2 am, which is early morning. It may even be slightly later at 2-3 am but it would still be in the morning, bôqer.

34 And the people took their dough before it was leavened, their kneading troughs being bound up in their clothes upon their shoulders.

35 And the children of Israel did according to the word of Moses [for they had already] borrowed from the Egyptians jewels of silver and jewels of gold and raiment.

Indications are that there are at least fourteen days between the ninth and tenth plagues, for the chapter starts with the beginning of the month, until Passover, the killing of the lamb;

in Chapter 11:2 “Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow from his neighbor, and every woman from her neighbor, jewels of silver and jewels of gold,”

ESV The people of Israel had also done as Moses told them, for they had asked the Egyptians for silver and gold jewelry and for clothing.

Actually the spoilings have occurred much earlier, throughout the ten plagues: Exodus 3:19 “And I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let you go, no, not by a mighty hand.”

And then more specifically in Exodus 3:22, “and every woman shall borrow of her neighbor and of her that sojourneth in her house jewels of silver and jewels of gold and raiment.”

Hence verses 35-36 is a flashback, for the spoiling had already began much earlier. 

36 And the Lord gave the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, so that they lent unto them such things as they required. And they despoiled the Egyptians.

For they had already plundered the Egyptians. In the previous chapter,

Exodus 11:1 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Yet will I bring one plague more upon Pharaoh and upon Egypt. Afterwards he will let you go hence. When he shall let you go, he shall surely thrust you out hence altogether.

2 Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow from his neighbor, and every woman from her neighbor, jewels of silver and jewels of gold.” So the plundering of the Egyptians had been happening for at least 13 days earlier!

37 And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot who were men, besides children.

Targum says from Pilusin towards Succoth, a hundred and thirty thousand “sons,” — supposingly to total 600,000;

Rashi: from Rameses to Succoth: They were 120 “mil” [apart]. Yet they arrived there instantly, as it is said: “and I carried you on eagles’ wings.” – [from Mechilta]

Numbers 33:3 And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month. On the morrow after the Passover the children of Israel went out with a high hand in the sight of all the Egyptians,

4 for the Egyptians buried all their firstborn, whom the Lord had smitten among them. Upon their gods also the Lord executed judgments. 5 And the children of Israel removed from Rameses and pitched camp in Succoth.

Since one lamb is for two or three families, some of the families could have earlier moved earlier from Goshen to Rameses in preparation for the signal to flee. Houses in Goshen could be quite empty.

38 And a mixed multitude went up also with them, and flocks and herds, even very much cattle.

39 And they baked unleavened cakes of the dough which they brought forth out of Egypt; for it was not leavened because they were thrust out of Egypt and could not tarry, neither had they prepared for themselves any victual.

The thrusting out of Egypt was carried out immediately after the killing of the firstborn, not the day after. Exodus 12:31-33, otherwise the urgency “with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste (verse 11)” made no sense.

Actually the Israelites were not thrusted out of Egypt until about a week later. Perhaps they could be better described “they began to be thrust out of Egypt.” And until they crossed the Red Sea they were really being thrusted out.

Also, the Israelites didn’t  tarry, so they didn’t wait for another 24 hours to start moving.

40 Now the sojourning of the children of Israel who dwelt in Egypt was four hundred and thirty years. — Targum: “the days of the dwelling of the sons of Israel in Mizraim were thirty weeks of years, (thirty times seven years)” which is 210 years;

Targum: “But the number of four hundred and thirty years (had passed away since) the Lord spake to Abraham.”

41 And it came to pass at the end of the four hundred and thirty years, even on the selfsame day it came to pass, that all the hosts of the Lord went out from the land of Egypt.

The 6 hours at the top right “Afternoon” is also known as “`ben ha arbayim

42 It is a night to be much observed unto the Lord for bringing them out from the land of Egypt. This is that night of the Lord to be observed by all the children of Israel in their generations.

— the night to be much observed is the night when they ate the Passover, when a few hours later, the Death Angel came and slaughtered the Egyptians, which made such a night memorable to be kept;

Deuteronomy 16:1 “Observe the month of Abib, and keep the Passover unto the Lord thy God; for in the month of Abib the Lord thy God brought thee forth out of Egypt by night. . .

4 And there shall be no leavened bread seen with thee in all thy borders seven days, neither shall there anything of the flesh, which thou sacrificed the first day at evening, remain all night until the morning.

Night (from 6 pm to 6 am) and morning (from midnight to 6 am) overlaps morning by 6 hours. So they left after midnight around 1-2 am which is night as well as in the morning.

43 And the Lord said unto Moses and Aaron, “This is the ordinance of the Passover H6453. There shall no stranger eat thereof; — this is the ordinance of the passover; as before delivered, and these the laws and rules, according to which it is to be observed, as now related, both with respect to the lamb, and to the unleavened bread;

— and the following is an account of the persons that were to partake of it: there shall no stranger eat thereof, one uncircumcised that is of another country.

44 but every man’s servant who is bought for money, when thou hast circumcised him, then shall he eat thereof. — if a stranger wished to join, he would need to accept circumcision for himself and the males of his family. —

45 A foreigner and a hired servant shall not eat thereof. — similarily, if a foreigner, bought as a slave into an Israelitish family, may eat of it, if he is made a member of their community by circumcision.

46 In one house shall it be eaten; thou shalt not carry forth any of the flesh abroad out of the house, neither shall ye break a bone thereof. — neither shall ye break a bone thereof; any of its tender bones to get out the marrow; and so the Targum of Jonathan adds, “that ye shall not eat that which is in the midst of it.”

47 All the congregation of Israel shall keep it. — all Israelites are to keep the Passover;

48 And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee and will keep the Passover H6453 to the Lord, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land, for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof.

49 One law shall be for him that is homeborn and for the stranger who sojourneth among you.” — one set of law shall be to him that is homeborn and would be the same unto the stranger;

50 Thus did all the children of Israel; as the Lord commanded Moses and Aaron, so did they.

51 And it came to pass the selfsame day that the Lord brought the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt by their armies. — this is a reminder that the children fled out of Egypt on the fifteenth of Nisan, and as that night was such a spectacular event, it was to be a night to be much remembered in later generations.

~~~~

A parallel Exodus would reoccur during the endtime, which would far exceed that of the original Exodus led by Moses.

Therefore will I cast you out of this land into a land that ye know not, neither ye nor your fathers; and there shall ye serve other gods day and night, where I will not show you favor.’

“Therefore behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that it shall no more be said, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’ 

but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.’ And I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers. Jeremiah 16:13-15; so emphatic is such a scene that it is repeated in Jeremiah 23:6-8.

So severe shall be their bondage that their deliverance from it shall be a far greater Deliverance than that out of Egypt where they spent 210 years in slavery under their Egyptian taskmasters!

For more see,

Why the Philippines Out of China’s BRI?

•November 8, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Why the Philippines Pulled Out of China’s Belt-and-Road Project: “He did what these client politicians do — they signal left but turn right,” so why this turnaround?

Sputnik International • November 4, 2023 // Asia Times

The Philippines forged closer ties with China and Russia under former President Rodrigo Duterte. But his successor, Bongbong Marcos, is following in the footsteps of his dictator father, said peace activist, writer, teacher and political analyst KJ Noh.

The Philippines is regressing to its historic status as a US colony by rejecting China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) for trade and security, a pundit says.

Filipino President Bongbong Marcos was among 23 regional leaders who attended the BRI summit in Beijing in October.

However, transportation Secretary Jaime Batista of the archipelago nation announced on October 30 that three joint rail infrastructure projects on the islands of Luzon and Mindanao, totaling around $5 billion dollars, have been revoked. According to the minister, construction on the three lines was delayed by Beijing, as per the agreement made by Rodrigo Duterte, the predecessor of Marcos.

“We have three projects that are no longer being funded by the Chinese government,” Bautista said. “We can’t wait forever, and it seems that China is not that interested anymore.”

That came a week after four Filipino navy ships entered disputed territorial waters claimed by the Chinese around islands in the South China Sea, resulting in a collision with a Chinese warship.

The Reagans dance with the Marcos during a state visit to Manila in 1969

Peace advocate KJ Noh told Sputnik that Manila’s decision was “very foolish.”

“Marcos has put all his chips on a losing bet,” Noh said. “The multipolar world is rising, linked to the economic infrastructure of the Belt and Road. It’s the biggest global construction project on the planet.”

He said the Filipino government was counting on continued “US geopolitical ascendancy, which is no longer the case.”

“Essentially, they’re saying that we side with the United States in its war against China, and economic benefit and win-win and neutral growth be damned,” Noh said. “It’s partly a legacy of the colonial legacy of the Philippines. The Philippines has always been a US client state and it’s simply falling, reverting back to the norm in this situation.”

The Philippines were under US rule from the end of the Spanish-American War in 1898 until July 4, 1946.

Some $50B are known to have plundered from the Philippines treasury

The writer said Marcos’ decision to emulate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not surprising given his family’s long relationship with Washington under his father, former President Ferdinand Marcos.

“The US was involved, interfered in 86 elections since World War Two,” Noh pointed out. “The Philippines has always been the US’s playground simply because the geostrategic value of the Philippines.”

China’s Overland & Maritime Belt-and-Road Routes Bypassing the Philippines

[Besides, the Pentegon knows where the remaining Marco’s wealth is located, looted from the Ferdinand’s era; some returned but the bulk remains hidden, subject to blackmail]

“Remember the father Marcos was a complete and total tin-pot US puppet. He did everything that the US did until they got tired of him and then they got rid of him. And this is the son. The son who does not fall far from the tree,” he continued. “He did what these client politicians do — they signal left but turn right.”

US military to consume seafood from Fukushima

•November 7, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US military will buy seafood from Fukushima to offset Chinese ban

Yahoo News • October 30, 2023 // US News & World Report

The US has reportedly begun buying Japanese seafood for its military stationed there to offset the impact of China’s ban on seafood, according to a new report from Reuters.

US Military Bulk Buys unwanted Japanese Seafood to Counter China Ban

In an interview with Reuters on Monday, US Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel said there will be a long-term contract between the US armed forces and the fisheries and co-ops in Japan.

Emanuel pushed for more ways Washington could help offset China’s ban on seafood, which was put in place in August in response to the the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant’s release of diluted and treated radioactive wastewater back into the Pacific Ocean.

Unwanted Sea bream at the Tokyo market destined for the US Navy

Japan’s move to release the wastewater came under fire from Chinese leaders at the time, including China’s Foreign Ministry, who said China “firmly opposes and strongly condemns it” and that Japan disregarded the criticism of the international community.

“The best way we have proven in all the instances to kind of wear out China’s economic coercion is come to the aid and assistance of the targeted country or industry,” Emanuel told Reuters.

US Military Bulk Buys Japanese Seafood to Counter China Ban

Pressed on Emanuel’s comments during a press conference Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin reiterated China’s opposition to Japan’s discharge and defended the ban as a “precautionary measure.”

“The precautionary measures taken by China and some other countries in response to Japan’s move to protect food safety and people’s health are entirely legitimate, reasonable and necessary,” Wenbin said Monday.

US troops dine at the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma Mess Hall in Okinawa, Japan

“As for the remarks of the US Ambassador to Japan, it needs to be pointed out that the duty of diplomats is to deepen friendship between countries,” Wenbin said, “rather than to smear other countries and sow discords.”

Emanuel told Reuters the US’s first purchase in the arrangement is just under a metric ton of scallops, a small portion of the more than 100,000 tons of scallops Japan exported to China last year.

The seafood will be given to soldiers in messes and vessels and sold in shops and restaurants on military bases, Emanuel reportedly said, adding that the types of seafood will expand over time. The US military had not purchased local seafood in Japan prior to the deal, according to Emanuel.

Unwanted Tuna from the Tsukiji Fish Market in Tokyo destined for the US Navy

The contained water was being stored in about 1,000 tanks, which were expected to reach capacity by early 2024. The tanks also risked leakage if the water was not removed.

While drawing criticism from some world leaders, Japan’s plan is supported by the scientific community, which has claimed watching the plan closely will deem it safe.

The tsunami led to nuclear meltdowns and a number of fuel plants explosions

On 9 March 2021, ahead of the 10-year anniversary, a UN report said there had been “no adverse health effects” documented among Fukushima residents directly related to the radiation from the disaster. Any future radiation-related health effects were “unlikely to be discernible,” it said.

The Four Countries that could be Pivotal

•November 6, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Will the Israel-Hamas war become a regional conflict? Here are 4 countries that could be pivotal

The Conversation • November 1, 2023

Fears are escalating the conflict between Israel and Hamas could spill over into a broader war involving other countries in the region.

Neighbouring countries such as Lebanon, Syria and Egypt, as well as regional players like Iran and Qatar, are currently navigating domestic and international pressures in their response.

So, how likely is it that another country could be dragged into the conflict – or have a diplomatic role in helping resolve the crisis? Here are four possibilities beyond Iran (which we covered in a separate piece).

Egypt: limited desire to get involved

In Egypt, President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi’s regime came to power in 2013 by ousting the Muslim Brotherhood-led government that was democratically elected following the Arab Spring uprising. The Muslim Brotherhood movement has long been a focal point for political opposition in Egypt and is ideologically aligned with Hamas.

Although El-Sisi’s government has allowed some protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza, these have been tightly controlled. And notably, they have not been permitted at Tahrir Square, the heart of the Arab Spring protests.

El-Sisi’s main concern is the conflict in Gaza does not spark widespread demonstrations in Egypt, which could galvanise dissatisfaction with his regime. As such, El-Sisi will try to prioritise domestic stability rather than direct involvement in the war. He will likely support Hamas rhetorically, while doing little of substance to assist its fight against Israel.

Critically, this means Egypt will also remain reluctant to open its southern border crossing with Gaza to allow Palestinian refugees to leave.

For a decade, Egyptian forces have been battling an Islamist insurgency in the Sinai desert. El-Sisi is concerned an influx of refugees from Gaza may exacerbate these tensions and lead to increased militant activity against the regime.

Lebanon: it depends what Hezbollah decides to do

In Lebanon, war with Israel would be an unwelcome development. In recent years Lebanon’s political landscape has been marked by public dissatisfaction with elites and an ongoing economic crisis.

Hezbollah, a powerful Shiite Muslim militant and political group in Lebanon, has already been clashing with Israeli forces across the border. If violence continues to escalate between Israel and Hamas, Hezbollah could enter the war from the north. This would commit Lebanon to an unpopular military confrontation with Israel, shattering the fragile peace between the countries that has held since 2006.

“Now, thou son of man, Behold, I am against thee, O Tyre,” Ezekiel 26-27

Given Hezbollah is embedded in the Lebanese government and commands the strongest and most well-organised militant force in the country, other Lebanese factions are limited in their ability to restrain it. These factions would also be wary of triggering another civil war by trying to prevent Hezbollah from pursuing military action.

Because Hezbollah receives funding, military equipment and training from Iran, it is seen as one of Tehran’s strongest proxies for its ambitions in the region. Any decision by Hezbollah to increase its attacks on Israel would thus be driven by Iran, or at least carried out with Tehran’s approval.

Syria: backed into a corner by political debts to Iran

Political protest in Syria in 2011 led to civil war between President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and rebel groups. Assad depended on Iranian and Russian military support to maintain his grip on power.

Assad has no incentive to engage Israel militarily and destablise his hard-won political control. However, debts to Iran may need to be repaid with agitation against Israel if Israel launches an expected ground operation into Gaza.

Since Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israeli communities, Syrian state media says Israel has hit airports in Damascus and Aleppo with missile strikes, causing damage and airport closures. State media also said eight Syrian soldiers were killed in an air strike last week. Israel said it had struck Syrian army infrastructure in response to rocket launches from Syria.

An oracle concerning Damascus: Before long Damascus will cease to be a city, and she will be reduced to a heap of ruins. Isaiah 17:1

Israel’s likely objective with these strikes was to deter, rather than provoke, a military confrontation. The strikes are a reminder to Assad that Israel has the capability to hit important targets deep in Syrian territory – and is willing to do so.

There is a risk such actions, combined with political pressure from Iran and Hezbollah, may still lead to a military escalation between Syria and Israel.

One actor with the ability to restrain Syria is Russia, which maintains a large military presence in the country. Russia has no interest in seeing Syria enter into a war with Israel, as this would likely fracture the fragile political stability Russia has been heavily invested in maintaining.

Qatar: seizing a diplomatic opportunity?

Qatar is perhaps one of the most interesting countries to watch in the coming weeks. For decades, it has played a somewhat provocative and outsized role in regional politics and diplomacy.

Qatar has long had a close relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates. It also houses Hamas’ political offices in Doha and has been one of the key financial backers for the group. As a Sunni Muslim state, Qatar is ideologically more closely aligned with Hamas than the group’s more prominent financial backer, Iran.

Qatar has already played a key role in negotiations with Hamas to release four hostages from Gaza.

Qatar lost regional influence in 2017 when four countries in the region cut ties and imposed a blockade on it. It now wants to regain prominence as a key player in the region. It would be in Qatar’s interests to position itself as a central diplomatic broker in the conflict and avoid being viewed in a similar light to Iran, as an enabler and funder of Hamas activity.

So, could Qatar succeed in leveraging its close relationship with Hamas to facilitate negotiations between the group and Israel to release the remaining Israeli hostages or even bring an end to the conflict? Or would Qatar’s lack of diplomatic relations with Israel thwart these ambitions?

Qatar’s influence may depend on Israel’s appetite for negotiations and the extent to which the United States demonstrates a willingness to broker between the parties.

~~~~

Exodus (9-10)

•November 5, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Exodus 9

Then the Lord said unto Moses, “Go in unto Pharaoh and tell him, ‘Thus saith the Lord God of the Hebrews: Let My people go, that they may serve Me. — let my people go, that they may serve me; this demand had been made repeatedly; and, though reasonable, was refused.

For if thou refuse to let them go and wilt hold them still,

behold, the hand of the Lord is upon thy cattle which are in the field, upon the horses, upon the asses, upon the camels, upon the oxen, and upon the sheep. There shall be a very grievous pestilence.

— the hand of the Lord; immediately, without the stretching out of Aaron’s hand; is upon the cattle; many of which, some of all kinds, should die by a sort of pestilence; a disease would be sent among all the flocks and herds of the Egyptians;

— the Targum renders it a “death” as the Jews commonly call a pestilence, whether on man or beast, because it generally sweeps away large numbers.

And the Lord shall distinguish between the cattle of Israel and the cattle of Egypt; and there shall nothing die of all that belong to the children of Israel.’” — nothing shall die of the children’s of Israel; this was the greater miracle,

— because the Israelites and the Egyptians were mingled together in the land of Goshen; so that their cattle breathed the same air, and drank the same water. By which it appeared that this pestilence was not natural, but proceeded from the immediate hand of God.

And the Lord appointed a set time, saying, “Tomorrow the Lord shall do this thing in the land.” — saying, tomorrow the Lord shall do this thing in the land;

— thus giving him time and space to consider the matter well, repent of his obstinacy, and dismiss the people of Israel, and so prevent the plague coming upon the cattle, as threatened.

And the Lord did that thing on the morrow; and all the cattle of Egypt died, but of the cattle of the children of Israel died not one. — but of the cattle of the children of Israel died not one; at least of the murrain or a pestilential disease, or by the hand of God.

And Pharaoh sent, and behold, there was not one of the cattle of the Israelites dead. And the heart of Pharaoh was hardened, and he did not let the people go.

— and the heart of Pharaoh was hardened, and he did not let the people go; though this plague was so heavy upon him and his people, and the loss they sustained so great:

— in the other plagues of the water, the frogs, lice, and flies, though very troublesome and terrible, yet the loss was not very great; but here much damage was done to their property, yet this did not make his heart relent, or cause him to yield to let Israel go.

And the Lord said unto Moses and unto Aaron, “Take to you handfuls of ashes from the furnace, and let Moses sprinkle it toward the heaven in the sight of Pharaoh. — and the heart of Pharaoh was hardened, and he did not let the people go, though this plague was so heavy upon him and his people, and the loss they sustained so great;

— in the other plagues of the water, the frogs, lice, and flies, though very troublesome and terrible, yet the loss was not very great; but here much damage was done to their property, yet this did not make his heart relent, or cause him to yield to let Israel go.

And it shall become small dust in all the land of Egypt, and shall be a boil breaking forth with blains, upon man and upon beast throughout all the land of Egypt.” — upon man, and upon beast, throughout all the land of Egypt;

— so that, as the last plague affected their property, substance, and riches, which in those times greatly lay in cattle, this, besides that, would affect their persons, and give them exceeding great pain, though it might not issue in death.

