Genesis (27-28)

•August 10, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Looking at the Scriptures with a puff of fresh air!

Then Isaac his father answered and prophesied, saying, “Thy dwelling shall be away from the fatness of the earth; and away from the dew of heaven above; Genesis 27:39

And by your sword shall you live, you will go to every place, and wander, and you will be subject to your brother. But when his descendants abandon the commandments of the Torah, then you will break his yoke from your neck.” Genesis 27:40 Targum (Jonathan)

And Esau harbored hatred in his heart against Jacob, his brother, because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, “I will not do as Cain did, who killed Abel during their father’s lifetime and then their father had another son, Seth. Rather, I will wait until the days of mourning for my father have passed, and then I will kill Jacob my brother, and I will be the sole heir.” Genesis 27:41 Targum (Jonathan)

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and until He has performed the intent of His thought; in the latter days ye shall understand it perfectly.” Jeremiah 23:20

Genesis 27

1 And it came to pass that when Isaac was old, and his eyes were dim so that he could not see, he called Esau his eldest son and said unto him, “My son.” And he said unto him, “Behold, here am I.” — Isaac was old; Isaac was now 137 years of age, but he lived to be 180 (Genesis 35:28);

And he said, “Behold now, I am old; I know not the day of my death. — I know not the day of my death; how soon I may die; a declaration which every man may make, and which every man ought well to consider, and lay to heart.

Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field and take me some venison. — thy quiver and thy bow; the former is the vessel or instrument, in which arrows were put and carried, from its being hung at the girdle;

And make me savory meat, such as I love, and bring it to me, that I may eat, that my soul may bless thee before I die.” — that my soul may bless thee; we gather from the solemn blessing given to his sons by Jacob (Genesis 49) that this was a prophetic act, by which Isaac, under the influence of the Spirit, and in expectation of death, decided to which son should belong the birthright;

And Rebekah heard when Isaac spoke to Esau his son. And Esau went to the field to hunt for venison, and to bring it. — Rebekah heard; she was present when Isaac gave the order, and she wished to know his determination to give the blessing to his favourite son;

And Rebekah spoke unto Jacob her son, saying, “Behold, I heard thy father speak unto Esau thy brother, saying, — Rebekah spake unto Jacob; she is here contriving to procure the blessing for Jacob, which was designed for Esau.

‘Bring me venison, and make me savory meat, that I may eat and bless thee before the Lord before my death.’ — before the Lord; solemnly, as in God’s presence, in his name, and by his authority which I shall heartily pray for thee. So he signifies that this was more than an ordinary blessing which he now intended to give him.

Now therefore, my son, obey my voice according to that which I command thee. — obey my voice; Jacob is Rebekah’s favourite; she was prepared to deceive Isaac, in order that Jacob may obtain the coveted blessing.

Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats, and I will make them savory meat for thy father, such as he loveth; — such as he loveth; such two good kids of the goats would pass with him for venison:

— by seasoning, the natural taste might be altered so as not to be distinguished, as we find it was; and such as have the best skill in venison may be imposed upon and deceived by more ways than one, as well as Isaac was;

10 and thou shalt bring it to thy father, that he may eat and that he may bless thee before his death.” — and thou shall bring it to thy father; for venison; and as if he was Esau that brought it: that he may eat, and that he may bless thee before his death;

11 And Jacob said to Rebekah his mother, “Behold, Esau my brother is a hairy man, and I am a smooth man. — and I am a smooth man: without hair, excepting in those parts where it is common for all men to have it.

12 My father perhaps will feel me, and I shall seem to him as a deceiver; and I shall bring a curse upon myself and not a blessing.” — and I shall bring a curse upon me, and not a blessing; and he might justly fear fooling a blind; that should he be found out, so provoke his father, that instead of blessing, he would curse him, Deuteronomy 27:18

13 And his mother said unto him, “Upon me be thy curse, my son; only obey my voice, and go, fetch me them.” — upon me be thy curse, my son; that is, if thy father should curse thee, which I am well assured he will not, let the curse, be what it will, fall upon me;

14 And he went, and fetched and brought them to his mother; and his mother made savory meat, such as his father loved. — and his mother made savoury meat, such as his father loved; by picking out proper pieces, and seasoning them well, it was as grateful to him as if it had really been venison, such as he loved;

15 And Rebekah took goodly raiment of her eldest son Esau, which were with her in the house, and put them upon Jacob her younger son; — goodly raiment of her eldest son Esau; evidently the clothing would be something special, sacerdotal garments or such as was peculiar to Esau: which were with her in the house; 

— for ordinary raiment, however handsome, would not have been kept in the mother’s tent, but in that of Esau or of one of his wives;

— and put them upon Jacob her younger son; that be might be took for Esau, should Isaac examine him and feel his garments, or smell them;

16 and she put the skins of the kids of the goats upon his hands and upon the smooth of his neck. — and she put the skins of the kids of the goats upon his hands; upon both his hands, and the whole of them that was bare, that he might appear to be like Esau;

17 And she gave the savory meat and the bread, which she had prepared, into the hand of her son Jacob. — and she gave the savoury meat; seasoned and dressed as might be taken for venison: and the bread which she had prepared: into the hand of her son Jacob;

18 And he came unto his father, and said, “My father.” And he said, “Here am I. Who art thou, my son?” — arise, sit and eat; it is a mistake to suppose that Isaac was a bedridden old man, for Jacob bids him arise and seat himself;

19 And Jacob said unto his father, “I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done according as thou badest me. Arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that thy soul may bless me.”

— and Jacob said unto his father, I am Esau thy firstborn; had he only said that he was his firstborn, he might have been excused from lying, because he had bought the birthright of Esau;

— how could he say, I have done as thou badest me, when he had received no command from his father: this was Jacob’s second lie; and, arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison: a third lie, when he knew it came not from the field, but from the fold;

— that thy soul may bless me; as this was the thing in view, and it was the blessing of the Abrahamic covenant he craved. The disguise, which may have upset the whole plot, succeeded in misleading Isaac; and while giving his paternal blessing, the old man was roused into a state of high satisfaction and delight.

20 And Isaac said unto his son, “How is it that thou hast found it so quickly, my son?” And he said, “Because the Lord thy God brought it to me.” — because the Lord thy God brought it to me; Jacob does not keep up his acting well here, for Isaac could not see anything providential in his success in hunting; hence may have helped to arouse Isaac’s suspicions, who immediately proceeds to examine him;

21 And Isaac said unto Jacob, “Come near, I pray thee, that I may feel thee, my son, whether thou be my very son Esau or not.” — Come near that I may feel thee; besides the answer, in a style very different from Esau’s way of thinking, Isaac was surprised at the short delay in bringing the savoury meat;

22 And Jacob went near unto Isaac his father; and he felt him and said, “The voice is Jacob’s voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau.” — but the hands are the hands of Esau; are like them, being hairy as they; or, as the Targum of Jonathan says, “the feeling of the hands is as the feeling of the hands of Esau;” they feel like them;

23 And he discerned him not, because his hands were hairy, as his brother Esau’s hands; so he blessed him. — and he discerned him not; as he could not see, and, though he had his hearing, and thought the voice was like Jacob’s, he might imagine there might be an alteration in Esau’s voice, coming in haste and weary from the fields; hence he thought it safe to trust to that;

24 And he said, “Art thou my very son Esau?” And he said, “I am.” — and he said, I am; in order to excuse Jacob from lying, that he does not say, “I am Esau” since it is an answer to Isaac’s question, with a design to deceive him; and he intended that he should understand him as he did, that he was really Esau;

25 And he said, “Bring it near to me, and I will eat of my son’s venison, that my soul may bless thee.” And he brought it near to him, and he ate; and he brought him wine, and he drank. — and he brought him wine, and he drank; and so was comfortably refreshed, and in a good temper and disposition of mind to confer the blessing;

— the Targum of Jonathan indicates all these are ordained from the foundation of the world: and now Isaac does not seem to have grasped the full meaning of the prophecy, “The older shall serve the younger:”

And he said, Draw near, and I will eat of my son’s venison, that my soul may bless thee. And he approached him, and he ate; and he had no wine; but an angel prepared it for him, from the wine which had been kept in its grapes from the days of the beginning of the world; and he gave it into Jakob’s hand, and Jakob brought it to his father, and he drank.

— or for a more modern version:

“And he said, ‘Bring it to me, and I will eat of my son’s game, so that my soul may bless you.’ So he brought it to him, and he ate; and there was no wine with him. And an angel was sent to him, and brought wine that had been stored in its grapes since the days of the creation of the world, and he placed it in Jacob’s hand. Jacob brought it to his father, and he drank.”

26 And his father Isaac said unto him, “Come near now, and kiss me, my son.” — Come near now, and kiss me, my son: this was the solemn preparation for the giving of the blessing. Isaac’s suspicions had now quite passed away; he had eaten and drunk, and the time had now come for the decision his son was to inherit the promise.

27 And he came near, and kissed him; and he smelled the smell of his raiment, and blessed him and said, “See, the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which the Lord hath blessed. — now Isaac had eaten the venison, and drank of the wine; and the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which the Lord hath blessed; and gave him the spiritual power to impart the “blessing of Abraham” to the son;

28 Therefore God give thee of the dew of heaven, and the fatness of the earth, and plenty of corn and wine. — God give thee of the dew of heaven; or he was blessed of God, and the blessed seed should spring from him, as well as his posterity should inherit the land of mild and honey;

— and the fatness of the earth, and plenty of corn and wine; the word and ordinances, which God has given to his Jacob and Israel in all ages, as he has not given to other people;

29 Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee; be lord over thy brethren, and let thy mother’s sons bow down to thee. Cursed be every one that curseth thee, and blessed be he that blesseth thee!” — let people serve thee; let peoples (‘am·mîm) serve thee;

— up to this point the blessing had been general, but now Isaac bestows the birthright, carrying with it widespread dominion, precedence over all other members of the family, and special blessedness;

— let thy mother’s son bow down to thee; one case of how and when this was fulfilled, on Genesis 25:23 refering to Esau, Jacob’s brother, serving the younger; and his mother’s sons; Jonathan says “all the sons of Esau, and kingdoms bend before thee, all the sons of Keturah;” and Jerusalem “all the sons of Ishmael:”

— the Targum of Jerusalem interprets “thy mother’s sons” inclusive of the sons of Laban, his mother’s brother, the Arabians and Syrians; which will be more fully accomplished when the kingdoms of this world shall become the kingdoms of our Lord; when the Messiah, the King of the whole earth, arrives;

30 And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarcely gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting. — and it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob; that Esau came in from his hunting;

31 And he also had made savory meat, and brought it unto his father and said unto his father, “Let my father arise and eat of his son’s venison, that thy soul may bless me.” — he also made, Esau returned just as Jacob was leaving Isaac’s presence; there would still be some considerable delay before the captured game was made into savoury meat;

32 And Isaac his father said unto him, “Who art thou?” And he said, “I am thy son, thy firstborn, Esau.” — who art thou? hearing another voice more like Esau’s than what he had heard before surprised him, and therefore in haste puts this question;

— and he said, I am thy son, thy firstborn Esau; all which was true in a sense; he was his son, and he was Esau, and he was his firstborn by nature, but not by right, for he had sold his birthright.

33 And Isaac trembled exceedingly and said, “Who? Where is he that hath taken venison and brought it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? Yea, and he shall be blessed.” — Isaac trembled very exceedingly; or “trembled with a great trembling exceedingly” he was amazed, shocked and astonished;

— being shell-shocked, perplexed and astonished to consider herein God’s overruling providences, and how strangely his purpose of giving the blessing to Esau had been disappointed;

— I have blessed him, and he shall be blessed; he might have recalled it; but now, at last, he is sensible he was in an error when he designed it for his firstborn, Esau;

34 And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, “Bless me, even me also, O my father!”

— he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, not for repentance of his former sin, in despising his birthright, but for grief at his great loss therein, because God would not suffer him to be perjured in keeping that birthright blessing which he had sold and sworn away;

— Bless me, even me also, O my father, that is, thou art my father no less than his, and therefore, as a child, I claim a share in thy blessing; one at least equal to what thou hast given Jacob, if not a greater, as being the firstborn; but one which, when compared with the blessing of Jacob, was to be regarded rather as “a modified curse,” and which is not even described as a blessing;

— but Esau despised his birthright, as if quenching the spirit, and consciously selling his birthright off for a bowl of soup. For a close parallel, see Offending the Holy Spirit, the unpardonable sin; once it is sold, it couldn’t be redeemed;

35 And he said, “Thy brother came with subtlety, and hath taken away thy blessing.” — thy brother came with subtilty, as if it was wisely and prudently managed; but the word signifies fraud and deceit;

36 And he said, “Is not he rightly named Jacob [that is, A supplanter]? For he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright, and behold, now he hath taken away my blessing.” And he said, “Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me?” — and Esau said: for he hath supplanted me these two times; to supplant another is to put his foot under the heel of another;

— he took away my birthright; which is not true, for Jacob did not take it away from him either by force or fraud, for Esau had despised and made light of his birthright, and even sold it for a bowl of pottage; for by now he should convinced that it was the design of Providence that the spiritual blessing should fall on the line of Jacob;

37 And Isaac answered and said unto Esau, “Behold, I have made him thy lord, and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; and with corn and wine have I sustained him. And what shall I do now unto thee, my son?” — behold, I have made him thy lord; the lord of his posterity, who would be subdued and become tributary to his seed;

— and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; the Edomites, who sprung from his brother Esau, who, according to this prophetic blessing, became servants to David, who was a son of Jacob’s; but that is only a microcosm of a latter-day Monroe Doctrine; for more see, “Who are the children of Esau?”

— and what shall I do now unto thee, my son? what are the leftovers for you, my sons? what can be bestowed upon thee? there is nothing left; dominion over others, even over all nations, yea, over thyself and thy posterity, and plenty of all good things, are given already to Jacob; what is there to be done for thee, or thou canst expect?

38 And Esau said unto his father, “Hast thou but one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, O my father!” And Esau lifted up his voice and wept. — hast thou but one blessing? only one son could inherit the spiritual prerogatives of the birthright, and the temporal lordship which accompanied it?

— bless me, even me also, O my father: with another blessing, with one equal to what has been given my brother: and even lower earthly blessings would avail little if Esau’s descendants were to be subject to the dominion of the other brother’s race. With some mitigation, then, of his lot Esau must now be contented with;

— and Esau lift up his voice, and wept; in order to move the affections of his father, and to prevail upon him to reverse the blessing he had bestowed on Jacob, and give it to him; but he could not bring his father to repentance, to change his mind, and revoke the blessing, and give it him, despite all his crying and tears. For a close parallel, see Offending the Holy Spirit, the unpardonable sin; once it is lost, nothing could be redeemed;

39 And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, “Behold, thy dwelling shall be from the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above. — for the blessing was a prophecy, and that not merely in the case of the posterity of Esau, but in that of Jacob also;

— since Isaac said (Genesis 27:37) he had given the posterity of Jacob the blessing of the super-abundance of corn and wine, he could not possibly promise Esau also fat fields and the dew of heaven; thus his “blessing” is actually away from it;

40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.” — by thy sword shalt thou live; by violence and rapine, in an unquiet and military posture, troubling others, and forced to defend thyself;

— and it shall come to pass, when thou shalt have the dominion; not over the Israelites, the posterity of Jacob, which the Edomites, Esau’s posterity, never had; but when they should get a greater degree of strength, power, authority, and dominion in the world; “that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck;”

41 And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, “The days of mourning for my father are at hand. Then will I slay my brother Jacob.”

— the days of mourning for my father are at hand; Esau evidently expected that his father’s death was near, and such also was Isaac’s own expectation (Genesis 27:2); but he recovered, and lived forty-four years after this;

— perhaps on this account another translation has been suggested, namely, “Days of mourning for my father are at hand: then I will slay Jacob” in fact, there ais a bidding for time; in fact millennia, when ther posterity of Jacob had gone astray with the laws of God;;

— as the Targum Jonathan says of Esau’s delayed intent of killing his brother Jacob; in fact it is a latter-day prophecy for the house for Esau against the house of Jacob:

“And upon thy sword shalt thou depend, entering at every place: yet thou shalt be supple and credulous, and be in subjection to thy brother [Jacob]; but it will be that when his sons [the modern children of Israel] become evil, and fall from keeping the commandments of the law, thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother, and will be found the killer and the heir”  Genesis 27:40-41 Jonathan (abridged)

— or for a more modern translation:

“And by your sword shall you live, you will go to every place, and wander, and you will be subject to your brother. But if his descendants abandon the commandments of the Torah, then you will break his yoke from your neck.”

“And Esau harbored hatred in his heart against Jacob his brother because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, ‘I will not do as Cain did, who killed Abel during their father’s lifetime and then their father had another son, Seth. Rather, I will wait until the days of mourning for my father have passed, and then I will kill Jacob my brother, and I will be the sole heir.'”

— a bit more on what this phase means “and will be found the killer and the heir” by delaying and waiting for Jacob’s killing, Esau hopes he would be both be the killer and the only heir. Hence Esau harboured thoughts he would not do that. Instead, he would delay the killing of Jacob until the death of Isaac, so that when Jacob is killed, Esau will become the sole heir.

42 And these words of Esau her elder son were told to Rebekah; and she sent and called Jacob her younger son, and said unto him, “Behold, thy brother Esau doth comfort himself concerning thee, purposing to kill thee. — Rebekah hearing this, advises Jacob to flee to Laban her brother, and await the abatement of his brother’s anger;

— said unto him, behold, thy brother Esau, as touching thee, doth comfort himself, purposing to kill thee; he has determined on it, and has laid a scheme for it, and comforts himself with the thought of it, that he shall be able to accomplish it, and so be the heir of the promise, and get the blessing; 

43 Now therefore my son, obey my voice; and arise, flee thou to Laban my brother in Haran, — obey my voice; and arise, flee thou to Laban my brother, to Haran; where Laban her brother, dwelt;

44 and tarry with him a few days until thy brother’s fury turn away — tarry with him one or two years; but instead of so short a time Jacob stayed there twenty years, and perhaps Rebekah never saw him anymore, being dead before he returned; after this account, no more mention is made of her;

45 until thy brother’s anger turn away from thee, and he forget that which thou hast done to him. Then I will send and fetch thee from thence. Why should I be deprived also of you both in one day?”

— and he forget that which thou hast done to him; in getting the blessing from him; being convinced that Jacob had done him no injury, and that he had no just cause of being angry with him, it being the will of God that he should have the blessing;

46 And Rebekah said to Isaac, “I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth. If Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these who are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?” — if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth; as Esau has done; this was not the thing she was afraid of; but if we use guile once, we shall be very ready to use it again.

Genesis 28

1 And Isaac called Jacob and blessed him, and charged him and said unto him, “Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan. — Isaac blessed him; that is, purposely and designedly and in faith now confirmed that blessing to him, which before he had given him unknowingly;

Arise, go to Padanaram to the house of Bethuel thy mother’s father, and take thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother. — to the house of Bethuel thy mother’s father; who though now dead in all probability, yet the house and family went by his name;

— and take thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother: who had daughters unmarried, of which no doubt Isaac and Rebekah had knowledge, a correspondence being kept up between the two families, though at a great distance.

And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude of people; — Isaac called Jacob and blessed him; he entered fully into Rebekah’s feelings, and the burden of his parting counsel to his son was to avoid a marriage alliance with any but the Mesopotamian branch of the family;

— a multitude of people; Heb., a congregation of peoples; which may all unite in one body and make one nation, as the twelve tribes descending from Jacob did; or even into numerous nations, as evidenced by today’s hardcore “liberal democracies” that championed LGBTqia’s rights and wokeism;

and give thee the blessing of Abraham to thee and to thy seed with thee, that thou mayest inherit the land wherein thou art a stranger, which God gave unto Abraham.” — and give thee the blessing of Abraham, to thee, and to thy seed with thee; which was promised to Abraham, and was entailed upon Isaac and his seed, and now upon Jacob and his seed;

— that thou mayest inherit the land wherein thou art a stranger, which God gave to Abraham; the land between the two great rivers; which was given to Abraham by promise, but not in possession;

And Isaac sent away Jacob; and he went to Padanaram unto Laban, son of Bethuel the Syrian, the brother of Rebekah, Jacob’s and Esau’s mother. — and Isaac sent away Jacob; Rebekah only counseled, Isaac commanded: and Jacob went to Padan-aram unto Laban, son of Bethel the Syrian;

When Esau saw that Isaac had blessed Jacob, and sent him away to Padanaram to take him a wife from thence, and that as he blessed him he gave him a charge, saying, “Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan,”

and that Jacob obeyed his father and his mother and had gone to Padanaram,

and Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father — and Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father; who he perceived was displeased with the daughters of Canaan, or that they were “evil in his eyes”

then went Esau unto Ishmael, and added unto the wives which he had Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael, Abraham’s son, the sister of Nebajoth, to be his wife. — and though Esau did not marry a “wife of the daughters of Canaan,” he married into a family which God had rejected; and took as a third wife Mahalath, a daughter of Ishmael;

10 And Jacob went out from Beersheba, and went toward Haran. — Jacob’s dream and vow; setting out on the way to Haran, he was overtaken by night, and slept in the field.

11 And he alighted upon a certain place, and tarried there all night, because the sun was set; and he took of the stones of that place and put them for his pillows, and lay down in that place to sleep. — he lighted upon the place; Jacob’s Dream at Bethel as it lay twelve miles north of Jerusalem, in the mountains of Ephraim, Jacob had already been at least four days on the route;

12 And he dreamed, and behold, a ladder was set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven; and behold, the angels of God were ascending and descending on it. — behold a ladder set up on the earth; this might represent the providence of God, by which there is a constant correspondence kept up between heaven and earth;

— the counsels of heaven are executed on earth, and the affairs of this earth are all known in heaven; angels are employed as ministering spirits to serve all the designs of Providence, and the wisdom of God is at the upper end of the ladder, directing all the motions of second causes to his glory;

— the Targum of Jonathan has futher insight as this:

“And he dreamed, and behold, a ladder was set upon the earth, and its top reached to the heavens.

And behold, the two angels who went to Sodom were driven from their places because they had revealed the secrets of the Lord of the world, and they were wandering until the time when Jacob left his father’s house. They accompanied him in kindness until Bethel.

And on that day, they ascended to the heavens and said, ‘Come and see Jacob, the righteous, whose image is engraved upon the throne of glory, which you have longed to see.’ Thus, the other holy angels of the Lord descended to look upon him.”

Rashi explains: ascending and descending: Ascending first and afterwards descending. The angels who escorted him in the [Holy] Land do not go outside the Land, and they ascended to heaven, and the angels of outside the Holy Land descended to escort him.[From Gen. Rabbah 68:12]

13 And behold, the Lord stood above it and said, “I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father and the God of Isaac: The land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed. — and behold, the Lord stood above it; ordering, directing, and overruling all things in Providence, for the glory of his name and the good of his people;

— the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed; meaning not that small pittance of land only on which his body then lay, and which it covered, but all the land of which it was a part, not just the land of Canaan; but even the whole land between the two great rivers, the Nile and the Euphrates;

14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west and to the east, and to the north and to the south; and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed. — and thou shalt spread abroad to the west; or “the sea” beyond the Mediterranean sea, which was west of the land of Canaan:

— and to the east, and to the north, and to the south; that is, scattered across the whole world; the meaning is, that his posterity should be numerous, and break out and spread themselves like a flood of water, and reach to the utmost bounds of the land in all directions;

15 And behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which I have spoken to thee of.” — and will bring thee again into this land; with details in Ezekiel 37 – Return of the Whole House of Israel;

16 And Jacob awaked out of his sleep, and he said, “Surely the Lord is in this place, and I knew it not.” — surely the Lord is in this place; I knew it not; he did not think or expect to meet with God in such a place, and Jacob called the place Bethel;

17 And he was afraid and said, “How fearsome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.” — and he was afraid; not with a servile but filial fear; not with a fear of the wrath and displeasure of God, but with a fear of his grace and goodness;

18 And Jacob rose up early in the morning, and took the stone that he had put for his pillows, and set it up for a pillar and poured oil upon the top of it. — and poured it upon the top of the stone, as a token of his consecration thereof to this use to be a memorial of God’s favour to him. Oil was used in sacrifices, and in the consecration of persons and places;

19 And he called the name of that place Bethel [that is, The house of God]; but the name of that city was called Luz at the first. — and he called the name of that place Bethel; the house of God, which he took this place; it was later selected by Jeroboam as one of the high places at which he set up the golden calves;

20 And Jacob vowed a vow, saying, “If God will be with me and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat and raiment to put on, — Jacob made a solemn vow on this occasion; it involves in its obligation, however, only one party, and is the spontaneous act of that party;

21 so that I come again to my father’s house in peace, then shall the Lord be my God. — so that I come again to my father’s house in peace; in safety from Esau, and all other enemies, as God promised him he should: then the Lord shall be my God; 

22 And this stone which I have set for a pillar shall be God’s house; and of all that Thou shalt give me I will surely give a tenth unto Thee.” — and this stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be God’s house; building an altar of it with some others, and sacrificing to God on it; and wherever God is worshipped, that place is his house, be it what or where it will; and Jacob did as he promised to do;

— and of all that thou shalt give me, I will surely give the tenth unto thee; for the support of his worship; for the maintenance of such that were employed in it; for the provision of sacrifice, and for the relief of the poor, or for any use or service in which God might be glorified.

Will the Real Olympic Cheats Please Stand-up?

•August 9, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Why US politicians are relentlessly picking on Chinese Olympic swimmers?

Pearls and Irritations by Alex Lo • August 8, 2024 // by Jerry Grey

Despite the excessive scrutiny and outrageous record numbers of testing, some sour grapes competitors, commentators and coaches still insinuate, with zero evidence, that Chinese swimmers at the Paris Olympics could be doping.

According to World Aquatics, the international governing body for swimming, China’s 31 swimmers in Paris have been tested an average of 21 times by various anti-doping agencies since the start of this year, compared with six times for their American rivals, according to an NBC News report.

But that’s not all. From last year, Qin Haiyang had the dubious distinction of being the world’s most tested swimmer at 46 times. Others most tested include Zhang Yufei (43 times), Li Bingjie (42), Yu Yiting (31), Liu Yaxin (29), Pan Zhanle (29) and Yang Junxuan (27). They cleared all the tests. If that’s not clean, I don’t know what is. Even Hong Kong’s Siobhan Haughey was tested 17 times.

Many of their Chinese fans have cried foul.

They may be right, but I am glad the swimmers were excessively tested. Imagine what those self-righteous – or is it racist? – Western critics would say if the Chinese swimmers were only tested with the same frequency as others. I can just see the headlines!

China’s Xu Jiayu, Qin Haiyang, Sun Jiajun, and Pan Zhanle pose with their gold medals during the awards ceremony for the men’s 4×100-meter medley relay at the Summer Olympics in Nanterre, France.

Otherwise, Pan’s training team must be doping geniuses. Having passed so many tests, he smashed his own world record in the men’s 100-metre freestyle. Some prominent people in the sport still went online to hint that he must have doped.

You just can’t win, even if you do win – when you are Chinese.

The New York Times got the row rolling in April when it claimed in an exclusive that 23 Chinese swimmers tested positive for a banned heart drug called trimetazidine (TMZ) before the last Tokyo Games. Eleven of them would compete in Paris.

In all cases from four years before, there were only trace amounts consistent with food contamination. Besides human treatment, TMZ is a type of steroid hormone that is found in lean beef and pork. After repeated testing, examinations and re-examinations of the results, the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) eventually accepted the food contamination explanation and cleared the swimmers.

Yet, the Anglo-American mainstream media keep referring to “the Chinese doping scandal” when there was never one, except the one they themselves have conjured up and now is being exploited by politicians in the US Congress.

Being exposed to contaminated food is hardly unique to the Chinese, given the sensitivity of the tests.

“Based on the number of cases, clearly there is an issue of contamination in several countries around the world,” Wada said. “Apart from China, in particular, there have been several of these cases in the United States in the past few months alone, where highly intricate contamination scenarios were accepted.”

For example, US sprinter Erriyon Knighton, who was tested positive in March, was cleared to compete in Paris. Nevertheless, the Times story started what has often been described as a diplomatic row between Wada and American authorities, not just in sports but the US Congress itself.

Will the real Olympic cheats please stand up By Jerry Grey

Talk about politicising sports!

Last month, a bipartisan bill – called “Restoring Confidence in the World Anti-Doping Agency Act of 2024” – was introduced in both the US House of Representatives and the Senate. If passed, as is likely, the Office of National Drug Control Policy – better known as the drug tsar – under the White House will have permanent authority to reduce or revoke US funding for Wada.

At about the same time, the FBI and the US Justice Department opened a criminal probe into how the Chinese swimmers had avoided sanctions. They could do that because – as part of America’s typical extraterritorial overreach – a 2020 law gives the US jurisdiction over doping matters anywhere in the world so long as the sporting events involve American athletes. And that basically means all important international sporting events.

I wonder if some hapless Chinese swimmer who happened to pass through Vancouver’s international airport might not end up being arrested for extradition to the US for having eaten a TMZ-contaminated burger.

If these are not threats and intimidation against Wada and the International Olympic Committee (IOC), it’s hard to know what they are.

The US has a long habit of targeting international authorities and undermining international law. It has blocked appointments to the appeal panel of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), thus paralysing the whole legal process.

It once sanctioned the now-former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for launching a formal investigation into alleged war crimes committed by the US military in Afghanistan and has threatened the current ICC chief prosecutor with sanctions for trying to arrest Israel’s prime minister and defence minister for war crimes and crimes against humanity as related to the country’s war in Gaza.

This is Washington’s rules-based system in action, as opposed to actual international law and norms and their systems of global multilateral agencies and authorities. America’s actions against Wada and the IOC, not to say the Chinese Olympic authorities, are par for the course.

“It’s highly incorrect that one country tries to impose jurisdiction on the anti-doping decisions to the rest of the world,” Wada president Witold Banka said in a rebuttal late last month.

In an official statement, Wada said: “The politicisation of Chinese swimming continues with this latest attempt by the media in the United States to imply wrongdoing on the part of Wada and the broader anti-doping community. As we have seen over recent months, Wada has been unfairly caught in the middle of geopolitical tensions between superpowers but has no mandate to participate in that.”

The IOC, which set up Wada, is fighting back. In an unusual move, it has added an amendment in the host city contract for the 2034 Winter Games in Salt Lake City in Utah that would allow it to terminate the deal “in cases where the supreme authority of Wada” is not respected. It also requires Utah officials to lobby for an end to the FBI and Justice Department probe.

Predictably, some US legislators have accused the IOC and Wada of blackmail. In this case though, it’s pretty clear who is really blackmailing whom. In any case, the added contractual condition will not affect the Summer Games in Los Angeles in 2028. So American sports officials, politicians and media hacks will have plenty of time and opportunities to cook up more “scandals” and make trouble for everyone, but especially the Chinese.

Genesis (25-26)

•August 7, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Looking at the Scriptures with a puff of fresh air!

Then Isaac his father answered and prophesied, saying, “Thy dwelling shall be away from the fatness of the earth; and away from the dew of heaven above; Genesis 27:39

“And by your sword shall you live, you will go to every place, and wander, and you will be subject to your brother. But when his descendants abandon the commandments of the Torah, then you will break his yoke from your neck.”

“And Esau harbored hatred in his heart against Jacob, his brother, because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, ‘I will not do as Cain did, who killed Abel during their father’s lifetime and then their father had another son, Seth. Rather, I will wait until the days of mourning for my father have passed, and then I will kill Jacob my brother, and I will be the sole heir.'” Genesis 27:41-42 Targum (Jonathan)

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and until He has performed the intent of His thought; in the latter days ye shall understand it perfectly.” Jeremiah 23:20

Genesis 25

1 Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah. — and her name was Keturah; who she was, or of what family, is not said. Abraham was 137 years of age at Sarah’s death, and lived to be 175;

— it is quite possible that, left solitary by Isaac’s marriage, he took Keturah to wife, and had by her six sons; yet Keturah is called Abraham’s concubine, or secondary wife (1Ch 1:32)

And she bore him Zimran and Jokshan and Medan, and Midian and Ishbak and Shuah. — Midian is the one son of Keturah who had a great future before him, for his race became famous traders (Genesis 37:28); Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, belonged to them (Exodus 2:15-16)

And Jokshan begot Sheba and Dedan. And the sons of Dedan were Asshurim and Letushim and Leummim. — Asshurim, and Letushim, and Leummim; these are certainly not the names of men, but of the three tribes;

And the sons of Midian: Ephah and Epher, and Hanoch and Abidah and Eldaah. All these were the children of Keturah. — they to be sons of Abraham by Keturah, when they were his actually grandchildren;

And Abraham gave all that he had unto Isaac. — And Abraham gave all that he had to Isaac; as he was bound to do, not only in justice to Sarah his first wife, but also to Rebekah, who married Isaac upon this assurance;

But unto the sons of the concubines whom Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts; and while he yet lived he sent them away from Isaac his son, eastward unto the east country. — but unto the sons of the concubines; that is, of Hagar and Keturah; migrated to “the east country,” that is, Arabia and Southern Mesopotamia;

And these are the days of the years of Abraham’s life which he lived, a hundred threescore and fifteen years. — Abraham’s years were a hundred and seventy-five; he survived Sarah thirty-eight years, and Isaac’s marriage thirty-five, and Jacob and Esau must how be fifteen years of age at this time.

Then Abraham gave up the ghost and died in a good old age, an old man and full of years, and was gathered to his people. —‘full of years’ in the original it is only, “and full” and does not seem to be a mere synonym for longevity; but appreciating all the good and unpleasantness of life, much like Job and David also had;

And his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah, in the field of Ephron the son of Zohar the Hittite, which is before Mamre, — none of the six sons of Keturah were present; and had no particular blessing bestored upon them; perhaps they were apparently already sent far away into the far end of Arabia, while Ishmael was nearer at Paran;

10 the field which Abraham purchased from the sons of Heth. There was Abraham buried, and Sarah his wife. — there was Abraham buried, and Sarah his wife; Sarah had been buried there thirty eight years before, which was the reason why his sons buried, him there;

11 And it came to pass after the death of Abraham, that God blessed his son Isaac; and Isaac dwelt by the well Lahairoi. — God blessed Isaac; for the blessing of Abraham did not die with him, but was perpetuated to his posterity, and especially to the children of the promise;

— the Targum of Jonatham adds some complexities, says:

And because Abraham had not designed to bless Ishmael, therefore he blessed not Izhak; for had he blessed Izhak and not Ishmael, it would have kept them in enmity.

But, after the death of Abraham, the Lord blessed Izhak; and Izhak dwelt near the well at which was revealed the glory of the Living and Eternal One, who seeth and is not seen.

12 Now these are the generations of Ishmael, Abraham’s son, whom Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah’s handmaid, bore unto Abraham. — Ishmael had twelve sons, whose families became distinct tribes; they populated a very large country that lay between Egypt and Assyria, called Arabia.

13 And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar and Adbeel and Mibsam, — the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth: mentioned in Isaiah 60:7; and from whence a people of the Arabs are called Nabathaeans, and their country Nabathaea; they inhabit the town and capital at Petra;

14 and Mishma and Dumah and Massa,

15 Hadar and Tema, Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah.

16 These are the sons of Ishmael, and these are their names, by their towns and by their castles, twelve princes according to their nations. — twelve princes according to their nations; these were princes, or heads of tribes, and there were twelve of them;

17 And these are the years of the life of Ishmael, a hundred and thirty and seven years; and he gave up the ghost and died, and was gathered unto his people. — then he also was gathered to his people at the age of a hundred and thirty-seven; he died in the presence of all his brethren;

18 And they dwelt from Havilah unto Shur, that is before Egypt as thou goest toward Assyria; and he died in the presence of all his brethren. — and he died in the presence of all his brethren; they being present when he died, or in peace with them, in all prosperity along with them;

19 And these are the generations of Isaac, Abraham’s son. Abraham begot Isaac.

20 And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah for a wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister of Laban the Syrian. — the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian, they were originally Chaldees, being descended from Nahor the brother of Abraham, who both were of Ur of the Chaldees; so Jacob is called a Syrian.

21 And Isaac entreated the Lord for his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord was entreated by him, and Rebekah his wife conceived. — and Isaac entreated the Lord for his wife; though God had promised to multiply his family, he prayed for it;

— the Targum of Jonathan says, that, after twenty years, Isaac took her and went with her to Mount Moriah, to the place where he was bound, and prayed that she might conceive; putting the Lord in mind of the promise he there made of the multiplication of Abraham’s seed; and Rebekah conceived; two sons at once;

22 And the children struggled together within her; and she said, “If it be so, why am I thus?” And she went to inquire of the Lord. — say the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem; and she went to inquire of the Lord; to the school of Shem the great;

23 And the Lord said unto her, “Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy body; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people, and the elder shall serve the younger.”

— the Targums of Jonathan says

“And the children struggled within her, and it was like men fighting. And she said, ‘If this is the pain of pregnancy, why do I desire children?’ So she went to the study hall of Shem the Great to seek mercy from before the Lord.”

“And the Lord said to her, ‘Two nations are in your womb, and two kingdoms will separate from your belly. One kingdom will be stronger than the other, and the elder will serve the younger if the descendants of the younger keep the commandments of the Torah.'” Genesis 25:22-23 Jonathan

24 And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb. — and when her days to be delivered were fulfilled; the nine months were up from the time of her conception; or, as the Targum of Jonathan, when the two hundred and seventy days she went with child were completed;

25 And the first came out red, all over like a hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. — red, like a hairy garment; with red hair all over his body, as if he had been already a grown man, whence he had his name, Esau, made, reared already;

— the Targum of Jonathan says,

and the first came forth wholly red, as a garment of hair: and they called his name Esau, because he was born altogether complete, with the hair of the head, and the beard, and teeth, and grinders;

26 And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold of Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob. And Isaac was threescore years old when she bore them. — and his name was called Jacob; by his parents; because he took his brother by the heel, which his name has the signification of, and Esau has respect to in Genesis 27:36,

27 And the boys grew. And Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents. — Esau a cunning hunter and equally had a tent for his abode, but Jacob stayed at home, and busied about the flocks and cattle; hence he was the mother’s darling, while Isaac preferred his more enterprising son.

28 And Isaac loved Esau, because he ate of his venison; but Rebekah loved Jacob. — because he did eat of his venison, literally, because the venison—that is, the produce of Esau’s hunting—was in his mouth; in our phrase, was to his taste—was what he liked;

— but Rebekah loved Jacob upon better grounds, both because of his more pious and meek temper, and because of the oracle and promise of God.

29 And Jacob boiled pottage; and Esau came from the field, and he was faint. — and Esau came from the field, and be was faint: for want of food, and weary with hunting, and perhaps more so, having toiled and got nothing;

30 And Esau said to Jacob, “Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage, for I am faint”; therefore was his name called Edom. — therefore was his name called Edom; besides from his red hair, but more from this red pottage; for Edom signifies red;

31 And Jacob said, “Sell me this day thy birthright.” — and Jacob said, sell me this day thy birthright; which had many privileges annexed to it; a double portion of inheritance; some say the exercise of priesthood, but that is questioned; the parental blessing;

32 And Esau said, “Behold, I am at the point of dying. And what profit shall this birthright be to me?” — Esau said, I am at the point to die; that is, I am running daily risk of my life; and of what use will the birthright be to me;

33 And Jacob said, “Swear to me this day.” And he swore unto him, and he sold his birthright unto Jacob. — and he sware unto him; that he would abide by the bargain, and never give him any trouble on that account; God himself being appealed to as a witness of it;

34 Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentils; and he ate and drank, and rose up and went his way. Thus Esau despised his birthright. — thus Esau despised his birthright; he used no means to get the bargain revoked, made no appeal to his father about it.

Genesis 26

1 And there was a famine in the land, besides the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And Isaac went unto Abimelech king of the Philistines, unto Gerar. — it is probable that Abraham was now dead; in that case, Esau and Jacob would be at least fifteen years of age when the following event occurred;

And the Lord appeared unto him, and said, “Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of. — and the Lord appeared unto Isaac, Go not down into Egypt; it being a very fruitful place, washed by the Nile; and Jonathan says it was in the heart of Isaac to go down into Egypt;

Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee and will bless thee. For unto thee and unto thy seed I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I swore unto Abraham thy father.

— and I will be with thee, and I will bless thee; with his presence; with protection from all enemies; with a supply of all the necessaries of life; and with all spiritual blessings, and with eternal life and happiness: for unto thee, and to thy seed, will I give these countries; inhabited at that time by the Philistines, Canaanites, and the several tribes of them;

And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, — I will make thy seed to multiply; here we find a renewal to Isaac of all God’s promises made to Abraham; in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;

— perhaps Abraham might suppose God spoke of his immediate seed, namely, of Isaac; but when he came upon the stage of life, he brought no such blessing with him; and when the promise was renewed to him in the very same words, it became evident that the seed which was to be this universal blessing was still to come;

because Abraham obeyed My voice, and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws.” — my voice, my charge, my commandments: this variety of expression seems to be designed to show the universality and exactness of Abraham’s obedience, that he readily complied with every intimation of the divine will;

And Isaac dwelt in Gerar. — Gerar was probably a trading town between Syria and Egypt, and therefore Isaac’s needs during the famine are here supplied;

And the men of the place asked him concerning his wife. And he said, “She is my sister”; for he feared to say, “She is my wife,” lest, said he, “the men of the place should kill me for Rebekah, because she was fair to look upon.” — we now find Isaac imitating his father’s example with even less reason for his unjustifiable conduct;

And it came to pass, when he had been there a long time, that Abimelech king of the Philistines looked out a window and saw, and behold, Isaac was frolicking with Rebekah his wife. — Abimelek observes Isaac sporting with Rebekah as only husband and wife should;

— constrains him to confess that she is his wife, charges him with the impropriety of his conduct, and commands his people to refrain from harming either of them on pain of death;

And Abimelech called Isaac and said, “Behold, of a surety she is thy wife; and how saidst thou, ‘She is my sister’?” And Isaac said unto him, “Because I said, ‘Lest I die for her.’” — lest I die for her; for her sake, that another might have and enjoy her; it was fear of losing his life that led him to take such a step, and give out that she was his sister, like his father, Abraham.

10 And Abimelech said, “What is this thou hast done unto us? One of the people might lightly have lain with thy wife, and thou shouldest have brought guiltiness upon us.”

11 And Abimelech charged all his people, saying, “He that toucheth this man or his wife shall surely be put to death.” — whoever shall go near to injure this man or his wife, shall verily be put to death.

12 Then Isaac sowed in that land, and received in the same year a hundredfold; and the Lord blessed him. — an hundredfold, that is, a hundred times as much as he sowed; the same degree of increase is repeated in Matthew 13:8;

13 And the man waxed great, and went forward, and grew until he became very great. — Isaac became increasingly great and strong, until he was very powerful and his wealth very great;

14 For he had possession of flocks and possession of herds, and great store of servants; and the Philistines envied him. — so that the Philistines envied Isaac, which makes men grieve at the good of others;

15 For all the wells which his father’s servants had dug in the days of Abraham his father, the Philistines had stopped them and filled them with earth. — and the Philistines endeavoured to do him injury by stopping up and filling with rubbish all the wells that had been dug in his father’s time;

16 And Abimelech said unto Isaac, “Go from us, for thou art much mightier than we.” — and even Abimelech requested Isaac to depart, because he was afraid of his power; his family being greatly increased, his servants numerous;

17 And Isaac departed from thence, and pitched his tent in the Valley of Gerar and dwelt there. — Isaac’s retreats from Gerar and its suburbs, and takes up his abode in the valley, or wady of Gerar.

18 And Isaac dug again the wells of water which they had dug in the days of Abraham his father, for the Philistines had stopped them after the death of Abraham; and he called their names after the names by which his father had called them.

— and Isaac digged those rather than new ones, partly to keep up his father’s memory, and partly because he had most right to them, and others less cause of quarrel with him about them.

19 And Isaac’s servants dug in the valley, and found there a well of springing water. — and found there a well of springing water; or “living water” which flows continually;

20 And the herdsmen of Gerar strove with Isaac’s herdsmen, saying, “The water is ours.” And he called the name of the well Esek [that is, Contention], because they strove with him. — and Isaac called the name of the well Esek: which signifies “contention” because they strove with him;

21 And they dug another well, and strove for that also; and he called the name of it Sitnah [that is, Hatred]. — signifies “hatred” it being out of hatred and malice to him that they gave him so much trouble;

22 And he removed from thence, and dug another well, and for that they strove not; and he called the name of it Rehoboth [that is, Room]. And he said, “For now the Lord hath made room for us, and we shall be fruitful in the land.”

— and we shall be fruitful in the land; his flocks and his herds increase, having good pasturage and watering for them, and so he and his family be in prosperous circumstances.

23 And he went up from thence to Beersheba. — and Isaac went south from thence to Beer-sheba;

— this was a very serious act on Isaac’s part as he leaves the solitudes where he had found a refuge from the enmity of the Philistines, and returns to a place scarcely five leagues distant from their city;

24 And the Lord appeared unto him the same night and said, “I am the God of Abraham thy father. Fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless thee, and multiply thy seed for My servant Abraham’s sake.” — Isaac is again and again reminded of the relation in which his father stood to God;

— fear not; any future famine, nor want of any good things, nor any enemies, the Philistines his neighbours, who had driven him from their country, and had harassed him from place to place;

— and multiply thy seed, for my servant Abraham’s sake; who was a faithful, diligent, servant of his; whose service was, not forgotten by him;

25 And he built an altar there, and called upon the name of the Lord, and pitched his tent there; and there Isaac’s servants dug a well. — and he builded an altar there; at Beersheba, where his father Abraham had planted a grove before, and very probably had built an altar also, though it might not be now standing, Genesis 21:33,

— and there Isaac’s servants digged a well; in order to find water for the family, and for the flocks and herds; and called upon the name of the Lord; and gave him thanks for all his mercies to him; for the care he had taken of him, and provision he had made for him especially during the time of famine; 

26 Then Abimelech went to him from Gerar with Ahuzzath one of his friends and Phichol the chief captain of his army. — then Abimelech went to Isaac; as there was a lapse of ninety years between the visit of Abraham and of Isaac, the Abimelech and Phichol spoken of must have been different persons’ official titles;

— then Abimelech went to him from Gerar, after Isaac was settled at Beersheba, and was still increasing in his family and substance;

27 And Isaac said unto them, “Why come ye to me, seeing ye hate me and have sent me away from you?” — wherefore come ye to me? Isaac’s return had brought matters to a crisis, and the king must now decide whether there was to be peace or war;

28 And they said, “We saw certainly that the Lord was with thee; and we said, ‘Let there be now an oath between us, even between us and thee, and let us make a covenant with thee, — Let there be now an oath; the word literally signifies a curse; each side uttered an imprecation, with the prayer that it might fall upon himself if he broke the terms of the covenant;

29 that thou wilt do us no hurt, as we have not touched thee, and as we have done unto thee nothing but good, and have sent thee away in peace. Thou art now the blessed of the Lord.’” — as we have not touched thee; not done the least injury to him, to his person, family, and substance, but suffered him to go away with nothing but good; by royal authority;

30 And he made them a feast, and they ate and drank. — and they did eat and drink; freely and in a friendly manner; for both having spoken their minds, they agreed to bury all former things oblivion, and live in peace and friendship;

31 And they rose up early in the morning and swore one to another; and Isaac sent them away, and they departed from him in peace. — and Isaac sent them away, and they departed from him in peace; he took his leave of them in a friendly manner to mutual satisfaction;

32 And it came to pass the same day, that Isaac’s servants came and told him concerning the well which they had dug, and said unto him, “We have found water.” — not only had dug a well, but they had found plenty of water, and that which was good; or otherwise it would not have been worth while to have troubled Isaac;

33 And he called it Shebah [that is, An oath]; therefore the name of the city is Beersheba [that is, The well of the oath] unto this day. — the well of the oath: it had been so called by Abraham an hundred years ago or more; but now upon this occasion it was renewed and confirmed;

34 And Esau was forty years old when he took for a wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Basemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite, — Esau, by thus inter marrying with idolaters he violated the great principle laid down by Abraham (Genesis 24:3), forfeited thereby his birthright, and, as such marriages were beyond righteousness;

35 who were a grief of mind unto Isaac and to Rebekah. — which were a grief of mind unto Isaac, and to Rebekah; although Esau partially repented, and took as a third wife a daughter of Ishmael (Genesis 28:9).

A Fresh Way of Looking at Scriptures

•August 6, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Looking at the Scriptures with a blast of fresh air!

Then Isaac his father answered and prophesied, saying, “Thy dwelling shall be away from the fatness of the earth; and away from the dew of heaven above; Genesis 27:39

And by your sword shall you live, you will go to every place, and wander, and you will be subject to your brother. But when his descendants abandon the commandments of the Torah, then you will break his yoke from your neck.” Genesis 27:40 Targum (Jonathan)

And Esau harbored hatred in his heart against Jacob, his brother, because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, “I will not do as Cain did, who killed Abel during their father’s lifetime and then their father had another son, Seth. Rather, I will wait until the days of mourning for my father have passed, and then I will kill Jacob my brother, and I will be the sole heir.” Genesis 27:41 Targum (Jonathan)

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and until He has performed the intent of His thought; in the latter days ye shall understand it perfectly.” Jeremiah 23:20

Sequence of Prophecies till the Return of the Messiah

Incorporating:

A) Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

B) The Sword and Flaming Fire from the South!

C) A Psalm 83 Prophecy

D) A Greater than the Egyptian “Exodus”

E) Ezekiel 37 – Return of the Whole House of Israel

F) Gog and Magog

G) Return of the Messiah

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and until He has performed the intent of His thought; in the latter days ye shall understand it perfectly.” Jeremiah 23:20

‘Civil War Inevitable’ Musk

•August 5, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Elon Musk Speculates Civil War ‘Inevitable’ as Violence Sweeps UK

Sputnik International • August 4, 2024 // Ground News

Angry anti-migrant protests have swept across the UK, with the latest unrest set off by the horrific stabbing of three children in Southport by the 17-year-old son of Rwandan immigrants. Manchester, Liverpool, and Birmingham have witnessed violent demonstrations, with mosques attacked, police premises ransacked, and cars and buildings set ablaze.

US billionaire Elon Musk has speculated that the UK is heading towards civil war.

Musk weighed in on the wave of violence sweeping across the country amid uncontrolled migration and soaring crime, posting on X a succinct post that read, “Civil war is inevitable.”

The Tesla CEO and owner of X made the comment under one of many videos showing scenes of unrest gripping towns and cities in Britain during the past days. The latest wave of interethnic violence was triggered by a recent tragedy in the town of Southport, where a 17-year-old teen of Rwandan origin stabbed three girls to death on July 29.

LIVERPOOL: Rioters torched the city’s new Spellow Hub library 

Police arrested dozens of people on Saturday, as projectiles and fireworks were set off, and storefronts set on fire. Footage posted on social media shows crowds chanting anti-immigrant slogans such as “stop the boats” in Liverpool, in a reference to the dinghies used by asylum seekers to cross the English Channel to the UK.

BRICS+ to establish common Parliament

•August 4, 2024 • Leave a Comment

BRICS+ develops legislators’ dialogue amid plans to establish common parliament

Kenya News July 25, 2024 // Geopolitics

The BRICS+ countries intensify cooperation at all levels of government and are currently considering projects to create a common parliament. The July summit of the highest legislative bodies of the organization’s members and their partners in the Global South demonstrated not only common views on the problems of the time, but also readiness to work together on integration.

In 2024, the BRICS+ chairmanship passed to Russia, which is one of the founders of the organization and an important driving force for its development and expansion. This was a landmark period for the member states, as it was the year when four nations with regional influence, namely; Egypt, Iran, UAE, and Ethiopia became official members of the alliance.

In addition, a number of other countries in the Global South with notable economic potential, rich natural resources and significant populations expressed their intentions to join BRICS+ in the near future or to join in as a strategic partners or observers.

The organization, which started its programmes relatively recently, is already causing impact with notable indicators, including population, GDP, military strength, and economic growth rates.

Even without taking into account new members and candidates for accession, BRICS+ has incomparably large reserves of natural resources, including such strategic materials and energy carriers as oil, gas, coal, gold, diamonds and metals. The members of the organization are keen to address own problems and attract new allies are already actively leveraging these advantages, with a goal to stop reliance on the West.

The increasing number of countries on the queue to join BRICS+, which includes states in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America, indicates the growing need to have an alternative mechanism and model to what currently prevails.

The BRICS+ Parliamentary Summit held in the Russian city of St Petersburg recently brought together top representatives of the legislative authorities of 11 countries of the Union and the states preparing to join the organization. The format and level of delegations was largely due to the huge amount of work on the implementation of joint programs that are either already underway or in the pipeline.

It is important to take into account that BRICS+, despite its relative youth, has already achieved great success in energy, logistics, industrial and humanitarian projects, and its plans to expand cooperation are unparalleled in the world.

Such large-scale projects as the construction of the North-South transport corridor, the creation of the One Belt One Road zone, the development of the Northern Sea Route and the Eurasian pipeline system require the highest level of cooperation both at the level of the executive branch of government and from national legislative bodies.

The ability within a significant group of BRICS+ countries and their partners to promptly implement such ambitious programs, to agree on the solution of many complex and controversial issues, to conclude multi-component, multilateral agreements and promptly adjusting legislation for their implementation, testifies to the high viability of the organization.

A good number of unions, blocs and alliances in the West have over the past decades been unable to agree on or implement agreed projects that could compare in scale and significance with the programs of BRICS+ members.

For example, even the construction of Rail Baltica, a high-speed railroad in the eastern part of the EU, which is not even comparable to local projects of BRICS+ members in terms of length or complexity, has been going on for 13 years, exceeding the initial estimate timeframe for completion.

Against this background, BRICS+, whose founders include China, Russia and India, is building a completely different model of cooperation, even as they reiterate that they respect the interests, rights and traditions of even the poorest states compared to West.

The fact that the organization is constantly expanding the scope of its format, developing platforms such as parliamentary cooperation or the Union of Municipalities, shows not only the great ambitions of the Union, but also the desire to support the sustainable development of dialogue with its partners at all levels. The attractiveness of such an approach to the interests of all current and potential BRICS+ members is the main reason why more nations are gravitating towards the bloc.

Genesis (23-24)

•August 3, 2024 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

~~

Genesis 23

1 And Sarah was a hundred and seven and twenty years old; these were the years of the life of Sarah. — Sarah was an hundred and seven and twenty years old; Sarah is the only woman whose age at her death is mentioned in the Bible, an honour doubtless given her as the ancestress of the Hebrew heritage.

And Sarah died in Kirjatharba (the same is Hebron) in the land of Canaan; and Abraham came to mourn for Sarah and to weep for her. — Abraham came to mourn; at this period Abraham was in quiet possession of several homes, and apparently was himself at Beersheba when Sarah died at Hebron, where probably he had left Isaac in charge of his mother and the cattle;

— the Targum of Jonathan says, “And Sarah died in Kiryath Arba, which is Hebron. And Abraham came from the mountain of worship, and found that she was dead; and he sat to mourn for Sarah, and to weep for her.”

And Abraham stood up from before his dead, and spoke unto the sons of Heth, saying, — the sons of Heth; it now appears that it was associates of the Hittites, a race who, while the Israelites sojourned in Egypt, became so powerful as to contend for empire with the Egyptians themselves;

“I am a stranger and a sojourner with you. Give me a possession for a burying place with you, that I may bury my dead out of my sight.” — sell me a possession of a buryingplace with you; not that he desired it as a free gift, but that he might be allowed to make a purchase of a piece of ground to bury his dead in;

And the children of Heth answered Abraham, saying unto him, — the children of Heth, so called from Heth the son of Canaan, Genesis 10:15, “And Canaan begot Sidon his firstborn, and Heth;”

“Hear us, my lord: Thou art a mighty prince among us; in the choicest of our sepulchers bury thy dead. None of us shall withhold from thee his sepulcher, that thou mayest bury thy dead.” — in the choice of our sepulchres; the meeting between Abraham and the Hittites is marked by the utmost courtesy on both sides;

And Abraham stood up and bowed himself to the people of the land, even to the children of Heth. — Abraham bowed himself; thus returning them thanks for their kind offer, with all proper decency and respect.

And he communed with them, saying, “If it be in your mind that I should bury my dead out of my sight, hear me, and entreat for me Ephron the son of Zohar, — hear me, and entreat for me to Ephron the son of Zohar; a principal man among the Hittites, who had a field and a cave in it;

that he may give me the cave of Machpelah which he hath, which is in the end of his field. For as much money as it is worth he shall give it to me as a possession for a burying place amongst you.” — the cave of Machpelah; seems like a double cave as the Targum of Jonathan renders it, “the double cave” consisting probably of an outer and an inner compartment;

— the Message Bible has these few verses as:

Then Abraham got up, bowed respectfully to the people of the land, the Hittites, and said, “If you’re serious about helping me give my wife a proper burial, intercede for me with Ephron son of Zohar.

“Ask him to sell me the cave of Machpelah that he owns, the one at the end of his land. Ask him to sell it to me at its full price for a burial plot, with you as witnesses.” Genesis 23:87-9 MSG

10 And Ephron dwelt among the children of Heth; and Ephron the Hittite answered Abraham in the audience of the children of Heth, even of all who went in at the gate of his city, saying, — the transaction now comes to be between Abraham and Ephron; the sons of Heth were seated in council, and Ephron among them.

11 “Nay, my lord, hear me: The field give I thee; and the cave that is therein, I give it to thee. In the presence of the sons of my people give I it to thee; bury thy dead.” — the field give I thee; not only the cave had been mentioned, but for its quiet possession the land around it as well;

12 And Abraham bowed himself down before the people of the land. — and Abraham bowed down himself before the people of the land; showing hereby great respect, and giving much honour both to them and Ephron; 

13 And he spoke unto Ephron in the audience of the people of the land, saying, “But if thou wilt give it, I pray thee, hear me. I will give thee money for the field. Take it from me, and I will bury my dead there.” — I will give thee money; Abraham was rich in silver and gold, and therefore thought it unjust to take advantage of Ephron’s generosity;

14 And Ephron answered Abraham, saying unto him,

15 “My lord, hearken unto me: The land is worth four hundred shekels of silver. What is that between me and thee? Bury therefore thy dead.”

— the Message Bible has these few verses as:

Abraham bowed respectfully before the assembled council and answered Ephron: “Please allow me—I want to pay the price of the land; take my money so that I can go ahead and bury my wife.”

Then Ephron answered Abraham, “If you insist, master. What’s four hundred silver shekels between us? Now go ahead and bury your wife.” Genesis 23:12-15

16 And Abraham hearkened unto Ephron; and Abraham weighed the silver for Ephron which he had named in the audience of the sons of Heth: four hundred shekels of silver, current money with the merchant. — Abraham weighed; current money with the merchant; shekel literally means weight, and money was not coined until long afterwards;

17 And the field of Ephron which was in Machpelah, which was before Mamre, the field and the cave which was therein, and all the trees that were in the field that were in all the borders round about, were secured

18 unto Abraham as a possession in the presence of the children of Heth, before all who went in at the gate of his city.

19 And after this, Abraham buried Sarah his wife in the cave of the field of Machpelah, before Mamre (the same is Hebron) in the land of Canaan.

20 And the field and the cave that is therein were secured unto Abraham as a possession for a burying place by the sons of Heth.

— the Message Bible has these few verses as:

That’s how Ephron’s field next to Mamre—the field, its cave, and all the trees within its borders—became Abraham’s property. The town council of Hittites witnessed the transaction.

Abraham then proceeded to bury his wife Sarah in the cave in the field of Machpelah that is next to Mamre, present-day Hebron, in the land of Canaan. The field and its cave went from the Hittites into Abraham’s possession as a burial plot. Genesis 23:17-20

Genesis 24

1 And Abraham was old and well stricken in age; and the Lord had blessed Abraham in all things. — Abraham, who was a centenarian at Isaac’s birth, would now be nearly 140; as he lived to be 175 (Genesis 25:7), he survived Isaac’s marriage thirty-five years, and lived to see Esau and Jacob nearly grown up.

And Abraham said unto his eldest servant of his house, who ruled over all that he had, “Put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh;

— Eliezer, his servant, the Targum of Jonathan named him, the senior of his house, put thy hand under my thigh; as Jacob requires that Joseph should swear to him in the same manner (Genesis 47:29), this form of oath was evidently regarded as a very solemn one;

and I will make thee swear by the Lord, the God of heaven and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell. — that thou wilt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites; these being not only idolaters, and very wicked people, the seed of the accursed Canaan; 

But thou shalt go unto my country and to my kindred, and take a wife for my son Isaac.” — my kindred, the family of Nahor, concerning the increase whereof he had received information, Genesis 22:20, which he justly preferred before the wicked Canaanites;

And the servant said unto him, “Perhaps the woman will not be willing to follow me unto this land. Must I bring thy son again unto the land from whence thou camest?” — must I needs bring thy son again unto the land from whence thou camest? that is, must I agree with the woman on these terms, and promise that Isaac shall come and dwell with her in Mesopotamia?

And Abraham said unto him, “Beware thou that thou bring not my son thither again. — it was dangerous for Isaac to go, where, though there was some knowledge of the true God, yet there was much idolatry there, lest he should be corrupted, and degenerate from the true religion.

The Lord God of heaven, who took me from my father’s house and from the land of my kindred, and who spoke unto me and who swore unto me, saying, ‘Unto thy seed will I give this land,’ He shall send His angel before thee, and thou shalt take a wife for my son from thence.

— saying, unto thy seed will I give this land; the land of Canaan; and therefore his son, in whom his seed was to be called, must not be removed from hence, and settled in another country;

And if the woman will not be willing to follow thee, then thou shalt be clear from this my oath; only bring not my son thither again.” — then thou shalt be clear from this my oath; the sense is, when he had done all he could to get the consent of the damsel to go with him and marry his master’s son; and after all she could not be prevailed upon to come with him, then he was free from his oath;

And the servant put his hand under the thigh of Abraham his master, and swore to him concerning that matter. — and the servant, Eliezer, put his hand under the thigh of Abraham his master; or being satisfied of the nature and extent of his oath, and thoroughly understanding how he was to act upon it;

10 And the servant took ten camels from the camels of his master and departed, for all the goods of his master were in his hand. And he arose and went to Mesopotamia, unto the city of Nahor. — the servant took ten camels to the city of Nahor; this was Harran (Genesis 27:43); the city of Nahor; this was the brother of Abraham;

11 And he made his camels to kneel down outside the city by a well of water at the time of the evening, even the time that women go out to draw water. — Eliezer made his camels to kneel down; probably to unload them; kneeling, however, is the posture in which they take their rest.

12 And he said, “O Lord God of my master Abraham, I pray Thee, send me good speed this day, and show kindness unto my master Abraham. — as a circumcised member of Abraham’s household, the servant also prays to Yehovah, Abraham’s God;

13 Behold, I stand here by the well of water, and the daughters of the men of the city come out to draw water. — Eliezer stand here by the well of water, wishing, hoping that something would turn out that would direct and instruct what further to do, and that would lead on to the business he came about;

— and during the evening, the daughters of the men of the city came out to draw water; which was the usual custom in those days.

14 And let it come to pass, that the damsel to whom I shall say, ‘Let down thy pitcher, I pray thee, that I may drink,’ and she shall say, ‘Drink, and I will give thy camels drink also’ — let the same be she whom Thou hast appointed for Thy servant Isaac; and thereby shall I know that Thou hast shown kindness unto my master.”

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

The servant took ten of his master’s camels and, loaded with gifts from his master, traveled to Aram Naharaim and the city of Nahor. Outside the city, he made the camels kneel at a well.

It was evening, the time when the women came to draw water. He prayed, “O God, God of my master Abraham, make things go smoothly this day; treat my master Abraham well!

As I stand here by the spring while the young women of the town come out to get water, let the girl to whom I say, ‘Lower your jug and give me a drink,’ and who answers, ‘Drink, and let me also water your camels’

—let her be the woman you have picked out for your servant Isaac. Then I’ll know that you’re working graciously behind the scenes for my master.” Genesis 24:10-14 MSG

15 And it came to pass, before he had done speaking, that behold, Rebekah came out, who was born to Bethuel son of Milcah, the wife of Nahor, Abraham’s brother, with her pitcher upon her shoulder. — the response was immediate and direct. “He had not yet done speaking,” when the answer came.

16 And the damsel was very fair to look upon, a virgin, neither had any man known her; and she went down to the well and filled her pitcher and came up. — neither had any man known her; not only was reckoned a virgin, but was really one, pure and incorrupt;

17 And the servant ran to meet her and said, “Let me, I pray thee, drink a little water from thy pitcher.” — and said, let me, I pray thee, drink a little water of thy pitcher; or taste a little of it, or suffer me to swallow a little of it;

18 And she said, “Drink, my lord”; and she hastened and let down her pitcher upon her hand, and gave him drink. — and she said, drink, my lord, signifying at once that he was welcome to drink what he would, giving him a very respectable title;

19 And when she had done giving him drink, she said, “I will draw water for thy camels also, until they have done drinking.” — she said, I will draw water for thy camels also; she proposed to go back to the well, and did, and fill her pitcher, and repeat it as often as was necessary, until the camels had enough;

20 And she hastened and emptied her pitcher into the trough, and ran again unto the well to draw water, and drew for all his camels. — and ran again to the well to draw water; and which must be repeated several times to have enough for all the camels;

21 And the man, wondering at her, held his peace to learn whether the Lord had made his journey prosperous or not. — the servant, Eliezer, was astonished at the exactness and quickness with which his prayer was being answered;

22 And it came to pass, as the camels were done drinking, that the man took a golden earring of half a shekel weight, and two bracelets for her hands of ten shekels weight of gold, — earring; really nose-ring; for in Genesis 24:47 the man places it on her nose, wrongly translated face in our version;

23 and said, “Whose daughter art thou? Tell me, I pray thee, is there room in thy father’s house for us to lodge in?” — whose daughter art thou? the reason of this question is, because by her answer to it he would know whether she was of the family related to Abraham;

24 And she said unto him, “I am the daughter of Bethuel the son of Milcah, whom she bore unto Nahor.” — which she bare unto Nahor; Abraham’s brother; so that her father was Nahor’s son, not by his concubine Reumah, but by his lawful wife Milcah.

25 She said moreover unto him, “We have both straw and provender enough, and room to lodge in.” — we have both straw and provender enough; for the camels, straw for their litter, and provender for their food, as hay, barley;

— and room to lodge in; for him and his men; this she could venture to say, and invite him to come and take up his quarters in her father’s house;

26 And the man bowed down his head, and worshiped the Lord. — Eliezer bowed his head and worshipped; the bowing of the head and of the body are here combined to indicate the aged servant’s deep thankfulness and respect for the guidance of the Lord.

27 And he said, “Blessed be the Lord God of my master Abraham, who hath not left destitute my master from His mercy and His truth. I, being on the way, the Lord led me to the house of my master’s brethren.” — blessed be the Lord God of my master; here again this servant shows a noble example in returning thanks to God, as soon as he finds that his errand is likely to succeed.

28 And the damsel ran and told those of her mother’s house these things. — and the damsel ran; having invited him to come and lodge at her father’s house, that he might not be brought in abruptly, she ran before to acquaint the family of what had passed;

29 And Rebekah had a brother, and his name was Laban; and Laban ran out unto the man by the well. — her brother Laban had responsed to her account, hurried out to the stranger at the well, but her father Bethuel absent; perhaps being old, or sick in bed (but alive, verse 50), thus not involved;

30 And it came to pass, when he saw the earring, and bracelets upon his sister’s hands, and when he heard the words of Rebekah his sister, saying, “Thus spoke the man unto me,” that he came unto the man; and behold, he stood by the camels at the well.

31 And he said, “Come in, thou blessed of the Lord. Why standest thou outside? For I have prepared the house, and room for the camels.” — being hospitable, Laban ready himself with his sister to find the man, and invite him, as a matter of course, to his father’s house.

32 And the man came into the house; and he ungirded his camels, and gave straw and provender to the camels, and water to wash his feet and the feet of the men who were with him. — and Eliezer ungirded his camels; took off their bridles, which hindered them from eating, as the Targum of Jonathan says; or loosed their girts and took off their burdens, that they might have rest;

33 And there was meat set before him to eat; but he said, “I will not eat until I have told mine errand.” And he said, “Speak on.” — aware of this feeling, Abraham’s servant will not partake of Laban’s bread and salt until he has told his request;

34 And he said, “I am Abraham’s servant. — I am Abraham’s servant, Eliezer; not Abraham himself, this undeceived Laban, if he so thought, but a servant of his;

35 And the Lord hath blessed my master greatly, and he is become great; and He hath given him flocks and herds, and silver and gold, and menservants and maidservants, and camels and asses. — and he is become great; in the world, and highly honoured and esteemed among men:

36 And Sarah my master’s wife bore a son to my master when she was old, and unto him hath he given all that he hath. — and Sarah, my master’s wife; who must be well known to this family, by name at least, being, as is generally supposed, the sister of Milcah, Nahor’s wife, and Bethuel’s mother;

37 And my master made me swear, saying, ‘Thou shalt not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, in whose land I dwell; — and my master made me swear; the servant relates the oath his master made him take, and the charge he gave him,

38 but thou shalt go unto my father’s house and to my kindred, and take a wife for my son.’ — the servant declined all attention to his own comforts till he had told his master’s mission and his errand;

39 And I said unto my master, ‘Perhaps the woman will not follow me.’

40 And he said unto me, ‘The Lord, before whom I walk, will send His angel with thee and prosper thy way; and thou shalt take a wife for my son from my kindred and from my father’s house. — Abraham’s other children by Hagar and Keturah were dismissed with portions during his life, but the main bulk of his property was conveyed to Isaac.

41 Then shalt thou be clear from this my oath when thou comest to my kindred; and if they give not thee one, thou shalt be clear from my oath.’ — the words oath and curse are often times indifferently used, because they commonly go together, and sometimes they are both expressed, as an example in Numbers:

then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman — “the Lord make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the Lord doth make thy thigh to rot and thy belly to swell. Numbers 5:21

42 And I came this day unto the well and said, ‘O Lord God of my master Abraham, if now Thou do prosper my way which I go, — and said, O Lord God of my master Abraham; being come to the well, he prayed:

43 behold, I stand by the well of water; and it shall come to pass that when the virgin cometh forth to draw water, and I say to her, “Give me, I pray thee, a little water of thy pitcher to drink,”

44 and she say to me, “Both drink thou, and I will also draw for thy camels,” let the same be the woman whom the Lord hath appointed out for my master’s son.’

45 And before I was done speaking in mine heart, behold, Rebekah came forth with her pitcher on her shoulder; and she went down unto the well and drew water. And I said unto her, ‘Let me drink, I pray thee.’ — speaking in mine heart; the idiom is far more exact and true: namely, before I had done speaking to my heart;

46 And she made haste and let down her pitcher from her shoulder, and said, ‘Drink, and I will give thy camels drink also’; so I drank, and she made the camels drink also.

47 And I asked her and said, ‘Whose daughter art thou?’ And she said, ‘The daughter of Bethuel, Nahor’s son, whom Milcah bore unto him’; and I put the earring upon her face and the bracelets upon her hands. — and she said, the daughter of Bethuel, Nahor’s son, whom Milcah bare unto him:

48 And I bowed down my head and worshiped the Lord, and blessed the Lord God of my master Abraham, who had led me in the right way to take my master’s brother’s daughter for his son. — and Eliezer, the servant, bowed down his head and worshipped the Lord;

49 And now if ye will deal kindly and truly with my master, tell me; and if not, tell me, that I may turn to the right hand or to the left.” — and if not, tell me: if you do not choose to gratify my master, and are not hearty in this matter, let me know.

50 Then Laban and Bethuel answered and said, “The thing proceedeth from the Lord; we cannot speak unto thee bad or good. — Rebekah’s father, Bethuel, is placed after the brother; is now finally in the scene; and his consent was finally given;

— but Josephus testifies differently:

Nor did she disdain to satisfy his inquiries, but told him her family. “They,” says she, “call me Rebeka; my father was Bethuel, but he is dead; and Laban is my brother; and, together with my mother, takes care of all our family affairs, and is the guardian of my virginity.” (Antiquities. l. 1. c. 16. sect. 2)

51 Behold, Rebekah is before thee; take her and go, and let her be thy master’s son’s wife, as the Lord hath spoken.” — Bethuel, the father, had confirmed giving his consent;

52 And it came to pass, when Abraham’s servant heard their words, that he worshiped the Lord, bowing himself to the earth. — and Eliezer, the servant, worshiped the Lord, bowing himself to the earth;

53 And the servant brought forth jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment, and gave them to Rebekah; he gave also to her brother and to her mother precious things. — and Eliezer brought forth more jewels of silver, and gold;

54 And they ate and drank, he and the men who were with him, and tarried all night; and they arose up in the morning, and he said, “Send me away unto my master.” — and they did eat and drink, he, Eliezer and the men that were with him, every thing being settled with respect to the affair he came about,

55 And her brother and her mother said, “Let the damsel abide with us a few days, at the least ten. After that she shall go.” — no reason was given why they ask for a delay of ten days; or more, but;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds the father died feasting, asking for delays:

But as they were talking in the evening, Bethuel had eaten of that prepared food; and in the morning they found that he was dead.

And the brother and mother said therefore, Let the damsel dwell with us the days of one year or ten months, and then she shall go.

56 And he said unto them, “Hinder me not, seeing the Lord hath prospered my way. Send me away, that I may go to my master.” — but Eliezer, the servant, resisted any more delays; knowing his master could be too anxious for any delay; and might end like Bethuel;

57 And they said, “We will call the damsel, and inquire from her mouth.” — still urging his suit for permission to depart, they proposed the matter so important for all concern; so they decided to hear that from the horses’s mouth;

58 And they called Rebekah and said unto her, “Wilt thou go with this man?” And she said, “I will go.” — her agreeing to go with the man directly, having no manner of objection on her mind, perhaps was under a divine impulse;

59 And they sent away Rebekah their sister and her nurse, and Abraham’s servant and his men. — Rebekah and her nurse, named as Deborah as appears in Genesis 35:8;

60 And they blessed Rebekah and said unto her, “Thou art our sister; be thou the mother of thousands of millions; and let thy seed possess the gate of those who hate them.”

— they, her mother, father, and brother blessed Rebekah; the meaning of this verse is, that they prayed God to make her very fruitful, and to render her posterity, the Edomites and Israelites, both victorious over their enemies;

— and let thy seed possess the gate of those who hate them; exercise dominion and authority over their enemies: the Suez and Parama canals;

61 And Rebekah arose, and her damsels, and they rode upon the camels and followed the man; and the servant took Rebekah and went his way. — and Rebekah arose, and her damsels; her maids that were given her by her parents to wait upon her, as was usual in those days and times;

62 And Isaac came from the way of the well Lahairoi; for he dwelt in the south country. — for he dwelt in the south country: at Beersheba, to which Abraham, it seems, was returned again; for that they dwelt together;

63 And Isaac went out to meditate in the field at the eventide; and he lifted up his eyes and saw, and behold, the camels were coming. — to meditate; this is a characteristic of Isaac’s retiring, contemplative mood. Abraham was the active, authoritative father; Isaac was the passive, submissive son;

64 And Rebekah lifted up her eyes, and when she saw Isaac she alighted from the camel. — she concludes at once that this must be he, and, alighting, asks if it be.

65 For she had said unto the servant, “What man is this who walketh in the field to meet us?” And the servant had said, “It is my master”; therefore she took a veil and covered herself. — on being informed by the servant that this is his young master, she puts on the veil, which covers the head;

66 And the servant told Isaac all things that he had done. — no reference was made of Abraham; where was he and what happened to him? Living elsewhere?

67 And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent; and he took Rebekah and she became his wife, and he loved her. And Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death. — Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, partly to give her possession of it, and partly to consummate the marriage. Women then had their tents apart from men.

— and flashing forward for prophetic significance in the Targum of Jonathan:

“And upon thy sword shalt thou depend, entering at every place: yet thou shalt be supple and credulous, and be in subjection to thy brother [Jacob]; but it will be that when his sons [the children of Israel] become evil, and fall from keeping the commandments of the law, thou shalt break his yoke of servitude from off thy neck….and then will I kill Jakob my brother,” Genesis 27:40-41 Jonathan

or for a more modern unabridge version:

“And by your sword shall you live, you will go to every place, and wander, and you will be subject to your brother. But if his descendants abandon the commandments of the Torah, then you will break his yoke from your neck.”

“And Esau harbored hatred in his heart against Jacob his brother because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him. And Esau said in his heart, ‘I will not do as Cain did, who killed Abel during their father’s lifetime and then their father had another son, Seth. Rather, I will wait until the days of mourning for my father have passed, and then I will kill Jacob my brother, and I will be the sole heir.'” Genesis 27:40-41 Jonathan (unabridge)

Turkey’s Erdogan threatens to invade Israel

•August 2, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The land of Gog and Magog is anciently the same with Cathaia or Scythia, that part of Tartary from whence the Turks came; Joel Richardson is of this opinion; and could this be a fulfilment of Prophecy?

POLITICO • July 29, 2024 // The Times of Israel

Turkey’s leader is threatening to send the NATO heavyweight’s troops into Israel to intervene on behalf of Palestinians in an escalation of rhetoric that raises fears of wider regional conflict.

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan told a meeting of his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) in the northeastern city of Rize on the Black Sea that Turkey “must be very strong so that Israel can’t do these ridiculous things to Palestine.”

“Just like we entered Karabakh, just like we entered Libya, we can do similar to them,” he said, referring to Turkish support for Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia last year and his country’s military intervention in Libya.

“There is no reason not to do it,” he continued. “We must be strong to take these steps.”

Throughout the war in Gaza, Erdogan has stood up for Hamas, the armed Palestinian group that controlled Gaza and attacked Israel on Oct 7, referring to it as “an organization of liberation” while harshly criticizing Israel. He has compared Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler and called him a “psychopath” and a “vampire.”

Türkiye’s President Erdogan performs Umrah in Mecca, April 29, 2024

Diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel broke down in the early months of the war, and in May, Turkey announced that it was halting all trade with Israel.

Despite Erdogan’s statements and Turkey’s policy of allowing Hamas political figures to remain in the country, Turkey has played no military role in the Gaza conflict. But support for the Palestinians and anger at Israel’s prosecution of the war in Gaza are common in Turkish society.

Israel’s foreign minister, Israel Katz, struck back at Erdogan on Sunday, accusing him on social media of following in the footsteps of Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi strongman who was executed in 2006.

Omer Celik, the spokesman for Erdogan’s political party, responded by calling Katz a “Nazi.”

On Monday, Erdogan’s communication director, Fahrettin Altun, said on social media that Turkey was a “serious and responsible state committed to peace and stability in the region.”

He did not refer to any specific Turkish plan to act against Israel.

“Anyone who is crazy enough to test our limits will get a swift and resolute response,” he said.

Offending the Holy Spirit, the unpardonable sin

•August 1, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Admittedly, the subject of Offending the Holy Spirit, the unpardonable sin, is a complex and difficult subject, hence this study is taking an unconventional approach.

First an introduction: Metaphor

A metaphor is a figure of speech that, for rhetorical effect, directly refers to one thing by mentioning another.

Merriam-Webster: a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them.

A metaphor may provide (or obscure) clarity or identify hidden similarities between two different ideas. Metaphors are usually meant to create a likeness or an analogy.

Metaphors are often compared with other types of figurative language, such as:

— antithesis: a rhetorical contrast of ideas by means of parallel arrangements of words, clauses, or sentences:

“For many are called, but few are chosen.”
“Let the evildoer still do evil, and the filthy still be filthy.”
“He who desires peace, should prepare for war.”
“If you fail to plan, then you plan to fail.”
many fragments of antitheses could be found in the Sermon on the Mount: Matthew 5:17–48

— hyperbole: excessive exaggeration to illustrate a point; often used for emphasis or effect, or sometimes, for humour. In casual speech, it functions as an intensifier: saying “the bag weighed a ton” simply means that the bag was extremely heavy:

“I have a thousand missed calls today.”
“I’m so hungry I could eat a horse!”
“I’m giving it two hundred per cent.”
“Her laughter could bring an entire building crashing.”

— allegory: a story illustrating a narrative or visual representation in which a character, place, or event can be interpreted to represent a meaning with moral or political significance:

The Tortoise and the Hare by Aesop – this story tells of a slow-and-steady tortoise in a race with an overconfident hare. When the hare in his confidence lays down to nap, the tortoise slowly passes him and wins the race.

Animal Farm by George Orwell – the story follows a farm full of tired, overworked animals as they rebel against their farmer to create a utopian community. Yet in the end, the idealism they sought to promote failed just as their tyrannical leader did.

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”

— simile: a figure of speech that directly compares two things, usually using words such as “like” and “as.” And as an example “Her face looks like a moon.” Other examples are: Strong as an ox; Fit as a fiddle; Bright as the sun; Sweating like a pig; White as snow; His heart was as cold as ice; Sleeping like a log;
Fast as lightning; Dance like no one is watching; As cool as a cucumber

“She’s as fierce as a tigress” is a simile, but “She’s a tigress when she’s angry” is a metaphor.

One of the most commonly cited examples of a metaphor in English literature comes from the “All the world’s a stage” monologue from As You Like It:

All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely players;
They have their exits and their entrances
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His Acts being seven ages. At first, the infant…
—William Shakespeare, As You Like It

This quotation expresses a metaphor because the world is not literally a stage, and most humans are not literally actors and actresses playing roles. By asserting that the world is a stage, Shakespeare uses points of comparison between the world and a stage to convey an understanding about the mechanics of the world and the behavior of the people within it.

In the ancient Psalms, one finds already vivid and poetic examples of metaphor such as, “The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold” and “The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want.” This just doesn’t make sense: if the Lord is my fortress and shepherd, we should all want him to be that way all the time.

And now we come to the “unpardonable sin”

And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. Matthew 12:32

“Verily I say unto you, all sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men and blasphemies, however they shall blaspheme; but he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation” Mark 3:28-29

Despite incorporating the term “Holy Ghost” or “Holy Spirit” with caps and so on, it isn’t a person; but is just a finger of God. At other times, the spirit of God could appear as an angel of God. And when John was having a vision before the Throne of God in heaven, the “Holy Spirit” as a person was nowhere to be seen, but John saw seven angels:

“And I saw the seven angels who stood before God, and to them were given seven trumpets.” Revelation 8:2

“And the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound.” Revelation 8:6

Elsewhere “seven angels” would appear as the seven eyes of God, which run to and fro through the whole earth:

For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua: upon one stone shall be seven eyes. Behold, I will engrave the engraving thereof,’ saith the Lord of hosts, ‘and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day. Zechariah 3:9

For who hath despised the day of small things? For they shall rejoice and shall see the plummet in the hand of Zerubbabel with those seven. They are the eyes of the Lord, which run to and fro through the whole earth.” Zechariah 4:10

And Revelation confirms that seven angels would appear as the seven eyes (or seven spirits) of God:

And I beheld, and lo, in the midst of the throne and the four living beings, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God, sent forth into all the earth. Revelation 5:6

As an inanimate substance, the spirit of God, or the finger of God, couldn’t express emotion to forgive or not to forgive a human. And since the Son and the Father are One, the Son could express the emotion of the Father; that is, both could forgive any transgression against either of them. Hence a sin against the finger of God as a person makes no sense: it has to be a metaphor.

Hence “whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him” is a metaphor. It means that it is a serious offence, with the consequence that the spirit would not be working with the person once he had given such an offence.

For example, if the spirit of God told a person that he or she needs to keep the Sabbath and he or she thwarts it by not following the voice of the spirit, then the spirit of God wouldn’t be working with the person any more.

“Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, ‘Verily My Sabbaths ye shall keep; for it is a sign between Me and you throughout your generations, that ye may know that I am the Lord who doth sanctify you.” Exodus 31:13

For the vast majority of people the Sabbath is a test: whether the person would keep God through obeying the Sabbath. What the spirit would guide us and to keep this command is that the Sabbath should be kept, Exodus 16:4. To thwart this command would be a serious offence against the spirit; and in this sense, unpardonable — a lost chance of being called and sanctified immediately.

Cain became angry when his sacrifice wasn’t accepted. He thwarted the voice of the spirit to repent, instead, he followed the spirit of jealousy and rebellion. He killed his brother, Abel, and lost the rights of being a firstborn; and his posterity, after the seventh generation, came to nothing.

Cain had committed an unpardonable sin, so to speak. It was a serious offence, so serious that even if he would repent, which could only be possible during or after the Millennium, he wouldn’t be able to recover his rights of being the firstborn, “neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”

The same is true with king Saul; he thwarted the spirit of repentance when Samuel showed him how he had sinned. Instead of repentance he found excuses for his misconduct. Consequently, his kingship was taken from him in this world, unforgiven, and in the world to come. That’s how serious it is: he would never be able to recover his lost opportunity!

Judas Iscariot, he held the bag, was greedy, and not knowing the full plan of God, was trying to force Jesus to establish the Kingdom there and then. He ended up betraying Christ by identifying him in the dark and handing him to the Romans.

Any sin against the Son of Man could be forgiven; Judas could be forgiven, resurrected during the Millennium and would be a great evangelist, but he would never be able to regain a seat as one of the original Twelve Disciples ruling the Twelve Tribes of Israel! Matthew 19:28. Matthias took his seat (Acts 1:12-26) and for Judas Iscariot, that chance was lost forever!

And now, we come to the most important point: assuming that in Matthew 12:32, the “unpardonable sin” should be taken literally—that anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven, neither in this world nor in the world to come—then we should let the Holy Spirit testify for itself. Surely, we would appreciate hearing this directly from the source. Surely we would appreciate to hear this from the horse’s mouth.

Lies… after Lies…

•July 31, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Lies… after Lies… US now ‘an empire of lies’

“Ephraim surrounds me with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit.”

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden July 27, 2024 // Bracing Views

They’re Everywhere in America

Soon after Joe Biden took office as president in 2021, I remember hearing that his VP, Kamala Harris, was put in charge of immigration, informally known as the “border czar.” Yesterday, the House passed a resolution condemning Harris for her handling of the border crisis. Yet I’ve also been hearing from Democrats and the media that Harris never was the border czar, even as there’s plenty of video evidence of networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC referring to her using that term.

Denying that Harris was the border czar is a fairly small lie immersed in much larger sea of lies, and of course it’s a bipartisan effort. Donald Trump exaggerates and lies just to stay in shape. Democrats love to attack Trump for lying even as they lie themselves. Truly, it’s hard to run a government and a country when lies confuse every issue.

Gorbachev Was Promised Non-Expansion of NATO, His Mistake Was to Believe it

Another lie being told about Kamala Harris is that her candidacy is the result of democracy in action. She’s the people’s choice! Except almost nobody voted for her as a presidential candidate. She’s been elevated and selected by the DNC and the donor class. She is a packaged product of the so-called elites within the party, the very opposite of a candidate chosen by the people. And yet I’m told this packaged product is going to “save democracy” from Trump, who was actually selected as a candidate in a more democratic process.

Of course, there are far bigger and more serious lies than whether Harris was the border czar or whether she’s the people’s choice as the savior of democracy. US troops’ deadliest enemies, I’d argue, are most often the lies told by the US government, abetted and amplified by senior officers in the military. Think here of Iraq and Afghanistan, or go back further to Vietnam.

Daniel Ellsberg, truth-teller about the Vietnam War and many other things

Knowing (or sensing/feeling) you killed for lies, or knowing your friends died for lies, is surely a contributing cause to a rash of suicides in the US military today. The sacrifices and horrors of war may be eased by a “just” war, like World War II, but they are aggravated by unjust wars.  And they are further aggravated when you try to get help through the VA only to be turned away or stonewalled.

All this is prologue to a note I received from a regular reader of Bracing Views about lies in America. I’ve decided to retain the profanity because it’s more than appropriate:

I don’t know about you, but I find it quite amazing that, despite decades of bold-faced lying about US wars, all of it proven and even reported in the NYT and other mainstream media, the narrative of the each subsequent war is always accepted as true, until it too is exposed as being nothing but lies.

Let’s look at the recent record:

1) Vietnam–exposed as nothing but lies by the Pentagon Papers.

2) Iraq–exposed as lies when the infamous WMD were never found and there was nothing found to back up the claim of links to Al Qaeda.

3) Afghanistan–exposed as pure fiction as revealed by the Washington Post “Afghanistan Papers” which said that “senior US officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.”

Add to the above list the fact that the Mueller report investigating the Russiagate hoax came up with nothing, ZERO.

Currently, there are a couple of new false narratives duly reported by the mainstream media and, for the most part, swallowed by most people. First is the false narrative about the US war in Ukraine, that NATO expansion has nothing to do with it but rather was caused by naked Russian aggression and Putin’s plans to re-create the Soviet Union and take over the rest of Eastern Europe. Second, the false narrative that Israel is just defending itself against Palestinian terrorism rather than committing grotesque war crimes, completely ignoring the fact that the Israelis have been keeping the Palestinians under illegal occupation for over 50 years, since June 1967. 

Lie after lie after lie after lie. And yet none of it matters. It is all sent down the memory hole as if it never happened. And then it is on to the next war, when the official narrative spewed out by the DC blob will once again be swallowed hook, line and sinker. It appears to be never ending. No matter how much lying is exposed, it simply does not matter.

I think it is pretty fucking amazing. What will it take to get people to come out of their coma and realize what the fuck is going on?

And keep in mind…..it has nothing to do with party affiliation. The lying is endemic, it’s in the DNA of the National Security State. Presidents come and go, but the lying for war-making never stops. And no one is ever held accountable either. 

It’s pretty fucking impressive, when you think about it.

Keep this is in mind……one would think that, after this abhorrent track record, the appropriate response would be to assume that the narrative justifying the new war of the moment was not true and nothing but more of the same lying. But that NEVER happens. NEVER.

How is that possible? Is it just a serious form of denial? Is it due to mental illness? Is it just some perverted form of patriotism? In what other realm is it possible to lie non-stop and never be held accountable? Even worse, to continue to have credibility despite a track record of pathological lying? 

A friend of mine pointed out that, in the old USSR, people knew that the official news on their TV every night was nothing but lies. 

So, this begs the question: Which system is more pernicious and has more effectively brainwashed its people? The one where people are controlled but they are aware that they are being fed nothing but lies, or the one that is constantly lied to but the people still believe they are being told the truth?

To those keen insights, I made this reply:

Our [American] system of lying is better! We have state/corporate media too, it’s just more subtle and advertised as “free.” We have our own “Pravda” except it rarely tells the truth, unless that “truth” is in the interests of the powerful.

To which our BV keen reader replied:

Exactly. But to suggest that we have our own version of “Pravda,” only worse because it has the cover of supposedly being “free,” is tantamount to treason, you realize.

This is the reason why Julian Assange/Wikileaks was such a threat…for actually challenging the right of the National Security State to lie non-stop about its war making and never be exposed for its lying or held accountable.

Of course, that is exactly why Assange was locked away in prison for so long and tortured, not because he was spreading lies but because he was revealing truths.

And we can’t have that in America!

Genesis (21-22)

•July 30, 2024 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

Today’s Golden Calf: the 2024 Paris Olympics has gone full Woke dystopian with transgend*r mockery of the Last Supper, the Golden Calf idol,
and even the Pale Horse from the prophetic Book of Revelation; for France

Genesis 21

~~~~

The Holy Land: Judea and Samaria

And the Lord visited Sarah as He had said, and the Lord did unto Sarah as He had spoken. — and the Lord visited Sarah as he had said; to Abraham, Genesis 17:16; in a way of graciousness and kindness, by fulfilling his promise, giving strength to conceive and bear a child;

For Sarah conceived and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the set time of which God had spoken to him. — and bare Abraham a son in his old age; which circumstance is remarkable, that the favour might appear the greater, and the more wonderful;

— at the set time of which God had spoken to him, Genesis 17:21; God was not only faithful in fulfilling his promise, but in keeping the exact time of it.

And Abraham called the name of his son who was born unto him, whom Sarah bore to him, Isaac. — Isaac; this name not only recorded the fact of the laughter of the father (Genesis 17:17) and of the mother (Genesis 18:12),

— but was a standing memorial that Isaac’s birth was contrary to nature, and one of which the promise was provocative of ridicule in the sight even of his parents; who was born according to the promise, at the set time of which God had spoken;

And Abraham circumcised his son Isaac, being eight days old, as God had commanded him. — he circumcised his son; the covenant being established with him, the seal of the covenant, according to God’s command, was administered to him.

And Abraham was a hundred years old when his son Isaac was born unto him. — and Abraham was an hundred years old when son Isaac was born unto him; so that this was years after his departure from Haran, and coming into the land of Canaan, for then he was seventy five years of age;

And Sarah said, “God hath made me laugh, so that all who hear will laugh with me.” — Sarah said, God has made me to laugh; not through diffidence and irreverence, as my own distrustful heart before made me to laugh; but through excess of holy joy. He hath given me both cause and a heart to rejoice.

And she said, “Who would have said unto Abraham that Sarah should have given children suck? For I have borne him a son in his old age.” — Sarah will nurse children; children, though she had but one child, either by a usual enallage of the plural number for the singular, whereby the word sons or daughters is used when there was but one;

— for she shall bring forth a son in her old age! that she who was ninety years of age should bear a child, and suckle it, as she did; and in doing she set an example to her daughters to do likewise, since neither age nor grandeur, were any objection to this duty of nature;

And the child grew, and was weaned; and Abraham made a great feast the same day that Isaac was weaned. — the child grew, and was weaned; according to tradition, Isaac was two years old when weaned.

And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne unto Abraham, mocking. — mocking; the verb used here is the same as that rendered to laugh in Genesis 21:6, but in an intensive conjugation.

10 Therefore she said unto Abraham, “Cast out this bondwoman and her son; for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac.” — for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac; which he would seem to be, if continued, and would think himself so, and there would be continual bickerings about it;

11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham’s sight because of his son. — the issue was very grievous in Abraham’s sight, the matter was evil exceedingly in Abraham’s eyes;

12 And God said unto Abraham, “Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman. In all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called. — let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of the bondwoman:

— that is, let not the motion displease thee, which Sarah has made, to turn out the bondwoman and her son; do not look upon the new situation as an ill thing, or as an hard thing; it is but what is right and proper to be done, and leave the bondwoman and her son to me; I will take care of them, be under no concern for them and their welfare;

13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed.” — the son of the bondwoman; the handmaid; Hagar is never acknowledged as Abraham’s wife, though her child, as Abraham’s son, receives a noble promise for the father’s sake.

14 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread and a bottle of water; and he gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away. And she departed and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba.

— and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder; that is, the bread and the water, which might be put in one parcel or bundle, or in a basket, and so laid and carried on her shoulder: the Targum of Jonathan adds, “and bound it to her loins, to show that she was an handmaid and dismissed her with a letter of divorce:”

15 And the water in the bottle was spent, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. — and the water was spent in the bottle; it was all drank up by them, having wandered about some time in a wilderness, where they could not replenish their bottle;

16 And she went and sat down apart from him a good way off, as it were, a bowshot; for she said, “Let me not see the death of the child.” And she sat opposite him, and lifted up her voice and wept. — Hagar, in distress said, Let me not see the death of the child; she could not bear to hear his dying groans, and see him in his dying agonies;

17 And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven and said unto her, “What aileth thee, Hagar? Fear not, for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is. — God had heard the voice of the lad: Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thy hand;

18 Arise; lift up the lad and hold him in thine hand, for I will make him a great nation.” — Hagar is assured that he would recover and live, and become a man and the father of children, who in time would become a great nation;

19 And God opened her eyes and she saw a well of water; and she went and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink. — God opened her eyes: he regarded her and directed her to a fountain close beside her, probably hidden amid brushwood, by the waters of which her almost expiring son was revived.

20 And God was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. — God was with the lad; He grew an archer, or multiplied into a tribe of archers.

21 And he dwelt in the Wilderness of Paran, and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt. — a wife out of the land of Egypt; in Paran; that is, Arabia, where his posterity has ever dwelt;

— so the Arabians that live in the deserts and round about them, called Nabathees, from Nabaioth, another son of Ishmael; however natural this might be on Hagar’s part, it would nevertheless strengthen the heathen element in Ishmael and his descendants:

— Abraham’s posterity could be broken into four major groups: (1) Ismael: Arabs: Islam; (2) Esau: Catholics; (3) 10 Northern Tribes: Protestants; (4) Southern Tribes: Judaism

22 And it came to pass at that time that Abimelech and Phichol, the chief captain of his host, spoke unto Abraham, saying, “God is with thee in all that thou doest. — that Abimelech and Phichol, the chief captain of his host, spake unto Abraham; Abimelech was king of Gerar, the same that is spoken of in the preceding chapter, and Phichol was the general of his army; these two great personages came together and paid Abraham a visit;

23 Now therefore swear unto me here by God that thou wilt not deal falsely with me, nor with my son, nor with my son’s son; but according to the kindness that I have done unto thee, thou shalt do unto me and to the land wherein thou hast sojourned.” — Abimelek, accompanied by Phikol, his commander-in-chief, proposes to form a league with Abraham;

— that thou wilt not deal falsely with me, nor with my son, nor with my son’s son; perhaps he had heard that God had promised to give the whole land of Canaan to him and his posterity, and among the rest his kingdom, which was a part of it;

— and, seeing him grow great and powerful, he could not tell how soon it might be ere he was put in the possession of it, whether in his own time, or his son’s, or his grandson’s; and therefore desires Abraham that he would swear to do no hurt to them whenever it should be; and that they might not be driven out, but sojourn in it as he had done.

24 And Abraham said, “I will swear.” — and Abraham said, I will swear; grateful of the many favours he had received from Abimelech in times past, he very readily agreed to his proposal;

— that it would be over four hundred years before his posterity should be put into the possession of the land of Canaan; and therefore could take an oath that neither he, nor his son, nor his grandson, should be injured or dispossessed.

25 And Abraham reproved Abimelech because of a well of water which Abimelech’s servants had violently taken away. — which Abimelech’s servants had violently taken away: that is, had by force taken the use of it to themselves for their cattle, and had deprived Abraham of it;

26 And Abimelech said, “I know not who hath done this thing; neither didst thou tell me, neither yet heard I of it until today.” — neither yet heard of it but today: he had not heard of it from others, as the Targum of Jonathan rightly adds, by way of explanation, but that very day, and not till the moment he had it from Abraham himself;

27 And Abraham took sheep and oxen and gave them unto Abimelech, and both of them made a covenant. — and Abraham took sheep and oxen, and gave them unto Abimelech; in gratitude for former favours he had received from him, in token of the friendship that subsisted between them;

28 And Abraham set seven ewe lambs of the flock by themselves. — in the seven ewe-lambs which Abraham tenders, and Abimelek, in token of consent, accepts at his hand.

29 And Abimelech said unto Abraham, “What mean these seven ewe lambs, which thou hast set by themselves?” — what mean these seven ewe lambs which thou hast set by themselves? he understood what the sheep and oxen were for, that they were presents to him,

— at least some of them, and the rest were for the solemnizing and ratifying the covenant between them; but what these were for he could not devise.

30 And he said, “These seven ewe lambs shalt thou take from my hand, that they may be a witness unto me that I have dug this well.” — and he said; that is, Abraham replied to Abimelech:

— that they may be a witness to me that I have digged this well: these were to be a testimony that the well that had been taken away from Abraham was one that he had dug, and was his property, and which Abimelech acknowledged by his acceptance of these seven lambs; and his title to the well, which these were a witness of.

31 Therefore he called that place Beersheba [that is, The well of the oath], because there they swore, both of them. — the Targum of Jonathan says, “and therefore he called the well the well of seven lambs;” “Beer” signifying a well, and “sheba” seven; being expressed, because there they sware both of them; by the living God, to keep the covenant inviolably they had made between them;

32 Thus they made a covenant at Beersheba. Then Abimelech rose up, and Phichol the chief captain of his host, and they returned into the land of the Philistines. — and they returned into the land of the Philistines; from Beersheba, which was in the extreme border of it, unto Gerar, which was the capital city.

33 And Abraham planted a grove in Beersheba, and called there on the name of the Lord, the Everlasting God. — what sort of trees this grove consisted of cannot with certainty be said, nut probably the oak.

34 And Abraham sojourned in the Philistines’ land many days. — and Abraham sojourned in the Philistines’ land many days; even many years, days being often times put for years.

Genesis 22

And it came to pass after these things, that God tested Abraham and said unto him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Behold, here I am.” — and he said, behold, here I am; signifying that he heard his voice, and was ready to obey his commands, be whatever they would be;

— and the Targum of Jerusalem says this was Abraham’s tenth trial “these things that the Lord tried Abraham with the tenth trial”

and the Maimonides lists them as follows:

  1. G‑d tells him to leave his homeland to be a stranger in the land of Canaan
  2. Immediately after his arrival in the Promised Land, he encounters a famine
  3. The Egyptians seize his beloved wife, Sarah, and bring her to Pharaoh
  4. Abraham faces incredible odds in the battle of the four and five kings
  5. He marries Hagar after not being able to have children with Sarah
  6. G‑d tells him to circumcise himself at an advanced age
  7. The king of Gerar captures Sarah, intending to take her for himself
  8. G‑d tells him to send Hagar away after having a child with her
  9. His son, Ishmael, becomes estranged
  10. G‑d tells him to sacrifice his dear son Isaac upon an altar

— the Targum of Jonathan says Isaac was 36 years of age, same as Chabad’s reckoning, but Josephus (Antiqu. l. 1. c. 13. sect. 2) says he was 25 years of age;

— besides, the Targum of Jonathan adds much details of the rivary between Isaac and Ishmael, which would be prophetic on the claimacy of being the firstborn:

And it was after these things that Izhak and Ishmael contended; and Ishmael said, It is right that I should inherit what is the father’s because I am his firstborn son.

And Izhak said, It is right that I should inherit what is the father’s, because I am the son of Sarah his wife, and thou art the son of Hagar the handmaid of my mother.

Ishmael answered and said, I am more righteous than thou, because I was circumcised at thirteen years; and if it had been my will to hinder, they should not have delivered me to be circumcised; but thou wast circumcised a child eight days; if thou hadst had knowledge, perhaps they could not have delivered thee to be circumcised.

Izhak responded and said, Behold now, today I am thirty and six years old; and if the Holy One, blessed be He, were to require all my members, I would not delay.

These words were heard before the Lord of the world, and the Word of the Lord at once tried Abraham, and said to him, Abraham! And he said, Behold me.

And He said, “Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah, and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.” — thine only son Isaac; the words in the original are emphatic: “Take, I pray, thy son, thine only son, whom thou lovest, even Isaac.”

And Abraham rose up early in the morning and saddled his ass, and took two of his young men with him and Isaac his son; and he cleaved the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up and went unto the place of which God had told him. — and saddled his ass; for his journey, not to carry the wood and provision on, which probably were carried by his servants, but to ride on;

— and Isaac his son: who was the principal person to be taken, since he was to be the sacrifice: whether Abraham acquainted Sarah with the affairs and she consented to it, cannot be said with certainty;

Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off. — afar off; the summit called the Mountain of the House, usually identified with Mount Moriah, cannot be seen by a traveller from Beer-sheba at a greater distance than three miles; but Mount Moriah being forty miles from Beersheba;

And Abraham said unto his young men, “Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.” — I and the lad will come again to you; for he knew that God both could and would for his promise sake, either preserve Isaac from being sacrificed, or afterward raise him from the dead;

And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand and a knife, and they went both of them together. — and he took the fire in his hand, and a knife; a vessel in one hand, in which fire was to kindle the wood, and a knife in the other hand to slay the sacrifice;

And Isaac spoke unto Abraham his father and said, “My father!” And he said, “Here am I, my son.” And he said, “Behold the fire and the wood; but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?” — “Here am I, my son?” is a little formal as a rendering. It is equivalent to a father’s reply: “Well, boy, what is it?”

— and he said, Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering; a great hint that the sacrificial system did not originate with Moses. Genesis 22:7; and will be there again during the Millennium: Ezekiel 40-48

And Abraham said, “My son, God will provide Himself a lamb for a burnt offering.” So they went both of them together. — God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering; in which answer Abraham may have reference to the Messiah, the Lamb of God, John 1:29, whom he had provided in covenant before the world was; and who in promise, and type, was slain from the foundation of the world, Revelation 13:8

And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son and laid him on the altar upon the wood. — to the place which God had told him of; that is, Mount Moriah; this is the place where, later, David and Solomon built an altar in the threshing floor;

10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son. — and Abraham stretched forth his hand; all things being ready for execution, the altar built, the wood laid on it, the sacrifice bound and laid on that, nothing remained but to cut the throat of the sacrifice;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds further details:

And Abraham stretched out his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

And Izhak answered and said to his father, Bind me properly (aright), lest I tremble from the affliction of my soul, and be cast into the pit of destruction, and there be found profaneness in thy offering.

(Now) the eyes of Abraham looked on the eyes of Izhak; but the eyes of Izhak looked towards the angels on high, (and) Izhak beheld them, but Abraham saw them not.

And the angels answered on high, Come, behold how these solitary ones who are in the world kill the one the other; he who slayeth delays not; he who is to be slain reacheth forth his neck.

11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here am I.” — and the Angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven; most likely not an ordinary angel, but the Son of God, for that this was a divine Person is clear from his swearing by himself, and renewing the promise unto Abraham;

12 And He said, “Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him; for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son, from Me.” — and he said, lay not thine hand upon the lad; which he was just going to stretch out, with his knife in it, to slay him; and though the Lord had bid him take his son, and offer him for a burnt offering, to try his faith;

— the Lord will provide; probably alluding to what Abraham had said, God will provide himself a lamb. The Lord will always have his eye upon his people, in their straits and distresses, that he may give them seasonable help;

13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes and looked; and behold, behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns. And Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. — and looked, and, behold, a ram caught in a thicket by his horns; where Abraham was, behind him and he saw it;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds details which Christians could readily infer the ram foreordained before “the foundation of the world” as the Son, who would also later be ordained as the Messiah:

And Abraham lifted up his eyes and saw, and, behold, a certain ram which had been created between the evenings of the foundation of the world, was held in the entanglement of a tree by his horns. And Abraham went and took him, and offered him an offering instead of his son. Genesis 22:13 Jonathan

14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh [that is, The Lord will provide]; as it is said to this day, “In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.” — God will provide himself a lamb; this was purely the Lord’s doing: where reference was made to the promised Messiah;

15 And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time — the angel having restrained him from slaying his son, and having provided another sacrifice, calls him again;

16 and said, “By Myself have I sworn, saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son, — by myself have I sworn; is a great oath, and abides for ever; for because he could swear by no greater, he swore by himself, his own nature, perfections, and life;

17 in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven and as the sand which is upon the seashore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies.

— and this seed is also promised the possession of the gate of its enemies, that is, the conquest of the enemy and the capture of his cities (cf Genesis 24:60: “and let thy seed possess the gate of those who hate them”)

18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, because thou hast obeyed My voice.” — and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore;

— both his natural seed, descending from him in the line of Isaac, and his spiritual seed, all the nations of the earth be blessed, both among Jews and Gentiles;

19 So Abraham returned unto his young men, and they rose up and went together to Beersheba; and Abraham dwelt at Beersheba. — Beersheba being south of both Hebron and Jerusalem.

20 And it came to pass after these things, that it was told Abraham, saying, “Behold Milcah, she hath also borne children unto thy brother Nahor: — saying, behold Milcah, she hath also borne children unto thy brother Nahor;

— as Sarah, supposed to be the same with Iscah, a daughter of Haran, had borne a son to him; so Milcah, another daughter of Harsh, had borne children to his brother Nahor, whom he had left in Ur of the Chaldees, when he departed from thence, and who afterwards came and dwelt in Haran of Mesopotamia;

21 Huz his firstborn, and Buz his brother, and Kemuel the father of Aram, — Huz his (Nahor) firstborn, and Buz his brother; the first of these gave name to the land of Uz, where Job dwelt, and some speculate could be a descendant or related to Job;

22 and Chesed and Hazo, and Pildash and Jidlaph and Bethuel.” — all the names of Nahor’s eight children; and Bethuel became the father of Rebekah and Laban,

23 And Bethuel begot Rebekah. These eight Milcah bore to Nahor, Abraham’s brother.

24 And his concubine, whose name was Reumah, she bore also Tebah and Gaham, and Thahash and Maachah.

NATO States Are Embracing Conscription

•July 29, 2024 • Leave a Comment

These NATO States Are Embracing Conscription, Eyeing Future War With Russia

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden July 25, 2024

As NATO escalates its proxy war in Ukraine and inches closer to fighting directly with Russia, the Washington-led bloc is embracing mandatory military serviceMany European members of NATO have expanded or reintroduced conscription as part of large-scale preparations for such a war, CNN reports. Already outpaced in terms of military industrial capacity by Russia, the alliance’s new battleplans will see an attempt to beef up weapons production and form 35-50 brigades of 3,000-7,000 battle ready troops.

Outgoing NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has insisted, “Today, we have 500,000 troops on high readiness, combat-ready battlegroups in the eastern part of the Alliance for the first time.” But the bloc is struggling to meet its goals of assembling 300,000 soldiers prepared to be activated within a month and another half a million in six months. There is also a question of whether the bloc can filed a military fit for a protracted war akin to the Ukraine conflict.

Following the end of the Cold War, several European states ceased conscripting their citizens. Although increasing numbers of NATO member countries have resorted to the draconian practice during recent years, especially in the Baltics and Scandinavia. Roughly a third of the NATO alliance practices some form of compulsory military service.

This year, for the first time since it was abolished in 2006, Latvia reimplemented its draft. Male citizens are subject to conscription within a year of turning 18 years old. Additionally, Norway has unveiled a long-term plan to increase its ranks of mandatorily conscripted troops, employees, and reservists by 20,000 as well as double the military budget. In 2015, Oslo became the first NATO government to establish a gender-neutral draft.

Lithuania brought back mandatory military service in 2015, each year drafting 3,500 to 4,000 men between the ages of 18-26 for a nine-month period. Although the Finnish Defense Forces employ only 13,000 people during peacetime, Helsinki claims it has the ability to activate over 900,000 reservists with 280,000 combat-ready troops. Sweden conscripts both men and women, Stockholm drafted 7,000 its citizens and the military expects to conscript 8,000 next year. The Swedes have had conscription since 1901.

Citing the supposed Russian threat to Europe, Robert Hamilton, the head of Eurasia Research at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, said “It is tragically true that here we are, in 2024, and we are grappling with the questions of how to mobilize millions of people to be thrown into a meatgrinder of a war potentially.” For 30 years, Hamiliton served as a US Army officer. “Meatgrinder” is a term often used by frontline troops in Ukraine, particularly during the battle of Bakhmut where the average life span of such a soldier was only a few hours.

In the United Kingdom, conscription is currently being pushed by Conservative MPs. The 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, the annual military spending bill, may include provisions which inter alia will seek to automatically register all eligible men and women for Selective Service, a form of conscripted labor, which could inevitably include military service.

Former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe General Wesley Clark echoed Hamilton’s hawkish sentiments, emphasizing “whether this is a new Cold War or an emerging hot war is unclear.” He added that NATO “must rebuild our defenses,” including with mandatory military drafts.

“I think young people in Europe and the US will come to realize that this generation, like the generation that fought WWII, it didn’t ask to be the ‘Greatest Generation’ but the circumstances thrust that burden on them,” Clark added.

Norwegian Army participate in a military exercise called “Cold Response 2022”

The risk of direct war with Russia is growing by the day amidst the Ukraine proxy war, as the alliance has largely approved NATO missiles to be used for attacks against the Russian mainland. The bloc will soon provide Kiev with F-16s and an explicit green light for the warplanes to carry out direct strikes against Russian territory as well. Without irony, Stoltenberg claimed this should not be viewed by Russia as an escalation.

As NATO considers increasing its nuclear weapons deployments, the US is also planning to deploy previously banned, medium-range, nuclear capable missiles in Germany which has caused Russia to hint it could similarly retaliate. Pointing to the massive US-led buildup for war with China, President Vladimir Putin accused NATO of creating major security threats for Russia in Asia.

NATO set its sights on China four years ago, identifying Beijing as a military threat to European security. China maintains a “no limits” partnership with Russia. “NATO is already ‘moving’ there (to Asia) as if to a permanent place of residence. This, of course, creates a threat to all countries in the region, including the Russian Federation. We are obliged to respond to this and will do it,” Putin vowed earlier this year. That same month, Stoltenberg cited China as a reason the bloc is considering an “adaptation” of its nuclear arsenal.

China’s anti-satellite-killing lasers

•July 28, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Chinese subs may soon sport satellite-killing lasers

PLA scientists suggest submarines equipped with solid-state lasers could target SpaceX and other adversary satellites in a war scenario

AsiaTimes by Gabriel Honrada July 22, 2024 // SCMP

Chinese scientists have proposed developing laser-equipped submarines to kill satellites stealthily from underwater, potentially revolutionizing anti-satellite (ASAT) warfare.

The South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that People’s Liberation Army (PLA) scientists, led by Professor Wang Dan of the Naval Submarine Academy, have suggested that Chinese submarines could be equipped with megawatt-class, solid-state laser weapons capable of targeting satellites such as SpaceX’s extensive Starlink network while remaining submerged.

The report says this approach addresses the challenge of concealing ASAT operations, which rely on ground-to-air missiles that can easily betray the launch site’s location.

It mentions that the proposed laser attack submarines could use a retractable optoelectronic mast to fire at satellites and then dive back to depth, enhancing the element of surprise and operational security.

SCMP says the study highlights the inefficiency of using missiles against small, numerous and densely packed satellites like those in the Starlink program and advocates for the mass production of laser-equipped submarines to counter military threats.

It notes that the PLA scientists’ paper provides a detailed guide for attacking Starlink-like satellites, emphasizing the need for satellite position guidance from other forces due to the limitations of the submarine’s detection equipment.

In addition to ASAT operations, the report says laser-equipped submarines could perform various tasks, including attacking anti-submarine aircraft, escorting merchant ships and striking land-based targets.

Nuclear attack submarines (SSN) may be ideal platforms for mounting laser weapons, with their nuclear reactors providing enough power for an energy-intensive weapon while giving the stealth advantage of submarines.

In a June 2024 article for the US Naval Institute (USNI), Liam Nawara says that SSNs have the potential to retain unhindered freedom of maneuver under persistent space-based intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), possibly making them potent ASAT platforms.

Nawara mentions that as the cost-to-launch into low-Earth orbit (LEO) decreases, satellite constellations will support more persistent ISR, impacting maritime conflicts.

Submarines could hold the key in China’s defence against enemy satellites, including the enormous Starlink network

He says that SSNs, such as the US Navy’s Virginia class, are an example of a platform capable of attacking adversary surveillance satellites with directed-energy weapons such as lasers and high-powered microwave systems.

Nawara underscores the importance of submarines’ stealth capabilities in an era where surface ships and land forces struggle for localized superiority due to the omnipresence of space-based ISR.

He envisions a future operational environment where submarines equipped with ASAT-directed-energy weapons play a crucial role in achieving localized ISR superiority and supporting joint force operations.

Further, H I Sutton writes in a February 2020 Forbes article that a laser-armed ASAT submarine will only have to reveal itself briefly to eliminate the threat and that lasers are complicated to defend against since they travel at the speed of light.

Sutton mentions that besides killing satellites, submarine-mounted lasers could be effective against swarming unmanned surface vehicles (USV), promising negligible costs per shot, unlike gun and missile-based systems. He adds that laser weapons could be effective against fast attack craft or other manned targets that are not worth a torpedo.

He also says submarine-mounted lasers could strike coastal targets such as submarine piers or communications masts. However, he mentions that the caveat is that the target must be of sufficiently high value to justify the risk of placing the submarine so close to a hostile shore.

However, submarine-mounted lasers may also have significant drawbacks, which may be inferred from developing submarine-launched surface-to-air missiles (SLAMs), a similar mast-mounted weapons system.

Tyler Rogoway mentions in a July 2020 article for The War Zone that mast-mounted submarine weapons systems such as SLAMs and possibly lasers may only be useful as a last line of defense for submarines that have been detected and face destruction from an aerial or space-based threat.

Rogoway says that SLAMs or submarine-mounted lasers would require the submarine to be dangerously close to the surface to take a shot, leaving the submarine vulnerable to attack.

However, he says that using SLAMs or submarine-mounted lasers could allow for plausible deniability, as the nationality of the attacking submarine may not necessarily be known before a SLAM or laser attack.

Rogoway cautions that a SLAM or submarine laser attack might not destroy its intended target outright. If that happens, he says that a failed attack may give away the submarine’s position, which would likely mean guaranteed destruction for the submarine.

He also notes technical issues in mounting SLAMs or lasers on the limited space of a submarine mast.

In January 2024, Asia Times pointed out that current laser weapons are constrained by physical, weight, power and cooling requirements, which may not be available on surface warships and perhaps much less on submarines.

Rogoway says that SLAMs or submarine-mounted lasers may be a weapon of last resort, given the significant implications of their use. Furthermore, he mentions that such weapons conflict with traditional submarine warfare tactics.

The idea of submarine-mounted lasers may also be wholly negated by the increasing transparency of the world’s oceans, brought on by the proliferation of technologies such as commercial satellite imagery, synthetic aperture radar, hydroacoustic monitoring and even social media.

In a March 2023 The Conversation article, Roger Bradbury and other writers say that advancements in science may lead to the detection of submarine movements and their environmental impacts, potentially making the oceans “transparent” and marking the end of the submarine era.

Bradbury and his team conducted a comprehensive analysis in 2020 to anticipate the future and its potential developments, focusing on the 2050s. Their assessment utilized the Intelfuze software, which provides thorough, transparent and updatable probabilistic evaluations, particularly suitable for addressing issues with uncertain and speculative data.

According to their findings, it is highly probable (with a 90% likelihood from some perspectives) that the oceans will become transparent in most cases by the 2050s.

They say that this high-confidence estimate, evaluated independently by the software at above 70% certainty, suggests that submarines, including nuclear-powered ones, will likely be detectable in the world’s oceans due to advancements in science and technology, despite any developments in stealth technologies.

Genesis (19-20)

•July 27, 2024 • Leave a Comment

“We must through much tribulation enter into the Kingdom of God,” Acts 14:22

Genesis 19

1 And there came two angels to Sodom at evening, and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom. And Lot, seeing them, rose up to meet them, and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; — here came two angels; that is, two of the three that had just before been with Abraham, the two angels, who were now sent to execute God’s purpose concerning Sodom;

and he said, “Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant’s house and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early and go on your ways.” And they said, “Nay, but we will remain in the street all night.”

— they said, Nay, but we will abide in the street all night; so they said, not only to give Lot an opportunity of evincing the sincerity and cordiality of his invitation, but because it was their real intention to abide in the street, to manifest the great difference between Lot and the barbarous Sodomites.

And he pressed upon them greatly, and they turned in unto him and entered into his house; and he made them a feast and baked unleavened bread, and they ate. — Lot’s invitation; at first declined, is at length accepted; and they entered his house.

But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom — both young and old, all the people from every quarter —compassed the house around. — here were the old and young, all vile and from every quarter; for practices too shameful to be mentioned!

And they called unto Lot and said unto him, “Where are the men who came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may know them.”

— bring them out unto us, that we may know them; not who they were, or from whence they came, or what their business was; nor did they pretend anything of this kind to hide and cover their design from Lot, but they were open and impudent, and declared their sin without shame and blushing;

And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him — and Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him;

and said, “I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. — Lot pleaded, do not so wickedly; as to use ill a man’s guests, to abuse strangers, to break the laws and rules of hospitality, and especially to commit that unnatural sin they were bent upon.

Behold now, I have two daughters who have not known a man. Let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes. Only unto these men do nothing, for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.”

— I have two daughters; this was unadvisedly and unjustifiably offered, probably through the great discomposure and perturbation which his mind was in.

And they said, “Stand back.” And they said again, “This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will become a judge! Now will we deal worse with thee than with them.” And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.

— and they said, stand back; turn on one side, get away from the door, that we may come to it;

— this one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge; this one man, and he a stranger and sojourner, not a citizen of this city, sets himself against the whole body of the inhabitants, and takes upon himself to be judge what is right and wrong;

10 But the men put forth their hands, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut the door. — but the men, who were the two angels who had met Abraham, put forth their hand; they came to the door, and opened it, and put out their hands, one on one side the door, and the other on the other;

11 And they smote the men who were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they wearied themselves to find the door. — again the men, who were the two angels, smote the others with blindness;

12 And the men said unto Lot, “Hast thou here any besides? Soninlaw, and thy sons, and thy daughters, and whomsoever thou hast in the city — bring them out of this place. — the men said; these were the angels who had met Abraham earlier;

13 For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them has waxed great before the face of the Lord, and the Lord hath sent us to destroy it.” — again, the “we” are the two angels; who said “we will destroy this place”

— might be clearer from the Message Bible:

10-11 But the two men reached out and pulled Lot inside the house, locking the door. Then they struck blind the men who were trying to break down the door, both leaders and followers, leaving them groping in the dark.

12-13 The two men said to Lot, “Do you have any other family here? Sons, daughters—anybody in the city? Get them out of here, and now! We’re going to destroy this place. The outcries of victims here to God are deafening; we’ve been sent to blast this place into oblivion.” Genesis 19:10-12 MSG

14 And Lot went out and spoke unto his sons-in-law, who married his daughters, and said, “Up, get ye out of this place; for the Lord will destroy this city!” But he seemed as one who mocked unto his sons-in-law. — Lot spoke to his sons-in-law; it is a possibilty that these sons-in- law had married other daughters of Lot;

— according to Jewish sources, Lot had two other daughters that perished in Sodom; but according to Josephus (Antiquities. l. 1. c. 11. sect. 4) were espoused to men in the city, but not yet married; and on account of such espousals, as were usual in the eastern countries, Lot calls them his sons-in-law;

15 And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot, saying, “Arise, take thy wife and thy two daughters who are here, lest thou be consumed in the iniquity of the city.” — when the morning arose; Lot had thus the night for making his preparations, part of this he spent in his visits to his sons-in-law;

16 And while he lingered, the men laid hold upon his hand, and upon the hand of his wife and upon the hand of his two daughters, the Lord being merciful unto him; and they brought him forth and set him outside the city.

— while he lingered; he did not make so much haste as the case required, and this would have been fatal to him, if the angels had not laid hold on his hand, and brought him forth. Herein the Lord was merciful to him; and if God had not been merciful to them, their lingering had been their ruin;

17 And it came to pass, when they had brought them forth outside, that he said, “Escape for thy life! Look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain. Escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed!” — look not behind thee; they must not loiter by the way; stay not in all the plain;

— for it would all be made into one dead sea; he must not take up short of the place of refuge appointed him; escape to the mountain; such are the commands given to those who are delivered out of a sinful state: first, return not to sin and second, rest not in the world, for that is staying in the plain.

18 And Lot said unto them, “Oh, not so, my lord. — oh, not so, my Lord; that is, let me not be obliged to go so far as to the mountain;

19 Behold now, thy servant hath found grace in thy sight, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, which thou hast shown unto me in saving my life; and I cannot escape to the mountain, lest some evil take me, and I die.

— lest some evil take me, and I die; or “that evil” the burning of Sodom, and the cities of the plain, lest that should overtake him before he got to the mountain;

— thus Lot had some distrust of the power of God to strengthen him to go thither, who had appeared so wonderfully for him in his present deliverance; and he might have assured himself, that he that brought him out of Sodom would never suffer him to perish in the destruction of it.

20 Behold now, this city is near enough to flee unto, and it is a little one. Oh, let me escape thither, (is it not a little one?) and my soul shall live.” — the MSG version says:

But Lot protested, “No, masters, you can’t mean it! I know that you’ve taken a liking to me and have done me an immense favor in saving my life, but I can’t run for the mountains—who knows what terrible thing might happen to me in the mountains and leave me for dead.

Look over there—that town is close enough to get to. It’s a small town, hardly anything to it. Let me escape there and save my life—it’s a mere wide place in the road.” Genesis 19:19-21 MSG

21 And he said unto him, “See, I have accepted thee concerning this thing also, that I will not overthrow this city for which thou hast spoken. — the MSG version says:

“All right, Lot. If you insist. I’ll let you have your way. And I won’t stamp out the town you’ve spotted. But hurry up. Run for it! I can’t do anything until you get there.” That’s why the town was called Zoar, that is, Smalltown. Genesis 19:19-21 MSG

22 Hasten thee, escape thither; for I cannot do any thing till thou hast come thither.” Therefore the name of the city was called Zoar. — therefore the name of the city was called Zoar; in later times, and probably first by Lot, from his use of the word “little” which was his request, which Zoar signifies; called Bela, see Genesis 14:2

23 The sun had risen upon the earth when Lot entered into Zoar. — in haste; the ruin of Sodom was suspended till he was secure.

24 Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire, from the Lord out of heaven; — the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire; the Lord (Yehovah יְהוָ֖ה);

— from the Lord (Yehovah יְהוָ֖ה) out of heaven; this destruction was brought upon them by Yehovah the Son of God, who had appeared to Abraham in an human form, and gave him notice of it, and heard all he had to plead for those cities, and then departed from him to Sodom,

— and the Son, who was the author of this catastrophe; this amazing shower of fire and brimstone was re-inforced and rained by him from Yehovah his Father, out of heaven; as the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem both call him, the Word of the Lord;

25 and He overthrew those cities, and all the plain and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground. — and he overthrew those cities; of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim: very probably at the same time that this fiery tempest was from the heavens; and all the plain; the plain of Jordan, and the cities on it, all but Zoar;

26 But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt. — but his wife looked back from behind him; herein she disobeyed an express command; according to the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem, she was a native of Sodom; hence menories of her kinmen and sons-in-law; and she became a pillar of salt;

27 And Abraham got up early in the morning to the place where he stood before the Lord; — stood before the Lord, and he looked toward Sodom; he has an extensive view spread out before him which would be the Dead Sea.

28 and he looked toward Sodom and Gomorrah, and toward all the land of the plain, and beheld. And lo, the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace. — the violence of the fire is indicated by the last word, which is not the ordinary word for a furnace, but means a kiln, such as that used for burning chalk into lime, or for melting ores of metal;

— the smoke of a furnace; after the fiery shower was over, and the cities burnt down, the smoke ascended toward heaven, as the smoke of mystical Babylon will do, Revelation 19:3; like the reek of a boiling cauldron; or like the smoke of a lime kiln always burning.

29 And it came to pass, when God destroyed the cities of the plain, that God remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the overthrow when He overthrew the cities in which Lot dwelt. — the prayer or promise made by Abraham, Genesis 18:23-32, who doubtless in his promise for Sodom would not forget Lot;

30 And Lot went up out of Zoar and dwelt on the mountain, and his two daughters with him, for he feared to dwell in Zoar; and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters. — for he feared to dwell in Zoar; probably he found it as wicked as Sodom; and therefore concluded it could not survive long;

— and dwelt in the mountain; which the Lord had directed him to go to before, but was unwilling, and chose Zoar, and his two daughters with him; and they dwelt in a cave;

31 And the firstborn said unto the younger, “Our father is old, and there is not a man on the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth. — the whole earth; for they thought the same deluge of fire which destroyed the four cities, and all other places;

32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.” — and we will lie with him, that we may preserve the seed of our father; have children by him, and propagate and preserve the human species; this incestuous copulations, they might think lawful;

33 And they made their father drink wine that night, and the firstborn went in and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. — he perceived not; wherein there is nothing strange, it being usual with drunken men to do many things in that condition, which, when they come to themselves, they perfectly forget.

~~~~

34 And it came to pass on the morrow that the firstborn said unto the younger, “Behold, I lay yesternight with my father. Let us make him drink wine this night also, and go thou in and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.”

— the firstborn said to the younger, behold, I lay last night with my father; informed her, that what they had contrived succeeded according to her wish, and therefore, with her encouragement to go on, proposes to take the same method again;

35 And they made their father drink wine that night also. And the younger arose and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. — and the younger arose, and lay with him following the bad example of her sister; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose;

36 Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father. — Lot’s daughters had so little feeling of shame in connection with their conduct, that they gave names to the sons they bore, which have immortalized their paternity;

37 And the firstborn bore a son and called his name Moab; the same is the father of the Moabites unto this day. — his name Moab; the Moabites, who originally inhabited the country northeast of the Dead Sea, and afterward, they occupied the district east of the Salt Sea;

38 And the younger, she also bore a son and called his name Benammi; the same is the father of the children of Ammon unto this day. — the Ammonites dwelt to the northeast of Moab, where they had a capital called Rabbah; they both ultimately merged into the more general class of the Arabs;

— and according to Deuteronomy 2:9, Deuteronomy 2:19, Israel was ordered not to touch the territory of either of these tribes because of their descent from Lot, Abraham’s nephew.

Genesis 20

~~~~

1 And Abraham journeyed from thence toward the south country, and dwelt between Kadesh and Shur and sojourned in Gerar. — and Abraham sojourned in Gerar; in the southern border of Canaan which were occupied by the Philistines. We are not told upon what occasion he removed;

And Abraham said of Sarah his wife, “She is my sister.” And Abimelech king of Gerar sent and took Sarah. — she is my sister; twenty years before, Abraham had acted in the same way in Egypt, and Pharaoh had rebuked him; she was now ninety years of age, yet her naturally beauty had not faded.

But God came to Abimelech in a dream by night, and said to him, “Behold, thou art but a dead man, because of the woman whom thou hast taken; for she is a man’s wife.”

— God came to Abimelech in a dream by night; put fear into his mind, by which he cautioned him against taking Sarah to be his wife; so careful was the Lord that no wrong should be done to such a godly and virtuous person, to which she was exposed through the weakness of her husband;

— and said unto him, behold, thou art but a dead man, for the woman which thou hast taken; that is, God would punish him with death, unless he restored the woman, whom he had taken, to her husband; 

But Abimelech had not come near her; and he said, “Lord, wilt Thou slay also a righteous nation? — “Thou wilt die,” the point of death if he persisted; wilt thou also slay a righteous nation?

— he probably referred to the late destruction of Sodom and the cities of the plain, which, no doubt, must have caused great consternation; and or he knew that this had been usual for people to suffer for the crimes of their governors, or kings, if they sin;

Said he not unto me, ‘She is my sister’? And she, even she herself said, ‘He is my brother.’ In the integrity of my heart and innocency of my hands have I done this.” — in the integrity of my heart; not only does Abimelech assert this, but God himself (Genesis 20:6) admits the plea.

And God said unto him in a dream, “Yea, I know that thou didst this in the integrity of thy heart, for I also withheld thee from sinning against Me. Therefore I suffered thee not to touch her. — without any adulterous design in my heart, or outward actions tending to it, being wholly ignorant of what thou now informest him.

Now therefore restore the man his wife; for he is a prophet, and he shall pray for thee, and thou shalt live. And if thou restore her not, know thou that thou shalt surely die, thou and all that are thine.” — for he is a prophet; of course he is a true prophet of God;

— to whom he communicates his secrets; is able to foretell things to come, as well as to interpret the mind of God, that he might pray for him and save his life, and threatened him with certain death to himself and all belonging to him in case he should refuse;

— a prophet is God’s spokesman, who speaks with authority the things of God Exodus 7:1; Exodus 4:15. This implies two things: first, the things of God are known only to him, and therefore must be communicated by him; secondly, the prophet must be enabled of God to announce in correct terms the things made known to him.;

— these things refer not only to the future, but in general to all such matters as fall within the purpose and procedure of God, like Moses and Aaron in Exodus 7:1. They may even include things otherwise known or knowable by man, so far as these are necessary to the exposition of the divine will. Now Abraham has heretofore received numerous communications from God; this, also constitutes him a prophet;

Therefore Abimelech rose early in the morning, and called all his servants, and told all these things in their hearing; and the men were sore afraid. — and the men were sore afraid; lest they should be struck with death; and perhaps they might call to mind the burning of Sodom and Gomorrah for their sins, they had lately heard of, and might fear that some such calamity would befall them.

Then Abimelech called Abraham and said unto him, “What hast thou done unto us? And how have I offended thee, that thou hast brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? Thou hast done deeds unto me that ought not to be done.” — thou hast done deeds unto me that ought not to be done; in saying Sarah was his sister, and persuading her to say the same;

10 And Abimelech said unto Abraham, “What sawest thou, that thou hast done this thing?” — that thou hast done this thing? he desires to know what he had observed, either in him or his people, that gave him any reason to conclude that they were a lustful people, lest they should kill him for his wife’s sake.

11 And Abraham said, “Because I thought surely the fear of God is not in this place, and they will slay me for my wife’s sake. — surely the fear of God is not in this place; this is a certain truth, which he thought might be depended upon, and taken for granted, since it was everywhere;

12 And yet indeed she is my sister: she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother, and she became my wife. — and yet indeed she is my sister; in the same sense as Lot was his brother; for she was sister to Lot, and both were the children of Haran, the brother of Abraham;

13 And it came to pass, when God caused me to wander from my father’s house, that I said unto her, ‘This is thy kindness which thou shalt show unto me: at every place whither we shall come, say of me, “He is my brother.”’”

— at every place whither we shall come, say of me; or for the sake of me, in order to save me from the hands of wicked men, whom he feared would slay him for her sake: he is my brother; and so he hoped, instead of being ill used or killed, he should meet with favour and friendship on her account;

14 And Abimelech took sheep and oxen, and menservants and womenservants, and gave them unto Abraham, and restored to him Sarah his wife. — the Philistine gives atoning presents on restoring Sarah, and grants her husband permission to dwell in his land wherever it pleased him; this also implies that he had done Abraham a wrong.

15 And Abimelech said, “Behold, my land is before thee. Dwell where it pleaseth thee.” — and Abimelech said, behold, my whole land is before thee; instead of bidding him be gone, and sending him away in haste out of his country, as the king of Egypt did;

16 And unto Sarah he said, “Behold, I have given thy brother a thousand pieces of silver; behold, he is to thee a covering of the eyes unto all who are with thee and with all other.” Thus she was reproved. — behold, he is to thee a covering of the eyes, unto all that are with thee; a protection of her chastity: so an husband, in our language, is said to be a cover to his wife, or that she is under a cover;

17 So Abraham prayed unto God. And God healed Abimelech, and his wife and his maidservants; and they bore children, — and God healed Abimelech, and his wife, and his maidservants: who by reason of some disease were rendered unfit for and incapable of cohabitation with their husbands, and they with them;

— and they bare children; cohabited and conceived, bare and brought forth children, all which are comprehended in this expression.

18 for the Lord had closed up fast all the wombs of the house of Abimelech because of Sarah, Abraham’s wife. — for the Lord had fast closed up all the wombs of the house of Abimelech; with large tumours probably, so that they could not cohabit with their husbands and conceive.

China’s new radar penetrated US jamming jet

•July 26, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China claims new radar penetrated toughest US jamming jet in South China Sea. Using a combination of AI and next-gen tech, the PLA has shown it can overcome US EW systems.

A US Navy EA-18G Growler, a 2-seat F/A-18F carrier-based electronic warfare jet

Interesting Engineering by Christopher McFadden • July 15, 2024 // SCMP

Chinese researchers have revealed how the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) navy’s ‘kill web’ was able to defeat the US Navy’s EA-18G “Growler” electronic warfare (EW) systems. Highlighted in a peer-reviewed paper published last month in the Chinese Academic Journal Radar & ECM, the scientists explained how artificial intelligence (AI) played a crucial role.

This news comes six months after PLA officers onboard a Type 055 destroyer were honored as a “role model of the times” for their actions against a US aircraft carrier fleet. Chinese media showed footage of two US jets buzzing the Nanchang, one widely believed to be an EA-18G “Growler.”

Videos released by China show that the EA-18G may have adopted a combat mode known as jamming-while-accompanying, creating a formation with other warplanes and conducting noise jamming or releasing strong signals of dense, false targets to blind the Nanchang.

However, the radar system on Nanchang continued to operate normally and locked onto the main targets of the US fleet. A commander on the Nanchang later told state media that the US planes and ships backed off shortly after they opened the protective covers of the vertical launching system (VLS).

China’s ‘kill web’ PLAN Nanchang Type 055 Destroyer: able to defeat the US Navy’s EA-18G “Growler” electronic warfare (EW) systems

US losing EW-edge with China

Manufactured by Boeing, the “Growler” is an EW aircraft primarily used for electronic jamming. Based on the F/A-18 “Super Hornet,” it can be loaded with various EW systems to suppress enemy reconnaissance and communication signals in all frequency bands and all directions with high power.

It can also launch anti-radiation missiles for precise strikes against shipborne radars, making it a core combat force in the US AirSea Battle strategy. Production of the “Growler” began 20 years ago; the platform has been extensively upgraded over the years.

However, the new paper shows that all its capabilities are not foolproof.

“Cognitive intelligent radar has capabilities such as proactive environmental sensing, arbitrary transmit and receive design, intelligent processing, and resource scheduling. It can effectively counter the complex and variable electromagnetic jamming of the EA-18G,” wrote the project team led by Professor Liu Shangfu. Shangfu is a radar expert with the Naval Non-Commissioned Officer School in Bengbu, southeast China’s Anhui province.

China’s modern warships reportedly have multiple radars with different working principles and sensors. According to the South China Morning Post (SCMP), China has also solved the bottleneck issue in transmitting and processing massive amounts of data to help streamline integration.

According to the researchers, this combination significantly reduces the effectiveness of the Growler’s jamming against individual radars.

The Nanchang and her crew have been honoured for actions against a US aircraft carrier fleet. But William Coulter, the commander of US Electronic Attack Squadron 136 (VAQ-136) deployed in the South China Sea on the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier, was given the axe by the US Navy “due to a loss of confidence in his ability to command.”

China’s ‘kill web’ a gamechanger

“System detection is not simply a stacking of multiple detection sensors, nor a loosely connected network, but rather a comprehensive utilization of the performance characteristics of different sensors based on actual situations, and a rational allocation and scheduling of detection resources from a tactical perspective to enhance the platform’s information control capabilities,” Liu’s team wrote.

Chinese scientists have also made breakthroughs in maintaining high-speed and reliable communication across the entire fleet in complex electromagnetic environments. To this end, the researchers explained that when an EA-18G launches an attack on a Chinese naval ship, nearby Chinese naval ships immediately counter it.

As the ships share information, a giant “kill web” is then created, with the capability to “flexibly, actively, quickly and intelligently counter the EA-18G, achieving a transformation from ‘single-resource confrontation’ to ‘systematic detection resource confrontation,’” Liu and his colleagues wrote.

With technology on its side, the Chinese navy has reversed its previous cautious style and adopted a more proactive tactic of “attacking as defense, taking multiple measures simultaneously, optimizing combinations and joining forces with other elements to counter electronic warfare aircraft,” the scientists added.

A US’s Secret Weapon for Critical Minerals?

•July 25, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Could Critical Metals Corp’s Tanbreez Project Become Washington’s Secret Weapon in the Future for Critical Minerals?

Could this Tanbreez Project Developed into the US’s Most Important Weapon System?

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God. Matthew 5:9

ZeroHedge • July 20, 2024

The western world has only just begun to appreciate the magnitude of the risk posed by China’s control of rare earth elements, the central building blocks behind the modern defense industry. Fortunately, there is hope on the horizon, as a new publicly traded company may help to level the playing field, empowering the West to provide China with its most formidable competitor yet. 

This past June, Nasdaq-listed Critical Metals Corp. (Nasdaq: CRML), a leading mining development company, embarked on a game-changing move when it announced plans to acquire an interest in the world-class Tanbreez rare earths project in Greenland. 

This foundational rare earths project, strategically located in Southern Greenland with access to key transportation outlets, has the potential to turn the tide in the global war for the rare earths market. With an estimated resource of 4.7 billion tonnes containing 28.2 million tonnes of total rare earth oxides, Tanbreez stands as one of the world’s largest known rare earth deposits. A notable differentiator for Tanbreez is its sizable concentration of heavy rare earth elements, which constitutes more than 25% of the resource. 

Rare Earth Elements are Key to our Defense

Before really delving into the significance of this acquisition, it is important to understand what rare earth elements are and why they are essential for investors to consider.

Rare earths are a group of 17 elements on the periodic table, many of which have names that are difficult for the average person to pronounce.  They are divided into two broader categories: Light Rare Earth Elements (LREEs) and Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREEs), with the latter having limited refining capacity. 

For the most part, Light Rare Earth Elements are used in an enormous range of everyday products, such as mobile phones, electric cars, supercomputers, windmills, quantum computing, and they are essential to the clean energy transition. These elements are used to make modern magnets, vital components of electric vehicle motors, medical equipment, wind turbines and data storage systems 

But, perhaps most importantly, Heavy Rare Earth Elements are critical materials for the development of national defense applications and heavy weaponry. HREEs are also used in fiber optics, medical equipment and hybrid vehicles.

Key HREEs such as Dy, Tb and Gd are essential components in advanced military defense systems, including the F-35 Lightning II Aircraft, the DDG-51 Aegis Destroyer, and Virginia-class submarines. With the Pentagon planning a substantial increase in F-35 procurement in the coming decades, ensuring a reliable supply of these critical metals will be crucial for national security.

For perspective, a single DDG-51 Aegis Destroyer requires 5,200 lbs of rare earth elements, and even a F-35 fighter requires more than 500 lbs of rare earth material.

The Threat of China’s Rare Earth Stranglehold

When it comes to the defense industry, it is alarming how active the Chinese are relative to the western world. The speed of the manufacturing and investment in Chinese defense systems is severely outpacing the of the US, with investments in munitions and high-end weapons systems and equipment progressing more than five times faster than in America. A large part of this is enabled by China’s stranglehold on the rare earth market.

Currently, China is the world’s dominant producer of rare earths, controlling more than 90% of the market. This level of market dominance allows China to influence great control as it did in 2023 when China put export controls on gallium and germanium, citing concern for their own national security. Both are critical minerals in US industrial and defense manufacturing.

What’s even more alarming are the concerns posed by North Korea’s significant untapped rare earth resources. While North Korea is a bit of a ‘black box’ in terms of assessments, many believe that the region has more than six times the amount of rare earths as China. This makes rare earth elements all the more critical of a material.

This is a massive issue that cannot be understated, and it’s only a matter of time before the West wakes up and scrambles to get as many rare earth metals as possible. Critical Metals Corp and the Tanbreez project may be able to help.

Diving into the Tanbreez Project

This highlights the importance and strength of the Tanbreez asset. First and foremost, Tanbreez is massive, containing billions of tonnes of valuable material. The outcropping ore body, known as Kakortokite, spans an impressive 8 by 5 kilometers and boasts a thickness of approximately 400 meters. The production rate is expected to start at 500,000 metric tons per year, eventually increasing to 3 million metric tons per year, supporting an extraordinary mine life.

Significant progress has already been made to tap this valuable asset. Tanbreez was awarded a key exploitation license 4 years ago, extensive studies have been completed, and Critical Metals Corp is close to underway with a SK1300. A total of 414 drill holes and more than 366,000 assays have been conducted, providing a rich database on the deposit’s geology, geochemistry and rare earth element distribution. Substantial bulk testing, totaling approximately 709 tonnes, further demonstrates the asset’s key significant scale and underscores the depth of the work already completed.

One of the key advantages of the Tanbreez Project is its prime location in Southern Greenland, which offers year-round direct shipping access via deep water fjords connected to the North Atlantic Ocean. The region also benefits from the mildest weather conditions in Greenland, with average temperatures ranging from 0 to 5 degrees Celsius in the winter and 10 to 15 degrees Celsius in the summer. These factors significantly enhance the project’s feasibility and economic viability. Moreover, the Tanbreez resource is an open pit that can be mined with minimal waste(approximately 3%), and with minimal need for chemicals.

Greenland is strategically important to both Europe and the US as seaborne trade from the island nation with a population of 58,000 people is easily defended by America’s dominant naval presence in the Atlantic. Material can be protected during transportation – even in the event of war – to both the US and Europe for processing. Tanbreez’s size and uniquely defensible geography have garnered the attention of key national security departments and agencies in both the America and Europe.

They understand the strategic importance of this deposit and its singular ability to solve the vice grip that China holds over the rare earth metals market.   

CRML Is Not Just Rare Earths Company, But Also a Lithium Play

As exciting as the Tanbreez project is, it isn’t even Critical Metals Corp’s flagship project. That distinction belongs to the Wolfsberg Lithium Project in Austria. With Tanbreez and Wolfsberg in its expanding multi-geography portfolio, Critical Metals is strategically focused on two of the most in-demand resources of the 21st century: rare earth elements and lithium – widely regarded as the metals of the future. Europe’s first fully-permitted lithium mine, the Wolfsberg project is strategically located to serve the continent’s burgeoning lithium-ion battery market.

With a resource of 12.88 million tonnes at 1% Li2O grade and a mine life exceeding 15 years, Wolfsberg is set to play a crucial role in Europe’s electric vehicle supply chain. To put this in perspective, the project could produce enough material to power more than 5 million average electric vehicles, assuming an average of 63 kg of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) per EV battery.

Further underscoring the project’s viability, Critical Metals Corp has a binding offtake agreement with BMW Group, and recently received a $15 million pre-payment from the automaker. 

This July, the company announced its acceptance of assignment of the European Lithium-Obeikan Group Investment Company (Obeikan Group) joint venture. The 50%/50% JV will be focused on developing, constructing and commissioning a large-scale lithium hydroxide processing plant in Saudi Arabia, and operating the plant for the conversion of lithium spodumene concentrate from the Wolfsberg Lithium Project in Austria. 

The Fundamental Market Opportunities are Robust

For comparables, I would encourage you to check out MP Materials (NYSE:MP), a $2.2 billion market cap issuer with a known resource of just under 3 million tonnes that is almost entirely light rare earth elements (LREE) for comparison. On the lithium side, Sigma Lithium Corp (Nasdaq: SGML) serves as a great comparable.

This all boils down to robust market opportunities. The market for both rare earths and lithium is robust and growing. The global rare earths market is projected to nearly double from $5.3 billion in 2021 to $9.6 billion by 2026, driven by demand for magnets in electric vehicles and wind turbines, but most of all, defense industry applications.

Similarly, lithium demand is expected to quadruple by 2030. While lithium prices have experienced recent declines, a significant shortfall in the supply of lithium spodumene product and battery-grade lithium hydroxide is expected by 2026 or 2027, coinciding with when the Wolfsberg project is expected to be in production.

As the world races to secure supplies of rare earths and lithium, Critical Metals Corp is strategically positioned to play a pivotal role in reshaping global supply chains and bolstering national security. The key to success with future metals projects lies in an experienced management team, the fundamental strength of the assets in question, location, permitting, and offtake partners – all of which are present within the Critical Metals Corp story. 

They will be essential players in securing the essential  elements use to build the products of the future and, more importantly, the national security we so desperately need.

Rare Earth Reserves: Top 8 Countries

Rare Earth Production: Top 5 Countries

China’s ban of rare earth technologies

Trump didn’t say he wouldn’t defend Taiwan

•July 24, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Trump said he can’t defend it, because the island is ’68 miles from China, a slight disadvantage’

AsiaTimes by David Goldman • July 18, 2024

Donald Trump’s July 17 Bloomberg interview prompted headlines to the effect that “the US would not defend Taiwan from a Chinese invasion under his presidency,” as the Daily Telegraph complained.

He said no such thing: He said that China doesn’t need to invade Taiwan, which lies within range of as much Chinese ordnance as the mainland cares to shoot at it. The former president and frontrunner for the November US election spoke common sense, as opposed to the face-saving obfuscation of US defense experts – including many from the Trump camp.

The US has the wrong sort of military to fight a land-based power with the world’s most advanced mass production capability, capable of turning out an arbitrarily large number of anti-ship missiles and drones, and US defense analysts have the unenviable task of explaining away thirty years’ worth of compounded blunders.

Trump, by contrast, ignores the experts and notes the obvious. 

“Taiwan is 9,500 miles away. It’s 68 miles away from China. A slight advantage, and China’s a massive piece of land, they could just bombard it. They don’t even need to – I mean, they can literally just send shells. Now they don’t want to do that because they don’t want to lose all those chip plants,” Trump said. 

Strictly speaking, Taiwan is 100 miles from the Chinese mainland and the maximum range of artillery shells is about 20 miles, but China has enough missiles to obliterate the island if it chooses to do so. It won’t, as Trump suggested, not only because it does not want to destroy the Taiwanese fabrication plants that make 90% of the world’s advanced chips, but because it does not want to kill Taiwanese citizens, whom it considers Chinese nationals.

In the event of a crisis, for example, a move towards formal sovereignty by Taiwan, China would blockade the island. The island imports all of its energy, mainly natural gas, and has about three weeks of storage capacity. China need only inform shipping companies of its intent to sink any LNG tanker approaching the island and the lights would go out in Taiwan in less than a month.

China isn’t stupid enough to send landing craft across 100 miles of open ocean. American defense experts such as the Center for a New American Security and the Center for Strategic and International Studies stage “war games” about a prospective Chinese invasion to obfuscate the failure of US defense strategy.

No expeditionary force 6,000 miles from home can match the land-based firepower of a nearby peer adversary. In the unlikely event of a full-blown battle between China and the US Navy, the outcome would resemble the destruction of the Russian fleet by Japan at the 1905 Battle of Tsushima Strait.

The US military knows this perfectly well and has explained why in numerous published locations.

Speaking of the PLA Rocket Force, Major Christopher J Mihal wrote in 2021 in a US Army journal that “The conventional arm of the PLARF is the largest ground-based missile force in the world, with over 2,200 conventionally armed ballistic and cruise missiles and with enough anti-ship missiles to attack every US surface combatant vessel in the South China Sea with enough firepower to overcome each ship’s missile defense,” 

The Pentagon’s 2023 assessment of the People’s Liberation Army reported: 

The PLARF’s conventionally-armed CSS-5 Mod 5 (DF-21D) ASBM variant gives the PLA the capability to conduct long-range precision strikes against ships, including aircraft carriers, out to the Western Pacific from mainland China. The DF-21D has a range exceeding 1,500 km, is fitted with a maneuverable reentry vehicle (MaRV) and is reportedly capable of rapidly reloading in the field.

The PLARF continues to grow its inventory of DF-26 IRBMs, which it first revealed in 2015 and fielded in 2016. The multi-role DF-26 is designed to rapidly swap conventional and nuclear warheads and is capable of conducting precision land-attack and anti-ship strikes in the Western Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and the SCS from mainland China. In 2020, the PRC fired anti-ship ballistic missiles against a moving target in the SCS.

The PLARF is developing and testing several new variants of theater-range missiles and developing capabilities and methods to counter adversary BMD systems. The DF-17 passed several tests successfully and is deployed operationally. In 2020, a PRC-based military expert described the primary purpose of the DF-17 as striking foreign military bases and fleets in the Western Pacific.

China claims to have automated factories that can manufacture 1,000 cruise missile motors a day. It can also produce as many anti-ship drones of the kind used effectively by the Houthis against US ships in the Red Sea. These are easy to shoot down with modern anti-missile systems, but a US destroyer can carry only 100 interceptors in its hold. China can fire as many projectiles as it wants from land. China also has about 60 silent diesel-electric submarines and about 1,000 4th– and 5th-generation aircraft.

The US built the wrong kind of military, something that no Pentagon-funded think tank or prospective office-seeker wants to admit. Donald Trump by contrast stated the obvious: China’s enormous size and proximity to Taiwan constitute an overwhelming, insuperable advantage. Surface ships, moreover, are sitting ducks for modern missiles, just as the lumbering battleships of 1940 were vulnerable to dive bombers and torpedo planes. 

Today’s situation resembles the eve of World War II, when battleships were the largest line item in the defense budget of every major power except Russia. Victor Davis Hanson observes in The Second World Wars that Germany and Japan made the mistake of building battleships rather than carriers, and that probably cost them the war. After Japanese bombers sunk four US battleships at Pearl Harbor and Britain’s Repulse and Prince of Wales near Singapore in December 1941, no navy started work on a battleship again. 

No matter how much of its existing capability the United States assigns to East Asia, China’s home-theater advantage in missiles and drones can overwhelm it. That makes nonsense out of the now-popular meme of “prioritizing Asia” over Ukraine, a theme promoted by a former junior Pentagon official, Elbridge Colby, reportedly under consideration for a senior national security post in a new Trump Administration.

Just what the United States might prioritize – perhaps 155mm howitzers and Patriot air defense systems – and how this would help against a deluge of Chinese missiles has never been explained. The US should aim for “a balance of power that is consistent with our reasonable differences,” maintaining the status quo over Taiwan, Colby said in a recent interview

Translated into real-world circumstances, that means China will let the United States pretend to be a Pacific power, and pretend to threaten an invasion of Taiwan while Taiwan pretends to defend itself. Taiwan won’t provoke China by promoting sovereignty, and all sides will save face. Face-saving flummery of this sort might keep the peace, but it would depend not on a balance of power, but rather on Chinese forbearance.

Using a million-dollar interceptor to shoot down a $5,000 drone is a losing proposition. Even if America could make enough interceptors to keep pace with China’s missile output and US ships could carry enough of them to counter Chinese attacks, the cost of conventional missile defense is prohibitive.

Directed-energy weapons, including laser and microwave devices, have the potential to destroy projectiles and drones cheaply, but prototypes of such devices can only stop slow-moving drones. Focusing a laser on a ballistic long enough to burn a hole in it isn’t easy, and an enormous amount of R&D would be required to deploy directed-energy weapons effectively against modern missiles.

The Pentagon’s 2025 budget includes just $780 million for directed-energy weapons research, less than the cost of eight F35 fighters.

Drone swarms also have the potential to screen against missile attacks, but this technology also faces formidable obstacles. Drones have a short range and would have to be launched from a platform less vulnerable than surface ships, for example, from a submarine. The US has built just six submarines in the past five years.

Trump has spoken often of building a missile shield for the American homeland, in emulation of Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative. That’s exactly the right idea, but would require a drastic reordering of defense priorities and a radical transformation of the US military. 

Trump also hinted in the Bloomberg interview that the prospect of massive tariffs on Chinese exports to the US, promoted by advisers like former Special Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and economist Peter Navarro, constitutes a negotiating stance.

Tariffs do “two things,” Trump said. “Economically, it’s great. And man, is it good for negotiation? I’ve had guys, I’ve had countries, that were potentially extremely hostile coming to me and say, ‘Sir, please stop with the tariffs. Stop.’ They would do anything. Nothing to do with economic, they would do—you know, we have more than economic, we have other things like let’s not go to war. Or I don’t want you to go into war in another place.”

Trump also reiterated his April invitation to Chinese car companies to build plants in the United States.

Genesis (17-18)

•July 23, 2024 • Leave a Comment

In view of our current turmoil in Butler County, here’s a Prophecy for reflection:

“The LORD shall smite thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart; and thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness” Deuteronomy 28:28-29

Genesis 17

1 And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the Lord appeared to Abram and said unto him, “I am the Almighty God. Walk before Me, and be thou perfect. — Abram was ninety years old and nine; thirteen years, therefore, had passed by since the birth of Ishmael, who doubtless during this time had grown very dear to the childless old man;

And I will make My covenant between Me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly.” — and will multiply thee exceedingly; as he had before promised at several times, and now renews it, lest be should think that Ishmael was the promised seed;

And Abram fell on his face; and God talked with him, saying, — and Abram fell on his face while God was talking to him;

“As for Me, behold, My covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations. — and thou shalt be a father of many nations: as he was of many Arabian nations in the line of Ishmael;

— and of the Midianites, and others, in the line of his sons by Keturah; and of the Israelites in the line of Isaac, as well as of the Edomites in the line of Esau; and in a spiritual sense the father of all that believe, in all the nations of the world, circumcised or uncircumcised;

Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. — a multitude of nations and kings are to trace their descent from Abram; the twelve tribes of Israel, the twelve princes of Ishmael, Keturah’s descendants, and the dukes of Edom sprang from him; and many Arab tribes;

And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee. — and I will make nations of thee; as the nations of Israel and Judah;

— of the Midianites and Edomites, of the Arabs, and and kings shall come out of thee; as the twelve princes of Ishmael, the kings of Edom and Midian, of the Arabs, and of Israel and Judah;

And I will establish My covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee. — thy name shall be Abraham; it signified some new circumstance in the history, rank, or religion of the individual who bears it.

And I will give unto thee and to thy seed after thee the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.” — all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; this respects only the natural seed of Abraham, and those in the line of Isaac and Jacob;

And God said unto Abraham, “Thou shalt keep My covenant, therefore, thou and thy seed after thee in their generations. — thou, and thy seed after thee, in their generations; in successive ages;

10 This is My covenant which ye shall keep between Me and you and thy seed after thee: every manchild among you shall be circumcised. — circumcision to be a sign of entering into a covenant, and especially into one to which children were to be admitted;

— and even until the new age, where the uncircumcised wouldn’t be allowed into his Sanctuary, Ezekiel 44:7, 9; if such requirement applied to strangers what more of the Israelites, especially those serving in the inner court;

11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant between Me and you. — the covenant of circumcision; as the rainbow, might have been in existence before it was adopted as the token of a covenant; is here said to be the covenant which Abraham and his seed must keep, as a copy or counterpart; it is a sign and a seal;

— the covenant is about the land; wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, that God would give to Abram and his seed for an everlasting possession; and every manchild among Abram and his seed shall be sealed into a covenant by being circumcised;

12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every manchild in your generations, he that is born in the house or bought with money from any stranger who is not of thy seed. — any stranger who is not of thy seed, but want to live in the same land with the seed of Abram, shall be circumcised among you;

13 He that is born in thy house and he that is bought with thy money must be circumcised; and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. — the everlasting covenant is about the land that God was planning to bestow upon those who are part of the covenant; nothing about everlasting life that came later;

14 And the uncircumcised manchild whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken My covenant.” — this sealed only the covenant of the land of Canaan to Isaac’s posterity;

15 And God said unto Abraham, “As for Sarai thy wife, thou shalt not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall her name be. — Sarai is now formally taken into the covenant, as she is to be the mother of the promised seed;

16 And I will bless her and give thee a son also by her. Yea, I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her.” — a son of her: this is the first place where it was definitely promised that Abram’s heir should be Sarah’s own son.

17 Then Abraham fell upon his face and laughed, and said in his heart, “Shall a child be born unto him that is a hundred years old? And shall Sarah, who is ninety years old, bear?” — and laughed; not through distrust of the promise, as Sarah did (Genesis 18:12), for he staggered not at that through unbelief, but for joy at such good news; and so Onkelos renders it, “and he rejoiced”

18 And Abraham said unto God, “O that Ishmael might live before Thee!” — O that Ishmael might live before thee; he prays that Ishmael’s might be preserved, and that it might be spent in the fear, worship, and service of God; so the Targum of Jonathan says, “O that Ishmael might live and worship before thee,”

19 And God said, “Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed, and thou shalt call his name Isaac; and I will establish My covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. — Thou shalt call his name Isaac; that is, he laughs; the name was to be a perpetual memorial that Isaac’s birth was naturally such an impossibility as to excite ridicule.

20 And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee. Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful and will multiply him exceedingly. Twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. — the blessings of the covenant are reserved for Isaac, but common blessings were abundantly promised to Ishmael; or twelve sons of Ishmael, his son by Hagar; and, adds he, these going into Arabia;

21 But My covenant will I establish with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.” — but my covenant will I establish with Isaac, implying the covenant wasn’t with Ishmael;

22 And He left off talking with him, and God went up from Abraham. — and God went up from Abraham; from the earth, where he had been with Abraham, and ascended above him up to heaven;

23 And Abraham took Ishmael his son, and all that were born in his house, and all that were bought with his money, every male among the men of Abraham’s house, and circumcised the flesh of their foreskin in the selfsame day, as God had said unto him.

— and Abraham took Ishmael his son; to circumcise him; he took his son first, to set an example to his servants; which were three hundred and eighteen when he rescued Lot from the kings, Genesis 14:14; and perhaps they might be now increased;

24 And Abraham was ninety years old and nine when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin. — and Abraham was ninety years old and nine; when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin;

25 And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin. — Ishmael was thirteen years old; hence Arabs and Mohammedans defer circumcision to the thirteenth year.

26 In the selfsame day was Abraham circumcised, and Ishmael his son. — in the selfsame day was Abraham circumcised, and Ishmael his son; this is repeated, that it might be taken notice of that both were circumcised according to the command of God, and on the very day in which it was given.

27 And all the men of his house, born in the house, and bought with money from the stranger, were circumcised with him. — born in the house, or bought with money of the stranger, were circumcised with him; by their will, and with their consent; not forced on them.

Genesis 18

“Is anything too hard for the Lord?”

1 And the Lord appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre, as he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day. — as Abraham was sitting in the tent door in the heat of the day, reposing; then three “men” stood before him;

And he lifted up his eyes and looked, and lo, three men stood by him. And when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground — three men; these three men were three spiritual, heavenly beings, now assuming human shapes, that they might be visible to Abraham,

and said, “My lord, if now I have found favor in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant. — my lord; Heb ‘donai, a term of simple respect, or denoting one having authority;

Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet and rest yourselves under the tree; — and wash your feet; which was very refreshing to travellers in hot countries, who walked barefoot or in sandals; and this he proposes to be done by one of his servants;

and I will fetch a morsel of bread and comfort ye your hearts. After that ye shall pass on, for therefor are ye come to your servant.” And they said, “So do, as thou hast said.” — and they said, so do as thou hast said; they agreed to it, that water should be fetched to wash their feet, and food for them to eat.

And Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said, “Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth.” — Sarah is tasked and occupied with the baking;

And Abraham ran unto the herd and fetched a calf, tender and good, and gave it unto a young man, and he hastened to dress it.

— Abraham and his servant are responsible for the selection and killing of a calf, the cooking of the meat, and the procuring of butter and milk from the herd; a meal in which meat is provided is a rarity in a Bedouin’s life, and is the sign of the offering of hospitality.

And he took butter and milk and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they ate. — and they did eat; or seemed to eat, though as they assumed bodies so animated as to be capable of talking and walking, why not of eating and drinking? as the Targum of Jonathan implies;

And they said unto him, “Where is Sarah thy wife?” And he said, “Behold, in the tent.” — Where is Sarah thy wife? by naming her, they gave intimation to Abraham, that though they seemed strangers, yet they well knew him and his family.

10 And he said, “I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son.” And Sarah heard it from the tent door, which was behind him. — Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him; the women’s place is in the back of the tent, normally divided by a thin partition from the men’s.

11 Now Abraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age, and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women. — and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women; her monthly visitors had left her, so that she was unfit for conception, and there could be no hope of it in a natural way; —

12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, “After I have waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also?” — Sarah laughed; not from joy and admiration, but from distrust and contempt, as if it were incredible;

— Heb; in her heart, that is, she secretly derided it, though none but herself, as she thought, knew it.

13 And the Lord said unto Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, saying, ‘Shall I of a surety bear a child, who am old?’ — which am old? suggesting there was no reason for it, and signifying his displeasure and indignation.

14 Is any thing too hard for the Lord? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son.” — at the time appointed will I return to thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son; which words are repeated not merely for the confirmation of Abraham’s faith, which staggered not, but to remove any of Sarah’s doubts;

15 Then Sarah denied, saying, “I laughed not,” for she was afraid. And He said, “Nay, but thou didst laugh.” — somewhat a lie, to say she did not laugh when she did; which she might be tempted to say in her confusion; for she was afraid;

16 And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom; and Abraham went with them to bring them on the way. — and looked toward Sodom; set their faces and steered their course that way, by which it appeared they intended to go thither:

— the Targum of Jonathan says that he that brought the news to Sarah “ascended to high heavens,” and the other two looked toward Sodom; but it seems most likely, that, when the two went on their way to Sodom, Abraham went with them for a distance;

— and upon Abraham’s return, the first may have descended from the first atmosphere, which is the first heaven (not the highest heaven), and continue his discourse with Abraham;

17 And the Lord said, “Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do, — and the Lord said; (וַֽיהֹוָ֖ה) Yehovah the Hebrew word we call Lord, shows that this angel was God himself: for this word Yehovah is God.

18 seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him. — the Jonathan says: Abraham is to be a great and mighty people, and through him shall all the peoples of the earth be blessed.

19 For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord to do justice and judgment, that the Lord may bring upon Abraham that which He hath spoken of him.” — this judgment upon Sodom is to be explained to him, that he may train his household to avoid the sins of this doomed city;

— “to keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment; and all this to the further intent that the Lord may bring upon Abraham what he hath spoken of him,” to do justice and judgment; to attend to all the laws, statutes, and judgments of God;

20 And the Lord said, “Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous, — because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great; their sins were grievous; attended with very aggravated circumstances;

21 I will go down now and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which has come unto Me; and if not, I will know.” — their cry, which ascends to heaven, is an appeal for judgement or punishment;

— I will go down and see; these cities were to be made examples to all future ages of God’s severity; and therefore ample proof given that the judgment was neither rash nor excessive; but well considered by God himself, (Eze 18:23; Jer 18:7).

22 And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom; but Abraham stood yet before the Lord. — but Abraham stood yet before the Lord; before the first person, whom Abraham now began to know more clearly;

— he stood before him with all reverence and humility, to hear what the Lord (Yehovah יְהוָֽה) had further to say to him, as well as to say something to him himself; he stood “yet” that is, he continued to stand after the departure of the two angels that were gone to Sodom. Onkelos and Jonathan paraphrase it, “he ministered in prayer before the Lord.”

23 And Abraham drew near and said, “Wilt Thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked? — Abraham prayed or pleaded earnestly that Sodom might be spared, if but a few righteous persons should be found in it.

24 Perhaps there be fifty righteous within the city; wilt Thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein? — within the city, within the pentapolis, which consisted of five cities:

— the Targum of Jonathan says, “perhaps there may be fifty righteous persons in the city who pray before thee, ten for every city, answerable to the five cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Zoar:”

25 That be far from Thee to do in this manner — to slay the righteous with the wicked; and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from Thee! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” — to slay the righteous with the wicked? which is true of temporal calamities but certainly not true of eternal punishment;

— shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? meaning the Lord, to whom he drew nigh, and was pleading with, even the Son of God in human form, who, as he made the world, was the Governor of it and Judge in it; and indeed, as Mediator, has all judgment committed to him, and is appointed to be Judge of quick and dead at the last day;

26 And the Lord said, “If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.” — then will I spare all the place for their sakes; not Sodom only, but the whole country, (Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Zoar) of which Sodom was the chief;

27 And Abraham answered and said, “Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, I, who am but dust and ashes. — but dust and ashes, yet he speaks as one amazed at his own boldness, and the liberty God graciously allowed him, considering God’s greatness;

28 Perhaps there shall lack five of the fifty righteous; wilt Thou destroy all the city for lack of five?” And He said, “If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it.” — and he asked, if l find there forty and five, I will not destroy it; that is, forty five righteous persons?

29 And he spoke unto Him yet again and said, “Perhaps there shall be forty found there?” And He said, “I will not do it for forty’s sake.” — and he said, I will not do it for forty’s sake; but spare them for their sake.

30 And he said unto Him, “Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Perhaps there shall thirty be found there.” And He said, “I will not do it if I find thirty there.” — he said unto him, Oh, let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak; this he feared, through his importunity, he should be wearisome to him and incur his displeasure;

31 And he said, “Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord: Perhaps there shall be twenty found there.” And He said, “I will not destroy it for twenty’s sake.” — and he said, I will not destroy it for twenty’s sake; if there were no more in it, I would spare it for their sake.

32 And he said, “Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Perhaps ten shall be found there.” And He said, “I will not destroy it for ten’s sake.” — and he said, I will not destroy it for ten’s sake; though no more righteous persons were found in it;

— he ended at ten, perhaps because he supposed there were at least ten righteous persons in Lot’s family, Lot and his wife, and their four daughters, and their four husbands; but they forgot that two of Lot’s daughters were unmarried, and how many he had married is not known; ten they say make a congregation, and wherever there are ten righteous persons, a place is saved for their sakes.

33 And the Lord went His way, as soon as He had finished communing with Abraham; and Abraham returned unto his place. — and Abraham returned unto his place; to his tent in the plains of Mamre, waiting to observe or hear what would be the issue and event of things respecting Sodom and Gomorrah.

Four in five Americans fear country sliding into chaos

•July 22, 2024 • Leave a Comment

“And I will spread My net upon him, and he shall be taken in My [note that it’s not China’s nor Russia’s] snare” Ezekiel 17:20

Exclusive: Four in five Americans fear country is sliding into chaos, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Reuters by Jason Lange July 17, 2024

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) – Americans fear their country is spiraling out of control following an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, with worries growing that the Nov 5 election could spark more political violence, a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Tuesday found.

The two-day poll found Republican presidential candidate Trump opening a marginal lead among registered voters – 43% to 41% – over Democratic US President Joe Biden, an advantage that was within the poll’s 3 percentage point margin of error, suggesting the attempt on Trump’s life had not sparked a major shift in voter sentiment.

But 80% of voters – including similar shares of Democrats and Republicans – said they agreed with a statement that “the country is spiraling out of the control.” The poll, which was conducted online, surveyed 1,202 US adults nationwide, including 992 registered voters.

Trump narrowly avoided death on Saturday when a would-be assassin’s bullet grazed his ear as he spoke at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. Blood trickled across his face and he defiantly pumped his fist in the air, mouthing the words “Fight! Fight! Fight!” as he was rushed offstage. A rally attendee was slain and two others seriously injured.

The shooting brought back memories of turbulent political periods such as the 1960s, when Democratic President John F Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, followed by the killing of Democratic presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy in 1968.

Some 84% of voters in the poll said they were concerned that extremists will commit acts of violence after the election, an increase from the results of a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in May that showed 74% of voters having that fear.

Fears of political violence became more prominent in America after thousands of Trump supporters attacked the US Capitol on Jan 6, 2021, in a bid to overturn Trump’s election loss to Biden. Four people died on the day of the attack, and one Capitol Police officer who fought against the rioters died the next day.

While Americans said they feared violence, few condoned it. Just 5% of respondents said it was acceptable for someone in their political party to commit violence to achieve a political goal, down from 12% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll from June 2023.

Some 67% of respondents in the latest poll said they were concerned about acts of violence against their community because of their political beliefs, compared to 60% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll from June 2023. Bipartisan majorities in the latest poll said they were concerned Americans could resort to violence instead of coming together peacefully to solve disagreements.

The attempt on Trump’s life has dominated media headlines and fueled discussion among some of his conservative Christian supporters that he was protected by God.

In the Reuters/Ipsos poll, 65% of registered Republicans said Trump’s survival showed he was “favored by divine providence or God’s will.” Eleven percent of Democrats agreed.

The United States stands out among rich nations for its embrace of religion, with evangelical Christians largely aligned with the Republican Party in recent decades. Some 77% of Americans surveyed in 2022 said they believed in God, compared to 56% of Canadians and 39% of British respondents, according to a poll by the Gallup International Association.

Who is Ahead in Fusion Energy?

•July 21, 2024 • Leave a Comment

“If we can get fusion up and running, then really we have a very safe and clean energy source which can give us boundless energy for thousands of years.”

Forbes by Deborah Wince-Smith • November 23, 2023 // CNN

Every now and then, a scientific breakthrough changes the world. From the Copernican heliocentric model of the universe and electricity to penicillin and the discovery of the structure of DNA, these developments transform our globe — and another one has been reached.

A new breakthrough with world changing potential.

For most of human history, why stars glitter and the sun shines were a mystery. But, in 1920, British astrophysicist Arthur Eddington suggested that stars get their energy from the fusion of hydrogen atoms into helium. Nuclear physics pioneer Hans Bethe identified the process that underpinned Eddington’s theory in 1939.

On December 5, 2022, scientists at the US Department of Energy’s National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory proved that theory for the first time in a laboratory. They achieved “fusion ignition,” reproducing the process that powers the sun, which created a fusion reaction that produced more energy than it took to trigger it. They achieved fusion ignition again this past July.

Nuclear fusion has the potential to deliver an inexhaustible supply of cheap clean energy to any region or geography on the grid already in place, create a market worth trillions, and meet the world’s escalating need for energy expected to grow by nearly 50 percent by 2050.

The race for fusion energy is on.

The United Kingdom, Germany, France, South Korea, and Japan have fusion energy programs underway. China sees the massive implications of nuclear fusion in its competition with the US for global supremacy in the 21st century. It is ramping up spending for fusion energy research and facilities and has reported its own scientific breakthrough—a world record in sustaining a nuclear fusion reaction.

Earlier this year (February 22, 2023), an analysis by the Japanese research company astamuse reported China has filed more patents in nuclear fusion technology that any other country over the past decade.

China came first in a nuclear fusion patent ranking compiled by Tokyo-based research company astamuse — partly owned by Nikkei — ahead of second-placed US, which was followed by the UK and Japan.

The research company ranked 30 countries and regions by studying the 1,133 patents filed between 2011 and September 2022. Each country’s score was calculated by using the number of patents filed, the feasibility of each innovation, and the remaining period of exclusivity, among others.

China was also ranked first in the number of patents, and companies and research institutions that had filed patents in the nuclear fusion field. The number of patents filed by China started to increase from 2015, pushing the country ahead of the US.

Chinese patents were concentrated in the area of practical applications, such as the creation of a ceramic composite material that can be used in the wall of a nuclear fusion reactor. This technology was developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and is considered the most important breakthrough in the survey period.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences was ranked second among the organizations covered in the survey, followed by the Southwestern Institute of Physics, an affiliate of China National Nuclear Corp.

There are now 43 fusion companies known worldwide, reports the Fusion Industry Association, and the infant industry has attracted more than $6 billion in funding. Of these, the United States has the most runners in the race—25 of them—and most of this investment. These companies are working on different concepts for a pilot scale demonstration. However, they are too small to solve the host of challenges they face on their own.

Recently, the US Department of Energy announced awards of $43 million to eight of these US companies under its Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program to fund applied R&D to resolve scientific and technological challenges to create a fusion pilot plant. Within 18 months, the companies aim to deliver a preconceptual design (addressing the same issues as a conceptual design but at lower levels of fidelity and with greater uncertainties), and a roadmap toward realizing a fusion pilot plant. This is an important step toward establishing the United States as a leader in nuclear fusion technology.

The United States should seize first mover advantage.

Historically, the commercialization pathway for energy technology has taken 30 to 50 years. But fusion energy has reached a critical turning point. Projections for putting it on the grid range from 10 to more than 20 years. The White House and many commercial companies are targeting the early 2030s, and a few nuclear fusion start-ups have even more aggressive timelines.

Federally-supported efforts have prioritized the basic science for years. Now is the time to pivot and shift into high gear with a whole nation effort to make progress on numerous fronts simultaneously and cut the timeline from proof-of-concept to scale-up within 10 to 15 years. This involves:

  • Increasing investment in applied R&D and engineering development of fusion pilot plants.
  • Establishing a regulatory process that minimizes burdens and cost to developers.
  • Beginning development of supply chains and manufacturing.
  • Expanding STEM education programs to develop commercial fusion-ready physicists, engineers and advanced technicians.
  • Aligning public and private efforts to complement each other.
  • Establishing channels for rapid transfer of new fusion-related research and technology from the research community to industry.

We need to go bold.

The United States has made big bets before and come out as a big winner. President Kennedy challenged the nation to achieve one of the most ambitious feats of engineering in human history in 1961—put a man on the moon and return him safely to earth before the end of the decade. To achieve that goal, 20,000 industrial firms and universities mobilized. A recent cost analysis suggests that nearly $26 billion was spent by the Apollo program’s completion — or $257 billion in 2020 US dollars, as estimated by the paper’s author.

That massive effort helped pave the way for US leadership in the Space Age and our dominance in global aerospace markets. The United States has a 55 percent share of global value-added in aircraft and spacecraft manufacturing; the next largest producer, China, has an eight percent share.

Is it worth taking the risk?

There are tough scientific and engineering challenges that must be overcome to achieve commercial fusion, and it is uncertain which concepts will emerge as winners.

But As Tomás Díaz de la Rubia, Vice President for Research and Partnerships at the University of Oklahoma, puts it plainly:

“Successful commercial development of fusion energy will be among history’s most profound changes. Fusion will offer a clean, sustainable baseload and safe energy source that, when conquered on Earth, will enable a transformational change from energy scarcity to abundance — enabling us to do things that could never have been done before, overcoming enduring global grand challenges, like desalinating water, and making sustainable transportation fuels.”

The stakes are sky high. The nation that leads the fusion revolution will not only enjoy a massive economic boom and energy security, but also gain tremendous geopolitical power as energy has long shaped alliances, competition and conflict. The US position in the Age of Fusion Energy could hang in the balance.

Genesis (15-16)

•July 20, 2024 • Leave a Comment

In view of our current turmoil in Butler County, here’s a Prophecy for reflection:

“The LORD shall smite thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart; and thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness” Deuteronomy 28:28-29

Genesis 15

~~~~

1 After these things the word of the Lord came unto Abram in a vision, saying, “Fear not, Abram. I am thy shield and thy exceeding great reward.”

— up to this time Abram had received only general promises of offspring, and of the land being the possession of his seed; where is that land? and years were passing by, and the fulfilment of Abram’s hopes remained distant as ever;

— but the war with the Elamite king he had also made for himself powerful enemies; and though the immediate result was fortunate, yet many Canaanite nations may have witnessed with displeasure so remarkable an exhibition of the power and energy of an intruder, an “immigrant!”

— and thus the time had come when the patriarch needed and obtained more formal assurances, first, of the bestowal upon him of offspring (Genesis 15:1-6), and, secondly, of the future possession of that land, now called Palestine (Genesis 15:18-21);

And Abram said, “Lord God, what wilt Thou give me, seeing I go childless and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?” — Abram is still childless and landless;

— what wilt thou give me? there is a slight tone of complaint in these words. God promised Abram a “reward great exceedingly”

— Abram answers that no reward can really be great so long as he has no heir.

And Abram said, “Behold, to me Thou hast given no seed; and lo, one born in my house is mine heir.” — “What wilt thou give me?” Of what use will land or wealth be to me, the immediate reward specified by the promise?

And behold, the word of the Lord came unto him, saying, “This shall not be thine heir, but he that shall come forth out of thine own loins shall be thine heir.” — but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir; that is, one shall inherit all thou hast, that shall be begotten by thee;

— an own son of Abram’s, and not a servant born in his house; one that should spring out of his own loins: one “out of thy womb”, that is, out of his wife’s, which was his; the phrase designs a genuine and legitimate son, who would be legally his heir.

And He brought him forth outdoors and said, “Look now toward heaven and count the stars, if thou be able to number them.” And He said unto him, “So shall thy seed be.” — Abram’s seed according to the flesh were like the “dust of the earth,” Genesis 13:16, and his spiritual seed are like the stars of heaven.

And he believed in the Lord; and He accounted it to him for righteousness. — Abram believed the Lord. And the Lord accepted Abram’s faith, and that faith made him right with God.

And He said unto him, “I am the Lord who brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldeans, to give thee this land to inherit it.” — the Lord next confirms and explains the promise of “the land” to Abram and further assurance was given tohim of “this land ” the land of Canaan for an inheritance.

And he said, “Lord God, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it?” — he asks for a sign, not out of distrust of God’s promise, for he was strong in faith, but for further assurance and confirmation.

And He said unto him, “Take Me a heifer of three years old, and a shegoat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon.” — the sign to Abram is the sign of the covenant:

— take me an heifer; offer me a sacrifice, a occasion of great importance, when two or more parties join in a compact, they either observe precisely the same rites as Abram did, or, where they do not, they invoke the lamp as their witness;

10 And he took unto Him all these, and divided them in the midst and laid each piece one against another; but the birds divided he not. — divided them in the midst; that is, the three animals, the heifer, goat, and ram into two equal parts; this was done for two reasons:

  • to ratify God’s covenant with Abram and his seed; for this was a rite used in making covenants, as appears both from Scripture, Jeremiah 34:18, and other authors;
  • to represent the torn and distracted condition in which his seed was to lie for a season;

— laid each piece one against another, one half against the other, the left side against the right, shoulder against shoulder, and leg against leg, so that they might seem to join;

— partly in hope they would join together, that God would in his time put those parts together, and unite those dry bones, (to which the Israelites are compared, Ezekiel 37:1-28), and clothe them with flesh; and partly that the persons entering into covenant might pass between those parts, and so testify their union and conjunction in one and the same sacrifice.

— but the birds divided he not; but laid them one against another, as the pieces were laid; so the birds used in sacrifice under the law were not to be divided, Leviticus 1:17; which may signify that when the people of the Jews, in the latter day, are brought together into their own land, when they will better answer the character of turtles and doves than they ever did, will be no more divided and separated from each other;

— but the intended offerings were not burnt, hence, perhaps, God’s commitment of “I am thy shield!” is debatable; or conditional?

11 And when the fowls came down upon the carcasses, Abram drove them away. — and when the birds of prey came down upon the carcases, Abram scared them away;

— had there been a sacrifice the fire would have kept the vultures from approaching; but the bodies lay exposed, and Abram therefore kept guard over them, lest the purpose of the ceremonial should be frustrated by any want of respect shown to the outward symbols.

12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and lo, a horror of great darkness fell upon him. — when the sun was going down; the time described was the evening following the night on which he had received the assurance that his seed should be countless as the stars.

13 And He said unto Abram, “Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years. — thy seed shall be strangers; so they were in Canaan first and afterward in Egypt: before they were lords of their own land, they were strangers in a strange land;

— only by entering under Joshua 400 years later would the land be theirs, otherwise they were only strangers to the land;

14 And also that nation whom they shall serve will I judge, and afterward shall they come out with great substance. — that nation; had it been expressly revealed that the country that would afflict them was Egypt, the principal seat of their servitude, and the instrument of their sorest bondage;

— will I judge: that is, punish after judgement, which prediction was in due course fulfilled – and afterward shall they come out with great substance;

15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried at a good old age. — and thou shall go to thy fathers in peace; or die, which is a going the way of all flesh;

16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.” — for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet full; from this sentence we have much to learn:

— the Amorites in Amos 2:9, “whose height was like the height of the cedars, and he was strong as the oaks; yet I destroyed his fruit from above and his roots from beneath.“ Perhaps like Hamas today;

— first; the Lord foreknows the moral character of people; second. In his providence he administers the affairs of nations on the principle of moral rectitude; third. Nations are spared until their iniquity is full; fourth; they are then cut off in retributive justice in due time. 

17 And it came to pass that when the sun went down and it was dark, behold, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between those pieces. — behold a smoking furnace; this signified the affliction of his seed in Egypt: they were there in the furnace of affliction, and labouring in the very fire;

— a burning lamp; this speaks comfort in this affliction: and this God showed Abram at the same time with the smoking furnace. The lamp indicates direction in the smoke; God’s word was their lamp, a light shining in a dark place.

18 On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates:

— from the river of Egypt; the river of Egypt is the Nile, which overflowed annually and made the basin fruitful; so the Targum of Jonathan calls it the Nile of Egypt; it was rendered, “from the Nile of Mizraim” or Egypt to the great river, Euphrates;

— Keil and Delitzsch: the river (נהר) of Egypt is the Nile, and not the brook (נחל) of Egypt (Numbers 34:5); the character of the promise, the two large rivers, the Nile and the Euphrates, are mentioned as the boundaries within which the seed of Abram would possess the promised land,

— and from hence to the river Euphrates, the eastern boundary, was the utmost extent of it in which it was ever possessed, as it was in the times of David and Solomon, II Samuel 8:3.

19 the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites, — the Kenites; thought to be the Idumeans, who sprung from Kenaz of Esau’s posterity; found among the Amalekites in the south (1 Samuel 15:6); note that Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was a Kenite (Judges 1:16); he was also the priest of Midian; and they dwelt among the Midianites; so they were very mixed by comparing Exodus 3:1 with Judges 1:16;

— the Kenizzites are also supposed by some to be the descendants of Kenaz, a grandson of Esau, Genesis 36:11; but then they must be so called here by anticipation, or  that is, the land they were anticipated to live there; since Kenaz was not then born; Caleb, the head of the tribe of Judah, was a Kenizzite, Numbers 32:12Joshua 14:6;

and from Deuteronomy 2:5:

Meddle not with them [the children of Esau, who dwell in Seir]; for I will not give you of their land, no, not so much as a foot breadth, because I have given Mount Seir unto Esau for a possession.

— the Kadmonites; elsewhere the Kadmonites are never mentioned again; probably dwellers on the eastern desert frontier of the Jordan, an eastern or an ancient people, of whom we know nothing;

— besides, none of the land of the children of Esau, at least of those that dwelt about Mount Seir (Deuteronomy 2:5) was to be given to the children of Israel; henced could the Edomites or Idumeans (at least a portion of them had left, some remained) have moved away while the children of Israel were in Egypt?

20 and the Hittites and the Perizzites and the Rephaim, — the Hittites, who had their name from Heth, a son of Canaan, see Genesis 10:15; they dwelt about Hebron, in the south of the land of Canaan:

— the Perizzites and the Rephaim; probably these are included in the common name of Canaanites, those that lived in the land of Canaan; 

21 and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Girgashites and the Jebusites.” —  v16 above; “for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full” but soon it would be full, like Hamas today;

— the Jebusites; who inhabited Jerusalem and its surroundings, which was first called Jebus, from the founder of this nation;

— in this and the previous verses ten nations are reckoned as occupying the land of Canaan at that time, whereas only seven are mentioned in the times of Moses and Joshua; Deuteronomy 7:1Joshua 3:10;

— although the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates,” that seed were meant to be the whole house of Israel. Hence, during the Exodus, Moses was tasked of bringing the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt, for “I have also established My covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers” Exodus 6:4.

“When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee — the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou” Deuteronomy 7:1

And Joshua said, “Hereby ye shall know that the living God is among you, and that He will without fail drive out from before you the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Hivites and the Perizzites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Jebusites” Joshua 3:10.

and from MSG

When the sun was down and it was dark, a smoking firepot and a flaming torch moved between the split carcasses. That’s when God made a covenant with Abram: “I’m giving this land to your children, from the Nile River in Egypt to the River Euphrates in Assyria—the country of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaim, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites, and Jebusites.”

— and from another perspective, the reason is given in the Book of Jubilees:

And Ham and his sons went into the land which he was to occupy, which he acquired as his portion in the land of the south.

And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt that it was very good, and he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea,

and he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea.

And Ham, his father, and Cush and Mizraim, his brothers, said unto him: “Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, and which did not fall to us by lot:

do not do so; for if thou dost do so, thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition;

for by sedition ye have settled, and by sedition will thy children fall, and thou shalt be rooted out for ever.

Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot.

Cursed art thou, and cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, by the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, and in the presence of Noah our father.”

But he (Canaan) did not hearken unto them, and dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, he and his sons until this day.
And for this reason that land is named Canaan. Book of Jubilees Chapter 10:40-48

— again, the commitment earlier by an oath; from the Book of Jubilees:

And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath, imprecating a curse on every one that sought to seize the portion which had not fallen (to him) by his lot.