10 And they took ashes from the furnace and stood before Pharaoh, and Moses sprinkled it up toward heaven; and it became boils breaking forth with blains upon man and upon beast. — the sixth plague smote man and beast with;

— these failing down in the manner before described, on whomsoever they lighted, whether man or beast, produced sore boils and inflammations, and raised blisters and blotches;

11 And the magicians could not stand before Moses because of the boils, for the boils were upon the magicians and upon all the Egyptians. — the magicians; this time are not only not able to imitate the plague, but are themselves attacked by it;

— for the boil was upon the magicians, and upon all the Egyptians; but not upon Moses and Aaron, nor upon any of the Israelites;

12 And the Lord hardened the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them, as the Lord had spoken unto Moses. — their priests and magicians were so far from being able to shelter the king from this plague by their secret arts, that they were attacked by them themselves,

— were unable to stand before Moses, and were obliged to give up all further resistance. But Pharaoh did not take this plague to heart, and was given up to more hardening of his heart.

13 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Rise up early in the morning, and stand before Pharaoh and say unto him, ‘Thus saith the Lord God of the Hebrews: Let My people go, that they may serve Me.

14 For I will at this time send all My plagues upon thine heart, and upon thy servants and upon thy people, that thou mayest know that there is none like Me in all the earth. — for I will at this time send all my plagues upon thine heart; the plague of the hail, which next follows, so called, because it consisted of various things, as hail, rain, lightning and thunder;

15 For now I will stretch out My hand, that I may smite thee and thy people with pestilence, and thou shalt be cut off from the earth. — and thou shall be cut off from the earth; or “thou hadst been or wouldest have been cut off from the earth” must have perished out of it, and been no more in the land of the living.

16 And in very deed, for this cause have I raised thee up: to show in thee My power, and that My name may be declared throughout all the earth.

— and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth; as it has been more by that last action than by all the rest of the plagues; though, in all, his sovereignty, wisdom, power, patience, longsuffering and justice, are most visibly displayed and glorified.

17 As yet exaltest thou thyself against My people, that thou wilt not let them go? — as yet exaltest thou thyself against my people; and so against God himself, disobeying his commands, despising his messengers, and hardening his heart against him and refusing to let Israel go;

18 Behold, tomorrow about this time I will cause it to rain a very grievous hail, such as hath not been in Egypt since the foundation thereof even until now. — I will cause it to rain a very grievous hail; which should fall very thick, and the hailstones be very numerous and heavy, and the storm last long;

19 Send therefore now, and gather thy cattle and all that thou hast in the field, for upon every man and beast which shall be found in the field and shall not be brought home, the hail shall come down upon them, and they shall die.’” — I will cause it to rain a very grievous hail; the seventh plague which Pharaoh’s hardened heart provoked was that of hail;

— a phenomenon which must have produced the greatest astonishment and consternation in Egypt as rain and hailstones, accompanied by thunder and lightning, to kill both men and beasts.

20 He that feared the word of the Lord among the servants of Pharaoh made his servants and his cattle flee into the houses, — he that feared the word of the Lord among the servants of Pharaoh; it is a new fact that any of the Egyptians had been brought to “fear the word of Yehovah.”

— probably, the effect of the plagues had been gradually to convince a considerable number, not so much that Yehovah was the one True God as that he was a great and powerful god, whose chastisements were to be feared.

21 and he that regarded not the word of the Lord left his servants and his cattle in the field. — left his servants and cattle in the field; let them remain there, and took no thought about them, and so took no methods to preserve them; to his own detriment and loss.

22 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Stretch forth thine hand toward heaven, that there may be hail in all the land of Egypt, upon man and upon beast and upon every herb of the field, throughout the land of Egypt.” — stretch forth thine hand toward heaven; the action was appropriate, as the plague was to come from the heaven.

23 And Moses stretched forth his rod toward heaven; and the Lord sent thunder and hail, and the fire ran along upon the ground; and the Lord rained hail upon the land of Egypt. — the fire ran along upon the ground, devouring both herbs and cattle which were upon it; and came at the exact time he had foretold it should; all which were very extraordinary;

24 So there was hail and fire mingled with the hail, very grievous, such as there was none like it in all the land of Egypt since it became a nation. — so there was hail, and fire mingled with the hail; which was a miracle within a miracle; and very wonderful indeed it was, that the hail did not quench the fire, nor the fire melt the hail;

25 And the hail smote throughout all the land of Egypt all that was in the field, both man and beast; and the hail smote every herb of the field and broke every tree of the field. — the hail smote throughout all the land of Egypt; it is to the hail and not to the fire nor lightning that the great destruction of men and beasts is attributed;

— perhaps the fire and lightning are destined for the endtime? “Like fire that burns the forest and like a flame that sets the mountains on fire.” – Psalm 83:14

26 Only in the land of Goshen, where the children of Israel were, was there no hail. — only in the land of Goshen, where the children of Israel were, was there no hail;

— so that such Egyptians as might dwell among them, they, their servants, their cattle, and their fruits, escaped this plague; and oftentimes do wicked men fare the better for the people of God that are among them.

27 And Pharaoh sent and called for Moses and Aaron, and said unto them, “I have sinned this time. The Lord is righteous, and I and my people are wicked. — the Lord is righteous, and I and my people are wicked; which was well spoken, had it been serious and from his heart; for God is righteous in his nature, and in all his works;

— and in all those judgments he had inflicted upon him; and he and his people were wicked in using the Israelites in such a cruel manner, and in detaining them when it had been promised them again and again that they should have leave to go, and especially in rebelling against God, and disobeying his commands.

28 Entreat the Lord (for it is enough), that there be no more mighty thunderings and hail; and I will let you go, and ye shall stay no longer.” — mighty thunderings; literally, as in the margin, “voices of God.” Thunder was regarded by many nations of antiquity as the actual voice of a god.

29 And Moses said unto him, “As soon as I have gone out of the city, I will spread abroad my hands unto the Lord; and the thunder shall cease, neither shall there be any more hail, that thou mayest know that the earth is the Lord’S.

— that thou mayest know how that the earth is the Lord’s; that the whole earth is his, and therefore he can do, and does in it whatever he pleases; as the heavens also are his, and therefore can cause thunder, lightning, hail, and rain, and stop them when he thinks fit;

30 But as for thee and thy servants, I know that ye will not yet fear the Lord God.” — but as for thee, and thy servants, notwithstanding the confession of sin he had made, Moses know that they haven’t fear the Lord God yet;

31 And the flax and the barley were smitten; for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was in bolls. — and the flax and the barley was smitten; with the hail, thunder and lightning, and were beat down, bruised, broken, and blasted and destroyed;

32 But the wheat and the rye were not smitten, for they were not grown up. — they haven’t grown up yet; Heb, they were late or hidden. The ear was undeveloped, and lay hid in the low tufts that grew like grass.

33 And Moses went out of the city from Pharaoh, and spread abroad his hands unto the Lord; and the thunder and hail ceased, and the rain was not poured upon the earth. — Moses went out of the city, that, being solitary, he might pour forth his heart in fervent prayers.

34 And when Pharaoh saw that the rain and the hail and the thunder had ceased, he sinned yet more and hardened his heart, he and his servants. — but even this plague did not lead Pharaoh to alter his mind; as soon as it had ceased on the intercession of Moses, he and his servants continued sinning and hardening their hearts.

35 And the heart of Pharaoh was hardened, neither would he let the children of Israel go, as the Lord had spoken by Moses. — hardened; fifferent words in the Hebrew. In Exodus 9:34 the word means “made heavy,”that is, obtuse, incapable of forming a right judgement; in Exodus 9:35 it is stronger, and implies a stubborn resolution.

Exodus 10

1 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Go in unto Pharaoh; for I have hardened his heart and the heart of his servants, that I might show these My signs before him; — go in unto Pharaoh, for I have hardened his heart; that I might shew these my signs before him; and others that were to be done;

and that thou mayest tell in the ears of thy son and of thy son’s son what things I have wrought in Egypt, and My signs which I have done among them, that ye may know that I am the Lord.” — and that thou mayest tell; of thy son, and of thy son’s son;

— there was a further and higher reason for the infliction of those awful judgements, namely, that the knowledge of them there, and the permanent record of them still, might furnish a salutary and impressive lesson to others down to the latest ages.

And Moses and Aaron came in unto Pharaoh and said unto him, “Thus saith the Lord God of the Hebrews: ‘How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before Me? Let My people go, that they may serve Me.

— how long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before me? to acknowledge his offence, lie low before God, and be subject to his will; he had humbled himself for a moment;

— but then this did not continue what God expected of him, and complains of the want of, was such a continued humiliation before him, and such a subjection to him, as would issue in complying with what he had so often demanded of him;

Else, if thou refuse to let My people go, behold, tomorrow will I bring the locusts into thy border. — locusts, a well-known plague throughout the Middle-East and neighbouring countries;

And they shall cover the face of the earth, that one shall not be able to see the earth; and they shall eat the residue of that which has escaped, which remaineth unto you from the hail, and shall eat every tree which groweth for you out of the field.

— and shall eat every tree which groweth for you out of the field; such fruit trees as escaped the hail, and such boughs and branches of them which were not broken off by it;

— “When their swarms appear, everything green vanishes instantaneously from the fields, as if a curtain were rolled up; the trees and plants stand leafless, and nothing is seen but naked boughs and stalks.”

And they shall fill thy houses and the houses of all thy servants and the houses of all the Egyptians — which neither thy fathers nor thy fathers’ fathers have seen since the day that they were upon the earth unto this day.’” And he turned himself, and went out from Pharaoh.

— thy houses shall be filled; they entered the inmost recesses of the houses, were found in every corner, stuck to their clothes, and infested their food;

And Pharaoh’s servants said unto him, “How long shall this man be a snare unto us? Let the men go, that they may serve the Lord their God. Knowest thou not yet that Egypt is destroyed?” — knowest thou not yet that Egypt is destroyed?

— as good as ruined, by the plagues and boils upon the cattle, which destroyed great quantities, and by the hail which had smitten their flax and their barley; or “must thou first know that Egypt is destroyed?” before thou wilt let the people go;

And Moses and Aaron were brought again unto Pharaoh; and he said unto them, “Go, serve the Lord your God. But who are they that shall go?” — but who are they that shall go? or, “who and who”? for Pharaoh was unwilling that they should all go, but would have some retained as pledges of their return;

And Moses said, “We will go with our young and with our old, with our sons and with our daughters, with our flocks and with our herds will we go, for we must hold a feast unto the Lord.”

— with our flocks and with our herds will we go; which were requisite for the sacrifices, not knowing which they were to sacrifice, and with which to serve God, till they came to the place where they were to sacrifice;

10 And he said unto them, “Let the Lord be so with you, as I will let you go, and your little ones. Look to it, for evil is before you.

— and the Pharaoh said unto Moses and Aaron, let the Lord be so with you, as I will let you go, and your little ones; either as mocking them, let the Lord you talk of be with you if he will, and let him deliver you if he can, as I shall let you go with your children, which I never will;

— look to it, for evil is before you; which is either a charge of an evil design upon them, and intended to raise a mutiny, make an insurrection, and form a rebellion against them.

11 Not so! Go now ye that are men, and serve the Lord, for that ye did desire.” And they were driven out from Pharaoh’s presence. — not so; you shall not go with your children as you propose; —

12 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Stretch out thine hand over the land of Egypt for the locusts, that they may come up upon the land of Egypt and eat every herb of the land, even all that the hail hath left.”

— and eat every herb of the land, even all that the hail hath left; the wheat and the rye, or rice, the grass, herbs, and plants, it had beat down, but not utterly destroyed, as well as some boughs and branches of trees which were left unbroken by it.

13 And Moses stretched forth his rod over the land of Egypt, and the Lord brought an east wind upon the land all that day and all that night; and when it was morning, the east wind brought the locusts. — the Lord brought an east wind. Locusts generally come with a wind; and, indeed, cannot fly far without one;

— an east wind would in this case have brought them from northern Arabia, where they are often bred in large numbers;

14 And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the borders of Egypt. Very grievous were they; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such. — and rested in all the coasts of Egypt; in every part of it where the Egyptians dwelt;

— and where there were meadows, pastures, fields, gardens, orchards; here they lighted and fed, excepting the land of Goshen, where Israel dwelt;

15 For they covered the face of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened; and they ate every herb of the land and all the fruit of the trees which the hail had left, and there remained not any green thing in the trees or in the herbs of the field through all the land of Egypt.

— the land was darkened; either by their flying in vast numbers, and so darkening the air, as they have ofttimes done; or by covering the green and lightsome herbs and productions of the earth with their dark and direful bodies.

16 Then Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron in haste, and he said, “I have sinned against the Lord your God, and against you. — I have sinned against the Lord your God; against the Lord by disobeying his command, in refusing to let Israel go, when he had so often required it of him; and against Moses and Aaron his ambassadors;

17 Now therefore forgive, I pray thee, my sin only this once, and entreat the Lord your God, that he may take away from me this death only.”

— Pharaoh desires their prayers that this death only might be taken away, not this sin: pretending that he would never offend any more, and if he did, he did not desire it should be forgiven him, but that due punishment should be inflicted on him.

18 And he went out from Pharaoh and entreated the Lord. — intreated the Lord; Moses complied, though Pharaoh had this time made no distinct promise of releasing the people.

19 And the Lord turned a mighty, strong west wind, which took away the locusts and cast them into the Red Sea. There remained not one locust in all the borders of Egypt. — there remained not one locust in all the coasts of Egypt; so that the removal of them was as great a miracle as the bringing them at first;

20 But the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart, so that he would not let the children of Israel go. — but the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart; for as yet he had not brought all his judgments on him he designed to bring;

21 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Stretch out thine hand toward heaven, that there may be darkness over the land of Egypt, even darkness which may be felt.” — the plague of darkness brought upon Egypt was a dreadful plague;

22 And Moses stretched forth his hand toward heaven, and there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt three days. — it was darkness which might be felt, so thick were the fogs. It astonished and terrified. It continued three days; six nights in one;

23 They saw not one another, neither rose any from his place for three days; but all the children of Israel had light in their dwellings. — it was darkness which might be felt, so thick were the fogs; it continued three days; six nights in one; so long the most lightsome palaces were dungeons;

24 And Pharaoh called unto Moses and said, “Go ye, serve the Lord; only let your flocks and your herds be stayed. Let your little ones also go with you.” — go ye, serve the Lord, only let your flocks and your herds be stayed; stopped or remained behind, as a pledge and security of their return;

25 And Moses said, “Thou must give us also sacrifices and burnt offerings, that we may sacrifice unto the Lord our God. — but Moses said, thou must give us also sacrifices and burnt offerings: sheep, rams, and goats for sacrifices, and oxen for burnt offerings;

26 Our cattle also shall go with us. There shall not a hoof be left behind; for thereof must we take to serve the Lord our God, and we know not with what we must serve the Lord until we come thither.” — the Israelites’ own cattle must go as well: because until they reach their destination they do not know how many sacrifices will be required.

27 But the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he would not let them go. — but the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart; yet more and more, and he would not let them go;

28 And Pharaoh said unto him, “Get thee from me! Take heed to thyself! See my face no more, for in that day thou seest my face thou shalt die!” — see my face no more; neither here nor elsewhere: for in that day thou seest my face thou shalt die; this was a foolish as well as a wicked speech;

29 And Moses said, “Thou hast spoken well. I will see thy face again no more.” — knowing by a spirit of prophecy that he should be no more sent unto him, and that Pharaoh should in a little time be drowned in the Red sea, when he would be seen no more by him nor any other; for as for what is said in the following chapter.

Schiff: The US Isn’t Japan… It’s Argentina!

•November 4, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Peter Schiff: The US Isn’t Japan… It’s Argentina!

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • November 1, 2023

A lot of people don’t think it does, at least not yet. They point to Japan as an example of a country that has a much higher debt-to-GDP ratio and is doing fine. Peter Schiff said they’re looking at the wrong country. The US is more like Argentina than Japan.

The debt to GDP ratio in Japan is over 200%. The US debt-to-GDP ratio is only around 125%. If Japan is doing fine, why should we worry here in the US?

Peter notes the fact that Japan isn’t really doing “fine.”

They’re having a problem right now in Japan. They’re on the cusp of a crisis.”

The yield on a 10-year Japanese Government Bond is up to 8.7%. The yen recently broke the 150 mark. Meanwhile, price inflation is ratcheting up.

Don’t say, ‘Hey, Japan got off scot-free.’ They didn’t. They’re about to get their come-uppance.”

Peter said the US is in a different situation than Japan and it will get its come-uppance sooner. It will never get to a 200% debt-to-GDP ratio. The US won’t even get to 150%.

Why not?

Peter said the big difference between the US and Japan is that Japan is a net creditor and the Japanese people save at a much higher rate than Americans.

The world owes Japan a lot of money. Japan has a lot of that money in US dollar assets — in US Treasuries, in US mortgage-backed securities. Japan is going to sell and is selling those assets to try to mitigate the damage.

Because Japan was so wealthy, and didn’t have to borrow from abroad, they were able to run up their debt higher before the crisis happened. That doesn’t mean they’re not going to have a crisis. They just had more rope before they finally hung themselves with that rope.”

The US doesn’t have as much rope because the country is broke.

We owe the world. We owe the world a fortune. We depend on the world to buy our paper, to buy our Treasuries. That’s our biggest export — our debt — our dollars and our debt. If we can’t export that anymore, the economy doesn’t function anymore.

It’s built on that whole foundation, which is in the process of collapsing. So, you can’t draw some false comfort in the fact that Japan got away with it to 200% of GDP, or whatever it is, so we can too. We’re not Japan. We are worse. We’re Argentina.”

The Argentinian central bank is also in a war against price inflation it can’t win. It recently raised its interest rate to 133%. And that’s still below the country’s inflation rate.

Even though they have interest rates in the triple digits, it’s not going to work. It’s not going to stop inflation. The budget deficits are rising in Argentina. The national debt is rising.

So, inflation is not going away. These rate hikes aren’t going to stop it because they can’t change the dynamic of government spending. We are in the same predicament.”

Some people will say you can’t compare the US and Argentina. Peter said, “Sure we can.”

The laws of physics work in America the same way they work in Argentina. Economics are laws. We have the same consequences.”

Peter noted that at one point, Argentina was one of the wealthiest nations in the world.

So, Argentina wasn’t always broke. They are now. So, if it can happen to Argentina, it can happen to America if we’re doing the same exact thing that they did – running these big deficits, printing all of this money.”

Leaked: Israeli plan to cleanse out Gaza

•November 3, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Israeli plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza: the plan advocates the forced transfer of the population of the Gaza Strip to Sinai permanently, and calls for the international community to be leveraged to assist the move.

The Cradle • October 29, 2023 // Breitbart

Israeli culture magazine Mekovit published on 28 October a leaked document issued by Israel’s Ministry of Intelligence recommending the occupation of Gaza and total transfer of its 2.3 million inhabitants to Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.

The document, issued on 13 October, identifies a plan to transfer all residents of the Gaza Strip to North Sinai as the preferred option among three alternatives regarding the future of the Palestinians in Gaza at the end of the current war between Israel and the Hamas-led Palestinian resistance.

The document recommends that Israel evacuate the Gazan population to Sinai during the war, establish tent cities and new cities in northern Sinai to accommodate the deported population, and then create a closed security zone stretching several kilometers inside Egypt. The deported Palestinians would not be allowed to return to any areas near the Israeli border.

Palestinians shelter at a tent camp set up for those who were displaced from their homes by Israel’s evacuation orders and airstrikes, Khan Younis.

The existence of the document does not necessarily indicate that its recommendations are being implemented by Israel’s security establishment.

The Ministry of Intelligence, headed by Gila Gamliel of the Likud party, does not control any of Israel’s intelligence agencies, but independently prepares studies and policy papers, which are distributed for consideration by the government and its security bodies.

However, recent statements by Israeli government officials and actions by the Israeli army in Gaza suggest the plan is indeed being implemented. Since 7 October, Israeli officials have repeatedly issued warnings to Palestinians to move to southern Gaza in advance of a looming ground invasion. 

Israel has imposed a total siege on Gaza, cutting off food, water, fuel, and electricity. The siege, combined with intense Israeli bombing that has killed over 8,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, threatens to make Gaza uninhabitable. 

An official at the Ministry of Intelligence confirmed that the ten-page document is authentic but “was not supposed to reach the media,” Mekovit noted.