And they all said, “So be it; so be it,” for themselves and their sons for ever throughout their generations Book of Jubilees Chapter 9:18-19

~~~~

The Promised Land of Greater Israel 

— Deuteronomy 7:1Joshua 3:10; and these three – the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites- were not among them. Perhaps they were all from the children of Esau, a posterity of Shem (whereas the others are mostly posterity of Ham, and of Canaan), and during this time interval of over 400 years, they had already moved north and eventually settled in Spain and then westward onto the New World;

— note, too, that in the New World, several states of the United States (namely Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, and Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and California) have the Spanish Mexicans settled there first, then later during the Mexican-American War from 1846 to 1848, the American zionists took over, which accounted for a loss of 55% of Mexico’s territory;

During the Mexican-American War, Mexico lost 55% of her Territory

— for a more indepth study of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

Genesis 16

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and until He has performed the intent of His thought; in the latter days ye shall understand it perfectly” Jeremiah 23:20

1 Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, bore him no children; and she had a handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar. —  the marriage of Hagar to Abram, who was his secondary wife; and though he may be excused, he cannot be justified; for from the beginning it was not so;

And Sarai said unto Abram, “Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing. I pray thee, go in unto my maid. It may be that I may obtain children by her.” And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. — Sarah, despairing of bearing a son herself, as she was now seventy-five, and had been ten years in Canaan, concluded that her heir was to be born of a substitute.

And Sarai, Abram’s wife, took Hagar her maid, the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife. — after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan; so that he was now eighty five years of age;

And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived. And when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes. — her mistress was despised in her eyes; thus began the ill consequences of Abram’s marriage to Hagar;

And Sarai said unto Abram, “My wrong be upon thee. I have given my maid into thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes. The Lord judge between me and thee.”

— my wrong be upon thee; that is, may the wrong done to me be avenged upon thee; Sarai’s act had been one of self-denial for Abram’s sake, and now that it has led to her being treated insolently she makes Abram answerable for it.

But Abram said unto Sarai, “Behold, thy maid is in thy hand. Do to her as it pleaseth thee.” And when Sarai dealt harshly with her, she fled from her face. — do to her as it pleaseth thee: not giving her liberty to take away her life, nor to use her cruelly,

— but to deal with her as a mistress might lawfully do with a servant, or however exercise that power which a first wife had over a second;

And the angel of the Lord found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain on the way to Shur. — by the fountain in the way to Shur; a place before or back to Egypt, from whence the wilderness had its name;

And he said, “Hagar, Sarai’s maid, whence camest thou? And whither wilt thou go?” And she said, “I flee from the face of my mistress Sarai.” — by this title he admonisheth her, that though she was Abram’s wife, yet she was Sarai’s maid;

And the angel of the Lord said unto her, “Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.” — the angel of the Lord interrogates her, and requires her to return to her mistress, and humble herself under her hands.

10 And the angel of the Lord said unto her, “I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.” — the Hagarenes, Saracens, and various other tribes of Arabs were descended from Ishmael, and they have been, and still are, a great multitude of people.

11 And the angel of the Lord said unto her, “Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son and shalt call his name Ishmael [that is, God shall hear], because the Lord hath heard thy affliction. — Ishmael; that is, God will hear; and the reason is, because the Lord hath heard; he hath, and therefore he will.

12 And he will be a wild man. His hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.” — his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; signifying, that he would be of a quarrelsome temper and warlike disposition, continually engaged in fighting with his neighbours;

— and they with him in their own defence; and such the Arabs his posterity always have been, and still are, given to rapine and plunder, harassing their neighbours by continual excursions and robberies, and pillaging passengers of all nations, which they think they have a right to do;

— and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren; the sons of Abram by Keturah, the Midianites, and others; and the Edomites that sprung from Esau, the son of his brother Isaac; and the Israelites, the descendants of Jacob, another son of Isaac; and his kinsmen the Moabites and Ammonites, upon all which he and his posterity bordered;

13 And she called the name of the Lord who spoke unto her: “Thou God seest me.” For she said, “Have I also here looked upon Him that seeth me?” — looked after him that seeth me, that is, seen the face of my gracious God! That God should appear to me in my master’s house,  that I should have such a favour;

14 Therefore the well was called Beerlahairoi [that is, The well of Him that liveth and seeth me]. Behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered. — behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered; Kadesh is the same with Kadesh Barnea in the wilderness;

— the Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan call it Rekam, the same with Petra, the chief city of Arabia Petraea, near the wilderness of Kadesh, which in his times was inhabited by Saracens, inhabited in later times by the Nabathaeans, the posterity of Ishmael;

15 And Hagar bore Abram a son; and Abram called his son’s name, whom Hagar bore, Ishmael. — and Abram called his son’s name, which Hagar bare, Ishmael; that Hagar upon her return reported to Abram the whole of the conversation she had with the angel; wherefore Abram believing what she said, in obedience to the order and command of the angel, gave him this name.

16 And Abram was fourscore and six years old when Hagar bore Ishmael to Abram. — and Abram was eighty years old when Hagar bare Ishmael to Abram. Which is easily reckoned, for he was seventy five years of age when he left Haran, Genesis 12:4

— and he had been ten years in Canaan when Hagar was given him by Sarai for his wife, Genesis 16:3; and so must be then eighty five years of age, and of course must be eighty six when Ishmael was born.

“We are NATO. And we’re comin’ to get ya”

•July 19, 2024 • Leave a Comment

In view of our current turmoil in Butler County, here’s a Prophecy for reflection:

And to the others He said in mine hearing, “Go ye after him through the city and smite. Let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity.
Slay utterly old and young, both maids and little children and women; but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at My sanctuary.” Then they began with the elder men who were before the house.
And He said unto them, “Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain. Go ye forth.” And they went forth and slew in the city.
Ezekiel 9:5-7

We are the world. We are the people. We are NATO. And we’re comin’ to get ya – wherever you are, whether you want it or not.

Strategic Culture by Pepe Escobar • July 11, 2024 // ZeroHedge

Call it the latest pop iteration of the “rules-based international order” – duly christened at NATO’s 75th birthday in DC.

Well, the Global Majority had already been warned – but brains under techno-feudalism tend to be reduced to mush.

So a gentle reminder is in order. This had already been stated in the first paragraph of the Joint Declaration on EU-NATO Cooperation, issued on January 9, 2023:

“We will further mobilize the combined set of instruments at our disposal, be they political, economic, or military, (italics mine) to pursue our common objectives to the benefit of our one billion citizens.”

Correction: barely one million, part of the 0.1% plutocracy. Certainly not one billion.

Cut to the 2024 NATO Summit Declaration – obviously redacted, with stellar mediocrity, by the Americans, with the other 31 assorted vassal members duly assenting.

So here’s the main 2024 NATO “strategic” trifecta:

  1. Extra tens of billions of dollars in “assistance” to the upcoming rump Ukraine; the overwhelming majority of these funds will be slushing around the industrial-military money laundering complex.
  2. Forceful imposition of extra military spending on all members.
  3. Massive hyping up of the “China threat.”

As for the theme song of the NATO 75 show, there are actually two. Apart from “China Threat” (closing credits), the other one (opening credits) is “Free Ukraine.” The lyrics go something like this: it looks like we are at war against Russia in Ukraine, but don’t be fooled: NATO is not a participant in the war.

Well, they are even setting up a NATO office in Kiev, but that is just to coordinate production for a Netflix war series.

Those malignant authoritarians

The outgoing epileptic slab of Norwegian wood posing as NATO Secretary-General – before the arrival of his Dutch Gouda replacement – put on quite a performance. Highlights include his fierce denunciation of “the growing alliance between Russia and its authoritarian friends in Asia,” as in “authoritarian leaders in Iran, North Korea and China.” These malignant entities “all want NATO to fail.” So there’s much work to do “with our friends in the Indo-Pacific.”

“Indo-Pacific” is a crude “rules-based international order” invention. No one across Asia, anywhere, has ever used it; everyone refers to Asia-Pacific.

The joint declaration directly blames China for fueling Russian “aggression” in Ukraine: Beijing is described as a “decisive enabler” of the Kremlin’s “war effort.” NATO script writers even directly threaten China: China “cannot enable the largest war in Europe in recent history without this negatively impacting its interests and reputation.”

To counter-act such malignity, NATO will expand its “partnerships” with “Indo-Pacific” states.

Even before the summit declaration, the Global Times was already losing their cool with these inanities: “Under the hype from the US and NATO, it seems that China has become the ‘key’ to the survival of Europe, controlling the fate of the Russia-Ukraine conflict like a ‘decisive power.’”

The tawdry rhetorical fest in DC definitely won’t cut it in Beijing: the Hegemon just wants “to reach more deeply into Asia, trying to establish an ‘Asia-Pacific NATO’ to help achieve the US’ ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy.’”

Southeast Asia, via diplomatic channels, essentially agrees: with the exception of bought and paid for misguided Filipinos, no one wants serious turbulence across Asia-Pacific like NATO has unleashed across Europe.

Zhou Bo, senior fellow at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy and a retired PLA officer, also dismissed the Indo-Pacific shenanigans even before the summit: we had an excellent exchange about it late last year at the Astana Forum in Kazakhstan.

Whatever happens, Exceptionalistan will remain on overdrive. NATO and Japan have agreed to establish a “highly confidential security information” line, around the clock. So count on meek Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida to enhance Japan’s “pivotal role” in the building of an Asian NATO.

Everyone with a brain from Urumqi to Bangalore knows that the motto across Asia, for the Exceptionalists, is “Today Ukraine, Tomorrow Taiwan.” The absolute majority of ASEAN, and hopefully India, will not fall for it.

What is clear is that the NATO at 75 circus is absolutely clueless and impervious to what happened at the recent SCO summit in Astana. Especially when it comes to the SCO now positioned as a key node in bringing on a new, Eurasia-wide collective security arrangement.

As for Ukraine, once again Medvedev Unplugged, in inimitable style, delivered the Russian position:

“The Washington Summit Declaration of July 10 mentions ‘the irreversible path of Ukraine’ to NATO. For Russia, 2 possible ways of how this path ends are acceptable: either Ukraine disappears, or NATO does. Still better, both.”

In parallel, China is conducting military exercises in Belarus only a few days after Minsk officially became a SCO member. Translation: forget about NATO “expanding” to Asia when Beijing is already making it clear it is very much present in NATO’s alleged “backyard.”

NATO Enlargement; with the Philippines, being left out, screaming to be included

A declaration of war against Eurasia

Michael Hudson once again has reminded everyone with a brain that the running NATO warmongering show has nothing to do with peaceful internationalism.

It’s rather about “a unipolar US military alliance leading toward military aggression and economic sanctions to isolate Russia and China. Or more to the point, to isolate European and other allies from its former trade and investment with Russia and China, making those allies more dependent on the United States.”

The 2024 NATO declaration actually is a renewed declaration of war, hybrid and otherwise, against Eurasia – as well as Afro-Eurasia (yes, there are promises of “partnerships” advancing everywhere from Africa to the Middle East).

The Eurasia integration process is about geoeconomic integration – including, crucially, transportation corridors connecting, among other latitudes, northern Europe with West Asia.

For the Hegemon, this is the ultimate nightmare: Eurasia integration driving Western Europe away from the US and preventing that perennial wet dream, the colonization of Russia.

So only plan A would apply, with absolute ruthlessness: Washington – literally – bombed Russia-Germany integration (Nord Stream 1 and 2, and more) and turned the vassal lands of frightened, discombobulated Europeans into a potentially very dangerous place, right beside a raging Hot War.

So once again, let everyone go back to that first paragraph of the January 2023 EU-NATO joint communiqué. That’s what we’re facing today, reflected on the title of my latest book, Eurasia v. NATOstan: NATO – in theory – fully mobilized, in military, political and economic terms, to fight against any Global Majority forces that may destabilize Imperial Hegemony.

And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee. Deuteronomy 28:28-29,37

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

For more about a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

Genesis (13-14)

•July 18, 2024 • Leave a Comment

“The anger of the Lord shall not return, until He has executed and until He has performed the intent of His thought; in the latter days ye shall understand it perfectly” Jeremiah 23:20

Genesis 13

1 And Abram went up out of Egypt, he and his wife and all that he had, and Lot with him, into the south.

— ‘Get thee out from thy father’s house, and from thy country, and from thy kindred,’ was the command to Abram, and to most others called;

— and Lot with him; Lot accompanied him into Egypt, because he comes with him out of it; into the south; that is, into the Negev;

And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold. — and Abram was very rich; he was rich; in cattle, in silver, and in gold; cattle are mentioned first, as being the principal part of the riches of men in those days, such as sheep and oxen;

And he went on his journeys from the south even to Bethel, unto the place where his tent had been at the beginning, between Bethel and Ai, — he went on to Beth-el; because there he had formerly had an altar, and although the altar had fallen down,

— between Bethel and Ai, or Hai; afterwards called Mount Ephraim, and was four miles from Jerusalem on the north; see Genesis 12:8.

unto the place of the altar which he had made there at the first; and there Abram called on the name of the Lord. — unto the place of the altar, which he had made there at the first; when he first came to that place, and before he went down to Egypt;

And Lot also, who went with Abram, had flocks and herds and tents. — Lot; he, too, had possibly received presents in Egypt, for we find him rivalling his uncle in wealth;

And the land was not able to bear them, that they might dwell together; for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together. — both arises from a large increase of riches, that relations and friends are obliged to part; what one would think would make them more comfortable together, is the cause and occasion of their separation;

And there was strife between the herdsmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdsmen of Lot’s cattle; and the Canaanites and the Perizzites dwelled then in the land. — and there was a strife between the herdmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdmen of Lot’s cattle; not between the two masters, but between their servants;

And Abram said unto Lot, “Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee and between my herdsmen and thy herdsmen; for we are brethren. — for we be brethren, that is, both by nature near kinsmen, as the word brother is oft used, and in the faith and religion too, amongst whom contentions are very indecent and scandalous.

Is not the whole land before thee? Separate thyself, I pray thee, from me. If thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right, or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left.” — the Targum of Jonathan says, “if thou wilt go to the north, I will go to the south, or if thou wilt go to the south, I will go to the north:’

10 And Lot lifted up his eyes and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered everywhere (before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah), even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt as thou comest unto Zoar. — all the plain of Jordan; a great plain so called, because there the pleasant river Jordan divided itself into divers little streams or rivulets;

11 Then Lot chose for himself all the plain of Jordan; and Lot journeyed east, and they separated themselves the one from the other. — and Lot journeyed east; and that part of the land on which Sodom and Gomorrah stood, were to the east of Bethel;

12 Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain, and pitched his tent toward Sodom. — Abram dwelt in the land of Canaan; in that part of the land where the family of the Canaanites had their abode;

13 But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly. — the men of Sodom were wicked; exceeding great sinners, guilty of the most notorious crimes, and addicted to the most scandalous and unnatural lusts; and these they committed openly and publicly in the sight of God;

14 And the Lord said unto Abram after Lot was separated from him, “Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art, northward and southward and eastward and westward;

15 for all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it and to thy seed for ever. — on top of Mount Ephraim: all the land which thou seest; so extensive a survey of the country, in all directions,

— northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward; all point in the neighborhood; and those plains and hills, then lying desolate before the eyes of the solitary patriarch, were to be peopled with a mighty nation “like the dust of the earth in number”

16 And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth, so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. — and to thy seed for ever; the meaning is, that he gave it to his posterity to be enjoyed; in the days of Solomon, and as they will be in the latter day;

17 Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it, for I will give it unto thee.” — Arise, walk through the land; enter and take possession, for thy posterity; survey the land, and it will appear better than upon a distant prospect;

18 Then Abram removed his tent and came and dwelt in the plain of Mamre, which is in Hebron, and built there an altar unto the Lord. — the city Hebron was called Mamre; an ancient city built seven years before Zoan or Tanis in Egypt, Numbers 13:22.

Hebron; an ancient city built seven years before Zoan or Tanis of Egypt

Genesis 14

1 And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of nations, — and it came to pass, in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar; or Babylon, as Onkelos, says, where Nimrod began his kingdom,

that these made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar. — the cities Sodom and Gomorrah were well established by then; even after the confusion of tongues and that they had dispersed;

All these were joined together in the Vale of Siddim, which is the Salt Sea. — the Salt Sea; as afterwards so called, not at this time, but the Dead Sea, being 1300 feet below the level of the Mediterranean; for then it would not have been fit for armies to be drawn up in battle array in it;

Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled. — they served; that is, paid a yearly tribute in those days;

And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer and the kings that were with him, and smote the Rephaim in Ashteroth Karnaim, and the Zuzim in Ham, and the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim, — in the fourteenth year; after some pause and preparation, Chedorlaomer, in conjunction with his allies, set himself to punish the revolters;

and the Horites in their Mount Seir, unto Elparan, which is by the wilderness. — the Horites were the aboriginal inhabitants of Mount Seir, where they dwelt in caves; such as are still to be seen in Petra and other places around; they were centuries later absorbed into the Edomites.

And they returned and came to Enmishpat, which is Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites and also the Amorites, who dwelt in Hazezontamar. — flashing forward, the country of the Amalekites; they were later inhabited by the prosterity of Esau;

And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar), and they joined battle with them in the Vale of Siddim, — five kings came out and joined battle with the four in the dale of Siddim;

against Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and against Tidal king of nations, and Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar — four kings against five.

10 And the Vale of Siddim was full of slime pits; and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled and fell there, and those who remained fled to the mountain. — the five initiated the fight against the four but the vale of Siddim was full of slimepits, hence the four prevailed against the five;

11 And they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah and all their victuals, and went their way. — and they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah; they entered these cities and pillaged them, and carried off everything valuable in them;

12 And they took Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods and departed. — the victors plundered the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, and carried off Lot, who dwelt in Sodom, and all his possessions, along with the rest of the captives, probably taking the route through the valley of the Jordan up to Damascus;

13 And there came one who had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew, for he dwelt on the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and brother of Aner; and these were confederate with Abram. — the plain of Mamre; these were confederate with Abram; probably there was also a league for mutual defence between him and them.

14 And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house (three hundred and eighteen), and pursued them unto Dan. — and when Abram heard that his brother; regard Lot as his brother’s son, or at the same time his brother-in-law; or just brother;

Hebron, West Bank→Damascus, Syria 340 kilometers or 210 miles

15 And he divided himself against them, he and his servants by night, and smote them and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus. — Hobah, on the left of Damascus, was over 200 miles toward the north from Hebron;

16 And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot and his goods, and the women also and the people. — he brought back all the goods which the victorious kings had taken from the princes and people mentioned earlier;

17 And the king of Sodom went out to meet him at the Valley of Shaveh (which is the King’s Dale) after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer and of the kings who were with him. — the king of Sodom, who had fled, came down from the mountain whither he had escaped, came down to meet Abram;

18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine; and he was the priest of the Most High God. — and Melchizedek king of Salem; both the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem say, this is Shem, the son of Noah;

— though it is highly probable Shem was living at this time, yet it is not easy to account for it why his name should be changed, or that he should reign in a country in the possession of his brother’s son; or that he should meet Abram, and congratulate him on the slaughter of one of his own descendants;

— some have thought him to be more than a mere man, even the Son of God himself, but he is manifestly distinguished from him in Hebrews 7:

“For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, met Abraham, who was returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him.

To him also Abraham gave a tenth part of all, Melchizedek first being by interpretation “king of righteousness,” and after that also king of Salem, which means “king of peace.”

Without father, without mother and without descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like unto the Son of God, he abideth a priest continually.” Hebrews 7:1-3

19 And he blessed him and said, “Blessed be Abram of the Most High God, possessor of heaven and earth; — and Melchizedek blessed Abram, which was one part of his office as a priest; and said, blessed be Abram of the most high God;

20 and blessed be the Most High God, who hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand.” And he gave him tithes of all. — and he gave him tithes of all; not Melchizedek to Abram, but Abram to Melchizedek, and these tithes were given not out of the goods that were recovered;

21 And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, “Give me the persons, and take the goods for thyself.” — Grive me the persons; to this day it is the custom among the people there, that, if a camp be plundered, his own subjects that had been taken and carried away by the four kings, anyone who recovers the booty gives up only the persons, and takes the rest for himself.

22 And Abram said to the king of Sodom, “I have lifted up mine hand unto the Lord, the Most High God, the possessor of heaven and earth, — I have lifted up my hand; this is a serious matter with Abram, either before, or then and there, he made an oath before God, that he would not touch the property of Sodom.

23 that I will not take from a thread even to a shoe strap, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say,‘I have made Abram rich’” — even to a shoelatchet; that is, from a thread used in sewing garments to, a shoelatchet, or the string which fastens the shoes to the foot,

24 except only that which the young men have eaten and the portion of the men who went with me: Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.” — the young men have eaten; his three hundred and eighteen trained servants, and those of his confederates;

— who having recovered the victuals taken away from the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, had eaten of it for their refreshment, as it was but just and right.

Canada’s Big Worry: A US Civil War

•July 17, 2024 • Leave a Comment

In view of our current turmoil in Butler County, here’s a Prophecy for reflection:

“The LORD shall smite thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart; and thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness” Deuteronomy 28:28-29

Justin Trudeau probably won’t ask Joe Biden if the US is headed for a war between the states. But a report from within his government says it’s time for Canada to get ready.

Politico • July 11, 2024 // National Interest

This growing concern has particularly resonated with neighboring countries, especially Canada. But is the Canadian government truly anxious about the prospect of another American civil war?

A think tank housed within Trudeau’s government is already pondering that question.

In a spring report titled “Disruptions on the Horizon,” a quiet office known as Policy Horizons Canada proposed American civil war as a scenario that Ottawa should consider preparing for.

This hypothetical was tucked into the middle of the 37-page document, which sketched the possibility in 15 spare words: “US ideological divisions, democratic erosion, and domestic unrest escalate, plunging the country into civil war.”

It’s an unsettling thing to find out your immediate neighbor is getting nervous about the possibility of gruesome violence in your home.

There has been no shortage of apocalyptic forecasting about Trump-era American politics. Since the 2016 election, left-leaning nonprofits, political consultants and academics have indulged in endless speculation and role-playing exercises, ostensibly to help them defend democracy. In practice, much of this has amounted to self-indulgence. One hysterical episode in 2020 involved a war-game simulation that ended with Biden and his allies encouraging the entire West Coast to secede from the union.

The Policy Horizons report struck me as different: not dark fan fiction (or anti-fan fiction) from American partisans, but a sober branch of a friendly foreign government contemplating our national crackup.

So, how seriously should people take this on either side of the 49th parallel?

The Policy Horizons report surveyed hundreds of experts and government officials about disruptive events that Canada might do well to prepare for. Then, the authors classed those scenarios based on the likelihood they will occur, how soon they might happen and how much chaos they might create.

American civil war ranked as an improbable but ultra-high-impact event.

Other scenarios in that general category included the proliferation of homemade biological weapons; the rise of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, leading to mass death and food shortages; and the outbreak of World War 3.

John McArthur, a Brookings Institution scholar who sits on the Policy Horizons steering committee, told me the report’s description of American civil war might reflect the depth of Canadian anxiety about US politics, more than a literal concern about an 1861-style war between the states.

Stressing that he was speaking for himself and not Policy Horizons, McArthur noted that the rise of American protectionism and isolationism during the Trump administration had rattled the Canadian psyche and upended decades-old economic relationships. Donald Trump’s policies and personal behavior toward Canada — including trashing Trudeau after a previous G7 meeting in Quebec — have left a painful mark.

“Any sense of disruption to your closest sovereign relationship in the world, any disruption within that country, is a deep worry, I think, to any Canadian outlook,” said McArthur, adding: “Canada’s place in the world has become more complex terrain to navigate.”

The plausibility of the civil war scenario, he said, depends on “how one defines civil war.”

Catherine Beaudry, a professor at Polytechnique Montréal who analyzed the report on a Policy Horizons panel in May, sounded more skeptical.

The value of the “Disruptions” report, in Beaudry’s view, was in laying out a web of hypothetical events worth preparing for, so that experts and officials could see how they are interconnected — and how dealing with one scenario early might help address others later on.

Many of the scenarios in the report, she said, pointed to the urgency of mastering new technology: the threat of cyberattacks disabling critical infrastructure, for instance, or emergency services being overwhelmed to the point of collapse. A government could calibrate its priorities in view of those ideas.

The practical application of a US civil war scenario is not as obvious.

“How do you act on this?” Beaudry wondered. “You know, ‘World war breaks out’ — there are things where you have very little control and there are things where you have full control.”

A future report, she said, might do well to consider “the degree to which the government has tools to act” on various contingencies.

American Civil War Wallpapers

I didn’t get to ask Policy Horizons officials to engage this criticism. Several officials declined to speak with me or didn’t respond to emails. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Employment and Social Development, which houses Policy Horizons, sent me a statement explaining the methodology of the report and underlining that the content “does not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of Canada, or participating departments and agencies.”

Had they realized, perhaps, that speculating about an ally’s incipient civil war could come off as impolite?

Without a more developed sense of Policy Horizons thinking, I asked myself: What would an American civil war look like? Not, I suspect, a huge section of the country breaking away en masse and announcing its departure by shelling a military base. The Confederate approach seems obsolete against today’s vast, professionalized, high-tech federal military.

Most contemporary civil wars — in Yemen or Sudan, for instance — are not helpful reference points for the United States. They involve weak governments in poor countries, often with destabilizing interference from neighboring regimes.

So is the Policy Horizons scenario just idle provocation?

Maybe not entirely.

There is one credible scenario for American civil war, drawn not from the distant past or from far away but from a recent, nearby example — Canada’s own.

The Quebec separatism battle of the 1960s was not a full-blown civil war, but it was a sustained, violent attack on the state, carried out by sectional militants who believed the federal system had changed in unacceptable ways.

Nearly a decade of bombings, robberies and kidnappings culminated in the October Crisis of 1970, when Quebec separatists abducted and murdered Pierre Laporte, the province’s deputy premier.

This was a period of brutal, traumatic civil strife, and in a post-Jan. 6 world it is not wild speculation to envision a similar sequence of events in the United States. We are a heavily armed country with a contested federal system and proud, powerful provincial identities.

Some of our states, like Texas and California, are quasi-national entities already. The next president is sure to be loathed by much of the country, and likely seen as illegitimate by at least a large minority.

It does not take a kaleidoscopic imagination to see how that set of conditions could lead to our own October Crisis.

It does not take a kaleidoscopic imagination to see how that set of conditions could lead to our own October Crisis.

Has that thought crossed Justin Trudeau’s mind? His premiership is itself a legacy of that period: It was in part by crushing the Quebec militants with just-watch-me resolve that Trudeau’s father, Pierre Trudeau, became a dominant figure of modern Canadian politics — the kind of leader who could found a dynasty.

Justin Trudeau may not need a think tank to tell him the churning anger across the border is a threat to North American stability.

But he isn’t his father and this isn’t Canada’s crisis. They are neighbors and spectators, and for now they have a different role: Just watch.

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

For more about a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

Genesis (11-12)

•July 16, 2024 • Leave a Comment

In view of our current turmoil in Butler County, here’s a Prophecy for reflection:

And to the others He said in mine hearing, “Go ye after him through the city and smite. Let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity.
Slay utterly old and young, both maids and little children and women; but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at My sanctuary.” Then they began with the elder men who were before the house.
And He said unto them, “Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain. Go ye forth.” And they went forth and slew in the city.
Ezekiel 9:5-7

Genesis 11

~~~~

Armenia, where Noah’s ark rested and where all the creatures dispersed from

And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. — the whole earth; that is, all mankind at that time;

— after giving the connection of the various races of the then known world: consisting of Armenia, the regions watered by the Tigris and Euphrates, the Arabian peninsula, the Nile valley, with the districts closely bordering on the Delta, Palestine, the Levant, and the islands of Cyprus, Rhodes, and Crete;

— the whole earth was of one language; this even heathen writers acknowledge; and that language was, probably, the Hebrew; as the Targum of Jonathan says: “in the holy language spake they, that by which the world had been created at the beginning;”

And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and they dwelt there. — “from the east” or “they journeyed east” or another version (AMP) “and as people journeyed eastward”

— Josephus (Antiquities: book I, chapter 4, section 1) explained that God admonished them again to send out colonies; to cultivate a great part of the earth, but they, imagining the prosperity they enjoyed in the cities as before, did not obey him, began to build cities.

And they said one to another, “Come, let us make bricks and burn them thoroughly.” And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. — let us make brick, for in that low and fat soil they had no quarries of stones; the heathen writers agree that Babylon’s walls were made of brick;

And they said, “Come, let us build us a city and a tower whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.” — whose top may reach unto heaven: not that they imagined such a thing could be literally be done;

— but that it should be raised exceeding high, like the cities in Canaan, said to be walled up to heaven, Deuteronomy 1:28 hyperbolically speaking;

And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the children of men built. — and the Lord came down to see the city; this is an expression after the manner of men; he knew it as clearly as men know that which they come upon the place to view;

And the Lord said, “Behold, the people are one and they have all one language, and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be withheld from them which they have imagined to do. — nothing will be withholden from them; they will be baulked with no limits; if they mount up to heaven, their arrogance will soon make them endeavour to rival God.

Come, let Us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.” — and the Lord said “let Us” not to the angels or to the spirit, but rather the Father to the Son;

So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth; and they left off building the city. — they brought upon themselves the very thing they feared, and that more speedily and more mischievously to themselves; for now they were not only divided in place, but in language too;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And the Word of the Lord was revealed against the city, and with Him seventy angels, having reference to seventy nations, each having its own language, and thence the writing of its own hand:

and He dispersed them from thence upon the face of all the earth into seventy languages. And one knew not what his neighbour would say: but one slew the other; and they ceased from building the city. Jonathan

Therefore is the name of it called Babel [that is, Confusion], because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth; and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth. — confound their language; it was a failure in utterance, occasioning a difference in dialect which was intelligible only to those of the same tribe.

10 These are the generations of Shem: Shem was a hundred years old and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood; — Shem was one hundred years old, and begat Arphexad two years after the flood; by which it is pretty plain that he was younger than Japheth;

— for Noah was five hundred years old when he began to beget sons, Genesis 5:32 he was six hundred when he went into the ark, Genesis 7:11 two years after the flood Shem begat Arphaxad, when he was one hundred years old, and Noah six hundred and two, Genesis 11:10 so that Shem must be born when Noah was five hundred and two years old;

— these are the generations of Shem; here also, as in Genesis 5, there is a very considerable divergence between the statements of the Hebrew, the Samaritan, and the Septuagint. According to the Hebrew, the total number of years from Shem to the birth of Abram was 390, according to the Samaritan, 1,040, and according to the LXX, 1,270 1,140

Masoretic: Shem (100 Gen 11:10); Arphaxad (35 Gen 11:12); Salah (30 Gen 11:14); Eber (34 Gen 11:16); Peleg (30 Gen 11:18); Reu (32 Gen 11:20); Serug (30 Gen 11:22); Nahor (29 Gen 11:24); Terah (70 Gen 11:26); Abram = 390

Septuagint: Shem (100 Gen 11:10); Arphaxad (135 Gen 11:12); Salah (130 Gen 11:14); Eber (134 Gen 11:16); Peleg (130 Gen 11:18); Reu (132 Gen 11:20); Serug (130 Gen 11:22); Nahor (179 Gen 11:24); Terah (70 Gen 11:26); Abram = 1,140

Samaritan: Shem (100 Gen 11:10); Arphaxad (135 Gen 11:12); Salah (130 Gen 11:14); Eber (134 Gen 11:16); Peleg (130 Gen 11:18); Reu (132 Gen 11:20); Serug (130 Gen 11:22); Nahor (79 Gen 11:24); Terah (70 Gen 11:26); Abram = 1,040

Targum of Jonathan: Shem (100 Gen 11:10); Arphaxad (35 Gen 11:12); Salah (30 Gen 11:14); Eber (34 Gen 11:16); Peleg (30 Gen 11:18); Reu (32 Gen 11:20); Serug (30 Gen 11:22); Nahor (29 Gen 11:24); Terah (70 Gen 11:26); Abram = 390

— Josephus (Antiquities l. 1. c. 6. sect. 5) his figures go along mostly with the Septuagint and the Samaritan:

I will now treat of the Hebrews. The son of Phaleg, whose father Was Heber, was Ragau; whose son was Serug, to whom was born Nahor; his son was Terah, who was the father of Abraham, who accordingly was the tenth from Noah, and was born in the two hundred and ninety-second year after the deluge; for Terah begat Abram in his seventieth year.

Nahor begat Haran when he was one hundred and twenty years old; Nahor was born to Serug in his hundred and thirty-second year; Ragau had Serug at one hundred and thirty; at the same age also Phaleg had Ragau; Heber begat Phaleg in his hundred and thirty-fourth year; he himself being begotten by Sala when he was a hundred and thirty years old, whom Arphaxad had for his son at the hundred and thirty-fifth year of his age. Arphaxad was the son of Shem, and born twelve years after the deluge.

Now Abram had two brethren, Nahor and Haran: of these Haran left a son, Lot; as also Sarai and Milcha his daughters; and died among the Chaldeans, in a city of the Chaldeans, called Ur; and his monument is shown to this day.

These married their nieces. Nabor married Milcha, and Abram married Sarai. Now Terah hating Chaldea, on account of his mourning for Ilaran, they all removed to Haran of Mesopotamia, where Terah died, and was buried, when he had lived to be two hundred and five years old; for the life of man was already, by degrees, diminished, and became shorter than before, till the birth of Moses; after whom the term of human life was one hundred and twenty years, God determining it to the length that Moses happened to live.

Now Nahor had eight sons by Milcha; Uz and Buz, Kemuel, Chesed, Azau, Pheldas, Jadelph, and Bethuel. These were all the genuine sons of Nahor; for Teba, and Gaam, and Tachas, and Maaca, were born of Reuma his concubine: but Bethuel had a daughter, Rebecca, and a son, Laban. Josephus (Antiquities l. 1. c. 6. sect. 5)

11 and Shem lived after he begot Arphaxad five hundred years, and begot sons and daughters. — and Shem lived, after he begat Arphaxad, five hundred years; so that his whole age was six hundred years, and therefore must live to the times of Abraham; which only true if the Masoretic Text is considered;

— and even throughout the life of Abraham, or near the end of it; and if he was the same with Melchizedek, as is the general beliefs of the Jews, they would have interrelation with each other; but what if the Samaritan and the Septuagint is true instead? Then Melchizedek won’t live until Abraham’s birth;

12 And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years and begot Salah;

13 and Arphaxad lived after he begot Salah four hundred and three years, and begot sons and daughters.

14 And Salah lived thirty years and begot Eber;

15 and Salah lived after he begot Eber four hundred and three years, and begot sons and daughters.

16 And Eber lived four and thirty years and begot Peleg;

17 and Eber lived after he begot Peleg four hundred and thirty years, and begot sons and daughters.

18 And Peleg lived thirty years and begot Reu;

19 and Peleg lived after he begot Reu two hundred and nine years, and begot sons and daughters.

20 And Reu lived two and thirty years and begot Serug;

21 and Reu lived after he begot Serug two hundred and seven years, and begot sons and daughters.

22 And Serug lived thirty years and begot Nahor;

23 and Serug lived after he begot Nahor two hundred years, and begot sons and daughters.

24 And Nahor lived nine and twenty years and begot Terah;

25 and Nahor lived after he begot Terah one hundred and nineteen years, and begot sons and daughters.

26 And Terah lived seventy years and begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran.

— Terah was a idol-worshipper:

And Joshua said unto all the people, “Thus saith the Lord God of Israel: ‘Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the river in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor; and they served other gods. Joshua 234:2

— and here is an abridged story about Abraham’s righteousness: from Bereshit Rabbah 38

Abraham’s father, Terah was an idol manufacturer and worshipper. He operated a shop selling idols; and while he was away, Abraham was asked to look after the shop, but he took a hammer, smashed the idols and placed the hammer in the hand of the largest idol.

When Terah returned, he asked what happened to all the idols, Abraham told him that the idols fought among themselves and then the largest idol took the hammer and smashed all the others. When his father challenged him, saying, “That’s ridiculous, idols are only statues and cannot move!”

Abraham replied, “Then why do you worship them?”

— Josephus wrote:

“Terah, who was the father of Abraham, who accordingly was the tenth from Noah, and was born in the two hundred and ninety-second year after the deluge” (Antiquities: book I, chapter 6, section 5);

— that is, the year 1948 (according to Jewish reckoning).

27 Now these are the generations of Terah: Terah begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran begot Lot. — and Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran. Abram, though named first, does not appear to be the eldest, but rather Nahor or more probably Haran;

— it seems pretty plain that Abram was not born until the 130th year of his father’s life, for Terah was 205 years old when he died, Genesis 11:32 and Abram was 75 of age when he went out of Haran to Canaan, Genesis 12:4 and that was after his father had died and buried there; so that if 75 years are taken out from 205, Terah would be 130, in which year Abram was born, assuming Abram journeyed on soon after Terah’s death;

And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years, and Terah died in Haran. Genesis 11:32 

So Abram departed as the Lord had spoken unto him, and Lot went with him; and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran. Genesis 12:4

— from here, Abram was born when Terah was 130 years, and not 70 as we believe; and secondly from this case, it proves that the names mentioned first in biblical genealogy may not necessarily be the eldest;

— hypothetically, if Abram’s departure from Haran had been delayed by, say, 2 years after his father’s death, then Terah would be 132 when Abram was born;

28 And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldeans. — Haran died in Ur before his father Terah; thus Abram took Lot as an orphan with him when they left Haran to go to Canaan;

— Abram’s brethren were, Nahor, out of whose family both Isaac and Jacob had their wives; and Haran, the father of Lot, who died before his father. Children cannot be sure that they shall outlive their parents. Haran died in Ur, before the happy removal of the family out of that idolatrous country;

29 And Abram and Nahor took for themselves wives: the name of Abram’s wife was Sarai, and the name of Nahor’s wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah.

30 But Sarai was barren; she had no child. — Joseph says as Abram has no son of his own, he adopted Lot, his brother Haran’s son, and his wife Sarai’s brother; (Antiquities: book I, chapter 7, section 1)

31 And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son’s son, and Sarai his daughter-in-law, his son Abram’s wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldeans to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran and dwelt there.

— Abram and Nabor his brother married their nieces. Nabor married Milcha and Abram married Sarai, both daughters of Haran, who died in Ur;

32 And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years, and Terah died in Haran.

— concerning Abram’s courage, Jewish writings say:

Now Abram had two brethren, Nahor and Haran: of these Haran left a son, Lot; as also Sarai and Milcha his daughters; and died among the Chaldeans, in a city called Ur of the Chaldees, where, he adds, his grave is shown to this day:

the Jews have a fable concerning the death of Haran; they say that Terah was not only an idolater, but a maker and seller of images; and that one day going abroad, he left his son Abraham in the shop to sell them, who, during his father’s absence, broke them all to pieces,

except one; upon which, when Terah returned and found what was done, he had him [Abram] before Nimrod, who ordered him [Abram] to be cast into a burning furnace, and he should see whether the God he worshipped would come and save him; and while he was in it, they asked his brother Haran in whom he believed?

he [Haran] answered, if Abraham overcomes, he would believe in his God, but if not, in Nimrod; wherefore, they cast him [Haran] into the furnace, and he was burnt; and with respect to this it is said, “and Haran died before the face of Terah his father”; but Abraham came out safe before the eyes of them all. Now Terah, hating what he had witnessed, and on account of his mourning for his son, they all removed to Haran of Mesopotamia. (Bereshit Rabbah 38);

Joshua 24:2 “even Terah, the father of Abraham, served other gods.”

Genesis 12

1 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, “Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will show thee. — Abram was expressly commanded to leave “his kindred and his father’s house,” but Nahor wasn’t asked to, so Nahor didn’t join Abram;

And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing. — In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed; henceforward Abram and the nation sprung from him were to be the intermediaries between God and mankind;

And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee; and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” — and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed; that is, through his seed;

So Abram departed as the Lord had spoken unto him, and Lot went with him; and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran. — and Lot, being an orphan, went with him; of his own accord, and he only, besides Adram’s wife Sarai and his servants, for Terah was dead, and Nahor and his family stayed behind;

And Abram took Sarai his wife and Lot his brother’s son, and all their substance that they had gathered, and the souls whom they had gotten in Haran; and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan, and into the land of Canaan they came. — into the land of Canaan they came; with all their substance that they had gathered; either in Ur of the Chaldees, or from Haran, or both;

And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Shechem, unto the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanites were then in the land. — Shechem; this name signifies “shoulder,” and was the name of the ridge uniting Mounts Ebal and Gerizim, the summits of which are about two miles apart;

— and the Canaanites were already then in the land; this simply implies that the land was not open for Abram to enter upon immediate possession without a challenge;

And the Lord appeared unto Abram and said, “Unto thy seed will I give this land.” And there built he an altar unto the Lord, who appeared unto him. — Unto thy seed will I give this land; the whole of it inhabited by Canaanites and others; no place or condition can shut us out from God’s gracious gifts;

And he removed from thence unto a mountain on the east of Bethel and pitched his tent, having Bethel on the west and Ai on the east; and there he built an altar unto the Lord, and called upon the name of the Lord. — and the life of God’s calling is ever a pilgrim life, and Bethel has soon to be the home instead of Shechem; here, too, Abram keeps outside the city, and pitches his tent;

— and there he builded an altar unto the Lord: as he had done at Shechem; for wherever he went he worshipped God, and offered sacrifice unto him;

And Abram journeyed, going on still toward the south. — going on still toward the south; the southern part of the land of Canaan, which lay nearest Egypt, into which he is said to go next;

10 And there was a famine in the land; and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there, for the famine was grievous in the land. — there was a famine in the land; this famine must have happened within a few years after Abram reached Canaan;

— for he was seventy-five years of age on leaving Haran, and as Ishmael, his son by an Egyptian slave-woman, was thirteen years old when Abram was ninety-nine, only about eight years are left for the events recorded in Genesis 12-16.

11 And it came to pass, when he had come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, “Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon. — though sixty five years of age, being ten years younger than her husband; yet might still be a fair woman, having a good complexion and comely features;

— Sarai’s complexion, coming from a mountainous country, would be fresh and fair compared with the faces of Egyptian women which were of unhealthy pale brown;

12 Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, ‘This is his wife’; and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive. — Sarai then was sixty-five years of age and beauty does not vanish with middle age; but that Sarai’s age corresponds with twenty to thirty years in modern times,

13 Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister, that it may be well with me for thy sake, and my soul shall live because of thee.” — Say thou art my sister; as his niece; for nephews and nieces are in Scripture called brethren and sisters; as Genesis 13:8

14 And it came to pass, when Abram had come into Egypt, that the Egyptians beheld the woman, that she was very fair. — the Egyptians beheld the woman, that she was very fair; Abram knew that Sarai was fair; but in the eyes of the Egyptians she was very fair; perhaps, they there were none of such fairness in Egypt.

15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh; and the woman was taken into Pharaoh’s house. — the woman was taken into the royal palace of Pharaoh; kings have for ages claimed the privilege of taking to their harem any unmarried woman whom they like;

16 And he treated Abram well for her sake; and he had sheep and oxen and heasses, and menservants and maidservants, and sheasses and camels. — and he entreated Abram well for her sake; Pharaoh was very complaisant to him, showed him great respect,

— and bestowed many favours on him on account of Sarai, whom he took to be his sister, and which were done, that he would consent that she might be his wife; and Abram were given sheep, and oxen, and heasses, and menservants, and maidservants, and sheasses, and camels; 

17 And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai, Abram’s wife. — not only Pharaoh was plagued, but those of his household also, his courtiers and servants, who were accessary to the bringing of Sarai into his house; for all this was because of Sarai, Abram’s wife;

— Jewish writings and Rashi have a notion, that an angel stood by Sarai with a scourge in his hand, and when Sarai bid the angel to smite Pharaoh, he smote him; signifying not just Pharaoh but his courtiers as well; because she was taken by these courtiers and detained in Pharaoh’s house, and designed Sarai to be made his wife or concubine; and thus for evil intentions was this punishment inflicted to all involved;

— but Josephus says it slightly different:

“but God put a stop to his unjust inclinations, by sending upon him a distemper, and a sedition against his government. And when he inquired of the priests how he might be freed from these calamities, they told him that this his miserable condition was derived from the wrath of God, upon account of his inclinations to abuse the stranger’s wife.

He then, out of fear, asked Sarai who she was, and who it was that she brought along with her. And when he had found out the truth, he excused himself to Abram, that supposing the woman to be his sister, and not his wife, he set his affections on her, as desiring an affinity with him by marrying her, but not as incited by lust to abuse her.

He also made him a large present in money, and gave him leave to enter into conversation with the most learned among the Egyptians; from which conversation his virtue and his reputation became more conspicuous than they had been before.” (Antiquities l. 1. c. 8. sect. 1)

18 And Pharaoh called Abram and said, “What is this that thou hast done unto me? Why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? — what is this that thou hast done unto me? to impose upon me, and deceive me after this manner, by giving out that Sarai was thy sister;

— when she is thy wife; by which means I have been led to prepare to take her for my wife, and have brought plagues upon myself and family? and thus he resented it as an injury done him, as he well might;

19 Why saidst thou, ‘She is my sister,’ so I might have taken her to me for a wife? Now therefore behold thy wife; take her and go thy way.” — now therefore, behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way; Sarai it seems was present at this interview, who was delivered to her husband untouched;

20 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him; and they sent him away with his wife and all that he had. — and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had;

— they did not drive him out by force, or in any disgraceful manner, but being committed to a guard of men, appointed by the king, he had safe conduct out of the land, with his family, and all that he had; all that he brought with him, and all the increase he had made there, and all the gifts he had received of the king.

Asia, say ‘No’ to NATO

•July 15, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Prof John Mearsheimer: NATO Declares Ukraine’s Membership Irreversable

“Asia, say No to NATO,” cautions Kishore Mahbubani: “the Pacific has no need of the destructive militaristic culture of the Atlantic alliance;” but Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Australia and the Philippines all say Yes to NATO in the Asia-Pacific.

NATO Says It Will Invite Ukraine into NATO; thereafter, to include Asian countries

Pearls and Irritations by Kishore Mahbubani • July 12, 2024

The implicit message was clear: Nato would like to expand its tentacles beyond the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. All of us who live close to the Pacific Ocean, especially in East Asia, should be deeply concerned. If Nato comes to the Pacific, it only means trouble for us. Why? Three reasons.

First, Nato is not a geopolitically wise organisation. It did a brilliant job in the Cold War, deterring Soviet expansion into Europe. During the Cold War, it was careful and restrained, building up military capabilities and avoiding direct military conflicts.

The Cold War ended 30 years ago. In theory, after “mission accomplished,” Nato should have shut down. In practice, it desperately looked for new missions. In the process, it destabilised Europe.

With NATO, the Wind from the Ukrainian War might soon spread to Asia

It bears remembering that relations between Russia and Nato used to be much better, so much so that in 1994, Russia officially signed up to the Partnership for Peace, a programme aimed at building trust between Nato and other European and former Soviet countries.

But things fell apart because Nato rejected Russia’s repeated requests to refuse to accept new members in its “backyard.” Then, in April 2008, Nato pushed things further, opening the door to membership for Georgia and Ukraine at the Bucharest summit.

As US commentator Tom Friedman noted:

“There is one thing future historians will surely remark upon, and that is the utter poverty of imagination that characterised US foreign policy in the late 1990s. They will note that one of the seminal events of this century took place between 1989 and 1992 – the collapse of the Soviet Empire …

Thanks to Western resolve and the courage of Russian democrats, that Soviet empire collapsed without a shot, spawning a democratic Russia, setting free the former Soviet republics and leading to unprecedented arms control agreements with the US. And what was America’s response? It was to expand the Nato Cold-War alliance against Russia and bring it closer to Russia’s borders.”

The result was inevitable. Russia had tried to be a friend of the Nato countries after the Cold War ended. Instead, it was slapped in the face with Nato expansion. Many Western media reports portray Russia as a “belligerent, aggressive actor.” They fail to mention that Nato actions generated this response.

A truly dangerous moment surfaced in 2014 when it looked as if Nato was about to encroach into Ukraine with the ouster of its pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych by Western-supported demonstrators.

For President Vladimir Putin, that was the last straw, and soon after came the seizure of Crimea, which the Russians consider part of their cultural heartland.

The dangers of Western expansion into Ukraine were well known. Dr Henry Kissinger had pointed out:

“[The Ukrainians] live in a country with a complex history and a polyglot composition. The Western part was incorporated into the Soviet Union in 1939, when Stalin and Hitler divided up the spoils. Crimea, 60 per cent of whose population is Russian, became part of Ukraine only in 1954, when Nikita Khrushchev, a Ukrainian by birth, awarded it as part of the 300th-year celebration of a Russian agreement with the Cossacks.

The west is largely Catholic; the east largely Russian Orthodox. The west speaks Ukrainian; the east speaks mostly Russian. Any attempt by one wing of Ukraine to dominate the other – as has been the pattern – would lead eventually to civil war or break-up. To treat Ukraine as part of an East-West confrontation would scuttle for decades any prospect to bring Russia and the West – especially Russia and Europe – into a cooperative international system.”

Sadly, since 2014, Ukraine has become a divided country. If Nato had shown greater geopolitical restraint, these problems could have been avoided.


Former war crimes prosecutor, Carla Del Ponte, could not investigated NATO’s criminal activities in the former Yugoslavia

The second major weakness of post-Cold War Nato is that its behaviour reflects the old adage: If you are a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

Curiously, during the Cold War, Nato dropped very few bombs on foreign countries. Since the end of the Cold War, Nato has dropped a massive amount of bombs on many countries. Between March and June 1999, Nato bombing campaigns were estimated to have killed 500 civilians in the former Yugoslavia. Nato also dropped several thousand cluster bombs there, despite their use being illegal under the 2010 Convention on Cluster Munitions Treaty.

Nato airstrikes in Libya in 2011 resulted in 7,700 bombs dropped, and an estimated 70 civilians killed.

Many of the bombing missions were illegal under international law. I vividly remember having dinner at the home of a former Canadian diplomat in Ottawa when Nato decided to bomb Yugoslav forces in 1999. This Canadian diplomat was deeply worried. Since this military campaign was neither an act of self-defence nor authorised by the United Nations Security Council, it was clearly and technically illegal under international law.

Indeed, Ms Carla Del Ponte, a former special prosecutor in the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, tried to investigate whether Nato committed war crimes in the former Yugoslavia. Even though most Nato countries believe in the sanctity of international law, they applied so much political pressure that Ms Del Ponte could not carry out her investigations.

Even worse, Nato has often started a military campaign and then walked away from the disastrous consequences of its intervention. Libya is a classic example of this. The Nato countries were exultant when Muammar Gaddafi was removed from Libya. However, after the country split apart and became caught up in a civil war, Nato just walked away.

Many years ago, a wise former US secretary of state, Mr Colin Powell, warned against such military interventions by citing a common statement in crystal shops: “If you break it, you own it.” Nato failed to own the wreckage it left behind.

This leads to the third danger: East Asia has developed, with the assistance of ASEAN, a very cautious and pragmatic geopolitical culture. In the 30 years since the end of the Cold War, Nato has dropped several thousand bombs on many countries. By contrast, in the same period, no bombs have been dropped anywhere in East Asia.

This is therefore the biggest danger we face in Nato expanding its tentacles from the Atlantic to the Pacific: It could end up exporting its disastrous militaristic culture to the relatively peaceful environment we have developed in East Asia.

Indeed, if Nato was a wise, thinking and learning organisation, it should actually be studying the East Asian record – especially the ASEAN record of preserving peace – and learning lessons from it. Instead, it is doing the opposite, thereby creating real dangers for our region.

In view of the risks to East Asia through the potential expansion of Nato culture, all of East Asia should speak with one voice and say no to Nato.

Were the Moon landings faked?

•July 14, 2024 • Leave a Comment

I’d like to believe the Moon landings were faked – the alternative is far bleaker

“We Never Went to the Moon: America’s 30 Billion Dollar Swindle.”

The Telegraph by Mary Harrington • July 8, 2024

In September 2002, the astronaut Buzz Aldrin – the second man to walk on the Moon – was confronted in Beverly Hills by a camera crew led by Bart Sibrel. Sibrel, the creator of several documentaries alleging that the Moon landings never happened, shoved a Bible at Aldrin and demanded he swear on it that he wasn’t lying about walking on the Moon, before calling him “a coward and a liar.”

In response Aldrin, then 72, punched Sibrel in the face. Aldrin’s angry reaction didn’t reassure anyone, though, and just fuelled a new wave of conspiracy theories. The central claim: the Apollo landings were a gigantic scam, perpetrated on the whole world by the American government.

Humans first landed on the Moon on July 20 1969. More than half a billion people watched on tele­vision as Neil Armstrong and Aldrin took their first steps on the arid surface. They left behind an American flag, a patch honouring the fallen crew of Apollo 1, and a plaque that read: “We came in peace for all mankind.” The sixth Apollo mission to land humans on the Moon concluded three years later. The Moon has not been visited by astronauts since December 1972.

By 1976, doubts were already creeping in. That year, Bill Kaysing, a former US Navy officer who had worked for one of Nasa’s rocket manufacturers, self-­published a pamphlet titled “We Never Went to the Moon: America’s 30 Billion Dollar Swindle.” In it, ­Kaysing pointed to unexplained optical anomalies – the absence of dust clouds or blast craters around the lunar module, and the lack of stars in surface photographs – to suggest that the footage was ­created in a studio.

Such hypotheses have proliferated into a body of literature that shades into hallucinatory weirdness: theories on the demonic nature of UFOs, astral projection, ancient aliens genetically engineering the human race, and other oddities.

The hoax is of such a vintage that it’s become a staple of popular culture. Already in 1971, James Bond was depicted stumbling upon a Nasa film set made to look like the lunar surface, before giving chase in a Moon buggy, in Diamonds Are Forever. In this month’s Fly Me to the Moon, Scarlett Johansson plays a marketing genius hired by Nasa to film a fake landing in case the Apollo 11 mission fails.

With that kind of pedigree, the Moon-landing hoax can’t just be explained away as a form of modern-day “fake news” that blooms and fades on social media. Scepticism about the Apollo space programme was swirling long before the advent of the internet, beginning almost immediately after the landings themselves.

In turn, a great deal of effort has been expended over the decades trying to use evidence to dispel the conspiracy ­theories. But attempting to debunk them logically is to misunderstand what such claims are communicating.

Today, one in eight Americans think the Moon landings were staged – as do one in 11 Britons. Why won’t we all just accept the facts? Perhaps because most people aren’t ­interested in or persuaded by facts alone. We need only recall how, when Covid broke out, the educated classes demanded officials discard the existing pandemic action plan to see this extends well beyond those routinely accused of ignorance and emotional reasoning. Conspiracy theories make most sense when understood not as factual claims but as emotional stories – allegories – that exist in oblique relation to empirical reality. They convey diffuse, and sometimes prophetic, intuitions about the world.

The pandemic illustrates this again. Among the many conspiracies that circulated concerning the Covid vaccination programme, one common claim was that vaccines were really a covert programme to inject each of us with a microchip that would allow Bill Gates to track our whereabouts or even control our minds.

This is, we can safely say, not true. Conversely, though, the vaccination programme really was acc­om­panied by the international rollout of digital “vaccine passports”, which link vaccination ­status to other biomedical data, as well as official state iden­tifiers. And while it’s no longer in active use, this architecture now enables states potentially to track individuals’ move­ments, and to index freedoms previously taken for granted – such as travel or access to public spaces – to co-operation with who-knows-what future mandatory medical interventions.

However, this probably isn’t a ­sin­i­ster plot, whatever the conspiracists may say. It does nevertheless prompt us to read the conspiracy differently – poetically – ­interpreting “Bill Gates” as ­personifying a fusion of tech and governance interests, and the “microchip injection” as symbolic shorthand for the discomfiting sense that unknown technologies wielded by this figurative “Bill Gates” increasingly intrude into our physical, embodied lives. It’s fancifully expressed, but is it really so far from the truth?

The Moon-hoax conspiracy also makes sense as allegory, when we consider what the Moon landings symbolised in mid-century American culture and international politics. The “space race” between America and Russia stood, symbolically, for the competition between capitalist West and communist East: that is, between two ways of organising a mass industrial civilisation. Which social framework was better at delivering rapid, ambitious advances in real-world engineering and technological progress? The race to reach the Moon served as a proxy for this competition, by virtue of the sheer immensity of the goal, as well as its technical demands. For a living human being to leave the Earth’s protective envelope for the emptiness of space and walk on the surface of a celestial body took extraordinary financial, organisational and technical resources, not to mention tremendous courage and ambition.

Winning the space race, then, served as proof positive that the Land of the Free was a more fertile home for this kind of ambition and innovation than any command-and-control socialist regime. Putting the first man on the Moon wasn’t just a “giant leap for mankind,” as Neil Armstrong famously said. It was also a watershed moment in the Cold War.

What, then, to make of the sceptics who appeared in the midst of that mid-century American triumphalism to cast aspersions on its veracity? It perhaps reflects an early intuition that America’s long, slow drift away from the material and sociocultural conditions that enabled the space race had already begun at the moment it was won.

To build the lunar landers, the Apollo programme drew on American engineering talent and heavy industry that has since been shredded by globalisation, outsourcing and changing educational priorities. By the last Apollo flight, this process was well under way: US manufacturing was already declining from its 1957 peak of more than a quarter of American GDP – and today it languishes at about 11 per cent.

Meanwhile, the sense of common American purpose that drove the project has also fractured. In a 2001 interview, Armstrong praised the mission’s low rate of engineering failure, which he attributed to a sense of common endeavour and striving towards excellence spread across the “hundreds of thousands” of engineers, makers and fitters involved in the mission. Among this number, he said, “every guy in the project, every guy at the bench building something, every assembler, every inspector, every guy that’s setting up the tests, cranking the torque wrench, and so on, is saying, man or woman, ‘If anything goes wrong here, it’s not going to be my fault, because my part is going to be better than I have to make it.’”

Since the Moon landings, though, the sense of civic unity that enabled this degree of co-ordinated striving towards excellence has become increasingly contested. No longer taken for granted as core American attributes, instead national pride and cultural homogeneity have come increasingly to be seen as actively inimical to American values. And this has occurred, the historian Christopher Caldwell argues in The Age of Entitle­ment (2020), as a consequence of the many state-mandated measures to impose equality by fiat, which have mushroomed since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Though he does not endorse the segregation the act sought to dismantle, in Caldwell’s view its ratification in effect created a “rival Constitution,” which implicitly treats civic unity and patriotism not as necessary preconditions for high civilisation, but as obstacles to radical equality.

Other distractions have displaced the 20th-century drive for industrial innovation: though there are exceptions, such as Elon Musk’s SpaceX, there has been a notable shift away from trying to reach outer space towards a preoccupation with virtual worlds. Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley investor, argues that this has been enabled by the digital revolution, whose advances serve, in his view, as a distraction from the stagnation and decline of ­real-world technological progress. In his notorious formulation: “We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters.”

Understood against this backdrop, the eruption of scepticism about the Moon landings can be read as an early intuition that even at America’s crowning civilisational moment, the enabling conditions for that moment were already under threat. Deindustrialisation had already begun; the germinal form of “diversity, equity and inclusion” was already written into American law; the precursors of the internet were spreading.

Earlier this year, Bart Sibrel himself appeared on the wildly popular Joe Rogan Experience podcast. It’s not difficult to see how modern America might struggle to believe that their forebears were capable of the kind of engineering inventiveness, courage and large-scale co-operation required to make the Apollo missions a reality.

At its peak, Apollo involved some 400,000 people, across thousands of institutions. Even the rockets were built across multiple locations. It was an extraordinary feat of co-ordination, achieved in an age before modern computer-design programmes or tools for instantaneous communication. By contrast, when in the 2000s California invited bids for construction of a high-speed rail line through the state, the French rail firm SNCF tendered a proposal – only to withdraw it in 2011 to work on a similar project in Morocco, whose government, the SNCF engineers declared, was less politically dysfunctional than California’s. Morocco’s high-speed railway began operating in 2018. California’s is still not completed.

What do you made of this image reflected off the above visor?

It is unlikely that the America of today could muster the degree of co-ordination and industrial resources that put Armstrong and Aldrin on the Moon in 1969. Were I an American raised on the conviction that progress moves only in one direction, I too might conclude that, logically, these feats could not have been achievable half a century ago.

The most comforting conclusion, in other words, might be that the Moon landings were a hoax. The alternative is far bleaker: that the achievements of mid-20th-century America were the achievements of a different civilisation, one now as distant and mysterious as the Moon.

NATO’s Pacific Partners

•July 13, 2024 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

An Alignment without Limits: NATO and its Partners in the Indo-Pacific

Associated Press by Didi Tang • July 10, 2024

WASHINGTON (AP) — In the third year of the war in Ukraine, NATO is set to deepen relations with its four Indo-Pacific partners, which, although not part of the military alliance, are gaining prominence as Russia and China forge closer ties to counter the United States and the two Koreas support opposing sides of the conflict in Europe.

The leaders of New Zealand, Japan and South Korea for the third year in a row will attend the NATO summit, which starts Tuesday in Washington, DC, while Australia will send its deputy prime minister. China will be following the summit closely, worried by the alliance’s growing interest beyond Europe and the Western Hemisphere.

“Increasingly, partners in Europe see challenges halfway around the world in Asia as being relevant to them, just as partners in Asia see challenges halfway around the world in Europe as being relevant to them,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said last week at the Brookings Institution.

America’s top diplomat said the US has been working to break down barriers between European alliances, Asian coalitions and other partners worldwide. “That’s part of the new landscape, the new geometry that we’ve put in place.”

President Joe Biden and Ukraine’s Zelenskiy during a bilateral meeting

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Tuesday that NATO allies and the Indo-Pacific partners will launch four new joint projects, which will be on Ukraine, artificial intelligence, disinformation and cybersecurity.

“Each initiative is different, but the main goal is the same: harness the unique strengths of highly capable democracies to address shared challenges,” Sullivan said at a defense industry forum.

Countries with shared security concerns are strengthening ties as competition escalates between the United States and China. Washington is trying to curb Beijing’s ambition to challenge the US-led world order, which the Chinese government dismisses as a Cold War mentality aimed at containing China’s inevitable rise.

Beijing has responded angrily to the prospect of NATO and its four Indo-Pacific partners deepening their cooperation.

Lin Jian, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, on Monday accused NATO of “breaching its boundary, expanding its mandate, reaching beyond its defense zone and stoking confrontation.”

The war in Ukraine, which has pitted the West against Russia and its friends, has bolstered the argument for closer cooperation between the US, Europe and their Asian allies. “Ukraine of today may be East Asia of tomorrow,” Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida told the US Congress in April.

The US and South Korea accused Pyongyang of supplying Russia with ammunition, while Russian President Vladimir Putin visited North Korea last month and signed a pact with leader Kim Jong Un that envisions mutual military assistance.

South Korea and Japan, meanwhile, are sending military supplies and aid to Ukraine. The US also says China is providing Russia with machine tools, microelectronics and other technology that allow it to make weapons to use against Ukraine.

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol will bring to Washington “a strong message regarding the military cooperation between Russia and North Korea and discuss ways to enhance cooperation among NATO allies and Indo-Pacific partners,” his principal deputy national security adviser, Kim Tae-hyo, told reporters Friday.

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said discussions would “focus on our collective efforts to support the rules-based system.”

The partnership does not make NATO a direct player in the Indo-Pacific but allows it to coordinate with the four partners on issues of mutual concern, said Mirna Galic, senior policy analyst on China and East Asia at the US Institute of Peace. For example, she wrote in an analysis, they can share information and align on actions such as sanctions and aid delivery but do not intervene in military crises outside of their own regions.

The NATO summit will allow the United States and its European and Indo-Pacific allies to push back against China, Russia, North Korea and Iran, according to Luis Simon, director of the Centre for Security Diplomacy and Strategy at Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

“The fact that the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific alliances are structured around a clear anchor — US military power — makes them more cohesive and gives them a strategic edge as compared to the sort of interlocking partnerships that bind China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea,” Simon wrote in a commentary last week on War On the Rocks, a defense and foreign affairs website.

Beijing is worried by NATO’s pivot to the east, said Zhu Feng, dean of the School of International Studies at Nanjing University in eastern China. Beijing has insisted that NATO not interfere in security affairs in the Indo-Pacific and that it should change its view of China as a strategic adversary.

“NATO should consider China as a positive force for the regional peace and stability and for global security,” Zhu said. “We also hope the Ukraine war can end as soon as possible … and we have rejected a return to the triangular relation with Russia and North Korea.”

“In today’s volatile and fragile world, Europe, the US and China should strengthen global and regional cooperation,” Zhu said.

NATO and China had little conflict until tensions grew between Beijing and Washington in 2019, the same year the NATO summit in London raised China as a “challenge” that “we need to address together as an alliance.” Two years later, NATO upgraded China to a “systemic challenge” and said Beijing was “cooperating militarily with Russia.”

After Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, leaders of Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand attended a NATO summit for the first time, where statements noted the geopolitical challenges China poses. Beijing accused NATO of “cooperating with the US government for an all-around suppression of China.”

Now, Beijing is worried that Washington is forming a NATO-like alliance in the Indo-Pacific.

Chinese Senior Col. Cao Yanzhong, a researcher at China’s Institute of War Studies, asked US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin last month whether the US was trying to create an Asian version of NATO by emphasizing partnerships and alliances. They include a US grouping with Britain and Australia; another with Australia, India and Japan; and one with Japan and South Korea.

“What implications do you think the strengthening of the US alliance system in the Asia-Pacific will have on this region’s security and stability?” Cao asked at the Shangri-la Dialogue security summit in Singapore.

Austin replied that the US was simply working with “like-minded countries with similar values and a common vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific.”

Beijing has its own conclusion.

“The real intent of the US Indo-Pacific strategy is to integrate all small circles into a big circle as the Asian version of NATO in order to maintain the hegemony as led by the United States,” Chinese Lt Gen Jing Jianfeng said at the forum.

Genesis (9-10)

•July 13, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The Targum was started by Ezra for those returning from the Babylon exile and for these returnees they could only understand the Scriptures in Aramaic. That is, the Targum is as if Ezra is speaking to us today from the Hebrew Bible quoted.

Genesis 9

1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth. — God blessed Noah and his sons; assuring them of his goodwill and his gracious intentions;

— and said unto them, be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth; depopulated by the flood: this is a renewal of the blessing on Adam;

And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. — and the fear of you and the dread of you; this not only reestablishes man’s dominion over the animals, but also incorporate the fear of humans;

— Jewish writings, however, say a new stage is reached where man hereafter is invested with the right to take the life of animals for food; perhaps this was also when certain animals or beasts became wild; lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, wolves and foxes;

Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. — the grant of sustenance is no longer confined to just vegetable, but extended to the animal kinds, with two solemn restrictions;

— animals were slain for sacrifice from the earliest times; but whether they were used for food before this time we are not certain; but now “every creeper that is alive” is granted for food.

— “every moving thing” is everything that moves with the body living, and therefore this seems to describe any animal, clean or unclean; the phrase “that is alive” seems to exclude animals that have died a natural death, or were killed by wild beasts, from being used as food.

“But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. — the animal must be slain before any part of it is used for food; and as it lives so long as the blood flows in its veins, the life-blood must be drawn before its flesh may be eaten;

Gill explains it another way: not that the blood is of itself the life, but because it is a means of life, should not be eaten; but blood properly let out, and dressed, or mixed with other things, might be eaten, only that it could not to be eaten with the flesh, though it might separately;

— the Targum of Jonathan says, “but flesh which is torn of the living beast, what time the life is in it, or that torn from a slaughtered animal before all the breath has gone forth, you shall not eat.”

And surely your blood of your lives will I require. At the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man. — your blood of your lives; or your blood, which is for your souls;

Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God made He man. — whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed; that is, he that is guilty of wilful murder shall surely be put to death;

— in the image of God made he man; so that murder is not only an offence against man, but also an injury to God, and a contempt of that image of God which all men are obliged to reverence and maintain;

And you, be ye fruitful and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.” — and you, be ye fruitful and multiply; instead of taking away the lives of men, the great concern should be to multiply them;

And God spoke unto Noah and to his sons with him, saying,

“And I, behold, I establish My covenant with you and with your seed after you, — and I, behold, I establish my covenant with you; my covenant of the preservation of the creatures in common, a promise that they should not be destroyed any more by a flood;

10 and with every living creature that is with you — of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you, from all that go out of the ark to every beast of the earth. — of every fowl, of every cattle, and of every beast of the earth, but no dinosaur exist as living creatures today; hence the obvious conclusion is that the dinosaurs were not among these “cattles” or beasts; otherwise they would be alive today;

11 And I will establish My covenant with you: Neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.” — again, the obvious conclusion is that the dinosaurs were not among these “cattles” or beasts; otherwise, today, they would be in our zoos, or reserves, and not in our museums;

12 And God said, “This is the token of the covenant which I make between Me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: — the covenant is made between God and Noah (and his posterity) and every living creature that is with you;

— that is, any creature that have survived through the Flood, in the ark, would be alive today, but the dinosaurs are only bones and skeletons today; destroyed amass millions of years ago;

— the Targum of Jonathan says,

“I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your children after you; and with every living soul that is with you, of birds, and of cattle, and of every beast of the earth that is with you, of all that go forth from the ark, of every beast of the earth.

And I will establish my covenant with you, and will not again cause all flesh to perish by the waters of a flood; and there shall not again be a flood to destroy the earth.

And the Lord said, This is the sign of the covenant which I establish between My Word and between you and every living soul that is with you, unto the generations of the world.” Genesis 9:9-12 Jonathan

— the Message Bible says:

Then God spoke to Noah and his sons: “I’m setting up my covenant with you including your children who will come after you, along with everything alive around you—birds, farm animals, wild animals—that came out of the ship with you. I’m setting up my covenant with you that never again will everything living be destroyed by floodwaters; no, never again will a flood destroy the Earth.” Genesis 9:8-11 MSG

God continued, “This is the sign of the covenant I am making between me and you and everything living around you and everyone living after you. I’m putting my rainbow in the clouds, a sign of the covenant between me and the Earth.

From now on, when I form a cloud over the Earth and the rainbow appears in the cloud, I’ll remember my covenant between me and you and everything living, that never again will floodwaters destroy all life. When the rainbow appears in the cloud, I’ll see it and remember the eternal covenant between God and everything living, every last living creature on Earth.” Genesis 9:12-16 MSG

13 I do set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between Me and the earth. — I set my bow in the clouds; the rainbow, was seen in the clouds before, but was never a seal of the covenant till now;

14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the rainbow shall be seen in the cloud. — that the bow shall be seen in the cloud; for the rainbow is always in a thin, not a thick cloud; after the heavy showers are fallen from the thick clouds, and a small thin one remains, then the rainbow is seen;

15 And I will remember My covenant which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh, and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. — and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh; this is repeated to remove those fears which would be repeated as God would remember his covenant, which he can never forget;

16 And the rainbow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.” — and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth;

17 And God said unto Noah, “This is the token of the covenant which I have established between Me and all flesh that is upon the earth.” — unfortunately, “all flesh” doesn’t include the dinosaurs, otherwise they would still be alive today, in our zoos or in the wild;

18 And the sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem and Ham and Japheth; and Ham is the father of Canaan. — and the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham and Japheth, who are here again mentioned as the heads of the nations into which the family of man developed;

— and Ham is the father of Canaan; this is observed for the sake of the following history, concerning the behaviour of the one to Noah, and of the ultimate curse on Canaan;

19 These are the three sons of Noah, and from them was the whole earth overspread. — these are the three sons of Noah; and his only ones; and if he had any more, they left no posterity behind them; and of them was the whole earth overspread, with inhabitants, by them and their posterity only;

20 And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard. — Noah began to be an husbandman; or rather, Noah, being a husbandman, began to plant a vineyard;

21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. — SDAs (Seventh-day Adventists, over twenty millions of them spread all over the world) claim the use of grape juice in ancient times were masquerading as wine; but have they ever come to their senses and ask how could unfermented grape juice make Noah drunk?

— having already two great disappointments in quick succession in the 1840s might make a third less disappointing and painful than the first two;

22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brethren outside. — and Ham saw the nakedness of his father; he looked with pleasure and delight on his father’s nakedness; not offering to cover him; instead he just went off and told his brethren withside;

23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were turned away, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. — and Shem and Japheth took a garment; they not only would not see it themselves, but provided that no one else might see it; herein setting an example of good deeds with reference to other men’s sin and shame;

24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. — now Ham was not the youngest son, but Shem; but only younger, compared to Japheth; and it is not Ham who is cursed, but Canaan, Ham’s fourth or youngest son.

25 And he said, “Cursed be Canaan! A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.” — Cursed be Canaan; Noah declares a curse on Canaan, the son of Ham; perhaps this grandson of his was more guilty than the rest; a servant of servants, that is, the vilest and worst of servants; but why?

26 And he said, “Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. — Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; Abraham and all his posterity were included in the descendants of Shem;

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.” — God shall enlarge Japheth; it is the God of the universe to enlarge Japheth with the most numerous posterity; as most of the inhabitants of northern and eastern parts of Asia are descended from Japheth;

— other definitions or meanings for “enlarge” pathah H6601 (2) to be spacious, wide or open: Genesis 9:27 may God make wide for Japhet (give him an extensive inheritance); (3) entice or seduces as a man seduces a virgin;

— and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; inhabit the countries belonging to the posterity of Shem; the Targum of Jonathan says “the Lord shall beautify the borders of Japhet, and his sons shall be proselyted and dwell in the schools of Shem;”

— or from a more modern version of Jonathan:

“May the Lord enlarge the territory of Japheth, and may his descendants convert and dwell in the study hall of Shem, and let Canaan be a servant to them.” ChatGPT

“The Lord shall beautify the borders of Japhet, and his sons shall be proselyted and dwell in the schools of Shem, and Canaan shall be a servant to them.” CoPilot

Voice: May God make plenty of room for Japheth’s family and give them homes among Shem’s tents.

Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, Hunan, China
Huangshan, Anhui, China

28 And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years. — and Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years; so that he not only saw the old wicked world, and its destruction, but another wickedness again: the building of the tower of Babel;

29 And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years, and he died. — Noah lived twenty years more than Adam did, and within nineteen of Methuselah, and his age must be called a good old age; and what is honourable of all the patriarchs is also applicable to him.