According to a right-wing activist, the document from the Ministry of Intelligence was leaked by a member of Likud. Leaking the document was an attempt to find out whether “the public in Israel is ready to accept ideas of a transfer from Gaza.”

The document unequivocally and explicitly recommends carrying out a transfer of civilians from Gaza as the desired outcome of the war.

An Israeli government ministry has drafted a wartime proposal to transfer the Gaza Strip’s 2.3 million people to Egypt’s Sinai peninsula.

The transfer plan is divided into several phases: in the first phase, the population in Gaza must be forced to move to southern Gaza, while Israeli air strikes will focus on targets in northern Gaza.

In the second phase, the Israeli army’s ground entry into Gaza will begin, which will lead to the occupation of the entire strip, from north to south, and the “cleansing of the underground bunkers from Hamas fighters.”

At the same time as the Gaza Strip is occupied, the citizens of Gaza will move to Egyptian territory and will be prevented from returning permanently. 

“It is important to leave the traffic lanes towards the south usable, to allow the evacuation of the civilian population towards Rafah,” the document states.

The document recommends beginning a dedicated campaign that will “motivate” Gazans “to agree to the plan,” and make them give up their land. 

Gazan should be convinced that “Allah made sure that you lost this land because of the leadership of Hamas – there is no choice but to move to another place with the help of Your Muslim brothers,” the document reads.

“I am thy shield! Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15)

Further, the plan states the government must launch a public relations campaign that will promote the transfer program to western states in a way that does not promote hostility to Israel or damage its reputation.

The deportation of the population from Gaza must be presented as a necessary humanitarian measure to receive international support. Such a deportation could be justified if it will lead to “fewer casualties among the civilian population compared to the expected number of casualties if they remain,” the document says.

The document also states that the US should be leveraged to pressure Egypt to take in the residents of Gaza, and to encourage other European countries, and in particular Greece, Spain and Canada, to help take in and settle the refugees who will be evacuated from Gaza. 

Finally, the document claims that if the population of Gaza remains, there will be “many Arab deaths” during the expected occupation of Gaza by the Israeli army, and this will damage Israel’s international image even more than the deportation of the population.

For all these reasons, the recommendation of the Ministry of Intelligence is to promote the transfer of all Palestinians in Gaza to Sinai permanently.

Exodus (7-8)

•November 3, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Exodus 7

1 And the Lord said unto Moses, “See, I have made thee a god (’ĕ·lō·hîm) to Pharaoh, and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. — a god ’ĕ·lō·hîm to Pharaoh;

— “a god” that is, he was to act in this business as God’s representative, God’s envoy, to act and speak in His name and to perform things beyond the ordinary course of nature;

— any messenger (mal·’āḵ) is also an angel; and God gives authority for an messenger to carry God’s name, “for My name is in him;”

“Behold, I send a messenger (mal·’āḵ) before thee to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared.

Have regard for him, and obey his voice. Provoke him not, for he will not pardon your transgressions, for My name is in him. Exodus 23:20-21

Thou shalt speak all that I command thee; and Aaron thy brother shall speak unto Pharaoh, that he send the children of Israel out of his land.

— that he send the children of Israel out of his land; this was the principal thing to be insisted upon; and all that was said or done to him was to bring about this end, the dismission of the children of Israel out of Egypt.

And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and multiply My signs and My wonders in the land of Egypt. — but I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go; that is, not directly, not for some time, not until all the wonders are wrought, and plagues inflicted to bring him to it;

— Pharaoh first hardening his own heart against God; leaving him to strong delusions, to believe the lying miracles of his magicians: this the Lord thought fit to acquaint Moses with, lest he should be discouraged by his refusal to dismiss Israel.

But Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you, that I may lay My hand upon Egypt and bring forth Mine armies and My people, the children of Israel, out of the land of Egypt by great judgments. — that I may ;lay mine hand upon Egypt; the inhabitants of Egypt, smiting them with one plague after another;

— and particularly with the last, slaying their firstborn; every plague was a stroke of his hand, and an effect of his mighty power and vengeance, and more especially that;

And the Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I stretch forth Mine hand upon Egypt and bring out the children of Israel from among them.” — and the Egyptians shall know; these great judgement, and Israel’s triumphant exodus, will teach the Egyptians Yehovah’s might, and His superiority to their own gods.

And Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded them; so did they. — their reluctance and resistance from this time ceased.

And Moses was fourscore years old, and Aaron fourscore and three years old when they spoke unto Pharaoh. — and Moses was eighty years old; at this time, which is observed partly to show how long Israel had been afflicted in Egypt;

— for their great troubles and miseries began about the time of the birth of Moses, or a little before, as appears from the above history;

And the Lord spoke unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying,

“When Pharaoh shall speak unto you, saying, ‘Show a miracle for yourselves,’ then thou shalt say unto Aaron, ‘Take thy rod and cast it before Pharaoh, and it shall become a serpent.’” — thy rod; this Moses ordinarily held in his hand, but the rod is now called Aaron’s, because Moses had entrusted him with it.

10 And Moses and Aaron went in unto Pharaoh, and they did so as the Lord had commanded; and Aaron cast down his rod before Pharaoh and before his servants, and it became a serpent.

— it became a serpent; or a “dragon” as the Septuagint says; not only to affect Pharaoh with wonder, but to strike a terror upon him, because it was also an Egyptian deity.

11 Then Pharaoh also called the wise men and the sorcerers. Now the magicians of Egypt, they also did in like manner with their enchantments. — the names of these magicians of Egypt, Janis and Jamberes, were already incorporated in the Targum, but picked up by Paul in II Timothy 3:8;

12 For they cast down every man his rod, and they became serpents; but Aaron’s rod swallowed up their rods. — swallowed up their rods and so gave proof of Aaron’s superiority to the magicians; though this miracle made no impression upon Pharaoh.

13 And He hardened Pharaoh’s heart, that he hearkened not unto them, as the Lord had said. — he hardened Pharaoh’s heart; or, “notwithstanding the heart of Pharaoh was hardened” though he saw the rods of his magicians devoured by rod;

— or “therefore” his heart was hardened, because he saw that the rods of his magicians became serpents as well as Aaron’s; that he hearkened not unto them; to Moses and Aaron, and comply with their demand, to dismiss the people of Israel;

14 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Pharaoh’s heart is hardened; he refuseth to let the people go. — Pharaoh’s heart is hardened; or “heavy,” dull and stupid, stiff and inflexible, cannot lift up his heart, or find in his heart to obey the will of God;

15 Get thee unto Pharaoh in the morning. Lo, he goeth out unto the water, and thou shalt stand by the river’s brink until he come; and the rod which was turned to a serpent shalt thou take in thine hand.

— and thou shall stand by against the brink of the river Nile, in order to meet him, seems rather to imply a daily custom of the Pharaoh; and the rod which was turned to a serpent shalt thou take in thine hand; as a terror to Pharaoh;

16 And thou shalt say unto him, ‘The Lord God of the Hebrews hath sent me unto thee, saying, “Let My people go, that they may serve Me in the wilderness”; and behold, hitherto thou wouldest not hear.

— saying, let my people go, that they may serve me in the wilderness; the demand is once more renewed, before any punishment is inflicted for refusal, that the patience and forbearance of God might be the more visible, and his judgments appear the more righteous when inflicted, as well as Pharaoh be left more inexcusable.

17 Thus saith the Lord: “In this thou shalt know that I am the Lord: Behold, I will smite with the rod that is in mine hand upon the waters which are in the river, and they shall be turned to blood.

— they shall be turned to blood, which was a very grievous plague to them; both because it was an eternal dishonour to their religion, and because from hence they had both their drink and their meat; and if this river was their god;

18 And the fish that are in the river shall die, and the river shall stink; and the Egyptians shall loathe to drink of the water of the river.”’” — the water of the Nile has always been regarded by the Egyptians as a blessing unique to their land; now with the water changed into blood and stink, this was a severe calamity.

19 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, “Say unto Aaron, ‘Take thy rod and stretch out thine hand upon the waters of Egypt, upon their streams, upon their rivers, and upon their ponds, and upon all their pools of water, that they may become blood; and that there may be blood throughout all the land of Egypt, both in vessels of wood and in vessels of stone.’”

— both in vessels of wood, and in vessels of stone; in which water were kept in private houses, fetched from the river for the use of families; all which were to be turned into blood everywhere, in all parts of the land, and in all places mentioned, immediately upon Aaron’s taking his rod, and smiting the waters with it in that part of the river that was before him.

20 And Moses and Aaron did so, as the Lord commanded; and he lifted up the rod and smote the waters that were in the river, in the sight of Pharaoh and in the sight of his servants; and all the waters that were in the river were turned to blood.

— and all the waters that were in the river were turned into blood; not only the face of the waters looked like blood, but they were really turned into it; and not only the surface of the water, but all the water that was in the river, wherever it flowed, and as far as it flowed in the land of Egypt.

21 And the fish that were in the river died; and the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink of the water of the river; and there was blood throughout all the land of Egypt. — the change in the water extended to “the streams,” or different arms of the Nile; or canals; “the ponds,” that is, every collection of water;

22 And the magicians of Egypt did so with their enchantments; and Pharaoh’s heart was hardened, neither did he hearken unto them, as the Lord had said. — the magicians could not act on this large scale; they could only operate, or seem to operate, on some small quantity of water;

23 And Pharaoh turned and went into his house, neither did he set his heart to this also. — neither did he set his heart (that is, pay attention); Pharaoh did not lay even this to heart; he passed it over as a slight matter, unworthy of much thought, and “turned, and went into his house.

24 And all the Egyptians dug round about the river for water to drink, for they could not drink of the water of the river. — for they could not drink of the waters of the river; it being turned into blood, and stunk so exceedingly;

— and though they might strain it, and make it in some measure, drinkable, and might make use of the juice of herbs, and other things, to extinguish their thirst, and the better sort might have a stock of wine, yet multitudes must be greatly distressed.

25 And seven days were fulfilled after the Lord had smitten the river. — and seven days were fulfilled; these words seem to mark the duration of the first plague.

Exodus 8

1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, “Go unto Pharaoh and say unto him, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Let My people go, that they may serve Me.

— again, while the main purpose of the plague was to punish the nation by which Israel had been so long oppressed, the secondary object of throwing contempt upon their, religion was main-rained. Frogs were among the Egyptian sacred animals.

And if thou refuse to let them go, behold, I will smite all thy borders with frogs. — I will smite all thy borders with frogs: fill the whole land of Egypt with them, to the utmost borders thereof on every side.

And the river shall bring forth frogs abundantly, which shall go up and come into thine house, and into thy bedchamber and upon thy bed, and into the house of thy servants and upon thy people, and into thine ovens and into thy kneading troughs.

— everywherea bundantly: which must be very offensive and troublesome to them, what with their ugly shape, croaking noise and filthy smell, and the disagreeable touch of them, leaping on them, and even upon their food, and all vessels used for the same, which must make it very nauseous and distasteful to them;

And the frogs shall come up both on thee and upon thy people and upon all thy servants.’” — even the king himself not excepted; his people, and servants, high and low, rich and poor, and upon the king’s ministers, courtiers, and nobles; but the children of Israel may be thought to be exempted from this plague;

And the Lord spoke unto Moses, “Say unto Aaron, ‘Stretch forth thine hand with thy rod over the streams, over the rivers and over the ponds, and cause frogs to come up upon the land of Egypt.’” — say unto Aaron, stretch forth thy hand with thy rod; for Aaron was to speak and to do whatever he ordered him from the Lord;

And Aaron stretched out his hand over the waters of Egypt, and the frogs came up and covered the land of Egypt. — and the frogs came and covered the land of Egypt: they came up at once, and in such multitudes everywhere, that the whole land was full of them;

And the magicians did so with their enchantments, and brought up frogs upon the land of Egypt. — the magicians would seem foolishishly to have been able to increase the plague, but not to remove it;

Then Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron and said, “Entreat the Lord, that he may take away the frogs from me and from my people; and I will let the people go, that they may do sacrifice unto the Lord.”

— Pharaoh said, entreat the Lord; this is the man, who, not long ago, proudly said, Who is the Lord? Who is Jehovah? He now begins to know something of Jehovah’s power and justice at least;

And Moses said unto Pharaoh, “Glory over me: When shall I entreat for thee and for thy servants and for thy people to destroy the frogs from thee and thy houses, that they may remain in the river only?” — when shall I entreat for thee, that they may remain in this river only?

10 And he said, “Tomorrow.” And Moses said, “Be it according to thy word, that thou mayest know that there is none like unto the Lord our God. — and he said, be it according to thy word, as if he had said, it shall be done as thou hast desired, and at the time fixed;

11 And the frogs shall depart from thee, and from thy houses and from thy servants and from thy people. They shall remain in the river only.”

12 And Moses and Aaron went out from Pharaoh; and Moses cried unto the Lord because of the frogs which He had brought against Pharaoh. — and Moses cried unto the Lord: prayed unto him with great fervency, and with a loud voice, most fervently entreating that the frogs might be removed on the morrow, as he had promised;

13 And the Lord did according to the word of Moses; and the frogs died out of the houses, out of the villages, and out of the fields. — so that the land stank with the odour of their putrefaction;

14 And they gathered them together upon heaps, and the land stank. — and the land stank; with the stench of the dead frogs, which was another proof and evidence of the reality of the miracle;

15 But when Pharaoh saw that there was respite, he hardened his heart and hearkened not unto them, as the Lord had said. — but when Pharaoh saw that there was respite; from his affliction, as the Targum of Jonathan adds; the plague was removed, and he found himself and his people at ease:

— or there was a “breathing” before he and his people were so oppressed, that they could scarce breathe, but now being delivered from the judgment on them with which they were straitened, were enlarged and at liberty, and in easy circumstances: he hardened his heart;

16 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Say unto Aaron, ‘Stretch out thy rod and smite the dust of the land, that it may become lice throughout all the land of Egypt.’” — it is observed by Hebrew commentators that the nine plagues are divided into three groups:

— distinct warnings are given of the first two plagues in each group; the third in each is inflicted without any previous notice; namely, the third, lice, the sixth, boils, the ninth, darkness.

17 And they did so; for Aaron stretched out his hand with his rod and smote the dust of the earth, and it became lice on man and on beast. All the dust of the land became lice throughout all the land of Egypt. — that it may become lice throughout all the land of Egypt: not gnats, nor flies, but lice, though perhaps not of the common and ordinary sort, but new and extraordinary;

18 And the magicians so did with their enchantments to bring forth lice, but they could not; so there were lice upon man and upon beast. — it was as easy for them to produce lice as frogs, but God forbid them, partly to confound them, and to show that what they did before was only by his consent, but to show them that even the dust of the earth obeys him.

19 Then the magicians said unto Pharaoh, “This is the finger of God.” And Pharaoh’s heart was hardened, and he hearkened not unto them, as the Lord had said. — the finger of God; the magicians meant to say, “This is beyond the power of man: it is supernatural;

20 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Rise up early in the morning and stand before Pharaoh. Lo, he cometh forth to the water, and say unto him, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Let My people go, that they may serve Me.

— cometh forth to the water; it is not improbable that on this occasion Pharaoh went to the Nile, and Moses was ordered to meet him while walking on the banks of the Nile and repeat his request for the liberation of Israel;

21 Else, if thou wilt not let My people go, behold, I will send swarms of flies upon thee, and upon thy servants and upon thy people and into thy houses; and the houses of the Egyptians shall be full of swarms of flies, and also the ground whereon they are.

— and the houses of the Egyptians shall be full of the swarms of flies, and also the ground whereon they are; their number would be so very great.

22 And I will sever in that day the land of Goshen in which My people dwell, that no swarms of flies shall be there, to the end thou mayest know that I am the Lord in the midst of the earth. — and I will sever in that day the land of Goshen, in which my people dwell; distinguish it from other parts of the land of Egypt:

— but restricted to the place where Pharaoh lived, and to bound and limit such sort of creatures as flies, which move swiftly from place to place, and particularly to keep the land of Goshen clear of them;

23 And I will put a division between My people and thy people. Tomorrow shall this sign be.’”

24 And the Lord did so; and there came a grievous swarm of flies into the house of Pharaoh, and into his servants’ houses and into all the land of Egypt. The land was corrupted by reason of the swarm of flies. — into the house of Pharaoh, and into the houses of his servants;

— and into all the land of Egypt: into the palace of Pharaoh, and of his nobles, ministers and courtiers, and into the dwelling places of all his subjects, throughout the whole land, excepting the land of Goshen;

25 And Pharaoh called for Moses and for Aaron and said, “Go ye, sacrifice to your God in the land.” — the Pharaoh gave way before this plague ended and without waiting for any remonstrance on the part of the magicians or others, he “called for Moses.”

— and said, go ye, sacrifice to your God in the land; that is, in the land of Goshen, in the place where they were; he was willing to allow them the liberty of sacrificing to their God, which it seems they had before; but then he would not consent they should go out of the land to do it.

26 And Moses said, “It is not meet so to do; for we shall sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to the Lord our God. Lo, shall we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes, and will they not stone us? — the abomination of the Egyptians; that which the Egyptians abhor to kill, or to see killed; because they worshipped them as gods, as is notoriously known.

27 We will go three days’ journey into the wilderness and sacrifice to the Lord our God, as He shall command us.” — we will go three days’ journey into the wilderness; as was first insisted on, and from which demand they should not depart;

28 And Pharaoh said, “I will let you go, that ye may sacrifice to the Lord your God in the wilderness; only ye shall not go very far away. Entreat for me.” — for the first time Pharaoh shows his real objection to letting the Israelites go: he is afraid that they will escape him;

— so he suggests the compromise: entreat or petition for me; that they shall just enter the wilderness on his eastern border, remaining near the frontier, and therefore within his reach.

29 And Moses said, “Behold, I go out from thee, and I will entreat the Lord that the swarms of flies may depart from Pharaoh, from his servants and from his people tomorrow; but let not Pharaoh deal deceitfully any more in not letting the people go to sacrifice to the Lord.”

— let not Pharaoh deal deceitfully any more. God’s servants must rebuke even kings when they openly break any of their words; and told the Pharaoh not to deceive them again as he had done before;

30 And Moses went out from Pharaoh and entreated the Lord. — entreat for me; the words seem to be spoken in haste, and with great eagerness and vehemence;

31 And the Lord did according to the word of Moses, and He removed the swarms of flies from Pharaoh, from his servants, and from his people; there remained not one. — there remained not one; the meaning is not, not one swarm of flies, but not one fly, there was not one left;

32 And Pharaoh hardened his heart at this time also, neither would he let the people go. — again, it is after being impressed, and partially relenting, that Pharaoh hardens his own heart.

Over 10 Million Have Crossed US Border

•November 2, 2023 • Leave a Comment

What goes around comes around. Now over 10 Million Illegals Have Crossed US Border Under Biden – Report Claims

Sputnik International • October 30, 2023

More than 10 million people may have illegally entered the United States since President Joe Biden took the reins in January 2021, according to Center Square, a US conservative website.US President Joe Biden at the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 25, 2023. - Sputnik International, 1920, 27.10.2023

Republicans have subjected US President Joe Biden’s border policy to harsh criticism since the beginning of his tenure which saw an abrupt influx of migrants through the Mexican border.

Currently, GOP presidential candidates and lawmakers are lashing out at Team Biden for failing to secure the southern frontier, prompting the latter to backpedal on its decision to axe the Donald Trump-era effort to build a border wall. Thus, in early October, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced plans to install 20 new miles of barriers along the Rio Grande in southeastern Texas.

Over 10 Million Have Crossed US Border Under Biden – Report Claims

US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data, released on Friday, indicated that US immigration enforcement released over 900,000 migrants into the country in fiscal 2023, marking the third consecutive year of record high illegal border crossings under Joe Biden.

Meanwhile, Center Square – a project of the Franklin News Foundation, a conservative online news organization – estimates that the number of illegals entering the US has reached a whopping 10 million since President Joe Biden took office in January 2021.

In Queens, NY, immigrants filled the sidewalks and streets

The conservative media went on saying that the figure does not include “gotaway data,” which CBP does not make public. However, the media noted that it managed to obtain those numbers from a Border Patrol agent, who spoke to the outlet on condition of anonymity.

“Since January 2021, total illegal border crossers apprehended nationwide were 8,396,198. Combined with at least 1,678,979 gotaways, the number increases to over 10 million (at least 10,075,177),” the conservative media outlet noted.