Genesis 10

~~~~

“Fear not, Abram. I am thy shield and your reward shall be very great. Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” Genesis 15

1 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth; and unto them were sons born after the flood. — this chapter shows concerning the three sons of Noah, where the whole population were spread from one of these seventy, has come.

The sons of Japheth: Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. — the sons of Japheth; Japheth is placed first, because he was, the oldest brother: Genesis 9:24; Genesis 10:21; of seven sons and his descendants were the most numerous and most widely spread from the birthplace of mankind;

— they seem to have been settled north of the Caspian, and to have wandered north and east from that point;

And the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz and Riphath and Togarmah.

And the sons of Javan: Elishah and Tarshish, Kittim and Dodanim.

By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided into their lands, every one after his own tongue, according to their families, into their nations. — from these were distributed the tribes of the islands of the Gentiles, every one according to his language, to his kindred in their nations.

— the grandchildren of Noah are identified according to Josephus (Antiquities 1:6.1):

Now they were the grandchildren of Noah, in honor of whom names were imposed on the nations by those that first seized upon them. Japhet, the son of Noah, had seven sons: they inhabited so, that, beginning at the mountains Taurus and Amanus, they proceeded along Asia, as far as the river Tansis, and along Europe to Cadiz; and settling themselves on the lands which they light upon, which none had inhabited before, they called the nations by their own names.

For Gomer founded those whom the Greeks now call Galatians, [Galls,] but were then called Gomerites. Magog founded those that from him were named Magogites, but who are by the Greeks called Scythians. Now as to Javan and Madai, the sons of Japhet; from Madai came the Madeans, who are called Medes, by the Greeks; but from Javan, Ionia, and all the Grecians, are derived. Thobel founded the Thobelites, who are now called Iberes; and the Mosocheni were founded by Mosoch; now they are Cappadocians.

There is also a mark of their ancient denomination still to be shown; for there is even now among them a city called Mazaca, which may inform those that are able to understand, that so was the entire nation once called. Thiras also called those whom he ruled over Thirasians; but the Greeks changed the name into Thracians. And so many were the countries that had the children of Japhet for their inhabitants.

Of the three sons of Gomer, Aschanax founded the Aschanaxians, who are now called by the Greeks Rheginians. So did Riphath found the Ripheans, now called Paphlagonians; and Thrugramma the Thrugrammeans, who, as the Greeks resolved, were named Phrygians.

Of the three sons of Javan also, the son of Japhet, Elisa gave name to the Eliseans, who were his subjects; they are now the Aeolians. Tharsus to the Tharsians, for so was Cilicia of old called; the sign of which is this, that the noblest city they have, and a metropolis also, is Tarsus, the tau being by change put for the theta.

Cethimus possessed the island Cethima: it is now called Cyprus; and from that it is that all islands, and the greatest part of the sea-coasts, are named Cethim by the Hebrews: and one city there is in Cyprus that has been able to preserve its denomination; it has been called Citius by those who use the language of the Greeks, and has not, by the use of that dialect, escaped the name of Cethim.

And so many nations have the children and grandchildren of Japhet possessed. Now when I have premised somewhat, which perhaps the Greeks do not know, I will return and explain what I have omitted; for such names are pronounced here after the manner of the Greeks, to please my readers; for our own country language does not so pronounce them: but the names in all cases are of one and the same ending; for the name we here pronounce Noeas, is there Noah, and in every case retains the same termination.

And the sons of Ham: Cush and Mizraim, and Put and Canaan.

And the sons of Cush: Seba and Havilah, and Sabtah and Raamah and Sabtechah; and the sons of Raamah: Sheba, and Dedan.

— the Targum of Jonathan says

And the sons of Kush, Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raama, and Sabteka, and the name of their provinces, Sinirai, and Hindiki, and Semadi, and Lubai, and Zingai. And the sons of Mauritinos, Zmargad and Mezag.

And Cush begot Nimrod; he began to be a mighty one on the earth.

He was a mighty hunter before the Lord; therefore it is said, “Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord.”

10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.

11 Out of that land he went forth to Assyria, and built Nineveh and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,

12 and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; the same is a great city.

13 And Mizraim begot Ludim and Anamim and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim — Mizraim has seven sons, most of the descendants of Mizraim settled in Africa, with the exception of the Philistines, who migrated into the country to which they gave their name; Palestine;

14 and Pathrusim and Casluhim (out of whom came the Philistines) and Caphtorim.

— the Philistines; were originally Egyptians, since they descended from Mizraim; they sprung from both the Casluhim and the Pathrusim; Rashi says they exchanged the intimacy of their wives with one another, hence the Philistines sprung from them both;

— they had five principal cities – Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath and Ekron; but today, they are still dominating the Gaza strip;

15 And Canaan begot Sidon his firstborn, and Heth; — today a city of Sidon (or Zidon); the firstborn, and is in Lebanon; where Joshua smote them: Joshua 11:8, 19:28;

— and Tyre, for that was built by the Sidonians; today they are part of Lebanon, and both cities are dominated by the Hezbollah;

16 and the Jebusite and the Amorite, and the Girgashite

17 and the Hivite, and the Arkite and the Sinite,

18 and the Arvadite and the Zemarite and the Hamathite; and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.

19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; and as thou goest unto Sodom and Gomorrah, and Admah and Zeboiim, even unto Lasha.

20 These are the sons of Ham, according to their families, according to their tongues, in their countries and in their nations.

— the children of Ham are identified according to Josephus (Antiquities 1:6.2):

The children of Ham possessed the land from Syria and Amanus, and the mountains of Libanus; seizing upon all that was on its sea-coasts, and as far as the ocean, and keeping it as their own. Some indeed of its names are utterly vanished away; others of them being changed, and another sound given them, are hardly to be discovered; yet a few there are which have kept their denominations entire.

For of the four sons of Ham, time has not at all hurt the name of Chus; for the Ethiopians, over whom he reigned, are even at this day, both by themselves and by all men in Asia, called Chusites. The memory also of the Mesraites is preserved in their name; for all we who inhabit this country [of Judea] called Egypt Mestre, and the Egyptians Mestreans.

Phut also was the founder of Libya, and called the inhabitants Phutites, from himself: there is also a river in the country of Moors which bears that name; whence it is that we may see the greatest part of the Grecian historiographers mention that river and the adjoining country by the apellation of Phut: but the name it has now has been by change given it from one of the sons of Mesraim, who was called Lybyos. We will inform you presently what has been the occasion why it has been called Africa also.

Canaan, the fourth son of Ham, inhabited the country now called Judea, and called it from his own name Canaan. The children of these [four] were these: Sabas, who founded the Sabeans; Evilas, who founded the Evileans, who are called Getuli; Sabathes founded the Sabathens, they are now called by the Greeks Astaborans; Sabactas settled the Sabactens; and Ragmus the Ragmeans; and he had two sons, the one of whom, Judadas, settled the Judadeans, a nation of the western Ethiopians, and left them his name; as did Sabas to the Sabeans: but Nimrod, the son of Chus, staid and tyrannized at Babylon, as we have already informed you.

Now all the children of Mesraim, being eight in number, possessed the country from Gaza to Egypt, though it retained the name of one only, the Philistim; for the Greeks call part of that country Palestine. As for the rest, Ludieim, and Enemim, and Labim, who alone inhabited in Libya, and called the country from himself, Nedim, and Phethrosim, and Chesloim, and Cephthorim, we know nothing of them besides their names; for the Ethiopic war which we shall describe hereafter, was the cause that those cities were overthrown. The sons of Canaan were these: Sidonius, who also built a city of the same name; it is called by the Greeks Sidon

Amathus inhabited in Amathine, which is even now called Amathe by the inhabitants, although the Macedonians named it Epiphania, from one of his posterity: Arudeus possessed the island Aradus: Arucas possessed Arce, which is in Libanus. But for the seven others, [Eueus,] Chetteus, Jebuseus, Amorreus, Gergesus, Eudeus, Sineus, Samareus, we have nothing in the sacred books but their names, for the Hebrews overthrew their cities; and their calamities came upon them on the occasion following.

21 Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born.

22 The children of Shem: Elam and Asshur, and Arphaxad and Lud and Aram.

23 And the children of Aram: Uz and Hul, and Gether and Mash.

24 And Arphaxad begot Salah, and Salah begot Eber.

25 And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg, for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.

26 And Joktan begot Almodad and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth and Jerah,

27 and Hadoram and Uzal and Diklah,

28 and Obal and Abimael and Sheba,

29 and Ophir and Havilah and Jobab; all these were the sons of Joktan.

30 And their dwelling was from Mesha as thou goest unto Sephar, a mount of the east.

31 These are the sons of Shem, according to their families, according to their tongues, in their lands, according to their nations.

— the children of Shem are identified according to Josephus (Antiquities 1:6.4):

Shem, the third son of Noah, had five sons, who inhabited the land that began at Euphrates, and reached to the Indian Ocean. For Elam left behind him the Elamites, the ancestors of the Persians.

Ashur lived at the city Nineve; and named his subjects Assyrians, who became the most fortunate nation, beyond others. Arphaxad named the Arphaxadites, who are now called Chaldeans. Aram had the Aramites, which the Greeks called Syrians; as Laud founded the Laudites, which are now called Lydians.

Of the four sons of Aram, Uz founded Trachonitis and Damascus: this country lies between Palestine and Celesyria. Ul founded Armenia; and Gather the Bactrians; and Mesa the Mesaneans; it is now called Charax Spasini.

Sala was the son of Arphaxad; and his son was Heber, from whom they originally called the Jews Hebrews. Heber begat Joetan and Phaleg: he was called Phaleg, because he was born at the dispersion of the nations to their several countries; for Phaleg among the Hebrews signifies division. 

Now Joctan, one of the sons of Heber, had these sonsElmodad, Saleph, Asermoth, Jera, Adoram, Aizel, Decla, Ebal, Abimael, Sabeus, Ophir, Euilat, and Jobab. These inhabited from Cophen, an Indian river, and in part of Asiaadjoining to it. And this shall suffice concerning the sons of Shem.

32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and by these were the nations divided on the earth after the flood.

‘Siberia will be free’

•July 12, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s assertion that US wants to ‘weaken’ Russia underlines a long-term Biden covert strategy!

‘Siberia will be free’: Five Russian regions vote in unauthorised independence referendums over a year ago; but as President Joe Biden pushes for the War in Ukraine to continue, this little known referendum news is even more relevant today than a year ago.

Post-Russia Forum
“Moscow takes a lot of resources from Siberia and spends the money not on the development of Siberia, but on its own needs and wars of aggression”

Siberia will be free • February 17, 2023 // Referendum Report

Russians began voting in unauthorised independence referendums in five regions of the country on Thursday, as part of a campaign to promote secession from Moscow’s rule.

The online vote organised by umbrella group the Post-Russia Forum covers Siberia, the Urals, Kaliningrad, Krasnodar and Ingria.

The referendums are not binding, and may be illegal under a law against challenging Russia’s “territorial integrity.” But more than 130,000 votes were recorded on the first day of voting, which remains open until 28 February.

Stanislav Pavlovsky-Suslov, of the Committee of the Independent Confederation of Siberia, said he was confident of a “Yes” vote that would strengthen the campaign.

“The results will allow us to understand whether people in Siberia want to be free from Moscow’s influence,” he told i. “Moscow takes a lot of resources from Siberia and spends the money not on the development of Siberia, but on its own needs and wars of aggression,” he said, adding: “Siberia will be free.”

Independence movements have grown in several regions of Russia since the invasion of Ukraine, with disproportionate death tolls in the provinces and the impact of sanctions adding to pre-existing grievances over a lack of autonomy and perceived exploitation.

In May 2022, representatives of six provinces united to form the League of Free Nations, with the aim of seeking “the collapse of the Russian Federation and the creation of new states on its ruins.”

But while those provinces have long-established campaigns for self-determination, and in most cases a single, predominant ethnic group, the Post-Russian Forum is seeking independence for larger, more diverse areas without a common identity.

In this context, the referendums help to build momentum and normalise the idea of secession, said Dr Alexander Etkind, a professor of international relations at the Central European University in Vienna.

While a potential break up of Russia has gained traction among foreign policy analysts during the war, there are also concerns that attempts to divide Russia could lead to bloody conflict, and insecurity around its nuclear arsenal.

Stanislav Pavlovsky-Suslov, of the Committee of the Independent Confederation of Siberia, said he was confident of a “yes” vote that would strengthen the campaign.

“The results will allow us to understand whether people in Siberia… want to be free from Moscow’s influence,” he told i.

“Moscow takes a lot of resources from Siberia and spends the money not on the development of Siberia, but on its own needs and wars of aggression,” he said, adding: “Siberia will be free.”

But while those provinces have long-established campaigns for self-determination, and in most cases a single, predominant ethnic group, the Post-Russian Forum is seeking independence for larger, more diverse areas without a common identity.

The unauthorised independence referendums call for “the collapse of the Russian Federation and the creation of new states on its ruins”

Independence movements have grown in several regions of Russia since the invasion of Ukraine, with disproportionate death tolls in the provinces and the impact of sanctions adding to pre-existing grievances over a lack of autonomy and perceived exploitation.

The event was the initiative of groups from different Russian regions. The voting took place from February 16 to 28th on Referendum’s website. 5,6 million people participated in votes according to organizers. 

Former Königsberg (Kaliningrad and the district), Ingria (St Petersburg and the Leningrad region), and Kuban (Krasnodar Territory) voted for independence. 

The results of the voting for independence from Moscow are as follows:

Königsberg (Kaliningrad): 72.1% for independence, 27.9% against;
Ingria: 66.2% for independence, 33.8% against;
Kuban: 55.7% for independence, 44.3% against;
Siberia: 63.9% for independence, 36.1% against;
Ural: 68.2% for independence, 31.8% against.

In this context, the referendums help to build momentum and normalise the idea of secession, said Dr Alexander Etkind, a professor of international relations at the Central European University in Vienna.

Foreign political experts previously predicted that Russia will become a failed state or disintegrate by 2033.

US plots to break up the “Russian Empire”

Rand: How to Destroy Russia!

The Plan to Carve Up Russia

Rand’s Strategy to Destroy Russia!

US playing the ‘Tibet card’

•July 11, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The US is playing the ‘Tibet card’ – Asian Media Report

The Dalai Lama with ex-Speaker Nancy Pelosi adding Tibet to other flashpoints

Pearls and Irritations by David Armstrong • July 6, 2024

The US, likely supported by India, is preparing to play the “Tibet card” – to add another Asian crisis point to its confrontation with China, along with Taiwan, the South China Sea and islands claimed by Japan and China.

One of the signs that the US intends to raise the temperature on Tibet was a recent visit to India by a Congressional delegation that included Nancy Pelosi, now with the title of Speaker Emerita.

The group met the Dalai Lama in the northern town of Dharamsala, seat of his government-in-exile. Pelosi was allowed to address the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.

The Indian Express reported Pelosi piled praise on the Dalai Lama, speaking of his knowledge, tradition, compassion, purity of soul and love. But she dismissed the notion that China’s President, Xi Jinping, would leave a legacy.

Ravi Velloor, a senior columnist with Singapore’s The Straits Times, noted this week in a detailed analytical piece the trip followed the passage by Congress of a Bill on Tibet that pressed China to engage the Dalai Lama without preconditions and rejected Beijing’s claim that Tibet had been part of China since ancient times. The Bill is awaiting President Joe Biden’s signature.

Velloor said that while in New Delhi the delegation met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. The group also had a meeting with US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and the administration’s top Asia hand, Kurt Campbell.

“These things do not happen by accident,” Velloor said. “The rest of us must recognise the developments for what they are: a disturbing and potentially dangerous new turn that adds the Tibet border to other Asian flashpoints.”

America was trying to get India into a tighter strategic embrace against China, he wrote. “New Delhi appears increasingly receptive.”

India, he said, might be getting ready to drop its resistance to turning the Quad – the US, Japan, India and Australia – into more of a security partnership.

South China Morning Post reported that China issued a stern warning after the delegation arrived in Dharamsala, vowing “resolute measures” if the US failed to stick by its commitment to recognise Tibet as part of China.

It said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian had called the Dalai Lama a political exile engaged in anti-China separatist activities.

Lin said China urged the US to have no contact with the Dalai Lama. Specifically, he warned Biden not to sign the recently passed Tibet Bill.

Lin used the Chinese name Xizang – the pinyin, or Chinese romanisation, of the Mandarin script for Tibet.

In a separate story, the Post said Beijing’s use of Xizang was a way to show its sovereignty over the region.

A recent US congressional delegation meeting with the Dalai Lama

The story quoted La Xianjia, a senior religious studies official, as asserting Beijing’s right to identify the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, who is expected to announce his own decision in a year’s time.

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

For more about a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

The Shakeup in China’s Rocket Force Continues

•July 10, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Corruption investigations have toppled top leaders of the vaunted PLA Rocket Force. But the new replacements are just as interesting as the mysterious departures. 255 Pages

The Diplomat • January 3, 2024 // AsiaTimes

On December 27, 2023, the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) decided to revoke the political titles of three aerospace-defense executives: Wu Yansheng, Liu Shiquan, and Wang Changqing.  Two days later, on December 29, nine senior military officials were removed from their posts at the National People’s Congress. Notably, five of those were past or current commanders of the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF). Analysts saw the removals as a prelude to further disciplinary action, as NPC members are immune from prosecution.

While a continuation of the Chinese government’s anti-corruption campaign, the events of late December are the latest in a worrying trend of probes targeting China’s aerospace sector.  

Since 2023, Chinese officials in the PLARF, and those with ties to the Rocket Force, have been the subject of corruption investigations and quickly removed from their positions. Such aggressive shuffling in the vaunted Rocket Force is a testament to the political insecurity felt by top Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping, despite having invested greatly in the Rocket Force’s expansion from 2010 onward. In addition, the characteristics of the replacements for those ousted by the purges imply a more aggressive and uncompromising strategic posture for the PLA in the near-future.  

The anti-graft purges targeting the PLA began following the scheduled resignation of the former Rocket Force commander Wei Fenghe from his position as China’s minister of defense in March 2023. Wei has not been heard from since being replaced by Li Shangfu.  

As the anti-corruption probes continued, in June of 2023, Rocket Force Commander Li YuchaoRocket Force Commissar Xu Zhongbo, and his deputies Liu Guangbin and Zhang Zhenzhong were all removed from their positions. While no official cause was given, there has been speculation of embezzlement and espionage by these officers, with one rumor asserting that Li Yuchao’s son leaked government secrets to the United States while studying abroad. The following month, a former deputy of the Rocket Force and head of the secretive Third Department Wu Guohua died under mysterious circumstances. Official reports said that his death was the result of an illness, but a former associate speculated that Wu died of suicide related to work.  

The anti-graft investigations would expand in scope in the following months, no longer targeting solely Rocket Force officials, but are concerning the loyalty of the People’s Liberation Army and Chinese Communist Party as a whole. In July of 2023, Foreign Minister Qin Gang was officially sacked from his position, with reports in diaspora media citing his extramarital affair in the United States as cause for removal. A few weeks later, Ju Qiansheng, commander of the PLA Strategic Support Force (PLASSF) and member of the Third Department, went missing amid investigations of misconduct. Among the PLASSF’s many responsibilities is coordinating with the Rocket Force in using intelligence and space assets. 

In September, there was a major shakeup in the CCP hierarchy as Cheng Dongfang, head of the PLA Military Court and Li Shangfu, the defense minister, were removed from their positions and disappeared without a trace – mere months after taking their latest positions. Li Shangfu was previously the deputy commander of the Strategic Support Force and he also has close ties to the Rocket Force, being an aerospace engineer by trade. He previously held commands in departments relating to the procurement and development of aerospace weaponry.  

The purges continued with the sidelining of still more senior military officers and defense industry executives in late December. On December 29, the National People’s Congress officially announced the removal of nine senior military officials from their positions, including Li Yuchao and Zhang Zhenzhong.  Former PLARF commander Zhou Yaning, head of the PLARF armaments department Lu Hong, and former PLARF deputy Li Chuanguang were all discharged. Commander of the Southern Theater Navy Ju Xinchun and PLAAF commander Ding Laihang were also removed from their positions. Of particular note is the dismissal of Equipment Development Department officials Zhang Yulin, and Rao Wenmin, given the speculation that misconduct originating from the department was responsible for the dismissal of Li Shangfu.  

In spite of all the drama surrounding the missing officials, it is worth noting that those that Xi Jinping selected as replacements are just as interesting as the ousted ministers themselves.  Replacing Qin Gang is veteran diplomat Wang Yi, who has returned to the position of foreign minister and is known to be a longtime ally of Xi. Wang, 69, was even allowed to stay past the normal retirement age and join the Politburo at the 20th National Party Congress last fall.  

On December 29, China finally announced its new defense minister: Dong Jun, who was the commander of the PLA Navy (PLAN). Notably, Dong becomes the first naval officer elevated to the minister of defense position – and he has spent his entire career in the navy, meaning little exposure to whatever corruption scandal may be plaguing the PLARF and PLASSF. He previously served as the deputy commander of the East Sea Fleet, which has responsibility for Taiwan Strait maritime issues and disputed islands in the East China Sea. Before that, Dong was deputy commander of the Southern Theater Command, which oversees the South China Sea.

Before Dong was tapped as Li’s replacement, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli helped fill the role of the Chinese military’s global face. Both are unorthodox selections, with Zhang being past the customary retirement age for a PLA officer and Liu being the youngest in his rank group and both generals are among the few combat veterans left in the PLA, having seen action against Vietnam in the 1980s. 

Li Yuchao and Xu Zhongbo were replaced by Wang Houbin and Xu Xisheng, respectively. Wang was the deputy commander for the PLAN and has a reputation for strict obedience, while Xu Xisheng was previously a PLA Air Force commissar assigned to the important Southern Theater Command.  

These appointments should come as no surprise as Xi Jinping has already revealed his priorities in selecting officials with his picks for the Central Military Commission last year in 2022. These replacements are a continuation of his practices to ensure loyalty to him and support for his aggressive foreign policies. By order of rank, they were Zhang Youxia, He Weidong, Li Shangfu, Liu Zhenli, Miao Hua, and Zhang Shemin. Zhang Youxia, He Weidong, and Liu Zhenli have the operational command experience that Xi values, and while He lacks the combat experience of Zhang and Liu, he previously commanded the Eastern Theater Command which encompasses Taiwan.

Zhang Youxia and Miao Hua have also worked with Xi in the past and Zhang in particular has close family ties to Xi. Zhang Shemin, despite having a career in the Rocket Force, is a part of the Shaanxi Gang, having grown up in the same area as Xi and acting as his enforcer.  Li Shangfu has since lost favor with Xi, but his initial appointment can be attributed to Xi desiring more development in military technology

Taken separately, the political fate of each official appears ambiguous, but together, they paint a picture of the strategic posture and outlook that Xi Jinping wants his government to have. Xi’s points of emphasis for his officials are political loyalty to himself and military command experience. With the investigations of the last few months, Xi has signaled that he has become unhappy with the technocrats in his administration, and is moving to replace them with aggressive commanders that can make his ambitions in the Indo-Pacific come to fruition.

China Aerospace Studies Institute – 255 Pages

Over 15 US Bases on Russia’s Doorstep

•July 9, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Finland Gives US Control Over 15 Military Bases, on Russia’s Doorstep. This explains the US relentless determination “to weaken Russia” in its long-term Covert Strategy!

Map shows 15 Best Cities to Visit in Finland but 15 New US Bases will surface soon

Global Research by Drago Bosnic • July 04, 2024

For nearly half a century, Scandinavia’s neutrality (with the obvious exception of Norway) was an important segment of keeping various buffer zones between the Soviet Union and NATO. And interestingly, despite the fact that the USSR was much more powerful than Russia nowadays, while also being virtually unopposed in the Baltic Sea, for some reason, neither Sweden nor Finland felt the need to become part of NATO.

What’s more, if there ever was a danger of a mythical Soviet invasion of either country, it was gone in 1991. Up to that point, Moscow’s access to the Baltic Sea stretched from Finland to Denmark (nearly, that is). Nowadays, Saint Petersburg and Kaliningrad are Russia’s only access points.

Thus, if the Kremlin hadn’t invaded Sweden and Finland during the (First) Cold War, it surely wouldn’t be doing it now. However, as rabid Russophobia is an extremely damaging degenerative disease, it clouds people’s judgment, leading them to make all sorts of rash and inexplicable decisions.

On the other hand, it’s impossible to explain NATO expansionism in Scandinavia without seeing it as part of a wider offensive build-up that aims to surround Russia with hostile states and other entities (including terrorist ones). In one of the latest such moves, Helsinki just gave the United States the legal permission to station troops in the country. The vote in the Finnish Parliament was unanimous.

The Question is, would the 15 New US Bases Carry Any Nuclear Weapon?

Thus, starting from July 1, Washington DC has access to at least 15 Finnish military bases, with the possibility of deploying heavy weapons. It wasn’t specified what sort of arms and equipment that refers to, but it’s not that difficult to imagine.

The US is already trying to surround both Russia and China with the previously banned medium and intermediate-range missiles, which is precisely why it’s setting up new military bases all across Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The latest agreement with Finland, aptly termed the “Defense” Cooperation Agreement (DCA), “will allow the United States to bring defense equipment, supplies, materials, and soldiers to Finland,” according to local sources.

Worse yet, the DCA gives America legal grounds to create military exclusion zones, areas that will be accessible to US personnel only. What this really means is that Finland effectively relinquished its sovereignty so it could become a legitimate target for Russian missiles.

Congratulations, Helsinki! You just exposed 5.5 million Finns to virtually immediate thermonuclear annihilation in case of (an increasingly possible) military conflict between NATO and Russia. Considering the fact that the US has similar “exclusive access” facilities all over the world and that the Pentagon usually uses them for illegal programs and experiments, including with deadly biological materials, Russia will respond.

In fact, the Kremlin certainly anticipated such moves, which is why it started deploying new missile brigades in northwestern Russia, including those armed with ballistic and hypersonic weapons.

Moscow’s second-to-none missiles such as those used by the “Iskander-M” platform or the MiG-31K strike fighters with 9-A-7660 “Kinzhal” systems (carrying the 9-S-7760 air-launched hypersonic missiles) put the entire Scandinavia in range.

“Exclusion Zone” so if a soldier rape a local, he is not subjected to Finnish Law

In addition, the sheer speed of these unrivaled weapons gives the Kremlin the ability of a virtually instantaneous retaliation in case anyone gets any ideas. Unfortunately, none of this seems to have deterred the (obviously suicidal) ruling elite in Helsinki.

The Finnish Parliament’s rather senseless decision to antagonize its much larger nuclear-armed neighbor cannot possibly be justified by any excuses of “defense” or any similar reasoning. The simple fact that Finland is allowing the presence of American offensive capabilities on the border with Russia will be enough for the latter to deploy weapons that the former simply has no means of defending against.

As the DCA creates a legal framework for a permanent American military presence in Finland, this also means that the Kremlin will surely respond in kind, making Helsinki far less safe than was the case before it joined NATO, thus defeating the very purpose of its membership in this racketeering cartel.

However, according to Finnish sources, there might even be some opposition to this in the country, as MP Anna Kontula submitted a proposal calling on other MPs to reject the DCA, although her motion received no backing.

Therefore, the Finnish Parliament “did not vote on the agreement, but approved it unanimously,” local sources report. This alone puts the legality of the agreement in serious question, although we’re extremely unlikely to see any major opposition to it.

Last month, Helsinki’s Constitutional Law Committee concluded that the “[DCA] would have to be approved by a two-thirds majority in Parliament, as it affects several aspects of the Finnish constitution” (i.e. it’s unconstitutional).

Another Question is, how would the Russians react to these New US Bases?

In other words, Finland is going out of its way to please the US and NATO, just like it did with Nazi Germany (their geopolitical predecessor) over 80 years ago. This was in the making for quite some time, even predating the special military operation (SMO), as Helsinki wanted to acquire the troubled F-35 fighter jets back in 2021.

Having such aircraft in one’s arsenal also means that a country is relinquishing its sovereignty. Namely, the US has control over the F-35’s systems, as the jet keeps sending data back to Lockheed Martin and the US military, meaning that even if the then “neutral” Finland didn’t join NATO, the Pentagon would effectively control a crucial branch of the country’s armed forces, forcing Russia to respond either way.

Genesis (7-8)

•July 9, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Genesis 7

1 And the Lord said unto Noah, “Come thou and all thy house into the ark, for thee have I seen righteous before Me in this generation. — thou and all thy family; which consisted only of eight persons; Noah and his three sons, and their four wives, Genesis 6:18.

Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female; and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female. — of every clean beast; of all clean cattle, thou shalt take to thee by sevens; or seven pairs.

Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female, to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth. — of every clean fowls; by sevens or seven pairs.

For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights, and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.” — yet seven days; or after seven days;

— and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights: this was not an ordinary but an extraordinary rain, and the quantity of water that fell;

And Noah did according unto all that the Lord commanded him. — and Noah did according to all that the Lord commanded him; he prepared for his entrance into the ark, and all the creatures with him; got everything ready for them, the rooms for their habitation, and food for their sustenance;

And Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth. — Noah was six hundred years old; it follows that Shem was about one hundred years of age (Genesis 5:32), and his two brothers were all married, though apparently without children;

And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him into the ark, because of the waters of the flood. — and Noah went in, and his sons, his wife, and his sons’ wives with him, into the ark;

— within the space of the seven days, between the command of God to go into it, and the coming of the flood; or rather on the seventh day, on which it began to rain; when he saw it was coming on;

Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowls and of every thing that creepeth upon the earth, — of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean; there were no mention of a distinction between clean and not clean in the beasts, birds and the creeping things; or, perhaps, distinction were made but were not written down;

— the behemoth (H930 ḇə·hê·mō·wṯ), or known as as dinosaur in Job 40:15, is not mentioned in this verse or anywhere hereabout; indicating they were not in the ark;

there went in two by two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female as God had commanded Noah. — there went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, being impressed with an instinct from God so to do; or by the ministry of angels;

10 And it came to pass after seven days that the waters of the flood were upon the earth. — and it came to pass after seven days; were ended, or on the seventh day, after God had given the orders to Noah, to prepare for his going into the ark, with his family, and all the creatures;

11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, that same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. — the second month; either of the one sacred, for the celebration of feasts, beginning in March; or the other civil, for men’s political or civil affairs, beginning in September;

Masoretic, the Flood was 1656 after the creation of Adam: Seth (130 Gen 5:3); Enosh (105 Gen 5:6); Cainan (90 Gen 5:9); Mahalalee (70 Gen 5:12); Jared (65 Gen 5:15); Enoch (162 Gen 5:18); Methuselah (65 Gen 5:21); Lamech (187 Gen 5:25); Noah (182 Gen 7:28-29) Noah (600 Gen 7:6,11) = 1656

Septuagint, the Flood was 2242 after the creation of Adam: Seth (230 Gen 5:3); Enosh (205 Gen 5:6); Cainan (190 Gen 5:9); Mahalalee (170 Gen 5:12); Jared (165 Gen 5:15); Enoch (162 Gen 5:18); Methuselah (165 Gen 5:21); Lamech (167 Gen 5:25); Noah (188 Gen 5:28-29); Noah (600 Gen 7:6,11) = 2242 (a difference of 586 years)

Samaritan, the Flood was 1407 after the creation of Adam: Seth (130 Gen 5:3); Enosh (105 Gen 5:6); Cainan (90 Gen 5:9); Mahalalee (70 Gen 5:12); Jared (65 Gen 5:15); Enoch (162 Gen 5:18); Methuselah (65 Gen 5:21); Lamech (67 Gen 5:25); Noah (53 Gen 7:28-29) Noah (600 Gen 7:6,11) = 1407 (a difference of 249 years from the Masoretic Text)

Targum of Jonathan and the Peshitta both went along with the Masoretic figures; whereas the Armenian largely went along with the Greek Septuagint; both are of Eastern Orthodox Christianity.

12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights. — forty days and forty nights; so long it was falling upon it, after the windows of heaven were opened.

13 In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem and Ham and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah’s wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark — a threefold description of the entrance of Noah and his retinue into the ark, first in the command, next in the actual process during the seven days, and, lastly, in the completed act on the seventh day;

14 they, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every fowl after his kind, every bird of every sort. — they, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind; all sorts of beasts and cattle, reckoned one hundred and thirty sorts, by some one hundred and fifty, including serpents;

15 And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two by two of all flesh wherein is the breath of life. — two by two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life; they that went by sevens; being seven couples, as they went by pairs;

16 And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him; and the Lord shut him in. — went in male and female of all flesh; that is, two by two;

17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth, and the waters increased and bore up the ark, and it was lifted up above the earth. — the flood was increasing for forty days; the waters rose so high, that the tops of the highest mountains were overflowed;

Orthodox Judaism says this happens in the year 1656 from Adam; but Josephus says 2656 from Adam, (Antiquities: book 1 chapter 3, section 3); a difference of a thousand years;

— a difference of a thousand years to reconcile:

18 And the waters prevailed and were increased greatly upon the earth, and the ark went upon the face of the waters. — it raised the ark above the earth and above the mountains, and, on the other, destroyed every living being upon the dry land, from man to cattle, creeping things and birds;

19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth, and all the high hills that were under the whole heaven were covered. — all the high hills, and the mountains were covered; there were hills and mountains before the flood, and that these were not caused by the deluge.

20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail, and the mountains were covered. — fifteen cubits would be about twenty-two feet;

21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl and of cattle and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: — all the men, women, and children, that were in the world, excepting those in the ark, died;

22 all in whose nostrils was the breath of life, all that was on the dry land, died. — all flesh, fowl, cattle, and creeping thing, died;

23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man and cattle, and the creeping things and the fowl of the heaven, and they were destroyed from the earth. And Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark. — of the millions of creatures that were upon the earth (except those who dwell in the sea), none was left, the flood came and destroyed them all;

24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth a hundred and fifty days. — fifty and a hundred days; these, and the forty days of rain, make one hundred and ninety days: about six lunar months and thirteen days;

— this number “one hundred and ninety days” coincides with Ezekiel 4 in the Septuagint version where Ezekiel was asked to sleep for the iniquity for Israel: for more, see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

Genesis 8

1 And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that were with him in the ark; and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters were assuaged. — Noah, who having heard nothing of him for five months, and having been perhaps longer in the ark than expected, might begin to think that he was forgotten of God; but God remembered him;

The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained. — the subterraneous waters in great quantity upon the earth, and the clouds of heaven, which poured down water upon it like spouts, were stopped from sending forth any more;

And the waters returned from off the earth continually, and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated. — the waters returned from off the earth; a vast wave from the sea had swept over the land, in addition to the forty days of rain; now it has return back to the ocean;

And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. — the ark rested upon one of the mountains of Ararat; some, Josephus and the Targum of Jonathan, think one of those mountains in Armenia, for other loose cannons, in Turkey;

And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month. In the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen. — the ark rested; it is stranded on some hill in Ararat; this country forms part of Armenia;

And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made. — at the end of forty days; it is easy to imagine the ardent longing Noah and his family must have felt to enjoy again the sight of land as well as breathe the fresh air;

And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth. — Noah sent forth a raven; through the window of the ark; which wentback and forth; until the waters were dried up from the earth;

Also he sent forth a dove from him to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground; — Noah sent forth the dove a second time, probably seven days after the first time, and the third time was after seven days too after the sending forth of the raven;

but the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth. Then he put forth his hand and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark. — the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot; because the tops of the hills which then could not be landed;

Mount Aragats in Aragatsotn Province, Shirak Province, Armenia

10 And he stayed yet another seven days, and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark. — and he stayed yet other seven days; as he had stayed seven days between the sending out of the raven and the dove, so he stayed seven days more after he had sent out the dove, and it returned to him;

11 And the dove came in to him in the evening, and lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf plucked off; so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth. — so Noah knew the waters were abated from off the earth: by this he perceived not only that they were gone off the mountains, but the lower grounds, at least the hills on which olive trees delight to grow;

12 And he stayed yet another seven days and sent forth the dove, which returned not again unto him any more. — which returned not again unto him any more: the earth being dry, it found rest for the sole of its feet, sufficient food to eat; and liking to be at liberty in the open air, chose not to return to the ark;

13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth; and Noah removed the covering of the ark and looked, and behold, the face of the ground was dry.

— and, behold, the face of the ground was dry; the ground or surface of the earth looked dry; but was not so dry and hard as to bear heavy bodies, or the foot to tread on it, being soft and tender;

14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. — Noah delays apparently another month, and, on the first day of the new year, ventures to remove the covering of the ark;

15 And God spoke unto Noah, saying, — and God spake unto Noah, saying; whether in a dream or vision, or by an articulate voice, appearing in an human form, or by an impulse on his mind, is not certain;

16 “Go forth from the ark, thou and thy wife, and thy sons and thy sons’ wives with thee. — Go forth of the ark; though the earth was dry and fit to be inhabited, yet they would not go out without orders, as he had to go in; which he waited for before he would, and now he has them;

17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee of all flesh, both of fowl and of cattle and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, that they may breed abundantly on the earth, and be fruitful and multiply upon the earth.”

— Question: how could these creatures which came out of the ark in Asia get thence to America, Australia, like the slow moving koalas or to the islands remote from the continent? A: perhaps with the help of angels;

18 And Noah went forth, and his sons and his wife and his sons’ wives with him. — and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him: in all eight persons, and no more were saved in the ark;

— interestingly the Chinese symbol for “boat” or 船 is made of 舟 (which means vessel), 八 (meaning eight) and 口 (meaning mouth); 船 literally translate “eight people in the boat.” This character was used in the ancient Chinese story of Noah’s ark.

19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark. — after their kind; not in a confused disorderly manner, mixing with one another; but as they went in by pairs, male and female of every sort, so they came forth in like manner;

20 And Noah built an altar unto the Lord, and took of every clean beast and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. — Noah builded an altar; literally, “a high place” probably a mound of earth, on which a sacrifice was offered;

21 And the Lord smelled a sweet savor; and the Lord said in His heart, “I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake, for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. — the Lord said in his heart; same as “I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth” Isaiah 54:9.

22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.” — while the earth remaineth; literally, as yet, all the days of the earth, that is, henceforth, so long as the earth continues.

Chinese Fueling America’s Fentanyl Crisis

•July 8, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Inside The Chinese Money-Laundering Network Fueling America’s Fentanyl Crisis

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • July 4, 2024

It’s worth noting that 100,000 Americans die in drug-related deaths per year, the vast majority from pills cooked with fentanyl, an opioid analog 50 times more potent than heroin. Every six months, the US drug death catastrophe eclipses the Vietnam War.

Fueling the fentanyl epidemic across the US are Chinese money launderers helping international drug traffickers, like Mexican cartels. Capital flight from China is not a new phenomenon, but in recent years, the scale of these transfers, washed through the drug trade, has become very alarming.

Paul Murphy from the Financial Times has provided the most straightforward explanation yet of the new Chinese money laundering network fueling America’s fentanyl crisis: 

First, understand that Chinese nationals are barred from transferring more than $50,000 out of China each year. And yet, as you are surely aware, there are many many Chinese nationals living very comfortable lives in the west, as students perhaps, or tourists, or simply not working.

Now understand that Mexican drug cartels are harvesting untold billions of dollars, in cash, selling drugs in North America — and that the pill of the moment is fentanyl, which kills about 70,000 people a year in the US.

The chemicals to make fentanyl come from China. These are shipped to Mexico by otherwise legit Chinese chemical manufacturers.

In Mexico, the cartels turn the chemicals into pills and smuggle these north across the border, where they are sold for cash — dollar bills that then need to be cleaned.

Murphy continued:

Meanwhile, in New York for instance, there will be a Chinese student attending an educational establishment, where the fees will be circa $66,000 a year, books and extras another $10,000, food and lodging costs of maybe $5,000 a month, or a lot more.

The $50,000 Chinese transfer cap doesn’t cover these things, so she will go on WeChat and broadcast a message to her network of friends saying: “I need dollars in New York to meet my outgoings. Can anyone help?”

In due course, someone associated with what is a very efficient Chinese underground banking system will get in touch and tell the student to meet a courier at a preordained time and place, typically a park in Brooklyn. There, the student will be handed a bundle of cash.

Back in China, the parents of the student will then be asked to transfer the same amount of money (plus commission) to an account that will eventually make its way to the chemical company that produced the precursor ingredients for fentanyl, settling the outstanding bill for the Mexican drug cartel.

Murphy explained, “Drug addicts in the US are facilitating the Western education of Chinese youth, as well as helping to fund the lifestyles of other Chinese nations living outside China.” 

He provided a flow chart showing how the complex laundering system works. 

In a separate report last week, FT’s Joe Miller and James Kynge published an in-depth analysis of the Chinese-Mexican laundering network in a report titled “The new money laundering network fuelling the fentanyl crisis.”

The report sheds light on the less understood part of the money laundering operation — the demand for dollars from wealthy Chinese individuals. While capital flight from China is not new, the methods have become increasingly creative, involving chemical companies that, in turn, have fueled America’s opioid epidemic.

“The levels of capital flight in the past three years have been quite alarming,” one senior Chinese official told FT, adding, “Some wealthy private entrepreneurs are losing confidence in China’s future. They feel unsafe, so they find ways to get their money out.”

Brad Setser, a former US Treasury official and an expert on global capital flows at the Council on Foreign Relations, estimated that capital flight from China is running at an annualized rate of about $516 billion as of 1Q24. This figure was even higher in the 3Q22, reaching almost $738 billion. 

“The whole system of drug trafficking is being sustained by a network of clandestine [Chinese] money brokers,” said Giovanni Melillo, the chief prosecutor for Italy’s National Anti-Mafia and Terrorism Directorate. His office has been coordinating laundering probes across Italy this past year.  

Previous cases of money laundering in the US involving Chinese nationals have raised serious questions about how much Beijing knows about these dark laundering networks. For instance, a recent Wall Street Journal report revealed that Chinese crime groups and drug traffickers used the Toronto-Dominion Bank to launder money from US fentanyl sales. 

In mid-April, the House Select Committee on China revealed that the Chinese Communist Party used tax rebates to subsidize the manufacturing and exporting of fentanyl chemicals to overseas customers. 

The biggest mystery here is why the Biden administration hasn’t taken a tougher stance on China while America’s fentanyl epidemic kills as many citizens each year as two Vietnam Wars.

But here is another big problem: there would be much civil unrest, because many Mexicans (or other Latinos included, legal or illegals) considered their land being occupied. And when Trump wants to throw them out, there could be fierce fightback

Many Mexicans (or other Latinos included, legal or illegals) considered their land being occupied. And when Trump wants to throw them out, there could be fierce fightback

CSIS: China could take over Taiwan without a Shot

•July 7, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The prominent think tank, CSIS, says China could take control of Taiwan without even launching an invasion — here’s how

Yahoo News • June 30, 2024 // Business Insider

  • China could take control of Taiwan without even launching an invasion, CSIS says.
  • The CSIS report says that China could use a “quarantine” of Taiwan to exert control over the island.
  • The report comes amid heightened tensions between China and Taiwan.

China could take control of Taiwan without ever having to invade, a prominent think tank has said.

China has long seen Taiwan as a breakaway province destined to come under its control, but Taiwan views itself as distinct from the mainland, with its own government and constitution and a staunchly pro-independence president.

While China has not ruled out using force to take control of Taiwan, it may be able to exert its power over the island without resorting to military means, according to a report by the Washington DC-based think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

China could initiate a full or partial “gray zone” quarantine of Taiwan using its coast guard and other law enforcement agencies to restrict access to the island’s ports, per the report.

This would not completely seal off the island from the world, but it would “assert China’s control over Taiwan by setting the terms for traffic in and out of the island,” the report says.

“A key goal is to compel countries and companies to comply with China’s terms. If foreign actors largely comply with the quarantine, it strengthens China’s narrative that it has control over Taiwan and undermines Taipei’s sovereignty claims,” it adds.

CSIS: China could take control of Taiwan without even firing a Shot

How a Guarantine could play out

The China Coast Guard and China’s Maritime Safety Administration would likely lead a quarantine, patrolling the waters around the island and intercepting any vessel that might breach the quarantine’s terms.

They could be supported by other air, naval, cyber, missile, and other forces “to intimidate Taiwan, deter outside intervention, and provide crucial intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance,” the report says.

It follows another report that was published last month by experts from the American Enterprise Institute and the Institute for the Study of War, which looked at the idea of a potential Chinese “coercion campaign” that would also fall short of an invasion but would still bring Taiwan under Beijing’s control.

China has already begun carrying out certain elements of such a campaign, launching increasing military exercises around the island.

The report also noted that while the US must still prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, the possibility of a coercion campaign represented a “significant gap in US strategic thought.”

However, Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, told CNN: “Historical evidence shows that even severe blockades have limited coercive value, and a limited quarantine might result in a rally around the flag effect.”

A screen grab captured from a video shows the Chinese People's Liberation Army's Eastern Theater Command launching large-scale joint military exercises around Taiwan with naval vessels and military aircraft in China on May 24, 2024.
Chinese fighter jets during military exercises near Taiwan in May

Why a quarantine could suit China

A quarantine might appeal to China for several reasons, the CSIS report says.

Firstly, unlike an invasion or blockade, the latter of which the CSIS defines as a “military-led campaign to significantly curtail the flow of traffic into Taiwan,” a quarantine “would not be seen as an act of war.”

“It is also more reversible and would not require closing off the Taiwan Strait,” the report adds.

Under the Taiwan Relations Act, the US is obliged to ensure that Taiwan with the means to defend itself — but there is no stipulation on whether US forces would be sent in the event of an invasion. Despite this, President Joe Biden said in 2022 that US forces would defend Taiwan should China invade.

However, a “law enforcement-led gray zone operation” would complicate any third-party intervention, per the CSIS report.

Tensions between China and Taiwan are increasing by the day

Relations between Taiwan and China remain on a knife edge.

At a conference in Singapore earlier this month, Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun said that the idea of peaceful “reunification” with Taiwan was being “eroded” by Taiwanese separatists and external forces.

“We will take resolute actions to curb Taiwan independence and make sure such a plot never succeeds,” he said.

In April last year, Chinese leader Xi Jinping said that Taiwan was at the “core” of China’s interests, according to a press statement, adding: “If anyone expects China to compromise and concede on the Taiwan question, they are having a pipe dream and would shoot themselves in the foot.”

Beijing has also continued to launch military exercises around the island.

Last month, China began the two-day exercise “Joint Sword” around Taiwan, carrying out “joint sea-air combat readiness patrols, joint seizure of comprehensive battlefield control, and joint precision strikes on key targets,” per Chinese state media.

A screen grab captured from a video shows the Chinese People's Liberation Army's Eastern Theater Command launching large-scale joint military exercises around Taiwan with naval vessels and military aircraft in China on May 24, 2024.
Chinese military exercises off Taiwan.Gui Xinhua/PLA/China Military

The training included mock strikes by fighter jets and drills with a number of naval vessels.

Further large-scale drills occurred in April 2023 and August 2022.

China’s armed forces have been able to “essentially start mounting an increased tempo of these large-scale drills that have a lot of the makings of a blockade,” Tom Shugart, a former US Navy officer and adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security think tank, previously told BI.

He added that the recent May exercises showed that China’s fleet was “very well suited” for a blockade or quarantine of Taiwan.

Ukraine war will end in surrender

•July 6, 2024 • Leave a Comment

And there won’t be any negotiations with Zelensky when the Ukrainian army collapses and a replacement government is installed

AsiaTimes by Stephen Bryen • July 2, 2024

The Ukraine war will end in a surrender, not in a negotiated deal. That is my sense of where the war is headed and why the parties cannot negotiate a settlement.

The latest wrinkle in the missing negotiating saga is a declaration in the form of an interview given by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the Philadelphia Inquirer. 

In the interview, Zelensky said there can’t be direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia but there could be indirect negotiations through a third party. In Zelensky’s proposed scenario, the third party will serve as an intermediary and any deal will only be with the intermediary, not between Russia or Ukraine. Zelensky suggested the UN could act in this role.

However, the Zelensky proposal is a non-starter for many reasons, but the biggest one is that warring states need to directly agree on ending a conflict. 

There is no hope of a third party implementing any deal, as the failed Minsk agreements (2014, 2015) proved. Minsk was a hybrid case where the deal was signed by Russia, Ukraine and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). 

Ukraine refused to implement the deal and the OSCE proved toothless and unwilling to try and enforce the Minsk accords. The deal had political backing from Germany and France, although neither was a signatory nor legally obliged in any manner to support the resulting deal. 

Zelensky’s “proposal” really is just another smokescreen to deflect criticism of Ukraine for not wanting a settlement with Russia. Three strong forces are keeping Zelensky from the negotiating table. 

The most important is that the main Anglo-Saxon players in NATO, namely the US and the UK, strongly oppose any negotiations with Russia. The US has done everything it can, including through sanctions and diplomatic measures, to prevent any dialogue with Russia on any subject (other than prisoner exchanges).  

The second reason is Ukrainian legislation, sponsored by Zelensky, prohibiting negotiations with Russia. The Verkhovna Rada (Ukraine’s parliament) could rescind that legislation in a nanosecond if Zelensky asked them to do so but he likely won’t. 

Zelensky completely controls the Ukrainian parliament, has arrested or exiled opposition politicians, and controls the press and other media. Zelensky’s iron fist means that he won’t personally allow direct negotiations.

Zelensky also has signed a decree prohibiting any negotiations with Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin.

The third reason relates to pressure on Zelensky from hard-right nationalists, including especially the neo-Nazi Azov brigade. Direct evidence for this is the firing of Lieutenant General Yuri Sodol, the top commander of Kiev’s forces in the Kharkov area.

Sodol was accused by Azov brigade leaders of killing more Ukrainians than the Russians in the Kharkov battles. Azov took their message to the Rada and Zelensky obliged them by firing Sodol.

Since Sodol’s dismissal, Ukraine’s situation has worsened along the entire line of contact. Ukrainian battle losses are very high, with as many as 2,000 killed and wounded on some days.

The Russians have stepped up their attacks with FAB glide bombs, including the monster FAB-3000 which just hit a Ukrainian army command center in the Donbas town of New York and reportedly killed 60 or more Ukrainian military personnel.

The Russians say that Zelensky is not a viable negotiating partner because his term of office expired in May. There is some confusion about the legal situation in Ukraine but experts in and outside Ukraine think that the leadership of the country should pass to the Speaker of the Rada since Zelensky completed his term.  

Ruslan Stefanchuk is the Rada speaker and is becoming more politically active, though he has not opposed Zelensky’s continued rule.

Meanwhile, given the battlefield situation, the Russians no doubt figure that the time will soon come when the Ukrainian army either collapses or surrenders, or both. 

In either case, the Ukrainian government will need to be replaced in some manner, perhaps with an interim military leadership selected by Russia. That would allow the Russians to formulate a capitulation agreement with a replacement government.

A surrender by Ukraine’s army and an agreement with a Russia-appointed government would make NATO’s continued involvement in Ukraine impossible.

That could open the door, finally, to a security dialogue between NATO and Russia once NATO digests what happened and why. Unfortunately, loading NATO with has-been political leaders like Marc Rutte does not bode well for the future of the alliance. 

The key message for NATO if the Russians win in Ukraine, as seems more and more likely, is that the security alliance must stop its expansion and look for a more stable arrangement with Russia in Europe.

Genesis (5-6)

•July 6, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The secret of the Lord is with them that fear Him, and He will show them His covenant. Psalm 25:14

Genesis 5

1 This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made He him. — in the likeness of God; man is now a fallen being, yet these words are repeated to show that the Divine likeness was not lost, nor the primæval blessing bestowed at his creation revoked.

Male and female created He them, and blessed them and called their name Adam in the day when they were created. — he called their name Adam; he gave this name both to the man and the woman, being at first one by nature, and afterward one by marriage, it was fit they should both have the same name in token of their union.

And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begot a son in his own likeness, after his image, and called his name Seth. — in his own likeness, after his image; that is, Adam handed down to his posterity that Divine likeness which he had himself received.

And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years; and he begot sons and daughters. — and the days of Adam, after he had begotten Seth, were eight hundred years; the Septuagint has it as seven hundred; probably counting a hundred years later where Adam began to have other children; which Josephus agrees (Antiquities of the Jews: book I, chapter 2, section 3)

— and he begat sons and daughters; not only after the birth of Seth, but before, though we have no account from the Scriptures of any; and what their number is, either before or after;

— but Josephus says the number of children Adam had, according to the old tradition, was thirty three sons and twenty three daughters. Joseph. Antiquities of the Jews: book I, chapter 2, section 3, footnote 8

— below is from Josephus’ Antiquities of the Jews: book I, chapter 2, section 3:

Now Adam, who was the first man, and made out of the earth, [for our discourse must now be about him,] after Abel was slain, and Cain fled away, on account of his murder, was solicitous for posterity, and had a vehement desire of children, he being two hundred and thirty years old; after which time he lived other seven hundred, and then died. He had indeed many other children,8 but Seth in particular.

As for the rest, it would be tedious to name them; I will therefore only endeavor to give an account of those that proceeded from Seth. Now this Seth, when he was brought up, and came to those years in which he could discern what was good, became a virtuous man; and as he was himself of an excellent character, so did he leave children behind him who imitated his virtues. 

All these proved to be of good dispositions. They also inhabited the same country without dissensions, and in a happy condition, without any misfortunes falling upon them, till they died. They also were the inventors of that peculiar sort of wisdom which is concerned with the heavenly bodies, and their order.

And that their inventions might not be lost before they were sufficiently known, upon Adam’s prediction that the world was to be destroyed at one time by the force of fire, and at another time by the violence and quantity of water, they made two pillars, the one of brick, the other of stone: they inscribed their discoveries on them both, that in case the pillar of brick should be destroyed by the flood, the pillar of stone might remain, and exhibit those discoveries to mankind; and also inform them that there was another pillar of brick erected by them. Now this remains in the land of Siriad to this day.

And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years; and he died. — he was from thence sentenced the sentence of death, and liable to it; yea, death seized upon him till it brought him to the dust of it; his life, though so long protracted, was a dying life, and at last he submitted to the stroke of death, as all his posterity ever since;

— the MSG has these verses as:

When Adam was 130 years old, he had a son who was just like him, his very spirit and image, and named him Seth. After the birth of Seth, Adam lived another 800 years, having more sons and daughters. Adam lived a total of 930 years. And he died. Genesis 5:3-5 MSG

And Seth lived a hundred and five years, and begot Enosh. — and Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos. Not that this was his firstborn, no doubt but he had other children before this time; but this is only mentioned, because it carried the lineage and descent directly from Adam to Noah;

And Seth lived after he begot Enosh eight hundred and seven years, and begot sons and daughters. — and begat sons and daughters; very probably both before and after Enos was born; but how many is not said;

And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years; and he died. — and all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years;

— Seth, according to Josephus (Antiquities: book 1 chapter 2, section 3), was a very good man, and brought up his children well, who trod in his steps, and who studied the nature of the heavenly bodies; and that the knowledge of these things they had acquired might not be lost, remembering a prophecy of Adam, that the world should be destroyed both by fire and by water;

And Enosh lived ninety years, and begot Cainan. — and Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan, but according to the Septuagint, a hundred and ninety years;

10 And Enosh lived after he begot Cainan eight hundred and fifteen years, and begot sons and daughters. — and Enos lived, after he begat Cainan, eight hundred and fifteen years; the Septuagint is seven hundred and fifteen;

11 And all the days of Enosh were nine hundred and five years; and he died. — he died in the year of his age nine hundred and five; and according to Gill, is AM 1340, and was buried in the holy mountain; 

12 And Cainan lived seventy years, and begot Mahalaleel. — and Cainan lived seventy years, and begat Mahalaleel; here the Septuagint adds an hundred years, as before;

13 And Cainan lived after he begot Mahalaleel eight hundred and forty years, and begot sons and daughters. — eight hundred and forty years; the Septuagint has seven hundred and forty, which, when added to the years given him before, makes the same sum;

14 And all the days of Cainan were nine hundred and ten years; and he died.

15 And Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begot Jared. — and Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared. A hundred and sixty, according to the Septuagint version;

16 And Mahalaleel lived after he begot Jared eight hundred and thirty years, and begot sons and daughters.

17 And all the days of Mahalaleel were eight hundred ninety and five years; and he died.

18 And Jared lived a hundred sixty and two years, and he begot Enoch. — and Jared lived an hundred and sixty two years, and he begat Enoch. Here the Septuagint agrees with the Hebrew text, and the Samaritan version differs, reading only sixty two;

19 And Jared lived after he begot Enoch eight hundred years, and begot sons and daughters. — and Jared lived, after he begat Enoch, eight hundred years; and so, the Septuagint version, but the Samaritan is seven hundred and eighty five;

20 And all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years; and he died.

21 And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begot Methuselah. — and Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah; here the Septuagint version adds again an hundred years;

22 And Enoch walked with God after he begot Methuselah three hundred years, and begot sons and daughters. — and Enoch walked with God, after he begat Methuselah, three hundred years; the Septuagint version is two hundred;

23 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years. — their lives a getting shorter, and now approximately half the age of those older patriarchs;

24 And Enoch walked with God; and he was not, for God took him. — and he was not, for God took him; instead of the mournful refrain when one died, we have here an early removal into another world, suggesting Enoch, in this special case, may have the highest form of blessing;

— “another world” may mean into heaven, where God’s throne is, where he is with the holy angels and other saints; Revelation: he could be one of the 24 Elders in Revelation?

— the Targum of Jonathan paraphrases it; “behold, he was not with the sojourners of the earth; for he was withdrawn, and he ascended to the firmament by the Word before the Lord,”

Who are the 24 Elders in Revelation?

25 And Methuselah lived a hundred eighty and seven years, and begot Lamech. — and Methuselah lived an hundred and eighty and seven years, and beget Lamech; the Septuagint version is an hundred and sixty seven;

Methuselah lived a hundred eighty and seven years, and begot Lamech

26 And Methuselah lived after he begot Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begot sons and daughters. — and Methuselah lived, after he begat Lamech, seven hundred eighty and two years; but the Septuagint version is eight hundred and two years, and so makes the sum total of his life the same;

27 And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years; and he died. — and all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred and sixty nine years, and he died; this was the oldest man that ever lived, no man ever lived to a thousand years;

28 And Lamech lived a hundred eighty and two years, and begot a son. — and Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat son; according to the Septuagint version he was an hundred and eighty eight years old; 

— Josephus says after the seventh generation, his posterity turned into wickedness:

Now this posterity of Seth continued to esteem God as the Lord of the universe, and to have an entire regard to virtue, for seven generations; but in process of time they were perverted, and forsook the practices of their forefathers; and did neither pay those honors to God which were appointed them, nor had they any concern to do justice towards men. But for what degree of zeal they had formerly shown for virtue, they now showed by their actions a double degree of wickedness, whereby they made God to be their enemy. (Antiquities: book 1 chapter 3, section 1),

29 And he called his name Noah, saying, “This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed.” — the Lord hath cursed; because of the ground, which the Lord hath cursed;

— this he spake, foreseeing what his son would be, and of what advantage to him and his family, and to the world: the earth was cursed for the sin of man immediately after the fall, and continued under it to this time, bringing forth thorns and thistles in great abundance of itself, which occasioned much trouble to root and pluck them up, and nothing else, without digging, and planting and sowing;

— the Message version is:

When Lamech was 182 years old, he had a son. He named him Noah, saying, “This one will give us a break from the hard work of farming the ground that God cursed.” After Lamech had Noah, he lived another 595 years, having more sons and daughters. Lamech lived a total of 777 years. And he died. Genesis 5:28-30 MSG

30 And Lamech lived after he begot Noah five hundred ninety and five years, and begot sons and daughters. — and Lamech lived, after he begat Noah, five hundred ninety and five years; the Septuagint version is five hundred and sixty five;

31 And all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years; and he died. — and all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years, and he died; the Septuagint version he lived but seven hundred and fifty three;

32 And Noah was five hundred years old; and Noah begot Shem, Ham, and Japheth. — and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth; not together, but one after another;

— Shem was an hundred years old two years after the flood, Genesis 11:10 he must be born in the five hundred and second year of his father’s age; so that it seems most probable that Japheth was the eldest.

— for more, see Japheth, the Eldest

— discrepancies of dates in Jospehus (Antiquities: book 1.1 chapter 3 section 3): “and this was two thousand six hundred and fifty-six [one thousand six hundred and fifty-six] years from Adam, the first man.”

Genesis 6

1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born unto them, — and it came to pass, when men began to multiply upon the face of the earth; either mankind in general, or rather the posterity of Cain;

— or the the posterity of Seth, or a mixture of the two; but then again, Josephus says the number of children Adam had, was thirty three sons and twenty three daughters;

that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were fair; and they took for themselves wives of all whom they chose. — the sons of God saw the daughters of men; by the former, from God’s point of view, is meant the family of Seth, who were of good dispositions, virtuous and professedly religious;

— by the latter, the descendants of apostate Cain, the daughters of men; from God’s point of view, mixed marriages between parties of opposite principles and practice were necessarily sources of evils and corruption;

— persons of greatest eminency for place and power, for such are called gods, and children of the Most High, Psalm 82:6 ‘I have said, “Ye are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High,”’ where, in contrast, also they are opposed to men, Genesis 6:7, that is, to meaner men.

And the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not always strive with man, for he also is flesh; yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.” — my spirit shall not always strive with man; indicating his spirit strives with man up to a certain point; and there will a certain point beyond which he will not go; hence God reduced their days and it shall be an hundred and twenty years; given to them to repent;

There were giants on the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men who were of old, men of renown. — there were giants on the earth in those days; before those intermarriages were beginning to take place, and these intermarriages bare children unto them, or giants unto them;

— the same became mighty, which were of old: like those that were of old before; hence, perhaps, there were now two sets of giants?

— or a third set, from the evil angels: as Josephus says:

“For many angels of God accompanied with women, and begat sons that proved unjust, and despisers of all that was good, on account of the confidence they had in their own strength; for the tradition is, that these men did what resembled the acts of those whom the Grecians call giants.” This notion, that the fallen angels were, in some sense, the fathers of the old giants, was the constant opinion of antiquity; (Antiquities: book 1 chapter 3, section 1).

And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagining of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. — and God saw the wickedness of man was great on the earth; that it spread throughout the earth, wherever it was inhabited, both among the posterity of Cain and Seth, who now were mixed together;

And the Lord repented that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him in His heart. — and it repented the Lord; not in the sense the Lord wished he haven’t created man, since he was able to declare the end from the beginning; but that it grieved him at his heart to see man sinned;

Rashi: it was a consolation to Him that He had created him [man] of the earthly beings, for had he been one of the heavenly beings, he would have caused them to rebel.

And the Lord said, “I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, and the creeping thing and the fowls of the air, for I repent that I have made them.” — for I repent that I have made them; same in the sense that he was able to declare the end from the beginning; but that God grieved that his creation had sinned;

But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord. — but Noah found grace; this is evidence that grace found in the Old Testament; that is, Noah obtained mercy and favour from the Lord;

These are the generations of Noah. Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. — Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations; “Just” is, literally, righteous, one whose actions were sufficiently upright to exempt him from the punishment inflicted upon the rest of mankind;

10 And Noah begot three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. — Shem was an hundred years old two years after the flood, Genesis 11:10 he must be born in the five hundred and second year of his father’s age;

— so that it seems most probable that Japheth was the eldest; and born in the five hundred and first year of his age; though Shem is usually mentioned first, because of his superior dignity: Abraham and from whom king David and the Messiah was to spring from;

— for more, see Japheth, the Eldest

11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. — and the land was corrupt, abominable, and other enormous crimes; in contrast with Noah, the rest of the race were corrupt; entirely depraved by sin;

12 And God looked upon the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. — the land was corrupt; the earth was filled with violence, with their uncleanness and wickedness of various sorts;

13 And God said unto Noah, “The end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with violence through them; and behold, I will destroy them with the earth. — the end of all flesh is come before me; that is, it was determined to put an end to the lives of all men, and of all cattle, and fowl and creeping things on the earth;

— before an order is executed the case is presented to the sovereign, that it may finally be examined, and if approved, receive the judgement, upon which it becomes a decree: “I will destroy them with the earth.”

14 Make thee an ark of gopherwood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt cover it within and without with pitch. — make thee an ark, or chest; an oblong box; not capable of sailing, but intended merely to float; the secret of the Lord is with them that fear him;

— the Targum of Jonathan says

“Make thee an ark of the wood of cedars; a hundred and fifty cells shalt thou make to the ark in its left side, and thirty and six in its breadth; and ten cabins in the midst, to lay up in them provision; and five repositories on the right, and five on the left; and thou shalt protect it within and without a pitch.”

15 And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: the length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits. — the cubit is the length of the arm from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger;

— as, further, it was regarded as one-fourth of a man’s height, we may safely compute it at eighteen inches, except where the sacred or longer cubit is expressly mentioned; thus the ark was 450 feet long, 75 broad, and 45 in depth.

16 A window shalt thou make for the ark, and to a cubit shalt thou finish it above; and the door of the ark shalt thou set in the side thereof; with lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it. — it is not necessary to suppose that Noah and his three sons built this vast vessel with their own hands; he was probably a powerful chieftain, and many of the Sethites may have given him aid;

— the highest story was for men and birds; the second for provision for the brute creatures; the lowest for the beasts, under which was the bottom of the ark, which most probably was made sloping on both sides;

17 And behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth to destroy all flesh wherein is the breath of life from under heaven; and every thing that is on the earth shall die. — every thing that is in the earth shall die; this limitation that the fishes are not included in the destruction because they did not live in the same element wherein men lived and sinned;

18 But with thee will I establish My covenant; and thou shalt come into the ark, thou and thy sons, and thy wife and thy sons’ wives with thee. — my covenant; there had been no covenant with Adam or with the Sethites, but in the higher state of things it began with Noah;

19 And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female. — and of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark; that is, of fowls, cattle, and creeping things,

20 Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee to keep them alive. — they shall be male and female; not any two, but one male and one female, they are to come in pairs for propagation;

21 And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and thou shalt gather it to thee; and it shall be food for thee and for them.” — and take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten; by man and beast;

22 Thus did Noah; according to all that God commanded him, so did he. — thus did Noah as he began without delay to prepare the colossal fabric, and in every step of his progress faithfully followed the divine directions he had received.

Washington Defeated in the Red Sea

•July 5, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Washington, Tel Aviv and London are now been Defeated by the Houthis in the Red Sea.

“There remains some degree of speculation that if a US warship [refering to the USS Dwight Eisenhower] did suffer damage, it might be kept under wraps. It’s entirely possible that the Pentagon would not publicize such an event in order to prevent the Houthis from declaring a ‘win’ and using it in their subsequent propaganda.”

The Unz Review by Mike Whitney • June 22, 2024

In June, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) released a report highlighting the impact of Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. The report is a devastating account of Washington’s failure to protect critical transit corridors in one of the world’s most important waterways.

The Biden administration’s makeshift naval coalition, dubbed Operation Prosperity Guardian, has not only been unable to ensure safe passage for commercial carriers in the Red Sea, it’s actually made matters worse. The Houthis have fine-tuned their military operations while adding more lethal weapons to their arsenal.

The Houthis claims they hit numerous American warships in the Red Sea

In short, the Houthis have shown that a disparate group of militants can impose costly penalties on their enemies by implementing asymmetrical strategies that undermine the “rules-based order.”

Here’s an excerpt from the DIA’s report:

As of mid-February, container shipping through Red Sea had declined by approximately 90% since December 2023; shipping via the Red Sea typically accounts for approximately 10-15% of international maritime trade….

Alternate shipping routes around Africa add about 11,000 nautical miles, 1-2 weeks of transit time, and approximately $1 million in fuel costs for each voyage. For many shipping companies, the combined costs of crew bonuses, war risk insurance (roughly 1000% more than pre-war costs)…

As of mid-February, insurance premiums for Red Sea transits have risen to 0.7-1.0% of a ship’s total value, compared to less than 0.1% prior to December 2023 Houthi Attacks Placing Pressure on International Trade, DIA

This is a shocking report. According to the Government’s own analysis, Biden’s Red Sea policy has been an abject failure. Container shipping is down by 90 percent while insurance premiums, fueling costs and ‘extra miles sailed’ have skyrocketed. There’s not a trace of optimism in the entire report. The Houthis have basically achieved all of their strategic objectives while Washington’s meddling has accomplished nothing.

 The USS Dwight D Eisenhower from the Red Sea, now Streaming back to its Home Base in Norfolk, Virginia, for Some Unknown Major Repairs

Surprisingly, the journalists at Business Insider have drawn the same conclusion as the DIA, that the Houthis have out maneuvered Uncle Sam at every turn. Here’s a clip from a recent BI article:

The Houthis have proven to be a wily and formidable foe. Five months after rounds of US-led coalition airstrikes to “disrupt and degrade” their capabilities, the militants continue to wreak havoc. They’re routinely forcing the US-led task force to intercept their missiles, bomb boats, and flying drones that have turned shipping lanes in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden into a dangerous — and deadly — corridor.

The Houthis have struck multiple ships in the last week, and US officials say these attacks are unlikely to end anytime soon, raising concerns the US is stuck in a costly and unsustainable standoff.

The Houthis have managed to drag Washington into a prolonged, expensive, resource-depleting conflict and driven shipping costs much higher. While no American warships have been hit, the US must bear the growing financial costs and wear and tear to its warships. US Navy warships are stuck in a Red Sea battle they can’t fight forever, Business Insider

The Houthis have essentially closed commercial shipping through one of the world’s most important transit chokepoints and the US is unable to do anything about it. Couldn’t someone have anticipated this scenario before Biden impulsively deployed a naval flotilla to the Red Sea?

Why the US Won’t Negotiate to End the War in Ukraine?

•July 4, 2024 • Leave a Comment
The US flag, Russian flag, Ukraine flag.

For goodness’ sake, negotiate!

AntiWar by Jeffrey D Sachs • June 26, 2024 // Pearls and Irritations

For the fifth time since 2008, Russia has proposed to negotiate with the US over security arrangements, this time in proposals made by President Vladimir Putin on June 14, 2024. Four previous times, the US rejected the offer of negotiations in favor of a neocon strategy to weaken or dismember Russia through war and covert operations. The US neocon tactics have failed disastrously, devastating Ukraine in the process, and endangering the whole world. After all the warmongering, it’s time for Biden to open negotiations for peace with Russia.

Since the end of the Cold War, the US grand strategy has been to weaken Russia. As early as 1992, then Defense Secretary Richard Cheney opined that following the 1991 demise of the Soviet Union, Russia too should be dismembered. Zbigniew Brzezinski opined in 1997 that Russia should be divided into three loosely confederated entities in Russian Europe, Siberia, and the far east. In 1999, the US-led NATO alliance bombed Russia’s ally, Serbia, for 78 days in order to break Serbia apart and install a massive NATO military base in breakaway Kosovo. Leaders of the US military-industrial complex vociferously supported the Chechen war against Russia in the early 2000s.

To secure these US advances against Russia, Washington aggressively pushed NATO enlargement, despite promises to Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin that NATO would not move one inch eastward from Germany. Most tendentiously, the US pushed NATO enlargement to Ukraine and Georgia, with the idea of surrounding Russia’s naval fleet in Sevastopol, Crimea with NATO states: Ukraine, Romania (NATO member 2004), Bulgaria (NATO member 2004), Turkey (NATO member 1952), and Georgia, an idea straight from the playbook of the British Empire in the Crimean War (1853-6).

Brzezinski spelled out a chronology of NATO enlargement in 1997, including NATO membership of Ukraine during 2005-2010. The US in fact proposed NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia at the 2008 NATO Bucharest Summit. By 2020, NATO had in fact enlarged by 14 countries in Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union (Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland in 1999; Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia in 2004; Albania and Croatia, 2009; Montenegro, 2017; and Northern Macedonia, 2020), while promising future membership to Ukraine and Georgia.

In short, the 30-year US project, hatched originally by Cheney and the neocons, and carried forward consistently since then, has been to weaken or even dismember Russia, surround Russia with NATO forces, and depict Russia as the belligerent power.

It is against this grim backdrop that Russian leaders have repeatedly proposed to negotiate security arrangements with Europe and the US. that would provide security for all countries concerned, not just the NATO bloc. Guided by the neocon game plan, the US has refused to negotiate on every occasion, while trying to pin the blame on Russia for the lack of negotiations.

In June 2008, as the US prepared to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev proposed a European Security Treaty, calling for collective security and an end to NATO’s unilateralism. Suffice it to say, the US showed no interest whatsoever in Russia’s proposals, and instead proceeded with its long-held plans for NATO enlargement.

The second Russian proposal for negotiations came from Putin following the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014, with the active complicity if not outright leadership of the US government. I happened to see the US complicity up close, as the post-coup government invited me for urgent economic discussions. When I arrived in Kiev, I was taken to the Maidan, where I was told directly about US funding of the Maidan protest.

The evidence of US complicity in the coup is overwhelming. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was caught on a phone line in January 2014 plotting the change of government in Ukraine. Meanwhile, US Senators went personally to Kiev to stir up the protests (akin to Chinese or Russian political leaders coming to DC on January 6, 2021 to rile up the crowds).

On February 21, 2014, the Europeans, US and Russia brokered a deal with Yanukovych in which Yanukovich agreed to early elections. Yet the coup leaders reneged on the deal the same day, took over government buildings, threatened more violence, and deposed Yanukovych the next day. The US supported the coup and immediately extended recognition to the new government.

In my view, this was a standard CIA-led covert regime change operation, of which there have been several dozen around the world, including sixty-four episodes between 1947 and 1989 meticulously documented by Professor Lindsey O’Rourke. Covert regime-change operations are of course not really hidden from view, but the US government vociferously denies its role, keeps all documents highly confidential, and systematically gaslights the world: “Do not believe what you see plainly with your own eyes! The U.S. had nothing to do with this.” Details of the operations eventually emerge, however, through eyewitnesses, whistleblowers, the forced release of documents under the Freedom of Information Act, declassification of papers after years or decades, and memoirs, but all far too late for real accountability.

In any event, the violent coup induced the ethnic-Russia Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine to break from the coup leaders, many of whom were extreme Russophobic nationalists, and some in violent groups with a history of Nazi SS links in the past. Almost immediately, the coup leaders took steps to repress the use of the Russian language even in the Russian-speaking Donbas. In the following months and years, the government in Kiev launched a military campaign to retake the breakaway regions, deploying neo-Nazi paramilitary units and US arms.

In the course of 2014, Putin called repeatedly for a negotiated peace, and this led to the Minsk II Agreement in February 2015 based on autonomy of the Donbas and an end to violence by both sides. Russia did not claim the Donbas as Russian territory, but instead called for autonomy and the protection of ethnic Russians within Ukraine. The UN Security Council endorsed the Minsk II agreement, but the US neocons privately subverted it. Years later, Chancellor Angela Merkel blurted out the truth. The Western side treated the agreement not as a solemn treaty but as a delaying tactic to “give Ukraine time” to build its military strength. In the meantime, around 14,000 people died in the fighting in Donbas between 2014 and 2021.

Following the definitive collapse of the Minsk II agreement, Putin again proposed negotiations with the US in December 2021. By that point, the issues went even beyond NATO enlargement to include fundamental issues of nuclear armaments. Step by step, the US neocons had abandoned nuclear arms control with Russia, with the US unilaterally abandoning the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty in 2002, placing Aegis missiles in Poland and Romania in 2010 onwards, and walking out of the Intermediate Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty in 2019.

In view of these dire concerns, Putin put on the table on December 15, 2021 a draft “Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Security Guarantees.” The most immediate issue on the table (Article 4 of the draft treaty) was the end of the US attempt to expand NATO to Ukraine. I called US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan at the end of 2021 to try to convince the Biden White House to enter the negotiations. My main advice was to avoid a war in Ukraine by accepting Ukraine’s neutrality, rather than NATO membership, which was a bright red line for Russia.

The White House flatly rejected the advice, claiming remarkably (and obtusely) that NATO’s enlargement to Ukraine was none of Russia’s business! Yet what would the US say if some country in the Western hemisphere decided to host Chinese or Russian bases? Would the White House, State Department, or Congress say, “That’s just fine, that’s a matter of concern only to Russia or China and the host country?” No. The world nearly came to nuclear Armageddon in 1962 when the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba and the US imposed a naval quarantine and threatened war unless the Russians removed the missiles. The US military alliance does not belong in Ukraine any more than the Russian or Chinese military belongs close to the US border.

The fourth offer of Putin to negotiate came in March 2022, when Russia and Ukraine nearly closed a peace deal just weeks after the start of Russia’s special military operation that began on February 24, 2022. Russia, once again, was after one big thing: Ukraine’s neutrality, i.e., no NATO membership and no hosting of US missiles on Russia’s border.

Ukraine’s President Vladimir Zelensky quickly accepted Ukraine’s neutrality, and Ukraine and Russia exchanged papers, with the skillful mediation of the Foreign Ministry of Turkey. Then suddenly, at the end of March, Ukraine abandoned the negotiations.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, following in the tradition of British anti-Russian war-mongering dating back to the Crimean War (1853-6), actually flew to Kiev to warn Zelensky against neutrality and the importance of Ukraine defeating Russia on the battlefield. Since that date, Ukraine has lost around 500,000 dead and is on the ropes on the battlefield.

Now we have Russia’s fifth offer of negotiations, explained clearly and cogently by Putin himself in his speech to diplomats at the Russian Foreign Ministry on June 14. Putin laid out Russia’s proposed terms to end the war in Ukraine.

“Ukraine should adopt a neutral, non-aligned status, be nuclear-free, and undergo demilitarization and de-nazification,” Putin said. “These parameters were broadly agreed upon during the Istanbul negotiations in 2022, including specific details on demilitarization such as the agreed numbers of tanks and other military equipment. We reached consensus on all points.

“Certainly, the rights, freedoms, and interests of Russian-speaking citizens in Ukraine must be fully protected,” he continued. “The new territorial realities, including the status of Crimea, Sevastopol, Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions as parts of the Russian Federation, should be acknowledged. These foundational principles need to be formalized through fundamental international agreements in the future. Naturally, this entails the removal of all Western sanctions against Russia as well.”

Let me say a few words about negotiating.

Russia’s proposals should now be met at the negotiating table by proposals from the US and Ukraine. The White House is dead wrong to evade negotiations just because of disagreements with Russia’s proposals. It should put up its own proposals and get down to the business of negotiating an end to the war.

There are three core issues for Russia: Ukraine’s neutrality (non-NATO enlargement), Crimea remaining in Russian hands, and boundary changes in Eastern and Southern Ukraine. The first two are almost surely non-negotiable. The end of NATO enlargement is the fundamental casus belli. Crimea is also core for Russia, as Crimea has been home to Russia’s Black Sea fleet since 1783 and is fundamental to Russia’s national security.

The third core issue, the borders of Eastern and Southern Ukraine, will be a key point of negotiations. The US cannot pretend that borders are sacrosanct after NATO bombed Serbia in 1999 to relinquish Kosovo, and after the US pressured Sudan to relinquish South Sudan. Yes, Ukraine’s borders will be redrawn as the result of the 10 years of war, the situation on the battlefield, the choices of the local populations, and tradeoffs made at the negotiating table.

Biden needs to accept that negotiations are not a sign of weakness. As Kennedy put it, “Never negotiate out of fear, but never fear to negotiate.” Ronald Reagan famously described his own negotiating strategy using a Russian proverb, “Trust but verify.”

The neocon approach to Russia, delusional and hubristic from the start, lies in ruins. NATO will never enlarge to Ukraine and Georgia. Russia will not be toppled by a CIA covert operation. Ukraine is being horribly bloodied on the battlefield, often losing 1,000 or more dead and wounded in a single day. The failed neocon game plan brings us closer to nuclear Armageddon.

Yet Biden still refuses to negotiate. Following Putin’s speech, the US, NATO, and Ukraine firmly rejected negotiations once again. Biden and his team have still not relinquished the neocon fantasy of defeating Russia and expanding NATO to Ukraine.

The Ukrainian people have been lied to time and again by Zelensky and Biden and other leaders of NATO countries, who told them falsely and repeatedly that Ukraine would prevail on the battlefield and that there were no options to negotiate. Ukraine is now under martial law. The public is given no say about its own slaughter.

For the sake of Ukraine’s very survival, and to avoid nuclear war, the President of the United States has one overriding responsibility today: Negotiate.

Genesis (3-4)

•July 3, 2024 • Leave a Comment
Many species of Dinosaurs were discovered over time; and their ages spread over million of years; hence they are unlikely to be created only in the Creation Week of Genesis 1:3-31. The Truth of God should get along with True Science

Genesis 3

1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, “Yea, hath God said, ‘Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?” — the serpent was more subtle, or crafty, by its manipulation of God’s Words and its loathly form, is the natural symbol of such a deceiver of man;

— the tempter appreared unto the woman as the more susceptible and unguarded of the two creatures he would betray; and ventures upon a half-questioning, half-insinuating remark;

And the woman said unto the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden, — the woman said, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden; indicating, Eve extolled the large extent of liberty they enjoyed in ranging at will amongst all the trees, except one;

but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, ‘Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.’” — but of the fruit of the tree, which is in the midst of the garden; this tree, is highly probable, stood near the tree of life, since that is described in the same “midst of the garden,” Genesis 2:9

And the serpent said unto the woman, “Ye shall not surely die; — ye shall not surely die; the serpent proceeded, in direct contradiction to divine command, not only to assure her of perfect impunity, but to promise great benefits from partaking of it;

for God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” — your eyes shall be opened; his words meant more than met the ear “your eyes shall be opened”

— and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil: as “Elohim” which word is sometimes used of judges or magistrates, sometimes of angels, or “the mighty angels” as the Targum of Jonathan paraphrases the word; and sometimes of God himself, and of the divine Persons in the Godhead;

— knowing good and evil; or, as God, like unto God himself in that their knowledge should be enlarged, knowing more than just good and evil as many are being deceived with a new version today: “and you’ll go to heaven”

— the Targum, whose origin was in the Aramaic language, could be traced to Ezra speaking to the returning exiles who couldn’t understand Hebrew, but was expounded to them in a language they could understand.

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof and ate, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he ate. — the prevailing motive to influence her to eat: pleasant to the eyes, of a beautiful colour, and very inviting to the taste; succumbed to the lust of the flesh;

— and a tree to be desired to make one wise; which promised not only what she perceived by the discourse she had with the serpent, which she believed that this would be the consequence of eating this fruit, which looked very desirable, and she concluded to justify herself to eat;

— and gave also to her husband with her; that he might eat as well as she, and partake of the same benefits and advantages she hoped to reap from hence;

— and he did eat; an emphasis upon his eating lies the fate of his posterity; not the woman for the man was the federal head, and he sinning, all his posterity sinned in him, and died in him; through this offence judgment came upon all to condemnation; all became sinners, and subject to death;

And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves things to gird about. — the eyes of them both were opened that they were naked; the consciousness of guilt striked upon them as soon as they had broken God’s commandment by eating of the forbidden fruit;

— and they sewed, or platted fig leaves together; to cover at least part of their shame one from another, made themselves aprons;

And they heard the voice of the Lord God, walking in the garden in the cool of the day. And Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden. — “the voice of the Lord God, walking” seems like he appears as of the same kind;

— Adam and his wife hid themselves: being sensible of God’s approach, filled with shame and conscience of their own guilt, and dread of judgment; instead of flying to God for mercy, they foolishly attempted to run away from him, whom it was impossible to avoid;

And the Lord God called unto Adam and said unto him, “Where art thou?” — the question, “Where art thou?” implies that the Lord was aware of their endeavor to hide themselves from him to face the consequence;

10 And he said, “I heard Thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; and I hid myself.” — I was afraid, because I was naked; he confesses his nakedness, which was evident; but makes no mention of his sin; this he wished rather to hide, feeling the shameful effects of himself;

11 And He said, “Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” — hast thou eaten of the tree; though God knows all our sins, yet he will know them from us, and requires from us an ingenuous confession of them, not that he may be informed, but that we may be humbled;

12 And the man said, “The woman whom Thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.” — the woman gave me; he shifts the blame to God; since the woman had been given him for his companion and help, he had eaten of the tree from her;

13 And the Lord God said unto the woman, “What is this that thou hast done?” And the woman said, “The serpent beguiled me, and I ate.” — the serpent beguiled me; that is, a spirit in the serpent, which she took for a good one, but proved a bad one, with lying words and deceitful language imposed upon her; thus similarily laying the blame on otheers;

14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, “Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field. Upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. — upon thy belly shalt thou go; thus “no longer on thy feet, or half erect,” but thou shalt crawl along, thy belly cleaving to the earth;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds more details:

And the Lord God brought the three unto judgment; and He said to the serpent, Because thou hast done this, cursed art thou of all the cattle, and of all the beasts of the field: upon thy belly thou shalt go,

and thy feet shall be cut off, and thy skin thou shalt cast away once in seven years; and the poison of death shall be in thy mouth, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life.

15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her Seed; It shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise His heel.” — I will put enmity between thee and the woman; and the man too, but the woman alone is mentioned, for the devil’s greater confusion;

— she conceived an antipathy against it, and which is become natural between the serpent and man; man abhors the sight of a serpent, and the serpent the sight of man; and are poison to each other;

16 Unto the woman He said, “I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception. In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.” — multiplies “her sorrow and her conception,” that is, her sorrow generally, but especially in connection with pregnancy, when with anguish and peril of life she wins the joy of bringing a man into the world;

17 And unto Adam He said, “Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree of which I commanded thee, saying, ‘Thou shalt not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life.

— cursed is the ground for thy sake; it shall now yield both fewer and worse fruits, and not even those without more care and trouble to thy mind, and the minds of thy posterity, and more labour to your bodies than otherwise would have been requisite;

— in sorrow shall thou eat of it all the days of thy life, meaning that with much toil and trouble, in manuring and cultivating the earth, he should get his living out of the produce of it, though with great difficulty; and this would be his case as long as he was in it.

18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee, and thou shalt eat the herb of the field. — thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; to give him more trouble, and cause him more fatigue and sorrow to root them up;

— and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; not the fruits of the garden of Eden, but only the common herbs of the wild, such as even the beasts of the earth fed upon: to such a low condition was man, the lord of the whole earth; and this was according to the law of consequence effect, of eating the forbidden fruit should be deprived of them all;

19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread till thou return unto the ground, for out of it wast thou taken; for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.” — in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread; sweat appearing chiefly on the forehead, from whence it trickles down by the nose in persons employed in hard labour;

— for dust thou art, and unto dust shall thou return; his body was composed of the dust, was of the earth, earthly, and should be reduced to that again by death;

20 And Adam called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living. — Adam called his wife’s name Eve; named “Ishah” a woman, because taken from the man; for through her alone could human life be continued, and the “woman’s seed” be obtained who was to raise up man from his fall.

21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins, and clothed them. — coats of skins; animals, therefore, were killed not just for food, but also for clothing, to defend them from the heat and cold, and other injuries of the air to which they were now to be exposed;

22 And the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become as one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put forth his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat and live for ever” — behold, the man is become as one of us to know good and evil; we are now prepared to understand the nature of the two trees which were in the midst of the garden;

— the tree of knowledge of good and evil; if man had obeyed, he would have come to this knowledge in a legitimate way; and to partake of the Divine nature of God;

— as one of us, if it concerning the angels, it is an unreasonable conceit that the great God should level himself with the angels, and give them a kind of equality with himself, as this expression indicates. To know all things, both good and evil; no, the “Us” incorporates just the Father and Son; see John 1:1-3

23 therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the Garden of Eden to till the ground from whence he was taken. — therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden; gave him orders to depart immediately; sent or put him away as a man does his wife, when he divorces her;

— to till the ground, from whence he was taken: either the earth in general, out of which he was made, and to which he must return, and in the mean while must labour hard, in digging and ploughing, in planting and sowing, that so he might get a livelihood;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds more details, “and he went and dwelt in Mount Moriah, to till the ground from which he had been created.”

24 So He drove out the man; and He placed at the east of the Garden of Eden cherubims and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life. — so he drove out the man; this signified the exclusion of him and his guilty race from that communion with God which was the bliss and glory of paradise;

— cherubim, armed with a dreadful and irresistible power, represented by flaming swords which turned every way; on that side the garden which lay next to the place where Adam was sent, to keep the way that led to the tree of life.

Genesis 4

1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have gotten a man from the Lord.” — Eve calls Cain “a man,” Hebrew, ish, a man;

— Adam and Eve had many sons and daughters, Genesis 5:4 “And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years; and he begot sons and daughters,” but Cain and Abel seem to have been the two eldest;

And she again bore his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. — Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground; as Adam was 130 years old when Seth was born (Genesis 5:3), there was a long period for the increase of Adam’s family (comp. Genesis 4:14-17);

And in process of time it came to pass that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. — in process of time; might be after a harvest, or after a long indefinite period, shown by the age of Adam at the birth of Seth to have been something less than 130 years;

— the Targum of Jonathan says “it was at the end of days, on the fourteenth of Nisan,” as if it was the preparation of the Passover;

— remember, the Targum, whose origin was in the Aramaic language, could be traced to Ezra speaking to the returning exiles who couldn’t understand Hebrew, but was expounded to them in a language they could understand.

And Abel also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering; — and the Lord God had respect to Abel and to his offering; and God showed his acceptance of his offering;

Rashi adds more details: “Fire descended and consumed his offering”

but unto Cain and to his offering He had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. — and Cain was very angry, his countenance fell; a feeling of resentment, and a sense of disappointment and condemnation take possession of Cain’s heart; 

And the Lord said unto Cain, “Why art thou wroth? And why is thy countenance fallen? — Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? the Lord does not yet give up Cain but make an efford to deal with him;

— if thou do well, shalt thou not be accepted? to do well is to retrace his steps, to consider his ways, and find out wherein he has been wrong, and to amend his offering and his intention accordingly.

If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? And if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.” — if thou doest well; but he (Cain) didn’t do well, hence Cain couldn’t qualify the last phase: “and thou shalt rule over him.”

— and unto thee shall be his desire; to whom do the pronouns “his” and “him” refer? Perhaps it should be read as: “And as to thy brother, unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over thee with all the right of the first born,” which is misleading since this clause is subjected to the first clause, “If thou doest well,”

— perhaps this verse could have been restructured this way: “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted; and thou shalt rule over him? But if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door; and unto thee shall be his desire.”

And Cain talked with Abel his brother; and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother and slew him. — And Cain talked with Abel his brother; under the guise of brotherly familiarity, he concealed his premeditated purpose till a convenient time and place occurred for the murder;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds some step-by-step details:

And Kain said to Habel his brother, Come, and let us two go forth into the field.

And it was that when they two had gone forth into the field, Kain answered and said to Habel, I perceive that the world was created in goodness, but it is not governed (or conducted) according to the fruit of good works, for there is respect to persons in judgment; therefore it is that thy offering was accepted, and mine not accepted with good will.

Habel answered and said to Kain, In goodness was the world created, and according to the fruit of good works is it governed; and there is no respect of persons in judgment; but because the fruits of my works were better than thine, my oblation, before thine, hath been accepted with good will.

Kain answered and said to Habel, There is neither judgment nor Judge, nor another world; nor will good reward be given to the righteous, nor vengeance be taken of the wicked.

And Habel answered and said to Kain, There is a judgment, and there is a Judge; and there is another world, and a good reward given to the righteous, and vengeance taken of the wicked.

And because of these words they had contention upon the face of the field; and Kain arose against Habel his brother, and drave a stone into his forehead, and killed him.

— or for a more modern version:

“And Cain said to Abel his brother, ‘Let us go out to the field.’

And when they were in the field, Cain said to Abel, ‘I perceive that the world is created by mercy, but it does not operate according to good deeds; therefore, your offering was accepted while mine was not.’

Abel answered Cain, ‘The world is indeed created by mercy and operates according to good deeds; because my deeds were better than yours, my offering was accepted.’

Cain replied to Abel, ‘There is no judgment, no judge, no other world, no reward for the righteous, and no punishment for the wicked.’

Abel responded, ‘There is judgment, there is a judge, there is another world, there is reward for the righteous, and there is punishment for the wicked.’

And as they argued about these matters, Cain rose up against Abel his brother and struck him with a stone in his forehead, and killed him.”

And the Lord said unto Cain, “Where is Abel thy brother?” And he said, “I know not. Am I my brother’s keeper?” — it seems that Cain went away, scarcely conscious of the greatness of his crime; thus in Cain, like the devil, was both a murderer and a liar from the beginning;

— then the voice of God repeated it in his own heart, Where is Abel, thy brother! Not that God was ignorant where he was, but to inquire into the causes, and hear the accused speak for themselves, before passing sentence;

— am I my brother’s keeper? Why dost thou inquire of me concerning him who is of age to look to himself? Is he such a stripling that he needs a guardian? Or didst thou ever make me his guardian? all which was very saucily and impudently thought of in his harden heart;

10 And He said, “What hast thou done? The voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto Me from the ground. — thy brother’s blood crieth unto me; the sight God has seen tells him that the blood he has shed calls aloud for judgement and vengeance;

11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand. — and now art thou cursed from the earth; from receiving its benefit and enjoying its fruits as before;

12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength. A fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be on the earth.” — a fugitive; condemned to perpetual exile; a degraded outcast; the miserable victim of an accusing conscience;

— “a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be on the earth” a vagabond shalt thou be, banished from thy own land and kindred; reminds us of the Gypsies; who are they?

13 And Cain said unto the Lord, “My punishment is greater than I can bear. — my punishment is greater than I can bear; what an overwhelming sense of misery; but no sign of repentence, nor cry for pardon;

14 Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth, and from Thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond on the earth. And it shall come to pass that every one who findeth me shall slay me.”

— he is driven, not “from the face of the earth,” which was impossible, but from the adâmâh, his dear native soil, banished from which, he must go into the silence and solitude of an earth unknown and untracked;

— whosoever findeth me, shall slay me; implies that the family of Adam had now become numerous. Not only sons and daughters, but their children and grandchildren may have been growing up when Cain was sent into exile; but in his present terror even an excited fancy suggested an enemy at every turn.

15 And the Lord said unto him, “Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold.” And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

— sevenfold; Cain’s punishment was severe, because his crime was the result of violent passions, but his life was not to be taken because God wanted the earth to be populated;

— and the Lord set a mark upon Cain; to distinguish him from the rest of man; what the mark was, God has not told us: therefore any conjectures of men are just conjectures; and the Targum of Jonathan says: “Behold now, any one who killeth Kain, unto seven generations vengeance shall be taken of him,”

16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod to the east of Eden. — Cain, on migrating from the whole land of Eden, regarded himself as beyond the range of the sight of his fellow humans and from God;

— the land of Nod; read the word Nod with different set of vowels, the place could well be India! The Sacred Text in its original doesn’t have any vowel; they were added later, so the possibility is there.

17 And Cain knew his wife, and she conceived and bore Enoch. And he built a city, and called the name of the city after the name of his son, Enoch. — he calls his son Henok (Enoch), and his city after the name of his son; the same word is employed in the lines of Seth Genesis 5:18, of Midian Genesis 25:4, and of Reuben Genesis 46:9

18 And unto Enoch was born Irad; and Irad begot Mehujael, and Mehujael begot Methushael, and Methushael begot Lamech. — and unto Enoch was born Irad; and Irad begat Mehujael, and Mehujael begat Methusael; and Methusael begat Lamech;

— God, “declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done,” Isaiah 46:10 hence he, by preserving Cains despite his sin, wants this line to be preserved;

19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. — Lamech took unto him two wives; contrary to the first institution of marriage, whereby only one man and one woman were to be joined together, and become one flesh, Genesis 2:24

20 And Adah bore Jabal; he was the father of those who dwell in tents, and of those who have cattle. — the father of such as dwelt in tents, and of such as have cattle: though his posterity might succeed the same business; since he was the first inventor of tents or movable habitations, which could be carried from place to place;

21 And his brother’s name was Jubal; he was the father of all those who handle the harp and organ. — he was the father of all such that handle the harp and organ: he was the inventor of instrumental music, both of stringed instruments;

22 And Zillah, she also bore Tubalcain, an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron; and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah. — an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron; he taught men the way of melting metals, and of making armour and weapons of war, and other instruments, for various uses;

23 And Lamech said unto his wives, “Adah and Zillah, hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech! For I have slain a man for my wounding, and a young man for my hurt. — and Lamech (Josephus says he had 77 children) said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah; besides confessing what he had done, he self boasting what he would do should he be attacked; as this he wasn’t backed by God; but acting as if he were God;

24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.” — the Septuagint has it “seventy times seven” which may also seem probable; in view of his boasting; like Nebuchadnezzar, saying, “Is not this great Babylon that I have built for the house of the kingdom, by the might of my power and for the honor of my majesty?”

— the line of Cain is traced no further than the seventh generation from Adam, as Josephus says “the posterity of Cain became exceeding wicked, every one successively dying, one after another, more wicked than the former.” We cannot tell whether there were any more in that line before the flood; the other line through Noah and Abraham is from Seth; and from them the Messiah would descend;

— perhaps the seven generation in verse 15 above, the Targum of Jonathan: “Behold now, any one who killeth Kain, unto seven generations vengeance shall be taken of him,” may mean that Cain’s posterity would be protected only till the seventh generation;

25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bore a son and called his name Seth. “For God,” said she, “hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.” — another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew; Cain, the firstborn, and Abel, who had outstripped him in prosperity, were both lost to Adam;

26 And to Seth also there was born a son, and he called his name Enosh. Then began men to call upon the name of the Lord. — then began men to be called by the name of the Lord; to pray unto God, to worship God; or to call themselves by the name of the Lord;

— now Cain and those that had deserted God had built a city, they began to err, and they made themselves idols, and surnamed their idols by the name of the Lord; and begun to declare for themselves the sons of men. Those that adhered to God began to declare for him and his worship, and called themselves the sons of God.

North Korea will send engineering troops to help Russia

•July 2, 2024 • Leave a Comment

North Korea to send engineering troops to help Russia rebuild bombed cities; or are they military troops in disguise?

Kim Jong Un and Vladimir Putin after a signing ceremony

The Telegraph • June 28, 2024 // Daily Mail

North Korea will send a “large number” of engineering and construction troops to help rebuild Russian-occupied cities in eastern Ukraine, according to reports.

The soldiers will arrive as early as June and take part in “reconstruction” works largely in the heavily bombed Donetsk region, TV Chosun reported, citing a South Korean government official.

The report stated that the North Korean army has 10 engineering brigades, three out of four of which will be sent to Ukraine in exchange for an annual payment of $115 million (£92 million) from Russia.

“The goal is to rebuild a city destroyed by fighting,” said the unnamed official, without specifying further on the location.

There is currently no indication the soldiers would have combat roles.

Pentagon spokesman Pat Ryder warned on Tuesday that North Korean troops would become “cannon fodder” if they joined Moscow’s forces on the battlefield in Ukraine.

It follows Vladimir Putin’s rare state visit to Pyongyang last week to sign a new military pact with his growing ally, Kim Jong-un as the two states position themselves at the centre of an anti-West axis.

North Korea is already a major weapons supplier to Moscow which is facing depleted weapons stocks and a defence industry hampered by Western sanctions.

EU signs security deal with Ukraine

•July 1, 2024 • Leave a Comment

EU and Ukraine sign security deal, thus establishing Ukraine as both a de-facto EU and a NATO member. Second, the deal ensures Europe’s Forever War with Russia will not end.

RT World News • June 28, 2024 // Yahoo News

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signed a security pact with the European Union providing long-term assurances, at a summit of EU leaders in Brussels on Thursday.

Zelensky signed the accord in a ceremony along with European Council President Charles Michel and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

The deal intends to show the EU’s long-term support for Kiev as the conflict with Moscow shows no sign of ending soon. Ukraine has “no immediate prospect” of joining either the EU or NATO, Reuters said.

Ukrainian Zelenskiy and European leaders attend a family photo session, during the European Union leaders’ summit in Brussels, Belgium, June 27, 2024

“Under the EU-Ukraine agreement, the bloc pledges to provide ‘predictable, long-term and sustainable support for Ukraine’s security and defence,’ to continue training Ukrainian security and military forces, to boost cooperation between Ukrainian and European defence industries, and to strengthen cooperation to counter hybrid and cyber threats as well as foreign information manipulation and interference.”

According to the agreement, it obligates the bloc to help Kiev in nine areas of security and defense policy, from weapons deliveries and training of the Ukrainian military, to demining and “defense industry cooperation.”

Zelensky himself has signed it in Brussels on Thursday, while making an unannounced visit to the summit of EU member state leaders.

The security agreement isn’t quite a mutual defense pact, but a pledge that the EU will provide Ukraine with weapons and other aid against “future invasion,” according to anonymous officials who spoke to Reuters. In the event of “future aggression,” the deal obligates the EU and Ukraine to consult within 24 hours and “swiftly determine” their next steps.

It does not specify the value or quantity of future military aid, beyond acknowledging the bloc’s agreement to fund the Ukrainian military to the tune of €5 billion this year, while “further comparable annual increases could be envisaged until 2027.”

Similar security treaties with Kiev have already been made by the US, UK, France, and Germany. Western powers have sought to formalize the ad-hoc funding to Kiev in case of election upsets later this year.

The EU agreement’s commitments will remain in effect “as Ukraine pursues its European path” and will be reviewed within ten years, Reuters said. The bloc formally opened negotiations for Ukraine’s eventual membership on Tuesday, with the EU ambassador in Kiev speculating that the process could be complete by 2030.

Biden and Zelensky sign security pact

Genesis (1-2)

•June 29, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is none other; I am God, and there is none like Me,

declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure,’ Isaiah 46:9-10

Genesis 1

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. — created; not formed or made from any pre-existing materials, but created out of nothing; in the beginning of this sidereal system, of which our sun, with its planets; of this material, visible, and temporal world; not the the spiritual, invisible and eternal world;

— God; Heb. Elohim; a word plural in form (Father and Son), but joined with a verb singular; created; the idea of creating them out of nothing;

And the earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. — and the earth; the conjunction “and” (וְ) negatives the well-meant attempt to harmonise geology and Scripture while studying Genesis 1:1

— and the earth became (hā·yə could be translated as “become” in some versions as in Genesis 3:20 and elsewhere) without form and void; it just doesn’t make sense that God created something that is already in a state of decay (bohû and tohû);

— this process of hā·yə could have taken many years, perhaps thousands, or even million, the details we’re not given; we’re only given the gist of it only; hence today, many trace marks could be gathered to prove that the earth is very old;

— one example is the Tibetan Plateau, sometimes called the “roof of the world,” and according to Bradley Hacker, a professor of geological sciences at the University of California, “the plateau dates back 13.5 million years and has reached a maximum average height of five kilometers.”

Humankind has been enthralled by the Himalayas for millennia

— a second example is the Hawaiian chain of islands; more from Britannica; “The origin of Hawaii’s islands, islets, and seamounts can be traced to at least 70 million years ago, near the end of the Cretaceous Period (145 million to 66 million years ago);”

— a third evidence is the absence of the creation of the dinosaurs in Genesis chapter two, indicating they were created and destroyed millions of years before another creation in Genesis 1:1

Dinosaurs appeared during the Triassic period over 200 million years ago

— both the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem paraphrase it, a waste and desert, empty and destitute of both men and beasts;

And God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. — God said, Let there be light; he willed it, and at once there was light. Oh, the power of the Word of God!

And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. — divided between the light and between the darkness; God then separates light and darkness, by assigning to each its relative position in time and space; which refers to the division of day and night;

Day and Night, Evening and Morning

And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. — and the Evening and the Morning were the first day: the evening, the first and second part of the evening; about the space of twelve hours;

— and the morning, which is also the second part of the night, and the second morning, in the light, in all together they make the opposite space from Evening; and both form one natural day, consisting of twenty four hours; 

And God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” — a firmament; an extension, or a space; or place extended or stretched out, and spread abroad like a tent or curtain, it indicates something solid;

— and let it be dividing between water and water; it appears that the water in the atmosphereic sphere was in contact with another mass of water ion the earth; hence the Targum of Jonathan says “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate between the waters above and the waters beneath.”

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so. — the waters under the firmament are seas, rivers, lakes, fountains, and other waters in the bowels of the earth;

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. — God called the firmament (the expanse) heaven; and means something heaved up; including the starry and airy heavens; being above the earth, and reaching to the third heaven;

— and the evening; and the morning were the second day; these together made up the space of twenty four hours, which was another natural day; 

And God said, “Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so. — unto one place; the ocean bed. We must add the vast depth of the ocean to the height of the mountains before we can rightly estimate the intensity of the forces at work on the third day;

— and let the dry land appear: clear of the waters, dried by the expanded air, hardened by the fiery light, and as yet without any herb or tree upon it: and it was so; immediately done;

10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called He Seas; and God saw that it was good. — he called them not sea, but seas; because of the differing quantity and nature both of several seas, and of the rivers, and other lesser collections of waters, all which the Hebrews call seas;

11 And God said, “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth”; and it was so. — and God said, Let the earth bring forth grass; which had been impregnated by the spirit of God that moved upon it when a fluid; and though now become dry land;

12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind; and God saw that it was good. — and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind; as apples, pears, plums, apricots, nectars, peaches, oranges, lemons, and more;

13 And the evening and the morning were the third day. — the space of twenty four hours ran out, and were measured, either by the rotation of the body of light and heat around the earth, or of the earth upon its axis;

14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years; — and God said, let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven; in the upper part of it, commonly called the starry heaven;

— and let them be for signs and the times of the feasts, and to reckon with them the number of days, and, sanctify the beginnings of the months, and the beginnings of the years;

15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth”; and it was so. — to give light upon the earth; and the inhabitants of it, when formed: and it was so:

— the Targum of Jonathan adds “and let them be for signs and for festival times,”

16 And God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. — the great light, the sun, which is really and considerably greater than the moon and with the little light, the stars, from man’s point of view, are insignificant;

17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, — and God set them in the firmament of the heaven; he not only ordered that there they should be, and made them that there they might be,

— but he placed them there with his own hands; and they are placed, particularly the sun, at such a particular distance as to be beneficial and not hurtful: had it been set nearer to the earth, its heat would have been intolerable; in the one case we should have been scorched with its heat, and in the other been frozen up for the lack of it;

18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. — in the fourth day’s work, the creation of the sun, moon, and stars is accounted for; all by the works of God;

19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. — the fourth day, made by the rotation of the earth on its own axis, in the space of twenty four hours;

20 And God said, “Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.” — moving creature; all oviparous animals, both among the finny and the feathery tribes, remarkable for their rapid and prodigious increase: fowl, which means every flying thing;

21 And God created great whales and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind; and God saw that it was good. — great whales; those vast sea monsters known by that name, though elsewhere this word be applied to great creatures of the earth, or under the seas;

22 And God blessed them, saying, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply on the earth.” — be fruitful, and multiply; this blessing shows that the earth was replenished with animal life from a limited number of progenitors, and probably from a small number of centres, both for the flora and for the fauna;

23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. — the evening and the morning were the fifth day; the sun now in the firmament, where it was fixed the day before, having gone round the earth, or the earth about that, in the space of twenty four hours; 

24 And God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth after his kind”; and it was so. — “cattle” which seem to design domestic cattle, and such as are for the use of man, either for carriage, food,

— or clothing, as horses, asses, camels, oxen, sheep and “creeping” things, which are different from the creeping things in the sea before mentioned, are such as either have no feet, and go upon their bellies, or are very short, and seem to do so, whether greater or lesser, as serpents, worms, ants and more;

25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind; and God saw that it was good. — and God saw that it was good; that every creature he had made would some way or other be for his glory, and for the benefit of man;

Simplified Picture of the Creation Week in Children Classroom

— the Behemoth (H930 ḇə·hê·mō·wṯ), or known as as dinosaur in Job 40:15, is a different word from Cattle (H929 bə·hê·māh) used in this verse and elsewhere; the word “dinosaur” was coined only in 1841 by an Englishman named Sir Richard Owen, hence most translations today continue to use the antiquated word Behemoth;

A reconstruction of a Argentinosaurus, approximately 97 to 93 million years ago; 40 metres in length, at Museo Municipal Carmen Funes, Neuquén, Argentina

26 And God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”

— in our image, in our form; after our likeness; with the ability to understand and to discern; these Words “let us” indicates the plurality of God (Elohim); are spoken by God the Father to the Son; hence the “US” and “OUR” plural form of a singuar God;

27 So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them. — in our image, that is, in our form; after our likeness; with the ability to understand and to discern, showing man’s superior glory and dignity to the rest of the creations;

— the Jerusalem Targum says,

the Word of the Lord created man in his likeness; even that Word that was in the beginning with God, and in God’s presence, the Word created all things; which is closely linked to John 1:1;

— and the parallel revealing of the Word in John 1:1-3

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made. John 1:1-3

28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.” — so God created man in his own image; and with man’s superior intelligence, to subdue and have dominion over them;

29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. — to you it shall be for meat: which is generally thought to be the food; as the Hebrew word “meat” is an old English term for “food;” compares this Luke 24:41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, He said unto them, “Have ye here any meat?”

30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat”; and it was so. — and to every beast, and to every fowl and every thing that creepeth, are likewise for food;

31 And God saw every thing that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. — it is affirmed here everything is good that flesh and meat as well as herbs and fruits, are granted to the first men for food;

— and therefore we are safe to ignore any false shepherds who came along later and preached derogatively the eating of meat as if eating corpses; it is sufficient for us that it was expressly allowed here; as was instructed to righteous Noah in Genesis 9:3 (except the blood);

— and Ellen G White is thus a false prophetess; for she wrote derogatively of eating meat as if eating corpses:

From the light God has given me, the prevalence of cancer and tumors is largely due to gross living on dead flesh.

I sincerely and prayerfully hope that, as a physician, you will not forever be blind on this subject, for blindness is mingled with a want of moral courage to deny our appetite, to lift the cross, which means, to take up the very duties which cut across the natural passions.

Feeding on flesh, the juices and fluids of what you eat pass into the circulation of your blood, and, as we are composed of what we eat, we become animalized; thus a feverish condition is created, because the animals are diseased, and by partaking of their flesh, we plant the seeds of disease in our own tissue and blood.

Then when exposed to the changes in a malarious atmosphere, these are more sensibly felt; also when we are exposed to prevailing epidemics and contagious diseases the system is not in condition to resist the disease. TSDF 68.11

I have the subject presented to me in different aspects. The mortality caused by meat-eating is not discerned; if it were, we would hear no more arguments and excuses in favor of the indulgence of the appetite for dead flesh. We have plenty of good things to satisfy hunger without bringing CORPSES upon our table to compose our bill of fare. TSDF 68.12

The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love to have it so. And what will ye do in the end thereof? Jeremiah 5:31

 For they prophesy falsely unto you in My name: I have not sent them, saith the Lord. Jeremiah 29:9

Genesis 2

1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. — the host of them; that is, the creatures contained therein; the host of heaven, in Scripture language, sometimes signifies the stars and sometimes the angels;

And on the seventh day God ended His work which He had made; and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had made. — God ended his work; not all work (John 5:17), but the work of this specific creation;

And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because in it He had rested from all His work which God created and made. — God blessed the seventh day, by conferring special honours and privileges upon it above all other days, that it should be a day of solemn rest and rejoicing and celebration of God and his works.

These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens, —t hese are the generations of the heavens and the earth, when they were created; that is, the above account is a history of the creation of the heavens and earth, and of all things in them; the creation of them being a kind of generation, and the day of their creation a sort of birthday;

and before every plant of the field was in the earth, and before every herb of the field grew; for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.

— for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth: so the plants and herbs could not grow owing to that; since on the third day, when they were made, there was no sun to exhale and draw up the waters into the clouds, in order to be let down again in showers of rain;

— and there was not a man to till the ground; who was not created till the sixth day, and therefore could have no concern in the cultivation of the earth, and of the plants and herbs in it; but these were the produce of almighty power;

But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. — a mist; this mist, as we learn from Job 36:27, where the same word is translated vapour, is the measure and material of the rain;

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. — and the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground; literally, formed the man (adam) dust from the ground;

— became a living soul, that is, a living man: not only capable of performing the functions of the animal life, of eating, drinking, walking and more; and of thinking, reasoning, and discoursing as a rational creature;

And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there He put the man whom He had formed. — and the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; or “had planted” for this wasn’t done after the formation of man;

And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. — the tree of life also; so called, because of assuring him of the continuance of life and happiness, on condition of his persevering in obedience;

— but also because God had given to the fruit of it a singular virtue for the support of nature, the prolongation of life, and the prevention of all diseases, infirmities, and decays through age;

— the tree of knowledge of good and evil; to man, who by the use of it would know, to his cost, how great and good things he did enjoy, and might have kept by his obedience, and how evil and bitter the fruits of his disobedience were to himself and all his posterity; thus knowing both the good and evil;

10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden, and from thence it was parted and became four heads. — the Targum of Jonathan says And a river went forth from Eden, to water the garden, and from thence was separated, and became four heads of rivers (or four chief rivers).

11 The name of the first is Pishon; that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. — the first is Pishon; or Pison, perhaps an eminent branch of the river Tigris, probably that called by others Pasi-tigris, or Piso-tigris;

12 And the gold of that land is good, and there is bdellium and the onyx stone. — there is the bdellium, and the onyx stone; the first of these is either an aromatic gum; the tree is black, and is of the size of an olive tree, has the leaf of an oak;

13 And the name of the second river is Gihon; the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Cush. — Gihon, the second river, flows by the land of Kush; there is one other Gihon mentioned in 1 Kings 1:33, and in II Chronicles 32:30;

— the rivers Pishon and Gihon may have been greatly altered or even effaced by the deluge and other causes over time;

14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel; that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates. — of the “Hiddekel” and “Euphrates” there high probability the former is the Tigris, or Tigres;

— and the fourth river is Euphrates; which retains its name till modern time as we know it today;

15 And the Lord God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. — to dress it and to keep it; the first word literally means to work it; for though a paradise, yet the garden had to be tilled and planted; seeds must be sown and the cultivated plots kept in order;

— the other word, “to keep it,” implies, however, some difficulty and danger, though no unpropitious weather, nor blight nor mildew, spoiled the crop, yet apparently it had to be guarded against the incursion of wild animals and birds, and protected even against the violence of winds and the burning heat of the sun;

16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat; — saying, of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: a very generous, large, and liberal allowance this: or “in eating thou mayest eat”

17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it. For in the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die.” — the tree of knowledge of good and evil; a consequence to humanity of how evil and bitter the fruits of his disobedience were to himself and all his posterity; thus knowing both the good and evil;

— for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die; man became at once a mortal creature; but had he obeyed by eating of the tree of life, he would have lived an immortal life;

18 And the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper meet for him.” — a new and final need of man is stated, a helper;  she is formed to be social, to hold converse, not only with her superior, but also with him, a co-worker;

19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air, and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them; and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

— whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof; his powers of perception and intelligence were supernaturally enlarged to know the characters, habits, and uses of each species that was brought to him.

20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found a helper meet for him. — power and dominian over the creatures were also given to man, and as a proof of this he named them all.

21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof. — the Targum of Jonathan says, “and he took one of his ribs; it was the thirteenth rib of his right side:”

— that opening of his side and the taking away of his rib might be no grievance to him; while he knows no sin, God will take care that he shall feel no pain;

22 And the rib which the Lord God had taken from man, made He a woman and brought her unto the man. — the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he woman; was not made from the superior part of man, that she might not be thought to be above him, and have power over him; nor from any inferior part, as being below him, and to be trampled on by him; but out of his side;

23 And Adam said, “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” — she shall be called Woman (Ishah), because she was taken out of Man (Ish); from hence the suffix ish is derived from: British (English, Scottish), Irish, Danish, Swedish, Finnish; indicating they are of Hebraic origin;

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife; and they shall be one flesh. — one flesh; the human pair differed from all other pairs, that by peculiar formation of Eve, they were one; the man and his wife;

25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed. — and they were both naked, the man and his wife, but were not ashamed.

“The death of the petrodollar?”

•June 28, 2024 • Leave a Comment

News about the expiration of a Washington-Riyadh deal may be fake, but an arrangement that is key to the dollar’s success has eroded. What really happened?

What really happened between the US and Saudis?

RT World News • June 23, 2024

It is said that works of fiction can often convey certain truths better than a newswire. That is perhaps the light in which to view reports circulating around the internet recently about the expiration of a 50-year ‘petrodollar’ treaty between the US and Saudi Arabia.

The agreement is a piece of fiction. The spurious reports appear to have originated in India or in the murky tangle of websites aimed at crypto investors. There was an official agreement between the US and Saudi Arabia signed in June of 1974 and another, secret one reached later that year according to which the Saudis were promised military aid in exchange for recycling their oil proceeds into US Treasuries. The deal whereby Riyadh would sell its oil in dollars was informal, and there was no expiration date. The petrodollar system as we have come to known largely grew organically.  

However, this fiction points to an underlying truth: the petrodollar has entered a long twilight from which there will be no return. No other economic arrangement has done more to ensure American preeminence over the last half-century. Yet in its essence it represented an implicit oil backing to the dollar that would be maintained. To borrow an idea originally expressed by financial analyst Luke Gromen, it is ultimately America’s inability and unwillingness to maintain this backing that is gradually dooming the system. 

Origins of the petrodollar

When the US abandoned the dollar’s gold peg in 1971, thus ending the Bretton Woods arrangement, the international financial system was thrown into chaos. What ensued was a turbulent period of high inflation and major adjustments to the new reality of free-floating currencies. Untethered from even the pretense of a gold backing, the dollar unsurprisingly devalued and inflation ran rampant. By the summer of 1973, it had lost a fifth of its value against other major currencies.

This should have marked the end of the two and a half decades of post-war dollar primacy. And yet quite a peculiar thing happened: the dollar’s role as reserve currency and primary instrument of trade only expanded. The reason is that the Americans managed to steer the oil trade into dollars, starting with the Saudis in 1974 and soon thereafter extending to all of OPEC. This established a de facto commodity backing for the dollar. Since the oil market is much larger than the gold market, it actually gave the dollar even greater scope. 

In exchange for agreeing to sell their oil in dollars, Saudi Arabia became a protectorate of the US military. Many have seen this deal as a Godfather-like “offer you can’t refuse” for the Saudis. After all, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Defense Secretary James Schlesinger attracted considerable attention in early 1975 by refusing to rule out the possibility of taking over foreign oil fields using military force in the event of a “strangulation” of the West by oil-producing countries. Although the US-Saudi oil deal predates these remarks, it’s not a stretch to imagine that the Kingdom regarded coming under the US tent as a safer move than waiting around to find out how the word “strangulation” would be defined.

It probably was a good bet. Many things have transpired in Saudi Arabia in the intervening half century, but one thing that has resolutely not happened is a color revolution or US regime-change operation.

A Gentleman understanding that the Saudis would invest their surplus oil proceeds in US treasuries for a security guarantee for the Kingdom

The de facto oil backing and the exception that proved the rule

The dollar thus went from being pegged to gold under Bretton Woods to being unofficially backed by oil. And indeed, after the shock in 1973-74, oil traded in a remarkably stable range of roughly $15-30/per barrel for the next 30 years. This remarkable stability lies at the heart of the success of the petrodollar arrangement. There was one important exception to this stability, but even it ended up only buttressing the system. 

That exception is the oil shock of 1978-79, sparked by the Iranian Revolution, when oil surged well above the upper end of this range. This coincided with (and partly caused) a deep crisis in the dollar and raging inflation in the US. It was at this time that Fed chairman Paul Volcker embarked on his famous series of aggressive rate hikes.

Volcker’s tough medicine was aimed at breaking the back of the worst US inflation in history, but no less important was the effect it had on bolstering the frayed credibility of the dollar. A New York Times article from the time complained that the Fed chairman’s moves “make clear that international considerations, and specifically the defense of the dollar, are now influencing American economic policy to a degree unparalleled in the postwar period.” In other words, Volcker was being accused of prioritizing the functioning of the dollar system over domestic considerations.

It’s important not to get too bogged down in untangling cause and effect here, or in seeking in Volcker’s actions an explicit petrodollar angle. The oil market during those years was responding to a host of factors, and it was by no means within the power of the Fed to manage it. Nor was Volcker explicitly trying to do so. But he was very aware of the pain high crude prices caused oil importers and the threat to the stability of the system it posed.

Volcker’s decisive action restored the dollar as the world’s most preferred currency, and the stronger greenback did help keep oil cheaper in the greenback than in other currencies. Most importantly, however, the perception was created that the US was willing to subject its own economy to pain (Volcker put the US through two punishing recessions) in order to preserve the value of the dollar for all global players holding or transacting in dollars.

Oil prices came down in the early ‘80s and basically stayed within the $15-30 range for the next twenty or so years. A lot of this had to do with major new sources of oil coming online, such as the North Sea, Alaska, and Mexico. However, the bottom line is that the dollar preserved its value against oil. It doesn’t even really matter how much of this is an actual achievement of US policy and how much is just a confluence of favorable circumstances. What matters is that the dollar was seen as equivalent to oil, and the Volcker years had created the impression that the US would actually defend it in a time of crisis and manage it fairly. That made holding dollars (or US Treasuries) a reasonable proposition for all.

A 30-year range breaks and the rest is history

Fast forward to 2003, and the oil price began a long and steady ascent. This is largely attributable to rising Chinese demand and the geological realities that many of the world’s major legacy fields were peaking and starting to turn over, meaning the easy-to-extract oil was becoming scarce (It’s more accurate to think about peak ‘cheap’ oil than the actual geological peak.) The dollar also weakened substantially against other major currencies over 2003-2008, a circumstance economist Steve Hanke believes caused 50% of the oil price surge during that period.

Importantly, when oil moved to the top of its 30-year range, it didn’t stop. Over the next couple of years, oil prices would rise steadily before peaking at $145 per barrel in July 2008. Again, another way to think about this is a drop in the value of the dollar against oil, an ominous development for those holding dollars and buying oil. 

This is the moment when a fatal crack appeared in the foundation of the petrodollar edifice. With oil surging and the dollar weak, where was a new swashbuckling Paul Volcker to come in and tighten policy, strengthen the dollar at whatever cost, and preserve its implicit oil backing? The answer: nowhere to be found. In fact, quite the opposite happened. During the crucial period when crude was rising in 2007 and early 2008, the US actually cut interest rates in response to a weakening economy, thus exacerbating the problem. 

Luke Gromen sees this episode as causing an important epiphany for many nations who had been aggregating foreign currency reserves with a belief that the dollar would continue to be managed to be as good as gold for oil, and that the US would not pursue policies that would have the effect of impoverishing energy importers.

Making matters worse was the deluge of bailouts and trillions in quantitative easing in the aftermath of the 2008-09 financial crisis, which contributed to the sense that the US would spare no effort to stabilize its own faulty banking system – the dollar be damned. It had also become apparent that the US economy was now too financialized and too leveraged to endure Volcker-like treatment. 

Now it should be noted that oil prices did plummet in 2009, and the dollar did (perversely) strengthen amid the global financial crisis. But this owed directly to the economic carnage caused by the meltdown itself and the ensuing recession. Nobody confused Ben Bernanke for Paul Volcker.

Oil prices also plummeted in 2014-2016 amid the shale boom, which made the US the de facto marginal cost producer globally. It can even be argued that for much of the decade of 2010-2020, the dollar fell into a new (albeit higher) range against oil, thus reinstating a pale reflection of the previous dollar-energy tie. But the system was already malfunctioning by then; the short-lived shale miracle only delayed and obscured the consequences. 

It’s important not to seek in any fluctuation of the dollar or crude an affirmation or refutation of the idea of an oil backing to the greenback. What is key to grasp is that starting in the mid-2000s with the run-up in oil described above, the implicit promise of the petrodollar system began to break down. This break-down has been playing out ever since. 

China wants to print yuan for oil; the US inadvertently obliges

One country that took early notice of the declining credibility of the dollar is China. Merely days after Fed chairman Ben Bernanke announced the largest money-printing escapade in history, in March 2009, the head of the People’s Bank of China issued a boldly titled white paper called ‘Reform the International Monetary System,’ calling for a neutral reserve asset to replace the dollar-centric system. 

In the ensuing years, China, the world’s largest importer of oil, made clear its desire to be able to purchase oil using its own currency. It has also cut back on buying US Treasuries and been acquiring gold at a blistering pace, both clear votes of no-confidence in the dollar.

Many interpret these moves in overly geopolitical terms, as Beijing’s desire to flex its muscles and undermine the US-led unipolar world for its own sake. However, it’s important to understand that for the Chinese, who are short oil and long US Treasuries, this is a matter of national security. Relying on a currency which is being debased by the day and overseen by an increasingly belligerent fading hegemon for buying the modern economy’s most critical commodity – whose overall price trajectory is upward – is no solution. 

China introduced yuan-priced oil contracts in 2018 as part of an effort to make its currency tradable globally. Although this initially didn’t make much of a dent in the dollar’s dominance of the oil market, it showed where Beijing was headed. What got the needle moving was the Ukraine conflict – or rather Washington’s unhinged reaction to it. And here we arrive at the meeting point of a deep-seated economic trend and a geopolitical flashpoint. 

With Moscow limited by sanctions in where it could market its oil, China significantly ramped up purchases of discounted Russian crude, with settlement in yuan. Legendary analyst Zoltan Pozsar called this development “dusk for the petrodollar… and dawn for the petroyuan.” 

It goes beyond China. The BRICS group as a whole has, as a stated objective, increasing trade in local currencies, an objective that has gained urgency in light of Washington’s capricious and overbearing use of sanctions. India, the world’s third-biggest oil importer and consumer, has become the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude since 2022, paying for Russian crude in rupees, dirhams, and yuan. As the BRICS group consolidates and new financial infrastructure and trade networks coalesce, the non-dollar oil trade will only grow.

In January 2023, Saudi Arabia even openly stated that it was willing to sell oil in currencies other than the dollar, the first public acknowledgement of what had been a source of speculation for years. In November of that year, the Kingdom sealed a currency swap deal with China, a surefire precursor of plans to do future business in local currencies. 

The petrodollar arrangement has been very good for the Saudis and historically they have not shown a strong eagerness to give it up. No doubt contributing to this is a certain hesitancy about breaking with the Americans. Things do not tend to end well for the leadership of oil-producing countries who stop doing the bidding of the US. Yet the times are changing and Riyadh seems to sense that. 

Xi’s proposed symbiotic relationship with some of the country’s largest oil suppliers where China pays for its imports in renminbi

Washington wants all the benefits but none of the responsibility

We are now accustomed to the proliferation of unbacked currencies, so it’s hard to appreciate just how unusual the petrodollar arrangement was for a world long used to dealing with some form of gold standard. It’s one thing for a government to insist that a currency be accepted within its own borders, but to propose that another country part with real goods – such as oil – for money backed by absolutely nothing would have been a tough sell in past eras. Yet the US managed to do that and more. 

But such an arrangement would never have been sustainable for so long – longer than the gold-backed Bretton Woods lasted – based on military power and backroom dealings by cabals of diplomats alone.

While Washington has always acted with a certain sense of impunity, believing there to be no viable alternative to the dollar, for the several-decade-long golden age of the petrodollar there was at least an economic justification for it. It worked well enough for the rest of the world that, until recently, no major bloc emerged to oppose it. There also was the long shadow of Paul Volcker to give it credibility.

However, just as the US reneged in 1971 on its obligation to convert dollars into gold, it later reneged on its implicit obligation to maintain the value of the dollar against oil. Since then, Washington has shed all semblances of fiscal restraint and any pretense of managing the dollar in the best interests of everyone. Instead, it now wields the greenback as a weapon in a desperate bid to roll back the very events it helped set in motion by not preserving the integrity of the currency in the first place.

The US is now fighting to maintain all the benefits of this broken system, the responsibility for which it is neither equipped nor willing to take any longer. If the dollar isn’t pegged to gold and isn’t even implicitly backed by oil, and Washington won’t preserve its integrity, then it is hardly up to the task of facilitating trade in critical resources. A system as deeply entrenched as the petrodollar won’t disappear overnight, but when its economic foundation has eroded, it can only be maintained for so long by bluster and smoke and mirrors. 

China reveals fusion tech breakthrough

•June 27, 2024 • Leave a Comment

A commercial ‘artificial sun’ has achieved its first plasma discharge, the developer says

Nuclear fusion energy is an almost infinite, clean and cheap source of energy

RT World News • June 21, 2024 // Global Times

Privately-run Chinese fusion company, Energy Singularity, has built the world’s first fully high-temperature superconducting tokamak, and used it to produce plasma, state media outlets have reported, citing the firm.

The creation of the device, dubbed HH70 and located in Shanghai, is seen as a major step in the development of fusion technology to potentially generate clean energy.

A tokamak is a doughnut-shaped confinement device able to contain the plasma so its temperature can be raised to replicate conditions similar to those on the Sun. Its goal is to create a safe and almost limitless supply of electricity. The devices are often referred to as “artificial suns.”

The technology uses extremely high temperatures produced by fusion reactions, in which hydrogen atoms are fused together to become helium, releasing vast quantities of energy. Tokamaks, which are large and expensive-to-build machines, are able to create magnetic fields that help contain the particles within the plasma.

According to the developers, as cited by Chinese media, the HH70 tokamak is smaller and cheaper to assemble than its predecessors. The device uses a magnetic system made from high-temperature superconducting material, commonly known as REBCO (Rare Earth Barium Copper Oxide).

It can reportedly be manufactured on a large scale, reducing the cost of Energy Singularity’s tokamaks. Moreover, the HH70 device, according to the company, is only 2% the size of conventional tokamaks – providing a major advantage in the race to produce a commercially viable device.

Fusion reactors’ performance is commonly measured using the Q value, which represents the ratio of energy generated to the input energy required to keep the reaction going. Currently, the highest Q value obtained by a tokamak is 1.53.

Energy Singularity has reportedly pledged to build a next-generation tokamak by 2027, with its technology demonstrator to be completed by the end of the decade. The company is aiming to build “artificial suns” with a Q value of 10.

US troop numbers in Jordan surge!

•June 26, 2024 • Leave a Comment

US troop numbers in Jordan surge to record high amid Gaza war. Is this a signal that Israel is about the strike the Hezbollah?

US troop levels in Jordan have soared 20 percent since an Iraqi militia attacked a remote base inside the country; perhaps to man their MIM-104 Patriot Defence System!

The US had deployed 3,813 to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Middle East Eye • June 18, 2024

The number of US troops stationed in Jordan has soared to a two-decade high amid Israel’s war on Gaza, according to a new congressional report.

US President Joe Biden informed Congress on 7 June that the US had deployed 3,813 to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, a nearly 20 percent increase in troop numbers from December.

The troop levels are higher than at any time since the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, according to US troop levels reported at the time.

The surge in troop numbers coincides with Israel’s war on Gaza, which has seen the relatively stable Kingdom of Jordan cast into the centre of soaring tensions between the US and Iran.

In January, a drone attack by an Iraqi militia on a remote US military outpost in Jordan killed three US soldiers and wounded at least 40 more.

The attack rattled US policymakers who have long considered Jordan a safe haven for American soldiers and diplomats, MEE reported.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned at the time that the Middle East was in its most “dangerous” place since at least 1973, a reference to the Arab-Israeli war when the US went to Defcon three, the highest alert level during peacetime.

In response to the attack on Tower 22, the US launched strikes on 85 sites across Iraq and Syria that it said were used by “Iranian proxies” and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps.

No sooner had tensions between Iran and the US calmed, when Israel escalated its own campaign of strikes against Iranian assets.

In April, Israel bombed Iran’s consulate in Damascus, killing several top commanders in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, including General Mohammad Reza Zahedi, the head of IRGC operations in Syria and Lebanon.

Iran retaliated to the attack by launching over 300 drones, ballistic missiles and cruise missiles at Israel in a carefully calibrated but unprecedented assault.

‘Unimpeded access to Jordanian bases’

Jordan was again cast into the spotlight when it joined the UK, France and the US in helping to down the Iranian projectiles as they crossed Jordanian airspace en route to Israel.

Israel’s war on Gaza has put Jordan in a tight spot.

Jordan was the second country after Egypt to sign a peace treaty with Israel, but those ties are deeply unpopular among Jordanians, the majority of whom are of Palestinian descent.

Jordan’s King Abdullah II visits the King Abdullah II Airbase on July 24, 2022

The US’s deepening military footprint in Jordan is not unprecedented.

The kingdom has long been a stable fallback for the US in its campaign against the Islamic State (IS) and preserve its interests in the region, and its Muwaffaq Salti Air Base is a key hub for US drones and fighter jets.

At least 3,000 US troops have operated in Jordan, which has a defence agreement with Washington that allows them “unimpeded access” to many Jordanian military facilities.

Amman is dependent on the US for economic aid, but its military ties to Washington are unpopular at home. In 2021, Jordan’s King Abdullah 11 bypassed parliament in order to seal the US defence agreement.

Domestic pressure on Jordan’s king over his close ties to the US has only grown since the war on Gaza erupted. Hamas’s popularity in Jordan has soared and calls have grown for Amman to sever its peace treaty with Israel.

US plots to break up the “Russian Empire”

•June 25, 2024 • Leave a Comment

This writeup is more real today than was published over two years ago as Nato and the US plot relentlessly to break up Russia in name of ‘freedom for democracy.’ Witness Dagestan!

The Nato’s and US’s relentless covert and overt plot to break up Russia

G/E by Ben Norton • June 23, 2022 // MRonline

A US government body held a Congressional briefing plotting ways to break up Russia as a country, in the name of supposed “decolonization.”

The participants urged the United States to give more support to separatist movements inside Russia and in the diaspora.

They proposed the independence of numerous republics in the Russian Federation, including Chechnya, Tatarstan, and Dagestan, as well as historic areas that existed centuries ago such as Circassia.

This is far from the first time that hawks in Washington have fantasized about carving up foreign countries. During the first cold war, the US sponsored secessionist groups inside the Soviet Union. In the 1990s, the US-led NATO military cartel successfully dismantled Yugoslavia. And Washington has long backed separatists in the Chinese regions of Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and Taiwan.

After the overthrow of the USSR, neoconservative operative and future Vice President Dick Cheney wanted to slice up Russia into several smaller countries. Former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski even published an article in elite Foreign Affairs magazine in 1997 proposing to create a “loosely confederated Russia–composed of a European Russia, a Siberian Republic, and a Far Eastern Republic.”

Yet this Congressional hearing was one of the most high-profile and provocative calls for balkanization yet, held in broad daylight.

Titled “Decolonizing Russia: A Moral and Strategic Imperative,” the June 23 briefing was organized by the US Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), known more commonly as the Helsinki Commission.

This commission claims to be “independent,” but it is a US government agency created and overseen by Congress.

The event was introduced by Congressman Steve Cohen, a Democrat from Tennessee who co-chairs the commission.

Representative Cohen claimed Russians “have in essence colonized their own country,” and argued that Russia is “not a strict nation, in the sense that we’ve known in the past.”

At the virtual hearing, which was livestreamed on YouTube, the congressman was joined by veteran regime-change activists who have worked for an array of US government agencies.

The event was moderated by Bakhti Nishanov, a senior policy advisor to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

He excitedly noted, “We have many, many participants. I think this is pretty much a record for a House commission briefing.”

Nishanov argued that Western condemnation of Moscow’s war in Ukraine should expand to opposition to “Russia’s interior empire.”

He added that the panelists hoped to “come up with ideas that will actually contain Russia.”

The most active speaker in the hearing was Casey Michel, a millennial neoconservative activist who has made a career out of advocating for regime change against the US government’s adversaries.

Michel got his start professionally working for the US Peace Corps on the Russia-Kazakhstan border, and later capitalized on the new cold war hysteria in Washington.

He is an adjunct fellow at the ironically named Kleptocracy Initiative of the Hudson Institute, a right-wing DC think tank that has been handsomely funded by the Koch oligarchs, WalMart’s Walton family, massive corporations like ExxonMobil, and the Pentagon.

In May, Michel published an article in Washington’s establishment magazine The Atlantic, titled “Decolonize Russia,” which appears to have been an inspiration for the Congressional briefing.

“Russia continues to oversee what is in many ways a traditional European empire, only that instead of colonizing nations and peoples overseas, it instead colonized nations and peoples over land,” Michel declared in the hearing.

The neoconservative activist lamented that the United States did not use the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 to break up Russia itself. He complained that Western support for secessionist movements in Russia did not go far enough.

“These are colonized nations that we consider to be part of Russia proper, even though, again, these are non-Russian nations themselves that remain colonized by, as we’ve seen yet again, another dictatorship in the Kremlin,” Michel said.

He insisted that the event was not simply about advocating for the “dismemberment and partition” of Russia, but was rather motivated by genuine opposition to colonialism and imperialism.

This was deeply ironic, because Michel has spent years viciously smearing the anti-imperialist left in the United States, while frequently caricaturing the term to demonize the governments of Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Bolivia.

When it comes to supporting separatist movements inside Russia, however, Michel curiously fashions himself one of the world’s most vocal advocates of a unique form of “anti-imperialism” that just so happens to advance US foreign policy interests.

Joining Michel at the Congressional briefing was Erica Marat, a professor at the College of International Security Affairs at the Pentagon’s National Defense University.

Marat accused Russia of committing “genocide.” She condemned so-called “imperial collaborators” in Russia, singling out Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov. She did not acknowledge the incongruity that she herself works for the US Department of Defense.

Marat also complained that the “Global South continues to consider Russia as an anti-Western, anti-colonial power and denies the dignity of non-Russian people and especially people of color from the former Soviet states.”

Similar comments were made by fellow panelist Botakoz Kassymbekova, a lecturer at Switzerland’s University of Basel.

Kassymbekova lamented that the Soviet Union’s anti-imperialist “narrative was very attractive, especially in the Global South.”

She rejected “the Marxian idea, that was popular all around the world, that capitalism produces colonialism,” and the “very successful anti-Western narrative of the Soviet Union that colonialism is a Western problem.”

Kassymbekova insisted that the USSR was colonialist, although her argument was contradictory because she simultaneously admitted that, after the Bolshevik Revolution, the former Russian czarist empire “partially underwent decolonization.”

Ironically, she also repeatedly mentioned “Stalinism” and the need for thorough “de-Stalinization,” without ever acknowledging that Joseph Stalin was himself Georgian, not Russian.

Kassymbekova used the briefing to call for the US government to provide more resources for secessionist movements by “supporting civic initiatives and civil societies of its neighbors and within Russia.”

Another panelist was Fatima Tlis, a Circassian separatist activist from Russia who was given a fellowship by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a notorious CIA cutout used to finance US regime-change operations around the globe.

Tlis has worked extensively with US government propaganda outlets Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. According to her publicly available LinkedIn profile, Tlis has also worked with the Jamestown Foundation, a neoconservative DC think tank closely linked to the CIA.

Tlis claimed in the hearing that her “homeland” Circassia is “occupied” by Russia. She also spoke of “white slavery.”

In the Q&A session, a guest asked how the panelists could discuss “decolonization” in Russia while they are in the United States and work for the US government, which was founded on genocide of Indigenous peoples. Tlis dismissively shot back, “As for your question, everybody who has ever dealt with the Russian disinformation and propaganda would immediately recognize it for what it is. It’s called–there’s actually a professional term for this disinformation: whataboutism.”

Kassymbekova responded similarly, arguing “this is kind of a very typical way of blaming the West rather than looking inwards.”

The final participant in the briefing was Hanna Hopko, a former of member of Ukraine’s parliament, who previously chaired its Foreign Affairs Committee, and a significant figure in the 2014 US-sponsored coup in Ukraine, marketed as Euromaidan.

Hopko insisted that Washington must think “how to change not just the regime, but how to change the imperialistic nature of Russian statehood.”

But because she was traveling, Hopko’s call signal was very weak, and she was not able to speak much in the briefing.

The panelists concluded the hearing condemning Russia’s military intervention in Syria, while making no mention of the billions of dollars the United States, its European allies, Gulf monarchies, Israel, and NATO member Turkey spent arming and training sectarian Islamist rebels in order to wage a proxy war in the country.

They likewise failed to acknowledge that Russia only entered Syria at the request of the country’s internationally recognized government. Tlis referred to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad as an illegitimate Russian “asset,” and depicted Moscow’s defense of Syria’s territorial integrity against Western attempts at state collapse as a form of aggression.

Intersectional imperialism

This “Decolonizing Russia” briefing is one of a growing number of examples of the US government co-opting left-wing rhetoric in order to advance its imperial interests.

Numerous Biden administration officials have exploited rhetoric about “intersectionality,” the principle that various forms of oppression like racism and sexism intersect.

The White House claimed to follow an “intersectional approach.” Secretary of State Antony Blinken insisted the State Department supports “diversity and intersectionality.”

The CIA published a recruitment ad featuring a Latina agent who proudly called herself a feminist. The spy agency–which is notorious for organizing right-wing coups d’etat and torturing detainees–has likewise portrayed itself as a supporter of the trans community.

The US government funds a podcast co-created and hosted by a CIA veteran that claims to speak on behalf of the “Uyghur diaspora” and employs intersectional feminist rhetoric to demonize China.

This strategy of intersectional imperialism shows how Washington has modified its propaganda strategy, employing progressive-sounding talking points to appeal to left-leaning youth.

DC’s call to “decolonize” Russia is reminiscent of an award-winning paper by academic Cara Daggett, titled “Drone Disorientations: How ‘Unmanned’ Weapons Queer the Experience of Killing in War.” This article whitewashed the US assassination program by arguing it is subversive and anti-heteronormative, because “Killing with drones produces queer moments of disorientation.”

Rand’s Strategy to Destroy Russia!

The Plan to Carve Up Russia

Can US decouples its military supplies from China?

•June 24, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The US wants to decouple its military supplies from China – but can it?

Yahoo News • June 18, 2024 // SCMP

China’s central role in the global supply chain has prompted the United States to initiate a series of measures to de-risk its relationship with the world’s second largest economy as relations worsen.

For the US defence industry, it seems inevitable that Washington will want to go further and seek to cut out China completely.

Whether it will work is another question, though. China now plays a central role in the global economy as a leading producer of everything from the raw materials used to make basic equipment and rare earth metals to the hi-tech equipment that is vital to the production of some of America’s most advanced weapons.

When it comes to global arms exports, China accounts for a relatively modest 6.6 per cent of the market, according to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

But because China accounts for 20 per cent of total global manufacturing trade, according to Beijing’s own figures, the picture is very different when looking at the components used to make weapons.

China is a major component producer used in night-vision goggles

If all made-in-China parts and components were removed from existing weapons as well as from the international arms industry’s supply chain, it would lead to chaotic consequences for arms manufacturers around the world.

Precision-guided missile makers would struggle to find enough sensors, there might not be enough infrared lenses for night-vision goggles and shortages of bulletproof fibre would have a knock-on effect on supplies of body armour.

It could also cause the war in Ukraine to suddenly stop. Much of the Western equipment supplied to Ukraine – from Javelin anti-tank missiles to Patriot air-defence systems – would stop working, and the same would apply to significant parts of Russia’s arsenal, from drones to armoured vehicles.

Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Lightning II, the cornerstone stealth fighter for the US and its allies, would see production lines coming to a halt while the existing fleet would run out of replacement parts.

The plane’s engines and flight control systems use critical high-performance magnets, made of rare earth materials such as neodymium, dysprosium and praseodymium – all sourced from China.

As China also dominates the global rare earths processing industry there would be no immediate alternative source for these high-grade magnets.

China also has “a near-total monopoly over gallium, a critical mineral used to produce high-performance microchips that power some of the US’ most advanced military technologies,” the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank, said in a report last July.

It produced 98 per cent of the world’s supply of raw gallium and controlled a majority of gallium extracted from bauxite, the centre said. The Rand Corporation has also said that 18 out of the 37 minerals relevant to defence applications are concentrated in China.

Advanced batteries, described by US deputy defence secretary Kathleen Hicks as “essential to thousands of military systems” such as drones and electric vehicles, is another area where China dominates the supply chain from mineral extraction, processing and component-making to battery assembly.

A report by the Pentagon earlier this year examining the US military’s supply chain vulnerabilities and pointing out ways to reduce them said it provided 94 per cent of the world’s lithium hydroxide, 76 per cent of cells and 76 per cent of electrolytes.

Even when it comes to basic raw materials, China holds a dominant position. The world’s second biggest economy is also the world’s top producer of intermediate metal products, which are vital for a whole range of weaponry – more than the next seven countries combined.

It manufactures half the world’s crude steel, the largest volume of aluminium and refined copper, and exports more than twice the amount of these materials than the second-ranked producers, according to the data-gathering platform Statista.

The rapid boom in the Chinese electric vehicle industry is a further concern for Washington, which may find itself lagging when it comes to producing the military transport vehicles of the future.

Given the increasing tensions between Washington and Beijing and the obvious vulnerability in globalised supply chains highlighted by the Covid-19 pandemic, rebuilding domestic manufacturing, and reducing heavy reliance on China is a priority for the US across the political divide.

In his first month in office, Joe Biden signed an executive order to build “resilient American supply chains.”

Some key industries, such as laser and microwave weapons, continue to depend on China, though direct supplies in some critical technologies, such as nuclear weapons, space, artificial intelligence and advanced communications, did see a significant drop between 2020 and 2023 despite other areas seeking a strong post-pandemic resurgence, according to defence acquisition information firm Govini.

Timothy Heath, a senior international defence researcher at the Rand Corporation, said due to the globalised production chain and complex subcontracting links, the US and its allies face a “difficult challenge” in tracing any component or part of their weapons and platforms that may have been made in China.

“However, the US government seems determined to reduce its vulnerabilities and so it has directed an extensive effort to relocate production of parts and components from China to friendlier countries,” he said, adding that the success of the supply chain reshaping would depend on how quickly the US can “identify and develop alternative sources of rare earths and other critical materials.”

“Both [the US and China] are likely to carry out measures to reduce risk and, if possible, decouple from the other country as a way to reduce vulnerabilities and ensure secure supply chains.”

In the case of rare earths, the “friendlier countries” could be Australia, which has rich reserves of some of the critical minerals and has already formed a partnership with the US to develop “critical minerals,” such as rare earths, tungsten and cobalt.

Other measures put forward include more investment into domestic manufacturing and small businesses, research and development, STEM education, industrial standardisation and cooperation with allies, to tackle the country’s systematic industrial base challenges such as low capacity, technical dependence, workforce shortage, as the Pentagon’s 2022 supply chain action plan suggested.

US F-35s use an array of materials and components sourced from China

However, China too has its vulnerabilities, most notably when it comes to chips.

The US has moved to restrict China’s access to the most advanced chips and equipment used to make them, pushing allies such as Japan and the Netherlands, which make key components, to follow suit.

Although Beijing is trying to become self-reliant in this area by developing its own industry, the Chinese mainland currently imports nearly half the world’s semiconductor chips, many of which come from Taiwan.

Further complicating the picture, many of these are then used to make electric products or parts that China then exports, including to US defence contractors.

Last year, 41 per cent of the semiconductors in the US weapons systems and associated infrastructure were sourced from China, according to Govini.

These can be found in some of America’s most advanced weapons, ranging from warships – including its Ford-class aircraft carriers – stealth bombers, ballistic and anti-ship missiles and warplanes.

In some cases, manufacturers are also buying components, including electronics, software, fuses, detonators and data links, the Pentagon report found.

Eugene Gholz, an associate professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, said the US still had significant advantages, saying the relationship is “not equally dependent” as the US economy is more flexible and innovative, and it has access to more alternative suppliers than China.

He also argued that Washington was well on its way to achieving its goal of military decoupling.

“The US defence supply chain already has many reasons not to use many Chinese components and materials, so in effect, while the broader US and Chinese markets are highly interlinked through trade and investment, the defence supply chain is largely ‘decoupled’,” Gholz added.

“When specific instances of components from China have been identified in US weapon systems, the United States and its prime defence contractors have generally been able to find substitute sources.”

China’s global military base strategy

•June 23, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China’s global military base strategy taking shape

Rand report identifies China’s target countries for basing agreements in a rising but still distant challenge to US power

AsiaTimes by Gabriel Honrada • June 14, 1024

China is securing international military base access agreements to expand the global reach of its armed forces, a counter to America’s extended deterrence strategy for Taiwan while threatening India with encirclement.

This month, RAND released a report detailing how China is advancing its global military reach by negotiating base access agreements to expand its security footprint and enable overseas operations for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the People’s Armed Police (PAP).

RAND identifies target countries including Cambodia, Equatorial Guinea, Namibia, the Solomon Islands, the UAE and Vanuatu. The report notes China already operates a logistics base in Djibouti and a paramilitary outpost in Tajikistan.

Apart from those countries, Newsweek reported in March 2024 that China is also seeking base access in Cuba, Pakistan, Tanzania, Sri Lanka and Myanmar.

While these bases support peacetime operations like noncombatant evacuations and intelligence-gathering, their potential wartime utility is uncertain, the Rand report says. The PLA’s primary kinetic mission from these bases will likely be protecting sea lines of communication (SLOC) through 2030.

China’s military writings indicate a lack of plans or ability to utilize foreign bases for offensive actions against US forces by 2030, the Rand report says. It says China’s priority is the protection of maritime trade routes and response to possible US blockades.

The report also highlights the significant challenges the PLA faces in developing and sustaining these bases, including the political reliability of host nations, logistical support issues and base security. It notes that the PLA relies heavily on mobilized civilian assets for logistics, raising concerns about the effectiveness and resilience of the approach in wartime.

Despite efforts to build a network of strategic strongpoints and logistics support bases, including in commercial ports, the PLA’s capacity for higher-end combat operations from these locations is limited.

The Rand report suggests that increased PLA naval and air defense activities in overseas bases could indicate a shift to a more aggressive stance, but logistical and political challenges make it unlikely for PLA bases to pose a significant threat to US military interests over the next decade.

Still, this assessment might underestimate the rapid advancements in Chinese military technology and strategic planning.

In a June 2024 article for The National Interest (TNI), Brandon Weichert notes China is set to possess the biggest fleet of aircraft carriers worldwide, underscoring its massive shipbuilding advantage vis-a-vis the US.

Weichert asserts that the People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) aims to use these assets to prevent US forces from entering the Indo-Pacific, thereby asserting regional dominance.

He says the PLA-N envisions its carriers as floating command centers in any potential conflict, such as an invasion or blockade of Taiwan. He also suggests that the US must adapt to a new era of contested regional waters and Chinese warships deployed in the Western Hemisphere.

China may be seeking base access in the Western Hemisphere to challenge the US’s extended deterrence in a Taiwan conflict by leveraging the threat of a direct attack on the US mainland.

In a 2023 article for the Peruvian Army Center for Strategic Studies, Robert Ellis points out that with base access in Cuba China could conduct special operations, disrupt the US military and attack the US mainland to snap key defense supply chains in a conflict scenario.

Moreover, Gordon Chang warns in a June 2023 Gatestone Institute article that China could deploy long-range missiles in Cuba to hit US Navy bases in Florida, block the movement of US vessels and shoot down planes over the southeastern US.

Meanwhile, India is concerned that China will use its economic clout to gain base access at Gwadar in Pakistan and Hambantota in Sri Lanka, bolstering its lone overseas military base at Djibouti. This situation would challenge India’s dominance of the Indian Ocean and raise fears of encirclement.

Isaac Kardon notes in a February 2023 Foreign Policy at Brookings briefing that while China’s base at Djibouti can support its naval operations in the Indian Ocean, it lies at the end of tenuous supply lines.

Kardon says that China’s Djibouti facility is isolated and operationally limited because it does not receive mutual support from other Chinese military facilities in the Indian Ocean. However, Kardon points out that China’s dual-use commercial facilities at Gwadar and Hambantota have nonetheless become important nodes for its naval operations.

As for Gwadar, Kardon and other authors mention in an August 2020 China Maritime Studies Institute report that the facility can become a long-term rest and replenishment location for the PLA-N, noting its geographic location, military importance and Chinese port operator.

Kardon and others also say that some circles in the PLA believe that Chinese base access to Gwadar is already as good as established, quoting a PLA officer saying, “The food is already on the plate; we’ll eat it whenever we want to.”

Likewise, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported in July 2023 that Hambantota will most likely be China’s next military base in the Indian Ocean, pointing out that China has direct control of the facility and represents its single largest port investment.

In a military sense, Gwadar and Hambantota can support a more persistent Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean, which could eventually threaten India’s sea-based nuclear deterrent.

Asia Times noted this month that India may be planning to turn the Bay of Bengal into a bastion for its nuclear ballistic missile submarines (SSBN), with the area’s deep waters providing better cover than the congested waters of the Arabian Sea.

Operating from a massive submarine base at Rambilli, India’s SSBNs would patrol the Bay of Bengal with the area protected by surface assets such as aircraft carriers and destroyers. Such a strategy would allow India to launch nuclear-tipped submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM) at Pakistan and China undetected.

However, China-India nuclear tensions are most likely to result from mutual penetrations of each other’s bastions using conventional assets. In that scenario, Chinese warships operating from Gwadar and Hambantota may track the movement of India’s SSBNs.

At the same time, India is considering boosting its South China Sea naval presence, where China intends to establish a bastion for its SSBNs, mirroring India’s intentions in the Bay of Bengal.

Deuteronomy (33-34)

•June 22, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 33

1 And this is the blessing wherewith Moses the man of God blessed the children of Israel before his death.— the blessing wherewith Moses blessed Israel; Moses, the prophet of the Lord, called upon upon Israel by foretelling the blessings which God would confer upon them in the latter days;

And he said: “The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them. He shined forth from Mount Paran, and He came with ten thousands of saints; from His right hand went a fiery law for them.

— the Lord came; under a beautiful metaphor, borrowed from the dawn and progressive splendor of the sun, the Majesty of God is sublimely described as a divine light which appeared in Sinai and scattered its beams on all the adjoining region in directing Israel’s march to Canaan;

— ten thousands of saints, that is, with a a great company of holy angels, Psalm 68:17 Daniel 7:10, which attended upon him in this great and glorious work of giving the law;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds that both the sons of Esau and Ishmael rejected the law:

And he said: The Lord was revealed at Sinai to give the law unto His people of Beth Israel, and the splendour of the glory of His Shekinah arose from Gebal to give itself to the sons of Esau: but they received it not.

It shined forth in majesty and glory from mount Pharan, to give itself to the sons of Ishmael; but they received it not.

It returned and revealed itself in holiness unto His people of Beth Israel, and with Him ten thousand times ten thousand holy angels. He wrote with His own right hand, and gave them His law and His commandments, out of the flaming fire. Deuteronomy 33:2 Targum

Yea, He loved the people; all His saints are in Thy hand; and they sat down at Thy feet; every one shall receive of Thy words. — all God’s saints or holy ones, that is, his people, were in thy hand, that is, under God’s care, to protect, direct, and govern them;

— and from MSG

Moses, man of God, blessed the People of Israel with this blessing before his death. He said, God came down from Sinai, he dawned from Seir upon them; He radiated light from Mount Paran, coming with ten thousand holy angels And tongues of fire streaming from his right hand.

Oh, how you love the people, all his holy ones are palmed in your left hand. They sit at your feet, honoring your teaching, The Revelation commanded by Moses, as the assembly of Jacob’s inheritance. Thus God became king in Jeshurun as the leaders and tribes of Israel gathered. Deuteronomy 33:1-5 MSG

Moses commanded us a law, even the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob. — the Law, both Written and Oral, is Jacob’s inheritance, because the obligation to observe it was hereditary, passing from parents to their children, and because this was the best part of their inheritance, the greatest of all those gifts which God bestowed upon the children of Israel;

— this command to study the law by the house of Jacob is one example worth studying further from Sanhedrin, the Talmud:

And Rabbi Yoḥanan says: A Gentile who engages in Torah study is liable to receive the death penalty; as it is stated: “Moses commanded us a law [torah], an inheritance of the congregation of Jacob” (Deu 33:4), indicating that it is an inheritance for us, and not for them. Sanhedrin 59a

— to Rabbi Yoḥanan, God want the children of Israel to study the Torah, which is true, but he doesn’t want Gentiles to study and know the Scriptures; which is untrue, for God want “all people, nations, and languages should serve Him:” How could one serve God without an understanding of serving Him?

— for a more detailed analysis, see The Talmud: true or fake?

And He was king in Jeshurun, when the heads of the people and the tribes of Israel were gathered together. — He was king; that is, not Moses but the Lord became king. —

“Let Reuben live, and not die, and let not his men be few.” — Reuben (France), identified by most CoG Communities as France. Despite having gone to his father’s bed, let Reuben live, and not die. Yet no judge, prophet, or national hero arose out of this tribe. Napoleon might be an exception, but he ended in Waterloo with a defeat!

the Targum of Jonathan says

Let Reuben live in this world, nor die the second death which the wicked die in the world to come; and let his youths be numbered with the young men of his brethren of Beth Israel.

And this is the blessing of Judah; and he said: “Hear, Lord, the voice of Judah, and bring him unto his people; let his hands be sufficient for him, and be Thou a help to him from his enemies.” — and this is the blessing of Judah, who are the Jews; the Targum of Jonathan adds, “Let his hand take vengeance on his enemies, and be Thou his help and support against his foes.”

— the Targum of Jonathan says in full

And this is the benediction of the tribe of Jehudah, conjoined with the portion and benediction of his brother Shemeon; and thus he spake: Receive, O Lord, the prayer of Jehudah when he goeth forth unto war, and bring Thou him back from war unto his people in peace. Let his hand take vengeance on his enemies, and be Thou his help and support against his foes.

And of Levi he said: “Let Thy Thummim and Thy Urim be with Thy holy one, whom Thou didst prove at Massah, and with whom Thou didst strive at the waters of Meribah,

— and of Levi (the Jews); next to Joseph, this tribe has the largest share in Moses’ last words, it being his own tribe. The character of the priest is the principal subject. The blessing may be thus paraphrased: “Let thy Thummim and thy Urim (the chief high-priestly ornaments) be ever with some saintly man of thine;

— the Targum of Jonathan says

And Mosheh the prophet blessed the tribe of Levi, and said, With Perfections and Lights hast Thou robed Aharon, the man whom Thou didst find devout before Thee, whom Thou didst try in the temptation, and he was sincere, and didst prove at the Contention Waters in Rekem, and he was found faithful.

who said unto his father and to his mother, ‘I have not seen him’; neither did he acknowledge his brethren, nor knew his own children; for they have observed Thy word, and kept Thy covenant. — they kept thy covenant; while the rest broke their covenant with God by sin of idolatry, the priests and Levites kept themselves pure from that infection, and adhered to God and his worship.

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

The tribe of Levi go forth to the service of the tabernacle, and separate themselves from their dwellings, saying of their fathers and mothers, I have not regarded them and of their brethren, Since we were of thirty years we have not known them or their children, for that they abide twenty years in their charge according to Thy Word, and keep the service of the holy covenant.

10 They shall teach Jacob Thy judgments and Israel Thy law; they shall put incense before Thee and whole burnt sacrifice upon Thine altar. — they shall teach Jacob thy statutes, and Israel thy law; the priests and Levites, being dispersed among each of the tribes, having cities in them allotted to them, taught the people the laws, statutes, and ordinances of the Lord.

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Apt are they in teaching the orders of Thy judgments to them of Beth Jakob, and Thy law to them of Beth Israel. Their brethren the priests put incense on the censers to restrain the plague in the day of Thy wrath, and offer up the burnt sacrifice with acceptance at Thy altar.

11 Bless, Lord, his substance, and accept the work of his hands; smite through the loins of them that rise against him, and of them that hate him, that they rise not again.” — Bless, Lord, his substance; because the priests and Levites hath no inheritance of his own, and therefore wholly depends upon thy blessing;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Bless Lord, the sacrifice of the house of Levi, who give the tenth of the tenth; and the oblation of the hand of Elijah the priest, which he will offer on Mount Karmela, receive Thou with acceptance: break the lons of Achab his enemy, and the neck of the false prophets who rise up against him, that the enemies of Johanan the high priest may not have a foot to stand.

12 And of Benjamin he said: “The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by Him; and the Lord shall cover him all the day long, and he shall dwell between His shoulders.” — Benjamin is put next to Levi, because the temple, where the work of the Levites lay, was upon the edge of the lot of this tribe;

— Benjamin (Norway and Iceland) was his father’s favourite child, and the imagery of this promise is throughout drawn from the relations between such a child and its father;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Mosheh the prophet blessed the tribe of Benjamin, and said: The beloved of the Lord shall abide in safety with Him, He will protect him all the days, and His Shekinah will dwell within his borders.

13 And of Joseph he said: “Blessed of the Lord be his land, for the precious things of heaven, for the dew, and for the deep that coucheth beneath, — blessed of the Lord be his land; as the lands inherited by his sons were extremely fruitful, the countries of lead and Bashan by Manasseh, and the fields of Samaria by Ephraim;

— for the precious things of heaven; that is, the pleasant, precious, and excellent fruits, reproduced by the influence of the heavens, particularly showers of rain which descend from thence;

— and for the deep that coucheth beneath; that is, oil, coal, iron ore, tin, zinc and diamonds, beneath the earth, and breaks out upon it, and waters it, and makes it fruitful, which happiness the land of Joseph had, as well as the rain and dew of heaven: this is to be understood of springs and fountains that flow out of the earth to the enriching of it;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And Mosheh the prophet of the Lord blessed the tribe of Joseph, and said: The land of Joseph shall be blessed from before the Lord. From the bounty of the heavens shall it have goodly fruit, from the dew and the rain that come down from above, and from the bounty of the founts of the deep which rise up and flow and with good fruitage to water the herbage from beneath,

14 and for the precious fruits brought forth by the sun, and for the precious things put forth by the moon, — by the sun, which opens and warms the earth, cherisheth and improveth, and in due time ripeneth the seeds for all manner of fruits of the earth;

— by the moon, which by its moisture refreshes and promotes them; that onions, when the moon waxes old, increase, and flag when it is young, and at the increase of the moon all sort of corn grows bigger and larger. Hebrew, of the moons, or months, that is, which it bringeth forth in the several months or seasons of the year;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

age and produce that the earth maketh perfect by the aid (bringing out) of the sun, and with the bounty of the firstfruits of the trees which the ground yieldeth in the beginning of month after month,

15 and for the chief things of the ancient mountains, and for the precious things of the lasting hills, — and for the chief things of the ancient mountains; wWhich were from the beginning of the world, and for which the land, possessed by the children of Joseph, Manasseh, and Ephraim, were famous;

— as the mountains of Gilead and Bashan, inherited by the former, and Mount Ephraim, and the mountains of Samaria, by the latter; which produced, besides great quantities of grass and corn, also vines, figs, olives, and more;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

and with the goodness through the birthright ordained of the mountain tops, him at the beginning by the benediction of the fathers who resemble the mountains, and with the goodness of the hills whose produce faileth not, which was given him in heritage by the benedictions of the mothers of old, who resemble the hills;

16 and for the precious things of the earth and fullness thereof, and for the good will of Him that dwelt in the bush. Let the blessing come upon the head of Joseph, and upon the top of the head of him that was separated from his brethren. — in the strength of this blessing, the tribe of Joseph would attain to such a development of power, that it would be able to tread down all brothers and all other nations;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

and with the goodness of the excel- lent fruits of the earth and its fulness and the favour towards him of Eloah who revealed Himself to Mosheh at the bush in the glory of His Shekinah: let all these blessings be combined, and be made a diadem of grandeur for the head of Joseph, and for the brow of the man who was chief and ruler in the land of Mizraim, and was the glory and honour of his brethren.

17 His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns. With them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth; and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.”

— his glory is like the firstling of his bullock; or the prime and fairest bullock of the herd. For things that excel in their kind are called firstborn in Scripture; his horns are like the horns of unicorns;a horn is a common Scripture emblem of power and force; as of the monoceros or rhinoceros;

— here also it ascribes to Ephraim ten thousands, and to Manasseh only thousands; thus foreshowing, that Ephraim the younger was to be the more numerous of the two, as Jacob had before prophesied of them;

— ten thousands of Ephraim and thousands of Manasseh; another view refers this to the ten thousands slain by Joshua, the Ephraimite leader, and the thousands slain by Gideon, who was of the tribe of Manasseh;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

The birthright had belonged to Reuben, but was taken from him and given to Joseph at the beginning; from thence comes the splendour of his glory and praise.

For as it may not be that a man should work the ground with the firstling of his herd, so are not the children of Joseph to be reduced to servitude among the kingdoms; and as the reema pusheth with his horns the beasts of the wilderness, so will the sons of Joseph predominate together among the peoples in all the ends of the earth.

Myriads will be slain in Gulgela by Hoshea bar Nun who hath arisen from the house of Ephraim, and thousands of the Midyance by Gideon bar Yoash who will be of the tribe of Menasheh.

— refering to the posterity of Joseph should carry their conquests and spread their dominionin “among the peoples in all the ends of the earth” the Targum would refer such prophecy to the latter days, not just to the end of the land of Caanan during the days of Joshua and Gidean, which are only a forerunner;

— for more, see (1) Ephraim / The United States (2) The Ox without the Unicorn (3) Jacob prefers Ephraim over Manasseh

18 And of Zebulun he said: “Rejoice, Zebulun, in thy going out, and, Issachar, in thy tents. — Rejoice, Zebulun; in thy going out; first, to war, as this phrase is often used; second to sea, in the way of traffic, because their portion lay near the sea;

— Zebulun (Holland) and Issachar (Finland) were united with Judah, in the leading division of Israel in the wilderness; the warlike character of the first and the more peaceful wisdom of the second, are illustrated by Judges 5:18 and 1Chronicles 12:32-33;

— Issachar (Finland) is a strong ass couching down between two burdens (Genesis 49:14); between East and West, between Russia and Nato;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And Mosheh the prophet blessed the tribe of Zebulon, and said: Rejoice, O house of Zebulon, in your going forth for your commerce, and you, O house of Issakar, in the tabernacles of your schools.

19 They shall call the people unto the mountain; there they shall offer sacrifices of righteousness; for they shall suck of the abundance of the seas and of treasures hid in the sand.”

— of the abundance of the sea; Holland shall grow rich by the traffic of the sea; and treasures of Finand are hidden in the sand; in which sometimes there is mixed a considerable quantity of gold, including iron, chromium, copper and nickel;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Many peoples shall pray at the mountain of the sanctuary, thither will they bring their oblations of truth: for they dwell by the side of the great sea, they are nourished with (its) dainties; and they take the shell-fish and dye with its blood in purple the threads of their vestments; and from the sands make mirrors and vessels of glass; for the treasures of their coasts are discovered to them.

20 And of Gad he said: “Blessed be he that enlargeth Gad; he dwelleth as a lion and teareth the arm with the crown of the head. — and of Gad (Switzerland) he dwelleth as a lion; bold and courageous, secure, and without fear of any of his enemies, though near him, on his borders;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Mosheh the prophet of the Lord blessed the tribe of Gad, and said: Blessed be He who hath made wide the border of Gad. He reposeth as a lion in his habitation; but when he goeth out to battle against his adversaries, he slayeth kings and rulers, and his slaughtered ones are known from all the slain, for he striketh off the arm with the crown (of the head).

21 And he provided the first part for himself, because there, in a portion of the lawgiver, was he seated. And he came with the heads of the people; he executed the justice of the Lord and His judgments with Israel.” — the first part; the first territory conquered by Moses was distributed between Reuben and Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh;

— he executed the justice of the Lord, and his judgments with Israel; that is, either he justly and truly fulfilled all his promises and engagements, on condition of which he was placed on the other side; or he, together with the rest of the Israelites, executed the righteous judgment of God upon the Canaanites, in the expulsion and destruction of them;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And he saw that the land was good, and took his portion among the first; for there was a place strown with precious stones and pearls; for there is the place where Mosheh the prophet is hidden, who, as he went in and out at the head of the people in this world, will go in and out in the world that cometh; because he wrought righteousness before the Lord, and taught the orders of the judgments to the house of Israel his people.

22 And of Dan he said: “Dan is a lion’s whelp; he shall leap from Bashan.” — Dan (Ireland and Denmark) is a lion’s whelp; the lion of the tribe of Dan is not like the lion of the tribe of Judah; Jacob in Genesis 49:17 compared him to a serpent and an adder;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And Mosheh the prophet of the Lord blessed the tribe of Dan, and said: The tribe of Dan is like a lion’s whelp, his land is watered by the streams that flow from Mathnan, and his border cometh unto Batania.

23 And of Naphtali he said: “O Naphtali, satisfied with favor and full with the blessing of the Lord, possess thou the west and the south.” — O Naphtali, satisfied with favour; with the favour of men; and of Naphtali (Sweden); Genesis 49:21 says Naphtali is a hind let loosed indicating sexual immorality and promiscuity; this best describes modern Sweden;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And Mosheh the prophet of the Lord blessed the tribe of Naphtali, and said: {Naphtali is satisfied with favour, and hath delight in the fishes of the sea which falleth within his portion; and he will be replete with blessings in the fruits of the vale of Genesareth which hath been given him from the Lord; he shall inherit the water of Sopheni, and the sea of Tebaria.}

24 And of Asher he said: “Let Asher be blessed with children; let him be acceptable to his brethren, and let him dip his foot in oil. — and of Asher (Belgium) be blessed with children; he shall have numerous, strong, and healthful children;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

{And Mosheh the prophet of the Lord blessed the tribe of Asher, and said:} Blessed is Asher of the sons of Jakob. He will be acceptable to his brethren, and will supply them with provender in the years of release: his border will produce many olives yielding oil, enough for him to bathe in it even his feet.

25 Thy shoes shall be iron and brass; and as thy days, so shall thy strength be. — thy shoes shall be iron and brass; perhaps it should be read, thy bars shall be iron and brass; or Iron and brass be thy castle; and as the days of thy life let thy rest continue;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

The tribe of Asher be sound as iron, and their feet-strong as brass in walking on the stony rocks; and as the days of their youth so shall they be strong in their age.

26 “There is none like unto the God of Jeshurun, who rideth upon the heaven to thy help and in His excellency on the sky. — there is none like unto the God of Jeshurun; or Israel, as all the three Targums say; for this is one of the names of the God of Israel;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

There is no God like the God of Israel, whose Shekinah and Chariot dwell in the heavens. He will be your helper. He sitteth on His glorious throne in His majesty, in the expanse of the heavens above.

27 The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms; and He shall thrust out the enemy from before thee, and shall say, ‘Destroy them.’ — and shall say, destroy them; the Canaanites: to do which the people of Israel had an order from the Lord, Deuteronomy 7:1

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

The habitation of Eloha is from eternity; by the arm of His power beneath the world is upborne. He will scatter your adversaries before you, and will say by His Word, Destroy them.

28 Israel then shall dwell in safety alone; the fountain of Jacob shall be upon a land of corn and wine; also his heavens shall drop down dew. — Israel then shall dwell in safety; that is, in confidence and security;

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

And Israel shall dwell safely as of old according to the benediction with which Jakob their father did bless them, for whose righteousness sake He will cause them to inherit the good land that yieldeth corn and wine; the heavens also above them will drop with the dews of blessing, and the rains of lovingkindness.

29 Happy art thou, O Israel! Who is like unto thee, O people saved by the Lord, the shield of thy help, and who is the sword of thy excellency! And thine enemies shall be found liars unto thee, and thou shalt tread upon their high places.” — be found liars unto thee; or “shall lie unto thee” or be in such dread and fear as to tell lies to save themselves, perhaps even, “cringe before thee.”

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

Happy are you, O Israel: who of all the nations are like you, a people saved in the Name of the Word of the Lord? He is the shield of your help, and His sword, the strength of your excellency. And your enemies shall be found liars against you from terror, and you shall tread upon the necks of their kings.

Deuteronomy 34