The media outlet cited official US CBP data for fiscal years 2020-2023. (CBP fiscal year is from October 1 to September 30). Given that CBP reported 3,201,144 apprehensions in fiscal 2023; 2,766,582 in fiscal 2022; 1,956,519 in fiscal 2021; and 471,954 in nine months of the Biden administration in fiscal 2020, the total number of official apprehensions amounts to 8,396,199.

Thus, the news outlet estimated that the minimum reported gotaways from January 1, 2021, to September 30, 2023 could be at least 1,678,979.

The report lamented the fact that the gargantuan figure is greater than the individual populations of 41 states, adding that the only states with an estimated population greater than 10 million are California, Texas, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Georgia, and North Carolina.

What’s more, among those crossing the border illegally were thousands of suspected terrorists as well as drug and human traffickers, as per the conservative news outlet.

The burning border issue adds to the plummeting approval numbers of President Joe Biden, who announced his reelection bid in April. Joe’s rating among his fellow Democratic Party members has slid 11 percentage points since September to 75%, while his overall approval has fallen to 37%, according to a new Gallup poll.

Exodus (5-6)

•November 1, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Exodus 5

1 And afterward Moses and Aaron went in and told Pharaoh, “Thus saith the Lord God of Israel: ‘Let My people go, that they may hold a feast unto Me in the wilderness.’” — let my people go, that they may hold a feast unto me in the wilderness of Sinai or Horeb there, where they might keep it more freely and safely, without being disturbed by outsiders;

And Pharaoh said, “Who is the Lord, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not the Lord, neither will I let Israel go.” — that I should obey his voice, to let Israel go? he knew of no superior monarch to him, whose orders he was obliged to obey in any respect, and particularly in this, the dismission of the people of Israel out of land;

And they said, “The God of the Hebrews hath met with us. Let us go, we pray thee, three days’ journey into the desert and sacrifice unto the Lord our God, lest He fall upon us with pestilence or with the sword.” — lest he fall upon us with pestilence, or with the sword: this they urge as a reason to have their request granted, taken from the danger they should be exposed unto, should they not be allowed to go and offer sacrifice to God;

And the king of Egypt said unto them, “Why do ye, Moses and Aaron, delay the people from their work? Get you unto your burdens!” — wherefore do ye, Moses and Aaron, let the people from their works? The Pharaoh regards the pilgrimage as merely an excuse for a holiday;

— Get you to your burdens; these words were addressed to the Israelites, the elders of whom went with Moses, several others also probably following him, when he went in unto Pharaoh, impatient to see what the end would be.

And Pharaoh said, “Behold, the people of the land now are many, and ye make them rest from their burdens!” — they are already sufficiently numerous; and putting a stop to their labours could unsettle them, and make them dangerous to their masters.

And Pharaoh commanded the same day the taskmasters of the people and their officers, saying, — taskmasters and officers; taskmasters were Egyptians; “officers” (shoterim) supervisors or foremen, were undoubtedly Hebrews.

“Ye shall no more give the people straw to make brick, as heretofore. Let them go and gather straw for themselves. — let them go and gather straw: a mixture of clay, mud and straw; it has been estimated that this requirement would “more than double” the people’s toils;

And the tally of bricks which they made heretofore, ye shall lay upon them; ye shall not diminish any thereof. For they are idle; therefore they cry, saying, ‘Let us go and sacrifice to our God.’ — therefore they cry, let us go and sacrifice to our God;

— suggesting, that this request and cry of theirs did not proceed from a religious principle, or the great veneration they had for their God, but from the sloth and idleness they were addicted to.

Let there more work be laid upon the men, that they may labor therein, and let them not regard vain words.” — vain words; those of Moses and Aaron, which he claimed were vain, or false; that is, that they falsely pretended that their God had commanded them to go and worship, when it was only a crafty design of their own to advance themselves by raising sedition.

10 And the taskmasters of the people went out, and their officers, and they spoke to the people, saying, “Thus saith Pharaoh: ‘I will not give you straw. — and the taskmasters of the people went out; from the presence of Pharaoh, out of his court, to the respective places where they were set to see that the Israelites did their work;

— and their officers; the officers of the Israelites, who were under the taskmasters, and answerable to them for the work of the people, and their tale of bricks.

11 Go ye, get you straw where ye can find it; yet not any of your work shall be diminished.’” — “Let the work be heavy upon the people, and they shall stick to their work, and not look at lying words.”

12 So the people were scattered abroad throughout all the land of Egypt to gather stubble instead of straw. — to gather stubble instead of straw; straw not being easy to come at, they were obliged to gather stubble that was left in the fields, after the corn was gathered in.

13 And the taskmasters hastened them, saying, “Fulfill your works, your daily tasks, as when there was straw.” — and the taskmasters hasted them; kept them tight and close to their work, and were urgent on them to make quick dispatch of it;

14 And the officers of the children of Israel, whom Pharaoh’s taskmasters had set over them, were beaten and were demanded, “Why have ye not fulfilled your task in making brick both yesterday and today, as heretofore?” — this makes it clear, not only that the taskmasters and officers were different persons, but that the one were Egyptians appointed by Pharaoh, and the other were Israelites;

— and were demanded, wherefore have ye not fulfilled your task in making brick, both yesterday and today, as before?

15 Then the officers of the children of Israel came and cried unto Pharaoh, saying, “Why dealest thou thus with thy servants? — “Why do you treat your servants like this?”

16 There is no straw given unto thy servants, and they say to us, ‘Make brick!’ And behold, thy servants are beaten, but the fault is in thine own people.” — the Egyptian task-masters, who, by sending us abroad to gather straw, hinder us from doing the work which they require;

— and so they are both unjust and unreasonable. They charge the task-masters, not the king, either in civility and duty, casting his fault upon the instruments; or because they did not know, or at best not believe, that this was the king’s act.

17 But he said, “Ye are idle, ye are idle! Therefore ye say, ‘Let us go and do sacrifice to the Lord.’ — but he said, ye are idle, ye are idle; instead of expressing indignation at the taskmasters, and relieving the officers and the people, he insults them in a flouting sarcastic way, charging them with sloth and idleness;

— therefore ye say, let us go and do sacrifice to the Lord; suggesting that it was not so much the service and honour of God they regarded, as that they might have a leisure day from work and labour.

18 Go therefore now and work; for there shall no straw be given you, yet shall ye deliver the tally of bricks.”

19 And the officers of the children of Israel saw that they were in evil straits after it was said, “Ye shall not diminish any from your bricks of your daily task.” — after it was said, ye shall not minish ought from your bricks of your daily task; after this had been said and confirmed by Pharaoh, they had no hope of things being better with them, but looked upon their misfortune as irretrievable.

20 And they met Moses and Aaron, who stood in the way as they came forth from Pharaoh. — when the Israelitish overlookers saw that they were in an evil condition, they came to meet Moses and Aaron, waiting for them as they came out from the king, and reproaching them with only making the circumstances of the people worse.

21 And they said unto them, “The Lord look upon you and judge, because ye have made our savor to be abhorred in the eyes of Pharaoh and in the eyes of his servants, to put a sword in their hand to slay us.” — a sword . . . to slay us; this the officers may have feared that their inability to enforce the Pharaoh’s impracticable demands would ultimately lead to their execution.

22 And Moses returned unto the Lord and said, “Lord, why hast Thou so evilly treated this people? Why is it that Thou hast sent me? — Moses returned unto the Lord; he could find nothing to say to the officers;

— the course of events had as much disappointed him as it had them. All that he could do was to complain to God, “must I, who hoped to be a blessing, become a scourge to them?”

23 For since I came to Pharaoh to speak in Thy name, he hath done evil to this people; neither hast Thou delivered Thy people at all.” — “For since I came to Pharaoh to speak in thy name, the Pharaoh has done evil to this people, and thou hast not delivered thy people at all.”

Exodus 6

1 Then the Lord said unto Moses, “Now shalt thou see what I will do to Pharaoh; for with a strong hand shall he let them go, and with a strong hand shall he drive them out of his land.” — now shalt thou see what I will do to Pharaoh: in inflicting punishments on him: for with a strong hand shall he let them go; being forced to it by the mighty hand of God upon him;

And God spoke unto Moses and said unto him, “I am the Lord. — I am the Lord; that is, יהוה‎ YHVH Yehovah;

And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of God Almighty, but by My name Jehovah was I not known to them. — and I appeared unto Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, El-Shaddai;

— “but by my name Yehovah was I not known to them?” God’s name is the four-letter Hebrew word יהוה‎ YHVH Yehovah (not Yahweh, since it is only used among the Samaritan communities; and not Jehovah since the letter J wasn’t around but only after the sixteenth century; (more on this at the end)

And I have also established My covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers. — the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers; not being in actual possession of any part of it, but lived as pilgrims and strangers in it, as their posterity now did in another land not theirs;

And I have also heard the groaning of the children of Israel, whom the Egyptians keep in bondage; and I have remembered My covenant. — that covenent was with Abraham, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt [river Nile] unto the great river, the River Euphrates,” Genesis 15:18.

Moses was to bring the children of Israel out of Egypt into a land ”which I swore to give to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob” Exodus 6:8.

Therefore say unto the children of Israel: ‘I am the Lord, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will rid you out from their bondage, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with great judgments.

— and I will redeem you with a stretched out arm; with an arm stretched out from heaven to earth; by the exertion of his almighty power, openly and manifestly displayed in the lighting down of his arm upon the enemies of his people, and in delivering them out of their hands;

And I will take you to Me for a people, and I will be to you a God; and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God, who bringeth you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians. — and I will be to you a God, to be revered by you, and also to be your all-powerful leader, protector and benefactor.

And I will bring you in unto the land, concerning which I swore to give to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob; and I will give it to you for a heritage: I am the Lord.’” — to give it to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob; where God has authority and power to dispose of lands and kingdoms as he please; and faithful to give them what he had promised.

And Moses spoke so unto the children of Israel, but they hearkened not unto Moses from anguish of spirit and from cruel bondage. — but they hearkened not unto Moses; being disappointed of deliverance by him, and their afflictions being increased, and lying heavy upon them, they were heartless and hopeless;

10 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, — at another time, and renewed his orders to him to go again to Pharaoh, and require their dismission;

11 “Go in, speak unto Pharaoh king of Egypt, that he let the children of Israel go out of his land.” — the second message was an advance upon the first;

— the first asked only for permission to enter the wilderness, much of which was within the limits of Egypt; the second was a demand that the Israelites should be allowed “to go out of the land.”

12 And Moses spoke before the Lord, saying, “Behold, the children of Israel have not hearkened unto me. How then shall Pharaoh hear me, who am of uncircumcised lips?” — “uncircumcised” is used, according to the Hebrew idiom, for any imperfection which interferes with efficiency: “slow of speech and of a slow tongue.”

13 And the Lord spoke unto Moses and unto Aaron, and gave them a charge unto the children of Israel and unto Pharaoh king of Egypt to bring the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt. — this time, no notice is taken of the objection of Moses, having been sufficiently answered before, and Aaron is joined with him in the following charge;

14 These are the heads of their fathers’ houses. The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel: Hanoch and Pallu, Hezron and Carmi; these are the families of Reuben. — this genealogy describes here, to show the lineage of Moses and Aaron, by. whom this great work was to be effected. Only he promiseth in brief the genealogy of his two elder brethren. Reuben and Simeon;

15 And the sons of Simeon: Jemuel and Jamin, and Ohad and Jachin and Zohar, and Shaul the son of a Canaanite woman; these are the families of Simeon.

16 And these are the names of the sons of Levi according to their generations: Gershon and Kohath and Merari; and the years of the life of Levi were a hundred thirty and seven years.

17 The sons of Gershon: Libni and Shimi, according to their families.

18 And the sons of Kohath: Amram and Izhar, and Hebron and Uzziel; and the years of the life of Kohath were a hundred thirty and three years.

19 And the sons of Merari: Mahali and Mushi; these are the families of Levi according to their generations.

20 And Amram took Jochebed, his father’s sister, for a wife; and she bore him Aaron and Moses; and the years of the life of Amram were a hundred and thirty and seven years.

21 And the sons of Izhar: Korah and Nepheg and Zichri.

22 And the sons of Uzziel: Mishael and Elzaphan and Zithri.

23 And Aaron took Elisheba, daughter of Amminadab, sister of Nahshon, for a wife; and she bore him Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar.

24 And the sons of Korah: Assir and Elkanah and Abiasaph; these are the families of the Korahites.

25 And Eleazar, Aaron’s son, took one of the daughters of Putiel for a wife; and she bore him Phinehas; these are the heads of the fathers of the Levites according to their families.

26 These are that Aaron and Moses to whom the Lord said, “Bring out the children of Israel from the land of Egypt according to their armies.” — their armies; this expression is here used of the Israelites for the first time. It seems to refer to that organisation, of a quasi-military character,

— which was given to the people by the order of Moses during the long struggle with Pharaoh, and which enabled them at last to quit Egypt, not a disorderly mob, but “harnessed,” or “in military array” (Exodus 13:18). The expression is repeated in Exodus 7:4; Exodus 12:17; Exodus 12:51.

27 These are they who spoke to Pharaoh king of Egypt to bring out the children of Israel from Egypt. These are that Moses and Aaron. — this emphatic repetition shows the reason for inserting the genealogy;

— the names of Moses and Aaron are given twice and in a different order; used in Exodus 6:26 probably to mark Aaron as the older in the genealogy, and used in Exodus 6:27 to denote the leadership of Moses.

28 And it came to pass on the day when the Lord spoke unto Moses in the land of Egypt, — and it came to pass indicates a time gap;

29 that the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, “I am the Lord. Speak thou unto Pharaoh king of Egypt all that I say unto thee.” — speak thou unto Pharaoh king of Egypt all that I say unto thee; that he let Israel go;

— and that in case of refusal, that he would punish him and his people with this and the other plague, one after another, and at last slay him and their firstborn.