~~~~

Mount Nebo in today Jordan; where Moses was shown by God all the days till the end of this age: the fall of the “latter” sanctuary, the Sword and Flaming Fire from the South; the Psalm 83 Prophecy; a Greater than the Egyptian “Exodus” and the coming Gog and Magog

And Moses went up from the plains of Moab unto the mountain of Nebo, to the top of Pisgah, that is opposite Jericho. And the Lord showed him all the land of Gilead as far as Dan, — Moses went up; when he knew the place of his death, he cheerfully mounted the hill to come to it;

and all Naphtali, and the land of Ephraim, and Manasseh, and all the land of Judah unto the utmost sea, — the Lord shewed him all the land of Gilead, unto Dan, and all Naphtali . . . unto the utmost sea; that is, the Mediterranean;

— and the land of Ephraim and Manasseh: which lay in the midland part of the country; and he showed him all the land which was to be given to these several tribes; and all the land of Judah; which lay to the south;

— another explanation for “unto the utmost sea” offered by the Targum of Jonathan is “who would have dominion in the land until the latter sanctuary should be destroyed” of which “the latter sanctuary” is further explained by Rashi:

Do not understand the verse as stating הַיָּם הָאַחֲרוֹן, but read it as though it had said הַיּוֹם הָאַחֲרוֹן, “until the very last day,” meaning that the Holy One, blessed is He, showed him all the incidents that were destined to happen to Israel [until “the last day,” namely,] until the time that the dead would return to life. — [Sifrei 33:31]

— which means, Moses was shown by God all the days till the end of this age: the fall of the “latter” sanctuary, the Sword and Flaming Fire from the South; the Psalm 83 Prophecy; a Greater than the Egyptian “Exodus” and the coming Gog and Magog; for more, see Sequence of Prophecies till the Return of Israel

and the South, and the plain of the Valley of Jericho, the city of palm trees, as far as Zoar. — and the Desert of the “South,” that is, the Negeb; and the plain and valley of Jericho which lay before him;

And the Lord said unto him, “This is the land which I swore unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, saying, ‘I will give it unto thy seed.’ I have caused thee to see it with thine eyes, but thou shalt not go over thither.”

— this is the land which I sware unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, saying, I will give it unto thy seed; to Abraham, Genesis 15:18 “from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates:” to Isaac, Genesis 26:3; to Jacob, Genesis 28:13,

So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. — the land of Moab; which formerly belonged to Moab, and was taken from them by Sihon king of the Amorites, and now in the possession of Israel:and Moses dies

— here on a mountain in this land Moses died; according to the decree of the Lord; and is buried on Pisgah, and Joshua steps into his place, but no man knoweth of his sepulcher unto this day;

And He buried him in a valley in the land of Moab, over against Bethpeor; but no man knoweth of his sepulcher unto this day. — and he buried him; Moses is alone in this honour: the Son of God was buried by sinful men, but Moses was buried by Yehovah himself;

— but no man knoweth of his sepulchre; men have always believed that the contention between Michael and the devil about the body of Moses (Jude 1:9) was in fact, a struggle for his body; bearing in mind the appearance of Moses at the Transfiguration Matthew 17:1-10, and what is said by Jude (Jude 1:9), we may conjecture that Moses after death passed into the same state with Enoch and Elijah; and that his grave could not be found because he was shortly translated (transported) from it.

Before he died, Moses was shown by God all the days till the end of this age: the Psalm 83 Prophecy; and even the coming Gog and Magog

And Moses was a hundred and twenty years old when he died; his eye was not dim nor his natural force abated. — his age may be divided into three equal periods, forty years in Pharaoh’s court, forty years in Midian, and forty in the care and government of Israel, in Egypt and in the wilderness;

— Moses was a hundred and twenty years old when he died; but though he lived the full length of human life, and to an age which, in others that live up to it, is accompanied with many diseases and infirmities, yet this had made little or no alteration in him;

And the children of Israel wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; so the days of weeping and mourning for Moses were ended. — the children of Israel wept for Moses thirty days; as they did for Aaron, his brother (Numbers 20:29);

— the Targum of Jonathan adds more details:

And the children of Israel wept for Mosheh in the plains of Moab thirty days; and the days of weeping in the mourning for Mosheh were completed on the eighth of the month of Nisan.

And on the ninth of Nisan the people of Beth Israel prepared their vessels and set their cattle in order, and passed over the Jordan on the tenth of Nisan.

And the manna ceased for them on the sixteenth of Nisan. They found manna to eat thirty seven days after the death of Mosheh, for the sake of his righteousness.

— “And the manna ceased for them on the sixteenth of Nisan” this being the fact that from the moment (morning) of the “wave sheaf” offering, the children of Israel were then allowed to eat the new grain; adding another proof that the wave sheaf was waved on the sixteenth of Nisan (and not at the end of that week).

— for numerous Issues and Critiques of Pentecost and Wave Sheaf Offering, see (1) Archive for the ‘Pentecost’ Category (2) Archive for the ‘Wave Sheaf Offering’ Category

And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom, for Moses had laid his hands upon him. And the children of Israel hearkened unto him, and did as the Lord commanded Moses.

— Joshua was full of the spirit of wisdom; as wisdom is mentioned as being most necessary for the government to which he was now called; for Moses had laid his hands upon him; which was a symbol of the government being committed to him;

10 And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, — there arose not a prophet since in Israel; such words like these can only indicate have been written some time later after the death of Moses;

11 in all the signs and the wonders which the Lord sent him to do in the land of Egypt, to Pharaoh and to all his servants and to all his land, — in all the signs and the wonders which the Lord sent him to do; which the Lord sent him to do; ‘for he it was that appeared to him in the bush, and sent him to Egypt to work miracles, which he did by him;

— in the land of Egypt, to Pharaoh, and to all his servants, and to all his land; to whom they were visible, and who were all affected by the ten plagues inflicting upon all the Egyptians;

12 and in all that mighty hand, and in all the great terror which Moses showed in the sight of all Israel. — and in all that great terror which Moses showed in the sight of all Israel; meaning either the terror the Egyptians were struck with by him, in the sight of all Israel,

— when he publicly and before them wrought the wonders he did in the land of Egypt, which threw them into a panic, especially the thunders and lightning, the three days darkness, and the slaying of their firstborn;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds more details of the content that were later deposited inside the Ark, especially “the two tables of sapphire stone:”

and in all the strength of the Mighty Hand by which he bare the rod whose weight was forty savin and that divided the sea, and smote the rock; and in all the solemn things which Mosheh did when he received the two tables of sapphire stone, whose weight was forty savin, and carried both of them in his hands in the sight of all Israel.

Negotiate Now, or Capitulate Later: Geoffrey Roberts

•June 21, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Geoffrey Roberts – Negotiate Now, or Capitulate Later: Ten Incentives for Ukraine to Make Peace with Russia

Pearls and Irritations by Geoffrey Roberts • June 17, 2023 // Brave New Europe

No, not a patriotic political rally in Ukraine, but a war cemetery

  1. The Worsening Situation. The window to a compromise peace with Russia is fast closing. Western hardliners are urging Ukraine to expend its remaining military resources in the vain hope of stopping and reversing Russia’s most recent advances, supposedly to strengthen Kiev’s position in future negotiations with Moscow. But wishful thinking is not a strategy. There is no evidence Ukraine is capable of doing this. Ukraine’s attempted counter-offensive in summer 2023 – when both it and NATO were much stronger – was an unmitigated disaster. Ukraine’s remaining ability to inflict significant military costs on Russia is a negotiating card that Kiev needs to play now. The weaker Ukraine is militarily, the less incentive Russia will have to negotiate a peace settlement, as opposed to imposing one.
  2. Averting Armageddon. Western hardliners have no compunction when it comes to fighting to the last Ukrainian and they are determined to escalate NATO’s support for Ukraine, even at the risk of nuclear war with Russia. But Western escalationism is a sign of weakness, not strength, a barometer of NATO’s persistent failure, and the inability of its guns, tanks, missiles, mercenaries, sanctions, sabotage, technicians, intelligence, targeting and terrorism to turn the tide of war in Ukraine’s favour. All-out nuclear war would be catastrophic, not least for Ukraine, which would be wiped out in the first wave of attacks.
  3. Saving Odessa. The Donbass is lost, and Kharkov may be doomed, too. Control of Odessa might be maintained as part of a peace settlement, but only if Russia faces – as it does just now – a very hard fight to seize it. Should Ukraine collapse militarily and be unable to effectively defend Odessa, Putin will have no reason to concede to Kiev a city he considers historically Russian. Odessa’s retention as a result of a negotiated settlement would signal Ukraine’s survival as an independent, sovereign state – a country with a Black Sea port and a viable economic future that is not reliant on Western hand-outs.
  4. De-Railing Demographic Decline. Ukraine is heading towards a demographic disaster that could see the country’s post-independence population halved from 40 to 20 million. It desperately needs to halt the slaughter of its young people. And only when the war ends will the millions of Ukrainian refugees living abroad even consider returning home.
  5. Reclaiming Sovereignty. The war has turned Ukraine into a Western client state, whose future depends on the whims and electoral fortunes of American and European politicians. Ending the West’s proxy war with Russia would regain Ukraine’s sovereignty.
  6. Beating Trump. Come November, the chances are Ukraine will either have lost the war or will be losing even more badly than it is now. Democratic strategists calculate that even a severely stricken Ukraine will be better for Biden’s votes than a lost war. But much more helpful to Biden politically would be peace negotiations with Russia initiated and led by Ukraine. A Trump presidency would be a nightmare for Ukraine, threatening to undermine, and possibly end, US economic and military support for Kiev.
  7. Regime-Changing. Elected President on a platform of peace with Russia, Zelensky is all-in on the continuation of the war, whatever the costs to the Ukrainian people. He remains popular among Ukrainians who want to fight on come what may, but the broader public is increasingly embracing the idea of ending the war by conceding territory to Russia in order to save lives and safeguard the country’s future existence. Zelensky’s regime will be ended by peace – and the sooner the better for the families of the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians who will die if the war continues for much longer.
  8. Getting Russia to Pay. While Putin will concede little or nothing when it comes to the negotiation of vital territorial and security issues, economic and financial concessions are another matter. Aid to a recovering, postwar Ukraine could serve Russia’s trade and commercial interests. One possibility is that Moscow could guarantee the supply of cheap energy to Ukraine, something Russia did for decades before the breakdown of its relations with Kiev. Instead of attempting to steal Russia’s foreign assets, the West should unfreeze the funds so that Putin can invest money in the reconstruction of not just his newly acquired territories but, quite possibly, in Kiev-controlled Ukraine as well.
  9. Joining NATO and the EU. While Ukraine’s membership of NATO is not on offer as part of any peace deal, Putin has already conceded Ukraine’s right to join the EU. The negotiation of Ukraine’s entry into the EU will take years and the talks will only make significant, practical progress when the war ends. Putin has also accepted the idea of some kind of international security guarantee for postwar Ukraine. Importantly, peace between Russia and Ukraine could kick-start discussions about the establishment of pan-European security structures that would obviate the need for NATO.
  10. “Ukrainianisation.” Not the ultra-nationalist wet dream of an ethnically cleansed Ukraine, but a form of ‘Finlandisation.’ Finland was invaded by the Soviet Union in 1939-1940 and then fought on Hitler’s side during World War II, but it survived to prosper during the cold war by balancing between the Soviet and Western blocs. In return for a friendly foreign policy Moscow allowed the Finns freedom of action in their domestic affairs. It was a formula that enabled Finland to become one of the most successful post-WW2 states. Finland aspired to bridge East and West, and had many successes in that regard, notably during détente in the 1960s and 1970s. Ukraine could play the same role in ameliorating the highly dangerous new cold war that is developing between Russia and the West. Like Finland, Ukraine can recover from the dire consequences of siding with Russia’s enemies and benefit from good relations with both Washington and Moscow.
Current situation of line of Control -Ukraine and Russia

What’s the real size of China’s economy?

•June 20, 2024 • Leave a Comment

What’s the real size of China’s economy?

World Bank’s latest purchasing power parity GDP survey shows China edging up slightly on US but the measure widely misses the mark

AsiaTimes by Han Feize • June 17, 2024

In May, the World Bank concluded one of its periodic International Comparison Program (ICP) assessments – the price survey which “officially” determines purchasing power parity GDP.

Like college rankings, the league table of the world’s largest economies shifted just enough for the obsessives to notice while springing no real surprises. Harvard will be Harvard and whether Princeton ranks above or below Yale this year is largely irrelevant.

For the obsessives, China’s lead versus the US expanded by 5.6%, India inched closer to China, Japan kept its ranking while sliding down a tick, Russia moved ahead of Germany, France ahead of the UK, Indonesia tumbled two places and Brazil rose one spot. The top 10 remained the top 10.

While Russia fans can beat their chest over a 13% increase in PPP GDP and the British may fret about dropping out of the top 10, all said, the latest ICP did not produce any remarkable revelations. Nor should it have.

Periodic pricing surveys are necessary to calibrate and maintain the accuracy of PPP adjustments. However, if they result in significant shifts, either too much time has elapsed between surveys or methodologies have broken down.

The ICP is a massive undertaking. According to The Economist, World Bank researchers visited 16,000 shops in China alone to collect price data. The latest ICP assessment collected data in 2021, four years after the 2017 survey. And the conclusion is that China’s GDP was undervalued by US$1.4 trillion pushing China’s 2022 PPP GDP from 119% of the US to 125%.

According to the Economist, China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) was not impressed, downplaying the results stating, “We need to interpret the… results with caution and correctly grasp the global economic landscape and the status of each economy in it” while stressing China remained a “developing economy.” If the NBS did not like such a modest upward adjustment to China’s PPP GDP, it will surely hate the rest of this article.

China’s PPP GDP is only 25% larger than that of the US? Come on people… who are we kidding? Last year, China generated twice as much electricity as the US, produced 12.6 times as much steel and 22 times as much cement. China’s shipyards accounted for over 50% of the world’s output while US production was negligible. In 2023, China produced 30.2 million vehicles, almost three times more than the 10.6 million made in the US.

On the demand side, 26 million vehicles were sold in China last year, 68% more than the 15.5 million sold in the US. Chinese consumers bought 434 million smartphones, three times the 144 million sold in the US. As a country, China consumes twice as much meat and eight times as much seafood as the US. Chinese shoppers spent twice as much on luxury goods as American shoppers.

In 2023, Chinese travelers took 620 million flights, 25% fewer than the 819 million flights taken by Americans, but Chinese travelers also took 3 billion trips on high-speed rail (and 685 million on traditional rail), significantly more than the 28m Amtrak trips.

With the exception of luxury goods, all of the above are volume or unit measurements and need to be adjusted for quality/features to be comparable apple-to-apples. It would be highly presumptuous of us to discount the 16,000 shop visits conducted by the World Bank and accuse them of grossly lowballing China’s PPP GDP.

But that is exactly what we are going to do. It is prima facie ridiculous that China’s production and consumption, at multiples of US levels, can be realistically discounted for lower quality/features to arrive at a mere 125% of US PPP GDP.  

It’s not that we think the World Bank has done a bad job. It’s that we believe China’s NBS, contrary to popular opinion, has been lowballing GDP for decades and the World Bank has to work within the confines of the NBS’s reported data. This was politically important decades ago for WTO concessions and it is politically important today to maintain developing economy status as China makes a play for leadership of the Global South.

We believe China’s GDP and PPP GDP are lowballed by an incomplete transition from the Material Product System (MPS) of national accounts, which excludes services by design. The World Bank is likely dutifully doing its sums with goods consumption in China multiples of the US but measuring services consumption as a fraction of the US.

The United Nations System of National Accounts (UNSNA) provides voluntary guidelines and specifically states that nations should base their national accounts on local conditions. What that has meant in the West is to adopt all UNSNA “innovations” introduced over the years.

Items like imputed rent, legal fees and R&D are now all included in GDP. The UK went hog wild with both illegal drugs and prostitution as now part of their GDP because… hey, why not? UNSNA’s 2008 guidelines explicitly recommend that illegal market activity should be included in GDP.

China’s NBS stood its ground on a conceptual level. Rightly or wrongly, the Leninist MPS considers services necessary costs of material production rather than real value creation. In China’s first attempt at converting MPS to SNA in 1985, it tacked on a ludicrously low 13% to the MPS number and called it China’s services GDP.

Over the years, the World Bank has twisted the arm of the NBS for modest increases to China’s services GDP – with limited success.

The affordability crisis in Western economies, the US in particular, is largely driven by inflation of necessary services – rent, healthcare, education and childcare – not by manufactured goods. While these costs have also gone up in China, they have increased less and much are left out of GDP anyway.

Also not captured by the ICP survey conducted in 2021 are the price and service wars that have broken out across industries and products – a bane on businesses but a boon for consumers.

This is most visible in China’s car market with OEMs either cutting prices to the bone (Hyundai Sonatas down to $17,000 from $42,000) or offering cutting-edge technology for peanuts (a 2,000-kilometer range BYD Q plug-in hybrid electric vehicle for $14,000). The price of solar panels fell 50% in 2023 and continues to trend down in 2024. CATL has announced plans to cut lithium-ion battery prices in half by the end of 2024. 

Restaurants are offering white glove perks like hot towels, lotion by the sink and snazzy remodeled decors. Hairdressers hand out bottled water and fruit plates. Tech companies have slashed large language model (LLM) prices to basically free. Service quality in China, impossible to quantify, is now head and shoulders above the West and probably even Japan.

Adherence to UNSNA has caused a breakdown in the meaning of GDP. As necessary services become an ever larger share of Western economies, their growth does not appear to result in discernable improvements in living standards.

Are US healthcare and universities twice as good as they were in the year 2000? If US households have not gotten vastly improved healthcare, education, housing and childcare over the past two decades, then inflation has been systematically underreported and GDP growth may have, in fact, been less than 1% per annum (instead of 2%), which equals stagnation given 0.8% per annum population growth. This may go a long way in explaining popular anger and the meltdown of American politics.

China’s material-focused GDP may be a better measure of the economy as it relates to living standards, especially since UNSNA has obviously lost its mind by now officially recommending drugs, prostitution, illegal gambling and theft be included in GDP.

Western defense analysts are onto something when they come up with wildly inflated estimates for China’s defense spending. But it’s not China’s defense spending that is lowballed – it is Western defense spending, especially by the Pentagon, which needs to be reassessed.

Somehow the $1 trillion a year the US devotes to defense (including intelligence and Energy Department programs) has caused the US Navy to shrink while China’s $236 billion budget has built the world’s largest navy by ship count.

Similarly, analysts who lament that China accounts for 30% of the world’s manufacturing output but only 13% of household consumption are far off the mark. China accounts for 20-40% of global demand for just about every consumer product but much of the services it consumes have been left out of national accounts.

So how much is it? How big is China’s economy really? About six months ago, this writer estimated that China’s GDP needed to be grossed up by 25-40% to be on a UNSNA basis.

But after shopping for cars, buying a domestic brand carbon fiber road bike with all the bells and whistles for $2,600 (equivalent to a $15,000 Trek), paying $7.65 for Bluetooth earphones (much better than the $250 PowerBeats Pro they replaced), renting cars for $20 a day, staying at boutique hotels for $30 a night, buying an extremely solid heavy duty umbrella for $2.20 (and losing it right away) and undergoing an unfortunate series of medical interventions (both major and minor) for less than the deductible on expat health insurance and getting white glove customer service for the smallest of purchases, Han Feizi’s mental map of price and value has crumbled.   

No, the ICP did not do a lousy job. They were hamstrung by the initial conditions that China’s NBS subjected them to. And the data released in 2024 was taken in 2021 – ancient history in China. The recent ICP adjustment of a few percentage points in China’s PPP GDP relative to the US elicited consternation from the NBS.

But the reality is an accurate adjustment would be of a multiple or two.

Reports of Petrodollar’s Demise are ‘fake news’

•June 19, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Media Reports of the petrodollar system’s demise are ‘fake news’ — here’s why

It seemed like big news, and many wondered why the mainstream media had seemingly ignored it. Turns out, there was a very good reason.

“Clearly, the story that is going around today is fake news.”

MSN by Joseph Adinolfi • June 16, 2024 // MarketWatch

Earlier this week, reports circulating widely on social-media platforms like X offered up a shocking proclamation: A 50-year-old agreement between the US and Saudi Arabia requiring that the latter price its crude-oil exports in US dollars had expired on Sunday.

The collapse of the accod would inevitably deal a fatal blow to the US dollar’s status as the de facto global reserve currency, various commentators on X opined. Surely, financial upheaval lay ahead.

Almost immediately, Google searches for the term “petrodollar” spiked to the highest level on record dating back to 2004, according to Google Trends data.

But as speculation about an imminent end to the US dollar’s global dominance intensified, several Wall Street and foreign-policy experts emerged to point out a fatal flaw in this logic: The agreement itself never existed.

At least, not in the way it was being described in the posts that had gone viral on social media.

In a blog post published Friday, Paul Donovan, chief economist at UBS Global Wealth Management, remarked that the fake story had become surprisingly widespread, providing another lesson about the pitfalls of “confirmation bias.”

“Clearly, the story that is going around today is fake news. There was an agreement signed in June of 1974, but it had nothing to do with currencies because the Saudis carried on selling in sterling after that,” Donovan noted in an interview with MarketWatch.

The agreement referred to by Donovan is the United States-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation. It was formally established on June 8, 1974, by a joint statement issued and signed by Henry Kissinger, the US secretary of state at the time, and Prince Fahd, the second deputy prime minister (and later king and prime minister) of Saudi Arabia, according to a report found on the Government Accountability Office’s website.

“Ultimately, the more important question is does Saudi Arabia change the currency in which it holds its reserves, which at the moment is majority dollar”

The agreement, as initially envisioned, was intended to last five years, although it was repeatedly extended. The rational for such a deal was pretty straightforward: Coming on the heels of the 1973 OPEC oil embargo, both the US and Saudi Arabia were eager to flesh out a more formal arrangement that would ensure each side got more of what it wanted from the other.

The surge in oil prices following the OPEC embargo was leaving Saudi Arabia with a surplus of dollars, and the Kingdom’s leadership was eager to harness this wealth to further industrialize its economy beyond the oil sector. At the same time, the US wanted to strengthen its then-nascent diplomatic relationship with Saudi Arabia, while encouraging the country to recycle its dollars back into the US economy.

Washington also wanted to ensure there wouldn’t be a repeat of the 1973 embargo, which sparked a destabilizing wave of inflation and an economic and stock-market crash.

According to Donovan and others who emerged on social-media to debunk the conspiracy theories, a formal agreement demanding that Saudi Arabia price its crude oil in dollars never existed. Rather, Saudi Arabia continued accepting other currencies — most notably the British pound — for its oil even after the 1974 agreement on joint economic cooperation was struck. It wasn’t until later that year that the Kingdom stopped accepting the pound as payment.

Perhaps the closest thing to a petrodollar deal was a secret agreement between the US and Saudi Arabia reached in late 1974, which promised military aid and equipment in exchange for the Kingdom investing billions of dollars of its oil-sales proceeds in US Treasurys, Donovan said. The existence of this agreement wasn’t revealed until 2016, when Bloomberg News filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the National Archives.

“A formal agreement demanding that Saudi Arabia price its crude oil in dollars never existed.”

Bloomberg’s reporting also led to the Treasury Department breaking out figures on Saudi Treasury ownership for the first time, revealing that the Kingdom was among the largest creditors to the US — although Bloomberg’s sources reportedly said the official figures likely underestimated the Kingdom’s total dollar reserves.

Still, the notion that the petrodollar system largely grew organically from a place of mutual benefit — rather than some shadowy agreement established by a secret cabal of diplomats — remains a matter of indisputable fact, according to Gregory Brew, an analyst at Eurasia Group. Of course, this hasn’t stopped conspiracy theories about the origins of the petrodollar system from flourishing as far back as the 1970s.

“The evidence for any kind of conspiracy is thin to nonexistent,” Brew told MarketWatch in an interview on Friday. “There is a very clear record of both the Americans and the Saudis being concerned in the aftermath of the global oil shock of what Saudi surpluses would do to the global economy.”

“It was a very common-sense solution to a mutual problem,” he added.

To be sure, there have been some signs recently that the Saudis are more open to accepting currencies other than the dollar as payment for some of their oil sales. The Wall Street Journal has reported that the Saudis have been in talks with Beijing for years about accepting payment in yuan for example.

But even if such an agreement were reached, Saudi Arabia’s close economic and military ties with the US — and the fact that nearly the entire global system for financing, insuring and transporting oil requires dollars — will likely continue to incentivize the Kingdom to continue seeking dollars as its preferred and primary form of payment, according to Jeffrey Kleintop, chief global investment strategist at Schwab, who posted about the issue on X.

Even more importantly as far as the dollar’s reserve status is concerned, the currency or currencies used to make payments for oil are of secondary importance. What matters most when it comes to the dollar maintaining its role as the world’s main reserve currency is where oil exporters like Saudi Arabia decide to park their reserves, Donovan said.

None of this seems likely to change, with the US and Saudi Arabia reportedly on the cusp of signing a landmark defense treaty, according to the Journal.

“Ultimately, the more important question is does Saudi Arabia change the currency in which it holds its reserves, which at the moment is majority dollar,” Donovan said.

The latest data from the International Monetary Fund show that while the dollar’s share of global reserves has continued to gradually decline, no rival is garnering a large enough share to challenge the dollar’s dominance. Instead, central banks have continued to diversify their holdings into a range of other “nontraditional” reserve currencies like Australian and Canadian dollars and Chinese yuan.

The US dollar strengthened against its rivals this week, with the ICE US Dollar Index gaining 0.6% to 105.51, its strongest level in more than a month, according to FactSet data.

Counterfeit Titanium Used In Boeing And Airbus

•June 18, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Counterfeit Titanium Found In Some Boeing And Airbus Jets

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • June 14, 2024

Boeing is no longer the pride of American aviation. The plane manufacturer is riddled with so many problems it’s impossible to keep track. Yesterday, the FAA announced an investigation (yet another…) into a 737 Max 8 jet that encountered a dangerous mid-flight ‘Dutch roll’ several weeks ago. Now, a report from the New York Times reveals that some Boeing jets are built with ‘counterfeit titanium.’ 

Some recently manufactured Boeing and Airbus jets have components made from titanium that was sold using fake documentation verifying the material’s authenticity, according to a supplier for the plane makers, raising concerns about the structural integrity of those airliners.

The falsified documents are being investigated by Spirit AeroSystems, which supplies fuselages for Boeing and wings for Airbus, as well as the Federal Aviation Administration. The investigation comes after a parts supplier found small holes in the material from corrosion. – NYT

The report continued:

The planes that included components made with the material were built between 2019 and 2023, among them some Boeing 737 Max and 787 Dreamliner airliners as well as Airbus A220 jets, according to three people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. It is not clear how many of those planes are in service or which airlines own them.

Fuselage maker Spirit is investigating the source of the titanium and whether the metal meets aviation standards. The big question is if the metal used in critical parts of the airframe is structurally sound enough to last the projected life spans of the jets. If the metal is tested and found to be below aviation specs, the parts must be removed and replaced. 

“This is about documents that have been falsified, forged and counterfeited,” Joe Buccino, a Spirit spokesman, told NYT, adding, “Once we realized the counterfeit titanium made its way into the supply chain, we immediately contained all suspected parts to determine the scope of the issues.”

According to Spirit officials, counterfeit titanium was used in passenger entry doors, cargo doors, and a component that connects the engines to the plane’s airframe for 787 Dreamliners. The affected parts of the 737 Max and the Airbus A220 include a heat shield on the engine.

NYT pointed out, “Boeing and Airbus both said their tests of affected materials so far had shown no signs of problems,” adding, “Boeing said it directly purchased most of the titanium used in its plane production, so most of its supply was unaffected.”

Boeing released this statement:

“This industrywide issue affects some shipments of titanium received by a limited set of suppliers, and tests performed to date have indicated that the correct titanium alloy was used.

“To ensure compliance, we are removing any affected parts on airplanes prior to delivery. Our analysis shows the in-service fleet can continue to fly safely.”

A complex global supply chain for producing commercial jets is likely at fault. Late last year, a London-based firm flooded the aviation market with “unapproved parts” for jet engines on older Airbus SE A320s and Boeing Co. 737s.

FAA Investigates Dutch Roll Incident on Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 Max

The counterfeit titanium issue first emerged in 2019:

The issue appears to date to 2019 when a Turkish material supplier, Turkish Aerospace Industries, purchased a batch of titanium from a supplier in China, according to the people familiar with the issue. The Turkish company then sold that titanium to several companies that make aircraft parts, and those parts made their way to Spirit, which used them in Boeing and Airbus planes.

In December 2023, an Italian company that bought the titanium from Turkish Aerospace Industries noticed that the material looked different from what the company typically received. The company, Titanium International Group, also found that the certificates that came with the titanium seemed inauthentic.

Turkish Aerospace Industries did not respond to a request for a comment.

Spirit began investigating the matter, and the company notified Boeing and Airbus in January that it could not verify the source of the titanium used to make certain parts. Titanium International Group told Spirit that when it bought the material in 2019, it had no clue that the paperwork had been forged, according to Spirit officials.

… People familiar with the situation said it appeared that an employee at the Chinese company that sold the titanium had forged the details on the certificates, writing that the material came from another Chinese company, Baoji Titanium Industry, a firm that often supplies verified titanium. Baoji Titanium later confirmed that it had not supplied the titanium. The origin of the titanium remains unclear.

This is yet another problem for the aviation industry and Boeing. Stories like these erode confidence in commercial air travel and raise the question: Has the FAA been asleep at the yoke?

Biden and Zelensky sign security pact

•June 17, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The treaty brings bilateral ties “to the level of a true alliance,” the Ukrainian leader said

Ensuring a Forever War, Ukrainian Zelensky and US Joe Biden shake hands after signing a bilateral 10-year security agreement during a press conference in Italy

RT International News • June 14, 2024 // CNN

US President Joe Biden and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky have signed a 10-year security agreement, under which Washington pledged to continue backing Kiev in its conflict with Moscow. 

The deal was signed on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in the southern Italy on Thursday. According to the agreement, the US promised to “help deter and confront any future aggression against the territorial integrity” of Ukraine and to “support Ukraine’s efforts to win today’s war and deter future Russian military aggression.” 

“It is the policy of the United States to assist Ukraine in maintaining a credible defense and deterrence capability,” the pact said. Washington pledged to support Kiev in numerous ways, including military aid, intelligence sharing, and economic assistance

“A lasting peace for Ukraine must be underwritten by Ukraine’s own ability to defend itself now and to deter future aggression,” Biden told reporters after the signing ceremony.

In a video address released on early Friday morning, Zelensky said that the treaty elevates the relations between the US and Ukraine “to the level of a true alliance.” He described the security deal as “the strongest agreement with America in all 33 years of our independence.”

Since 2023, Ukraine has made similar pacts with individual NATO countries, including the UK, France and Germany. According to Zelensky, Kiev now has 17 security agreements with foreign backers, “with ten more in preparation.” 

The treaties are intended to serve as long-term commitments without granting Ukraine the status of a NATO member. The documents already signed not have the power of Article 5 of the NATO Charter, however, which stipulates that an attack against one member must be treated by the rest as an attack of the alliance as a whole.

Kiev formally applied to join the NATO in September 2022. Washington has made it clear, however, that Ukraine cannot become a member until its armed conflict with Russia is resolved. Russia, for its part, has repeatedly warned that no amount of Western aid would deter its military operation in Ukraine.

How America bought up Britain

•June 16, 2024 • Leave a Comment

From assets to businesses, the high street to the internet, US investors have a stranglehold on Britain’s economy.

The New Stateman by Will Dunn • April 17, 2024

In the summer of 1913, the newly appointed US ambassador to Great Britain, Walter Hines Page, wrote to a friend back in Washington: “These English are spending their capital… what are we going to do with the leadership of the world presently when it clearly falls into our hands?” Page was an Anglophile, but he saw that the realignment was already happening, as America’s huge natural resources and new-found economic might allowed it to replace Britain’s dwindling empire.

In 1930, the American journalist Ludwell Denny summed up his country’s approach to imperialism: “Too wise to govern the world, we shall merely own it.” Denny believed capitalism would enable the US to take over other countries without ever needing to invade: “What chance has Britain got against America?” he asked. 

Nowhere has America asserted its economic dominance more strongly than in Britain, where around two million people now work for US companies. Tens of billions of dollars per year are transferred across the Atlantic in the form of dividends paid on the proceeds of British work, conducted on behalf of American owners. A jaunty little map on the Office for National Statistics website gives the good news that our goods exports to America actually outweigh our imports by a few billion. Go, Global Britain!

But a less accessible chart, found in the deeper reaches of the website of the American tax authority, the IRS, tells a different story: in 2020 (the latest year on record) the revenue recorded by American companies in the UK was over $707bn, more than ten times the amount made in the entire continent of Africa. In 2019, large US corporations made an (aggregated) profit of £2,500 from every household in the UK.  

Under the direction of Angus Hanton, economist and co-founder of the Intergenerational Foundation, Vassal State takes the reader on a dizzying tour of an economy that has come to resemble Orwell’s Airstrip One (the title refers to Angela Merkel’s description of Belarus, the smaller and financially subservient partner to Russia).

Every British high street has obvious American outposts (KFC, McDonald’s) but the average shopper probably does not realise how many products that we might think of as belonging to British culture – Mars bars, Weetabix, Innocent smoothies, Andrex loo roll – are ultimately owned in dollars.

We do not question the little Union Jack sticker that reassures us we are buying “British chicken” – was the unfortunate bird issued a blue passport before it was mechanically separated? – and so we fail to understand that we buy much of our meat from conglomerates that are controlled from across the Atlantic.

The British characters we assign to shops – Morrisons, the working-class supermarket from Bradford, or Gail’s, the blousy bakery from Hampstead – are fictions; both are owned by US private equity firms, as are the middle-class temples of Majestic Wine and Waterstones.

The “digital economy” beloved of our politicians is a means of extending the American economy into our own: British consumers use American technology (Apple, Google, Microsoft) to shop on American websites (Amazon, eBay) hosted by American internet companies (Amazon, Google). We find these sites using American search engines.

When we’re not working (usually on Microsoft software) we watch American TV and films on US-owned streaming services; all three of the main streaming services in the UK are American, and seven of the ten most-watched titles on Netflix one recent week were made by US companies.

British kids are more likely to watch Google-owned YouTube (where all five of the top English-language channels are based in the US), or to play games bought from companies in Seattle, or to scroll Californian social media platforms. British teachers and parents increasingly observe children in the UK speaking with American accents, because most of the media they consume comes from across the Atlantic.

It’s true that British culture also heads the other way. America has been buying up the UK’s artworks at a rate of £5bn a year for the last decade, furnishing museums in Los Angeles and New York with those paintings that cannot be “saved for the nation.” There is a great deal of debate about the extent to which our universities educate students from overseas; far less is said of the thousands of gifted British students and researchers who are chosen to transfer their intelligence and energy to American universities and businesses.

Britain has been singled out for special treatment. The investment made by the US into the UK outweighs its spending in the rest of Europe combined. This is not just because we have a shared language and we were on the same team in the Second World War. Our political leaders have actively courted this takeover. Voters have been told that foreign direct investment, or FDI, is an unequivocal good; it means foreign investors building new factories for grateful British workers.

The reality is that a lot of this “investment” is US private equity firms helping themselves to British companies that are cheaper to buy (thanks to our less buoyant financial markets) than American businesses. This is good for the financial sector, which profits from the boom in buyouts – in 2022-23 alone, US private equity firms bought 181 British businesses – but it means swathes of companies come to be owned by people for whom local employment is not a concern. The UK has lost two million manufacturing jobs since 1991.