30 And Moses said before the Lord, “Behold, I am of uncircumcised lips, and how shall Pharaoh hearken unto me?” — of uncircumcised lips; as he had done, Exodus 6:13, and this is only a repetition of what is there said, in order to lead on to what is related in the following chapter.

~~~~

More on God’s name, Yehovah.

God’s name is the four-letter Hebrew word יהוה‎ YHVH Yehovah, which are embedded in the Masoretic text over 6000 times, yet when translated into our English language most had been translated as Lord, or LORD, which are titles, but not his name. His name is יהוה‎ Yehovah, or YEHOVAH (but there are no capital letters in Hebrew).

It wasn’t until 1524 that Gian Giorgio Trissino, an Italian Renaissance grammarian, invented the letter J that this new letter started to take a hold in the writings of western Europe. Even in 1611 when the English Bible the King James has our subject of study by the prophet Jeremiah, he was known as Ieremiah. So Jehovah is a very late comer.

The following verses with the LORD erred in translation. His name Yehovah should be used:

I am the LORD; that is My name. And My glory will I not give to another, neither My praise to graven images. Isaiah 42:8

And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered; for in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call. Joel 2:32

“I am sought of them that asked not for Me; I am found of them that sought Me not. I said, ‘Behold Me, behold Me,’ unto a nation that was not called by My name. Isaiah 65:1

When we call our God, the LORD, we err, because his name is not the LORD, which is a title. His name is YEHOVAH! May We all ask for his forgiveness, and may Our merciful God forgive us all.

Allies Fear US Is Overextended

•October 31, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Allies Fear US Is Overextended as Global Conflicts Spread

Bloomberg October 28, 2023 // Yahoo News

(Bloomberg) — Joe Biden came to office declaring America is back. Now, facing hot wars in the Middle East and Ukraine and a simmering cold one with China, the US is beginning to look overextended.

The US defense industry — Biden’s “arsenal of democracy” — is struggling to produce enough artillery shells to ensure Ukraine can keep firing them at Russian forces. The Pentagon is bombing targets in Syria as it rushes air defenses to the region to protect troops in case Israel’s war against Hamas prompts new attacks by enemies. Taiwan, another American ally, has stepped up orders for American weapons as China confronts it over strategic sea lanes.

In capitals across Europe and Asia, officials are growing worried that some partners might ultimately be shortchanged as the surge in simultaneous challenges strains the US ability to respond and its defense industry struggles to produce enough weapons for all these conflicts. Rivals in Beijing, Moscow and Tehran, they fear, won’t miss the openings that creates.

Adding to the alarm is the presidential election just over a year from now that may return Donald Trump to the White House with his talk of pulling out of alliances, making deals with Russia and openly confronting Iran and China. Already, Biden’s $106 billion budget request for aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan is running into headwinds from Republicans in Congress.

Biden has raced to reassure leaders around the world that the US would be able to confront all the threats at once and deliver on its promises of support.

Privately, however, administration officials concede that the crisis in the Middle East has upended what had been a key tenet of their global approach – that the long-tumultuous region was finally heading into a period where it wouldn’t require such a big US commitment, allowing Washington to focus more on the threat from China. That eastward pivot is likely to be slowed, officials said.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan had to hastily recast the online version of his 7,000-word essay for Foreign Affairs on “The Sources of American Power” this week to delete a reference to the Middle East as “quieter than it’s been in decades.”

Since the Hamas attack on October 7, the US has been rushing forces back to the Middle East. Biden dispatched two aircraft carrier groups and air-defense systems to the region, and put thousands of troops on heightened alert, in what officials call a signal to Iran and other rivals in the region not to join the fight when Israel launches a widely expected ground invasion of Gaza.

But that message of deterrence doesn’t seem to have gotten through. This week, the US sent warplanes to strike targets in Syria – its first military action in the region since October 7 – after a string of attacks by Iran-backed militias had injured more than a dozen troops at US bases there and in Iraq.

Administration officials underline there are no plans at the moment to have US troops fight on the ground in the Middle East. But Biden, who even as vice president was known for telling aides in the Situation Room that superpowers don’t bluff, is fully aware of the risks that the American forces may be drawn in if efforts to contain the conflict fail.

In Ukraine, the US has been adamant from even before Russia’s February 2022 invasion that it wouldn’t get directly involved in the fighting, instead marshaling allies and providing military and financial support that’s been essential to Kyiv’s ability to push back Moscow’s forces.

But now, with Ukraine’s counteroffensive this year making slow progress against Russia’s defenses and questions in Congress growing about the continued commitment to support Kyiv as the war settles into a standoff, the global message looks less clear. The Kremlin, for its part, is betting that it will be able to outlast the US and its allies.

Now, Israel is also seeking some of the same kinds of shells Ukraine needs for its war against Hamas. Taiwan, at the same time, has ordered some of the same air-defense weapons that both Israel and Ukraine use.

Already, Moscow seems to be winning the race in artillery shells, which have become a key weapon in the conflict. Ukraine has depleted limited US and allied stocks and efforts to escalate production, especially in Europe, have faced setbacks.

“Our industrial base was not prepared to have to restock so many different types of weapons for multiple different partners at the same time,” said Michèle Flournoy, a former undersecretary of Defense for policy. “In all three cases, our ability to equip train and support these partners is really the primary means by which we can safeguard our own interests,” she said.

“The US risks overreaching at a dangerously complicated and uncertain time in the world during a time when we see historic American dysfunction, incompetence and division in our ability to govern,” said former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel.

Europe Facing Civil War?

•October 30, 2023 • Leave a Comment

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden October 28, 2023 // Datestone Institute

In ViennaLondonParisBerlinBrussels and dozens of other European cities, demonstrations “in support of Palestine” were organised even before the Israelis responded the jihadist pogrom perpetrated by Iran-backed Hamas on October 7, while the corpses of more than 1,400 Israeli victims — tortured, raped, murdered and mutilated, babies decapitated or burned alive — were still warm. According to a JNS report:

“The IDF on Monday, October 23, published two segments from the interrogation of Hamas terrorists who participated in the massacre.

“‘The purpose of entering Israeli territory… was to kidnap civilians; they want as many hostages as possible,’ one of the terrorists revealed. He added, ‘They [Hamas] promised us that whoever brings a kidnapped person will receive an apartment and $10,000.'”

All the same, each and every one of these demonstrations in Europe was the scene of hate-filled slogans against Israel and Jews.

In Brussels, those slogans were shouted, and the atmosphere of violence and blood-lust was everywhere. Around me, surrounded by about 2,000 hate-filled demonstrators, a group of a dozen young Arabs were shouting “Death to the Jews” and “Death to Israel,” all the while exchanging knowing smiles and a few jokes. One of them ordered me to stop filming. I did.

Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger explained in an interview recently that Europe had made a serious mistake by creating within itself, through mass immigration, populations that reject all its norms, values and a “constitutional basis.” He deplored the fact that in 2023 in Berlin, almost 80 years after the Holocaust, people, with complete impunity, are shouting “Death to the Jews” in the streets.

Thousands march to Israeli embassy in Kensington for Free Palestine

In the hours following the revelation of the butchery committed by Hamas, a wave of racist violence and attacks began in Europe, especially in France. Against Arabs or Muslims? Not at all. Against Jews, of course. In Europe, Jews are still the victims of hatred and violence. Apparently it is a way for our local pro-Hamas Europeans to celebrate the jihad pogrom of October 7.

Even though the media have been warning us for 30 years about the risk of violence against Muslims, in deeds and figures, our Jewish fellow citizens are infinitely more victims of violence and abuse than are Muslims living in Europe. Already in 2015, Jeffrey Goldberg warned in The Atlantic: “In 2014, Jews in Europe were murdered, raped, beaten, stalked, chased harassed, spat on and chased for being Jewish.”

I feel a certain fatigue towards those who hold Israelis and Arabs equally responsible. Not just the European Left, which often no longer takes the trouble to hide its anti-Semitism. No, also those on the right who, out of cowardice or ignorance, tell us that Israel had it coming.

Let us look at a few facts: In 2005, seeing that the peace process had reached an impasse, Israel forcibly expelled 8,500 Jews from their homes in the Gaza Strip and bulldozed all their homes and communities. From that day on, there was not a single Israeli foot on Gaza soil and Gaza was “free.” Now, with not one Jew there, the Arabs of Gazan finally had total control of this beautiful land on the Mediterranean coast and could build the “Singapore of the Middle East.”

A group of Americans even donated $14 million to buy 3,000 greenhouses from the expelled Jews and donated them to the Palestinian Authority (PA) to ensure that the Gazans could start with businesses there. Within days, they all had been looted and destroyed.

In 2006, elections were held in Gaza; the majority of Gazans voted for the totalitarian terrorist organisation, Hamas, whose openly stated goal was — and still is — the total destruction of Israel and the eradication of the Jews (Articles 7, 32).

In 2007, in response to Hamas’s smuggling in weapons to fulfil its genocidal mission, a blockade of Gaza was introduced by Israel and Egypt, in agreement with the Palestinian Authority, which Hamas had just persuaded to leave Gaza by killing hundreds of its members, some by throwing them from the top floors of high buildings.

Israel bears no responsibility whatsoever for the pogrom it suffered on October 7, the responsibility for which lies entirely not only with the psychopaths of Hamas but at least as much with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the puppet-master and aspiring hegemon of the region.

But let us return to Europe. In most Western European countries, support for terrorism and incitement to hatred and violence against non-Muslims have gone from being offences, to being support for and diversity and “multiculturalism.” 99% of those who commit these offences are never prosecuted, let alone convicted. Saying “Death to the Jews” and “Gas the Jews” has again become acceptable in the West.

No sane person, according to Thucydides, wants the worst form of war, which is civil war. It is for this reason that Europe needs to better understand what it has done to itself. Europe doubtless intended to “do good” but has demographically overwhelmed itself with people who Europeans may have imagined were fleeing tyranny, but who in fact were bringing tyranny with them. Three measures seem worth considering.

The first is a moratorium on immigration. Europeans will have the greatest difficulty integrating the populations already present in their countries. They may not even be able to. Many do not seem to want to integrate into European culture; they appear to want Europeans to integrate into theirs. It should by now be obvious that adding millions of newcomers every year will not solve the problem.

This would mean leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The extremist “open borders” jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court prevents any development of a rational asylum policy. In 2012, the ECHR enacted the so-called “Hirsi ruling,” named after the court case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, which states that the European states have the legal obligation to rescue migrants wherever they find them in the Mediterranean Sea — even just 200 meters away from the Libyan coast — and ferry them to a European port, so that these people can claim refugee status.

When the Italian Navy intercepted illegal migrants in the Mediterranean Sea and sent them back to their point of origin in Libya, not only did the ECHR condemn Italy for this “obvious” breach of human rights; the Italians had to pay 15,000 euros ($17,000 at the time) to each of these illegal migrants in the name of “moral damage.” This kind of money is equivalent to more than 10 years of income in the countries of origin of Mr Hirsi Jamaa and his companions: Somalia and Eritrea.

In 2016, Somalia’s GDP per capita was an estimated $400; Eritrea’s $1,300. Everyone, of course, heard about the Hirsi ruling. In Africa, especially, many understood that if they could reach the Mediterranean, European navies would now be obliged to ferry them directly to Europe.

Before the Hirsi ruling, when people tried to reach the shores of Europe, hundreds every year tragically died at sea. After Hirsi, the objective is now simply to be intercepted. Consequently, hundreds of thousands attempt this journey — often with the help of non-governmental organizations such as Médecins Sans Frontières, whose activists wait for boats to appear at sea, just off the Libyan coast.

Finally, Europeans will have to do the unthinkable: actually apply their laws. If anyone — Muslim or non-Muslim — wants to celebrate the jihadist pogroms against Jews, well, they can go and rejoice in Iran or Qatar. Not in Europe.

Every “Death to the Jews” or “Death to Israel” uttered in Europe, particularly after babies tortured, burned alive and beheaded, women raped and more than 200 Israelis dragged back to Gaza as hostages on October 7, is an insult not only to Jews, but to us, what we are, our laws, our democracies and the will of the people.

Exodus (3-4)

•October 29, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Exodus 3

1 Now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian; and he led the flock to the back side of the desert and came to the mountain of God, even to Horeb.

— Horeb; also called Sinai, Exodus 19:1; that is, “dry,” “desert,” was the general name for the mountainous district in which Sinai is situated, and of which it is a part.

— mountain of God; so named either according to Hebrew idiom from its great height, as “great mountains,” Hebrew, “mountains of God” (Ps 36:6); “goodly cedars,” Hebrew, “cedars of God” (Ps 80:10);

And the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush; and he looked and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed. — the “angel of the Lord” is certainly not “the Lord” hence he is an angel;

— but sometimes the Son appears as an angel: Malakh or messenger; hence this being in the fire could be a created angel or he could be the Son;

And Moses said, “I will now turn aside and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.”

And when the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush and said, “Moses, Moses.” And he said, “Here am I.”

— the name of the Lord, יהוה, is comprised of 3 different letters that form the words for;

‘was’, היה, PAST
‘is’, הוה PRESENT
‘will be’, יהיה FUTURE

And He said, “Draw not nigh hither. Put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.”

Moreover He said, “I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look upon God.

— many commentators mistakenly identify this Being “the Lord” is the Son; but more events that followed were to revealed (regarding the Temple, even the Son says this is my Father’s House, not the Son’s; and as such the Being in the Holy of Holies, accepting the sacrificial blood sprinkled upon the Mercy Seat during the Day of Atonement) this Being is certainly the Father;

And the Lord said, “I have surely seen the affliction of My people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters, for I know their sorrows. — and have heard their cry, by reason of their taskmasters; who were set over them to see that they did their work;

— and to lay heavy burdens on them, and afflict them by all manner of ways they could devise; and who abused and beat them for not doing what was not to be done, which made them cry out because of their barbarous usage of them, and cry unto God for help and deliverance;

And I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey, unto the place of the Canaanites and the Hittites, and the Amorites and the Perizzites, and the Hivites and the Jebusites.

— the enumeration of the nations here mentioned are only five of the ten whose land was promised to Abraham (Genesis 15:19-21) being expressly mentioned. One, however, that of the Hivites, is added;

— but the “the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites,” were not mentioned here; perhaps they, being the children of Esau, over four hundred years later, had already moved to Spain; for a more indepth study of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah;

Now therefore behold, the cry of the children of Israel hath come unto Me, and I have also seen the oppression wherewith the Egyptians oppress them. — and I have also seen the oppression wherewith the Egyptians oppress them; which is repeated to emphasis he took of their suffering;

10 Come now therefore, and I will send thee unto Pharaoh, that thou mayest bring forth My people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt.” — to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up to a good and broad land, to the place of the Canaanites;

11 And Moses said unto God, “Who am I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I should bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt?” — who am I, that I should go? the men most fit for great missions are apt to deem themselves unfit. When God called Jeremiah to be a prophet, his reply was, “O Lord God! Behold, I cannot speak, for I am a child” (Jeremiah 1:6).

12 And He said, “Certainly I will be with thee; and this shall be a token unto thee that I have sent thee: when thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain.” — God replies – “Thou wilt not be unfit, since I will be with thee – I will supply thy deficiencies;

13 And Moses said unto God, “Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel and shall say unto them, ‘The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you,’ and they shall say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say unto them?” — what is his name; the meaning of this question is evidently: “By which name shall I tell them that the promise is confirmed?”

— Israel’s God had had no name that could be called a proper name more than any other. He had been known as “El,” “the High;” “Shad-dai,” “the Strong;” and “Yehovah,” “the Existent;” but these terms had all been felt to be descriptive epithets, and none of them had passed as yet into a proper name.

14 And God said unto Moses, “I Am That I Am.” And He said, “Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, ‘I Am hath sent me unto you.’” — the name of the Lord, יהוה, is comprised of 3 different letters that form the words for;

‘was’, היה, PAST
‘is’, הוה PRESENT
‘will be’, יהיה FUTURE

— the true meaning of the Hebrew, אהיה אשׁר אהיה, ’Ehyeh ’ăsher ’ehyeh: Yehovah promises that He will be, to Moses and His people, what He will be—something which is undefined;

— thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you; or as the Targum has it, “I am he that is, and that shall be.”

15 And God said moreover unto Moses, “Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel: ‘The Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob hath sent me unto you.’ This is My name for ever, and this is My memorial unto all generations.

— the Lord God of your fathers; Hebrew, Yehovah, God of your fathers. The “I AM” of the preceding verse (‘ehyeh) is modified here into Yehovah, by a substitution of the third person for the first. The meaning of the name remains the same;

— lastly, God’s name in Hebrew is the four-letter Hebrew word יהוה‎ YHVH Yehovah (not Jehovah since the letter J wasn’t around but only after the sixteenth century);

16 Go, and gather the elders of Israel together, and say unto them, ‘The Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob appeared unto me, saying, “I have surely visited you and seen that which is done to you in Egypt;

— the elders; either by age, or rather by office and authority. For though they were all slaves to the Egyptians, yet among themselves they retained some order and government, and had doubtless some whom they owned as their teachers and rulers, or heads of tribes and families;

17 and I have said I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt unto the land of the Canaanites and the Hittites, and the Amorites and the Perizzites, and the Hivites and the Jebusites, unto a land flowing with milk and honey.”’ — the same 6 tribes as mentioned in verse 8 above;

18 And they shall hearken to thy voice; and thou shalt come, thou and the elders of Israel, unto the king of Egypt, and ye shall say unto him, ‘The Lord God of the Hebrews hath met with us; and now let us go, we beseech thee, three days’ journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the Lord our God.’

— they shall hearken; the pronoun “they” refers to “the elders” and they appeared to be persuaded easily, and at once.

19 And I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let you go, no, not by a mighty hand. — no, not by a mighty hand; rather, not even under a mighty hand. Pharaoh, even when chastised by God’s mighty hand, will not voluntarily permit of their departure;

20 And I will stretch out My hand and smite Egypt with all My wonders which I will do in the midst thereof; and after that he will let you go. — and I will stretch out my hand; or “therefore” he would stretch out his mighty hand, exert his almighty power; and for this purpose was Pharaoh raised up, and his heart hardened, that God might show his power in him, and on him;

— and smite Egypt with all my wonders, which I will do in the midst thereof: with those wondrous plagues, the amazing effects of his almighty power, which were wrought by him in the midst of Egypt, by which their land, their rivers, their persons, and their cattle, were smitten;

— and after that he will let you go; this is said for their encouragement, that their faith and patience might hold out, who otherwise seeing him so obstinate and inflexible, might be ready to despair of ever succeeding.

21 And I will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians. And it shall come to pass that, when ye go, ye shall not go empty, — not only will the Egyptians then let the Israelites go, but God will give them favour in the eyes of the Egyptians, and they will bestow many valuables upon them.

22 but every woman shall borrow of her neighbor and of her that sojourneth in her house jewels of silver and jewels of gold and raiment; and ye shall put them upon your sons and upon your daughters, and ye shall despoil the Egyptians.”

— Egypt had spoiled Israel by the tributary labour so unjustly enforced, and now Israel carried off the spoil of Egypt-a prelude to the victory which the people of God will one day obtain in their conflict with the power of the world;

— oppressed, wronged, down-trodden, miserably paid for their hard labour during centuries, the Israelites were to obtain at the last something like a compensation for their ill-usage; the riches of the Egyptians were to be showered on them.

Exodus 4

1 And Moses answered and said, “But, behold, they will not believe me, nor hearken unto my voice; for they will say, ‘The Lord hath not appeared unto thee.’” — they will say, The Lord hath not appeared; it is very probable that the people would have said this if Moses had not had any credentials to produce;

— this on the background that they had been no appearance of God to any one for over two hundred years in Egypt; and the Israelites, who had not seen Moses for forty years, would not know whether he was a veracious person or not;

And the Lord said unto him, “What is that in thine hand?” And he said, “A rod.” — a rod; the word seems to denote the long staff, from three to six feet in length; such as shepherds use in the management of their flocks, for Moses was now feeding the flock of his father-in-law. It was usually made of acacia wood.

And He said, “Cast it on the ground.” And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from before it. — it became a serpent; it changed into a fiery serpent; whereby it was intimated and frightful what and how pernicious his rod should be to the Egyptians.

And the Lord said unto Moses, “Put forth thine hand and take it by the tail.” And he put forth his hand and caught it, and it became a rod in his hand— — the tail was the dangerous part; whereby God would try Moses’s faith, and prepare him for the approaching difficulties.

“that they may believe that the Lord God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob hath appeared unto thee.”

— that they may believe; the sign was to convince the Israelites, in the first instance, and cause them to accept the mission of Moses (see verses 30, 31). It was afterwards to be exhibited before Pharaoh (verse 21), to try him and prove him, but not to convince him.

And the Lord said furthermore unto him, “Put now thine hand into thy bosom.” And he put his hand into his bosom; and when he took it out, behold, his hand was leprous as snow. — and when he took it out, behold, his hand was a leprosy of the white sort, and which is reckoned the worst and most difficult to be cured;

And He said, “Put thine hand into thy bosom again.” And he put his hand into his bosom again and plucked it out of his bosom, and behold, it was turned again as his other flesh. — it was turned again as his other flesh; the inflicting of this disease, and curing it in an instant, was so much the greater miracle, as the leprosy is a disease generally reckoned incurable by any human;

“And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe thee, neither hearken to the voice of the first sign, that they will believe the voice of the latter sign. — that they will believe the voice of the latter sign; which had a voice in it commanding belief that he was a messenger of God; the first sign respects his rod, the other his hand, a miracle with leprosy.

And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe also these two signs, neither hearken unto thy voice, that thou shalt take of the water of the river and pour it upon the dry land; and the water which thou takest out of the river shall become blood upon the dry land.”

— and pour it upon the dry land, and the water which thou takest out of the river shall become blood upon the dry land; by which it would appear how easily the Lord could destroy the land of Egypt, and make it a barren land;

10 And Moses said unto the Lord, “O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither heretofore nor since Thou hast spoken unto Thy servant; but I am slow of speech and of a slow tongue.” — I am not eloquent; not able to deliver thy message acceptably and decently, either to Pharaoh or to the Israelites.

11 And the Lord said unto him, “Who hath made man’s mouth? Or who maketh the dumb or deaf, or the seeing or the blind? Have not I, the Lord? — God could and would have cured the defect in Moses’ speech, whatever it was;

— could and would have added eloquence to his other gifts, if he had even at this point yielded himself up unreservedly to his guidance and heartily accepted his mission; nothing is too hard for the Lord. He gives all powers – sight, and hearing, and speech included – to whom he will.

12 Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth and teach thee what thou shalt say.” — by my Spirit to direct and assist thee what and how to speak. Whence Moses, though he still seems to have remained slow in speech, yet was in truth mighty in words as well as deeds, Acts 7:22.

13 And he said, “O my Lord, send, I pray Thee, by the hand of him whom Thou wilt send.” — send by whom thou wilt send, by any but me; hence the anger of the Lord was kindled;

14 And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Moses, and He said, “Is not Aaron the Levite thy brother? I know that he can speak well. And also, behold, he cometh forth to meet thee; and when he seeth thee, he will be glad in his heart. — Aaron; this is the first mention of Aaron; the words “he can speak well,” probably imply that Aaron had both the power and will to speak;

— he cometh forth to meet thee, by my instigation and direction; which, because I see thou art still diffident, I give thee for a new sign to strengthen thy belief that I will carry thee through this hard work.

15 And thou shalt speak unto him and put words in his mouth; and I will be with thy mouth and with his mouth, and will teach you what ye shall do. — I will be with thy mouth and with his mouth; Even Aaron that could speak well, yet could not speak to purpose, unless God were with his mouth; without the constant aids of divine guidance, the best gifts will fail.

16 And he shall be thy spokesman unto the people; and he shall be, even he shall be to thee instead of a mouth, and thou shalt be to him instead of God. — instead of God; God did not speak to Aaron directly, but only through Moses.

— Aaron was to recognise in Moses God’s mouthpiece, and to consider what Moses told him as coming from God. Moses had still, therefore, the higher position.

17 And thou shalt take this rod in thine hand, wherewith thou shalt do signs.” — take this rod; the staff or crook he carried as a shepherd, that he might not be ashamed of the mean condition out of which God called him. “This rod must be his staff of authority, and must be to him instead of either the sword or sceptre.

18 And Moses went and returned to Jethro his father-in-law, and said unto him, “Let me go, I pray thee, and return unto my brethren who are in Egypt and see whether they are yet alive.” And Jethro said to Moses, “Go in peace.” — Jethro said, Go in peace; Jethro’s character is altogether one of which kindness and understanding are his main elements.

19 And the Lord said unto Moses in Midian, “Go, return into Egypt; for all the men are dead who sought thy life.” — all the men which sought thy life; not only the Pharaoh, but the kindred of the murdered man, and the officials empowered by the Pharaoh to arrest Moses. As forty years had elapsed since the homicide, this is readily conceivable.

20 And Moses took his wife and his sons, and set them upon an ass, and he returned to the land of Egypt. And Moses took the rod of God in his hand.

21 And the Lord said unto Moses, “When thou goest to return into Egypt, see that thou do all those wonders before Pharaoh which I have put in thine hand; but I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go.

— but I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go; that is, not directly, not for some time, not until all the wonders are wrought, and plagues inflicted to bring him to it;

22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, ‘Thus saith the Lord: Israel is My son, even My firstborn.

23 And I say unto thee, “Let My son go, that he may serve Me.” And if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy firstborn.’” — Israel is my son, even my firstborn; as dear to him as a man’s firstborn is, or as his only son;