Our political class is well aware of this. Our Prime Minister worked for an American investment bank and a hedge fund based in California; his personal wealth today is largely predicated on how the New York Stock Exchange values his father-in-law’s company, Infosys.

The Chancellor is a multimillionaire because the company he founded, Hotcourses, was sold to a foreign (Australian) buyer. Unlike France and Germany, which have laws to prevent foreign takeovers of strategically important companies, Britain – ever the butler – has made a virtue of being the “junior partner,” as David Cameron described our role in the special relationship in 2010.

Sometimes it is the government itself that sells our assets overseas. Hanton highlights the 5,000 railway arches, home to thousands of small businesses, that Philip Hammond (as transport secretary) compelled Network Rail to sell at a very affordable price to the US private equity giant Blackstone.

Rents promptly doubled, putting many small companies out of business and destroying jobs, but Hammond was satisfied to have created decisive change: the civil servants who had previously managed the commercial property were, he told Hanton, “hopeless people” who were “bureaucratically unable to ever get anything done.” Lord Hammond is now a partner at the private equity firm Buckthorn and a person with significant control of seven property development companies.

Blackstone’s treatment of the railway arches is one example of why private equity has been so successful. Private owners have fewer requirements for transparency and accountability than publicly traded companies. Negative publicity doesn’t really affect them. They can aggressively reshape companies and increase their margins as their fiduciary duty dictates. This might mean simply running the company better, or it might mean loading it with debt, or sacking large numbers of workers, or avoiding as much tax as possible.

This last point is also true of publicly traded companies. Last December, HMRC estimates indicated that US multinationals had underpaid tax in the UK by £5.6bn. Amazon’s main UK division paid no UK corporation tax at all in 2021 or 2022; the company’s net sales in the UK for those two years exceeded £48bn.

In the last five years 6,000 British shops have closed permanently, according to the British Retail Consortium, and more than one in ten shops are vacant. In 2020, the UK attempted to defend its ailing shops by placing a new digital services tax (DST) on the US online giants.

The previous year Donald Trump responded to a similar plan by France: “We tax our companies; they don’t tax our companies.” In October 2021 the UK agreed to “transition away” from the DST in favour of a “global system” (guess who benefits).   

It was Trump, with his weird grasp on the hand of a painfully embarrassed Theresa May, who made a mockery of the special relationship, although on one side of the Atlantic it was already a joke. When Gordon Brown visited Washington in 2009 he was presented with a DVD box set of old films that would only work on a US machine, the kind of gift that comes from a hasty trip to the nearest petrol station.

It is time, Hanton writes, to see this relationship for what it is, and to write new rules that favour British work over the financial interests of American investors. This involves rethinking the tax system, regulating takeovers and aggressively supporting the growth of businesses and skills that are incentivised to sell shares in London rather than New York. Hanton writes with admiration and fondness for America; he is “not arguing for nationalism”, he writes, “but against abject dependency.”

Vassal State: How America Runs Britain
Angus Hanton

More on

Deuteronomy (31-32)

•June 15, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 31

1 And Moses went and spoke these words unto all Israel. — these are the words Moses spoke unto all Israel, which is in great contrast to the books of Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers, where was usual to read “And the Lord spoke unto Moses” and “And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the word of the Lord,”

And he said unto them: “I am a hundred and twenty years old this day; I can no more go out and come in. Also the Lord hath said unto me, ‘Thou shalt not go over this Jordan.’ — and he said unto them, I am an hundred and twenty years old this day; perhaps on the selfsame day he was bid to go up to Mount Nebo and die;

The Lord thy God, He will go over before thee, and He will destroy these nations from before thee, and thou shalt possess them; and Joshua, he shall go over before thee, as the Lord hath said. — and He will destroy these nations from before thee; and he will destroy those nations from before thee; the seven nations which then inhabited the land;

— the Lord would fulfil His promise, to go before Israel and destroy the Canaanites, like the two kings of the Amorites; only they (the Israelites) were to do to them as the Lord had commanded them, that is, to root out the Canaanites (Deuteronomy 7:2; Numbers 33:51; Exodus 34:11)

And the Lord shall do unto them as He did to Sihon and to Og, kings of the Amorites, and unto the land of those whom He destroyed. — and the Lord shall do unto them as he did unto Sihon, and to Og, kings of the Amorites; deliver them up into their hands; the story of this in Numbers 21:10

And the Lord shall give them up before your face, that ye may do unto them according unto all the commandments which I have commanded you. — and the Lord shall give them up before your face; to their ruin and destruction; the Targum of Jonathan says, “the Word of the Lord will deliver them up before you:”

Be strong and of good courage, fear not, nor be afraid of them; for the Lord thy God, He it is who doth go with thee. He will not fail thee nor forsake thee.” — fear not, nor be afraid of them; their enemies, though numerous and mighty, and some of them of a gigantic stature, and their cities strong and well fenced;

And Moses called unto Joshua and said unto him in the sight of all Israel, “Be strong and of good courage; for thou must go with this people unto the land which the Lord hath sworn unto their fathers to give them, and thou shalt cause them to inherit it.

— and Moses called unto Joshua; who might be at some distance from him, with the tribe to which he belonged; the Targum of Jonathan adds, “out of the midst of the people” and said unto him, in the sight of all Israel;

And the Lord, He it is who doth go before thee. He will be with thee, He will not fail thee, neither forsake thee. Fear not, neither be dismayed.” — fear not, neither be dismayed; at the number and strength of the enemy, nor at any difficulties that might lie in the way of finishing so great an undertaking, since the Lord would be with him;

And Moses wrote this law and delivered it unto the priests, the sons of Levi, who bore the ark of the covenant of the Lord, and unto all the elders of Israel. — and Moses wrote this law; the book of Deuteronomy, or the Torah, Pentateuch, the five books of Moses, which he had now finished, and which all of them together are sometimes called the law;

10 And Moses commanded them, saying, “At the end of every seven years, in the solemnity of the year of release, in the Feast of Tabernacles, — at the end of every seven years; thou shalt read this law; at the return of the sabbatic year and during the feast of tabernacles, the law was to be publicly read;

11 when all Israel has come to appear before the Lord thy God in the place which He shall choose, thou shalt read this law before all Israel in their hearing. — in the place which the Lord shall choose; the city of Jerusalem, and the Temple there.

12 Gather the people together — men, and women, and children, and thy stranger who is within thy gates — that they may hear, and that they may learn, and fear the Lord your God, and observe to do all the words of this law,

— thy stranger who is within thy gates; those strangers that couldn’t hear, see, learn and fear the Lord, these are the blind and unrepentent Gentiles, especially, First, from those of Psalm 83, and, Second, from those of “Gog and Magog;”

— for more, see Sequence of Prophecies for the Return of Israel

13 and that their children, who have not known any thing, may hear and learn to fear the Lord your God as long as ye live in the land whither ye go over the Jordan to possess it.” — may hear, and learn to fear the Lord your God; hear the law of God, learn the meaning of it, and so be brought up in the fear, nurture, and admonition of the Lord, and serve him their Creator in the days of their youth;

14 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Behold, thy days approach that thou must die. Call Joshua, and present yourselves in the tabernacle of the congregation, that I may give him a charge.” And Moses and Joshua went and presented themselves in the tabernacle of the congregation.

— that I may give him a charge; immediately from myself, for his great encouragement, and to gain him more authority with the people;

15 And the Lord appeared in the tabernacle in a pillar of a cloud, and the pillar of the cloud stood over the door of the tabernacle. — the Targum of Jonathan adds, “Moses and Joshua went, and stood in the tabernacle of ordinance;”

16 And the Lord said unto Moses, “Behold, thou shalt sleep with thy fathers; and this people will rise up and go a whoring after the gods of the strangers of the land whither they go to be among them, and will forsake Me and break My covenant which I have made with them. — this people will go after the gods of the strangers; first with the Canaanites;

— then later with others:

(a) Easters, a celebration of the Queen of heaven: Ishtar, the Assyrian and Babylonian goddess of fertility and sex. Her symbols (like the egg and bunny) were and still are fertility and sex symbols; and to those who actually think eggs and bunnies have something to do with the resurrection; Jeremiah 7:18 the women knead their dough to make cakes to the Queen of heaven; in Egypt, Jeremiah 44:17-19, 25, this is Ishtar: pronounced ‘Easter.’

(b) Christmas; Ezekiel 8:16 five and twenty men with their backs toward the temple; their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the sun toward the east; Christmas, which honor Mithraism, birthday on December 25th – a form of nature worship based on the Sun-Goddess Mithra who on the darkest night of the year (December 20/21), gives birth to “Light” causing each day thereafter to grow longer until the Summer solstice;

(c) Sundays; her sabbaths which is Sundays, where the original Sun-worshippers were the Samaritans, brought from Assyria: And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel; and they possessed Samaria and dwelt in the cities thereof, II Kings 17:24.

17 Then My anger shall be kindled against them in that day, and I will forsake them, and I will hide My face from them, and they shall be devoured; and many evils and troubles shall befall them, so that they will say in that day, ‘Have not these evils come upon us because our God is not among us?’

— and they shall be devoured; and they shall be devoured; by their enemies, or by the sore judgments of God, by famine, sword, pestilence, and evil beasts, they and their substance; and many evils and troubles shall befall them; both in their own land, and in other countries, where they would be carried captives;

18 And I will surely hide My face in that day for all the evils which they shall have wrought, in that they are turned unto other gods. — for all the evils which they shall have wrought; for all the immoralities they should be guilty of, every transgression of his law, whether of the first or second table, or of LGBTqia; greed or other idolatries.

19 Now therefore write ye this song for you, and teach it to the children of Israel. Put it in their mouths, that this song may be a witness for Me against the children of Israel. — put it in their mouths, that this song may be a witness; such method of perpetuating the truth was even better adapted to the times and to the condition of the people than the delivery of a written law.

20 For when I shall have brought them into the land which I swore unto their fathers, that floweth with milk and honey, and they shall have eaten and filled themselves and waxed fat, then will they turn unto other gods and serve them, and provoke Me and break My covenant.

— and they shall have eaten and filled themselves, and waxen fat; that is, after they have for a considerable time enjoyed the good things of the land, and they abound with them, and increase in them, and have great fullness of them;

— then will they turn unto other gods: turn from the Lord who has brought them into all this plenty, from the fear, worship, and service of him, and turn to the worship of idols;

21 And it shall come to pass, when many evils and troubles have befallen them, that this song shall testify against them as a witness; for it shall not be forgotten out of the mouths of their seed. For I know their imagination and that which they go about, even now, before I have brought them into the land which I swore.”

— this song shall testify against them as a witness; that they were sufficiently admonished of their duty, and forewarned what would be the consequence of their defection from me and my worship;

— for I know their imagination which they go about even now; there being a secret inclination in their minds to idolatry, which were working and contriving schemes to bring it about, and set it up;

22 Moses therefore wrote this song the same day, and taught it to the children of Israel. — Moses therefore wrote this song the same day; that same day it was dictated to him by divine inspiration; and he wrote it;

23 And He gave Joshua, the son of Nun, a charge and said, “Be strong and of good courage; for thou shalt bring the children of Israel into the land which I swore unto them, and I will be with thee.” — and said, be strong and of a good courage; that is, not fearing the people of the land, however tall their height or statue;

24 And it came to pass, when Moses had made an end of writing the words of this law in a book until they were finished, — and it came to pass, when Moses had made an end of writing the words of this law in a book; this book of Deuteronomy and those preceding it, and which concluded the Torah, or the Pentateuch;

25 that Moses commanded the Levites, who bore the ark of the covenant of the Lord, saying, — the Levites, which bare the ark; more specifically “the priests the sons of Levi” as in Deuteronomy 31:9

26 “Take this Book of the Law and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee; — the solemn delivery of the book of the law to the Levites, to be deposited in, or rather by the side, of the ark;

— the Targum of Jonathan says “Take the book of this law, and put it into a chest on the right side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be for a testament to you.”

27 for I know thy rebellion and thy stiff neck. Behold, while I am yet alive with you this day, ye have been rebellious against the Lord. And how much more after my death? — and how much more after my death? When he would be no more with them to instruct and advise them, to caution and reprove them, and to keep them in awe by his authority.

28 Gather unto me all the elders of your tribes and your officers, that I may speak these words in their ears, and call heaven and earth to record against them. — the heads of the tribes, the princes, and magistrates;

29 For I know that after my death ye will utterly corrupt yourselves and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you. And evil will befall you in the latter days, because ye will do evil in the sight of the Lord to provoke Him to anger through the work of your hands.”

— and evil will befall you in the latter days; not only in the times of the judges, nor even the time of the Babylonish captivity, but in their coming captivity, that is of “the latter days” as they call it;

— and here a revelation from Isaiah

Remember the former things of old; for I am God, and there is none other; I am God, and there is none like Me,

declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure,’ Isaiah 46:9-10

— for more, see Sequence of Prophecies for the Return of Israel

30 And Moses spoke in the ears of all the congregation of Israel the words of this song until they were ended: — and Moses spake; the words of this song; the exodus of Israel begins and ends with a song of Moses.

Deuteronomy 32

1 “Give ear, O ye heavens, and I will speak; and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.

— the expression, “O earth” is expressed seven times throughout the OT, here by Moses, elsewhere by Job, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Micah, empahsizing that God, too, has a message for the whole of humanity;

— Give ear, O ye heavens; hear, O earth; by appealing, in this solemn manner, to the heavens and the earth in the beginning of this song, Moses intended to signify heaven and earth are here for the inhabitants of all, angels and men: both will agree to justify God in his proceedings against Israel, and to declare his righteousness.

My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distill as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showers upon the grass. — of such importance throughout, he desired that the words should trickle down like rain and dew upon grass and herb.

Because I will proclaim the name of the Lord, ascribe ye greatness unto our God. — it is the name YEHOVAH that I utter; Give ye greatness to our God.

“He is the Rock, His work is perfect; for all His ways are judgment, a God of truth and without iniquity; just and right is He. — He is the Rock, his work is perfect; or rather, the Rock, perfect is his work.

They have corrupted themselves; their spot is not the spot of His children; they are a perverse and crooked generation. — they have corrupted themselves; that is, the Israelites by their frequent lapses and their inveterate attachment to idolatry.

“Do ye thus requite the Lord, O foolish people and unwise? Is not He thy father that hath bought thee? Hath He not made thee and established thee? — is not he thy Father, that hath bought thee? thus the Father is also the Rock; verse 4 above;

Remember the days of old; consider the years of many generations. Ask thy father, and he will show thee, thy elders, and they will tell thee. — the days of old, that is, the history and events of ancient days or former ages, and thou wilt find that I had a respect unto thee, not only in Abraham’s time, but long before it and also long after;

When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. — as the chosen people of God, the sons of Jacob were to be his messengers to the nations, the Gentiles; the LXX translate the latter half of Deuteronomy 32:8, “He set the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the angels of God”

— and here from the Targum of Jonathan in archaic English; “when by lot the Most High divided the world to the people that sprung from the sons of Noah:”

When the Most High made allotment of the world unto the nations which proceeded from the sons of Noach, in the separation of the writings and languages of the children of men at the time of the division, He cast the lot among the seventy angels, the princes of the nations with whom is the revelation to oversee the city, even at that time He established the limits of the nations according to the sum of the number of the seventy souls of Israel who went down into Mizraim.

For the Lord’S portion is His people; Jacob is the lot of His inheritance. — the Lord’s portion is his people.’  Jacob is the lot of his inheritance; because they were his part, his portion, his inheritance, which he chose by lot for himself

— and from the Message Bible

When the High God gave the nations their stake,
    gave them their place on Earth,
He put each of the peoples within boundaries
    under the care of divine guardians.
But God himself took charge of his people,
    took Jacob on as his personal concern. The Message Bible Deuteronomy 32:8-9

10 “He found him in a desert land and in the waste howling wilderness; He led him about, He instructed him, He kept him as the apple of His eye. — he found him in a desert land; not by chance, but as it were looking out and seeking for him; he did, indeed, manifest himself to Israel in Egypt;

— as men use to keep the apple of their eye, that is, with singular care and diligence, this being, as a most tender, so a most useful part. What a striking idea does this give us of the care which God took of Israel.

11 As an eagle stirreth up her nest, fluttereth over her young, spreadeth abroad her wings, taketh them, beareth them on her wings, — the eagle is observed by scientists to have a most tender affection to her young, and therefore the care of God over Israel is here well illustrated thereby.

12 so the Lord alone did lead him, and there was no strange god with him. — there was no strange god with him; no idolatry among them then;

— it signifies that the Lord alone was the leader of his people, and he had no assistant in that work, and therefore all the glory should be given to him: he is the leader of his people.

13 He made him ride on the high places of the earth, that he might eat the increase of the fields; and He made him to suck honey out of the rock, and oil out of the flinty rock; — he made him ride on the high places; to conquer their strongest holds on the mountains, and their cities fenced with walls of the greatest height and strength;

— oil out of the flinty rocks; olive-trees growing and bearing fruit best in rocky or hilly places. The expressions are proverbial, and denote a most fertile land;

14 butter of cows and milk of sheep, with fat of lambs and rams of the breed of Bashan, and goats, with the fat of kidneys of wheat; and thou didst drink the pure blood of the grape. — the pure blood of the grape; this metaphor, as well as the preceding, is very elegant and natural, on account of the great resemblance between red wine and blood;

15 “But Jeshurun waxed fat and kicked; thou hast waxed fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered with fatness. Then he forsook God who made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation.

— then he forsook God which made him; the worship of God, as the Targum of Jonathan says, giving into idolatry in times past; and the written word of God, by giving heed to neighbouring traditions of surrounding nations;

16 They provoked Him to jealousy with strange gods; with abominations provoked they Him to anger. — they provoked him to jealousy with strange gods; they sacrificed to devils, which were not-God; to gods whom they knew not, to new ones that had lately come up, whom their fathers knew not;

17 They sacrificed unto devils, not to God, to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not. — the devils; render unto idols or destroyers;

— whom your fathers feared not; paid no regard unto, put no trust or confidence in; or, as the Targum of Jonathan, “with whom your fathers had nothing to do.”

18 Of the Rock that begot thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee. — that begat thee, that is, who hath adopted you to be his people, and hath showed as much care and kindness to you as if he had begotten you.

19 “And when the Lord saw it, He abhorred them, because of the provoking of His sons and of His daughters. — when the Lord saw how they had departed from him to serve idols, he abhorred (rather, spurned or rejected) them in consequence of the provocation which their unworthy conduct israel had given to him;

20 And He said: ‘I will hide My face from them, I will see what their end shall be; for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith. — and he said, I will hide my face from them; to withdraw his favour and see what their end would be;

— I will see what their end will be; I will make them and others see what the fruit of such actions shall be; that their apostasy would bring nothing but evil and destruction;

21 They have moved Me to jealousy with that which is not God; they have provoked Me to anger with their vanities. And I will move them to jealousy with those who are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation. — they have provoked me to anger with their vanities; by vanities are meant the fictitious deities of the nations with whose worship the Israelites corrupted themselves;

22 For a fire is kindled in Mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains. — and set on fire the foundations of the mountains; that is, subvert their strongest fortresses, yea, Jerusalem itself, now London, Paris and Washington DC; founded on the holy mountains, which was perfectly fulfilled in its destruction, first, by Titus.

23 “‘I will heap mischiefs upon them; I will spend Mine arrows upon them. — I will heap mischief upon them; I will send them one calamity upon another;

— I will spend mine arrows upon them; even empty my quiver, and send upon them all my plagues, which, like arrows (or missiles these days) shot by a skilful and strong hand, shall speedily reach, and certainly hit and mortally wound them.

24 They shall be burned with hunger, and devoured with burning heat and with bitter destruction; I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them, with the poison of serpents of the dust. — burned with hunger; from War, famine, pestilence; burning heat; with burning fevers, or carbuncles or other inflaming distempers;

— poison of serpents of the dust; could not escape falling into the hands of wild beasts, and of meeting with poisonous serpents that go upon their bellies, and feed on the dust of the earth;

25 The sword without and terror within shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of gray hairs. — these are accompanied by the evils of war, which sweeps away the men outside in the slaughter itself by the sword, and the defenceless; all inclusive, the youths and maidens, sucklings and old men;

26 I said I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men, — I would scatter them into corners, or rather, I would utterly disperse them to the end of the world,;

— I would make the remembrance of them cease from among men; as of the Amalekites, Moabites, Midianites, Edomites, Chaldeans, and others, whose names as well as nations are no more;

27 were it not that I feared the wrath of the enemy, lest their adversaries should behave themselves strangely, and lest they should say, “Our hand is high; and the Lord hath not done all this.”’ — the wrath of the enemy, that is their rage against me; their insolent and furious reproaches against my name, as if I were unnatural and cruel to my people, or unable to deliver them;

— and from MSG

I could have said, “I’ll hack them to pieces,
    wipe out all trace of them from the Earth,”
Except that I feared the enemy would grab the chance
    to take credit for all of it,
Crowing, “Look what we did!
    God had nothing to do with this.” Deuteronomy 32:26-27 MSG

28 “For they are a nation void of counsel, neither is there any understanding in them. — for they are a nation void of counsel; instances of their ingratitude, folly, and for lack of counsel and understanding;

29 O that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would consider their latter end! — Moses, under a spirit of prophecy, foresees the ignorance and stupidity of the Israelites in the latter days;

— that they would consider their latter end; either the latter days of this age; had they wisdom, they would understand and observe that the displeasure of God against them, and their destruction among the nations.

30 How should one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight, unless their Rock had sold them, and the Lord had shut them up?

— except their rock had sold them, and the Lord had shut them up; that is, unless the Lord, who was their rock and fortress, and in whom they should have trusted as such, had forsaken them, and given them up into their enemies’ hands;

— if Israel were wise, they could easily overcome all their foes through the help of the Almighty (Leviticus 26:8); but having forsaken him, they were left by him, and so came under the power of the enemy.

31 For their rock is not as our Rock, even our enemies themselves being judges. — for their rock is not as our rock; that is, the gods of the heathens, the rock in which they trusted, are not like the God of Israel.

32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom and of the fields of Gomorrah; their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter. — Sodom and Gomorrah; here, as elsewhere, and often in the prophets, emblems of utter depravity and destruction; as the cities whose destruction for their wickedness was proverbial doomed.

33 Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps. —their wine is the poison of dragons; of these creatures, both land and sea dragons;

— and from MSG

They are a nation of idiots,
    they don’t know enough to come in out of the rain.
If they had any sense at all, they’d know this;
    they would see what’s coming down the road.
How could one soldier chase a thousand enemies off,
    or two men run off two thousand,
Unless their Rock had sold them,
    unless God had given them away?
For their rock is nothing compared to our Rock;
    even our enemies say that.
They’re a vine that comes right out of Sodom,
    who they are is rooted in Gomorrah;
Their grapes are poison grapes,
    their grape-clusters bitter.
Their wine is rattlesnake venom,
    mixed with lethal cobra poison. Deuteronomy 32:28-33 MSG

34 “‘Is not this laid up in store with Me, and sealed up among My treasures? — is not this laid up? “This” is generally taken to refer to what follows, but it is not clear. It may refer to the fact that “He looked for grapes, but the vine brought forth wild grapes” Isaiah 5:2

35 To Me belongeth vengeance and recompense; their foot shall slide in due time; for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste.’ — a prophecy: their foot shall slide in due time; though not so soon as some may expect it, yet in at a latter time when it shall be most proper and seasonable, when they have filled up the measure of their sins.

36 “For the Lord shall judge His people and repent for His servants, when He seeth that their power is gone and there is none shut up or left. — for the Lord shall judge his people; his chosen and covenant people;

— and there is none shut up or left; a phrase used to express the miserable state and condition of a people, when none are left, but all are carried off, or cut off, and destroyed, and there is none to help them;

37 And He shall say: ’Where are their gods, their rock in whom they trusted, — he shall ask: the Lord, before he deliver his people, will first convince them of their former folly in forsaking him and following idols; he will find an occasion from that miserable and hopeless condition into which their idols have brought them, to upbraid them with it;

38 which ate the fat of their sacrifices and drank the wine of their drink offerings? Let them rise up and help you, and be your protection. — let them rise up and help you; their gods whom Israel had adopted from the Gentiles, upon whom judgment had fallen.

39 “‘See now that I, even I, am He, and there is no god besides Me. I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal; neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand. — the repetition of “I” is emphatic: “I, even I, am He, I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal” is expressive of his existence, eternity, immutability, and sovereignty;

40 For I lift up My hand to heaven and say: I live for ever. — for I lift up my hand; this is the form in taking an oath;

41 If I whet My glittering sword and Mine hand take hold on judgment, I will render vengeance to Mine enemies and will reward them that hate Me. — as to say, “As I live forever, if I whet my lightning sword, and my hand take hold on judgment, I will render vengeance to mine enemies, and repay them that hate me.”

42 I will make Mine arrows drunk with blood, and My sword shall devour flesh, and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives, from the beginning of revenges upon the enemy.’ — I will make mine arrows drunk with blood; signifying, that by various judgments he would bring upon them, which, like arrows, would come suddenly, fly swiftly, and pierce deeply, there would be a prodigious effusion of blood;

— and that with the blood of the slain, and of the captives; that is, his arrows should be drunk not only with the blood of these that were wounded and killed, but of the captives; who commonly are spared, but in this case should not, their blood should be shed;

43 “Rejoice, O ye nations, with His people; for He will avenge the blood of His servants, and will render vengeance to His adversaries, and will be merciful unto His land and to His people.” — rejoice, O ye nations, with his people; or, “rejoice, ye nations” who are “his” people; the Gentiles, who are the Lord’s chosen and covenant people, redeemed and called;

44 And Moses came and spoke all the words of this song in the ears of the people, he and Joshua the son of Nun. — Joshua, who is here joined with Moses in this action, because though Moses only spake the words, yet Joshua consented to them; and, it may be, afterwards repeated them;

45 And Moses made an end of speaking all these words to all Israel, — such rehearsal, once more impressed upon the hearts of the people the importance of observing all the commandments of God;

46 and he said unto them: “Set your hearts unto all the words which I testify among you this day, which ye shall command your children to observe to do, all the words of this law. — which ye shall command; or rather, that ye may command your children to observe to do all the words of this law.

47 For it is not a vain thing for you, because it is your life; and through this thing ye shall prolong your days in the land whither ye go over the Jordan to possess it.” — for it is not a vain thing for you; not too light a thing for you, not unworthy of your attention;

— the law was no light and trifling matter, because it is your life, but of great importance and consequence, obedience to it being attended with rewards, and disobedience with punishment;

48 And the Lord spoke unto Moses that selfsame day, saying, — the selfsame day; on which he finished the reading of the law, and the above song, which was the seventh of Adar (twelveth month) around February; according to the Targum of Jonathan, the day he died on;

49 “Get thee up into this mountain Abarim, unto Mount Nebo, which is in the land of Moab that is opposite Jericho, and behold the land of Canaan, which I give unto the children of Israel for a possession. — unto Mount Nebo; where Moses was to die; which is in the land of Moab; it formerly belonged to it, but was taken from the Moabites by Sihon, and now possessed by Israel;

50 And die on the mount whither thou goest up, and be gathered unto thy people, as Aaron thy brother died on Mount Hor and was gathered unto his people, — as Aaron thy brother died in Mount Hor, and was gathered unto his people; of which Moses was an eyewitness; and which is observed, because there was a great likeness in their death;

51 because ye trespassed against Me among the children of Israel at the waters of Meribah-Kadesh in the Wilderness of Zin, because ye sanctified Me not in the midst of the children of Israel. — because ye trespassed; God reminds him of the sin he had committed long before, and this Moses records as an acknowledgment, made at his death, of God’s justice, and a warning to all people not to distrust or disobey the voice of God.

52 Yet thou shalt see the land before thee, but thou shalt not go thither unto the land which I give the children of Israel.” — but thou shalt not go thither unto the land which I give the children of Israel; the land of Canaan was a gift of God to Israel.

Venezuelan gang infiltrating the United States

•June 14, 2024 • Leave a Comment

This is the dangerous Venezuelan gang infiltrating the US that you probably know nothing about but should

CNN • June 9, 2024 // NEWS4SA

An alleged multistate human trafficking ring forcing immigrant women into prostitution. The mysterious killing of a former police officer in South Florida. Attacks against police officers in New York. The arrest of a drug dealer in Chicago.

Local and federal officials say these apparently unrelated crimes have a common denominator: Tren de Aragua, a transnational criminal gang that originated in a Venezuela prison and has slowly made its way south and north in recent years. They say it’s now operating in the United States. The scale of its operations is unknown, but crimes attributed to alleged members of the gang have worried elected officials and some Republican members of Congress have asked the Biden administration “to formally designate the vicious Tren de Aragua as a Transnational Criminal Organization.”

For several years, the criminal group has terrorized South American countries, including Venezuela, its country of origin, as well as Bolivia, Colombia, Chile and Peru. Retired general Óscar Naranjo, a former vice president of Colombia and chief of the Colombian National Police, told CNN Tren de Aragua is “the most disruptive criminal organization operating nowadays in Latin America, a true challenge for the region.”

‘Watch out for this gang’

Tren de Aragua adopted its name between 2013 and 2015 but begun operations years before, according to a report by Transparency Venezuela. “It has its origin in the unions of workers who worked on the construction of a railway project that would connect the center-west of the country and that was never completed” in both Aragua and Carabobo states.

The group’s leadership, according to the report, operated out of the notorious Tocorón prison, which they controlled. When Venezuelan officials raided it last September, they found a swimming pool and several restaurants inside the prison walls, in addition to weapons seized from inmates, including automatic rifles, machine guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

A view of a gate of the Tocorón prison in Tocorón, Aragua state, Venezuela

By 2015, a former Venezuelan law enforcement official told CNN, “They were already in their prime.” That year they forged an alliance with Primeiro Comando da Capital, a Brazilian criminal organization. It was only a matter of time before they would extend their tentacles throughout South America.

In Colombia, Tren de Aragua, and a rival guerrilla group known as the National Liberation Army, “operate sex trafficking networks in the border town of Villa del Rosario in the Norte de Santander department. These groups exploit Venezuelan migrants and internally displaced Colombians in sex trafficking and take advantage of economic vulnerabilities and subject them to debt bondage,” according to the US State Department 2023 Trafficking in Persons Report about Colombia. Police in the region say the organization has victimized thousands through extorsion, drug and human trafficking, kidnapping and murder.

Now, US Customs and Border Protection and the FBI say the gang is established in the US.

“They have followed the migration paths across South America to other countries and have set up criminal groups throughout South America as they follow those paths, and that they appear to follow the migration north to the United States,” Britton Boyd, an FBI special agent in El Paso, Texas, told CNN said.

US Border Patrol chief Jason Owens, who has confirmed multiple arrests at the southern border of alleged Tren de Aragua members over the last year, issued a warning in early April. “Watch out for this gang. It is the most powerful in Venezuela, known for murder, drug trafficking, sex crimes, extortion, & other violent acts,” Owens said on X.

There are more than 70 cases in which Tren de Aragua is mentioned in law enforcement documents or prosecutors’ complaints. From that total, the Customs and Border Patrol in Texas has identified 58 as gang members between the fiscal year 2023 and last May. The rest appear in complaints made by victims or arrest reports that point to the possible involvement of the suspects with this organized crime group.

Venezuelan gang infiltrating the United States

‘If left unchecked’

In New York, police say Bernardo Raul Castro-Mata, a 19-year-old from Venezuela, shot two police officers last week. Castro-Mata entered the country illegally last July, a member of Immigration and Customs Enforcement told CNN. The Venezuelan has tattoos associated with Tren de Aragua – which court documents for a suspected gang member in Georgia describe as five-pointed crowns, five-pointed stars and teardrops – the New York Police Department told CNN. Castro-Mata had no prior arrests but is a suspect in several robberies in Queens.

Castro-Mata remains in custody and has pleaded not guilty to charges. When contacted by CNN, his attorneys declined to comment.

But of all the crimes attributed to the gang, including the kidnapping and murder of a former Venezuelan police officer in South Florida in November 2023, one stands out. In late April, the East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Department received a 911 call from a Spanish-speaking woman saying she was being held against her will at a residence and “forced to have sexual intercourse with unknown males for money.” The woman later told investigators that she was forced to have sex with strangers “to pay off a $30,000 USD debt to a trafficker for bringing her to the United States.”

Officials arrested two suspects – both Venezuelan nationals – at the location, Allbert Herrera Machado, 23, and Osleidy Vanesa Chourio-Diaz, 26. Agents later arrested another Venezuelan, Josmar Jesus Zambrano-Chirinos, 23, identified in the complaint as a leader of the sex trafficking operation being conducted by the Tren de Aragua in the US. Zambrano was “operating ‘stash houses’ used for human trafficking in Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, New Jersey, and Florida,” according to the criminal complaint reviewed by CNN. Herrera Machado and Chourio-Diaz were not linked to Tren de Aragua in the complaint.

If the allegations against the suspects are true, it would mean that the gang already has the ability to operate trafficking rings in the US the same way it has done in several South American countries. The challenge for law enforcement officials is that it’s very difficult to know how many members of Tren de Aragua are already in the country, in spite of the arrests. What some Venezuelan immigrants in Florida and other states have told CNN is that they are already beginning to see in their communities the same type of criminal activity they fled from in Venezuela.

Álvaro Boza, a former Venezuelan police officer now living in Florida, says he fled his country in large part because the gang had become so powerful. He says they could kill law enforcement like him with impunity. A fellow police officer who refused to cooperate with the gang in his native Aragua state was shot 50 times, Boza says. “He refused and was murdered. They tied his body to a motorcycle and dragged it throughout the San Vicente neighborhood to demonstrate the power of the Tren de Aragua,” Boza said.

In March, a group of Republican members of Congress led by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and his fellow Republican Representative Ana María Salazar sent a letter to President Joe Biden urging him to take action by designating the gang as a “transnational criminal organization.”

In the letter, the legislators said “If left unchecked, they will unleash an unprecedented reign of terror, mirroring the devastation it has already inflicted in communities throughout Central and South America, most prominently in Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, and Peru.”

For more about the South, a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

For more into another Captivity: see Ezekiel Timeline – 190/40 Years

Mexico’s drug cartels are thriving

•June 13, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Mexico’s drug cartels are thriving as the outgoing president said he would tackle gangs with ‘hugs not bullets.’ Five years on, violence is worse than ever

The Express • June 8, 2024 // Financial Times

Mexico attracts millions of visitors a year, despite its reputation for violence and drug cartels. Some 66 million people headed to the Central American country last year, most making their way to one of the beach resorts in Quintana Roo state.

But behind the scenic front, a different picture emerges.

When a group of strangers turned up uninvited at a Christmas party in a bucolic colonial-era courtyard in Salvatierra, central Mexico, last year, the assembled revellers asked them to leave.

Shortly afterwards, as the young partygoers danced to live music, the gatecrashers returned with armed gunmen and the order: “Kill them all.” Using automatic weapons, the assassins sprayed the revellers with 195 bullets as they attempted to flee, according to investigators. Eleven dead bodies were recovered from the bloodstained courtyard and 14 people were injured.

Even in a country weary of extreme violence, the massacre of unarmed partygoers in Guanajuato state had the power to shock. Despite national outrage, it took two months for the authorities to arrest anyone. When they did, they detained two people accused of firing the shots but not those who ordered the killing.

Organised crime and violence are hardly new to Mexico. The country’s first cocaine cartel formed in the early 1980s. A quarter of a century later, conservative President Felipe Calderón launched an all-out “war on drugs,” plunging the country into a bloodbath.

But Mexico’s organised crime problem has worsened dramatically during the five and a half years of populist leftwinger Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s presidency, security experts say, and has become so serious that it threatens the country’s future. Polls show that security is a top voter concern ahead of the presidential election on June 2.

For more than a decade, the dominant drug groups have been fragmenting, generating a host of smaller splinter gangs who fight over turf. Today, the two largest and most powerful cartels, the Sinaloa cartel and the Jalisco New Generation cartel (CJNG), are jostling with smaller rivals such as the Viagras, the Squirrels and the Scorpions.

Many of the cartels have expanded into lucrative new businesses. In a 2024 report, the US Drug Enforcement Administration called the Sinaloa and Jalisco cartels “transnational criminal organisations” because they are “involved in arms trafficking, money laundering, migrant smuggling, sex trafficking, bribery, extortion, and a host of other crimes.” The cartels control more territory than ever before, about a third of the country according to one estimate from the US military.

“There’s been an exponential deterioration,” says Manuel Clouthier, a former state deputy and businessman in the northwestern state of Sinaloa, which is home to the eponymous drug cartel. “Mexico is becoming a failed state.”

As the cartels’ economic power has grown, so has their international reach. Mexico’s two top cartels now run a network of illegal activities stretching across South America that is challenging governments and alarming citizens. Battles between local affiliates of the CJNG and the Sinaloa cartel have turned previously peaceful Ecuador into one of the world’s most violent countries.

The cartels source chemicals needed to make synthetic drugs such as fentanyl from China and India and have strong connections to European mafia such as the Italian ’Ndrangheta, investigators say. Anne Milgram, head of the DEA, told a US Senate committee in February last year that “the Jalisco cartel has influence through associates, facilitators and brokers on every continent except Antarctica.”

In the US, Mexico’s deteriorating security and flourishing drug trade have become an election issue, with Republicans calling for a tougher line. Some in the party have gone as far as calling for US military forces to nab cartel leaders in Osama bin Laden-style commando operations.

While official statistics on crimes such as murder are questioned by independent researchers, experts agree that the power of organised crime now represents a serious risk not only to the population but to business and the economy. It is one of the reasons, experts say, why the country is failing to capitalise fully on its potential to draw manufacturing away from China.

A Mexican business leader, speaking off the record because of the sensitivity of the subject, says security has deteriorated dramatically under López Obrador and that the government has played down the problem. “Nobody is talking about drug trafficking or fuel theft,” he says.

The president has painted a picture of an administration doing all it can to tackle the problem, while blaming his predecessors for creating it. He has so far avoided paying a serious political price for the deterioration. His approval rating remains at 65 per cent, according to poll aggregator Oraculus, and has barely changed in the past three years.“

The [government has] been above all trying to control the narrative,” says Falko Ernst, senior Mexico analyst at Crisis Group. “Security policy has been watered down to a PR exercise for electoral purposes.”

In reality, he adds, López Obrador’s policies have allowed criminals to continue “getting a much stronger, much more direct and much more aggressive foothold within institutions.”

Officially, security is a top priority for López Obrador. Each weekday at 6am the president chairs a security cabinet with military and police chiefs and key ministers. Twice a month his security team presents a “zero impunity” report with a blizzard of statistics covering everything from arrests to the exact number of security forces and vehicles deployed.

“Nowhere in the world is there a security cabinet where the [president] heads up daily tasks,” said Rosa Icela Rodríguez Velázquez, Mexico’s security minister, at the April 30 security briefing. Since taking office, she added, the president had presided over 1,353 security council meetings and not missed a single one.

At the start of his administration, López Obrador set out a new strategy which he called “hugs not bullets.” The idea was to tackle the root causes of crime, replace the federal police force with a new military-run National Guard and to minimise bloodshed by avoiding direct confrontation with the cartels. Instead, he appealed to cartel members to “think of their mothers.”

López Obrador intended his more peaceful approach as an alternative to Calderón’s 2006-2012 “war” and to his immediate predecessor Enrique Peña Nieto’s strategy, which had failed to contain rising murder rates.

College students enjoy spring break parties in Cancun

But the president drew fierce criticism for greeting personally the mother of jailed Sinaloa cartel boss Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán in 2020 — something he said was a humanitarian gesture towards a woman then in her nineties.

Eduardo Guerrero, a security expert at Lantia Consultores, says López Obrador’s policy of hugs not bullets “had the . . . undesired effect of expanding the geographical presence of organised crime to new areas, precisely because the army wasn’t confronting criminals.”

Criminal groups are also interfering more brazenly in elections. This year’s campaign, which includes races for federal and state congresses, governorships and mayoralties, has been the deadliest ever. So far 36 candidates and another 45 people linked to the election have been murdered, 15 more kidnapped and dozens of others threatened, according to think-tank Laboratorio Electoral.

Another key battleground is official statistics. López Obrador’s six-year term will be Mexico’s most violent ever in terms of total murders, with more than 175,000 killed so far. But the president has seized on figures showing a small reduction in homicides in the last three years from a record level in 2020.

Experts point out that the murder figures do not include the record number of people reported as missing, almost 115,000 by last year, 43,000 of whom disappeared during López Obrador’s presidency. They also note that the proportion of “crimes against life” reported as manslaughter or “other crimes” has been rising as murders fall, suggesting homicides are being reclassified.

At the start of López Obrador’s presidency in 2018, 57 per cent of Mexico’s violent deaths were marked as homicides. By the first four months of 2023, murders had fallen to 46 per cent of the total, according to analysis of the data by Nexos.

“The figures aren’t totally reliable. Nobody audits the figures,” says Edna Jaime, dean of the school of social sciences and government at the Tecnológico de Monterrey. “Past administrations did try to improve the quality of the information . . . that was all abandoned in this administration.”

Police and doctors conducting autopsies are sometimes under pressure, critics say, to avoid reporting the cause of death on certificates as murder. “If it’s not a homicide, it’s less paperwork,” says Ernst of Crisis Group. “Basically, like, 10 bullet holes and it’s going to be ‘heart failure’.”

At the same time municipal police in many parts of Mexico are on the payroll of or forced to work for cartels, security experts say.

A Mexican soldier on beach patrol

Claudia Sheinbaum

López Obrador’s chosen successor, ruling party Morena’s candidate Claudia Sheinbaum, experienced Mexico’s security problems first hand last month when a group of hooded men halted her convoy in the municipality of Motozintla in southern Chiapas state.

The men, who were unarmed, demanded she not forget the area when in power. Rival drug cartels are battling for turf in Chiapas but López Obrador dismissed the interception as “staged” by media critical of the government and Sheinbaum has alluded to something similar, saying the encounter was “strange.”

If elected, Sheinbaum would broadly continue López Obrador’s strategy of avoiding direct confrontation with the cartels, while incorporating elements of the strategy she employed as mayor of Mexico City, running programmes for youths to keep them off the streets and boosting investigative capability. She will continue López Obrador’s policy of relying on a military-run National Guard.

“Every year we are going to reduce crime,” she says. “We can’t give percentages over the next six years . . . [but] we are sure that this strategy is going to work.”

Many analysts are not convinced, pointing out that Sheinbaum’s academic background and upbringing in a middle-class Mexico City suburb have not prepared her to deal with brutal cartel wars.

“She still has to prove that she understands how fragile the situation is,” says Salvador Camarena, a columnist with El Financiero newspaper. “Her tours of the country have been inside a [security] bubble. I don’t think they’ve allowed her to go into the complexity of what Mexicans face.”

Sheinbaum rejects the criticism, telling the Financial Times that past wars on drugs fought in Mexico “mean a licence for the armed forces and other law and order forces in our country to kill, and we don’t believe in a licence to kill, we believe in justice.”

Xóchitl Gálvez, the main opposition candidate in next month’s election, has quoted the US military estimate that about a third of Mexico’s territory is under the control of organised crime and pledged to confront cartels head-on. “There are areas of the country where only criminals can enter and that has to stop,” she told reporters.

The two candidates clashed over security in a debate on May 19. Sheinbaum criticised the war on drugs as “one of the most terrible decisions” in recent Mexican history and defended the security record of her mentor, while Gálvez said the government’s strategy was to “give the country to organised crime.”

The situation in some areas is so bad that citizens have taken matters into their own hands.

In January, a video shared on social media showed a group of masked women from the Wixárika ethnic group in Jalisco state appealing directly to one of the country’s most powerful cartel bosses, CJNG leader “El Mencho”, for protection, rather than going to the police.

In the strife-torn Pacific coast state of Guerrero, four Catholic bishops sat down with drug cartel leaders in February without the government to negotiate a carve-up of territory with the aim of reducing violence. Salvador Rangel, an emeritus bishop, told local media that the church acted because “the state government doesn’t want to find a solution.”

Given how bad the situation has become, many question whether Mexico’s next leader will be able to make much of a difference.

The next president “will have to start from below zero,” says Guillermo Valdés, the former head of intelligence agency Cisen under Calderón. “Criminals are more powerful, there is more violence, there is more political control of territory and of the authorities . . . the task will be tremendous.”

The Talmud: true or fake?

•June 12, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The Talmud is a collection of writings that covers the full aspect of Jewish law and tradition, compiled and edited between the third and sixth centuries; it  is the body of Jewish civil and ceremonial law and teachings comprising the Mishnah and the Gemara. There are two versions of the Talmud: the Babylonian Talmud (which dates from the 5th century AD but includes earlier material) and the earlier Palestinian or Jerusalem Talmud.

The Talmud is the learning of men, even the learnings of Rabbis, not directly the Word of God. If their learning is in line or coincide with the Word of God, then it could enlighten our understanding. But sometimes, their learnings could veer wide off the Word of God, unfortunately, then they should be avoided.

One example worth studying from Sanhedrin, the Talmud:

And Rabbi Yoḥanan says: A Gentile who engages in Torah study is liable to receive the death penalty; as it is stated: “Moses commanded us a law [torah], an inheritance of the congregation of Jacob” (Deu 33:4), indicating that it is an inheritance for us, and not for them. Sanhedrin 59a

To Rabbi Yoḥanan God want the children of Israel to study the Torah, which is true, but he doesn’t want Gentiles to study and know the Scriptures; which is untrue, for God want “all people, nations, and languages should serve Him:” How could one serve God without an understanding of serving Him?

“And to Him was given dominion,
Glory and a kingdom,
That all the peoples, nations and men of every language
Might serve Him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion
Which will not pass away;
And His kingdom is one
Which will not be destroyed. Daniel 7:14

How could people of the nations serve God if Gentiles couldn’t or not allowed to study his Word? Or how could a Gentile know God if they are not allowed to study the Scriptures?

“And the nations shall know that I, the Lord, do sanctify Israel, when My sanctuary shall be in the midst of them for evermore.’” Ezekiel 37:28

“Gather the people together — men, and women, and children, and thy stranger who is within thy gates — that they may hear, and that they may learn, and fear the Lord your God, and observe to do all the words of this law,” Deuteronomy 31:12

— thy stranger who is within thy gates; these strangers aren’t from the children of Jacob; they should also hear, see, learn and fear the Lord; but there are others that remain blind and unrepentent; these are the Gentiles, especially, First, from those of Psalm 83, and, Second, from those of “Gog and Magog;” they are deemed for destruction.

From these angles, an overzealous Rabbi Yoḥanan certainly had gone too far and subjected himself to adding the Word of God and teaching falsehood.

However, from another angle, Rabbi Yoḥanan has some truth if any Gentile teaches any concept that deviated from the Scriptures. For example, where “ben ha arbayim” had been defined by the Orthodoxy as “after noon . . . til nightfall” and then the Gentile come alone to redefine it as “between sundown and dark,” then this Gentile has taught heresy; such crime is very serious, and is worthy of a death sentence.

Putin to arm West’s enemies with long-range missiles

•June 12, 2024 • Leave a Comment

In response to the West’s long-range Ukraine strikes into Russia, Putin says he would arm West’s enemies from around the world with long-range missiles.

Imagine the Houthis has long range Russian missiles that could strike any ship or carrier in the Red Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabian Sea and even those in the Indian Ocean.

Round 2: Russia may arm other enemies of the West; militias from Syria, Iraq, Libya, and cartels in Mexico, all with long-range supersonic or even hypersonic missiles.

RT News • June 5, 2024 // POLITICO

Moscow is considering arming adversaries of West in “sensitive” areas. This threatened tit-for-tat comes as Russia is expected to deploy warships and aircraft in the Caribbean.

Several countries that have provided long-range weapons to Ukraine, including the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany, have given Kyiv permission to use them to attack targets across Russia’s border in recent weeks

Russia is considering “asymmetric” measures against Kiev’s sponsors due to Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied weapons against its territory, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said. 

The Russian leader’s remarks came at a meeting with heads of international news agencies on Wednesday, on the sidelines of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF).

“We have no illusions in this regard,” Putin added, repeating his prior comments that Ukrainian troops might be pulling the trigger but the US and its allies are providing the intelligence and targeting information.

Russia will respond by boosting air defenses and destroying these missiles, Putin said. 

“Secondly, if someone deems it possible to supply such weapons to the war zone, to strike our territory… why shouldn’t we supply similar weapons to those regions of the world, where they will be used against sensitive sites of these countries?” the Russian president added. “We can respond asymmetrically. We will give it a thought.”

If the West continues to escalate, such actions “will completely destroy international relations and undermine international security,” Putin noted.

“If we see that these countries are being drawn into a war against us, and this is their direct participation in the war against Russia, then we reserve the right to act in a similar way. This is a recipe for very serious problems,” he warned.

The Russian president also brought up the fact that some military instructors and advisers from NATO countries have already been deployed to Ukraine, and that a number of them were killed in Russian strikes. 

French instructors are already in Ukraine – French colonel; Russian hypersonic Mach10 missile instructors will ask the Houthis “Would you like us to help you?”

The US and its allies have insisted that providing weapons and equipment to Ukraine does not make them party to the conflict with Russia, and maintained certain restrictions on their use to preserve that perception.

Last month, however, as Russian troops began advancing towards Kharkov, Ukraine began to demand the relaxation of those rules. A British-led pressure campaign eventually resulted in Washington complying with Kiev’s wishes.

Rare Earth Reserves: Top 8 Countries

•June 11, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Rare Earths Reserves: Top 8 Countries; but for top production, see Rare Earth Production: Top 5 Countries

“Going Critical” In 1993, 38 percent of world production of REEs was in China, 33 percent was in the United States, 12 percent was in Australia, and five percent each was in Malaysia and India. Several other countries, including Brazil, Canada, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, made up the remainder.

However, in 2008, China accounted for more than 90 percent of world production of REEs, and by 2011, China accounted for 97 percent of world production. Beginning in 1990 and beyond, supplies of REEs became an issue as the Government of China began to change the amount of the REEs that it allows to be produced and exported.

The Chinese Government also began to limit the number of Chinese and Sino-foreign joint-venture companies that could export REEs from China.” US Geological Survey news release “Going Critical”

VINACHEM • August 13, 2023 // INN Investing News Network (Updated 2024)

The outlook for rare earths is supported by strong supply and demand fundamentals as the world heads into a new economic era with a focus on clean energy and technological advancements.

But with supply chain worries rising, it’s worth looking at which countries have the highest rare earths reserves. While in many cases the world’s major rare earths producers have large reserves, some countries have low rare earths output and high reserves.

Total rare earth reserves 122 MT, of which China has 44 MT; about 40% of world’s total

Case in point — mines in Brazil produced only 80 metric tons (MT) of rare earth elements in 2022, but the nation’s reserves are tied for third highest in the world. It’s possible that countries like this could become bigger players in the space in the future.

On that note, here’s an overview of rare earths reserves by country, with a focus on the eight countries whose reserves are over 1 million MT. Data is taken from the US Geological Survey’s latest report on rare earths.

1. China
Reserves: 44 million MT

(Global Times reports another 1.15 million MT middle and heavy rare-earth deposit “for electric vehicles, renewable energy, national defense security, and are key metals for the development of high-tech industries” in Yunnan; also by China Daily of “critical rare earth elements such as praseodymium, neodymium, dysprosium and terbium exceed 470,000 tons”)

Unsurprisingly, China has the highest reserves of rare earth minerals at 44 million MT. The country was also the world’s leading rare earths producer in 2022 by a long shot, putting out 210,000 MT.

Despite its top position, China remains focused on ensuring that its reserves remain elevated. Back in 2012, the Asian nation declared that its rare earths reserves were declining; it then announced in 2016 that it would raise domestic reserves by establishing both commercial and national stockpiles.

Bayan Obo “light rare-earth” Mining District in Inner Mongolia, China

The last decade has also seen the country hone in on illicit rare earths mining, taking steps such as shutting illegal or environmentally non-compliant rare earths mines and limiting production and exports. China’s stern measures have cleaned up its supply chain significantly, although it continues to improve regulation and supervision.

China’s dominance in both rare earth elements production and reserves has caused problems in the past. Rare earths prices surged when the country cut exports in 2010, resulting in a rush to secure supply of the minerals elsewhere.

Correction by USC to these research articles by VINACHEM and INN Investing News Network No 2. should go to Mongolia: According to a 2009 survey by US government geologists, there are 31m tonnes (claimed to have 275m tonnes in the documentary below) of rare earth resources in Mongolia, which is equal to 16.8% of known reserves worldwide and makes Mongolia the second-biggest source globally after China.

2. Vietnam
Reserves: 22 million MT

Vietnam’s rare earths reserves stand at 22 million MT. It reportedly hosts several deposits with concentrations against its northwestern border with China and along its eastern coastline. The majority of rare earths in the country can be found in primary ore deposits, with a smaller amount located in coastal placer deposits.

Vietnam’s rare earths production was minuscule in 2021 at 400 MT, but it went up significantly in 2022 to reach 4,300 MT. Vietnam is interested in building its clean energy capacity, and is working to produce more rare earths for that reason.

In December 2022, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade signed an agreement with South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy to increase cooperation on rare earths and other core minerals, and help strengthen the global rare earths supply chain. Canada’s Saskatchewan province has also been in talks with the country, sending a trade mission in December 2022 to look for opportunities to collaborate on “green energy, sustainable mining, and rare earths.”

3. Brazil
Reserves: 21 million MT

Although Brazil has the third largest rare earths reserves globally, the latin nation was not a major producer of rare earths in 2023, with production flat at a tiny 80 MT on par with the previous year and even lower than its 2021 total of 500 MT.

However, that will soon be changing as rare earths company Serra Verde began commercial production from its Pela Ema rare earths deposit at the top of 2024. Pela Ema is an ionic clay deposit that will produce the four critical magnet rare earth elements: neodymium, praseodymium, terbium and dysprosium. According to the company, it is the only rare earths operation outside of China to produce all four of those magnet rare earths.

Below: these are unverified Claims from Mongolia and Malaysia

3a. Mongolia Reserve: 21 million MT Mongolia Weekly

“Mongolia boasts the world’s largest known rare earth reserves, totaling up to 21 million tons. Global demand for vital rare earth magnets and elements is climbing, as they are essential for electric vehicles, wind turbines, electronics and medical gear.” Mongolia Weekly

3b. Kazakhstan Reserve: 20 million MT; Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Industry claimed that the new site could possibly hold more than 20 million tonnes of rare earth resources, subject to further verification and research. MSN Sciencealert

3c. Malaysia Reserve: 16 million MT CNA Straits Times

“Malaysia’s Minister of Natural Resources, Environment and Climate Change Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad told CNA that the country currently has an estimated 16.2 million tonnes of NR-REE deposits in the country, with a potential estimated value of up to US$182 billion.” CNA

“Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad had said in June 2023 that Malaysia has over 16 million tonnes of non-radioactive rare-earth elements that the government valued at around RM800 billion.” Straits Times

4. Russia
Reserves: 10 million MT (Sputnik claims of 28.7 MT, if true, would be second)

Russia produced 2,600 MT of rare earths in 2023, more than Brazil and Vietnam. The Russian government shared plans in 2020 to invest US$1.5 billion in order to compete with China in the rare earths market.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused some concern over possible disruptions to the rare earths supply chain in the US and Europe, and there are signs the government has had to put its domestic rare earths sector development plans on ice while it’s mired in war.

5. India
Reserves: 6.9 million MT

India’s rare earths reserves sit at 6.9 million MT, and it produced 2,900 MT of rare earths in 2022. India has nearly 35 percent of the world’s beach and sand mineral deposits, which are significant sources of rare earths. The country’s Department of Atomic Energy released a statement in December 2022 breaking down the country’s production and refining.

6. Australia
Reserves: 5.7 million MT

While Australia was the fourth largest rare earths-mining country in 2023 at 18,000 MT of production, it has the sixth largest reserves in the world. Currently, its reserves stand at 5.7 million MT.

Rare earths have only been mined in Australia since 2007, but extraction is expected to increase moving forward. Lynas Rare Earths (ASX:LYC,OTC Pink:LYSCF) operates the Mount Weld mine and concentration plant in the country; it also runs a rare earths refining and processing facility in Malaysia. The company is considered the world’s largest non-Chinese rare earths supplier.

7. United States
Reserves: 1.8 million MT

While the US reported the second highest output of rare earths in 2023 at 43,000 MT, the country takes the seventh top spot in global rare earths reserves.

Rare earths mining in the US now happens only at California’s Mountain Pass mine. Over the past few years, the Biden Administration has made several moves toward strengthening the nation’s rare earths industry.

In February 2021, President Joe Biden signed an executive order aimed at reviewing shortcomings in America’s domestic supply chains for rare earths, medical devices, computer chips and other critical resources. The next month, the US Department of Energy announced a US$30 million initiative to research and secure domestic supply chains for rare earths and battery metals such as cobalt and lithium.

The government released a follow-up fact sheet about the progress made in these initiatives in February 2022. The US Department of Energy announced a US$32 million investment in new rare earths production facilities in July 2023.

8. Greenland
Reserves: 1.5 million MT

Although Greenland’s rare earths reserves number is close to that of the US, the island nation hasn’t made much of an effort to bring them into production. The country’s current government ran on a platform that included canceling Greenland’s only (and highly controversial) rare earths-mining project, Energy Transition Minerals’ (ASX:ETM,OTC Pink:GDLNF) Kvanefjeld. The government followed through with rejecting the project’s exploitation license, and the company’s request for interim orders against the decision was declined in September 2022.

For more, see Rare Earth Production: Top 5 Countries

A documentary on Mongolian Rare Earth potential

NATO Draws Up US Troops Movement to Europe

•June 10, 2024 • Leave a Comment

NATO Draws Up Potential Plans to Move Troops From US to Europe – Reports

Sputnik International • June 5, 2024 // Daily Mail

In theory, US soldiers could arrive at one of five designated ports and then be transported along predetermined logistics routes on the continent should a European war break out.

The US-led military bloc is preparing land corridors that would enable US troops to rush to the front lines in the event of a European war, in a move that would seek to stave off a potential “Russian attack,” the Telegraph has reported.

In theory, US soldiers could arrive at one of five designated ports and then be transported along predetermined logistics routes on the continent.

NATO has a plan in place for rapid deployment for some 300,000 soldiers to the front-line in the event of a Russian attack on Europe

According to the plans, US forces would land in the Netherlands and then be taken to Poland via Germany by train. Other potential options include using ports in the Balkans, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Greece, and Turkiye.

“In these corridors, national militaries will not be restricted by local regulations and will be free to transport consignments without normal restrictions,” the report said.

The Ukraine conflict has demonstrated Kiev’s logistics bases being particularly susceptible to Russian precision strikes.

According to Lieutenant General Alexander Sollfrank, commander of NATO’s Joint Support and Enabling Command (JSEC), larger bases, like those seen in Afghanistan or Iraq, are no longer feasible as they can be targeted and destroyed with ease.

In the interview Russian President Vladimir Putin gave to US journalist Tucker Carlson, the president made it clear that Russia has no plans to attack any NATO nation.

“It is absolutely out of the question. You just don’t have to be any kind of analyst, it goes against common sense to get involved in some kind of global war. And a global war will bring all of humanity to the brink of destruction. It’s obvious,” he emphasized.

Following a Paris-hosted conference on Ukraine held on February 26, French President Emmanuel Macron said Western leaders had discussed the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine and, although no consensus had been reached in this regard, nothing could be ruled out. Some EU countries hastened to dismiss such plans.

Amid the heated discussions, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the bloc has no plans to send combat units to Ukraine but called on member states to ramp up arms supply to Kiev.

Plan for some 300,000 troops — mostly American soldiers — to front line positions

NATO is expected to formally oppose deploying troops to Ukraine, Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera reported earlier. According to a draft policy document to be approved at the bloc’s July summit in Washington, NATO would adhere to a “no boots on the ground” principle, which the Italian media described as “one of the key phrases” in the paper.

Why Russians still embrace the war

•June 9, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Why Russians still embrace the war;

Declining living standards, static frontline and hundreds of thousands of casualties haven’t yet dented public support

Putin captured 87% of the vote from a record-high voter turnout

AsiaTimes by John Ruehl June 4, 2024

Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Beijing for a two-day trip on May 15, 2024, and was greeted with a red-carpet welcome by Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The two leaders pledged a “new era” for the Russia-China relationship, building on their “no limits partnership” struck just before Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As Putin’s first foreign trip since winning reelection in March, the visit showcased his and Russia’s enduring stature amid the war in Ukraine.

Despite Russia’s 2024 election being marked by systemic repression of serious alternative parties and candidates and decades of brazen statements about Russia’s “managed” democracy, Putin captured 87% of the vote from a record-high voter turnout.

Even with some self-censorship and a slight drop in approval, the Russian public still largely backs the war, despite a largely static frontline, the severance of ties with Europe, declines in living standards, and the deaths and injuries of hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers.

The staggering number of casualties is mirrored in Ukraine, a nation that Putin and many Russians consider a brotherly nation and the mother culture of Russia.

In contrast, US domestic support for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq began to decline markedly a couple of years after the conflicts began, and predictions of a collapse in Russian public support for the war emerged soon after it began.

Yet, although the costs of Russia’s war in Ukraine continue to escalate and it appears far from conclusion, several reasons have compelled Russian citizens to continue supporting the war and the president who initiated it.

Opposition to war in Russia faces unique challenges not encountered in the US, but convincing a population that war is unavoidable is essential for any government to sustain a war effort.

The Kremlin has framed the nation’s military actions as a noble fight to save ethnic Russians and Russian speakers in Ukraine from a fascist regime in Kiev – a narrative that resonates with many Russians and the country’s history in World War II.

Highlighting growing restrictions on the Russian language in Ukraine furthers this message while Russia’s excuse that they were answering cries for help in Ukraine echoes their 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia.

Russian media also portrays their forces as minimizing civilian casualties, as Ukraine is accused of targeting civilians in Russia, and Ukraine’s failure to hold scheduled elections in 2024 has been used to question President Volodymyr Zelensky’s legitimacy.

By portraying Ukraine as the mother culture of Russia, Putin has cast the invasion through a historical and patriotic lens. The conflict is framed as an internal matter of reasserting Russian dominance over the ancestral homeland that birthed Russian language, religion and political origins against an illegitimate Ukrainian government that currently occupies the country.

Russian nationalism can be rallied by invoking ethnic unity, territorial patrimony and the need to rectify Ukraine’s separation from Moscow, making it easier to dismiss Ukraine’s sovereignty.

Russia has also deflected its violations of the UN Charter against non-aggression by depicting itself as an aggrieved party, forced into war by the US-led West and its vassal states. It’s a sentiment reflected in national polls and supported by notable figures like Slovakia’s Prime Minister Robert Fico, who in January 2024 stated that Ukraine was under the complete control of Washington.

On May 1, 2024, an exhibition of captured Western weapons, vehicles and equipment since the start of the war opened in Moscow – much like Kiev’s in May 2022 which showed captured Russian equipment.

The Kremlin connects everything to the war – including the recent attack by ISIS in Moscow. In contrast, the American public increasingly began to believe that US leaders had misled them into the War on Terror, particularly the war in Iraq, which it felt could have been avoided.

Russians’ support for the war has manifested as the culmination of decades of “patriotic mobilization” that has taken place since Putin’s first term. The cultivation of nationalist sentiment, pervasive across media, culture, and politics, has intensified significantly since the invasion.

The Russian identity is increasingly intertwined with the existential need to protect Russians abroad, shield Russia from NATO and bolster Russia’s status as a great power.

Preparing and instilling confidence in the Russian armed forces’ ability to sustain a major conflict has been ongoing for decades. Russian forces engaged in counterinsurgency operations in Russia’s restive region of Chechnya in the 2000s and supported a limited conflict in support of two restive regions in neighboring Georgia in 2008.

Subsequently, Russian forces seized Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and supported a limited conflict in support of Ukraine’s restive border region with Russia. In 2015, they launched a major military operation to rescue Syrian President Assad in 2015.

With relative success in Syria, the significant escalation of Russia’s conflict in Ukraine in 2022 did not come as a surprise. This contrasts with the perceived failures of Western military interventions in the 21st Century, causing domestic confidence in the US military to decline.

To alleviate domestic concerns stemming from severing Russia’s historical connections with Europe, as well as distancing by other countries to comply with Western sanctions, Putin has embarked on a series of foreign trips to show Russia’s resiliency.

Visits to Belarus and other former Soviet states in Central Asia and the Caucasus have helped stabilize its regional influence. Visits to Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates have served to demonstrate Russia’s enduring influence in the Middle East, while Russia has also hosted dozens of foreign leaders from the Global South, as well as those of Hungary and Austria.

However, Russia’s ties with China form its most crucial bilateral relationship. Despite the power imbalance, Putin’s May visit to China reaffirmed Moscow’s strategic relationship with Beijing.

Russia’s capacity to confront the US and collaborate with other major powers offers reassurance that has erased much of the pain of the geopolitical decline that accompanied the Soviet collapse. Moscow has also aimed to counter any moral superiority by the West in Ukraine by highlighting Washington’s and Kiev’s support for Israel since October 7.

Framing it as part of Russia’s confrontation with the West for a new multipolar world order, the Kremlin hopes to legitimize its policies and broaden Russia’s appeal to the Global South.

Following the Nigerien government’s expulsion of US troops in May 2024 and the invitation of Russian forces, images of Russian troops entering the same airbase where US military personnel were stationed further underscored Russia’s assertive struggle with the West and wider geopolitical ambitions.

Furthermore, Russian citizens have been shielded from the economic repercussions of the war through subsidized fuel, food and other essential resources. Russia’s substantial gold and foreign reserves have helped fund the war and prevented extended currency volatility, while the imposition of hefty penalties on foreign companies considering leaving Russia has deterred many Western firms from exiting or compelled them to pay significant costs.

Russia’s major economic partners, most importantly China and India, have helped maintain stability in Russia’s exports and imports. Western sanctions have also by design not crippled the Russian economy, as preventing Russian resources from reaching global markets would cause prices to spike.

Moreover, the Russian public has also been largely spared from devastation. Ukrainian attacks within Russia have mostly been limited to small flareups in border regions and attacks on energy and transport facilities while Ukrainian forces are still restricted from using Western weapons. Sabotage attacks in Russia have also risen but the situation is manageable.

In contrast to Ukrainian citizens, no Russian civilians have been forcefully committed to fight. The 2022 partial mobilization called up reservists, while recent changes to laws have meant Russia has been more easily able to offer generous contracts to annual conscripts soon after their training has concluded.

Compared to the forced conscription videos in Ukraine, Russian media can claim it only uses volunteers and those already part of the armed forces. Russian soldiers who are injured, as well as the families of Russian soldiers who died in service, receive substantial compensation.

Though payment is often delayed, the modest backgrounds of most Russian soldiers mean that these funds can be life-changing. The use of prisoners in particularly perilous military operations has also shielded regular Russian soldiers, with Ukraine only considering this practice earlier this year.

Nevertheless, tens of thousands of Russian soldiers have been killed and hundreds of thousands more seriously wounded. This tests the casualties hypothesis, which states that the public’s willingness to remain engaged in a military intervention declines as casualties mount.

The Soviet Union’s 10-year war in Afghanistan saw 15,000 Soviet troops killed and eventually helped lead to the downfall of the country, while the deeply unpopular Iraq War saw 4,500 US soldier deaths and saw the Bush administration’s popularity decline considerably.

Undoubtedly, the Russian government distorts official casualty figures. Yet it is crucial to contextualize Russia’s losses in Ukraine within the context of recent history. The Covid-19 pandemic claimed more than 400,000 Russian lives, far surpassing the casualties in Ukraine.

Furthermore, the Russian public’s stomach in the face of such significant losses may be influenced by the large number of deaths of prominent Russians since the beginning of the war.

Across Russian media, the war and its repercussions have shown that even the country’s most influential individuals can be killed and have their assets stripped, contributing to a sense of collective sacrifice amid the conflict.

Amid the chaos of the war, dozens of Russian oligarchs and political figures have been killed in suspicious circumstances both in Russia and overseas, in a public settling of scores, opportunism and punishment from the Kremlin for disobedience.

A day after Russian forces entered Ukraine, the body of Alexander Tyulyakov, a senior executive of Gazprom’s corporate security, was found hanging in his garage.

Ravil Maganov, chairman of the board of Russia’s oil giant Lukoil, allegedly fell out of a Moscow hospital window in September 2022. In December, businessman Vladimir Bidenov died of heart problems at the Hotel Sai International in India – two days later his business associate and deputy in the Legislative Assembly of Vladimir Oblast, Pavel Antov, fell out of a window at the same hotel.

While the deaths of oligarchs and politicians may offer some solace to ordinary Russian soldiers serving in Ukraine, there has also been a significant loss of high-ranking military officials.

Some, like Lieutenant General Vladimir Sviridov, were also killed in suspicious circumstances. However, the necessity for high-ranking Russian military officials to remain near the frontlines, owing to a more top-down decision-making military structure and the risk of electronic eavesdropping by Ukrainian and Western advisors, contributes to their higher casualty rate.

Alongside hundreds of other high-profile deaths, Russia has confirmed that seven general officers had been killed in Ukraine by 2024, with Ukraine claiming more than 14 had been killed by early 2023.

The last time a US general was killed in combat was in 2014 when an Afghan serviceman opened fire on NATO personnel in Kabul; prior to that, no American general had lost their life in combat since the Vietnam War.

With this backdrop of sacrifice and solidarity among Russian elites, Russia’s “rally-‘round-the-flag” effect may sustain itself longer than expected.

Russians appear to believe time and demographics are on their side. According to a March 2024 poll by Russia’s Levada Center, after decades of emigration, the share of Russians expressing a desire to move abroad hit a record low, partly in response to many of those wanting to leave having already done so.

Nevertheless, Finion, a Moscow-based relocation firm, stated that 40-45% of Russians who fled abroad had since returned, driven by factors such as cracking down on remote work, visa issues, reduced fears of conscription and a general desire to return.

And while tens of thousands of Russian soldiers have perished, along with thousands more ethnic Russians in occupied parts of Ukraine, millions of those living in those occupied territories have already been incorporated into the Russian Federation’s pre-existing 144 million citizens.

Conversely, Ukraine, with 37 million people before the war, has faced a population exodus compounding already challenging demographics.

By early 2024, the prevailing sentiment was that Russia had gained a fragile upper hand. Victory, though potentially pyrrhic, appears increasingly likely, if loosely defined, in Russia. Yet, as the conflict drags on, sustained by a Russian economy increasingly geared toward the war, the pursuit of victory may wane as casualties and other costs mount.

The Kremlin’s anxieties are now focused on Western nations, led by the UK, France and Poland, allowing Ukraine to use Western weapons in Russia, which would further bring the war home to Russian civilians and internal infrastructure.

While projecting an image of composure to the public, tensions are unquestionably simmering in the Kremlin. Estimates regarding Russia’s capacity to sustain the war in its current state typically hover around two to three years.

Yet unwavering support for Putin, coupled with the absence of viable alternatives, may extend his strong personal commitment to the war indefinitely. While Russia appears capable of and determined to continue the war, its uncertain future will continue to test the Russian public’s tacit enthusiasm for it.

Putin’s willingness to continue the war is seen as something to exploit in the West. Western policymakers have witnessed Russia increasingly commit its domestic resources to the conflict, as well as recently shift from calling it a “special military operation” to a war.

Steadily increasing Ukraine’s technical capacity to fight a war of attrition will continue to wear down Russia’s Soviet arsenal and deployment of arms abroad, demonstrating the feebleness of Russia’s production and advanced weapons systems.

By provoking a Russian defeat, it is hoped a second major convulsion across the former Soviet Union will further reduce Moscow’s geopolitical influence.

Russia’s protracted military campaign and the West’s strategy of prolonging the conflict through escalation management will keep exacting a catastrophic toll on Ukrainian lives and infrastructure.

Russian warships will arrive in Cuba next week

•June 8, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Russian warships, including nuclear sub, missile frigate, will arrive in Cuba next week as tension rises. This in response to the Biden administration quietly gave Ukraine the green light to use US weapons to strike targets inside Russia, with the assurance that it will not be used to strike Moscow or the Kremlin

The Russian frigate Admiral Gorshkov will arrive at the Port of Havana nest week

Miami Herald • June 6, 2024 // Yahoo News

Three Russian Navy ships and a nuclear-powered submarine will arrive at the Port of Havana for an official visit next week, the Cuban armed forces said in a statement Thursday, confirming the military exercises first disclosed by US officials on Wednesday.

The Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces said the Russian missile frigate Admiral Gorshkov, the nuclear sub Kazan, the oil tanker Pashin and the salvage tug Nikolai Chiker will arrive on June 12 and stay for a week.

The Cuban military said the visit by the Russian Navy ships is part of the “friendly” relations between the two countries, complies with international law and does not pose a security threat to the region because “none of the ships carry nuclear weapons.”

A US official told McClatchy and the Miami Herald on Wednesday that the exercises are expected to include “heightened naval and air activity near the United States,” involving both Russian aircraft and combat naval vessels – the first coordinated air and sea exercise by Russia in the Western Hemisphere in five years.

“While we are disappointed that Cuba has likely agreed to host visiting Russian ships, we are not surprised,” the official said Thursday. While one of the ships is a nuclear-powered submarine, the official said that the US intelligence community “assesses it is not carrying nuclear weapons, and poses no direct threat to the national security of the United States.”

Administration officials suspect that Cuba approved the Russian port call “at least in part” over an incident last year in which a US nuclear submarine docked at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, angering the Cubans, the US official said.

“We are not surprised by it given Russia’s long history of Cuban port calls,” the official said. “These are routine naval visits that are part of Russian military exercises, which have ratcheted up because of US support to Ukraine and exercise activity in support of our NATO allies.”

The Kazan nuclear-powered submarine takes part in a naval parade marking Russian Navy Day in the Kola Bay

The warships are part of the Russian Navy Northern fleet and departed on May 17 on “a long voyage… to demonstrate the Russian flag and ensure naval presence in important areas of the distant oceanic zone,” the Russian government news agency Tass reported Thursday.

According to the Tass report, the Admiral Gorshkov frigate held an artillery fire exercise at an air target in the Atlantic Ocean. The ship “fired AK-192M artillery complex and Palash antiaircraft missiles at an imitated air target,” the report says.

The warship joined the Navy in 2018 and was updated to carry hypersonic Zircon cruise missiles, a new complex and expensive missile recently developed by Russia.

The Kazan submarine also joined the fleet recently in 2021 and can carry long-range precision missiles capable of destroying land, sea and underwater targets, Tass reported in April.

The Cuban government did not mention military exercises in its statement but highlighted “cultural” activities.

“During their stay, the Russian sailors will carry out a program of activities that includes courtesy visits to the Chief of the Revolutionary War Navy and the Governor of Havana. They will also visit places of historical and cultural interest.”

According to the US Navy Institute, Russian submarines have been visiting Cuban ports since 1969. Russian spy ships have been spotted unannounced at the port of Havana on several occasions, including ahead of Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014, days before US-Cuba talks in Havana in 2015 and on March 2018. The Russian navy’s training class ship Perekop sailed into Havana in July last year.

Deuteronomy (29-30)

•June 8, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 29

1 These are the words of the covenant which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the land of Moab, besides the covenant which He made with them in Horeb.

— beside the covenant which he made with them in Horeb; though it was substantially the same; but it was renewed now, in different circumstances;

— they had violated its conditions, hence Moses rehearses these, that they might have a better knowledge of its conditions and be more disposed to comply with them.

And Moses called unto all Israel and said unto them, “Ye have seen all that the Lord did before your eyes in the land of Egypt unto Pharaoh and unto all his servants and unto all his land,

— unto Pharaoh and unto all his servants, and unto all his land; the plagues he inflicted on the person of Pharaoh, and on all his courtiers, and on all the people in Egypt, for they reached the whole land.

the great temptations which thine eyes have seen, the signs, and those great miracles. — the great temptations which thine eyes have seen; or trials, the ten plagues which tried the Egyptians; the signs and those great miracles: as the said plagues were such as were beyond the power of nature to produce.

Yet the Lord hath not given you a heart to perceive and eyes to see and ears to hear unto this day. — yet the Lord hath not given you an heart to perceive; some of them seen the above miracles with their eyes, but had not discerned with their understanding the power of God displayed in them;

And I have led you forty years in the wilderness. Your clothes have not waxed old upon you, and thy shoe has not waxed old upon thy foot. — your clothes are not waxen old upon you: were not worn out; all those forty years they had been in the wilderness, they had never wanted clothes fitting for them;

— and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot; which were to wear in travelling, and especially in a rugged wilderness; and yet, thought they had been always in use during so long a time, were not worn out.

Ye have not eaten bread, neither have ye drunk wine or strong drink, that ye might know that I am the Lord your God. — ye have not eaten bread; not eaten bread made of corn, common bread, of their own preparing, by the labour of their own hands; but manna, the bread of heaven;

And when ye came unto this place, Sihon the king of Heshbon and Og the king of Bashan came out against us unto battle, and we smote them. — and when ye came unto this place; the borders of Moab, the wilderness before it, to which joined the plains they were now in;

And we took their land and gave it for an inheritance unto the Reubenites and to the Gadites and to the halftribe of Manasseh. — and we took their land; which belonged to the two kings, the lands of Jazer, Gilead, and Bashan, fine countries for pasturage:

Keep therefore the words of this covenant and do them, that ye may prosper in all that ye do. — the words of this covenant; that is, those spelt out in Deuteronomy 29:1 and on Deuteronomy 4:13;

10 “Ye stand this day all of you before the Lord your God— your captains of your tribes, your elders, and your officers, with all the men of Israel, — ye stand — before the Lord your God; they were assembled at the tabernacle, from whence he delivered these words to them by the priests and Levites;

11 your little ones, your wives, and thy stranger that is in thy camp, from the hewer of thy wood unto the drawer of thy water—

— and thy stranger that is in thy camp; not only the proselyte of righteousness, who embraced the Israelite’s religion entirely, but the proselyte of the gate, who was admitted to dwell among them, having renounced idolatry;

12 that thou shouldest enter into covenant with the Lord thy God, and into His oath, which the Lord thy God maketh with thee this day, — the covenant was national, the whole congregation of Israel, of all ages and conditions, all, young as well as old; and therefore embraced all the elements which make up the nation;

13 that He may establish thee today for a people unto Himself, and that He may be unto thee a God, as He hath said unto thee and as He hath sworn unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob.

— that he may establish thee to day for a people unto himself; it must be observed that this is the aspect of the covenant which makes Yehovah responsible for the fulfilment of the whole; he takes all this trouble for the sake of establishing thee in his presence for himself;

14 “Neither with you only do I make this covenant and this oath, — neither with you only do I make this covenant and this oath; that is, Moses; for he was ordered to make this covenant with them in the name of the Lord;

15 but with him that standeth here with us this day before the Lord our God, and also with him that is not here with us this day — so also with him that is not here; that is, with your posterity; and so with him that is not here with us this day; of the people of future generations;

16 (for ye know how we have dwelt in the land of Egypt, and how we came through the nations which ye passed by, — for ye know how we have dwelt in the land of Egypt; how long they and their fathers had dwelt there, the number of years they had been in the land;

— as the Targum of Jonathan, which was upwards of two hundred years; and being a country the inhabitants of which were much given to idolatry, they had seen many of their idols, and much of their idolatrous worship;

— and how we came through the nations which ye passed by; as the Edomites, Ammonites, Moabites, and Midianites, through whose borders they came, as they passed by their countries in their journeys in the wilderness.

17 and ye have seen their abominations and their idols, wood and stone, silver and gold, which were among them); — wood and stone, silver and gold; these are the materials of which the idols they had seen in the several countries they had been in, or passed through, were made of;

— some of wood, others of stone cut out of these, and carved; others more rich and costly were made of massive gold and silver, and were molten ones; or the images of wood were glided with gold and silver;

18 lest there should be among you man or woman or family or tribe, whose heart turneth away this day from the Lord our God to go and serve the gods of these nations, lest there should be among you a root that beareth gall and wormwood,

— lest there should be; to prevent their falling into idolatry, and preserve them from it, whether a single person of either sex, or a whole family, or even a tribe, which might be in danger of being infected with it, and so all the people;

19 and it come to pass, when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, ‘I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart’—to add drunkenness to thirst.

— that he bless himself in his heart; inwardly pronounce himself blessed, thinking himself secure from the curse of the law, and flattering himself it will never reach him nor come upon him;

— saying, I shall have peace; all happiness and prosperity, in soul, body, and estate; inward peace of mind now, and eternal peace hereafter: though I walk in the imagination of my heart; in worshipping idols which he vainly and wickedly imagined to be gods; to the worship of which his wicked heart prompted him, and he was resolutely and stubbornly bent upon, and in which he continued;

20 The Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord and His jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven.

— then the Lord will not spare him; have no mercy upon him, nor forgive him, being an hardhearted, impenitent, stubborn, and obstinate sinner, as well as guilty of the grossest and most provoking sin, as idolatry is;

— and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him: for as he that offends in one point is guilty of all, and especially in such a principal point as this, which concerns the being and worship of God; so he makes himself liable to all the curses of the law;

21 And the Lord shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that are written in this Book of the Law, — according to all the curses of the covenant that are written in this book of the law; the evil of punishment he shall be separated unto shall be according to them, or include them all;

— and here is from MSG:

14-21 I’m not making this Covenant and its oath with you alone. I am making it with you who are standing here today in the Presence of God, our God, yes, but also with those who are not here today.

You know the conditions in which we lived in Egypt and how we crisscrossed through nations in our travels. You got an eyeful of their obscenities, their wood and stone, silver and gold junk-gods.

Don’t let down your guard lest even now, today, someone—man or woman, clan or tribe—gets sidetracked from God, our God, and gets involved with the no-gods of the nations; lest some poisonous weed sprout and spread among you, a person who hears the words of the Covenant-oath but exempts himself, thinking, “I’ll live just the way I please, thank you,” and ends up ruining life for everybody.

God won’t let him off the hook. God’s anger and jealousy will erupt like a volcano against that person. The curses written in this book will bury him. God will delete his name from the records.

God will separate him out from all the tribes of Israel for special punishment, according to all the curses of the Covenant written in this Book of Revelation. Deuteronomy 29:18-20 The Message

22 so that the generation to come of your children who shall rise up after you, and the stranger who shall come from a far land, shall say, when they see the plagues of that land and the sicknesses which the Lord hath laid upon it,

— and the stranger that shall come from a far land; the Assyrians and the Babylonians were from closeby; or for the sake of travelling from afar, his road either lying through it, or his curiosity leading him to see it;

23 and that the whole land thereof is brimstone and salt and burning, that it is not sown nor beareth nor any grass groweth therein, like the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboiim, which the Lord overthrew in His anger and in His wrath—

— like the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah; the whole land burnt of brimstone, and salt, and thereafter, is not sown, nor beareth, nor any grass groweth therein;

24 even all nations shall say, ‘Why hath the Lord done thus unto this land? What meaneth the heat of this great anger?’ — even all nations shall say; not just the Assyrians and the Babylonians from closeby; or even the Roman, but all nations shall wonder;

25 Then men shall say, ‘Because they have forsaken the covenant of the Lord God of their fathers, which He made with them when He brought them forth out of the land of Egypt; — then men shall say; these men are Gentiles; and they even know the answer: because they have forsaken the covenant of the Lord God of their fathers;

26 for they went and served other gods and worshiped them, gods whom they knew not and whom He had not given unto them. — for they went and served other gods, and worshipped them; as did all Israel, in the times of Solomon, and the ten tribes under Jeroboam,

— and other succeeding kings of Israel; and the two tribes in the times of Ahaz, and especially of Manasseh, when they worshipped all the gods of the surrounding nations; 1 Kings 11:33,

27 And the anger of the Lord was kindled against this land, to bring upon it all the curses that are written in this book; — to bring upon it all the curses that are written in this book; in this book of Deuteronomy, and particularly Deuteronomy 28:16; Daniel 9:11

28 and the Lord rooted them out of their land in anger and in wrath and in great indignation, and cast them into another land, as it is this day.’ — and cast them another land, as it is this day; the ten tribes were cast into Assyria, and from thence into the cities of the Medes, the two tribes into the land of Chaldea;

— “and cast them into another land, as it is this day” this maybe a predicted statement of the forthcoming exiles; it could either be the writer’s own and if so betrays his foresight at that time, or it is a later editorial addition. In view of the language of the whole chapter, the former alternative is the more probable.

29 “The secret things belong unto the Lord our God; but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law. — secret things belong unto the Lord our God; that is, the counsels and secrets of God concerning persons or nations;

— but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children for ever; the things of nature and Providence, which are plain and manifest, are for our use and instruction; and especially the word and ordinances of God, which are the revelation of his will, the doctrines and promises contained in the Scriptures, each of the duties of religion, and the commandments of God.

Deuteronomy 30

1 “And it shall come to pass, when all these things have come upon thee, the blessing and the curse which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations whither the Lord thy God hath driven thee,

— and thou shalt call them to mind; recollect the promises of blessings and cursings; an awakening among the people themselves must precede their restoration.

and shalt return unto the Lord thy God and shalt obey His voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart and with all thy soul, — and shalt return unto the Lord thy God; by repentance, acknowledging their manifold sins and transgressions;

In 1947, the first batch of Jewish refugees arrived in Palestine to establish settlements. A banner was hung on the boat. The banner read: The Germans destroyed our families and homes – don’t you destroy our hopes.

that then the Lord thy God will return thee from captivity and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations whither the Lord thy God hath scattered thee.

— God will return thee from all the nations; not from Assyria, not from Babylon, not from Rome, but from “all the nations” that is, from the east, west, north, and south, where they are now dispersed;

— these are Prophecies of a sequence of Major events that will lead to the Return of the House of Israel, the Northern Lost 10-Tribes, back to the Promise Land that God had promised to Abraham, the land defined as the land between the two rivers;

— for more details written by the prophets Ezekiel, Isaiah and Jeremiah, see Sequence of Prophecies for the Return of Israel

If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the Lord thy God gather thee, and from thence will He fetch thee. — if any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven; again, emphasizing from the “outmost parts of heaven” that is, from the east, west, north, and south, where they are now dispersed;

— the timing is where the Targum of Jonathan indicates, “from thence will he bring you near by the hands of the King Messiah,” which means, at the close of this age;

And the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and He will do thee good and multiply thee above thy fathers.

— and the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; that these Israelites upon their conversion in the latter day will return to the land of Judea and Samaria again, and possess it, is the sense of many passages of other Scripture; written by the prophets Ezekiel, Isaiah, Daniel and Jeremiah;

And the Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live. — the Lord will circumcise thy heart; will by his Word and Spirit change and purge thy heart from all thy idolatry and wickedness;

And the Lord thy God will put all these curses upon thine enemies and on them that hate thee, who persecuted thee. — the Lord thy God will put all these curses upon thine enemies; from these blind and unrepentent Gentiles, especially, First, from those of Psalm 83, and, Second, from those of “Gog and Magog;”

And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the Lord, and do all His commandments which I command thee this day. — and thou shalt return and do all his commandments; it is as certain that in this age that the laws of Deuteronomy have been forgotten or have never been kept perfectly.

And the Lord thy God will make thee plenteous in every work of thine hand, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy land, for good. For the Lord will again rejoice over thee for good, as He rejoiced over thy fathers,

— thy God will make thee plenteous in every work of thine hand; indicating these Israelites are humans, not spirit beings; in the fruit of thy body; abundance of children; and in the fruit of thy cattle; a large increase of oxen and sheep; and in the fruit of thy land for good;

10 if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God to keep His commandments and His statutes which are written in this Book of the Law, and if thou turn unto the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soul.

— to keep his commandments and his statutes, which are written in this book of the law; a constant reminder of keeping his laws and statutes, particularly at Mount Sinai and in this chapter;

11 “For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off. — for this commandment is not hidden, either is it far off; that law of obeying God, which was the subject of Moses’ discourse, was well known to the Israelites; they could not plead ignorance of its existence and requirements.

12 It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, ‘Who shall go up for us to heaven and bring it unto us, that we may hear it and do it?’ — it is not in heaven; the scheme of it was formed in heaven, it was hid in the heart of God there, before revealed;

13 Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say, ‘Who shall go over the sea for us and bring it unto us, that we may hear it and do it?’ — neither is it beyond the sea: the knowledge of this commandment is not to be fetched from far distant places;

14 But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it. — in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it; the fulfilment of obeying God’s laws is not impossible, nor really very difficult;

15 “See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil, — see, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil; the alternative of a good and happy, or a disobedient and miserable life.

16 in that I command thee this day to love the Lord thy God, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments, that thou mayest live and multiply; and the Lord thy God shall bless thee in the land whither thou goest to possess it. — a constant reminder of keeping his commandments, his statutes and judgments;

— and the Lord thy God shall bless thee in the land whither thou goest to possess it; with health and happiness, with an affluence of all good things, in the land between the two rivers they would enter into to take possession of.

17 But if thine heart turn away so that thou wilt not hear, but shalt be drawn away and worship other gods and serve them, — so that thou wilt not hear; the voice of the Lord and obey it, or hearken to his laws, and do them: but shalt be drawn away; by an evil heart, or by the ill examples of others;

18 I declare unto you this day that ye shall surely perish, and that ye shall not prolong your days upon the land whither thou passest over the Jordan to go to possess it. — I denounce unto you this day that ye shall surely perish; by one judgment or another; or else sent off into exile as captives;

19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing. Therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live, — therefore choose life, that thou and thy seed may live; that is, prefer obedience to the law, and choose to perform that, the consequence of which is life;

20 that thou mayest love the Lord thy God, and that thou mayest obey His voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto Him; for He is thy life and the length of thy days, that thou mayest dwell in the land which the Lord swore unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.”

— that thou mayest love the Lord thy God; here he shows them in short what their duty is; to love God as the Lord, a being most amiable, and as their God;

— that thou mayest dwell in the land which the Lord sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them; the land of Canaan, the land between the two rivers.

Macron has Sent Military “Trainers” To Ukraine

•June 7, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Macron Gathering European Coalition To Send Military “Trainers” To Ukraine. Paris would be able to command a force of around 60,000 soldiers made up of French and other allied troops from the Baltic states of Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, as well as Poland. 

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden June 3, 2024 // Newsweek

French President Emmanuel Macron is busy working behind the scenes on a controversial new initiative to assemble an army of troops from NATO countries to be sent to Ukraine.

For now, the plan is to send the Western soldiers in the capacity of trainers and military advisers for Ukraine’s armed forces, with the training likely to take place in the West of the war-ravaged country, or at least far from the front lines.

“Paris has been working for a while now with the Ukrainians on this,” a person familiar with France’s initiative told The Financial Times. But the plan hasn’t been launched formally by NATO leadership.

“The strong view is that it makes sense, technically… But it won’t be a Nato initiative,” the source explained. This as a number of NATO countries have voiced reluctance or even outright disapproval, fearing unnecessary confrontation with Russia and runaway escalation that would put Western troops directly in harm’s way.

According to more details of Macron’s plan via FT:

President Emmanuel Macron is expected to unveil France’s plan to send army trainers next Thursday when he hosts Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Normandy along with other leaders, including US President Joe Biden, on the 80th anniversary of the D-Day, according to people familiar with the matter.

Macron’s proposal would entail French soldiers training Ukrainian personnel for tasks including demining operations or repairing and maintaining military equipment. It could end up involving dozens or hundreds of troops. 

Already, the hawkish anti-Moscow Baltic states of Estonia and Lithuania appear to have signed onto Macron’s plan. As of a month ago, Estonia said it was “seriously” discussing sending troops to Ukraine.

The French government has since said it is working with Kiev to try and understand their exact needs in terms of training and advisory operations.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholtz was among the first who tried to caution against a ‘boots on the ground’ scenario starting back in February. “What was agreed among ourselves and with each other from the very beginning also applies to the future, namely that there will be no ground troops, no soldiers on Ukrainian soil sent there by European countries or NATO states,” he had said.

Interestingly, Russian state media is pointing to recent words of Kiev officials to claim that French troops area already en route to Ukraine. According to RT:

The first group of French military instructors are on their way to Ukraine, senior Ukrainian MP Aleksey Goncharenko said on Friday. This comes just days after Ukraine’s top commander, Aleksandr Syrsky, announced that he had completed paperwork facilitating the presence of French personnel in the country.

“My sources informed me that the first group of French instructors is already on its way to Ukraine,” Goncharenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament and delegate to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on Friday evening.

Russia has warned it will target NATO personnel and equipment found in Ukraine, and so all of this brings with it the real risk of triggering the NATO Article 5 common defense treaty, which some hawkish Western leaders would argue requires going to war with Russia.

The United States is lurching towards civil war

•June 6, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The United States is lurching towards civil war

The Telegraph by Tim Stanley • June 3, 2024

When the news of the Trump verdict came over the car radio, I almost had to pull over. My thought was: “This is Fort Sumter.” Just as when the South decided to shell a Northern-held fort in 1861, it felt like the no-turning-back, first shot fired in an inevitable civil war.

Why was I so shocked? We’ve known this was coming for weeks and the trials of Donald J Trump have barely moved the polls. But the American public has always said a conviction is important, for it changes the nature of the election.

Two horrible things can be true at once. Trump governed intemperately, lost the 2020 election, refused to concede and, at the very least, was the inspiration for an insurrection on January 6, 2021.

But it’s also accurate to say he’s been the target of a conspiracy to deny him office. The Democrats had every chance to nominate a competent alternative in 2020. Instead they chose Joe Biden, a zombie who they couldn’t persuade to stand aside in 2024. Far from uniting the country, he has put Trump back into contention.

Uncertain they could beat him at the ballot box, the Democrats turned to the courts, attacking every conceivable aspect of his career – from sex to business to his mishandling of White House paperwork – across several states. The strategy was absurd. It’s usually reserved for gangsters like Al Capone.

So, no, I wasn’t psychologically prepared for a conviction in New York because the case should never have been brought; tampering business records shouldn’t have been linked to election influence; and Stormy Daniels should never have given testimony irrelevant to the case.

It all seemed so preposterous. Legal experts now say it’s highly unlikely that the sentence, to be handed down on July 11, will include prison – but if prison is possible, I’d put money on it happening. It’s clear that the goal of this exercise isn’t to prove the banal point that no one is above the law. It is to stop Trump serving another full term.

His campaign won’t end; he might wind up running for president while being barred from voting. Trump has pledged to appeal: if he makes it to the White House, he cannot then pardon himself as this is a state case, not federal. By that point, Ms Daniels will be the least of his problems anyway. Three fresh criminal trials will probably have started. Trump is hoping the Supreme Court will excuse him from one; his powers of presidential self-pardon will be tested in the others. 

Either way, given how easy it was to convict him in New York on such silly charges, we can expect him to face ongoing, aggressive legal jeopardy.

In short, the November election is crystalised in the mind as not about jobs or war, but a referendum on whether or not Trump should be in prison. Whatever the outcome, America will lose. Either it gets a president with a rap sheet, which would be a national humiliation, or Trump is defeated, cries fraud, does time and there is violence from his supporters. Those who think you can restore normalcy by locking him up are deluded.

There was already a riot on January 6, which cast minds back to the worst of the 1960s or the racist Red Summer of 1919. Four presidents have previously been assassinated. White supremacists have blown up buildings and shot school kids. 

By comparing 2024 to the civil war of 1861-65, I risk not only hyperbole but sacrilege, for the great cause of slavery abolition is absent – and the conflict is more difficult to define than Confederate v Union. But it is rural v urban, blue-collar v educated, Christian v secular, with issues – such as abortion or immigration – that determine identity and defy compromise. The two parts of the nation hate each other.

Blame Trump for that, fine. But the Democrats have raised the stakes by calling him a wannabe dictator, implying that a second term would mark the end of the republic. And by now labelling him as a criminal, they’ve put him totally beyond the pale.

Why there’s this special hate for him escapes me. The deadliest thing a president can do is go to war, yet Trump avoided it – while George W Bush declared two, killed millions, and is apparently the acceptable face of the Republican Party. Reality is less important than perception. Trump’s people attack Biden as a far-Left failure, yet he’s copying Trump’s policies at the border and the economy is going well.

An irrationality is entering Western politics. A recent movie by Alex Garland, Civil War, depicts a United States torn into several factions – and has been criticised for failing to say how the conflict started. But the fight is the point. All our mindless anger has to go somewhere, looking for the release valve of sanctioned violence, directed by the logic of wild rhetoric. In the 1850s, America witnessed prophetic killing at John Brown’s raid or Bleeding Kansas, but it was the election of 1860 that triggered all-out war – because the South believed Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln was the devil and his victory an existential threat.

Lincoln would have despised Trump, but also recognised in the present danger the death-wish that has haunted his country since its birth. Abe once observed that a country so blessed by geography and talent could never be conquered by outsiders. “As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

Trump supporters: ‘Hang everyone’

•June 5, 2024 • Leave a Comment

~~~~

‘Hang everyone’: Trump supporters react to guilty verdict with calls for violence

On Truth Social and other sites identified with former president, seething loyalists threaten to riot, kill political opponents and judicial figures in response to conviction

Supporters Donald Trump gather near his residence at Mar-a-Lago as they react after he was convicted in his criminal trial, in Palm Beach, Florida

The Times of Israel • May 31, 2024

Reuters — Supporters of former United States president Donald Trump, enraged by his conviction on 34 felony counts by a New York jury Thursday, flooded pro-Trump websites with calls for riots, revolution and violent retribution.

After Trump became the first US president to be convicted of a crime, his supporters responded with dozens of violent online posts, according to a Reuters review of comments on three Trump-aligned websites: the former president’s own Truth Social platform, Patriots.win and the Gateway Pundit.

Some called for attacks on jurors, the execution of the judge, Justice Juan Merchan, or outright civil war and armed insurrection.

“Someone in NY with nothing to lose needs to take care of Merchan,” wrote one commentator on Patriots.win. “Hopefully he gets met with illegals with a machete,” the post said in reference to illegal immigrants.

On Gateway Pundit, one poster suggested shooting liberals after the verdict. “Time to start capping some leftys,” said the post. “This cannot be fixed by voting.”

“Trump should already know he has an army willing to fight and die for him if he says the words…I’ll take up arms if he asks.”

Threats of violence and intimidating rhetoric soared after Trump lost the 2020 election and falsely claimed the vote was stolen. As he campaigns for a second White House term, Trump has baselessly cast the judges and prosecutors in his trials as corrupt tools of the Biden administration, intent on sabotaging his White House bid. His loyalists have responded with a campaign of threats and intimidation targeting judges and court officials.

“This was a disgrace, this was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who was corrupt,” Trump told reporters afterwards, echoing comments he often made during the trial.

A 12-member jury found Trump guilty on Thursday of falsifying documents to cover up a payment to silence a porn star’s account of a sexual encounter ahead of the 2016 election. Sentencing is set for July 11, days before the Republican Party is scheduled to formally nominate Trump for president ahead of the November 5 election. Trump has denied wrongdoing and is expected to appeal.

Trump continued his attacks online after the verdict.

On Truth Social, he called Merchan “HIGHLY CONFLICTED” and criticized his jury instructions as unfair. One commentator responded by posting a picture of a hangman’s platform and a noose with the caption: “TREASONOUS MOBSTER OF THE JUSTICES SYSTEM!!”

Jacob Ware, a co-author of the book “God, Guns, and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America,” said the violent language used by Trump’s followers was testament to the former president’s “ironclad ability to mobilize more extreme supporters to action, both at the ballot box and through violence.”

“Until and unless he accepts the process, the extremist reaction to his legal troubles will be militant,” said Ware, a research fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

A spokesperson for Truth Social said, “It’s hard to believe that Reuters, once a respected news service, has fallen so low as to publish such a manipulative, false, defamatory and transparently stupid article as this one purely out of political spite.”

All three sites have policies against violent language, and some of the posts were later removed. Representatives of Patriots.win and Gateway Pundit did not immediately return requests for comment. A Trump spokesperson also did not respond to an email seeking comment.

After Thursday’s verdict, many of his supporters also said that his conviction was proof that the American political system was broken and that only violent action could save the country.

“1,000,000 men [armed] need to go to Washington and hang everyone. That’s the only solution,” said one poster on Patriots.win. Another added: “Trump should already know he has an army willing to fight and die for him if he says the words…I’ll take up arms if he asks.”

Other posts specifically urged targeting Democrats, in some cases suggesting they be shot. “AMERICA FULLY DESTROYED BY DEMOCRATS. LOCK AND LOAD,” wrote a commentator on Gateway Pundit.

While the posts identified by Reuters all called for violence or insurrection, most fell short of the legal standard in the US for a prosecutable threat, which typically requires evidence that the comment reflects a clear intent to act or instill fear, rather than simply suggesting a frightening outcome.

Protesters both for and against former President Donald Trump face off outside of Manhattan Criminal Court on May 30, 2024 in New York City

Still, one researcher who studies extremist militias said the guilty verdict could inspire violence by reinforcing a conviction among some of Trump’s supporters that he’s a victim of a conspiracy orchestrated by his enemies.

“I do think a lot of these folks have been looking for an excuse to maybe mobilize for a while,” said Amy Cooter of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies’ Center on Terrorism, Extremism and Counterterrorism. “I hope I’m wrong. I’ve said for a long time, though, that I would not be shocked to see violence result from a guilty verdict, either directed toward the jurors” or others connected to the case.

Mehdi Hasan: ‘What a bloody s—show’

•June 4, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Former MSNBC anchor trashes Biden after $320M Gaza pier falls apart: ‘What a bloody s—show’

Fox News by Gabriel Hays • May 30, 2024

Former MSNBC anchor Mehdi Hasan slammed the Biden administration on Wednesday over the news that the $320 million pier the US built to transport aid into Gaza had fallen apart after only a few days. 

“Let’s be clear: if this had happened on Trump’s watch, we would all be mocking and denouncing him,” Hasan wrote on X. “It’s super-embarrassing that it happened on Biden’s watch and the fact that it did shouldn’t prevent us from saying: what a bloody s—show.”

The $320 million structure lasted for only Twelve Days; then Kaput!

Fox News Digital obtained satellite images of the destroyed pier in Gaza, which was built earlier this month as a temporary means to get aid to innocent Palestinians as Israel began its invasion into Rafah, the Hamas stronghold.

The $320 million structure lasted roughly a week before choppy weather battered it apart. The Biden administration said it is working to repair the pier, but offered no timeline for when it would be fixed.

The images show that less than a third of the pier remains intact, and there is no sign of the remnants of the deeper sections of the structure.

The White House told Fox News Digital that efforts to get relief to Gazans “are continuing, including through land crossings, etc.”

While the pier has been used to transfer roughly 569 metric tons of aid into Gaza, none of that aid had been delivered to Palestinians as of last week, the Pentagon confirmed.

Broken Pier floating off the shore of Gaza in the Mediterranean Sea

Hasan, who left MSNBC following the network canceling his show last year amid his fierce criticism of Israel, was responding to “The Economist” reporter Gregg Carlstrom’s assessment of the pier debacle.

“The pier took two months and $320m to build, lasted 12 days, and delivered less than 60 trucks’ worth of food (most of which was stolen after it reached Gaza) before it broke and had to be towed away for repairs,” Carlstrom wrote.

Prior to the Oct 7 terror attacks Hamas committed against Israel, Hasan was an ardent cheerleader for Biden. In February 2023, Hasan praised him as “the most impressive president of my lifetime.”

However, Hasan began to sour on Biden and his administration for their actions and stances regarding Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.

After the Oct. 7 attacks, the then-MSNBC host told Israeli official Mark Regev, an adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that his government had killed innocent Palestinian children and was spreading misinformation about its actions.

China to hunt US submarines from the air

•June 3, 2024 • Leave a Comment
LATEST! DWIGHT EISENHOWER IS UNDER ATTACK! US Nuclear-Powered aircraft carrier damaged by Houthi missile! IS THIS TRUE OR FAKE?

~~~~

China is developing systems to hunt any lurking US submarines from the air

Yahoo News by Michael Peck May 30, 2024 // Business Insider

  • China is developing sensors to hunt enemy submarines from aircraft.
  • Recent patents show a focus on magnetic detection and improved sonobuoys.
  • New capabilities are critical for China to guard its aircraft carriers, experts said.

China is developing new systems to hunt the US nuclear-powered submarines that could threaten a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, according to a new report.

KQ-200 MPA of the PLAN, with a current range of about 3,000 miles

The Chinese navy views anti-submarine warfare, or ASW, as essential to any successful amphibious operation and intends to use its aircraft to protect a flotilla from submarine attack by the US or Japan.

“The PLAN [People’s Liberation Army Navy] clearly views fixed-wing and vertical lift ASW capabilities as a crucial component necessary for any of its amphibious based contingencies, be that a seizure of an island or reef, or the successful implementation of a Joint Island Landing Campaign against Taiwan,” wrote Eli Tirk and Daniel Salisbury in a study for the China Maritime Studies Institute at the Naval War College.

“ASW capabilities would be crucial for safeguarding high value surface assets such as carriers or an amphibious landing group, protecting them as they are in port embarking forces, sanitizing the operational area of enemy submarines, and escorting these assets on their way to staging areas and operational areas.”

Also significant is that Chinese airborne sub hunters are tasked with protecting Chinese ballistic missile submarines as they sail to their patrol and launch locations. “The PLAN clearly views fixed-wing ASW as an important enabler of its at-sea nuclear deterrent,” the report said.

The Chinese navy’s current fixed-wing anti-submarine aircraft is the KQ-200, a four-engine turboprop aircraft that is China’s equivalent of the US Navy’s P-8 Poseidon. The PLAN has about 20 KQ-200s, which have a range of about 3,000 miles.

Much like the US Navy, China’s submarine force tends to be secretive. But by examining open-source literature, Tirk and Salisbury were able to discern the efforts China is making in anti-submarine warfare, including patents filed by Chinese researchers.

For example, the state-owned China Electronics Technology Group Corporation filed a patent in 2020 for improved magnetic anomaly detection (MAD), a technology first used in World War II to detect subs by the effect of these big metal objects on the Earth’s magnetic field.

It’s a useful but limited system that usually requires the aircraft to be flying within less than a mile of the target, and can only detect the presence of a sub rather than its course — which means a positive hit must be followed by laying a web of other sensors to be able to target the lurking submarine.

Chinese scientists want to use highly sensitive atomic magnetometers, which use lasers to detect changes in the energy levels between atoms caused by fluctuations in a magnetic field. CETC’s patent is for technology that would “enable an atomic magnetometer to sense the direction of a target rather than just its existence,” Tirk and Salisbury noted.

“According to the filing, previous research on highly-sensitive atomic magnetometers had focused on scalar results (i.e. only the magnitude of a target’s magnetic field), but could not provide vectors (i.e. magnitude and direction).”

“MAD is already a shorter-range capability usually used for more precise positioning after other sensors have provided a rough search area, but any additional information could potentially give operators an edge during search operations.”

A 2022 patent by Aviation Industry Corporation of China calls for a new system to operate sonobuoys, which are floating canisters, dropped by planes and ships, that detect subs by emitting active sonar signals or by passive sensors that detect the noise of a submarine.

Current Chinese sonobuoys require “a complicated and labor-intensive series of manual button presses to configure sonobuoy parameters such as radio working frequency, working depth, working time, and pulse form to fit maritime conditions before deployment.”

These parameters aren’t displayed on the sonobuoy control system. “This means the display and control system is unaware of whether a sonobuoy is on the rack or has been launched, what type of sonobuoys have been launched, or the parameters of any launched sonobuoys,” Tirk and Salisbury wrote. “Instead, operators must manually input this data into the display and control system.”

Other patents are for lighter sonobuoys, and improved communications between sonobuoys and aircraft. In 2022, China surpassed America in number of patents filed.

China has also been improving the quality of anti-submarine training. “The PLAN has acknowledged its limitations and has begun taking steps to improve the quality of its ASW training, both in simulators and in physical training environments,” the report said.

“PLAN ASW units are training under more realistic conditions, and breaking down administrative barriers which prevented them from generating more training opportunities in different operational environments.”

For example, since 2015, training materials have stressed the need for ASW aircraft and ships to work closely together, which is standard practice in the US and Western navies. The PLAN is also using simulators to train sensor and weapon operators.

One exercise involved a patrol aircraft transmitting target data to a command ship, “which then integrated it with information from other sources and checked the information against a target information database to confirm whether or not the target was an enemy submarine,” the CMSI report noted.

“This indicated both a potential command relationship from command vessels to ASW aircraft and confirmed that the PLAN trains to compare potential targets to a database, despite its small (but expanding) ocean surveillance and intelligence collection fleet and a nascent underwater surveillance capability.”

Conscription Is Coming Back To Europe

•June 2, 2024 • Leave a Comment
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz at the Lithuanian-German military exercise “Grand Quadriga” in Pabrade, north of the capital Vilnius, Lithuania

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • May 28, 2024 // ReMix

While several countries are reintroducing compulsory military service, some EU politicians would welcome a uniform reintroduction across the EU.

Hungarian news portal Divány has rounded up the countries that have reintroduced conscription.

Professional armies are understaffed across the continent, as more and more European countries are recognizing. In recent weeks, not only EU leaders but also the leadership of the German Christian Democratic Party has brought up the idea of reintroducing compulsory military service.

At its party congress at the beginning of May, the CDU adopted a proposal that young people should be obliged to serve for a certain period either in the army or the social sector. Manfred Weber, leader of the European People’s Party, made a similar statement recently, saying he would extend conscription to the whole continent.

Germany abolished conscription in 2011, and this is what would be gradually rebuilt.

The former compulsory military service would be reintroduced as a year of community service, either in the Bundeswehr or a social institution. The initiative would also open up the possibility for women to enter the military. The German government would reintroduce conscription based on several scenarios, making it compulsory for all 18-year-olds.

The Swedish model is seen by many as an example, with all citizens in the Nordic country, both men and women, having to register and, at the same time, indicate their willingness to serve in the military. In Sweden, only a small proportion of those who are of age are actually conscripted into the army.

Germany is not the only country to revisit the idea of compulsory military service, with Denmark planning to introduce the recruitment of women in 2026.

Military service is compulsory in the following European countries: Cyprus, Greece, Austria, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Cyprus, Denmark and Sweden.

Latvia was the latest country to reintroduce the system, with all men aged between 18 and 27 having to re-enlist in 2023 for 11 months of compulsory service, just 16 years after its abolition, while military service is voluntary for women.

The Baltic State’s decision was influenced by the Russian-Ukrainian war.

Lithuania decided in 2015 to introduce compulsory military service, also in response to the geopolitical situation.

Finland has also just decided on compulsory military service, with periods of 165, 255, or 347 days.

From the age of 18, all men can be called up, and military service is compulsory until the age of 30, after which Finns are considered reservists. The Swedish example, already mentioned, is a curiosity in Europe, where women, in addition to men, can also enlist on the basis of their declaration.

In Greece, military service is compulsory between the ages of 19 and 45, usually for 9-12 months, the length depending on the type of force, and in Cyprus it is compulsory for those over 18.

In Denmark, the military service is similar to the abolished Hungarian system, with 18-year-olds having to serve for 4-12 months, which can be replaced by community service.

Those who wish to continue their education after secondary school can postpone their compulsory military service until the age of 25.

In Austria, in a 2013 referendum, more than 59 percent of the population voted in favor of conscription, with all men having to serve for eight months, which can also be replaced by community service.

Deuteronomy (27-28)

•June 1, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 27

1 And Moses with the elders of Israel commanded the people, saying, “Keep all the commandments which I command you this day.

— Moses with the elders; having in discourses at several times repeated the principal parts of the laws, and made several necessary additions to them, Moses called the council together, the seventy elders, at the head of whom was Moses, which made the great Sanhedrin, or council of the nation;

— keep all the commandments which I command you this day; not in his own name, as being the supreme legislator, but in the name of the Lord, whom they had avouched to be their God and King;

And it shall be on the day when ye shall pass over the Jordan unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, that thou shalt set thee up great stones, and plaster them with plaster.

— they were ordered to take twelve stones, and did; but then they were set up in a different place, and for a different purpose; and plaster them with plaster: that so words might be written upon them, and be more conspicuous, and more easily read;

And thou shalt write upon them all the words of this law when thou art passed over, that thou mayest go in unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, a land that floweth with milk and honey, as the Lord God of thy fathers hath promised thee.

— thou shalt write upon them all the words of this law; it might be, as some think, the Decalogue; but a greater probability is that it was “the blessings and curses,” which comprised in fact an epitome of the law (Joshua 8:34).

Therefore it shall be when ye have gone over the Jordan, that ye shall set up these stones, which I command you this day, on Mount Ebal, and thou shalt plaster them with plaster. — in Mount Ebal; a mountain near Shechem in Samaria, the mount of cursing. Here the law is written, to signify that a curse was due to its violators;

And there shalt thou build an altar unto the Lord thy God, an altar of stones. Thou shalt not lift up any iron tool upon them. — there shalt thou build an altar; of whole stones; these stones were to be in their natural state.

Thou shalt build the altar of the Lord thy God of whole stones, and thou shalt offer burnt offerings thereon unto the Lord thy God. — whole stones; rough, not hewn, nor polished, whereby all manner of imagery was avoided.

And thou shalt offer peace offerings, and shalt eat there, and rejoice before the Lord thy God. — and thou shall offer peace offerings; part of which belonged to God, which was burnt on the altar, and part to the priest that offered them; and the rest to the owner that brought them, which he eat of with his friends;

And thou shalt write upon the stones all the words of this law very plainly.” — and thou shall write upon the stones all the words of this law; not upon the stones of the altar, but upon the first stones brought to Mount Ebal, and set up there before;

And Moses and the priests, the Levites, spoke unto all Israel, saying, “Take heed and hearken, O Israel: This day thou art become the people of the Lord thy God. — this day thou art become the people of the Lord thy God; they were his people before; he had redeemed them out of Egypt; led them through the wilderness, and provided for them and protected them there;

— and had given them laws and statutes to observe to walk in; all which showed them to be his peculiar people: but now in a very formal and solemn manner they were vouched and declared by him to be his people;

10 Thou shalt therefore obey the voice of the Lord thy God, and do His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day.” — thou shalt therefore obey the voice of the Lord thy God; in whatsoever he directs in his word, and by his prophets, his Son, eminently called the Word of the Lord:
and do his commandments and his statutes, which I command thee this day;

11 And Moses charged the people the same day, saying,

12 “These shall stand upon Mount Gerizim to bless the people when ye have come over the Jordan: Simeon, and Levi, and Judah, and Issachar, and Joseph, and Benjamin. — the 12 tribes were divided on Gerizim and Ebal;

— on Mount Gerizim were stationed the descendants of Rachel and Leah, the two principal wives of Jacob, and to them was assigned the most pleasant and honorable office of pronouncing the benedictions;

13 And these shall stand upon Mount Ebal to curse: Reuben, Gad, and Asher, and Zebulun, Dan, and Naphtali. — on the twin hill of Ebal were placed the posterity of the bond-women, of the two secondary wives, Zilpah and Bilhah, with those of Reuben, who had lost the primogeniture, and Zebulun, Leah’s youngest son that the numbers might be equal;

14 And the Levites shall speak, and say unto all the men of Israel with a loud voice: — with a loud voice; so as they might be heard by a great number of the people, by whom the rest were informed and directed by some signal when they should answer.

15 “‘Cursed be the man that maketh any graven or molten image, an abomination unto the Lord, the work of the hands of the craftsman, and putteth it in a secret place.’ And all the people shall answer and say, ‘Amen.’ — the “Amen” attested the conviction of the utterers that the sentences to which they responded were true, just, and certain;

16 “‘Cursed be he that treateth lightly his father or his mother.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — cursed be he that setteth light by his father, or his mother; that secretly despises them in his heart, and by looks and gestures mocks at them in a private manner;

17 “‘Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor’s landmark.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — cursed be he that removeth his neighbour’s landmark; removes it forward, and steals ground, this is commonly done secretly; Deuteronomy 19:14

18 “‘Cursed be he that maketh the blind to wander out of the way.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — cursed be he that maketh the blind to wander out of the way; by directing him wrong knowingly, or laying a stumbling block in his way, Leviticus 19:14

— the Targum of Jonathan says, “that maketh a traveller wander out of the way, who like a blind man;” who knows his way no more than a blind man does.

19 “‘Cursed be he that perverteth the judgment of the stranger, fatherless, and widow.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — there follow twelve curses; the fifth against those who pervert the right of strangers, orphans and widows;

20 “‘Cursed be he that lieth with his father’s wife, because he uncovereth his father’s skirt.’ And all the people shall say, ’Amen.’ — the sixth against incest with a mother;

21 “‘Cursed be he that lieth with any manner of beast.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — the seventh against unnatural vices (Leviticus 18:23);

22 “‘Cursed be he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father or the daughter of his mother.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — the eighth and ninth against incest with a sister or a mother-in-law (Leviticus 18:9 and Leviticus 18:17);

23 “‘Cursed be he that lieth with his mother-in-law.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’

24 “‘Cursed be he that smiteth his neighbor secretly.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — the tenth against secret murder (Exodus 20:13; Numbers 35:16.);

25 “‘Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — the eleventh against judicial murder (“he that taketh reward to slay a soul, namely, innocent blood:” Exodus 23:7-8);

26 “‘Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ — the twelfth against the man who does not set up the words of this law to do them, who does not make the laws the model and standard of his life and conduct.

Deuteronomy 28

1 “And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of the Lord thy God to observe and to do all His commandments which I command thee this day, that the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth;

— if thou hearken diligently; the foregoing blessings and curses being appointed to be pronounced in so solemn a manner, Moses takes occasion from thence to enlarge upon both of them, to show the Israelites what they and their posterity had to expect at the hands of God;

and all these blessings shall come on thee and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God: — all these blessings shall overtake thee; the blessings which others greedily follow after, and never overtake, shall follow after thee, and shall be thrown into thy lap by special kindness.

“Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field. — blessed shalt thou be in the city; not only in the city of Jerusalem, where the temple would be built, and there be blessed with the service, worship, and ordinances of God, but in all other cities of the land;

— where they should dwell in title, large, and spacious houses, and their cities should be walled and fenced, and be very populous; yet should enjoy health, and have plenty of all sorts of provisions brought unto them, as well as prosper in all kinds of merchandise there.

Blessed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit of thy herds, the increase of thy cattle, and the flocks of thy sheep. — blessed shall be the fruit of thy body; their children, of which they should have many, and these live; be healthful, thrive, and arrive to manhood, and increase and perpetuate their families;

— and the fruit of thy ground; of their gardens, orchards, and fields; grass for the cattle, and the wheat, barley, vines, figs, pomegranates, olives, and dates for the use of men: and the fruit of thy cattle; which being distinguished from oxen and sheep.

Blessed shall be thy basket and thy stores. — blessed shall be thy basket; which the Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem restrain to the basket of firstfruits, and the cake of the first of their dough;

— but it intends any and every vessel in which they put their provisions for present use, and that that should never be empty of them, and that they should always have a sufficiency: and thy store; what remained, and was laid up in their barns, cellars, and storehouses, for future use, or in proper places for seed.

Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out. — in all their business and employments of life whether within doors or outside;

— in the administration of every office, whether more public or private; and in all their journeys going out and coming home; and particularly when they went out to war, and returned, all should be attended with success.

“The Lord shall cause thine enemies who rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face; they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways. — flee before thee seven ways—that is, in various directions, as always happens in a rout.

“The Lord shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses and in all that thou settest thine hand unto; and He shall bless thee in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. — in thy storehouses: barns, granaries, and cellar, where their corn, wine, and oil, were laid up; by preserving the corn from being devoured by vermin, and the casks of wine and oil from bursting and running out.

“The Lord shall establish thee a holy people unto Himself, as He hath sworn unto thee, if thou shalt keep the commandments of the Lord thy God and walk in His ways. — an holy people unto himself, that is, shall confirm and establish his covenant with thee, by which he separated thee to himself as a holy and peculiar people, and shall publicly own thee for such.

10 And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord, and they shall be afraid of thee. — compare this to Jeremiah 33:9 “And they shall fear and tremble for all the goodness and for all the prosperity, that I provide unto it.”

11 And the Lord shall make thee plenteous in goods, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy ground, in the land which the Lord swore unto thy fathers to give thee. — in the land which the Lord sware unto thy fathers to give thee; the land of Canaan, often thus described; it evidence shows it is also true in the land of exile.

12 The Lord shall open unto thee His good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in his season, and to bless all the work of thine hand; and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.

— and thou shall lend unto many nations, and thou shall not borrow; that is, thou shalt be in such affluent circumstances, as to be capable, out of thy superfluous wealth, to give aid to thy poorer neighbors.

13 And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath, if thou hearken unto the commandments of the Lord thy God which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them. — the head, and not the tail; give them dominion over others, and not make them subject to them; the head signifies rulers and governors, and the tail the common people that are subjects;

14 And thou shalt not go aside from any of the words which I command thee this day, to the right hand or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them. — to the right hand or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them; which to do was to break the first and principal table of the law, than which nothing was more abominable and provoking to God.

15 “But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day, that all these curses shall come upon thee and overtake thee: — that all these curses shall come upon thee; from the hand of God, certainly, suddenly and unexpectedly:

16 “Cursed shalt thou be in the city, and cursed shalt thou be in the field. — in these curses are specified and delivered out in form, as the reverse of the blessings in Deuteronomy 28:3;

17 Cursed shall be thy basket and thy stores. — if under the curse, which, in summary, includes all misery, as the blessing all happiness.

18 Cursed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy land, the increase of thy cattle, and the flocks of thy sheep. — cursed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy land; — the Targum of Jonathan says “Accursed the children of your wombs, the fruits of your ground, the oxen of your herds, and the sheep of your flocks.”

19 Cursed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and cursed shalt thou be when thou goest out. — in all their business and employments of life whether within doors or outside;

— in the administration of every office, whether more public or private; and in all their journeys going out and coming home; and particularly when they went out to war, and returned, all should be attended with success.

20 “The Lord shall send upon thee cursing, vexation, and rebuke in all that thou settest thine hand unto to do until thou be destroyed and until thou perish quickly, because of the wickedness of thy doings whereby thou hast forsaken Me.

— vexation; trouble, distress, and anguish of spirit: and rebuke; this may well be considered as a rebuke and correction for sins committed, to awaken to a sense and acknowledgment of them, and to repentance for them;

21 The Lord shall make the pestilence cleave unto thee until He have consumed thee from off the land whither thou goest to possess it. — pestilence; some fatal epidemic, like Covid-19; there is no reason, however, to think that the plague, which is the great modern scourge worldwide, is referred to.

22 The Lord shall smite thee with a consumption, and with a fever, and with an inflammation, and with an extreme burning, and with the sword, and with blight, and with mildew; and they shall pursue thee until thou perish.

— hard drugs such as methamphetamine, fentanyl and heroin, and they shall pursue thee until thou perish; coincided with an increase in violence, including gun crime, and come so close one after another upon them, until they are utterly destroyed. In 2021, more than 80,000 deaths in the United States were related to opioids, with nearly 71,000 linked with fentanyl.

23 And thy heaven that is over thy head shall be brass, and the earth that is under thee shall be iron. — thy heaven that is over thy head shall be brass; for its dryness and hardness, no moisture being in it, or passing through it; no showers of rain nor dew being let down from it;

— and the earth that is under thee shall be iron; or like iron, hard and impenetrable, into which the plough and spade will not enter; nor anything spring out of it, for want of rain and dew to moisten and soften it.

24 The Lord shall make the rain of thy land powder and dust; from heaven shall it come down upon thee until thou be destroyed. — powder and dust; the great desert, that is, instead of showers of rain in their season, to water, refresh, and enrich the earth, now a land of powder and dust; becoming a great desert, makes this only too possible;

Heavy sand and dust storm above desert land during the summer heat

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

After the rain which cometh down on the earth, the Lord will send a wind that shall drive dust and ashes upon the herbage of your fields; and calamity will fall upon you from the heavens, until you are consumed.

25 “The Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies; thou shalt go out one way against them and flee seven ways before them, and shalt be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.

— the Lord shall cause thee to be smitten fore thine enemies; and by them, as they sometimes were by the Philistines and others, before their utter destruction, when they sinned against the Lord; and by the Assyrians, Babylonians, and Romans;

— thou shall go out one way against them, and flee seven ways before them; march out against them in a body, promising themselves victory, but be utterly routed; so that they shall flee every way they can for their safety; Deuteronomy 28:7,

— and shall be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth; the ten tribes, when taken captive by Shalmaneser, were not carried into all the kingdoms of the earth, neither were the Jews; only to some particular places; but this prophecy is yet for the endtime: “into all the kingdoms of the earth”

— for a close parallel, see Jeremiah 23 (Another “Out of Egypt” Exodus)

“Therefore, behold, the days come,” saith the Lord, “that they shall no more say, ‘The Lord liveth who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt,’

but, ‘the Lord liveth who brought up and who led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them.’ And they shall dwell in their own land” Jeremiah 23:7-8

26 And thy carcass shall be meat unto all fowls of the air and unto the beasts of the earth, and no man shall frighten them away. — it was to be a very grievous calamity, where their carcasses lying unburied; and as this have never happened, this prophecy is yet for the endtime;

27 The Lord will smite thee with the boils of Egypt, and with the hemorrhoids, and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed. — the botch of Egypt; the “boil,” with which the Egyptians were plagued (Exodus 9:9); the “scab” and “itch” represent the various forms of the loathsome skin diseases;

28 The Lord shall smite thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart; — and blindness; not of body, but of mind; with judicial blindness and hardness of heart: astonishment of heart; they shall be filled with wonder and horror, because of the strangeness and soreness of their calamities.

29 and thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness, and thou shalt not prosper in thy ways. “And thou shalt be only oppressed and despoiled evermore, and no man shall save thee. — thou shalt grope at noonday, a general description of the painful uncertainty in which they would live.;

— and thou shall not prosper in thy ways; in any steps they may take to extricate themselves out of their difficulties, distresses, and calamities; they would be miserable, poor and wretched, mean and despicable.

30 Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her. Thou shalt build a house, and thou shalt not dwell therein. Thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes thereof. — thou shall betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her; espouse a woman in order to make her his wife, and before he can take her home, and consummate the marriage, some calamity or another would come upon them;

— thou shall build an house, and thou shall not dwell therein; being, before it is quite finished, or however before he is got into it, carried captive, or obliged to flee to a distant place;

31 Thine ox shall be slain before thine eyes, and thou shalt not eat thereof. Thine ass shall be violently taken away from before thy face, and shall not be restored to thee. Thy sheep shall be given unto thine enemies, and thou shalt have none to rescue them.

— thine ox shall be slain before thine eyes, and thou shalt not eat thereof; shall be taken from the owner, and out of the field or stall, by the enemy, and killed for the soldiers to feed on, and not the least part of it given to them;

— thine ass shall be violently taken away from before thy face, and shall not be restored unto thee; thy sheep shall be given unto thine enemies, and thou shall have none to rescue them; not given them by themselves, but they should be suffered to fall into their hands, and they should never be able to get them out again;

32 Thy sons and thy daughters shall be given unto another people, and thine eyes shall look and fail with longing for them all the day long; and there shall be no might in thine hand. — thy sons and thy daughters shall be given unto another people; this also was not true in the Babylonish captivity; for then their sons and daughters went with them, and continued with them, and returned again;

— but has been oftentimes verified on their captivity by the Romans; their sons and daughters taken from them by force, to be brought up in another religion, by the edicts of kings and popes, and by the canons of councils, and particularly of the fourth council of Toledo, in attendance by all the bishops of Hispania;

— but onone had happened with the lost 10 tribes; for then their sons and daughters went with them in captivity, and continued with them, though they never returned;

33 The fruit of thy land and all thy labors shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed always,

— “a nation which thou knowest not” wouldn’t be Assyria, who took the 10 tribes, nor Babylon, who took the Jews; as they were neighbouring countries; nor Rome; more likely “a nation against thee from far” and “a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand” verse 49, it could be Russia or China at the endtimes;

— and thou shall be only oppressed and crushed always; this seems best to agree with their present case, or future tense; for in their former captivities they were not always oppressed and crushed;

34 so that thou shalt be mad for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. — thou shalt be mad, for the sight of thine eyes that thou shall see; on account of the shocking things they saw, their dreadful calamities, oppressions, and persecutions;

35 The Lord shall smite thee in the knees and in the legs with a sore boil that cannot be healed, from the sole of thy foot unto the top of thy head.

— the Lord shall smite thee in the knees, and in the legs, with a sore botch, that cannot be healed; this as being a disease of such a nature, that it would render it utterly impossible for those who were afflicted with it either to stand or walk, and then heightens the threat by adding the words, “from the sole of the foot to the top of the head.”

36 “The Lord shall bring thee and thy king whom thou shalt set over thee unto a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, and there shalt thou serve other gods, wood and stone. — “a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known” seems very foreign; for they would have known the Assyrians, the Babylonians and even the Romans;

— and there shall thou serve other gods, wood and stone; which they were obliged to do as were in Babylon, and under subjection to a foreign power, and they should be made to serve other gods, wood and stone seduced or compelled into idolatry as were in the Assyrian and Babylonish captivities;

37 And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee. — an astonishment, and would become an object of horror, a proverb, and a byword among the nations;

38 “Thou shalt carry much seed out into the field and shalt gather but little in, for the locust shall consume it. — consumption of corn by locusts and of grapes by worms, and casting of olives; for the locust shall consume it; which is a great destroyer of the fruits of the earth;

39 Thou shalt plant vineyards and dress them, but shalt neither drink of the wine nor gather the grapes, for the worms shall eat them. — even in their own land the curse would fall upon every kind of labour and enterprise; much seed would give little to reap, because the locust would devour the seed; the planting and dressing of the vineyard would furnish no wine to drink, because the worm would devour the vine;

40 Thou shalt have olive trees throughout all thy borders, but thou shalt not anoint thyself with the oil, for thine olive shall cast his fruit. — thou shalt have olive trees throughout thy borders, but thou shalt not anoint thyself with the oil; nor any other relations, friends, guests, as were at entertainments;

41 Thou shalt beget sons and daughters, but thou shalt not enjoy them, for they shall go into captivity. — thou shalt beget sons and daughters, but thou shall not enjoy them; for “they shall not be thine” being taken from them into captivity, and given to others;

42 All thy trees and fruit of thy land shall the locust consume. — the locust, a creature that not only consumes grass, and herbs, and the corn of the field, but all green trees;

43 The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high, and thou shalt come down very low. — the stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; in wealth and riches, in power and authority, in honour and dignity;

— and thou shall come down, very low; into a very mean condition, to be in great subjection, a vassal and a slave;

44 He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him. He shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail. — he shall lend to thee, and thou shall not lend to him; the stranger, or one of another nation, shall be in a capacity of lending to the Israelite, when the Israelite would not be able to lend to the Gentile.

45 Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall pursue thee and overtake thee till thou be destroyed, because thou hearkened not unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to keep His commandments and His statutes which He commanded thee.

— and shall pursue thee, and overtake thee till thou be destroyed; which though they would endeavour to flee from and escape, should not be able, since they would follow them so closely and swiftly, and overtake them, and seize upon them;

46 And they shall be upon thee for a sign and for a wonder, and upon thy seed for ever. — and they shall be upon thee for a sign and for a wonder; and what follow, should rest and remain upon them, continue with them, and be very visible on them; so as to be observed by others, as a sign of the wrath and displeasure of God.

47 “Because thou served not the Lord thy God with joyfulness and with gladness of heart for the abundance of all things, — with joyfulness and gladness of heart, for the abundance of all things; which they enjoyed in the land of Canaan, a land that abounded with all good things; which laid them under great obligations to serve the Lord:

48 therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies whom the Lord shall send against thee, in hunger and in thirst and in nakedness and in want of all things; and He shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck until He have destroyed thee.

— and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck; bring them into a state of subjection to their enemies, which would be intolerable to them, and from which they would not be able to free themselves, any more than to break an iron yoke; which, as were in the Babylonish captivity, and their subjection in that state.

49 The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth, a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand, — the Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far; the invasion of the Romans: “they came from far.” But more likely for the endtime, the Russians and the Chinese , woule then be considered “the end of the earth.”

50 a nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old nor show favor to the young. — a nation of fierce countenance; the Russians had lost 20 millions to the Nazis; the Chinese a similar amount to the Japanese, all had toughened themselves;

51 And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle and the fruit of thy land until thou be destroyed; he also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy cattle, or flocks of thy sheep until he have destroyed thee.

— and your enemy shall eat the fruit of thy cattle, oxen and sheep, as their calves and lambs, and kids of the goat, and the fruit, wheat, barley, figs, grapes, pomegranates, olives, and dates, of thy land until thou be destroyed;

52 And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates until thy high and fortified walls come down wherein thou trusted, throughout all thy land; and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land which the Lord thy God hath given thee.

— and he, a modern type of Shalmaneser, Sennacherib, and Nebuchadnezzar, shall besiege thee in all thy gates until thy high and fortified walls come down wherein thou trusted;

53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the Lord thy God hath given thee, in the siege and in the extremity wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee,

— thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body; this been confirmed during the siege of Samaria by the Syrians (II Kings 6:26-29; but also in Deuteronomy 28:56), and also in Jerusalem when besieged by Nebuchadnezzar (Lamentations 2:20; 4:10)

— during the siege of Samaria by the Syrians:

26 And as the king of Israel was passing by upon the wall, there cried a woman unto him, saying, “Help, my lord, O king!”

27 And he said, “If the Lord do not help thee, from whence shall I help thee? Out of the barn floor or out of the wine press?”

28 And the king said unto her, “What aileth thee?” And she answered, “This woman said unto me, ‘Give thy son, that we may eat him today, and we will eat my son tomorrow.’

29 So we boiled my son and ate him. And I said unto her on the next day, ‘Give thy son, that we may eat him’; and she hath hid her son.” II Kings 6:26-29

— and from the MSG version:

26 One day the king of Israel was walking along the city wall. A woman cried out, “Help! Your majesty!”

27 He answered, “If God won’t help you, where on earth can I go for help? To the granary? To the dairy?”

28-29 The king continued, “Tell me your story.”

She said, “This woman came to me and said, ‘Give up your son and we’ll have him for today’s supper; tomorrow we’ll eat my son.’ So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I told her, ‘Your turn—bring your son so we can have him for supper.’ But she had hidden her son away.” II Kings 6:26-28

54 so that the man that is tender among you and very delicate, his eye shall be evil toward his brother, and toward the wife of his bosom, and toward the remnant of his children whom he shall leave, — his eye shall be evil towards his brother, and towards the wife of his bosom, and towards the remnant of his children which he shall leave;

— that is, he shall begrudge his brother, who is so nearly related to him, the least bit of food; yea, his wife, he dearly loved, and is one flesh with him, his other self, and even his children, which are parts of himself, such of them as were left not eaten by him; or his eye should be evil upon then, he should look with an evil eye on them, determining within himself to kill and eat them next.

55 so that he will not give to any of them of the flesh of his children whom he shall eat, because he hath nothing left him in the siege and in the extremity wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee in all thy gates. — so that he will not give to any of them of the flesh of his children whom he shall eat; neither give to a brother, nor to a wife, nor to any of his remaining children, the least bit of the flesh of a child he has killed and dressed for his own food;

— because he hath nothing left him in the siege, and in the straitness wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee in all thy gates; every creature being eaten up, dogs, cats, anything dung of beasts, and whatsoever else could be any ways made food of;

56 The tender and delicate woman among you, who would not venture to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness and tenderness, her eye shall be evil toward the husband of her bosom, and toward her son and toward her daughter,

— the stress being so immensed, character changed for fear of taking cold, or defiling her feet, her eye shall be evil towards the husband of her bosom, and towards her son, and towards her daughter; begrudge them every bit they eat, and restrain food from them as much as in her lies, and even snatch it out of their mouths;

57 and toward her young one who cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children whom she shall bear; for she shall eat them secretly for want of all things in the siege and extremity wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates. — and toward her young one that cometh out from between her fee; for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and straitness wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates;

58 “If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, The Lord Thy God, — that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name of the Lord thy God;

— or that it might appear that the fear of God was before their eyes, and in their hearts, by their obedience to his law; that they had a proper awe and reverence of him, who is glorious in his titles and attributes, and whose name is Yehovah;

59 then the Lord will make thy plagues wondrous, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. — then the Lord will make thy plagues wonderful; visible, remarkable, distinguishable, and astonishing to all that see them;

— and the plagues of thy seed; for they were to continue, as they have done, with their posterity, age after age: even great plagues, and of long continuance; great as to quality and quantity;

60 Moreover He will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt which thou wast afraid of, and they shall cleave unto thee. — and would bring all the diseases and pestilences of Egypt; which thou wast afraid of; when living among them, and they shall cleave unto thee; not only should come upon them, but continue with them; they should not get rid of, or be cured;

61 Also every sickness and every plague which is not written in the book of this law, them will the Lord bring upon thee until thou be destroyed. — every plague which is not written in the book of this law; now Covid-19, bird flu; whatsoever sickness or disease that could be thought of or named;

62 And ye shall be left few in number, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude, because thou wouldest not obey the voice of the Lord thy God. — whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; and, as it is sometimes said, as the sand of the sea, as was promised to Abraham, Genesis 15:5; and was partly fulfilled in the days of Solomon 1 Kings 4:20;

— and ye shall be left few in number, because thou wouldest not obey the voice of the Lord thy God; in his law, and by his prophets;

63 “And it shall come to pass that as the Lord rejoiced over you to do you good and to multiply you, so the Lord will rejoice over you to destroy you and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it. — rejoice over you to destroy you; his just indignation against them will be so great, that it will be a pleasure to him to take vengeance on them;

— the Emperor Adrian, to prevent their insurrections and rebellions, which had given him a great deal of trouble, ordered by an edict that no Jew should come into Jerusalem, nor into the land of Judea, or be seen; by which means the country had them cleared.

64 And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone. — and the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even to the other; which refers to their current situation, in all parts of the world, east, west, north, and south;

65 And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest; but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart and failing of eyes and sorrow of mind. — but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart; being always in fear lest their persons should be seized on, their children taken from them, and their goods confiscated; hence the epithet of “trembling”

66 And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have no assurance of thy life. — and thou shalt fear day and night; being in continual dread of being killed: and shalt have none assurance of thy life; of its being continued a moment scarcely, but live in constant fear and expectation of its being taken away.

67 In the morning thou shalt say, ‘Would God it were evening!’ and at evening thou shalt say, ‘Would God it were morning!’ for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. — in the morning thou shalt say, would God it were even; wishing they might get through the day well, fearing their life would be taken away before night, or some sad calamity befall them before the day could past;

— for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine eyes which, thou shalt see; often beholding such dreadful sights, as their countrymen put upon the rack, and cruelly tortured, and then burnt alive;

— and so their hearts would fear and tremble, lest they should be the next that would be taken up and used in this manner; besides other severities and hard usages, with which their brethren were treated, and they in continual fear of.

68 And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships by the way whereof I spoke unto thee, ‘Thou shalt see it no more again.’ And there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.”

— into Egypt again, either into a state of hard bondage and slavery, like that their fathers were in; he hath now so gloriously delivered thee, and the remembrance of what they endured in Egypt could not but make the thoughts of returning thither again very terrible to them;

— no man shall buy you; that is, no one shall venture even to employ you as slaves, regarding you as accursed of God, and to be shunned in everything;

— in archaic English, the Targum of Jonathan says:

And the Word of the Lord will bring you captive to Mizraim in ships through the Sea of Suph, by the way you passed over, of which I said to you, No more shall you see it. And there will you be sold to your enemies, at the beginning for a dear price, as artificers, and afterward at a cheap price, as servants and handmaids, until you be worthless and (be consigned) to unpriced labour, and there be none who will take you.

Russia’s Tactical Nuclear Drills Near Ukraine

•June 1, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Russia Launches Tactical Nuclear Drills Near Ukraine In Response To ‘Western Threats’

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • May 22, 2024

Russia on Tuesday confirmed that its forces have kicked off tactical nuclear weapons drills in its southern military district, which is near the Ukrainian border, in what the Kremlin has described as a response to “threats” by the West.

The defense ministry (MoD) announced that the exercises aim to test the “readiness” of its “non-strategic nuclear weapons … to ensure the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Russian state.”

The MoD specified that this is in “response to provocative statements and threats by certain Western officials.”

“Under the order of the commander-in-chief, a military exercise involving practice of preparation and use of tactical nuclear weapons started in the Southern military district under the supervision of the General Staff,” the ministry said.

First unveiled in early May, the date and location of the exercises at that early preview phase were unknown. The Foreign Ministry had warned at the time that NATO’s own “Steadfast Defender” drills are possible preparations for war with Russia.

And more recently some US and UK officials have been pressing for more Ukrainian attacks directly on Russian soil, with Washington officials now openly debating whether to allow pro-Kiev forces to utilize US-supplied missiles to attack inside Russian territory. Zelensky has meanwhile launched a new aggressive lobbying campaign to push deepened Western involvement

Western allies are taking too long to make key decisions on military support for Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy told Reuters in an exclusive interview in Kyiv on Monday.

He also said he was pushing partners to get more directly involved in the war by helping to intercept Russian missiles over Ukraine and allowing Kyiv to use Western weapons against enemy military equipment amassing near the border.

Another among the ‘threats’ emanating from the West is the possibility of deploying NATO troops in Ukraine. The idea has gained steam ever since Frances Emmanuel Macron first proposed it months ago a security conference in Paris. Lithuania is the latest to recently back the idea.

According to more details of Tuesday’s non-strategic nuclear forces drills via state media:

“As part of this stage, the personnel of the missile formations of the Southern Military District are completing combat training tasks for obtaining special ammunition for the Iskander operational and tactical missile system, equipping them with launch vehicles and covertly advancing to the designated positional area to prepare for missile launches,” the ministry explained, adding that the Russian aviation is training with the equipment of special combat units of aircraft destruction, including Kinzhal hypersonic missiles.

Russia’s military has issued several videos and images of the drills in progress, which will also be monitored closely from Western capitals and the Pentagon. The situation is ominous to say the least…

Curious, have you ever wonder what this prophecy is all about?

Blowback in the African Coup Belt

•May 31, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Mises Wire by Marcel Dumas Gautreau • May 11, 2024

Starting in 2020, things started to get strange in Africa for those who knew what to look for. Normally, coups in Africa are nothing to write about. But starting in 2020, we saw six countries flip into a pro-Russian direction in just three years.

Individually, they were a curiosity. Taken together, that rate of turnover outpaced even the most optimistic neoconservative ambitions for pro–United States regime changes in the Middle East.

As General Wesley Clark summarized, “We’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”

That fourth country, Libya, is where our story starts.

Muammar Gaddafi and the Disposal Problem

In 2011, the US and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization destroyed the regime of Muammar Gaddafi. They had wanted to do it for a long time. A true cosmopolitan, Gaddafi had provided lawyers, guns, and money to black nationalists in South Africa, Palestinian Nationalists in Tunisia, Irish Nationalists in the British Isles, White Nationalists in Canada, and Armenian Nationalists in Turkey.

The one ideology for which the Brotherly Leader and Guide of the Revolution had no patience or tolerance was radical Islamic Salafi jihadism.

In March 1998, Libya was the first country to issue an Interpol arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden. The warrant received no attention or action. Five months later, Al-Qaeda bombed the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224.

In September 2001, President George W Bush told Congress that “every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” Gaddafi took the US up on the offer, dismantling its weapons of mass destruction program under the United Nations’ supervision.

It paid over $1 billion in reparations to victims of terrorism to get removed from the State Sponsor of Terror list. In 2008, future US Ambassador to Libya (and Benghazi embassy casualty) J Christopher Stephens reported that “Libya has been a strong partner in the war against terrorism and cooperation in liaison channels is excellent.”

Gaddafi had been highly suspicious of the citizens who chose to join the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan and surveilled them extensively, dutifully reporting them to other intelligence agencies whenever possible. In one particularly obscene case, a Guantanamo detainee named Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda bin Qumu was on the ground leading the Salafi jihadist group “Supporters of Sharia.”

While hundreds are held in Guantanamo, being tortured without trial, the US knowingly released what it deemed a “probable member of al-Qaeda and a member of the African Extremist Network” to tear things up in Libya for them.

A United Kingdom Parliamentary retrospective on the Libya overthrow later admitted, “The possibility that militant extremist groups would attempt to benefit from the rebellion should not have been the preserve of hindsight. Libyan connections with transnational militant extremist groups were known before 2011, because many Libyans had participated in the Iraq insurgency and in Afghanistan with al-Qaeda.”

Gaddafi made a series of dire warnings of what would happen if he died:

“Libya plays a vital role in regional peace and world peace,” he said in an interview with the France 24 television station. “We are an important partner in fighting al Qaeda.”

“There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross to France and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean.”

Saif Gaddafi likewise warned, “Libya may become the Somalia of North Africa, of the Mediterranean. You will see the pirates in Sicily, in Crete, in Lampedusa. You will see millions of illegal immigrants. The terror will be next door.” While the Mediterranean didn’t see a resurgence of literal piracy, Gaddafi’s predictions were otherwise correct if not conservative.

Within five years, US military officials openly conceded that Libya was a failed state. In February 2015, the International Crisis Group warned, “On the current trajectory, the most likely medium-term prospect is not one side’s triumph, but that rival local warlords and radical groups will proliferate, what remains of state institutions will collapse, financial reserves . . . will be depleted, and hardship for ordinary Libyans will increase exponentially.”

As predicted, millions of blacks flocked to Libya’s Mediterranean coast to cross into France and Italy. Many were beaten, raped, and starved in what the United Nations Children’s Fund called “living hellholes” or even sold in open-air slave markets. On the Italian island of Lampedusa, it is not unheard of thirteen years later for hundreds or thousands of illegal African migrants to land in a single night.

On May 22, 2017, in a manifestation of what former Senate Foreign Relations Committee investigative counsel Jack Blum called a “disposal problem,” a Manchester-born Libyan named Salman Abedi returned from his MI5-sponsored jihad in Libya and blew himself to pieces in the middle of an Ariana Grande concert. He killed himself and twenty-two others in an audience primarily composed of young girls.

As the second phase of Hillary Clinton’s “bank shot,” the overthrow of Libya’s government and the looting of its arsenals allowed the Central Intelligence Agency to direct those weapons to jihadis in Syria. The scourges of the Islamic world would also use this windfall of weapons to brutalize populations across Africa’s Sahel region, most notably in Mali.

After 2011, countries in the Sahel experienced between a tenfold and twentyfold increase in deadly Islamic terror incidents from groups like Boko Haram and the Islamic State following what Vision of Humanity calls a “Jihadization of Banditry.”

French Africa and the Series of Coups

After seizing power in 1969, Gaddafi moved in 1973 to seize land in the former French colony of Chad based on older colonial boundaries between Italy and France. In 1979, Libya intervened in the Chadian civil war on the side of Goukouni Oueddei. When Oueddei demanded the withdrawal of Libyan troops, Libya withdrew from the nondisputed territories. Goukouni implicitly affirmed the new border.

France backed Hissène Habré to take over in 1982. General Idriss Déby played a pivotal role in dislodging Libyan troops from northern Chad, but France and President Habré feared his growing influence, exiling him to Sudan.

Gaddafi began supporting Déby’s efforts to raise an army and take over Chad in 1990. When Déby successfully took power, the former rivals became quick friends. Libya withdrew from the disputed strip in 1994, and the two countries locked in a series of security, trade, and refugee resettlement agreements.

Most importantly, the two cooperated extensively as two points in a chain along with Nigeria against Islamic militants. In 2021, Déby was killed in battle against Saudi-funded rebels, backed by elements of one of Libya’s three competing revolutionary governments.

During his rapprochement with the West, Gaddafi and Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi signed the 2008 Treaty of Benghazi. Italy apologized for colonialism and agreed to pay Libya $5 billion in reparations over twenty years.

More importantly, Italy and the European Union would fully modernize Libya’s border patrol infrastructure, including satellite detection and a joint Italian-Libyan coastal patrol to stop the flow of illegal migrants into Europe. With Gaddafi’s death and the failure of any Libyan faction to consolidate control, this infrastructure fell to tatters.

In January 2019, Italy’s populist right began a diplomatic offensive against France, blaming the Republic’s policies in Africa for the migrant flood. At a rally, deputy prime minister Luigi Di Maio posed the question, “If today people are leaving Africa is it because some European countries, with France taking the lead, have never stopped colonizing tens of African states?”

Matteo Salvini likewise said,

There are countries that steal wealth from Africa and France is definitely one of them. France has no interest in making Libya a better place. Paris is interested in taking control of the oil there. And their interests are opposed to the Italian ones. I’m proud to govern a generous country.

We don’t take lessons on humanity from France, let alone from Macron. In recent years, France turned back thousands of migrants, including women and children. They took them back to Italy in the middle of the night, like animals. Again, I don’t take lesson from Macron.

Future prime minister Giorgia Meloni joined the attack, explaining to a television audience the CFA franc, “the colonial currency that France prints for 14 African nations to which it applies seigniorage and by virtue of which it exploits the resources of these nations.”

Holding a picture of a child at the bottom of a Burkina Faso gold mine, she concluded that “the solution is not to take Africans and bring them to Europe, the solution is to free Africa from certain Europeans who exploit it.”

In its defense, the CFA franc has historically been less inflationary than currencies in adjacent African nations. Still, for once, it was not completely unfair and ahistorical to single out France as particularly incompetent.

France’s former colonies have fared unusually poorly relative to those of other colonial powers. From de jure decolonization in 1960 until the end of the Cold War, France launched over a hundred military expeditions into its former African colonies. After the Cold War, more than three-quarters of the coups in sub-Saharan Africa were in former French colonies.

Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger were the worst hit by the Islamic terror wave. Straddling the border between the three countries is the “Islamic State of the Greater Sahara.” After repeated failures of the French-backed governments to dislodge the insurgents, the militaries seized power with popular support.

Sudan, Guinea, and Gabon were likewise overthrown, creating a continuous “coup belt” running from Sudan on the Red Sea to Guinea on the Atlantic. On March 24, Senegal elected Bassirou Diomaye as president, who has vowed to take the country off the CFA franc.

Russia, Russia, Russia

The new military governments of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger formed the Alliance of Sahel States, all of them leaving the Nigeria-dominated and Western-backed Economic Community of West African States. They then announced that French troops were no longer welcome in the countries, and that they would instead be welcoming protection and training from Russia’s Wagner Group.

The Wagner Group was originally a mercenary company run by the Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin. In July 2023, Russia hosted a summit in Saint Petersburg, at which Putin announced he would write off $23 billion in debt owed by various African countries.

The conference was one of Yevgeny Prigozhin’s last appearances in public after his failed June 2023 coup and before his accidental August 2023 plane crash. Wagner in Africa has been renamed as the Africa Corps, rumored to be directly managed by Russian military intelligence.

Russia began offering “regime survival packages” to countries in Africa, in exchange for access to mineral resources. Russia threatens to cut off privileged French access to Nigeran uranium reserves, which are responsible for the production of 12 percent of France’s electricity.

The US also has a direct stake in the form of two Africa Command bases in Niger, one of which completed construction in 2019 as an intelligence center and a launchpad for Reaper drones. The Agadez and Niamey bases are critical to surveillance across Central Africa.

Besides an unknown number of intelligence agents, there are one thousand US troops in the country, and the new Niger government has insisted that they are not welcome. US Undersecretary of State for Africa Molly Phee visited Niger twice in March, but so far, the Nigerien government has shown no sign of budging.

After September 11, 2001, the neoconservatives schemed to dominate the entire Middle East and North Africa. Instead, imperial arrogance and outright perfidy may well have put the country on the path to losing it all.

Curious, have you ever wonder what this prophecy is all about?

China and Russia: One bed but different dreams

•May 30, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China and Russia have one bed but different dreams

Russian weakness has enabled China to emerge as Eurasia’s dominant power. But it also limits the partnership of the two.

China and Russia have one bed but different dreams

Pearls and Irritations by Geoff Raby • May 23, 2024

Visits by heads of state to each other are cloaked in symbolism. But insensitivity to cultural or historical nuances can see the best of intentions go awry.

In March 2013, when Xi Jinping made his first overseas visit as president, to mark the occasion, President Vladimir Putin presented his guest with a specially reproduced front page from Pravda, the official Soviet newspaper, announcing on February 14, 1950, that the so-called Valentine’s Day treaty of friendship and cooperation had been signed by Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong.

After having been kept for three months in Moscow by Stalin, Mao had to sign the treaty, which gave the USSR special access to Xinjiang, accepted Outer Mongolia was ‘‘independent’’ but within the USSR’s sphere of influence, and conceded more than a million hectares of territory in the far east taken from China by Imperial Russia with the 1860 Treaty of Peking.

Mao described these as ‘‘three bitter pills’’ he had been forced to swallow to secure Moscow’s economic and security support for his new regime. Later, during the height of the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s, Mao said China had yet to present Russia with the bill for these territories. If Putin wasn’t, Xi most definitely would be aware of this history.

Putin’s brief two-day visit to China last week, included a day in Harbin in China’s far north-east, near the Russian border. Xi did not accompany him. Following the Bolshevik revolution in October 1917, Harbin is best remembered as a sanctuary for refugees rather than a symbol of Russia-China friendship. Saint Sophia church in central Harbin, in the Byzantine style from the early 20th century, is today a local museum and tacky tourist souvenir store. Far from being ‘‘little Moscow,’’ Russian influence has long gone, except for its bread.

In the Russian Far East, Chinese immigrants are starting to arrive in significant numbers, worrying locals that they will seek to reoccupy land that they believe traditionally belonged to China. To add to these concerns, in 2023 the Chinese government declared that the names of eight Russian cities in the territory lost to Russia in the Treaty of Peking be changed on Chinese maps back to their original Chinese names, including cities such as Vladivostok and Khabarovsk.

Xi and Putin are said to have met 43 times since Xi took charge in 2012. Putin likes to boast about the special relationship between Russia and China based on their ‘‘friendship.’’ Famously, in February 2022, just 18 days before Putin invaded Ukraine, they declared the friendship was ‘‘without limits.’’ Beijing was blindsided by the subsequent invasion; just as it was when Putin invaded Georgia on the eve of the Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics.

Following Putin’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the imposition of a limited sanctions regime, the Kremlin ‘‘pivoted east.’’ As Xi’s anti-Western position hardened, Putin was a natural ally to push back against the US-led liberal international order.

China soon claimed this to be a model of a ‘‘new great power relationship,’’ based on co-operation for the common good of the planet, rather than competition. Together, they increasingly sought to provide leadership to the Global South. In Central Asia, this led to a ‘‘division of labour’’ between Russia providing security and China economic development, especially through the Belt and Road Initiative.

Over the past decade, however, China’s economy has continued to grow substantially faster than Russia’s. Meanwhile, Putin’s Ukraine folly has seen troops moved from the east to the western front. Russia’s military has underperformed; Russia’s claim to provide security for Central Asia carries less weight.

China has become more active in the security area, including opening its second overseas military base in Tajikistan. Beijing has also sought to assert itself politically.

In May 2023, it convened a summit of China plus the five central Asian states, without Russia’s participation. This will become a bi-annual process for economic and security co-ordination. A secretariat will be based in China.

China already hosts the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, and the New Development Bank. Use of the renminbi in trade settlements is becoming widespread. China has also broken ranks and unilaterally extended diplomatic recognition to the Taliban government in Kabul.

While public attitudes towards China are mixed, central Asian elites can see where their bread is buttered and are favourably disposed towards China. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has also raised fears of where the Putin Doctrine might next be applied, contributing to a broader questioning of both Russian and Soviet imperial legacies.

Territories taken from Qing’s China during the last two centuries

China has emerged as the dominant power in Eurasia. Putin therefore needs more than ever to stay close to Xi. China is not his only friend. India, which has bought as much hydrocarbons from sanctioned-Russia as China, is a bigger military customer. Despite India’s more favourable stance towards the US in recent years, Putin also needs it to help balance China.

Despite the superficial bonhomie of the visit optics, gone is the ‘‘friendship without limits’’ rhetoric. Significantly, no progress was made on the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline project, discussed for years and which Russia badly needs now to replace its European markets.

Fears in the West of a rising Chussia – a united China and Russia ‘‘axis of autocracies’’ – belies knowledge of their histories, approaches to security, and extent of economic integration in the global economy. The usual sour antipathy towards the US was in their joint statement; the strongest bond they share. Joint military and security exercises are to expand, but this is a long way from a mutual defence pact which neither wants nor even movement towards interoperability. The Chussia anxiety is much exaggerated.

Beijing’s biggest concern about Russia is regime stability. Failure in Ukraine could see Putin swept away by a colour revolution, although the possibility of that seems remote. Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin’s incandescent flame out across the political landscape would have horrified Xi. For better or worse, Xi finds himself now having to ride the tiger with Putin; regime survival in Moscow is in both their interests.

China’s lost land to Russia

The Eight-Nation Alliance of 1900

Eight-Nation Alliance – Wikipedia

China firing railguns relentlessly

•May 29, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China firing railguns relentlessly while US blows hot and cold

China’s latest test shows commitment to perfecting electromagnetic tech while US waffles between defunding or reviving its efforts

Type 072 destroyer spotted carrying PLAN’s first electromagnetic rail gun

AsiaTimes by Gabriel Honrada • May 22, 2024

China’s latest electromagnetic railgun test ultimately failed but underscored its relentless pursuit of the weapon, contrasting sharply with the US’s uncertain commitment to the potential game-changing technology.

This month, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that the People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) tested an electromagnetic railgun by firing a smart bomb 15 kilometers into the stratosphere at a speed exceeding Mach 5. The test was later declared unsuccessful.

A Naval Engineering University team led by Lu Junyong used artificial intelligence technology to identify and address the cause of the railgun projectile’s undesired tilt during ascent, according to the SCMP report.

The projectile accelerated at roughly 35 times the force of gravity for around five seconds after launch, confirming the researchers’ claim that it exceeded hypervelocity, or Mach 5.

The report says that Chinese policymakers expect the railgun project to advance civilian technologies such as high-speed railways, affordable space launches and obvious military applications.

SCMP notes that while the US Navy stopped its railgun development efforts in 2021, due to high energy requirements and poor barrel life, Chinese scientists and engineers have received consistent support, resulting in a series of breakthroughs.

Chinese policymakers anticipate that the rail gun project’s progress will also spur the development of cutting-edge civilian technologies such as hyper-speed railways and more cost-effective space launches.

In a March 2024 article for Defense One, Matt Bruzzese and Peter Singer note that, 20 years ago, Chinese leaders recognized that obtaining advanced shipboard power systems was challenging as foreign countries had restricted their exports to China.

In response, Bruzzese and Singer note that China established the National Key Laboratory in 2007 to advance ship-based electricity and electromagnetics.

They point out that Lu, the same scientist mentioned by SCMP, has been working on those challenges for the past two decades, even before the laboratory was established.

Bruzzese and Singer add that Lu also worked on the railgun wear and failure problem, which has troubled US researchers for at least a decade. In addition to advancing railgun technology, the laboratory has made significant progress in electric and electromagnetic applications.

These include electromagnetic catapults for China’s growing aircraft carrier fleet, a medium-voltage DC-integrated power system to enable the PLA-N’s newest warships to accommodate advanced weaponry and systems, intelligent micro-grids, a direct-drive wind power inverter and an intelligent power station for outposts in the South China Sea.

The US may be taking a different approach to developing the technology. An April 2022 US Congressional Research Service (CRS) report mentions that while the US stopped funding for its railgun project as a naval gunfire support weapon, the US Navy has acknowledged that the gun has potential for missile defense.

The CRS report notes that railgun projectiles costing just US$25,000 each and fired at hypersonic speeds can destroy much more expensive anti-ship missiles. Still, it mentions the difficulty of defending against a swarm of incoming missiles. The report says it takes 300 seconds to detect a ballistic missile launch signature, track it and calculate the vector for defensive projectiles.

The CRS report also asks critical questions about the development of railgun technology for missile defense, including regarding their effectiveness against drone swarms or saturation missile attacks and whether current and planned US Navy ships meet the space and power requirements for such weapons.

The US Navy’s upcoming DDG(X) destroyers are 40% larger than the preceding Arleigh Burke-class and will have an Integrated Power System (IPS) to allocate power to propulsion or weapons systems in real-time. But Asia Times has pointed out severe limitations in US naval shipbuilding capacity and the potential folly of putting so much capability into a few potentially vulnerable ships.

Despite stopping railgun development in 2021, the US has continued railgun testing by firing advanced hypersonic-guided munitions that could be useful for missile defense.

In March 2022, General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems (GA-EMS) completed a significant test series in partnership with the US Army and US Navy to advance gun-launched defensive projectile interceptor designs.

Identical projectiles were test-fired from a railgun and a powder gun at White Sands Missile Range at Dugway Proving Ground in New Mexico to achieve record hypersonic velocities and to test guided flight capabilities.

GA-EMS provided projectiles with integrated gun-hardened guidance electronics to test their ability to maintain data links and control trajectory under intense G-forces at hypersonic speeds.

The initial test series involved firing projectiles from the US Navy’s 32-megajoule railgun system at the White Sands Missile Range. In contrast, the subsequent test series utilized the same projectile designs launched from a 120mm powder gun.

Naval Surface Warfare Center test firing in January 2008

However, the production of those advanced munitions could prove challenging. One reason the US Navy removed the Advanced Gun System (AGS) aboard its Zumwalt-class destroyers was the high cost of its ammunition, estimated at $800,000 per round.

Reducing planned Zumwalt class destroyers from 32 to just three ships drove the exorbitant per ammunition unit cost. Each ship could carry 990 AGS rounds and hit targets at 150 kilometers with ten rounds per minute.

It remains to be seen whether the US Navy’s upcoming DDG(X) will be built in limited numbers, which can significantly raise guided railgun projectile costs.

Christian Orr mentions in an October 2023 19FortyFive article that the US retested its railgun technology that month. However, he says the test video does not explain whether the US Navy is serious about reviving its railgun project.

The US may also be engaging foreign partners to continue railgun research. Orr also an article from the same month by Asia Times about Japan’s railgun test, in which Japan test-fired its railgun prototype from a floating platform at sea.

Orr also mentions that the Japanese Ministry of Defense (MOD) is looking to partner with the US in developing railgun technology to defeat hypersonic weapons. The Japanese MOD has contacted defense contractors BAE Systems and General Atomics, both of which have worked on railgun technology.

Universities capitulate to pro-Palestinian demands

•May 28, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Today, around 300,000 Jews are living in the United Kingdom; 350,00 in France; millions in all elsewhere, the United States, Canada and Australia. More of such demonstrations will bring forth a Boomarang effect making them yearning for home. That’s right, Aliyah!

Volley of shots fired at Jewish girls school in Toronto

And more will end up setting roots in Israel, many around the West Bank, the ancient land of Judea and Samaria. And more troubles ahead! Now, Pro-Palestinian protesters announce end to University of Melbourne encampment after claiming ‘major win’ setting off another round!

After a week-long stand-off that saw hundreds of classes disrupted and threats of police intervention, the University of Melbourne has capitulated to pro-Palestinian demands

ABC News May 22, 2024

Pro-Palestine protesters who occupied a Melbourne university building last week have decided to end their encampment after they say the institution agreed to disclose connections to weapons manufacturers.

In a press conference on Wednesday night uploaded to social media, a Unimelb for Palestine spokesperson announced the encampments in the Arts West building and on the South Lawn would end.

A spokesperson for the group later told the ABC the University of Melbourne had agreed to disclose all research partnerships with weapons manufacturers.

“After months of campaigning, rallies, petitions, meetings and in recent weeks, the encampment, the University of Melbourne has finally agreed to meet an important demand of our campaign,” the spokesperson said.

In the press conference uploaded to social media, the spokesperson said they demanded disclosure of ties within a month and that an independent party of the group’s choice must oversee the process.

“We stand by our claim that the University remains complicit in the genocide in Gaza and continues to fail in its obligations to humanity.”

The spokesperson also said it would be a “gross injustice” if the university were to punish students for being involved in protests, and urged the institution’s leadership to prevent this from happening. 

“We are committed to our demands and will continue to build and fight until the University of Melbourne not only discloses but divests in full,” the spokesperson said.

It’s understood protesters will disband the encampments on Thursday morning.

University welcomes removal of encampment

In a statement, the University of Melbourne say they have welcomed the move.

“We welcome the willingness of the occupiers to leave the Arts West building and remove the encampment from our Parkville campus.”

The University of Melbourne has not yet provided comment on the negotiations with the protesters.

On Wednesday last week, hundreds of demonstrators at the University of Melbourne stormed the Arts West building at its Parkville campus, in actions condemned by the university administration.

Aliyah flights bring in recruits to Israeli army, among others in the West Bank

It followed the establishment of encampments at multiple Melbourne universities, and several weeks of student protests across the city calling for tertiary institutions cut ties with weapons companies.

Pro-Palestinian protesters at Monash University took down their encampment on Friday.

And now, consider this prophecy:

Comac’s tripling rise to Boeing’s downfall

•May 28, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China’s Comac poised to rise on Boeing’s downfall

Chinese plane maker tripling production capacity to seize Boeing’s local market share despite the looming threat of US sanctions

AsiaTimes by Scott Foster • May 24, 2024

The Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, better known as Comac, plans to triple its production capacity to meet rising domestic demand for passenger jets, an expansion that coincides with ongoing troubles for American aviation giant Boeing’s planes.

The chances that Comac will overtake the maligned and mismanaged US plane maker in China’s booming aviation market are rising. But so too are the chances that the US might respond with new sanctions targeting Comac and other Chinese plane makers.

Comac plans to establish a second manufacturing site in Shanghai with an assembly line for its C919 narrow-body passenger jet and related logistics facilities, according to recent reports. The reported goal is to raise Comac’s annual production capacity from about 50 aircraft now to 150 later in the decade.

With a second assembly line in Shanghai, Comac’s goal is to raise its annual production capacity from 50 aircraft now to 150 later in the decade

The C919 can carry up to 192 passengers and travel 5,555 kilometers, putting it in competition with the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320. With only five C919s delivered so far, Comac is just getting started in competing for market share. But Chinese reports suggest Comac’s order backlog already exceeds 1,000 aircraft.

Specifically, the fledgling Chinese aircraft assembler has received orders for about 300 aircraft from China Air, China Eastern Airlines and China Southern Airlines, with deliveries scheduled through 2031. Tibet Airlines, meanwhile, ordered 40 C919s in February.

Limited disclosure makes comparisons difficult but Boeing reported that it had 140 completed B737 MAX 8 aircraft in inventory, of which 85 were destined for China, at the end of 2023. Of these, only 22 had been delivered by the end of April.

The MAX 8 is one of four variants of the Boeing 737 MAX series of narrow-body passenger jets. It entered commercial service in 2017 and became infamous in 2018 and 2019 when two fatal crashes, one in Indonesia and one in Ethiopia, were attributed to defective flight control software.

In March 2019, China became the first nation to ground the 737 MAX. In December 2023, the Chinese government lifted its ban on the delivery of 118 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft that had been ordered by Chinese airlines and aircraft leasing companies.

In January of this year, a MAX 9 aircraft flown by Alaska Airlines created a media sensation when a door plug popped out of the plane and fell into the backyard of a school teacher in Portland, Oregon. Investigations subsequently revealed bolts that were supposed to hold the door in place had not been installed.

This incident resulted in another setback for Boeing as regulators demanded a review of its supply chain and manufacturing procedures, and US Senate hearings put a spotlight on allegations of inadequate quality control and safety procedures.

More recently, on May 22, it was reported that deliveries of Boeing aircraft in China have been delayed again while the Civil Aviation Administration of China investigates the batteries that power their cockpit voice recorders.

Boeing expects to deliver most of its aircraft in inventory by the end of this year but at this point, it is hard to say whether or not this will be possible. If election-year politics lead the Biden administration to sanction Comac, Boeing’s quality problems have made it a perfect target for retaliation.

More than a year ago, in April 2023, US Senators Marco Rubio and Rick Scott of Florida sent a letter to Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan Estevez complaining about the department’s failure to add Comac to its Military End User list.

The senators wrote that Comac “works closely with Western aerospace companies, including firms that produce jet engines and many other components used in commercial and military aircraft. Given the CCP’s [Chinese Communist Party’s] commitment to acquire dual-use aerospace technologies through trade as well as forced joint venture and partnerships, these firms, and US national security by extension, are at risk.”

Most major components of the C919 are either imported or made in China by American and European companies working with Chinese partners. The aircraft is powered by the LEAP jet engine, which is manufactured by CFM International, a joint venture between America’s GE Aviation and France’s Safran Aircraft Engines.

Flight controls, avionics, hydraulics, actuators, fuel systems and landing gear are made in China by local joint ventures with Honeywell, Rockwell Collins, Parker Aerospace and Liebherr.

Aero Engine Corporation of China is developing an alternative [CJ-1000A] to the LEAP jet engine, but recent reports suggest that certification [but the CJ-1000A engine has already obtained certification from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC)] may not come until 2025, if then. About 200 Chinese subcontractors supply the C919’s fuselage, wings, forged parts and other basic components and materials.

Comac seeks to avoid the quality problems that have hamstrung Boeing’s operations and seriously damaged its reputation. At the beginning of May, the C919 was put through four days of tests by China Eastern Airlines, with the engines, landing gear and instruments receiving special attention.

As a new entrant to the civil aviation industry, rigorous testing is imperative for the C919 to obtain certification and eventually compete for orders outside China.

In February, the C919 and Comac’s smaller ARJ21 regional aircraft participated in the Singapore Airshow, after which they made demonstration flights in Malaysia and elsewhere in Southeast Asia. Countries in Africa and Latin America, where China has a large economic presence and relatively good political relations, are also obvious Comac target markets.

For related articles, see:

Comac Unveils Plans for C939

China Rallies C929 off the Ground

China world’s largest wind tunnel

Deuteronomy (25-26)

•May 28, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 25

“If there be a controversy between men and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them, then they shall justify the righteous and condemn the wicked. — if there be a controversy between men; a dispute between two or more:

— that the judges may judge them; who were never less than three; the great Sanhedrin at Jerusalem consisted of seventy one, the lesser court was of twenty three, and the least of all three only;

And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down and to be beaten before his face, according to his fault, by a certain number. — scourging is named as a penalty in Leviticus 19:20. The beating here spoken of would be on the back with a rod or stick, perhaps a rotan, which have been proven to be very effective in its desire effect;

Forty stripes he may give him, and no more, lest, if he should exceed and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem vile unto thee. — then thy brother should seem vile unto thee; as if he was a beast, and not a man, and much less a brother;

— the Targum of Jonathan says, “lest he be in danger, and that thy brother may not be made despicable in thy sight;” lest he be in danger of his life, and become vile, as a dead carcass;

“Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn. — thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn; the larger grains were beaten out by the feet of oxen, which, yoked together, day after day trod round the wide open spaces which form the threshing-floors; and to be humane, they were allowed freely to pick up a mouthful;

“If brethren dwell together, and one of them die and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry outside unto a stranger; her husband’s brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him for a wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother unto her. — if brethren dwell together; in the same town, or at least, the same county.

And it shall be that the firstborn whom she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel. — that his name be not put out of Israel; that a family be not lost. So this was a provision that the number of their families might not be diminished;

And if the man like not to take his brother’s wife, then let his brother’s wife go up to the gate unto the elders, and say, ‘My husband’s brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel. He will not perform the duty of my husband’s brother.’

Then the elders of his city shall call him and speak unto him; and if he stand by it and say, ‘I like not to take her,’ — the duty is recognized as one of affection for the memory of the deceased;

then shall his brother’s wife come unto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face, and shall answer and say, ‘So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother’s house.’

— the root of the obligation here imposed upon the brother of the deceased husband lies in the idea of childlessness being a great calamity (compare with Hagar in Genesis 16:4), and extinction of name and family one of the greatest that could happen;

10 And his name shall be called in Israel, ‘The house of him that hath his shoe loosed.’

— and from MSG

7-10 But if the brother doesn’t want to marry his sister-in-law, she is to go to the leaders at the city gate and say, “My brother-in-law refuses to keep his brother’s name alive in Israel; he won’t agree to do the brother-in-law’s duty by me.”

Then the leaders will call for the brother and confront him. If he stands there defiant and says, “I don’t want her,” his sister-in-law is to pull his sandal off his foot, spit in his face, and say, “This is what happens to the man who refuses to build up the family of his brother—his name in Israel will be Family-No-Sandal.” Deuteronomy 25:9-10

11 “When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth forth her hand and taketh him by the secret parts, — when men strive together, one with another; quarrel with one another, and come to blows, and strive for mastery, which shall beat, and be the best man;

12 then thou shalt cut off her hand; thine eye shall not pity her. — thine eye shall not pity her; because of the plausible excuse that might be made for her action, as these considerations were to have no place with the magistrate, who was to order the punishment inflicted without pity;

13 “Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small. — in Proverbs 11:1, “a false balance is abomination to the Lord.”

14 Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small. — the protection of the poor is the chief practical end in this; rich men can take care of themselves; poor men are doubly robbed by short weight and measure, because they cannot protect themselves against it.

15 But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have, that thy days may be lengthened in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. — that thy days may be lengthened in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee; long life was always reckoned a blessing, and is frequently promised to.

16 For all who do such things and all who do unrighteously are an abomination unto the Lord thy God. — and all that do unrighteously; what is not just and right between man and man, in any other instance whatever: are an abomination unto the Lord thy God; both they and their actions; he is a righteous God, and loves righteousness, and hates injustice of every kind.

17 “Remember what Amalek did unto thee on the way, when ye had come forth out of Egypt, — take warning from the case of the Amalekites; which was an aggravation of their cruel and inhuman action, that they not only came out against them unprovoked;

18 how he met thee on the way and smote the hindmost of thee, even all who were feeble behind thee, when thou wast faint and weary; and he feared not God.

— the Amalekites were the aggressors, and fell upon them as they were travelling on the road, but when they were just come out of Egypt, where they had been in hard bondage, and their spirits broken, and they not used to war; and so took them at all these disadvantages, a people that had not in the least injured them.

19 Therefore it shall be, when the Lord thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it. — that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven:

— that is, utterly destroy them, so that there should be none left of them anywhere, to put in mind that there ever were such a people on earth; men, women, children, cattle of all sorts, were to be destroyed, and nothing left that belonged unto them; that it might not be said this beast was Amalek’s; and to be destroyed.

Deuteronomy 26

1 “And it shall be, when thou art come in unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance, and possessest it and dwellest therein, — and possessest it, and dwellest therein; not only had entered into it, but got the possession of it, and settled there;

that thou shalt take of the first of all the fruit of the earth, which thou shalt bring from thy land that the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt put it in a basket and shalt go unto the place which the Lord thy God shall choose to place His name there.

— and shalt go unto the place which the Lord thy God shall choose to place his name there; which, as the event showed, was the city of Jerusalem; hither from all parts of the country were the firstfruits to be brought.

And thou shalt go unto the priest who shall be in those days, and say unto him, ‘I profess this day unto the Lord thy God, that I have come unto the country which the Lord swore unto our fathers to give us.’ — the priest that shall be in those clays; not the high priest, but the priests generally, or the individual priest whose function it was to officiate on the occasion;

And the priest shall take the basket out of thine hand, and set it down before the altar of the Lord thy God. — the firstfruits here in question are to be distinguished alike from those offered in acknowledgment of the blessings of harvest;

“And thou shalt speak and say before the Lord thy God: ‘A Syrian ready to perish was my father; and he went down into Egypt and sojourned there with a few, and became there a nation, great, mighty, and populous.

— a Syrian was my father; that is, Jacob; for though born in Canaan, he was a Syrian by descent, his mother Rebecca, and his grandfather Abraham, being both of Chaldea or Mesopotamia, which in Scripture is comprehended under the name of Syria;

— Jacob’s wives and children, by their mothers’ side, and his relations, were Syrians, and he himself had lived twenty years in Syria with Laban.

And the Egyptians evilly treated us and afflicted us, and laid upon us hard bondage. — and the Egyptians evilly entreated us; ordered their male children to be killed by the midwives, and by another edict to be drowned by the people: and afflicted us; by setting taskmasters over them, who put heavy burdens upon them;

And when we cried unto the Lord God of our fathers, the Lord heard our voice, and looked on our affliction and our labor and our oppression. — and the Lord heard our voice, and looked upon our affliction, and our labour, and our oppression; with a look of pity and compassion, heard their cries, answered their petitions, and sent them a deliverer, Exodus 2:25.

And the Lord brought us forth out of Egypt with a mighty hand, and with an outstretched arm, and with great fearsomeness, and with signs and with wonders; — with a mighty hand and with an outstretched arm; by his almighty power, of which full proof was given by what he then did, Deuteronomy 5:15,

— and with great terribleness: to Pharaoh and his people, through the plagues that were inflicted on them, especially the last, the slaying of their firstborn; Deuteronomy 4:34; and with signs and wonders; wrought by the hands of Moses and Aaron, meaning the ten plagues, often so called;

and He hath brought us into this place and hath given us this land, even a land that floweth with milk and honey. — “a land flowing with milk and honey” was for ancient Israel; but “amber waves of grain” and “mountains of cheese and lakes of wine” for modern Israel;

10 And now, behold, I have brought the firstfruits of the land which Thou, O Lord, hast given me.’ And thou shalt set it before the Lord thy God, and worship before the Lord thy God; — the person who offered his first-fruits, must remember and own the mean origin of that nation, particularly the family of Abraham began to develop into a nation, of which he was a member.

11 and thou shalt rejoice in every good thing which the Lord thy God hath given unto thee and unto thine house, thou, and the Levite, and the stranger who is among you. — thou and the Levite, and the stranger that is among you; by which it seems that not only a basket of firstfruits was brought and presented to the Lord, which is the perquisite of the priest,

— but there were others also brought, or bought with their money at Jerusalem, and a sort of a kept, which the Levite, and stranger or proselyte, from Pentecost to the feast of tabernacles a man may bring the firstfruits, and proclaim; must thankfully acknowledge God’s great goodness to Israel. 

12 “When thou hast made an end of tithing all the tithes of thine increase the third year, which is the year of tithing, and hast given it unto the Levite, the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, that they may eat within thy gates and be filled, — the third year, which was the year of tithing; that is, of the tithe for the poor, commanded to be paid every third year;

13 then thou shalt say before the Lord thy God: ‘I have brought away the hallowed things out of mine house, and also have given them unto the Levite and unto the stranger, to the fatherless, and to the widow, according to all Thy commandments which Thou hast commanded me. I have not transgressed Thy commandments, neither have I forgotten them. — again, the tithe for the poor, or the third tithe; commanded to be paid every third year;

14 I have not eaten thereof in my mourning, neither have I taken away aught thereof for any unclean use, nor given aught thereof for the dead; but I have hearkened to the voice of the Lord my God and have done according to all that Thou hast commanded me.

— I have not eaten thereof in my mourning; when in times of sorrow, which brought defilement on sacred things; under a pretense of poverty, and grudging to give any away to the poor.

15 Look down from Thy holy habitation, from heaven, and bless Thy people Israel and the land which Thou hast given us as Thou swore unto our fathers, a land that floweth with milk and honey.’

— and the land which thou hast given us; with fertility and plenty of all good things, that it might be as thou swarest to our fathers, a land flowing with milk and honey;

16 “This day the Lord thy God hath commanded thee to do these statutes and judgments; thou shalt therefore keep and do them with all thine heart and with all thy soul. — refer not only to the laws last mentioned, but to all others which he had been repeated and repeated;

— thou shall therefore keep and do them with all thy heart, and with all thy soul; cordially, readily, willingly, sincerely, constantly, and to the utmost of their abilities.

17 Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God, and to walk in His ways, and to keep His statutes and His commandments and His judgments, and to hearken unto His voice.

— thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God; said, affirmed, pledged and in the most solemn manner declared, that the Lord was their God, and him only; and that they would have no other God, nor worship, serve, or obey any other;

18 And the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be His peculiar people, as He hath promised thee, and that thou shouldest keep all His commandments,

— and that thou shouldest keep all his commandments; at the same time declared this as his will, that they should observe all his precepts, to which they were laid under obligation by the special favour and peculiar privileges he bestowed upon them, Deuteronomy 7:6;

19 and to make thee high above all nations which He hath made in praise and in name and in honor, and that thou mayest be a holy people unto the Lord thy God, as He hath spoken.” — to make thee high above all nations; none of them having the Lord to be their God and King in such sense as Israel,

— nor they his people in such a peculiar sense as they were; nor having such laws and statutes as he had given to them; these things gave them a superiority over all other nations;

— and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the Lord thy God, as he hath spoken; the end of the Lord in being their God, and making them his people, was not only to make them high above all others, but to make them more holy than others; to set them apart for himself, as a people sacred to his worship and service, as he had both determined and declared, Deuteronomy 7:6.

Trump to Triggle Cartel Chaos from Mexico

•May 27, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Map Shows Latest Cartel Activity In Mexico As Drug Lords should Fear a Potential Trump Victory. But then again with the Boomerang Effect, “cartel leaders could activate sleeper cells in major US cities and spark chaos.”

ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden • May 21, 2024

Every six months, the US drug death catastrophe eclipses the Vietnam War. The vast majority of deaths are derived from fentanyl-laced narcotics, which come from Mexico (and chemicals sourced initially from China), via open southern borders pushed by radical leftists in the White House.

More recently, the House Select Committee on China revealed that the Chinese Communist Party used tax rebates to subsidize the manufacturing and exporting of fentanyl chemicals abroad. 

About a year and a half ago, the conservative think tank Center for Renewing America penned a note titled “It’s time to wage war on transnational drug cartels.” In recent weeks, a Rolling Stone report said former President Trump is seriously considering deploying America’s Special Forces operators to combat cartel leaders if he wins in November. 

The conversations are growing louder that if Trump clinches victory in November, the drug cartels behind the fentanyl overdose crisis are in for a reckoning. The first strike? It is likely the US Treasury Department is zeroing in on Mexican banks that launder cartel cash. Today’s sanctioning of cartel members has yet to crush these drug empires.

America’s Special Forces to combat cartel leaders if Trump wins in November

As David Asher, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and former senior advisor to the State Department on China, recently described:

“There needs to be a top-down targeting approach against the Mexican cartels and their Chinese partners with military force being part of the strategy ala Pablo Escobar.

“As we approach 100,000 American deaths yearly from fentanyl, we must truly go to war against drug traffickers and designate them as the terrorists that they are.

“The Treasury Department should sanction and DOJ indict Mexican banks holding cartel cash — it’s hard to believe that a major Mexican bank has never been taken down before. No more “too big to fail, too big to jail.””

If Trump wins, there’s an increasing likelihood that the era of defense against cartels will be over, and counter-offenses will begin. Strike Mexican banks with sanctions, then as the Rolling Stone report laid out, Use Tier 1 operators to take out cartel leaders surgically.

The problem with this offensive move is spillovers. This would likely include cartel members targeting US tourists and expatriates across Mexico. Then, cartel leaders could activate sleeper cells in major US cities and spark chaos.

A new cartel activity map of Mexico, published by the research firm Bismarck Analysis, shows that “cartels have regional strongholds where they originate, but only the Sinaloa Cartel and the CJNG have regular national reach.”

“Cartel leaders could activate sleeper cells in major US cities and spark chaos”

Biden’s sanctioning of cartel members and affiliated companies has proven ineffective so far as open borders still permit the flow of fentanyl across the southern border to American neighborhoods. The weak, leftist administration is doing very little while out-of-control drug trafficking in the Western Hemisphere, driven by China and Mexican cartels, is killing a record number of Americans. 

And here is a prophecy written two and a half thousand years ago:

For more on the enemy from the South, see A Sword from the South!

For more about the South, a prophecy of Esau or Edom, see Obadiah

Hezbollah missile strikes at Israel’s Tiberias

•May 26, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Hezbollah launched drones at military base west of Israel’s Tiberias. In response, Israel’s Smotrich suggests IDF enter Lebanon, establish security zone if Hezbollah continues firing.

Minister of Finance and Head of the Religious Zionist Party Bezalel Smotrich

The Jerusalem Post • May 19, 2024

If Hezbollah would continue firing after such an ultimatum, Smotrich said the IDF should launch a defensive attack deep in Lebanese territory, including a ground entry.

Finance Minister and Chairman of the Religious Zionism Party, Bezalel Smotrich, called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to issue an ultimatum to Hezbollah to stop firing on the North, as well as for the permanent presence of the IDF in the entire Gaza Strip and total military occupation of the city of Rafah.

He also insisted on the immediate completion of the operation along the Philadelphi Corridor and the total occupation of the whole city of Rafah. He argued that this “is to prevent the continued smuggling from Egypt to Hamas and to cut off the lifeline to the terrorists.”

Israel’s northern border

Regarding the northern border with Lebanon, Smotrich called on the prime minister to issue an ultimatum to Hezbollah to completely stop firing at northern Israel and to “withdraw all of its forces beyond the Litani River.”

Should Hezbollah continue to fire after such an ultimatum, Smotrich said, the IDF should launch a defensive attack deep in Lebanese territory, which would include a ground entry and an Israeli military takeover of southern Lebanon.

Smotrich’s comments came a day after war cabinet member and Minister-without-Portfolio MK Benny Gantz gave Netanyahu a June 8 deadline to come up with a comprehensive plan for the ‘day after’ Hamas.

Gantz’s plan encompassed returning the hostages, forming a coalition of international and Palestinian actors to take over civilian matters in Gaza, moving forward with a normalization process with Saudi Arabia, and returning Israeli evacuees from the North to their homes by September 1.

Smotrich on Saturday night accused Gantz of de facto advocating for a Palestinian state, which Smotrich said would “certainly” become a “terror country.”

In response to Smotrich’s statements on Sunday, Yisrael Beiteinu MK Avigdor Liberman asked which soldiers would be fulfilling these duties.

 Huge wildfires from a missile attack in the Israeli town of Katsrin, Golan Heights

“For Minister Smotrich’s information, the Israeli government should have prepared to create a security zone in southern Lebanon several months ago.

The question now is, who exactly will be the force to do this? The reservists who have been on duty for over seven months, or the regular soldiers who haven’t seen home because there aren’t enough troops?”

Liberman concluded, “First, promote recruitment for everyone – then talk,” referring to the ongoing issue of the exemption of haredim from army duty.

Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with mayors from the North late in the afternoon on Sunday. The meeting ended after press time.

Two of these mayors, Metulla’s David Azulay and the head of the Upper Galilee Regional Council, Giora Zaltz, decided in advance to boycott the meeting.

Estonia’s PM calls for breakup of Russia

•May 25, 2024 • Leave a Comment

It is not a bad thing when a big power becomes much smaller, Estonia’s Kaja Kallas has said

RT News • May 21, 2024

The conflict between Moscow and Kiev should end with the defeat and breakup of the Russian Federation, Estonia’s Prime Minister Kaja Kallas has proposed.

Kallas made the suggestion on Saturday during a debate in the country’s capital, Tallinn, at an event dedicated to supporting Ukraine.

“Russia’s defeat is not a bad thing because then you know there could really be a change in society,” the prime minister told the 17th Lennart Meri Conference.

The Russian Federation is comprised of “many different nations” and suggested that they should become separate states after the end of the conflict between Moscow and Kiev, she argued.

“I think if you would have more like small nations… it is not a bad thing if the big power is actually [made] much smaller,” Kallas said.