24 And it came to pass, on the way at the inn, that the Lord met him and sought to kill him. — the Lord met him; the Septuagint and the Targum, “an angel of the Lord;“

25 Then Zipporah took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet and said, “Surely a bloody husband art thou to me.” — Zipporah took a sharp stone; she perceived, it seems, the danger of her husband;

— and he being disabled from performing the office, whether by some stroke of affliction, or the terror of so dreadful and unexpected an appearance, and a delay in a matter of such moment being dangerous, she performed the work herself;

— a bloody husband art thou to me; some think she spake to the child, whom she calls her spouse, as some late rabbins affirm the infant used to be called, when it was circumcised;

26 So He let him go; then she said, “A bloody husband thou art, because of the circumcision.” — so he let him go; God let Moses go, allowed him to recover; accepted Zipporah’s act as sufficient, albeit tardy, reparation, and spared the life of her husband.

27 And the Lord said to Aaron, “Go into the wilderness to meet Moses.” And he went and met him on the mount of God, and kissed him. — the scene suddenly shifts. Moses is left in the wilderness to recover his strength and make such arrangements with respect to his wife and children as he thinks best under the circumstances.

28 And Moses told Aaron all the words of the Lord who had sent him, and all the signs which He had commanded him. — Aaron met him in the mount of God, and kissed him; after a separation of forty years, their meeting would be mutually happy.

29 And Moses and Aaron went and gathered together all the elders of the children of Israel. — all the elders; the Israelites retained their own national organization; their affairs were administered by their own elders, who called a public assembly Exodus 4:31 to hear the message brought by Moses and Aaron.

30 And Aaron spoke all the words which the Lord had spoken unto Moses, and did the signs in the sight of the people. — Aaron did the signs; by the direction of Moses; hereby full proof was given to the people of the divine mission of Moses and their concurrence was gained before he applied to Pharaoh in their behalf.

31 And the people believed; and when they heard that the Lord had visited the children of Israel, and that He had looked upon their affliction, then they bowed their heads and worshiped. — then they bowed their heads, and worshipped;

— expressing their thankfulness for the notice he took of them, and signifying their readiness to obey all instructions and directions that should be given them.

China outpacing US in AI patents

•October 28, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China increasingly outpacing US in AI patents – Bloomberg

RT News • October 25, 2023 // Bloomberg

Beijing is pursuing self-reliance in critical tech sectors

China has dramatically increased its lead over the US in AI patent filings, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday, citing data tracked by the World Intellectual Property Organization.

Chinese companies and institutions applied for 29,853 AI-related patents in 2022, compared to 29,000 in the previous year. The figure is nearly 80% more than US filings, which amounted to 16,805 over the same period, marking a year-on-year decline of 5.5%.

Japan and South Korea rounded out the 2022 leaders, having applied for 8,870 and 7,899 AI patents respectively.

According to the data, China has accounted for more than 40% of global AI applications over the past year.

But in the past decade, China has filed 74.7% of the global AI patents – WIPO

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), China has filed 389,571 patents in the area of AI in the past decade, accounting for 74.7% of the global total and ranking first in the world.

The growth is driven partly by the largest digital user base in the world. China is generating new data, particularly from mobile users, faster than any other country.

Chinese companies have substantially boosted investments in AI and quantum computing after President Xi Jinping urged the nation to accelerate fundamental scientific research. Beijing is aiming to increase self-reliance in crucial areas, including chipmaking, space exploration, and military sciences.

The measures were taken amid Washington’s latest efforts to curtail China’s access to advanced technologies.

Chinese multinational technology company Baidu is currently vying with tech giants such as Alibaba Group and Tencent, as well as minor startups, including Baichuan and Zhipu, to create a local response to US rival OpenAI’s groundbreaking generative AI chatbot ChatGPT. 

Tech firms from China such as Huawei Technologies have already established a track record of leading innovation in the networking, supercomputing, and image recognition sectors.

The Asian nation has outpaced the US in the number of AI filings since 2017, when Chinese companies deployed algorithms in a wide range of businesses, from online shopping to ride-hailing.

Exodus (1-2)

•October 27, 2023 • Leave a Comment

The two hundred and ten years of Israel’s stay in Egypt were divided into two unequal periods, in the former and longer of which they were prosperous and favoured, while in the latter they were oppressed. Both periods had their uses and place in the shaping of the nation and its preparation for the Exodus.

Exodus 1

1 Now these are the names of the children of Israel who came into Egypt; every man and his household came with Jacob: — every man and his household came with Jacob; into Egypt, all excepting Joseph, and along with them their families, wives, children, and servants;

— though wives and servants are not reckoned into the number of the seventy, only such sons as came out of Jacob’s loins:

— the Targum of Jonathan is, “a man with the men of his house,” as if only male children were meant, the sons of Jacob and his grandsons;

Reuben, Simeon, Levi and Judah, — Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah. The first sons of Jacob by Leah;

— the sons are arranged according to their mothers, as in Genesis 35:23-26, and the sons of the two maid-servants stand last. Leah has precedence over Rachel; Bilhah over Zilpah.

Issachar, Zebulun and Benjamin, —and Benjamin; who, though youngest of all, is placed before Dan, Naphtali, Gad and Ashe; because they were the children of the maidens.

Dan and Naphtali, Gad and Asher. — the children of each wife and concubine are given in order of seniority. The omission of Joseph from the list is explained in the last clause of Exodus 1:5.

And all the souls who came out of the loins of Jacob were seventy souls, for Joseph was already in Egypt. — on the number 70, in which Jacob is included; but not Joseph;

— seventy souls; Jacob himself, 1; his sons, 12; his daughter, Dinah, 1; his grandsons, 51; his grand-daughter Serah, 1; his great-grandsons, 4—Total, 70. His daughters, except Dinah, and his sons’ daughters, except Serah, spoken of in Genesis 46:7, are not included;

— if his female descendants were, at the time of his descent into Egypt, as numerous as the males, the entire number of those who “came out of his loins” must have been 132.

And Joseph died, and all his brethren, and all that generation. — Plant by plant the leaves drop, and the stem rots and its place is empty.

And the children of Israel were fruitful and increased abundantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceeding mighty; and the land was filled with them. — Seed by seed the tender green spikelets pierce the mould, and the field waves luxuriant in the breeze and the sunshine. ‘The children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly.’

Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, who knew not Joseph. — “a new king” is a phrase not found elsewhere; perhaps to imply that he did not succeed his predecessor in the natural order of descent and inheritance;

— he “arose up over Egypt,” occupying the land, as if on different terms from the previous king whose place he took, either by usurpation or conquest.

And he said unto his people, “Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we. — “his people” no doubt they were his nobles, or, at any rate, his courtiers;

— ancient Egypt must have had a population of seven or eight millions, which would imply nearly two millions of adult males, whereas the adult male Israelites, near a century later, were no more than six hundred thousand (Exodus 12:37).

10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them, lest they multiply and it come to pass, when there befalleth any war, that they join also unto our enemies and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.” — let us deal wisely; instead of open force, the king proposes stratagem;

— he thinks that he has hit upon a wise scheme, a clever plan, by which the numbers of the Israelites will be kept down, and they will cease to be formidable. The nature of the plan appears in Exodus 1:11.

11 Therefore they set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses. — Raamses is a place different from Ramesses, Genesis 47:11 and had its name from the then reigning Pharaoh, Ramesses Miamun;

— Raamses; Pi-Ramesu, the city of Rameses, was the ordinary seat of the Court during the earlier part of the nineteenth dynasty. It appears to have been a new name for Tanis, or for a suburb of Tanis, which overshadowed the old city;

12 But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew; and they were grieved because of the children of Israel. — and they were grieved because of the children of Israel; because of their multiplication and increase, and because their schemes for lessening them did not succeed; they were as thorns in their eyes;

13 And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigor. — with rigour; forced labour was of a very severe character; those condemned to it worked from morning to night under the rod of a task-master, which was freely applied to their legs or backs, if they rested their weary limbs for a moment.

14 And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in mortar and in brick and in all manner of service in the field; all their service wherein they made them serve was with rigor. — all their service wherein they made them serve was with rigour; they not only put them to hard work, but used them in a very churlish manner, abusing them with their tongues, and beating them with their hands;

15 And the king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, of whom the name of one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah. — Hebrew midwifes; or “midwives of the Hebrew women.”

16 And he said, “When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women and see them upon the birthstools, if it be a son then ye shall kill him; but if it be a daughter then she shall live.”

— if it be a son, then ye shall kill him; opinions are divided, however, what was the method of destruction which the king did recommend; short-term thinking: for he feared not them, but the males only;

17 But the midwives feared God, and did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive. — but the midwives feared God; their faith inspired them with such courage as to risk their lives, by disobeying the mandate of a cruel tyrant;

18 And the king of Egypt called for the midwives and said unto them, “Why have ye done this thing, and have saved the men children alive?”

19 And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women; for they are lively, and are delivered ere the midwives come in unto them.”

— for they are lively; they are vigorous; a large proportion of the women deliver themselves; and the services of professional accoucheurs are very rarely called upon; or that they gave birth to their children before the midwives arrived.

20 Therefore God dealt well with the midwives, and the people multiplied and waxed very mighty. — God dealt well with the midwives; this represents God as rewarding them for keeping their faith.

21 And it came to pass, because the midwives feared God, that He made them houses. — that he made them houses; making houses for them, being moved by the Lord, to preserve them from the insults of the Egyptians; others of Pharaoh building houses for them;

22 And Pharaoh charged all his people, saying, “Every son who is born ye shall cast into the river, and every daughter ye shall save alive.” — every son that is born; the Targums and the Septuagint add “to the Hebrews,” but without any necessity, since the context shows that only Hebrew children are meant.

Exodus 2

1 And there went a man of the house of Levi, and took for a wife a daughter of Levi.

And the woman conceived and bore a son; and when she saw that he was a goodly child, she hid him three months. — there went a man of the house of Levi; Amram the husband, the son of Kohath, and grandson of Levi, as appears from Exodus 6:18; and Jochebed his wife; and their two children, Miriam and Aaron;

— Miriam, a daughter, born probably soon after their marriage, and Aaron, a son, born some twelve years later. Soon after the issue of the edict, Jochebed gave birth to her third child, a son;

And when she could no longer hide him, she took for him an ark of bulrushes, and daubed it with slime and with pitch, and put the child therein; and she laid it in the reeds by the river’s brink. — Moses, was born, as the Jews say, in the thirty seventh year after the death of Levi, AM 2368;

— the ark was made of the papyrus which was commonly used by the Egyptians for light and swift boats.

And his sister stood afar off to learn what would be done to him. — and his sister stood afar off; this was Miriam, as the Targum of Jonathan expresses it; who is supposed to be about ten or twelve years of age;

And the daughter of Pharaoh came down to wash herself at the river, and her maidens walked along by the riverside; and when she saw the ark among the reeds, she sent her maid to fetch it. — the princess would, of course, seek a part of the river which was reserved for females; probably Jochebed know where she was accustomed to bathe.

And when she had opened it, she saw the child; and behold, the babe wept. And she had compassion on him and said, “This is one of the Hebrews’ children.” — Jewish writers say, she knew it by its being circumcised, the Egyptians not yet using circumcision.

Then said his sister to Pharaoh’s daughter, “Shall I go and call to thee a nurse of the Hebrew women, that she may nurse the child for thee?” — the Hebrew women, that she may nurse the child for thee; for she perceived that she was desirous of having the child brought up as her own.

And Pharaoh’s daughter said to her, “Go.” And the maid went and called the child’s mother. — called the child’s mother; Jochebed must have been waiting near, eagerly expecting—perhaps, while concealed from sight, watching the result, and ready to appear the moment that she was summoned.

And Pharaoh’s daughter said unto her, “Take this child away and nurse it for me, and I will give thee thy wages.” And the woman took the child, and nursed it. — take this child away, and nurse it for me, and I will give thee thy wages; by which means she, who was unknown to the princes, had not only the nursing of her own child, but was paid for it;

10 And the child grew, and she brought him unto Pharaoh’s daughter, and he became her son. And she called his name Moses [that is, Drawn out], and she said, “Because I drew him out of the water.” — the child grew; in stature and in strength; Josephus regards these words as implying a growth that was strange and extraordinary (Ant. Jud. ii. 9, § 6);

11 And it came to pass in those days, when Moses was grown, that he went out unto his brethren and looked on their burdens; and he spied an Egyptian smiting a Hebrew, one of his brethren. — he went out unto his brethren; it is probable that Pharaoh’s daughter had never concealed from Moses that he was not her own child, but one of the oppressed race.

12 And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian and hid him in the sand. — he slew the Egyptian, and hid him in the sand; this act of Moses may seem and indeed by some has been condemned as rash and unjustifiable—in plain terms, a deed of assassination.

13 And when he went out the second day, behold, two men of the Hebrews strove together; and he said to him that did the wrong, “Why smitest thou thy fellow?” — the second day; that is, the next day;

— wherefore smitest thou thy fellow? Compare with Acts 7:26, where the words of Moses are reported somewhat differently, “Sirs, ye are brethren; why do ye wrong one to another?”

14 And he said, “Who made thee a prince and a judge over us? Intendest thou to kill me as thou killed the Egyptian?” And Moses feared and said, “Surely this thing is known.” — and Moses feared; lest the thing should be discovered and be told to Pharaoh, and he should suffer for it: this fear that possessed Moses was before he fled from Egypt and went to Midian;

15 Now when Pharaoh heard this thing, he sought to slay Moses. But Moses fled from the face of Pharaoh, and dwelt in the land of Midian; and he sat down by a well. — and dwelt in the land of Midian: a country so called from Midian, one of Abraham’s sons by Keturah, Genesis 25:2.

16 Now the priest of Midian had seven daughters; and they came and drew water, and filled the troughs to water their father’s flock. — the Priest of Midian; Reuel Exodus 2:18. His name, and the detailed notices in Exodus 18, prove that he was a priest s(ometimes used of a prince, ruler, and governor) of the one true God who was known to the patriarchs especially under the name El.

17 And the shepherds came and drove them away; but Moses stood up and helped them, and watered their flock. — the shepherds came; those of the neighbourhood;

— the rule of the desert is that those who come to a well take their turns in the use of the water in the order of their arrival. But these rude shepherds declined to wait for their turn.

18 And when they came to Reuel their father, he said, “How is it that ye have come so soon today?” — strictly, and then he is the same who elsewhere is called Jethro, Exodus 3:1;

19 And they said, “An Egyptian delivered us out of the hand of the shepherds, and also drew water enough for us and watered the flock.” — an Egyptian; so they concluded from his dress and appearance, perhaps even from his speech.

20 And he said unto his daughters, “And where is he? Why is it that ye have left the man? Call him, that he may eat bread.” — that he may eat bread; Arabian hospitality was offended that the stranger had not been invited into the tent to partake of the evening meal. The feeling of the modern Bedouin would be the same.

21 And Moses was content to dwell with the man; and he gave Moses Zipporah his daughter. — the Targum says it was at the end of ten years; and indeed forty years after this a son of his seems to have been young, having not till then been circumcised, Exodus 4:22.

22 And she bore him a son, and he called his name Gershom [that is, A stranger there]; for he said, “I have been a stranger in a strange land.” — Gershom; that is, a stranger there. Now this settlement of Moses in Midian was designed by Providence to shelter him for the present; God will find hiding-places for his people in the day of their distress.

23 And it came to pass in process of time that the king of Egypt died. And the children of Israel sighed by reason of the bondage, and they cried; and their cry came up unto God by reason of the bondage. — in those many days;

— as Moses was now eighty years old (Exodus 7:7), and only forty when he quitted Egypt, the Pharaoh from whom he fled must have reigned above forty years.

24 And God heard their groaning, and God remembered His covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob. — and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob; that he would bring their seed out of a land not theirs, in which they were strangers, and were afflicted, into the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession.

25 And God looked upon the children of Israel, and God took heed of them. — and God looked upon the children of Israel; with an eye of pity and compassion, and saw all the hardships they laboured under, and all the injuries that were done unto them.

“I am thy shield!” (Genesis 15)

•October 26, 2023 • Leave a Comment

In Chapter 14, Abraham had refused all share in booty, a large sacrifice. Now he might fear lest the four kings he had routed should rally and fall upon him; but here he is promised protection, “I am thy shield!” and “a Great Reward” from God!

Genesis 15 “I am thy shield!”

1 After these things the word of the Lord came unto Abram in a vision, saying, “Fear not, Abram. I am thy shield and I will give you a great reward.” — up to this time Abram had received only general promises of offspring, and of the land being the possession of his seed; where is hat land? and years were passing by, and the fulfilment of his hopes remained distant as ever;

— but the war with the Elamite king he had also made for himself powerful enemies; and though the immediate result was fortunate, yet many Canaanite nations may have witnessed with displeasure so remarkable an exhibition of the power and energy of an intruder, an “immigrant!”

— and thus the time had come when the patriarch needed and obtained more formal assurances, first, of the bestowal upon him of offspring (Genesis 15:1-6), and, secondly, of the future possession of that land, now called Palestine (Genesis 15:18-21);

And Abram said, “Lord God, what wilt Thou give me, seeing I go childless and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?” — Abram is still childless and landless;

— what wilt thou give me? there is a slight tone of complaint in these words. God promised Abram a “reward great exceedingly”

— Abram answers that no reward can really be great so long as he has no heir.

And Abram said, “Behold, to me Thou hast given no seed; and lo, one born in my house is mine heir.” — “What wilt thou give me?” Of what use will land or wealth be to me, the immediate reward specified by the promise?

And behold, the word of the Lord came unto him, saying, “This shall not be thine heir, but he that shall come forth out of thine own loins shall be thine heir.” — but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir; that is, one shall inherit all thou hast, that shall be begotten by thee;

— an own son of Abram’s, and not a servant born in his house; one that should spring out of his own loins: one “out of thy womb”, that is, out of his wife’s, which was his; the phrase designs a genuine and legitimate son, who would be legally his heir.

And He brought him forth outdoors and said, “Look now toward heaven and count the stars, if thou be able to number them.” And He said unto him, “So shall thy seed be.” — Abram’s seed according to the flesh were like the “dust of the earth,” Genesis 13:16, and his spiritual seed are like the stars of heaven.

And he believed in the Lord; and He accounted it to him for righteousness. — Abram believed the Lord. And the Lord accepted Abram’s faith, and that faith made him right with God.

And He said unto him, “I am the Lord who brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldeans, to give thee this land to inherit it.” — the Lord next confirms and explains the promise of “the land” to Abram and further assurance was given tohim of “this land ” the land of Canaan for an inheritance.

And he said, “Lord God, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it?” — he asks for a sign, not out of distrust of God’s promise, for he was strong in faith, but for further assurance and confirmation.

And He said unto him, “Take Me a heifer of three years old, and a shegoat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon.” — the sign to Abram is the sign of the covenant:

— take me an heifer; offer me a sacrifice, a occasion of great importance, when two or more parties join in a compact, they either observe precisely the same rites as Abram did, or, where they do not, they invoke the lamp as their witness;

10 And he took unto Him all these, and divided them in the midst and laid each piece one against another; but the birds divided he not. — divided them in the midst; that is, the three animals, the heifer, goat, and ram into two equal parts; this was done for two reasons.

  1. to represent the torn and distracted condition in which his seed was to lie for a season;
  2. to ratify God’s covenant with Abram and his seed; for this was a rite used in making covenants, as appears both from Scripture, Jeremiah 34:18, and other authors;

— laid each piece one against another, one half against the other, the left side against the right, shoulder against shoulder, and leg against leg, so that they might seem to join;

— partly in hope they would join together, that God would in his time put those parts together, and unite those dry bones, (to which the Israelites are compared, Ezekiel 37:1-28), and clothe them with flesh; and partly that the persons entering into covenant might pass between those parts, and so testify their union and conjunction in one and the same sacrifice.

— but the birds divided he not; but laid them one against another, as the pieces were laid; so the birds used in sacrifice under the law were not to be divided, Leviticus 1:17; which may signify that when the people of the Jews, in the latter day, are brought together into their own land, when they will better answer the character of turtles and doves than they ever did, will be no more divided and separated from each other;

— but the intended offerings were not burnt, hence, perhaps, God’s commitment of “I am thy shield!” is debatable; or conditional?

11 And when the fowls came down upon the carcasses, Abram drove them away. — and when the birds of prey came down upon the carcases, Abram scared them away;

— had there been a sacrifice the fire would have kept the vultures from approaching; but the bodies lay exposed, and Abram therefore kept guard over them, lest the purpose of the ceremonial should be frustrated by any want of respect shown to the outward symbols.

12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and lo, a horror of great darkness fell upon him. — when the sun was going down; the time described was the evening following the night on which he had received the assurance that his seed should be countless as the stars.

13 And He said unto Abram, “Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years. — thy seed shall be strangers; so they were in Canaan first and afterward in Egypt: before they were lords of their own land, they were strangers in a strange land;

— only by entering under Joshua 400 years later would the land be theirs, otherwise they were only strangers to the land;

14 And also that nation whom they shall serve will I judge, and afterward shall they come out with great substance. — that nation; had it been expressly revealed that the country that would afflict them was Egypt, the principal seat of their servitude, and the instrument of their sorest bondage;

— will I judge: that is, punish after judgement, which prediction was in due course fulfilled – and afterward shall they come out with great substance;

15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried at a good old age. — and thou shall go to thy fathers in peace; or die, which is a going the way of all flesh;

16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.” — for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet full; from this sentence we have much to learn:

— the Amorites in Amos 2:9, “whose height was like the height of the cedars, and he was strong as the oaks; yet I destroyed his fruit from above and his roots from beneath.“ Perhaps like Hamas today;

— first; the Lord foreknows the moral character of people; second. In his providence he administers the affairs of nations on the principle of moral rectitude; third. Nations are spared until their iniquity is full; fourth; they are then cut off in retributive justice in due time. 

17 And it came to pass that when the sun went down and it was dark, behold, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between those pieces. — behold a smoking furnace; this signified the affliction of his seed in Egypt: they were there in the furnace of affliction, and labouring in the very fire;

— a burning lamp; this speaks comfort in this affliction: and this God showed Abram at the same time with the smoking furnace. The lamp indicates direction in the smoke; God’s word was their lamp, a light shining in a dark place.

“I am thy shield! Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” Genesis 15

18 On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates:

— from the river of Egypt; the river of Egypt is the Nile, which overflowed it annually and made it fruitful; so the Targum of Jonathan calls it the Nile of Egypt; it was rendered, “from the Nile of Mizraim” or Egypt to the great river, Euphrates;

Keil and Delitzsch: the river (נהר) of Egypt is the Nile, and not the brook (נחל) of Egypt (Numbers 34:5); the character of the promise, the two large rivers, the Nile and the Euphrates, are mentioned as the boundaries within which the seed of Abram would possess the promised land,

— and from hence to the river Euphrates, the eastern boundary, was the utmost extent of it in which it was ever possessed, as it was in the times of David and Solomon, II Samuel 8:3.

19 the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites, — the Kenites; thought to be the Idumeans, who sprung from Kenaz of Esau’s race; found among the Amalekites in the south (1 Samuel 15:6); note that Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was a Kenite (Judges 1:16);

— the Kenizzites are also supposed by some to be the descendants of Kenaz, a grandson of Esau, Genesis 36:11; but then they must be so called here by anticipation, or  that is, the land they were anticipated to live there; since Kenaz was not then born; Caleb, the head of the tribe of Judah, was a Kenizzite, Numbers 32:12, Joshua 14:6;

and from Deuteronomy 2:5:

Meddle not with them [the children of Esau, who dwell in Seir]; for I will not give you of their land, no, not so much as a foot breadth, because I have given Mount Seir unto Esau for a possession.

— the Kadmonites; elsewhere the Kadmonites are never mentioned again; probably dwellers on the eastern desert frontier of the Jordan, an eastern or an ancient people, of whom we know nothing;

— besides, none of the land of the children of Esau, at least of those that dwelt about Mount Seir (Deuteronomy 2:5) was to be given to the children of Israel; henced could the Edomites or Idumeans (at least a portion of them had left, some remained) have moved away while the children of Israel were in Egypt?

20 and the Hittites and the Perizzites and the Rephaim, — the Hittites, who had their name from Heth, a son of Canaan, see Genesis 10:15; they dwelt about Hebron, in the south of the land of Canaan:

— the Perizzites and the Rephaim; probably these are included in the common name of Canaanites, those that lived in the land of Canaan; 

21 and the Amorites and the Canaanites (descendants of Canaan) and the Girgashites and the Jebusites.” — v16 above; “for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full” but soon it would be full, like Hamas today;

— the Jebusites; who inhabited Jerusalem and its surroundings, which was first called Jebus, from the founder of this nation;

— in this and the previous verses ten nations are reckoned as occupying the land of Canaan at that time, whereas only seven are mentioned in the times of Moses and Joshua; Deuteronomy 7:1Joshua 3:10;

— although the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates,” that seed were meant to be the whole house of Israel. Hence, during the Exodus, Moses was tasked of bringing the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt, for “I have also established My covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers” Exodus 6:4.

“When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee — the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou—” Deuteronomy 7:1

And Joshua said, “Hereby ye shall know that the living God is among you, and that He will without fail drive out from before you the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Hivites and the Perizzites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Jebusites” Joshua 3:10.

~~~~

and from MSG

When the sun was down and it was dark, a smoking firepot and a flaming torch moved between the split carcasses. That’s when God made a covenant with Abram: “I’m giving this land to your children, from the Nile River in Egypt to the River Euphrates in Assyria—the country of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaim, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites, and Jebusites.”

Deuteronomy 7:1Joshua 3:10; and these three -the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites- were not among them. Perhaps they were all from the children of Esau, a posterity of Shem (whereas the others are mostly posterity of Ham), and during this time interval of over 400 years, they moved north and eventually settled in Spain and then onto the New World;

— note, too, that several states of the United States (namely Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, and Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and California) have the Spanish Mexicans settled there first, then later during the Mexican-American War from 1846 to 1848, the American zionists took over, which accounted for a loss of 55% of Mexico’s territory.

During the Mexican-American War, Mexico lost 55% of her Territory

— for a more indepth study of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

China restricts Graphite in tech war

•October 25, 2023 • Leave a Comment

China restricts exports of graphite as it escalates a global tech war

CNN by Juliana Liu • October 21, 2023 // ZeroHedge

China has unveiled plans to restrict exports of graphite — a mineral crucial to the manufacture of batteries for electric vehicles (EVs) — on national security grounds, the Ministry of Commerce and the General Administration of Customs said Friday.

China accounts for an estimated 65% of global graphite production

The announcement comes just days after the United States imposed additional limits on the kinds of semiconductors that American companies can sell to Chinese firms.

“At the moment both China and Western countries are engaged in a tit for tat, highlighting how protectionist measures often spread. Newton’s third law that every action causes a reaction applies here, too,” said Stefan Legge, head of tax and trade policy research at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland.

“At the same time, both sides of the dispute also realize how costly it is if geopolitics trumps economics,” he added.

China, which dominates the world’s production and processing of graphite, says export permits will be needed, starting in December, for synthetic graphite material — including high-purity, high-strength and high-density versions — as well as for natural flake graphite.

The Institute for Energy Research, a Washington, DC-based research organization, says carmakers are trying to lock in supplies of graphite from sources outside of China, as demand for EV batteries outpaces other uses for the material.

Shares of Tesla, Rivian, Nikola, VinFast and Fisker all slide lower in trading

Global sales of EVs, including purely battery-powered vehicles and hybrids, are soaring, according to the International Energy Agency.

Sales exceeded 10 million units last year, up 55% from 2021, and are expected to rise to nearly 14 million vehicles this year, it projected.

According to the US Geological Survey, the market for graphite used in batteries has grown 250% globally since 2018. China was the world’s leading graphite producer last year, accounting for an estimated 65% of global production, it said.

Besides EVs, graphite is commonly used in the semiconductor, aerospace, chemical and steel industries.

Gallium, germanium restrictions

The export curbs were announced as China faces pressure from multiple governments over its commercial and trade practices. For more than a year, it has been embroiled in a tech war with the United States and its allies in Europe and Asia over access to advanced chips and chipmaking equipment.

In July, Beijing imposed export restrictions on gallium and germanium, two minerals essential for making semiconductors. One month later, its overseas shipments of the materials fell to zero.

Ivan Lam, a senior analyst at Counterpoint Research, said China had previously imposed temporary export controls on graphite, with little industry impact, adding that the new rules were not a “complete ban.” Still, he predicts prices will go up.

“We believe that the average price of graphite will continue to rise in the future due to supply and demand imbalances, including Russia, which was one of the major graphite suppliers before the Russia-Ukraine war,” he said.

China has a massive hold on the worldwide supply chain of critical minerals needed to make EV batteries. It refines 60% of the world’s lithium and 80% of the cobalt, according to the US Department of Energy.

Israel Plans to Turn Gaza Into ‘Hiroshima!’

•October 24, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Israel Plans to Turn Gaza Into ‘Hiroshima’ But Without Nuclear Weapons – Sy Hersh

Sputnik International • October 19, 2023

The latest escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has resulted in thousands killed and injured on both sides, with over 500 perishing in the bombing of the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza on Tuesday night.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have every intention of staging in the Gaza Strip something similar to the US destruction of the Japanese city of Hiroshima, only without nuclear weapons, American journalist Seymour Hersh wrote in an article on Substack.

“Gaza City is in the process of being turned into Hiroshima with no nuclear weapons used,” Hersh cited sources as telling him.

Furthermore, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has every intention “to wipe out Hamas,” with little concern for hundreds of thousands of citizens of Gaza that were told to evacuate and move south of the enclave on October 12, underscored Sy Hersh, referencing unnamed intelligence analysts in Washington.

Netanyahu formed an emergency unity government a few days ago with ex-military Chief of Staff Benny Gantz to bring his National Unity party into the governing coalition and join the war cabinet including Defense Minster Yoav Gallant.

Israel has vowed to “destroy” the Hamas movement ruling in the Gaza Strip after its attacks on Southern Israel. After calling up a reported 350,000 army reservists — totalling around a tenth of the country’s workforce — since October 7, Israel appeared to be holding back on an invasion.

On October 7, Palestinian group Hamas launched a surprise large-scale rocket attack against Israel from the Gaza Strip.

After it breached the border, killing and seizing people in neighboring Israeli communities, Israel launched retaliatory strikes and ordered a complete blockade of the Gaza Strip, home to more than 2 million people, cutting off supplies of water, food and fuel. Thousands of dead and injured have been reported on both sides as a result of the escalation.

While the Rafah crossing between the Gaza Strip and Egypt remains closed, at some point, “American-made bombs in the Israeli arsenal, including those known as “bunker busters,” may be targeted on the underground tunnel systems where Hamas manufactured the weapons and conducted planning for the horrific attacks in southern Israel on October 7,” wrote Hersh.

“Under the Israeli plans, there would be no need for a massive ground invasion,” insiders had informed Hersh, while Israeli troops, “would be needed for hunting down those Hamas members underground who choose to surrender.” However, the orders to the Israeli military, according to a cited official, would be “shoot on sight,” with surrender not an option.

“The official told me that the Hamas soldiers who would emerge from the tunnels desperate for food were seen by the Israelis as starving rats who would be met with poisoned food. The fate of the nearly two hundred hostages, most of them Israeli but known also to include a few Americans, was left unsaid,” wrote Sy Hersh.

Accordingly, Netanyahu’s plan, as per the official referenced by Hersh, is to ensure that the Israeli Army destroys the Hamas tunnel system, along with every member of the militant group they can hunt down. After that, the remnants of Gaza City would be purportedly barricaded at the southernmost end. Hamas “stragglers” would be tracked down as Israeli soldiers scored every block in the destroyed city.

Sy Hersh also weighed in on the visit paid by US President Joe Biden to Israel on Wednesday. After earlier sending to the eastern Mediterranean near Israel two US Navy carrier strike groups led by the USS Gerald Ford and the USS Dwight D Eisenhower, Biden pledged support to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s operation in the Gaza Strip.

Recalling Biden’s Sunday interview for US media, where he conceded that while Hamas “must be eliminated entirely,” while adding that there “needs to be a path to a Palestinian state,” Hersh suggested that the latter was “not on Israel’s agenda.”

His visit had come a day after an attack on the al-Ahli Arab Hospital in northern Gaza, where locals were sheltering from Israeli airstrikes on the enclave.

On October 17, a deadly attack on the al-Ahli Hospital killed hundreds of people. Palestinian authorities and the Israeli army have since been pointing fingers at one another for the disaster. Hamas said that the missile was launched by the IDF, while Israeli officials put the blame on the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement.

The entire international community was shocked by the catastrophe, with citizens across the globe rallying in support of Palestine and urging for a ceasefire. Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova stressed that the attack on the hospital is an “act of dehumanization.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin described the hospital’s destruction as a tragedy and a humanitarian catastrophe. Speaking at the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing, he voiced hope that the horrific event will be a “signal” that the bloody conflict in Gaza needs to end as soon as possible.

Regarding the US show of force in the region amid the escalation of hostilities, Sy Hersh cited an official as saying:

“All the American services are jumping on it… but Israel is saying, ‘Go back. We don’t want your stuff’… There are no better pilots today than those in the Israeli Air Forces. Bibi’s got it under control and no Israeli is going to worry about the fate of the citizens of Gaza.”

The unnamed official also purportedly speculated whether Joe Biden’s fleeting visit to Israel might have been an attempt to “keep the Ukraine war off the front pages,” amid Kiev’s botched counteroffensive.

Kidnapping (Genesis 14)

•October 23, 2023 • Leave a Comment

A Study of kidnapping in the Days of Old: compare and contrast with today’s Hamas kidnapping of civilians and bring them back as captives into the Gaza strip.

Now, Hamas is holding 200 to 250 civilians as hostages. Is there going to a similar solution to the one Abraham experienced?PARSHA POSTS: BEHAR | The Blogs

Genesis 14

1 And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar [Babylon], Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of nations, — and it came to pass; that is, after the separation of Abram and Lot, the latter of whom now appears as a citizen of fruitful, but wicked Sodom;

— the raid is minutely described in Genesis 14:1-12; a confederacy consists of four kings; Elam is today’s Persia, Iran.

that these made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar. — three more kings joining Sodom and Gomorrah against the four in the confederacy;

— MSG:

Then this: Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Kedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of Goiim went off to war to fight Bera king of Sodom, Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, that is, Zoar.

All these were joined together in the Vale of Siddim, which is the Salt Sea. — were united in a confederacy, and so formed a pentapolis, or group of five allied kingdom;

— which is the salt sea; from these words commentators have concluded that the vale of Sodom was later swallowed up by the Dead Sea;

Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled. — Chedorlaomer king of Elam; he must be the leader;

— and in the thirteenth year they rebelled; refused homage to Chedorlaomer and to pay tribute to him.

And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer and the kings that were with him, and smote the Rephaim in Ashteroth Karnaim, and the Zuzim in Ham, and the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim,

— in the fourteenth year; after some pause and preparation, Chedorlaomer, in conjunction with his three allies, set himself to reduce the revolters: the group of five allied kingdom;

and the Horites in their Mount Seir, unto Elparan, which is by the wilderness. — the Horites, the ancient inhabitants of Seir, the sons of Esau or Edom; they dwelt in caves; such as are still to be seen in Petra and other places around;

And they returned and came to Enmishpat, which is Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites and also the Amorites, who dwelt in Hazezontamar. — they returned; more correctly, they turned, as they did not go back by the same route, but wheeled towards the north-west;

— the Amalekites; that is, the land the Amalekites were anticipated to live there; Saul had to pursue these wandering hordes into the recesses of Paran, but they were evidently then in possession of the Negeb of Judea.

And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar), and they joined battle with them in the Vale of Siddim, — they have now arrived again at the point they had reached in Genesis 14:3. The five kings came out and joined battle against the four in the dale of Siddim.

against Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and against Tidal king of nations, and Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar — four kings against five. — the invaders were from Chaldea and Persia, then only small kingdoms. They took Lot among the rest, and his goods. Though he was righteous, and Abram’s brother’s son, yet he was with the rest in this trouble.

10 And the Vale of Siddim was full of slime pits; and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled and fell there, and those who remained fled to the mountain. — and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled and fell there. Stumbled into the pits and perished;

11 And they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah and all their victuals, and went their way. — and they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah; they entered these cities and pillaged them, and carried off everything valuable in them;

12 And they took Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods and departed. — his goods, and departed; as him and his family, so all his substance, his cattle, wealth, and riches of every sort, and went off with it:

13 And there came one who had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew, for he dwelt on the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and brother of Aner; and these were confederate with Abram. — these were confederate with Abram, that is, had entered into a league for their mutual defence against common enemies.

14 And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house (three hundred and eighteen), and pursued them unto Dan. — Abram had now a company of three hundred and eighteen trained men, born in his own house;

— which implies a following of more than one thousand men, women, and children. His flocks and herds must have corresponded in extent to such an establishment.

15 And he divided himself against them, he and his servants by night, and smote them and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus. — he divided himself, that is, his forces into several parties,

— that coming upon them from several quarters he might strike them with greater terror, whilst they thought his army far more numerous than it was.

16 And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot and his goods, and the women also and the people. — and the women also, and the people; not only that belonged to Lot, but to Sodom and Gomorrah, who had been taken and carried captive; these were all rescued and brought back by Abram,

17 And the king of Sodom went out to meet him at the Valley of Shaveh (which is the King’s Dale) after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer and of the kings who were with him. — the king’s dale; the Targum calls it the place of the king’s exercise, where he had his diversions in riding, walking, etc;

18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine; and he was the priest of the Most High God. — Melchizedek king of Salem; he was probably the king of some Semitic race who still occupied Salem, but from whom it was at a subsequent period wrested by the Jebusites, who called it Jebus;

19 And he blessed him and said, “Blessed be Abram of the Most High God, possessor of heaven and earth; — and he blessed him; Melchizedek blessed Abram, which was one part of his office as a priest, to wish and pray for a blessing on others;

20 and blessed be the Most High God, who hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand.” And he gave him tithes of all. — Abraham gave him tithes; Abram thus consecrated the war by a thank-offering to God, who had given him the victory;

— but he also, by paying tithes, acknowledged the priesthood of Melchizedek, and that the God whom he served was the true God.

21 And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, “Give me the persons, and take the goods for thyself.” — after the conversation between him and Melchizedek was over; note the king of Sodom’s grateful offer to Abram, Give me the captives, and take thou the substance;

22 And Abram said to the king of Sodom, “I have lifted up mine hand unto the Lord, the Most High God, the possessor of heaven and earth, — I have lifted up my hand; that is, this is a serious matter with Abram; he had made an oath or solemn asseveration before God;

23 that I will not take from a thread even to a shoe strap, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say,‘I have made Abram rich’”

— “I have lifted up mine hand” [that is, I have sworn] unto the Lord that I will not take from a thread even to a sandal-thong, and that that I will not take any thing that [is] thine, lest thou shouldst say, I have made Abram rich.”

24 except only that which the young men have eaten and the portion of the men who went with me: Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.” — while Abram refrains from accepting any part of the spoils beyond what had been consumed in supplying the necessities of his followers in the expedition, he expressly excepts the portion to which his confederates, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre, became entitled by their share in the recovery of the property.

Israel cleansing Palestinians off Gaza

•October 22, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US opposes peace as Israel ethnically cleanses Palestinians, waging war on ‘entire nation’ of Gaza

G/E by Ben Norton • October 15, 2023

Israel is ethnically cleansing Palestinians, trying to force them out of Gaza into Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. The US and EU support Netanyahu’s scorched-earth war on the “entire nation” and the State Department ordered diplomats not to call for peace, de-escalation, or a ceasefire.

The Israeli government is in the process of ethnically cleansing more than 1 million Palestinians, pushing them out of their homes in Gaza.

According to senior Israeli officials, the plan of the far-right Benjamin Netanyahu government is to force Palestinians into the desert of Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, where they will live in so-called “tent cities.”

At the same time, Israel is brutally bombing the besieged Gaza strip – one of the most densely populated areas on Earth.

There are even reports that Israel has attacked convoys of Palestinian civilians who were abiding by its evacuation order and fleeing from the north to the south of the 40-kilometer strip.

Meanwhile, the United States has adamantly refused to support calls for peace.

Instead, the State Department told US diplomats not to mention the phrases “de-escalation/ceasefire,” “end to violence/bloodshed,” and “restoring calm” when discussing Gaza, according to a memo obtained by HuffPost.

On 12 October, Israel ordered the roughly 1.1 million Palestinians living in the northern half of Gaza to evacuate to the south.

The United Nations warned that it would be “impossible for such a movement to take place without devastating humanitarian consequences.”

The UN “strongly appealed” for the Israeli evacuation order “to be rescinded,” noting it “could transform what is already a tragedy into a calamitous situation.”

Israel ignored the UN and instead cracked down even harder, bombing Palestinian civilians as they evacuated.

The BBC acknowledged that the Israeli military attacked a Palestinian convoy, writing, “These vehicles were carrying civilians, who were fleeing northern Gaza after the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued an evacuation order.”

The BBC verified a video of the attack, describing it as “a scene of total carnage,” which “is too graphic for us to show.”

“Bodies, twisted and mangled, are scattered everywhere,” the BBC described, adding that many of the victims of the Israeli attack were women and children, including infants aged 2 to 5 years old.

The Associated Press confirmed the same, writing:

Two witnesses reported a strike on fleeing cars near the town of Deir el-Balah, south of the evacuation zone and in the area Israel told people to flee to. Fayza Hamoudi said she and her family were driving from their home in the north when the strike hit some distance ahead on the road and two vehicles burst into flames. A witness from another car on the road gave a similar account.

As of 14 October, Israel had killed at least 2,215 Palestinians, including 724 children and 458 women, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.

Another 8,714 Palestinians have been wounded in a week of Israeli attacks, among them 2,450 children and 1,536 women.

Meanwhile, top Israeli officials have engaged in borderline genocidal rhetoric.

Israel’s President Isaac Herzog declared at a press conference that the country is at war with the “entire nation” of Gaza.

“It is an entire nation out there that is responsible” Herzog said, in reference to Palestinians.

“It is not true this rhetoric about civilians not being aware, not involved. It’s absolutely not true. They could have risen up [against Hamas],” he argued, in comments reported by HuffPost.

According to Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, Israel’s plan is to ethnically cleanse Palestinians and force them into Egypt.