The Constitution of the Russian Federation describes the polity as a multinational state. According to the 2020-2021 census, the country’s population speaks 155 different languages, with Russian being the most common.

Estonia’s Prime Minister also urged Ukraine’s Western backers not to be afraid to do more to assist the government in Kiev in its fight with Moscow.

“Fear keeps us from supporting Ukraine. Countries have different fears, be it nuclear fear, fear of escalation, fear of migration. We must not fall into the trap of fear because that is what [Russia’s President Vladimir] Putin wants,” she said.

According to Kallas, the West must help Kiev “push Russia back to its borders” and continue to pressure Moscow via sanctions until Ukraine’s territorial integrity is restored. She also called for reparations to be paid and for the country’s leadership to be held accountable for the conflict.

The prime minister insisted that in order for stable peace to be achieved in Europe, Ukraine has to be made a member of both the EU and NATO.

In February, Russia issued an arrest warrant for Kallas over her campaign to destroy Soviet WWII memorials across Estonia.

The authorities in Moscow have said repeatedly that due to the unwillingness of both Kiev and the West to look for a diplomatic solution to the crisis, Russia will continue its military operation until all of its goals are achieved, including assuring the security of the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine, the demilitarization and “denazification” of the country, and making sure that it never becomes a NATO member.

Earlier this month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that the Ukrainian conflict will be decided militarily in Moscow’s favor if that is the wish of the US and its allies. “If they want it to be on the battlefield, they will have it on the battlefield,” Lavrov stressed.

Rand: How to Destroy Russia!

The Plan to Carve Up Russia

Washington’s Plan to Break Up Russia

Deuteronomy (23-24)

•May 25, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 23

1 “He that is wounded in the stones or hath his private member cut off shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord. — he that is wounded in the stones; in any of them, not accidentally, but purposely;

— or hath his private member cut off; a eunuch should not enter into the congregation was doubtless intended to prevent the Israelitish rulers from making eunuchs of their brethren the children of Israel.

A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord. — a bastard; probably, a child born of incest or adultery; even to his tenth generation;

An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the Lord for ever, — an Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; because their forefathers were begotten in incest (Genesis 19:30);

— or marry an Israelitish woman, and so the Targum of Jonathan says, “the male Ammonites and Moabites are not fit to take a wife of the congregation of the Lord;”

— they not enter into the congregation of the Lord for ever; that is, not only to the tenth generation, but for ever; and this law was understood as in force in Nehemiah’s time; when, at the time of Nehemiah, the newly-built Temple was infiltrated with an Ammonite named Tobiah,

— who, at the bidding of Sanballat, a Samaritan (Josephus: Sanballat was “satrap of Samaria”) went on to introduce the heresy of the Samaritan “passover” to the Jews; whereby there sprung a branch of Judiasm called the Sadducees,

— further, Tobiah, an Ammonite official and an enemy of Nehemiah who had opposed the rebuilding of the walls, had actually been given a room in the Temple for his possessions. That room had housed many important items, including the money allotted to pay the Levites for their time in the Temple. With no payment forthcoming, the Levites had abandoned their posts and returned to their homes to work their fields, (for more, see Nehemiah 2; 4)

because they met you not with bread and with water in the way when ye came forth out of Egypt, and because they hired against thee Balaam the son of Beor, of Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse thee.

— in the way when ye came forth out of Egypt; they (viz., the king of the Moabites) had even hired Balaam to curse Israel. In this way they had brought upon themselves the curse which falls upon all those who curse Israel;

Nevertheless the Lord thy God would not hearken unto Balaam, but the Lord thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto thee, because the Lord thy God loved thee. — but the Lord thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto thee; in the very mouth of Balaam, as the Targum of Jonathan says;

— for when he opened his mouth and Balak expected he would have cursed Israel, and he intended it, could he have been permitted, the Lord overruled his tongue, and put such words into his mouth, that instead of cursing Israel, he blessed him; see Numbers 23:11,

Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever. — still upon any Ammonite or Moabite: thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days forever; not just until the tenth generation;

— make no contracts, either by marriages, or leagues, or commerce with them, but rather shalt constantly keep a jealous eye over them, as enemies who will watch every opportunity to insnare or disturb thee.

“Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, for he is thy brother. Thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian, because thou wast a stranger in his land. — the Edomite, as descended from Esau, the nearest akin to each other of all the nations; and the Egyptian, as of that nation which had shown hospitality to Joseph and his brethren, and shouldn’t be objects of abhorrence.

The children who are begotten of them shall enter into the congregation of the Lord in their third generation. — Edomite, and Egyptian; not in the third generation from the time that this law was made, but from the time that any of their males should embrace the true religion; for females, might be accepted immediately as soon as made proselytes through marriage.

“When the host goeth forth against thine enemies, then keep thyself from every wicked thing. — then keep thee from every wicked thing;

— the Targum of Jonathan adds, by way of explanation, “from strange worship, uncovering of nakedness, and from shedding innocent blood;” that is, from idolatry, uncleanness of every sort, and murder; and all other wickednesses ought to be abstained from at all times by all persons;

10 “If there be among you any man that is not clean by reason of uncleanness that chanceth him by night, then shall he go abroad out of the camp; he shall not come within the camp. — by reason of uncleanness that chanceth him by night; through pollution by a nocturnal flux, Leviticus 15:4

11 But it shall be, when evening (first erev) cometh on, he shall wash himself with water; and when the sun is down (second erev) he shall come into the camp again. — he shall wash himself with water; dip himself all over in water, not only wash his garments but his flesh;

12 “Thou shalt have a place also outside the camp whither thou shalt go forth abroad. — thou shalt have also a place without the camp; a place prepared, as the Targums of Jonathan says, provided on purpose for the use hereafter suggested;

— whither thou shalt go forth abroad; to do the necessities of nature, which they were to do outside the camp, not in any place they thought fit and most convenient, but what was appointed for that purpose.

13 And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee. — and thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; a nail or spike, some kind of instrument to make a hole in the ground with, which was fastened to the sword upon their loins; which was to be instead of a spade or mattock to dig with;

— and it shall be, when thou shall ease thyself abroad; outside the camp, in the place appointed for that use, whenever nature required such an action to be performed;

— thou shall dig therewith; with, the paddle, an hole in the earth: to make it a foot deep with a spade or mattock, and to everyone that was newly admitted among them, a little pickaxe was given for that purpose: and shalt turn back; having eased nature;

— and cover that which cometh from thee; their dung, with the earth they dug out of the hole they made. This law was made to preserve modesty and decency becoming men, and not act like brute beasts, as well as cleanliness in the camp,

14 For the Lord thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp to deliver thee and to give up thine enemies before thee; therefore shall thy camp be holy, that He see no unclean thing in thee and turn away from thee. — for the Lord thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp, to deliver thee, and give up thine enemies before thee: to save them from falling into the hands of their enemies;

— therefore shall thy camp be holy; that he see no unclean thing; and turn away from thee; and so they fall into the hands of their enemies; care should be taken not to offend him, and cause him to depart from them;

15 “Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant who has escaped from his master unto thee. — this case in question is that of a slave who fled from a pagan master to the holy land. It is of course assumed that the refugee was not flying from justice, but only from the tyranny of his lord.

16 He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates where it is good for him. Thou shalt not oppress him. — evidently a slave of the Canaanites or some of the neighboring people, who was driven by tyrannical oppression, or induced, with a view of embracing the true religion, to take refuge in Israel;

— in that place he shall choose, in one of thy gates, where it liketh him best: he was not to be detained by the person that took him up in his own house, or be obliged to dwell in any certain place under, a restraint, but he might take up his abode in any of the cities of Israel, which would be most for his good.

17 “There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. — whore and sodomite seem both intended to be taken in the sense in which they belonged to the temples of Baal and Ashtaroth, of persons dedicated to impurity;

— today, such impurities are prevelant in both houses of Israel in the name of liberal democracies; and, with few exceptions, whore and sodomite are far worse than those of the Gentiles;

18 Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore or the price of a dog into the house of the Lord thy God for any vow, for even both these are abomination unto the Lord thy God. — for even both these are an abomination to the Lord thy God; both the hire of the whore and the price of the dog, when brought as a sacrifice to him.

19 “Thou shalt not lend upon interest to thy brother, interest of money, interest of victuals, interest of any thing that is lent upon interest. — thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; one of the same nation and religion, and who is in poor and necessitous circumstances, and wants either food for himself and family;

— till such times as the fruits of his ground will bring him in a sufficiency for his support, and the payment of what he borrows, and which is to be lent him without any interest.

20 Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon interest, but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest, that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.

— the case was different with foreigners, who, engaged in trade and commerce, borrowed to enlarge their capital, and might reasonably be expected to pay interest on their loans.

21 “When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not be slack to pay it; for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee, and it would be sin in thee. — thou shall not slack to pay it; or delay the payment of it, but do it immediately; since zeal and affection might abate;

— and there might not be hereafter an ability to perform, or death might come and prevent it; the Targum of Jonathan adds, at the three feasts, that is, of the Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles;

22 But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee. — there shall be no sin in not making any vow, nor any pledge; no charge of guilt be brought or punishment laid;

23 That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform, even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the Lord thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth.

— even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the Lord thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth; it was to be paid, and in the manner as it was vowed and promised;

— the Targum of Jonathan says

the oath which goeth from your lips you shall confirm. The precepts of integrity you shall verily perform, but that which is not right to do ye shall not do; and according as you have vowed shall you fulfil;

sin offerings, trespass offerings, burnt sacrifices, and consecrated victims shall you present before the Lord your God, and bring the libations and the gifts of the sanctuary of which you have spoken (in promises), and alms for the poor which your lips have declared.

24 “When thou comest into thy neighbor’s vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes to thy fill at thine own pleasure, but thou shalt not put any in thy vessel.

25 When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbor, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand, but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbor’s standing corn.

Deuteronomy 24

1 “When a man hath taken a wife and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favor in his eyes because he hath found some uncleanness in her, then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.

— some uncleanness; some hateful thing, some distemper of body, or quality of mind, not observed before marriage; evidently mere caprice and dislike are not intended here: there must be some real ground of complaint;

And when she has departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. — she may go and be other man’s wife; it was permitted her to marry another man, she being by her divorce freed from the law of her former husband;

And if the latter husband hate her and write her a bill of divorcement, and putteth it in her hand and sendeth her out of his house, or if the latter husband die who took her to be his wife,

— or if her latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; and she survives him; as she is then by death loosed from the law of an husband, she may lawfully marry another man, but not her former husband;

her former husband who sent her away may not take her again to be his wife after she is defiled; for that is abomination before the Lord, and thou shalt not cause the land to sin which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

— for that is abomination before the Lord; for a man to take his wife again, after she had been divorced by him, and married to another man;

— and thou shalt not cause the land to sin which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance; since if this was allowed, that men might put away their wives, and take them again at pleasure, and change them as often as they thought fit;

“When a man hath taken a new wife, he shall not go out to war, neither shall he be charged with any business; but he shall be free at home one year, and shall cheer up his wife whom he hath taken.

— he shall be free at home one year, that their affections newly engaged may be firmly settled, so as there may be no occasions for the divorces last mentioned.

“No man shall take the nether or the upper millstone in pledge, for then he taketh a man’s life in pledge. — MSG “Don’t seize a handmill or an upper millstone as collateral for a loan. You’d be seizing someone’s very life.”

“If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him or selleth him, then that thief shall die; and thou shalt put evil away from among you.

MSG “If a man is caught kidnapping one of his kinsmen, someone of the People of Israel, to enslave or sell him, the kidnapper must die. Purge that evil from among you.”

“Take heed in the plague of leprosy, that thou observe diligently and do according to all that the priests, the Levites, shall teach you; as I commanded them, so ye shall observe to do.

— take heed, in the plague of leprosy; whether in the bodies of men, or in houses, or in garments, not to hide and conceal it; or cut out the bright spot; that thou observe diligently;

Remember what the Lord thy God did unto Miriam on the way after ye had come forth out of Egypt.

— remember what the Lord did unto Miriam; this seems to have been intended as an admonition, to take care lest they spoke evil of dignities, or disobeyed the commands of the priest, which might bring such a stroke upon them as God inflicted upon Miriam.

10 “When thou dost lend thy brother any thing, thou shalt not go into his house to fetch his pledge. — thou shall not go into his house to fetch his pledge; which would be an exercise of too much power and authority;

— to go into a neighbour’s house, and take what was liked; and besides, as no doubt he would take the best, so he might take that which the poor man could not spare;

11 Thou shalt stand abroad, and the man to whom thou dost lend shall bring out the pledge abroad unto thee. — if the lender or creditor had been allowed to go in and take what he pleased for a pledge, he would choose the best; so, on the other hand, the borrower or debtor would be apt to bring the worst, what was of the least value and use;

12 And if the man be poor, thou shalt not sleep with his pledge. — and if the man be poor; which may be thought to be the case of anyone that gives pledges for a debt he owes, or a sum of money he borrows;

13 In any case thou shalt deliver him the pledge again when the sun goeth down, that he may sleep in his own raiment and bless thee; and it shall be righteousness unto thee before the Lord thy God.

— in any case thou shalt deliver him the pledge again, when the sun goeth down; if it was a night covering; but if it was his day clothes, he was to return it in the morning, when the sun arose;

14 “Thou shalt not oppress a hired servant who is poor and needy, whether he be of thy brethren or of thy strangers who are in thy land within thy gates. — not oppress a hired servant; by detaining his wages from him when due;

15 At his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor and setteth his heart upon it, lest he cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee. — lest he cry against thee to the Lord; having none to apply unto but him, who is the patron of the poor and needy;

16 “The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

— the fathers shall not be put to death for the sin of their children; by the civil magistrates, for sins committed by them of a capital nature, and which are worthy of death: neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers; every man shall be put to death for his own sin;

17 “Thou shalt not pervert the judgment of the stranger nor of the fatherless, nor take a widow’s raiment in pledge; — the law against perverting the right of strangers, widows, and orphans is here repeated from Exodus 22:20, 21; Exodus 23:9 with the addition that the raiment of the widow was not to be taken in pledge;

18 but thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in Egypt, and the Lord thy God redeemed thee thence. Therefore I command thee to do this thing. — but thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in Egypt; the remembrance of which may cause sympathy with persons in distress; particularly the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow.

19 “When thou cuttest down thine harvest in thy field and hast forgotten a sheaf in the field, thou shalt not go again to fetch it; it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow, that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all the work of thine hands.

— when thou cuttest down thine harvest in thy field; whether barley harvest or wheat harvest, when either of them are ripe for cutting, mowing, or reaping, and are cutting down: and hast forgot a sheaf in the field; it shall be for the stranger; or proselyte; or for the fatherless and for the widow; which of them soever should first find it.

20 When thou beatest thine olive tree, thou shalt not go over the boughs again; it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow.

— thou shall not go over the boughs again; to beat off some few that may remain; they were not nicely to examine the boughs over again, whether there were any left or not: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow;

21 When thou gatherest the grapes of thy vineyard, thou shalt not glean it afterward; it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow. — thou shalt not glean after thee, that is, after thou hast reaped and gathered for thyself;

22 And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt. Therefore I command thee to do this thing.

— and thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt; when they would have been glad to have enjoyed the like favours, as small as they might seem to be, even to glean in their fields, vineyards, and oliveyards.

Ukraine: a fundamentally Divided Nation

•May 24, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Ukraine is fundamentally a divided nation; historically it had absorbed numerous territories from neighbouring countries: Poland, Romania, Hungary and even from Russia. Any permanent solution to the current conflicts would be an extremely difficult task, if it could be remotely possible.

Ukraine had absorbed numerous territories from neighbouring countries

CNN, a Divided Ukraine • Mar 3, 2014

Ukraine is beset by political turmoil the likes of which it hasn’t seen in almost a decade. What started as protests over the handling of a trade pact with the European Union escalated to the ousting of the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych.

Ukraine, a political Divide based on Politicians – Mar 3, 2014

The language

A new government has been installed in Kiev, the capital. Ukraine, the biggest frontier nation separating Russia and the European Union, is sometimes considered a pawn between Russia and the West. The maps show a couple of ways in which Ukraine is divided.

Ukrainian is the official language, spoken by 70% of the country’s population. Russian is also spoken widely and is the mother tongue of many Ukrainians, especially in the east and in the southern region of Crimea, where ethnic Russians are in the majority.

Violent protests broke out in the Crimean capital of Simferopol on February 27, against the new order set in motion a week earlier amid mass demonstrations in the country capital of Kiev. Crimea is a bastion of support for ousted President Yanukovych and is also home to Russia’s Black Sea naval fleet, based at Sevastopol.

Ukraine, a political Divide based on Language

55-60% of the population in Eastern Ukraine is ethnic Ukrainian, but ethnic Russians make up a plurality in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.

This is a lingustic map and obviously most Ukrainians in the eastern portion use Russian. But they still put their native tongue so this qualifys a lot as more of an ethnicity map.

Ukraine/Russian current (May 2024) control map; but how would it end?

US bases exposed to Chinese attacks

•May 23, 2024 • Leave a Comment

US bases woefully exposed to Chinese missile attacks

US lawmakers criticize Pentagon’s sluggish approach to Indo-Pacific base defense upgrades amid China’s growing strike capabilities

US forces on full display at Guam’s Andersen Air Force Base

AsiaTimes • May 15, 2-24

US lawmakers are demanding urgent upgrades to US military bases in the Indo-Pacific, citing the severe threat posed by China’s improving strike capabilities while criticizing the US Department of Defense’s (DOD) slow adoption of critical defenses.

This month, Representative John Moolenaar and Senator Marco Rubio addressed a critical letter to US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall and US Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro, urging immediate enhancements to the resilience of US military facilities in Asia.

They highlighted the grave threat posed by China’s missiles, which can now target all US bases in the region, including those in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.

The lawmakers criticized the DOD’s slow adoption of passive defenses like hardened aircraft shelters, which are crucial to withstand and quickly recover from potential Chinese missile attacks.

China has constructed over 400 such shelters in the past decade, while the US has added only 22, according to reports. The letter also called out a cumbersome DOD regulation on handling World War II-era munitions, which delays essential construction projects and inflates costs.

The letter’s signatories requested a shift from the restrictive “Munitions and Explosives of Concern” procedures to the more efficient “Recognize, Retreat, Report” approach while demanding answers on steps to be taken to enhance base defenses.

This strategic shift aims to distribute US forces in smaller, more mobile units across the region rather than concentrating them at large bases, thereby making them less vulnerable to Chinese missile strikes.

However, a June 2023 report by the US Congressional Research Service (CRS) highlights significant concerns regarding the survivability of US defense infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific against a Chinese attack.

The report underscores that the US maintains at least 66 significant regional defense sites, which are crucial for basing military personnel, conducting maintenance and supporting operations. It notes the current basing posture, largely reflective of Cold War-era decisions, is increasingly vulnerable to China’s increasingly advanced missile capabilities.

Key installations, especially those west of the International Date Line including in Japan, South Korea and Guam, are well within striking range of Chinese missiles.

Over 20,000 US personnel station at Kadena Air Base on Okinawa Islands

The CRS report calls for Congress to adequately address whether the DOD’s infrastructure supports strategic goals and operational requirements. It also questions whether investments through initiatives like the Pacific Deterrence Initiative are sufficient and appropriately managed.

Recent war game simulations indicate substantial US aircraft losses on the ground due to inadequate infrastructure defenses, underscoring the urgency of these considerations.

Using Guam as a case study, Asia Times noted in April 2024 that the strategic island’s disjointed air and missile defense mechanisms may prove inadequate in safeguarding against sophisticated weapons like drones, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and hypersonic weapons.

Kill chains supporting Guam’s new Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS) may also be vulnerable to kinetic or non-kinetic attacks. Kill chains are the processes and assets involved in detecting, locating, tracking, targeting, attacking and assessing battle damage.

US kill chains reportedly have limited flexibility and information sharing. Their centralized decision-making approach and fixed connections are ill-equipped to adapt to disruptions likely to occur in an Indo-Pacific region conflict.

Carl Rehberg and Herbert underscored the need for layered, comprehensive and distributed US base defenses in a January 2024 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) report, which addressed the need to counter the growing threat of massed precision-guided air and missile attacks in the Indo-Pacific.

Rehberg and Kemp recommend continued support for the Guam Defense System, emphasizing the urgency for a timely, cost-effective implementation plan with minimal personnel and infrastructure.

They also call for fielding Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) equipped with advanced sensors for persistent detection and early warning of missile salvos.

Furthermore, they call for acquiring multiple types of High-Power Microwave (HPM) and Electronic Warfare (EW) defenses, leveraging emerging technologies demonstrated by directed-energy weapons programs like THOR and Mjolnir to counter drone swarms and cruise missiles.

Rehberg and Kemp also recommend alternatives to the delayed Integrated Fire Protection Capability Increment 2-Intercept (IFPC 2-I) for cost-effective and timely cruise missile defense, including the US Marine Corps (USMC) Ground-Based Air Defense Medium Range Interceptor Capability (GBAD MRIC) and gun systems.

They highlight the importance of improving responsibilities for Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) within and outside the DOD for greater effectiveness. In particular, they suggest creating an enhanced IAMD Test Bed for the US Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM) to support realistic training and development.

US aircraft carriers share the same, if not greater, vulnerabilities as US Indo-Pacific bases. In an article for The National Interest (TNI) this month, Brandon Weichert argues that the staggering costs—upwards of US$13.3 billion for a single Gerald R Ford-class supercarrier—and their increasing vulnerability render them ineffective in contemporary warfare.

Weichert argues that even non-state actors like the Houthis, backed by Iran, have demonstrated the ability to challenge US naval might with low-grade anti-ship missiles. These missiles, he notes, have the potential to overwhelm carriers’ shipborne defenses, including in strategic regions like the Indo-Pacific and Red Sea.

However, in an April 2024 TNI article, Harrison Kass says that aircraft carriers will remain strategically relevant, pointing out their still unmatched mobile airpower and elusive nature in vast oceans.

While Kass says that modern defensive technologies pose risks to aircraft carriers, their ability to operate without harassment in the open sea remains a significant advantage. He argues that carriers’ effectiveness outweighs the risks, facilitating US grand strategy and offering a mobile alternative to fixed airbases on foreign soil.

ASPI: China leads in “critical” technologies

•May 22, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Jamie Wright: This is insane! • May 11, 2024 China leads in almost all “critical” technologies — ASPI

According to the Australia Strategic Policy Institute, China ranks number one in 53 of the world’s 64 most critical advanced technologies.

Advanced manufacturing – 13/13

In advanced manufacturing, China leads in all 13 fields. The US finishes a very distant second in most cases, and is beaten by India as well on three occasions. In smart materials, for example, China boasts 42.6% of the world’s market share, while India occupies a little over 8% and the US claims only 7%.

Top Five Countries

Advanced information & communication technologies – 6/7

In advanced information & communication technologies, China leads in 6 of the 7 core sectors. In 5G & 6G, China has more capacity than the next four nations combined.

Artificial intelligence technologies – 4/6

In artificial intelligence, China leads 4 of the 6 fields, particularly excelling in advanced data analytics, AI algorithms & hardware. The US takes two top spots, specifically in advanced integrated circuits (chips) and natural language processing.

Biotech, gene technology & vaccines – 4/7

Biotech is the only sector where the US picks up three number 1 positions. China, however, still leads, ranking first in 4 of the 7 fields.

Defence & space, robotics & transportation – 5/7

Interestingly, China leads in defence despite the US spending more than the next 10 nations combined. China leads in 5 of the 7 defence, space, robotics & transportation industries. The biggest lead is in hypersonic detection, with a whopping 73.2% of the global market share. Next is in advanced aircraft engines (48.5%) and drones (36.1%). The US is only ahead in small satellites, and fractionally ahead in space launch systems.

Energy & Environment — 8/8

Quantum — 3/4

Sensing, timing & navigation — 7/9

This is another surprising sector where China dominates. Considering the US government invented the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the British led much of the world’s earlier navigational advances, China now leads in 7 of the 9 sensing/timing & navigation fields. In inertial navigation systems, China dominates with 44%, the US follows with 12.5%, and the UK has 4.2%.

Unique AUKUS Technologies 3/3

This interesting category, comprised of autonomous underwater vehicles, electronic warfare and something called “air-independent compact energy generation,” is also dominated by China. Indeed, despite being named “unique AUKUS technologies,” China is ahead in all three sectors & has more capacity than the next four nations combined.

World’s #1 technological superpower

Clearly, the writing is on the wall. On top of being the world’s largest economy (PPP) and the world’s number one trading partner, China is the world’s formemost technological superpower.

Sure, critics may say, “But, China can’t even make its own 5nm chips” — and they’re right, for now. But, seriously, how long will this be the case? What’s more, chips represent only 1 of 64 “critical technologies.” China leads in 53 future critical technologies (82%).

Three Important Facts to Emerge:

1. Decoupling is Near-Impossible

The US is already reliant on Chinese technology for its economic stability. Add rare earths into the mix and the leverage gained from its huge dollar holdings, and it seems unlikely that the US will pull the trigger on a full-scale economic, trade & financial war any time soon. More likely, it will continue (to no avail) placing sanctions on certain Chinese companies and sectors while trying to discourage investment.

2. The End of History is a Myth

Remember that article by a much-lauded economist claiming the West had won absolute ideological victory (after the fall of the Soviet Union) and that the rest of the world must get in line & follow the Western liberal model?

Well, those days too are over. China’s rise to become the world’s leading economic, trade & technological superpower — all without firing a single shot — has shown that an alternative political and economic model does, in fact, exist.

3. A New World is Emerging

The economic, technological and geopolitical realities have shifted. The era of US hegemony is over and a new multipolar world is slowly emerging. How long before there is systemic institutional change at the global level? My guess is within the next five years, that is to say within the current terms of Xi, Putin and the next US president — Europe is largely irrelevant.

Original 37/44 China Dominance: Lead country and technology monopoly risk

Deuteronomy (21-22)

•May 21, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 21

“If one be found slain in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee to possess it, lying in the field, and it be not known who hath slain him, — if a murderer could not be found, great solemnity is provided for putting away the guilt from the land, as an expression of dread and detesting of that sin;

then thy elders and thy judges shall come forth, and they shall measure the distance unto the cities which are round about him that is slain. — thy elders and thy judges near the cities, appointed by members of the great Sanhedrin at Jerusalem;

— so the Targum of Jonathan says, “then shall go out from the great Sanhedrin two of thy wise men, and three of thy judges;”

And it shall be that the city which is next unto the slain man, even the elders of that city shall take a heifer which hath not been worked and which hath not drawn in the yoke; — in this case, the heifer, of a year old, represents the murderer, so far at least as to die in his stead, since he himself could not be found;

and the elders of that city shall bring down the heifer unto a rough valley, which is neither eared nor sown, and shall strike off the heifer’s neck there in the valley. — unto a rough valley; rough, uncultivated ground, fitly representing the horribleness of the murder;

And the priests, the sons of Levi, shall come near, for them the Lord thy God hath chosen to minister unto Him and to bless in the name of the Lord; and by their word shall every controversy and every stroke be tried.

— by their word shall every controversy be tried; every controversy between man and man respecting civil things, and every stroke or blow which one man may give another; and whatsoever came before them was tried by them;

And all the elders of that city who are next unto the slain man shall wash their hands over the heifer that is beheaded in the valley. — shall wash their hands over the heifer that is beheaded in the valley: in token of their innocence, and this they did not only for themselves, but for the whole city;

And they shall answer and say, ‘Our hands have not shed this blood, neither have our eyes seen it. — our hands have not shed this blood; have been no ways concerned in it, nor accessory to it: the Targum of Jonathan says “it is manifest before the Lord that he did not come into our hands, nor did we dismiss him, that has shed this blood;”

Be merciful, O Lord, unto Thy people Israel, whom Thou hast redeemed, and lay not innocent blood unto Thy people of Israel’s charge.’ And the blood shall be forgiven them. — and lay not innocent blood unto thy people of Israel’s charge; impute not the guilt of innocent blood to Israel in general, when only a single person, and he unknown, is chargeable with it.

So shalt thou put away the guilt of innocent blood from among you when thou shalt do that which is right in the sight of the Lord. — so shalt thou put away the guilt of innocent blood from among you; which otherwise, the person not being found out, and brought to just punishment for it, would devolve upon the whole.

10 “When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered them into thine hands and thou hast taken them captive, — by this law a soldier was allowed to marry his captive, if he pleased;

11 and seest among the captives a beautiful woman and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her for thy wife, — and hast a desire unto her; being captivated with her beauty; it signifies a passionate desire of enjoying her in a lawful way,

12 then thou shalt bring her home to thine house. And she shall shave her head and pare her nails; — she shall shave her head; this was one of the external signs of mourning,

13 and she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house and bewail her father and her mother a full month. And after that thou shalt go in unto her and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.

— and bewail her father and her mother a full month; who were either dead in the battle, or however she had no hope of seeing them any more,

14 And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will, but thou shalt not sell her at all for money; thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her. — then thou shalt let her go whither she will; by a bill of divorce, as the Targum of Jonathan, who understands it in this sense,

— and as before marriage, at the month’s end, or any time before, that if his affections cooled towards her, and all the above methods tended to abate his love of her, then he was obliged to dismiss her, or to grant her her freedom, and let her go wherever she pleased.

15 “If a man have two wives, one beloved and another hated, and they have borne him children, both the beloved and the hated, and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated, — this law restrains men from disinheriting their eldest sons without just cause;

16 then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, who is indeed the firstborn.

— when the son of his wife he has the least value for is really his firstborn, he may not, through favour and affection to the wife he loves better, prefer her son, and declare him to be the firstborn;

— the birthright was to Joseph, the eldest son of Rachel, the most beloved wife of Jacob, before Reuben who was the son of Leah, less beloved by him, and was in fact his firstborn; yet this was owing to the sin of Reuben, and by the appointment of God; Genesis 49:3.

17 But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated as the firstborn by giving him a double portion of all that he hath, for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his.

— for he is the beginning of his strength; as Jacob said, of Reuben; distinguish him from all his other sons, and make known to all, that he is his firstborn.

18 “If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and who, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them, — which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother; is disobedient to the commands of either of them;

19 then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city and unto the gate of his place.

— and bring him out unto the elders of his city; the Sanhedrin, or court of judicature, to be admonished and scourged by order of the bench of three, if he returns to his corrupt and wicked ways again;

20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, ‘This, our son, is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ — this our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; one of an obstinate disposition, will have his own will and way,

— he is a glutton and a drunkard; is perverse and refractory; honours not, but despises his parents, and is disobedient to their commands, unruly and ungovernable;

21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, so that he die. So shalt thou put evil away from among you, and all Israel shall hear and fear. — so shalt thou put away evil from among you; put a stop to, and prevent such an evil for the future,

— and remove the guilt of it; or, as the Targum of Jonathan says, him that doeth that evil, then “all the men of his city shall stone him with stones that he die; and so shall you put away the evil doer from among you, and all Israel will hear, and be afraid.”

22 “And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he is to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree, — on a tree; which was done after the malefactor was put to death some other way; this public shame being added to his former punishment.

23 his body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day (for he that is hanged is accursed of God), that thy land be not defiled which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

— accursed of God by this law, the touch of a dead body was defiling, therefore dead bodies must not be left hanging, as that would defile the land.

Deuteronomy 22

1 “Thou shalt not see thy brother’s ox or his sheep go astray, and hide thyself from them. Thou shalt in any case bring them back unto thy brother. — go astray; literally, being driven away, as by wild beasts, or by robbers; or frightened and starved away from the herd or from the flock by a wolf or a dog.

And if thy brother be not nigh unto thee, or if thou know him not, then thou shalt bring it unto thine own house, and it shall be with thee until thy brother seek after it, and thou shalt restore it to him again.

— if thou know him not; which implies, that if they did know the owner, they should restore it to him; thou shalt bring it unto thine own house, to be used like thine own cattle.

In like manner shalt thou do with his ass; and so shalt thou do with his raiment and with all lost things of thy brother’s, which he hath lost and thou hast found, shalt thou do likewise; thou mayest not hide thyself. — and so shalt thou do with his raiment; if that is lost and found, it must be restored to the owner;

Thou shalt not see thy brother’s ass or his ox fall down by the way, and hide thyself from them; thou shalt surely help him to lift them up again.

— thou shall not see thy brother’s ox or his ass fall down by the way; and lie under his burden, not being able to rise with it of himself, nor with all the assistance about it, without further help;

— and hide thyself from them; cover thine eyes, or turn them another way, and make as if thou didst not see them in distress; thou shalt surely help him to lift them up again; 

Mettler is a Swiss, first non-binary winner of EuroVision 2024 in Sweden

“The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for all who do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God. — the woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man; it being very unseemly and impudent, and contrary to the modesty of her sex;

— neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment; which would betray effeminacy and softness unbecoming men, and would lead the way to many impurities; as they are an abomination to the Lord thy God;

“If a bird’s nest chance to be before thee in the way in any tree or on the ground, whether there be young ones or eggs, and the dam sitting upon the young or upon the eggs, thou shalt not take the dam with the young; — if a bird’s nest chance to be before thee: these precepts are designed to cultivate a spirit of humanity; and cares for animals and fowls of the sir;

but thou shalt in any wise let the dam go and take the young to thee, that it may be well with thee and that thou mayest prolong thy days.

— let the dam go; partly for the bird’s sake, which suffered enough by the loss of its young; for God would not have cruelty exercised towards the brute creatures; and partly for men’s sake, to restrain their greediness and covetousness;

— and from MSG

When you come across a bird’s nest alongside the road, whether in a tree or on the ground, and the mother is sitting on the young or on the eggs, don’t take the mother with the young. You may take the babies, but let the mother go so that you will live a good and long life. Deuteronomy 22:6

“When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a parapet for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house if any man fall from thence. — when thou buildest a new house; obviously the Law refers to houses with flat roofs, upon which it was customary to walk;

— that thou bring not blood upon thy house; be not the occasion of blood being shed, or contract guilt of blood through negligence of such a provision the law directs to, the guilt of manslaughter, or of shedding innocent blood in thy house;

“Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with divers seeds, lest the fruit of thy seed which thou hast sown and the fruit of thy vineyard be defiled. — with divers kinds of seed mixed and sowed together between the rows of vines in thy vineyard; which was forbidden to be done in the field, Leviticus 19:19, and here in the vineyard.

10 “Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together. — an ox and ass, being of different species and of very different characters, cannot associate comfortably, nor unite cheerfully in drawing a plough or a wagon. The ass being much smaller and his step shorter, there would be an unequal and irregular draft.

11 “Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woolen and linen together. — a garment of woollen and linen together aren’t allowed;

— in Ezekiel 44:17-18, the priests are altogether forbidden the use of woollen garments during their ministry.

12 “Thou shalt make thee fringes upon the four quarters of thy vesture wherewith thou coverest thyself. —this fringe on the four sides of the square shawl or mantle, Numbers 15:38; partly to bring the commands of God to their remembrance, and partly as a public profession of their nation and religion, whereby they might be distinguished from strangers of the nations.

13 “If any man take a wife and go in unto her, and hate her, — that is, marries a wife, and cohabits with her as man and wife, and after some time dislikes her,

14 and give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her and say, ‘I took this woman, and when I came to her I found her not a maid,’ — I found her not a maid; the sense is, that he had married her, and when he came to cohabit with her as man and wife, it appeared to him that she was vitiated, and not a pure virgin;

15 then shall the father of the damsel and her mother take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel’s virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate. — then shall the father and the mother of the damsel take; power from the court, according to the Targum of Jonathan;

16 And the damsel’s father shall say unto the elders, ‘I gave my daughter unto this man for a wife, and he hateth her; — and he hateth her; has taken a dislike to her, and wants to be rid of her, and therefore has brought this infamous action against her;

17 and lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, “I found not thy daughter a maid,” and yet these are the tokens of my daughter’s virginity.’ And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.

— saying, l found not thy daughter a maid; so that it seems he said this not only to his neighbours, and before a court of judicature, but to the parents of the damsel (a young unmarried woman);

18 And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him; — and the elders of that city shall take the man, and chastise him. Not with words, but “shall scourge him;” as the Targum of Jonathan says; —

19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought an evil name upon a virgin of Israel. And she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days. — the fine was to be paid to the father, because the slander was against him principally as the head of the wife’s family.

20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel, — but if this thing be true; which the husband of the damsel (a young unmarried woman) laid to her charge, that she was no virgin when married to him, and she had committed whoredom, of which there was proof;

21 then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die, because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father’s house; so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

— sin of an injury to her husband in the false profession of virginity, with a pretence of virginity, she should then be put to death.

22 “If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman and the woman; so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. — both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman; they were both to die, and to die the same death.

23 “If a damsel who is a virgin be betrothed unto a husband, and a man find her in the city and lie with her, — and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; with her consent, as might be presumed by her not crying out,

24 then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones, that they die — the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city, and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbor’s wife; so thou shalt put away evil from among you.

— the damsel because she cried not, being in the city, and the man because he hath humbled his neighbour’s wife; as she was by espousal, by contract, by promise, and so was guilty of adultery, which was punishable with death: so thou shall put away evil from among you;

25 “But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her and lie with her, then the man only that lay with her shall die. — he being guilty of rape;

26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death. For as when a man riseth against his neighbor and slayeth him, even so is this matter;

— and a man force her, and lie with her; or “take fast and strong hold on her” (b); so that she is not able to get out of his hands, and make her escape; then the man only that lay with her shall die; he being guilty of rape;

27 for he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her. — for he found her in the field; from which it might he presumed that she was forced, and did not consent;

28 “If a man find a damsel who is a virgin who is not betrothed, and lay hold on her and lie with her, and they be found, — and lay hold on her, and lie with her, she yielding to it, and so is not expressive of a rape;

29 then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days. — and she shall be his wife; if her father and she agreed to it; and in such a case the man was not at his liberty to refuse;

30 “A man shall not take his father’s wife, nor uncover his father’s skirt. — a man shall not take his father’s wife; not marry her, or any other incestuous relationship with her, whether his own mother, or a stepmother.

Major car companies are sabotaging EV

•May 20, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Nearly all major car companies are sabotaging EV transition, and Japan is worst, study finds

Pearls and Irritations by Daniel Bleakley • May 17, 2024

A damning new report has shown that nearly all major car companies are actively sabotaging the world’s efforts to avoid catastrophic global warming. The lobbying strategies being used by the world’s largest automakers are putting global climate targets at risk and threatening the electric vehicle transition, according to the new report released by InfluenceMap.

Titled Automakers and Climate Policy Advocacy, the report provides analysis on the anti-EV lobbying activities of 15 of the world’s largest automakers in seven key regions around the world. The study uses industry-standard data from S&P Global Mobility on automakers’ forecast electric vehicle production.

In addition to scoring automakers on their climate policy sabotage, InfluenceMap also found the industry’s own EV production forecasts fail to meet the IEA’s (International Energy Agency) updated 1.5°C scenario of 66% EV market share by 2030.

The report says Japanese automakers are the least prepared for the EV transition and have the most active, strategic engagement against it.

This latest global report follows another damning report in 2023 by InfluenceMap which through FOI requests revealed the behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts of the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) to water down and delay pro-EV policies in Australia.

Nearly all major car companies are sabotaging EV transition, and Japan is the worst

Negative lobbying “a key barrier to climate policy”

Aside from Tesla, only Mercedes and BMW have EV production forecasts that align with the IEA’s updated 1.5°C scenario which requires 66% of all new car sales to be EVs by 2030.

“Toyota, with a Performance Band score of D, remains the lowest-scoring company and is found to be driving opposition to climate rules in multiple regions.” says the report.

“In regulatory comments submitted in 2023, Toyota advocated to weaken GHG emissions standards in the US and Australia, engaged against stringent zero-emission vehicle mandates in Canada and the UK. Globally, in 2023- 24, multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles have been weakened following industry pressure.”

“This includes US greenhouse gas emission standards and Australia’s fuel efficiency standards.”

AUTOMAKER AND CLIMATE POLICY ENGAGEMENT SCORE. SOURCE: INFLUENCEMAP

Auto industry groups driving opposition to climate regulation

The report says that auto industry lobby groups are sabotaging policies designed to decarbonise passenger vehicles.

“An analysis of climate policy advocacy in seven key regions (Australia, EU, India, Japan, South Korea, UK and the US) finds that auto associations are leading efforts to delay and weaken key climate rules for light-duty vehicles.”

“In the US, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation has led opposition to ambitious fuel economy (CAFE) and GHG emissions standards, while in Australia, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) led a strategic campaign to weaken fuel efficiency standards.”

“Of the eight automotive industry associations included in this study, every automaker (except Tesla), remains a member of at least two of these groups, with most automakers a member of at least five of these associations globally.”

Growing SUV sales responsible for increased transport emissions

InfluenceMap says higher SUV and light truck production, and automakers’ push for policies to promote them, is a growing climate problem.

“The shift towards larger and less efficient vehicles has led to higher CO2 emissions, with SUVs’ oil consumption accounting for one-third of global oil demand growth between 2021 and 2022.” says InfluenceMap.

The think tank says despite the higher emissions that come with diesel powered SUV and light-commercials, production of these types of vehicles is forecast to grow rapidly from 57% of all light vehicles in 2020 to 64% by 2030.

“Each automaker analysed in this report, excluding Tata Motors, is forecasted to produce a higher combined proportion of such vehicles by 2030 as compared to 2020. InfluenceMap has also found evidence of automakers continuing to influence regulations to favour SUV and light-truck sales over smaller vehicles, such as in Australia.”

Fossil lobby undermining Australia’s efforts to decarbonise light vehicles

Nowhere has the fossil car lobby’s influence over public policy been more evident than in Australia.

After the Australian government announced its intention to introduce a new vehicle efficiency standard in February (Russia being the only other developed country in the world yet to have such a standard), the Australian fossil car lobby (FCAI) launched a scare campaign to weaken the proposed standard.

The FCAI was successful in watering down the standard resulting in allowing the industry to produce an additional 40 million tonnes of CO2 emissions compared to the original proposal.

This was despite overwhelming evidence showing the devastating impact that vehicle exhaust pollution has on human health and climate, as well as polling showing overwhelming support for the original proposed standard.

In addition to increasing new vehicle emissions thresholds, the FCAI also successfully lobbied the government to re-categorise luxury SUVs into as “light commercial class” including such vehicles as the Mercedes AMG-G 63 (price range $180,000 to $350,000), and the Lexus LX (around $200,000).

The active sabotage of efforts to mitigate catastrophic global warming by the fossil car lobby were shown to be even more damning this week after a report from the Guardian showed that most IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) scientists expect the global warming to “blast past the 1.5C target.”

It also found that almost 80% of scientists expect a rise of at least 2.5C above preindustrial levels which is considered a catastrophic level of heating.

Comac Unveils Plans for C939

•May 19, 2024 • Leave a Comment

The state-owned manufacturer has an ambitious plan for the C939, a widebody plane aimed squarely at challenging the dominance of Western giants Boeing and Airbus in the commercial aviation market.

Building on C919’s Success, China’s Comac Unveils Plans for C939 Widebody Jet

China’s Plans for C939 Widebody Jet to Challenge Boeing and Airbus

According to a South China Morning Post report, Comac has initiated work on the C939, which will be the third aircraft in its series of domestically produced airliners. 

While preliminary designs have been outlined, it will be several years before these concepts materialize into a testable prototype. The development of the C939 highlights China’s ambition to secure a lucrative share of the highly technological aviation market currently dominated by Western conglomerates.

Simultaneously, Comac is also progressing with the development of the C929, another widebody aircraft intended for international routes. Originally a joint venture with Russia’s United Aircraft Corporation, the project’s status has been uncertain following geopolitical tensions. 

Despite Russia’s withdrawal from the program, progress on the C929 remains robust, with efforts paralleling the design and development processes of the successful C919.

China’s Comac Expands Production Amid Growing Orders for C919

Recent developments in Comac’s expansion plans tell us about its plans to bolster its production capabilities. 

Reuters recently reported that Comac is expanding its production facilities for the C919 in Shanghai to meet the escalating demand. The second phase of construction, covering a vast area in Pudong, Shanghai, includes vital components such as assembly plants, parts warehouses, and tarmac areas. 

This expansion aims to enhance production efficiency and support commercial operations and market competition for domestically produced large aircraft.

Furthermore, Comac’s efforts have been met with significant interest from domestic carriers. Air China and China Southern Airlines have each placed orders for 100 C919 jets, signaling a growing adoption of domestically produced aircraft. 

The C919 has already amassed over 1,000 orders, primarily from Chinese airlines and aircraft lessors. With ambitions to achieve an annual production capacity of 150 C919s within five years, China is aggressively pursuing broader international recognition for its aircraft, including certification by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency.

Comac’s inaugural model, the C919, has demonstrated its capabilities by entering commercial service with China Eastern Airlines in May 2023. Hosting 192 passengers for distances up to 5,555km, the C919 has been operating on domestic routes, marking a significant milestone in China’s aviation industry. 

According to estimates from Airbus, Boeing, and the International Air Transport Association, China will soon surpass the United States as the world’s largest market for aviation services in a few years.

Deuteronomy (19-20)

•May 18, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 19

1 “When the Lord thy God hath cut off the nations whose land the Lord thy God giveth thee, and thou succeedest them and dwellest in their cities and in their houses, — the Lord thy God giveth thee; the seven nations of the land of Canaan, whose destruction was of the Lord for their sins, and whose land was a gift to the children of Israel;

— and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their cities, and in their houses; should possess their land in their stead, by virtue of the gift of it to them by the Lord, and inhabit their cities and houses built by them.

thou shalt separate three cities for thee in the midst of thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee to possess it. — thou shalt separate three cities for thee; there were to be six cities of refuge in all, but Moses had already appointed three on that side of Jordan where they now were;

— three were before ordered to be separated from those inhabited by the tribes of Reuben and Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh, Deuteronomy 4:41: namely, Bezer, Ramoth-Gilead and Golan.

Thou shalt prepare thee a way, and divide the borders of thy land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee to inherit, into three parts, that every slayer may flee thither. — thou shalt prepare thee a way; the roads leading to them were to be kept in good condition and the brooks or rivers to be spanned by good bridges;

— divide the coasts of thy land; into three parts, the whole extent of the country from the south to the north. The three cities on each side of Jordan were opposite to each other, “as two rows of vines in a vineyard.”

“And this is the case of the slayer who shall flee thither, that he may live: Whoso killeth his neighbor ignorantly, whom he hated not in time past—

— and this is the case of the slayer, which shall flee thither, that he may live; it was not any slayer that might have protection in these cities, but such who were thus and thus circumstanced, or whose case was as whoso killeth his neighbour ignorantly; without intention, as the Targum of Jonathan, did not design it, but was done by him unintentional;

as when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbor to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the ax to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve and lighteth upon his neighbor, so that he die — he shall flee unto one of those cities and live,

— he shall flee unto one of these cities, and live; be safe and secure from the avenger of blood; such an one might have the benefit of one of these cities;

lest the avenger of the blood pursue the slayer while his heart is hot and overtake him, because the way is long, and slay him, whereas he was not worthy of death, inasmuch as he hated him not in time past.

— and overtake him, because the way is long, and slay him; wherefore it was proper that everything should be done to make the way to these cities as easy and as short as it could be;

Therefore I command thee, saying, ‘Thou shalt separate three cities for thee.’ — thou shalt separate three cities for thee; this was to be done as soon as they were settled in the land of Canaan, and established these cities as soon as when the inhabitants were cut off, or driven out, or however subdued.

And if the Lord thy God enlarge thy border, as He hath sworn unto thy fathers, and give thee all the land which He promised to give unto thy fathers, — and if the Lord thy God enlarge thy coast; three additional sanctuaries were to be established in the event of their territory extending over the country from Hermon and Gilead to the Euphrates (Genesis 15:18; Exodus 23:31).

if thou shalt keep all these commandments to do them, which I command thee this day — to love the Lord thy God and to walk ever in His ways — then shalt thou add three cities more for thee besides these three,

— and then shall thou add three cities more besides these three; three more in the land of Canaan, besides the three now ordered to be separated in it;

10 that innocent blood be not shed in thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance, and so blood be upon thee. — that innocent blood be not shed; as it would be if such a slayer as before described was killed by the avenger of blood, before he could get to one of these cities of refuge;

11 “But if any man hate his neighbor, and lie in wait for him, and rise up against him and smite him mortally, so that he die, and he fleeth into one of these cities,

— and lie in wait for him knowing and expecting he will come by in such a way at such a time; and rise up against him; out of the place where he lay in wait, just at the time he is passing by;

12 then the elders of his city shall send and fetch him thence, and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die.

— then the elders of his city shall send and fetch him thence; the Targum of Jonathan says, “the wise men of his city,” appointed by the Sanhedrin, or court of judicature, or at least the civil magistrates of that city, to which such a murderer belonged, had a power to send to the city of refuge whither he was fled;

— that he may die; that is, after the examination and trial of him, and when he is found guilty, and sentence is passed upon him, then he was to be delivered into the hands of the avenger of blood, to be the executioner of that sentence.

13 Thine eye shall not pity him, but thou shalt put away the guilt of innocent blood from Israel, that it may go well with thee. — thine eye shall not pity him; this is the elders, judges, and civil magistrates of the city to which he belonged, who is not to be supposed to have any pity or compassion on such a criminal;

14 “Thou shalt not remove thy neighbor’s landmark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance, which thou shalt inherit in the land that the Lord thy God giveth thee to possess it.

— it is the will of God that every one should know his own; which they of old have set in thine inheritance; and not to injure a man’s property, and alienate his lands to the use of another;

15 “One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth. By the mouth of two witnesses or by the mouth of three witnesses shall the matter be established. — at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established; either for acquittance or condemnation;

16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong, — if a false witness rise up against any man; in a court of judicature;

17 then both the men involved in the controversy shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges who shall be in those days; — before the priests and the judges which shall be in those days; which shall compose the Sanhedrin, or court of judicature;

18 and the judges shall make diligent inquisition. And behold, if the witness be a false witness and hath testified falsely against his brother, — and the judges shall make diligent inquisition; into the case before them, into the nature of the evidence and proof that each witness brings for or against; so the Targum of Jonathan, “the judges shall interrogate the witnesses of their times fairly;”

19 then shall ye do unto him as he had thought to have done unto his brother; so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. — then shall ye do unto him as he had thought to have done unto his brother; inflict the same fine or punishment on him he thought to have brought his brother under by his false testimony of him;

— whether any pecuniary fine, or whipping and scourging, or the loss of a member, or the value of it, or death itself; whether stoning, strangling, burning, or to be slain by the sword;

— so shalt thou put the evil away from among you; the evil man that bears a false testimony of his brother, or the guilt of sin which would be incurred by conniving at him.

20 And those who remain shall hear and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you. — and those which remain shall hear, and fear; those which survive the false witness shall hear of the punishment inflicted on him, and fear to commit the like sin, lest they should be punished in like manner.

21 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. — and thine eye shall not pity; the false witness when convicted; this is directed to the judges, who should not spare such an one through favour or affection, but pronounce a righteous sentence on him, and see it executed, in proportion to the crime;

— eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot; that is, the price of an eye an eye; practically, however, a pecuniary compensation might be accepted for the offence.

Deuteronomy 20

1 “When thou goest out to battle against thine enemies, and seest horses and chariots and a people more than thou, be not afraid of them; for the Lord thy God is with thee, who brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.

— when thou goest out to battle against thine enemies; the land of Canaan being to be gained by conquest, in a war of God’s special appointment; and the Israelites, after their settlement in it, being likely to be exposed to invasions from, or quarrels with the neighbouring nations;

— which brought thee out of the land of Egypt; who were reminded for the encouragement of their faith and confidence in him; for he that did that for them, what is it he cannot or will not do?

And it shall be, when ye have come nigh unto the battle, that the priest shall approach and speak unto the people, — the priest; not the high priest, but one appointed for that purpose, and called “the anointed of the war” hence, perhaps the expression of Jeremiah 6:4, “prepare ye war”

— they appoint a priest to speak to the people at the time of war, and they anoint him with the anointing oil, and he is called the anointed of war; twice the anointed of war speaks unto the people;

and shall say unto them, ‘Hear, O Israel: Ye approach this day unto battle against your enemies. Let not your hearts faint; fear not and do not tremble, neither be ye terrified because of them; — Let not your hearts faint, fear not; but the opposite could also be true:

“for they will turn away thy son from following Me, that they may serve other gods. So will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you and destroy thee suddenly” Deuteronomy 7:4

For the Lord your God is he that goeth with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you. — a reassurance of a promise made to Abraham from Genesis:

“I am thy shield! Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” Genesis 15

And the officers shall speak unto the people, saying, ‘What man is there who hath built a new house and hath not dedicated it? Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man dedicate it.

— what man is there; these questions show that, primarily, all Israelites of military age (20 to 50) were expected to attend the muster; then those who were unprepared for the campaign were suffered to depart;

And what man is he that hath planted a vineyard and hath not yet eaten of it? Let him also go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle and another man eat of it. — what man is there; this and the following exceptions are to be understood only of a war allowed by God;

And what man is there who hath betrothed a wife and hath not taken her? Let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle and another man take her.’

— lest he die in the battle, and another man dedicate it; as the Targum of Jonathan says, “let him go and return to his house, lest sin prevent him from rejoicing with his wife and he be slain in the battle, and another take her.”

And the officers shall speak further unto the people, and they shall say, ‘What man is there that is fearful and fainthearted? Let him go and return unto his house, lest his brethren’s heart faint as well as his heart.’

— these cases were founded on the principle that a man’s heart being deeply engrossed by something at a distance, he would not be very enthusiastic in the public service; thus God also provides even for men’s infirmities;

— let him go and return to his house; lest, by his pale looks and trembling joints, his fainting fits and swoons, he discourage the rest in the same company with him, and by his example make them unfit for war also.

And it shall be, when the officers have made an end of speaking unto the people, that they shall make captains of the armies to lead the people. — that they shall make captains of armies to lead on the people; on to battle; that is, either the officers should do this, that they might be generals of the army, who constituted captains under them, to lead the people on to battle;

10 “When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. — when thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it; this is to be understood of an arbitrary war, which they engaged in of themselves, or were provoked to by their enemies; which was their own choice, and according to their own will and pleasure;

11 And it shall be, if it make thee an answer of peace and open unto thee, then it shall be that all the people who are found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. — shall be tributaries unto thee: pay a yearly tax imposed upon them, as the Moabites sometimes did, and which was paid in lambs and rams with the wool, II Kings 3:4

— and they shall serve thee; be in continual bondage and servitude; and upon occasion be called out to any public service, as joining them against their enemies, rebuilding or repairing palaces, cities, or walls of cities, and the like; and in general acknowledge their dominion over them by paying an annual tribute, or sending gifts unto them; thus the Moabites, Syrians, and Edomites, became the servants of David, II Samuel 8:2.

12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it. — and if it will make no peace with thee; will not accept of terms of peace offered: but will make war against thee; come out and fight, or prepare to defend themselves: then thou shall besiege it; surround and block it up on all sides with their forces;

13 And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword. — thou shall smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword; the men in it, grown persons, as distinguished from little ones; because it was owing to these it was not surrendered at once, when terms of peace were offered;

14 But the women and the little ones, and the cattle and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies which the Lord thy God hath given thee.

— but the women, the little ones, and the cattle; these were to be spared; women, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shall thou take unto thyself; gold, silver, merchandise, household goods, utensils in trade, and whatever was of any worth and value to be found in their houses;

— and thou shall eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the Lord thy God hath given thee; that is, enjoy all their wealth and riches, estates and possessions; for this is not to be restrained to things eatable only.

15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations. — thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee; as all such were reckoned that were outside the land of Israel, even all in their neighbouring nations, the Moabites, Edomites, Ammonites, Syrians;

— for the children of Israel never went to war with any very distant nations, unless they came unto them and invaded them; nor did they seek to carry their conquests to any great distance, when the most powerful and victorious, as in the days of David and Solomon;

— the Targum of Jonathan says “Thus shall you do to all cities that are remote from you, which are not of the cities of these seven nations;” the seven nations of the land of Canaan; all that were not of them were accounted foreign cities, and at a distance.

16 But of the cities of these people which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth, — but of the cities of those people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance; the cities of the seven nations, six of which are mentioned by name in the next verse:

— thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth; the reason of this severity was because of their wickedness, the capital crimes and gross abominations they were guilty of, when the measure of their iniquities was full, plus others such as idolatry, incest, witchcraft, soothsaying, and necromancy; for which they reserved total destruction;

17 but thou shalt utterly destroy them, namely: the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee, — forbearance, however, was not to be shown toward these Canaanite nations, who were to be utterly exterminated;

18 that they teach you not to do according to all their abominations which they have done unto their gods, so ye should sin against the Lord your God.

— that they teach you not to do after all their abominations; this is another reason why they were to be utterly destroyed, not only because of the abominations which they committed, but to prevent the Israelites being taught by them to do the same;

19 “When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by forcing an ax against them, for thou mayest eat of them; and thou shalt not cut them down to employ them in the seige, for the tree of the field is man’s life.

— the trees thereof; the fruit trees, as appears from the following words; not of the cutting down of all, but only some of them, as the conveniency of the siege might require; for the tree of the field is man’s life; by the fruit of which, among other things, his life is supported and maintained;

20 Only the trees which thou knowest are not trees for meat, thou shalt destroy and cut them down; and thou shalt build bulwarks against the city that maketh war with thee, until it be subdued.

— if only the trees which thou knowest that they are not trees for eating, these trees do not bear edible fruits, then mayest thou hew them down;

— and thou shall build bulwarks against the city that maketh war; build bulwarks of the trees cut down, and raise batteries with them, or make machines and weapons from their wood, to cast stones into the city to annoy the inhabitants of it, in order to make them surrender, until they are totally subdued.

Sen Lindsey Graham Suggests Nuking Gaza

•May 17, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Sen Lindsey Graham Suggests Nuking Gaza, Calls Hiroshima ‘the Right Decision’

Graham argued Israel would be justified in obliterating Gaza because America did it to Japan 80 years ago.

Daily Beast by Amanda Yen • May 12, 2024 // NBC News

Sen Lindsey Graham (R-SC) offered a baffling comparison of Israel’s war on Gaza to the US decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan during World War II, telling Israel to “do whatever you have to do” to finish the military campaign.

Speaking to NBC’s Kristin Welker on Meet the Press Sunday morning, Graham made the argument that Israel would be justified in slaughtering civilians in Gaza by likening the situation to the US’s war with Japan eight decades ago. He suggested Israel would be right to flatten the Gaza strip—home to 2.2 million Palestinians, half of whom are children—simply because the US did it to Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the 1940s.

“So when we were faced with destruction as a nation after Pearl Harbor, fighting the Germans and the Japanese, we decided to end the war by bombing Hiroshima, Nagasaki, with nuclear weapons,” Graham began.

The senator continued to call the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki “the right decision” by the US That decision ended the war with Japan, but killed hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians between the initial blasts and the deadly radiation that followed.

“Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize casualties,” Graham insisted.

It was unclear how he believed the US and Israel could work to “minimize casualties,” since bombs tend not to discriminate between civilians and militants upon detonation.

Graham’s comments were so extreme that even Welker was taken aback, unsuccessfully attempting to interject as the senator talked over her.

“Can I say this?” Graham continued. “Why is it okay for America to drop two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end their existential threat war? Why is it okay for us to do that? I thought it was okay.”

Of course, the presumption that the US was justified in nuking Japan to end World War II has been contested by historians and other critics for decades. Those bombs also decimated nearly all of Hiroshima’s and Nagasaki’s medical infrastructures, making it nearly impossible to deliver aid to the injured and dying, according to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

Graham’s comments came as Israel appears poised to launch a full-scale invasion of Rafah, which the UN and the Biden administration have warned would be catastrophic for the 1.4 million people sheltering there. On Sunday, as Graham went on national television to suggest incinerating Gaza, the UN secretary general pleaded once more to prevent the area from spiraling into all-out devastation.

Musk: 2024 likely to be Our Last Election

•May 16, 2024 • Leave a Comment

2024 election likely the last to be decided by US citizens – Musk

The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX has called the “massive influx of illegals from every country on Earth” the main factor

“Given the massive influx of illegals from every country on Earth, 2024 will probably be the last election actually decided by US citizens”

RT World News • May 11, 2024

The continuing influx of illegal immigrants into the US could mean that American citizens could cease to decide the outcome of elections in the country in the not-too-distant future, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has predicted.

The South African-born billionaire claimed that the Democrats are wittingly refusing to address the issue in the hope of skewing the balance in their favor going forward.

Musk’s recent comment came in response to Republican lawmakers passing the Equal Representation Act in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, which would require the Census Bureau to ask respondents about their citizenship in its 10-year surveys. GOP representatives want only US citizens to be counted when determining the number of congressional seats in each state.

Speaker Mike Johnson argued that “we should not reward states and cities that violate federal immigration laws and maintain sanctuary policies with increased Congressional representation.”

“Common sense dictates that only American citizens should be counted for electoral apportionment,” he insisted.

Democratic Representative Grace Meng described the initiative as “reckless, cynical, and frankly, illegal.”

Migrants cross the Darien Gap from Colombia into Panama, hoping to reach the US

President Joe Biden’s office was quick to state that it “strongly opposes” the measure, “which would preclude the Department of Commerce’s Census Bureau from performing its constitutionally mandated responsibility.”

In a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday, Musk wrote that “Unanimous Democrat opposition to requiring citizenship for apportionment of House seats and Presidential electoral college votes says it all.”

According to the entrepreneur, “the Democratic Party goal is to disenfranchise US citizens by importing as many illegal immigrants as possible.”

“Given the massive influx of illegals from every country on Earth, 2024 will probably be the last election actually decided by US citizens,” Musk concluded.

Last month, Musk warned that a terrorist attack on the scale of September 11, 2001 on US soil was “only a matter of time,” considering the number of people who have entered the country illegally.

In February, the billionaire alleged that the Biden administration is seeking to import as many illegal immigrants as possible, legalize them, and “create a permanent majority – a one-party state.”

“Common sense dictates that only American citizens should be counted for electoral apportionment,” Speaker Mike Johnson said

According to some estimates, there could be as many as 16 million illegal migrants in the US at this point, including over 7.2 million who entered during Biden’s tenure.

The issue of lax security at the US-Mexican border has dominated domestic politics in America for months, with Republicans advocating tougher controls and Democrats arguing in favor of a more liberal approach to the issue.

Lifelike China’s robot invasion

•May 15, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Jacques: The next “China” is still China. Jacques didn’t mentioned, but this is the onset of the Fifth Industrial Revolution: Lifelike robotic invasion is spreading inside China’s insane humanoid factories.

Interesting Engineering • May 10, 2024

EX Robots specializes in crafting realistic humanoids designed for interaction with people and fulfilling public service duties.

Ashort video clip circulating on social media has sparked amusement and concern as it unveils the inner workings of a Chinese humanoid robot factory.

The video offers a glimpse of numerous humanoid robots in different stages of development, showcasing the pace at which robotics technology is advancing.

The uploaded video on TikTok is known to be from the manufacturing floor of the Chinese robotics firm Ex Robots.

At the 2023 World Robot Conference, the company showcased an array of humanoid robots in a preview of its ambitions. Their products surprised attendees with their hyper-realistic appearance and movements, accurately mimicking the people around them.

Advancing humanoid robotics

Chinese startup EX Robots was established in 2009 and started developing humanoid robots in 2016. Now, EX Robots specializes in intelligent bionic humanoid robot research, development, manufacture, sales, and service.

Five years later, the business opened the EX Future Science and Technology Museum in Liaoning Province, which is the first robot museum in the nation.

The firm said in a statement earlier, “The museum integrates high-tech achievements such as bionic humanoid robots, 5G cloud robots, interactive science and technology products, etc.”

The entire museum offers comprehensive robot one-stop service, encompassing a bionic experimental module, an artificial intelligence robot research center, a bionic robot manufacturing center, and other cutting-edge scientific and technological exhibits.

Ex Robots’ Einstein humanoid showcases at the EX Future Science and Technology Museum in Liaoning Province, China

In 2023, it was reported that EX Robots may have achieved a groundbreaking feat in crafting the lightest humanoid robot worldwide and advancing silicone skin simulation technology.

Their strides in this field, powered by modern techniques such as 3D scanning, digital design, and 3D printing, have positioned them at the forefront of innovation in artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics.

These techniques are instrumental in developing lifelike skin and flexible movements for the robots, complementing their patented lightweight mechanical structure.

As a result, EX Robots’ creations stand out as the “world’s lightest in their category,” marking a significant milestone in robotics technology.

China’s push for robotic supremacy

The video shared by user ‘meimei4515’ showcases an expansive production facility with humanoid robots created to mimic different service personnel employed in various industries.

As the presenter moves through the workshop, viewers are treated to rows of pretty cyborg ladies standing alongside disembodied heads on stands.

These fully human-like presenters are wearing shirts and pants. Notably, a tree-like structure emerges, composed of humanoid arms performing synchronized flexing and twirling motions with their white-fingered hands.

The video serves as a glimpse into the impending influx of robotics set to integrate into our daily lives in the foreseeable future.

A EX Robots’ product featuring lifelike skin and human-like flexibility in movements

EX Robot, in particular, aims to develop humanoids that communicate with people and serve the public. These robots are currently used in various settings, including science museums, tourist spots, public service centers, hotel lobbies, educational environments, and corporate settings.

China is vying for the pole position in the robotics domain, with developers giving stiff competition to Western players like Tesla, Boston Dynamics, Figure, and Agility.

Recently, multiple Chinese startups, such as Unitree, UBTech/Baidu, Astribot, LimX, Kepler, and the Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, have introduced advanced humanoid offerings.

Jacques: The next “China” is still China

Deuteronomy (17-18)

•May 14, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Deuteronomy 17

1 “Thou shalt not sacrifice unto the Lord thy God any bullock or sheep wherein is blemish or any evilfavoredness, for that is an abomination unto the Lord thy God. — thou shalt not sacrifice; any bullock, or sheep, which is blemish;

— having spoken of the principal services and offerings prescribed in the law for preventing the Israelites from idolatrous practices, Moses interposes a caution against neglect in their own worship of God; which might be committed by offering any beast to him that had a disease, blemish, or defect in it;

— the only time mentioned in the Scriptures when the sacrifice of imperfect creatures is complained of to any great extent is the time of the prophet Malachi (Malachi 1:7-14). The laxity of the priests in his time called forth the prophecy that “in every place incense should be offered to God’s name and a pure offering.”

“If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee, man or woman who hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the Lord thy God in transgressing His covenant, — who hath wrought wickedness; a man or a woman who does evil; doing what is wrong in God’s eyes, breaking his covenant;

— in transgressing his covenant; that is, his law, and particularly the table of the commands, which respects divine worship, and which is in the nature of a marriage contract or covenant; which, as that is transgressed by adultery committed by either party, so the covenant between God and Israel was transgressed by idolatry;

and hath gone and served other gods and worshiped them, either the sun or moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded, — the host of heaven; either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven; which I have not commanded; to do would be an abomination to the Lord; —

and it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it and inquired diligently, and behold, it be true and the thing certain that such abomination is wrought in Israel,

then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman who has committed that wicked thing unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones till they die. — and it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and inquired diligently; a report of this kind was not to be neglected; though it was not to be concluded upon as certain by hearsay,

— it was to be looked into, within the gates of the Sanhedrin and the persons that brought it thoroughly examined; so the Targum of Jonathan says, “and inquired the witnesses fairly,” what proof and evidence they could give of the fact, who the persons were, when and where, and in what manner the sin was committed;

At the mouth of two witnesses or three witnesses shall he that is worthy of death be put to death, but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.

— at the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; the idolater found guilty was to be stoned; two witnesses were sufficient to prove a fact, if three the better, but, on the testimony of one, sentence might not be pronounced.

The hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hands of all the people. So thou shalt put the evil away from among you. — the hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death; of everyone of them; they were to cast the first stone at him;

— so thou shall put the evil away from among you; both the evil man and the evil committed by him, which by this means would be prevented from spreading, seeing by his death others would be deterred from following his example;

“If there arise a matter too hard for thee in judgment, between blood and blood, between plea and plea, and between stroke and stroke, being matters of controversy within thy gates, then shalt thou arise and get thee up into the place which the Lord thy God shall choose,

— too hard for thee; he speaks to the lower-ranked magistrates, who were erected in outlying cities, as appears by those at Jerusalem. If, saith he, no the necessary or confidence to determine so weighty and difficult a cause;

— between blood and blood, that is, in capital causes in matter of bloodshed, whether it be wilful or casual murder, whether punishable or pardonable by those laws;

— between plea and plea; in civil causes or suits between plaintiffs and defendants to decide which is in the right and which is in the wrong; or about words, contracts or estates; whether in capital or pecuniary cases; it chiefly if not solely respects civil things in controversy;

— and between stroke and stroke; blow or wound which one man received from another, and for which he commences a suit of law upon it, Exodus 21:18 or for assault of blows and bruises;

and thou shalt come unto the priests, the Levites, and unto the judge who shall be in those days, and inquire; and they shall show thee the sentence of judgment. — unto the priests; that is, unto the great council, which consisted chiefly of the priests and Levites, as being the best expositors of the laws of God, by which all those controversies were to be decided;

— by judges, here, seems to be meant those supreme judges of the nation, whom God raised up when the Israelites were oppressed by their enemies, such as Gideon, Jephthah, Samson, Samuel: such judges were, by their office, invested with the highest authority, civil as well as military;

— the Sanhedrin, the Supreme court, Deuteronomy 17:9, consisted partly of priests, and partly of wise and learned persons of other tribes, is referred to in very general terms as sitting similarily as Jerusalem at “the place which the Lord thy God shall choose,” the Sanctuary Deuteronomy 17:8

The underground Third Temple Sanhedrin in Jerusalem

10 And thou shalt do according to the sentence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose shall show thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee.

— and thou shalt do according to the sentence which they of that place which the Lord shall choose shall show thee; the judges of the lower courts were to return and proceed on the difficult case according to the judgment of the highest court at Jerusalem, and follow the directions and instructions they should give them;

— and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee; not only observe and take notice of what they say, but put it in practice, and not in some things and some circumstances only, but in all and everything they should give them information about relating to the case in question.

11 According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do. Thou shalt not decline from the sentence which they shall show thee to the right hand nor to the left.

— according to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee; for they were not to make any new law, but to teach the law of God, and so far as their sense and opinion of things agreed with that law they were to be regarded;

— and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do; what were law and justice, what were fit and right to be done, according to the will of God, which they should declare unto them, that was carefully to be done by them;

— thou shalt not decline from the sentence they shall show thee, to the right hand nor to the left; by setting up after, all their own judgments against theirs to whom they had applied for information and direction, which to have done would have been very insolent and affronting;

12 And the man who will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest who standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die; and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel. — who will do presumptuously, he who will acted proudly and obstinately oppose the sentence given against him;

— even that man shall die; and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel; the Targum of Jonathan affirms “that man shall be put to death; so shalt you put down the doer of evil from Israel,”

13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously. — and all the people shall hear, and fear; all the people of Israel in their own cities, and particularly the judges in those cities;

— they shall hear of what is done to the obstinate and disobedient elder, and shall be afraid to commit the like offence, lest they should come into the same punishment.

14 “When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, ‘I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about me,’ — this is a pophecy; and thou shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are round about me;

— which was what would and did lead them to such a thought and resolution; observing that the neighbouring nations had kings over them, they were desirous of being like them as to the form of their civil government, and have a king as they had.

15 thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall choose. One from among thy brethren shalt thou set as king over thee; thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, who is not thy brother.

— whom the Lord thy God shall choose; approve of, or appoint. So it was in Saul and David ny annointing. God reserved to himself the nomination both of the family and of the person.

16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt to the end that he should multiply horses, forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you, ‘Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.’

— horses were not anciently used for purposes of agriculture or traveling, but ordinarily for war and as a symbol and embodiment strength and might;

17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away; neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold. — neither shall he multiply wives to himself; as Solomon’s did; as well as the manner of other kings were, contrary to the design of God from the beginning.

18 “And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book from that which is before the priests the Levites. — upon the throne of his kingdom; when he is settled on it, and is even amidst all the pomp and glory of it: he shall write with his own hand; out of that which is before the priests;

— out of that original, which was carefully kept by the priests in the sanctuary, that it might be a perfect copy, and that it might have the greater influence upon him, coming to him as from the hand and presence of God. He shall read therein; diligently and constantly: neither the greatness of his place, nor the weight and multitude of his business, shall excuse or hinder him; all the days of his life;

— it is not enough to have Bibles, but we must use them, yea, use them daily. Our souls must have constant meals of that manna, which, if well digested, will afford them true nourishment and strength.

19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this law and these statutes, to do them, — and it shall be with him; always, when at home or abroad, sitting on his throne or lying down, or wherever he went;

— and he shall read therein all the days of his life; every day of his life; meditate on it night and day, that he may learn to, fear the Lord his God; to serve and worship him both internally and externally; having the fear of God always before his eyes, and on his heart, which the holy law of God directs to and instructs in;

— to keep all the words of this law, and these statutes, to do them; not only such as concerned him as a king, but all others that concerned him as a man, a creature subject to the Lord,

20 that his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the commandment to the right hand or to the left, to the end that he may prolong his days in his kingdom, he and his children, in the midst of Israel.

— that his heart be not lifted up above his brethren; on account of his office, the dignity of it, considering that he was subject to the law of God, and accountable to the Lord for all his actions;

— and that he turn not aside from the commandment, to the right hand or to the left; not in the least deviate from the law of God in the whole of his conduct, and particularly in the exercise of his kingly office;

— he and his children in the midst of Israel; this shows, that if his son was fit for the kingdom, he was to be preferred to any other man; for though it was elective, yet to be continued in the same family, provided they walked in the ways of the Lord, and observed his laws.

Deuteronomy 18

1 “The priests, the Levites, and all the tribe of Levi, shall have no part nor inheritance with Israel; they shall eat the offerings of the Lord made by fire, and His inheritance.

— the priests, the Levites, and all the tribe of Levi; this is the office of the priests and the Levites: they are said, “to stand before the congregation to minister unto them” (Numbers 16:9); in the Sanctuary and throughout their cities;

Therefore shall they have no inheritance among their brethren; the Lord is their inheritance, as He hath said unto them.

— therefore shall they have none inheritance among their brethren; neither of the field, nor of the vineyard, because provision was made for them otherwise, and especially because the Lord is their inheritance;

“And this shall be the priest’s due from the people, from those who offer a sacrifice, whether it be ox or sheep; and they shall give unto the priest the shoulder and the two cheeks and the maw. — and this shall be the priest’s due from the people, from them that offer sacrifice; not from the priests, but from those that bring the sacrifices to the priests;

— and they shall give unto the priest the shoulder, and the two cheeks, and the maw; the first of these designs the upper part of the arm that joins to the neck and back, and the next the two cheeks with the tongue.

The firstfruit also of thy corn, of thy wine, and of thine oil, and the first of the fleece of thy sheep, shalt thou give him. — and the first of the fleece of thy sheep shall thou give him: and they give white wool, and not defiled, enough to make it into fine garment to minister in; or enough garment fit for a priest to minister in is a girdle.

For the Lord thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes to stand to minister in the name of the Lord, him and his sons for ever.

“And if a Levite come from any of thy gates out of all Israel where he sojourned, and come with all the desire of his mind unto the place which the Lord shall choose, — and if a Levite come; the Levites with the priests were to receive forty-eight cities in Israel, with the suburbs, Numbers 35:7

— for the Lord thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes; that is, has chosen the tribe of Levi out of all the other tribes of Israel;

then he shall minister in the name of the Lord his God as all his brethren the Levites do, who stand there before the Lord. — then he shall minister in the name of the Lord his God, as every priest and every sacrifice were: he was to be allowed to officiate, though it was not his course or turn.

They shall have like portions to eat, besides that which cometh from the sale of his patrimony. — they shall have like portions to eat, beside that; the Levite thus dedicated was to have the same allowance from tithes as the rest who served at the tabernacle;

— beside that which cometh of the sale of his patrimony; though he have an estate whereby he may subsist raised by the sale of his flock or herd, or other movables, yet you shall not upon this ground either deny or diminish their part of your share of maintenance.

“When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do according to the abominations of those nations.

— thou shall not learn to do after the abominations of these nations; the seven nations which before inhabited it; they might learn to know how corrupt their works were, and to show to their children, that they might not do so.

10 There shall not be found among you any one who maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or who useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, — there shall not be found among you anyone that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, see Leviticus 18:21

11 or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. — necromancer; or a necromancer that inquiries of the dead, or seeks instruction from them, as the Targum of Jerusalem; as Saul did: 1 Samuel 28:8, Isaiah 8:19

— four of the above practices are ascribed to king Manasseh in II Chronicles 33:6. It is hardly possible that all of them were mere imposture and deceit.

12 For all who do these things are an abomination unto the Lord, and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.

— thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations; that whoever does any of them, including the Israelites themselves, all such persons shall be removed from their land; and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee; —

13 Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God. — thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God; the Israelites being wholly his, seeking him and cleaving to him, and to his word alone, faithfully adhere to his word, laws, statutes, and ordinances, and walk uprightly before him; and therefore abhorring all commerce and conversations with devils.

14 For these nations which thou shalt possess hearkened unto observers of times and unto diviners; but as for thee, the Lord thy God hath not suffered thee so to do. — though the heathen whom they exterminated before them hearkened to conjurers and soothsayers, the Lord their God had not allowed anything of the kind to them.

15 “The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, from thy brethren, like unto me. Unto Him ye shall hearken, — the Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet; namely, Him of whom Peter spoke in Acts 3:22-26. “Unto you first; God, having raised up His son Jesus, sent Him to bless you,”

16 according to all that thou desired of the Lord thy God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, ‘Let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not.’

— according to all that thou desiredst of the Lord thy God at Horeb; this was promised them, in answer to their request at Horeb or Mount Sinai, when the law was delivered to them in the terrible manner it was;

— saying, let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God; which was attended with so much terror, that they that heard entreated the word might not be spoken to them any more; neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not; out of which the Lord spoke; the congregation of Israel is here represented speaking as if a single person.

17 And the Lord said unto me: ‘They have well spoken that which they have spoken. — they have spoken in the name of the Lord, for the purpose of enforcing obedience with all the greater emphasis.

18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren like unto thee, and will put My words in His mouth; and He shall speak unto them all that I shall command Him. — here was the Father, promising concerning Christ, that there should come a Prophet, that his Son, great above all the prophets;

— and I, the Father, will put my word in his mouth; the doctrines of the Gospel, which come from the Father, and are the words of truth, faith, righteousness, peace, pardon, life, and salvation; and which Christ says were not his own, as man and Mediator, but his Father’s, which he gave unto him, and put into his mouth;

19 And it shall come to pass that whosoever will not hearken unto My words which He shall speak in My name, I will require it of him.

— whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him; the direful consequences of unbelief in his Son, the Christ, and disregard of his mission, the Jewish people have been experiencing during eighteen hundred years of exiles;

— I will require it of him; or, as the Targum of Jonathan says, “my Word shall require it of him, or take vengeance on him;” as Christ the Word of God did in the destruction of the Jewish nation, city, and even the Temple; see Luke 19:27.

20 But the prophet who shall presume to speak a word in My name which I have not commanded him to speak, or who shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.’ — but the prophet which shall presume to speak in my name; pretending a mission and commission from God, and yet was never sent by him, like the false prophets in Jeremiah 23:21,

— the Targum of Jonathan says:

But the false prophet who doeth wickedly in speaking a thing in My Name, when I have not commanded him to speak, or who shall speak in the name of the gods of the Gentiles, that prophet shall be slain with the sword.

21 And if thou say in thine heart, ‘How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?’ — that is, how shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken? What marks, signs, and criterions are those by which it may be known that it is not a word that comes from the Lord?

22 when a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously; thou shalt not be afraid of him. — if the thing follow not; which he gives as a sign of the truth of his prophecy. He means the prediction of some strange and wonderful event, and doesn’t come true;

— the Lord hath not spoken: the falsehood of his prediction shows him to be a false prophet, though the truth and accomplishment of his prediction had not proved him to be a true prophet; presumptuously; impudently ascribing his own vain and lying fancies to be the God of truth;

— thou shall not be afraid of him; not only to reprove him for his wickedness, but also to punish him for it; showing no regard to the high character he assumes; we should not be afraid of his predictions or threats, so as to be scared from doing thy duty in bringing him to deserved punishment.

US threaten to sanction and invade the ICC

•May 13, 2024 • Leave a Comment

US politicians threaten to invade Int’l Criminal Court if Israel faces war crimes charges

US Senators sent a letter to the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor, threatening to impose sanctions and even invade the Hague if it issues arrest warrants for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Biden administration is also pressuring the ICC not to charge Israeli officials over their war crimes in Gaza.

US threaten to sanction and invade the ICC

Geopolitical Economy by Ben Norton • May 8, 2024

US political officials have threatened the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the Hague, telling its Prosecutor Karim Khan that if he issues arrest warrants against Israeli officials over their war crimes in Gaza, the US government could impose sanctions on him, other ICC personnel, and their family members.

US senators even threatened to invade the Hague if it tries to prosecute Israeli officials.

UN experts: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza

This April, Israel’s extreme-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a prominent member of the state security cabinet, called for “total annihilation” of Gaza.

Smotrich cited the Biblical nation of Amalek – a genocidal reference also made by far-right Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

These invocations of Amalek are clear calls for genocide. In the Book of Samuel, God orders King Saul, “Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

The UN’s top legal body, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled this January that Israel could be investigated on “plausible” charges of violating the Genocide Convention. (The ICJ and ICC are separate institutions, although both are located at the Hague.)

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have stated that Israel is violating this ICJ ruling that demands that it abide by the Genocide Convention.

Top UN experts have publicly warned that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

In addition to bombing civilian areas and killing tens of thousands of innocent men, women, and children, Israel has used hunger as a weapon, starving Palestinian civilians.

The US director of the UN World Food Program warned that Gaza is now suffering from a “full-blown famine,” after seven months of a suffocating Israeli blockade.

The US government has provided the vast majority of the weapons that Israel is using to bomb civilian areas in Gaza. If Israeli officials face charges over their war crimes, Washington would be complicit.

US senators threaten to sanction and invade the ICC

On April 24, a dozen Republican senators sent a threatening letter to the ICC prosecutor. The media outlet Zeteo obtained the document.

The missive was signed by major GOP leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Tom Cotton.

In the aggressively worded letter, the senators pledged to “sanction your employees and associates, and bar you and your families from the United States” if Israeli officials face charges over their war crimes in Gaza.

“Target Israel and we will target you,” they threatened.

Issuing an arrest warrant for Netanyahu or other top officials would be seen “not only as a threat to Israel’s sovereignty but to the sovereignty of the United States,” the US politicians wrote, making it clear that they see Israel as a key part of the US empire.

“Our country demonstrated in the American Service-Members’ Protection Act the lengths to which we will go to protect that sovereignty,” they added.

The American Service-Members’ Protection Act is popularly known as the “Hague Invasion Act.” The legislation was signed into law in 2002 by President George W Bush.

Human Rights Watch explained that this law “authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a US-allied country being held by the court.”

By invoking the Hague Invasion Act in their 2024 letter to the ICC prosecutor, the Republican senators made it clear that the two-decade-old legislation is still valid: hawks in Washington are willing to invade the Hague to save Israeli officials if they are prosecuted.

“The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth, a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand,
“a nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old nor show favor to the young.
“And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle and the fruit of thy land until thou be destroyed; he also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy cattle, or flocks of thy sheep until he have destroyed thee.
“And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates until thy high and fortified walls come down wherein thou trusted, throughout all thy land; and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land which the Lord thy God hath given thee,”
 Deuteronomy 28:49-51

Poll: Civil war within five years?

•May 12, 2024 • Leave a Comment

Shock survey reveals huge number of Americans see another civil war within five years

The poll also revealed the partisan nature of the issue, with 37 percent agreeing that a civil war is more likely to happen if Joe Biden is re-elected this year.

Over 40 percent surveyed believe another civil war is likely

The Daily Express • May 4, 2024 // ZeroHedge

A shocking new poll revealed that over 40 percent of Americans believe their country could be torn apart by another civil war within the next five years.

Rasmussen Reports conducted a national telephone and online survey, which revealed 41 per cent of likely US voters think a second civil war is on the horizon, with 16 per cent saying one in the next five years would be very likely.

On the other hand, 49 per cent of participants did not believe a civil war in the next five years is likely to occur, and 20 per cent responded not likely at all.

It also showed that this is a partisan issue, with 37 per cent of voters agreeing that a civil war is more likely to happen if Joe Biden is re-elected this year.

By comparison, 25 per cent saw the conflict being more likely under Donald Trump, and 30 per cent said it would not make much difference who the president is.

41 per cent of US voters think a second civil war is likely on the horizon

Republican voters were also more concerned about the prospect of a civil war, with 54 per cent thinking there would be one by 2029.

Rasmussen Reports said: “The possibility that America could face another civil war soon is not too far-fetched for a lot of voters.”

The data comes from a survey of 1,105 voters and found that women, younger adults, and non-white Americans were more likely to believe a civil war could erupt within five years.

This comes amid increasing support for secession among certain states, with 36 per cent of Alaskans wanting to leave the USA, according to a YouGov survey of 35,000 people.

Texas was the second highest on the list, with 31 per cent, followed by California (29 per cent) and New York (28 per cent).

What’s wrong with China dropping a flare?

•May 11, 2024 • Leave a Comment

China dropped a flare near an Aussie copter in its EEZ. What’s wrong with that?

Earlier this week, there were reports of the nasty Chinese dropping a flare near a good old patriotic Australian helicopter said to be in “international waters.”

Pearls and Irritations • May 9, 2024

Condemnation came fast and in numbers. First out of the ranks was Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles who, according to the national broadcaster, the venerable ABC, said:

“The PLA Air Force plane dropped flares about 300 metres in front of the Seahawk helicopter and about 60 metres above it, requiring the helicopter to take evasive action in order to not be hit by those flares.

“The consequence of being hit by the flares would have been significant. Importantly, the helicopter was unaffected and all the crew are safe.”

Shanghai Daily columnist Andy Boreham pointed out that the distance between Canberra and the site of the helicopter incident was 8535 kilometres.

“Importantly, the area they claim the incident happened is within China’s EEZ,” he pointed out. “Innocent passage is allowed but military aircraft do NOT constitute ‘innocent passage’.”

Asked about the incident at the daily Chinese foreign ministry press conference, spokesperson Lin Jian said:

“What truly happened was, an Australian military aircraft deliberately flew within close range of China’s airspace in a provocative move that endangered China’s maritime and air security in the name of enforcing UN Security Council resolutions.

“The Chinese military took necessary measures at the scene to warn and alert the Australian side. The way the situation was handled was consistent with our laws and regulations, professional and safe. China has lodged serious protests to the Australian side on its risky moves. We urge Australia to immediately stop the provocations and hypes to prevent misunderstanding and miscalculation.”

One Australian journalist, Bernard Keane, politics editor of the website Crikey, has written an unbiased report about similar incidents in the past.

“… there is no doubt that EEZs around the world are international waters, ” Keane wrote in June 2023.

He noted that China had ratified the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, established its own EEZ and also recognised those of other states.

But, Keane added, the US has not ratified the convention, but says it will act in accordance with its provisions. “And it established its EEZ within 200 nautical miles of its coast and also recognises the EEZ of other states.”

However, Keane noted, “the US also says it has the right to conduct military and intelligence-collection activities within any country’s EEZ. China disagrees. It says it respects freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, but does not respect the right of foreign governments to conduct military and intelligence-collection activities within its EEZ.

“More to the point, the three major regional maritime powers friendly to Australia — India, Indonesia and the Philippines — agree with China.”

Keane explained the benefit that Australia got from upholding the US approach to EEZs. “An expert from the US Naval War College who testified before Congress in 2009, said if it accepted the position of China, India, the Philippines and Indonesia on EEZs, the US would be forced to conduct military operations from more than 200 miles offshore,” he pointed out.

“That would significantly reduce the range of US sensors and missiles, making intelligence-gathering much harder and making it much more difficult to deploy US marines and their equipment in amphibious assaults.

“America’s ability to project naval and air power would face limitations not only in the South China Sea but also in other EEZs such as the Persian Gulf. Its ability to use the world’s oceans as a medium of manoeuvre and global power projection would be threatened.

“This approach has consequences. China has begun to conduct intelligence-gathering and presence operations in other countries’ EEZs, including Australia’s, justifying its behaviour by saying that it would not do so if Australia adopted its own position on the sovereignty of EEZs. Australia can have no complaint if China adopts the very behaviour we’re engaging in.

“The real nature of the dispute over EEZs is rarely, if ever, made clear by the Australian Government. The presence of Australian vessels and aircraft in the South China Sea is always explained in vague terms as about ‘freedom of navigation,’ without saying what that actually involves — dropping sonobuoys to identify Chinese submarines and ships in order to destroy them at the start of hostilities. Instead, Australian vessels and aircraft are portrayed as innocently exercising their rights under international law in the face of a belligerent power.”

And, Keane concluded: “Australian media rarely deviate from the government line. In foreign media, however, it is relatively normal to note that there is a fundamental dispute between the US and China over what conduct is permissible in EEZs.

“Australians deserve to be told what the objective is: to uphold America’s desire to project power in every EEZ in the world, not just the South China Sea. Otherwise they will continue to be misled if or when a clash occurs.”

Also rallying to the nation’s side was Euan Graham of the defence industry lobby group, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, who was firmly of the view that “China’s latest unsafe interception at sea was no accident.”

ASPI, after all, is paid $4 million by the Defence Department every year. It has to sing enough to earn its supper.

“The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth, a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand,
“a nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old nor show favor to the young.
“And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle and the fruit of thy land until thou be destroyed; he also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy cattle, or flocks of thy sheep until he have destroyed thee.
“And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates until thy high and fortified walls come down wherein thou trusted, throughout all thy land; and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land which the Lord thy God hath given thee,”
 Deuteronomy 28:49-51

Debunking China’s overcapacity myth

•May 11, 2024 • Leave a Comment

There isn’t a ‘China overcapacity,’ but a US overcapacity of anxiety stemming from a lack of confidence in a declining empire.

Global Times • April 30, 2024 // AsiaTimes

The US accusation of “China’s overcapacity” is not a market-driven conclusion, but a crafted narrative to manipulate perception and politicize trade, with the real purpose being holding back China’s high-quality development and depriving China of its legitimate right to development, Lin Jian, spokesperson from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said at a routine press briefing on Tuesday, in a latest response to Washington’s false narratives targeting Chinese new energy vehicles (NEVs).

There isn’t a “China overcapacity,” but a US overcapacity of anxiety stemming from a lack of confidence and smears against China, the spokesperson said.

The remarks were made in response to media questions regarding the rhetoric by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during his recent visit to China. He pointed fingers at China over so-called “unfair trade practices and the potential consequences of industrial overcapacity to global and US markets,” naming some industries including electric vehicles, batteries, and solar panels.

The “China overcapacity” accusation may look like an economic discussion, but the truth is, the accusation is built on false logic and ignores more than 200 years of the basic concept of comparative advantage in Western economics, Lin said.

When China’s electric vehicle exports account for only 12 percent of its production, it’s labeled as “overcapacity.” But consider this: Germany exports 80 percent of its automobile production, followed by Japan’s 50 percent, and the US’ 25 percent.

“Wouldn’t that be considered more serious overcapacity?” Lin asked.

An Overflowing of Anxiety from a lack of confidence in a Declining Empire

Moreover, according to estimates from the International Energy Agency, to realize carbon neutrality, the world will need 45 million NEVs by 2030, 4.5 times that of the demand of 2022.

“When the global capacity is still far below the market demand, how could there be overcapacity?” Lin asked.

In contrary to the US’ narrow-minded narratives in new energy development, China has taken an open stance in the field, welcoming businesses worldwide to develop cooperation together for win-win outcomes, as it is well reflected at the 2024 18th Beijing International Automotive Exhibition Beijing Auto Show, which takes place from April 25 to May 4.

The auto show features more than 1,500 exhibiting companies, 278 new energy models and 117 global premieres, including 30 premieres by multinational companies.

The event was attended by executives from renowned international car companies such as BMW, Volkswagen, and Nissan, demonstrating their regard for the Chinese market and their expectations for working more closely with China.

Recently, German carmakers Volkswagen and BMW announced additional investments in China totaling five billion euros each, aiming to ramp up their layouts in the manufacturing of electric and smart vehicles in China.

These facts and statistics not only reveal global automakers’ optimism for the growth potential of China’s mega-sized market and their confidence in China’s development outlook, but also are the most convincing argument against the so-called “Chinese overcapacity,” Lin said.

Chinese experts also refuted the US’ intensified discourse of “overcapacity” narratives.

Speaking with Global Times on Tuesday, Cui Dongshu, secretary-general of the China Passenger Car Association, said that actual demand for NEVs remain huge in both China and around the world.

Heavily Subsidised Mountains of Cheese and Lakes of Wine from Europe

The NEV market in China is undergoing rapid expansion, and the implementation of the new trade-in policy alone has the potential to drive up to two million electric vehicle sales this year, according to Cui, reflecting positive market prospects for the booming sector.

Overcapacity is only caused by enterprises lacking competitiveness, leading to unsold inventory, which is surely not the case in China’s NEV industry, Cui said, noting that Chinese NEV manufacturers are reputable enterprises, and there is strong demand for their products in the market.

“Both domestically and internationally, there is no overcapacity in the NEV sector,” he said.

The US’ repeated accusations of “overcapacity” against China stem from concerns about the rapid development of China NEV industry potentially impeding the growth of American car manufacturers. “This highlights the narrow-minded approach of the US in attempting to isolate Chinese companies from the global market,” said Cui.