Citing an anonymous high level source, Hersh wrote,

“I have been told by an Israeli insider that Israel has been trying to convince Qatar, which at the urging of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was a long-time financial supporter of Hamas, to join with Egypt in funding a tent city for the million or more refugees awaiting across the border.”

This plan was in fact confirmed by Israel’s former deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, who previously served as the Israeli ambassador to the United States and a foreign policy adviser for far-right Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In an interview with Al Jazeera reporter Marc Lamont Hill on 12 October, Ayalon stated:

DANNY AYALON: This was, this is thought out. It’s not something that we tell them, go to the beaches, go drown yourselves, God forbid, not at all. There is a huge expanse, almost endless space in the Sinai desert, just on the other side of Gaza.

The idea is – and this is not the first time it will be done – the idea is for them to leave over to the open areas where we and the international community will prepare the infrastructure, you know, tent cities, with food and with water – you know, just like for the refugees of Syria that fled the butchering of Assad a few years ago to Turkey; Turkey received 2 million of them.

This is the idea. Now Egypt will have to play ball here, because once the the population is out of sight, then we can go…

I’ll tell you in a practical manner what we should do, and what we can do: create, like in the past, in history, a humanitarian corridor.

When there is a humanitarian corridor – and we have been discussing this with the United States – then we can guarantee in this corridor that nobody will get hurt.

Now, again, I say, there is a way to receive them all on the other side for temporary time, on the Sinai, because what did Hamas turn –

MARC LAMONT HILL: On the other side? Are we talking about Rafah? Are you saying the other side, they go to Egypt?

DANNY AYALON: Yes, absolutely, absolutely. And Egypt will have to play ball.

The Promise Land between two Great Rivers; the Nile and Euphrates (Gen 15:18)

While Israel is ethnically cleansing Palestinians and killing large numbers of civilians, Western governments have showed unflinching support.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen both traveled to Tel Aviv to symbolically back the far-right Netanyahu government.

The Financial Times reported that some EU officials are concerned “that the European Commission president could look as if she is endorsing military actions that will cause mass civilian casualties — and that will swiftly be labelled as war crimes.”

An unnamed EU diplomat told the Times, “We may be about to see massive ethnic cleansing” – a clear indication that Western capitals know exactly what Israel is doing.

“Our fear is that we’ll pay a heavy price in the global south because of this conflict,” an anonymous EU official confessed to the newspaper.

The vast majority of countries in the Global South support the Palestinian people in their struggle against Israeli colonialism. A rare exception is the far-right government in India, whose Prime Minister Narendra Modi represents a vehemently anti-Muslim Hindu-nationalist party, the BJP, which sees Israel’s religious ethnostate as an inspiration and potential model for its own plans for a so-called “Hindu Rashtra.”

Meanwhile, Netanyahu has suggested that Israel plans to further escalate its extreme violence. He told soldiers near the border of Gaza that the “next stage is coming.”

The Israeli military has also been attacking neighbors Lebanon and Syria.

Human Rights Watch confirmed that Israel used white phosphorous in strikes on both Gaza and Lebanon. The human rights organization made it clear that this “puts civilians at risk of serious and long-term injuries” and “violates the international humanitarian law prohibition on putting civilians at unnecessary risk.”

Israel has likewise bombed Syria multiple times, even targeting the international airport in Aleppo.

For the roughly 2.3 million Palestinians trapped in the besieged Gaza strip, conditions are virtually unlivable.

Israel has cut off Gaza’s access to electricity, water, food, and fuel. The Associated Press reported, “When water does trickle from pipes, the meager flow lasts no more than 30 minutes each day and is so contaminated with sewage and seawater that it’s undrinkable, residents said.”

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) cautioned, “Mass casualties are unlike anything seen in past years.”

“The medical system is on its knees. As Gaza loses power, hospitals lose power. Water cannot be pumped. Sewage systems will likely flood. People have nowhere else to go,” the humanitarian organization stated.

Rising Hostility in the US

•October 21, 2023 • Leave a Comment

War between Israel and Hamas raises fears about rising hostility in the US

Associated Press • October 18, 2023

A fatal stabbing in Illinois, a gun pointed at protesters in Pennsylvania, vandalism at synagogues and harassment of staff at a Palestinian restaurant all are raising fears that the war between Israel and Hamas is sparking violence in the United States.

War between Israel and Hamas raises fears and hostilities in the US

The tensions follow a familiar pattern of crimes against Jewish and Muslim communities rising when conflict erupts in the Middle East and Americans have been killed or taken hostage.

“We have a two pronged threat to American faith communities,” said Brian Levin, founding director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino.

While it’s too soon to say with certainty whether anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish crimes have increased during the war, hate crimes overall increased in the US last year. In its annual report released Monday, the FBI estimated that hate crimes increased by 7% to 11,634 cases in 2022 compared to the previous year.

With 1,124 incidents, anti-Jewish attacks were the second most reported hate crime, after anti-Black cases. There were 158 reported incidents of anti-Muslim attacks, and 92 reports of anti-Arab cases, according to the report.

Civil rights organizations, however, believe that even before the Hamas attacks in Israel, crime data didn’t reflect reality due to a lack of participation by local police departments and internalized fear among the Muslim population, said Robert McCaw, director of governmental affairs for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

In 2021, the Othering & Belonging Institute at the University of California, Berkeley, released a study in which 85% of those who were subjected to Islamophobia said they did not report it to authorities.

“The true number remains to be seen,” McCaw said.

Insurrection? Pro-Palestinian Protesters Occupy Capitol Building

In one of the most troubling recent incidents, a landlord in Plainfield, Illinois, is accused of attacking a Palestinian American tenant and her son with a knife on Saturday, purportedly because of their Muslim faith, stabbing the 6-year-old boy to death and injuring the mother.

The sheriff, prosecutors and family all said the boy and his mother were targeted for being Muslim. More specifically, prosecutors said the landlord was “angry … for what was going on in Jerusalem” and his wife told police her husband feared they would be attacked by people of Middle Eastern descent.

In Pennsylvania, a man was charged with felony ethnic intimidation after police said he pointed a gun and yelled slurs at attendees of a pro-Palestinian rally near the state Capitol on Friday. In Boston, the word “Nazis” was spray-painted across the sign for the Palestinian Cultural Center for Peace.

“There’s a lot of fear. There’s a lot of anxiety and uncertainty in everything that’s happening,” said Abed Ayoub, national executive director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. He said the group has received more than 100 reports including verbal harassment, threats, intimidation and physical attacks.

“It’s very reminiscent of the early days of post-9/11, where people didn’t want to go outside, they didn’t want to send their kids to school,” he said. “They’re just worried about being in public and being approached.”

In Dearborn, Michigan, which has the nation’s highest Muslim population per capita, community and faith leaders met outside the city’s police department Monday. The city has seen multiple threats of violence in recent days, including from a man accused of asking on social media if anyone in metro Detroit wanted to “go to Dearborn & hunt Palestinians.”

“We have to understand that these issues that are overseas are not just overseas, they are very much also issues here,” said Imran Salha, the imam of the Islamic Center of Detroit.

Historically, anti-Jewish hate crimes have increased during violent Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, said Levin, a professor emeritus at California State.

In March 1994, there was a spike in anti-Jewish hate crimes from 79 incidents to 147 a month after an American Israeli extremist opened fire on Palestinian Muslims in a mosque, he said, citing FBI statistics.

In October 2000, anti-Jewish hate crimes in the US surged from 81 to 204 compared to the month before after a series of violent protests in Arab villages in northern Israel. Levin observed a similar trend in May 2021, particularly in cities with significant Jewish populations such as New York and Los Angeles.

In California last week, flyers spreading anti-Jewish rhetoric were left in neighborhoods and on vehicles in the city of Orange. And in Fresno, police said a man suspected of breaking windows and leaving an anti-Jewish note at a bakery also is a “person of interest” in the vandalism of a local synagogue.

Julie Platt, chair of the Jewish Federations of North America, said synagogues and Jewish community centers around the country have been strengthening their security programs, but that she does not want to see members of her community duck for cover.

“I think the whole point of this is to terrorize us psychologically,” she said. “As long as I hear of no credible threats, I believe we should live our Jewish lives.”

Several Palestinian Americans interviewed Friday in a Brooklyn neighborhood with a large Arab population said the atmosphere has been tense in the last week.

Jumana Alkaram said she has not been personally threatened but that: “I know if I was to demonstrate my heritage or the Palestinian flag there would be some type of threat. Because the majority has the support of Israel and don’t have the full legit story about what’s happening in Gaza.”

In New York City, a Palestinian restaurant, Ayat, was forced to disconnect its phone after receiving “nonstop” threatening voicemails, according to co-owner, Abdul Elenani. The storefront features a mural of a crying Palestinian and its menu includes calls to “end the occupation.”

On Friday, a man entered the dining room shouting “terrorist” at the people behind the counter, Elenani said.

Still, the hostile reception was overshadowed by the support he has received from his neighbors, many of whom are Jewish and share his views about minimizing civilian deaths, he said.

“In New York, we all live together, we work together, we grow together,” Elenani said. “And we all want this violence to stop.”

The Case for “Greater Israel!”

•October 20, 2023 • Leave a Comment

The biblical Case for a “Greater Israel” between two Great Rivers!

“On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” Genesis 15:18

The Scriptures below are part of a prophecy and speaks about the regathering of the outcasts of Israel from the nations to which they have been scattered; that the time is before the coming of the Messiah.

The Tehiya and the National Religious Party are parties supporting this idea.

Annexation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip are part of the platform of the Israeli Likud party, and of some other Israeli political parties.

Commentators and observers have suggested the two blue strips of the Israeli flag represent the Nile and the Euphrates

Meir Kahane, an ultra-nationalist Knesset member, who founded the American Jewish Defense League and the banned Israeli Kach party, are working towards Greater Israel and other Zionist goals.

The modern descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel include many in the northwestern European countries. The descendants of Joseph include many of the English-speaking countries today, most notably the United States and Britain and some of Britain’s former colonies, such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

Judah was the tribe to lead the way into the Promised Land (Numbers 10:13–14). The Jews of the tribe of Judah have been the first to return to the land of Israel in our recent past. If the chronicles of the Bible are are a guide, then the rest of the tribes will follow Judah.

Following Nakba and Naksa, Progression towards a Greater Israel

Ezekiel 11:16-17

16 Therefore say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: Although I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come.’

17 Therefore say, ‘Thus saith the Lord God: I will even gather you from the people and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel.’

Isaiah 11:10–12:6

10 “And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse, who shall stand for an ensign of the people; to It shall the Gentiles seek, and His rest shall be glorious.”

11 And it shall come to pass in that day that the Lord shall set His hand again the second time to recover the remnant of His people who shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.

12 And He shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

13 The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off; Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim.

14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines toward the west; they shall despoil them of the east together. They shall lay their hand upon Edom and Moab, and the children of Ammon shall obey them.

15 And the Lord shall utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian Sea; and with His mighty wind shall He shake His hand over the river, and shall smite it in the seven streams and make men go over dryshod.

16 And there shall be a highway for the remnant of His people who shall be left from Assyria, as it was to Israel in the day that he came up out of the land of Egypt.

Isaiah 12:1 And in that day thou shalt say: “O Lord, I will praise Thee; though Thou wast angry with me, Thine anger is turned away, and Thou comforted me.

2 Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust and not be afraid; for the Lord Jehovah is my strength and my song; He also has become my salvation.”

3 Therefore with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation;

4 and in that day shall ye say: “Praise the Lord! Call upon His name! Declare His doings among the people; make mention that His name is exalted.

5 Sing unto the Lord, for He hath done excellent things; this is known in all the earth.

6 Cry out and shout, thou inhabitant of Zion! For great is the Holy One of Israel in the midst of thee.”

The Promise Land between two Great Rivers; the Nile and Euphrates

Jeremiah 16:14–15

14 “Therefore behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that it shall no more be said, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’

15 but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel from the land of the north, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.’ And I will bring them back into their land that I gave unto their fathers.

Jeremiah 23:7–8

7 “Therefore, behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that they shall no more say, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’

8 but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up and who led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them.’ And they shall dwell in their own land.”

The children of Israel went out of Egypt as a unified group in the first exodus, since they all lived in the land of Goshen in Egypt.

However, in the second exodus of the last days, scattered Israel, by virtue of the fact that they have been scattered around the world, will not return to Israel as a single unified group. They will likely return in waves at various times from various places. Many from Judah have already returned to the land of Israel.

Remember, the first exodus involved the ancient Israelites coming out of Egypt. The Bible prophesies that the second exodus will involve the last days’ descendants of those ancient Israelites who have been scattered to the four corners of the globe returning to the land of Israel.

Perhaps, an organization such as B’ney Yosef North America could lead the way:

“The founders of B’ney Yosef North America took inspiration from the early Zionists. Like them, we recognized the times and resolved to take action to bring the promises of God into reality. Those promises, like the promises the Jewish pioneers took to heart, concern the restoration of the entire nation of Israel.

“The restoration of the Jewish state in 1948 was the fulfillment of the first half of those promises, but BYNA’s founders realized that much more was to happen before all was fulfilled. Isaiah recorded much about that process, such as this passage from a prominent chapter about the Messianic Kingdom:

Then it will happen on that day that the Lord will again recover the second time with His hand the remnant of His people, who will remain, from Assyria, Egypt, Pathros, Cush, Elam, Shinar, Hamath, and from the islands of the sea. And He will lift up a standard for the nations and assemble the banished ones of Israel, and will gather the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. Then the jealousy of Ephraim will depart, and those who harass Judah will be cut off; Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, and Judah will not harass Ephraim. (Isaiah 11:11-13)

“We had seen in the days of our parents and grandparents the gathering of Judah (the Jewish people) from the four corners of the earth. Who, then, were the people of Ephraim?”

For more on (1) “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by J H Allen

(2) Ephraim / The United States; (3) Ephraim and Manasseh

(4) Who is Ephraim, a Chronic Liar? (5) The Ox without the Unicorn

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

“Beware of False Prophets!”

•October 19, 2023 • Leave a Comment

Numbers 12:6

And He said, “Hear now My words: If there be a prophet among you, I, the Lord, will make Myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.

Jeremiah 5:30-31

An astonishing and horrible thing is committed in the land:

The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love to have it so. And what will ye do in the end thereof?

“Beware of False Prophets!” For they are wolves among sheep!

Jeremiah 14:14

Then the Lord said unto me, “The prophets prophesy lies in My name. I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spoke unto them. They prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought and the deceit of their heart.

Jeremiah 23:11-12

“For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in My house have I found their wickedness,” saith the Lord.

“Therefore their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness; they shall be driven on, and fall therein; for I will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation,” saith the Lord.

Jeremiah 23:16

Thus saith the Lord of hosts: “Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you. They make you vain; they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord.

Jeremiah 23:20-22

The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and till He has performed the thoughts of His heart; in the latter days ye shall consider it perfectly.

“I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.

But if they had stood in My counsel and had caused My people to hear My words, then they should have turned them from their evil way and from the evil of their doings.

Jeremiah 23:26

How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets who prophesy lies? Yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart.

Jeremiah 23:31-32

Behold, I am against the prophets,” saith the Lord, “that use their tongues and say, ‘He saith.’

Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams,” saith the Lord, “and do tell them, and cause My people to err by their lies and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them. Therefore they shall not profit this people at all,” saith the Lord.

Ezekiel 13:3-4

Thus saith the Lord God: Woe unto the foolish prophets, who follow their own spirit and have seen nothing!

O Israel, thy prophets are like the foxes in the deserts.

Ezekiel 13:6

They have seen vanity and lying divination, saying, “The Lord saith,” but the Lord hath not sent them; and they have made others to hope that they would confirm the word.

Jeremiah 29:8-9

For thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel: Let not your prophets and your diviners who are in the midst of you deceive you, neither hearken to your dreams which ye cause to be dreamed.

For they prophesy falsely unto you in My name: I have not sent them, saith the Lord.

Revelation 2:2

I know thy works and thy labor and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them that are evil; and how thou hast tried them that say they are apostles and are not, and hast found them liars;

Three Great Deceptions promoted by False Prophets:

(a) Easters, a celebration of the Queen of heaven: Ishtar, the Assyrian and Babylonian goddess of fertility and sex. Her symbols (like the egg and bunny) were and still are fertility and sex symbols; and to those who actually think eggs and bunnies have something to do with the resurrection; Jeremiah 7:18 the women knead their dough to make cakes to the Queen of heaven; in Egypt, Jeremiah 44:17-19, 25, this is Ishtar: pronounced ‘Easter.’

(b) Christmas; Ezekiel 8:16 five and twenty men with their backs toward the temple; their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the sun toward the east; Christmas, which honor Mithraism, birthday on December 25th – a form of nature worship based on the Sun-Goddess Mithra who on the darkest night of the year (December 20/21), gives birth to “Light” causing each day thereafter to grow longer until the Summer solstice;

(c) Sundays; her sabbaths which is Sundays, where the original Sun-worshippers were the Samaritans, brought from Assyria: And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel; and they possessed Samaria and dwelt in the cities thereof, II Kings 17:24.

— today, more than 98.5 percent of Pretenders are honoring the SUN by observing SUNday worship. Ezekiel 8:16 They have “their backs toward the temple of the Lord and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the SUN toward the east; whose penalty is to be stoned to death, Deuteronomy 17:3-5 – ’till they die.

— also, following the SUN-worshipping Samaritans, most Church of God Communities are showing their contempt for God by having their “wavesheaf offering” and Pentecost on a SUNday; always on a SUNday. And these are supposedly in God’s Sanctuary, but God says He is a jealous God, so these pretentious Christians could be spewed out of His mouth! A death penalty – ’till they die!

If false shepherd couldn’t get their basic doctrines right, how could they advance to understand the more sophisticated and complex prophecies of the future right?

If false prophets couldn’t know who Ephraim (mentioned 60 times in the prophetic books of the OT) is today, how could they pretend to understand how the end will play out?

US’s 2nd aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean

•October 18, 2023 • Leave a Comment

US to send 2nd aircraft carrier to eastern Mediterranean; USS Eisenhower will join the USS Ford off the coast of Israel

ABC News by Martha Raddatz and Luis Martinez • October 15, 2023

The Pentagon has ordered a second aircraft carrier strike group to the eastern Mediterranean near Israel to deter Iran or Hezbollah from joining the Israel-Hamas conflict, according to US officials.

A senior US official and a US official told ABC News that the USS Eisenhower carrier strike group will be ordered to the eastern Mediterranean to join the USS Gerald R Ford carrier strike group that arrived there earlier this week and is in international waters off of Israel.

“Those adversaries should think twice.”

A Pentagon spokesperson did not immediately have a comment on the development.

Senior US officials have said publicly this week that the presence of the USS Ford carrier strike group in the eastern Mediterranean and the addition of more US Air Force fighter jets to the region was intended to show the US commitment to Israel and to serve as a deterrent to Iran and Hezbollah not to get involved in the Israel-Hamas conflict.

“These posture increases were intended to serve as an unequivocal demonstration in deed and not only in words of US support for Israel’s defense and serve as a deterrent signal to Iran, Lebanese Hezbollah, and any other proxy across the region who might be considering exploiting the current situation to escalate conflict,” a senior US defense official said Monday. “Those adversaries should think twice.”

Having the Eisenhower joining the Ford will increase the show of force enhancing that message of deterrence.

The Eisenhower strike group left Norfolk, Virginia, earlier on Saturday bound for a previously scheduled deployment that would take it to the Middle East via the Mediterranean Sea where it was to participate in previously-scheduled exercises in the US European Command area of responsibility.

Its pending deployment led to speculation that it might be deployed to the eastern Mediterranean to join the USS Ford, but a Pentagon statement would only say that Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin would “continue to review both the Eisenhower and Ford’s deployment plans as he considers the appropriate balance of maritime capability across theaters in support of national security priorities.”

The Eisenhower strike group includes the aircraft carrier USS Eisenhower and the guided missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea (CG-58), and the guided missile destroyers USS Laboon (DDG-58), USS Mason (DDG-87) and USS Gravely (DDG-107).

The USS Ford strike group arrived in the waters of the eastern Mediterranean on Tuesday and in addition to the carrier includes the cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60), as well as destroyers USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116), USS Ramage (DDG 61), USS Carney (DDG 64), and USS Roosevelt (DDG 80).

For more, see

“Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” by JH Allen

More on (1) Ephraim / The United States; (2) Ephraim and Manasseh

(3) Who is Ephraim, a Chronic Liar? (4) The Ox without the Unicorn